Re: ARS7 install with oracle 10G RAC ... the saga continues ...

2007-07-15 Thread Axton

I've been thinking about this a bit.  The biggest difference I see
between running ars with a local db versus a remote db is the method
by which arserver connects to the db.  With a local db, arserver can
connect using IPC, which has a lot less overhead and variables than
using TCP with some application protocol.

I plan to perform some tests to see if I can isolate any differences
in performance and what can be tuned with the oracle client/db to tune
the performance.  I am guessing that the type of network (gb/mb, jumbo
frames, etc), latency, and a number of other factors will drive how
things should be configured.

Axton Grams

On 7/10/07, Lammey, Peter A. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Does this lead anyone to believe or have people noticed other general
activities in the applications are slow based on this?

Thanks
Peter Lammey
ESPN MIT Technical Services  Applications Management
860-766-4761

-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Axton
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2007 11:47 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: ARS7 install with oracle 10G RAC ... the saga continues ...

The issue is widespread, esp. with a remote Oracle db.  Our servers are
switched with fiber/gb.  Even if I have 2 vm's runnning on the same
physical host (one db and one ars), I see the same issue.  The packet
logs do not show a problem with throughput and my switches show no
congestion.

Axton Grams

On 7/10/07, Shellman, David [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



 When I spoke to support about how long it took the system to start up
 they said that start up was chatty between the server app and the
 database.  With a network link that running near capacity (our case),
 flaky router/switch, slow link, etc the length of time to respond
 between app server and fb server is increased..  All these situations
 are often not apparent with out getting network folks involved.

  Dave
  --
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Wireless)

  - Original Message -
  From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
 arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
  To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
  Sent: Tue Jul 10 10:19:29 2007
  Subject: Re: ARS7 install with oracle 10G RAC ... the saga continues
...

   The problem does
   not seem to be in the way that the query to the db, but in the way
 the   results are processed.

  I don't know about that.
  If the problem was the way that arserverd is processing the results
 of the query, why would startup be like  1 minute when the db is on
 the same box?

  My bet is that this has something to do with the way that arserverd
 is connecting to oracle ... perhaps incorrect use of the api? All
 that waiting between queries really makes me think there's a timeout
 somewhere ... like waiting for a local listener to respond, i.e.
  looking for the database to be on the same machine, and only querying

 remotely when the local connection times out.

  Man, this is why I sometimes hate dealing with proprietary software.
  If this was open, you could bet someone would have fixed it by now,
 and if they hadn't we'd at least have a fighting chance of fixing it
 ourselves.

  thanks again, everyone for all your help.
  looks like the only answer for now is the Run-DMC response: it's
 like that, and that's the way it is ... huh!

  -A ;-)

  On Jul 10, 2007, at 8:30 AM, Axton wrote:

   Good luck with support (and I sincerely mean that).  The problem
 does   not seem to be in the way that the query to the db, but in the

 way the   results are processed.  If the arserver could serialize the

 memory   contents as part of the shutdown process, then reload them
 on startup,   it could probably be designed to be much more
 efficient, but there   would be trade offs with that route.  A few
that come to mind:
   - storage of the serialized contents (possibly gb's)   - time
 required to serialize the contents (slower shutdown)   The trade off
 is for a faster startup.
  
   Another method that this could be addressed is to expose some  
 configuration parameters in how the current process works:
   - chunk size (would be contingent on memory available and
 architecture   limits 32 vs 64 bit) Another method is to
 streamline the current process; where do the   bottlenecks exist in
 the current design?  Can they be eliminated?
  
   Just some thoughts...
  
   Axton Grams
  
   On 7/10/07, Tony Worthington [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   Yup.  And the second query (each taking about four minutes on our

  boxes)   is:
  
   SELECT schemaId,fieldId,groupId,permission FROM field_permissions

  ORDER BY   1 ASC,2 ASC,3 ASC I wonder if we could get a
 defect filed, and have this looked at by   engineering... and get an

 answer more than as designed.
  
   -tony
  
   --
   Tony Worthington
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   262-703-5911
  
  
  
   Axton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Sent by: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
   arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
   07/09

Re: ARS7 install with oracle 10G RAC ... the saga continues ...

2007-07-10 Thread Jarl Grøneng

Do you really think you will get an answer other than as designed? :-)

--
Jarl

Yuppi yeee, got an ok to travel to Vancouver in october :-)






On 7/10/07, Tony Worthington [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Yup.  And the second query (each taking about four minutes on our boxes)
is:

SELECT schemaId,fieldId,groupId,permission FROM field_permissions ORDER BY
1 ASC,2 ASC,3 ASC

I wonder if we could get a defect filed, and have this looked at by
engineering... and get an answer more than as designed.

-tony

--
Tony Worthington
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
262-703-5911



Axton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
07/09/2007 05:55 PM
Please respond to
arslist@ARSLIST.ORG


To
arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
cc

Subject
Re: ARS7 install with oracle 10G RAC ... the saga continues ...






Remedy fetches information from it's data dictionary (e.g.,
field_disp_prop, field, etc.), then processes it in chunks of 100,
500, or 1000.  So if you have a table field_dispprop that has 120k
records and 500 records are processed at a time, 15 seconds per chunk,
you end up with a start time that totals 3600 seconds (for that part
of the startup).

If you add a -t parameter to arserverd in the armonitor.conf file, a
special startup log file is created.  The log file will look something
like this:

Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6577 Startup TID:3086968512 Set up thread
control block with key = 0
Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6582 Startup TID:3086968512 Initialize thread
local storage block
Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6583 Startup TID:3086968512 Initialize
mutiple-byte environment
Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6585 Startup TID:3086968512 InstallDir =
/u01/arsystem/arsdev
Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6587 Startup TID:3086968512 Initialize Server
utility
Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6599 Startup TID:3086968512 Initialize License
Library
Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6602 Startup TID:3086968512 LicenseFilename =
/etc/arsystem/arsdev/arsystem.lic
Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6603 Startup TID:3086968512 Initialize
Language setting and locale
Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6610 Startup TID:3086968512 Initialize the
Decimal Math libray
Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6610 Startup TID:3086968512 Open shared catalog
Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6648 Startup TID:3086968512 Load encryption
shared library
Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6653 Startup TID:3086968512 Load encryption
static functions
Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6654 Startup TID:3086968512 Initialize
default configuration information
Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6654 Startup TID:3086968512 Create Mutexes
Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6655 Startup TID:3086968512 Initialize parse
environment
Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6657 Startup TID:3086968512 Initialize date
time information
Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6659 Startup TID:3086968512 Initialize
notification strings
Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6659 Startup TID:3086968512 Initialize RPC
queue type strings
Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6660 Startup TID:3086968512 Initialize filter
strings
Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6662 Startup TID:3086968512 Initialize
escalation strings
Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6662 Startup TID:3086968512 Load system
configuration file
Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6669 Startup TID:3086968512
arsCodeSet=windows-1252[0] arDbCodeSet=windows-1252[0]
Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6670 Startup TID:3086968512 Initialize pending
lists
Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6671 Startup TID:3086968512 Create cache read
write lock
Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6671 Startup TID:3086968512 Create full text
status read write lock
Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6672 Startup TID:3086968512 Initialize fork proxy
Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6672 Startup TID:3086968512 Check licensing
Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6693 Startup TID:3086968512 Initialize user cache
Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6707 Startup TID:3086968512 Open log file
Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6745 Startup TID:3086968512 Initialize XML parser
Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6782 Startup TID:3086968512 Initialize thread
list
Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6784 Startup TID:3086968512 Check multiple
servers
Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6787 Startup TID:3086968512 Initialize dead
thread list
Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6790 Startup TID:3086968512 Initialize timed
calls
Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6792 Startup TID:3086968512
CreateRPCQueue(min=1, max=1, rpc=390600)
Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6793 Startup TID:3086968512 Await cache ready...
Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.8988 Startup TID:0030571424
InitializeServerCache: LoadInitialSchemaInfo Begin
Jul 09 2007 18:29:11.7241 Startup TID:0030571424 Begin
LoadDisplayInfoList
Jul 09 2007 18:29:25.6076 Startup TID:0030571424
LoadDisplayInfoList: 500 rows
Jul 09 2007 18:29:42.7008 Startup TID:0030571424
LoadDisplayInfoList: 1000 rows

If you then review the sql that is sent to the db while the server is
unavailable, you will see this statement, followed by silence:

SELECT schemaId,fieldId,vuiId,propShort,propLong FROM field_dispprop
ORDER BY 1 ASC, 2 ASC, 3 ASC

What is happening here is that arserverd fetches the field display
property info, then processes it 500 records at a time.  Depending on
the size of your server (number of forms, views, fields, etc), there
may be a couple of sql statements

Re: ARS7 install with oracle 10G RAC ... the saga continues ...

2007-07-10 Thread Axton

Good luck with support (and I sincerely mean that).  The problem does
not seem to be in the way that the query to the db, but in the way the
results are processed.  If the arserver could serialize the memory
contents as part of the shutdown process, then reload them on startup,
it could probably be designed to be much more efficient, but there
would be trade offs with that route.  A few that come to mind:
- storage of the serialized contents (possibly gb's)
- time required to serialize the contents (slower shutdown)
The trade off is for a faster startup.

Another method that this could be addressed is to expose some
configuration parameters in how the current process works:
- chunk size (would be contingent on memory available and architecture
limits 32 vs 64 bit)

Another method is to streamline the current process; where do the
bottlenecks exist in the current design?  Can they be eliminated?

Just some thoughts...

Axton Grams

On 7/10/07, Tony Worthington [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Yup.  And the second query (each taking about four minutes on our boxes)
is:

SELECT schemaId,fieldId,groupId,permission FROM field_permissions ORDER BY
1 ASC,2 ASC,3 ASC

I wonder if we could get a defect filed, and have this looked at by
engineering... and get an answer more than as designed.

-tony

--
Tony Worthington
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
262-703-5911



Axton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
07/09/2007 05:55 PM
Please respond to
arslist@ARSLIST.ORG


To
arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
cc

Subject
Re: ARS7 install with oracle 10G RAC ... the saga continues ...






Remedy fetches information from it's data dictionary (e.g.,
field_disp_prop, field, etc.), then processes it in chunks of 100,
500, or 1000.  So if you have a table field_dispprop that has 120k
records and 500 records are processed at a time, 15 seconds per chunk,
you end up with a start time that totals 3600 seconds (for that part
of the startup).

