Re: CMDB 2.0 compatibility with ARS 6.x... (Corrected to Change 6.0)
David,
You probably have better insight in this area and hence accurate information.
Anyhow, all that I have heard/read over the last few months since BMCUW w.r.t.
CMDB 2.x and ITSM 6.x being supported have been indicative of the ITSM 6.x
patch being most likely a white paper (including some definition files) - hence
my point of reference.
Cheers,
--
Shyam
- Original Message -
From: Easter, David
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.crm.arsystem.general
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2007 10:58 AM
Subject: Re: CMDB 2.0 compatibility with ARS 6.x... (Corrected to Change 6.0)
**
> I would not hold my breath for the white paper
It's not just a white paper to make BMC applications compatible with CMDB
2.0x. It will also require the applications to be patched. While I'm not
involved in that area of development, the latest I've heard is that it's still
scheduled and has not been cancelled. My guess would be that something
official would be announced in late April or early May.
Thanks,
-David J. Easter
Sr. Product Manager, Service Management Business Unit
BMC Software, Inc.
The opinions, statements, and/or suggested courses of action expressed in
this E-mail do not necessarily reflect those of BMC Software, Inc. My
voluntary participation in this forum is not intended to convey a role as a
spokesperson, liaison or public relations representative for BMC Software, Inc.
--
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick Cook
Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2007 9:21 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: CMDB 2.0 compatibility with ARS 6.x... (Corrected to Change 6.0)
**
I think you're probably right, Shyam. It probably wouldn't be delayed this
long unless there were some strategic concerns at play. For my $0.02, there
are customers who have no intention of upgrading ITSM beyond v6 for the time
being, understand that there is no easy upgrade path, and yet they would like
the much improved CMDB CDM and enhanced functionality it offers for as long as
they are on ITSM 6. If support is such a major concern (and I am not at all
saying it shouldn't be), then perhaps the white paper needs to include caveats
that "Support on this is limited to.". Then let the customers decide if
they have the bandwidth and expertise available to fly pretty much solo on it,
or wait until they want to upgrade ITSM.
Of course, experienced customers know that the first time or two through a
new process like this, they're pretty much finding the bugs that QA did not
anyway, and helping support to know how to navigate the minefields, so maybe
they should release this in a limited fashion to a couple of high-profile
companies that are willing to trade the extra work in return for getting this
done early. Of course, by the time that process is finished, it may be a
completely moot point anyway, as ITSM 6 will be rolling toward the end of the
supported products line.
Rick
On 3/21/07, Shyam Attavar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Joe,
I am also eagerly awaiting the white paper that will support running ITSM
6.x on CMDB 2.x. However, I have heard that there are concerns about the
complexity from a support perspective and BMC is re-evaluating this
compatibility. Furthermore the upgrade path from such a configuration to
ITSM 7.x or higher.
I would not hold my breath for the white paper
Cheers,
--
Shyam
- Original Message -
From: "Joe DeSouza" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.crm.arsystem.general
To:
Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2007 4:40 PM
Subject: CMDB 2.0 compatibility with ARS 6.x... (Corrected to Change 6.0)
> Disregard my previous email... my question actually is is 6.0 Change
> running on a 7.x ARS platform compatible with CMDB 2.0?
>
> I know this might not be supported if you go strictly according to the
> compatibility matrix but am wondering if this combination could be made
> workable either directly or using some sort of a workaround.. Any good
> reasons besides the compatibility matrix why it would not work?
>
> Joe
>
__20060125___This posting was submitted with HTML in
it___ __20060125___This posting was submitted with HTML in
it___
___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:"Where the
Answers Are"
Re: CMDB 2.0 compatibility with ARS 6.x...
