Re: Unloading tapes when task done ?

2002-04-04 Thread Uncle George

Its sorta like when you go to your kar mechanic. The job is not complete
till you put all of your tools away, and cleaned your work area for the
next job. That would be the mechanics responsibility, and not the
cleaning staff that follows in the evening.

But at this moment, some 18hours after amanda started, it is still
going, and only on the third ( of an estimated 6 tape backup ). So the
unload/eject is the least of my current concerns with regard to getting
a backup to happen. 

Right now the most efficient system i have would be to run tar cMf
remoteHost:/dev/st0 /  directly on the remote system. after each EOT i
will run a shell script to change to the next tape. AFTER I DO THIS
CORRECTLY, only then will I get a TRUE feel of the time needed to do
this phase of the task.
/gat


John R. Jackson wrote:
 
 Maybe they can OPT-OUT of the feature ...
 
 It's just as easy for someone to opt-in and do their own tape operations
 when Amanda is done.  Amanda will currently support both camps -- unload
 it when done vs. leave it alone.  Why add more complexity?  We already
 have too many options (and lots of other things on the TODO list).
 
 btw, what do u mean each operation.  ...
 
 I meant amdump and amflush.
 
 John R. Jackson, Technical Software Specialist, [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Unloading tapes when task done ?

2002-04-04 Thread Uncle George

DLT's are not flying head technology. They are like 9trk, QIC, i think
travan, colorado. The heads do not spin ( i had to think about it ), as
the heads move up  down to change tracks. But the DLT 8000, now, also
place the heads at an angle to tape direction, as well as going up and
down. I dont even think there is an idler pully, just a tach. I'd like
to know if there is 'continual' tension on the tape while it is loaded (
on a dlt )( Like that of a DEC Tape, or 9trk )  but I do not know.

But for whatever technology reasons the schemes that tape mechanisms
have evolved, they all rely on knowing what 'state' that they are in.
When you have a power outage, turn off the drive, lightning, whatever, 
you may find that the tape left inside the mechanism to be of little use
to you. Quantum says dont do that, AND i'd bet that the legal staff of
the other drive manufacturers will never certify that you will always
recover a tape left inside the mechanism.


Gene Heskett wrote:
 I'd love to see the tapes stored and used at or slightly below 50
 degrees F, and 50% relative humidity as the tape is many times
 less abrasive then.  Some TV stations have even gone so far as to
 store their tapes in a small room adjacent to the control room
 which is maintained in the 40 degree and 40% range.   Everyting
 lasts longer, a lot longer.
But i suppose that if you needed a tape right away, you'd have to wait
for the temp rise, otherwise ud get condensation on the kolder tapes.
 
 The tape makers themselves recommend it too, and have data to



Re: Unloading tapes when task done ?

2002-04-04 Thread Gene Heskett

On Thursday 04 April 2002 07:33 am, Uncle George wrote:

DLT's are not flying head technology. They are like 9trk, QIC, i
 think travan, colorado. The heads do not spin ( i had to think
 about it ), as the heads move up  down to change tracks. But
 the DLT 8000, now, also place the heads at an angle to tape
 direction, as well as going up and down. I dont even think
 there is an idler pully, just a tach. I'd like to know if there
 is 'continual' tension on the tape while it is loaded ( on a
 dlt )( Like that of a DEC Tape, or 9trk )  but I do not know.

I see, thanks.  Interesting to see that asimuth changes are also 
being used to pack tracks tighter in the linear drives too these 
days.

But for whatever technology reasons the schemes that tape
 mechanisms have evolved, they all rely on knowing what 'state'
 that they are in. When you have a power outage, turn off the
 drive, lightning, whatever, you may find that the tape left
 inside the mechanism to be of little use to you. Quantum says
 dont do that, AND i'd bet that the legal staff of the other
 drive manufacturers will never certify that you will always
 recover a tape left inside the mechanism.

Since *you* are the tape changer in this case, I can see why the 
requested operations would be to your advantage.

