Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk, ATA-186 & Sipgate.de / sipgate.co.uk

2004-10-23 Thread BetaTeilchen
Ronald Wiplinger schrieb:
[sipgate.de]
type=friend
username=5552220
secret=my_password3
host=sipgate.de
fromuser=5552220
fromdomain=sipgate.net

should be "fromdomain=sipgate.de"
nat=yes
context=incomingsipgate
canreinvite=no
[sipgate.co.uk]
type=friend
username=4782156
secret=my_password4
host=sipgate.co.uk
fromuser=4782156
fromdomain=sipgate.net

should be "fromdomain=sipgate.co.uk"
nat=yes
context=incomingsipgate
canreinvite=no

extensions.conf:
===
[general]
static=yes
writeprotect=no
[globals]
CONSOLE=Console/dsp; Console interface for demo
[incomingsipgate]
exten => h,1,Hangup
exten => 800,1,Dial(SIP/internestelefon,20,tr)
should be
[incomingsipgate]
exten => 5552220,1,Dial(SIP/internestelefon,20,r)
exten => 4782156,1,Dial(SIP/internestelefon,20,r)

[sipgate.de]
exten => _0049.,Dial(SIP/${EXTEN:[EMAIL PROTECTED],30,tr)
exten => _0049.,2,Playback(invalid)
exten => _0049.,3,Hangup
should be
(you forgot to number prio 1 !)
exten => _0049.,1,Dial(SIP/0${EXTEN:[EMAIL PROTECTED],30,r)
; do not dial international prefix 0049 with Sipgate, if you call from 
same national net !
exten => _0049.,2,Playback(invalid)
exten => _0049.,3,Hangup


[sipgate.co.uk]
exten => _0044.,Dial(SIP/${EXTEN:[EMAIL PROTECTED],30,tr)
exten => _0044.,2,Playback(invalid)
exten => _0044.,3,Hangup
exten => _0044.,1,Dial(SIP/0${EXTEN:[EMAIL PROTECTED],30,tr)
; do not dial international prefix 0044 with Sipgate, if you call from 
same national net !
exten => _0044.,2,Playback(invalid)
exten => _0044.,3,Hangup


I did not understand the paragraph of [incomingsipgate].

This is the context to which all incoming calls from Sipgate will be 
sent to be handled.

I also do not understand EXTEN:1   (should the second phone be EXTEN:2 
???)

please regard correct expression ${EXTEN:1} !
This means "take the variable ($) called {EXTEN} (this is the dialed 
number) and cut the FIRST digit (:1)"
So - if you dial 0049341234567 and then DIAL(SIP/${EXTEN:1}...) this 
will result in dialing 0493411234567 which is not a valid number.

Regards
--
Please visit http://www.ip-phone-forum.de
--
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] KSS/BLF on Asterisk

2004-10-23 Thread Nick Bachmann
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Folks,
I am trying to determine the best way to allow a station to monitor the
status of another station.
For example: 
a reception set needing to see the status of 20 or 30 phones
OR
an executive assistant wanting to have appearances of several other
extensions, in order to monitor their status and assist with call
handling.

I know Snom has a phone that you can attach an add-on module to, but I
don't know how you'd program Asterisk to deliver status information to
those buttons.
 

Get a hint! :-)
Check out the "hint" priority in extensions.conf.  There are also some 
details in the wiki.

Nick
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Asterisk, ATA-186 & Sipgate.de / sipgate.co.uk

2004-10-23 Thread Ronald Wiplinger
I try to get the following to work:
Sipgate.de and sipgate.co.uk are configured as gateway, while the 
ATA-186 has two phone sets attached.

I tried:
ATA settings as described at: 
http://www.loligo.com/asterisk/Cisco/ATA-186-guide.v20030628.txt
(just with a fixed IP)

sip.conf:
==
[general]
context=default 
port=5060   
bindaddr=0.0.0.0
srvlookup=yes   

register => 5552220:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/5552220
register => 4782156:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/4782156
externip = 61.220.121.xx
localnet=192.168.0.0/255.255.0.0; All RFC 1918 addresses are local networks
[601]
type=friend
username=601
secret=my_password1
canreinvite=no
host=dynamic
dtmfmode=rfc2833
mailbox=601
nat=yes
[602]
type=friend
username=602
secret=my_password2
canreinvite=no
host=dynamic
dtmfmode=rfc2833
mailbox=601
nat=yes
[sipgate.de]
type=friend
username=5552220
secret=my_password3
host=sipgate.de
fromuser=5552220
fromdomain=sipgate.net
nat=yes
context=incomingsipgate
canreinvite=no
[sipgate.co.uk]
type=friend
username=4782156
secret=my_password4
host=sipgate.co.uk
fromuser=4782156
fromdomain=sipgate.net
nat=yes
context=incomingsipgate
canreinvite=no

extensions.conf:
===
[general]
static=yes
writeprotect=no
[globals]
CONSOLE=Console/dsp ; Console interface for demo
[incomingsipgate]
exten => h,1,Hangup
exten => 800,1,Dial(SIP/internestelefon,20,tr)
[sipgate.de]
exten => _0049.,Dial(SIP/${EXTEN:[EMAIL PROTECTED],30,tr)
exten => _0049.,2,Playback(invalid)
exten => _0049.,3,Hangup
[sipgate.co.uk]
exten => _0044.,Dial(SIP/${EXTEN:[EMAIL PROTECTED],30,tr)
exten => _0044.,2,Playback(invalid)
exten => _0044.,3,Hangup

I did not understand the paragraph of [incomingsipgate].
I also do not understand EXTEN:1   (should the second phone be EXTEN:2 ???)
starting the server with asterisk -vvvcg   brings a lots of lines ;-)
sip show users:
sipgate.co.uk   my_password2  incomingsipgateNo   Alway
sipgate.demy_password1  incomingsipgateNo   Alway
602 my_password4  incomingsipgateNo   Alway
601 my_password3  incomingsipgateNo   Alway
sip show registry:
sipgate.co.uk:5060  4782156   105Registered
sipgate.de:5060   5552220   105Registered

Tests:
601 calls 602busy
00491  busy(1 at sipgate.de should play a tape)
No info on the screen (asterisk: *CLI>  )
What have I forgotten / made wrong?
bye
Ronald
begin:vcard
fn:Ronald Wiplinger
n:Wiplinger;Ronald
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
version:2.1
end:vcard

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[Asterisk-Users] G.729 on YDL and MacOSX

2004-10-23 Thread Benjamin on Asterisk Mailing Lists

Re: G.729 codec on Yellow Dog Linux for various PPC
 

Kristian Kielhofner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> This is probably a good time to ask if there is any
> planned support for a g729 binary for YDL and
> G3/G4, etc.  I would love to start playing with
> apple hardware, YDL, and asterisk.
> But I need that binary!

Indeed it is a good time to ask (but always start a new thread ;-)

I have mentioned this before, and I would like to ask EVERYBODY who is
interested to VOICE your interest directly with the respective
vendors. This is the first step and it is VERY IMPORTANT.

I am confindent that an Altivec optimised G.729 codec for the PPC970
CPUs (aka G5) on YDL4 would so clearly trash any Intel or AMD based
system that most serious deployments that require G.729 will end up
using Xserve instead of Intel toyz. Combine this with the fact that
the x86 architecture has hit the wall while IBM is only getting
started. Even Microsoft have recognised the leadership of IBM by going
PPC with their new game console. Before this background it is quite
apparent that there is an interesting market potential for G.729
binaries for LinuxPPC.

However, without requests from customers for a G.729 codec for
LinuxPPC it will take so much longer for an x86 centric shop like
Digium to recognise this potential and consider spending time and
effort on it. Therefore, please, send an email to Digium and tell them
that you want this binary for PPC and continue to nag them about it
again and again and again and again. If as a result, Digium realise
that there is demand, then they will quite possibly provide that
binary.

At the same time, let's also remind TerraSoft
(http://www.terrasoftsolutions.com) that Asterisk on their YDL
platform is alive and that their sponsorship to bring Asterisk to
LinuxPPC was not in vain, that there is finally an opportunity to get
a return on their investment. Let's assume that Digium is simply too
busy with other things and that even if they wanted to, they couldn't
do the G.729 codec for PPC. So, in lieu of Digium providing the codec
for PPC, TerraSoft may recognise the opportunity and step in. But
again, in order for this to happen, it will take requests from
customers.

Therefore, please, send an email to Kai Staats at TerraSoft and tell
them that you'd be very interested to buy G.729 codec binaries for
Asterisk on YDL if they were to offer them, then follow up on that
with reminders to show that you are serious about it. TerraSoft have
been working together with Digium to bring Asterisk to YDL, so there
shouldn't be a problem for the two companies to get together again and
bring the G.729 codec to YDL as well. All it takes for that to happen
is visible customer demand.

Perhaps we should set up some kind of petition page on the Wiki.


Re: G.729 codec on MacOSX for Apple Macintosh
 

Darren Sessions <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Or for that matter, is there a planned G729 binary
> for Mac OSX ?

It will probably take a LinuxPPC port first, but here again, why don't
you send email to Apple and tell them that you would rather purchase
oodles of Xserve instead of x86 based servers if only there was a
G.729 codec for OSX. It will take a lot more noise to get Apple to
recognise that there is a market potential than it will take to get
Digium or TerraSoft to do so, but that's no reason not to make a
request.

So, please, send email to Apple and tell them that you have tested
Asterisk on MacOSX -- they have listed our installer on their website
http://www.apple.com/downloads/macosx/unix_open_source/asteriskinstallpackageformacosx.html,
that you found it runs circles around any other product, such as Cisco
Call Manager -- Apple just loves to hear that sort of thing -- and
that the only thing that's missing is the G.729 codec which the open
source community is unable to provide on its own due to the patent
royalties that need to be paid on a reseller-to-patent-holder basis
because there is no end-user-to-patent-holder scheme, that you would
love to buy many many Xserves if Apple was to sell you the missing
codec.

rgds
benjk
-- 
Sunrise Telephone Systems, 9F Shibuya Daikyo Bldg., 1-13-5 Shibuya,
Tokyo, Japan.

NB: Spam filters in place. Messages unrelated to the * mailing lists
may get trashed.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] One approach to SIP dialing through asterisk

2004-10-23 Thread David McNett
Caveat: I've only got about three weeks of experience working with Asterisk
so it's possible I've completely overlooked a more obvious solution
to this issue.  Snide comments are welcomed if this is the case.

One of the more puzzling frustrations I've faced in working with Asterisk is
that the dialplan seems to have been built without the accomodation for 
SIP dialing to be done through the Asterisk box acting as a sip proxy.  I
was startled to discover that dialing an URI-based SIP address such as
sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] from my cisco phone or from a soft phone like x-lite
resulted in a connection to a local "nugget" extension to the phone's 
Asterisk server.  I was surprised that Asterisk was stripping off the SIP
domain before working through the dialplan, although I've grown familiar with
working with the dialplan this way it still feels odd to me.

Early on in my configuring I discovered a function (albeit crufty and akward)
approach devised by Wayne Harrison which is documented at
http://www.planetwayne.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=196

While that does work, it wasn't what I was hoping to accomplish.  I later
found this piece of tease: http://www.voip-forum.com/?p=153&more=1 which
leads the reader to the conclusion that SIP dialing through Asterisk is
just a Simple Matter of Programming(tm) but seems to overlook some rather
significant hurdles that would face a person trying to design a dialplan 
as described.

Tonight I set myself to this task and I've come up with a quasi-workable
implementation of the proposal in the voip-forum.com article.  I'd appreciate
any feedback on this approach since it does have some drawbacks.

I created a [trunkuri] context for evaluating extensions to see if the 
SIPDOMAIN does not match a MYDOMAIN variable which I hard-code with my
local SIP domain.  My first dilemma was where to perform this evaluation.
At first I tried to place it in "exten => s" for my [trunkuri] context, but
that never seemed to actually be processed.  I found that the only way to
have this test hooked was to make a match-all _. extension in my trunkuri
context.  This means that I have to be careful to make sure that [trunkuri]
is the last extension context that's applied for any placed call.

I include it last from my container context, as such:

  ; For stations that are physically inside the house
  [house]
  include => local
  include => kpmirror
  include => trunkld
  include => trunkint
  include => emergency
  include => trunkuri

The [trunkuri] context appears as follows:

  ; Hey, it works.
  [trunkuri]
  exten => _.,1,NoOp(trunkuri start! [EMAIL PROTECTED])
  exten => _.,2,GotoIf($[${SIPDOMAIN} = ${MYDOMAIN}]?4)
  exten => _.,3,Dial(SIP/[EMAIL PROTECTED])
  exten => _.,4,Congestion()

This matches any extension that hasn't previously been caught by my local and 
normal targets and dials it if the SIPDOMAIN isn't me.  It works, but only
barely.  One glaring hole is that with this approach I am unable to dial 
SIP URIs that partly match my own local extensions.  If, for example, I have a
sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] address, I'm unable to dial sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] with this
because sales will have already hit.  The only way I can see around that would
be to burden all my defined internal extensions with that same SIPDOMAIN
evaluation which seems cumbersome and unwieldy to maintain.

Is there a way for me to hang [trunkuri] as the very first included context?
I haven't seen a dialplan command that would allow me to do this.  In effect
I'm guessing I'd need a way for the _. extension to voluntarily defer and 
pass on down to the remaining extensions as if it had not been a hit.  Is
this even possible?

For context, the whole of my extensions.conf is available at:
  http://slacker.com/~nugget/stuff/extensions.conf

Additionally, I've documented my progress at:
  http://slacker.com/~nugget/asterisk1.php

Feedback and suggestions would be welcomed.

-- 
David McNett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://slacker.com/~nugget/
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk and Broadvoice, no incoming voice

2004-10-23 Thread Tim Jackson
I'm having the same issue, and I'm not behind NAT.

Maybe this is a BV issue?

-Tim

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Terry
Evans
Sent: Saturday, October 23, 2004 4:33 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk and Broadvoice, no incoming voice

I just signed up for the BroadVoice service a few hours ago, but for
the life of me I can't get any incoming voice.  The incoming
connection is fine as it rings my extension from outside, but I can't
hear anyone talking.   Outgoing voice is working fine though.

