Re: [arch-general] Banshee needs an update
Justin Gx wrote: Alec Hussey wrote: Hello, I was glad when you guys (or Jan de Groot, whichever) decided to push the banshee alpha out to extra. However, it is missing many pretty essential features and it now far behind the releases put out by the banshee developers. I think that either we need to keep up or provide two seperate versions of the package until a final release of 1.0 is made. Thanks for writing this - I was going to write something along the same lines. the Banshee in the repos is much too basic. Where is your PKGBUILD up-to-date and with essential features, so that people interested would know what you are talking about?
Re: [arch-general] Banshee needs an update
On Fri, 18 Apr 2008 08:00:26 +0200 Xavier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Justin Gx wrote: Alec Hussey wrote: Hello, I was glad when you guys (or Jan de Groot, whichever) decided to push the banshee alpha out to extra. However, it is missing many pretty essential features and it now far behind the releases put out by the banshee developers. I think that either we need to keep up or provide two seperate versions of the package until a final release of 1.0 is made. Thanks for writing this - I was going to write something along the same lines. the Banshee in the repos is much too basic. Where is your PKGBUILD up-to-date and with essential features, so that people interested would know what you are talking about? This is a developer's work. If Jan requests his help, Justin or Alec can email him directly to his e-mail. And yours isn't the answer much appropriate, the best way would was 'use the out-of-date checkbox and not this mailing-list' /* Leave from your brain this 'patches welcome' mind. They only want * to help. */ -- JJDaNiMoTh - ArchLinux Trusted User pgpOxsntvjglr.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [arch-general] Banshee needs an update
On 4/18/08, JJDaNiMoTh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 18 Apr 2008 08:00:26 +0200 Xavier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Justin Gx wrote: Alec Hussey wrote: Hello, I was glad when you guys (or Jan de Groot, whichever) decided to push the banshee alpha out to extra. However, it is missing many pretty essential features and it now far behind the releases put out by the banshee developers. I think that either we need to keep up or provide two seperate versions of the package until a final release of 1.0 is made. Thanks for writing this - I was going to write something along the same lines. the Banshee in the repos is much too basic. Where is your PKGBUILD up-to-date and with essential features, so that people interested would know what you are talking about? This is a developer's work. If Jan requests his help, Justin or Alec can email him directly to his e-mail. And yours isn't the answer much appropriate, the best way would was 'use the out-of-date checkbox and not this mailing-list' /* Leave from your brain this 'patches welcome' mind. They only want * to help. */ -- JJDaNiMoTh - ArchLinux Trusted User Current banshee version is 0.98.1 and latest is 0.98.3. Even though i dont know i doubt the features added are that essential to cause this fuzz. What Xavier meant to say was since you think the Archlinux package is very basic you you propose what you compilation options you want to be added. Thus provide a PKGBUILD containing these. Chill. Greg
Re: [arch-general] Banshee needs an update
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 9:19 AM, Grigorios Bouzakis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Current banshee version is 0.98.1 and latest is 0.98.3. Even though i dont know i doubt the features added are that essential to cause this fuzz. What Xavier meant to say was since you think the Archlinux package is very basic you you propose what you compilation options you want to be added. Thus provide a PKGBUILD containing these. Chill. I'm glad someone understood what I meant, thanks.
Re: [arch-general] ClamAV should be update to 0.93
On Wed, 2008-04-16 at 18:38 +0200, Tino Reichardt wrote: Hello list, clamav should be updated. I filed a bug with the two CVE links for the two security issues fixed by clamav 0.93 here http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/10214 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [arch-general] Banshee needs an update
On Fri, 2008-04-18 at 10:19 +0300, Grigorios Bouzakis wrote: Current banshee version is 0.98.1 and latest is 0.98.3. Even though i dont know i doubt the features added are that essential to cause this fuzz. Oh, they are. Banshee had a complete rewrite and the 0.98.1 version is really really basic. 0.98.3 adds new stuff like shuffling, video support etc. I think I would call that major features.
Re: [arch-general] Banshee needs an update
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 7:49 PM, Timm Preetz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 2008-04-18 at 10:19 +0300, Grigorios Bouzakis wrote: Current banshee version is 0.98.1 and latest is 0.98.3. Even though i dont know i doubt the features added are that essential to cause this fuzz. Oh, they are. Banshee had a complete rewrite and the 0.98.1 version is really really basic. 0.98.3 adds new stuff like shuffling, video support etc. I think I would call that major features. 0.98.3 compiles fine with little version modification of PKGBUILD, and the patch isn't needed any longer
Re: [arch-general] 2008.04-RC Images are out
On Tue, 15 Apr 2008 02:04:37 -0500 Simo Leone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Crosspostingissocool http://www.archlinux.org/news/389/ Enjoy. I had some strange issues with kernel panics, oops and other fun, on my first try at installing using the 64bit ftp image. Sadly it only happened once and I was unable to reproduce it, so I won't make a bug report on it. Once the kernel opsed and hangd after udev events, and once it panicked during installation of pkg's. But no prob at next try. I tried about 8 more times to trigger it again, but no sucsess :/ Anyone else noticed anything similar?