Gene Heskett wrote:
 I'd love to see the tapes stored and used at or slightly
 below 50

 degrees F, and 50% relative humidity as the tape is many
 times less abrasive then.  Some TV stations have even gone so
 far as to store their tapes in a small room adjacent to the
 control room which is maintained in the 40 degree and 40%
 range.   Everyting lasts longer, a lot longer.

But i suppose that if you needed a tape right away, you'd have
 to wait for the temp rise, otherwise ud get condensation on the
 kolder tapes.

As the control room in this case was handled by yet another duct 
from the same AC, and therefore pretty dry too, it wasn't a 
problem.  Commercials came out, got loaded, played, and put away 
with not more than 5 minutes between the time they were brought 
out, and loaded into the players.  With spinning head tech, any 
dew will tell you right quick as you'll load up a tape, and have 
20 feet of it wrapped around the drum as the dew film will make 
it grab the spinning head.  Its messy, and as our newsroom folks 
recently found, expensive.  The locked up head drum proceeded to 
burn up the servo boards so badly we had to replace them, at $700 
a copy, 3 copies, knocking out 3 of the 5 cameras they had.  14 
pin tsop chips got so hot they burned halfway thru the epoxy 
board under them.

We have at this point, discussed this well enough that the rest 
of the readers can make intelligent decisions based on the 
technology of their individual drives.

-- 
Cheers, Gene
AMD K6-III@500mhz 320M
Athlon1600XP@1400mhz  512M
98.7+% setiathome rank, not too shabby for a hillbilly



Unloading tapes when task done ?

2002-04-03 Thread Uncle George

It seems like when the whole procedure ( whether its labeling tape(s),
amchecking tape, or amdumping ) is complete, the tape is left in the
tape drive in an on-line state. 
Is there some reason why the tape is not at least rewind-offlined, or
for tape changer folks rewoffl/unload'ed back to the carousel slot when
the job/task is finished?

Just my 2 cents



Re: Unloading tapes when task done ?

2002-04-03 Thread Gerhard den Hollander

* Uncle George [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 06:19:19AM -0500)
 It seems like when the whole procedure ( whether its labeling tape(s),
 amchecking tape, or amdumping ) is complete, the tape is left in the
 tape drive in an on-line state. 
 Is there some reason why the tape is not at least rewind-offlined, or
 for tape changer folks rewoffl/unload'ed back to the carousel slot when
 the job/task is finished?

Dunno,
my crontab sez:
0 18 * * 1-5 /volume/amanda/sbin/amdump lto; mt -f /dev/rmt/3h rewoffl

works like a charm.

Currently listening to: Helloween - If I Could Fly

Gerhard,  @jasongeo.com   == The Acoustic Motorbiker ==   
-- 
   __O  Some say the end is near.
 =`\,  Some say we'll see armageddon soon
(=)/(=) I certainly hope we will
I could use a vacation




Re: Unloading tapes when task done ?

2002-04-03 Thread Uncle George

I dunno either, will it work on a 6 drive auto changer/tape library?
/gat

 Dunno,
 my crontab sez:
 0 18 * * 1-5 /volume/amanda/sbin/amdump lto; mt -f /dev/rmt/3h rewoffl
 
 works like a charm.
 




Re: Unloading tapes when task done ?

2002-04-03 Thread Gene Heskett

On Wednesday 03 April 2002 06:19 am, Uncle George wrote:
It seems like when the whole procedure ( whether its labeling
 tape(s), amchecking tape, or amdumping ) is complete, the tape
 is left in the tape drive in an on-line state.
Is there some reason why the tape is not at least
 rewind-offlined, or for tape changer folks rewoffl/unload'ed
 back to the carousel slot when the job/task is finished?

Just my 2 cents

I'd druther it didn't.  By leaving the tape online, the display 
on the front of the changer tells me what slot is loaded.  If its 
the last slot, and its after the runtime for amdump, then I know 
to change tapes.

-- 
Cheers, Gene
AMD K6-III@500mhz 320M
Athlon1600XP@1400mhz  512M
98.7+% setiathome rank, not too shabby for a hillbilly



Re: Unloading tapes when task done ?

2002-04-03 Thread John R. Jackson

Is there some reason why the tape is not at least rewind-offlined ...