I've been looking through the archives, but I haven't found a solution
to the problem yet.  I even tried another router since someone had a
problem with that, but still no dice.

I've had my Asterisk server running fine for a few months, but this is
the first time I've tried a VOIP service with it.  I just downloaded
and installed the lastest CVS and the problem is still there also.

Here's some of my configuration information:

sip.conf (I've tried with nat=no and it didn't help)

[general]
context=from-sip   ; Default context for incoming calls
port=5060   ; UDP Port to bind to (SIP standard port is 5060)
bindaddr=0.0.0.0; IP address to bind to (0.0.0.0 binds to all)
maxexpirey=3600
defaultexpirey=120
callerid=No CallID
tos=lowdelay; 0x18 ; reliabile before
dtmfmode=inband
srvlookup=yes
;progressinband=no
nat=yes
notifymimetype=text/plain

[broadvoice]
type=friend
username=801527 (hid real number)
fromuser=801527  (hid real number)
secret= (hid real password)
fromdomain=sip.broadvoice.com
host=sip.broadvoice.com
canreinvite=no
dtmfmode=inband
context=broadvoice-inbound
nat=yes (tried nat=never also)
disallow=all
allow=ulaw
insecure=very

I have the following ports forwarded to my linux server (it's behind a
NAT router):

5060, 2-21000 (from my rdp.conf file), 4445, and 4569.  All of
those have both TCP and UDP forwarded for now.

I've tried several different combinations from different posts,
including splitting the broadvoice section up into parts for incoming
and outgoing, but it still didn't work.

Anyone have any ideas?  Let me know if traces, etc. will help and I'll
capture and post some.

Thanks,
Terry
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk and Broadvoice, no incoming voice

2004-10-23 Thread Terry Evans
It also sounds like some type of NAT issue to me, but I can't figure
out what's going wrong.  I changed the RTP ports back to 1-2
and set the router up to forward those, but still no incoming voice.

Kevin suggest I try the two inbound sections in the sip.conf, but I
had already tried them prior to my previous post.  I've tried lots of
combinations of sip.conf files I could find in this mailing list, but
none of them seem to work for me for some reason.

Terry


On Sat, 23 Oct 2004 17:39:12 -0600 (MDT), Greg Hill
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It really sounds like a NAT problem to me.. If your NAT supports the
> notion of a "DMZ host" then give that a try. Or if the NAT has some sort
> of logging feature to let you know when the nat receives unexpected
> packets and discards them, then look through the log. It may be that BV
> isn't sending RTP in the 2-21000 port range, and that these packets
> are being dropped by the NAT. Outgoing RTP (voice) would work fine, of
> course, because the NAT is designed to work that direction.
> 
> FYI, I just placed a call to my BV number and ran 'netstat -nupa'. UDP
> connections showed up on ports 14704, 14705, 19838, 19839. These
> disappeared when I hung up the call.
> 
> While it might be a config issue, I'm inclined to believe that NAT is
> making life unpleasant for you.
> 
> Greg
> 
> ___
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Outlook reports internal error after using AstTapi

2004-10-23 Thread Rana Dutt
I wanted to use Outlook 2000 to dial my Contacts using Asterisk. So I
installed AstTapi on my Windows XP machine. When I try to dial a contact,
the call originates just fine. My SIP phone rings, and when I pick up,
Asterisk makes the call to the dialed number correctly.

However, Outlook displays an error message saying "Unable to complete an
operation requested by the automatic phone dialer. Please make sure your
modem, phone and phone line are properly configured." After closing the
error message dialog, if I then go to dial the Contact again, I get a
different error message saying "An internal error occurred in the phone
dialer. Close the Dial Phone dialog box and then open it again." Well,
closing the dialog box and opening it again doesn't work: the same internal
error message keeps popping up when trying to make a call. The only way to
get rid of it is to exit Outlook and restart it.

Has anyone who has used AstTapi seen this problem? I am using Outlook 2000
SP3.

My Asterisk TAPI driver is configured as follows:

Host: 192.168.2.11 (IP of Asterisk server)
Port: 5038
Dial out by using the Dial application - Outgoing chan: Zap/1/
User: john
Password: my_secret
User channel: SIP/200

My manager.conf is as follows:

[general]
enabled = yes
port = 5038
bindaddr = 0.0.0.0

[john]
secret = mysecret
deny=0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0
permit=192.168.2.17/255.255.255.0
read = system,call,log.verbose,command,agent,user
write = system,call,log.verbose,command,agent,user

As I said, the first time I place the call from Outlook, it works fine. The
trace on Asterisk shows:

== Manager 'john' logged on from 192.168.2.17
  -- Launching Dial(Zap/1/18005551212) on SIP/200-da5d
  -- Called 1/18005551212
== Manager 'john' logged off from 192.168.2.17
  -- Zap/1-1 answered SIP/200-da5d
  -- Hungup 'Zap/1-1'

Any help would be much appreciated.

Rana Dutt
Softel, Inc.

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Re: Direct SIP connection to Vonage service

2004-10-23 Thread Benjamin on Asterisk Mailing Lists
On Sun, 24 Oct 2004 01:45:19 +0200, Stewart Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I looked at NuFone.net and some others, but it appears that
> IAX is not right for my system.

I'd say this is only because you don't know enough about IAX yet ;-)

> I live near Reno, NV, and
> have a second home in Paris.  Most of my calling is to the
> US, via an H.323 gateway to the Reno POTS line;

Install an Asterisk server in Reno and run IAX.

> overflow traffic is sent to an H.323 ITSP.

Replace that with a provider that supports IAX, ie NuFone.

> I run GnuGk on a shared
> server at a hosting provider in New York.

Run Asterisk on that or take it out of the equation entirely.

> Paris has a Cisco
> 827-4V (ADSL modem / NAT / 4 FXS) that speaks H.323 and SIP.

Replace that with an Asterisk server and run IAX.

> There are also some associates on the system using ATA-186.

Replace those with Digium IAXy ATAs or Farfon Farata ATAs.

> When calling from an H.323 or SIP client to an IAX service
> (or vice-versa), I believe that Asterisk must proxy the
> media stream.

No, it doesn't. Only if you force it.

> If * is run at the hosting service, I'm
> worried that delays caused by other users will result in
> choppy voice.  I'd rather run * in Reno, where it could also
> replace an ancient DOS-based voice mail, and possibly my
> Partner key system.  However, that configuration would have
> lots of extra delay.  For example, if the IAX provider is in
> Michigan, a call from Paris to San Francisco would go
> Paris->Reno->Michigan->California.

No. An IAX call from Paris setup through Reno via NuFone would go like this ...

Paris ---IAX---> Michigan ---???---> SF

... and if NuFone have a node in SF, then it would go ...

Paris ---IAX---> SF ---POTS---> Called Party in SF

[Jeremy, can you elaborate please? Do you run an IAX node in California?]

> With SIP, a REINVITE
> would cause it to go Paris->Michigan->California, saving two
> trips across the country.

IAX does a so called IAX Transfer, which is similar in effect to a SIP REINVITE.

rgds
benjk

-- 
Sunrise Telephone Systems, 9F Shibuya Daikyo Bldg., 1-13-5 Shibuya,
Tokyo, Japan.

NB: Spam filters in place. Messages unrelated to the * mailing lists
may get trashed.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Hardware

2004-10-23 Thread Steve Underwood
Stay away from boards with Intel chipsets. Those are problematic in my 
experience. The FX, LX, 820, 840 and various others have been extremely 
flaky, and caused no end of problems. :-)

VIA used to be bad, but seem to get steadily better. Intel are just 
erratic. I think most makers have made good and bad chipsets. Go with 
known good chips, not specific makers. The same goes with motherboards.

Steve
Brian McSpadden wrote:
Stay away from boards with VIA chipsets, those are problematic in my
experience. I have had some good results with the D865PERL boards from
Intel, along with several other Intel boards. Those seem to be of high
quality. They may not have the very best performers, but the PCI bus
is implemented cleanly, which is what * needs for Zaptel hardware.
Brian
 

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] asterisk & chan_sccp

2004-10-23 Thread Joel Berry



Chad,
   I noticed you wrote this earlier (see 
below).  I have the same problem with the chan_sccp module with a Cisco 
7910 phone.  I have traced down the * crash to a reference to an undefined 
variable.  Adding the speeddial entries would fix the issue, but I am VERY 
unclear on the format.  
  For the 7910 phones, there are two indexes: 1 and 
2.  Setting those would fix the issue, but I do not understand what the 
next entry references?  Where is "John Doe" defined?  What config file 
is it using for this data.   
 
Thank you for any insight you can provide.
 
Joel Berry
 
On Wednesday 25 August 2004 15:33, 
Matthew Boehm wrote:> I don't see any speed dials 
setup on the devices in sccp.conf.>> Ex:>> [SEP000F3442E199]> description = Jack's 7960> type = 
7960> context = sccp> tzoffset = -6> autologin = 
richard,neill> speeddial = 4,John 
Doe> speeddial = 7,Jack 
Trades> speeddial = 8,Richard 
Doofus>> 
These all work great for my 2 7960s. It could be that you are pushing 
the> button and * is seeing that there isn't 
anything to dial.>> Matthew
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Hardware

2004-10-23 Thread Brian McSpadden
Stay away from boards with VIA chipsets, those are problematic in my
experience. I have had some good results with the D865PERL boards from
Intel, along with several other Intel boards. Those seem to be of high
quality. They may not have the very best performers, but the PCI bus
is implemented cleanly, which is what * needs for Zaptel hardware.

Brian


On Sat, 23 Oct 2004 20:39:00 -0500, Henry Devito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'll be running the Red Hat Enterprise.  I thought I saw people posting
> certain motherboards had issues with sound, I know I saw where others said
> to stay away from the VIA chipset.
> 
> 
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stan
> Brinkerhoff
> Sent: Saturday, October 23, 2004 6:56 PM
> To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
> Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Hardware
> 
> Look for support by whatever operating system you plan on running.
> 
> Henry Devito wrote:
> 
> > Hi guys I know this has been asked on the list before, but my hard
> > drive crashed and I lost all of the past posts,  I need to know what
> > motherboard works ok for asterisk,  I have no problems with the Dual
> > and Quad Xeon processor boards I have used.  Now I plan on building a
> > Pentium 4 3.0 with hyper-threading.  I looked through the wiki and
> > could not find the recommended P4 board.  Does anyone have any
> > suggestions?  Thanks.
> >
> >
> >
> >___
> >Asterisk-Users mailing list
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> >To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> >   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> >
> 
> ___
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> 
> ___
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] iLBC/PCM16 Huge Cost

2004-10-23 Thread Michael Loftis

--On Saturday, October 23, 2004 21:35 -0500 Brian West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:

Done and done.  FYI you may want to update
http://voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk+mpg123+redhat as that's where I got
inspired to download the RPM.
Repeat after me... RPM is bad source is good.
I have put a nice warning on that page.  Its already been proven to use
0.59r and you'll notice the "make mpg123" target in asterisk will even
fetch and install 0.59r btw.
bkw
mmm... any packaging is better than none.  I regularly destroy things on 
systems when it's not been put into proper packaging because we upgrade the 
system, and there's no record of something being installed, nor what it 
depends on, so it gets broken.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] iLBC/PCM16 Huge Cost

2004-10-23 Thread Brian West
> Done and done.  FYI you may want to update
> http://voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk+mpg123+redhat as that's where I got
> inspired to download the RPM.

Repeat after me... RPM is bad source is good.

I have put a nice warning on that page.  Its already been proven to use
0.59r and you'll notice the "make mpg123" target in asterisk will even fetch
and install 0.59r btw.

bkw

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] iLBC/PCM16 Huge Cost

2004-10-23 Thread Brian West
Also quietmp3nb:  and you'll only have one process per music class.

bkw

> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Trevor Peirce
> Sent: Saturday, October 23, 2004 9:09 PM
> To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
> Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] iLBC/PCM16 Huge Cost
> 
> Brian West wrote:
> 
> >REMOVE THAT POS and install mpg123 0.59r, compile from src.
> >
> Done and done.  FYI you may want to update
> http://voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk+mpg123+redhat as that's where I got
> inspired to download the RPM.
> 
> I just stopped asterisk and killed off all the mpg123 processes... ran
> safe_asterisk and it immediately spawned three mpg123's (which are 0.59r).
> 
> I don't see them eating up any processer time just yet but it seems to
> take a few hours for that to happen.  I will report back later.
> 
> Probably related to whatever is causing my other headaches - MOH sounds
> very staticy.  The time, pitch, speed are all fine, but there are lots
> of "scratch" sounds and glitches added.  This is with both my own MP3s
> and the ones included with *.
> 
> I'm starting to think a format and reinstall might be a good idea
> there has got to be something deeper to this.
> 
> Trevor
> ___
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Fedora 2, Kudzu and X100P

2004-10-23 Thread Carlos Chavez
 I am installing a new * server using Fedora Core 2 but I ran into a
problem after I installed the X100P.  When FC2 boots it runs KUDZU to detect
new hardware and it detected the card and insists on loading the module
"crc_ccitt" before the zaptel module.  Because of this I cannot load the wcfxo
module without the computer crashing.  I have already erase the entry in
/etc/sysconfig/hwconf and turned kudzu off during boot.

 Anyone know of a way to fix this (short or reinstalling FC2)?

--
Carlos Chavez
Director de Tecnología
Telecomunicaciones Abiertas de México S.A. de C.V.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] iLBC/PCM16 Huge Cost

2004-10-23 Thread Todd Lieberman
Wo trevor, Format and start over?  Don't go crazy, just remove the files
created by make install.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Trevor
Peirce
Sent: Saturday, October 23, 2004 10:09 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] iLBC/PCM16 Huge Cost


Brian West wrote:

>REMOVE THAT POS and install mpg123 0.59r, compile from src.
>
Done and done.  FYI you may want to update
http://voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk+mpg123+redhat as that's where I got
inspired to download the RPM.