Joe, Even ITSM 6 (and cmdb 1.0) will not run on ARS 6.0, you will need at least version 3. -- Met vriendelijke groet / Kind regards Michiel Beijen __ MANSOLUTIONS Energieweg 60-62 3771 NA Barneveld The Netherlands Tel. +31-(0)612968592 Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet http://bsm.mansolutions.nl On 3/21/07, Rick Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ** BMC is supposed to be providing a loong-promised white paper telling how to map those two, but I don't think it's available yet. Until then, you can still do it, but you're on your own to do the mapping of the ITSM 6 forms to the CMDB 2.0 CDM, which is different than the 1.xCDM that it is currently mapped to. *Rick* -- *From:* Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Joe DeSouza *Sent:* Tuesday, March 20, 2007 7:29 PM *To:* arslist@ARSLIST.ORG *Subject:* CMDB 2.0 compatibility with ARS 6.x... ** Is anyone out there running CMDB 2.0 on ARS 6.0? I know this might not be supported if you go strictly according to the compatibility matrix but was wondering if this combination was workable.. If not anyone knows the reasons why? Joe -- Finding fabulous fares is fun. Let Yahoo! FareChase search your favorite travel sites<http://farechase.yahoo.com/promo-generic-14795097;_ylc=X3oDMTFtNW45amVpBF9TAzk3NDA3NTg5BF9zAzI3MTk0ODEEcG9zAzEEc2VjA21haWx0YWdsaW5lBHNsawNxMS0wNw-->to find flight and hotel bargains. __20060125___This posting was submitted with HTML in it___ __20060125___This posting was submitted with HTML in it___ ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:"Where the Answers Are"
Re: CMDB 2.0 compatibility with ARS 6.x... (Corrected to Change 6.0)
> I would not hold my breath for the white paper
It's not just a white paper to make BMC applications compatible with
CMDB 2.0x. It will also require the applications to be patched. While
I'm not involved in that area of development, the latest I've heard is
that it's still scheduled and has not been cancelled. My guess would be
that something official would be announced in late April or early May.
Thanks,
-David J. Easter
Sr. Product Manager, Service Management Business Unit
BMC Software, Inc.
The opinions, statements, and/or suggested courses of action expressed
in this E-mail do not necessarily reflect those of BMC Software, Inc.
My voluntary participation in this forum is not intended to convey a
role as a spokesperson, liaison or public relations representative for
BMC Software, Inc.
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick Cook
Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2007 9:21 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: CMDB 2.0 compatibility with ARS 6.x... (Corrected to Change
6.0)
**
I think you're probably right, Shyam. It probably wouldn't be delayed
this long unless there were some strategic concerns at play. For my
$0.02, there are customers who have no intention of upgrading ITSM
beyond v6 for the time being, understand that there is no easy upgrade
path, and yet they would like the much improved CMDB CDM and enhanced
functionality it offers for as long as they are on ITSM 6. If support
is such a major concern (and I am not at all saying it shouldn't be),
then perhaps the white paper needs to include caveats that "Support on
this is limited to.". Then let the customers decide if they have
the bandwidth and expertise available to fly pretty much solo on it, or
wait until they want to upgrade ITSM.
Of course, experienced customers know that the first time or two through
a new process like this, they're pretty much finding the bugs that QA
did not anyway, and helping support to know how to navigate the
minefields, so maybe they should release this in a limited fashion to a
couple of high-profile companies that are willing to trade the extra
work in return for getting this done early. Of course, by the time that
process is finished, it may be a completely moot point anyway, as ITSM 6
will be rolling toward the end of the supported products line.
Rick
On 3/21/07, Shyam Attavar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Joe,
I am also eagerly awaiting the white paper that will support
running ITSM
6.x on CMDB 2.x. However, I have heard that there are concerns
about the
complexity from a support perspective and BMC is re-evaluating
this
compatibility. Furthermore the upgrade path from such a
configuration to
ITSM 7.x or higher.
I would not hold my breath for the white paper
Cheers,
--
Shyam
- Original Message -
From: "Joe DeSouza" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.crm.arsystem.general
To:
Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2007 4:40 PM
Subject: CMDB 2.0 compatibility with ARS 6.x... (Corrected to
Change 6.0)
> Disregard my previous email... my question actually is is 6.0
Change
> running on a 7.x ARS platform compatible with CMDB 2.0?
>
> I know this might not be supported if you go strictly
according to the
> compatibility matrix but am wondering if this combination
could be made
> workable either directly or using some sort of a workaround..
