[amsat-bb] Re: AO-7 help

2009-09-26 Thread PE0SAT

On Sat, September 26, 2009 15:41, Randy wrote:

> Hi all ..

Hi Randy,

> And tuned the receiver and cannot find my signal ..

Here is an exmaple I used yesterdag

RX 145.952.500 USB
TX 432.143.950 LSB

Give it a try.

>
> Randy - N2CUA

73's Jan - PE0SAT

___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: AO-7 help

2009-09-26 Thread Joe
AMEN! 

Finally someone on this board, that also remembers what the big knob on 
the face of the radio is used for.

Maybe it's a age thing of when you got into the hobby? Like when I got 
into this hobby when Novices were only allowed crystal control.  It 
wasn't all that different from using the birds.

You listened to your transmit freq. to see if it was clear. and threw 
out a CQ.

THEN YOU TUNED THE VFO   and I mean a LOT  like up and down the whole 
band looking to hear your call.  almost everyone was not by choice 
operated split back then.  You could only afford so many crystals.  I 
remember many times CQing on my 1 crystal for 40 meters 7.109  and find 
someone calling me at 7.127  or whatever freq. they happened to own.  
You had to listen to not only your own transmit freq. in case a general 
or someone with a VFO called you on freq., or if nothing heard started 
tuning around looking for someone off freq.

It was not un common to call CQ  then tune for a minute or so looking. 
and everyone knew this so if you were answering a CQ but way off freq.  
you made a long call  like maybe up to a minute even to give the guy a 
chance to find you calling him.

It just drives me insane to hear people complaining about a little 
doppler,  turn the big knob  DUH!

Joe WB9SBD

Glen Zook wrote:

>I haven't used AO-7 for some time (need to revise my antennas to do so again). 
> But, back in the "goode olde dayes" (when the satellite first went into 
>orbit) we didn't have any problems with Doppler.  The accepted method was to 
>leave the transmit frequency alone and keep one hand on the receiver to 
>compensate for the frequency shift and send CW with the other hand (or hold 
>the microphone for SSB).  No one even thought of compensating for Doppler any 
>other way.
>
>Of course at the time everyone used a separate receiver and transmitter (no 
>transceivers) so you could keep the receiver active while transmitting.  There 
>were hundreds of QSOs made on each orbit and everyone had a "ball".
>
>Glen, K9STH
>AMSAT 239 / LM 463
>
>Website:  http://k9sth.com
>
>
>--- On Sat, 9/26/09, Andrew Glasbrenner  wrote:
>
>Those splits are only right when Doppler is zero. Other wise, you have around 
>+/-7 khz shift to deal with. It's really tough to work AO-7  half-duplex with 
>no Doppler tuning. REALLY tough. If you have a PC nearby, I'd recommend trying 
>to use SatPC32 to control the Doppler shift during the pass. CAT cables are 
>pretty cheap on Ebay, and really easy to set up with the 897.
> 
>Also, since you are using gain antennas AND are half duplex, you should make 
>sure you keep the power output low, like 5 watts or so, since you can't hear 
>if you our overdriving the uplink and making the satellite FM for everyone.
>
>
>  
>___
>Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
>Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
>Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>  
>
>
>
>
>No virus found in this incoming message.
>Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 
>Version: 8.5.416 / Virus Database: 270.13.113/2396 - Release Date: 09/26/09 
>05:51:00
>
>  
>
___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: AO-7 help

2009-09-26 Thread Joe
Not Hard
Just Skill,

Just like my other post about operating as a Novice in the days of only 
crystal control.  You did not operate full duplex on 40 meters, yet we 
operated contests on one transmit freq and listened to the whole band 
for someone calling us.

We all have just gotten incredibly lazy.

Joe WB9SBD

Andrew Glasbrenner wrote:

>Glen Zook wrote:
>  
>
>>I haven't used AO-7 for some time (need to revise my antennas to do so 
>>again).  But, back in the "goode olde dayes" (when the satellite first went 
>>into orbit) we didn't have any problems with Doppler.  The accepted method 
>>was to leave the transmit frequency alone and keep one hand on the receiver 
>>to compensate for the frequency shift and send CW with the other hand (or 
>>hold the microphone for SSB).  No one even thought of compensating for 
>>Doppler any other way.
>>
>>Of course at the time everyone used a separate receiver and transmitter (no 
>>transceivers) so you could keep the receiver active while transmitting.  
>>There were hundreds of QSOs made on each orbit and everyone had a "ball".
>>
>>Glen, K9STH
>>AMSAT 239 / LM 463
>>
>>Website:  http://k9sth.com
>>  
>>
>>
>The half-duplex part is what makes it hard. I ran from 1992 until about 
>2006 without computer tuning, although I followed the current AMSAT 
>protocol of tuning the higher of the two frequencies. You don't drift 
>into others as much that way. I've tried this all ways, and if you are 
>going to run half-duplex, life is much easier with CAT tuning.
>
>73, Drew KO4MA
>___
>Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
>Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
>Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
>  
>
>
>
>
>No virus found in this incoming message.
>Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 
>Version: 8.5.416 / Virus Database: 270.13.113/2396 - Release Date: 09/26/09 
>05:51:00
>
>  
>
___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: AO-7 help

2009-09-26 Thread Glen Zook
I haven't used AO-7 for some time (need to revise my antennas to do so again).  
But, back in the "goode olde dayes" (when the satellite first went into orbit) 
we didn't have any problems with Doppler.  The accepted method was to leave the 
transmit frequency alone and keep one hand on the receiver to compensate for 
the frequency shift and send CW with the other hand (or hold the microphone for 
SSB).  No one even thought of compensating for Doppler any other way.

