[amsat-bb] emailing Amsat

2011-03-13 Thread zach hillerson
Does anyone know the email address to send correspondence to Amsat?  When I try 
using the form on their site it tells me their is an error..?



  
___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: emailing Amsat

2011-03-13 Thread Alan P. Biddle
Zach,

Call??

Send it to mar...@amsat.org  

Alan
WA4SCA

 

-Original Message-
From: amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org [mailto:amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org] On
Behalf Of zach hillerson
Sent: Sunday, March 13, 2011 8:22 AM
To: amsat-bb@amsat.org
Subject: [amsat-bb] emailing Amsat

Does anyone know the email address to send correspondence to Amsat?  When I
try using the form on their site it tells me their is an error..?



  
___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb



___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Is it 100% impossible to work a satellite below thehorizon?

2011-03-13 Thread na2x
On 3/12/2011 7:25 PM, Bill Dzurilla wrote:
 I was giving a presentation at our club meeting called Working 
 DX on the Satellites and afterwards someone had a good 
 question: is it at all possible that tropo, skip, or other 
 form of enhanced propagation can enable a contact via a 
 satellite below the horizon?

 It has never happened to me.  Has it ever happened?




My memory might be a little fuzzy here. There was an article in the AMSAT 
Journal back in the early 90's where G3IOR described his contact from the UK 
into VK/ZL using RS-12.  As others have mentioned in this thread, RS-12 using 
15 and 10 meters for uplink and downlink, below the horizon contacts were 
possible. I was able to work KH6 that way from New York. I also worked many 
European countries out of normal expected range.

I seriously doubt that satellites using 2 meters and higher frequencies for 
uplink/downlink would show much (if any) below the horizon capability.

Bob NA2X  
AMSAT LM #51 since 1974



  
___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Is it 100% impossible to work a satellite below thehorizon?

2011-03-13 Thread Gary Joe Mayfield
I have heard satellite paths extended by Aurora many times.  It has very
distinctive sound.

73,
Joe kk0sd

-Original Message-
From: amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org [mailto:amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org] On
Behalf Of n...@yahoo.com
Sent: Sunday, March 13, 2011 9:13 AM
To: amsat-bb@amsat.org
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: Is it 100% impossible to work a satellite below
thehorizon?

On 3/12/2011 7:25 PM, Bill Dzurilla wrote:
 I was giving a presentation at our club meeting called Working 
 DX on the Satellites and afterwards someone had a good 
 question: is it at all possible that tropo, skip, or other 
 form of enhanced propagation can enable a contact via a 
 satellite below the horizon?

 It has never happened to me.  Has it ever happened?




My memory might be a little fuzzy here. There was an article in the AMSAT
Journal back in the early 90's where G3IOR described his contact from the UK
into VK/ZL using RS-12.  As others have mentioned in this thread, RS-12
using 15 and 10 meters for uplink and downlink, below the horizon contacts
were possible. I was able to work KH6 that way from New York. I also worked
many European countries out of normal expected range.

I seriously doubt that satellites using 2 meters and higher frequencies for
uplink/downlink would show much (if any) below the horizon capability.

Bob NA2X  
AMSAT LM #51 since 1974



  
___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb

___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Is it 100% impossible to work a satellite below thehorizon?

2011-03-13 Thread K5OE


Drew,
I believe your reference was to N4ZC.  

There are some old (2002) posts on amsat-bb about his exploits:
http://www.amsat.org/amsat/archive/amsat-bb/200203/msg5.html
http://www.amsat.org/amsat/archive/amsat-bb/200202/msg00708.html
http://www.amsat.org/amsat/archive/amsat-bb/200202/msg00712.html

73,
Jerry, K5OE

On 3/12/2011 7:25 PM, Bill Dzurilla wrote:
 I was giving a presentation at our club meeting called Working DX on the 
Satellites and afterwards someone had a good question: is it at all possible 
that tropo, skip, or other form of enhanced propagation can enable a contact 
via a satellite below the horizon?

 It has never happened to me.  Has it ever happened?


