Re: [Asterisk-Users] SPA-3000 as a regular Asterisk FXO device?

2004-08-04 Thread Mike Benoit
It _seems_ to only pick up the line when the VoIP end answers. At least
for me it doesn't stop ringing until I see the log entry in Asterisk say
it picked up the call.

Now I just have to figure out how to get Asterisk to _not_ override the
incoming caller id with the SIP information from sip.conf. The SPA-3000
says it sends the CID from the PSTN through, but Asterisk is just show
the SIP extension number. 

On Wed, 2004-08-04 at 12:12 +1200, Andrew Gordon wrote:
 Andres wrote:
  The issue I'm having problems with is having the SPA-3000 automatically
  forward all incoming PSTN calls to the Asterisk mainmenu context (or
  ext I guess).  
  Configure an auto-dial number in the SPA to that it corresponds to 
  something in the mainmenu context.  Like:
  PSTN_Caller_Default_DP[2] 2 ;
  Dial_Plan_2[2](S0:551155) ;
  
  When a call comes in the FXO port, the SPA automatically dials 551155 
  via your Proxy[2] settings..
 
 Does it answer the line first then ring the 551155 or does it ring the 
 551155 and only pick up the line when the VoIP end answers?
 
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
-- 
Mike Benoit [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Rodopi Billing

2004-08-04 Thread Greg Boehnlein
On Tue, 3 Aug 2004, Tom wrote:

 At 07:08 PM 8/3/2004, you wrote:
 That sigh will turn to cursing after a couple of months. We currently use
 Rodopi, have for 10 years but the inflexability is too much to deal with
 anymore so we are moving away from it.
 
 To what?  I am also a cursed Rodopi owner. :-(
 
 Tom

We use Platypus from Boardtown, which was just acquired by Tucows. 
Although it has it's quirks, having seen Rodopi, Emerald, Prism and 
ISPEasy in action, I'll take Platypus ANY day!

I have a method for hacking VoIP per minute billing into Platypus, but I 
haven't executed it yet. Basically, we dump all of our CDR records to a 
database. On a daily basis, we can tally up the the per-minute LD totals 
for each customer and then insert a Radius Start/Stop record w/ the total 
billing seconds for that day. Platypus's built in rate tables take care of 
the rest. We provide 1,000 minutes of long distance with each account, so 
at the end of the month when Platypus tallies up it's overage charges, if 
the usage exceeds the limit, it bills the customer accordingly.

-- 
Vice President of N2Net, a New Age Consulting Service, Inc. Company
 http://www.n2net.net Where everything clicks into place!
 KP-216-121-ST



___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Cisco SIP Phone 7960 DTMF Problem

2004-08-04 Thread Miroslav Nachev
   Hi,

   When we use BudgeTone where the DTMF is set to via RTP (RFC2833)
all the DTMF functionality of Asterisk is working OK. When use Cisco
7960 the transfer is working OK, but when I try to remote pick-up the
call through '*8#' I can't do that because the Cisco Phone start busy
signal.
   How can I start using all DTMF features using Cisco Phone?
   

   Best Regards,
   Miroslav Nachev


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Call pickup (group)

2004-08-04 Thread Florian Overkamp
Hi,

Asterisk has a feature called pickupgroup, meaning you can pickup the call
that is ringing on your collegues phone. Can this type of behaviour be
emulated in extension logic or AGI (maybe together with manager login) ?

We need the group settings to be tied into a database which makes it a
little more dynamic :-


Any suggestions are welcome.

Florian

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] about sip.conf

2004-08-04 Thread Murali
  
HI all,

  Is there any possible to add sip entry 7004 from CLI without open sip.conf

like

 [7004]
 type=friend
 username=7004
 secret=123
 canreinvite=no
 host=dynamic
 dtmfmode=rfc2833
 mailbox=11
 nat=yes


  Thanks in advance

Regards
Murali

[Asterisk-Users] avm c4

2004-08-04 Thread Maurizio Marini
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi there,
now c4 does work :)
i plugged isdn cable in the fourth controller instead of the first one;
now, the problem is: why the 4th does work and the 1th does not?
i will try the 2th and 3th in the morning
10x

- -- 
Maurizio Marini GSM +39-335-8259739
Work: +39-0721-855285   Fax +39-0721-859609
Home: +39-0721-950396   IAXTel: (700) 350-1234
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFBEJU94Q/49nIJTlwRAjDWAJ9yHX72cUhA0txJg6G6DtgwbM8o4QCdGSIu
GazjEpC45MpcUcoh3JT4kug=
=VGAm
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] capturing a call

2004-08-04 Thread Maurizio Marini
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Ddoes it feasible with * to capture a call? when arrives a call, floor bells 
ring and everyone can hear them in the company, then everyone can answer 
'capturing' the call
m.
- -- 
Maurizio Marini GSM +39-335-8259739
Work: +39-0721-855285   Fax +39-0721-859609
Home: +39-0721-950396   IAXTel: (700) 350-1234
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFBEJYq4Q/49nIJTlwRAsZtAJ9jDbfeLg9ia2n3yYy6RR3NBidY/wCcDgML
O3ViqrM+ypEzAra3UOfZTVM=
=0csq
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] rxfax killed asterisk

2004-08-04 Thread Vladyslav
HI All.
I'm using tiff-v.3.5.7 and spandsp-0.0.1k with latest * cvs on
Slackware-10.0.
Here is debug messages from * console.
Please advise.

Can receive fax
Selected data signalling rate: V.29, 9600bps
2D coding OK
Scan line length: 215mm
Recording length: A4 (297mm)
Minimum scan line time: 0ms
Get at 9600
Changed from phase 3 to 5
Fast carrier up
Training failed (sequence failed)
Fast carrier training failed
Fast carrier down
Fast carrier up
Coarse carrier frequency 1699.96 (66)
Training error 2.228910
Training succeeded (constellation mismatch 4.905620)
Fast carrier trained
Fast carrier down
Changed from phase 5 to 4
Start rx document - compression 2
Start rx page
Killed


P.S. Have the same installation on Fedora Core 2 and everything works
ok. But I need it on Slackware :)
-- 
Best regards
Vlad

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] capturing a call

2004-08-04 Thread avizion
How about simply making that floor bell extension part of a call queue?

If you use ringall it will ring along with all handsets in same queue.

This is what I'm thinking about doing - once I get the PRI up here :)

Just an idea - I haven't tried it yet... but I hope you can use it somehow.

Regards

 - avizion


Quoting Maurizio Marini [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
 Ddoes it feasible with * to capture a call? when arrives a call, floor bells
 ring and everyone can hear them in the company, then everyone can answer
 'capturing' the call
--
avizion on irc.freenode.org #asterisk
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] PRI/H323 gateway

2004-08-04 Thread Asmine Ouloube



Hi, 
I ve got a problem whenI do this 
:
usr/src/asterisk/channels/h323# make

There are a lot of errors with ast_h323.cpp and .h. 
And at the end, I've got this: 
make ***[ast_h323.o] Error 1

In fact, I want a sample PRI/H323 
gateway.

  


Asterisk
___
|___|
ISDN(PRI) 
 
 
VOIP (H323)
-- 
|E1||RJ45.|---
|___| 
||
|___|
 


SoI've configured zapetel.conf and 
zapata.conf for an E1 card.
I 've installed pwlib and openh323 like in their 
README.
I 've changed the h323.conf to allow g723.1 and to 
disable the gatekeeper.
And for the expension.conf, at first,I 
decided to put all in comments. 
BecauseI just want to take the channels which 
come from the ISDN to use H323 in order to have VOIP and 
reciprocally.

Can someone help me?

Thanks for your answers




[Asterisk-Users] German sounds

2004-08-04 Thread Bastian Schern
Hi *,
are there already some free German sounds for Asterisk?
Regards
Bastian
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] about sip.conf

2004-08-04 Thread Duane Cox
Not that I know of, although one possibility is have * read from a mysql
database instead of sip.conf
then all you would have to do is 'sip reload'

Duane Cox


- Original Message - 
From: Murali
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2004 2:24 AM
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] about sip.conf



HI all,

  Is there any possible to add sip entry 7004 from CLI without open sip.conf

like

[7004]
type=friend
username=7004
secret=123
canreinvite=no
host=dynamic
dtmfmode=rfc2833
mailbox=11
nat=yes


  Thanks in advance
Regards
Murali



___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] VoIP experiences with Cable and DSL

2004-08-04 Thread Walt Reed

On Tue, Aug 03, 2004 at 07:48:13PM -0700, Chris said:
 - Original Message - 
 From: Steve Szmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2004 7:04 PM
 Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] VoIP experiences with Cable and DSL
 
 Assuming you're talking about Random Early Detection, are you saying that
 all
 cable providers use it?
 
 No, not saying that, just that since it's so CPU friendly and can handle
 large bandwidth, it's an attractive choice... however because VoIP packets
 are so tiny and very latency sensitive, RED is their worst nightmare :(
 
 -Chris

This is an interesting thread, but it's VERY difficult to follow when quoting
is done incorrectly. If I had not read previous messages, I would not
know who said what.

I urge all outlook and outlook express users to install quotefix which
fixes Outlook and OE's horribly broken behavior.

http://home.in.tum.de/~jain/software/oe-quotefix/
and
http://home.in.tum.de/~jain/software/outlook-quotefix/

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] German sounds

2004-08-04 Thread Christoph Rothe
On Wed, 4 Aug 2004, Bastian Schern wrote:

 Hi *,
 
 are there already some free German sounds for Asterisk?

Try here: 
http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk+sound+files+international

Christoph
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] German sounds

2004-08-04 Thread Chris
Bastian Schern wrote:
Hi *,
are there already some free German sounds for Asterisk?
Regards
Bastian
Take a look at this site http://www.stadt-pforzheim.de/asterisk/index.html .
Chris
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Who is calling me ?

2004-08-04 Thread Andrei Goncalves
Hi,
I made a follow me from my phone (111) to my softphone (222)... when 
someone call me, softphone show my phone number (111)..

I´d like to asterisk to forward the calling number, so I could know how is 
calling me.

Thanks a lot.
Andrei.
_
MSN Messenger: converse com os seus amigos online.  
http://messenger.msn.com.br

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Congested link

2004-08-04 Thread Alexey Hrapunov

I try to dial a number 3 rings and then busy tone in h.323 trace writes Congested link to 10.1.105.3  what this means and how to make this connection work ? 

Re: [Asterisk-Users] VoIP experiences with Cable and DSL

2004-08-04 Thread Leif Madsen
On Tue, 3 Aug 2004 12:07:14 -0400, Steve Szmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 For a few years now I've operated with cable as the obvious choice, at least
 in my area where RoadRunner really built up a good network. It could be that
 for nation wide implementation VoIP really should be on DSL. (Unless of
 course you need a big pipe where a split T is the only higher option.)

I currently use Cogeco cable in Oakville, ON, Canada.  It has been
fantastic!  I don't think I've used a provider with as much available
throughput (exactly as advertised).  Only occasionally does the
service go up and down, but that is infrequent.  I have an external
modem, and am using a pure VoIP setup with IAX trunking to my
VoIP/PSTN gateway.  Only occasionally do I get a dropped packet or
something, but nothing to worry about.  I spoke with my parents for an
hour over the connection, and there was no problems (actually... I was
getting some echo, but Asterisk nicely took care of it, and my parents
were not aware of any echo cancelling going on until I told them what
Asterisk was doing on my end, as I could hear it working).

I will be using Cogeco again for me internet (cable) so that I don't
have to pay Bell any money.  Unfortunately my buzzer isn't going to
work in the apartment, so I'll have to let guests in, but hey, I'll do
a bit of leg work just to save any of my money going to the greater of
two evils :)

Leif Madsen.
http://www.asteriskdocs.org
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] 2 sip servers

2004-08-04 Thread Altus Snyman
Good day all
I have figured out most/basics of asterisk.I went with sip and made my
own sip.conf and extensions.conf

No I have 2 servers running sip in different towns.Both is connected
with static ip so thats fine,but now.
Lets say someone want to call someone else in the other town.How do I
get asterisk to know,for instance sip extension 101 is on another sip
server on a different ip.
And I even want to say if someone in town A calls a town B code it
should go out threw town B's pstn card,so it will only be charge for a
local call?Can this be done

Its hard to explain for me and my english is not that good.Please Help
Thanks
Altus


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Who is calling me ?

2004-08-04 Thread Leif Madsen
On Wed, 04 Aug 2004 12:48:03 +, Andrei Goncalves
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hi,
 
 I made a follow me from my phone (111) to my softphone (222)... when
 someone call me, softphone show my phone number (111)..
 
 I´d like to asterisk to forward the calling number, so I could know how is
 calling me.

Set the CallerID to the ${CALLERID} of the line, then you should be
able to make the call appear to be coming from the incoming call as
opposed to the extension number that is calling you from Asterisk.

What I ended up doing was specifying a callerID argument in my macro,
then I just passed the ${CALLERID} variable as the argument.  I then
did a SetCallerID(${ARG2}) where ${ARG2} ended up being ${CALLERID}.

At least this is how I did it in my follow me script.  I'm sure there
are at least a couple of ways of doing this.

HTH,
Leif Madsen.
http://www.asteriskdocs.org
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] SIP pickupgroup

2004-08-04 Thread Tais M. Hansen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi,

Any reason why pickupgroup has been limited to 31? 31 groups are quickly used 
up when you have multiple companies on the same server.