If you add a -t parameter to arserverd in the armonitor.conf file, a
special startup log file is created.  The log file will look something
like this:

Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6577 Startup TID:3086968512 Set up thread
control block with key = 0
Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6582 Startup TID:3086968512 Initialize thread
local storage block
Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6583 Startup TID:3086968512 Initialize
mutiple-byte environment
Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6585 Startup TID:3086968512 InstallDir =
/u01/arsystem/arsdev
Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6587 Startup TID:3086968512 Initialize Server
utility
Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6599 Startup TID:3086968512 Initialize License
Library
Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6602 Startup TID:3086968512 LicenseFilename =
/etc/arsystem/arsdev/arsystem.lic
Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6603 Startup TID:3086968512 Initialize
Language setting and locale
Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6610 Startup TID:3086968512 Initialize the
Decimal Math libray
Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6610 Startup TID:3086968512 Open shared catalog
Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6648 Startup TID:3086968512 Load encryption
shared library
Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6653 Startup TID:3086968512 Load encryption
static functions
Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6654 Startup TID:3086968512 Initialize
default configuration information
Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6654 Startup TID:3086968512 Create Mutexes
Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6655 Startup TID:3086968512 Initialize parse
environment
Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6657 Startup TID:3086968512 Initialize date
time information
Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6659 Startup TID:3086968512 Initialize
notification strings
Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6659 Startup TID:3086968512 Initialize RPC
queue type strings
Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6660 Startup TID:3086968512 Initialize filter
strings
Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6662 Startup TID:3086968512 Initialize
escalation strings
Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6662 Startup TID:3086968512 Load system
configuration file
Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6669 Startup TID:3086968512
arsCodeSet=windows-1252[0] arDbCodeSet=windows-1252[0]
Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6670 Startup TID:3086968512 Initialize pending
lists
Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6671 Startup TID:3086968512 Create cache read
write lock
Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6671 Startup TID:3086968512 Create full text
status read write lock
Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6672 Startup TID:3086968512 Initialize fork proxy
Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6672 Startup TID:3086968512 Check licensing
Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6693 Startup TID:3086968512 Initialize user cache
Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6707 Startup TID:3086968512 Open log file
Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6745 Startup TID:3086968512 Initialize XML parser
Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6782 Startup TID:3086968512 Initialize thread
list
Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6784 Startup TID:3086968512 Check multiple
servers
Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6787 Startup TID:3086968512 Initialize dead
thread list
Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6790 Startup TID:3086968512 Initialize timed
calls
Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6792 Startup TID:3086968512
CreateRPCQueue(min=1, max=1, rpc=390600)
Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6793 Startup TID:3086968512 Await cache ready...
Jul 09 2007 18

Re: ARS7 install with oracle 10G RAC ... the saga continues ...

2007-07-10 Thread Jarl Grøneng

Another possible solution is to cache information like the mid-tier
does it When its requested, then fetch it. And the possibilites to
choose which elements to be fetched at startup.

--
Jarl


On 7/10/07, Axton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Good luck with support (and I sincerely mean that).  The problem does
not seem to be in the way that the query to the db, but in the way the
results are processed.  If the arserver could serialize the memory
contents as part of the shutdown process, then reload them on startup,
it could probably be designed to be much more efficient, but there
would be trade offs with that route.  A few that come to mind:
- storage of the serialized contents (possibly gb's)
- time required to serialize the contents (slower shutdown)
The trade off is for a faster startup.

Another method that this could be addressed is to expose some
configuration parameters in how the current process works:
- chunk size (would be contingent on memory available and architecture
limits 32 vs 64 bit)

Another method is to streamline the current process; where do the
bottlenecks exist in the current design?  Can they be eliminated?

Just some thoughts...

Axton Grams

On 7/10/07, Tony Worthington [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Yup.  And the second query (each taking about four minutes on our boxes)
 is:

 SELECT schemaId,fieldId,groupId,permission FROM field_permissions ORDER BY
 1 ASC,2 ASC,3 ASC

 I wonder if we could get a defect filed, and have this looked at by
 engineering... and get an answer more than as designed.

 -tony

 --
 Tony Worthington
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 262-703-5911



 Axton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent by: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
 arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
 07/09/2007 05:55 PM
 Please respond to
 arslist@ARSLIST.ORG


 To
 arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
 cc

 Subject
 Re: ARS7 install with oracle 10G RAC ... the saga continues ...






 Remedy fetches information from it's data dictionary (e.g.,
 field_disp_prop, field, etc.), then processes it in chunks of 100,
 500, or 1000.  So if you have a table field_dispprop that has 120k
 records and 500 records are processed at a time, 15 seconds per chunk,
 you end up with a start time that totals 3600 seconds (for that part
 of the startup).

 If you add a -t parameter to arserverd in the armonitor.conf file, a
 special startup log file is created.  The log file will look something
 like this:

 Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6577 Startup TID:3086968512 Set up thread
 control block with key = 0
 Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6582 Startup TID:3086968512 Initialize thread
 local storage block
 Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6583 Startup TID:3086968512 Initialize
 mutiple-byte environment
 Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6585 Startup TID:3086968512 InstallDir =
 /u01/arsystem/arsdev
 Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6587 Startup TID:3086968512 Initialize Server
 utility
 Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6599 Startup TID:3086968512 Initialize License
 Library
 Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6602 Startup TID:3086968512 LicenseFilename =
 /etc/arsystem/arsdev/arsystem.lic
 Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6603 Startup TID:3086968512 Initialize
 Language setting and locale
 Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6610 Startup TID:3086968512 Initialize the
 Decimal Math libray
 Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6610 Startup TID:3086968512 Open shared catalog
 Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6648 Startup TID:3086968512 Load encryption
 shared library
 Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6653 Startup TID:3086968512 Load encryption
 static functions
 Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6654 Startup TID:3086968512 Initialize
 default configuration information
 Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6654 Startup TID:3086968512 Create Mutexes
 Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6655 Startup TID:3086968512 Initialize parse
 environment
 Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6657 Startup TID:3086968512 Initialize date
 time information
 Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6659 Startup TID:3086968512 Initialize
 notification strings
 Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6659 Startup TID:3086968512 Initialize RPC
 queue type strings
 Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6660 Startup TID:3086968512 Initialize filter
 strings
 Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6662 Startup TID:3086968512 Initialize
 escalation strings
 Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6662 Startup TID:3086968512 Load system
 configuration file
 Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6669 Startup TID:3086968512
 arsCodeSet=windows-1252[0] arDbCodeSet=windows-1252[0]
 Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6670 Startup TID:3086968512 Initialize pending
 lists
 Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6671 Startup TID:3086968512 Create cache read
 write lock
 Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6671 Startup TID:3086968512 Create full text
 status read write lock
 Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6672 Startup TID:3086968512 Initialize fork proxy
 Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6672 Startup TID:3086968512 Check licensing
 Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6693 Startup TID:3086968512 Initialize user cache
 Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6707 Startup TID:3086968512 Open log file
 Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6745 Startup TID:3086968512 Initialize XML parser
 Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6782 Startup TID:3086968512 Initialize thread
 list
 Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6784 Startup TID:3086968512 Check multiple
 servers

Re: ARS7 install with oracle 10G RAC ... the saga continues ...

2007-07-10 Thread Joe D'Souza
Working with a slight problem :-)
  -Original Message-
  From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jarl Grøneng
  Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2007 9:03 AM
  To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
  Subject: Re: ARS7 install with oracle 10G RAC ... the saga continues ...


  **
  Do you really think you will get an answer other than as designed? :-)

  --
  Jarl

  Yuppi yeee, got an ok to travel to Vancouver in october :-)






  On 7/10/07, Tony Worthington [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   Yup.  And the second query (each taking about four minutes on our boxes)
   is:
  
   SELECT schemaId,fieldId,groupId,permission FROM field_permissions ORDER
BY
   1 ASC,2 ASC,3 ASC
  
   I wonder if we could get a defect filed, and have this looked at by
   engineering... and get an answer more than as designed.
  
   -tony
  
   --
   Tony Worthington
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   262-703-5911
  
  
  
   Axton  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Sent by: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
   arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
   07/09/2007 05:55 PM
   Please respond to
   arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
  
  
   To
   arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
   cc
  
   Subject
   Re: ARS7 install with oracle 10G RAC ... the saga continues ...
  
  
  
  
  
  
   Remedy fetches information from it's data dictionary (e.g.,
   field_disp_prop, field, etc.), then processes it in chunks of 100,
   500, or 1000.  So if you have a table field_dispprop that has 120k
   records and 500 records are processed at a time, 15 seconds per chunk,
   you end up with a start time that totals 3600 seconds (for that part
   of the startup).
  
   If you add a -t parameter to arserverd in the armonitor.conf file, a
   special startup log file is created.  The log file will look something
   like this:
  
   Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6577 Startup TID:3086968512 Set up thread
   control block with key = 0
   Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6582 Startup TID:3086968512 Initialize thread
   local storage block
   Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6583 Startup TID:3086968512 Initialize
   mutiple-byte environment
   Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6585 Startup TID:3086968512 InstallDir =
   /u01/arsystem/arsdev
   Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6587 Startup TID:3086968512 Initialize Server
   utility
   Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6599 Startup TID:3086968512 Initialize License
   Library
   Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6602 Startup TID:3086968512 LicenseFilename =
   /etc/arsystem/arsdev/arsystem.lic
   Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6603 Startup TID:3086968512 Initialize
   Language setting and locale
   Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6610 Startup TID:3086968512 Initialize the
   Decimal Math libray
   Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6610 Startup TID:3086968512 Open shared catalog
   Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6648 Startup TID:3086968512 Load encryption
   shared library
   Jul 09 2007 18:29: 06.6653 Startup TID:3086968512 Load encryption
   static functions
   Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6654 Startup TID:3086968512 Initialize
   default configuration information
   Jul 09 2007 18:29: 06.6654 Startup TID:3086968512 Create Mutexes
   Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6655 Startup TID:3086968512 Initialize parse
   environment
   Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6657 Startup TID:3086968512 Initialize date
   time information
   Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6659 Startup TID:3086968512 Initialize
   notification strings
   Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6659 Startup TID:3086968512 Initialize RPC
   queue type strings
   Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6660 Startup TID:3086968512 Initialize filter
   strings
   Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6662 Startup TID:3086968512 Initialize
   escalation strings
   Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6662 Startup TID:3086968512 Load system
   configuration file
   Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6669 Startup TID:3086968512
   arsCodeSet=windows-1252[0] arDbCodeSet=windows-1252[0]
   Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6670 Startup TID:3086968512 Initialize pending
   lists
   Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6671 Startup TID:3086968512 Create cache read
   write lock
   Jul 09 2007 18:29: 06.6671 Startup TID:3086968512 Create full text
   status read write lock
   Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6672 Startup TID:3086968512 Initialize fork
proxy
   Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6672 Startup TID:3086968512 Check licensing
   Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6693 Startup TID:3086968512 Initialize user
cache
   Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6707 Startup TID:3086968512 Open log file
   Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6745 Startup TID:3086968512 Initialize XML
parser
   Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6782 Startup TID:3086968512 Initialize thread
   list
   Jul 09 2007 18:29: 06.6784 Startup TID:3086968512 Check multiple
   servers
   Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6787 Startup TID:3086968512 Initialize dead
   thread list
   Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6790 Startup TID:3086968512 Initialize timed
   calls
   Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6792 Startup TID:3086968512
   CreateRPCQueue(min=1, max=1, rpc=390600)
   Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6793 Startup TID:3086968512 Await cache
ready...
   Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.8988 Startup TID:0030571424
   InitializeServerCache: LoadInitialSchemaInfo Begin
   Jul 09 2007 18:29:11.7241 Startup TID:0030571424 Begin

Re: ARS7 install with oracle 10G RAC ... the saga continues ...

2007-07-10 Thread Andrew Hicox

The problem does
not seem to be in the way that the query to the db, but in the way the
results are processed.


I don't know about that.
If the problem was the way that arserverd is processing the results  
of the query, why would startup be like  1 minute when the db is on  
the same box?


My bet is that this has something to do with the way that arserverd  
is connecting to oracle ... perhaps incorrect use of the api? All  
that waiting between queries really makes me think there's a timeout  
somewhere ... like waiting for a local listener to respond, i.e.  
looking for the database to be on the same machine, and only querying  
remotely when the local connection times out.


Man, this is why I sometimes hate dealing with proprietary software.
If this was open, you could bet someone would have fixed it by now,  
and if they hadn't we'd at least have a fighting chance of fixing it  
ourselves.


thanks again, everyone for all your help.
looks like the only answer for now is the Run-DMC response: it's  
like that, and that's the way it is ... huh!