It was relatively commonplace with RS-12 on Mode K, 15m up, 10m down. 
There was one guy in North Carolina I think that worked dxcc on 
RS-12/13. He was my first satellite QSO in 1992 or so, and was always 
on. I can't remember the call, but it was a 1x2 I think.

I imagine it would be at least possible on other birds and higher bands 
with strong tropo. Jerry, KK5YY told me about doing that on AO-27 or 
UO-14 from Alaska over the ocean. I've not experienced it though.

73, Drew KO4MA



___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: ISS Digipeaer over Japan

2011-03-13 Thread Bob Bruninga
Toyo san,

A few more ideas.  It is easy to manually estimate ISS pass times every day 
once you have heard a pass.  
See: http://aprs.org/MobileLEOtracking.html

1) ISS over Japan today is between about 0830 to 1830 JST.

2) When you hear the first pass, then you will have additional passes every 91 
minutes or so that day.

3) Each day a given GOOD pass is 23 minutes later.

4) But overall-long-term pattern is moving earlier every other day by 51 
minutes.

5) So in one week from now, the time window will be 0600 to 1600

6)  The pass pattern is about the same.  First 2 passes peak to the SE, then 
NW.  Then a low northern pass, then the last two passes are NE and then SW.

You can get EXACT pass times from http://heavens-above.com and select a city.  
However, this web page does not show the 1 or 2 low passes each day below 10 
degrees elevation. 

The problem with using the ISS digipeater is that the survivors in the 
devistated area do not know the frequency (145.825).  One way to solve this is 
to look for opportunity for someone to take a portable digipeater on an 
airplane over devistated area.  The new TH-D72 HT can digipeat now!  So have 
someone with a D72 catch a ride in an aircraft one day.

The D72 can BEACON on 144.64 a MESSAGE BULLETIN with info about the ISS 
digipeater and the time-window.  WHile it is aloft, it can also act as a 
digipeater on Japanese APRS channel 144.64 and can also capture a list of any 
APRS stations or mobiles on the air.

The short bulletins might say something like this:

TO: BLN1
MSG: ISS Digi on 145.825 between 0830 to 1830

TO: BLN2
MSG: Passes are 6 min long every 91 minutes

TO: BLN3
MSG: Every day, passes are 23 minutes later

TO: BLN4
MSG: Time window moves EARLIER 51m every 2 days

Keep bulletins to under 45 characters to make sure that every radio display can 
see the full bulletin (D7 screen limit).

But in small area like Japan, I think it might be easier just to try to drive 
APRS mobiles (acting as digipeaters) to nearby hill tops on 144.64 normal APRS 
Japanese Frequency and keep everyone on same frequency without confusion.

Bob, WB4APR

___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: AMSAT-BB Digest, Vol 6, Issue 151

2011-03-13 Thread Louis House, KD5GM
- Original Message - 
From: amsat-bb-requ...@amsat.org
To: amsat-bb@amsat.org
Sent: Saturday, March 12, 2011 10:56 PM
Subject: AMSAT-BB Digest, Vol 6, Issue 151
LOUIS, KD5GM in EL29kq

Bill,

I have on several occasions, while I am  listening to my own signals (in CW) 
on the SAT's  AO-07, FO-29 and VO-52,  when they are LOS to the North of the 
US and have copied the signals down  to -6 degrees on nights that there have 
Aurora alerts posted from several reflectors that I subscribe to.  Most of 
the time my Northern LOS for these birds is 1 to 2 degrees when there are no 
alerts.  Certainly no expert on this phenomenon, but I believe that the 
signals are enhanced beyond the normal range during the enhancement 
conditions.

73, Louis
CW, The original digital mode
AMSAT #37061: FIST #3606


 - Original Message - 
 From: Bill Dzurilla billdz@yahoo.com
 To: amsat-bb@amsat.org
 Sent: Sunday, March 13, 2011 12:25 AM
 Subject: [amsat-bb] Is it 100% impossible to work a satellite below
 thehorizon?


I was giving a presentation at our club meeting called Working DX on the
Satellites and afterwards someone had a good question: is it at all
possible that tropo, skip, or other form of enhanced propagation can 
enable
a contact via a satellite below the horizon?