Any good
> reasons besides the compatibility matrix why it would not
work?
>
> Joe
>
__20060125___This posting was submitted with HTML in
it___
___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:"Where the
Answers Are"
Re: CMDB 2.0 compatibility with ARS 6.x... (Corrected to Change 6.0)
I think you're probably right, Shyam. It probably wouldn't be delayed this long unless there were some strategic concerns at play. For my $0.02, there are customers who have no intention of upgrading ITSM beyond v6 for the time being, understand that there is no easy upgrade path, and yet they would like the much improved CMDB CDM and enhanced functionality it offers for as long as they are on ITSM 6. If support is such a major concern (and I am not at all saying it shouldn't be), then perhaps the white paper needs to include caveats that "Support on this is limited to.". Then let the customers decide if they have the bandwidth and expertise available to fly pretty much solo on it, or wait until they want to upgrade ITSM. Of course, experienced customers know that the first time or two through a new process like this, they're pretty much finding the bugs that QA did not anyway, and helping support to know how to navigate the minefields, so maybe they should release this in a limited fashion to a couple of high-profile companies that are willing to trade the extra work in return for getting this done early. Of course, by the time that process is finished, it may be a completely moot point anyway, as ITSM 6 will be rolling toward the end of the supported products line. Rick On 3/21/07, Shyam Attavar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Joe, I am also eagerly awaiting the white paper that will support running ITSM 6.x on CMDB 2.x. However, I have heard that there are concerns about the complexity from a support perspective and BMC is re-evaluating this compatibility. Furthermore the upgrade path from such a configuration to ITSM 7.x or higher. I would not hold my breath for the white paper Cheers, -- Shyam - Original Message - From: "Joe DeSouza" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Newsgroups: gmane.comp.crm.arsystem.general To: Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2007 4:40 PM Subject: CMDB 2.0 compatibility with ARS 6.x... (Corrected to Change 6.0) > Disregard my previous email... my question actually is is 6.0 Change > running on a 7.x ARS platform compatible with CMDB 2.0? > > I know this might not be supported if you go strictly according to the > compatibility matrix but am wondering if this combination could be made > workable either directly or using some sort of a workaround.. Any good > reasons besides the compatibility matrix why it would not work? > > Joe > ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:"Where the Answers Are"
Re: CMDB 2.0 compatibility with ARS 6.x... (Corrected to Change 6.0)
Joe, I am also eagerly awaiting the white paper that will support running ITSM 6.x on CMDB 2.x. However, I have heard that there are concerns about the complexity from a support perspective and BMC is re-evaluating this compatibility. Furthermore the upgrade path from such a configuration to ITSM 7.x or higher. I would not hold my breath for the white paper Cheers, -- Shyam - Original Message - From: "Joe DeSouza" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Newsgroups: gmane.comp.crm.arsystem.general To: Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2007 4:40 PM Subject: CMDB 2.0 compatibility with ARS 6.x... (Corrected to Change 6.0) Disregard my previous email... my question actually is is 6.0 Change running on a 7.x ARS platform compatible with CMDB 2.0? I know this might not be supported if you go strictly according to the compatibility matrix but am wondering if this combination could be made workable either directly or using some sort of a workaround.. Any good reasons besides the compatibility matrix why it would not work? Joe Expecting? Get great news right away with email Auto-Check. Try the Yahoo! Mail Beta. http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/mailbeta/newmail_tools.html ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:"Where the Answers Are"
Re: CMDB 2.0 compatibility with ARS 6.x... (Corrected to Change 6.0)
Thanks will look for it.. Thanks to all those who replied to this thread.. Joe - Original Message From: Rick Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2007 11:48:16 PM Subject: Re: CMDB 2.0 compatibility with ARS 6.x... (Corrected to Change 6.0) ** There is a .pdf with the entire CMDB 2.0 data model on it on the Support site. Rick From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joe DeSouza Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2007 11:41 PM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: CMDB 2.0 compatibility with ARS 6.x... (Corrected to Change 6.0) ** I certainly can understand those concerns.. I guess if we ever are to venture into this territory, I'll have to make damn sure I have DB backups at every possible change on the