[AMaViS-user] banning .exe attachments, but not if inside .zip files

2005-06-15 Thread Sven Riedel
Hi,
I'm trying to have exe files banned in attachments,
unless they are inside a zip file.

Currently amavis seems to inspect the attachments 
themselves in addition to the contents of archives
in order to decide if a mail should be banned or not.

I'm currently using 
   banned_filename_maps  = [ new_RE( qr|.*\.exe$|i, ) ],
inside policy bank.

Any way to, say, whitelist zip files before banning exe files?

(Oh, and in light of current Bugtraq news regarding malformed 
zips, I still want amavis to unpack archives for my virus 
scanners...)

Regs,
Sven

--

BAGHUS GmbH
EDV und Internetdienstleistungen

Staffelseestr. 2
81477 München

Tel.: 0 89 / 8 71 81 - 4 84
Fax.: 0 89 / 8 71 81 - 4 88

www.baghus.net, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
HRB: 144283, USt-IdNr: DE224865405

--
 


---
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idt77alloc_id492op=click
___
AMaViS-user mailing list
AMaViS-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amavis-user
AMaViS-FAQ:http://www.amavis.org/amavis-faq.php3
AMaViS-HowTos:http://www.amavis.org/howto/


Re: [AMaViS-user] Ldap and amavis 2.3.1

2005-06-15 Thread h35 . office
Hi, thanks for reply,

I figured out and it works. I have a environment with extern and intern
mailing configured.
So if usera want to send intern to userb a mail with a banned file i have to
set the attribute for usera and userb in the ldap dir. 
usera and userb are also allowed to send banned files through the internet.
Is there a solution to allow intern users to send banned files, but not to the
Internet?

greetings

Paul

-- Original Message ---
From: Michael Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: amavis-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 21:10:08 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: Re: [AMaViS-user] Ldap and amavis 2.3.1

 On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 01:45:54PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  Hi all,
  
  I configured amavis with ldap. Since the $banned_files_lovers_ldap setup is
  gone, How can i use the attribute amavisBannedFilesLover ? Do I have create 
  a
  lookup for this attribute or does amavis itself? Cause amavis is searching 
  for
  spam attributes itself.
 
 Just use it like any other attribute, all the available attributes 
 are in the schema file, in order to use them all you need to do is 
 set a value for them in users directory entry.
 
 --
 
 Mike Hall,
 System Admin - Rock Island Communications   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 System Admin - riverside.org, ssdd.org  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 ---
 SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration 
 Strategies from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward 
 articles, informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to 
 get up to speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477alloc_id=16492op=click
 ___
 AMaViS-user mailing list
 AMaViS-user@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amavis-user
 AMaViS-FAQ:http://www.amavis.org/amavis-faq.php3
 AMaViS-HowTos:http://www.amavis.org/howto/
--- End of Original Message ---



---
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477alloc_id=16492op=click
___
AMaViS-user mailing list
AMaViS-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amavis-user
AMaViS-FAQ:http://www.amavis.org/amavis-faq.php3
AMaViS-HowTos:http://www.amavis.org/howto/


[AMaViS-user] local_domain_maps and read_hash

2005-06-15 Thread Johan Fredrik Øhman
I understand that one is supposed to use @local_domains_maps to list the
local delivery domains.

Currently I use @local_domains_maps = (1); ,which works fine…

But I would like to switch to something similar to this:
@local_domains_maps = ( read_hash(/etc/postfix/amavis_listofdomains) );

However, how should the format of the textfile be? I tried:
Domain.com
Domain2.com
Domain3.com
Etc…  

But it didn’t work as expected…  Any ideas?

--
JFØ 




---
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idt77alloc_id492op=click
___
AMaViS-user mailing list
AMaViS-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amavis-user
AMaViS-FAQ:http://www.amavis.org/amavis-faq.php3
AMaViS-HowTos:http://www.amavis.org/howto/


Re: [AMaViS-user] local_domain_maps and read_hash

2005-06-15 Thread Gary V
Johan wrote:

 I understand that one is supposed to use @local_domains_maps to list the
 local delivery domains.

 Currently I use @local_domains_maps = (1); ,which works fine…

 But I would like to switch to something similar to this:
 @local_domains_maps = ( read_hash(/etc/postfix/amavis_listofdomains) );

 However, how should the format of the textfile be? I tried:
 Domain.com
 Domain2.com
 Domain3.com
 Etc…  

 But it didn’t work as expected…  Any ideas?