Of course at the time everyone used a separate receiver and transmitter (no 
transceivers) so you could keep the receiver active while transmitting.  There 
were hundreds of QSOs made on each orbit and everyone had a "ball".

Glen, K9STH
AMSAT 239 / LM 463

Website:  http://k9sth.com


--- On Sat, 9/26/09, Andrew Glasbrenner  wrote:

Those splits are only right when Doppler is zero. Other wise, you have around 
+/-7 khz shift to deal with. It's really tough to work AO-7  half-duplex with 
no Doppler tuning. REALLY tough. If you have a PC nearby, I'd recommend trying 
to use SatPC32 to control the Doppler shift during the pass. CAT cables are 
pretty cheap on Ebay, and really easy to set up with the 897.
 
Also, since you are using gain antennas AND are half duplex, you should make 
sure you keep the power output low, like 5 watts or so, since you can't hear if 
you our overdriving the uplink and making the satellite FM for everyone.


  
___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: AO-7 help

2009-09-26 Thread Andrew Glasbrenner

>
> I use the translation table provided by AMSAT and the books..
> Have those programmed into the radio as splits..
>
> LSB 432.XXX up and USB 145.XXX down .
> ( mode B like this morning )
> I can hear PLENTY of QSO's.
> I cannot make contact with anyone ..
>
>   

Those splits are only right when Doppler is zero. Other wise, you have 
around +/-7 khz shift to deal with. It's really tough to work AO-7 
half-duplex with no Doppler tuning. REALLY tough. If you have a PC 
nearby, I'd recommend trying to use SatPC32 to control the Doppler shift 
during the pass. CAT cables are pretty cheap on Ebay, and really easy to 
set up with the 897.

Also, since you are using gain antennas AND are half duplex, you should 
make sure you keep the power output low, like 5 watts or so, since you 
can't hear if you our overdriving the uplink and making the satellite FM 
for everyone.

73, Drew KO4MA

___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: AO-7 help

2009-09-26 Thread Andrew Glasbrenner
Glen Zook wrote:
> I haven't used AO-7 for some time (need to revise my antennas to do so 
> again).  But, back in the "goode olde dayes" (when the satellite first went 
> into orbit) we didn't have any problems with Doppler.  The accepted method 
> was to leave the transmit frequency alone and keep one hand on the receiver 
> to compensate for the frequency shift and send CW with the other hand (or 
> hold the microphone for SSB).  No one even thought of compensating for 
> Doppler any other way.
>
> Of course at the time everyone used a separate receiver and transmitter (no 
> transceivers) so you could keep the receiver active while transmitting.  
> There were hundreds of QSOs made on each orbit and everyone had a "ball".
>
> Glen, K9STH
> AMSAT 239 / LM 463
>
> Website:  http://k9sth.com
>   
The half-duplex part is what makes it hard. I ran from 1992 until about 
2006 without computer tuning, although I followed the current AMSAT 
protocol of tuning the higher of the two frequencies. You don't drift 
into others as much that way. I've tried this all ways, and if you are 
going to run half-duplex, life is much easier with CAT tuning.

73, Drew KO4MA
___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb


[amsat-bb] Re: AO-7 help

2009-09-26 Thread Rocky Jones

Drew.  you and I obviously have our differences.  However you are one of the 
folks on this board (and on the BOD) who consistently helps others on the 
sats...and does it in a "bravo zulu" (well done) manner

Robert WB5MZO

> Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 10:30:06 -0400
> From: glasbren...@mindspring.com
> To: rswa...@twcny.rr.com
> CC: amsat-bb@amsat.org
> Subject: [amsat-bb] Re: AO-7 help
> 
> 
> >
> > I use the translation table provided by AMSAT and the books..
> > Have those programmed into the radio as splits..
> >
> > LSB 432.XXX up and USB 145.XXX down .
> > ( mode B like this morning )
> > I can hear PLENTY of QSO's.
> > I cannot make contact with anyone ..
> >
> >   
> 
> Those splits are only right when Doppler is zero. Other wise, you have 
> around +/-7 khz shift to deal with. It's really tough to work AO-7 
> half-duplex with no Doppler tuning. REALLY tough. If you have a PC 
> nearby, I'd recommend trying to use SatPC32 to control the Doppler shift 
> during the pass. CAT cables are pretty cheap on Ebay, and really easy to 
> set up with the 897.
> 
> Also, since you are using gain antennas AND are half duplex, you should 
> make sure you keep the power output low, like 5 watts or so, since you 
> can't hear if you our overdriving the uplink and making the satellite FM 
> for everyone.
> 
> 73, Drew KO4MA
> 
> ___
> Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
> Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
> Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb
  
_
Microsoft brings you a new way to search the web.  Try  Bing™ now
http://www.bing.com?form=MFEHPG&publ=WLHMTAG&crea=TEXT_MFEHPG_Core_tagline_try 
bing_1x1
___
Sent via amsat...@amsat.org. Opinions expressed are those of the author.
Not an AMSAT-NA member? Join now to support the amateur satellite program!
Subscription settings: http://amsat.org/mailman/listinfo/amsat-bb