Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk, ATA-186 & Sipgate.de / sipgate.co.uk
Ronald Wiplinger schrieb: [sipgate.de] type=friend username=5552220 secret=my_password3 host=sipgate.de fromuser=5552220 fromdomain=sipgate.net should be "fromdomain=sipgate.de" nat=yes context=incomingsipgate canreinvite=no [sipgate.co.uk] type=friend username=4782156 secret=my_password4 host=sipgate.co.uk fromuser=4782156 fromdomain=sipgate.net should be "fromdomain=sipgate.co.uk" nat=yes context=incomingsipgate canreinvite=no extensions.conf: === [general] static=yes writeprotect=no [globals] CONSOLE=Console/dsp; Console interface for demo [incomingsipgate] exten => h,1,Hangup exten => 800,1,Dial(SIP/internestelefon,20,tr) should be [incomingsipgate] exten => 5552220,1,Dial(SIP/internestelefon,20,r) exten => 4782156,1,Dial(SIP/internestelefon,20,r) [sipgate.de] exten => _0049.,Dial(SIP/${EXTEN:[EMAIL PROTECTED],30,tr) exten => _0049.,2,Playback(invalid) exten => _0049.,3,Hangup should be (you forgot to number prio 1 !) exten => _0049.,1,Dial(SIP/0${EXTEN:[EMAIL PROTECTED],30,r) ; do not dial international prefix 0049 with Sipgate, if you call from same national net ! exten => _0049.,2,Playback(invalid) exten => _0049.,3,Hangup [sipgate.co.uk] exten => _0044.,Dial(SIP/${EXTEN:[EMAIL PROTECTED],30,tr) exten => _0044.,2,Playback(invalid) exten => _0044.,3,Hangup exten => _0044.,1,Dial(SIP/0${EXTEN:[EMAIL PROTECTED],30,tr) ; do not dial international prefix 0044 with Sipgate, if you call from same national net ! exten => _0044.,2,Playback(invalid) exten => _0044.,3,Hangup I did not understand the paragraph of [incomingsipgate]. This is the context to which all incoming calls from Sipgate will be sent to be handled. I also do not understand EXTEN:1 (should the second phone be EXTEN:2 ???) please regard correct expression ${EXTEN:1} ! This means "take the variable ($) called {EXTEN} (this is the dialed number) and cut the FIRST digit (:1)" So - if you dial 0049341234567 and then DIAL(SIP/${EXTEN:1}...) this will result in dialing 0493411234567 which is not a valid number. Regards -- Please visit http://www.ip-phone-forum.de -- ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] KSS/BLF on Asterisk
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Folks, I am trying to determine the best way to allow a station to monitor the status of another station. For example: a reception set needing to see the status of 20 or 30 phones OR an executive assistant wanting to have appearances of several other extensions, in order to monitor their status and assist with call handling. I know Snom has a phone that you can attach an add-on module to, but I don't know how you'd program Asterisk to deliver status information to those buttons. Get a hint! :-) Check out the "hint" priority in extensions.conf. There are also some details in the wiki. Nick ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] Asterisk, ATA-186 & Sipgate.de / sipgate.co.uk
I try to get the following to work: Sipgate.de and sipgate.co.uk are configured as gateway, while the ATA-186 has two phone sets attached. I tried: ATA settings as described at: http://www.loligo.com/asterisk/Cisco/ATA-186-guide.v20030628.txt (just with a fixed IP) sip.conf: == [general] context=default port=5060 bindaddr=0.0.0.0 srvlookup=yes register => 5552220:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/5552220 register => 4782156:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/4782156 externip = 61.220.121.xx localnet=192.168.0.0/255.255.0.0; All RFC 1918 addresses are local networks [601] type=friend username=601 secret=my_password1 canreinvite=no host=dynamic dtmfmode=rfc2833 mailbox=601 nat=yes [602] type=friend username=602 secret=my_password2 canreinvite=no host=dynamic dtmfmode=rfc2833 mailbox=601 nat=yes [sipgate.de] type=friend username=5552220 secret=my_password3 host=sipgate.de fromuser=5552220 fromdomain=sipgate.net nat=yes context=incomingsipgate canreinvite=no [sipgate.co.uk] type=friend username=4782156 secret=my_password4 host=sipgate.co.uk fromuser=4782156 fromdomain=sipgate.net nat=yes context=incomingsipgate canreinvite=no extensions.conf: === [general] static=yes writeprotect=no [globals] CONSOLE=Console/dsp ; Console interface for demo [incomingsipgate] exten => h,1,Hangup exten => 800,1,Dial(SIP/internestelefon,20,tr) [sipgate.de] exten => _0049.,Dial(SIP/${EXTEN:[EMAIL PROTECTED],30,tr) exten => _0049.,2,Playback(invalid) exten => _0049.,3,Hangup [sipgate.co.uk] exten => _0044.,Dial(SIP/${EXTEN:[EMAIL PROTECTED],30,tr) exten => _0044.,2,Playback(invalid) exten => _0044.,3,Hangup I did not understand the paragraph of [incomingsipgate]. I also do not understand EXTEN:1 (should the second phone be EXTEN:2 ???) starting the server with asterisk -vvvcg brings a lots of lines ;-) sip show users: sipgate.co.uk my_password2 incomingsipgateNo Alway sipgate.demy_password1 incomingsipgateNo Alway 602 my_password4 incomingsipgateNo Alway 601 my_password3 incomingsipgateNo Alway sip show registry: sipgate.co.uk:5060 4782156 105Registered sipgate.de:5060 5552220 105Registered Tests: 601 calls 602busy 00491 busy(1 at sipgate.de should play a tape) No info on the screen (asterisk: *CLI> ) What have I forgotten / made wrong? bye Ronald begin:vcard fn:Ronald Wiplinger n:Wiplinger;Ronald email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED] x-mozilla-html:FALSE version:2.1 end:vcard ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] G.729 on YDL and MacOSX
