Re: Engage 2016 Call for Papers - due March 7 - a discussion suggestion .... technical topics to be covered?

2016-03-07 Thread Ravindra Sharma
Hi All,

It seems that the Call For Papers has a new date for submissions

Call for Papers Closes
March 11, 2016

Regards
Ravi Sharma



On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 5:48 PM, arslist  wrote:

> **
>
> I have submitted my problem trying to get to where we can vote, I am
> wondering if anyone else is getting this?
>
> When I try to get there, logged in with my Communities ID, I get:
>
> “The area of BMC Communities is visible to registered logged in users. If
> you are logged in when you receive this message then you might not have
> sufficient access privileges to view requested page. Please contact us
> if you need any further
> assistance.”
>
>
>
> *From:* Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:
> arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] *On Behalf Of *Mueller, Doug
> *Sent:* March 4, 2016 4:01 PM
>
> *To:* arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
> *Subject:* Re: Engage 2016 Call for Papers - due March 7 - a discussion
> suggestion  technical topics to be covered?
>
>
>
> **
>
> Everyone,
>
>
>
> I would strongly encourage you to use the Communities Forum for Engage for
> submitting the “I would like to see but I am not the presenter” type
> topics.  That gives visibility to the ideas to everyone.  It gives a chance
> to vote if interested.  It may give you new ideas of things to propose
> yourself.
>
>
>
> Doug
>
>
>
> *From:* Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [
> mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG ] *On Behalf Of *Brock,
> Anne
> *Sent:* Friday, March 04, 2016 9:56 AM
> *To:* arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
> *Subject:* Re: Engage 2016 Call for Papers - due March 7 - a discussion
> suggestion  technical topics to be covered?
>
>
>
> **
>
> Some of the topics were submitted as Ideas on the Engage forum – you can
> vote on those
>
>
> https://communities.bmc.com/community/engage/content?filterID=contentstatus[published]~objecttype~objecttype[idea
> ]
>
>
>
> Not sure if there will be a chance for additional feedback or not; you can
> ask on the forum….
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [
> mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG ] *On Behalf Of *Joe
> D'Souza
> *Sent:* Thursday, March 03, 2016 6:12 PM
> *To:* arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
> *Subject:* Re: Engage 2016 Call for Papers - due March 7 - a discussion
> suggestion  technical topics to be covered?
>
>
>
> **
>
> Where would we get to see a list of ideas that are submitted? Would that
> be an internal list for BMC to review or will that list be published for
> feedback or ratings on ideas that are submitted?
>
>
>
> Personally I feel the later is a better idea than having those ideas
> filtered by BMC internally.
>
>
>
> Joe
>
>
> --
>
> *From:* Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [
> mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG ] *On Behalf Of *Brock,
> Anne
> *Sent:* Thursday, March 03, 2016 4:23 PM
> *To:* arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
> *Subject:* Re: Engage 2016 Call for Papers - due March 7 - a discussion
> suggestion  technical topics to be covered?
>
>
>
> Yeah – What he said!
>
> We’ve had people comment in the past that there weren’t enough topics for
> the more technically knowledgeable of you; or not enough topics on things
> that interest you. So please do flood us with topics of interest! Of
> course, “no guarantees” and all that. But would be great to get a good list
> in! And even better if you are able to give the talk!
>
>
>
> Anne
>
> *while I do work for BMC I admit I have no say in which topics get chosen
> and which ones don’t*
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [
> mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG ] *On Behalf Of *Mueller,
> Doug
> *Sent:* Thursday, March 03, 2016 11:31 AM
> *To:* arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
> *Subject:* Re: Engage 2016 Call for Papers - due March 7 - a discussion
> suggestion  technical topics to be covered?
>
>
>
> **
>
> Everyone,
>
>
>
> I just want to step in here in support of Daniel’s suggestion and to
> encourage you all to submit ideas.
>
>
>
> If you have a topic you are passionate about and have expertise in that
> others would like to know, please submit a talk.  You get a free pass to
> the conference if your talk is selected so that discussion about expenses
> becomes much easier.  And, you get to bask in the adoration of the masses
> who come to your talk who all want to learn from you!
>
>
>
> Now on the other side, if there are “talks that you want to see” although
> you are not the expert, let’s hear about those as well.  There are times
> when we have topics or themes that need to be covered and we go and find
> the right speaker for a talk on that subject.  So, if there are things you
> would really like covered in a talk, please think about a title/abstract
> (couple of sentences) about what that talk would be.
>
>
>
> We would love to be flooded with both kinds of items – talks you want to
> propose where you 

Re: Engage 2016 Call for Papers - due March 7 - a discussion suggestion .... technical topics to be covered? URL error fixed below

2016-03-07 Thread Brock, Anne
Thanks for that correction!