I just stopped asterisk and killed off all the mpg123 processes... ran
safe_asterisk and it immediately spawned three mpg123's (which are 0.59r).

I don't see them eating up any processer time just yet but it seems to
take a few hours for that to happen.  I will report back later.

Probably related to whatever is causing my other headaches - MOH sounds
very staticy.  The time, pitch, speed are all fine, but there are lots
of "scratch" sounds and glitches added.  This is with both my own MP3s
and the ones included with *.

I'm starting to think a format and reinstall might be a good idea
there has got to be something deeper to this.

Trevor
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Hardware (and apple YDL G.729)

2004-10-23 Thread Darren Sessions
Or for that matter, is there a planned G729 binary for Mac OSX ?___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

RE: [Asterisk-Users] iLBC/PCM16 Huge Cost

2004-10-23 Thread Senad Jordanovic
Trevor Peirce wrote:
> Trevor Peirce wrote:
> 
>> I have noticed that when * is first loading, CPU usage goes to 100%
>> for exactly the same duration that it takes that ilbc codec to load.
> 
> 
> Upon closer inspection, it seems that every time a caller is hears
> MOH, a new mpg123 is spawned.  Right now top is showing 8 mpg123's
> running, and between then and * CPU utilisation is maxed out.  About
> 30% user and 65% system.
> 
> Can anyone tell me if this would make sense from a faulty IDE
> controller card, or is it most likely something else?  I won't have a
> chance to use the slower onboard channels until later tonight, but if
> anyone has suggestions before then I'd love to hear them.

Trevor, 

You are better off using this instead of mpg321:

http://bugs.digium.com/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0002379

Mark... Any chance including this patch in the 1.0?


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] iLBC/PCM16 Huge Cost

2004-10-23 Thread Trevor Peirce
Brian West wrote:
REMOVE THAT POS and install mpg123 0.59r, compile from src.
Done and done.  FYI you may want to update 
http://voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk+mpg123+redhat as that's where I got 
inspired to download the RPM.

I just stopped asterisk and killed off all the mpg123 processes... ran 
safe_asterisk and it immediately spawned three mpg123's (which are 0.59r).

I don't see them eating up any processer time just yet but it seems to 
take a few hours for that to happen.  I will report back later.

Probably related to whatever is causing my other headaches - MOH sounds 
very staticy.  The time, pitch, speed are all fine, but there are lots 
of "scratch" sounds and glitches added.  This is with both my own MP3s 
and the ones included with *.

I'm starting to think a format and reinstall might be a good idea 
there has got to be something deeper to this.

Trevor
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] iLBC/PCM16 Huge Cost

2004-10-23 Thread Brian West
REMOVE THAT POS and install mpg123 0.59r, compile from src.

bkw

> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Trevor Peirce
> Sent: Saturday, October 23, 2004 8:57 PM
> To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
> Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] iLBC/PCM16 Huge Cost
> 
> Brian West wrote:
> 
> >>Upon closer inspection, it seems that every time a caller is hears MOH,
> >>a new mpg123 is spawned.  Right now top is showing 8 mpg123's running,
> >>and between then and * CPU utilisation is maxed out.  About 30% user and
> >>65% system.
> >>
> >>
> >IMPOSSIBLE...  What mpg123 version are you running?
> >
> >
> # rpm -qa | grep mpg
> mpg123-0.59q-1
> 
> and
> 
> High Performance MPEG 1.0/2.0/2.5 Audio Player for Layer 1, 2 and 3.
> Version 0.59q (1999/Jan/26). Written and copyrights by Michael Hipp.
> 
> Got this one directly from a link I found on the wiki.
> 
> ___
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] iLBC/PCM16 Huge Cost

2004-10-23 Thread Trevor Peirce
Brian West wrote:
Upon closer inspection, it seems that every time a caller is hears MOH,
a new mpg123 is spawned.  Right now top is showing 8 mpg123's running,
and between then and * CPU utilisation is maxed out.  About 30% user and
65% system.
   

IMPOSSIBLE...  What mpg123 version are you running?
 

# rpm -qa | grep mpg
mpg123-0.59q-1
and
High Performance MPEG 1.0/2.0/2.5 Audio Player for Layer 1, 2 and 3.
Version 0.59q (1999/Jan/26). Written and copyrights by Michael Hipp.
Got this one directly from a link I found on the wiki.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] iLBC/PCM16 Huge Cost

2004-10-23 Thread Brian West

> Upon closer inspection, it seems that every time a caller is hears MOH,
> a new mpg123 is spawned.  Right now top is showing 8 mpg123's running,
> and between then and * CPU utilisation is maxed out.  About 30% user and
> 65% system.

IMPOSSIBLE...  What mpg123 version are you running?

bkw

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] iLBC/PCM16 Huge Cost

2004-10-23 Thread Trevor Peirce
Trevor Peirce wrote:
I have noticed that when * is first loading, CPU usage goes to 100% 
for exactly the same duration that it takes that ilbc codec to load.

Upon closer inspection, it seems that every time a caller is hears MOH, 
a new mpg123 is spawned.  Right now top is showing 8 mpg123's running, 
and between then and * CPU utilisation is maxed out.  About 30% user and 
65% system.

Can anyone tell me if this would make sense from a faulty IDE controller 
card, or is it most likely something else?  I won't have a chance to use 
the slower onboard channels until later tonight, but if anyone has 
suggestions before then I'd love to hear them.

Thanks,
Trevor
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Hardware

2004-10-23 Thread Henry Devito
I'll be running the Red Hat Enterprise.  I thought I saw people posting
certain motherboards had issues with sound, I know I saw where others said
to stay away from the VIA chipset.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stan
Brinkerhoff
Sent: Saturday, October 23, 2004 6:56 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Hardware

Look for support by whatever operating system you plan on running.

Henry Devito wrote:

> Hi guys I know this has been asked on the list before, but my hard 
> drive crashed and I lost all of the past posts,  I need to know what 
> motherboard works ok for asterisk,  I have no problems with the Dual 
> and Quad Xeon processor boards I have used.  Now I plan on building a 
> Pentium 4 3.0 with hyper-threading.  I looked through the wiki and 
> could not find the recommended P4 board.  Does anyone have any 
> suggestions?  Thanks.
>
>
>
>___
>Asterisk-Users mailing list
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] doublehash patch for 1.0.1

2004-10-23 Thread Barton Hodges
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Just tried the patch you made with the latest CVS and it patches
fine
> although it does not work.  Now when I hit # it does not send the
DTMF
> to the other side at all.  Although hitting ## does get the
transfer.
> Now # doesn't do ANYTHING :) 

I'm not sure why that is, it works with all our phones (Grandstream
BT101s and analog phones on Grandstream ATA286s).  I just tested by
calling my bank's IVR.



___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Re: Apple YDL g729

2004-10-23 Thread Kristian Kielhofner
Michael Loftis wrote:

--On Saturday, October 23, 2004 19:39 -0500 Kristian Kielhofner 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Hey,
This is probably a good time to ask if there is any planned 
support for
a g729 binary for YDL and G3/G4, etc.  I would love to start playing with
apple hardware, YDL, and asterisk.  But I need that binary!

Hummm, can't compile your own?  And anyway please don't coopt others 
threads.  It's FAR better to start a totally new thread on your subject, 
this ensures it gets read by more people, and that you get a better 
response to your question(s).

Sorry,
	I felt that it was relevant seeing as many people swear up and down 
that you don't get any funky motherboard - zaptel issues with apple 
hardware.  I don't know if you have ever used Digium's g729, but there 
are processor specific binaries and registration programs that just will 
not work with power pc.  Maybe some kind of emulation, but that probably 
outweighs using ppc hardware in the first place...

--
Kristian Kielhofner
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] doublehash patch for 1.0.1

2004-10-23 Thread Matthew Marlowe
Just tried the patch you made with the latest CVS and it patches fine
although it does not work.  Now when I hit # it does not send the DTMF
to the other side at all.  Although hitting ## does get the transfer. 
Now # doesn't do ANYTHING :)



On Sat, 23 Oct 2004 19:00:38 -0500, Barton Hodges
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > is there a doublehash patch for 1.0.1?
> >   o old one to res_parking.c does not apply as there is no longer
> 
> >   res_parking.c o wiki search is useless
> >   o google only finds the problems applying old patch to 0.7
> 
> I've attached an old-school, no frills, double-hash patch ported to
> the latest "Stable with bug fixes" CVS.
> 
> Barton
> 
> 
> ___
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> 
> 
> 


-- 
MBM
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Support for reception of "send url" in SIP clients needed

2004-10-23 Thread Nicolás Gudiño
Hello,

On Sat, 23 Oct 2004 08:54:27 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would like to let asterisk send an URL to a PC based softphone or a PC based
> message client. This would allow for many great applications such as automatic
> client data lookup. Or for technical client support. It is a must for many
> types of customer support centers.
> 
> I understand that the "send url" application can do the job seen from the
> asterisk side.
> 
> But I have not been able to find a PC client which is able to handle reception
> of the url and the subsequent opening of it in the specified browser.
> 
> It looks as if Nortel has two products capable of this, but I have not tested
> them yet.
> 
> I would like to know if anybody has experience about available PC clients
> supporting this feature.

Not exactly what you are looking for (it is not a soft phone), but you
might want to look at Flash Operator Panel. It can open a web page
sending the callerid received in certain channel as a GET variable
(you can do automatic data lookup based on callerid). It connects to
asterisk using the manager interface.

It can also be used to visualize a call center, the latest version can
display logged in agents, and it shows some statistics on queues and
individual agents also.

http://www.asternic.org

Best regards,

-- 
Nicolás Gudiño
Buenos Aires - Argentina
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Hardware (and apple YDL G.729)

2004-10-23 Thread Michael Loftis

--On Saturday, October 23, 2004 19:39 -0500 Kristian Kielhofner 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hey,
This is probably a good time to ask if there is any planned support for
a g729 binary for YDL and G3/G4, etc.  I would love to start playing with
apple hardware, YDL, and asterisk.  But I need that binary!
Hummm, can't compile your own?  And anyway please don't coopt others 
threads.  It's FAR better to start a totally new thread on your subject, 
this ensures it gets read by more people, and that you get a better 
response to your question(s).

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Uniden UIP 200 Phone and NAT?

2004-10-23 Thread Me
Any chance you can pass me the Beta Version or let me know how to get it 
myself?

I love this phone except for this problem, either way I guess I will keep it 
and wait for the new firmware since it's a nice phone overall.

Thanks,
Todd
--
Start Your Own ISP!
http://www.YourOwnISP.com
- Original Message - 
From: "Ryan Courtnage" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion" 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, October 23, 2004 1:52 PM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Uniden UIP 200 Phone and NAT?


On Sat, 2004-23-10 at 08:14 -0500, Lyle Giese wrote:
As of version 4.59a, no, it does not support NAT.  Rumor had it that 
Uniden
was going to release new firmware for the phone in October, but it's not
there as of right now, it has not been posted on their web site.
Yes - the new firmware is coming. I've tested a beta version, and it
does fix the rport mess (which required nat=never or route).  It also
adds support for STUN.
Last i heard, the release is supposed to be the end of Oct.
Ryan
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users 
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Hardware (and apple YDL G.729)

2004-10-23 Thread Kristian Kielhofner
Stan Brinkerhoff wrote:
Look for support by whatever operating system you plan on running.
Henry Devito wrote:
Hi guys I know this has been asked on the list before, but my hard 
drive crashed and I lost all of the past posts,  I need to know what 
motherboard works ok for asterisk,  I have no problems with the Dual 
and Quad Xeon processor boards I have used.  Now I plan on building a 
Pentium 4 3.0 with hyper-threading.  I looked through the wiki and 
could not find the recommended P4 board.  Does anyone have any 
suggestions?  Thanks.

Hey,
	This is probably a good time to ask if there is any planned support for 
a g729 binary for YDL and G3/G4, etc.  I would love to start playing 
with apple hardware, YDL, and asterisk.  But I need that binary!

--
Kristian Kielhofner
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Hardware

2004-10-23 Thread Michael Loftis

--On Saturday, October 23, 2004 19:56 -0400 Stan Brinkerhoff 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Look for support by whatever operating system you plan on running.
I second thatpretty much any P4 based hardware should be perfectly fine 
for asterisk.  I'd tend to lean towards SCSI drives though, but other than 
that go to town!
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] doublehash patch for 1.0.1

2004-10-23 Thread Barton Hodges
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> is there a doublehash patch for 1.0.1?
>   o old one to res_parking.c does not apply as there is no longer

>   res_parking.c o wiki search is useless
>   o google only finds the problems applying old patch to 0.7

I've attached an old-school, no frills, double-hash patch ported to
the latest "Stable with bug fixes" CVS.

Barton



res_features.diff
Description: Binary data
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Hardware

2004-10-23 Thread Stan Brinkerhoff
Look for support by whatever operating system you plan on running.
Henry Devito wrote:
Hi guys I know this has been asked on the list before, but my hard 
drive crashed and I lost all of the past posts,  I need to know what 
motherboard works ok for asterisk,  I have no problems with the Dual 
and Quad Xeon processor boards I have used.  Now I plan on building a 
Pentium 4 3.0 with hyper-threading.  I looked through the wiki and 
could not find the recommended P4 board.  Does anyone have any 
suggestions?  Thanks.


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Re: Webmin for ASTERISK and QOS and call quality

2004-10-23 Thread Senad Jordanovic
Because I don't want to clog the list with more never-ending
> discussions that seem to be so popular lately, I probably won't reply
> to this thread any longer.  I feel that I have gotten my point across.


Yes... You have...
And good points you made...
There are people on this list who just love to criticize instead of
trying to help
with their knowledge/experience... 

Good luck in becoming asteriskian...  and if you need help I will be
glad to help if I can!