Re: G.729 codec on Yellow Dog Linux for various PPC Kristian Kielhofner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This is probably a good time to ask if there is any > planned support for a g729 binary for YDL and > G3/G4, etc. I would love to start playing with > apple hardware, YDL, and asterisk. > But I need that binary! Indeed it is a good time to ask (but always start a new thread ;-) I have mentioned this before, and I would like to ask EVERYBODY who is interested to VOICE your interest directly with the respective vendors. This is the first step and it is VERY IMPORTANT. I am confindent that an Altivec optimised G.729 codec for the PPC970 CPUs (aka G5) on YDL4 would so clearly trash any Intel or AMD based system that most serious deployments that require G.729 will end up using Xserve instead of Intel toyz. Combine this with the fact that the x86 architecture has hit the wall while IBM is only getting started. Even Microsoft have recognised the leadership of IBM by going PPC with their new game console. Before this background it is quite apparent that there is an interesting market potential for G.729 binaries for LinuxPPC. However, without requests from customers for a G.729 codec for LinuxPPC it will take so much longer for an x86 centric shop like Digium to recognise this potential and consider spending time and effort on it. Therefore, please, send an email to Digium and tell them that you want this binary for PPC and continue to nag them about it again and again and again and again. If as a result, Digium realise that there is demand, then they will quite possibly provide that binary. At the same time, let's also remind TerraSoft (http://www.terrasoftsolutions.com) that Asterisk on their YDL platform is alive and that their sponsorship to bring Asterisk to LinuxPPC was not in vain, that there is finally an opportunity to get a return on their investment. Let's assume that Digium is simply too busy with other things and that even if they wanted to, they couldn't do the G.729 codec for PPC. So, in lieu of Digium providing the codec for PPC, TerraSoft may recognise the opportunity and step in. But again, in order for this to happen, it will take requests from customers. Therefore, please, send an email to Kai Staats at TerraSoft and tell them that you'd be very interested to buy G.729 codec binaries for Asterisk on YDL if they were to offer them, then follow up on that with reminders to show that you are serious about it. TerraSoft have been working together with Digium to bring Asterisk to YDL, so there shouldn't be a problem for the two companies to get together again and bring the G.729 codec to YDL as well. All it takes for that to happen is visible customer demand. Perhaps we should set up some kind of petition page on the Wiki. Re: G.729 codec on MacOSX for Apple Macintosh Darren Sessions <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Or for that matter, is there a planned G729 binary > for Mac OSX ? It will probably take a LinuxPPC port first, but here again, why don't you send email to Apple and tell them that you would rather purchase oodles of Xserve instead of x86 based servers if only there was a G.729 codec for OSX. It will take a lot more noise to get Apple to recognise that there is a market potential than it will take to get Digium or TerraSoft to do so, but that's no reason not to make a request. So, please, send email to Apple and tell them that you have tested Asterisk on MacOSX -- they have listed our installer on their website http://www.apple.com/downloads/macosx/unix_open_source/asteriskinstallpackageformacosx.html, that you found it runs circles around any other product, such as Cisco Call Manager -- Apple just loves to hear that sort of thing -- and that the only thing that's missing is the G.729 codec which the open source community is unable to provide on its own due to the patent royalties that need to be paid on a reseller-to-patent-holder basis because there is no end-user-to-patent-holder scheme, that you would love to buy many many Xserves if Apple was to sell you the missing codec. rgds benjk -- Sunrise Telephone Systems, 9F Shibuya Daikyo Bldg., 1-13-5 Shibuya, Tokyo, Japan. NB: Spam filters in place. Messages unrelated to the * mailing lists may get trashed. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] One approach to SIP dialing through asterisk