I just got an email that the deadline is extended to March 11, so you have a 
little more time to submit something!

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of arslist
Sent: Monday, March 07, 2016 5:52 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Engage 2016 Call for Papers - due March 7 - a discussion 
suggestion  technical topics to be covered? URL error fixed below

**
I head back from support, apparently the problem is that if you click on the 
URL we were given, the final ] is not part of it
I should have noticed that it was black on my screen not blue... The 
following works
https://communities.bmc.com/community/engage/content?filterID=contentstatus[published]~objecttype~objecttype[idea]

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of arslist
Sent: March 6, 2016 8:48 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Engage 2016 Call for Papers - due March 7 - a discussion 
suggestion  technical topics to be covered?

**
I have submitted my problem trying to get to where we can vote, I am wondering 
if anyone else is getting this?
When I try to get there, logged in with my Communities ID, I get:
"The area of BMC Communities is visible to registered logged in users. If you 
are logged in when you receive this message then you might not have sufficient 
access privileges to view requested page. Please contact us 
 if you need any further 
assistance."

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Mueller, Doug
Sent: March 4, 2016 4:01 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Engage 2016 Call for Papers - due March 7 - a discussion 
suggestion  technical topics to be covered?

**
Everyone,

I would strongly encourage you to use the Communities Forum for Engage for 
submitting the "I would like to see but I am not the presenter" type topics.  
That gives visibility to the ideas to everyone.  It gives a chance to vote if 
interested.  It may give you new ideas of things to propose yourself.

Doug

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Brock, Anne
Sent: Friday, March 04, 2016 9:56 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Engage 2016 Call for Papers - due March 7 - a discussion 
suggestion  technical topics to be covered?

**
Some of the topics were submitted as Ideas on the Engage forum - you can vote 
on those
https://communities.bmc.com/community/engage/content?filterID=contentstatus[published]~objecttype~objecttype[idea]

Not sure if there will be a chance for additional feedback or not; you can ask 
on the forum


From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Joe D'Souza
Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2016 6:12 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Engage 2016 Call for Papers - due March 7 - a discussion 
suggestion  technical topics to be covered?

**
Where would we get to see a list of ideas that are submitted? Would that be an 
internal list for BMC to review or will that list be published for feedback or 
ratings on ideas that are submitted?

Personally I feel the later is a better idea than having those ideas filtered 
by BMC internally.

Joe


From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Brock, Anne
Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2016 4:23 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Engage 2016 Call for Papers - due March 7 - a discussion 
suggestion  technical topics to be covered?

Yeah - What he said!
We've had people comment in the past that there weren't enough topics for the 
more technically knowledgeable of you; or not enough topics on things that 
interest you. So please do flood us with topics of interest! Of course, "no 
guarantees" and all that. But would be great to get a good list in! And even 
better if you are able to give the talk!

Anne
*while I do work for BMC I admit I have no say in which topics get chosen and 
which ones don't*


From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Mueller, Doug
Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2016 11:31 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Engage 2016 Call for Papers - due March 7 - a discussion 
suggestion  technical topics to be covered?

**
Everyone,

I just want to step in here in support of Daniel's suggestion and to encourage 
you all to submit ideas.

If you have a topic 

Re: Engage 2016 Call for Papers - due March 7 - a discussion suggestion .... technical topics to be covered? URL error fixed below

2016-03-07 Thread arslist
I head back from support, apparently the problem is that if you click on the
URL we were given, the final ] is not part of it

I should have noticed that it was black on my screen not blue... The
following works

https://communities.bmc.com/community/engage/content?filterID=contentstatus[
published]~objecttype~objecttype[idea]
 

 

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of arslist
Sent: March 6, 2016 8:48 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Engage 2016 Call for Papers - due March 7 - a discussion
suggestion  technical topics to be covered?

 

** 

I have submitted my problem trying to get to where we can vote, I am
wondering if anyone else is getting this?

