[AMRadio] RE: MODULATION POWER REQUIRED

2008-02-15 Thread D. Chester
Most of us stay somewhere within the ballpark of the so-called legal 
limit, and worrying about an occasional voice peak that might jump a little 
over, every now and again for a milliseconds or two during the course of an 
entire old-buzzard transmission, is MUCH ADO ABOUT NOTHING.  Is everyone 
that picky and consientious in regard to exceeding the posted speed limit 
when we drive, something that can actually put our own or someone else's 
life in danger?


We need to be more concerned about overmodulation, flat-topping and other 
improper conditions that generate spurious distortion products and do actual 
harm on the bands by causing unnecessary splatter and interference beyond 
the limits of our normal channel width.  (Not the same thing as the higher 
frequency audio components that occur naturally in our voice signals.)


Don k4kyv 


__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


Re: [AMRadio] RE: MODULATION POWER REQUIRED

2008-02-15 Thread Bob Macklin
I understand the modern RICEBOXES had speech processing the clips peaks and
filters the audio.

I had a tube speech processor back in the 60's. It was a classic
clipper/filter. It worked very well. For a lower power transmitter like the
smaller Heath DX units you can increase the voice level clipping and
filtering there by generating a higher modulation index without over
modulating. And if properly set you won't exceed the legal limits.

I am going to build another one for my current DX-60.

Bob Macklin
K5MYJ
Seattle, Wa,
Real Radios Glow in the Dark
- Original Message -
From: D. Chester [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: amradio@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Friday, February 15, 2008 1:46 AM
Subject: [AMRadio] RE: MODULATION POWER REQUIRED


 Most of us stay somewhere within the ballpark of the so-called legal
 limit, and worrying about an occasional voice peak that might jump a
little
 over, every now and again for a milliseconds or two during the course of
an
 entire old-buzzard transmission, is MUCH ADO ABOUT NOTHING.  Is everyone
 that picky and consientious in regard to exceeding the posted speed limit
 when we drive, something that can actually put our own or someone else's
 life in danger?

 We need to be more concerned about overmodulation, flat-topping and other
 improper conditions that generate spurious distortion products and do
actual
 harm on the bands by causing unnecessary splatter and interference beyond
 the limits of our normal channel width.  (Not the same thing as the higher
 frequency audio components that occur naturally in our voice signals.)

 Don k4kyv

 __
 Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
 AMRadio mailing list
 Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
 List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
 List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
 Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
 To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
 the word unsubscribe in the message body.


__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


Re: [AMRadio] Cap Substitution

2008-02-15 Thread jeremy-ca
What is the full AC secondary voltage of the tranny, 6 or 12V? He may have 
been attempting a doubler or tripler circuit and you got it with parts 
missing or miswired. If one diode was across the relay coil it is to prevent 
back EMF.  A 24V relay will usually pull in around 16-18V.


Carl
KM1H


- Original Message - 
From: Bob Macklin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service 
amradio@mailman.qth.net

Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2008 11:05 PM
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] Cap Substitution



With a single 1N4007 and a capacitor you will have a filtered 1/2wave
rectifier. It should charge to .9 time the 24V. That should be OK.

You could use 4 1N4007s in a bridge and not use the capacitor.

Bob Macklin
K5MYJ
Seattle, Wa,
Real Radios Glow in the Dark
- Original Message -
From: JT Croteau [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service
amradio@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2008 7:55 PM
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] Cap Substitution



Nope Bob, this guy definitely only had three 1N2069's in parallel -
two cathodes to one anode connected directly to a 6.3V tranny.

I'm not looking to put it back the way he had it, I'm putting it back
the way the schematic shows it with a 1N4007 instead of the 1N91 shown
(already have in my junk box) and a filter cap.

I'm just trying to understand how he was getting the 24V relay to work
with a 6.3V tranny.

- JT

On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 10:49 PM, Bob Macklin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Connecting diodes in parallel does not really effect the current like
  connecting batteries in parallel. The diode with he lowest forward 
 drop

will

  handle most of the current.

  But if you really had diodes connected with anode to cathode you don't

have

  a rectifier. That configuration is used in voltage limiter circuits.

  Got to Radio Shack and get some 1N4000 series diodes and use them for
  rectifiers. You only need one for a 1/2wave rectifier. Or 4 connected

in a

  bridge for a full wave rectifier.

  Are you sure the ones you have are not connected in a bridge circuit.

There

  would be 4 diodes. And 2 of them would have the cathodes connected

together.

  The other 2 would have the anodes connected together.


  Bob Macklin
  K5MYJ
  Seattle, Wa,
  Real Radios Glow in the Dark

 - Original Message -
  From: JT Croteau [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service
  amradio@mailman.qth.net

 Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2008 7:38 PM
  Subject: Re: [AMRadio] Cap Substitution




  As a follow up to all this talk..
  
   The person who did this mod, was rectifying the power to this 24V
   relay with three 1N2069's in parallel with 2 cathodes facing one
   direction and the other cathode facing the opposite direction. 
 These
   were wired to a dedicated 6.3V tranny he also added.  Any idea why 
 he

   would have done this rather than using the 24V tap on the filament
   transformer specially there for a 24V relay?  I measure roughly 26V

on

   this tap so I would assume the tranny is fine.
  
   --
   JT Croteau, N1ESE - Manchester, NH (FN42gx)
   Contest Manager, TARA Skirmish


  __
   Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
   AMRadio mailing list
   Searchable Archives:

http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/

   List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
   List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
   Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
   Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
   To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 with

   the word unsubscribe in the message body.
  

  __
  Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
  AMRadio mailing list
  Searchable Archives:

http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/

  List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
  List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
  Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
  Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
  To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
  the word unsubscribe in the message body.




--
JT Croteau, N1ESE - Manchester, NH (FN42gx)
Contest Manager, TARA Skirmish
__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.



__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
List Rules (must 

Re: [AMRadio] Cap Substitution

2008-02-15 Thread JT Croteau
Carl: 6.3VAC with three 1N2069's across the relay, 2 facing the
opposite direction from the other with 150 uF of capacitance.

- JT

On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 9:14 AM, jeremy-ca [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 What is the full AC secondary voltage of the tranny, 6 or 12V? He may have
  been attempting a doubler or tripler circuit and you got it with parts
  missing or miswired. If one diode was across the relay coil it is to prevent
  back EMF.  A 24V relay will usually pull in around 16-18V.

  Carl
  KM1H



  - Original Message -
  From: Bob Macklin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service
  amradio@mailman.qth.net


 Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2008 11:05 PM
  Subject: Re: [AMRadio] Cap Substitution


   With a single 1N4007 and a capacitor you will have a filtered 1/2wave
   rectifier. It should charge to .9 time the 24V. That should be OK.
  
   You could use 4 1N4007s in a bridge and not use the capacitor.
  
   Bob Macklin
   K5MYJ
   Seattle, Wa,
   Real Radios Glow in the Dark
   - Original Message -
   From: JT Croteau [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   To: Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service
   amradio@mailman.qth.net
   Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2008 7:55 PM
   Subject: Re: [AMRadio] Cap Substitution
  
  
   Nope Bob, this guy definitely only had three 1N2069's in parallel -
   two cathodes to one anode connected directly to a 6.3V tranny.
  
   I'm not looking to put it back the way he had it, I'm putting it back
   the way the schematic shows it with a 1N4007 instead of the 1N91 shown
   (already have in my junk box) and a filter cap.
  