Caveat: I've only got about three weeks of experience working with Asterisk so it's possible I've completely overlooked a more obvious solution to this issue. Snide comments are welcomed if this is the case. One of the more puzzling frustrations I've faced in working with Asterisk is that the dialplan seems to have been built without the accomodation for SIP dialing to be done through the Asterisk box acting as a sip proxy. I was startled to discover that dialing an URI-based SIP address such as sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] from my cisco phone or from a soft phone like x-lite resulted in a connection to a local "nugget" extension to the phone's Asterisk server. I was surprised that Asterisk was stripping off the SIP domain before working through the dialplan, although I've grown familiar with working with the dialplan this way it still feels odd to me. Early on in my configuring I discovered a function (albeit crufty and akward) approach devised by Wayne Harrison which is documented at http://www.planetwayne.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=196 While that does work, it wasn't what I was hoping to accomplish. I later found this piece of tease: http://www.voip-forum.com/?p=153&more=1 which leads the reader to the conclusion that SIP dialing through Asterisk is just a Simple Matter of Programming(tm) but seems to overlook some rather significant hurdles that would face a person trying to design a dialplan as described. Tonight I set myself to this task and I've come up with a quasi-workable implementation of the proposal in the voip-forum.com article. I'd appreciate any feedback on this approach since it does have some drawbacks. I created a [trunkuri] context for evaluating extensions to see if the SIPDOMAIN does not match a MYDOMAIN variable which I hard-code with my local SIP domain. My first dilemma was where to perform this evaluation. At first I tried to place it in "exten => s" for my [trunkuri] context, but that never seemed to actually be processed. I found that the only way to have this test hooked was to make a match-all _. extension in my trunkuri context. This means that I have to be careful to make sure that [trunkuri] is the last extension context that's applied for any placed call. I include it last from my container context, as such: ; For stations that are physically inside the house [house] include => local include => kpmirror include => trunkld include => trunkint include => emergency include => trunkuri The [trunkuri] context appears as follows: ; Hey, it works. [trunkuri] exten => _.,1,NoOp(trunkuri start! [EMAIL PROTECTED]) exten => _.,2,GotoIf($[${SIPDOMAIN} = ${MYDOMAIN}]?4) exten => _.,3,Dial(SIP/[EMAIL PROTECTED]) exten => _.,4,Congestion() This matches any extension that hasn't previously been caught by my local and normal targets and dials it if the SIPDOMAIN isn't me. It works, but only barely. One glaring hole is that with this approach I am unable to dial SIP URIs that partly match my own local extensions. If, for example, I have a sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] address, I'm unable to dial sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] with this because sales will have already hit. The only way I can see around that would be to burden all my defined internal extensions with that same SIPDOMAIN evaluation which seems cumbersome and unwieldy to maintain. Is there a way for me to hang [trunkuri] as the very first included context? I haven't seen a dialplan command that would allow me to do this. In effect I'm guessing I'd need a way for the _. extension to voluntarily defer and pass on down to the remaining extensions as if it had not been a hit. Is this even possible? For context, the whole of my extensions.conf is available at: http://slacker.com/~nugget/stuff/extensions.conf Additionally, I've documented my progress at: http://slacker.com/~nugget/asterisk1.php Feedback and suggestions would be welcomed. -- David McNett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://slacker.com/~nugget/ ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk and Broadvoice, no incoming voice
I'm having the same issue, and I'm not behind NAT. Maybe this is a BV issue? -Tim -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Terry Evans Sent: Saturday, October 23, 2004 4:33 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk and Broadvoice, no incoming voice I just signed up for the BroadVoice service a few hours ago, but for the life of me I can't get any incoming voice. The incoming connection is fine as it rings my extension from outside, but I can't hear anyone talking. Outgoing voice is working fine though. I've been looking through the archives, but I haven't found a solution to the problem yet. I even tried another router since someone had a problem with that, but still no dice. I've had my Asterisk server running fine for a few months, but this is the first time I've tried a VOIP