-A ;-)

On Jul 10, 2007, at 8:30 AM, Axton wrote:


Good luck with support (and I sincerely mean that).  The problem does
not seem to be in the way that the query to the db, but in the way the
results are processed.  If the arserver could serialize the memory
contents as part of the shutdown process, then reload them on startup,
it could probably be designed to be much more efficient, but there
would be trade offs with that route.  A few that come to mind:
- storage of the serialized contents (possibly gb's)
- time required to serialize the contents (slower shutdown)
The trade off is for a faster startup.

Another method that this could be addressed is to expose some
configuration parameters in how the current process works:
- chunk size (would be contingent on memory available and architecture
limits 32 vs 64 bit)

Another method is to streamline the current process; where do the
bottlenecks exist in the current design?  Can they be eliminated?

Just some thoughts...

Axton Grams

On 7/10/07, Tony Worthington [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yup.  And the second query (each taking about four minutes on our  
boxes)

is:

SELECT schemaId,fieldId,groupId,permission FROM field_permissions  
ORDER BY

1 ASC,2 ASC,3 ASC

I wonder if we could get a defect filed, and have this looked at by
engineering... and get an answer more than as designed.

-tony

--
Tony Worthington
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
262-703-5911



Axton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
07/09/2007 05:55 PM
Please respond to
arslist@ARSLIST.ORG


To
arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
cc

Subject
Re: ARS7 install with oracle 10G RAC ... the saga continues ...






Remedy fetches information from it's data dictionary (e.g.,
field_disp_prop, field, etc.), then processes it in chunks of 100,
500, or 1000.  So if you have a table field_dispprop that has 120k
records and 500 records are processed at a time, 15 seconds per  
chunk,

you end up with a start time that totals 3600 seconds (for that part
of the startup).

If you add a -t parameter to arserverd in the armonitor.conf file, a
special startup log file is created.  The log file will look  
something

like this:

Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6577 Startup TID:3086968512 Set up thread
control block with key = 0
Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6582 Startup TID:3086968512 Initialize  
thread

local storage block
Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6583 Startup TID:3086968512 Initialize
mutiple-byte environment
Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6585 Startup TID:3086968512 InstallDir =
/u01/arsystem/arsdev
Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6587 Startup TID:3086968512 Initialize  
Server

utility
Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6599 Startup TID:3086968512 Initialize  
License

Library
Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6602 Startup TID:3086968512  
LicenseFilename =

/etc/arsystem/arsdev/arsystem.lic
Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6603 Startup TID:3086968512 Initialize
Language setting and locale
Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6610 Startup TID:3086968512 Initialize the
Decimal Math libray
Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6610 Startup TID:3086968512 Open shared  
catalog

Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6648 Startup TID:3086968512 Load encryption
shared library
Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6653 Startup TID:3086968512 Load encryption
static functions
Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6654 Startup TID:3086968512 Initialize
default configuration information
Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6654 Startup TID:3086968512 Create Mutexes
Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6655 Startup TID:3086968512 Initialize parse
environment
Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6657 Startup TID:3086968512 Initialize date
time information
Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6659 Startup TID:3086968512 Initialize
notification strings
Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6659 Startup TID:3086968512 Initialize RPC
queue type strings
Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6660 Startup TID:3086968512 Initialize  
filter

strings
Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6662 Startup TID:3086968512 Initialize
escalation strings
Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6662 Startup TID:3086968512 Load system
configuration file
Jul

Re: ARS7 install with oracle 10G RAC ... the saga continues ...

2007-07-10 Thread Axton

Definitely opaque.  All I have to go on are packet dumps, sqlnet logs,
low level system calls, and an arserver startup log generated by using
an undocumented flag to arserverd.

Axton Grams

On 7/10/07, Andrew Hicox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 The problem does
 not seem to be in the way that the query to the db, but in the way the
 results are processed.

I don't know about that.
If the problem was the way that arserverd is processing the results
of the query, why would startup be like  1 minute when the db is on
the same box?

My bet is that this has something to do with the way that arserverd
is connecting to oracle ... perhaps incorrect use of the api? All
that waiting between queries really makes me think there's a timeout
somewhere ... like waiting for a local listener to respond, i.e.
looking for the database to be on the same machine, and only querying
remotely when the local connection times out.

Man, this is why I sometimes hate dealing with proprietary software.
If this was open, you could bet someone would have fixed it by now,
and if they hadn't we'd at least have a fighting chance of fixing it
ourselves.

thanks again, everyone for all your help.
looks like the only answer for now is the Run-DMC response: it's
like that, and that's the way it is ... huh!

-A ;-)

On Jul 10, 2007, at 8:30 AM, Axton wrote:

 Good luck with support (and I sincerely mean that).  The problem does
 not seem to be in the way that the query to the db, but in the way the
 results are processed.  If the arserver could serialize the memory
 contents as part of the shutdown process, then reload them on startup,
 it could probably be designed to be much more efficient, but there
 would be trade offs with that route.  A few that come to mind:
 - storage of the serialized contents (possibly gb's)
 - time required to serialize the contents (slower shutdown)
 The trade off is for a faster startup.

 Another method that this could be addressed is to expose some
 configuration parameters in how the current process works:
 - chunk size (would be contingent on memory available and architecture
 limits 32 vs 64 bit)

 Another method is to streamline the current process; where do the
 bottlenecks exist in the current design?  Can they be eliminated?

 Just some thoughts...

 Axton Grams

 On 7/10/07, Tony Worthington [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Yup.  And the second query (each taking about four minutes on our
 boxes)
 is:

 SELECT schemaId,fieldId,groupId,permission FROM field_permissions
 ORDER BY
 1 ASC,2 ASC,3 ASC

 I wonder if we could get a defect filed, and have this looked at by
 engineering... and get an answer more than as designed.

 -tony

 --
 Tony Worthington
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 262-703-5911



 Axton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent by: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
 arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
 07/09/2007 05:55 PM
 Please respond to
 arslist@ARSLIST.ORG


 To
 arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
 cc

 Subject
 Re: ARS7 install with oracle 10G RAC ... the saga continues ...






 Remedy fetches information from it's data dictionary (e.g.,
 field_disp_prop, field, etc.), then processes it in chunks of 100,
 500, or 1000.  So if you have a table field_dispprop that has 120k
 records and 500 records are processed at a time, 15 seconds per
 chunk,
 you end up with a start time that totals 3600 seconds (for that part
 of the startup).

 If you add a -t parameter to arserverd in the armonitor.conf file, a
 special startup log file is created.  The log file will look
 something
 like this:

 Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6577 Startup TID:3086968512 Set up thread
 control block with key = 0
 Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6582 Startup TID:3086968512 Initialize
 thread
 local storage block
 Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6583 Startup TID:3086968512 Initialize
 mutiple-byte environment
 Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6585 Startup TID:3086968512 InstallDir =
 /u01/arsystem/arsdev
 Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6587 Startup TID:3086968512 Initialize
 Server
 utility
 Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6599 Startup TID:3086968512 Initialize
 License
 Library
 Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6602 Startup TID:3086968512
 LicenseFilename =
 /etc/arsystem/arsdev/arsystem.lic
 Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6603 Startup TID:3086968512 Initialize
 Language setting and locale
 Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6610 Startup TID:3086968512 Initialize the
 Decimal Math libray
 Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6610 Startup TID:3086968512 Open shared
 catalog
 Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6648 Startup TID:3086968512 Load encryption
 shared library
 Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6653 Startup TID:3086968512 Load encryption
 static functions
 Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6654 Startup TID:3086968512 Initialize
 default configuration information
 Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6654 Startup TID:3086968512 Create Mutexes
 Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6655 Startup TID:3086968512 Initialize parse
 environment
 Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6657 Startup TID:3086968512 Initialize date
 time information
 Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6659 Startup TID:3086968512 Initialize
 notification strings
 Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6659 Startup TID

Re: ARS7 install with oracle 10G RAC ... the saga continues ...

2007-07-10 Thread Shellman, David
When I spoke to support about how long it took the system to start up they said 
that start up was chatty between the server app and the database.  With a 
network link that running near capacity (our case), flaky router/switch, slow 
link, etc the length of time to respond between app server and fb server is 
increased..  All these situations are often not apparent with out getting 
network folks involved. 

Dave
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Wireless)

- Original Message -
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Sent: Tue Jul 10 10:19:29 2007
Subject: Re: ARS7 install with oracle 10G RAC ... the saga continues ...

 The problem does
 not seem to be in the way that the query to the db, but in the way the
 results are processed.

I don't know about that.
If the problem was the way that arserverd is processing the results  
of the query, why would startup be like  1 minute when the db is on  
the same box?

My bet is that this has something to do with the way that arserverd  
is connecting to oracle ... perhaps incorrect use of the api? All  
that waiting between queries really makes me think there's a timeout  
somewhere ... like waiting for a local listener to respond, i.e.  
looking for the database to be on the same machine, and only querying  
remotely when the local connection times out.

Man, this is why I sometimes hate dealing with proprietary software.
If this was open, you could bet someone would have fixed it by now,  
and if they hadn't we'd at least have a fighting chance of fixing it  
ourselves.

thanks again, everyone for all your help.
looks like the only answer for now is the Run-DMC response: it's  
like that, and that's the way it is ... huh!

-A ;-)

On Jul 10, 2007, at 8:30 AM, Axton wrote:

 Good luck with support (and I sincerely mean that).  The problem does
 not seem to be in the way that the query to the db, but in the way the
 results are processed.  If the arserver could serialize the memory
 contents as part of the shutdown process, then reload them on startup,
 it could probably be designed to be much more efficient, but there
 would be trade offs with that route.  A few that come to mind:
 - storage of the serialized contents (possibly gb's)
 - time required to serialize the contents (slower shutdown)
 The trade off is for a faster startup.

 Another method that this could be addressed is to expose some
 configuration parameters in how the current process works:
 - chunk size (would be contingent on memory available and architecture
 limits 32 vs 64 bit)

 Another method is to streamline the current process; where do the
 bottlenecks exist in the current design?  Can they be eliminated?

 Just some thoughts...

 Axton Grams

 On 7/10/07, Tony Worthington [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Yup.  And the second query (each taking about four minutes on our  
 boxes)
 is:

 SELECT schemaId,fieldId,groupId,permission FROM field_permissions  
 ORDER BY
 1 ASC,2 ASC,3 ASC

 I wonder if we could get a defect filed, and have this looked at by
 engineering... and get an answer more than as designed.

 -tony

 --
 Tony Worthington
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 262-703-5911



 Axton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent by: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
 arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
 07/09/2007 05:55 PM
 Please respond to
 arslist@ARSLIST.ORG


 To
 arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
 cc

 Subject
 Re: ARS7 install with oracle 10G RAC ... the saga continues ...






 Remedy fetches information from it's data dictionary (e.g.,
 field_disp_prop, field, etc.), then processes it in chunks of 100,
 500, or 1000.  So if you have a table field_dispprop that has 120k
 records and 500 records are processed at a time, 15 seconds per  
 chunk,
 you end up with a start time that totals 3600 seconds (for that part
 of the startup).