When I try to get there, logged in with my Communities ID, I get:

"The area of BMC Communities is visible to registered logged in users. If
you are logged in when you receive this message then you might not have
sufficient access privileges to view requested page. Please
 contact us if you need any
further assistance."

 

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [
 mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of
Mueller, Doug
Sent: March 4, 2016 4:01 PM
To:   arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Engage 2016 Call for Papers - due March 7 - a discussion
suggestion  technical topics to be covered?

 

** 

Everyone,

 

I would strongly encourage you to use the Communities Forum for Engage for
submitting the "I would like to see but I am not the presenter" type topics.
That gives visibility to the ideas to everyone.  It gives a chance to vote
if interested.  It may give you new ideas of things to propose yourself.

 

Doug

 

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [
 mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Brock,
Anne
Sent: Friday, March 04, 2016 9:56 AM
To:   arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Engage 2016 Call for Papers - due March 7 - a discussion
suggestion  technical topics to be covered?

 

** 

Some of the topics were submitted as Ideas on the Engage forum - you can
vote on those

 

https://communities.bmc.com/community/engage/content?filterID=contentstatus[
published]~objecttype~objecttype[idea]

 

Not sure if there will be a chance for additional feedback or not; you can
ask on the forum..

 

 

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [
 mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Joe
D'Souza
Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2016 6:12 PM
To:   arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Engage 2016 Call for Papers - due March 7 - a discussion
suggestion  technical topics to be covered?

 

** 

Where would we get to see a list of ideas that are submitted? Would that be
an internal list for BMC to review or will that list be published for
feedback or ratings on ideas that are submitted?

 

Personally I feel the later is a better idea than having those ideas
filtered by BMC internally.

 

Joe

 

  _  

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [
 mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Brock,
Anne
Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2016 4:23 PM
To:   arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Engage 2016 Call for Papers - due March 7 - a discussion
suggestion  technical topics to be covered?

 

Yeah - What he said!

We've had people comment in the past that there weren't enough topics for
the more technically knowledgeable of you; or not enough topics on things
that interest you. So please do flood us with topics of interest! Of course,
"no guarantees" and all that. But would be great to get a good list in! And
even better if you are able to give the talk!

 

Anne

*while I do work for BMC I admit I have no say in which topics get chosen
and which ones don't* 

 

 

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [
 mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of
Mueller, Doug
Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2016 11:31 AM
To:   arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Engage 2016 Call for Papers - due March 7 - a discussion
suggestion  technical topics to be covered?

 

** 

Everyone,

 

I just want to step in here in support of Daniel's suggestion and to
encourage you all to submit ideas.

 

If you have a topic you are passionate about and have expertise in that
others would like to know, please submit a talk.  You get a free pass to the
conference if your talk is selected so that discussion about expenses
becomes much easier.  And, you get to bask in the adoration of the masses
who come to your talk 

Re: Engage 2016 Call for Papers - due March 7 - a discussion suggestion .... technical topics to be covered?

2016-03-06 Thread arslist
I have submitted my problem trying to get to where we can vote, I am
wondering if anyone else is getting this?

When I try to get there, logged in with my Communities ID, I get:

"The area of BMC Communities is visible to registered logged in users. If
you are logged in when you receive this message then you might not have
sufficient access privileges to view requested page. Please contact us
 if you need any further
assistance."

 

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Mueller, Doug
Sent: March 4, 2016 4:01 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Engage 2016 Call for Papers - due March 7 - a discussion
suggestion  technical topics to be covered?

 

** 

Everyone,

 

I would strongly encourage you to use the Communities Forum for Engage for
submitting the "I would like to see but I am not the presenter" type topics.
That gives visibility to the ideas to everyone.  It gives a chance to vote
if interested.  It may give you new ideas of things to propose yourself.

 

Doug

 

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Brock, Anne
Sent: Friday, March 04, 2016 9:56 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG  
Subject: Re: Engage 2016 Call for Papers - due March 7 - a discussion
suggestion  technical topics to be covered?

 

** 

Some of the topics were submitted as Ideas on the Engage forum - you can
vote on those

https://communities.bmc.com/community/engage/content?filterID=contentstatus[
published]~objecttype~objecttype[idea
 ]

 

Not sure if there will be a chance for additional feedback or not; you can
ask on the forum..

 

 

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Joe D'Souza
Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2016 6:12 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG  
Subject: Re: Engage 2016 Call for Papers - due March 7 - a discussion
suggestion  technical topics to be covered?