- -- 
Regards,
Tais M. Hansen
ComX Networks
Tel: +45-70257474
Fax: +45-70257374

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFBEOMg32si/nlrQ5gRAu3+AJ9FkeGMgb1JaAy2WjY8wBNEsN4WnwCeMFP0
tn8MacTrFSK8ySN/yNbG/8I=
=Erm8
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] 2 sip servers

2004-08-04 Thread Leif Madsen
On Wed, 04 Aug 2004 15:03:59 +0200, Altus Snyman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Good day all
 I have figured out most/basics of asterisk.I went with sip and made my
 own sip.conf and extensions.conf
 
 No I have 2 servers running sip in different towns.Both is connected
 with static ip so thats fine,but now.
 Lets say someone want to call someone else in the other town.How do I
 get asterisk to know,for instance sip extension 101 is on another sip
 server on a different ip.
 And I even want to say if someone in town A calls a town B code it
 should go out threw town B's pstn card,so it will only be charge for a
 local call?Can this be done

This sounds like you want to use

switch =

In your dialplans.  

http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk+config+extensions.conf
http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk+-+dual+servers

These are links I found on the wiki with a little bit of googling (the
wiki search function isn't very good.  Doing a site:voip-info.org and
a couple of terms will get you what you want)

HTH,
Leif Madsen.
http://www.asteriskdocs.org
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] No incoming audio on incoming SIP calls

2004-08-04 Thread Johan Landerholm

Hi Dave,

Long time no see...

I have been looking at the various packets going in/out of my network with
regards to my SIP phones.
I usually use the ethereal network sniffer on my network and it has
wonderful support for SIP/RTP/RTSP/SDP analysing.
In the setup phase of a call the RTP packet shows exactly what IPs and
ports that your call is supposed to use.
When I have these problems, I sniff the network and it shows a private IP
instead of the public (external) IP in the voice data stream. Then it's
easy to see what needs to be fixed.
What kind of router/firewall do you use ?

I can send you some examples later on tonight if you need them.

Best regards,
Johan Landerholm, Stockholm, Sweden
(ex. SCO)

 Now this is really frustrating. Everything was working fine, and now it
 isn't ... I don't think I've changed anything that would affect this, but
 I
 guess you never can be too sure.

 My setup is as follows:

 SIP softphone (SJphone) connected to Asterisk running my Linux NAT
 firewall
 box. This is all on the internal network.

 Asterisk then dialing out through various means - SIP to Stanaphone, FWD,
 Gossiptel and PSTN via an X100P.

 For incoming calls, an 0870 number from CallUK routes to my FWD account,
 and
 an 0870 number from Gossiptel routing to my Gossiptel account.

 Outbound calls all work fine ... I get audio in both directions, no
 problem.

 Incoming calls on either 0870 number connect fine, and audio goes from the
 softphone to the caller, but not the other way ... I hear no audio on the
 softphone from the caller's phone.

 I'm getting no alerts from my firewall that it's dropping anything.

 I know my way around packet sniffers, but I don't know what to look for
 here. What should the inbound audio packets look like?

 Thanks


 --
 David Gurr
 Congruity Ltd.
 Hemel Hempstead, UK

 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] VoIP experiences with Cable and DSL

2004-08-04 Thread Steven P. Donegan
Leif Madsen wrote:
On Tue, 3 Aug 2004 12:07:14 -0400, Steve Szmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 

For a few years now I've operated with cable as the obvious choice, at least
in my area where RoadRunner really built up a good network. It could be that
for nation wide implementation VoIP really should be on DSL. (Unless of
course you need a big pipe where a split T is the only higher option.)
   

 

I believe this is a 'religious' discussion. I deployed a widespread 
(phoenix/california/hawaii) telecommuting setup for 50 employees using 
H.323 (not Asterisk - Altigen at the time). This was across probably 15 
different providers networks and spread pretty equally between Cable 
modem/router and DSL. In all cases 'business class' services were 
ordered at the highest available speeds.

The bottom line - after 2+ years we have had about equal amounts of 
trouble over both media types. When it's good it's just about perfect - 
when it's bad it's the same as bad cell phone connections. The bad times 
are infrequent on either media types.

My .02$
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Astetrisk connectet to PBX

2004-08-04 Thread Claus Lavdal
I have got the change to set op an Asterisk PBX for one department in a
large organisation.

This means that in instead of connecting the Asterisk direct to the
PSTN
thought E1 interface (ISDN) I have to connect thought the big PBX
central
(IS3000).(http://pbcextra.net/commonnet/marcom/pdf/001_06221.pdf)

Is there any body who has experience with this?

The right size of connection between the Asterisk and the IS3000 is a
E1
interface (30 channels). 

Which cards can I use? 
Are the cards on (http://asterisk.org/index.php?menu=hardware) the only
ones
or are they the only ones you have tested?

The next part is of course the connections whit the IS 3000.

In another department they have some matra boxes (I'm not sure
- but I think they are using the LAN for transporting phone
conversations
matra to matra) this matra main box is connected to the IS3000 with an
E1
interface in both boxes. Yo keep the overall control of the telephone
network these two boxes are using Q.SIG. - this way the system shoud
be
transeprant. 

Maybe I'm mixing things - pleas help me.

Overall the main think is that the Asterisk must be transperant so that
the
services on IP-telephones that is hook op on the Astrisk is the same as
the
services on traditional telephones that is hooked op on the IS 3000.
(Login
in and out, forwarding, show callerID)

So my question is - Is Q.SIG the way for connection the Asterisk to
the
IS3000? and do this give any problems. (I have seen that this have been
an
issue on the list about a year ago). 

Regards/Claus
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Rodopi Billing

2004-08-04 Thread Ejay Hire
I second this.  Our Primary (not the one we bought) system
is radiator, with mysql for the backend.  I've never found
something it couldn't do.

-e 

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of 
 Saliel Figueira Filho
 Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2004 7:09 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Rodopi Billing
 
 I know it's  OT here ... but anyone looking for a Radius
server should
 consider getting Radiator -
http://www.open.com.au/radiator/.
 
 It's not free, but at a very decent price you get the full
source code
 (it's written in Perl), but you seldom will need to tweak
the code, as
 it is flexible by design.
 
 No, I don't work or represent them, just an old-time happy
customer.
 Back to my lurking now.
 
 Saliel
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] 2 sip servers

2004-08-04 Thread Deon Rodden
I setup extension 105 on my Asterisk server to
Dial(SIP/[EMAIL PROTECTED]) and then defined [sipserver_b] in the
sip.conf

So then I setup extension on sipserver_b's extensions.conf file to answer
with the auto attendant, and it simply plays a message asking what number I
want to dial. It then puts me in a context where all outbound calls are
pushed through the pstn card in it.

So now from my system, I dial 105 and I immediately get asked what number to
call, and once I enter it, the call goes through.  The same thing works from
asterisk_b to asterisk_a, now our cities are linked.

Not familiar with switch but I saw references to it before, will
investigate further.

- Original Message - 
From: Leif Madsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2004 9:23 AM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] 2 sip servers


 On Wed, 04 Aug 2004 15:03:59 +0200, Altus Snyman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
  Good day all
  I have figured out most/basics of asterisk.I went with sip and made my
  own sip.conf and extensions.conf
 
  No I have 2 servers running sip in different towns.Both is connected
  with static ip so thats fine,but now.
  Lets say someone want to call someone else in the other town.How do I
  get asterisk to know,for instance sip extension 101 is on another sip
  server on a different ip.
  And I even want to say if someone in town A calls a town B code it
  should go out threw town B's pstn card,so it will only be charge for a
  local call?Can this be done

 This sounds like you want to use

 switch =

 In your dialplans.

 http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk+config+extensions.conf
 http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk+-+dual+servers

 These are links I found on the wiki with a little bit of googling (the
 wiki search function isn't very good.  Doing a site:voip-info.org and
 a couple of terms will get you what you want)

 HTH,
 Leif Madsen.
 http://www.asteriskdocs.org
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Logging into Multiple Call Queues on two * Servers and Voice Mail option.

2004-08-04 Thread Robert Jackson

-Original Message-
From: Shad Mortazavi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2004 9:37 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Logging into Multiple Call Queues on two *
Servers and Voice Mail option.


Dear All, 
I have two objectives that I need to meet; 
1. I need to be able to log into two separate call queues on two
different Asterisk servers, servicing two data centers. I seem to have
problems configuring my SNOM phone to actively register with both
servers. Has anyone got a working configuration for this?

I have not implemented this exact scenario, but I have setup agents in
multiple queues.  In queues.conf you can either specify the agents that
belong to the group or use agent groups.  Since each agent can be in
multiple queues all you have to do is specify that agent in the second
queues section.  As far as getting it working with two servers all you
should have to do is use the switch = statement to forward the calls
back and forth.  Basically the agent would have to log in to both
servers, but once finished he/she could receive calls from both.  

2. I need to have an option for the user to press a button when in the
call queue to go to voicemail. Has anyone got a working configuration
for this?

You need to specify the context option in your queues.conf for that
queue.  When you have a context defined whatever buttons the caller hits
is sent directly to that context.  This can work very similarly to an
auto attendant where you can have them hit one to leave a message or two
to receive a callback, etc...

I appreciate all the help. 

No Problem, I hope this qualifies.

Warm Regards 
Shad Mortazavi 


Robert Jackson
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Problems with E100P

2004-08-04 Thread Marcelo Rodriguez
Hi,
   I'm having trouble configuring and E1 link , I know the E1 is a PRI
and the switchtype is 5ess. The problem is that everytime I try to dial
I got and error saying that it was unable to open the zap channel .
Devices are created in the /dev/zap directory and I can open them with a
cat /dev/zap/1. I can also see the channels in /proc/zaptel/1.

Thanks in advance

[zaptel.conf]
span=1,1,0,cas,ami
bchan=1-15,17-31
dchan=16
loadzone = us
defaultzone=us

[zapata.conf]
trunkgroup = 1,16
spanmap = 1,1
[channels]
switchtype=5ess
context = default
signalling = pri_cpe
group = 1
channel = 1-15,17-31

cat /proc/zaptel/1
Span 1: WCT1/0 Digium Wildcard E100P E1/PRA Card 0 AMI/ RED
 
   1 WCT1/0/1 Clear
   2 WCT1/0/2 Clear
   3 WCT1/0/3 Clear
   4 WCT1/0/4 Clear
   5 WCT1/0/5 Clear
   6 WCT1/0/6 Clear
   7 WCT1/0/7 Clear
   8 WCT1/0/8 Clear
   9 WCT1/0/9 Clear
  10 WCT1/0/10 Clear
  11 WCT1/0/11 Clear
  12 WCT1/0/12 Clear
  13 WCT1/0/13 Clear
  14 WCT1/0/14 Clear
  15 WCT1/0/15 Clear
  16 WCT1/0/16 HDLCFCS
  17 WCT1/0/17 Clear
  18 WCT1/0/18 Clear
  19 WCT1/0/19 Clear
  20 WCT1/0/20 Clear
  21 WCT1/0/21 Clear
  22 WCT1/0/22 Clear
  23 WCT1/0/23 Clear
  24 WCT1/0/24 Clear
  25 WCT1/0/25 Clear
  26 WCT1/0/26 Clear
  27 WCT1/0/27 Clear
  28 WCT1/0/28 Clear
  29 WCT1/0/29 Clear
  30 WCT1/0/30 Clear
  31 WCT1/0/31 Clear



___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Re: Analog FXO Card

2004-08-04 Thread Francois Menard (Mailing List Account)

-= On 15 Sep 2003 11:09:38 -0600, tom [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:

And interestingly, the Digium card looks a lot like a product sold
by Tigerjet, called the Personal Phone Gateway. I'm purely
speculating on this, but Digium could have used Tigerjet's reference
design for their own board.

Steve Haehnichen replied:
That's kindof how the industry goes.  No point in rehashing designs or
trying to beat volume manufacturers at their own game.

The FCC Reg# on the board is for AMIGO Technology Co of Taiwan.
I'm guessing the FXO board is a lot like an AMI-IA92:
 http://www.amigo.com.tw/products/modem/AMIIA92_IE92.htm

You can zoom in here:
 http://www.amigo.com.tw/catalogue/Modem.pdf

The same right down to the AMI-IA92/IE92 on the FXO silkscreen. :)
For the record: I bought an XP 100 so that I could too get the support 
that I expect that I will need.  However, I like to know what I buy when I 
purchase hardware.

I do not understand what is this notion of AMI-IA92 - this is being 
labeled as Intel's software base solution for a V.92 modem under 
windows.

However, this is still showing up in my /proc/pci as a TigerJet 300 
Communications Controller.

Does this mean that Intel software works for the TigerJet 300?
If I boot into windows, could I use this board as a modem?
What about T.38 and Fax support for this board, is this envisionable?
What I am interested in knowing is whether the sound i/o on this board is 
down through PCI DMA or its being done through a serial port on a PCI 
bus.

-=Francois=-
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


OT: Re: [Asterisk-Users] [RANT] Today's possible problems with Broadvoice????

2004-08-04 Thread Jayson Vantuyl
On Tue, Aug 03, 2004 at 02:25:03PM -0500, Brian Capouch wrote:
 Despite using spam control, I still have to hit delete fifty times or so 
 a day to get rid of those disgusting sex ads.  Why is it any harder to 
 do the same with messages that, upon swift perusal, aren't of interest?
That's it!  Train a spam filter to block those messages.