Senad Jordanovic
Bicom Systems - Complete Systems Provider
www.bicomsystems.com

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Broadvoice

2004-10-23 Thread Greg Hill
On Sat, 23 Oct 2004, Tim Jackson wrote:

> We just got setup with Broadvoice yesterday for LD. This isn't something
> I REALLY need (No local numbers avail so we just got a Houston number),
> but I'm just curious. I can make outbound calls to Broadvoice and they
> work great, but I can't do inbound. I have bv's voicemail turned off so
> all I get is a busy signal when I call our bv number. I've tried this
> with both type=peer and type=friend and I get the same results, any
> ideas?

in the * CLI, use 'sip show registry' to find out whether you're really
registered with the BV servers. Also use 'sip debug' and then place a
call. See whether your screen gets filled with a transcript of the
conversation between your * and BV. If it does, then read through every
line to decide whether what it says seems reasonable (or not). You should
at least see attempts by your * to register with BV. If these don't get
any reply, then you're probably fighting NAT or some other network issue.
Once the registration is successful, then BV should know where to find you
so that they can route your inbound calls. These may also be getting
dumped by a router/nat somewhere along the network.

Hopefully these tips will aid you in diagnosing the problem!

Greg


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Hardware

2004-10-23 Thread Henry Devito








Hi guys I know this has been asked on the list before, but my
hard drive crashed and I lost all of the past posts,  I need to know what
motherboard works ok for asterisk,  I have no problems with the Dual and
Quad Xeon processor boards I have used.  Now I plan on building a Pentium
4 3.0 with hyper-threading.  I looked through the wiki and could not find
the recommended P4 board.  Does anyone have any suggestions?  Thanks.






___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[Asterisk-Users] Re: Direct SIP connection to Vonage service

2004-10-23 Thread Stewart Nelson
Hi,
Thanks for the replies.
Brian wrote:
FYI these so called "unlimited" monthly plans are RARELY,
if _EVER_ truly unlimited. They CAN (read the TOS), and
WILL terminate you if you use too many minutes more then
whatever average they calculated for when pricing the
plan.

I personally know several people who were using the Vonage
"unlimited" calling plan and were terminated for
_"EXCESSIVE USAGE"_
Ouch.  I am aware that service is not really unlimited.  My
present POTS service has "unlimited" long distance; the TOS
makes it clear that you are billed four cents per minute for
usage beyond 5000 min. per month.  That's pretty steep, but
going a little over won't break you, and it sure beats
having your service disconnected.  I usually run 2000-3000
min., and have never gone over 3500, so I'm not in any
danger.
Vonage, OTOH, is quite vague; their TOS speaks of
"inconsistent with normal residential usage patterns".  Do
you know what they consider "excessive", or if my usage
would be acceptable?
Benjk wrote:
I personally wouldn't bother and I wouldn't want to take
my money to a company that uses a business model that I
despise. So, vote with your wallet. Don't use Vonage. Use
a true VoIP service. And while we are at it, support IAX:
Use a provider that offers IAX.
I looked at NuFone.net and some others, but it appears that
IAX is not right for my system.  I live near Reno, NV, and
have a second home in Paris.  Most of my calling is to the
US, via an H.323 gateway to the Reno POTS line; overflow
traffic is sent to an H.323 ITSP.  I run GnuGk on a shared
server at a hosting provider in New York.  Paris has a Cisco
827-4V (ADSL modem / NAT / 4 FXS) that speaks H.323 and SIP.
There are also some associates on the system using ATA-186.
When calling from an H.323 or SIP client to an IAX service
(or vice-versa), I believe that Asterisk must proxy the
media stream.  If * is run at the hosting service, I'm
worried that delays caused by other users will result in
choppy voice.  I'd rather run * in Reno, where it could also
replace an ancient DOS-based voice mail, and possibly my
Partner key system.  However, that configuration would have
lots of extra delay.  For example, if the IAX provider is in
Michigan, a call from Paris to San Francisco would go
Paris->Reno->Michigan->California.  With SIP, a REINVITE
would cause it to go Paris->Michigan->California, saving two
trips across the country.
Have I missed something?  Or did you mean that I should use
a provider that *offers* IAX, but connect via SIP :)
Thanks,
Stewart
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk and Broadvoice, no incoming voice

2004-10-23 Thread Greg Hill
On Sat, 23 Oct 2004, Terry Evans wrote:

> I just signed up for the BroadVoice service a few hours ago, but for
> the life of me I can't get any incoming voice.  The incoming
> connection is fine as it rings my extension from outside, but I can't
> hear anyone talking.   Outgoing voice is working fine though.
(snip)
> I have the following ports forwarded to my linux server (it's behind a
> NAT router):
>
> 5060, 2-21000 (from my rdp.conf file), 4445, and 4569.  All of
> those have both TCP and UDP forwarded for now.

It really sounds like a NAT problem to me.. If your NAT supports the
notion of a "DMZ host" then give that a try. Or if the NAT has some sort
of logging feature to let you know when the nat receives unexpected
packets and discards them, then look through the log. It may be that BV
isn't sending RTP in the 2-21000 port range, and that these packets
are being dropped by the NAT. Outgoing RTP (voice) would work fine, of
course, because the NAT is designed to work that direction.

FYI, I just placed a call to my BV number and ran 'netstat -nupa'. UDP
connections showed up on ports 14704, 14705, 19838, 19839. These
disappeared when I hung up the call.

While it might be a config issue, I'm inclined to believe that NAT is
making life unpleasant for you.

Greg


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Re: Webmin for ASTERISK and QOS and call quality

2004-10-23 Thread Kristian Kielhofner
Thomas Hutton wrote:
Mr Kielhofner, you answer nothing, while adding to the noise you
complain about.  

Googling for information on the webmin module leads to nothing.  The
webmin module on the digium FTP site is worthless.  Can somebody talk
Jamie Cameron into writing one?
Most people will tell you that gsm or ILBC is acceptable quality.  If
you want to run 20 simultaneous conversations, reserving 1 Megabit is
more than sufficient.  

As for LDAP, search for that on the Wiki.
http://voip-info.org/tiki-searchresults.php?words=LDAP&where=pages&search=go
Thomas Hutton
Mr. Hutton,
	I was simply trying to illustrate the point that if every single person 
that downloaded * and installed it went straight to the list with every 
BASIC question we ALL would be very overwhelmed.  If the list were the 
sole source of information on asterisk, the people working on the docs 
project, the wiki etc. could all stop wasting their time.

	The docs project and the wiki are SUPERB sources of information for 
everything that the OP was asking about (and much, much more).  I was 
telling him that if he were to type any of those queries into google, 
read what was returned to him (most likely from the wiki), he would have 
his answer right then and there, instead of waiting for someone on the 
list to answer or go look it up for him.

	There is an old saying about catching fish vs. teaching how to fish 
that applies here.  I am sure that google knows about that one as well.

	I don't in any way want to sound like an elitist, but I had about 200 
hours in working with * (and reading) before I ever made my first post 
to the list.  I recognized that the people on the list take their spare 
time to help me (and others) when I (they) need it.  I learned all that 
I could on my own out of respect for them and their time.  In addition, 
I now know where to look should I have more questions, or am answering 
someone else's (like on the list).  Someone once said that they couldn't 
figure out how people could find the list and not stumble across this 
kind of basic info in the process.  I totally agree.

	This would be a good time for me to thank everyone on the list, the 
wiki, and all the developers.  Really, thanks a lot.  Asterisk is the 
most exciting thing since I found Linux!

	Back to the original thread.  I understand that English is probably not 
the OP's first language.  This is fine.  I answered every question that 
I could reasonably understand, and I didn't want to confuse him more by 
throwing acronyms, etc. at him.  I merely wanted him to go back and 
think about what he really meant, and hopefully in doing so realize that 
everything that he wanted to know is already out there for the asking 
(via google, etc.).

	Furthermore, I think that Asterisk is more deserving of it's own 
complete web environment, fulling integrating voice mail, user access, 
and admin access.  Webmin probably isn't suitable for that.

As for bandwidth:
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=Asterisk+bandwidth+usage&btnG=Google+Search
	Because I don't want to clog the list with more never-ending 
discussions that seem to be so popular lately, I probably won't reply to 
this thread any longer.  I feel that I have gotten my point across.

--
Kristian Kielhofner
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Re: cannot call Grandstream

2004-10-23 Thread dean collins
GS is fine for that


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David
Ishmael
Sent: Saturday, October 23, 2004 5:49 PM
To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion'
Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Re: cannot call Grandstream

So in keeping with the topic, the GS phones work well with the Asterisk
system?  Should I get a GS phone or is there another phone that I should
consider?  Since this is for my home rather than a company, I just want
something that will work with little fuss.  ;)


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of steve
szmidt
Sent: Saturday, October 23, 2004 4:37 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Re: cannot call Grandstream

On Friday 22 October 2004 02:05 pm, Neil Cherry wrote:
> David Ishmael wrote:
> > I think my Netgear router will try to lease the same DHCP address to
a
> > device based on MAC automatically each time the device queries for
an
> > address (but I'm not 100% sure about that, never really watched it).
So
> > the problem is with the address changing?
>
> I can't infer that from the 2 examples as it may be some other
> problem with the DHCP implementation on the DHCP server. Though
> it may be a possibility.
>
> I like to have the stationary IP devices to have a permanent IP
> address. It just makes it easier to admin my local DNS (I have
> too many devices to remember all the IP addresses).

Hmmm. In my opinion DHCP is mostly a false time saver anyway. It's true
you 
can just plug in a host and have it get an ip nice and easily.

But I prefer to know who's IP is on the wire with a minimum of fuss. I
like
to 
be able to notice that nnn is being involved far too often in that XYZ 
problem, or whatever. Plus it's one less service to maintain. Whenever I
add

a host I spend a little more time with configuring it but that's better
than

chasing leases as far as I'm concerned. Eases LAN maintenance a lot.

True, as an ISP I would use DHCP. It's quite suitable there as I would
have 
more limited resources. But on a LAN it's hard to run out of IP's. It's
kind

of how windows got popular, thanks to the apparent easier way of doing 
things, and how lazy we all seem to be. 

Anyway, this is on th edge of the topic so I'll stop here.
-- 

Steve Szmidt

"They that would give up essential liberty for temporary safety 
deserve neither liberty nor safety."
Benjamin Franklin
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Re: cannot call Grandstream

2004-10-23 Thread David Ishmael
So in keeping with the topic, the GS phones work well with the Asterisk
system?  Should I get a GS phone or is there another phone that I should
consider?  Since this is for my home rather than a company, I just want
something that will work with little fuss.  ;)


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of steve szmidt
Sent: Saturday, October 23, 2004 4:37 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Re: cannot call Grandstream

On Friday 22 October 2004 02:05 pm, Neil Cherry wrote:
> David Ishmael wrote:
> > I think my Netgear router will try to lease the same DHCP address to a
> > device based on MAC automatically each time the device queries for an
> > address (but I'm not 100% sure about that, never really watched it).  So
> > the problem is with the address changing?
>
> I can't infer that from the 2 examples as it may be some other
> problem with the DHCP implementation on the DHCP server. Though
> it may be a possibility.
>
> I like to have the stationary IP devices to have a permanent IP
> address. It just makes it easier to admin my local DNS (I have
> too many devices to remember all the IP addresses).

Hmmm. In my opinion DHCP is mostly a false time saver anyway. It's true you 
can just plug in a host and have it get an ip nice and easily.

But I prefer to know who's IP is on the wire with a minimum of fuss. I like
to 
be able to notice that nnn is being involved far too often in that XYZ 
problem, or whatever. Plus it's one less service to maintain. Whenever I add

a host I spend a little more time with configuring it but that's better than

chasing leases as far as I'm concerned. Eases LAN maintenance a lot.

True, as an ISP I would use DHCP. It's quite suitable there as I would have 
more limited resources. But on a LAN it's hard to run out of IP's. It's kind

of how windows got popular, thanks to the apparent easier way of doing 
things, and how lazy we all seem to be. 

Anyway, this is on th edge of the topic so I'll stop here.
-- 

Steve Szmidt

"They that would give up essential liberty for temporary safety 
deserve neither liberty nor safety."
Benjamin Franklin
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Asterisk and Broadvoice, no incoming voice

2004-10-23 Thread Terry Evans
I just signed up for the BroadVoice service a few hours ago, but for
the life of me I can't get any incoming voice.  The incoming
connection is fine as it rings my extension from outside, but I can't
hear anyone talking.   Outgoing voice is working fine though.

I've been looking through the archives, but I haven't found a solution
to the problem yet.  I even tried another router since someone had a
problem with that, but still no dice.

I've had my Asterisk server running fine for a few months, but this is
the first time I've tried a VOIP service with it.  I just downloaded
and installed the lastest CVS and the problem is still there also.

Here's some of my configuration information:

sip.conf (I've tried with nat=no and it didn't help)

[general]
context=from-sip   ; Default context for incoming calls
port=5060   ; UDP Port to bind to (SIP standard port is 5060)
bindaddr=0.0.0.0; IP address to bind to (0.0.0.0 binds to all)
maxexpirey=3600
defaultexpirey=120
callerid=No CallID
tos=lowdelay; 0x18 ; reliabile before
dtmfmode=inband
srvlookup=yes
;progressinband=no
nat=yes
notifymimetype=text/plain

[broadvoice]
type=friend
username=801527 (hid real number)
fromuser=801527  (hid real number)
secret= (hid real password)
fromdomain=sip.broadvoice.com
host=sip.broadvoice.com
canreinvite=no
dtmfmode=inband
context=broadvoice-inbound
nat=yes (tried nat=never also)
disallow=all
allow=ulaw
insecure=very

I have the following ports forwarded to my linux server (it's behind a
NAT router):

5060, 2-21000 (from my rdp.conf file), 4445, and 4569.  All of
those have both TCP and UDP forwarded for now.

I've tried several different combinations from different posts,
including splitting the broadvoice section up into parts for incoming
and outgoing, but it still didn't work.

Anyone have any ideas?  Let me know if traces, etc. will help and I'll
capture and post some.