 --
 JFØ 

Here is someone with the same problem, see if you can find answers
here:

http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=amavis-userm=09820614111w=2
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=amavis-userm=45227116436w=2

@local_domains_maps = (
read_hash(/etc/postfix/amavis_listofdomains),[.$mydomain] );

make sure local_domains_acl is commented out.

You might also try revising entries:
.domain.com
.domain2.com
.domain3.com

or
.domain.com 1
.domain2.com 1
.domain3.com 1

Gary V



---
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477alloc_id=16492op=click
___
AMaViS-user mailing list
AMaViS-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amavis-user
AMaViS-FAQ:http://www.amavis.org/amavis-faq.php3
AMaViS-HowTos:http://www.amavis.org/howto/


[AMaViS-user] deleteing msgs at sa_dsn_cutoff_level?

2005-06-15 Thread Mike Schrauder
Here is what I have for SA 

$sa_tag_level_deflt  = -1999; # add spam info headers if at, or above
that level 
$sa_tag2_level_deflt = 5.0; # add 'spam detected' headers at that level 
$sa_kill_level_deflt = 10.00; # triggers spam evasive actions 
   # at or above that level: bounce/reject/drop,

   # quarantine, and adding mail address
extension 
$sa_dsn_cutoff_level = 15.00;  # spam level beyond which a DSN is not
sent, 
# effectively turning D_BOUNCE into
D_DISCARD; 
# undef disables this feature and is a
default; 
This is for a site wide gateway and everyone here wants me to handle it
for them.
They do not want any user prefs of any kind. 

What I want is this: 
Always tag the msg. 
Mark the subject if score over 5. 
Redirect the msg to a single quar. email address on the server if over
10. 

this is all working.  Now I would like to outright delete the msg if the
score is over 15.
Again, all my users are in agreement w/ this brutal msg.   
Is this addition directive possible and if so, how would I do it?
Would I need to provide any other config files to help set this up?  
TIA 

Mike Schrauder 
Specialty Blades, Inc.


---
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idt77alloc_id492op=click
___
AMaViS-user mailing list
AMaViS-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amavis-user
AMaViS-FAQ:http://www.amavis.org/amavis-faq.php3
AMaViS-HowTos:http://www.amavis.org/howto/


Re: [AMaViS-user] deleteing msgs at sa_dsn_cutoff_level?

2005-06-15 Thread Gary V
Mike wrote:

 Here is what I have for SA 

 $sa_tag_level_deflt  = -1999; # add spam info headers if at, or above
 that level 
 $sa_tag2_level_deflt = 5.0; # add 'spam detected' headers at that level 
 $sa_kill_level_deflt = 10.00; # triggers spam evasive actions 
# at or above that level: bounce/reject/drop,

# quarantine, and adding mail address
 extension 
 $sa_dsn_cutoff_level = 15.00;  # spam level beyond which a DSN is not
 sent, 
 # effectively turning D_BOUNCE into
 D_DISCARD; 
 # undef disables this feature and is a
 default; 
 This is for a site wide gateway and everyone here wants me to handle it
 for them.
 They do not want any user prefs of any kind. 

 What I want is this: 
 Always tag the msg. 
 Mark the subject if score over 5. 
 Redirect the msg to a single quar. email address on the server if over
 10. 

 this is all working.  Now I would like to outright delete the msg if the
 score is over 15.
 Again, all my users are in agreement w/ this brutal msg.   
 Is this addition directive possible and if so, how would I do it?
 Would I need to provide any other config files to help set this up?  
 TIA 

 Mike Schrauder 
 Specialty Blades, Inc.

Version 2.3.0 and newer support $sa_quarantine_cutoff_level
(@spam_quarantine_cutoff_level_maps)

see http://www200.pair.com/mecham/spam/amavisd-hack.txt

If you decide to upgrade, upgrade to 2.3.1, not 2.3.0.

Gary V



---
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477alloc_id=16492op=click
___
AMaViS-user mailing list
AMaViS-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amavis-user
AMaViS-FAQ:http://www.amavis.org/amavis-faq.php3
AMaViS-HowTos:http://www.amavis.org/howto/


Re: [AMaViS-user] Q: spam lovers?