 

** 

Where would we get to see a list of ideas that are submitted? Would that be
an internal list for BMC to review or will that list be published for
feedback or ratings on ideas that are submitted?

 

Personally I feel the later is a better idea than having those ideas
filtered by BMC internally.

 

Joe

 

  _  

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Brock, Anne
Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2016 4:23 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG  
Subject: Re: Engage 2016 Call for Papers - due March 7 - a discussion
suggestion  technical topics to be covered?

 

Yeah - What he said!

We've had people comment in the past that there weren't enough topics for
the more technically knowledgeable of you; or not enough topics on things
that interest you. So please do flood us with topics of interest! Of course,
"no guarantees" and all that. But would be great to get a good list in! And
even better if you are able to give the talk!

 

Anne

*while I do work for BMC I admit I have no say in which topics get chosen
and which ones don't* 

 

 

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Mueller, Doug
Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2016 11:31 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG  
Subject: Re: Engage 2016 Call for Papers - due March 7 - a discussion
suggestion  technical topics to be covered?

 

** 

Everyone,

 

I just want to step in here in support of Daniel's suggestion and to
encourage you all to submit ideas.

 

If you have a topic you are passionate about and have expertise in that
others would like to know, please submit a talk.  You get a free pass to the
conference if your talk is selected so that discussion about expenses
becomes much easier.  And, you get to bask in the adoration of the masses
who come to your talk who all want to learn from you!

 

Now on the other side, if there are "talks that you want to see" although
you are not the expert, let's hear about those as well.  There are times
when we have topics or themes that need to be covered and we go and find the
right speaker for a talk on that subject.  So, if there are things you would
really like covered in a talk, please think about a title/abstract (couple
of sentences) about what that talk would be.

 

We would love to be flooded with both kinds of items - talks you want to
propose where you present and talks where you want to be in the audience.

 

 

Now the challenge for you.  In the submissions so far, there is a team OTHER
THAN the Service Support (Remedy products, Discovery, .) that have been
getting a lot of submissions and they are close to - if not there - in
taking over the lead in the number of submissions.  I want to make sure that
there are 

Re: Engage 2016 Call for Papers - due March 7 - a discussion suggestion .... technical topics to be covered?

2016-03-04 Thread Mueller, Doug
Everyone,

I would strongly encourage you to use the Communities Forum for Engage for 
submitting the "I would like to see but I am not the presenter" type topics.  
That gives visibility to the ideas to everyone.  It gives a chance to vote if 
interested.  It may give you new ideas of things to propose yourself.

Doug

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Brock, Anne
Sent: Friday, March 04, 2016 9:56 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Engage 2016 Call for Papers - due March 7 - a discussion 
suggestion  technical topics to be covered?

**
Some of the topics were submitted as Ideas on the Engage forum - you can vote 
on those
https://communities.bmc.com/community/engage/content?filterID=contentstatus[published]~objecttype~objecttype[idea]

Not sure if there will be a chance for additional feedback or not; you can ask 
on the forum


From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Joe D'Souza
Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2016 6:12 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Engage 2016 Call for Papers - due March 7 - a discussion 
suggestion  technical topics to be covered?

**
Where would we get to see a list of ideas that are submitted? Would that be an 
internal list for BMC to review or will that list be published for feedback or 
ratings on ideas that are submitted?

Personally I feel the later is a better idea than having those ideas filtered 
by BMC internally.

Joe


From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Brock, Anne
Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2016 4:23 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Engage 2016 Call for Papers - due March 7 - a discussion 
suggestion  technical topics to be covered?

Yeah - What he said!
We've had people comment in the past that there weren't enough topics for the 
more technically knowledgeable of you; or not enough topics on things that 
interest you. So please do flood us with topics of interest! Of course, "no 
guarantees" and all that. But would be great to get a good list in! And even 
better if you are able to give the talk!

Anne
*while I do work for BMC I admit I have no say in which topics get chosen and 
which ones don't*


From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Mueller, Doug
Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2016 11:31 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Engage 2016 Call for Papers - due March 7 - a discussion 
suggestion  technical topics to be covered?

**
Everyone,

I just want to step in here in support of Daniel's suggestion and to encourage 
you all to submit ideas.

If you have a topic you are passionate about and have expertise in that others 
would like to know, please submit a talk.  You get a free pass to the 
conference if your talk is selected so that discussion about expenses becomes 
much easier.  And, you get to bask in the adoration of the masses who come to 
your talk who all want to learn from you!