 If you add a -t parameter to arserverd in the armonitor.conf file, a
 special startup log file is created.  The log file will look  
 something
 like this:

 Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6577 Startup TID:3086968512 Set up thread
 control block with key = 0
 Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6582 Startup TID:3086968512 Initialize  
 thread
 local storage block
 Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6583 Startup TID:3086968512 Initialize
 mutiple-byte environment
 Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6585 Startup TID:3086968512 InstallDir =
 /u01/arsystem/arsdev
 Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6587 Startup TID:3086968512 Initialize  
 Server
 utility
 Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6599 Startup TID:3086968512 Initialize  
 License
 Library
 Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6602 Startup TID:3086968512  
 LicenseFilename =
 /etc/arsystem/arsdev/arsystem.lic
 Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6603 Startup TID:3086968512 Initialize
 Language setting and locale
 Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6610 Startup TID:3086968512 Initialize the
 Decimal Math libray
 Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6610 Startup TID:3086968512 Open shared  
 catalog
 Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6648 Startup TID:3086968512 Load encryption
 shared library
 Jul 09 2007

Re: ARS7 install with oracle 10G RAC ... the saga continues ...

2007-07-10 Thread Axton

The issue is widespread, esp. with a remote Oracle db.  Our servers
are switched with fiber/gb.  Even if I have 2 vm's runnning on the
same physical host (one db and one ars), I see the same issue.  The
packet logs do not show a problem with throughput and my switches show
no congestion.

Axton Grams

On 7/10/07, Shellman, David [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:




When I spoke to support about how long it took the system to start up they
said that start up was chatty between the server app and the database.  With
a network link that running near capacity (our case), flaky router/switch,
slow link, etc the length of time to respond between app server and fb
server is increased..  All these situations are often not apparent with out
getting network folks involved.

 Dave
 --
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Wireless)

 - Original Message -
 From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
 To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
 Sent: Tue Jul 10 10:19:29 2007
 Subject: Re: ARS7 install with oracle 10G RAC ... the saga continues ...

  The problem does
  not seem to be in the way that the query to the db, but in the way the
  results are processed.

 I don't know about that.
 If the problem was the way that arserverd is processing the results
 of the query, why would startup be like  1 minute when the db is on
 the same box?

 My bet is that this has something to do with the way that arserverd
 is connecting to oracle ... perhaps incorrect use of the api? All
 that waiting between queries really makes me think there's a timeout
 somewhere ... like waiting for a local listener to respond, i.e.
 looking for the database to be on the same machine, and only querying
 remotely when the local connection times out.

 Man, this is why I sometimes hate dealing with proprietary software.
 If this was open, you could bet someone would have fixed it by now,
 and if they hadn't we'd at least have a fighting chance of fixing it
 ourselves.

 thanks again, everyone for all your help.
 looks like the only answer for now is the Run-DMC response: it's
 like that, and that's the way it is ... huh!

 -A ;-)

 On Jul 10, 2007, at 8:30 AM, Axton wrote:

  Good luck with support (and I sincerely mean that).  The problem does
  not seem to be in the way that the query to the db, but in the way the
  results are processed.  If the arserver could serialize the memory
  contents as part of the shutdown process, then reload them on startup,
  it could probably be designed to be much more efficient, but there
  would be trade offs with that route.  A few that come to mind:
  - storage of the serialized contents (possibly gb's)
  - time required to serialize the contents (slower shutdown)
  The trade off is for a faster startup.
 
  Another method that this could be addressed is to expose some
  configuration parameters in how the current process works:
  - chunk size (would be contingent on memory available and architecture
  limits 32 vs 64 bit)
 
  Another method is to streamline the current process; where do the
  bottlenecks exist in the current design?  Can they be eliminated?
 
  Just some thoughts...
 
  Axton Grams
 
  On 7/10/07, Tony Worthington [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Yup.  And the second query (each taking about four minutes on our
  boxes)
  is:
 
  SELECT schemaId,fieldId,groupId,permission FROM
field_permissions
  ORDER BY
  1 ASC,2 ASC,3 ASC
 
  I wonder if we could get a defect filed, and have this looked at by
  engineering... and get an answer more than as designed.
 
  -tony
 
  --
  Tony Worthington
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  262-703-5911
 
 
 
  Axton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent by: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
  arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
  07/09/2007 05:55 PM
  Please respond to
  arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
 
 
  To
  arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
  cc
 
  Subject
  Re: ARS7 install with oracle 10G RAC ... the saga continues ...
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Remedy fetches information from it's data dictionary (e.g.,
  field_disp_prop, field, etc.), then processes it in chunks of 100,
  500, or 1000.  So if you have a table field_dispprop that has 120k
  records and 500 records are processed at a time, 15 seconds per
  chunk,
  you end up with a start time that totals 3600 seconds (for that part
  of the startup).
 
  If you add a -t parameter to arserverd in the armonitor.conf file, a
  special startup log file is created.  The log file will look
  something
  like this:
 
  Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6577 Startup TID:3086968512 Set up thread
  control block with key = 0
  Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6582 Startup TID:3086968512 Initialize
  thread
  local storage block
  Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6583 Startup TID:3086968512 Initialize
  mutiple-byte environment
  Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6585 Startup TID:3086968512 InstallDir =
  /u01/arsystem/arsdev
  Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6587 Startup TID:3086968512 Initialize
  Server
  utility
  Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6599 Startup TID:3086968512 Initialize
  License
  Library
  Jul 09

Re: ARS7 install with oracle 10G RAC ... the saga continues ...

2007-07-10 Thread Lammey, Peter A.
Does this lead anyone to believe or have people noticed other general
activities in the applications are slow based on this? 

Thanks
Peter Lammey
ESPN MIT Technical Services  Applications Management
860-766-4761

-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Axton
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2007 11:47 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: ARS7 install with oracle 10G RAC ... the saga continues ...

The issue is widespread, esp. with a remote Oracle db.  Our servers are
switched with fiber/gb.  Even if I have 2 vm's runnning on the same
physical host (one db and one ars), I see the same issue.  The packet
logs do not show a problem with throughput and my switches show no
congestion.

Axton Grams

On 7/10/07, Shellman, David [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



 When I spoke to support about how long it took the system to start up 
 they said that start up was chatty between the server app and the 
 database.  With a network link that running near capacity (our case), 
 flaky router/switch, slow link, etc the length of time to respond 
 between app server and fb server is increased..  All these situations 
 are often not apparent with out getting network folks involved.

  Dave
  --
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Wireless)

  - Original Message -
  From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
 arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
  To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
  Sent: Tue Jul 10 10:19:29 2007
  Subject: Re: ARS7 install with oracle 10G RAC ... the saga continues
...

   The problem does
   not seem to be in the way that the query to the db, but in the way 
 the   results are processed.

  I don't know about that.
  If the problem was the way that arserverd is processing the results  
 of the query, why would startup be like  1 minute when the db is on  
 the same box?

  My bet is that this has something to do with the way that arserverd  
 is connecting to oracle ... perhaps incorrect use of the api? All  
 that waiting between queries really makes me think there's a timeout  
 somewhere ... like waiting for a local listener to respond, i.e.
  looking for the database to be on the same machine, and only querying

 remotely when the local connection times out.

  Man, this is why I sometimes hate dealing with proprietary software.
  If this was open, you could bet someone would have fixed it by now,  
 and if they hadn't we'd at least have a fighting chance of fixing it  
 ourselves.

  thanks again, everyone for all your help.
  looks like the only answer for now is the Run-DMC response: it's  
 like that, and that's the way it is ... huh!

  -A ;-)

  On Jul 10, 2007, at 8:30 AM, Axton wrote:

   Good luck with support (and I sincerely mean that).  The problem 
 does   not seem to be in the way that the query to the db, but in the

 way the   results are processed.  If the arserver could serialize the

 memory   contents as part of the shutdown process, then reload them 
 on startup,   it could probably be designed to be much more 
 efficient, but there   would be trade offs with that route.  A few
that come to mind:
   - storage of the serialized contents (possibly gb's)   - time 
 required to serialize the contents (slower shutdown)   The trade off 
 is for a faster startup.
  
   Another method that this could be addressed is to expose some   
 configuration parameters in how the current process works:
   - chunk size (would be contingent on memory available and 
 architecture   limits 32 vs 64 bit) Another method is to 
 streamline the current process; where do the   bottlenecks exist in 
 the current design?  Can they be eliminated?
  
   Just some thoughts...
  
   Axton Grams
  
   On 7/10/07, Tony Worthington [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   Yup.  And the second query (each taking about four minutes on our

  boxes)   is:
  
   SELECT schemaId,fieldId,groupId,permission FROM field_permissions

  ORDER BY   1 ASC,2 ASC,3 ASC I wonder if we could get a 
 defect filed, and have this looked at by   engineering... and get an

 answer more than as designed.
  
   -tony
  
   --
   Tony Worthington
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   262-703-5911
  
  
  
   Axton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Sent by: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
   arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
   07/09/2007 05:55 PM
   Please respond to
   arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
  
  
   To
   arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
   cc
  
   Subject
   Re: ARS7 install with oracle 10G RAC ... the saga continues ...
  
  
  
  
  
  
   Remedy fetches information from it's data dictionary (e.g.,   
 field_disp_prop, field, etc.), then processes it in chunks of 100,  

 500, or 1000.  So if you have a table field_dispprop that has 120k  

 records and 500 records are processed at a time, 15 seconds per   
 chunk,   you end up with a start time that totals 3600 seconds (for 
 that part   of the startup).
  
   If you add a -t parameter to arserverd in the armonitor.conf file,

 a   special

Re: ARS7 install with oracle 10G RAC ... the saga continues ... KM-000010001381 (UNCLASSIFIED)

2007-07-10 Thread HARTWICK, SCOTT G CTR DISA JSSC
Classification:  UNCLASSIFIED 
Caveats: NONE

We have been having performance issues with our Oracle installation and
found this KM article with some ideas on how to improve performance and
initial configuration:

*
The following is information for ITSM 7.0.x installs within an Oracle
environment:
1.  Have your DBA set the SGA Size to min 250 and max 850.
2.  Also, Knowledge Base entry KM-10001381 should prove to be
helpful to you:
*
PROBLEM:
Below are some settings which have been helpful for Oracle customers to
avoid ARERR 91, 92, 93, 94 timeout issues, especially during application
installations 

SOLUTION:
1) AR Server version 7.01  or AR Server version 6.03 patch 19
 The above version or later contain new method of Oracle client
calls which enhance performance

  2) For Oracle 9i or 10g customer:
 add CURSOR_SHARING=FORCE to the Oracle init file, 

  3) For Oracle 9i or 10g customer: add the following parameters to
ar.conf or ar.cfg
  Oracle-Cursor-Sharing: FORCE 

  4) For all Windows (with 2 CPU) customers, Suggest to assign
private RPC to RE (in ar.conf or ar.cfg)
   RE-RPC-Socket:  390621
   Private-RPC-Socket: 390621  10  10

   For UNIX platforms,
   RE-RPC-Socket:  390621
   Private-RPC-Socket: 390621  6   6
 
As always, turning of your database and ARServer is a task for your dba,
system administrator and Remedy administrator working in concert.  The
settings above have proved helpful in several cases, but they should be
used as a starting point for investigation rather than standard
configuration applicable in all environments. 
 
A defect SW00254374 has been logged for Engineering to consider whether
this information or an official recommendation should be included in the
shipped product docs.
**

Scott.

-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lammey, Peter A.
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2007 11:51 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: ARS7 install with oracle 10G RAC ... the saga continues ...