Thanks,
Terry
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Re: Webmin for ASTERISK and QOS and call quality

2004-10-23 Thread Thomas Hutton

> Hitete wrote:
> > Is there a FREE  third party module for webmin ?.
> > 
> > How much bandwidth do I have to reserver in order to get a good call quality
> > ?.
> > Let's say I have 20 people calling each other.
> > 
> > Is 1MB of bindwidth Ok or can I reserve even less ?.
> > 
> > To your experience what is the minimum "compression" to get good call
> > quality ?.
> > 
> > Has anybody tried putting all the callers info in a LDAP database yet ?.
> > 
> > /Alexandre
> > 
> 
> Please, please, please do some research before posting to the list.
> 
> There is a webmin module on digium's ftp site.  Last I heard it wasn't 
> being maintainted.
> 
> What protocol?  What codec?
> 
> Compression?  Do you mean codec?
> 
> What caller info?  CDR records, contact info, or user configuration. 
> You can use ODBC for most of that.
> 
> I don't mean to sound rude but ALL of your questions here could be 
> answered by google.  It cuts down on list traffic, and you don't have to 
> wait for someone on asterisk-users to read your message and post back. 
> You get your answers right away!
> 
> Just an FYI.
> 
> --
> Kristian Kielhofner

Mr Kielhofner, you answer nothing, while adding to the noise you
complain about.  

Googling for information on the webmin module leads to nothing.  The
webmin module on the digium FTP site is worthless.  Can somebody talk
Jamie Cameron into writing one?

Most people will tell you that gsm or ILBC is acceptable quality.  If
you want to run 20 simultaneous conversations, reserving 1 Megabit is
more than sufficient.  

As for LDAP, search for that on the Wiki.
http://voip-info.org/tiki-searchresults.php?words=LDAP&where=pages&search=go

Thomas Hutton

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Geotel integration with Asterisk

2004-10-23 Thread Brian West
Ok lets get this out of the way... WTF is Geotel?

bkw

> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greg Smith
> Sent: Saturday, October 23, 2004 4:19 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Geotel integration with Asterisk
> 
> 
> Has any one integrated to a Geotel with Asterisk?
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> Greg
> Advanta

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Geotel integration with Asterisk

2004-10-23 Thread Greg Smith
 
Has any one integrated to a Geotel with Asterisk?
 
Thanks.

Greg
Advanta
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [Asterisk-Users] cheap gig switch? smc, netgear, or 3com?

2004-10-23 Thread steve szmidt
On Thursday 21 October 2004 09:16 am, Matt Hess wrote:
> There was a thread on NANOG a while back about dell switches and the
> opinion at the time seemed almost in complete agreement - dell switches
> stink for everything but pure ipv4 shuffle packets.. unmanaged without
> any features.
> They are not ciscos at all.. they have a cisco like interface but then
> again so does zebra.. but that doesn't make it a cisco either.
> And imho, being the 'wal-mart' of something isn't necessarily a good
> thing.. even wal-mart sells some total junk (to put it lightly).

And except for only the largest routers, Cisco is overpriced and under 
powered. Great support but poor value.
-- 

Steve Szmidt

"They that would give up essential liberty for temporary safety 
deserve neither liberty nor safety."
Benjamin Franklin
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] cheap gig switch? smc, netgear, or 3com?

2004-10-23 Thread steve szmidt
On Wednesday 20 October 2004 04:08 am, Jay Wilton wrote:
> Hello,
>
> The Smc 8508T goes for about $95, jumbo frame support,
> lifetime warranty but no QOS.  The Netgear GS608 is $ 100,
> no jumbo frames, 1 year warranty, QOS, gig latency 10U max.
>  The 3com switch reviews that I read were not happy.  Does
> anyone hate or love their home switch?
>
> I doubt the jumbo frame support would help voip traffic,
> but it seems like it wouldn't hurt.  I was planning on
> doing the QOS on linux.  Gig support is wanted for file
> transfers and the future.  Thanks to all you nice asterisk
> people and a few of the mean ones.
>
> Jay

Haha, "a few of the mean ones"! I love it! : )

I prefer managed switches but they are all so pricey. The thing to go for with 
any switch for VoIP use is the ability to deal with QoS. Most of the routers 
are configured to support it and it does work.
-- 

Steve Szmidt

"They that would give up essential liberty for temporary safety 
deserve neither liberty nor safety."
Benjamin Franklin
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] cheap gig switch? smc, netgear, or 3com?

2004-10-23 Thread steve szmidt
On Wednesday 20 October 2004 04:47 pm, Matt Hess wrote:
> Remember, you pay for what you get.. especially with Dell networking
> equipment. I have heard about several groups who tried the dell switches
> only to give up on them because the dell switches just didn't perform.
> Yes, price-wise they look good.. but as far as performance goes.. (that
> is assuming you want high/solid performance) I'd look elsewhere.
>

Jup, I've read the same.

-- 

Steve Szmidt

"They that would give up essential liberty for temporary safety 
deserve neither liberty nor safety."
Benjamin Franklin
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Re: cannot call Grandstream

2004-10-23 Thread steve szmidt
On Friday 22 October 2004 02:05 pm, Neil Cherry wrote:
> David Ishmael wrote:
> > I think my Netgear router will try to lease the same DHCP address to a
> > device based on MAC automatically each time the device queries for an
> > address (but I'm not 100% sure about that, never really watched it).  So
> > the problem is with the address changing?
>
> I can't infer that from the 2 examples as it may be some other
> problem with the DHCP implementation on the DHCP server. Though
> it may be a possibility.
>
> I like to have the stationary IP devices to have a permanent IP
> address. It just makes it easier to admin my local DNS (I have
> too many devices to remember all the IP addresses).

Hmmm. In my opinion DHCP is mostly a false time saver anyway. It's true you 
can just plug in a host and have it get an ip nice and easily.

But I prefer to know who's IP is on the wire with a minimum of fuss. I like to 
be able to notice that nnn is being involved far too often in that XYZ 
problem, or whatever. Plus it's one less service to maintain. Whenever I add 
a host I spend a little more time with configuring it but that's better than 
chasing leases as far as I'm concerned. Eases LAN maintenance a lot.

True, as an ISP I would use DHCP. It's quite suitable there as I would have 
more limited resources. But on a LAN it's hard to run out of IP's. It's kind 
of how windows got popular, thanks to the apparent easier way of doing 
things, and how lazy we all seem to be. 

Anyway, this is on th edge of the topic so I'll stop here.
-- 

Steve Szmidt

"They that would give up essential liberty for temporary safety 
deserve neither liberty nor safety."
Benjamin Franklin
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] doublehash patch for 1.0.1

2004-10-23 Thread Brian West
http://bugs.digium.com/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0002460

This patch includes the double key hangup patch too which lets you define
what you want.

bkw

> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Randy Bush
> Sent: Saturday, October 23, 2004 1:39 PM
> To: splatters
> Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] doublehash patch for 1.0.1
> 
> and the patch take19.txt in bug 0002010 does not apply cleanly
> to the freebsd port of 1.0.1
> 
> randy
> 
> ___
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Uniden UIP 200 Phone and NAT?

2004-10-23 Thread Ryan Courtnage
On Sat, 2004-23-10 at 08:14 -0500, Lyle Giese wrote:
> As of version 4.59a, no, it does not support NAT.  Rumor had it that Uniden
> was going to release new firmware for the phone in October, but it's not
> there as of right now, it has not been posted on their web site.

Yes - the new firmware is coming. I've tested a beta version, and it
does fix the rport mess (which required nat=never or route).  It also
adds support for STUN.

Last i heard, the release is supposed to be the end of Oct.

Ryan


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] doublehash patch for 1.0.1

2004-10-23 Thread Randy Bush
and the patch take19.txt in bug 0002010 does not apply cleanly
to the freebsd port of 1.0.1

randy

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] iLBC/PCM16 Huge Cost

2004-10-23 Thread Trevor Peirce
Eric Wieling wrote:
Kevin Walsh wrote:
Benjamin on Asterisk Mailing Lists [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

Can you set up a test call where Asterisk will transcode from ulaw to
ILBC and see what it does to your CPU load?

How should I go about creating such a test call?
Also, try recalculating the translation matrix display values by typing
"show translation recalc 5".

Okay, that causes asterisk to crash...
callcentre*CLI> show translation
   Translation times between formats (in milliseconds)
Source Format (Rows) Destination Format(Columns)

   G723   GSM  ULAW  ALAW  G726 ADPCM SLINR LPC10 G729A SPEEX  ILBC
 G723 - - - - - - - - - - -
  GSM - - 2 2 4 2 1   237 - - 13561
 ULAW - 5 - 1 4 2 1   237 - - 13561
 ALAW - 5 1 - 4 2 1   237 - - 13561
 G726 - 6 3 3 - 3 2   238 - - 13562
ADPCM - 5 2 2 4 - 1   237 - - 13561
SLINR - 4 1 1 3 1 -   236 - - 13560
LPC10 -   133   130   130   132   130   129 - - - 13689
G729A - - - - - - - - - - -
SPEEX - - - - - - - - - - -
 ILBC -   200   197   197   199   197   196   432 - - -
callcentre*CLI> show translation recalc 10
   Recalculating Codec Translation (number of sample seconds: 10)

callcentre*CLI> show translation
callcentre*CLI>
If that doesn't work disable the RAID card and try again.
I can't do that right now for various reasons, but upon looking closer 
into our configuration, it seems we are just using an IDE Controller 
Card and software raid that's built in to linux.

I have noticed that when * is first loading, CPU usage goes to 100% for 
exactly the same duration that it takes that ilbc codec to load.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Broadvoice

2004-10-23 Thread Tim Jackson








We just got setup with Broadvoice
yesterday for LD. This isn’t something I REALLY need (No local numbers
avail so we just got a Houston number),
but I’m just curious. I can make outbound calls to Broadvoice
and they work great, but I can’t do inbound. I have bv’s voicemail turned off so all I get is a
busy signal when I call our bv number. I’ve
tried this with both type=peer and type=friend and I get the same results, any
ideas?

 

context=default


recordhistory=yes  


realm=angelinacounty.net    

port=5060   

bindaddr=0.0.0.0   


srvlookup=yes  


disallow=all

allow=ulaw

dtmfmode=inband

tos=reliability

 

register =>
7134810061:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 

[Broadvoice]

type=friend

username=7134810061

fromuser=7134810061

secret=[password]

host=sip.broadvoice.com

context=inbound-pots

fromdomain=sip.broadvoice.com

nat=yes

canreinvite=no

dtmfmode=inband

 






___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

RE: [Asterisk-Users] doublehash patch for 1.0.1

2004-10-23 Thread Brian West
http://bugs.digium.com/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0002460

Give that a whirl

Bkw


> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Randy Bush
> Sent: Saturday, October 23, 2004 11:46 AM
> To: splatters
> Subject: [Asterisk-Users] doublehash patch for 1.0.1
> 
> is there a doublehash patch for 1.0.1?
>   o old one to res_parking.c does not apply as there is no longer
> res_parking.c
>   o wiki search is useless
>   o google only finds the problems applying old patch to 0.7
> 
> thanks
> 
> randy
> 
> ___
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Webmin for ASTERISK and QOS and call quality .

2004-10-23 Thread Kristian Kielhofner
Hitete wrote:
Is there a FREE  third party module for webmin ?.
How much bandwidth do I have to reserver in order to get a good call quality
?.
Let's say I have 20 people calling each other.
Is 1MB of bindwidth Ok or can I reserve even less ?.
To your experience what is the minimum "compression" to get good call
quality ?.
Has anybody tried putting all the callers info in a LDAP database yet ?.
/Alexandre
Please, please, please do some research before posting to the list.
There is a webmin module on digium's ftp site.  Last I heard it wasn't 
being maintainted.

What protocol?  What codec?
Compression?  Do you mean codec?
What caller info?  CDR records, contact info, or user configuration. 
You can use ODBC for most of that.

I don't mean to sound rude but ALL of your questions here could be 
answered by google.  It cuts down on list traffic, and you don't have to 
wait for someone on asterisk-users to read your message and post back. 
You get your answers right away!

Just an FYI.
--
Kristian Kielhofner
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Zultys Zip 2 Setup

2004-10-23 Thread Me
I bought one of these phones and I am trying to set it up.
So far, I have figured out how to get to the web interface but I can't seem 
to figure out how to set some of the most important things like the Proxy 
address etc..

The manual is useless for things like this as well as their website. The 
only thing these folks seem to give instructions on is how to change the 
volume etc, but nothing related to actually setting up the phone for use 
with asterisk or anything else.

The Uniden phone was pretty much the same thing, virtually zero docs on how 
to get started etc..

So far the cheapest phone (the GrandStream) has been the most straight 
forward to setup.

I have already boxed up the Uniden which is ashame since it's a great phone. 
Thing is I can't use it behind a NAT so it has to go back :( I did email 
them though and ask them if they had the new firmware ready..
--
Start Your Own ISP!
http://www.YourOwnISP.com 

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Cheap hosted servers and Asterisk

2004-10-23 Thread William Suffill
Scott,

I use an AMD 2400 hosted in The Planet (www.theplanet.com) to host my
asterisk box currently. They don't directly offer AMDs but a provider
that colocates there does. $60/mnth. SeverMatrix.com is the low end
dedicated biz of The Planet directly. It is only 60ms from my home in
NJ even in TX and I have all my voip routes into that. I use
notransfer and G729 for most routes and been fine for the most part.
Cisco 7960 here to TX via sip and in/out for origination/term by SIP
or IAX2. It is a nice change since my system is reachable even when my
cable decided to take a hiatus which is not unheard of with Comcast. I
also configured it to forward calls to my cell phone if my VOIP
extension isn't available which is nice when I'm out  or Inet is down.
Sure it costs me the mins addition for that leg but I preferred that
over not getting the call at all.


I would suggest looking around and finding one with good routing to
your DSL But there isn't a shortage of providers that offer low end
dedicated.

Any specific questions feel free to contact me off list.

-- William
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Support for reception of "send url" in SIP clients needed

2004-10-23 Thread
I would like to let asterisk send an URL to a PC based softphone or a PC based
message client. This would allow for many great applications such as automatic
client data lookup. Or for technical client support. It is a must for many
types of customer support centers.

I understand that the "send url" application can do the job seen from the
asterisk side.