For everyone too troubled to hit the delete key, they can just train a
spam filter to block Broadvoice complaints.  Better yet, maybe if they
just dropped in all of the clueless questions they don't like, it would
automatically filter it out for them!

Mm.  I'm should patent that.  Something like Patent for Using Spam
Filters to Block Stuff That Isn't Spam or something equally obvious.  I
like it.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] 2 sip servers

2004-08-04 Thread Robert Jackson


 -Original Message-
 From: Deon Rodden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2004 9:46 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] 2 sip servers
 
 
 
 Not familiar with switch but I saw references to it before, 
 will investigate further.
 
I believe that it is for use with IAX, but I could be wrong.

Robert Jackson
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] SIP pickupgroup

2004-08-04 Thread Holger Schurig
because a unsigned int has usually 32 bits?

(I assume that the calling group is based on a bitmask)



You don't need the callgroups anyway, you can call multiple phones with 
the Dial() application, e.g. Dial(TECH1/Phone1TECH2/Phone2) if you want 
to call two phones at once.

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Problems with E100P

2004-08-04 Thread Jon Stockill
Marcelo Rodriguez wrote:
Hi,
   I'm having trouble configuring and E1 link , I know the E1 is a PRI
and the switchtype is 5ess. The problem is that everytime I try to dial
I got and error saying that it was unable to open the zap channel .
Devices are created in the /dev/zap directory and I can open them with a
cat /dev/zap/1. I can also see the channels in /proc/zaptel/1.

cat /proc/zaptel/1
Span 1: WCT1/0 Digium Wildcard E100P E1/PRA Card 0 AMI/ RED
You've got a red alarm - looks like there's a connection problem somewhere.
--
Jon Stockill
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] 2 sip servers

2004-08-04 Thread Altus Snyman
to put it this way
town A= sip 100+ ,local aria code = 022 .
town B= sip 200+ ,local aria code = 145 .

Now I want people from tow A to dial 202 and it should go threw the
static ip to the town B server to the users 202,and same for town B
And
If people from town A want to call the local butcher of town B whose
number is (145) 88 55 66,it should not go out threw town A's pstn card
but threw the static ip to town B's server and then going out threw town
B's pstn card since its a 145 number!

Hope this makes better sence
Thanks so far



On Wed, 2004-08-04 at 15:45, Deon Rodden wrote:
 I setup extension 105 on my Asterisk server to
 Dial(SIP/[EMAIL PROTECTED]) and then defined [sipserver_b] in the
 sip.conf
 
 So then I setup extension on sipserver_b's extensions.conf file to answer
 with the auto attendant, and it simply plays a message asking what number I
 want to dial. It then puts me in a context where all outbound calls are
 pushed through the pstn card in it.
 
 So now from my system, I dial 105 and I immediately get asked what number to
 call, and once I enter it, the call goes through.  The same thing works from
 asterisk_b to asterisk_a, now our cities are linked.
 
 Not familiar with switch but I saw references to it before, will
 investigate further.
 
 - Original Message - 
 From: Leif Madsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2004 9:23 AM
 Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] 2 sip servers
 
 
  On Wed, 04 Aug 2004 15:03:59 +0200, Altus Snyman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
   Good day all
   I have figured out most/basics of asterisk.I went with sip and made my
   own sip.conf and extensions.conf
  
   No I have 2 servers running sip in different towns.Both is connected
   with static ip so thats fine,but now.
   Lets say someone want to call someone else in the other town.How do I
   get asterisk to know,for instance sip extension 101 is on another sip
   server on a different ip.
   And I even want to say if someone in town A calls a town B code it
   should go out threw town B's pstn card,so it will only be charge for a
   local call?Can this be done
 
  This sounds like you want to use
 
  switch =
 
  In your dialplans.
 
  http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk+config+extensions.conf
  http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk+-+dual+servers
 
  These are links I found on the wiki with a little bit of googling (the
  wiki search function isn't very good.  Doing a site:voip-info.org and
  a couple of terms will get you what you want)
 
  HTH,
  Leif Madsen.
  http://www.asteriskdocs.org
  ___
  Asterisk-Users mailing list
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
  To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 
 
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Making asterisk distributed

2004-08-04 Thread Jeremy McNamara
Trilogy India wrote:
Hi,
I want to know, if someone has tried to use clustering
in asterisk to increase its scalability and make it
distributed??
If yes, how easy it is to cluster?
Can someone please ive me details about the same

Asterisk will not benefit from clustering.
Jeremy McNamara
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] IAX2 'no authority found' problem

2004-08-04 Thread Simon Ward
Hi everyone,
I'm having some problem trying to set up an IAX connection between two * 
servers.
The scenario is :
serverA has an X100p card and will direct all calls from the X100p over 
IAX to a specific extension on serverB which is at the other end of an 
unfirewalled VPN connection.

At the moment serverA tries to redirect the call to serverB but recieves 
this message (it appears on both servers) :

-- Executing Dial(Zap/1-1, IAX2/test:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/cardiff) in 
new stack
-- Called test:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/cardiff
Tx-Frame Retry[000] -- OSeqno: 000 ISeqno: 000 Type: IAX Subclass: NEW
   Timestamp: 6ms  SCall: 1  DCall: 0 [192.168.1.250:4569]
   VERSION : 2
   CALLED NUMBER   : cardiff
   LANGUAGE: en
   USERNAME: test
   FORMAT  : 2
   CAPABILITY  : 65283
   ADSICPE : 2
   DATE TIME   : 151287361

Rx-Frame Retry[No] -- OSeqno: 000 ISeqno: 001 Type: IAX Subclass: REJECT
   Timestamp: 1ms  SCall: 1  DCall: 1 [192.168.1.250:4569]
   CAUSE   : No authority found
Aug  4 14:50:02 WARNING[147465]: chan_iax2.c:5339 socket_read: Call rejected
by 192.168.1.250: No authority found
Tx-Frame Retry[-01] -- OSeqno: 001 ISeqno: 001 Type: IAX Subclass: ACK
   Timestamp: 1ms  SCall: 1  DCall: 1 [192.168.1.250:4569]
-- Hungup 'IAX2/192.168.1.250:4569/1'
  == No one is available to answer at this time
Here are excerpts from the config files :
ServerA:
extensions.conf
[incoming]
exten = s,1,Dial(IAX2/test:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/cardiff)
ServerB:
iax.conf
[cardiff]
type=friend
username=test
secret=test
context=sipfonescard
extensions.conf
[sipfonescard]
exten = cardiff,1,Dial(SIP/1101)
Has anyone got any suggestions on what might be the solution to the 'no 
authority found' problem, I'm convinced that it must be something pretty 
simple that I'm missing but I can't find any tips to point me in the 
right direction.

Any suggestions would be appreciated,
Thanks,
Simon Ward
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Rodopi Billing

2004-08-04 Thread Jeremy McNamara
Greg Boehnlein wrote:

We use Platypus from Boardtown, which was just acquired by Tucows. 
Although it has it's quirks, having seen Rodopi, Emerald, Prism and 
ISPEasy in action, I'll take Platypus ANY day!

I have a method for hacking VoIP per minute billing into Platypus, but I 
haven't executed it yet. Basically, we dump all of our CDR records to a 
database. On a daily basis, we can tally up the the per-minute LD totals 
for each customer and then insert a Radius Start/Stop record w/ the total 
billing seconds for that day. Platypus's built in rate tables take care of 
the rest. We provide 1,000 minutes of long distance with each account, so 
at the end of the month when Platypus tallies up it's overage charges, if 
the usage exceeds the limit, it bills the customer accordingly.

If that customer is still around to pay you.
Billing for services such as VoIP should be in real-time, anything less 
is unacceptable in my book.


Jeremy McNamara
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Barge in on to agents conversation

2004-08-04 Thread Navnit Chachan
Hi,
1. When an agent is active on a call, i need the ablity for a third person
to join the conversation. Basically barge in by a supervisor, participate in
the conversation and then leave.
2. As an extension to the above, while on call, can the agent request a
conference from another agent and later hang him up.
3. Is there any way for a call to be put in the queue destined for a
specific agent only? I need this for a callback feature with auto dial out.


I tries the wiki, google, a lil bit of the code but found no answers. Maybe
i am bad at searching.
Can somebody please put me on to the right track

Thanx in advance.
Regards
Navnit

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] PRI/H323 gateway

2004-08-04 Thread Jeremy McNamara
Asmine Ouloube wrote:
Hi,
I ve got a problem when I do this :
usr/src/asterisk/channels/h323# make
 
There are a lot of errors with ast_h323.cpp and .h. And at the end, I've 
got this:
make ***[ast_h323.o] Error 1
 

So I've configured zapetel.conf and zapata.conf for an E1 card.
I 've installed pwlib and openh323 like in their README.
I 've changed the h323.conf to allow g723.1 and to disable the gatekeeper.
And for the expension.conf, at first, I decided to  put all in comments.
Because I just want to take the channels which come from the ISDN to use 
H323 in order to have VOIP and reciprocally.
 
Can someone help me?

Read the README again and if you still can't figure it out send least 
one error message, but the README does cover how to setup your 
environment and how to properly compile the code.


Jeremy McNamara
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] rxfax killed asterisk

2004-08-04 Thread Andrew Kohlsmith
On Wednesday 04 August 2004 05:18, Vladyslav wrote:
 HI All.
 I'm using tiff-v.3.5.7 and spandsp-0.0.1k with latest * cvs on
 Slackware-10.0.
 Here is debug messages from * console.
 Please advise.

I get the same problem with Slack91 - some faxes work, some don't, some 
segfault *.  I'm no longer using rxfax, at least not without another machine 
handy so I don't have to worry about taking our entire phone system down :-)

-A.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Re: problems with'#' transfer after hold

2004-08-04 Thread Andrew Kohlsmith
On Tuesday 03 August 2004 23:57, Chris wrote:
 Check out bugs.digium.com, bug number 2010. Twisted (one of the bug
 marshalls) has written a patch that allows you to set the transfer key in
 features.conf to be anything you want...

Was this patch updated so that if you have a double-character transfer 
sequence and you don't get the secondary character(s), it emits the primary 
character?

i.e. if you have it set to ## and you hit #... after 0.5s or something it 
emits the # to the channel so you can pass it on (say a remote IVR).

-A.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] VoIP experiences with Cable and DSL

2004-08-04 Thread Andrew Kohlsmith
On Tuesday 03 August 2004 21:16, Steve Szmidt wrote:
 I take it you paid $200 for the Sangoma?

Yes I did, and it was the best $200 I ever spent on VOIP equipment.  
Relatively inexpensive and like I said it eliminated the guessing games and 
queueing garbage.

 Did you have to get through any hoops to get it up, or did it just
 autoconfigure, as advertized, and you were a happy camper?

The autoconfigure did *not* work.  Several little problems but all solveable.

1) 2.4.26 is not supported at the time of this email.  It's coming, they say, 
but they have some other pressing issues with other equipment and customers.  
(2.4.26 is closer to 2.6.x in terms of some of the driver backend)

2) The autoconfigure says it'll compile in ADSL but it doesn't...  I found I 
had to do a manual config and then specify all the protocols it said were 
default (ADSL among them) -- the screen looked as if I'd done an default 
install but I had to do it manually.

That's it.  After that it built, link went up without any hassle and it's been 
working great.

Now, having said that, I've been having perfect audio for the past 3 weeks but 
this past week I am having choppy outgoing audio but my bandwidth consumption 
is well below the maximum so I'm trying to track down what changed.  I don't 
believe it to be a problem with the sangoma card, though.

-A.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Re: problems with'#' transfer after hold

2004-08-04 Thread Chris Shaw
- Original Message -
From: Andrew Kohlsmith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2004 7:46 AM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Re: problems with'#' transfer after hold


 On Tuesday 03 August 2004 23:57, Chris wrote:
  Check out bugs.digium.com, bug number 2010. Twisted (one of the bug
  marshalls) has written a patch that allows you to set the transfer key
in
  features.conf to be anything you want...

 Was this patch updated so that if you have a double-character transfer
 sequence and you don't get the secondary character(s), it emits the
primary
 character?

 i.e. if you have it set to ## and you hit #... after 0.5s or something it
 emits the # to the channel so you can pass it on (say a remote IVR).

Yep, sure was

I'm using it right now, it's great!

-Chris

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Problems with E100P

2004-08-04 Thread Scott Stingel
In zaptel.conf, I think the line should be:

span=1,1,0,ccs,hdb3 

With an optional ,crc4 at the end.  This works for my E1 card.  The code
you're using sounds like for a T1.

Regards


Scott M. Stingel
President,
Emerging Voice Technology, Inc.
Palo Alto California  London England
www.evtmedia.com 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marcelo
Rodriguez
Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2004 6:47 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Problems with E100P

Hi,
   I'm having trouble configuring and E1 link , I know the E1 is a PRI and
the switchtype is 5ess. The problem is that everytime I try to dial I got
and error saying that it was unable to open the zap channel .
Devices are created in the /dev/zap directory and I can open them with a cat
/dev/zap/1. I can also see the channels in /proc/zaptel/1.