Now on the other side, if there are "talks that you want to see" although you 
are not the expert, let's hear about those as well.  There are times when we 
have topics or themes that need to be covered and we go and find the right 
speaker for a talk on that subject.  So, if there are things you would really 
like covered in a talk, please think about a title/abstract (couple of 
sentences) about what that talk would be.

We would love to be flooded with both kinds of items - talks you want to 
propose where you present and talks where you want to be in the audience.


Now the challenge for you...  In the submissions so far, there is a team OTHER 
THAN the Service Support (Remedy products, Discovery, ...) that have been 
getting a lot of submissions and they are close to - if not there - in taking 
over the lead in the number of submissions.  I want to make sure that there are 
more submissions of speakers and topic ideas from Service Support than all 
other teams COMBINED.  So, let's get busy with submitting those ideas.

Doug Mueller

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of arslist
Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 5:57 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Engage 2016 Call for Papers - due March 7 - a discussion 
suggestion  technical topics to be covered?

**
let us assume that if we indicate some highly technical development related 
topics quickly, that someone who knows that area would submit it if we showed 
interest, or that BMC would fill in what we can't.

Possibly one might be how to read the new java logs for the core and quickly 
know what the true error is (I tend to find a java log 

Re: Engage 2016 Call for Papers - due March 7 - a discussion suggestion .... technical topics to be covered?

2016-03-04 Thread Brock, Anne
Some of the topics were submitted as Ideas on the Engage forum - you can vote 
on those
https://communities.bmc.com/community/engage/content?filterID=contentstatus[published]~objecttype~objecttype[idea]

Not sure if there will be a chance for additional feedback or not; you can ask 
on the forum


From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Joe D'Souza
Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2016 6:12 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Engage 2016 Call for Papers - due March 7 - a discussion 
suggestion  technical topics to be covered?

**
Where would we get to see a list of ideas that are submitted? Would that be an 
internal list for BMC to review or will that list be published for feedback or 
ratings on ideas that are submitted?

Personally I feel the later is a better idea than having those ideas filtered 
by BMC internally.

Joe


From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Brock, Anne
Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2016 4:23 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Engage 2016 Call for Papers - due March 7 - a discussion 
suggestion  technical topics to be covered?

Yeah - What he said!
We've had people comment in the past that there weren't enough topics for the 
more technically knowledgeable of you; or not enough topics on things that 
interest you. So please do flood us with topics of interest! Of course, "no 
guarantees" and all that. But would be great to get a good list in! And even 
better if you are able to give the talk!

Anne
*while I do work for BMC I admit I have no say in which topics get chosen and 
which ones don't*


From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Mueller, Doug
Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2016 11:31 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Engage 2016 Call for Papers - due March 7 - a discussion 
suggestion  technical topics to be covered?

**
Everyone,

I just want to step in here in support of Daniel's suggestion and to encourage 
you all to submit ideas.

If you have a topic you are passionate about and have expertise in that others 
would like to know, please submit a talk.  You get a free pass to the 
conference if your talk is selected so that discussion about expenses becomes 
much easier.  And, you get to bask in the adoration of the masses who come to 
your talk who all want to learn from you!

Now on the other side, if there are "talks that you want to see" although you 
are not the expert, let's hear about those as well.  There are times when we 
have topics or themes that need to be covered and we go and find the right 
speaker for a talk on that subject.  So, if there are things you would really 
like covered in a talk, please think about a title/abstract (couple of 
sentences) about what that talk would be.

We would love to be flooded with both kinds of items - talks you want to 
propose where you present and talks where you want to be in the audience.


Now the challenge for you...  In the submissions so far, there is a team OTHER 
THAN the Service Support (Remedy products, Discovery, ...) that have been 
getting a lot of submissions and they are close to - if not there - in taking 
over the lead in the number of submissions.  I want to make sure that there are 
more submissions of speakers and topic ideas from Service Support than all 
other teams COMBINED.  So, let's get busy with submitting those ideas.

Doug Mueller

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of arslist
Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 5:57 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Engage 2016 Call for Papers - due March 7 - a discussion 
suggestion  technical topics to be covered?

**
let us assume that if we indicate some highly technical development related 
topics quickly, that someone who knows that area would submit it if we showed 
interest, or that BMC would fill in what we can't.