   I'm just trying to understand how he was getting the 24V relay to work
   with a 6.3V tranny.
  
   - JT
  
   On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 10:49 PM, Bob Macklin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Connecting diodes in parallel does not really effect the current like
 connecting batteries in parallel. The diode with he lowest forward
drop
   will
 handle most of the current.
   
 But if you really had diodes connected with anode to cathode you don't
   have
 a rectifier. That configuration is used in voltage limiter circuits.
   
 Got to Radio Shack and get some 1N4000 series diodes and use them for
 rectifiers. You only need one for a 1/2wave rectifier. Or 4 connected
   in a
 bridge for a full wave rectifier.
   
 Are you sure the ones you have are not connected in a bridge circuit.
   There
 would be 4 diodes. And 2 of them would have the cathodes connected
   together.
 The other 2 would have the anodes connected together.
   
   
 Bob Macklin
 K5MYJ
 Seattle, Wa,
 Real Radios Glow in the Dark
   
- Original Message -
 From: JT Croteau [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service
 amradio@mailman.qth.net
   
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2008 7:38 PM
 Subject: Re: [AMRadio] Cap Substitution
   
   
   
   
 As a follow up to all this talk..
 
  The person who did this mod, was rectifying the power to this 24V
  relay with three 1N2069's in parallel with 2 cathodes facing one
  direction and the other cathode facing the opposite direction.
These
  were wired to a dedicated 6.3V tranny he also added.  Any idea why
he
  would have done this rather than using the 24V tap on the filament
  transformer specially there for a 24V relay?  I measure roughly 26V
   on
  this tap so I would assume the tranny is fine.
 
  --
  JT Croteau, N1ESE - Manchester, NH (FN42gx)
  Contest Manager, TARA Skirmish
   
   
 __
  Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
  AMRadio mailing list
  Searchable Archives:
   http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
  List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
  List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
  Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
  Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
  To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
  the word unsubscribe in the message body.
 
   
 __
 Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
 AMRadio mailing list
 Searchable Archives:
   http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
 List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
 List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
 Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
 To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
 the word unsubscribe in the message body.
   
  
  
  
   --
   JT Croteau, N1ESE - Manchester, NH (FN42gx)
   Contest Manager, TARA Skirmish
   __
   Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
   AMRadio mailing list
   Searchable Archives: 

Re: [AMRadio] Replacement Tubes

2008-02-15 Thread Geoff/W5OMR

Bob Macklin wrote:

How many people have left the skin on their fingers on a HOT 6L6?


Is it the Ranger I (1614's) or Ranger II (7027's) that have B+ on a pin, 
that when 6L6's are substituted, the B+ appears on the outside metal 
plate of the tube?


Ask me how I know... BZT

But, that wasn't nothing compared to the 'thrill' I got one night, while 
talking to John/WA5BXO on 75m one night when I got across roughly 1kVDC.


Mostly went through my right thumb...  but I held the 'securely 
grounded' D-104 in the left hand...


NOT fun!

Nowadays, I don't let -me-, let alone anyone else, get behind my rig 
while it's on the air.


--
Driving your AM Rig without a scope, 
is like driving your car at night, without headlights. (K4KYV)


--
73 = Best Regards,
-Geoff/W5OMR

__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


Re: [AMRadio] Replacement Tubes

2008-02-15 Thread Bob Macklin
How many people have left the skin on their fingers on a HOT 6L6?

Bob Macklin
K5MYJ
Seattle, Wa,
Real Radios Glow in the Dark
- Original Message -
From: jeremy-ca [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service
amradio@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Friday, February 15, 2008 6:20 AM
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] Replacement Tubes


 Your rig is spec'ed for 6L6's period. What follows after that designator
in
 US tubes is strictly the the bulb size and shape.
 You take your chances with any import tubes.

 The 5881 is a direct swap also.

 Carl
 KM1H



 - Original Message -
 From: JT Croteau [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service
 amradio@mailman.qth.net
 Sent: Friday, February 15, 2008 12:34 AM
 Subject: Re: [AMRadio] Replacement Tubes


  Would Sovetek 6L6WXT+ priced at $24 for a matched pair be a good
  replacement for 6L6GB's?  They are supposed to be modeled after the
  RCA 6L6GC blackplate, the Sovtek 6L6WXT+ features larger plate
  dimensions and improved grid structure for increased power handling
  capabilities. The 6L6WXT+ also features mica spacers with metal
  springs to eliminate tube rattle and microphonics.
 
  My rig is spec'd for 6L6GB's.
 
  Thanks
 
  --
  JT Croteau, N1ESE - Manchester, NH (FN42gx)
  Contest Manager, TARA Skirmish
  __
  Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
  AMRadio mailing list
  Searchable Archives:
http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
  List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
  List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
  Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
  Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
  To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
  the word unsubscribe in the message body.
 

 __
 Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
 AMRadio mailing list
 Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
 List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
 List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
 Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
 To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
 the word unsubscribe in the message body.


__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


Re: [AMRadio] Replacement Tubes

2008-02-15 Thread jeremy-ca
Your rig is spec'ed for 6L6's period. What follows after that designator in 
US tubes is strictly the the bulb size and shape.

You take your chances with any import tubes.

The 5881 is a direct swap also.

Carl
KM1H



- Original Message - 
From: JT Croteau [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service 
amradio@mailman.qth.net

Sent: Friday, February 15, 2008 12:34 AM
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] Replacement Tubes



Would Sovetek 6L6WXT+ priced at $24 for a matched pair be a good
replacement for 6L6GB's?  They are supposed to be modeled after the
RCA 6L6GC blackplate, the Sovtek 6L6WXT+ features larger plate
dimensions and improved grid structure for increased power handling
capabilities. The 6L6WXT+ also features mica spacers with metal
springs to eliminate tube rattle and microphonics.

My rig is spec'd for 6L6GB's.

Thanks

--
JT Croteau, N1ESE - Manchester, NH (FN42gx)
Contest Manager, TARA Skirmish
__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.



__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


Re: [AMRadio] Replacement Tubes

2008-02-15 Thread JT Croteau
Some 6L6 specs I found:

Plate Voltage 275V max., 19W dissipation
6L6GC Plate Voltage 500V max. 30W dissipation

-- 
JT Croteau, N1ESE - Manchester, NH (FN42gx)
Contest Manager, TARA Skirmish
__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


Re: [AMRadio] Cap Substitution

2008-02-15 Thread jeremy-ca
Start from scratch and build a tripler using the 1N4007's you mentioned and 
150-220MF caps. Put a diode across the coil after its finished. Also use a 
10-20K bleeder on the PS output, 2-3W is sufficient.


Carl
KM1H

- Original Message - 
From: JT Croteau [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service 
amradio@mailman.qth.net

Sent: Friday, February 15, 2008 9:51 AM
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] Cap Substitution



Carl: 6.3VAC with three 1N2069's across the relay, 2 facing the
opposite direction from the other with 150 uF of capacitance.

- JT

On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 9:14 AM, jeremy-ca [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is the full AC secondary voltage of the tranny, 6 or 12V? He may 
have

 been attempting a doubler or tripler circuit and you got it with parts
 missing or miswired. If one diode was across the relay coil it is to 
prevent

 back EMF.  A 24V relay will usually pull in around 16-18V.