Thanks in advance

[zaptel.conf]
span=1,1,0,cas,ami
bchan=1-15,17-31
dchan=16
loadzone = us
defaultzone=us

[zapata.conf]
trunkgroup = 1,16
spanmap = 1,1
[channels]
switchtype=5ess
context = default
signalling = pri_cpe
group = 1
channel = 1-15,17-31

cat /proc/zaptel/1
Span 1: WCT1/0 Digium Wildcard E100P E1/PRA Card 0 AMI/ RED
 
   1 WCT1/0/1 Clear
   2 WCT1/0/2 Clear
   3 WCT1/0/3 Clear
   4 WCT1/0/4 Clear
   5 WCT1/0/5 Clear
   6 WCT1/0/6 Clear
   7 WCT1/0/7 Clear
   8 WCT1/0/8 Clear
   9 WCT1/0/9 Clear
  10 WCT1/0/10 Clear
  11 WCT1/0/11 Clear
  12 WCT1/0/12 Clear
  13 WCT1/0/13 Clear
  14 WCT1/0/14 Clear
  15 WCT1/0/15 Clear
  16 WCT1/0/16 HDLCFCS
  17 WCT1/0/17 Clear
  18 WCT1/0/18 Clear
  19 WCT1/0/19 Clear
  20 WCT1/0/20 Clear
  21 WCT1/0/21 Clear
  22 WCT1/0/22 Clear
  23 WCT1/0/23 Clear
  24 WCT1/0/24 Clear
  25 WCT1/0/25 Clear
  26 WCT1/0/26 Clear
  27 WCT1/0/27 Clear
  28 WCT1/0/28 Clear
  29 WCT1/0/29 Clear
  30 WCT1/0/30 Clear
  31 WCT1/0/31 Clear



___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Rodopi Billing

2004-08-04 Thread Gary Carr
 That sigh will turn to cursing after a couple of months. We currently use
 Rodopi, have for 10 years but the inflexability is too much to deal with
 anymore so we are moving away from it.
 
 To what?  I am also a cursed Rodopi owner. :-(
 
 Tom


We bought the source code to wirebill and are building our own platform.



Gary


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: OT: Re: [Asterisk-Users] [RANT] Today's possible problems with Broadvoice????

2004-08-04 Thread Steven Critchfield
On Wed, 2004-08-04 at 09:00, Jayson Vantuyl wrote:
 For everyone too troubled to hit the delete key, they can just train a
 spam filter to block Broadvoice complaints.  Better yet, maybe if they
 just dropped in all of the clueless questions they don't like, it would
 automatically filter it out for them!
 
 Mm.  I'm should patent that.  Something like Patent for Using Spam
 Filters to Block Stuff That Isn't Spam or something equally obvious.  I
 like it.

I think I have documented Prior Art on that. Your message nearly tripped
the spam filter and this one will probably do so. In fact this mailing
list is the reason I noticed my spam filter classified annoying
questions as spam.

-- 
Steven Critchfield [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Making asterisk distributed

2004-08-04 Thread Steven Critchfield
On Wed, 2004-08-04 at 09:30, Jeremy McNamara wrote:
 Trilogy India wrote:
 
  Hi,
  
  I want to know, if someone has tried to use clustering
  in asterisk to increase its scalability and make it
  distributed??
  
  If yes, how easy it is to cluster?
  
  Can someone please ive me details about the same
 
 
 Asterisk will not benefit from clustering.

Not in the HPC sense, but it will in the high availability sense.
-- 
Steven Critchfield [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Channel Bank

2004-08-04 Thread Joe Pukepail
Since it doesn't look like any of the FXS cards supported by asterisk
support analog DID trunks, would it work if I used a T100P connected
to an adtran channel bank (atlas 550?) with an FXS card installed?

Anyone ever try this configuration?
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] German sounds

2004-08-04 Thread Fran Boon
Bastian Schern wrote:
are there already some free German sounds for Asterisk?
Yes, 2 sets:
http://voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk+sound+files+international
F
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Gafachi?

2004-08-04 Thread Charles Ellis
Luke,

I have used them and have been very happy with the service. They are the
only ones I have found that seem to be able to process a call from
Firefly that goes through 2 * servers. Nufone and Voicepulse are not
able to process it - I think it is a firefly problem not a Nufone or
Voicepulse problem, since everything works fine if I use IAXPhone.
Anyway, Gafachi has worked well for me, and I do not think you need to
register unless you are receiving incoming phone calls.

Charles

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Luke
Catranis
Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2004 9:42 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Gafachi?

Anybody use them... I signed up for $20 to see how there system works..
They're at $.02 per minute for US Termination and their other ITX rates
aren't too shabby.

Sadly my IAX registration is rejected... maybe a glitch, wondering if
anyone's had a similar issue.

Luke

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] IAX2 'no authority found' problem

2004-08-04 Thread Josh Roberson
Simon, i was having the exact same problem, the only solution I found, 
was to remove the secret, then it worked great.. I thought I must have 
been missing something too, but apparently not.   I'm not sure exactly 
what is causing this, as if i set the servers up to register with each 
other, they register fine, but the moment they try to pass a call to one 
another, they fail, unless there is no secret listed in iax.conf for the 
connections.

-twisted
Simon Ward wrote:
Hi everyone,
I'm having some problem trying to set up an IAX connection between two 
* servers.
The scenario is :
serverA has an X100p card and will direct all calls from the X100p 
over IAX to a specific extension on serverB which is at the other end 
of an unfirewalled VPN connection.

At the moment serverA tries to redirect the call to serverB but 
recieves this message (it appears on both servers) :

-- Executing Dial(Zap/1-1, IAX2/test:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/cardiff) 
in new stack
-- Called test:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/cardiff
Tx-Frame Retry[000] -- OSeqno: 000 ISeqno: 000 Type: IAX Subclass: 
NEW
   Timestamp: 6ms  SCall: 1  DCall: 0 [192.168.1.250:4569]
   VERSION : 2
   CALLED NUMBER   : cardiff
   LANGUAGE: en
   USERNAME: test
   FORMAT  : 2
   CAPABILITY  : 65283
   ADSICPE : 2
   DATE TIME   : 151287361

Rx-Frame Retry[No] -- OSeqno: 000 ISeqno: 001 Type: IAX Subclass: 
REJECT
   Timestamp: 1ms  SCall: 1  DCall: 1 [192.168.1.250:4569]
   CAUSE   : No authority found

Aug  4 14:50:02 WARNING[147465]: chan_iax2.c:5339 socket_read: Call 
rejected
by 192.168.1.250: No authority found
Tx-Frame Retry[-01] -- OSeqno: 001 ISeqno: 001 Type: IAX Subclass: 
ACK
   Timestamp: 1ms  SCall: 1  DCall: 1 [192.168.1.250:4569]
-- Hungup 'IAX2/192.168.1.250:4569/1'
  == No one is available to answer at this time

Here are excerpts from the config files :

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Barge in on to agents conversation

2004-08-04 Thread Nicolas Gudino
Hello,

On Wed, 2004-08-04 at 11:35, Navnit Chachan wrote:
 Hi,
 1. When an agent is active on a call, i need the ablity for a third person
 to join the conversation. Basically barge in by a supervisor, participate in
 the conversation and then leave.

Asternic, the Flash Operator Panel can do this, but you need to open it
on a web browser and use your mouse to drag the manager extension to any
leg of an  already bridged call, with some extensions logic and meetme
in the mix. I'm not sure if it will fit your needs, but it might help...

http://www.asternic.org

Best regards,

-- 
Nicolas Gudino [EMAIL PROTECTED]
House Internet S.R.L.

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Cisco SIP Phone 7960 DTMF Problem

2004-08-04 Thread Nicolas Gudino
Hello,

On Wed, 2004-08-04 at 04:35, Miroslav Nachev wrote:
Hi,
 
When we use BudgeTone where the DTMF is set to via RTP (RFC2833)
 all the DTMF functionality of Asterisk is working OK. When use Cisco
 7960 the transfer is working OK, but when I try to remote pick-up the
 call through '*8#' I can't do that because the Cisco Phone start busy
 signal.
How can I start using all DTMF features using Cisco Phone?

Did you try by dialing just '*8' ?

-- 
Nicolas Gudino [EMAIL PROTECTED]
House Internet S.R.L.

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] BT100 bad handset?

2004-08-04 Thread Jason Kawakami



hello all-

has anyone had any problems with the handsets on 
BT100's. Just picked one up for my lab and the speakerphone works great 
but I am only getting one way audio (incoming) from the handset. 


Since the speakerphone works fine, I can't think of 
any config. reasons why the handset wouldn't other than a faulty handset. 
Any thoughts or experiences?

Jason Kawakami

Technical SalesOpen Telephony Labs, 
LLC801.527.2284www.optellabs.com


Re: [Asterisk-Users] IAX2 'no authority found' problem

2004-08-04 Thread steve


On Wed, 4 Aug 2004, Simon Ward wrote:

 -- Executing Dial(Zap/1-1, IAX2/test:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/cardiff) in 
 new stack
  -- Called test:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/cardiff
 Tx-Frame Retry[000] -- OSeqno: 000 ISeqno: 000 Type: IAX Subclass: NEW
 Timestamp: 6ms  SCall: 1  DCall: 0 [192.168.1.250:4569]
 VERSION : 2
 CALLED NUMBER   : cardiff
 LANGUAGE: en
 USERNAME: test
 FORMAT  : 2
 CAPABILITY  : 65283
 ADSICPE : 2
 DATE TIME   : 151287361
 
 Rx-Frame Retry[No] -- OSeqno: 000 ISeqno: 001 Type: IAX Subclass: REJECT
 Timestamp: 1ms  SCall: 1  DCall: 1 [192.168.1.250:4569]
 CAUSE   : No authority found
 
 Aug  4 14:50:02 WARNING[147465]: chan_iax2.c:5339 socket_read: Call rejected
 by 192.168.1.250: No authority found
 Tx-Frame Retry[-01] -- OSeqno: 001 ISeqno: 001 Type: IAX Subclass: ACK
 Timestamp: 1ms  SCall: 1  DCall: 1 [192.168.1.250:4569]
  -- Hungup 'IAX2/192.168.1.250:4569/1'
== No one is available to answer at this time

Hi,

Seeing that you are sending username test, you need an entry in iax.conf 
for [test]

That's how I understand it anyway.

Steve

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] rxfax killed asterisk

2004-08-04 Thread Steve Underwood
Hi Vladyslav,
Several people with these symtoms - crashing just as the reception of 
the actual page starts - found they had other versions of libtiff on 
their system, as well as 3.5.7. When the others were removed the problem 
when away.

Regards,
Steve
Vladyslav wrote:
HI All.
I'm using tiff-v.3.5.7 and spandsp-0.0.1k with latest * cvs on
Slackware-10.0.
Here is debug messages from * console.
Please advise.
Can receive fax
Selected data signalling rate: V.29, 9600bps
2D coding OK
Scan line length: 215mm
Recording length: A4 (297mm)
Minimum scan line time: 0ms
Get at 9600
Changed from phase 3 to 5
Fast carrier up
Training failed (sequence failed)
Fast carrier training failed
Fast carrier down
Fast carrier up
Coarse carrier frequency 1699.96 (66)
Training error 2.228910
Training succeeded (constellation mismatch 4.905620)
Fast carrier trained
Fast carrier down
Changed from phase 5 to 4
Start rx document - compression 2
Start rx page
Killed
P.S. Have the same installation on Fedora Core 2 and everything works
ok. But I need it on Slackware :)
 

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re[2]: [Asterisk-Users] Cisco SIP Phone 7960 DTMF Problem

2004-08-04 Thread Miroslav Nachev
Dear Nicolas,

NG Did you try by dialing just '*8' ?

   I try, but the result is the same. The problems is in Cisco Phone,
because the same account with BudgeTone is working well.


-- 
Best regards,
 Miroslavmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Wednesday, August 4, 2004, 7:23:31 PM, you wrote:

NG Hello,

NG On Wed, 2004-08-04 at 04:35, Miroslav Nachev wrote:
Hi,
 
When we use BudgeTone where the DTMF is set to via RTP (RFC2833)
 all the DTMF functionality of Asterisk is working OK. When use Cisco
 7960 the transfer is working OK, but when I try to remote pick-up the
 call through '*8#' I can't do that because the Cisco Phone start busy
 signal.
How can I start using all DTMF features using Cisco Phone?

NG Did you try by dialing just '*8' ?

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Get MWI from Telco's voicemail

2004-08-04 Thread Scott Petersen
Howdy

I have a question regarding support for picking up when the telco sends a MWI message.

My client's setup is a small office with three incoming lines on a TDM400P with iaxy's 
and a Grandstream as extensions. I am using CVS Head from yesterday. (I was resolving 
a different issue.) Since they only have two voice lines, with the third as a fax, I 
am using voicemail from the telco.

What I am seeing is an event every half hour exactly, on each of the two voice lines. 
This causes the simple switch to kick in and ring the extensions. Of course there is 
no one there. I have put a workaround in the dialplan of using WaitForRing(0) as the 
first entry in the s extension. The downside is that it delays the ringing of the 
extensions by one ring which my clients don't really like.

Since these events happen every half hour and only on the lines that have voicemail I 
am very confident that it is the telco sending a trigger to turn the MWI on the phones 
either on or off. I really don't want to have to try and find out from the telco as 
their support is much, much, much, less than knowledgeable or helpful. What I am 
wondering is if there is any way for Asterisk to pick up on these message from the 
telco. It would be great to set the MWI on the extensions and remove the delay in 
ringing. 

I have searched through the Wiki and lists.digium.com to try and track down 
information to no avail. I think I have looked at every message that has MWI, 
stutter or message waiting in it. Everything that I can find only relates to 
Asterisk's voicemail. Any ideas or pointers are appreciated.