service with it. I just downloaded and installed the lastest CVS and the problem is still there also. Here's some of my configuration information: sip.conf (I've tried with nat=no and it didn't help) [general] context=from-sip ; Default context for incoming calls port=5060 ; UDP Port to bind to (SIP standard port is 5060) bindaddr=0.0.0.0; IP address to bind to (0.0.0.0 binds to all) maxexpirey=3600 defaultexpirey=120 callerid=No CallID tos=lowdelay; 0x18 ; reliabile before dtmfmode=inband srvlookup=yes ;progressinband=no nat=yes notifymimetype=text/plain [broadvoice] type=friend username=801527 (hid real number) fromuser=801527 (hid real number) secret= (hid real password) fromdomain=sip.broadvoice.com host=sip.broadvoice.com canreinvite=no dtmfmode=inband context=broadvoice-inbound nat=yes (tried nat=never also) disallow=all allow=ulaw insecure=very I have the following ports forwarded to my linux server (it's behind a NAT router): 5060, 2-21000 (from my rdp.conf file), 4445, and 4569. All of those have both TCP and UDP forwarded for now. I've tried several different combinations from different posts, including splitting the broadvoice section up into parts for incoming and outgoing, but it still didn't work. Anyone have any ideas? Let me know if traces, etc. will help and I'll capture and post some. Thanks, Terry ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk and Broadvoice, no incoming voice
It also sounds like some type of NAT issue to me, but I can't figure out what's going wrong. I changed the RTP ports back to 1-2 and set the router up to forward those, but still no incoming voice. Kevin suggest I try the two inbound sections in the sip.conf, but I had already tried them prior to my previous post. I've tried lots of combinations of sip.conf files I could find in this mailing list, but none of them seem to work for me for some reason. Terry On Sat, 23 Oct 2004 17:39:12 -0600 (MDT), Greg Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It really sounds like a NAT problem to me.. If your NAT supports the > notion of a "DMZ host" then give that a try. Or if the NAT has some sort > of logging feature to let you know when the nat receives unexpected > packets and discards them, then look through the log. It may be that BV > isn't sending RTP in the 2-21000 port range, and that these packets > are being dropped by the NAT. Outgoing RTP (voice) would work fine, of > course, because the NAT is designed to work that direction. > > FYI, I just placed a call to my BV number and ran 'netstat -nupa'. UDP > connections showed up on ports 14704, 14705, 19838, 19839. These > disappeared when I hung up the call. > > While it might be a config issue, I'm inclined to believe that NAT is > making life unpleasant for you. > > Greg > > ___ > Asterisk-Users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] Outlook reports internal error after using AstTapi
I wanted to use Outlook 2000 to dial my Contacts using Asterisk. So I installed AstTapi on my Windows XP machine. When I try to dial a contact, the call originates just fine. My SIP phone rings, and when I pick up, Asterisk makes the call to the dialed number correctly. However, Outlook displays an error message saying "Unable to complete an operation requested by the automatic phone dialer. Please make sure your modem, phone and phone line are properly configured." After closing the error message dialog, if I then go to dial the Contact again, I get a different error message saying "An internal error occurred in the phone dialer. Close the Dial Phone dialog box and then open it again." Well, closing the dialog box and opening it again doesn't work: the same internal error message keeps popping up when trying to make a call. The only way to get rid of it is to exit Outlook and restart it. Has anyone who has used AstTapi seen this problem? I am using Outlook 2000 SP3. My Asterisk TAPI driver is configured as follows: Host: 192.168.2.11 (IP of Asterisk server) Port: 5038 Dial out by using the Dial application - Outgoing chan: Zap/1/ User: john Password: my_secret User channel: SIP/200 My manager.conf is as follows: [general] enabled = yes port = 5038 bindaddr = 0.0.0.0 [john] secret = mysecret deny=0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0 permit=192.168.2.17/255.255.255.0 read = system,call,log.verbose,command,agent,user write = system,call,log.verbose,command,agent,user As I said, the first time I place the call from Outlook, it works fine. The trace on Asterisk shows: == Manager 'john' logged on from 192.168.2.17 -- Launching Dial(Zap/1/18005551212) on SIP/200-da5d -- Called 1/18005551212 == Manager 'john' logged off from 192.168.2.17 -- Zap/1-1 answered SIP/200-da5d -- Hungup 'Zap/1-1' Any help would be much appreciated. Rana Dutt Softel, Inc. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Re: Direct SIP connection to Vonage service