 Carl
 KM1H



 - Original Message -
 From: Bob Macklin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service
 amradio@mailman.qth.net


Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2008 11:05 PM
 Subject: Re: [AMRadio] Cap Substitution


  With a single 1N4007 and a capacitor you will have a filtered 1/2wave
  rectifier. It should charge to .9 time the 24V. That should be OK.
 
  You could use 4 1N4007s in a bridge and not use the capacitor.
 
  Bob Macklin
  K5MYJ
  Seattle, Wa,
  Real Radios Glow in the Dark
  - Original Message -
  From: JT Croteau [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service
  amradio@mailman.qth.net
  Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2008 7:55 PM
  Subject: Re: [AMRadio] Cap Substitution
 
 
  Nope Bob, this guy definitely only had three 1N2069's in parallel -
  two cathodes to one anode connected directly to a 6.3V tranny.
 
  I'm not looking to put it back the way he had it, I'm putting it back
  the way the schematic shows it with a 1N4007 instead of the 1N91 
shown

  (already have in my junk box) and a filter cap.
 
  I'm just trying to understand how he was getting the 24V relay to 
work

  with a 6.3V tranny.
 
  - JT
 
  On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 10:49 PM, Bob Macklin [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:
   Connecting diodes in parallel does not really effect the current 
like

connecting batteries in parallel. The diode with he lowest forward
   drop
  will
handle most of the current.
  
But if you really had diodes connected with anode to cathode you 
don't

  have
a rectifier. That configuration is used in voltage limiter 
circuits.

  
Got to Radio Shack and get some 1N4000 series diodes and use them 
for
rectifiers. You only need one for a 1/2wave rectifier. Or 4 
connected

  in a
bridge for a full wave rectifier.
  
Are you sure the ones you have are not connected in a bridge 
circuit.

  There
would be 4 diodes. And 2 of them would have the cathodes connected
  together.
The other 2 would have the anodes connected together.
  
  
Bob Macklin
K5MYJ
Seattle, Wa,
Real Radios Glow in the Dark
  
   - Original Message -
From: JT Croteau [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service
amradio@mailman.qth.net
  
   Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2008 7:38 PM
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] Cap Substitution
  
  
  
  
As a follow up to all this talk..

 The person who did this mod, was rectifying the power to this 
24V

 relay with three 1N2069's in parallel with 2 cathodes facing one
 direction and the other cathode facing the opposite direction.
   These
 were wired to a dedicated 6.3V tranny he also added.  Any idea 
why

   he
 would have done this rather than using the 24V tap on the 
filament
 transformer specially there for a 24V relay?  I measure roughly 
26V

  on
 this tap so I would assume the tranny is fine.

 --
 JT Croteau, N1ESE - Manchester, NH (FN42gx)
 Contest Manager, TARA Skirmish
  
  
__
 Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
 AMRadio mailing list
 Searchable Archives:
  http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
 List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
 List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
 Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
 To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   with
 the word unsubscribe in the message body.

  
__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives:
  http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an 

[AMRadio] Re: MODULATION POWER REQUIRED

2008-02-15 Thread Jim Candela


Don,

   It seems that we have defined PEP power pretty well:

Well, PEP is defined as the AVERAGE power over at least one RF cycle at
 the most powerful point of the envelope.
 Now, since we do not speak with sine waves, the average power point of the 
envelope is going to be less than 0.636 (sine wave average) of the peak value. 
With many voices the average might be 0.2 to 0.5 of the peak. Doesn't this mean 
we can increase the peak power until the PEP as we have defined it hits 1500 
watts? It seems that many of us confuse peak power with Peak Envelope Power. 
The definitions are different. If I have this correct, then unprocessed voice 
peaks can be increased until the PEP legal limit is achieved, and the carrier 
level might be a lot more than 375 watts. Maybe the KW1, or Johnson Desk KW at 
Hi-Tap are still legal?

Regards,
Jim

__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


Re: [AMRadio] Cap Substitution

2008-02-15 Thread Bob Macklin
I was about to make a similar suggestion.

But if the transformer has a 24V secondary jut use a FW diode bridge.

Bob Macklin
K5MYJ
Seattle, Wa,
Real Radios Glow in the Dark
- Original Message -
From: jeremy-ca [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service
amradio@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Friday, February 15, 2008 7:03 AM
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] Cap Substitution


 Start from scratch and build a tripler using the 1N4007's you mentioned
and
 150-220MF caps. Put a diode across the coil after its finished. Also use a
 10-20K bleeder on the PS output, 2-3W is sufficient.

 Carl
 KM1H

 - Original Message -
 From: JT Croteau [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service
 amradio@mailman.qth.net
 Sent: Friday, February 15, 2008 9:51 AM
 Subject: Re: [AMRadio] Cap Substitution


  Carl: 6.3VAC with three 1N2069's across the relay, 2 facing the
  opposite direction from the other with 150 uF of capacitance.
 
  - JT
 
  On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 9:14 AM, jeremy-ca [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  What is the full AC secondary voltage of the tranny, 6 or 12V? He may
  have
   been attempting a doubler or tripler circuit and you got it with parts
   missing or miswired. If one diode was across the relay coil it is to
  prevent
   back EMF.  A 24V relay will usually pull in around 16-18V.
 
   Carl
   KM1H
 
 
 
   - Original Message -
   From: Bob Macklin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   To: Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service
   amradio@mailman.qth.net
 
 
  Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2008 11:05 PM
   Subject: Re: [AMRadio] Cap Substitution
 
 
With a single 1N4007 and a capacitor you will have a filtered
1/2wave
rectifier. It should charge to .9 time the 24V. That should be OK.
   
You could use 4 1N4007s in a bridge and not use the capacitor.
   
Bob Macklin
K5MYJ
Seattle, Wa,
Real Radios Glow in the Dark
- Original Message -
From: JT Croteau [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service
amradio@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2008 7:55 PM
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] Cap Substitution
   
   
Nope Bob, this guy definitely only had three 1N2069's in parallel -
two cathodes to one anode connected directly to a 6.3V tranny.
   
I'm not looking to put it back the way he had it, I'm putting it
back
the way the schematic shows it with a 1N4007 instead of the 1N91
  shown
(already have in my junk box) and a filter cap.
   
I'm just trying to understand how he was getting the 24V relay to
  work
with a 6.3V tranny.
   
- JT
   
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 10:49 PM, Bob Macklin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  wrote:
 Connecting diodes in parallel does not really effect the current
  like
  connecting batteries in parallel. The diode with he lowest
forward
 drop
will
  handle most of the current.

  But if you really had diodes connected with anode to cathode you
  don't
have
  a rectifier. That configuration is used in voltage limiter
  circuits.

  Got to Radio Shack and get some 1N4000 series diodes and use
them
  for
  rectifiers. You only need one for a 1/2wave rectifier. Or 4
  connected
in a
  bridge for a full wave rectifier.

  Are you sure the ones you have are not connected in a bridge
  circuit.
There
  would be 4 diodes. And 2 of them would have the cathodes
connected
together.
  The other 2 would have the anodes connected together.


  Bob Macklin
  K5MYJ
  Seattle, Wa,
  Real Radios Glow in the Dark

 - Original Message -
  From: JT Croteau [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service
  amradio@mailman.qth.net

 Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2008 7:38 PM
  Subject: Re: [AMRadio] Cap Substitution




  As a follow up to all this talk..
  