Does this lead anyone to believe or have people noticed other general
activities in the applications are slow based on this? 

Thanks
Peter Lammey
ESPN MIT Technical Services  Applications Management
860-766-4761

-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Axton
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2007 11:47 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: ARS7 install with oracle 10G RAC ... the saga continues ...

The issue is widespread, esp. with a remote Oracle db.  Our servers are
switched with fiber/gb.  Even if I have 2 vm's runnning on the same
physical host (one db and one ars), I see the same issue.  The packet
logs do not show a problem with throughput and my switches show no
congestion.

Axton Grams

On 7/10/07, Shellman, David [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



 When I spoke to support about how long it took the system to start up 
 they said that start up was chatty between the server app and the 
 database.  With a network link that running near capacity (our case), 
 flaky router/switch, slow link, etc the length of time to respond 
 between app server and fb server is increased..  All these situations 
 are often not apparent with out getting network folks involved.

  Dave
  --
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Wireless)

  - Original Message -
  From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
 arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
  To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
  Sent: Tue Jul 10 10:19:29 2007
  Subject: Re: ARS7 install with oracle 10G RAC ... the saga continues
...

   The problem does
   not seem to be in the way that the query to the db, but in the way 
 the   results are processed.

  I don't know about that.
  If the problem was the way that arserverd is processing the results 
 of the query, why would startup be like  1 minute when the db is on 
 the same box?

  My bet is that this has something to do with the way that arserverd 
 is connecting to oracle ... perhaps incorrect use of the api? All that

 waiting between queries really makes me think there's a timeout 
 somewhere ... like waiting for a local listener to respond, i.e.
  looking for the database to be on the same machine, and only querying

 remotely when the local connection times out.

  Man, this is why I sometimes hate dealing with proprietary software.
  If this was open, you could bet someone would have fixed it by now, 
 and if they hadn't we'd at least have a fighting chance of fixing it 
 ourselves.

  thanks again, everyone for all your help.
  looks like the only answer for now is the Run-DMC response: it's 
 like that, and that's the way it is ... huh!

  -A ;-)

  On Jul 10, 2007, at 8:30 AM, Axton wrote:

   Good luck with support (and I sincerely mean that).  The problem 
 does

Re: ARS7 install with oracle 10G RAC ... the saga continues ... KM-000010001381 (UNCLASSIFIED)

2007-07-10 Thread Tony Worthington
Now I'm confused.  There's a cursor sharing whitepaper Oracle's Cursor 
Sharing for BMC® Remedy® Products that specifies that it be set at 
SIMILAR.

Now which is it BMC.  SIMILAR or FORCE?

Best practices mandate specifically that, with 6.0.1, users should use 
force, and with 6.3 or 7.0, users should use similar, but the difference 
between the two settings is small.
The syntax of the cursor_sharing setting in the ar.conf file is as follows 
(set only one):
 Oracle-Cursor-Sharing: SIMILAR
 Oracle-Cursor-Sharing: FORCE


-- 
Tony Worthington
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
262-703-5911



HARTWICK, SCOTT G CTR DISA JSSC [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent by: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
07/10/2007 11:02 AM
Please respond to
arslist@ARSLIST.ORG


To
arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
cc

Subject
Re: ARS7 install with oracle 10G RAC ... the saga continues ... 
KM-10001381 (UNCLASSIFIED)






Classification:  UNCLASSIFIED 
Caveats: NONE

We have been having performance issues with our Oracle installation and
found this KM article with some ideas on how to improve performance and
initial configuration:

*
The following is information for ITSM 7.0.x installs within an Oracle
environment:
1.  Have your DBA set the SGA Size to min 250 and max 850.
2.  Also, Knowledge Base entry KM-10001381 should prove to be
helpful to you:
*
PROBLEM:
Below are some settings which have been helpful for Oracle customers to
avoid ARERR 91, 92, 93, 94 timeout issues, especially during application
installations 

SOLUTION:
 1) AR Server version 7.01  or AR Server version 6.03 
patch 19
 The above version or later contain new method of Oracle client
calls which enhance performance

  2) For Oracle 9i or 10g customer:
 add CURSOR_SHARING=FORCE to the Oracle init file, 

  3) For Oracle 9i or 10g customer: add the following parameters to
ar.conf or ar.cfg
  Oracle-Cursor-Sharing: FORCE 

  4) For all Windows (with 2 CPU) customers, Suggest to assign
private RPC to RE (in ar.conf or ar.cfg)
   RE-RPC-Socket:  390621
   Private-RPC-Socket: 390621  10  10

   For UNIX platforms,
   RE-RPC-Socket:  390621
   Private-RPC-Socket: 390621  6   6
 
As always, turning of your database and ARServer is a task for your dba,
system administrator and Remedy administrator working in concert.  The
settings above have proved helpful in several cases, but they should be
used as a starting point for investigation rather than standard
configuration applicable in all environments. 
 
A defect SW00254374 has been logged for Engineering to consider whether
this information or an official recommendation should be included in the
shipped product docs.
**

Scott.

-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lammey, Peter A.
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2007 11:51 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: ARS7 install with oracle 10G RAC ... the saga continues ...

Does this lead anyone to believe or have people noticed other general
activities in the applications are slow based on this? 

Thanks
Peter Lammey
ESPN MIT Technical Services  Applications Management
860-766-4761

-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Axton
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2007 11:47 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: ARS7 install with oracle 10G RAC ... the saga continues ...

The issue is widespread, esp. with a remote Oracle db.  Our servers are
switched with fiber/gb.  Even if I have 2 vm's runnning on the same
physical host (one db and one ars), I see the same issue.  The packet
logs do not show a problem with throughput and my switches show no
congestion.

Axton Grams

On 7/10/07, Shellman, David [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



 When I spoke to support about how long it took the system to start up 
 they said that start up was chatty between the server app and the 
 database.  With a network link that running near capacity (our case), 
 flaky router/switch, slow link, etc the length of time to respond 
 between app server and fb server is increased..  All these situations 
 are often not apparent with out getting network folks involved.

  Dave
  --
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Wireless)

  - Original Message -
  From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
 arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
  To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
  Sent: Tue Jul 10 10:19:29 2007
  Subject: Re: ARS7 install with oracle 10G RAC ... the saga continues
...

   The problem does
   not seem to be in the way that the query to the db, but in the way 
 the   results are processed.

  I don't know about that.
  If the problem was the way that arserverd is processing the results 
 of the query, why would startup be like  1 minute when the db is on 
 the same box

Re: ARS7 install with oracle 10G RAC ... the saga continues ... KM-000010001381 (UNCLASSIFIED)

2007-07-10 Thread Rick Cook

Something else to consider is that the CLOB-in-row setting (which you should
also consider setting), will only have its full effect if set prior to
installation.  When running our initial Discovery, we noticed that our DB
had increased 10x in size - far more than the data would have indicated.
Changing the CLOB-in-row setting on an EXISTING DB did NOT recover the
wasted disk space.

There is an RFE in now on the fact that Remedy does not use Oracle bind
parameters as often as it could, which really hurts performance.  I bet that
the Remedy engineers kind of wish Oracle would act like the rest of the DBs,
but that's probably a common wish across many platforms.

Rick

On 7/10/07, HARTWICK, SCOTT G CTR DISA JSSC [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:


Classification:  UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats: NONE

We have been having performance issues with our Oracle installation and
found this KM article with some ideas on how to improve performance and
initial configuration:

*
The following is information for ITSM 7.0.x installs within an Oracle
environment:
1.  Have your DBA set the SGA Size to min 250 and max 850.
2.  Also, Knowledge Base entry KM-10001381 should prove to be
helpful to you:
*
PROBLEM:
Below are some settings which have been helpful for Oracle customers to
avoid ARERR 91, 92, 93, 94 timeout issues, especially during application
installations

SOLUTION:
   1) AR Server version 7.01  or AR Server version 6.03 patch 19
The above version or later contain new method of Oracle client
calls which enhance performance

 2) For Oracle 9i or 10g customer:
add CURSOR_SHARING=FORCE to the Oracle init file,

 3) For Oracle 9i or 10g customer: add the following parameters to
ar.conf or ar.cfg
 Oracle-Cursor-Sharing: FORCE

 4) For all Windows (with 2 CPU) customers, Suggest to assign
private RPC to RE (in ar.conf or ar.cfg)
  RE-RPC-Socket:  390621
  Private-RPC-Socket: 390621  10  10

  For UNIX platforms,
  RE-RPC-Socket:  390621
  Private-RPC-Socket: 390621  6   6

As always, turning of your database and ARServer is a task for your dba,
system administrator and Remedy administrator working in concert.  The
settings above have proved helpful in several cases, but they should be
used as a starting point for investigation rather than standard
configuration applicable in all environments.

A defect SW00254374 has been logged for Engineering to consider whether
this information or an official recommendation should be included in the
shipped product docs.
**

Scott.

-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lammey, Peter A.
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2007 11:51 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: ARS7 install with oracle 10G RAC ... the saga continues ...

Does this lead anyone to believe or have people noticed other general
activities in the applications are slow based on this?

Thanks
Peter Lammey
ESPN MIT Technical Services  Applications Management
860-766-4761

-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Axton
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2007 11:47 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: ARS7 install with oracle 10G RAC ... the saga continues ...

The issue is widespread, esp. with a remote Oracle db.  Our servers are
switched with fiber/gb.  Even if I have 2 vm's runnning on the same
physical host (one db and one ars), I see the same issue.  The packet
logs do not show a problem with throughput and my switches show no
congestion.

Axton Grams

On 7/10/07, Shellman, David [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



 When I spoke to support about how long it took the system to start up
 they said that start up was chatty between the server app and the
 database.  With a network link that running near capacity (our case),
 flaky router/switch, slow link, etc the length of time to respond
 between app server and fb server is increased..  All these situations
 are often not apparent with out getting network folks involved.

  Dave
  --
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Wireless)

  - Original Message -
  From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
 arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
  To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
  Sent: Tue Jul 10 10:19:29 2007
  Subject: Re: ARS7 install with oracle 10G RAC ... the saga continues
...

   The problem does
   not seem to be in the way that the query to the db, but in the way
 the   results are processed.

  I don't know about that.
  If the problem was the way that arserverd is processing the results
 of the query, why would startup be like  1 minute when the db is on
 the same box?

  My bet is that this has something to do with the way that arserverd
 is connecting to oracle ... perhaps incorrect use of the api? All that

 waiting between queries really makes me think

Re: ARS7 install with oracle 10G RAC ... the saga continues ... KM-000010001381 (UNCLASSIFIED)

2007-07-10 Thread Emad Zaky

For performance of applications on a single server it is ok. But I have
noticed that if you run 2 AR servers with ITSM apps you get timeouts.

Emad


On 7/10/07, HARTWICK, SCOTT G CTR DISA JSSC [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:


Classification:  UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats: NONE

We have been having performance issues with our Oracle installation and
found this KM article with some ideas on how to improve performance and
initial configuration:

*
The following is information for ITSM 7.0.x installs within an Oracle
environment:
1.  Have your DBA set the SGA Size to min 250 and max 850.
2.  Also, Knowledge Base entry KM-10001381 should prove to be
helpful to you:
*
PROBLEM:
Below are some settings which have been helpful for Oracle customers to
avoid ARERR 91, 92, 93, 94 timeout issues, especially during application
installations

SOLUTION:
   1) AR Server version 7.01  or AR Server version 6.03 patch 19
The above version or later contain new method of Oracle client
calls which enhance performance

 2) For Oracle 9i or 10g customer:
add CURSOR_SHARING=FORCE to the Oracle init file,

 3) For Oracle 9i or 10g customer: add the following parameters to
ar.conf or ar.cfg
 Oracle-Cursor-Sharing: FORCE

 4) For all Windows (with 2 CPU) customers, Suggest to assign
private RPC to RE (in ar.conf or ar.cfg)
  RE-RPC-Socket:  390621
  Private-RPC-Socket: 390621  10  10

  For UNIX platforms,
  RE-RPC-Socket:  390621
  Private-RPC-Socket: 390621  6   6

As always, turning of your database and ARServer is a task for your dba,
system administrator and Remedy administrator working in concert.  The
settings above have proved helpful in several cases, but they should be
used as a starting point for investigation rather than standard
configuration applicable in all environments.

A defect SW00254374 has been logged for Engineering to consider whether
this information or an official recommendation should be included in the
shipped product docs.
**

Scott.

-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lammey, Peter A.
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2007 11:51 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: ARS7 install with oracle 10G RAC ... the saga continues ...

Does this lead anyone to believe or have people noticed other general
activities in the applications are slow based on this?

Thanks
Peter Lammey
ESPN MIT Technical Services  Applications Management
860-766-4761

-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Axton
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2007 11:47 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: ARS7 install with oracle 10G RAC ... the saga continues ...

The issue is widespread, esp. with a remote Oracle db.  Our servers are
switched with fiber/gb.  Even if I have 2 vm's runnning on the same
physical host (one db and one ars), I see the same issue.  The packet
logs do not show a problem with throughput and my switches show no
congestion.

Axton Grams

On 7/10/07, Shellman, David [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



 When I spoke to support about how long it took the system to start up
 they said that start up was chatty between the server app and the
 database.  With a network link that running near capacity (our case),
 flaky router/switch, slow link, etc the length of time to respond
 between app server and fb server is increased..  All these situations
 are often not apparent with out getting network folks involved.

  Dave
  --
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Wireless)

  - Original Message -
  From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
 arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
  To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
  Sent: Tue Jul 10 10:19:29 2007
  Subject: Re: ARS7 install with oracle 10G RAC ... the saga continues
...

   The problem does
   not seem to be in the way that the query to the db, but in the way
 the   results are processed.

  I don't know about that.
  If the problem was the way that arserverd is processing the results
 of the query, why would startup be like  1 minute when the db is on
 the same box?

  My bet is that this has something to do with the way that arserverd
 is connecting to oracle ... perhaps incorrect use of the api? All that

 waiting between queries really makes me think there's a timeout
 somewhere ... like waiting for a local listener to respond, i.e.
  looking for the database to be on the same machine, and only querying

 remotely when the local connection times out.

  Man, this is why I sometimes hate dealing with proprietary software.
  If this was open, you could bet someone would have fixed it by now,
 and if they hadn't we'd at least have a fighting chance of fixing it
 ourselves.

  thanks again, everyone for all your help.
  looks like the only answer for now is the Run-DMC

Re: ARS7 install with oracle 10G RAC ... the saga continues ... KM-000010001381 (UNCLASSIFIED)

2007-07-10 Thread Emad Zaky

Correction: 2 AR Servers on the same DB i.e. for load balancing.

On 7/10/07, Emad Zaky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


For performance of applications on a single server it is ok. But I have
noticed that if you run 2 AR servers with ITSM apps you get timeouts.

Emad


 On 7/10/07, HARTWICK, SCOTT G CTR DISA JSSC [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 Classification:  UNCLASSIFIED
 Caveats: NONE

 We have been having performance issues with our Oracle installation and
 found this KM article with some ideas on how to improve performance and
 initial configuration:

 *
 The following is information for ITSM 7.0.x installs within an Oracle
 environment:
 1.  Have your DBA set the SGA Size to min 250 and max 850.
 2.  Also, Knowledge Base entry KM-10001381 should prove to be
 helpful to you:
 *
 PROBLEM:
 Below are some settings which have been helpful for Oracle customers to
 avoid ARERR 91, 92, 93, 94 timeout issues, especially during application
 installations

 SOLUTION:
1) AR Server version 7.01   or AR Server version 6.03 patch 19
 The above version or later contain new method of Oracle client
 calls which enhance performance

  2) For Oracle 9i or 10g customer:
 add CURSOR_SHARING=FORCE to the Oracle init file,

  3) For Oracle 9i or 10g customer: add the following parameters to
 ar.conf or ar.cfg
  Oracle-Cursor-Sharing: FORCE

  4) For all Windows (with 2 CPU) customers, Suggest to assign
 private RPC to RE (in ar.conf or ar.cfg)
   RE-RPC-Socket:  390621
   Private-RPC-Socket: 390621  10  10

   For UNIX platforms,
   RE-RPC-Socket:  390621
   Private-RPC-Socket: 390621  6   6

 As always, turning of your database and ARServer is a task for your dba,

 system administrator and Remedy administrator working in concert.  The
 settings above have proved helpful in several cases, but they should be
 used as a starting point for investigation rather than standard
 configuration applicable in all environments.

 A defect SW00254374 has been logged for Engineering to consider whether
 this information or an official recommendation should be included in the
 shipped product docs.
 **

 Scott.

 -Original Message-
 From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lammey, Peter A.
 Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2007 11:51 AM
 To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
 Subject: Re: ARS7 install with oracle 10G RAC ... the saga continues ...

 Does this lead anyone to believe or have people noticed other general
 activities in the applications are slow based on this?

 Thanks
 Peter Lammey
 ESPN MIT Technical Services  Applications Management
 860-766-4761

 -Original Message-
 From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
 [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Axton
 Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2007 11:47 AM
 To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
 Subject: Re: ARS7 install with oracle 10G RAC ... the saga continues ...


 The issue is widespread, esp. with a remote Oracle db.  Our servers are
 switched with fiber/gb.  Even if I have 2 vm's runnning on the same
 physical host (one db and one ars), I see the same issue.  The packet
 logs do not show a problem with throughput and my switches show no
 congestion.

 Axton Grams

 On 7/10/07, Shellman, David [EMAIL PROTECTED]  wrote:
 
 
 
  When I spoke to support about how long it took the system to start up
  they said that start up was chatty between the server app and the
  database.  With a network link that running near capacity (our case),
  flaky router/switch, slow link, etc the length of time to respond
  between app server and fb server is increased..  All these situations
  are often not apparent with out getting network folks involved.
 
   Dave
   --
   [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Wireless)
 
   - Original Message -
   From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
  arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
   To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
   Sent: Tue Jul 10 10:19:29 2007
   Subject: Re: ARS7 install with oracle 10G RAC ... the saga continues
 ...
 
The problem does
not seem to be in the way that the query to the db, but in the way
  the   results are processed.
 
   I don't know about that.
   If the problem was the way that arserverd is processing the results
  of the query, why would startup be like  1 minute when the db is on
  the same box?
 
   My bet is that this has something to do with the way that arserverd
  is connecting to oracle ... perhaps incorrect use of the api? All that

  waiting between queries really makes me think there's a timeout
  somewhere ... like waiting for a local listener to respond, i.e.
   looking for the database to be on the same machine, and only querying

  remotely when the local connection times out.
 
   Man, this is why I sometimes hate dealing with proprietary software.
   If this was open, you could

Re: ARS7 install with oracle 10G RAC ... the saga continues ... KM-000010001381 (UNCLASSIFIED)

2007-07-10 Thread Emad Zaky

FORCE was recommended

On 7/10/07, Tony Worthington [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Now I'm confused.  There's a cursor sharing whitepaper Oracle's Cursor
Sharing for BMC(r) Remedy(r) Products that specifies that it be set at
SIMILAR.

Now which is it BMC.  SIMILAR or FORCE?

Best practices mandate specifically that, with 6.0.1, users should use
force, and with 6.3 or 7.0, users should use similar, but the difference
between the two settings is small.
The syntax of the cursor_sharing setting in the ar.conf file is as follows
(set only one):
Oracle-Cursor-Sharing: SIMILAR
Oracle-Cursor-Sharing: FORCE


--
Tony Worthington
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
262-703-5911



HARTWICK, SCOTT G CTR DISA JSSC [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
07/10/2007 11:02 AM
Please respond to
arslist@ARSLIST.ORG


To
arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
cc

Subject
Re: ARS7 install with oracle 10G RAC ... the saga continues ...
KM-10001381 (UNCLASSIFIED)






Classification:  UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats: NONE

We have been having performance issues with our Oracle installation and
found this KM article with some ideas on how to improve performance and
initial configuration:

*
The following is information for ITSM 7.0.x installs within an Oracle
environment:
1.  Have your DBA set the SGA Size to min 250 and max 850.
2.  Also, Knowledge Base entry KM-10001381 should prove to be
helpful to you:
*
PROBLEM:
Below are some settings which have been helpful for Oracle customers to
avoid ARERR 91, 92, 93, 94 timeout issues, especially during application
installations

SOLUTION:
1) AR Server version 7.01  or AR Server version 6.03
patch 19
The above version or later contain new method of Oracle client
calls which enhance performance

 2) For Oracle 9i or 10g customer:
add CURSOR_SHARING=FORCE to the Oracle init file,

 3) For Oracle 9i or 10g customer: add the following parameters to
ar.conf or ar.cfg
 Oracle-Cursor-Sharing: FORCE

 4) For all Windows (with 2 CPU) customers, Suggest to assign
private RPC to RE (in ar.conf or ar.cfg)
  RE-RPC-Socket:  390621
  Private-RPC-Socket: 390621  10  10

  For UNIX platforms,
  RE-RPC-Socket:  390621
  Private-RPC-Socket: 390621  6   6

As always, turning of your database and ARServer is a task for your dba,
system administrator and Remedy administrator working in concert.  The
settings above have proved helpful in several cases, but they should be
used as a starting point for investigation rather than standard
configuration applicable in all environments.

A defect SW00254374 has been logged for Engineering to consider whether
this information or an official recommendation should be included in the
shipped product docs.
**

Scott.

-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lammey, Peter A.
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2007 11:51 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: ARS7 install with oracle 10G RAC ... the saga continues ...

Does this lead anyone to believe or have people noticed other general
activities in the applications are slow based on this?

Thanks
Peter Lammey
ESPN MIT Technical Services  Applications Management
860-766-4761

-Original Message-
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Axton
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2007 11:47 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: ARS7 install with oracle 10G RAC ... the saga continues ...

The issue is widespread, esp. with a remote Oracle db.  Our servers are
switched with fiber/gb.  Even if I have 2 vm's runnning on the same
physical host (one db and one ars), I see the same issue.  The packet
logs do not show a problem with throughput and my switches show no
congestion.

Axton Grams

On 7/10/07, Shellman, David [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



 When I spoke to support about how long it took the system to start up
 they said that start up was chatty between the server app and the
 database.  With a network link that running near capacity (our case),
 flaky router/switch, slow link, etc the length of time to respond
 between app server and fb server is increased..  All these situations
 are often not apparent with out getting network folks involved.

  Dave
  --
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Wireless)

  - Original Message -
  From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
 arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
  To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
  Sent: Tue Jul 10 10:19:29 2007
  Subject: Re: ARS7 install with oracle 10G RAC ... the saga continues
...

   The problem does
   not seem to be in the way that the query to the db, but in the way
 the   results are processed.

  I don't know about that.
  If the problem was the way that arserverd is processing the results
 of the query, why would startup

Re: ARS7 install with oracle 10G RAC ... the saga continues ... KM-000010001381 (UNCLASSIFIED)

2007-07-10 Thread Axton

The only problem I see with storing the clob in row is that a table
scan will now include the clob data.  With the way remedy is
structured, there are tons of full table scans.  When you allow the
user to query a table on any value with wildcards, that's what you
get.  The only advantage I see to storing the clob in row is that when
a clob is accessed, you drop some of the reads from disk, namely the
address space where the clob is stored, which is small in comparison.
I would be interested to see a benchmark between the two
configurations for an ITSM 7 server with a production load in terms of
consistent gets, physical reads, disk io and the likes.

Axton Grams

On 7/10/07, Rick Cook [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

**
Something else to consider is that the CLOB-in-row setting (which you should
also consider setting), will only have its full effect if set prior to
installation.  When running our initial Discovery, we noticed that our DB
had increased 10x in size - far more than the data would have indicated.
Changing the CLOB-in-row setting on an EXISTING DB did NOT recover the
wasted disk space.

There is an RFE in now on the fact that Remedy does not use Oracle bind
parameters as often as it could, which really hurts performance.  I bet that
the Remedy engineers kind of wish Oracle would act like the rest of the DBs,
but that's probably a common wish across many platforms.

Rick


On 7/10/07, HARTWICK, SCOTT G CTR DISA JSSC [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
 Classification:  UNCLASSIFIED
 Caveats: NONE

 We have been having performance issues with our Oracle installation and
 found this KM article with some ideas on how to improve performance and
 initial configuration:

 *
 The following is information for ITSM 7.0.x installs within an Oracle
 environment:
 1.  Have your DBA set the SGA Size to min 250 and max 850.
 2.  Also, Knowledge Base entry KM-10001381 should prove to be
 helpful to you:
 *
 PROBLEM:
 Below are some settings which have been helpful for Oracle customers to
 avoid ARERR 91, 92, 93, 94 timeout issues, especially during application
 installations

 SOLUTION:
1) AR Server version 7.01   or AR Server version 6.03 patch 19
 The above version or later contain new method of Oracle client
 calls which enhance performance

  2) For Oracle 9i or 10g customer:
 add CURSOR_SHARING=FORCE to the Oracle init file,

  3) For Oracle 9i or 10g customer: add the following parameters to
 ar.conf or ar.cfg
  Oracle-Cursor-Sharing: FORCE

  4) For all Windows (with 2 CPU) customers, Suggest to assign
 private RPC to RE (in ar.conf or ar.cfg)
   RE-RPC-Socket:  390621
   Private-RPC-Socket: 390621  10  10

   For UNIX platforms,
   RE-RPC-Socket:  390621
   Private-RPC-Socket: 390621  6   6

 As always, turning of your database and ARServer is a task for your dba,
 system administrator and Remedy administrator working in concert.  The
 settings above have proved helpful in several cases, but they should be
 used as a starting point for investigation rather than standard
 configuration applicable in all environments.

 A defect SW00254374 has been logged for Engineering to consider whether
 this information or an official recommendation should be included in the
 shipped product docs.
 **

 Scott.

 -Original Message-
 From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lammey, Peter A.
 Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2007 11:51 AM
 To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
 Subject: Re: ARS7 install with oracle 10G RAC ... the saga continues ...

 Does this lead anyone to believe or have people noticed other general
 activities in the applications are slow based on this?

 Thanks
 Peter Lammey
 ESPN MIT Technical Services  Applications Management
 860-766-4761

 -Original Message-
 From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
 [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Axton
 Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2007 11:47 AM
 To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
 Subject: Re: ARS7 install with oracle 10G RAC ... the saga continues ...

 The issue is widespread, esp. with a remote Oracle db.  Our servers are
 switched with fiber/gb.  Even if I have 2 vm's runnning on the same
 physical host (one db and one ars), I see the same issue.  The packet
 logs do not show a problem with throughput and my switches show no
 congestion.

 Axton Grams

 On 7/10/07, Shellman, David
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  wrote:
 
 
 
  When I spoke to support about how long it took the system to start up
  they said that start up was chatty between the server app and the
  database.  With a network link that running near capacity (our case),
  flaky router/switch, slow link, etc the length of time to respond
  between app server and fb server is increased..  All these situations
  are often not apparent with out getting network folks involved.
 
   Dave

Re: ARS7 install with oracle 10G RAC ... the saga continues ... KM-000010001381 (UNCLASSIFIED)

2007-07-10 Thread Axton

Setting the cursor_sharing parameter to similar or force will force
the sql to be parsed using bind variables, though you introduce a
parse for every sql statement that gets dispatched to the db, which
introduces additional cpu overhead.  Ideally, Remedy would generate
the sql, when using an oracle backend, so that the bind variable were
defined in the sql when it was sent to the db.

Axton Grams

On 7/10/07, Rick Cook [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

**
Something else to consider is that the CLOB-in-row setting (which you should
also consider setting), will only have its full effect if set prior to
installation.  When running our initial Discovery, we noticed that our DB
had increased 10x in size - far more than the data would have indicated.
Changing the CLOB-in-row setting on an EXISTING DB did NOT recover the
wasted disk space.

There is an RFE in now on the fact that Remedy does not use Oracle bind
parameters as often as it could, which really hurts performance.  I bet that
the Remedy engineers kind of wish Oracle would act like the rest of the DBs,
but that's probably a common wish across many platforms.

Rick


On 7/10/07, HARTWICK, SCOTT G CTR DISA JSSC [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
 Classification:  UNCLASSIFIED
 Caveats: NONE

 We have been having performance issues with our Oracle installation and
 found this KM article with some ideas on how to improve performance and
 initial configuration:

 *
 The following is information for ITSM 7.0.x installs within an Oracle
 environment:
 1.  Have your DBA set the SGA Size to min 250 and max 850.
 2.  Also, Knowledge Base entry KM-10001381 should prove to be
 helpful to you:
 *
 PROBLEM:
 Below are some settings which have been helpful for Oracle customers to
 avoid ARERR 91, 92, 93, 94 timeout issues, especially during application
 installations

 SOLUTION:
1) AR Server version 7.01   or AR Server version 6.03 patch 19
 The above version or later contain new method of Oracle client
 calls which enhance performance

  2) For Oracle 9i or 10g customer:
 add CURSOR_SHARING=FORCE to the Oracle init file,

  3) For Oracle 9i or 10g customer: add the following parameters to
 ar.conf or ar.cfg
  Oracle-Cursor-Sharing: FORCE

  4) For all Windows (with 2 CPU) customers, Suggest to assign
 private RPC to RE (in ar.conf or ar.cfg)
   RE-RPC-Socket:  390621
   Private-RPC-Socket: 390621  10  10

   For UNIX platforms,
   RE-RPC-Socket:  390621
   Private-RPC-Socket: 390621  6   6

 As always, turning of your database and ARServer is a task for your dba,
 system administrator and Remedy administrator working in concert.  The
 settings above have proved helpful in several cases, but they should be
 used as a starting point for investigation rather than standard
 configuration applicable in all environments.

 A defect SW00254374 has been logged for Engineering to consider whether
 this information or an official recommendation should be included in the
 shipped product docs.
 **

 Scott.

 -Original Message-
 From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lammey, Peter A.
 Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2007 11:51 AM
 To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
 Subject: Re: ARS7 install with oracle 10G RAC ... the saga continues ...

 Does this lead anyone to believe or have people noticed other general
 activities in the applications are slow based on this?

 Thanks
 Peter Lammey
 ESPN MIT Technical Services  Applications Management
 860-766-4761

 -Original Message-
 From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
 [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Axton
 Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2007 11:47 AM
 To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
 Subject: Re: ARS7 install with oracle 10G RAC ... the saga continues ...

 The issue is widespread, esp. with a remote Oracle db.  Our servers are
 switched with fiber/gb.  Even if I have 2 vm's runnning on the same
 physical host (one db and one ars), I see the same issue.  The packet
 logs do not show a problem with throughput and my switches show no
 congestion.

 Axton Grams

 On 7/10/07, Shellman, David
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  wrote:
 
 
 
  When I spoke to support about how long it took the system to start up
  they said that start up was chatty between the server app and the
  database.  With a network link that running near capacity (our case),
  flaky router/switch, slow link, etc the length of time to respond
  between app server and fb server is increased..  All these situations
  are often not apparent with out getting network folks involved.
 
   Dave
   --
   [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Wireless)
 
   - Original Message -
   From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
  arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
   To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
   Sent: Tue Jul 10 10:19:29 2007
   Subject: Re: ARS7 install

Re: ARS7 install with oracle 10G RAC ... the saga continues ...

2007-07-09 Thread Tony Worthington
Please search the list archives at www.arslist.org or google groups.

This has been discussed at length, and the slow startup with a remote 
Oracle DB is not uncommon.  Our systems take about 8 minutes.

Even tickets submitted to support confirm this same delay.  They sometimes 
suggest to ensure all NIC's are set to full duplex, but that's about it.

Sorry...

tony


-- 
Tony Worthington
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
262-703-5911



Andrew Hicox [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent by: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
07/09/2007 03:00 PM
Please respond to
arslist@ARSLIST.ORG


To
arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
cc

Subject
ARS7 install with oracle 10G RAC ... the saga continues ...






** 
Hello everyone:
 
I've managed to get through the (incredibly flawed) solaris 10 arsystem 7 
install.
This is 7.0.01 patch 2.
 
I'm using oracle 10G client library with a remote database on an oracle 10 
Rapid Application Cluster.
 
So ... now the server is INCREDIBLY slow to start.
 
The server is configured to run on a TCP port (1). 
When I issue the 'arsystem start' command, I get the usual output on the 
console indicating that the server has started.
However, the TCP port is not listening, and of course, no clients can 
connect to the server.

If I wait (approx 7 minutes), I will see the following output on the 
console:
  (ARNOTE 0)
   Server indicates that it's up.


 (ARNOTE 0)
   ARMonitor child process (pid:29595) started.
./arplugin

Action Request System(R)  Fork Daemon   Version 7.0.01 patch 002 
200704021644
Copyright (c) 2000 - 2006 BMC Software, Inc.
All rights reserved.

Action Request System(R)  Plug-In Server   Version 7.0.01 patch 002 
200704021644
Copyright (c) 2001 - 2006 BMC Software, Inc.
All rights reserved.
Loaded Web Services plugin properly

After the above, the TCP port opens up and clients can connect, and it 
seems to work well enough.

What I presume is happening here is that arserverd must issue some sort of 
indication that it's completed start up so that arforkd and armonitor can 
do their thing and start listeners and plugins, and that arserverd is for 
some reason taking on average 7 minutes to do that.

I can't manage to get ANY sort of logging during the 7 minutes of mystery.
is there some way to figgure out what the heck is going on durring this 
period of time (is it timing out DNS? is the db slow to respond? is it 
waiting on disk access? what is it doing?).