 It has never happened to me.  Has it ever happened?

 73, Bill NZ5N



___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] 2M1EUB/P QRV SCOTLAND 20/3/11

2011-03-13 Thread paul robinson
Hi group opperations from scotland will begin this year 20/march ,depending on 
WX as there is plenty of snow about there!...ill be qrv for one week.
Ill be opperating from the van, so could be interesting as ive spent all winter 
seting it up ,hope to be able to be on the mountains rather than below 
them...fun starts from io87rj E.Scotland and arround that area...more info 
qrz.com .
 
Ill also be posting later in the year other interesting opperations from 
western islands of scotland,including sky,Harris and Lewis ...some rare islands 
to sat opps! dates will follow later in the year .73 de paul 2E1EUB /2M1EUB/P


  
___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Is it 100% impossible to work a satellite below thehorizon?

2011-03-13 Thread i8cvs
Hi Bill, NZ5N

When AO40 was alive and well I experimented many QSO's with several
stations in USA when the elevation of AO40 for me in JN70ES was already
-2 or -3 degrees belove my free horizon using InstantTrack for tracking

The AO40 downlinh was obviously in 2401.300 MHz but my uplink was in
70 cm or 23 cm and my negative elevation was monitored by those stations in
USA using all the same set of keplerian elements but with different tracking
programs and all gives the same results that the elevation for me was
negative.

To explain this uncommon below the horizon propagation anomaly I believe
that is my QTH location that play an important rule because my building is
located only 100 meters from the beach and the antennas are  50 meters above
the sea level and so it is possible that propably in presence  of
particular temperature and humidity and pressure conditions a duct similar
to a wave guide is developed over the sea so that my signals and the
satellite signals are traveling into the duct for many miles allowing the
QSO to be made with AO40 belove my horizon.

Another station i8KCL in my QTH wich home is many undred meters behind my
back and more high them me over the sea level he was never able to receive
AO40 with -2 or -3 degrees belove the horizon or made a two way QSO with the
above negative elevation because probably owing of his home altitude he was
not in condition to enter his signals into the suspected duct.

I do not remember the call letter of the many stations in USA experimenting
with me the above propagation anomaly but if some of them are reading this
AMSAT-BB please drop a line in responce.

Best 73 de

i8CVS Domenico

- Original Message -
From: Bill Dzurilla billdz@yahoo.com
To: amsat-bb@amsat.org
Sent: Sunday, March 13, 2011 1:25 AM
Subject: [amsat-bb] Is it 100% impossible to work a satellite below
thehorizon?


 I was giving a presentation at our club meeting called Working DX on the
Satellites and afterwards someone had a good question: is it at all possible
that tropo, skip, or other form of enhanced propagation can enable a contact
via a satellite below the horizon?

 It has never happened to me.  Has it ever happened?

 73, Bill NZ5N



 ___
 Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
 Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
 Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb

___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Fwd: Next HV Satcom Net date!

2011-03-13 Thread Stuart Balanger
*Hi all,
Am sorry that Lee didn't include my article in the ANS Weekly Bullitin (Week
of 3/13)
   73,.Stu (WA2BSS)
*
-- Forwarded message --
From: Stuart Balanger wa2...@gmail.com
Date: Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 6:06 AM
Subject: Next HV Satcom Net date!
To: ans-edi...@amsat.org


*The next HV satcomgroup net is Thursday March 17
(St. Patties day); at 8PM (EDT; UTC4) on the 146.97 MHz
Repeater with an Echolink node of N2EYH-L
 the Mt.Beacon ARC Hamfest Sunday April 10.
More info (Satcom): www.hvsatcom.org
More info (Mt.Beacon ARC) : www.wr2abb.org/home/
   73,.Stu (WA2BSS)
*
___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: ISS Digipeaer over Japan

2011-03-13 Thread Edward R. Cole
At 07:28 AM 3/13/2011, Bob Bruninga wrote:
Toyo san,

A few more ideas.  It is easy to manually estimate ISS pass times 
every day once you have heard a pass.
See: http://aprs.org/MobileLEOtracking.html

1) ISS over Japan today is between about 0830 to 1830 JST.