But I have not been able to find a PC client which is able to handle reception
of the url and the subsequent opening of it in the specified browser.

It looks as if Nortel has two products capable of this, but I have not tested
them yet.

I would like to know if anybody has experience about available PC clients
supporting this feature.

Jon Bruel
Denmark
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] doublehash patch for 1.0.1

2004-10-23 Thread Randy Bush
is there a doublehash patch for 1.0.1?
  o old one to res_parking.c does not apply as there is no longer
res_parking.c
  o wiki search is useless
  o google only finds the problems applying old patch to 0.7

thanks

randy

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] Cheap hosted servers and Asterisk

2004-10-23 Thread Brent Franks
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Laird
> Sent: Saturday, October 23, 2004 12:37 PM
> To: Asterisk Users Mailing List
> Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Cheap hosted servers and Asterisk
> 
> Does anyone have any experience with running Asterisk on dedicated
> servers from any of the cheap hosting providers, like 1&1?
> 
> I'd like to get my asterisk/mail/web server out of my house.  There
> isn't a whole lot of traffic involved, but I'd rather not end up with
> someplace that *utterly* oversubscribes their bandwidth--it needs to
> work with Asterisk, not just TCP-based services.  I can find a number

Haven't had any experience, however if your clients connecting to
Asterisk are setup to properly reinvite (assume you are using sip) then
you shouldn't have large overage charges.

If your using Asterisk in the media path, the potential for overage
charges then increases.

- Brent

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Cheap hosted servers and Asterisk

2004-10-23 Thread Scott Laird
Does anyone have any experience with running Asterisk on dedicated 
servers from any of the cheap hosting providers, like 1&1?

I'd like to get my asterisk/mail/web server out of my house.  There 
isn't a whole lot of traffic involved, but I'd rather not end up with 
someplace that *utterly* oversubscribes their bandwidth--it needs to 
work with Asterisk, not just TCP-based services.  I can find a number 
of providers that have listings for $50-$60/month (that's actually a 
net win over my current DSL bill), but I don't have experience with any 
of them.

Does anyone have any suggestions?
Scott
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] iLBC/PCM16 Huge Cost

2004-10-23 Thread Eric Wieling
Kevin Walsh wrote:
Benjamin on Asterisk Mailing Lists [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 23 Oct 2004 02:16:44 -0700, Trevor Peirce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 

   G723   GSM  ULAW  ALAW  G726 ADPCM SLINR LPC10 G729A SPEEX  ILBC
 G723 - - - - - - - - - - -
  GSM - - 2 2 4 2 1  1238 - - 529695
 ULAW - 5 - 1 4 2 1  1238 - - 529695
 ALAW - 5 1 - 4 2 1  1238 - - 529695
 G726 - 7 4 4 - 4 3  1240 - - 529697
ADPCM - 5 2 2 4 - 1  1238 - - 529695
SLINR - 4 1 1 3 1 -  1237 - - 529694
LPC10 -   196   193   193   195   193   192 - - - 529886
G729A - - - - - - - - - - -
SPEEX - - - - - - - - - - -
 ILBC -   219   216   216   218   216   215  1452 - - -
Whoa. There must be something very wrong with your codec translation.
I am getting the following on a PIII 533MHz IBM with Intel mobo, two
Zaptel cards, no shared interrupts ...
[snip: show translation results]
Can you set up a test call where Asterisk will transcode from ulaw to
ILBC and see what it does to your CPU load?
Also, try recalculating the translation matrix display values by typing
"show translation recalc 5".
If that doesn't work disable the RAID card and try again.
begin:vcard
fn:Eric Wileing
n:Wileing;Eric
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
tel;work:504-899-1387 x2120
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
version:2.1
end:vcard

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[Asterisk-Users] Quintum ASM400, ASM200 and ASTERISK

2004-10-23 Thread FRANCISCO PEREZ-LANDAETA
I have some ASM200 and ASM400, these are analog gatewyas,

The ASM 200 - 2 fxs 2 fxo ports (only two simulatenous calls)
The ASM 400 - 4 fxs 4 fxo Ports ( only 4 simulatenous calls )

My intention is to integrate them with Asterisk, so that I can  use their
FXS channels as internal extensions in conjunctions with my ZAP boards and
their fxo ports as outgoing to the pstn line.

The only issue is I'm not use how to integrate or use the (ports) in the
quintum box to asterisk, so asterisk can see them as extensions. ?? Any
clues on this.

Currently, there is a firmware that supports SIP and H323..

Hope to get some help from u guys !!!

Cheers

I  am sure this will be helpful for some people out there...

Thanks,

Francisco


___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] iLBC/PCM16 Huge Cost

2004-10-23 Thread Brian West
Just an FYI

show translation recalc 10

Give that a go.

bkw

> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Benjamin on Asterisk Mailing Lists
> Sent: Saturday, October 23, 2004 4:56 AM
> To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
> Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] iLBC/PCM16 Huge Cost
> 
> On Sat, 23 Oct 2004 02:16:44 -0700, Trevor Peirce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > G723   GSM  ULAW  ALAW  G726 ADPCM SLINR LPC10 G729A SPEEX  ILBC
> >   G723 - - - - - - - - - - -
> >GSM - - 2 2 4 2 1  1238 - -
> 529695
> >   ULAW - 5 - 1 4 2 1  1238 - -
> 529695
> >   ALAW - 5 1 - 4 2 1  1238 - -
> 529695
> >   G726 - 7 4 4 - 4 3  1240 - -
> 529697
> >  ADPCM - 5 2 2 4 - 1  1238 - -
> 529695
> >  SLINR - 4 1 1 3 1 -  1237 - -
> 529694
> >  LPC10 -   196   193   193   195   193   192 - - -
> 529886
> >  G729A - - - - - - - - - - -
> >  SPEEX - - - - - - - - - - -
> >   ILBC -   219   216   216   218   216   215  1452 - - -
> >
> 
> Whoa. There must be something very wrong with your codec translation.
> I am getting the following on a PIII 533MHz IBM with Intel mobo, two
> Zaptel cards, no shared interrupts ...
> 
> tyo-switch*CLI> show translation
>  Translation times between formats (in milliseconds)
>   Source Format (Rows) Destination Format(Columns)
> 
>  G723   GSM  ULAW  ALAW  G726 ADPCM SLINR LPC10 G729A SPEEX  ILBC
>G723 - - - - - - - - - - -
> GSM - - 4 410 4 3 - - -66
>ULAW - 9 - 1 8 2 1 - - -64
>ALAW - 9 1 - 8 2 1 - - -64
>G726 -15 8 8 - 8 7 - - -70
>   ADPCM - 9 2 2 8 - 1 - - -64
>   SLINR - 8 1 1 7 1 - - - -63
>   LPC10 - - - - - - - - - - -
>   G729A - - - - - - - - - - -
>   SPEEX - - - - - - - - - - -
>ILBC -181111171110 - - - -
> 
> Can you set up a test call where Asterisk will transcode from ulaw to
> ILBC and see what it does to your CPU load?
> 
> rgds
> benjk
> 
> --
> Sunrise Telephone Systems, 9F Shibuya Daikyo Bldg., 1-13-5 Shibuya,
> Tokyo, Japan.
> 
> NB: Spam filters in place. Messages unrelated to the * mailing lists
> may get trashed.
> ___
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Digum board TDM to Phonejack --Quicknet --Trandsfering calls.

2004-10-23 Thread FRANCISCO PEREZ-LANDAETA
I have succesfully integrated some phonejacks with Zaptels. I am able to
transfer calls from my tdm board to my phonejack (from quicknet) using  the
hangup button (pressing it once). But I am unable to do this the other way
around with the quicknet board.

This works :

Phonejack --Digium TDM -Phonejack

But,

THIS DOES NOT WORK

Digium TDM to ---Phonejack -- X ( does not work ) --another
extensions with a phonejack

ANY HELP IS APPRECIATED.

Thanks

Francisco



___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] IAX wireless problem

2004-10-23 Thread Benjamin on Asterisk Mailing Lists
On Sat, 23 Oct 2004 17:10:40 +0200, Neal Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm using IAXComm on the Mac to connect to my Asterisk system and it
> all seems to work well when I'm connected to my wired network. When I
> use wireless instead, IAXComm never registers with Asterisk and when I
> call, ASterisk seems to think it's connected but no sound comes back.

did you define your client as host=dynamic in iax.conf?

use "iax2 debug" on the asterisk console to get a session transcript
when you try to register and make test calls.

if there are no Rx-Frame messages coming in from the client, then you
have some sort of connectivity problem with your wireless setup. Use
tcpdump or ethereal to see if any traffic is coming in on port 4569.

rgds
benjk

-- 
Sunrise Telephone Systems, 9F Shibuya Daikyo Bldg., 1-13-5 Shibuya,
Tokyo, Japan.

NB: Spam filters in place. Messages unrelated to the * mailing lists
may get trashed.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Need help with RDNIS on ISDN PRI

2004-10-23 Thread mike123
Still looking for some feedback...

We are trying to configure our * box to receive RDNIS using ISDN PRI
circuits from a Lucent 5ESS so that when a call gets forwarded to the vmail
system (using call forward no answer) we get the original dialed digits to
identify the mailbox owner.

The local telco is now saying that Lucent is telling them that this
feature is not available on the 5ESS switch but he is not sure if Lucent
is giving them the "brush off or not".

Is anyone getting RDNIS on a Lucent 5ESS over ISDN PRI? If so could you
provide me the telco contact so that I can have my telco guy call them to
see how they set it up?

Alternatively, is anyone using ISDN PRI and RDNIS to identify the mailbox
owner? If so, what is the upstream switch and was there a special feature
you needed to have provisioned on the PRI to get the RDNIS?

Thanks,

Mike

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] chan_sip changes affecting ACK? - Bug?

2004-10-23 Thread Chad Brown
Olle,

No...Thank you! You are the perfect guy to look at this problem as well
since ultimately I need to switch to chan_sip2 given the outboundproxy
functionality.

My testing shows that not only stable has this issue but so does head.
That said, the problem could carry over to chan_sip2. Anyway...

I originally sent several log files from both the Siparator and Asterisk
but the message was refused from the list because of size.

Attached are 2 asterisk sip debug files. I fear that some of the
information scrolled off the screen during debug. If these don't have
enough information please let me know. When I get back to the office I
will log sip debug to a file rather than console as I was so I don't
loose anything.

If you would like to see the separator logs I will need to send them to
you directly because they are 300K a piece and go over the limit for
this list.

Thanks,

Chad

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Olle E.
Johansson
Sent: Saturday, October 23, 2004 2:29 AM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] chan_sip changes affecting ACK? - Bug?

Chad,
I need a more complete SIP debug than just one packet to try to look
into this
issue. If the device registers, both a REGISTER transaction and a
subsequent
call with the ACK - THank you!

/O
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users



 to 10.10.0.110:5060
-- Executing Dial("SIP/101-eac7", "SIP/[EMAIL PROTECTED]") in new stack
We're at 10.10.0.6 port 17666
Answering/Requesting with root capability 4
Answering with capability 0x2(GSM)
Answering with capability 0x8(ALAW)
Answering with non-codec capability 0x1(G723)
12 headers, 12 lines
Reliably Transmitting:
INVITE sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] SIP/2.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.10.0.6:5060;branch=z9hG4bK6016290f
From: "Chad Brown" ;tag=as2041d236
To: 
Contact: 
Call-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CSeq: 102 INVITE
User-Agent: Asterisk PBX
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 17:14:13 GMT
Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER
Content-Type: application/sdp
Content-Length: 255

v=0
o=root 8649 8649 IN IP4 10.10.0.6
s=session
c=IN IP4 10.10.0.6
t=0 0
m=audio 17666 RTP/AVP 0 3 8 101
a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000
a=rtpmap:3 GSM/8000
a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000
a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000
a=fmtp:101 0-16
a=silenceSupp:off - - - -
 (no NAT) to 10.10.0.5:5060
-- Called [EMAIL PROTECTED]
impbx01*CLI>

Sip read:
SIP/2.0 100 Trying
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.10.0.6:5060;branch=z9hG4bK6016290f
From: "Chad Brown" ;tag=as2041d236
Call-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CSeq: 102 INVITE
Server: SIParator/4.1.3
To: 
Content-Length: 0


8 headers, 0 lines
impbx01*CLI>

Sip read:
SIP/2.0 180 Ringing
To: ;tag=3307367608-554546
From: "Chad Brown" ;tag=as2041d236
Call-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CSeq: 102 INVITE
Contact: 
Content-Type: application/sdp
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.10.0.6:5060;branch=z9hG4bK6016290f
Content-Length: 187

v=0
o=NexTone-MSW 1234 467212419 IN IP4 10.10.0.5
s=sip call
c=IN IP4 10.10.0.5
t=0 0
m=audio 58030 RTP/AVP 0
a=silenceSupp:off
a=ecan:b on g168
a=ptime:20
a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000

9 headers, 10 lines
-- SIP/10.10.0.5-13c2 is ringing
Transmitting (no NAT):
SIP/2.0 180 Ringing
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.10.0.110:5060;branch=z9hG4bK1ed3fe76
From: "Chad Brown - ext 101" ;tag=001193d886a3010e3ae0c0a4-4f179b0e
To: ;tag=as33b30738
Call-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CSeq: 101 INVITE
User-Agent: Asterisk PBX
Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER
Contact: 
Content-Length: 0


 to 10.10.0.110:5060
impbx01*CLI>

Sip read:
SIP/2.0 200 OK
To: ;tag=3307367608-554546
From: "Chad Brown" ;tag=as2041d236
Call-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CSeq: 102 INVITE
Contact: 
Content-Type: application/sdp
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.10.0.6:5060;branch=z9hG4bK6016290f
Record-Route: 
Content-Length: 187

v=0
o=NexTone-MSW 1234 467212419 IN IP4 10.10.0.5
s=sip call
c=IN IP4 10.10.0.5
t=0 0
m=audio 58030 RTP/AVP 0
a=silenceSupp:off
a=ecan:b on g168
a=ptime:20
a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000

10 headers, 10 lines
Found RTP audio format 0
Peer audio RTP is at port 10.10.0.5:58030
Found description format PCMU
Capabilities: us - 0x8000e(GSM|ULAW|ALAW|H263), peer - 
audio=0x4(ULAW)/video=0x0(EMPTY), combined - 0x4(ULAW)
Non-codec capabilities: us - 0x1(G723), peer - 0x0(EMPTY), combined - 0x0(EMPTY)
list_route: hop: 
list_route: hop: 
set_destination: Parsing  for address/port to send to
set_destination: set destination to 10.10.0.5, port 5060
Transmitting:
ACK sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] SIP/2.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.10.0.6:5060;branch=z9hG4bK08fa5d64
Route: 
From: "Chad Brown" ;tag=as2041d236
To: ;tag=3307367608-554546
Contact: 
Call-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CSeq: 102 ACK
User-Agent: Asterisk PBX
Content-Length: 0

 (no NAT) to 10.10.0.5:5060
-- SIP/10.10.0.5-13c2 answered SIP/101-eac7
We're at 10.10.0.6 port 17116
Answerin

[Asterisk-Users] IAX wireless problem

2004-10-23 Thread Neal Nelson
I'm using IAXComm on the Mac to connect to my Asterisk system and it 
all seems to work well when I'm connected to my wired network. When I 
use wireless instead, IAXComm never registers with Asterisk and when I 
call, ASterisk seems to think it's connected but no sound comes back.

