[lingucomponent-issues] [Issue 64400] dash (-) should be forward ed to spellchecker
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64400 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 24 10:10:45 -0800 2007 --- I can setup a new rule to define dash as prefix and sufix of a word, not exactly like what maccy suggested, examples, '-first-second' is broken as '-first-' and 'second', 'first- -second' is broken as 'first-' and '-second'. If this is acceptable, I can checkin fix today. If not, I will retarget this issue to next release, since we have run out of time. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[lingucomponent-issues] [Issue 64400] dash (-) should be forward ed to spellchecker
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64400 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 23 00:53:12 -0800 2007 --- khong: no, for German it's *good* to have it enabled (I filed this bug to get this feature for the next dictionary version). er: what other spell checker implementations do you mean? The spell checker from StarOffice? At least for German language there is no other spellcheker implementation except hunspell, is it? What's the problem you see? - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[lingucomponent-issues] [Issue 64400] dash (-) should be forward ed to spellchecker
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64400 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 23 06:36:41 -0800 2007 --- Maccy, Please see #desc19 from sba Thu Jan 18 09:28:56 -0800 2007 The problem is with German language and it is not good to have it enabled in this form. Even if Hunspell manages to split dash compounded words, a word1-word2 that is now entirely forwarded where only word2 is wrong now marks the entire word1-word2 as bad because the API doesn't know about substrings. And yes, the other spellchecker referred the one used by StarOffice, I didn't check though if and how that is affected. Anyway, given the API shortness mentioned that's not relevant here. Karl, we may have two solutions to this: either disable the option for German again, or change implementation to what was previously suggested, see #desc7 from maccy Tue Jul 18 02:41:29 -0800 2006 cite It would be sufficient to say that dash is being forwarded to the spell checker if there is space-dash or dash-space or dash-comma etc. is found. You can stay with being dash a word separator if wordchar-dash-wordchar is found. /cite Suppressing the wordchar-dash-wordchar case should do, I think. However, if this would be too complicated we should refrain from doing this right now, otherwise we'd risk not getting CWS i18n28 integrated at all for OOo2.2. We need the CWS passing QA _now_. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[lingucomponent-issues] [Issue 64400] dash (-) should be forward ed to spellchecker
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64400 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 22 03:00:01 -0800 2007 --- Unfortunately this affects all spell checker implementations, so the affix file patch alone does not help. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[lingucomponent-issues] [Issue 64400] dash (-) should be forward ed to spellchecker
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64400 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 22 14:57:14 -0800 2007 --- take Eike's suggestion, remove optional entry from de_DE.xml, this fix only affects Polish. When this fix is integrated, anyone can add the feature to any language easily. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[lingucomponent-issues] [Issue 64400] dash (-) should be forward ed to spellchecker
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64400 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 20 03:35:47 -0800 2007 --- milek_pl: Arbeits-Amt ist correct too. Some possible correct forms are: Arbeits- Arbeits-Amt Arbeitsamt -amt Incorrect are: arbeits- -arbeits Arbeits-amt Arbeits To test this take the (still inofficial) dict files from http://j3e.de/hunspell_test/. For a cleaned up final next release from OOo inclusion I hoped to get a Hunspell homonym bug resolved first but maybe I make a new release without that fix. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[lingucomponent-issues] [Issue 64400] dash (-) should be forward ed to spellchecker
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64400 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 19 09:35:14 -0800 2007 --- I have just implemented what the issue requested, pass dash as part of word to spellchecker. Currently the feature is enabled for Geman and Polish by the optional entry in locale data, proposed by nemeth. There are two part of fixed in this issue. One is in breakiterator to handle optional entry in locale data, another is to add entry in locale data for particular languages, in this issue, I add entry in de_DE.xml and pl_PL.xml. I can remove entry from locale data, hide implementation in breakiterator, but you will not be able to see anything. Or we can suspend the fix until we get concret design. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[lingucomponent-issues] [Issue 64400] dash (-) should be forward ed to spellchecker
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64400 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 19 09:51:09 -0800 2007 --- khong, is the feature supposed to be implemented in OOF680_m1? If so, I could test the behavior and dictionaries. However, I didn't see any change in behavior for German nor Polish in this build? - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[lingucomponent-issues] [Issue 64400] dash (-) should be forward ed to spellchecker
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64400 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 19 10:04:20 -0800 2007 --- No, the feature has not been integrated yet, it is still in cws i18n28. sba has rejected it. We need more concret design for the feature. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[lingucomponent-issues] [Issue 64400] dash (-) should be forward ed to spellchecker