2) When you hear the first pass, then you will have additional 
passes every 91 minutes or so that day.

3) Each day a given GOOD pass is 23 minutes later.

4) But overall-long-term pattern is moving earlier every other day 
by 51 minutes.

5) So in one week from now, the time window will be 0600 to 1600

6)  The pass pattern is about the same.  First 2 passes peak to the 
SE, then NW.  Then a low northern pass, then the last two passes are 
NE and then SW.

You can get EXACT pass times from http://heavens-above.com and 
select a city.  However, this web page does not show the 1 or 2 low 
passes each day below 10 degrees elevation.

The problem with using the ISS digipeater is that the survivors in 
the devistated area do not know the frequency (145.825).  One way to 
solve this is to look for opportunity for someone to take a portable 
digipeater on an airplane over devistated area.  The new TH-D72 HT 
can digipeat now!  So have someone with a D72 catch a ride in an 
aircraft one day.

The D72 can BEACON on 144.64 a MESSAGE BULLETIN with info about the 
ISS digipeater and the time-window.  WHile it is aloft, it can also 
act as a digipeater on Japanese APRS channel 144.64 and can also 
capture a list of any APRS stations or mobiles on the air.

The short bulletins might say something like this:

TO: BLN1
MSG: ISS Digi on 145.825 between 0830 to 1830

TO: BLN2
MSG: Passes are 6 min long every 91 minutes

TO: BLN3
MSG: Every day, passes are 23 minutes later

TO: BLN4
MSG: Time window moves EARLIER 51m every 2 days

Keep bulletins to under 45 characters to make sure that every radio 
display can see the full bulletin (D7 screen limit).

All good suggestions except the last one.  I think the road system is 
devastated as all the relief work has been by air in the severest hit 
areas.  ~ Ed , KL7UW


But in small area like Japan, I think it might be easier just to try 
to drive APRS mobiles (acting as digipeaters) to nearby hill tops on 
144.64 normal APRS Japanese Frequency and keep everyone on same 
frequency without confusion.

Bob, WB4APR

___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


73, Ed - KL7UW, WD2XSH/45
==
BP40IQ   500 KHz - 10-GHz   www.kl7uw.com
EME: 144-1.4kw, 432-100w, 1296-testing*, 3400-winter?
DUBUS Magazine USA Rep dubus...@hotmail.com
==
___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Anyone using PacsatTools for Linux?

2011-03-13 Thread Bent, OZ6BL
Hi Eric

On 2011-03-13 00:28, Eric Christensen wrote:
 Anyone using PacsatTools for Linux?  I just installed the software but
 can't quite figure out what's going on with it.  Thanks.

We use PacsatTools at OZ7SAT. It works best if you also use PB/PG for 
Linux (http://fern.dk/?PB%2FPG)

We mostly use pbdir and occasionally pfhadd and phs but rarely the rest. 
The README file should tell the full story.

Best 73 de Bent/OZ6BL

___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Want to see the ND9M/MM QTH?

2011-03-13 Thread Ted
Wow !  not sure I would like to be running around on that heli deck with an
Arrow and my HT !! bet I'd walk right off the edge..Jim defiantly has Sea
Legs !!

Thanks for the pixs Patrick

-Original Message-
From: amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org [mailto:amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org] On
Behalf Of Patrick STODDARD (WD9EWK/VA7EWK)
Sent: Saturday, March 12, 2011 9:59 PM
To: amsat-bb@amsat.org
Subject: [amsat-bb] Want to see the ND9M/MM QTH?

Hi!

While I was just in California recently, I drove to Oceanside - 
along the coast north of San Diego, next to the huge Marine Corps
Base Camp Pendleton.  I was hoping to see the USNS Sgt. William
R. Button, the ship Jim ND9M has been on and operating from 
lately.  After some driving around, I was able to see his ship 
offshore on Friday morning before I left the San Diego area.  
I had seen photos of the ship on the Internet, so I had an idea
what to look for.  