application that might impact the applications definitions or its meta data.. >From what I've been told, messing with the meta data with the CMDB application >is not reccommended at all, but that doesn't really mean it can't be done - >I'm pretty sure there are ways out there but they may be long and time >consuming.. That brings me to asking - Is there a whitepaper on CMDB's architecture and its meta data? Or am I on my own to uncover it? - Original Message From: Rick Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2007 10:54:56 PM Subject: Re: CMDB 2.0 compatibility with ARS 6.x... (Corrected to Change 6.0) ** For the brave and/or foolish, anything is possible. :) Rick From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joe DeSouza Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2007 9:26 PM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: CMDB 2.0 compatibility with ARS 6.x... (Corrected to Change 6.0) ** Rick, Thanks for your response.. Good to know it is possible :-) Joe - Original Message From: Rick Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2007 7:48:40 PM Subject: Re: CMDB 2.0 compatibility with ARS 6.x... (Corrected to Change 6.0) ** Joe, the version of ARS is irrelevant - CMDB 2.x needs to be manually mapped to ITSM 6. The white paper, if it ever comes out, will tell you how to map that, but without it, you're on your own. Rick From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joe DeSouza Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2007 7:40 PM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: CMDB 2.0 compatibility with ARS 6.x... (Corrected to Change 6.0) ** Disregard my previous email... my question actually is is 6.0 Change running on a 7.x ARS platform compatible with CMDB 2.0? I know this might not be supported if you go strictly according to the compatibility matrix but am wondering if this combination could be made workable either directly or using some sort of a workaround.. Any good reasons besides the compatibility matrix why it would not work? Joe Food fight? Enjoy some healthy debate in the Yahoo! Answers Food & Drink Q&A. http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=list&sid=396545367 ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:"Where the Answers Are"
Re: CMDB 2.0 compatibility with ARS 6.x... (Corrected to Change 6.0)
There is a .pdf with the entire CMDB 2.0 data model on it on the Support site. Rick _ From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joe DeSouza Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2007 11:41 PM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: CMDB 2.0 compatibility with ARS 6.x... (Corrected to Change 6.0) ** I certainly can understand those concerns.. I guess if we ever are to venture into this territory, I'll have to make damn sure I have DB backups at every possible change on the application that might impact the applications definitions or its meta data.. >From what I've been told, messing with the meta data with the CMDB application is not reccommended at all, but that doesn't really mean it can't be done - I'm pretty sure there are ways out there but they may be long and time consuming.. That brings me to asking - Is there a whitepaper on CMDB's architecture and its meta data? Or am I on my own to uncover it? - Original Message From: Rick Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2007 10:54:56 PM Subject: Re: CMDB 2.0 compatibility with ARS 6.x... (Corrected to Change 6.0) ** For the brave and/or foolish, anything is possible. :) Rick _ From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joe DeSouza Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2007 9:26 PM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: CMDB 2.0 compatibility with ARS 6.x... (Corrected to Change 6.0) ** Rick, Thanks for your response.. Good to know it is possible :-) Joe - Original Message From: Rick Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2007 7:48:40 PM Subject: Re: CMDB 2.0 compatibility with ARS 6.x... (Corrected to Change 6.0) ** Joe, the version of ARS is irrelevant - CMDB 2.x needs to be manually mapped to ITSM 6. The white paper, if it ever comes out, will tell you how to map that, but without it, you're on your own. Rick _ From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joe DeSouza Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2007 7:40 PM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: CMDB 2.0 compatibility with ARS 6.x... (Corrected to Change 6.0) ** Disregard my previous email... my question actually is is 6.0 Change running on a 7.x ARS platform compatible with CMDB 2.0? I know this might not be supported if you go strictly according to the compatibility matrix but am wondering if this combination could be made workable either directly or using some sort of a workaround.. Any good reasons besides the compatibility matrix why it would not work? Joe _ It's here! Your new message! Get new <http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=49938/*http://tools.search.yahoo.com/toolbar/fea tures/mail/> email alerts with the free Yahoo! <http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=49938/*http://tools.search.yahoo.com/toolbar/fea tures/mail/> Toolbar. __20060125___This posting was submitted with HTML in it___ ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:"Where the Answers Are"