Because other users specifically asked for it to be left alone (we had
to remove code that used to rewind after each operation).  I assume they
run something else after amdump (for instance) to tack on a little more
data to the tape.

And in the case of a changer, offlining the drive may cause other things
to happen, such as dropping the stack and loading the next tape, which
might not be what you want.  Better that we leave things alone and if
a particular setup needs something different, it's easy for them to do.

John R. Jackson, Technical Software Specialist, [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Unloading tapes when task done ?

2002-04-03 Thread Uncle George

Guess I'm from old school. Older 9trk drives when left on, continually
have the vacuum on, and under constant tension. Its not healthy for the
tape. Does that happen with a DLT tape, how about the DDS tapes.
 I would NOT like a live tape to be left in the drive for long periods
of time. Who knows when a power failure will hit, who knows when the
drive will go awol. An unloaded tape, immediately after backup, is safe
from other folks, as well as the server, writing onto it.

Gene Heskett wrote:

 I'd druther it didn't.  By leaving the tape online, the display



Re: Unloading tapes when task done ?

2002-04-03 Thread Uncle George

Maybe they can OPT-OUT of the feature, but on a busy site, allowing the
customers to access the tape drives, would appear to make good business
sense. Particularily when the drives are doing just nothing.
/gat

btw, what do u mean each operation. Each run? If funny things happen,
maybe they should be addressed. After all, you got all these logs, and
status files hanging around.


John R. Jackson wrote:
 
 Is there some reason why the tape is not at least rewind-offlined ...
 
 Because other users specifically asked for it to be left alone (we had
 to remove code that used to rewind after each operation).  I assume they
 run something else after amdump (for instance) to tack on a little more
 data to the tape.
 
 And in the case of a changer, offlining the drive may cause other things
 to happen, such as dropping the stack and loading the next tape, which
 might not be what you want.  Better that we leave things alone and if
 a particular setup needs something different, it's easy for them to do.
 
 John R. Jackson, Technical Software Specialist, [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Unloading tapes when task done ?

2002-04-03 Thread Uncle George

Jay Lessert wrote:
 
 On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 06:19:19AM -0500, Uncle George wrote:
  It seems like when the whole procedure ( whether its labeling tape(s),
  amchecking tape, or amdumping ) is complete, the tape is left in the
  tape drive in an on-line state.
  Is there some reason why the tape is not at least rewind-offlined, or
  for tape changer folks rewoffl/unload'ed back to the carousel slot when
  the job/task is finished?
 
 1)  You would piss off people that are already doing:
 
 amdump DAILY; amverify DAILY
 
 ...from cron on a non-changer drive.
Maybe a visit to the toilet facility would do wonders to your
disposition. Its exceptionally arrogant of you to speak for us all. 
Since you dont know how it will be implemented, i can only wonder how
you or god know that this will be true.
 
 2)  Since it's already so easy to do any of:
 
 amdump DAILY; amtape DAILY eject
 amdump DAILY; amtape DAILY slot next
 amdump DAILY; amtape DAILY slot advance
 
 ...or anything else that makes sense for your particular installation,
 why hardwire some particular behavior into amdump (which would then
 inevitably be exactly the wrong behavior for some other poor schmoe's
 particular installation)?

Amazingly arrogant.  I might think that on a power failure, as Quantum
points out, they will not be responsible for the tape left inside the
drive. AND i agree with  their, slightly over stated, belief. The
purpose of a backup is not just to do a backup, but be able to restore
that data - generally when Kaos strikes. A trashed tape, even to the
poor schlep who believes in you, is of no use to anyone. When you are
finished, take the tape out, and put it in a safe place.
 
BTW who said it was, or has to be hardwired. it need not be any more
'hardwired' than dumpcycle 0, or compress none, or simply a
EjectWhenDone yes .

BTW#2 you should be doing an 
amdump  BACKUP; amtape BACKUP physically_set_write_protect_tab; amverify
BACKUP



Re: Unloading tapes when task done ?

2002-04-03 Thread Uncle George

I Beleive you are in error. 4mm dds simply have the head stop spinning,
the tape is still wrapped around in the mechanism. The DLT I have does
not unload at all, unless specifically directed to. 
Maybe you can show me where u got your information from ? Maybe i can
find the quantum docs that say 'dont do that'.

Jay Lessert wrote:
 
 On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 08:58:29AM -0500, Uncle George wrote:
  Guess I'm from old school. Older 9trk drives when left on, continually
  have the vacuum on, and under constant tension. Its not healthy for the
  tape. Does that happen with a DLT tape, how about the DDS tapes.
 
 8mm, AIT*, DDS*, DLT*, LTO* drives all unload the tape (unwrap the
 tape from around the head and power down the servos) after some
 hardwired time period.
 
   I would NOT like a live tape to be left in the drive for long periods
  of time.
 
 Then don't.  Is there something you need to do that amtape doesn't
 know how to do?
 
 --
 Jay Lessert   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Accelerant Networks Inc.   (voice)1.503.439.3461
 Beaverton OR, USA(fax)1.503.466-9472



Re: Unloading tapes when task done ?

2002-04-03 Thread John R. Jackson

Maybe they can OPT-OUT of the feature ...

It's just as easy for someone to opt-in and do their own tape operations
when Amanda is done.  Amanda will currently support both camps -- unload
it when done vs. leave it alone.  Why add more complexity?  We already
have too many options (and lots of other things on the TODO list).

btw, what do u mean each operation.  ...

I meant amdump and amflush.

John R. Jackson, Technical Software Specialist, [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Unloading tapes when task done ?

2002-04-03 Thread Gene Heskett

On Wednesday 03 April 2002 08:58 am, Uncle George wrote:
Guess I'm from old school. Older 9trk drives when left on,
 continually have the vacuum on, and under constant tension. Its
 not healthy for the tape. Does that happen with a DLT tape, how
 about the DDS tapes. 

I'd have to assume that the DLT, which I know nothing about, 
shares such a feature with which nearly all other drives, 
including professional vcr's, that has a timeout of a minute or 
so, and, like the DDS drives I have, does a backout of the 
loading mechanism thereby removing the tape from contact with the 
scanner drum, usually with one supply or takeup spindle braked, 
and shuts the head drum down at the same time.  The drive then 
gradually cools to match its resting temps and the tape is mostly 
protected and not subjected to the internal heat rise the drive 
does when its active.  I do not consider the roughly 80 degree 
temps my tapes have when I eject the magazine as being that hard 
on the tape if the tape is not in motion.

I'd love to see the tapes stored and used at or slightly below 50 
degrees F, and 50% relative humidity as the tape is many times 
less abrasive then.  Some TV stations have even gone so far as to 
store their tapes in a small room adjacent to the control room 
which is maintained in the 40 degree and 40% range.   Everyting 
lasts longer, a lot longer.

The tape makers themselves recommend it too, and have data to 
show that a tape used and stored at 90/90 for temp and RH, is not 
just marginally more abrasive, but dozens of times more abrasive.

That effect was brought home to me many years ago when a 
headwheel failed in a now old 2 broadcast vtr.  The wheel had 
over 7000 hours of runtime on it, and the failure was in a rotary 
transformer.  We sent it back for repair.  It was re-installed 
and ran till something over 9000 runtime hours was used and it 
was worn out.  That headwheel came with a 200 hour prorated 
warranty as it had soft tips.  No, I didn't forget a decimal 
there.  The machine was in a precipitron clean, dry, cold room.  
Under more usual conditions I've seen them fail in 125 hours.

But we don't have those conditions inside the typical computers 
case, not by a long shot.

I would NOT like a live tape to be left
 in the drive for long periods of time. Who knows when a power
 failure will hit, who knows when the drive will go awol. An
 unloaded tape, immediately after backup, is safe from other
 folks, as well as the server, writing onto it.

I'd consider that a problem only in those drives like older 
QIC's, that leave everything engaged for long periods of time, 
thereby denting the drive rollers etc.

-- 
Cheers, Gene
AMD K6-III@500mhz 320M
Athlon1600XP@1400mhz  512M
98.7+% setiathome rank, not too shabby for a hillbilly