[AMRadio] BC-610-E and -H FS on QTH.com

[crawfish]

W9GOB near Chicago has a BC-610-E for $700. and an -H for $300. The -H needs a 
new T5.Pick up only. Ads #628858 and 628859.Usual disclaimers apply.

  Joe W4AAB
__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.

RE: [AMRadio] Re: ARRL Director explains IARU bandplan to the "ignorant"

[W6OM]

Thanks for your observations.  All they (The ARRL) has to do is respond to
my free offer of a Webinar to explain their position to the membership. So
far all I see is more condescending responses about how "WE" the members
need to be better educated.  I believe my fellow Amateurs who enjoy AM and
Vintage equipment are more intelligent than that.  

All the Best

Ron Weaver   W6OM

www.qsl.net/w6om


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Peter Markavage
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2007 9:07 PM
To: amradio@mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] Re: ARRL Director explains IARU bandplan to the
"ignorant"

I believe only the Directors and Vice-Directors are subject to a recall.
A proposal is required, along with at least 10% of the membership in that
Division signing and dating the petition. After the petition is
validated, a ballot is prepared and a vote must be taken of the
membership in that entire Division (Recall - Yes or No). The paid staff
isn't subject to the recall ruling.

Also, you said: "we "ignorant" members"
But, he(Director) really said: "very few ignorant people"

It doesn't sound like he was categorizing the entire AM community. But
then again, I. you, they, etc. can sometimes be ignorant to the true
meaning of someone's written intent especially if it's worded poorly.

Pete, wa2cwa

On Fri, 9 Nov 2007 18:32:47 -0800 "W6OM" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In an open letter to Mr. Sumner and his staff I invited them to 
> participate
> in a live "Webinar" at my expense to accept questions from the 
> membership
> and explain their activities in regards to this ongoing issue. I was 
> clear
> that it would be "no expense" to the ARRL and my engineering staff 
> would set
> up the portal and publish the login address to the membership.
> 
> To date Mr. Sumner nor anyone on his staff or directors have 
> accepted my
> invitation which raises and even more ominous question as to why 
> they will
> not explain this issue in an open forum.  Their condescending 
> rhetoric and
> contempt for we "ignorant" members is unacceptable.
> 
> According to the ARRL bylaws, we the members can a recall of the 
> entire team
> and replace them.
> 
> No court necessary, just use the rules and change the system 
> 
> All the Best
> 
> Ron Weaver   W6OM
> 
> www.qsl.net/w6om
__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.

[AMRadio] Re: More from Central Division Director

[SBJohnston]

Mr Isely -

Thank you for your message and apology.  I hope you are feeling better...

I must continue to disagree with your contention that IARU Region 2 bandplan 
does not apply to the United States, and is not important to us.   The first 
paragraph of the plan itself defines its purpose:  Member Societies (such as 
ARRL) are to work for its incorporation into authority (such as FCC) 
regulations.   And did not ARRL vote in support of that wording?   So I must 
conclude 
that the ARRL must support the eventual incorporation of this plan into the FCC 
rules.  So it is important, after all...

If it is really meaningless to U.S. amateurs, as you contend, then why do you 
support it, and hope that it will help us deal with new digital modes?   Why 
is ARRL spending thousands of dollars to attend the IARU meetings and 
participate in the drafting of these changes, if it is of no consequence to us?

ARRL represents our country in the IARU, so as a member of ARRL I thought I 
would have a voice in this process, or at least have been informed.  Clearly I 
was wrong.   It was done behind the scenes without consulting the membership 
in any way, and member efforts to to discuss the matter have been viewed as 
ignorant interference.  

As far as I can discern, the ARRL not only doesn't care about the members' 
views on this issue, the League officials are deliberately trying to avoid the 
discussion.  I've not seen any announcement of the IARU Region 2 bandplan 
changes in QST, on the ARRL website, the ARRL-Letter, or elsewhere.  I've not 
seen 
any mention of the role ARRL is taking in this policy process either.   

In your message you stated that we needn't expect a further attempt by the 
ARRL to get bandwidth controls into FCC rules for at least two years - not 
until 
the League has had a chance to "educate" the members and other amateurs on 
the matter.