After seeing an e-mail from ND9M on Friday, I considered myself
lucky to see his ship.  It had gone out to deeper water, in advance
of the tsunami from the recent earthquake in Japan.  It had come 
back to its anchorage by the time I went out there.  I was able 
to see the ship, and took several photos of it in the 1800-1900 
UTC (1000-1100 local time) hour.  I posted a couple of those
photos at:

http://www.qsl.net/wd9ewk/pics/nd9m/

The first photo was taken at the north end of Oceanside Harbor, 
very close to Camp Pendleton.  The second photo was taken about
1/2 mile (almost 1km) south of that location, on the beach.  The
helicopter deck on the rear of the ship was visible, which is 
where Jim has been operating from.  These two photos are at a
lower resolution than the original 7-megapixel photos, so they
don't take much time to download.  If anyone wants to see the 
originals, please e-mail me directly and I'll send them to you. 

More information about Jim's ship is available at (among other 
places):

http://www.msc.navy.mil/inventory/ships.asp?ship=21
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maritime_Prepositioning_ship#2nd_Lieutenant_Joh
n_P._Bobo_Class

73!





Patrick WD9EWK/VA7EWK
http://www.wd9ewk.net/


___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: FT-8800R new toy

2011-03-13 Thread Ari Kosonen
2011/3/13 Bob- W7LRD w7...@comcast.net

 Not wanting to reinvent the wheel.  Anyone using the FT-8800R mobile for
 satellites have any hints or sugestions, antennas etc.  Email direct-thanks.

Hi,

I am using FT-8900R (practically same as '8800 plus 6m and 10m) for working
satellites
from my car. My antenna is a Diamond NR770 dualband whip on the trunk lid of
my car.
While this setup is ok for usual mobile FM operation and APRS, it is
probably not optimal
for satellite ops. I have got better results on satellites with a dual band
mag whip on the roof the my car. Especially when the satellite is below ~60
degrees it can be reached easily when
I can hear it (thanks to 50 watts on the uplink). When the sat is higher
than that the whip
is not so good.

I have been working mainly on AO-51 and I have preprogrammed the
uplink/downlink
channel pairs with different doppler values so it is easy to follow the
sweet spot while
the sat first approaches (above the nominal frequency on downlink) and the
starts to fly
away (below the nominal freq). Programming goes easily with FTB8900 software
by
G4HFQ. As same channel pairs are available both on the left and right side
of the
radio, I usually transmit and listen on the left side of the radio and try
to listen my
own signal on downlink with the right side of the rig. With a single mobile
whip
the sensitivity of the downlink rx is usually not good enough during the
transmission.
This might be better with separate antennasa for uplink and downlink.

I have planned to use my Arrow yagi with FT-8900R. As the Arrow's diplexer
is rated only
max 10 watts, I bought 100w rated separate diplexer to be used with '8900
instead.
But I have not tried this combination yet.

73 de Ari OH3KAV / OH7KA
Tampere, Finland (grid: KP11)
___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: FT-8800R new toy

2011-03-13 Thread Gregg Wonderly
For sat ops mobile, you will get the most success out of a 1/4 wave antenna on 
a good ground plane.  It will give you a hemispherical emission pattern so that 
any direction in LOS is equally covered.

Gregg
W5GGW

Sent from my iPhone

On Mar 13, 2011, at 4:28 PM, Ari Kosonen ari.koso...@gmail.com wrote:

 2011/3/13 Bob- W7LRD w7...@comcast.net
 
 Not wanting to reinvent the wheel.  Anyone using the FT-8800R mobile for
 satellites have any hints or sugestions, antennas etc.  Email direct-thanks.
 
 Hi,
 
 I am using FT-8900R (practically same as '8800 plus 6m and 10m) for working
 satellites
 from my car. My antenna is a Diamond NR770 dualband whip on the trunk lid of
 my car.
 While this setup is ok for usual mobile FM operation and APRS, it is
 probably not optimal
 for satellite ops. I have got better results on satellites with a dual band
 mag whip on the roof the my car. Especially when the satellite is below ~60
 degrees it can be reached easily when
 I can hear it (thanks to 50 watts on the uplink). When the sat is higher
 than that the whip
 is not so good.
 