Cheers
Scott Petersen
Xavier Solutions Inc.
250-216-5407
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Rodopi Billing

2004-08-04 Thread Darren Bentley
Hi Gary,

WireBill looks interesting. You mentioned that you are using the source
code to build your own platform, but how does it hold up on its own? Can
I ask what it can't do that requires you to build your own?

Thanks,

- Darren

On Wed, 2004-08-04 at 08:14, Gary Carr wrote:
  That sigh will turn to cursing after a couple of months. We currently use
  Rodopi, have for 10 years but the inflexability is too much to deal with
  anymore so we are moving away from it.
  
  To what?  I am also a cursed Rodopi owner. :-(
  
  Tom
 
 
 We bought the source code to wirebill and are building our own platform.
 
 
 
 Gary
 
 
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Asterisk Integration

2004-08-04 Thread felippe
Can some one give me a tip on how do I integrate two asterisks

Thanks Felippe Kilian Martins NPD-UFSC





This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Asterisk ISDN-card

2004-08-04 Thread Evert Meulie
Hi!

If I install a CAPI-compatible ISDN-card in my server, will that:

a) enable me to connect that server to the public phone net
b) allow me to connect an ISDN phone to the server and use it as a SIP-phone
c) all of the above?



Regards,
   Evert

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] problems with'#' transfer after hold...

2004-08-04 Thread Wayne
Hi, (please be gentle - still learning :))
This may be similar to a problem I had today...
Calling an automated phone system wanted me to press # to confirm a 
number - obviously * treats this a transfer - and relevant prompts were 
played... If you wait for this to 'time out' (or do an invalid 
extension) no more DTMF tones are sent down to the called number (I did 
a test calling to a mobile afterwards) - even a # doesn't provoke the 
correct response.

A thought that came to mind on this was - how do you actually send down 
a # when requested by an automated service as * treats this as its own.

But - looks like the question has been answered by Chris' reply with 
this ## patch :) - still - I dont know if that would fix the 'if you 
time out a transfer and then try to send DTMF tones they dont actually 
get sent' problem. So in answer to Chris question - I dont have this 
patch installed.

Thanks
Wayne.


Stephen Hon wrote:
Hi..
Has anybody been experiencing any problems with transfers using # to 
transfer after taking a call off of hold?

Transfers using the # and music on hold work fine by themselves. 
However, when we place somebody on hold we can no longer use the # to 
transfer. This is a problem since we use the # button to park calls.

So, say a call comes in, the operator is on a call already, places 
call on hold and answers the new call, places new call on hold, 
resumes old call and tries to transfer using the # button it wont 
work, itll just play the DTMF tone for the # button.

At first, I thought somewhere along the line the Tt options must be 
messed up in a dial command somewhere.. but I double checked 
everywhere and ensured that I was enabling transfers.

Does anybody have any suggestions?
Thanks,
Steve
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Making asterisk distributed

2004-08-04 Thread Sunrise Ltd
Jeremy McNamara wrote:
(B
(B Trilogy India wrote:
(B I want to know, if someone has tried
(B to use clustering in asterisk to increase
(B its scalability and make it distributed??
(B If yes, how easy it is to cluster?
(B
(BAsterisk will not benefit from clustering.
(B
(BIt all depends on how one defines the term cluster.
(B
(BThere was a time not so long ago when clusters had little
(Bor nothing to do with the kind of distributed parallel
(Bprocessing that is so often (perhaps wrongly) called
(Bclustering today. A more precise term would be grid
(Bcomputing, not clustering.
(B
(BDEC made the term cluster fashionable in the 80s with
(Btheir VAXcluster architecture. They pretty much coined and
(Bowned the term back then. But those clusters where
(Bdesigned for high availability and redundancy, not for
(Bparallelising and distributing a compute job over multiple
(BCPUs.
(B
(BOf course a VAXcluster would also increase scalability in
(Bthe same way that mirrored web servers do, simply because
(Bthey offer the same service on a single virtual network
(Baddress. Connections to the service are then workload
(Bbalanced between multiple nodes, but any given job is
(Balways executing entirely on a single node, unless the
(Bnode goes down while the job is processing, in which case
(Bit is failed over to another node to continue there.
(B
(BIn the hayday of the VAXcluster, if you used the word
(Bclustering for any bundling of computing resouces that did
(Bnot meet the high standards set by VAXcluster technology,
(Bmost IT folks would have lectured you like "That's not a
(Bcluster, it doesn't do proper failover, it doesn't have
(Bquorum, it doesn't have distributed locking" etc etc.
(BConsequently, Unix vendors were extremely careful to avoid
(Busing the word cluster. They would use terms like
(Bworkstation farm, compute farm, hot standby, etc etc.
(BHowever, during the 90s the term cluster has become a
(Bcatch all for anything that somehow bundles computing
(Bresources.
(B
(BIn this sense, running multiple Asterisk servers to offer
(Bthe same service on a domain name representing multipe IPs
(Bthrough round robin DNS or similar techniques is a form of
(Bclustering, much more so than grid computing is, at least
(Bin the original sense as it was defined by DEC. In the
(Bsame sense, TDMoE is a form of clustering.
(B
(BOf course if your definition of clustering is grid
(Bcomputing, then your statement is correct. Grid computing
(Bdoes nothing for Asterisk.
(B
(Brgds
(Bbenjk
(B
(B--
(BSunrise Telephone Systems Ltd
(B9F Shibuya Daikyo Bldg., 1-13-5 Shibuya, Shibuya-ku, Tokyo, Japan
(B
(B__
(BGANBARE! NIPPON!
(BYahoo! JAPAN JOC OFFICIAL INTERNET PORTAL SITE
(Bhttp://mail.ganbare-nippon.yahoo.co.jp/
(B
(B___
(BAsterisk-Users mailing list
(B[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(Bhttp://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
(BTo UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
(B   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[Asterisk-Users] Auto-attendant with an IP trunk

2004-08-04 Thread apurohit
Hi:

I am trying to setup a simple auto attendant with Asterisk using SIP extensions. I 
have an IP trunk to voicepulse and my outgoing calls go over that. 

I can also receive calls on that voicepulse trunk and want it to an auto attendant. 
Everything works except on the following:

- one of the options is to allow the caller to press the extension that they would 
like to be connected to. I have extensions from 2000 - 2010. What happens is that 
Asterisk jumps out at the first digit '2' and says that nothing found with '2'. It 
doesn't even read the rest of the digits '000'.

I expect this to be a basic PBX function and I am sure I'm missing something. Any help 
would be greatly appreciated.

Regards,

Anil

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Cisco SIP Phone 7960 DTMF Problem

2004-08-04 Thread Joshua M. Thompson
On Wed, 2004-08-04 at 04:35, Miroslav Nachev wrote:
Hi,
 
When we use BudgeTone where the DTMF is set to via RTP (RFC2833)
 all the DTMF functionality of Asterisk is working OK. When use Cisco
 7960 the transfer is working OK, but when I try to remote pick-up the
 call through '*8#' I can't do that because the Cisco Phone start busy
 signal.
How can I start using all DTMF features using Cisco Phone?

Is your cisco dial plan file set up to allow you to dial *8#?

-- 
Joshua M. Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Cisco SIP Phone 7960 DTMF Problem

2004-08-04 Thread Wayne
Hiya,
IIRC Cisco's take the '#' as being a 'send what ive dialed' key when 
there is no active call.
for example you could dial 123456, wait for the phone to 'time out' then 
it sends/dials your number
or you could dial 123456# to send 123456 as soon as you press the # key.

So - I would guess that when you dial '*8#' - asterisk is only getting a 
'*8' and not knowing what to do with it.

Dunno if you can change a cisco to not use # to 'send' - too new to all 
this at the mo - this is just what I've observed with playing at home :)

Wayne.
Nicolas Gudino wrote:
Hello,
On Wed, 2004-08-04 at 04:35, Miroslav Nachev wrote:
 

  Hi,
  When we use BudgeTone where the DTMF is set to via RTP (RFC2833)
all the DTMF functionality of Asterisk is working OK. When use Cisco
7960 the transfer is working OK, but when I try to remote pick-up the
call through '*8#' I can't do that because the Cisco Phone start busy
signal.
  How can I start using all DTMF features using Cisco Phone?
   

Did you try by dialing just '*8' ?
 

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] rxfax killed asterisk

2004-08-04 Thread Andrew Kohlsmith
On Wednesday 04 August 2004 13:31, Steve Underwood wrote:
 Several people with these symtoms - crashing just as the reception of
 the actual page starts - found they had other versions of libtiff on
 their system, as well as 3.5.7. When the others were removed the problem
 when away.

Untrue.  I am one such person and I posted something to that effect to this 
list when I was playing with rxfax.

The crashes became MUCH less frequent but they still occured on occassion :-)

-A.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Gafachi?

2004-08-04 Thread Chris Foster
I use Gafachi as well. They have killer international rates. 

On Wed, 4 Aug 2004 11:08:56 -0500, Charles Ellis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Luke,
 
 I have used them and have been very happy with the service. They are the
 only ones I have found that seem to be able to process a call from
 Firefly that goes through 2 * servers. Nufone and Voicepulse are not
 able to process it - I think it is a firefly problem not a Nufone or
 Voicepulse problem, since everything works fine if I use IAXPhone.
 Anyway, Gafachi has worked well for me, and I do not think you need to
 register unless you are receiving incoming phone calls.
 
 Charles
 
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Luke
 Catranis
 Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2004 9:42 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Gafachi?
 
 Anybody use them... I signed up for $20 to see how there system works..
 They're at $.02 per minute for US Termination and their other ITX rates
 aren't too shabby.
 
 Sadly my IAX registration is rejected... maybe a glitch, wondering if
 anyone's had a similar issue.
 
 Luke
 
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Zultys ZIP2

2004-08-04 Thread Asterisk User
Hello All,
I'm having trouble getting a Zultys ZIP2 to work with Asterisk, along 
with some other troubles in general.

I keep getting a Got SIP response 481 Call Leg/Transaction Does Not 
Exist back from x.x.x.x). Even when Asterisk reports that the ZIP2 
registered correctly, I can't make any calls out from the phone, or 
calls into the phone. Occaisionally I get a busy tone when I try to dial 
also.

This is the entry for the ZIP2 in sip.conf
[phone10]
type=friend
username=phone10
host=dynamic
dtmfmode=rfc2833
mailbox=110
context=sip
Incidentally, when I place the ZIP2 in a local subnet 192.168.0.x, the 
web interface for the phone is quick. But when I place it on a public IP 
address, the web interface is all but unusable and times out 90% of the 
time. However when I ping the phone it comes back with a 1~5ms ping.

Does anyone have any ideas? Has anyone got a ZIP2 to work wth Asterisk?
Thanks in Advance,
Jason
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Re: Integration with Altigen

2004-08-04 Thread Geoff Nordli
 - Original Message -
 Message: 15
 From: Geoff Nordli [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2004 11:36:05 -0700
 Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Integration with Altigen
 Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 I would like to integrate * with an existing Altigen PBX. I want to
 spend as little money as possible to make it happen.  My main goal
 is to inexpensively connect a branch office to the phone system.
 Eventually I would like to replace the Altigen system with an
 Asterisk 
 server so I
 don't
 want to spend any money on Altigen hardware.
 
 Currently the Altigen has analog interfaces with a couple of open
 ports. 
 
 If I used a TDM40B (FXS ports) could I interface that with the
 Altigen system and connect the two of them together.
 
 your integration would be difficult via FX(x).  the altigen is going
 to need to terminate the ringing line at a destination, ie vm AA that
 gives routing options for example.  can't remember from my altigen
 days how well it does something like DISA but that maight work as
 well.  going the other way would be fine, you would have to set up a
 dial code like 9 in the altigen that selected one of the ports
 connected to the *.  once the port was opened you could dial anything
 in the dialplan in *.  down and dirty but also cheap. 
 
 good luck
 
 
 jason kawakami
 Open Telephony Labs, LLC
 www.optellabs.com
 

Sorry Jason, could you expand on your answer a little bit.

I understand the dialplan parts, but not sure of the connection options.  I
don't have that much background in the PBX arena.

Thanks,

Geoff





___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] PSTN Access Providers for Asterisk

2004-08-04 Thread William R. Lorenz
Asterisk Users,

I'm looking for U.S. providers that will provide access to the PSTN and
allow me to easily use my Asterisk box with their services.  I would
prefer a provider that supports number portability, so that I can park my
existing cell number on their network and later move it again, but I'm
open to doing some funky stuff with call forwarding if I have to do that.

Can anyone provide their recommendations or experience in using a VoIP
provider, as opposed to a LEC, to provide Asterisk with PSTN access?

Thanks, in advance, for your ideas.

--  _ 
__ __ ___ _| | William R. Lorenz [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
\ V  V / '_| | http://www.ohiolinux.org/ ; Free conference and event hosting
 \./\./|_| |_| Linux and OSS-related topics. October 2, 2004 - Columbus, OH.

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] calling card on Zap outbound

2004-08-04 Thread rich allen
iH
i want to use a MCI calling card for long distance (outbound) calls 
from a Zap channel. how can i have the Dial command wait for a number 
of seconds before entering the pin?

thanks
- hcir
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk Integration

2004-08-04 Thread Senad Jordanovic
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Can some one give me a tip on how do I integrate two asterisks

Yes, sure... look at http://www.voip-info.org/tiki-index.php
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk Integration

2004-08-04 Thread Andrew Kohlsmith
On Wednesday 04 August 2004 14:34, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Can some one give me a tip on how do I integrate two asterisks

I would ask that you visit http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html 
and after meditating up on the knowlege contained therein come back and ask a 
question someone can actually answer.