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64400 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 19 10:29:15 -0800 2007 --- khong, I agree it should be implemented more carefully, i.e., for German, we need a careful review of the dictionary architecture, so that wer-auch-immer is OK, and Arbeits-Amt is not. For Polish, the issue is simpler, as dashes in words cannot be used as in ready-to-go, and it could be implemented just for Polish. I think we cannot have a more concrete design for that: it is an interplay between the dictionary structure (affix file) and Breakiterator. If the dictionary is not OK, then fixing Breakiterator won't help much, and that's the case now for German. The only thing I could think of is just make hunspell behave by default as if there was BREAK - in the affix file, and make Breakiterator pass on the dash. This way there could be no unintentional regression. Laci, what do you think? - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[lingucomponent-issues] [Issue 64400] dash (-) should be forward ed to spellchecker
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64400 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 19 11:06:52 -0800 2007 --- If I understood correctly, behavior for Polish (see issue 72408) is correct now, but for German isn't? I suggest to remove the new dash option from the de_*.xml files then so things are like they were before, remove this issue from CWS i18n28 and keep just issue 72408. I think we're fine with the CWS then. For this issue the German case should be investigated more thoroughly, taking the different spellcheckers and dictionaries and their options into account. Once CWS i18n28 is integrated lingucomponent can easily work on this by modifying the locale data files. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[lingucomponent-issues] [Issue 64400] dash (-) should be forward ed to spellchecker
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64400 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 19 12:16:25 -0800 2007 --- Eike, I think you're right though I cannot verify this (it's not in the current developer build). I will work with Polish dictionary developers to have this function work even better. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[lingucomponent-issues] [Issue 64400] dash (-) should be forward ed to spellchecker
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64400 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 19 15:19:27 -0800 2007 --- Karl: Thanks for the implementation. If this issue is not related to StarOffice, I suggest to use the attached 2-line de_DE affix file patch instead of removing Karl's work. The patch switches the breaking at dashes in Hunspell on. Hunspell in OOo 2.1 has already had this feature. I have made also a Hunspell patch with default breaking for German dictionaries in CWS hunspell2 (with this patch also the default German OOo dictionary de_frami_neu will work on URL's and other uncommon compounds with dashes). Maybe the best solution to move Karl's de_DE.xml definition to CWS hunspell2 to synchrone word breaking and spell checking. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[lingucomponent-issues] [Issue 64400] dash (-) should be forward ed to spellchecker
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64400 User nemeth changed the following: What|Old value |New value Attachment is patch| |Created an attachment (id= | |42329) de_DE.aff patch --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 19 15:21:35 -0800 2007 --- Created an attachment (id=42329) de_DE.aff patch - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[lingucomponent-issues] [Issue 64400] dash (-) should be forward ed to spellchecker
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64400 User sba changed the following: What|Old value |New value Assigned to|sba |khong --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 18 09:28:56 -0800 2007 --- SBA: Karl, we have a problem :-( Language set to German: I tried a string like Good-Word-Good-Word-BaadWorrrd. In the CWS, the entire string gets underlined. And in the spellcheck dialog, the string shows up in red entirely. Before, only BaadWorrrd got underlined and displayed in red, having a chance for a meaningful suggestion in the dialog without having the Good-Word-Good-Word-BaadWorrrd string in a user dictionary. I talked to Frank Meies and Thomas Lange and I can not give a go for this behavior. Now, the spellchecker is meaningless whenever-someone-combines-many-good-words-with-dashes and having a single error within. This is a regression at least for German. For example, in German I can add a wod-wth-dshes into a user dict and this is taken as correct and shows up as proposal in online spell context menu. For English, this does not work. You provided no list for what languages this is enabled. It is not exactly intuitive that this works for German, but not for English. Unfortunately, I have no internet performance right now and could not compare what hunspell is doing. I am not yet aware of the problems or wishes for other languages. I do not know if Thomas Lange and Oliver Specht shall join with other fixes to get this done. I.e. the spell checker separating the Good-Words Words again if they are valid ones before displaying only the BaadWorrrd in red. My idea is that you build in this option, but it should be disabled for all languages by default. Then lazlo or whoever can easily flip a switch once the new Hunspell dicts are able to deal with this (at least for testing). In total I reagard the current behavior as too risky to be integrated at this time (shortly before code freeze). I am afraid that my observations is not the only regression. So we shall postpone all this for the next milestone. Please comment. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[lingucomponent-issues] [Issue 64400] dash (-) should be forward ed to spellchecker