Re: CMDB 2.0 compatibility with ARS 6.x... (Corrected to Change 6.0)
I certainly can understand those concerns.. I guess if we ever are to venture into this territory, I'll have to make damn sure I have DB backups at every possible change on the application that might impact the applications definitions or its meta data.. >From what I've been told, messing with the meta data with the CMDB application >is not reccommended at all, but that doesn't really mean it can't be done - >I'm pretty sure there are ways out there but they may be long and time >consuming.. That brings me to asking - Is there a whitepaper on CMDB's architecture and its meta data? Or am I on my own to uncover it? - Original Message From: Rick Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2007 10:54:56 PM Subject: Re: CMDB 2.0 compatibility with ARS 6.x... (Corrected to Change 6.0) ** For the brave and/or foolish, anything is possible. :) Rick From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joe DeSouza Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2007 9:26 PM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: CMDB 2.0 compatibility with ARS 6.x... (Corrected to Change 6.0) ** Rick, Thanks for your response.. Good to know it is possible :-) Joe - Original Message From: Rick Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2007 7:48:40 PM Subject: Re: CMDB 2.0 compatibility with ARS 6.x... (Corrected to Change 6.0) ** Joe, the version of ARS is irrelevant - CMDB 2.x needs to be manually mapped to ITSM 6. The white paper, if it ever comes out, will tell you how to map that, but without it, you're on your own. Rick From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joe DeSouza Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2007 7:40 PM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: CMDB 2.0 compatibility with ARS 6.x... (Corrected to Change 6.0) ** Disregard my previous email... my question actually is is 6.0 Change running on a 7.x ARS platform compatible with CMDB 2.0? I know this might not be supported if you go strictly according to the compatibility matrix but am wondering if this combination could be made workable either directly or using some sort of a workaround.. Any good reasons besides the compatibility matrix why it would not work? Joe No need to miss a message. Get email on-the-go with Yahoo! Mail for Mobile. Get started. http://mobile.yahoo.com/mail ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:"Where the Answers Are"
Re: CMDB 2.0 compatibility with ARS 6.x... (Corrected to Change 6.0)
For the brave and/or foolish, anything is possible. :) Rick _ From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joe DeSouza Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2007 9:26 PM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: CMDB 2.0 compatibility with ARS 6.x... (Corrected to Change 6.0) ** Rick, Thanks for your response.. Good to know it is possible :-) Joe - Original Message From: Rick Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2007 7:48:40 PM Subject: Re: CMDB 2.0 compatibility with ARS 6.x... (Corrected to Change 6.0) ** Joe, the version of ARS is irrelevant - CMDB 2.x needs to be manually mapped to ITSM 6. The white paper, if it ever comes out, will tell you how to map that, but without it, you're on your own. Rick _ From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joe DeSouza Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2007 7:40 PM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: CMDB 2.0 compatibility with ARS 6.x... (Corrected to Change 6.0) ** Disregard my previous email... my question actually is is 6.0 Change running on a 7.x ARS platform compatible with CMDB 2.0? I know this might not be supported if you go strictly according to the compatibility matrix but am wondering if this combination could be made workable either directly or using some sort of a workaround.. Any good reasons besides the compatibility matrix why it would not work? Joe _ Sucker-punch <http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=49981/*http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/mailb eta/features_spam.html> spam with award-winning protection. Try the free <http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=49981/*http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/mailb eta/features_spam.html> Yahoo! Mail Beta. __20060125___This posting was submitted with HTML in it___ ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:"Where the Answers Are"
Re: CMDB 2.0 compatibility with ARS 6.x... (Corrected to Change 6.0)