Possibly one might be how to read the new java logs for the core and quickly 
know what the true error is (I tend to find a java log rather long  winded and 
finger pointing about what caused the issue, so some sort of smart parser would 
be nice). I can guess at least one person named John is chuckling at me right 
now, so perhaps he could submit that one :)

So, think we can gather a top 10 +- of topics that we would love to see 
[possibly wanted for years and never see]?

Dan

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Brock, Anne
Sent: March 2, 2016 11:58 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: ADV: Engage 2016 Call for Papers - due March 7

**
I wanted to remind everyone that the 

Re: Engage 2016 Call for Papers - due March 7 - a discussion suggestion .... technical topics to be covered?

2016-03-03 Thread Joe D'Souza
Where would we get to see a list of ideas that are submitted? Would that be
an internal list for BMC to review or will that list be published for
feedback or ratings on ideas that are submitted?

 

Personally I feel the later is a better idea than having those ideas
filtered by BMC internally.

 

Joe

 

  _  

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Brock, Anne
Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2016 4:23 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Engage 2016 Call for Papers - due March 7 - a discussion
suggestion  technical topics to be covered?

 

Yeah - What he said!

We've had people comment in the past that there weren't enough topics for
the more technically knowledgeable of you; or not enough topics on things
that interest you. So please do flood us with topics of interest! Of course,
"no guarantees" and all that. But would be great to get a good list in! And
even better if you are able to give the talk!

 

Anne

*while I do work for BMC I admit I have no say in which topics get chosen
and which ones don't* 

 

 

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Mueller, Doug
Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2016 11:31 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Engage 2016 Call for Papers - due March 7 - a discussion
suggestion  technical topics to be covered?

 

** 

Everyone,

 

I just want to step in here in support of Daniel's suggestion and to
encourage you all to submit ideas.

 

If you have a topic you are passionate about and have expertise in that
others would like to know, please submit a talk.  You get a free pass to the
conference if your talk is selected so that discussion about expenses
becomes much easier.  And, you get to bask in the adoration of the masses
who come to your talk who all want to learn from you!

 

Now on the other side, if there are "talks that you want to see" although
you are not the expert, let's hear about those as well.  There are times
when we have topics or themes that need to be covered and we go and find the
right speaker for a talk on that subject.  So, if there are things you would
really like covered in a talk, please think about a title/abstract (couple
of sentences) about what that talk would be.

 

We would love to be flooded with both kinds of items - talks you want to
propose where you present and talks where you want to be in the audience.

 

 

Now the challenge for you.  In the submissions so far, there is a team OTHER
THAN the Service Support (Remedy products, Discovery, .) that have been
getting a lot of submissions and they are close to - if not there - in
taking over the lead in the number of submissions.  I want to make sure that
there are more submissions of speakers and topic ideas from Service Support
than all other teams COMBINED.  So, let's get busy with submitting those
ideas.

 

Doug Mueller

 

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of arslist
Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 5:57 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Engage 2016 Call for Papers - due March 7 - a discussion
suggestion  technical topics to be covered?

 

** 

let us assume that if we indicate some highly technical development related
topics quickly, that someone who knows that area would submit it if we
showed interest, or that BMC would fill in what we can't.

 

Possibly one might be how to read the new java logs for the core and quickly
know what the true error is (I tend to find a java log rather long  winded
and finger pointing about what caused the issue, so some sort of smart
parser would be nice). I can guess at least one person named John is
chuckling at me right now, so perhaps he could submit that one :-)

 

So, think we can gather a top 10 +- of topics that we would love to see
[possibly wanted for years and never see]?

 

Dan

 

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Brock, Anne
Sent: March 2, 2016 11:58 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: ADV: Engage 2016 Call for Papers - due March 7

 

** 

I wanted to remind everyone that the Call for Papers for Engage 2016 ends
March 7th. So if you haven't had a chance to submit your paper yet, you have
under a week!

 

https://bmc.g2planet.com/bmcengage2016/cfp

 

 

 

Anne Brock

Principal SC

BMC Software

209-417-0481

  anne_br...@bmc.com

 

_ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" and have been for 20 years_ 

_ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" and have been for 20 years_

_ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" and have been for 20 years_ 

_ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" and have been for 20 years_

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
"Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years"


Re: Engage 2016 Call for Papers - due March 7 - a discussion suggestion .... technical topics to be covered?