On Sun, 24 Oct 2004 01:45:19 +0200, Stewart Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I looked at NuFone.net and some others, but it appears that > IAX is not right for my system. I'd say this is only because you don't know enough about IAX yet ;-) > I live near Reno, NV, and > have a second home in Paris. Most of my calling is to the > US, via an H.323 gateway to the Reno POTS line; Install an Asterisk server in Reno and run IAX. > overflow traffic is sent to an H.323 ITSP. Replace that with a provider that supports IAX, ie NuFone. > I run GnuGk on a shared > server at a hosting provider in New York. Run Asterisk on that or take it out of the equation entirely. > Paris has a Cisco > 827-4V (ADSL modem / NAT / 4 FXS) that speaks H.323 and SIP. Replace that with an Asterisk server and run IAX. > There are also some associates on the system using ATA-186. Replace those with Digium IAXy ATAs or Farfon Farata ATAs. > When calling from an H.323 or SIP client to an IAX service > (or vice-versa), I believe that Asterisk must proxy the > media stream. No, it doesn't. Only if you force it. > If * is run at the hosting service, I'm > worried that delays caused by other users will result in > choppy voice. I'd rather run * in Reno, where it could also > replace an ancient DOS-based voice mail, and possibly my > Partner key system. However, that configuration would have > lots of extra delay. For example, if the IAX provider is in > Michigan, a call from Paris to San Francisco would go > Paris->Reno->Michigan->California. No. An IAX call from Paris setup through Reno via NuFone would go like this ... Paris ---IAX---> Michigan ---???---> SF ... and if NuFone have a node in SF, then it would go ... Paris ---IAX---> SF ---POTS---> Called Party in SF [Jeremy, can you elaborate please? Do you run an IAX node in California?] > With SIP, a REINVITE > would cause it to go Paris->Michigan->California, saving two > trips across the country. IAX does a so called IAX Transfer, which is similar in effect to a SIP REINVITE. rgds benjk -- Sunrise Telephone Systems, 9F Shibuya Daikyo Bldg., 1-13-5 Shibuya, Tokyo, Japan. NB: Spam filters in place. Messages unrelated to the * mailing lists may get trashed. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Hardware
Stay away from boards with Intel chipsets. Those are problematic in my experience. The FX, LX, 820, 840 and various others have been extremely flaky, and caused no end of problems. :-) VIA used to be bad, but seem to get steadily better. Intel are just erratic. I think most makers have made good and bad chipsets. Go with known good chips, not specific makers. The same goes with motherboards. Steve Brian McSpadden wrote: Stay away from boards with VIA chipsets, those are problematic in my experience. I have had some good results with the D865PERL boards from Intel, along with several other Intel boards. Those seem to be of high quality. They may not have the very best performers, but the PCI bus is implemented cleanly, which is what * needs for Zaptel hardware. Brian ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] asterisk & chan_sccp
Chad, I noticed you wrote this earlier (see below). I have the same problem with the chan_sccp module with a Cisco 7910 phone. I have traced down the * crash to a reference to an undefined variable. Adding the speeddial entries would fix the issue, but I am VERY unclear on the format. For the 7910 phones, there are two indexes: 1 and 2. Setting those would fix the issue, but I do not understand what the next entry references? Where is "John Doe" defined? What config file is it using for this data. Thank you for any insight you can provide. Joel Berry On Wednesday 25 August 2004 15:33, Matthew Boehm wrote:> I don't see any speed dials setup on the devices in sccp.conf.>> Ex:>> [SEP000F3442E199]> description = Jack's 7960> type = 7960> context = sccp> tzoffset = -6> autologin = richard,neill> speeddial = 4,John Doe> speeddial = 7,Jack Trades> speeddial = 8,Richard Doofus>> These all work great for my 2 7960s. It could be that you are pushing the> button and * is seeing that there isn't anything to dial.>> Matthew ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Hardware
Stay away from boards with VIA chipsets, those are problematic in my experience. I have had some good results with the D865PERL boards from Intel, along with several other Intel boards. Those seem to be of high quality. They may not have the very best performers, but the PCI bus is implemented cleanly, which is what * needs for Zaptel hardware. Brian On Sat, 23 Oct 2004 20:39:00 -0500, Henry Devito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'll be running the Red Hat Enterprise. I thought I saw people posting > certain motherboards had issues with sound, I know I saw where others said > to stay away from the VIA chipset. > > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stan > Brinkerhoff > Sent: Saturday, October 23, 2004 6:56 PM > To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion > Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Hardware > > Look for support by whatever operating system you plan on running. > > Henry Devito wrote: > > > Hi guys I know this has been asked on the list before, but my hard > > drive crashed and I lost all of the past posts, I need to know what > > motherboard works ok for asterisk, I have no problems with the Dual > > and Quad Xeon processor boards I have used. Now I plan on building a > > Pentium 4 3.0 with hyper-threading. I looked through the wiki and > > could not find the recommended P4 board. Does anyone have any > > suggestions? Thanks. > > > > > > > >___ > >Asterisk-Users mailing list > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > >To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > > > > ___ > Asterisk-Users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: >http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > > ___ > Asterisk-Users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: >http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] iLBC/PCM16 Huge Cost
--On Saturday, October 23, 2004 21:35 -0500 Brian West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Done and done. FYI you may want to update http://voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk+mpg123+redhat as that's where I got inspired to download the RPM. Repeat after me... RPM is bad source is good. I have put a nice warning on that page. Its already been proven to use 0.59r and you'll notice the "make mpg123" target in asterisk will even fetch and install 0.59r btw. bkw mmm... any packaging is better than none. I regularly destroy things on systems when it's not been put into proper packaging because we upgrade the system, and there's no record of something being installed, nor what it depends on, so it gets broken. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] iLBC/PCM16 Huge Cost
> Done and done. FYI you may want to update > http://voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk+mpg123+redhat as that's where I got > inspired to download the RPM. Repeat after me... RPM is bad source is good. I have put a nice warning on that page. Its already been proven to use 0.59r and you'll notice the "make mpg123" target in asterisk will even fetch and install 0.59r btw. bkw ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] iLBC/PCM16 Huge Cost
Also quietmp3nb: and you'll only have one process per music class. bkw > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Trevor Peirce > Sent: Saturday, October 23, 2004 9:09 PM > To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion > Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] iLBC/PCM16 Huge Cost > > Brian West wrote: > > >REMOVE THAT POS and install mpg123 0.59r, compile from src. > > > Done and done. FYI you may want to update > http://voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk+mpg123+redhat as that's where I got > inspired to download the RPM. > > I just stopped asterisk and killed off all the mpg123 processes... ran > safe_asterisk and it immediately spawned three mpg123's (which are 0.59r). > > I don't see them eating up any processer time just yet but it seems to > take a few hours for that to happen. I will report back later. > > Probably related to whatever is causing my other headaches - MOH sounds > very staticy. The time, pitch, speed are all fine, but there are lots > of "scratch" sounds and glitches added. This is with both my own MP3s > and the ones included with *. > > I'm starting to think a format and reinstall might be a good idea > there has got to be something deeper to this. > > Trevor > ___ > Asterisk-Users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: >http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] Fedora 2, Kudzu and X100P
I am installing a new * server using Fedora Core 2 but I ran into a problem after I installed the X100P. When FC2 boots it runs KUDZU to detect new hardware and it detected the card and insists on loading the module "crc_ccitt" before the zaptel module. Because of this I cannot load the wcfxo module without the computer crashing. I have already erase the entry in /etc/sysconfig/hwconf and turned kudzu off during boot. Anyone know of a way to fix this (short or reinstalling FC2)? -- Carlos Chavez Director de Tecnología Telecomunicaciones Abiertas de México S.A. de C.V. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] iLBC/PCM16 Huge Cost