Mr. Isley, I think you're a bit confused as to the role of the League, and 
that of a Director.  Have you read the Articles of Association and By-Laws?
Shouldn't the views of the members be your first priority in the making of 
policy, rather than the last?  Or do you really think that you and the League 
officials are to set the course and we just have to follow along, sometimes 
with a 
bit of "education" to set us straight?

Whatever happened to the slogan "Of, by, and for the amateur?"

Steve WD8DAS




**
 See what's new at http://www.aol.com
__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.

[AMRadio] More from Central Division Director

[SBJohnston]

I just received a further clarification and apology from the ARRL Central 
Division Director...

- - - - - - - - 

9 NOV 2007 - 1505 CDT

Steven B. Johnston, WD8DAS

Dear Mr. Johnston,

Thank you for writing to me twice about the recently approved IARU Region 2
Band Plan.  I have been slow in responding to your messages because of
coincidental bad timing.  Your two emails and a very few others (current
total of 24) on this issue, along with approximately 300 other unrelated
emails arrived during time period when I was planning for and recovering
from a minor outpatient surgical procedure the past two weeks.  I mention
this only to explain my slow response.

Also, when a given issue appears to be generating some controversy, I like
to wait until I have a reasonable reading on the issue and the emails 
I have received.  For routine ARRL items, I try to respond within 48 
hours, if I am
at home.  Now to get down to business...

I admit I should have used neutral, less inflammatory words in my 
last email posting to the entire Central Division and for this 
apologize to you.
However, I stand by the content of my message because:

1. The Region 2 IARU band plan is only advisory and has no effect on our
current U.S. Amateur Radio Service HF band plan.  The primary intent of
this document is to provide guidance to Region 2 amateur radio societies
in countries that have little or nothing in the way of a band plan.  How
hams in other parts of the world operate effect us and vice versa.  And
regardless of your or my personal views on band plans, we would have
chaos without band plan regulations.

2. There are hams in the U.S. (and other parts of the world) who fear any
real or perceived change in the status quo.  Regardless of my poor
description of these people, it does not change the fact that they exist
and that a very few of them are very quick to publicly take offense.
Those who fall into this category seldom accept all the facts about the
issue, or issues that have caused them to speak out.  At best, they 
cherry
pick the facts that support their viewpoint.  The phrase in my mind that
best describes this situation is, "Don't confuse me with the facts 
because
my mind is already made up."

The people I described in #2 certainly have the right to speak out 
and I was wrong in my choice of descriptive words in my last division 
email posting.

But I wish individuals who accept at face value what is being said by 
these people would do their own independent fact-checking.  I'm 
skeptical about a
lot of what is said and published about controversial issues, both 
within and outside of amateur radio, until I have done my own 
homework.  My wife says I
am too suspicious, but this characteristic contributed to my 
longevity as a military and then as a civilian professional 
pilot.  And in retirement, it's still my frame of reference.

This skepticism first had me opposing regulation by bandwidth when it 
gained serious consideration by the ARRL board.  It took me about a 
year to finally understand the rationale for it and to then make sure 
that no existing HF
users would be shut out in the proposal.

The concept of regulation by bandwidth was developed via informal FCC-ARRL
staff discussions over several years before I arrived on the ARRL board in
2001.  When (orthogonal?) modulation systems started showing up that 
legally allow wide-band signals in narrow (non-voice) HF sub-bands, 
work on a band- width regulation proposal was formalized by board 
resolution about 18 months after my arrival.  I believe Winlink 2000 
is the first operating mode to use this modulation system.

With the withdrawal of the ARRL's regulation by bandwidth proposal 
this past February, this situation will get worse.  The only real 
impediment to further Winlink 2000 use is the very high cost of the 
proprietary modem.  Eventually, this cost will come down.  I'm not 
opposed to any operating mode including Winlink 2000.  But I'm 
opposed to it's use in our narrow-band sub-bands.
Under our current Part 97 Regulations, it is legal there.

I seriously doubt if another regulation by bandwidth proposal will be put
forth by the ARRL board in the near future.  We failed to educate the 
U.S. amateur radio community about the history of and rationale for 
our first proposal, and to make sure nearly everyone understood how 
it would work.  The ARRL board of directors has to do it's homework 
if we want to have regulation by bandwidth accepted by the U.S. 
amateur radio community.

I support amateur radio HF regulation by bandwidth.  However, I will 
not support an effort to rush another proposal to the FCC.  I have no idea 
how
long this educational process will take.  But I currently believe 
anything shorter than two years from 1 JAN 2008 will fail.

- George R. Isely, W9GIG
   ARRL Central Div. Director
   St. Charles, IL

   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

- - - - - - - - 

Re: [AMRadio] DX100 B Cabinet

[SBJohnston]

Where the heck do all these radio equipment cabinets go?  -grin-  must be the 
same place 1/2 of  our socks disappear to...

Steve WD8DAS




**
 See what's new at http://www.aol.com
__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.

Re: [AMRadio] Re: ARRL Director explains IARU bandplan to the "ignorant"

[Peter Markavage]

I believe only the Directors and Vice-Directors are subject to a recall.
A proposal is required, along with at least 10% of the membership in that
Division signing and dating the petition. After the petition is
validated, a ballot is prepared and a vote must be taken of the
membership in that entire Division (Recall - Yes or No). The paid staff
isn't subject to the recall ruling.

Also, you said: "we "ignorant" members"
But, he(Director) really said: "very few ignorant people"

It doesn't sound like he was categorizing the entire AM community. But
then again, I. you, they, etc. can sometimes be ignorant to the true
meaning of someone's written intent especially if it's worded poorly.

Pete, wa2cwa

On Fri, 9 Nov 2007 18:32:47 -0800 "W6OM" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In an open letter to Mr. Sumner and his staff I invited them to 
> participate
> in a live "Webinar" at my expense to accept questions from the 
> membership
> and explain their activities in regards to this ongoing issue. I was 
> clear
> that it would be "no expense" to the ARRL and my engineering staff 
> would set
> up the portal and publish the login address to the membership.
> 
> To date Mr. Sumner nor anyone on his staff or directors have 
> accepted my
> invitation which raises and even more ominous question as to why 
> they will
> not explain this issue in an open forum.  Their condescending 
> rhetoric and
> contempt for we "ignorant" members is unacceptable.
> 
> According to the ARRL bylaws, we the members can a recall of the 
> entire team
> and replace them.
> 
> No court necessary, just use the rules and change the system 
> 
> All the Best
> 
> Ron Weaver   W6OM
> 
> www.qsl.net/w6om
__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.

[AMRadio] More from Central Division Director

[SBJohnston]

I just received a further clarification and apology from the ARRL Central 
Division Director...

- - - - - - - - 

9 NOV 2007 - 1505 CDT

Steven B. Johnston, WD8DAS

Dear Mr. Johnston,

Thank you for writing to me twice about the recently approved IARU Region 2
Band Plan.  I have been slow in responding to your messages because of
coincidental bad timing.  Your two emails and a very few others (current
total of 24) on this issue, along with approximately 300 other unrelated
emails arrived during time period when I was planning for and recovering
from a minor outpatient surgical procedure the past two weeks.  I mention
this only to explain my slow response.

Also, when a given issue appears to be generating some controversy, I like
to wait until I have a reasonable reading on the issue and the emails 
I have received.  For routine ARRL items, I try to respond within 48 
hours, if I am
at home.  Now to get down to business...

I admit I should have used neutral, less inflammatory words in my 
last email posting to the entire Central Division and for this 
apologize to you.
However, I stand by the content of my message because:

1. The Region 2 IARU band plan is only advisory and has no effect on our
current U.S. Amateur Radio Service HF band plan.  The primary intent of
this document is to provide guidance to Region 2 amateur radio societies
in countries that have little or nothing in the way of a band plan.  How
hams in other parts of the world operate effect us and vice versa.  And
regardless of your or my personal views on band plans, we would have
chaos without band plan regulations.

2. There are hams in the U.S. (and other parts of the world) who fear any
real or perceived change in the status quo.  Regardless of my poor
description of these people, it does not change the fact that they exist
and that a very few of them are very quick to publicly take offense.
Those who fall into this category seldom accept all the facts about the
issue, or issues that have caused them to speak out.  At best, they 
cherry
pick the facts that support their viewpoint.  The phrase in my mind that
best describes this situation is, "Don't confuse me with the facts 
because
my mind is already made up."

The people I described in #2 certainly have the right to speak out 
and I was wrong in my choice of descriptive words in my last division 
email posting.

But I wish individuals who accept at face value what is being said by 
these people would do their own independent fact-checking.  I'm 
skeptical about a
lot of what is said and published about controversial issues, both 
within and outside of amateur radio, until I have done my own 
homework.  My wife says I
am too suspicious, but this characteristic contributed to my 
longevity as a military and then as a civilian professional 
pilot.  And in retirement, it's still my frame of reference.

This skepticism first had me opposing regulation by bandwidth when it 
gained serious consideration by the ARRL board.  It took me about a 
year to finally understand the rationale for it and to then make sure 
that no existing HF
users would be shut out in the proposal.

The concept of regulation by bandwidth was developed via informal FCC-ARRL
staff discussions over several years before I arrived on the ARRL board in
2001.  When (orthogonal?) modulation systems started showing up that 
legally allow wide-band signals in narrow (non-voice) HF sub-bands, 
work on a band- width regulation proposal was formalized by board 
resolution about 18 months after my arrival.  I believe Winlink 2000 
is the first operating mode to use this modulation system.

With the withdrawal of the ARRL's regulation by bandwidth proposal 
this past February, this situation will get worse.  The only real 
impediment to further Winlink 2000 use is the very high cost of the 
proprietary modem.  Eventually, this cost will come down.  I'm not 
opposed to any operating mode including Winlink 2000.  But I'm 
opposed to it's use in our narrow-band sub-bands.
Under our current Part 97 Regulations, it is legal there.

I seriously doubt if another regulation by bandwidth proposal will be put
forth by the ARRL board in the near future.  We failed to educate the 
U.S. amateur radio community about the history of and rationale for 
our first proposal, and to make sure nearly everyone understood how 
it would work.  The ARRL board of directors has to do it's homework 
if we want to have regulation by bandwidth accepted by the U.S. 
amateur radio community.

I support amateur radio HF regulation by bandwidth.  However, I will 
not support an effort to rush another proposal to the FCC.  I have no idea 
how
long this educational process will take.  But I currently believe 
anything shorter than two years from 1 JAN 2008 will fail.

- George R. Isely, W9GIG
   ARRL Central Div. Director
   St. Charles, IL

   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

- - - - - - - - 

RE: [AMRadio] Re: ARRL Director explains IARU bandplan to the "ignorant"

[W6OM]

In an open letter to Mr. Sumner and his staff I invited them to participate
in a live "Webinar" at my expense to accept questions from the membership
and explain their activities in regards to this ongoing issue. I was clear
that it would be "no expense" to the ARRL and my engineering staff would set
up the portal and publish the login address to the membership.

To date Mr. Sumner nor anyone on his staff or directors have accepted my
invitation which raises and even more ominous question as to why they will
not explain this issue in an open forum.  Their condescending rhetoric and
contempt for we "ignorant" members is unacceptable.

According to the ARRL bylaws, we the members can a recall of the entire team
and replace them.

No court necessary, just use the rules and change the system 

All the Best

Ron Weaver   W6OM

www.qsl.net/w6om

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bob Bruhns
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2007 5:58 PM
To: Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] Re: ARRL Director explains IARU bandplan to the
"ignorant"

The word "ignorant" is usually, and in this context definitely, used as a
derisive term.  This letter and its mode of influence
delivery leaves quite a bit to be desired.

I agree that the ARRL negotiators should receive many requests to expand the
use of those little asterisks, to include 160 meters,
and more areas of 75, 40, etc.  If it doesn't matter, then there should be
no problem.

I'm just hoping that nobody takes anything to the Supreme Court again.  In
the past, that turned out to be less than helpful.

  Bacon, WA3WDR
__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.

[AMRadio] DX100 B Cabinet

[kk4tr]

WTB  DX 100 B Cabinet . I have several of these radio's and only one for all of 
them.  If any of you have one that is excess to your needs let me know and we 
can talk about price . Thanks

Joe K4TR
__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.

Re: [AMRadio] Re: ARRL Director explains IARU bandplan to the "ignorant"

[Peter Markavage]

I think he's got his own problems to deal with these days.
Pete, wa2cwa

On Fri, 9 Nov 2007 20:57:42 -0500 "Bob Bruhns" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
> 
> I'm just hoping that nobody takes anything to the Supreme Court 
> again.  In the past, that turned out to be less than helpful.
> 
>   Bacon, WA3WDR
__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.

Re: [AMRadio] Re: ARRL Director explains IARU bandplan to the "ignorant"

[Bob Bruhns]

The word "ignorant" is usually, and in this context definitely, used as a 
derisive term.  This letter and its mode of influence
delivery leaves quite a bit to be desired.

I agree that the ARRL negotiators should receive many requests to expand the 
use of those little asterisks, to include 160 meters,
and more areas of 75, 40, etc.  If it doesn't matter, then there should be no 
problem.

I'm just hoping that nobody takes anything to the Supreme Court again.  In the 
past, that turned out to be less than helpful.

  Bacon, WA3WDR
__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.

[AMRadio] WANTED: Shunt reactor for a new AM rig

[Ben Dover]

Looking for a halfway decent condition smoothing choke, 30 to 50 Henrys,
hopefully insulated for 4 KV or more, and capable of handling maybe 
300 MADC or more.

We're looking at a 4-400A PA stage, modulated by P-P 810s. Old School rig
all the way that'll be loafing along and not straining anything when it's
running the legal limit...   sort of a Globe King 500 the way it SHOULD
have been done originally!   ;o)

If you've got anything suitable, write me at [EMAIL PROTECTED] and we'll
talk turkey.


Thanks,

Mr. T., W9LBB

__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.

[AMRadio] FS: Sprague TO-6 Cap Tester: $100 Shipped

[Don Merz]

For Sale: The last and best of the Sprague TO-line of capacitor testers. This 
one looks great and works well. The cap value dial control must be a bit dirty 
because the eye tube jumps a bit when the dial is turned. But this does not 
affect the accurate operation of this unit at all. Bright eye tube. Great for 
reforming caps--just hook up the cap, and increase the voltage while watching 
the current meter, keeping it under 1ma until full working voltage is reached 
or exceeded. The leather handle is falling apart--otherwise this has great 
cosmetics. I think I have the manual. Test leads included. PayPal is best. But 
check or MO also works. $100 shipped to your door.
Thanks for looking.
73, Don Merz, N3RHT
__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.

[AMRadio] FS: 120 NOS Electrolytic Twist-Locak Cans: $150 Shipped

[Don Merz]

For Sale: One lot of approximately 120 NOS Electrolytic Capacitors. Most of 
these are multi-section, twist-lock cans in their original packaging. I have 
these in 2 boxes. They are tedious to list out in detail, but here is a list of 
54 of them in the one box. The other box is similar in content--there are very 
few low-voltage caps and no junk here. 

In the list below, the notation for each section is "MFD/WVDC" so "5/400" is 
5Mfd at 400WVDC.  $150 for all of them shipped to your door.
Thanks for looking.
73, Don Merz, N3RHT

Aerovox
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mallory
40/350, 10/350,100/25, 25/25
50/400, 25/400,100/50, 20/25
20/400, 5/400, 20/25, 20/25
15/350, 15/350, 15/300, 15/25
20/300, 150/150, 80/150
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
200/200, 150/350, 20/200, 50/200
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
35/300, 500/6
20/350, 4/350,100/25
60/350, 60/150, 30/150, 160/25
140/350, 10/450, 100/300, 20/300
15/350, 80/200, 40/200, 200/25
80/150, 80/150, 10/150, 100/10
40/500, 50/200
40/450, 100/150, 50/50
50/105, 150/25
3--50/150, 30/150
250/200, 200/200, 150/200
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
250/200, 200/200, 10/200
60/150, 40/150, 250/15
500/50, 500/50, 100/50
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
80/150, 40/150, 20/150
Sprague
20/475, 10/475, 100/50
40/450, 40/450, 100/200
120/300, 20/300
80/400, 40/400
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sprague Atom Tubular Axial Wire-Lead Caps
[EMAIL PROTECTED] atom wire lead
80/150, 30/150 atom wire lead
[EMAIL PROTECTED] atom wire lead
[EMAIL PROTECTED] atom wire lead
[EMAIL PROTECTED] atom wire lead
[EMAIL PROTECTED] atom wire lead
10/450, 10/450 atom wire lead
[EMAIL PROTECTED] atom wire lead
Zenith
150/350, 100/350, 100/50
2--300/175, 200/150, 200/150, 10/150
150/350, 100/350, 10/350, 100/50
100/350, 100/50, 100/35
80/400, 80/200, 200/25
80/400, 40/400, 100/50
10/450, 150/350, 100/350, 60/50
30/400, 500/50, 500/35
80/400, 80/200, 200/25
80/475, 18/475, 10/475
Illinois [EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.

[AMRadio] Re: ARRL Director explains IARU bandplan to the "ignorant"

[sbjohnston]

The "The Radio Handbook for Amateurs and Experimenters", 1936 edition, 
("West Coast Handbook") contains a paragraph that seems to speak to the 
difficulties we are having with the ARRL of late...  note the "loyalty" 
part.


- - - - - - - -
 Beginning with theory, only such matter is treated
as will be of practical use. No space is wasted on
matters of communication, traffic handling or to the
preaching of gospels of loyalty, to whomsoever the
loyalty is to be pledged, for the publishers of this
book are of another belief. They hold that it is the
solemn duty of a publisher to be loyal to his reader,
not for the reader to be loyal to the publisher.
- - - - - - - -

Interesting...

Steve WD8DAS



Email and AIM finally together. You've gotta check out free AOL Mail! - 
http://mail.aol.com

__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.

RE: [AMRadio] For Sale:

[Phil LaMarche]

I apologize, didn't look at the header and thought I was going direct.
Sorry!

Phil 


Philip LaMarche 
LaMarche Enterprises, Inc.
www.instantgourmetspices.com 
www.w9dvm.com 
800-395-7795 pin 02 
727-944-3226 
FAX 727-937-8834 
NASFT 30210 
W9DVM 
  


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of A.R.S. - WA5AM
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2007 9:09 AM
To: Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] For Sale:

Hey guys,

Please replies to for sale or wanted ads, etc. via private email.
There is no need to send these transactions to the entire email list.
See:
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html

It is perfectly fine to post your FOR SALE ads or WANTED ads to the list,
but please request that interested parties contact you privately.

Embed your email address in all emails regarding for sale, or wanted items
so that "reply-to" does not include the list.

Thanks,
Brian / wa5am



On Nov 9, 2007 7:53 AM, Phil LaMarche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi Barry,
>
> Please send a check for 30.00 to 4227 Lake Avenue, Palm Harbor, Fl 
> 34684 and I'll ship prepaid when received.  Give my your address please.
>
> Phil
>
>
> Philip LaMarche
> LaMarche Enterprises, Inc.
> www.instantgourmetspices.com
> www.w9dvm.com
> 800-395-7795 pin 02
> 727-944-3226
> FAX 727-937-8834
> NASFT 30210
> W9DVM
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Barrie Smith
> Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2007 9:47 PM
> To: Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service
>
> Subject: Re: [AMRadio] For Sale:
>
> Phil:
>
> I'll take the dummy load.
>
> Send your terms and conditions to:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> 73, Barrie, W7ALW
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Phil LaMarche" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "'Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service'"
> 
> Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2007 2:35 PM
> Subject: [AMRadio] For Sale:
>
>
> > I have some goodies excess to my needs.
> >
> > Shure 450 Mike Nice 20.00  Looks like a 444 but controlled magnetic 
> > with Hi/Lo impedance
> >
> > 50 ohm DC-4 Ghz 60 watt dummy load 30.00
> >RF Parts sells this for 150.00
> >
> > Micro Match Model 624N Wattmeter for handhelds 30.00
> >
> > All prices include packing and shipping.
> > .
> >
> > Philip LaMarche
> > LaMarche Enterprises, Inc.
> > www.instantgourmetspices.com 
> > www.w9dvm.com 
> > 800-395-7795 pin 02
> > 727-944-3226
> > FAX 727-937-8834
> > NASFT 30210
> > W9DVM
> >
> >
> >
> > __
> > Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net AMRadio mailing list List 
> > Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html List Home: 
> > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
> > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
> > Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net To unsubscribe, send an email 
> > to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word unsubscribe in the 
> > message body.
> >
> >
>
>
> __
> Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net AMRadio mailing list List 
> Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html List Home: 
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
> Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
> To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 
> the word unsubscribe in the message body.
>
> __
> Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net AMRadio mailing list List 
> Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html List Home: 
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
> Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
> To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 
> the word unsubscribe in the message body.
>



--
"Money is only temporary, radios are forever" - Jim Little aka "the old
dawg"/K5BAI

Harvard Minor Planet Station (MPC) H44/Cascade Mtn. Arkansas www.arksky.org
__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html List Home:
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the
word unsubscribe in the message body.

__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.

Re: [AMRadio] For Sale:

[A.R.S. - WA5AM]

Hey guys,

Please replies to for sale or wanted ads, etc. via private email.
There is no need to send these transactions to the entire email list.
See:
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html

It is perfectly fine to post your FOR SALE ads or WANTED ads to the
list, but please request that interested parties contact you
privately.

Embed your email address in all emails regarding for sale, or wanted
items so that "reply-to" does not include the list.

Thanks,
Brian / wa5am



On Nov 9, 2007 7:53 AM, Phil LaMarche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi Barry,
>
> Please send a check for 30.00 to 4227 Lake Avenue, Palm Harbor, Fl 34684 and
> I'll ship prepaid when received.  Give my your address please.
>
> Phil
>
>
> Philip LaMarche
> LaMarche Enterprises, Inc.
> www.instantgourmetspices.com
> www.w9dvm.com
> 800-395-7795 pin 02
> 727-944-3226
> FAX 727-937-8834
> NASFT 30210
> W9DVM
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Barrie Smith
> Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2007 9:47 PM
> To: Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service
>
> Subject: Re: [AMRadio] For Sale:
>
> Phil:
>
> I'll take the dummy load.
>
> Send your terms and conditions to:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> 73, Barrie, W7ALW
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Phil LaMarche" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "'Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service'"
> 
> Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2007 2:35 PM
> Subject: [AMRadio] For Sale:
>
>
> > I have some goodies excess to my needs.
> >
> > Shure 450 Mike Nice 20.00  Looks like a 444 but controlled magnetic with
> > Hi/Lo impedance
> >
> > 50 ohm DC-4 Ghz 60 watt dummy load 30.00
> >RF Parts sells this for 150.00
> >
> > Micro Match Model 624N Wattmeter for handhelds 30.00
> >
> > All prices include packing and shipping.
> > .
> >
> > Philip LaMarche
> > LaMarche Enterprises, Inc.
> > www.instantgourmetspices.com 
> > www.w9dvm.com 
> > 800-395-7795 pin 02
> > 727-944-3226
> > FAX 727-937-8834
> > NASFT 30210
> > W9DVM
> >
> >
> >
> > __
> > Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
> > AMRadio mailing list
> > List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
> > List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
> > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
> > Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
> > To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
> > the word unsubscribe in the message body.
> >
> >
>
>
> __
> Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
> AMRadio mailing list
> List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
> List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
> Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
> To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
> the word unsubscribe in the message body.
>
> __
> Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
> AMRadio mailing list
> List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
> List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
> Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
> To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
> the word unsubscribe in the message body.
>



-- 
"Money is only temporary, radios are forever" - Jim Little aka "the
old dawg"/K5BAI

Harvard Minor Planet Station (MPC) H44/Cascade Mtn. Arkansas
www.arksky.org
__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.

RE: [AMRadio] For Sale:

[Phil LaMarche]

Hi Barry,

Please send a check for 30.00 to 4227 Lake Avenue, Palm Harbor, Fl 34684 and
I'll ship prepaid when received.  Give my your address please.

Phil 


Philip LaMarche 
LaMarche Enterprises, Inc.
www.instantgourmetspices.com 
www.w9dvm.com 
800-395-7795 pin 02 
727-944-3226 
FAX 727-937-8834 
NASFT 30210 
W9DVM 
  


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Barrie Smith
Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2007 9:47 PM
To: Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] For Sale:

Phil:

I'll take the dummy load.

Send your terms and conditions to:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

73, Barrie, W7ALW

- Original Message -
From: "Phil LaMarche" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service'" 

Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2007 2:35 PM
Subject: [AMRadio] For Sale:


> I have some goodies excess to my needs.
>
> Shure 450 Mike Nice 20.00  Looks like a 444 but controlled magnetic with
> Hi/Lo impedance
>
> 50 ohm DC-4 Ghz 60 watt dummy load 30.00
>RF Parts sells this for 150.00
>
> Micro Match Model 624N Wattmeter for handhelds 30.00
>
> All prices include packing and shipping.
> .
>
> Philip LaMarche
> LaMarche Enterprises, Inc.
> www.instantgourmetspices.com 
> www.w9dvm.com 
> 800-395-7795 pin 02
> 727-944-3226
> FAX 727-937-8834
> NASFT 30210
> W9DVM
>
>
>
> __
> Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
> AMRadio mailing list
> List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
> List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
> Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
> To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
> the word unsubscribe in the message body.
>
> 


__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.

__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.