2016-03-03 Thread Brock, Anne
Yeah - What he said!

We've had people comment in the past that there weren't enough topics for the 
more technically knowledgeable of you; or not enough topics on things that 
interest you. So please do flood us with topics of interest! Of course, "no 
guarantees" and all that. But would be great to get a good list in! And even 
better if you are able to give the talk!

Anne
*while I do work for BMC I admit I have no say in which topics get chosen and 
which ones don't*


From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Mueller, Doug
Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2016 11:31 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Engage 2016 Call for Papers - due March 7 - a discussion 
suggestion  technical topics to be covered?

**
Everyone,

I just want to step in here in support of Daniel's suggestion and to encourage 
you all to submit ideas.

If you have a topic you are passionate about and have expertise in that others 
would like to know, please submit a talk.  You get a free pass to the 
conference if your talk is selected so that discussion about expenses becomes 
much easier.  And, you get to bask in the adoration of the masses who come to 
your talk who all want to learn from you!

Now on the other side, if there are "talks that you want to see" although you 
are not the expert, let's hear about those as well.  There are times when we 
have topics or themes that need to be covered and we go and find the right 
speaker for a talk on that subject.  So, if there are things you would really 
like covered in a talk, please think about a title/abstract (couple of 
sentences) about what that talk would be.

We would love to be flooded with both kinds of items - talks you want to 
propose where you present and talks where you want to be in the audience.


Now the challenge for you...  In the submissions so far, there is a team OTHER 
THAN the Service Support (Remedy products, Discovery, ...) that have been 
getting a lot of submissions and they are close to - if not there - in taking 
over the lead in the number of submissions.  I want to make sure that there are 
more submissions of speakers and topic ideas from Service Support than all 
other teams COMBINED.  So, let's get busy with submitting those ideas.

Doug Mueller

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of arslist
Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 5:57 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Engage 2016 Call for Papers - due March 7 - a discussion 
suggestion  technical topics to be covered?

**
let us assume that if we indicate some highly technical development related 
topics quickly, that someone who knows that area would submit it if we showed 
interest, or that BMC would fill in what we can't.

Possibly one might be how to read the new java logs for the core and quickly 
know what the true error is (I tend to find a java log rather long  winded and 
finger pointing about what caused the issue, so some sort of smart parser would 
be nice). I can guess at least one person named John is chuckling at me right 
now, so perhaps he could submit that one :)

So, think we can gather a top 10 +- of topics that we would love to see 
[possibly wanted for years and never see]?

Dan

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Brock, Anne
Sent: March 2, 2016 11:58 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: ADV: Engage 2016 Call for Papers - due March 7

**
I wanted to remind everyone that the Call for Papers for Engage 2016 ends March 
7th. So if you haven't had a chance to submit your paper yet, you have under a 
week!

https://bmc.g2planet.com/bmcengage2016/cfp



Anne Brock
Principal SC
BMC Software
209-417-0481
anne_br...@bmc.com

_ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" and have been for 20 years_
_ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" and have been for 20 years_
_ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" and have been for 20 years_

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
"Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years"


Re: Engage 2016 Call for Papers - due March 7 - a discussion suggestion .... technical topics to be covered?

2016-03-03 Thread Mueller, Doug
Everyone,

I just want to step in here in support of Daniel's suggestion and to encourage 
you all to submit ideas.

If you have a topic you are passionate about and have expertise in that others 
would like to know, please submit a talk.  You get a free pass to the 
conference if your talk is selected so that discussion about expenses becomes 
much easier.  And, you get to bask in the adoration of the masses who come to 
your talk who all want to learn from you!

Now on the other side, if there are "talks that you want to see" although you 
are not the expert, let's hear about those as well.  There are times when we 
have topics or themes that need to be covered and we go and find the right 
speaker for a talk on that subject.  So, if there are things you would really 
like covered in a talk, please think about a title/abstract (couple of 
sentences) about what that talk would be.

We would love to be flooded with both kinds of items - talks you want to 
propose where you present and talks where you want to be in the audience.


Now the challenge for you...  In the submissions so far, there is a team OTHER 
THAN the Service Support (Remedy products, Discovery, ...) that have been 
getting a lot of submissions and they are close to - if not there - in taking 
over the lead in the number of submissions.  I want to make sure that there are 
more submissions of speakers and topic ideas from Service Support than all 
other teams COMBINED.  So, let's get busy with submitting those ideas.