 I have been working mainly on AO-51 and I have preprogrammed the
 uplink/downlink
 channel pairs with different doppler values so it is easy to follow the
 sweet spot while
 the sat first approaches (above the nominal frequency on downlink) and the
 starts to fly
 away (below the nominal freq). Programming goes easily with FTB8900 software
 by
 G4HFQ. As same channel pairs are available both on the left and right side
 of the
 radio, I usually transmit and listen on the left side of the radio and try
 to listen my
 own signal on downlink with the right side of the rig. With a single mobile
 whip
 the sensitivity of the downlink rx is usually not good enough during the
 transmission.
 This might be better with separate antennasa for uplink and downlink.
 
 I have planned to use my Arrow yagi with FT-8900R. As the Arrow's diplexer
 is rated only
 max 10 watts, I bought 100w rated separate diplexer to be used with '8900
 instead.
 But I have not tried this combination yet.
 
 73 de Ari OH3KAV / OH7KA
 Tampere, Finland (grid: KP11)
 ___
 Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
 Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
 Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb

___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] VX-8x or TH-D72A, which is better for working satellites?

2011-03-13 Thread Eric Christensen
I'm thinking about purchasing a couple of new HTs for the XYL and I to
carry around but I'd like to make sure that whatever I get works well
with the birds.

Being that APRS is a must I narrowed down my choices to the Yaesu VX-8DR
and the Kenwood TH-D72A.  If I were just using the radio for terrestrial
purposes I'd probably go with the Yaesu as the addition of 6m and 1.25m
is a great feature for me.

If you have one of these units and have used it on the birds I'd love to
hear your feedback.

73,
Eric W4OTN

___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: ISS Digipeaer over Japan (TEMPn-N)

2011-03-13 Thread Bob Bruninga
Toyo san,

One last idea Every D710 APRS mobile is automatically a digipeater by 
default 1) by its own callsign, and 2) in support of TRACEn-N.  

So if someone is in a disaster or otherwise out of range of the normal WIDEn-N 
network, he can always send his packet via TRACE7-7 and he might get lucky and 
hit a nearby D710 or other APRS mobile.

Only the D710 comes with that enabled by defualt (so we can count on it always 
being there)..   But since 2004 we have requested ALL APRS mobiles that can 
digipeat (includes tens of thousands of D700's) to set UITRACE TEMP so that all 
mobiles support this path.  But not very many people have done this, so we do 
not have this reliable invivible backup network in many places.

To understand how it works, see www.aprs.org/TEMPn-N.html

Bob, WB4APR


 Original message 
Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2011 11:28:39 -0400 (EDT)
From: amsat-bb-boun...@amsat.org (on behalf of Bob Bruninga  
bruni...@usna.edu)
Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: ISS Digipeaer over Japan  
To: amsat-bb@amsat.org

Toyo san,

A few more ideas.  It is easy to manually estimate ISS pass times every day 
once you have heard a pass.
See: http://aprs.org/MobileLEOtracking.html

1) ISS over Japan today is between about 0830 to 1830 JST.

2) When you hear the first pass, then you will have additional passes every 91 
minutes or so that day.

3) Each day a given GOOD pass is 23 minutes later.

4) But overall-long-term pattern is moving earlier every other day by 51 
minutes.

5) So in one week from now, the time window will be 0600 to 1600

6)  The pass pattern is about the same.  First 2 passes peak to the SE, then 
NW.  Then a low northern pass, then the last two passes are NE and then SW.

You can get EXACT pass times from http://heavens-above.com and select a city.  
However, this web page does not show the 1 or 2 low passes each day below 10 
degrees elevation.

The problem with using the ISS digipeater is that the survivors in the 
devistated area do not know the frequency (145.825).  One way to solve this is 
to look for opportunity for someone to take a portable digipeater on an 
airplane over devistated area.  The new TH-D72 HT can digipeat now!  So have 
someone with a D72 catch a ride in an aircraft one day.

The D72 can BEACON on 144.64 a MESSAGE BULLETIN with info about the ISS 
digipeater and the time-window.  WHile it is aloft, it can also act as a 
digipeater on Japanese APRS channel 144.64 and can also capture a list of any 
APRS stations or mobiles on the air.