It's not that we're disrespectful to newcomers, it's that newcomers typically 
have no idea how to ask questions that will get them useful responses.

Regards,
Andrew
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Auto-attendant with an IP trunk

2004-08-04 Thread Joshua McClintock
Could you post the part of your extensions.conf in question?

On Wed, 2004-08-04 at 11:47, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hi:
 
 I am trying to setup a simple auto attendant with Asterisk using SIP extensions. I 
 have an IP trunk to voicepulse and my outgoing calls go over that. 
 
 I can also receive calls on that voicepulse trunk and want it to an auto attendant. 
 Everything works except on the following:
 
 - one of the options is to allow the caller to press the extension that they would 
 like to be connected to. I have extensions from 2000 - 2010. What happens is that 
 Asterisk jumps out at the first digit '2' and says that nothing found with '2'. It 
 doesn't even read the rest of the digits '000'.
 
 I expect this to be a basic PBX function and I am sure I'm missing something. Any 
 help would be greatly appreciated.
 
 Regards,
 
 Anil
 
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] H323 Call Dropping

2004-08-04 Thread Asterisk .
Hello All,

I am trying to setup a SIP to H323 system using SER, Asterisk And GnuGK. Following is 
the
configuration:

CISCO ATA (NAT) - SER - ASTERISK - GNUGK

My Cisco ATA is registered with SER and When I dial a number, SER forwards the call to 
Asterisk,
and Asterisk forwards the call to the GateKeper. This is ok, call reaches the 
gatekeeper, however
the gatekeeper drops the call immediately after receiving it. Can anyone tell me what 
is the
reason for this? Is it a codec issue or anything i have misconfigured? I would 
sincerly appreciate
any help or guidence on this. I am using Nufone Network's chan_h323 driver.  

This is from the Asterisk console:

-- Executing Dial(SIP/XXX.XX.XXX.XXX-080f5e78, h323/h323:[EMAIL PROTECTED]) in new
stack
 -- Called h323:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 == No one is available to answer at this time
 -- Executing Hangup(SIP/XXX.XX.XXX.XXX-080f5e78, ) in new stack
== Spawn extension (default, 14083339452, 2) exited non-zero on 
'SIP/XXX.XX.XXX.XXX-080f5e78'


This is the gatekeeper log:
ACF|XXX.XX.XXX.XXX:1723|3950_endp|5285|14083339452:dialedDigits|995041321:dialedDigits|false;
DCF|XXX.XX.XXX.XXX|3950_endp|5285|normalDrop;

Registration details on gatekeeper for Asterisk:
?
AllRegistrations
RCF|XXX.XX.XXX.XXX:1723|root:h323_ID|gateway|3950_endp

This is from h323.conf:

[general]
port = 1723
disallow=all
allow=g723.1
allow=ulaw
allow=alaw
allow=gsm

This is from sip.conf:

[general]
context=default
port=5070
disallow=all
allow=g723.1
allow=ulaw
allow=alaw
allow=ilibc
allow=gsm

Extensions.conf has these entries in the default context:
exten = _.,1,Dial(h323/h323:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
exten = _.,2,Hangup

*CLI show version
Asterisk 1.0-RC1 built by [EMAIL PROTECTED] on a i686 running Linux

TIA...

/G



__
Do you Yahoo!?
New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - Send 10MB messages!
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail 
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk Integration

2004-08-04 Thread Jay Milk
Sure -- read up on IAX (www.google.com, www.voip-info.org are good
places for this)


 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2004 1:35 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk Integration
 
 Can some one give me a tip on how do I integrate two asterisks
 
 Thanks Felippe Kilian Martins NPD-UFSC

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] RE: No incoming audio on incoming SIP calls

2004-08-04 Thread David Gurr
Solved my own problem ... thought I'd record it here for any others who come
across it.

The problem arises since Asterisk is trying to get out of the way of the
media stream, by doing a SIP re-INVITE to get the two ends of the
conversation to talk directly. This won't work, as Asterisk is telling the
calling party that the IP address to talk to is the private IP address of
the softphone on the internal network. Adding canreinvite=no to the
softphone's stanza in sip.conf solves the problem.

It would be helpful if Asterisk noticed that it's about to tell the other
end to use a private IP address ... the ranges are well known, and Asterisk
could do an implicit canreinvite=no in this situation.

The same problem didn't occur on outgoing calls as the Dial string includes
a t for timeout - as per the wiki, this means that Asterisk must stay in
the stream to be able to implement this.

Of course, the other way to solve this would be to use a proper SIP proxy
server which handles RTP stream port forwarding ... something I must get
around to.

--
David Gurr
Congruity Ltd.
Hemel Hempstead, UK

 -Original Message-
 From: David Gurr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: 04 August 2004 14:05
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: No incoming audio on incoming SIP calls


 Now this is really frustrating. Everything was working fine, and
 now it isn't ... I don't think I've changed anything that would
 affect this, but I guess you never can be too sure.

 My setup is as follows:

 SIP softphone (SJphone) connected to Asterisk running my Linux
 NAT firewall box. This is all on the internal network.

 Asterisk then dialing out through various means - SIP to
 Stanaphone, FWD, Gossiptel and PSTN via an X100P.

 For incoming calls, an 0870 number from CallUK routes to my FWD
 account, and an 0870 number from Gossiptel routing to my
 Gossiptel account.

 Outbound calls all work fine ... I get audio in both directions,
 no problem.

 Incoming calls on either 0870 number connect fine, and audio goes
 from the softphone to the caller, but not the other way ... I
 hear no audio on the softphone from the caller's phone.

 I'm getting no alerts from my firewall that it's dropping anything.

 I know my way around packet sniffers, but I don't know what to
 look for here. What should the inbound audio packets look like?

 Thanks


 --
 David Gurr
 Congruity Ltd.
 Hemel Hempstead, UK


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk ISDN-card

2004-08-04 Thread Martin List-Petersen
Citat Evert Meulie [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 Hi!
 
 If I install a CAPI-compatible ISDN-card in my server, will that:
 
 a) enable me to connect that server to the public phone net
 b) allow me to connect an ISDN phone to the server and use it as a
 SIP-phone
 c) all of the above?

Only a) would work. b) (or c) for that sake) can only be archived with HFC-S
based passive ISDN cards at the moment and either zaphfc/qozap modules/channel
drivers or mISDN/chan_mISDN, when talking BRI.

Kind regards,
Martin List-Petersen
-- 
When he got in trouble in the ring, [Ali] imagined a door swung open and
inside he could see neon, orange, and green lights blinking, and bats
blowing trumpets and alligators blowing trombones, and he could hear snakes
screaming.  Weird masks and actors' clothes hung on the wall, and if he
stepped across the sill and reached for them, he knew that he was committing
himself to destruction.
-- George Plimpton

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Problems with E100P

2004-08-04 Thread Marcelo Rodriguez
Well I turn on the pri intense debuging and the only message that I
could find was this: 
 [ 00 01 7f ]
   
  
 Unnumbered frame:
 SAPI: 00  C/R: 0 EA: 0
  TEI: 000EA: 1
   M3: 3   P/F: 1 M2: 3 11: 3  [ SABME (set asynchronous balanced mode
extended) ]
 0 bytes of data
Sending Set Asynchronous Balanced Mode Extended

Also Scott was right I was using the wrong setting , changes the
zaptel.conf file with this 
span=1,1,0.ccs,hdb3

the /proc/zaptel/1 now shows this :
Span 1: WCT1/0 Digium Wildcard E100P E1/PRA Card 0 HDB3/CCS
ClockSource

But I can't still get the Zap channel to dial , any other thoughts?


Thanks in advance 

Marcelo Rodriguez



On Wed, 2004-08-04 at 09:58, Horacio J. Pea wrote:
  Well as you sugested I changed to ccs, hdb3 and nothing happen. Well the
  message on /proc/zaptel/1 changes to 
  Span 1: WCT1/0 Digium Wildcard E100P E1/PRA Card 0 HDB3/CCS YELLOW
  ClockSource
  But at the end when I try to dial I still have the same errors
 
  Any thoughts?
 
 I'm very new to asterisk, so take my words with a grain of salt.
 
 First, you should ask your provider what signalling type you should use (ami/hdb3,
 cas/ccs, crc4/nocrc) Then configure that on zaptel.conf
 
 On asterisk, pri intense debug span 1 will let you see anything that is
 happening over the E1.
 
  Saludos!
 
 Saludos? Si hablas castellano no nos gastemos en usar ingles :-)
 
  Aug  4 09:40:51 DEBUG[1217602880]: pbx.c:1255 pbx_extension_helper:
  Launching 'Dial'
  Aug  4 09:40:51 DEBUG[1217602880]: chan_zap.c:6535 zt_request: Using
  channel 1
  Aug  4 09:40:51 DEBUG[1217602880]: chan_zap.c:6535 zt_request: Using
  channel 2
  Aug  4 09:40:51 DEBUG[1217602880]: chan_zap.c:6535 zt_request: Using
  channel 3
  Aug  4 09:40:51 DEBUG[1217602880]: chan_zap.c:6535 zt_request: Using
  channel 4
  Aug  4 09:40:51 DEBUG[1217602880]: chan_zap.c:6535 zt_request: Using
  channel 5
  Aug  4 09:40:51 DEBUG[1217602880]: chan_zap.c:6535 zt_request: Using
  channel 6
  Aug  4 09:40:51 DEBUG[1217602880]: chan_zap.c:6535 zt_request: Using
  channel 7
  Aug  4 09:40:51 DEBUG[1217602880]: chan_zap.c:6535 zt_request: Using
  channel 8
  Aug  4 09:40:51 DEBUG[1217602880]: chan_zap.c:6535 zt_request: Using
  channel 9
  Aug  4 09:40:51 DEBUG[1217602880]: chan_zap.c:6535 zt_request: Using
  channel 10
  Aug  4 09:40:51 DEBUG[1217602880]: chan_zap.c:6535 zt_request: Using
  channel 11
  Aug  4 09:40:51 DEBUG[1217602880]: chan_zap.c:6535 zt_request: Using
  channel 12
  Aug  4 09:40:51 DEBUG[1217602880]: chan_zap.c:6535 zt_request: Using
  channel 13
  Aug  4 09:40:51 DEBUG[1217602880]: chan_zap.c:6535 zt_request: Using
  channel 14
  Aug  4 09:40:51 DEBUG[1217602880]: chan_zap.c:6535 zt_request: Using
  channel 15
  Aug  4 09:40:51 DEBUG[1217602880]: chan_zap.c:6535 zt_request: Using
  channel 17
  Aug  4 09:40:51 DEBUG[1217602880]: chan_zap.c:6535 zt_request: Using
  channel 18
  Aug  4 09:40:51 DEBUG[1217602880]: chan_zap.c:6535 zt_request: Using
  channel 19
  Aug  4 09:40:51 DEBUG[1217602880]: chan_zap.c:6535 zt_request: Using
  channel 20
  Aug  4 09:40:51 DEBUG[1217602880]: chan_zap.c:6535 zt_request: Using
  channel 21
  Aug  4 09:40:51 DEBUG[1217602880]: chan_zap.c:6535 zt_request: Using
  channel 22
  Aug  4 09:40:51 DEBUG[1217602880]: chan_zap.c:6535 zt_request: Using
  channel 23
  Aug  4 09:40:51 DEBUG[1217602880]: chan_zap.c:6535 zt_request: Using
  channel 24
  Aug  4 09:40:51 DEBUG[1217602880]: chan_zap.c:6535 zt_request: Using
  channel 25
  Aug  4 09:40:51 DEBUG[1217602880]: chan_zap.c:6535 zt_request: Using
  channel 26
  Aug  4 09:40:51 DEBUG[1217602880]: chan_zap.c:6535 zt_request: Using
  channel 27
  Aug  4 09:40:51 DEBUG[1217602880]: chan_zap.c:6535 zt_request: Using
  channel 28
  Aug  4 09:40:51 DEBUG[1217602880]: chan_zap.c:6535 zt_request: Using
  channel 29
  Aug  4 09:40:51 DEBUG[1217602880]: chan_zap.c:6535 zt_request: Using
  channel 30
  Aug  4 09:40:51 DEBUG[1217602880]: chan_zap.c:6535 zt_request: Using
  channel 31
  Aug  4 09:40:51 NOTICE[1217602880]: app_dial.c:714 dial_exec: Unable to
  create channel of type 'Zap'
== Everyone is busy/congested at this time
  Aug  4 09:40:51 DEBUG[1217602880]: app_dial.c:974 dial_exec: Exiting
  with DIALSTATUS=CHANUNAVAIL.
  