Doug Mueller

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of arslist
Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 5:57 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Engage 2016 Call for Papers - due March 7 - a discussion 
suggestion  technical topics to be covered?

**
let us assume that if we indicate some highly technical development related 
topics quickly, that someone who knows that area would submit it if we showed 
interest, or that BMC would fill in what we can't.

Possibly one might be how to read the new java logs for the core and quickly 
know what the true error is (I tend to find a java log rather long  winded and 
finger pointing about what caused the issue, so some sort of smart parser would 
be nice). I can guess at least one person named John is chuckling at me right 
now, so perhaps he could submit that one :)

So, think we can gather a top 10 +- of topics that we would love to see 
[possibly wanted for years and never see]?

Dan

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Brock, Anne
Sent: March 2, 2016 11:58 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: ADV: Engage 2016 Call for Papers - due March 7

**
I wanted to remind everyone that the Call for Papers for Engage 2016 ends March 
7th. So if you haven't had a chance to submit your paper yet, you have under a 
week!

https://bmc.g2planet.com/bmcengage2016/cfp



Anne Brock
Principal SC
BMC Software
209-417-0481
anne_br...@bmc.com

_ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" and have been for 20 years_
_ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" and have been for 20 years_

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
"Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years"


Re: Engage 2016 Call for Papers - due March 7 - a discussion suggestion .... technical topics to be covered?

2016-03-03 Thread Pierson, Shawn
A few topics I'd love to see are:

1)  How to best secure Smart IT and My IT.

2)  How to best set up Smart IT and My IT to scale in a production 
environment.

3)  How to build integrations with My IT.

4)  What is AppZone and how can it be used.

5)  How to add custom workflow to the client side of Smart IT.

6)  How to do true SSO with Remedy including Smart IT and My IT so people 
don't need to log in.

There's probably a theme in my interests.

Thanks,

Shawn Pierson
Remedy Developer | Energy Transfer

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of arslist
Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 7:57 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Engage 2016 Call for Papers - due March 7 - a discussion 
suggestion  technical topics to be covered?

**
let us assume that if we indicate some highly technical development related 
topics quickly, that someone who knows that area would submit it if we showed 
interest, or that BMC would fill in what we can't.

Possibly one might be how to read the new java logs for the core and quickly 
know what the true error is (I tend to find a java log rather long  winded and 
finger pointing about what caused the issue, so some sort of smart parser would 
be nice). I can guess at least one person named John is chuckling at me right 
now, so perhaps he could submit that one :)

So, think we can gather a top 10 +- of topics that we would love to see 
[possibly wanted for years and never see]?

Dan

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Brock, Anne
Sent: March 2, 2016 11:58 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: ADV: Engage 2016 Call for Papers - due March 7

**
I wanted to remind everyone that the Call for Papers for Engage 2016 ends March 
7th. So if you haven't had a chance to submit your paper yet, you have under a 
week!

https://bmc.g2planet.com/bmcengage2016/cfp



Anne Brock
Principal SC
BMC Software
209-417-0481
anne_br...@bmc.com

_ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" and have been for 20 years_
_ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" and have been for 20 years_

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
"Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years"


Re: Engage 2016 Call for Papers - due March 7 - a discussion suggestion .... technical topics to be covered?

2016-03-02 Thread arslist
let us assume that if we indicate some highly technical development related
topics quickly, that someone who knows that area would submit it if we
showed interest, or that BMC would fill in what we can't.

 

Possibly one might be how to read the new java logs for the core and quickly
know what the true error is (I tend to find a java log rather long  winded
and finger pointing about what caused the issue, so some sort of smart
parser would be nice). I can guess at least one person named John is
chuckling at me right now, so perhaps he could submit that one :)

 

So, think we can gather a top 10 +- of topics that we would love to see
[possibly wanted for years and never see]?

 

Dan

 

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Brock, Anne
Sent: March 2, 2016 11:58 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: ADV: Engage 2016 Call for Papers - due March 7

 

** 

I wanted to remind everyone that the Call for Papers for Engage 2016 ends
March 7th. So if you haven't had a chance to submit your paper yet, you have
under a week!

 

https://bmc.g2planet.com/bmcengage2016/cfp

 

 

 

Anne Brock

Principal SC

BMC Software

209-417-0481

  anne_br...@bmc.com

 

_ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" and have been for 20 years_ 


___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
"Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years"