[gsl-issues] [Issue 63426] K/B navigation of insensi tive menu items
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=63426 User pjanik changed the following: What|Old value |New value Target milestone|OOo 2.0.3 |OOo 2.0.4 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 17 00:10:47 -0700 2006 --- Move target. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[gsl-issues] [Issue 63426] K/B navigation of insensi tive menu items
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=63426 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 3 23:08:40 -0700 2006 --- Michael? Last CWS integration deadline is today. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[gsl-issues] [Issue 63426] K/B navigation of insensi tive menu items
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=63426 User fl changed the following: What|Old value |New value Assigned to|fl|mmeeks --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 31 03:32:32 -0800 2006 --- FL: Accepted after talking to Malte, please change behavior to default behavior used on Gnome. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[gsl-issues] [Issue 63426] K/B navigation of insensi tive menu items
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=63426 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Mar 29 08:51:43 -0800 2006 --- FL: If it is default on a system, we should do so, but personally I have the same concerns Lutz has about accessibility, because disabled menu items give feedback to the user thru their disabled status. So the user knows that the functionality is not available in the current context. If this menu item is just not there for disabled users (what would happen if we jump over them, because the won't get read) the user does not know that they are there. We already have an option in OOo (Options - OOo - View-Menu - Show inactive menu items) to hide inactive main menu items. To hide disabled main menu entries was planned to be the default, but due to a poor user experience, it got only default for context menus. I will ask Malte Timmermann for a final comment tomorrow morning. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[gsl-issues] [Issue 63426] K/B navigation of insensi tive menu items
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=63426 User mmeeks changed the following: What|Old value |New value CC|''|'stx12' Target milestone|--- |OOo 2.0.3 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 28 06:48:51 -0800 2006 --- Frank - no response in a week; whatsup ? targetting at 2.0.3. We have approval from a11y - and this is changing the behavior on 1 platform to behave in a familiar way, like other applications do. Surely this isn't that controversial :-) a 1-word affirmative reply would do. Thanks. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[gsl-issues] [Issue 63426] K/B navigation of insensi tive menu items
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=63426 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 28 06:56:10 -0800 2006 --- FL: Sorry, I am working on several other 2.0.3 issues and I have to deal with UI deadlines coming up for 2.0.3. Follow up on this issue tomorrow, March 29. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[gsl-issues] [Issue 63426] K/B navigation of insensi tive menu items
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=63426 User mmeeks changed the following: What|Old value |New value Attachment is patch| |Created an attachment | |(id=35090) trivial patch. --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 21 02:58:00 -0800 2006 --- Created an attachment (id=35090) trivial patch. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[gsl-issues] [Issue 63426] K/B navigation of insensi tive menu items
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=63426 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 21 05:04:07 -0800 2006 --- Keynav to insensitive menu items isn't helpful for accessibility IMO, if the rest of the interface implements a reasonable accessibility API, since in the latter case all the items can be queried and enumerated by assistive technology, for the purposes of exploration. I think the consistency of the UI with the host desktop software (i.e. Gnome/GTK+ on gnome-based desktops) is of much greater importance. OOo isn't quite as broken as Firefox, where onscreen focus is entirely lost when navigating past disabled menu items, but the onscreen focus indication is rather poor nonetheless; this is another disadvantage to the current inclusion of disabled menu items in the keyboard navigation sequence. My view is that when using a gtk+ look and feel, or when displaying to a Gtk+/Gnome desktop, the code in the patch should be used. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[gsl-issues] [Issue 63426] K/B navigation of insensi tive menu items
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=63426 User lho changed the following: What|Old value |New value Assigned to|lho |fl --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 21 06:04:54 -0800 2006 --- Hi Frank, please handle. I am still not certain as to whether skipping disabled menu items is a good idea, but I leave it to your Accessibility experience to come to a decision. Please be aware of any possible side effects. Thanks - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