   The person who did this mod, was rectifying the power to this
  24V
   relay with three 1N2069's in parallel with 2 cathodes facing
one
   direction and the other cathode facing the opposite direction.
 These
   were wired to a dedicated 6.3V tranny he also added.  Any idea
  why
 he
   would have done this rather than using the 24V tap on the
  filament
   transformer specially there for a 24V relay?  I measure
roughly
  26V
on
   this tap so I would assume the tranny is fine.
  
   --
   JT Croteau, N1ESE - Manchester, NH (FN42gx)
   Contest Manager, TARA Skirmish


  __
   Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
   AMRadio mailing list
   Searchable Archives:
http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
   List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
   List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
   Help: 

Re: [AMRadio] Replacement Tubes

2008-02-15 Thread JT Croteau
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 10:09 AM, jeremy-ca [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 JT, just put the manual in the drawer and pay attention to what we are
  trying to get thru to you.

Karl, but according to Slab Bacon:

GBs and GCs carry a little higher dissapation and power handling
ratings and are designet to have a little more oomph at higher
operating voltages. And also more designed for audio than RF service.


The HV supply powering the plates on my 6L6's runs at 275W.  The
regular 6L6's have a max. rating of 275W, shouldn't I be using a tube
with a slightly higher rating such as a GB or G6.

I am trying to listen so please be patient with me, I am being told
different things by different people.

-- 
JT Croteau, N1ESE - Manchester, NH (FN42gx)
Contest Manager, TARA Skirmish
__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


Re: [AMRadio] Replacement Tubes

2008-02-15 Thread jeremy-ca

Tell me the difference then..

What the manual says only represents the version that was in production at 
the time.


6L6's are not like 6146's where some versions are not interchangable in RF 
circuits at least.


Carl
KM1H


- Original Message - 
From: JT Croteau [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service 
amradio@mailman.qth.net

Sent: Friday, February 15, 2008 9:54 AM
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] Replacement Tubes



On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 9:20 AM, jeremy-ca [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Your rig is spec'ed for 6L6's period.


Manual states otherwise, manual specs and schematic says 6L6GB's.

--
JT Croteau, N1ESE - Manchester, NH (FN42gx)
Contest Manager, TARA Skirmish
__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.



__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


Re: [AMRadio] Replacement Tubes

2008-02-15 Thread jeremy-ca
JT, just put the manual in the drawer and pay attention to what we are 
trying to get thru to you.


IN YOUR APPLICATION they will all work as long as they physically fit. 
PERIOD, end of subject.


Carl
KM1H


- Original Message - 
From: JT Croteau [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service 
amradio@mailman.qth.net

Sent: Friday, February 15, 2008 9:55 AM
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] Replacement Tubes



On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 9:20 AM, jeremy-ca [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Your rig is spec'ed for 6L6's period.


Manual states otherwise, manual specs and schematic says 6L6GB's.
According to the specs, voltages are different between 6L6, 6L6GB, and
6L6GC with the GC's having the higher voltages.

--
JT Croteau, N1ESE - Manchester, NH (FN42gx)
Contest Manager, TARA Skirmish
__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.



__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


Re: [AMRadio] Replacement Tubes

2008-02-15 Thread JT Croteau
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 9:20 AM, jeremy-ca [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Your rig is spec'ed for 6L6's period.

Manual states otherwise, manual specs and schematic says 6L6GB's.

-- 
JT Croteau, N1ESE - Manchester, NH (FN42gx)
Contest Manager, TARA Skirmish
__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


Speech Processing Re: [AMRadio] RE: MODULATION POWER REQUIRED

2008-02-15 Thread RJ Mattson
Bob
Let me know what u decide on. I'm running qrp AM and need every ounce to be 
intelligence.
I can't waste power to be hifi.
Was your ckt similar to the Eico modulator clipper?
I assume you will strictly use tooobes?  :-)

bob...w2ami  x  wn2ami  1962


- Original Message - 
From: Bob Macklin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] RE: MODULATION POWER REQUIRED


I understand the modern RICEBOXES had speech processing the clips peaks and
filters the audio.

I had a tube speech processor back in the 60's. It was a classic
clipper/filter. It worked very well. For a lower power transmitter like the
smaller Heath DX units you can increase the voice level clipping and
filtering there by generating a higher modulation index without over
modulating. And if properly set you won't exceed the legal limits.

I am going to build another one for my current DX-60.

Bob Macklin
K5MYJ

__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


Re: [AMRadio] RE: MODULATION POWER REQUIRED

2008-02-15 Thread rev. don

AMEN!!!
Rev. Don W4BWS
- Original Message - 
From: D. Chester [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: amradio@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Friday, February 15, 2008 3:46 AM
Subject: [AMRadio] RE: MODULATION POWER REQUIRED


Most of us stay somewhere within the ballpark of the so-called legal 
limit, and worrying about an occasional voice peak that might jump a 
little over, every now and again for a milliseconds or two during the 
course of an entire old-buzzard transmission, is MUCH ADO ABOUT NOTHING. 
Is everyone that picky and consientious in regard to exceeding the posted 
speed limit when we drive, something that can actually put our own or 
someone else's life in danger?


We need to be more concerned about overmodulation, flat-topping and other 
improper conditions that generate spurious distortion products and do 
actual harm on the bands by causing unnecessary splatter and interference 
beyond the limits of our normal channel width.  (Not the same thing as the 
higher frequency audio components that occur naturally in our voice 
signals.)


Don k4kyv




__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


Re: [AMRadio] Replacement Tubes

2008-02-15 Thread JT Croteau
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 9:20 AM, jeremy-ca [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Your rig is spec'ed for 6L6's period.

Manual states otherwise, manual specs and schematic says 6L6GB's.
According to the specs, voltages are different between 6L6, 6L6GB, and
6L6GC with the GC's having the higher voltages.

-- 
JT Croteau, N1ESE - Manchester, NH (FN42gx)
Contest Manager, TARA Skirmish
__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


[AMRadio] BROADCAST XMTR F?S

2008-02-15 Thread Bob Peters
Hi guys and gals ...Listing this for Mason K5YHX. He is letting his RCA
BT1R go along with the Audio Chain. This xmtr is 100% converted and on
the air..I have a picture of it . I also have some audio clips. He will
include his Audio Chain if you want it or sell it sepretly. Now the
kicker is that it is a pick up only in the Dallas Area or you make all
arrangements to ship it... Price is $1500.00 complete or $1300 for the
RCA and $250 for the audio chain. The Audio Chain is a Peavy mixer with
a Marshall condenser mic and a Marti compressor limiter. Again I am list
it for Mason. He can be reached at 214-350-1947 which is his cell phone
or cantact me for any pix or audio clip or go to my web site under Ham
Shacks and the pix and clip are there. That is www.w1pe.com

Thanks all...


Very Best 73's
Bob W1PE
The Voice of Mesquite
www.w1pe.com

Money is only temporary, but radios are forever - Jim Little aka the
old dog/K5BAI


__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


Re: Speech Processing Re: [AMRadio] RE: MODULATION POWER REQUIRED

2008-02-15 Thread Bob Macklin
I have not looked at the EICO modulator clipper. But I would expect it to be
the type of speech processor shown in the ARRL handbooks from the 50's and
60's.

I work with both tubes and solid state. Today this is the kind of thing that
would be done with DSP. Why? Remote control!

Look through some of the older ARRL Handbooks. These are easy to do in
either tube or transistor circuits.

In tube circuits it was common to use inductor/capacitor low pass filters.
In transistor designs it was common to use active filters.

Bob Macklin
K5MYJ
Seattle, Wa,
Real Radios Glow in the Dark
- Original Message -
From: RJ Mattson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service
amradio@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Friday, February 15, 2008 7:25 AM
Subject: Speech Processing Re: [AMRadio] RE: MODULATION POWER REQUIRED


 Bob
 Let me know what u decide on. I'm running qrp AM and need every ounce to
be
 intelligence.
 I can't waste power to be hifi.
 Was your ckt similar to the Eico modulator clipper?
 I assume you will strictly use tooobes?  :-)

 bob...w2ami  x  wn2ami  1962


 - Original Message -
 From: Bob Macklin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [AMRadio] RE: MODULATION POWER REQUIRED


 I understand the modern RICEBOXES had speech processing the clips peaks
and
 filters the audio.

 I had a tube speech processor back in the 60's. It was a classic
 clipper/filter. It worked very well. For a lower power transmitter like
the
 smaller Heath DX units you can increase the voice level clipping and
 filtering there by generating a higher modulation index without over
 modulating. And if properly set you won't exceed the legal limits.

 I am going to build another one for my current DX-60.

 Bob Macklin
 K5MYJ

 __
 Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
 AMRadio mailing list
 Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
 List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
 List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
 Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
 To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
 the word unsubscribe in the message body.


__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


Re: [AMRadio] Replacement Tubes

2008-02-15 Thread jeremy-ca

JT, for the last time there is no difference in your application.
And there is no such thing as a 6L6 with a 275V maximum rating. All except 
for the GC are rated at 350-375V depending upon which TUBE manual you read. 
Forget the audiophool crap on the Internet.


The GC has higher ratings and will interchange WITH ANY other 6L6 PER THE 
RCA TUBE MANUAL.


This is my LAST post on the subject.

Carl
KM1H

- Original Message - 
From: JT Croteau [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service 
amradio@mailman.qth.net

Sent: Friday, February 15, 2008 10:17 AM
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] Replacement Tubes



On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 10:09 AM, jeremy-ca [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

JT, just put the manual in the drawer and pay attention to what we are
 trying to get thru to you.


Karl, but according to Slab Bacon:

GBs and GCs carry a little higher dissapation and power handling
ratings and are designet to have a little more oomph at higher
operating voltages. And also more designed for audio than RF service.


The HV supply powering the plates on my 6L6's runs at 275W.  The
regular 6L6's have a max. rating of 275W, shouldn't I be using a tube
with a slightly higher rating such as a GB or G6.

I am trying to listen so please be patient with me, I am being told
different things by different people.

--
JT Croteau, N1ESE - Manchester, NH (FN42gx)
Contest Manager, TARA Skirmish
__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.



__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


[AMRadio] FW: [BOATANCHORS-TEMPE] BROADCAST XMTR F?S

2008-02-15 Thread Bob Peters
CELL PHONE CORRECTION IS 214-293-4050.. PLEASE DO NOT CALL THE OTHER ##


Subject: [BOATANCHORS-TEMPE] BROADCAST XMTR F?S

Hi guys and gals ...Listing this for Mason K5YHX. He is letting his RCA
BT1R go along with the Audio Chain. This xmtr is 100% converted and on
the air..I have a picture of it . I also have some audio clips. He will
include his Audio Chain if you want it or sell it sepretly. Now the
kicker is that it is a pick up only in the Dallas Area or you make all
arrangements to ship it... Price is $1500.00 complete or $1300 for the
RCA and $250 for the audio chain. The Audio Chain is a Peavy mixer with
a Marshall condenser mic and a Marti compressor limiter. Again I am list
it for Mason. He can be reached at 214-293-4050 which is his cell phone
or cantact me for any pix or audio clip or go to my web site under Ham
Shacks and the pix and clip are there. That is www.w1pe.com

Thanks all...


Very Best 73's
Bob W1PE
The Voice of Mesquite
www.w1pe.com

Money is only temporary, but radios are forever - Jim Little aka the
old dog/K5BAI

---
This list is a public service of the City of Tempe, Arizona
---

Subscription control -
http://www.tempe.gov/lists/control.aspx?list=BOATANCHORS
To post - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives - http://listserv.tempe.gov/archives/BOATANCHORS.html

__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


Re: [AMRadio] Cap Substitution

2008-02-15 Thread ne1s
- Original Message -
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] Cap Substitution
Date: Thu, February 14, 2008 23:05
From: Bob Macklin [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 With a single 1N4007 and a capacitor you will have a filtered 1/2wave
 rectifier. It should charge to .9 time the 24V. That should be OK.

 You could use 4 1N4007s in a bridge and not use the capacitor.

  Nope Bob, this guy definitely only had three 1N2069's in parallel -
  two cathodes to one anode connected directly to a 6.3V tranny.
 
  I'm not looking to put it back the way he had it, I'm putting it back
  the way the schematic shows it with a 1N4007 instead of the 1N91 shown
  (already have in my junk box) and a filter cap.
 
  I'm just trying to understand how he was getting the 24V relay to work
  with a 6.3V tranny.
 
  - JT
 

My guess is his intent was to make a voltage multiplier (doubler,
tripler...) circuit, and either miswired it, or something is getting lost
in the translation)

-Larry/NE1S
__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


[AMRadio] Re: [Boatanchors] FW: ham radio bad

2008-02-15 Thread Bob Macklin
Sorry I cut off the links!


We hams are outlaws!



 . . neighbors showup at your door.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UKd5hupXJVofeature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D_LrOAbtZjIfeature=related


- Original Message -
From: Bob Macklin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Halicrafters [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Boatanchors list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; AM Radio amradio@mailman.qth.net;
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 15, 2008 9:40 AM
Subject: [Boatanchors] FW: ham radio bad


I remember those days. I had a TVI detector in  my livingroom. HONEY! YOU
HAVE THE TV AGAIN!.

We had a CBer that gave us a lot of trouble. One night we pit a straight pin
through his coax and cut it off flush. That kept him off the air for a
while!

Bob Macklin
K5MYJ
Seattle, Wa,
Real Radios Glow in the Dark
Here's a couple hilarious film clips.  Looks like those real estate
covenants had their start decades ago.


___

__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


[AMRadio] Re: GB FW: ham radio bad

2008-02-15 Thread Ben Dover

 We  had  a  CBer that gave us a lot of trouble. One night we pit a
   straight  pin through his coax and cut it off flush. That kept him off
   the air for a while! 







   Yeah,  the  old Pin thru the Coax bit was a whole LOT of fun back in
   the  day...  but nowhere near as successful as the Cheap Walkie Talkie
   bit.

   You  found out what the victim's favorite CB channel was, and got hold
   of a  junker  walkie  talkie  (100  milliwatt) crystaled for it. You'd
   then glue down the transmit button.

   Next...   cut  the  leads to the speaker; in cheap, 1960s vintage HTs,
   the speaker doubled as a mike.

   Next...   you'd cut the positive battery wire, and put a CdS photocell
   in series with it.

   Finally, you took off the whip antenna, and replaced it with a similar
   length of hookup wire.

   Once  your  radio  was  suitably modified, you'd sneak up to his house
   late  at  night  and  plant the rig nearby, preferably within 100 feet
   of his antenna. Toss it in the bushes with the new wire antenna spread
   out, and the photocell able to see the sky.

   When   the   sun   came  up,  the  CdS  photocell's  resistance  would
   drop, raising the battery voltage to the radio and causing it to start
   transmitting  an  overpowering dead  carrier  on  the  dude's favorite
   channel. At the same time, the resistance of the conducting cell would
   also  limit  current  flow  to  the  radio,  making the batteries last
   longer!

   It usually took a week or more for the batteries to wear out, and even
   longer  than that for the smarter ones to go out and actually FIND the
   jammer!


   Mr. T., W9LBB
__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


[AMRadio] FW: ham radio bad

2008-02-15 Thread Bob Macklin
I remember those days. I had a TVI detector in  my livingroom. HONEY! YOU HAVE 
THE TV AGAIN!.

We had a CBer that gave us a lot of trouble. One night we pit a straight pin 
through his coax and cut it off flush. That kept him off the air for a while!

Bob Macklin
K5MYJ
Seattle, Wa,
Real Radios Glow in the Dark
Here's a couple hilarious film clips.  Looks like those real estate covenants 
had their start decades ago.

 
__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


[AMRadio] Re: FS BA Stuff And Great BA Books (Bounced message)

2008-02-15 Thread D. Chester

Don,

I'm interested in  this one if you haven't sold it yet:

Radiotron Designers Handbook Fourth Edition (the BIG one). Some fading and
shelf wear on cover and spine but basically very good or excellent
condition. This is probably the one absolute must-have book for hollow-state
aficionados. $69

I tried sending private e-mail to your address as soon as it appeared in the 
Digest, but it bounced as follows, so I am hoping you still have the book 
and will get this message via the Reflector.  I  have no clue why it didn't 
go through. Here is the error message:



This Message was undeliverable due to the following reason:

Your message was not delivered because the Domain Name System
(DNS) for the destination computer is not configured correctly.
The following is a list of reasons why this error message could
have been generated.  If you do not understand the explanations
listed here, please contact your system administrator for help.

- The host does not have any mail exchanger (MX) or
  address (A) records in the DNS.

- The host has valid MX records, but none of the mail
  exchangers listed have valid A records.

- There was a transient error with the DNS that caused
  one of the above to appear to be true.

You may want to try sending your message again to see if the
problem was only temporary.

DNS for host yahoo.com is mis-configured.

The following recipients did not receive this message:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Please reply to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
if you feel this message to be in error.


Don, k4kyv

__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


RE: [AMRadio] Re: FS BA Stuff And Great BA Books (Bounced message)

2008-02-15 Thread Ed Sieb
Hmmm...
I've sent a private email twice, but no response as yet.  Wondering if that
DNS problem is affecting my email too?
So, I will publicly waste bandwidth and post my requests publicly here.
Don, here's hoping  you get this OK.

-Original Message-
From: Ed Sieb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: February 15, 2008 12:43 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [AMRadio] FS BA Stuff And Great BA Books


Don,

If still available, I'd like to purchase the following books:


Marcus and levy, Profitable Radio Troubleshooting, 1956, hardback with wall
chart, Last chapter on starting a business. Otherwise a practical technical
gold mine. $22

Marcus and Levy, Practical Radio Servicing, 2nd ed., 1963, hardback with
dust jacket and 2 wall charts. Slightly dirty but excellent. Killer text.
$24

H. J. Hicks, Principles and Practice of Radio Servicing, 1939, McGraw Hill
hardback in superb condition, 300+ pages. Before Marcus and Levy, there was
Hicks, with a dryer writing style, but more concrete examples. Marvelous
text. $29

Eimac Tube Catalog, 1952. this is the one with a 4-page, 8.5x11 loose leaf
flyer for each tube, with characteristics charts and detailed specs for each
tube. I believe this catalog is complete. It has the color summary charts,
several copies of the Eimac Pulse Tube Analysis Newsletter, plus flyers for
all the Eimac tubes you know and love. Very good or excellent. $34

 vy 73,

Ed, VA3ES

__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


Re: [AMRadio] Replacement Tubes

2008-02-15 Thread Geoff/W5OMR

JT Croteau wrote:

On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 9:20 AM, jeremy-ca [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  

Your rig is spec'ed for 6L6's period.



Manual states otherwise, manual specs and schematic says 6L6GB's.
According to the specs, voltages are different between 6L6, 6L6GB, and
6L6GC with the GC's having the higher voltages.


It's always been my understanding that a 6L6Gx meant it was a 6L6 in a 
glass tube.


But, since I wasn't sure, I went looking, and did a little investigation.

You can check out the differences for yourself at
http://www.mif.pg.gda.pl/homepages/frank/sheets65.html


Then again, as someone else said, it seems much hoopla over the 
differences in 6L6's and 6V6's, and yet Zero comments on a Huff-n-Puff 
very stable VFO project.


I'm not caring enough to make this an issue. 

I did like my zero responses about my VFO project when we can go days comparing the 6V6 to the 6L6. 

Maybe I'm subscribing to the wrong reflector! 
;-()
  



--
Driving your AM Rig without a scope, 
is like driving your car at night, without headlights. (K4KYV)


--
73 = Best Regards,
-Geoff/W5OMR

__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


[AMRadio] Re: What is PEP?

2008-02-15 Thread D. Chester




Don,

  It seems that we have defined PEP power pretty well:


Well, PEP is defined as the AVERAGE power over at least one RF cycle at
the most powerful point of the envelope.
Now, since we do not speak with sine waves, the average power point of 
the envelope is going to be less than 0.636 (sine wave average) of the 
peak value. With many voices the average might be 0.2 to 0.5 of the peak. 
Doesn't this mean we can increase the peak power until the PEP as we have 
defined it hits 1500 watts? It seems that many of us confuse peak power 
with Peak Envelope Power. The definitions are different. If I have this 
correct, then unprocessed voice peaks can be increased until the PEP 
legal limit is achieved, and the carrier level might be a lot more than 
375 watts. Maybe the KW1, or Johnson Desk KW at Hi-Tap are still legal?


Now, this makes me REALLY feel for all the Hammy Hambone types out  there. 
It has ME confused!


BTW, another term for average power is mean power.  There is no such thing 
as rms power.  MEAN power is calculated, using Ohm's law, by multiplying 
RMS voltage by RMS current, as they work into a resistive load.


Rms voltage and current are the effective values of an alternating current 
and voltage, meaning the equivalent measurement of DC that would produce the 
same effect.  With a sine waveform, the rms value is .707 times the peak 
value.  But the mean power into a  load is also dependent on power factor, 
that is, whether the voltage and current are perfectly in phase, as they 
would be into a resistor.  In a.c.circuits with a reactive component, 
voltage and current may not be exactly in phase, so that a direct 
calculation using measured values of voltage and current may give a figure 
that is greater than the actual power.  That's why transformers are rated in 
volt-amperes, not watts.


We don't talk in p.e.p. but we don't talk in sine waves, either.  The 
loudness and interference-causing capability of a signal over the air is a 
function of mean, or average power radiated from the antenna, regardless of 
where occasional voice peaks may reach.  The average amplitude of a typical 
human voice waveform is about 7 to 10 dB below the amplitude of the voice 
peaks.  In other words, unless we use clipping or severe peak limiting, when 
our voice modulates a  transmitter 100% on peaks, the average percentage of 
modulation is more like 30%.  If you ever visit a properly running broadcast 
studio that still uses analogue, electro-mechanical VU meters, you will 
notice the readings stay well over to the left side of the scale most of the 
time to avoid hitting the red zone on peaks.


Don k4kyv



__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


Re: [AMRadio] Re: What is PEP?

2008-02-15 Thread Bob Macklin
In the OLD DAYS the rule was 1KW INPUT POWER. But that rule did not work
when SSB became the predominant phone mode.

I think I recall a period where the power limit was defined in terms of DC
INPUT POWER or PEAK ENVELOPE POWER.

In those day the FCC did have a competent FIELD division. And they did have
direction finder trucks. The ones I remember from about 1950 were BREAD
VANS. They did go out and check on hams that were causing problems. Those
were the early days of TV.

Bob Macklin
K5MYJ
Seattle, Wa,
Real Radios Glow in the Dark
- Original Message -
From: D. Chester [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: amradio@mailman.qth.net
Sent: Friday, February 15, 2008 12:30 PM
Subject: [AMRadio] Re: What is PEP?




  Don,
 
It seems that we have defined PEP power pretty well:
 
 Well, PEP is defined as the AVERAGE power over at least one RF cycle at
  the most powerful point of the envelope.
  Now, since we do not speak with sine waves, the average power point of
  the envelope is going to be less than 0.636 (sine wave average) of the
  peak value. With many voices the average might be 0.2 to 0.5 of the
peak.
  Doesn't this mean we can increase the peak power until the PEP as we
have
  defined it hits 1500 watts? It seems that many of us confuse peak power
  with Peak Envelope Power. The definitions are different. If I have this
  correct, then unprocessed voice peaks can be increased until the PEP
  legal limit is achieved, and the carrier level might be a lot more than
  375 watts. Maybe the KW1, or Johnson Desk KW at Hi-Tap are still legal?

 Now, this makes me REALLY feel for all the Hammy Hambone types out  there.
 It has ME confused!

 BTW, another term for average power is mean power.  There is no such
thing
 as rms power.  MEAN power is calculated, using Ohm's law, by multiplying
 RMS voltage by RMS current, as they work into a resistive load.

 Rms voltage and current are the effective values of an alternating
current
 and voltage, meaning the equivalent measurement of DC that would produce
the
 same effect.  With a sine waveform, the rms value is .707 times the peak
 value.  But the mean power into a  load is also dependent on power factor,
 that is, whether the voltage and current are perfectly in phase, as they
 would be into a resistor.  In a.c.circuits with a reactive component,
 voltage and current may not be exactly in phase, so that a direct
 calculation using measured values of voltage and current may give a figure
 that is greater than the actual power.  That's why transformers are rated
in
 volt-amperes, not watts.

 We don't talk in p.e.p. but we don't talk in sine waves, either.  The
 loudness and interference-causing capability of a signal over the air is a
 function of mean, or average power radiated from the antenna, regardless
of
 where occasional voice peaks may reach.  The average amplitude of a
typical
 human voice waveform is about 7 to 10 dB below the amplitude of the voice
 peaks.  In other words, unless we use clipping or severe peak limiting,
when
 our voice modulates a  transmitter 100% on peaks, the average percentage
of
 modulation is more like 30%.  If you ever visit a properly running
broadcast
 studio that still uses analogue, electro-mechanical VU meters, you will
 notice the readings stay well over to the left side of the scale most of
the
 time to avoid hitting the red zone on peaks.

 Don k4kyv



 __
 Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
 AMRadio mailing list
 Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
 List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
 List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
 Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
 Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
 To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
 the word unsubscribe in the message body.


__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


Re: [AMRadio] Re: GB FW: ham radio bad

2008-02-15 Thread Bob Macklin
Here's some good GLOWBUG stuff:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vBGIdf0VjQ4feature=related

Bob Macklin
K5MYJ
Seattle, Wa,
Real Radios Glow in the Dark
- Original Message -
From: Robert Nickels [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Ben Dover [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Discussion of AM Radio in the
Amateur Service amradio@mailman.qth.net
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 15, 2008 11:30 AM
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] Re: GB FW: ham radio bad


 Ben Dover wrote:
 You  found out what the victim's favorite CB channel was, and got
hold
 of a  junker  walkie  talkie  (100  milliwatt) crystaled for it.
You'd
 then glue down the transmit button.
 
 
 Aw, that's WAY too much work, Tom!   Just clip the speaker leads and let
 that broadband rushbox detector do the work of jamming ALL channels at
 the same time.  For best results, toss on roof and let it slide in the
 gutter near the antenna, attach 9ft of nearly invisible wire to make
 sure it was nice and strong.

 The nice thing is, those cheapie walkie-talkies came in pairs, and yep,
 the bozo fell for the same treatment twice!

 73, Bob W9RAN



  The Glowbugs E-mail List Website is: ***
 *** http://www.mines.uidaho.edu/~glowbugs/ **
 *** Send subscribe and unsubscribe requests to this address: 
 ** [EMAIL PROTECTED] **



__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


RE: [AMRadio] Re: MODULATION POWER REQUIRED

2008-02-15 Thread Gary Schafer
The average VOLTAGE of a sine wave is meaningless. You don't use it to
calculate average power. We are looking for the RMS value.

The RF signal is always composed of sine waves no matter if there is
modulation or no modulation. It also doesn't matter what the wave shape of
the modulating signal is either, tones, voice or whatever, the RF coming out
of the transmitter is still going to be sine waves. If it were not there
would be serious harmonics generated.

When we are talking about PEP and the average power over one or more
cycles we are talking about the RF cycles of the transmitter. Each part of
the audio envelope, even the narrowest peaks, are going to be composed of
(contain) many RF cycles in each of those peaks. Being that all of those RF
cycles are pure sine waves the rules of .707 times the peak voltage to find
RMS voltage will always apply. The amplitude of those RF cycles will vary
with the modulation envelope level. To measure PEP we pick a point that is
the highest part of the modulation envelope (peak) and there will be many
many pure RF sine waves contained there. We want to find the average power
in those sine waves at that particular time.

If you have a fast enough scope you can see exactly what is happening. Look
at a transmitter modulated with a tone and you will see the familiar
modulation envelope. Spread that way out by increasing the sweep speed and
turn up the brightness and you will see all the RF cycles under the
modulation envelope. Those are all pure sine waves and will always be.

A 3.8 MHz signal with 1000 cycle modulation on it will show a 1000 cycle
modulation envelope and contained in that envelope there will be 3800 RF
cycles. You can break that down further and say that half of that audio
envelope will be positive and half negative. So then the positive half will
have 1900 RF cycles. We could break that down further and find how many
cycles are near the peak if we wish. But the point is they are all RF cycles
and good sine waves on which power is measured.
If you are modulating the transmitter with speech the RF power still comes
out in perfect sine waves regardless of the modulating waveform.

If you were trying to measure audio power at the audio frequencies in this
manner then it would not be pure sine waves with speech.

73
Gary  K4FMX


 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:amradio-
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jim Candela
 Sent: Friday, February 15, 2008 9:54 AM
 To: amradio@mailman.qth.net
 Subject: [AMRadio] Re: MODULATION POWER REQUIRED
 
 
 
 Don,
 
It seems that we have defined PEP power pretty well:
 
 Well, PEP is defined as the AVERAGE power over at least one RF cycle at
  the most powerful point of the envelope.
  Now, since we do not speak with sine waves, the average power point of
 the envelope is going to be less than 0.636 (sine wave average) of the
 peak value. With many voices the average might be 0.2 to 0.5 of the peak.
 Doesn't this mean we can increase the peak power until the PEP as we have
 defined it hits 1500 watts? It seems that many of us confuse peak power
 with Peak Envelope Power. The definitions are different. If I have this
 correct, then unprocessed voice peaks can be increased until the PEP legal
 limit is achieved, and the carrier level might be a lot more than 375
 watts. Maybe the KW1, or Johnson Desk KW at Hi-Tap are still legal?
 
 Regards,
 Jim
 

__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


Re: [AMRadio] Re: GB FW: ham radio bad

2008-02-15 Thread Robert Nickels

Ben Dover wrote:

   You  found out what the victim's favorite CB channel was, and got hold
   of a  junker  walkie  talkie  (100  milliwatt) crystaled for it. You'd
   then glue down the transmit button.

  
Aw, that's WAY too much work, Tom!   Just clip the speaker leads and let 
that broadband rushbox detector do the work of jamming ALL channels at 
the same time.  For best results, toss on roof and let it slide in the 
gutter near the antenna, attach 9ft of nearly invisible wire to make 
sure it was nice and strong.


The nice thing is, those cheapie walkie-talkies came in pairs, and yep, 
the bozo fell for the same treatment twice!


73, Bob W9RAN

__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


Re: [AMRadio] Vintage Eico Model 730 Modulator

2008-02-15 Thread JT Croteau
On Feb 15, 2008 7:15 PM, Bob Macklin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Here is something that always seems to be in demand:
 360022942202

I was actually contemplating one of these a few weeks ago to run with
a homebrew CW rig but not now that I have my Elmac rig.

-- 
JT Croteau, N1ESE - Manchester, NH (FN42gx)
Contest Manager, TARA Skirmish
__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


Re: [AMRadio] Vintage Eico Model 730 Modulator

2008-02-15 Thread Joe Crawford
I have an original copy of the Eico 730 Modulator manual if anyone needs it. 
Please contact off-list!!

 Joe W4AAB
- Original Message - 
From: JT Croteau [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Discussion of AM Radio in the Amateur Service 
amradio@mailman.qth.net

Sent: Friday, February 15, 2008 6:18 PM
Subject: Re: [AMRadio] Vintage Eico Model 730 Modulator



On Feb 15, 2008 7:15 PM, Bob Macklin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Here is something that always seems to be in demand:
360022942202


I was actually contemplating one of these a few weeks ago to run with
a homebrew CW rig but not now that I have my Elmac rig.

--
JT Croteau, N1ESE - Manchester, NH (FN42gx)
Contest Manager, TARA Skirmish
__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.



__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


[AMRadio] FS Tube and Audio Literature, SCR-274N Manual, Handbooks

2008-02-15 Thread Don Merz
For Sale: Very Excellent BA, Audio and Tube Literature. Postage extra.
 
Collins Signal magazine, Winter, 1954. Introducing the 75A4. $20
 
GE Essential Tube Characteristics, 1967, mildew marks may clean off. $6
 
Sams Audio Amplifiers AA-1, 1948 (1951 printing), missing front cover, tape at 
spine, but otherwise excellent. $59
 
Sams Audio Amplifiers AA-2, 1950, missing front cover, tape at spine, but 
otherwise excellent. $59
 
Sams Audio Amplifiers AA-4, 1953 (1955 printing), missing front cover, tape at 
spine, but otherwise excellent. $59
 
Sams Audio Amplifiers AA-5, 1954 (1956 printing), missing front cover, tape at 
spine, but otherwise excellent. $59
 
Sams Audio Amplifiers AA-9, 1957, missing front cover, tape at spine, but 
otherwise excellent. $59
 
Radio Set SCR-274-N Handbook of Instructions, original Signal Corps manual with 
many fold-out diagrams, Order No. 1470-NY-41, manual dated 5-42. Covers beat-up 
and taped at spine. $89
 
KT66 Tube original 2-color, 8.5x11 inch flyer, with separate BW data sheet, 
both published by British Industries Corp. $10/both
 
Tung-Sol 5881 Color flyer 8.5 x 11, 2-sides. $5
 
El-Tronics Geiger-Muller Counter Tubes General technical Data, 4 pages. $5
 
Sylvania Glow Modulator Tubes, color flyer. $4
 
Set of Raytheon Special Purpose Tube Literature: Hearing-aid tubes, Magnetrons, 
Klystrons and TV Picture Tubes. Like new. Color. $17
 
Heintz and Kaufman, A Quick Reference To HK Electronic Tubes, 12 pages, cover 
splitting at fold, undated, maybe 1946? 1940? $16
 
Federal Telephone and Radio Corporation, Handbook of Tube Operation (3rd ed.), 
8.5 x 11, 70 pages, chapters like: Secondary Emission In Transmitting Tubes, 
Tube Protection Problems, Filament Heating Transients, Proper Care of Metal To 
Glass Seals, etc. Also included is a set of FTR Nomographs for Double-Tuned 
Band Pass Circuits. Excellent condition. Undated, maybe 1949-50. $44
 
Trade Wanted: Trade Hammarlund SP-600-JX original manual with schematic 
fold-outs in excellent or near-mint condition for a Hammarlund SP-400-SX 
original manual in good shape.
 
Stancor Transformers in The Williamson High Fidelity Amplifier, Stancor flyer 
dated 7-51, 11x17 folded to 8.5x11 with schematics and chassis layouts. $9
 
ARRL Handbook, 23rd ed., 1946, library hard bound in good shape. $14
 
Radio Handbook, 8th ed., 1941, Editors and Engineers, good. $16
 
Radio Handbook, 7th ed., 1940, Editors and Engineers, good but cover covering 
has a wrinkle in it. $16
 
Radio Handbook, 11th ed., 1947, Editors and Engineers, cover and overall 
excellent, but pages are faded at edges--otherwise this would be almost like 
new. $22
 
Thanks for looking.
73, Don Merz, N3RHT
__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


[AMRadio] Sources for surplus Dummy Loads

2008-02-15 Thread JT Croteau
I'm going to need a new dummy load and wondering if anyone knows of
any surplus houses with a good selection.  I seem to recall seeing a
site a few years ago with more dummies than you could ever sort
through but the name escapes me.  I'm looking for something in the
500W to 1KW range for DC - 30 MHz. without breaking the bank.  Is the
Cantenna still the most economical way to go?

Thanks

-- 
JT Croteau, N1ESE - Manchester, NH (FN42gx)
Contest Manager, TARA Skirmish
__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


[AMRadio] Re: Sources for surplus Dummy Loads

2008-02-15 Thread JT Croteau
Hmm, found some nice Bird Thermalines on eBay.. have to watch some of
these as some have real low starting bids without reserves.

-- 
JT Croteau, N1ESE - Manchester, NH (FN42gx)
Contest Manager, TARA Skirmish
__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.


[AMRadio] Dummy loads

2008-02-15 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello JT,

I purchased a Circa 1950 600watt load off epay a couple months ago for 
only $45.  Called Bird and the fellow spent about half an hour helping 
me ID the thing and sent me a manual.   I was impressed.  My Antenna 
tuner has 1KW watt meters in it so didn't need the meter.

Mike Harrison
KE0ZU
__
Our Main Website: http://www.amfone.net
AMRadio mailing list
Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/amradio@mailman.qth.net/
List Rules (must read!): http://w5ami.net/amradiofaq.html
List Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/amradio
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
Post: mailto:AMRadio@mailman.qth.net
To unsubscribe, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
the word unsubscribe in the message body.