My Asterisk server contains a wireless card and all my wireless 
connections use a different subnet to my wired network. Wireless 
networking seem to work fine and in fact I've been using it for years, 
so I have no idea why Asterisk is having problems.

Does anyone have any ideas why it doesn't work?
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Fw: SPA-3000 Disconnect tone detection in France?

2004-10-23 Thread Benjamin on Asterisk Mailing Lists
On Sat, 23 Oct 2004 15:06:15 +0200, Yves-Marie CRABBE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks a lot, I tried, the string for the busy tone (from Voxzilla) is :
> [EMAIL PROTECTED];10(.5/.5/1)
> I also tried with [EMAIL PROTECTED];4(.5/.5/1) for a shorter detection delay (my pstn
> provider
> doesn't play the tone for 10 seconds). It still doesn't work.
> 
> The sipura support told me before that the frequency must be in 2 parts and
> suggested a
> detection string like this : [EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED];2(.5/.5/1+2)
> I tried many combinations, never worked :(

Sorry to hear that. Is this on a France Telecom line?

I too have a problem with the SPA-3000 here in Japan on an NTT line as
it is unable to recognise incoming calls, outgoing works just fine,
though, including disconnect supervision. So, if it turns out that the
SPA-3000 cannot detect a buzy tone in France, that makes two major G7
countries where the device cannot really be used.

I don't think Sipura have yet discovered that there is life outside
the US. To be fair, the SPA-3000 is a very recent addition to their
product portfolio, so the situation will probably improve over the
next six months or so,

> I'm also still waiting for an answer from the Sipura support.

In my experience, they do eventually get back, but it can take quite a
while, you have to be patient. Looks like they are very very busy.

rgds
benjk

-- 
Sunrise Telephone Systems, 9F Shibuya Daikyo Bldg., 1-13-5 Shibuya,
Tokyo, Japan.

NB: Spam filters in place. Messages unrelated to the * mailing lists
may get trashed.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


RE: [Asterisk-Users] iLBC/PCM16 Huge Cost

2004-10-23 Thread Kevin Walsh
Benjamin on Asterisk Mailing Lists [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Sat, 23 Oct 2004 02:16:44 -0700, Trevor Peirce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 
> > G723   GSM  ULAW  ALAW  G726 ADPCM SLINR LPC10 G729A SPEEX  ILBC
> >   G723 - - - - - - - - - - -
> >GSM - - 2 2 4 2 1  1238 - - 529695
> >   ULAW - 5 - 1 4 2 1  1238 - - 529695
> >   ALAW - 5 1 - 4 2 1  1238 - - 529695
> >   G726 - 7 4 4 - 4 3  1240 - - 529697
> >  ADPCM - 5 2 2 4 - 1  1238 - - 529695
> >  SLINR - 4 1 1 3 1 -  1237 - - 529694
> >  LPC10 -   196   193   193   195   193   192 - - - 529886
> >  G729A - - - - - - - - - - -
> >  SPEEX - - - - - - - - - - -
> >   ILBC -   219   216   216   218   216   215  1452 - - -
> > 
> Whoa. There must be something very wrong with your codec translation.
> I am getting the following on a PIII 533MHz IBM with Intel mobo, two
> Zaptel cards, no shared interrupts ...
> 
> [snip: show translation results]
> 
> Can you set up a test call where Asterisk will transcode from ulaw to
> ILBC and see what it does to your CPU load?
> 
Also, try recalculating the translation matrix display values by typing
"show translation recalc 5".

-- 
   _/   _/  _/_/_/_/  _/_/  _/_/_/  _/_/
  _/_/_/   _/_/  _/_/_/_/_/  _/   K e v i n   W a l s h
 _/ _/_/  _/ _/ _/_/  _/_/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_/   _/  _/_/_/_/  _/_/_/_/  _/_/

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Getting started

2004-10-23 Thread Anders Gnistrup
Hi all
Problem with gnophone:
I can not make a call. (just hangs)
Im am a novice to Asterisk but quite experienced Linux user. I am having 
some problems with the gnophone. I have tried to isert my user/password 
but nothing have changed.

I have tested the michrophone and it is working. The sound also works.
This is my configuration from preference->telephone
Use Asterics.
Server: iaxtel.com
port 10004 (it is a NAT assigned tcp port on the router directed to my PC)
Context: iaxtel
prefix :
username : my username provided by mail.
password : my password
peer(optional): my username provided by mail.
secret : my password
The user/pass-word is the same used to enter this mailing list.
What I would like to know is how to fix my problems. Second I would like 
to know where there is some info for setting up a system. (I have tried 
to get these but only been able to find  "buy a book". Before buying a 
book I would like to get it work first.)

With regards
Anders Gnistrup
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Uniden UIP 200 Phone and NAT?

2004-10-23 Thread Lyle Giese
As of version 4.59a, no, it does not support NAT.  Rumor had it that Uniden
was going to release new firmware for the phone in October, but it's not
there as of right now, it has not been posted on their web site.

Lyle

- Original Message - 
From: "Me" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, October 23, 2004 12:03 AM
Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Uniden UIP 200 Phone and NAT?


> Hello, been digging through the archive and the Wiki and it looks like
this
> phone I bought just can't be configured to work behind a NAT.
>
> Just wanted to check one last time before sending it back if anyone has
had
> any luck with this.
>
> It's pretty useless to me if it can't work behind a NAT.
>
> Thanks!
>
> ___
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Fw: SPA-3000 Disconnect tone detection in France?

2004-10-23 Thread Yves-Marie CRABBE
Thanks a lot, I tried, the string for the busy tone (from Voxzilla) is : 
[EMAIL PROTECTED];10(.5/.5/1)
I also tried with [EMAIL PROTECTED];4(.5/.5/1) for a shorter detection delay (my pstn 
provider
doesn't play the tone for 10 seconds). It still doesn't work.

The sipura support told me before that the frequency must be in 2 parts and 
suggested a
detection string like this : [EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED];2(.5/.5/1+2)
I tried many combinations, never worked :(

I'm also still waiting for an answer from the Sipura support.
Anyway, thanks again for your help, le localization wizard is very useful.
Yves-Marie
- Original Message - 
From: "Benjamin on Asterisk Mailing Lists" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion" 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, October 22, 2004 8:44 PM
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Fw: SPA-3000 Disconnect tone detection in 
France?


On Fri, 22 Oct 2004 18:06:27 +0200, Yves-Marie CRABBE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
I tried to define a disconnect tone description this way :
[EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED];2(.5/.5/1+2)
I'm located in France.
Try the localisation wizard on Voxilla.com. France should be on the list.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Webmin for ASTERISK and QOS and call quality .

2004-10-23 Thread Hitete
Is there a FREE  third party module for webmin ?.

How much bandwidth do I have to reserver in order to get a good call quality
?.
Let's say I have 20 people calling each other.

Is 1MB of bindwidth Ok or can I reserve even less ?.

To your experience what is the minimum "compression" to get good call
quality ?.

Has anybody tried putting all the callers info in a LDAP database yet ?.

/Alexandre

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] iLBC/PCM16 Huge Cost

2004-10-23 Thread Benjamin on Asterisk Mailing Lists
On Sat, 23 Oct 2004 02:16:44 -0700, Trevor Peirce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> G723   GSM  ULAW  ALAW  G726 ADPCM SLINR LPC10 G729A SPEEX  ILBC
>   G723 - - - - - - - - - - -
>GSM - - 2 2 4 2 1  1238 - - 529695
>   ULAW - 5 - 1 4 2 1  1238 - - 529695
>   ALAW - 5 1 - 4 2 1  1238 - - 529695
>   G726 - 7 4 4 - 4 3  1240 - - 529697
>  ADPCM - 5 2 2 4 - 1  1238 - - 529695
>  SLINR - 4 1 1 3 1 -  1237 - - 529694
>  LPC10 -   196   193   193   195   193   192 - - - 529886
>  G729A - - - - - - - - - - -
>  SPEEX - - - - - - - - - - -
>   ILBC -   219   216   216   218   216   215  1452 - - -
> 

Whoa. There must be something very wrong with your codec translation.
I am getting the following on a PIII 533MHz IBM with Intel mobo, two
Zaptel cards, no shared interrupts ...

tyo-switch*CLI> show translation
 Translation times between formats (in milliseconds)
  Source Format (Rows) Destination Format(Columns)

 G723   GSM  ULAW  ALAW  G726 ADPCM SLINR LPC10 G729A SPEEX  ILBC
   G723 - - - - - - - - - - -
GSM - - 4 410 4 3 - - -66
   ULAW - 9 - 1 8 2 1 - - -64
   ALAW - 9 1 - 8 2 1 - - -64
   G726 -15 8 8 - 8 7 - - -70
  ADPCM - 9 2 2 8 - 1 - - -64
  SLINR - 8 1 1 7 1 - - - -63
  LPC10 - - - - - - - - - - -
  G729A - - - - - - - - - - -
  SPEEX - - - - - - - - - - -
   ILBC -181111171110 - - - -

Can you set up a test call where Asterisk will transcode from ulaw to
ILBC and see what it does to your CPU load?

rgds
benjk

-- 
Sunrise Telephone Systems, 9F Shibuya Daikyo Bldg., 1-13-5 Shibuya,
Tokyo, Japan.

NB: Spam filters in place. Messages unrelated to the * mailing lists
may get trashed.
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] * dies with QuadBRI

2004-10-23 Thread Jean-Denis Girard
Hi list,
I have the following setup : a first asterisk is connected to the legacy 
Alcatel PaBX to connect to a remote site with a second asterisk server.

   PSTN
|
Legacy phones == Alcatel Omnipcx == Asterisk1
|
| IAX
|
  Asterisk2 == 25 Bugetone 101
Servers is a dell 400sc (Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz, 2 IDE disks in
software RAID1) and the system has been used in production with a tdm04b
connected to Omnipcx for a week wihtout troubles.
System has been working flawlessly for a week with a 4 analog lines 
between the omnipcx and asterisk1 (using TDM04B).

Today I've moved to a 4 BRI link between omnipcx and asterisk1 (using 
kpj's QuadBRI). It does work fine... for about 3 minutes, and then 
asterisk dies after hanging up a successful call to the omnipcx.