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64400 User sba changed the following: What|Old value |New value Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|FIXED | --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 18 09:29:34 -0800 2007 --- SBA: Reopened issue. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[lingucomponent-issues] [Issue 64400] dash (-) should be forward ed to spellchecker
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64400 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 18 09:50:05 -0800 2007 --- sba: This is indeed a good idea to have this switched off by default - but what method should be used to switch it on? The best would be to use dictionaries files themselves. But when you look at dictionaries, you'll discover they already have that swich (BREAK instruction). Anyway, the problem with German is most probably the dictionary file (the affix file), it should contain the following lines: BREAK 2 BREAK - BREAK –# n-dash Could you please test the behavior after adding this to de_frami_neu.aff? - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[lingucomponent-issues] [Issue 64400] dash (-) should be forward ed to spellchecker
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64400 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 14 16:14:29 -0800 2007 --- *** Issue 73316 has been marked as a duplicate of this issue. *** - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[lingucomponent-issues] [Issue 64400] dash (-) should be forward ed to spellchecker
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64400 User khong changed the following: What|Old value |New value Assigned to|khong |sba --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Dec 21 11:19:05 -0800 2006 --- ready for QA. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[lingucomponent-issues] [Issue 64400] dash (-) should be forward ed to spellchecker
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64400 User khong changed the following: What|Old value |New value Issue type|ENHANCEMENT |DEFECT --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 11 09:27:17 -0800 2006 --- set the issue as defect, since the cws i18n28 depends on cws icuupgrade, which is not integrated yet, and code freeze for enhancement is end of this month, setting it as defect buys time for this issue to be fixed in release OOo 2.2. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[lingucomponent-issues] [Issue 64400] dash (-) should be forward ed to spellchecker
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64400 User khong changed the following: What|Old value |New value Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Dec 7 10:40:56 -0800 2006 --- fixed in cws i18n28. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[lingucomponent-issues] [Issue 64400] dash (-) should be forward ed to spellchecker
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64400 User khong changed the following: What|Old value |New value Target milestone|OOo 2.x |OOo 2.2 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 6 09:58:53 -0800 2006 --- Will add an optional entry in locale data for language to select different word break rule. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[lingucomponent-issues] [Issue 64400] dash (-) should be forward ed to spellchecker
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64400 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 2 01:37:50 -0800 2006 --- what is the status of this issue? Is there any one feeling responsible or it? As this affects spellchecker quality quite a lot this is a very user visible thing which should be solved. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[lingucomponent-issues] [Issue 64400] dash (-) should be forward ed to spellchecker
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64400 User nemeth changed the following: What|Old value |New value CC|'er,fl,khong,nemeth,tl' |'er,fl,khong,milek_pl,neme | |th,tl' --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 23 16:45:34 -0700 2006 --- so what I suggest is that dashes should be forwarded to hunspell or add a breakiterator option to the locale resource files (de_DE.xml, etc.) - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[lingucomponent-issues] [Issue 64400] dash (-) should be forward ed to spellchecker
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64400 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 22 02:05:07 -0700 2006 --- Marcin Miłkowski, lead of Polish language project, has been reported, that for Polish need similar treatment of dashes: we have several classes of words with dashes: 1. like kogel-mogel, in which both parts are inflected (genitive case, singular: kogla-mogla, for example); 2. like e-mail, in which only the second part is inflected (e-maila); 3. like tse-tse or kong-fu where both parts are not inflected. In all three cases, both parts are not valid words, so it's a spelling mistake to write kogel mogel or kung fu. In myspell, ispell and aspell we couldn't find way to define this special dash-behavior. Plus there is one special case: inflection of acronyms with dashes, correct plural of SMS in Polish is SMS-y, not SMSy (we haven't defined it yet, as well). By the way, we have a complex rules of inflection of foreign words ending with mute vowels and -y, like Kennedy in genetive is Kennedy’ego. Seems to me that we'd have to switch to UTF-8 because the proper version of the apostrophe used for this inflection is not covered in ISO-8859-2 (it is, however, included in windows-1250). It seems, it's a general problem, when we want better spell checking. Polish and Hungarian (Finnish and probably several other languages) use dashes to join a lot of different affixes to acronyms or foreign stems, and we don't want to add these affixes to the dictionary as rigth words. (English too: America-like, see http://www.bartleby.com/64/84.html, but it has much fewer and simpler affixes). That is why we need handle dashes by spell checker. Hungarian is ok. in OpenOffice.org, but it would be fine to give a simple way to add dashes and n-dashes optionally to words in breakiterators of other languages. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[lingucomponent-issues] [Issue 64400] dash (-) should be forward ed to spellchecker
