[AMRadio] FT-101 on AM

2006-01-10 Thread VJB
For  Dan -- WAØJRD,

You may want to initially use a 2nd receiver combined
with the transmitter in the FT-101. The rig has a
provision on the back with an RCA jack to take your
service antenna over to an external source unless
transmitting. The internal receiver remains active,
but you can just pot it down.

This lets you spend time on efforts to refine the
transmit audio while not givng you the FT-101
receiver's distortion, vulnerability to overload on
strong signals, limited audio response and the expense
of a 6Kc filter.

I ended up using my FT-101EE as an RF exciter for a
1953 homebrew transmitter that I completed in 1976.
Most recently it was up on 10 meters, where the 101's
stability proved very nice.

For the modifications you may wish to consider, check
this link.

http://www.amwindow.org/tech/htm/ft101.htm

Rgds,
Paul/VJB






__ 
Yahoo! DSL – Something to write home about. 
Just $16.99/mo. or less. 
dsl.yahoo.com 



[AMRadio] FS: 160m and 40m crystals $4.00 and 5.00 closeouts.

2006-01-10 Thread Brian Carling
JANUARY SPECIALS:

FT243 Crystals on 1977.5 kHz
QTY 8 available for $5.00 each plus shipping.
Or buy 5 for $20.00 plus shipping

FT243 crystals on 7000 kHz
QTY 8 available for $5.00 each plus shipping.
Or buy 5 for $20.00 plus shipping

FT243 crystals on 7000, 7100, 7200 kHz
QTY 4 each available for $5.00 each plus shipping.

Many other FT243 crystals on popular ham 
frequencies available at:
http://www.af4k.com/crystals.htm


Re: [AMRadio] Modulator iron ideas needed

2006-01-10 Thread Todd, KA1KAQ
On 1/8/06, RJ Mattson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hi Mark,
 Are you in range of the K1JCL 6m 50.4 AM repeater in CT?
 I tried 50.4 here from the Catskills but never heard anything with my 6m
 Clegg.

Bob -

Last I knew, Al had taken the repeater off the air due to problems
with some nitwit anti-AM types and frequency coordination issues. I
think he just got sick of the BS.

I've heard no AM up this way, and only the occasional SSB signals. We
have a couple of big guns (K1LPS  W1AIM) up north on SSB, maybe
you've heard them? Would be nice to have some AM activity though...

de Todd/'Boomer'  KA1KAQ


[AMRadio] Negative Loading circuits - good, bad, or ?

2006-01-10 Thread Todd, KA1KAQ
Just curious to get some opinions on these circuits, the best design
to use, or if I should use one at all.

Brett, I heard talking about the negative loading cycle circuit
causing problems for you, I wonder if you could explain more? It's
something I had thought about adding and have talked with folks who
swear by them. Is there are good way and bad way to do so, or is it
just a bad idea from the start? The initial reason that interested me
was protection of the mod iron.

~ Todd/'Boomer'  KA1KAQ


Re: [AMRadio] coils

2006-01-10 Thread Jim Wilhite






Well, with thicker tubing, the outer layer will be thicker!



How much thicker would it be?  As I understand it, the frequency determines 
how deep the current flows.


73  Jim
W5JO 





RE: [AMRadio] Negative Loading circuits - good, bad, or ?

2006-01-10 Thread Brett gazdzinski
I have used the 3 diode, power supply (variac) and load 
resistor setup on various rigs, the first one was the 
pair of 813's modulated by a pair of 4x150 (4cx250b) tubes
in AB1.
The circuit worked very well on the mod monitor and scope, and 
I could get ungodly amounts of positive modulation.
Like 2500 to 3000 watts pep out of a 600 watt carrier, without
any audible distortion

I suspect the high voltage brick diodes I use have some sort of problem,
switching speed? that caused very bad splatter when I would exceed
100% neg modulation. I saw no signs of it on the scope or mod monitor,
but it showed up on the spectrum analyzer.

I also put the circuit in the push pull 812a rig, and the pair of 4d32
rf deck, with the same results.

Unless you are running a mod transformer within an inch of 
its life, I don't see the need to protect it that way.
I insulate the mod iron from ground, and never had problems.

I once had a qso with someone (cant remember who) who told 
me the circuit was no good, but would work with the 
addition of another diode...I think that is what he said...

I suppose the solid state 14kv 1 amp bricks just can not react
fast enough and let a real short pulse through?