Asterisk / Zaptel / Libpri / Qozap on first server have been built with
the scripts from bri-stuff-0.1.0-RC4a.tar.gz.
Asterisk1 logs shows warnings on all hangups, eg.
Oct 22 16:39:47 WARNING[1101196208]: PRI: Can't destroy call 133!
Oct 22 16:39:47 WARNING[1101196208]: Hangup on bad channel 0/1 on span 1
Oct 22 16:39:54 WARNING[1101196208]: Hangup on bad channel 0/1 on span 1
Oct 22 16:39:58 WARNING[1101196208]: Hangup on bad channel 0/1 on span 1
Oct 22 16:40:04 WARNING[1101196208]: PRI: Can't destroy call 135!
Oct 22 16:40:04 WARNING[1101196208]: Hangup on bad channel 0/1 on span 1
Oct 22 16:40:41 WARNING[1101196208]: PRI: Can't destroy call 137!
Oct 22 16:40:41 WARNING[1101196208]: Hangup on bad channel 0/2 on span 1
Oct 22 16:41:09 WARNING[1101196208]: Hangup on bad channel 0/1 on span 1
Oct 22 16:41:13 WARNING[1101196208]: Hangup on bad channel 0/1 on span 1
Oct 22 16:41:19 NOTICE[1121725360]: I should never be called!
Oct 22 16:41:53 WARNING[1101196208]: PRI: Can't destroy call 140!
Oct 22 16:41:53 WARNING[1101196208]: Hangup on bad channel 0/2 on span 1
Loading qozap shows no error except for devfs, but I doubt this is the 
source of the problem:
Oct 22 16:29:43 asterisk1 kernel: Zapata Telephony Interface Registered
on major 196
Oct 22 16:29:56 asterisk1 kernel: PCI: Enabling device 02:02.0 ( ->
0003)
Oct 22 16:29:56 asterisk1 kernel: PCI: Found IRQ 10 for device 02:02.0
Oct 22 16:29:56 asterisk1 kernel: PCI: Sharing IRQ 10 with 00:1f.3
Oct 22 16:29:56 asterisk1 kernel: PCI: Sharing IRQ 10 with 00:1f.5
Oct 22 16:29:56 asterisk1 kernel: qozap: Junghanns.NET quadBRI card
configured at mem 0xe08e IRQ 10 HZ 100 CardID 0
Oct 22 16:29:56 asterisk1 kernel: qozap: S/T ports: 4 [ NT NT NT NT ]
Oct 22 16:29:56 asterisk1 kernel: card 1 span 1 state G0 (A_ST_RD_STA = 0x0)
Oct 22 16:29:56 asterisk1 kernel: card 1 span 2 state G0 (A_ST_RD_STA = 0x0)
Oct 22 16:29:56 asterisk1 kernel: card 1 span 3 state G0 (A_ST_RD_STA = 0x0)
Oct 22 16:29:56 asterisk1 kernel: card 1 span 4 state G0 (A_ST_RD_STA = 0x0)
Oct 22 16:29:56 asterisk1 kernel: qozap: 1 multiBRI card(s) in this box,
4 BRI ports total.
Oct 22 16:29:56 asterisk1 devfsd[168]: error copying:
"/lib/dev-state/zap/1" to "/dev/zap/1"
Oct 22 16:29:56 asterisk1 devfsd[168]: error copying:
"/lib/dev-state/zap/2" to "/dev/zap/2"
Oct 22 16:29:56 asterisk1 devfsd[168]: error copying:
"/lib/dev-state/zap/3" to "/dev/zap/3"
Oct 22 16:29:56 asterisk1 devfsd[168]: error copying:
"/lib/dev-state/zap/4" to "/dev/zap/4"
Oct 22 16:29:56 asterisk1 devfsd[168]: error copying:
"/lib/dev-state/zap/5" to "/dev/zap/5"
Oct 22 16:29:56 asterisk1 devfsd[168]: error copying:
"/lib/dev-state/zap/6" to "/dev/zap/6"
Oct 22 16:29:56 asterisk1 devfsd[168]: error copying:
"/lib/dev-state/zap/7" to "/dev/zap/7"
Oct 22 16:29:56 asterisk1 devfsd[168]: error copying:
"/lib/dev-state/zap/8" to "/dev/zap/8"
Oct 22 16:29:56 asterisk1 devfsd[168]: error copying:
"/lib/dev-state/zap/9" to "/dev/zap/9"
Oct 22 16:29:56 asterisk1 devfsd[168]: error copying:
"/lib/dev-state/zap/10" to "/dev/zap/10"
Oct 22 16:29:56 asterisk1 devfsd[168]: error copying:
"/lib/dev-state/zap/11" to "/dev/zap/11"
Oct 22 16:29:56 asterisk1 devfsd[168]: error copying:
"/lib/dev-state/zap/12" to "/dev/zap/12"
Oct 22 16:30:36 asterisk1 kernel: Registered tone zone 2 (France)
Oct 22 16:30:36 asterisk1 kernel: card 1 span 1 state G2 (A_ST_RD_STA =
0x82)
Oct 22 16:30:36 asterisk1 kernel: card 1 span 2 state G2 (A_ST_RD_STA =
0xc2)
Oct 22 16:30:36 asterisk1 kernel: card 1 span 3 state G2 (A_ST_RD_STA =
0x82)
Oct 22 16:30:36 asterisk1 kernel: card 1 span 4 state G2 (A_ST_RD_STA =
0xc2)
Oct 22 16:30:36 asterisk1 kernel: card 1 span 1 state G3 (A_ST_RD_STA =
0x13)
Oct 22 16:30:36 asterisk1 kernel: card 1 span 2 state G3 (A_ST_RD_STA =
0x13)
Oct 22 16:30:36 asterisk1 kernel: card 1 span 3 state G3 (A_ST_RD_STA =
0x13)
Oct 22 16:30:36 asterisk1 kernel: card 1 span 4 state G3 (A_ST_RD_STA =
0x13)
Oct 22 16:30:36 asterisk1 kernel: qozap: card 1 span 1 RX [ 0x0 0x1 0x7f
0x64 0x54 ]
Oct 22 16:30:36 

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Direct SIP connection to Vonage service

2004-10-23 Thread Brian
On Friday, October 22, 2004 2:40 PM
Stewart Nelson wrote:
> I presently have a small VoIP network using H.323 and gnugk,
> and would like to upgrade it to an Asterisk-based system,
>
> primarily to take advantage of low cost unlimited calling
> plans offered by SIP providers such as Vonage.  

FYI these so called "unlimited" monthly plans are RARELY, if _EVER_ truly
unlimited. They CAN (read the TOS), and WILL terminate you if you use too
many minutes more then whatever average they calculated for when pricing the
plan.

I personally know several people who were using the Vonage "unlimited"
calling plan and were terminated for _"EXCESSIVE USAGE"_
 

>However, the carriers with good reputations for reliability and quality
> seem to require that you connect via a "locked" ATA device.


As some other people have suggested, your best bet is to just use a VoIP
provider who natively supports the InterAsteriskExchange protocol.

Two that I know of are NuFone.net and tollfreeexpress.com . Try Google and
the voip-info.org wiki for others.

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] iLBC/PCM16 Huge Cost

2004-10-23 Thread joachim

Could you tell us what RAID card you are using + what drivers you are using 
for it.
Could you try to run it without the raid card ?

Zoa.

At 12:35 23/10/2004, you wrote:
Trevor Peirce wrote:
Sure.  Running Fedora Core 2 with latest updates (kernel 2.6.8-1.521) on
a Celeron 1.70 GHz chip.  Half a gig DDR ram, one generic X100P card
with it's very own IRQ.
Asterisk is the latest CVS.  It's about time for bed.. spent too many 
hours trying to figure out other things that I'm starting to lose it!

I'll be back in a few hours to fill in any other details that might help 
to diagnose this problem.

Thanks,
Trevor Peirce
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] iLBC/PCM16 Huge Cost

2004-10-23 Thread Trevor Peirce
Trevor Peirce wrote:
Sure.  Running Fedora Core 2 with latest updates (kernel 2.6.8-1.521) on
a Celeron 1.70 GHz chip.  Half a gig DDR ram, one generic X100P card
with it's very own IRQ.
Asterisk is the latest CVS.  It's about time for bed.. spent too many 
hours trying to figure out other things that I'm starting to lose it!

I'll be back in a few hours to fill in any other details that might help 
to diagnose this problem.

Thanks,
Trevor Peirce
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] iLBC/PCM16 Huge Cost

2004-10-23 Thread Trevor Peirce
joachim wrote:
Could you give us more information on:
Distro, kernel version, compiler, makefile flags, version of asterisk, 
and hardware on your machine, + loaded modules ?

GSM to LPC10 is also way tooo slow.
Sure.  Running Fedora Core 2 with latest updates (kernel 2.6.8-1.521) on
a Celeron 1.70 GHz chip.  Half a gig DDR ram, one generic X100P card
with it's very own IRQ.
I've got zaptel, wcfxs and wcfxo loaded, other those the only other
modules are what Fedora put there during installation.
Not sure what other specifics would be handy.  Everything is pretty much
vanilla except asterisk's sip.conf, zaptel.conf, and extensions.conf.
Regards,
Trevor
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] chan_sip changes affecting ACK? - Bug?

2004-10-23 Thread Olle E. Johansson
Chad,
I need a more complete SIP debug than just one packet to try to look into this
issue. If the device registers, both a REGISTER transaction and a subsequent
call with the ACK - THank you!
/O
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] asterisk & ipv6

2004-10-23 Thread Olle E. Johansson
Miroslav Nachev wrote:
   Dear Olle,
   I can say that Emil Ivov has very good knowledge on IPv6 too. You
can use it.
   
Great - the more IPv6 experts that can help us with coding advice,
code review and patches - the better!
/O
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] iLBC/PCM16 Huge Cost

2004-10-23 Thread joachim

Could you give us more information on:
Distro, kernel version, compiler, makefile flags, version of asterisk, and 
hardware on your machine, + loaded modules ?

GSM to LPC10 is also way tooo slow.

-

*CLI> show uptime
System uptime: 27 minutes, 2 seconds
*CLI> show translation
   Translation times between formats (in milliseconds)
Source Format (Rows) Destination Format(Columns)

   G723   GSM  ULAW  ALAW  G726 ADPCM SLINR LPC10 G729A SPEEX  ILBC
 G723 - - - - - - - - - - -
  GSM - - 2 2 4 2 1  1238 - - 529695
 ULAW - 5 - 1 4 2 1  1238 - - 529695
 ALAW - 5 1 - 4 2 1  1238 - - 529695
 G726 - 7 4 4 - 4 3  1240 - - 529697
ADPCM - 5 2 2 4 - 1  1238 - - 529695
SLINR - 4 1 1 3 1 -  1237 - - 529694
LPC10 -   196   193   193   195   193   192 - - - 529886
G729A - - - - - - - - - - -
SPEEX - - - - - - - - - - -
 ILBC -   219   216   216   218   216   215  1452 - - -
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Trabas & Radius

2004-10-23 Thread joachim
If you look very hard, you can find two versions on trabas on the web, an 
old one, not working and a new one not complete and not installing. (the 
SQL files are incomplete for example)

If you combine both, and you are extremely patient you might be able to get 
it to actually display something in your browser, by the time you get 
there, you might understand that its maybe not a very good idea to even 
want to try to use it.

Many people tried, none survived.
Joachim.
I just saved you a week of complete misery, send me some beer on 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] :p

At 02:04 23/10/2004, you wrote:
Any tips, tricks or treats out there? I'm building a new system and
would like to move away from my SQL based call rating solution...

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] iLBC/PCM16 Huge Cost

2004-10-23 Thread Trevor Peirce
joachim wrote:
I have seen similar things in the past, but only during startup.
When started, do a show translation and look again, if that value is 
ok, you can ignore the one on startup.
*CLI> show uptime
System uptime: 27 minutes, 2 seconds
*CLI> show translation
   Translation times between formats (in milliseconds)
Source Format (Rows) Destination Format(Columns)
  

   G723   GSM  ULAW  ALAW  G726 ADPCM SLINR LPC10 G729A SPEEX  ILBC
 G723 - - - - - - - - - - -
  GSM - - 2 2 4 2 1  1238 - - 529695
 ULAW - 5 - 1 4 2 1  1238 - - 529695
 ALAW - 5 1 - 4 2 1  1238 - - 529695
 G726 - 7 4 4 - 4 3  1240 - - 529697
ADPCM - 5 2 2 4 - 1  1238 - - 529695
SLINR - 4 1 1 3 1 -  1237 - - 529694
LPC10 -   196   193   193   195   193   192 - - - 529886
G729A - - - - - - - - - - -
SPEEX - - - - - - - - - - -
 ILBC -   219   216   216   218   216   215  1452 - - -
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] iLBC/PCM16 Huge Cost

2004-10-23 Thread joachim
I have seen similar things in the past, but only during startup.
When started, do a show translation and look again, if that value is ok, 
you can ignore the one on startup.

Zoa.

At 12:06 23/10/2004, you wrote:
Hello,
During asterisk bootup, I've been having a fun time with a random delay 
which can be quite long, from what seems to be the codec_ilbc.so file.

I notice in verbose mode the cost is rather high, and was hoping someone 
will have some insight on what's going on here.

Prior to a harddrive dying, I was running * on this same hardware 
flawlessly.  The only difference now is a new RAID card (no IRQ 
conflicts), and a pair of harddrives instead of jsut one.  This seems to 
happen on both CVS and stable 1.0.1.

[codec_ilbc.so] => (iLBC/PCM16 (signed linear) Codec Translator)
== Registered translator 'ilbctolin' from format ILBC to SLINR, cost 215
== Registered translator 'lintoilbc' from format SLINR to ILBC, cost 629693
TIA,
Trevor Peirce
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] iLBC/PCM16 Huge Cost

2004-10-23 Thread Trevor Peirce
Hello,
During asterisk bootup, I've been having a fun time with a random delay 
which can be quite long, from what seems to be the codec_ilbc.so file.

I notice in verbose mode the cost is rather high, and was hoping someone 
will have some insight on what's going on here.

Prior to a harddrive dying, I was running * on this same hardware 
flawlessly.  The only difference now is a new RAID card (no IRQ 
conflicts), and a pair of harddrives instead of jsut one.  This seems to 
happen on both CVS and stable 1.0.1.

[codec_ilbc.so] => (iLBC/PCM16 (signed linear) Codec Translator)
== Registered translator 'ilbctolin' from format ILBC to SLINR, cost 215
== Registered translator 'lintoilbc' from format SLINR to ILBC, cost 
629693

TIA,
Trevor Peirce
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Re: Sipura 3000 FXO

2004-10-23 Thread Dameon D. Welch-Abernathy
Randy Bush wrote:
i come from an automated ip backbone world where we generated
configs automatically from sql data tied to the back office and
sales systems.  i want to have a shipping person take a new spa3k
out of the box, plug it into an ether, hit the 'Confirm' button on
the customer order fulfillment screen, wait 30 seconds, and then
stick the puppy in the outbound shipping box.
There's no reason a SPA configuration couldn't be auto-generated from a 
SQL database. There's the issue of interfacing that with the SPA 
Compiler to compile a configuration file and put it somewhere (e.g. a 
web server), but that should be easy to do.

It's fairly trivial to set up a box as a DHCP server and tftp server 
with a spa.cfg (where  is 2000, 3000, etc). The DHCP server sets 
the tftp-server option. This config simply sets a provisioning rule that 
says "go get your next config from https://some/website/$MA.cfg"; (where 
the device substitutes $MA for its MAC address). This URL would be the 
location where your auto-generated device configuration would reside. 
Optionally, you can also have it load new firmware. The spa.cfg file 
sits in the root of the tftp server.

Basically, all you have to do is unbox a new SPA, plug the box in, wait 
several seconds, wait for the status lights to stop blinking, and the 
box is ready to ship. I did something similar with about 40 SPA-2000s 
and the entire process was painless and quick. It doesn't even need to 
have the "real" configuration from the SQL database yet, it can pick 
that up when it gets plugged in next time.

-- PhoneBoy
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Load test IAX

2004-10-23 Thread joachim
.call files are through the manager.
An simple app exists, and should make it online very soon on 
www.astertest.com (just cleaning up the code to make it a bit more user 
friendly atm).

At 20:26 21/10/2004, you wrote:
Is there a way to load test IAX?  I know I can setup long duration calls 
via manager. Just wondering if there is an app that will spawn sessions easily.

Thanks!
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users