[analog-help] How do I eliminate hierarchy in Referrer report
This should be a simple thing, but I can't figure it out from the docs. Currently my Referrer report comes out something like this: #pages URL 100 http://www.google.com/search 60 http://www.google.com/search?q=foo (indented) 40 http://www.google.com/search?q=bar (indented) 80 http://www.yahoo.com/search 80 http://www.yahoo.com/search?q=foo (indented) Is there any combination of directives that can get it to look flat like this: #pages URL 80 http://www.yahoo.com/search?q=foo 60 http://www.google.com/search?q=foo 40 http://www.google.com/search?q=bar This would provide better ordering for the exact pages browsers are arriving from. + | TO UNSUBSCRIBE from this list: |http://lists.meer.net/mailman/listinfo/analog-help | | Usenet version: news://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.analog.general | List archives: http://www.analog.cx/docs/mailing.html#listarchives +
Re: [analog-help] How do I eliminate hierarchy in Referrer report
Indentation indicates a subset. In your example, lines 2 and 3 are a subset of line 1. That is, line 1 has 100 page requests. Lines 2 and 3 are part of those 100 requests; they aren't additional requests. If lines 2 and 3 aren't indented, there would be no way to recognize that they are subsets. HTH, -- Duke Nick Altmann wrote: This should be a simple thing, but I can't figure it out from the docs. Currently my Referrer report comes out something like this: #pages URL 100 http://www.google.com/search 60 http://www.google.com/search?q=foo (indented) 40 http://www.google.com/search?q=bar (indented) 80 http://www.yahoo.com/search 80 http://www.yahoo.com/search?q=foo (indented) Is there any combination of directives that can get it to look flat like this: #pages URL 80 http://www.yahoo.com/search?q=foo 60 http://www.google.com/search?q=foo 40 http://www.google.com/search?q=bar This would provide better ordering for the exact pages browsers are arriving from. + | TO UNSUBSCRIBE from this list: |http://lists.meer.net/mailman/listinfo/analog-help | | Usenet version: news://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.analog.general | List archives: http://www.analog.cx/docs/mailing.html#listarchives + begin:vcard fn:Duke Hillard n:Hillard;Duke org:University of Louisiana at Lafayette;University Computing Support Services adr:;;P.O. Box 42770;Lafayette;LA;70504-2770;USA email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED] title:University Webmaster tel;work:337.482.5763 x-mozilla-html:TRUE url:http://www.louisiana.edu/ version:2.1 end:vcard + | TO UNSUBSCRIBE from this list: |http://lists.meer.net/mailman/listinfo/analog-help | | Usenet version: news://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.analog.general | List archives: http://www.analog.cx/docs/mailing.html#listarchives +
Re: [analog-help] How do I eliminate hierarchy in Referrer report
On Wednesday, January 12, 2005 6:36 PM [GMT], Nick Altmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If lines 2 and 3 aren't indented, there would be no way to recognize that they are subsets. Thanks for the reply. For my particular purpose, I'm more interested in the absolute order of referring pages than in any grouping of them. I'd also like to leave out (in my example) lines like http://www.google.com/search; which themselves don't refer any requests. http://www.google.com/search is the referring page. Is there any difference between a foo reference from Yahoo and a foo reference from google? It sounds like you should probably be looking at the Search report, rather than the referrer report. I don't know whether you can use aliases to modify the way referrers are parsed. Has anyone any experience with that? Aengus + | TO UNSUBSCRIBE from this list: |http://lists.meer.net/mailman/listinfo/analog-help | | Usenet version: news://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.analog.general | List archives: http://www.analog.cx/docs/mailing.html#listarchives +
RE: [analog-help] How do I eliminate hierarchy in Referrer report
Is there any difference between a foo reference from Yahoo and a foo reference from google? It sounds like you should probably be looking at the Search report, rather than the referrer report. Using yahoo and google may have made that example unecessarily confusing. I do use the search query report, but in this case I'm trying to list the exact referers in order of requests. I don't know whether you can use aliases to modify the way referrers are parsed. Has anyone any experience with that? I can't remember the order of aliasing Analog performs, but I'm going to try putting in something to strip out the ?'s so it doesn't recognize them as arguments. Maybe: REFALIAS *?* $1X$2 + | TO UNSUBSCRIBE from this list: |http://lists.meer.net/mailman/listinfo/analog-help | | Usenet version: news://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.web.analog.general | List archives: http://www.analog.cx/docs/mailing.html#listarchives +