  
  
  
  
  On Wed, 2004-08-04 at 09:28, Horacio J. Pea wrote:
[zaptel.conf]
span=1,1,0,cas,ami
   
   Are you sure that cas,ami is correct? I'm using ccs,hdb3
   
   Saludos,
 HoraPe
   ---
   Horacio J. Pea
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] PSTN Access Providers for Asterisk

2004-08-04 Thread Luke Catranis
Try voicepulse connect connect.voicepulse.com



This mailbox protected from junk email by MailFrontier Desktop
from MailFrontier, Inc. http://info.mailfrontier.com

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of William R.
Lorenz
Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2004 3:23 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] PSTN Access Providers for Asterisk

Asterisk Users,

I'm looking for U.S. providers that will provide access to the PSTN and
allow me to easily use my Asterisk box with their services.  I would
prefer a provider that supports number portability, so that I can park my
existing cell number on their network and later move it again, but I'm
open to doing some funky stuff with call forwarding if I have to do that.

Can anyone provide their recommendations or experience in using a VoIP
provider, as opposed to a LEC, to provide Asterisk with PSTN access?

Thanks, in advance, for your ideas.

--  _ 
__ __ ___ _| | William R. Lorenz [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
\ V  V / '_| | http://www.ohiolinux.org/ ; Free conference and event hosting
 \./\./|_| |_| Linux and OSS-related topics. October 2, 2004 - Columbus, OH.

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Re: IAX2 'no authority found' problem

2004-08-04 Thread Tony Mountifield
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Josh Roberson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Simon, i was having the exact same problem, the only solution I found, 
 was to remove the secret, then it worked great.. I thought I must have 
 been missing something too, but apparently not.   I'm not sure exactly 
 what is causing this, as if i set the servers up to register with each 
 other, they register fine, but the moment they try to pass a call to one 
 another, they fail, unless there is no secret listed in iax.conf for the 
 connections.

It does work, but it took me a little digging to understand.

The following is a simple one-way setup that should work:

--
ServerA:

extensions.conf
[some-context]
exten = some-extension,1,Dial(IAX2/userid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/[EMAIL PROTECTED])

ServerB:

iax.conf
[userid]
type=user
secret=password
context=acontext

extensions.conf
[acontext]
exten = extension,1,Dial(wherever)
--

You can make the dial string more concise by putting a peer section in
the iax.conf for ServerA:

--
ServerA:

iax.conf
[identifier]
type=peer
username=userid
secret=password
peercontext=acontext
host=192.168.1.250

extensions.conf
[some-context]
exten = some-extension,1,Dial(IAX2/identifier/extension)

ServerB:

same as previous example.
--

However, it is only in recent CVS versions (from 1.175 of chan_iax2.c on
2004/07/30) that it picks up the username as userid from the [identifier]
section. In older versions it is still necessary to say
Dial(IAX2/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/extension). In fact, when experimenting I also
found it necessary to say [EMAIL PROTECTED], even when peercontext= was
set. I haven't yet fully investigated why.

If ServerB is on a dynamic IP address, then host=192.168.1.250 must be
replaced with host=dynamic. It is then necessary for ServerB to register
with ServerA by including the following in ServerB's iax.conf:

[general]
register = identifier:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

where 123.123.123.123 is the IP address or hostname of ServerA. Note that
it is identifier:password, not userid:password. I've deliberately kept
the various names different to show which is dependent on which. That's
also why I have keep peer and user separate instead of using type=friend.


Bi-directional peering can be set up by swapping the above sections for
ServerA and ServerB, changing names accordingly. With suitable choices of
names, and the same secret in both directions, it is then possible to
combine type=peer and type=user sections into a single type=friend, e.g.

--
ServerA (static IP):

iax.conf
[serverB]
type=friend
host=dynamic
username=serverA
secret=password
peercontext=from-serverA
context=from-serverB
qualify=yes
notransfer=yes

extensions.conf
[outgoing-to-B]
;exten = outextenB,1,Dial(IAX2/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/[EMAIL PROTECTED])
exten = outextenB,1,Dial(IAX2/serverB/extenB)
[from-serverB]
exten = extenA,1,Dial(wherever-on-A)

ServerB (dynamic IP):

iax.conf
[general]
register = serverB:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[serverA]
type=friend
host=serverA.name.or.ip
username=serverB
secret=password
peercontext=from-serverB
context=from-serverA
qualify=yes
notransfer=yes

extensions.conf
[outgoing-to-A]
;exten = outextenA,1,Dial(IAX2/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/[EMAIL PROTECTED])
exten = outextenA,1,Dial(IAX2/serverA/extenA)
[from-serverA]
exten = extenB,1,Dial(wherever-on-B)
--

As I said, it ought to be possible to omit the context from the IAX2
Dial commands if peercontext= is specified. I will investigate further.

Hope this all helps!

Cheers
Tony (softins)

-- 
Tony Mountifield
Work: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.softins.co.uk
Play: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://tony.mountifield.org
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] VoIP experiences with Cable and DSL

2004-08-04 Thread Geoff Nordli
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Tue, 3 Aug 2004 12:07:14 -0400, Steve Szmidt
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 For a few years now I've operated with cable as the obvious choice,
 at least in my area where RoadRunner really built up a good network.
 It could be that for nation wide implementation VoIP really should
 be on DSL. (Unless of course you need a big pipe where a split T is
 the only higher option.) 
 
 I currently use Cogeco cable in Oakville, ON, Canada.  It has been
 fantastic!  I don't think I've used a provider with as much available
 throughput (exactly as advertised).  Only occasionally does the
 service go up and down, but that is infrequent.  I have an external
 modem, and am using a pure VoIP setup with IAX trunking to my
 VoIP/PSTN gateway.  Only occasionally do I get a dropped packet or
 something, but nothing to worry about.  I spoke with my parents for an
 hour over the connection, and there was no problems (actually... I was
 getting some echo, but Asterisk nicely took care of it, and my parents
 were not aware of any echo cancelling going on until I told them what
 Asterisk was doing on my end, as I could hear it working).
 
 I will be using Cogeco again for me internet (cable) so that I don't
 have to pay Bell any money.  Unfortunately my buzzer isn't going to
 work in the apartment, so I'll have to let guests in, but hey, I'll do
 a bit of leg work just to save any of my money going to the greater
 of two evils :) 
 
 Leif Madsen.
 http://www.asteriskdocs.org


I am using Shaw for cable access and Primus as my VSP.  I find on a fairly
regular basis calls will just drop after 10 minutes or so.  The call doesn't
hangup but you can't hear each other talk.

I am not using any QOS or bandwidth rate control.

Any ideas why this might be happening?

Thanks,

Geoff



___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Get MWI from Telco's voicemail

2004-08-04 Thread Seth Remington
On Wed, 2004-08-04 at 14:21, Scott Petersen wrote:
 Since they only have two voice lines, with the third as a fax, I am using voicemail 
 from the telco.

Maybe I am misunderstanding you but why does this force you to use telco
voice mail instead of * voice mail? You can also free that third line up
for voice if you use faxdetect.

-Seth

-- 
Seth Remington
SaberLogic, LLC
661-B Weber Drive
Wadsworth, Ohio 44281
Phone: (330)335-6442
Fax: (330)336-8559

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Playback doesn't work whith h323

2004-08-04 Thread M. Willigs
Hi Jeremy

My entry in the extensions.conf is like this:

exten = 011001,1,Playback(tt-monkey)

I didn't asociate the cmd Dial whit this entry, so, I can't answer the line

(sorry by my english)

- Original Message -
From: Jeremy McNamara [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2004 7:32 AM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Playback doesn't work whith h323


 M. Willigs wrote:

  Hi everybody.
  I install the new Asterisk 1-RC1 on my machine and I can't make the
Playback
  function works through chan_h323 whith version 7.x's configs files
  Any ideas?


 Are you Answering the line before attempting to playback audio? Have you
 read AND FOLLOWED the README in asterisk/channels/h323?


 Jeremy McNamara
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Auto-attendant with an IP trunk

2004-08-04 Thread Seth Remington
On Wed, 2004-08-04 at 14:47, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 - one of the options is to allow the caller to press the extension that they would 
 like to be connected to. I have extensions from 2000 - 2010. What happens is that 
 Asterisk jumps out at the first digit '2' and says that nothing found with '2'. It 
 doesn't even read the rest of the digits '000'.

You might consider adding a DigitTimeout command at the beginning of
your IVR.

http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk+cmd+DigitTimeout

-Seth

-- 
Seth Remington
SaberLogic, LLC
661-B Weber Drive
Wadsworth, Ohio 44281
Phone: (330)335-6442
Fax: (330)336-8559

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] RE: No incoming audio on incoming SIP calls

2004-08-04 Thread Luke Catranis
I must do the same with the proxy... one note... the t stands for transfer
per the wiki: t : Allow the called user to transfer the call

http://www.voip-info.org/tiki-index.php?page=Asterisk%20cmd%20Dial



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Gurr
Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2004 3:56 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] RE: No incoming audio on incoming SIP calls

Solved my own problem ... thought I'd record it here for any others who come
across it.

The problem arises since Asterisk is trying to get out of the way of the
media stream, by doing a SIP re-INVITE to get the two ends of the
conversation to talk directly. This won't work, as Asterisk is telling the
calling party that the IP address to talk to is the private IP address of
the softphone on the internal network. Adding canreinvite=no to the
softphone's stanza in sip.conf solves the problem.

It would be helpful if Asterisk noticed that it's about to tell the other
end to use a private IP address ... the ranges are well known, and Asterisk
could do an implicit canreinvite=no in this situation.

The same problem didn't occur on outgoing calls as the Dial string includes
a t for timeout - as per the wiki, this means that Asterisk must stay in
the stream to be able to implement this.

Of course, the other way to solve this would be to use a proper SIP proxy
server which handles RTP stream port forwarding ... something I must get
around to.

--
David Gurr
Congruity Ltd.
Hemel Hempstead, UK

 -Original Message-
 From: David Gurr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: 04 August 2004 14:05
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: No incoming audio on incoming SIP calls


 Now this is really frustrating. Everything was working fine, and
 now it isn't ... I don't think I've changed anything that would
 affect this, but I guess you never can be too sure.

 My setup is as follows:

 SIP softphone (SJphone) connected to Asterisk running my Linux
 NAT firewall box. This is all on the internal network.

 Asterisk then dialing out through various means - SIP to
 Stanaphone, FWD, Gossiptel and PSTN via an X100P.

 For incoming calls, an 0870 number from CallUK routes to my FWD
 account, and an 0870 number from Gossiptel routing to my
 Gossiptel account.

 Outbound calls all work fine ... I get audio in both directions,
 no problem.

 Incoming calls on either 0870 number connect fine, and audio goes
 from the softphone to the caller, but not the other way ... I
 hear no audio on the softphone from the caller's phone.

 I'm getting no alerts from my firewall that it's dropping anything.

 I know my way around packet sniffers, but I don't know what to
 look for here. What should the inbound audio packets look like?

 Thanks


 --
 David Gurr
 Congruity Ltd.
 Hemel Hempstead, UK


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] problems with'#' transfer after hold...

2004-08-04 Thread Chris Shaw
The patch presents a dtmftimeout option in features.conf that deals with
this issue. It defaults to half a second, but can be set to longer than that
if necessary...

If the length of time between # presses is longer than this value, then *
assumes that it's NOT a transfer and sends the DTMF tone to the other end...
if however the length is less then you hear Allison say Transfer and
everything goes as you'd expect...

-Chris

- Original Message -
From: Wayne [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2004 11:40 AM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] problems with'#' transfer after hold...


 Hi, (please be gentle - still learning :))

 This may be similar to a problem I had today...
 Calling an automated phone system wanted me to press # to confirm a
 number - obviously * treats this a transfer - and relevant prompts were
 played... If you wait for this to 'time out' (or do an invalid
 extension) no more DTMF tones are sent down to the called number (I did
 a test calling to a mobile afterwards) - even a # doesn't provoke the
 correct response.

 A thought that came to mind on this was - how do you actually send down
 a # when requested by an automated service as * treats this as its own.

 But - looks like the question has been answered by Chris' reply with
 this ## patch :) - still - I dont know if that would fix the 'if you
 time out a transfer and then try to send DTMF tones they dont actually
 get sent' problem. So in answer to Chris question - I dont have this
 patch installed.

 Thanks
 Wayne.





 Stephen Hon wrote:

  Hi..
 
  Has anybody been experiencing any problems with transfers using # to
  transfer after taking a call off of hold?
 
  Transfers using the # and music on hold work fine by themselves.
  However, when we place somebody on hold we can no longer use the # to
  transfer. This is a problem since we use the # button to park calls.
 
  So, say a call comes in, the operator is on a call already, places
  call on hold and answers the new call, places new call on hold,
  resumes old call and tries to transfer using the # button it wont
  work, itll just play the DTMF tone for the # button.
 
  At first, I thought somewhere along the line the Tt options must be
  messed up in a dial command somewhere.. but I double checked
  everywhere and ensured that I was enabling transfers.
 
  Does anybody have any suggestions?
 