2005-06-15 Thread Gary V
Annette wrote:

 Am 14.06.2005 16:5 Uhr schrieb Sven Riedel unter [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 
 Hi,
 
 with amavisd-new and centralized SA and dspam:
 Is there an easy possibility for an user to decide to
 opt-out from the
 spam-checks of amavisd-new by itself? For dspam there would be a nice
 $USERHOME/.nodspam. Is there an option for amavisd similiar
 to that one?
 
 There is nothing built in that I know of. But since the config
 file is in essence a perl script that is invoked with perls
 'do'-function (q.v.) you'll be able to write a small loop
 in the config file that will build your spam_lovers_map
 for you. (Mark will correct me if I said anything wrong here :) ).
 
 Regs,
 Sven


 Meanwhile I also found bypass_spam_checks_map. Is it better to configure
 spam_lovers or bypass_spam_checks, if a mail receiver generelly want to
 opt-out from the centralized spam-checks? Whats the main difference between
 these two maps?
I am guessing that making someone a spam_lover might be safer for
multi-recipient mail.

Read this post:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=amavis-userm=111308882604523w=2

Notice it says:
When setting bypass* to true for some recipient, you should in almost
all cases also want to set *lover to true for this recipient.

bypass_spam_checks does just that, no spam checking is performed. For
a spam_lover, checks are performed, but the message is passed to the
recipient regardless of the spam score (provided it is not first
quarantined or deleted by virus checks).

 Furthermore I assume difficulties to realize no-spam-check for someone, if
 a mail to a list or alias this user is on is receiving by amavis. I read
 some hints, that for lists of receivers amavis process the mail for every
 receiver, ignoring opt-out settings, if not all receivers agree not to
 check the mail. So what with members of spam_lovers oder bypass_spam_check
 if they are on a mail alias list?
I also have a hard time conceptualizing what would happen. Why don't
you simply configure it each way and send some sample spam mails
through with multiple recipients and observe what happens? Even if we
knew the answer, I'm sure you would test it anyway. Try it with the
spam_lover (or bypassed recipient) as the To: recipient and then
someone else as the To: recipient.

 best regards,
 Annette

Gary V



---
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477alloc_id=16492op=click
___
AMaViS-user mailing list
AMaViS-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amavis-user
AMaViS-FAQ:http://www.amavis.org/amavis-faq.php3
AMaViS-HowTos:http://www.amavis.org/howto/


[AMaViS-user] benchmark question

2005-06-15 Thread Pavel Urban

Hello,
I've tried some internal testing and I'm quite surprised. Here are my 
results:


amavis+clamd+SA:
start - Wed Jun 15 19:41:36 CEST 2005
finish - Wed Jun 15 19:47:58 CEST 2005
queue empty - Jun 15 20:01:38

amavis+clamd, SA disabled (@bypass_spam_checks_maps  = (1);)
start - Wed Jun 15 18:30:19 CEST 2005
finish - Wed Jun 15 18:36:39 CEST 2005
queue empty - Jun 15 18:46:55

amavis+SA, clamd disabled (@bypass_virus_checks_maps = (1);)
start - Wed Jun 15 18:50:51 CEST 2005
finish - Wed Jun 15 18:57:15 CEST 2005
queue empty - Jun 15 19:10:47

amavis, both clamd and SA disabled
start - Wed Jun 15 19:20:36 CEST 2005
finish - Wed Jun 15 19:26:49 CEST 2005
queue empty - Jun 15 19:36:46

amavis completly turned off (disabled by Postfix' content_filter)
start - Wed Jun 15 19:12:32 CEST 2005
finish - Wed Jun 15 19:17:40 CEST 2005
queue empty - Jun 15 19:17:41

Seems like the main delay is caused by amavis alone... turning on clamd 
and SA doesn't make much difference. I certainly wasn't expecting this. 
Does anybody have some explanation?


My testing environment is RedHat Enterprise Linux 3, running on SunFire 
V20z, one processor, kernel 2.4.21-32.0.1.EL, 3GB RAM. Postfix 2.1.5, 
amavisd-new 2.3.1, SA 3.0.4 with SARE rules. AWL and Bayes DBs are in 
MySQL database. I've generated 200 x 50 mails - 50 runs of script:


#!/bin/bash

X=200

while [ $X -gt 0 ]; do
  cat ./$(($X%10+1)) |sendmail tester
  X=$(($X-1))
done


[EMAIL PROTECTED] test]# ls -l [0-9]*
-rw-r--r--1 root root 2444 Jun  9 14:04 1
-rw-r--r--1 root root 4881 Jun  9 14:05 10
-rw-r--r--1 root root 4200 Jun  9 14:04 2
-rw-r--r--1 root root38935 Jun  9 14:04 3
-rw-r--r--1 root root56037 Jun  9 14:06 4
-rw-r--r--1 root root   174319 Jun  9 14:05 5
-rw-r--r--1 root root11535 Jun  9 14:06 6
-rw-r--r--1 root root   135883 Jun  9 14:05 7
-rw-r--r--1 root root 1921 Jun  9 14:05 8
-rw-r--r--1 root root 9594 Jun  9 14:05 9

These are some examples of mails that recently arrived to our 
mailsystem. Spam, ham, anything. I can give more details if needed.


--
***
Pavel Urban ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
IOL system disaster
Internet OnLine, owned by Cesky Telecom, a.s. (www.ct.cz)
***
   Vegetables should not operate electronic equipment.
  Computer Stupidities, http://rinkworks.com/stupid/
***


---
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477alloc_id=16492op=click
___
AMaViS-user mailing list
AMaViS-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amavis-user
AMaViS-FAQ:http://www.amavis.org/amavis-faq.php3
AMaViS-HowTos:http://www.amavis.org/howto/


[AMaViS-user] log entries

2005-06-15 Thread Dale Walsh

[amavisd-new 2.3.1-rc3]

I've got the following entires and I'm wondering what it's about  
because I only see them on one server and it occurs immediately  
following the completion of each scanned e-mail.


Entries in question: Jun 15 15:50:12 uawebhost.com /usr/bin/amavisd 
[16060]: (16060-05) extra modules loaded: NDBM_File.pm, Tie/Hash.pm


Here's a sample of the amavis.log

Jun 15 15:47:29 uawebhost.com /usr/bin/amavisd[15929]: (15929-06)  
ESMTP::10024 /var/amavis/tmp/amavis-20050615T153425-15929:  
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received:  
SIZE=7753 from uawebhost.com ([127.0.0.1]) by mail.uawebhost.com  
(uawebhost.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id  
15929-06 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 15:47:29  
-0400 (EDT)
Jun 15 15:47:30 uawebhost.com /usr/bin/amavisd[15929]: (15929-06)  
Checking: cSDsIu3IRhDg [EMAIL PROTECTED] -  
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jun 15 15:47:30 uawebhost.com /usr/bin/amavisd[15929]: (15929-06) FWD  
via SMTP: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - [EMAIL PROTECTED],  
250 2.6.0 Ok, id=15929-06, from MTA([127.0.0.1]:10025): 250 Ok:  
queued as 7C1994D5596
Jun 15 15:47:30 uawebhost.com /usr/bin/amavisd[15929]: (15929-06)   
Passed CLEAN , [EMAIL PROTECTED] -  
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  , Message-ID:  
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  , Hits: 0

Jun 15 15:47:30 uawebhost.com /usr/bin/amavisd[15929]: (15929-06)
Jun 15 15:47:30 uawebhost.com /usr/bin/amavisd[15929]: (15929-06)  
extra modules loaded: NDBM_File.pm, Tie/Hash.pm
Jun 15 15:50:11 uawebhost.com /usr/bin/amavisd[16060]: (16060-05)  
ESMTP::10024 /var/amavis/tmp/amavis-20050615T153645-16060:  
[EMAIL PROTECTED] -  
[EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED] Received:  
SIZE=1854 from uawebhost.com ([127.0.0.1]) by mail.uawebhost.com  
(uawebhost.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id  
16060-05; Wed, 15 Jun 2005 15:50:11 -0400 (EDT)
Jun 15 15:50:11 uawebhost.com /usr/bin/amavisd[16060]: (16060-05)  
Checking: PO3K+OsDSGqk [EMAIL PROTECTED] -  
[EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jun 15 15:50:12 uawebhost.com /usr/bin/amavisd[16060]: (16060-05) FWD  
via SMTP: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - [EMAIL PROTECTED],  
[EMAIL PROTECTED], 250 2.6.0 Ok, id=16060-05, from MTA 
([127.0.0.1]:10025): 250 Ok: queued as 14D814D55DA
Jun 15 15:50:12 uawebhost.com /usr/bin/amavisd[16060]: (16060-05)   
Passed CLEAN , [EMAIL PROTECTED] -  
[EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED]  , Message- 
ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]  , Hits: 0.374