Rick, Thanks for your response.. Good to know it is possible :-) Joe - Original Message From: Rick Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2007 7:48:40 PM Subject: Re: CMDB 2.0 compatibility with ARS 6.x... (Corrected to Change 6.0) ** Joe, the version of ARS is irrelevant - CMDB 2.x needs to be manually mapped to ITSM 6. The white paper, if it ever comes out, will tell you how to map that, but without it, you're on your own. Rick From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joe DeSouza Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2007 7:40 PM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: CMDB 2.0 compatibility with ARS 6.x... (Corrected to Change 6.0) ** Disregard my previous email... my question actually is is 6.0 Change running on a 7.x ARS platform compatible with CMDB 2.0? I know this might not be supported if you go strictly according to the compatibility matrix but am wondering if this combination could be made workable either directly or using some sort of a workaround.. Any good reasons besides the compatibility matrix why it would not work? Joe 8:00? 8:25? 8:40? Find a flick in no time with the Yahoo! Search movie showtime shortcut. http://tools.search.yahoo.com/shortcuts/#news ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:"Where the Answers Are"
Re: CMDB 2.0 compatibility with ARS 6.x... (Corrected to Change 6.0)
Joe, the version of ARS is irrelevant - CMDB 2.x needs to be manually mapped to ITSM 6. The white paper, if it ever comes out, will tell you how to map that, but without it, you're on your own. Rick _ From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joe DeSouza Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2007 7:40 PM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: CMDB 2.0 compatibility with ARS 6.x... (Corrected to Change 6.0) ** Disregard my previous email... my question actually is is 6.0 Change running on a 7.x ARS platform compatible with CMDB 2.0? I know this might not be supported if you go strictly according to the compatibility matrix but am wondering if this combination could be made workable either directly or using some sort of a workaround.. Any good reasons besides the compatibility matrix why it would not work? Joe _ Get <http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=49678/*http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/domains/?p =BESTDEAL> your own web address. Have a HUGE year through Yahoo! <http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=49678/*http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/domains/?p =BESTDEAL> Small Business. __20060125___This posting was submitted with HTML in it___ ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:"Where the Answers Are"
Re: CMDB 2.0 compatibility with ARS 6.x...
BMC is supposed to be providing a loong-promised white paper telling how to map those two, but I don't think it's available yet. Until then, you can still do it, but you're on your own to do the mapping of the ITSM 6 forms to the CMDB 2.0 CDM, which is different than the 1.x CDM that it is currently mapped to. Rick _ From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joe DeSouza Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2007 7:29 PM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: CMDB 2.0 compatibility with ARS 6.x... ** Is anyone out there running CMDB 2.0 on ARS 6.0? I know this might not be supported if you go strictly according to the compatibility matrix but was wondering if this combination was workable.. If not anyone knows the reasons why? Joe _ Finding fabulous fares is fun. Let <http://farechase.yahoo.com/promo-generic-14795097;_ylc=X3oDMTFtNW45amVpBF9T Azk3NDA3NTg5BF9zAzI3MTk0ODEEcG9zAzEEc2VjA21haWx0YWdsaW5lBHNsawNxMS0wNw--> Yahoo! FareChase search your favorite travel sites to find flight and hotel bargains. __20060125___This posting was submitted with HTML in it___ ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:"Where the Answers Are"
CMDB 2.0 compatibility with ARS 6.x... (Corrected to Change 6.0)
Disregard my previous email... my question actually is is 6.0 Change running on a 7.x ARS platform compatible with CMDB 2.0? I know this might not be supported if you go strictly according to the compatibility matrix but am wondering if this combination could be made workable either directly or using some sort of a workaround.. Any good reasons besides the compatibility matrix why it would not work? Joe Expecting? Get great news right away with email Auto-Check. Try the Yahoo! Mail Beta. http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/mailbeta/newmail_tools.html ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:"Where the Answers Are"
CMDB 2.0 compatibility with ARS 6.x...
Is anyone out there running CMDB 2.0 on ARS 6.0? I know this might not be supported if you go strictly according to the compatibility matrix but was wondering if this combination was workable.. If not anyone knows the reasons why? Joe We won't tell. Get more on shows you hate to love (and love to hate): Yahoo! TV's Guilty Pleasures list. http://tv.yahoo.com/collections/265 ___ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:"Where the Answers Are"