The short bulletins might say something like this:

TO: BLN1
MSG: ISS Digi on 145.825 between 0830 to 1830

TO: BLN2
MSG: Passes are 6 min long every 91 minutes

TO: BLN3
MSG: Every day, passes are 23 minutes later

TO: BLN4
MSG: Time window moves EARLIER 51m every 2 days

Keep bulletins to under 45 characters to make sure that every radio display 
can see the full bulletin (D7 screen limit).

But in small area like Japan, I think it might be easier just to try to drive 
APRS mobiles (acting as digipeaters) to nearby hill tops on 144.64 normal APRS 
Japanese Frequency and keep everyone on same frequency without confusion.

Bob, WB4APR

___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: VX-8x or TH-D72A, which is better for working satellites?

2011-03-13 Thread Andrew Glasbrenner
On 3/13/2011 8:29 PM, Eric Christensen wrote:

 Being that APRS is a must I narrowed down my choices to the Yaesu VX-8DR
 and the Kenwood TH-D72A.

D-72 is full duplex, and the VX-8 is not. Easy decision if it were mine 
to make. Full duplex makes FM birds so much easier, for both the op, and 
the other users.

73, Drew KO4MA
___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: VX-8x or TH-D72A, which is better for working satellites?

2011-03-13 Thread Eric Christensen
On Sun, 2011-03-13 at 21:28 -0400, Andrew Glasbrenner wrote:
 On 3/13/2011 8:29 PM, Eric Christensen wrote:
 
  Being that APRS is a must I narrowed down my choices to the Yaesu VX-8DR
  and the Kenwood TH-D72A.
 
 D-72 is full duplex, and the VX-8 is not. Easy decision if it were mine 
 to make. Full duplex makes FM birds so much easier, for both the op, and 
 the other users.
 
 73, Drew KO4MA

Ewww...  I didn't know the VX-8 wasn't full duplex.  Yeah, full duplex
is definitely a must.

Thanks Drew!

73,
Eric W4OTN

___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] ND9M/MM Op Sked: Tonight

2011-03-13 Thread Clary, James T, Civilian
I'll be QRV from DM11 for one more pass very shortly; this one is VO52
at 14/0229Z. It's a low pass here.

 

Then the next VO52 pass at 14/0402Z will be the only time I'll be on
from the next grid square south, DM10. After that, I'll be on FO29 from
DL19 at 14/0928Z.

 

I'll work up an op sked for tomorrow's grids once I check the navigation
charts later this evening.

 

73,

 

Jim, ND9M / VQ9JC

Grid DM11

___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Using Preamps In Shack

2011-03-13 Thread Paul Delaney - K6HR

Does anyone have their preamps in the shack as opposed to mast mount?
Any major disadvantage to having the preamps in the shack?
I just acquired two AR2 SPxxxVDG preamps and understand they are not
weatherproof and would need an enclosure to mount near antennas, which for
the time being is not possible. Any thoughts would be appreciated.

Paul Delaney - K6HR
paul.hamra...@verizon.net
http://k6hr.dyndns.org:8080 


___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: Using Preamps In Shack

2011-03-13 Thread Mark Spencer
Yes I have done this.  The feed line loss will essentially add to the noise 
figure of the pre amp, which is not desirable, but in my case with a 70 foot 
run of 9913F7 the arr gasfet  preamplifier was still worth using on 70 cm.

Sent from my iPad

On 2011-03-13, at 9:36 PM, Paul Delaney - K6HR paul.hamra...@verizon.net 
wrote:

 
 Does anyone have their preamps in the shack as opposed to mast mount?
 Any major disadvantage to having the preamps in the shack?
 I just acquired two AR2 SPxxxVDG preamps and understand they are not
 weatherproof and would need an enclosure to mount near antennas, which for
 the time being is not possible. Any thoughts would be appreciated.
 
 Paul Delaney - K6HR
 paul.hamra...@verizon.net
 http://k6hr.dyndns.org:8080 
 
 
 ___
 Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
 Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
 Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb

___
Sent via AMSAT-BB@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb