[AsburyPark] Springwood - I need your help

2006-03-23 Thread bluebishop82
Since this was just brought up in a previous post and I wanted to 
gauge your opinions anyway, please let me know your thoughts.

In the Springwood Avenue Advisory Committee we are obviously 
considering many options.  Let me be clear that right now there is 
mixed use of everything being considered: Stores, housing, rec, etc.

One idea in the mix is to build a new state of the art municipal 
complex on Springwood to house City Hall, Police Department and Fire 
Department.

The experience Cookman has shown is that it is still very difficult 
to bring people to AP to shop because of the the safety factor (even 
though it is safe as anywhere else.  I had 2 calls this week from 
Monmouth people as to whether it was safe to come to my office).

If we are still trying to convince them that Downtown is safe, we 
are light years from convincing them shopping on Springwood is safe.

It seems to me that putting the Municipal complex on Springwood 
would not only make it feel safer due to the police being there, but 
it will create automatic foot traffic of hundreds of people a day 
down there between workers and people doing business with the City.  
It can be an instant anchor for whatever stores we can build there 
near it.

It will also open up 3 blocks of prime main street that the City is 
on now to be developed (stores, parking garage, walkway to downtown, 
etc).


What are your thoughts in this regard?

Thanks






 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[AsburyPark] Re: Biondi Bill

2006-03-23 Thread Joe D'Andrea
At 1:35 PM + 3/18/06, bluebishop82 wrote:
...I don't mind anonymous posters, but I do think the website should be
responsible for saving IP addresses so that if someone crosses the
line on libel then they can be found and held accountable.

Recording the IP address and time stamp with posts is something that is trivial 
to do. However it offers very little guarantee that one can identify the poster 
of libel.

Here's the problem. Most organizations (or homes for that matter) have one IP 
address for their connection. It may always be the same IP address or it may 
changes each time the connection is established. None the less, the IP address 
can be traced and the account holder of the account traced. BUT... and it's a 
big one. All the computers connected to that network at home or in the office 
come in on the same IP address.

So for example... in my house there are three computers connected to the 
internet. If something libelous were posted from the IP addresses assigned to 
my internet connection you would only know that the post came from my house. 
You wouldn't have a specific individual to sue. And you couldn't even make 
assumptions about who was in my house at the time the post was made.

It gets worse when we consider the work environment. Let's say a business 
employs 10 salespeople and it has a support staff of 25 additional people. 
Something libelous gets posted from one of those 35 computers. When traced 
back, the IP address points to that business. Who are you going to sue? Could 
you impound all 35 computers? And who's to say the libelous posting didn't come 
from a visitor that was allowed to plug into the companies internet connection 
while he/she was there for a meeting?

Yeah... you can record the IP address, but it doesn't help you prosecute your 
libel claim. (Unless you're MOG and you have to sign in at the library to use 
the computer then the prosecutor of a libel, defamation or bias crime or 
claim would have the name and address of the offender and could proceed with 
any remedy at law.)

~joe
 


 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[AsburyPark] [AP Daily Dose] Commemorative Tree Planting Program Launched

2006-03-23 Thread asburyparkdotcom







Commemorative Tree Planting Program Launched

Posted: Thursday, March 23rd, 2006

Want to help enhance the city's natural beauty
and create a lasting memorial to commemorate a special occasion or the
memory of a departed loved one or pet? Then check out the details of
the Environmental Shade Tree Commission's Commemorative Tree
Planting Program. 
MORE»



For more Asbury Park news, and events, shopping, dining and
community guides, visit the new AsburyPark.com



  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "AsburyPark" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  









[AsburyPark] Re: Springwood - I need your help

2006-03-23 Thread dfsavgny
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, bluebishop82 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 Since this was just brought up in a previous post and I wanted to 
 gauge your opinions anyway, please let me know your thoughts.
 
 In the Springwood Avenue Advisory Committee we are obviously 
 considering many options.  Let me be clear that right now there is 
 mixed use of everything being considered: Stores, housing, rec, 
etc.
 
 One idea in the mix is to build a new state of the art municipal 
 complex on Springwood to house City Hall, Police Department and 
Fire 
 Department.
 
 The experience Cookman has shown is that it is still very 
difficult 
 to bring people to AP to shop because of the the safety factor 
(even 
 though it is safe as anywhere else.  I had 2 calls this week from 
 Monmouth people as to whether it was safe to come to my office).
 
 If we are still trying to convince them that Downtown is safe, we 
 are light years from convincing them shopping on Springwood is 
safe.
 
 It seems to me that putting the Municipal complex on Springwood 
 would not only make it feel safer due to the police being there, 
but 
 it will create automatic foot traffic of hundreds of people a day 
 down there between workers and people doing business with the 
City.  
 It can be an instant anchor for whatever stores we can build there 
 near it.
 
 It will also open up 3 blocks of prime main street that the City 
is 
 on now to be developed (stores, parking garage, walkway to 
downtown, 
 etc).
 
 
 What are your thoughts in this regard?
 
 Thanks

There are some who may feel that the municipal buildings need to be 
on Main St. Personally I do not feel that way and think that what 
you propose is a good idea (generally). I would not like to force it 
upon the residents there if they don;t want it however. I aslo don't 
know how far down Springwood you intend to relocate, since I think 
they have to be within a block or two of the train station. I don;t 
think the Fire Dept should be there however unless there is going to 
be a second station east of the tracks. Most of the residential 
density is east of the tracks as I beleive that larger land area 
within city limits. The municipal complex (land) now on Main can be 
put to better uses. Rather than residential, maybe we get an office 
complex or retail.






 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[AsburyPark] Re: Springwood - I need your help

2006-03-23 Thread dfsavgny
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, oakdorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 
 6. Decide in 1 month who the winner is. Oh yea - don't forget to to 
 put in the RFP that the bidders must be bonded, have shown 
 development experience (past projects count), cannot be assigned, 
 must post a perfomance bond.
 
 7. Includes real, non-negoiatable time frames for development.
 
 8. Another words, as you are an old AP'er, time to stop the bs and 
 build out Springwood area.

fuggadaboutit







 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[AsburyPark] Asbury needs a Chinatown....

2006-03-23 Thread oakdorf
Time to re-think a master plan or re-market the town. Coming back from 
San Fran - some more ideas. 

I'll go back to the idea of raising Bradley Park so you get parking 
under it.

A piece of the west side from Asbury Ave to bangs should be repackaged 
as Chinatownheck, use eminent domain. San Frans Japantown retail 
area is only a small piece.

AP always had an old Italian Heritage and Greek as well. Call 
Springwood little Italy. Unless you want to start around Mt Carmel 
and remake 2nd Ave south the new Little Italy. Give the Greeks 
Springwood. Or - make Springwood little orleans - AP with a cajun twist.







 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[AsburyPark] Re: Springwood - I need your help

2006-03-23 Thread bluebishop82
Well I hope I can convince you two that we are doing exactly the 
right thing there right now. 



 In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, dfsavgny [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, oakdorf oakdorf@ wrote:
 
  
  6. Decide in 1 month who the winner is. Oh yea - don't forget 
to to 
  put in the RFP that the bidders must be bonded, have shown 
  development experience (past projects count), cannot be 
assigned, 
  must post a perfomance bond.
  
  7. Includes real, non-negoiatable time frames for development.
  
  8. Another words, as you are an old AP'er, time to stop the bs 
and 
  build out Springwood area.
 
 fuggadaboutit








 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[AsburyPark] Re: Springwood - I need your help

2006-03-23 Thread oakdorf
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, bluebishop82 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 Well I hope I can convince you two that we are doing exactly the 
 right thing there right now. 


Something in writing, that the public may view, would be a start.

35 years there and counting.






 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[AsburyPark] Re: Springwood - I need your help

2006-03-23 Thread oakdorf
you need to convince Neptune, as part of their plan, to make the Rt. 
35/Springwood corner an attractive entrance.






 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[AsburyPark] Re: Springwood - I need your help

2006-03-23 Thread bluebishop82
That's being written right now.  That's why I'm talking to you right 
now.


--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, oakdorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, bluebishop82 bluebishop82@ 
 wrote:
 
  Well I hope I can convince you two that we are doing exactly the 
  right thing there right now. 
 
 
 Something in writing, that the public may view, would be a start.
 
 35 years there and counting.








 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[AsburyPark] Re: Springwood - I need your help

2006-03-23 Thread bluebishop82
If I recall correctly Uncle Phil's suit was settled, which cleared 
up a rat's nest of title issues.

Thereafter a plan was made by the City to redevelop Springwood.  
People hated it.  They complained that the community was not 
involved, particulary people on and around Springwood.

So the City did what I thought was a great job responding to the 
people.

The City got rid of their own plans.  To heed to the wishes of those 
who wanted community involvement, they advertised a series of events 
held on Springwood for the community to come out and tell them 
exactly what they wanted on Springwood.  Many, many different ideas 
were recorded at those events.

Anyone at those meetings was encouraged to be part of the Springwood 
Avenue Advisory Committee, so that the community itself would be 
devising the plan.

From there the committee was formed.  It has been meeting for 
several months now.  We are debating the issues, inviting experts to 
guide us and will at the end make a recommendation to the City 
Council as to how to best redevelop Springwood Avenue (and yes we 
are interfacing with Neptune to tie into their redevelopment).

The City will then have a formal redevelopment plan drafted, based 
upon the Committee's recommendations.

Certainly I intend to heed the wishes of those I've read here to 
make the case for competitive bidding for development of the plan.  
Nation-wide advertising is what I will try to convince the board 
should be the policy.

I like the process because as you can see it has been from the grass 
roots up.  The committee is dominated by West Side people or people 
with West Side roots. 

It is in the stage where we are deciding what to recommend to the 
council, which is why I'm reaching out to this board for your 
comments, which I obviously intend to take quite seriously, and use 
your thoughts at the meetings.

Keep them coming.

Thanks. 




--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, Fred [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, bluebishop82 bluebishop82@ 
 wrote:
 
 
 Doesn't Uncle Phil still own most of the land?? If so how long in 
 court? So is this plan for all the land some it or in phases. Are 
 there any affordable housing developers interested ? What about 
 recreation?  Maybe another water park? Are your R friends in the 
 County involved?
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  That's being written right now.  That's why I'm talking to you 
right 
  now.
  
  
  --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, oakdorf oakdorf@ wrote:
  
   --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, bluebishop82 
bluebishop82@ 
   wrote:
   
Well I hope I can convince you two that we are doing exactly 
 the 
right thing there right now. 
   
   
   Something in writing, that the public may view, would be a 
start.
   
   35 years there and counting.
  
 







 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[AsburyPark] Re: Springwood - I need your help

2006-03-23 Thread dfsavgny
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, bluebishop82 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 
 So the City did what I thought was a great job responding to the 
 people.
 
 The City got rid of their own plans.  To heed to the wishes of 
those 
 who wanted community involvement, they advertised a series of 
events 
 held on Springwood for the community to come out and tell them 
 exactly what they wanted on Springwood.  Many, many different 
ideas 
 were recorded at those events.


Why don't they do that with the waterfront? Only kidding. Just no 
give aways on this one. No Fishmans. Move city hall there. Maybe 
move it to Neptune.







 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[AsburyPark] Re: Springwood - I need your help

2006-03-23 Thread bluebishop82
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, dfsavgny [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 Move city hall there. Maybe 
 move it to Neptune.


:-) LOL Again you're killin' me!






 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [AsburyPark] Springwood - I need your help

2006-03-23 Thread Allan Peterson



Great idea. Move the municipal complex. It is an eyesore and sit on property too valuable. Lets face it all the services need updated space. I would not worry about moving these services since they will still be within one mile of the entire town. Placings a second firehouse in the town would only burden more costs. If the twon was 4 miles wide, I could understand. The issue with Cookman is due to the lack of police presence. Makes no difference where the stataion is, unless it is placed on cookman, but people need to see the police.At times I have seen them driving the streets but this needs to be a regular thing!Now here is what the city needs to do with the property. Office buildings. This town needs places for people to work. Located by cookman so it helps support the stores and by the trian. Office Buildings! 
 bluebishop82 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:  Since this was just brought up in a previous post and I wanted to gauge your opinions anyway, please let me know your thoughts.In the Springwood Avenue Advisory Committee we are obviously considering many options. Let me be clear that right now there is mixed use of everything being considered: Stores, housing, rec, etc.One idea in the mix is to build a new state of the art municipal complex on Springwood to house City Hall, Police Department and Fire Department.The experience Cookman has shown is that it is still very difficult to bring people to AP to shop because of the the safety factor (even though it is safe as anywhere else. I had 2 calls this week from Monmouth people as to whether it was safe to come to my
 office).If we are still trying to convince them that Downtown is safe, we are light years from convincing them shopping on Springwood is safe.It seems to me that putting the Municipal complex on Springwood would not only make it feel safer due to the police being there, but it will create automatic foot traffic of hundreds of people a day down there between workers and people doing business with the City. It can be an instant anchor for whatever stores we can build there near it.It will also open up 3 blocks of prime main street that the City is on now to be developed (stores, parking garage, walkway to downtown, etc).What are your thoughts in this regard?Thanks
		New Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. Call regular phones from your PC and save big.




  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Asbury park home
  
  
Asbury park nj
  
  
Asbury park hotel
  
  


Asbury park foreclosure
  
  
Asbury park real estate
  
  
Asbury park
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "AsburyPark" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  









Re: [AsburyPark] Springwood - I need your help

2006-03-23 Thread Lighty







Now here is what the city needs to do with the property. Office buildings. This town needs places for people to work. Located by cookman so it helps support the stores and by the trian. Office Buildings!

While I know that many people want the municipal buildings to be on Main Street, I think that there are plenty of advantages to doing this. First, the property would be perfect for businesses. If the city made a simple plan of turning that space into office space (either with the existing building or a new structure) it would already have a nice sized parking lot, but would be extremely convenient by train. Imagine how many businesses would want to be located there IF it started off with affordable pricing? And those businesses would bring jobs to the city. And the people working there would help the local economy through the restaurants, gas stations, convenience stores, etc.

Personally, I think this is a better use of the land than a municipal building, but I know many others disagree. I just think its got so many positives it should be looked at closer. 





  




  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "AsburyPark" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  









Re: [AsburyPark] Re: Springwood - I need your help

2006-03-23 Thread gtscarano212







1. While your at it, move the city garage off main 
street. And blow away that whole corner. Or just move the complex to the 
opposite corners - (south of current location, replacng the city yard) 
again, over the tracks to Memorial/springwood.

2. you need to convince Neptune, as part of their plan, 
to make the Rt. 35/Springwood corner an attractive "entrance".

3. I'll go back to the idea of "raising" Bradley Park 
so you get parking under it.

1. Extend Victoria Mall, then the mall will like it starts in Asbury 
Park.
Also remove all gas stations off Main St.
2. Also develop better road plan/ patternso summer traffic can move 
easier in  out of A P
UseNeptune's Corllis  SpringwoodAve Redevelopments to help 
AP revitalization. Talk toNeptune. APshould be a regional economic 
engine.
3. All the redevelopment56 acres should be raised 12'or 
14'. Imagine 56 acresof parking and service routes? Only coping what 
was done in Paris  Orlando. Make new entrances for the few buildings that 
where not demolished on the new mezzanine level. Expensive for now, but truly a 
city for the future. 
Oh I forgot, people will be coming to AP to appreciate the beach and 
thenew street lights that Joe likes. Or was heand Garrett only 
attacking me? Or not biting the hands of their friends that feed 
them?

All theses ideas were brought up at council meetings, planing board 
meetings and redevelopment meetings. If it was not the three 
greatestdeal makers, Terry Wedlon (deals made behind closed doors), 
Duany,or Kate ideait was not a good or a feasible idea. I don't 
think Arron was involved withexpanding Duany's theories.Most 
ofthe above city officials scraped almost every suggestion the planing 
board recommended.





  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Asbury park home
  
  
Asbury park nj
  
  
Asbury park hotel
  
  


Asbury park foreclosure
  
  
Asbury park real estate
  
  
Asbury park
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "AsburyPark" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



  









[AsburyPark] Re: Springwood - I need your help

2006-03-23 Thread apoojo
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, oakdorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 so we agree cookman needs office workers. Why then, move the muni 
 center vs just building a new one, with offices on floors 3 and 4 or 
 2,3,4. Stick the police station on the other side of the tracks - 
 connected with a bridge.
 
 While your at it, move the city garage off main street. And blow away 
 that whole corner. Or just move the complex to the opposite corners - 
 (south of current location, replacng the city yard) again, over the 
 tracks to Memorial/springwood.

i hope you re being sarcastic, jesting , joking whatever.  If not you 
seem to be very intelligent, what would this idea cost? And who's going 
to pay for it? Hey guys wake up this City is broke and has nothing else 
to sell or hock, the beachfront condos will not come on line fast 
enough, for us to survive. Question and again i apologize for my lack 
of knowledge, are Convention Hall , pavilions, heating plant casion now 
on tax rolls if answer is yes what are they assesed at and are the 
taxes current?





 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[AsburyPark] Preservation and property value

2006-03-23 Thread dfsavgny
Historic Districts and Residential Property Values 
FILE UNDER: Preservation 

Click to enlarge.The Landmarks Preservation Commission's Web site 
recently posted a study by the Independent Budget Office that 
analyzed residential property values in the city's various historic 
districts. The report is not new--it's dated 2003--but its 
conclusions seem to back up preservationists' claims that historic 
districts increase property values. 
The I.B.O. looked at one-, two- and three-family houses in the 
period between 1975 and 2002, and concluded that, All else equal, 
prices of houses in historic districts are higher than those of 
similar houses outside historic districts. And it's not a chicken-
and-the-egg proposition:  … overall price appreciation from 1975 
through 2002 was greater for houses inside historical districts.

More tidbits after the jump.

Historic districts act as brand labels; 
In two time periods studied--1975-1982 and 1997-2002--properties in 
historic districts appreciated at a much higher rate than those 
outside of historic districts; 
In three periods--1982-1989, 1993-1997 and 2000-2002--property 
prices in hisotric districts appreciated slightly faster than those 
outside of historic districts; 
In 2000-2002, the differences were statistically insignificant; 
In 1989-1993, both types of properties declined in value, but those 
within historic districts declined slightly more than those outside 
of historic districts; 
Over the 1975-2002 period, the average increase in value for 
historic distric properties was 10.2 percent per year (5.3 percent 
adjusted for inflation), with non-historic district properties at 
9.0 percent (4.2 percent adjusted for inflation).






 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[AsburyPark] Re: Springwood - I need your help

2006-03-23 Thread dfsavgny
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, apoojo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 i hope you re being sarcastic, jesting , joking whatever.  If not you 
 seem to be very intelligent, what would this idea cost? And who's 
going 
 to pay for it? Hey guys wake up this City is broke and has nothing 
else 
 to sell or hock, the beachfront condos will not come on line fast 
 enough, for us to survive. Question and again i apologize for my lack 
 of knowledge, are Convention Hall , pavilions, heating plant casion 
now 
 on tax rolls if answer is yes what are they assesed at and are the 
 taxes current?

They are on tax rolls I am unsure what the taxes are and I don't know 
if they are current, but they are supposed to be under the RA. If I 
recall correctly, last year Partners owed about $600K in taxes but paid 
at the last minute. I think they have some tax increases on appeal.







 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[AsburyPark] Uncle Phil

2006-03-23 Thread Fred



Tommy I think your wrong Uncle Phil is still around. His ghost will 
haunt us.






 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[AsburyPark] Re: Uncle Phil

2006-03-23 Thread bluebishop82
I thought I heard a bump.  I'm getting out of here.


--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, Fred [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 
 
 
 Tommy I think your wrong Uncle Phil is still around. His ghost will 
 haunt us.







 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[AsburyPark] Re: 2nd Ave Property - Eminent Domain

2006-03-23 Thread wernerapnj
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, oakdorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 how about building NOTHING and letting the ocean blow through...
 
 of course this would nothing for the city coffers nor the partners.


Finally a conclusion that makes sense. The fact is that parcel is 
PUBLIC PROPERTY and has been since the founding days of AP. In all 
prior redevelopment plans there was never any development 
contemplated for that site.

Rightly so, just as was the case for the triangle blocks between the 
Casino and Palace. Dedicated PUBLIC PROPERTY. There is value in open 
undeveloped space in strategic areas such as these.

It adds value to the ajoining developable property and continues the 
rights of the public dedicated over time.

Building on every parcel in the entire waterfront to maximixe 
density, with no open space buffers is a disaster.

Werner






 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[AsburyPark] Re: 2nd Ave Property - Eminent Domain

2006-03-23 Thread bluebishop82
Werner you refuse to recognize your Northern and Western Monmouth 
overlords.  They have the $ and the power, and they will be soaking 
up all the open space funding.

Our only shot at largess is to assist them by accepting our Urban 
asthetic and continue to further Urbanize, which they are trying to 
avoid. 

We're Urban anyway, so grow with it.  Forget open spaces in AP.  It 
isn't who we are.

Rack'em pack'em and stack'em.  It's time to go vertical and build 
high.


--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, wernerapnj [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, oakdorf oakdorf@ wrote:
 
  how about building NOTHING and letting the ocean blow through...
  
  of course this would nothing for the city coffers nor the 
partners.
 
 
 Finally a conclusion that makes sense. The fact is that parcel is 
 PUBLIC PROPERTY and has been since the founding days of AP. In all 
 prior redevelopment plans there was never any development 
 contemplated for that site.
 
 Rightly so, just as was the case for the triangle blocks between 
the 
 Casino and Palace. Dedicated PUBLIC PROPERTY. There is value in 
open 
 undeveloped space in strategic areas such as these.
 
 It adds value to the ajoining developable property and continues 
the 
 rights of the public dedicated over time.
 
 Building on every parcel in the entire waterfront to maximixe 
 density, with no open space buffers is a disaster.
 
 Werner







 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[AsburyPark] Re: 2nd Ave Property - Eminent Domain

2006-03-23 Thread dfsavgny
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, bluebishop82 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 Werner you refuse to recognize your Northern and Western Monmouth 
 overlords.  They have the $ and the power, and they will be 
soaking 
 up all the open space funding.
 
 Our only shot at largess is to assist them by accepting our Urban 
 asthetic and continue to further Urbanize, which they are trying 
to 
 avoid. 
 
 We're Urban anyway, so grow with it.  Forget open spaces in AP.  
It 
 isn't who we are.
 
 Rack'em pack'em and stack'em.  It's time to go vertical and build 
 high.
 

Well funding is only an issue if you need to acquire land for open 
space, not keep land you already have vacant. Of course, technically 
we don't have th Triangle any more, we sold it but haven't gotten 
paid yet. I am not too worried about building on the Triangle since 
the Marine Grill proper site cannot be built upon. I don't think I 
would like to see our entire waterfront built up with high density, 
although I could accept density in isolated spots for lower density 
elsewhere. None of this is the problem however. That is of course 
that our waterfront remais in disgraceful condition and no one is 
doing anything about it. Sorry, but 12-month intervals is just not 
going to cut it. While the council is looking for the fourth wheel 
as Ed Johnson put it, they don;t realize that this car has no wheels 
and is up on milk crates.






 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[AsburyPark] Re: 2nd Ave Property - Eminent Domain

2006-03-23 Thread oakdorf
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, bluebishop82 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, dfsavgny dfsavgny@ wrote:
 
  
  the Marine Grill proper site cannot be built upon.  
 
 
 I'll be changing that someday.  Always dreamed of building a summer 
 home right there.

One of the best buys was when the Kassins purchased the Loch Arbor 
Site

Years ago, the marine grill site WAS almost built upon





 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[AsburyPark] Re: 2nd Ave Property - “rack'em pack'em and stack'em”

2006-03-23 Thread Skip Bernstein
…Northern and Western Monmouth overlords… have the $ and the power,
and they will be soaking up all the open space funding.  Our only shot
at largess is to assist them by accepting our Urban asthetic and
continue to further Urbanize, which they are trying to avoid.  We're
Urban anyway, so grow with it.  Forget open spaces in AP.  It isn't
who we are.  Rack'em pack'em and stack'em.  It's time to go vertical
and build high.

You can't lay our problems on the disastrous planning and political
power of suburbia; it wasn't they that gave away 56 acres of Asbury's
best, that catastrophe is home grown.  

The continuing urbanization of Asbury isn't a second best option, it
is the path to an enhanced quality of life and greater economic power,
but neither demands the elimination of all open space; that and
specifically the demise of the triangles was Weldon's and Aaron's doing.  

Were urbanization nothing more than rack'em pack'em and stack'em
Manhattan wouldn't have Central Park nor any other open spaces.






 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[AsburyPark] Re: Springwood - I need your help

2006-03-23 Thread jerseyjohn99
It sounds like a good idea, and in a perfect world it makes a lot of 
sense.

But lets be realistic here. This city has not been able to get its 
house in order, and this Council has consistently used City owned 
property to rearrange the deck chairs on the economic Titanic. 
Nothing they have done in 5 years has shown they have the ability to 
successfully redevelop anything. Why don't they start small  see if 
they have the wherewithal to put an actual plan together to make 
Springwood a viable destination where there is none, rather than 
giving them more prime property to shove Condos on? Maybe this is 
the perfect opportunity to get some volunteers from New Brunswick's 
DevCo to offer opinions, since they seem to have a knack for putting 
unwanted property back onto the taxrolls  getting it to thrive.
 
Property will always become available. Heck, once all the year-round 
families are forced out the city can choose any one of the grammar 
schools to put the new muni complex on. 

--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, bluebishop82 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

 Since this was just brought up in a previous post and I wanted to 
 gauge your opinions anyway, please let me know your thoughts.
 
 In the Springwood Avenue Advisory Committee we are obviously 
 considering many options.  Let me be clear that right now there is 
 mixed use of everything being considered: Stores, housing, rec, 
etc.
 
 One idea in the mix is to build a new state of the art municipal 
 complex on Springwood to house City Hall, Police Department and 
Fire 
 Department.
 
 The experience Cookman has shown is that it is still very 
difficult 
 to bring people to AP to shop because of the the safety factor 
(even 
 though it is safe as anywhere else.  I had 2 calls this week from 
 Monmouth people as to whether it was safe to come to my office).
 
 If we are still trying to convince them that Downtown is safe, we 
 are light years from convincing them shopping on Springwood is 
safe.
 
 It seems to me that putting the Municipal complex on Springwood 
 would not only make it feel safer due to the police being there, 
but 
 it will create automatic foot traffic of hundreds of people a day 
 down there between workers and people doing business with the 
City.  
 It can be an instant anchor for whatever stores we can build there 
 near it.
 
 It will also open up 3 blocks of prime main street that the City 
is 
 on now to be developed (stores, parking garage, walkway to 
downtown, 
 etc).
 
 
 What are your thoughts in this regard?
 
 Thanks








 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/