In the old days, they used tube type rectifiers, and they
may have worked better, just a guess...

I thought about trying to add a (very high voltage) capacitor
someplace in the circuit to damp out any spikes, 
but never looked into it.


I now tend to think limiting the audio in the low level
stages and not exceeding 90% negative modulation is the cleanest
way to go.


Brett
N2DTS




[AMRadio] Fw: Modulator iron ideas needed

2006-01-10 Thread peter markavage
I think it's still off the air. Last I heard there were a bunch of guys
in the New England area who meet early in the mornings on 50.4. Almost
every evening I hear SSB QSO's on 50.150 from the New England area. K1JJ
in CT has a small array set up for 6 meters. You should be able to work
him. See: 
http://home.comcast.net/~k1jj/wsb/html/view.cgi-photo.html--SiteID-186247
3.html
Or, if the link gets cut apart, go here:
http://tinyurl.com/dcuvt

January 21-23 is VHF Sweepstakes. You should here lots of 6 meter
activity.
Remember, you can work SSB stations with an AM rig. They'll just think
you're running a Swan rig.

Pete, wa2cwa


On Mon, 9 Jan 2006 11:51:21 -0500 Todd, KA1KAQ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
 On 1/8/06, RJ Mattson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Hi Mark,
  Are you in range of the K1JCL 6m 50.4 AM repeater in CT?
  I tried 50.4 here from the Catskills but never heard anything with 
 my 6m
  Clegg.
 
 Bob -
 
 Last I knew, Al had taken the repeater off the air due to problems
 with some nitwit anti-AM types and frequency coordination issues. I
 think he just got sick of the BS.
 
 I've heard no AM up this way, and only the occasional SSB signals. 
 We
 have a couple of big guns (K1LPS  W1AIM) up north on SSB, maybe
 you've heard them? Would be nice to have some AM activity though...
 
 de Todd/'Boomer'  KA1KAQ


RE: [AMRadio] Millen High Voltage Connectors

2006-01-10 Thread Gary Schafer
If you over tighten the millen connectors they will crack the shell of the
chassis part pretty easily. You may not realize they have cracked. This can
be a leakage point.

73
Gary  K4FMX


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of david knepper
Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2006 8:05 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; amradio@mailman.qth.net
Subject: [AMRadio] Millen High Voltage Connectors

Thanks to all of you for your insightful suggestionis.

In using coax connectors and coax cabling, I would recommend that one uses 
the red high voltage cable so as to clearly know the difference between an 
R.F. connection and a high voltage connection.

I am going to try another set of Millen connectors since the input seems to 
be that the ones that I used were just defective.  Most of the ARRL, etc. 
homebrew construction projects used those Millen H.V. connectors.  Perhaps, 
expanding the mounting hole on the chassis slightly might place less strain 
on the insulation properties.

Thank you again for taking the time to assist me.

Dave, W3ST
Publisher of the Collins Journal
Secretary to the Collins Radio Association
www.collinsra.com - the CRA Website
Now with PayPal
CRA Nets: 3805 Khz every Monday at 8 PM EST
and 14255 every Saturday at 12 Noon EST 


__
AMRadio mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
AMfone Website: http://www.amfone.net
AM List Admin: Brian Sherrod/w5ami, Paul Courson/wa3vjb




[AMRadio] Ebay item #5852017489

2006-01-10 Thread W5OMR/Geoff

Attention, DON CHESTER/K4KYV

In regards to Ebay item #5852017489, is this the same transformer you 
said was on-board most liberty ships, used as an MCW modulation transformer?


RCA 1:1
Pri: 5500 ohms
Sec: 5500 ohm
Secondary max current: 0.198Amps DC
with a screen winding.

?


---
73 = Best Regards,
-Geoff/W5OMR





Re: [AMRadio] Millen High Voltage Connectors

2006-01-10 Thread W7QHO

In a message dated 1/10/06 11:37:54 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:


 If you over tighten the millen connectors they will crack the shell of the
 chassis part pretty easily. You may not realize they have cracked. This can
 be a leakage point.
 
 

Yep, they sure will.   For HV I like to use a ceramic feed through insulator 
covered by a removable housing to prevent accidental contact with the exposed 
screw stud.   The Navy SRT-14/15/16 transmitters used ceramic plate caps (807 
size) on the cable ends and ceramic feed throughs with appropriately sized 
brass mating lugs on the chassis side for HV connections.   Clever solution.