Jun 15 15:50:12 uawebhost.com /usr/bin/amavisd[16060]: (16060-05)
Jun 15 15:50:12 uawebhost.com /usr/bin/amavisd[16060]: (16060-05)  
extra modules loaded: NDBM_File.pm, Tie/Hash.pm




---
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477alloc_id=16492op=click
___
AMaViS-user mailing list
AMaViS-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amavis-user
AMaViS-FAQ:http://www.amavis.org/amavis-faq.php3
AMaViS-HowTos:http://www.amavis.org/howto/


Re: [AMaViS-user] Re: SAVI glibc 2.2 version

2005-06-15 Thread Paul B. Henson

Sophos provided me a test build that supposedly will fix these problems,
but I don't have a Linux setup to test with. If you have a Linux install
that ran into these issues and would like to volunteer to test a possible
fix, please contact me off-list.

Thanks...


On Tue, 7 Jun 2005, Gary Windham wrote:

 I started digging into this problem after upgrading to Sophos 3.93 on our
 amavis servers the other day and getting bit. :)

 The problem is, as previously detailed, related to a pair of semaphores that
 the SAVI library creates upon initialization.  The problem is two-fold:

 1.  If the SAVI initialization function is called by root, the forked
 Net::Server process (and children) will not be able to access the semaphores
 if amavisd later switches to a less-privileged user.  This can be circumvented
 by starting the amavisd process as the less-privileged user (via 'su') or by
 passing the '-u' option to amavisd to invoke early dropping of privileges.

 2.  The semaphores created by SAVI are destroyed upon invocation of the SAVI
 Terminate function.  This function is called by SAVI-Perl in the
 SAVI::Handle::DESTROY() method.  Since the SAVI handle is initialized in the
 initial parent process, and all the children inherit this handle, any time a
 child process dies (i.e., after $max_requests) the SAVI::Handle::DESTROY()
 method is invoked, and the semaphores go bye-bye.  I kludged together a
 workaround for this, by having amavisd set a variable ($terminateOk) in the
 SAVI:: namespace.  The SAVI-Perl module will then check this variable in the
 DESTROY method and decide whether or not to call the SAVI terminate function.

 I'm sure this isn't the most elegant solution, but it seems to work around
 the problem.

 You can find patches for SAVI-Perl-0.30 and amavisd-new-2.3.2-pre1 here:
 http://www.u.arizona.edu/~windhamg/amavisd-savifix/.  If anyone is interested
 in cleaning this up and incorporating it into amavisd-new, that would be
 terrific.


-- 
Paul B. Henson  |  (909) 979-6361  |  http://www.csupomona.edu/~henson/
Operating Systems and Network Analyst  |  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
California State Polytechnic University  |  Pomona CA 91768


---
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477alloc_id=16492op=click
___
AMaViS-user mailing list
AMaViS-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amavis-user
AMaViS-FAQ:http://www.amavis.org/amavis-faq.php3
AMaViS-HowTos:http://www.amavis.org/howto/


[AMaViS-user] Feature request: for log_templ, different macros for spam score and boost

2005-06-15 Thread Ed Walker

A request for a small change for the next version of amavisd:

We'd like to log slightly more detailed info of the messages.  We use 
log_recip_templ, and it would be nice if we could store the score 
reported by spam assassin with a separate value for the 
whitelist/blacklist boost score.





---
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477alloc_id=16492op=click
___
AMaViS-user mailing list
AMaViS-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amavis-user
AMaViS-FAQ:http://www.amavis.org/amavis-faq.php3
AMaViS-HowTos:http://www.amavis.org/howto/


RE: [AMaViS-user] log entries

2005-06-15 Thread Sven Riedel
Hi,

 I've got the following entires and I'm wondering what it's about  
 because I only see them on one server and it occurs immediately  
 following the completion of each scanned e-mail.
 
 Entries in question: Jun 15 15:50:12 uawebhost.com /usr/bin/amavisd 
 [16060]: (16060-05) extra modules loaded: NDBM_File.pm, Tie/Hash.pm

there are some modules that are only loaded/initialized when the need
for them arises (the SAVI module is another one, IIRC). You should see 
something like that after amavis is restarted, once for each child.

But if you see that after every mail... What's your $max_requests
setting?

Regs,
Sven


---
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idt77alloc_id492op=click
___
AMaViS-user mailing list
AMaViS-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/amavis-user
AMaViS-FAQ:http://www.amavis.org/amavis-faq.php3
AMaViS-HowTos:http://www.amavis.org/howto/