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64400 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 22 04:12:47 -0700 2006 --- A related new issue about apostrophes in Italian words: Issue 68567. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[lingucomponent-issues] [Issue 64400] dash (-) should be forward ed to spellchecker
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64400 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 22 04:49:43 -0700 2006 --- Thomas, I wouldn't wait for grammar checkers as most languages won't have any grammar checking for some time -- though I'm doing my best for Polish :) The assumption that ready-to-go words are valid in every language is a clear example of being English-centred and ignoring i18n issues, so what I suggest is that dashes should be forwarded to hunspell. Hunspell should break words on - for all languages that haven't got WORDCHARDS - in the dictionary. So the default behavior would be to break on dashes for English, and not to break in Hungarian or Polish. So this way you won't get false alarms in English and spelling mistakes in Italian, French, Hungarian, Polish, and probably other languages. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[lingucomponent-issues] [Issue 64400] dash (-) should be forward ed to spellchecker
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64400 User tl changed the following: What|Old value |New value Assigned to|tl|khong --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jul 20 03:53:23 -0700 2006 --- TL-Karl: Can you implement it the way maccy has suggested? If so please take over. If not add a comment and reassing it back to me. Thanks! - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[lingucomponent-issues] [Issue 64400] dash (-) should be forward ed to spellchecker
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64400 User tl changed the following: What|Old value |New value CC|'er,khong,nemeth,tl' |'er,fl,khong,nemeth,tl' --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jul 18 02:01:28 -0700 2006 --- The reason for this behaviour was voluntarily made because of a) URL like www.wissenschaft-online.de and text like b) wer-auch-immer or ready-to-go which happen to get use in regular text to tie several words to a singular expression/meaning. If the dashs would be part of words and e.g. auch would have been misspelled like the whole 3 word construct would be highlighted by the spellchecker. And if it were an even longer expression like this it would be hard to see where the actual error is. By breaking words we gained the possibility to check these kind of expressions correctly and to point only to the mispelled word. The problem could not by solved by the spellchecker even if it were to break up the 3 word construct by itself since the API for spellchecking does not allow to identify only a part of the text as being wrong. And thus even if the spellchecker would find out that only the second word is wrong there is no way to let the UI know about this. Also one does not know if a specific spellchecker would be able to break up the construct on it's own or not. We hope to improve here when we have a grammar checking API that works on whole sentences or even a complete paragraph. Also it is a way old request for enhancement to not spellcheck URL's. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[lingucomponent-issues] [Issue 64400] dash (-) should be forward ed to spellchecker
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64400 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jul 18 03:41:29 -0700 2006 --- Is your proposal to wait and see what the grammer checker API brings? It would be sufficient to say that dash is being forwarded to the spell checker if there is space-dash or dash-space or dash-comma etc. is found. You can stay with being dash a word separator if wordchar-dash-wordchar is found. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[lingucomponent-issues] [Issue 64400] dash (-) should be forward ed to spellchecker
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64400 User er changed the following: What|Old value |New value Assigned to|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |tl Component|l10n |lingucomponent Issue type|DEFECT|ENHANCEMENT QA contact|[EMAIL PROTECTED] |[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subcomponent|i18npool |spell checking Target milestone|OOo 2.0.4 |OOo 2.x --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jul 17 05:18:38 -0700 2006 --- Won't make it for 2.0.4. I don't know what Maccy is refferring with The neccessary checking from issue 60645 has been done obviously, as the ICU upgrade is still ongoing and nothing has been checked regarding behavior or necessary breakiterator changes so far, or what would have to be done to support different spellcheckers at the same time. Btw, the [EMAIL PROTECTED] owner probably is not what we want here.. reassigning to Thomas Lange and changing component to lingucomponent. This is also not a defect, but an enhancement instead. Eike - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[lingucomponent-issues] [Issue 64400] dash (-) should be forward ed to spellchecker
To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=64400 User maccy changed the following: What|Old value |New value Version|OOo 2.0.2 |OOo 2.0.3 --- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jul 12 05:52:52 -0700 2006 --- is there attention for this for the 2.0.4 release now? The neccessary checking from issue 60645 has been done obviously. - Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