Dennis D. W7QHO
Glendale, CA


K1JCL 6m AM Repeater - was [AMRadio] Modulator iron ideas needed

2006-01-10 Thread RJ Mattson

Todd,
Thanks for the information. No wonder I can't hear the repeater :-)
I copied ER Magazine where it is listed under Vintage Nets.
bob...w2ami

- Original Message - 
From: Todd, KA1KAQ [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: Discussion of AM Radio amradio@mailman.qth.net


On 1/8/06, RJ Mattson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Hi Mark,
Are you in range of the K1JCL 6m 50.4 AM repeater in CT?
I tried 50.4 here from the Catskills but never heard anything with my 6m
Clegg.


Bob -

Last I knew, Al had taken the repeater off the air due to problems
with some nitwit anti-AM types and frequency coordination issues. I
think he just got sick of the BS.

I've heard no AM up this way, and only the occasional SSB signals. We
have a couple of big guns (K1LPS  W1AIM) up north on SSB, maybe
you've heard them? Would be nice to have some AM activity though...

de Todd/'Boomer'  KA1KAQ




Re: [AMRadio] 3TF7 Ballast Tube

2006-01-10 Thread crawfish
Bob, in AM Press/Exchange #57, there is an article on replacing the 3TF7
with SS components, plus the circuit changes in the R-390 and R-390-A. If
you can't find it, let me know and I will mail a copy.The AM P/E issues can
be found at www.amfone.net.
   73 de Joe W4AAB

- Original Message -
From: W5OMR/Geoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Discussion of AM Radio amradio@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Sunday, January 01, 2006 12:40 PM
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] 3TF7 Ballast Tube


 Bob Peters wrote:

 Anyone out there have one Would appreciate..
 
 

 If you're not already there, Bob, you might consider joining the
 T-368/BC-610 mailing list...  they're a Yahoo group, just like NewOldStock

 t-368/bc-610 info:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/T-368_BC-610/

 NewOldStock
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/newoldstock/

 First AM QSO for me, for this year, was with a surprise!  A returning AM
 Veteran, and the keeper of the AM Window, Steve/WB3HUZ was back on the
 air, from his new location in Williamsburg, VA.  Sure was great to hear
 Steve on the air, again.  His FT-102, driving into a pair of 3-500Z's
 and an outboard modulator,, with that 350W carrier here, sure was
 sounding -great-.

 See y'all on the air!

 --
 73 = Best Regards,
 Happy New Year
 -Geoff/W5OMR

 __
 AMRadio mailing list
 Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
 Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
 AMfone Website: http://www.amfone.net
 AM List Admin: Brian Sherrod/w5ami, Paul Courson/wa3vjb





Re: [AMRadio] Negative Loading circuits - good, bad, or ?

2006-01-10 Thread W7QHO

In a message dated 1/10/06 6:37:54 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:


 I have used the 3 diode, power supply (variac) and load
 resistor setup on various rigs, the first one was the
 pair of 813's modulated by a pair of 4x150 (4cx250b) tubes
 in AB1.
 The circuit worked very well on the mod monitor and scope, and
 I could get ungodly amounts of positive modulation.
 Like 2500 to 3000 watts pep out of a 600 watt carrier, without
 any audible distortion
 
 
I've had good results with the three diode circuit too.   Earliest 
reference to the scheme I can find is in QST, October 1956 using 866 
rectifiers.   
Covered again in ER #3, July 1989, this time with solid state diodes.   

More simple schemes can also give some useful benefit, ex., using a weak tube 
on the side of a P-P modulator circuit that conducts on the negative half of 
the audio cycle.   Other cheap and dirty tricks include lowering the screen 
voltage on the same side or inserting a resistor in series with the plate.   
Can 
end up sounding bloody awful, though, if not done carefully and with 
restraint.


 I suspect the high voltage brick diodes I use have some sort of problem,
 switching speed? that caused very bad splatter when I would exceed
 100% neg modulation. I saw no signs of it on the scope or mod monitor,
 but it showed up on the spectrum analyzer.
 
Don't believe the type of diodes used would have any significant effect on 
this.   Splatter is generated in the PA tank circuit when plate voltage is 
suddenly cut off   on the audio negative half cycle.   Same splatter would be 
produced if the PA was being fed straight off the secondary of the mod 
transformer.

Dennis D. W7QHO
Glendale, CA