We have an identical set up in our dev lab, with the exception that the 
database server is not a RAC and it's installed on the same machine. The 
startup is quite snappy on that setup.

There don't appear to be any issues with network latency between the 
remedy server and the RAC.

Anyone ever seen this before?
Any suggestions?

thanks,

Andrew
__20060125___This posting was submitted with HTML in 
it___ 


CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: 
This is a transmission from Kohl's Department Stores, Inc.
and may contain information which is confidential and proprietary.
If you are not the addressee, any disclosure, copying or distribution or use of 
the contents of this message is expressly prohibited.
If you have received this transmission in error, please destroy it and notify 
us immediately at 262-703-7000.

CAUTION:
Internet and e-mail communications are Kohl's property and Kohl's reserves the 
right to retrieve and read any message created, sent and received.  Kohl's 
reserves the right to monitor messages to or from authorized Kohl's Associates 
at any time
without any further consent.

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:Where the 
Answers Are


Re: ARS7 install with oracle 10G RAC ... the saga continues ...

2007-07-09 Thread Emad Zaky

Yes..I have seen this before.
Can you login to the Admin tool after the server starts up?


On 7/9/07, Andrew Hicox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


**

Hello everyone:

I've managed to get through the (incredibly flawed) solaris 10 arsystem 7
install.
This is 7.0.01 patch 2.

I'm using oracle 10G client library with a remote database on an oracle 10
Rapid Application Cluster.

So ... now the server is INCREDIBLY slow to start.

The server is configured to run on a TCP port (1).
When I issue the 'arsystem start' command, I get the usual output on the
console indicating that the server has started.

However, the TCP port is not listening, and of course, no clients can
connect to the server.


If I wait (approx 7 minutes), I will see the following output on the
console:

  (ARNOTE 0)
   Server indicates that it's up.


 (ARNOTE 0)
   ARMonitor child process (pid:29595) started.
./arplugin

Action Request System(R)  Fork Daemon   Version 7.0.01 patch 002
200704021644
Copyright (c) 2000 - 2006 BMC Software, Inc.
All rights reserved.

Action Request System(R)  Plug-In Server   Version 7.0.01 patch 002
200704021644
Copyright (c) 2001 - 2006 BMC Software, Inc.
All rights reserved.
Loaded Web Services plugin properly

After the above, the TCP port opens up and clients can connect, and it
seems to work well enough.

What I presume is happening here is that arserverd must issue some sort of
indication that it's completed start up so that arforkd and armonitor can do
their thing and start listeners and plugins, and that arserverd is for some
reason taking on average 7 minutes to do that.

I can't manage to get ANY sort of logging during the 7 minutes of mystery.
is there some way to figgure out what the heck is going on durring this
period of time (is it timing out DNS? is the db slow to respond? is it
waiting on disk access? what is it doing?).

We have an identical set up in our dev lab, with the exception that the
database server is not a RAC and it's installed on the same machine. The
startup is quite snappy on that setup.

There don't appear to be any issues with network latency between the
remedy server and the RAC.

Anyone ever seen this before?
Any suggestions?

thanks,

Andrew
__20060125___This posting was submitted with HTML in
it___




___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:Where the Answers 
Are


Re: ARS7 install with oracle 10G RAC ... the saga continues ...

2007-07-09 Thread Shellman, David
Andrew,

As noted been there done that when or app server and the database server were 
some distance apart by network.  It would take over 5 minutes to see the arfork 
line scroll by.  Once the two servers were moved to the same room, start up 
time dropped to around 30 seconds.

Dave
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Wireless)

- Original Message -
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Sent: Mon Jul 09 16:08:12 2007
Subject: Re: ARS7 install with oracle 10G RAC ... the saga continues ...

Please search the list archives at www.arslist.org or google groups.

This has been discussed at length, and the slow startup with a remote 
Oracle DB is not uncommon.  Our systems take about 8 minutes.

Even tickets submitted to support confirm this same delay.  They sometimes 
suggest to ensure all NIC's are set to full duplex, but that's about it.

Sorry...

tony


-- 
Tony Worthington
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
262-703-5911



Andrew Hicox [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent by: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
07/09/2007 03:00 PM
Please respond to
arslist@ARSLIST.ORG


To
arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
cc

Subject
ARS7 install with oracle 10G RAC ... the saga continues ...






** 
Hello everyone:
 
I've managed to get through the (incredibly flawed) solaris 10 arsystem 7 
install.
This is 7.0.01 patch 2.
 
I'm using oracle 10G client library with a remote database on an oracle 10 
Rapid Application Cluster.
 
So ... now the server is INCREDIBLY slow to start.
 
The server is configured to run on a TCP port (1). 
When I issue the 'arsystem start' command, I get the usual output on the 
console indicating that the server has started.
However, the TCP port is not listening, and of course, no clients can 
connect to the server.

If I wait (approx 7 minutes), I will see the following output on the 
console:
  (ARNOTE 0)
   Server indicates that it's up.


 (ARNOTE 0)
   ARMonitor child process (pid:29595) started.
./arplugin

Action Request System(R)  Fork Daemon   Version 7.0.01 patch 002 
200704021644
Copyright (c) 2000 - 2006 BMC Software, Inc.
All rights reserved.

Action Request System(R)  Plug-In Server   Version 7.0.01 patch 002 
200704021644
Copyright (c) 2001 - 2006 BMC Software, Inc.
All rights reserved.
Loaded Web Services plugin properly

After the above, the TCP port opens up and clients can connect, and it 
seems to work well enough.

What I presume is happening here is that arserverd must issue some sort of 
indication that it's completed start up so that arforkd and armonitor can 
do their thing and start listeners and plugins, and that arserverd is for 
some reason taking on average 7 minutes to do that.

I can't manage to get ANY sort of logging during the 7 minutes of mystery.
is there some way to figgure out what the heck is going on durring this 
period of time (is it timing out DNS? is the db slow to respond? is it 
waiting on disk access? what is it doing?).

We have an identical set up in our dev lab, with the exception that the 
database server is not a RAC and it's installed on the same machine. The 
startup is quite snappy on that setup.

There don't appear to be any issues with network latency between the 
remedy server and the RAC.

Anyone ever seen this before?
Any suggestions?

thanks,

Andrew
__20060125___This posting was submitted with HTML in 
it___ 


CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: 
This is a transmission from Kohl's Department Stores, Inc.
and may contain information which is confidential and proprietary.
If you are not the addressee, any disclosure, copying or distribution or use of 
the contents of this message is expressly prohibited.
If you have received this transmission in error, please destroy it and notify 
us immediately at 262-703-7000.

CAUTION:
Internet and e-mail communications are Kohl's property and Kohl's reserves the 
right to retrieve and read any message created, sent and received.  Kohl's 
reserves the right to monitor messages to or from authorized Kohl's Associates 
at any time
without any further consent.

___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:Where the 
Answers Are


Re: ARS7 install with oracle 10G RAC ... the saga continues ...

2007-07-09 Thread Axton

Remedy fetches information from it's data dictionary (e.g.,
field_disp_prop, field, etc.), then processes it in chunks of 100,
500, or 1000.  So if you have a table field_dispprop that has 120k
records and 500 records are processed at a time, 15 seconds per chunk,
you end up with a start time that totals 3600 seconds (for that part
of the startup).

If you add a -t parameter to arserverd in the armonitor.conf file, a
special startup log file is created.  The log file will look something
like this:

Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6577 Startup TID:3086968512 Set up thread
control block with key = 0
Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6582 Startup TID:3086968512 Initialize thread
local storage block
Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6583 Startup TID:3086968512 Initialize
mutiple-byte environment
Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6585 Startup TID:3086968512 InstallDir =
/u01/arsystem/arsdev
Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6587 Startup TID:3086968512 Initialize Server utility
Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6599 Startup TID:3086968512 Initialize License Library
Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6602 Startup TID:3086968512 LicenseFilename =
/etc/arsystem/arsdev/arsystem.lic
Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6603 Startup TID:3086968512 Initialize
Language setting and locale
Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6610 Startup TID:3086968512 Initialize the
Decimal Math libray
Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6610 Startup TID:3086968512 Open shared catalog
Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6648 Startup TID:3086968512 Load encryption
shared library
Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6653 Startup TID:3086968512 Load encryption
static functions
Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6654 Startup TID:3086968512 Initialize
default configuration information
Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6654 Startup TID:3086968512 Create Mutexes
Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6655 Startup TID:3086968512 Initialize parse
environment
Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6657 Startup TID:3086968512 Initialize date
time information
Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6659 Startup TID:3086968512 Initialize
notification strings
Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6659 Startup TID:3086968512 Initialize RPC
queue type strings
Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6660 Startup TID:3086968512 Initialize filter strings
Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6662 Startup TID:3086968512 Initialize
escalation strings
Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6662 Startup TID:3086968512 Load system
configuration file
Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6669 Startup TID:3086968512
arsCodeSet=windows-1252[0] arDbCodeSet=windows-1252[0]
Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6670 Startup TID:3086968512 Initialize pending lists
Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6671 Startup TID:3086968512 Create cache read
write lock
Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6671 Startup TID:3086968512 Create full text
status read write lock
Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6672 Startup TID:3086968512 Initialize fork proxy
Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6672 Startup TID:3086968512 Check licensing
Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6693 Startup TID:3086968512 Initialize user cache
Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6707 Startup TID:3086968512 Open log file
Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6745 Startup TID:3086968512 Initialize XML parser
Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6782 Startup TID:3086968512 Initialize thread list
Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6784 Startup TID:3086968512 Check multiple servers
Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6787 Startup TID:3086968512 Initialize dead thread list
Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6790 Startup TID:3086968512 Initialize timed calls
Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6792 Startup TID:3086968512
CreateRPCQueue(min=1, max=1, rpc=390600)
Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.6793 Startup TID:3086968512 Await cache ready...
Jul 09 2007 18:29:06.8988 Startup TID:0030571424
InitializeServerCache: LoadInitialSchemaInfo Begin
Jul 09 2007 18:29:11.7241 Startup TID:0030571424 Begin LoadDisplayInfoList
Jul 09 2007 18:29:25.6076 Startup TID:0030571424
LoadDisplayInfoList: 500 rows
Jul 09 2007 18:29:42.7008 Startup TID:0030571424
LoadDisplayInfoList: 1000 rows

If you then review the sql that is sent to the db while the server is
unavailable, you will see this statement, followed by silence:

SELECT schemaId,fieldId,vuiId,propShort,propLong FROM field_dispprop
ORDER BY 1 ASC, 2 ASC, 3 ASC

What is happening here is that arserverd fetches the field display
property info, then processes it 500 records at a time.  Depending on
the size of your server (number of forms, views, fields, etc), there
may be a couple of sql statements that are followed by a pause.

What is happening internally is anyone's guess; I would guess that
they are processing X rows at a time to operate within certain memory
constraints, and 'maybe' in a horribly inefficient way.  Some things
are for certain though;
(1) a lot of data is transferred from the db to the arserver.  My test
server, which has 3293 rows in field_dispprop (pretty much a base
arserver install) sends 411K of data over the wire.
(2) the field_dispprop data is processed in chunks of 500 (at least on Linux).

Axton Grams


On 7/9/07, Andrew Hicox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

**
Hello everyone:

I've managed to get through the (incredibly flawed) solaris 10 arsystem 7
install.
This is 7.0.01 patch 2.

I'm using oracle 10G client library with a remote database on an oracle 10
Rapid Application Cluster.

So