  Thanks,
 
  Steve
 
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Re: Auto-attendant with an IP trunk

2004-08-04 Thread apurohit
Josh:

The configuration I have for the extensions.conf is the following:

[macro-oneline]
exten = s,1,Dial(${ARG1},20)
exten = s,2,Voicemail(u${MACRO_EXTEN})
exten = s,3,Hangup
exten = s,102,Voicemail(b${MACRO_EXTEN})
exten = s,103,Hangup

[from-sip]

ignorepat = 9

exten = _91XX,1,Dial(SIP/${EXTEN:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
exten = _91XX,2,Playback(invalid)
exten = _91XX,3,Hangup

exten = s00123456,1,Wait,2
exten = s00123456,2,Answer
exten = s00123456,3,DigitTimeout,5
exten = s00123456,4,ResponseTimeout,30
exten = s00123456,5,Background(welcome-mainmenu)

; the welcome menu says press 1 for sales, 3 for support, 9 for 
; directory and press the extension at any time to be directly 
; connected. It plays this greeting when the caller calls the voice
; -pulse number and will also goto sales etc. on user input. the
; problem is when the user tries to enter the extensions i.e. 2000,
; 2001, 2002 at this point

exten = 1,1,Goto(sales,s,1)
exten = 3,1,Goto(support,s,1)
exten = 9,1,Directory(from-sip)
exten = 0,1,Goto(from-sip,2000,1)



exten = 2000,1,Macro(oneline,SIP/2000);
exten = 2001,1,Macro(oneline,SIP/2001);
exten = 2002,1,Macro(oneline,SIP/2002);
exten = 2003,1,Macro(oneline,SIP/2003);
exten = 2004,1,Macro(oneline,SIP/2004);
exten = 2005,1,Macro(oneline,SIP/2005);
exten = 2006,1,Macro(oneline,SIP/2006);
exten = 2007,1,Macro(oneline,SIP/2007);
exten = 2008,1,Macro(oneline,SIP/2008);
exten = 2009,1,Macro(oneline,SIP/2009);
exten = 2010,1,Macro(oneline,SIP/2010);
exten = 2011,1,Macro(oneline,SIP/2011);
exten = 2012,1,Macro(oneline,SIP/2012);
exten = 2013,1,Macro(oneline,SIP/2013);
exten = 2014,1,Macro(oneline,SIP/2014);


 
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: 2004/08/04 Wed PM 01:47:27 CDT
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Auto-attendant with an IP trunk
 
 Hi:
 
 I am trying to setup a simple auto attendant with Asterisk using SIP extensions. I 
 have an IP trunk to voicepulse and my outgoing calls go over that. 
 
 I can also receive calls on that voicepulse trunk and want it to an auto attendant. 
 Everything works except on the following:
 
 - one of the options is to allow the caller to press the extension that they would 
 like to be connected to. I have extensions from 2000 - 2010. What happens is that 
 Asterisk jumps out at the first digit '2' and says that nothing found with '2'. It 
 doesn't even read the rest of the digits '000'.
 
 I expect this to be a basic PBX function and I am sure I'm missing something. Any 
 help would be greatly appreciated.
 
 Regards,
 
 Anil
 

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Gafachi?

2004-08-04 Thread lists-jmhunter
I like gafachi... i have had no problems AT ALL with them.  I havent
had any with nufone either... broadvoice on the otherhand (sip)...

On Wed, 4 Aug 2004 14:05:16 -0500, Chris Foster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I use Gafachi as well. They have killer international rates.
 
 
 
 On Wed, 4 Aug 2004 11:08:56 -0500, Charles Ellis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Luke,
 
  I have used them and have been very happy with the service. They are the
  only ones I have found that seem to be able to process a call from
  Firefly that goes through 2 * servers. Nufone and Voicepulse are not
  able to process it - I think it is a firefly problem not a Nufone or
  Voicepulse problem, since everything works fine if I use IAXPhone.
  Anyway, Gafachi has worked well for me, and I do not think you need to
  register unless you are receiving incoming phone calls.
 
  Charles
 
 
 
  -Original Message-
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Luke
  Catranis
  Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2004 9:42 PM
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Gafachi?
 
  Anybody use them... I signed up for $20 to see how there system works..
  They're at $.02 per minute for US Termination and their other ITX rates
  aren't too shabby.
 
  Sadly my IAX registration is rejected... maybe a glitch, wondering if
  anyone's had a similar issue.
 
  Luke
 
  ___
  Asterisk-Users mailing list
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
  To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 
  ___
  Asterisk-Users mailing list
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
  To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Using Cisco SIP Phones with Asterisk

2004-08-04 Thread Gary Carr
Are they still hurdles using Cisco phones with asterisk as mentioned at
http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Cisco+Phones ?



We are looking for some cisco phones to test with.



Gary


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Rodopi Billing

2004-08-04 Thread Gary Carr
Mostly CLEC stuff like CDR imports for specific ILECS  LD carriers as well
as some ISP stuff like redirecting past due accounts to a payment page as
well as any other stuff we may need. We plan to offer it to other service
providers as a ASP model and for purchase.



Regards,


Gary


 WireBill looks interesting. You mentioned that you are using the source
 code to build your own platform, but how does it hold up on its own? Can
 I ask what it can't do that requires you to build your own?

 Thanks,

 - Darren

 On Wed, 2004-08-04 at 08:14, Gary Carr wrote:
   That sigh will turn to cursing after a couple of months. We currently
use
   Rodopi, have for 10 years but the inflexability is too much to deal
with
   anymore so we are moving away from it.
  
   To what?  I am also a cursed Rodopi owner. :-(
  
   Tom
 
 
  We bought the source code to wirebill and are building our own platform.
 
 
 
  Gary
 
 
  ___
  Asterisk-Users mailing list
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
  To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Snom 200 Programmable Keys

2004-08-04 Thread Steve Woolley
I would like to use one of my Snom 200's 5 programmable keys to park
calls. I am using image SIP 2.04g. I have tried a variety of
combinations and have come to the conclusion that:

1) On the Key Mappings administration page, I must select the Transfer
under the Break Keys option box to be able to successfully transfer
calls using the Transfer button.

2) Since my parking extension is 700, I have tried placing 700 in the
Number column and tried all the combinations of (Line, Destination,
Intercom, Park Orbit, Voice Recorder). Once I have used the Save
button to save my change, it changes the number to
SIP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]. However, I have no luck in parking the call
using the programmable key. 

According to the documentation, you can use DTMF in H.323 mode on the
Snom's, but this does not seem to be an option under SIP mode.

Anyone had any luck using the programmable keys for anything but
transfering/calling sip url's?

--
Steve Woolley
IT Manager
ADS Telecom, Inc.
59 Skyline Drive
Suite 1250
Lake Mary, Florida 32746

Phone: (407)682-6226 x1110
Fax:   (407)682-3455
Cell:  (321)229-5311

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.adstelecom.com 
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] CAC AB1 and Asterisk

2004-08-04 Thread Steven Critchfield
On Wed, 2004-08-04 at 15:26, Ronan wrote:
 Any ideas on this?

Have patience is the first idea. 

While there is a large subscriber base, there isn't a large base of
knowledgable users with that hardware. You haven't let enough time pass
to be sure people with the knowledge have seen it. 

I would suspect that you have a signalling problem. Configs would have
to be shared for that to be diagnosed though.

 On Wed, 2004-08-04 at 01:06, Ronan wrote:
  Hi all,
  
  Don't know if anyone can help me.  We just set up a CAC Access
  Bank 1
  with Asterisk.  Everything works great except, when we ring a Zap
  interface, the analog phone does not actually ring.  The light blinks,
  and if you answer it you are connected to the person, but the actual
  phone does not ring.
  
  Using the Test option for the channel does make the phone
  ring, but
  not during an actual call.
  
  Has anyone had this prob before.  I saw something about it on a
  list
  from back in 2002, but no answer.  :(
  
  Any help would be appreciated.
  
  Thanks,
  
  -Ronan
  
  ___
  Asterisk-Users mailing list
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
  To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
-- 
Steven Critchfield [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Get MWI from Telco's voicemail

2004-08-04 Thread lists-jmhunter
id call telco and deactivate voicemail and use asterisk VM... more
flexible... also if they need to check voicemail when out, give them a
dial number (voip from a company like nufone, or land line) that calls
into app VoicemailMain.

On Wed, 04 Aug 2004 16:37:32 -0400, Seth Remington
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Wed, 2004-08-04 at 14:21, Scott Petersen wrote:
  Since they only have two voice lines, with the third as a fax, I am using 
  voicemail from the telco.
 
 Maybe I am misunderstanding you but why does this force you to use telco
 voice mail instead of * voice mail? You can also free that third line up
 for voice if you use faxdetect.
 
 -Seth
 
 --
 Seth Remington
 SaberLogic, LLC
 661-B Weber Drive
 Wadsworth, Ohio 44281
 Phone: (330)335-6442
 Fax: (330)336-8559
 
 
 
 ___
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Integrating an old PBX with Asterisk

2004-08-04 Thread Marco Vescovi



Hi all,
I was thinking about 
integrating an old PBX with Asterisk and I was wondering some possible 
configurations. The question is: which is the best way to let the 2 systems 
interact ? I can imagine some possible scenarios:
- scenario 1: I want 
to use other then old PBX terminations (ie I have to link the 2 systems with 
some internal number line)
In this scenario I 
could think to give each user a dedicated old line number from old PBX to a 
'dedicated' port of a TDM card.
Pros: easy 
configuration (one - to - one mapping), no old PBX configuration changes, users 
with new SIP phone can still mantain their old extension.
Dis: expensive (one 
TDM card each 4 ext), not scalable (2 limits:free extension on the old PBX 
and PCI slots in the * server to add TDM cards), when I receive a call from a 
old extension and I want to forward it to another old PBX extension I am 
actually using 2 lines between * and the old PBX.
- scenario 2:I 
want to link the 2 PBX with a trunk of n linesnd use an arbitrary number 
of SIP phones being able to have # of SIP phones  then # of 
lines.
Pros: less expensive 
then scenario 1 because the number of lines I have to use between * and old PBX 
is based onblock probability I choose to have, more scalable for the same 
reason, virtually no limit to SIPextension number 
Dis: same call 
transfer problem of above, if the old PBX doesn't support some sort of DID 
between its extension I have to tell * to answer the line and then to ask the 
required extension, configuration changes to old PBX...

I know that probably 
the best way should be to add a digital card to old PBX and havea trunk 
between two systems, but the PBX is really old and I'm not sure I can still find 
an expansion card.


Any suggestion or 
tip ???

thanks

marco
---Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.Checked by AVG 
anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).Version: 6.0.732 / Virus 
Database: 486 - Release Date: 29/07/2004


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.732 / Virus Database: 486 - Release Date: 29/07/2004
 


Re: [Asterisk-Users] RE: No incoming audio on incoming SIP calls

2004-08-04 Thread Steven Critchfield
On Wed, 2004-08-04 at 14:56, David Gurr wrote:
 Solved my own problem ... thought I'd record it here for any others who come
 across it.
 
 The problem arises since Asterisk is trying to get out of the way of the
 media stream, by doing a SIP re-INVITE to get the two ends of the
 conversation to talk directly. This won't work, as Asterisk is telling the
 calling party that the IP address to talk to is the private IP address of
 the softphone on the internal network. Adding canreinvite=no to the
 softphone's stanza in sip.conf solves the problem.
 
 It would be helpful if Asterisk noticed that it's about to tell the other
 end to use a private IP address ... the ranges are well known, and Asterisk
 could do an implicit canreinvite=no in this situation.

What if both phones are on the private net?  I'm sure something is being
worked on.

 The same problem didn't occur on outgoing calls as the Dial string includes
 a t for timeout - as per the wiki, this means that Asterisk must stay in
 the stream to be able to implement this.

t and T are for transfer, not timeout, case denotes which end can
transfer.
-- 
Steven Critchfield [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Get MWI from Telco's voicemail

2004-08-04 Thread Greg Hill
On Wed, 4 Aug 2004, Scott Petersen wrote:
[snip]
 What I am seeing is an event every half hour exactly, on each of the two
 voice lines. This causes the simple switch to kick in and ring the
 extensions. Of course there is no one there. I have put a workaround in
[snip]
 Since these events happen every half hour and only on the lines that
 have voicemail I am very confident that it is the telco sending a
 trigger to turn the MWI on the phones either on or off. I really don't
 want to have to try and find out from the telco as their support is
 much, much, much, less than knowledgeable or helpful. What I am

I found that when I'm dealing with a technical issue on POTS, I get the
best results by personally visiting my CO and hoping a nice person answers
when I ring the bell. For example, I finally got my DSL to work through
this approach: it was up and down often, apparently related to ambient
outdoor temperature. I got to know the (then US west, now qwest) DSL tech
who handled that CO and worked with him directly to resolve the issue.
When he could see that he'd need to spend more than just a few minutes on
a job, he'd take my phone number and tell me to call the 800-number
service people. When they generated the work request and he received it,
he'd call me directly to find out what the real problem is and get it
addressed.

So what I'm getting at is that you might find it advantageous to at least
try talking with techs in your particular CO. They're much more likely to
understand what you're asking about and to know the answer than a
800-number support rep. Just make sure you're nice and avoid taking more
than just a few minutes of their time.

Greg


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] PSTN Access Providers for Asterisk

2004-08-04 Thread Greg Hill
On Wed, 4 Aug 2004, William R. Lorenz wrote:

 I'm looking for U.S. providers that will provide access to the PSTN and
 allow me to easily use my Asterisk box with their services.  I would
 prefer a provider that supports number portability, so that I can park my
 existing cell number on their network and later move it again, but I'm
 open to doing some funky stuff with call forwarding if I have to do that.

http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-VOIP+Service+Providers

 Can anyone provide their recommendations or experience in using a VoIP
 provider, as opposed to a LEC, to provide Asterisk with PSTN access?

After you go through the providers listed in the page above, reviewing
each of their coverage areas, features, use policies, etc, you'll probably
have narrowed it down to just a few who could meet your particular needs.
At that point you can use google or another list archive search tool to
find praises, rants, and probably config examples, for the ones you are
interested in.

Greg


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


  1   2   >