Wo trevor, Format and start over? Don't go crazy, just remove the files created by make install. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Trevor Peirce Sent: Saturday, October 23, 2004 10:09 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] iLBC/PCM16 Huge Cost Brian West wrote: >REMOVE THAT POS and install mpg123 0.59r, compile from src. > Done and done. FYI you may want to update http://voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk+mpg123+redhat as that's where I got inspired to download the RPM. I just stopped asterisk and killed off all the mpg123 processes... ran safe_asterisk and it immediately spawned three mpg123's (which are 0.59r). I don't see them eating up any processer time just yet but it seems to take a few hours for that to happen. I will report back later. Probably related to whatever is causing my other headaches - MOH sounds very staticy. The time, pitch, speed are all fine, but there are lots of "scratch" sounds and glitches added. This is with both my own MP3s and the ones included with *. I'm starting to think a format and reinstall might be a good idea there has got to be something deeper to this. Trevor ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Hardware (and apple YDL G.729)
Or for that matter, is there a planned G729 binary for Mac OSX ?___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] iLBC/PCM16 Huge Cost
Trevor Peirce wrote: > Trevor Peirce wrote: > >> I have noticed that when * is first loading, CPU usage goes to 100% >> for exactly the same duration that it takes that ilbc codec to load. > > > Upon closer inspection, it seems that every time a caller is hears > MOH, a new mpg123 is spawned. Right now top is showing 8 mpg123's > running, and between then and * CPU utilisation is maxed out. About > 30% user and 65% system. > > Can anyone tell me if this would make sense from a faulty IDE > controller card, or is it most likely something else? I won't have a > chance to use the slower onboard channels until later tonight, but if > anyone has suggestions before then I'd love to hear them. Trevor, You are better off using this instead of mpg321: http://bugs.digium.com/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0002379 Mark... Any chance including this patch in the 1.0? ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] iLBC/PCM16 Huge Cost
Brian West wrote: REMOVE THAT POS and install mpg123 0.59r, compile from src. Done and done. FYI you may want to update http://voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk+mpg123+redhat as that's where I got inspired to download the RPM. I just stopped asterisk and killed off all the mpg123 processes... ran safe_asterisk and it immediately spawned three mpg123's (which are 0.59r). I don't see them eating up any processer time just yet but it seems to take a few hours for that to happen. I will report back later. Probably related to whatever is causing my other headaches - MOH sounds very staticy. The time, pitch, speed are all fine, but there are lots of "scratch" sounds and glitches added. This is with both my own MP3s and the ones included with *. I'm starting to think a format and reinstall might be a good idea there has got to be something deeper to this. Trevor ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] iLBC/PCM16 Huge Cost
REMOVE THAT POS and install mpg123 0.59r, compile from src. bkw > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Trevor Peirce > Sent: Saturday, October 23, 2004 8:57 PM > To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion > Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] iLBC/PCM16 Huge Cost > > Brian West wrote: > > >>Upon closer inspection, it seems that every time a caller is hears MOH, > >>a new mpg123 is spawned. Right now top is showing 8 mpg123's running, > >>and between then and * CPU utilisation is maxed out. About 30% user and > >>65% system. > >> > >> > >IMPOSSIBLE... What mpg123 version are you running? > > > > > # rpm -qa | grep mpg > mpg123-0.59q-1 > > and > > High Performance MPEG 1.0/2.0/2.5 Audio Player for Layer 1, 2 and 3. > Version 0.59q (1999/Jan/26). Written and copyrights by Michael Hipp. > > Got this one directly from a link I found on the wiki. > > ___ > Asterisk-Users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: >http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] iLBC/PCM16 Huge Cost
Brian West wrote: Upon closer inspection, it seems that every time a caller is hears MOH, a new mpg123 is spawned. Right now top is showing 8 mpg123's running, and between then and * CPU utilisation is maxed out. About 30% user and 65% system. IMPOSSIBLE... What mpg123 version are you running? # rpm -qa | grep mpg mpg123-0.59q-1 and High Performance MPEG 1.0/2.0/2.5 Audio Player for Layer 1, 2 and 3. Version 0.59q (1999/Jan/26). Written and copyrights by Michael Hipp. Got this one directly from a link I found on the wiki. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] iLBC/PCM16 Huge Cost
> Upon closer inspection, it seems that every time a caller is hears MOH, > a new mpg123 is spawned. Right now top is showing 8 mpg123's running, > and between then and * CPU utilisation is maxed out. About 30% user and > 65% system. IMPOSSIBLE... What mpg123 version are you running? bkw ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] iLBC/PCM16 Huge Cost
Trevor Peirce wrote: I have noticed that when * is first loading, CPU usage goes to 100% for exactly the same duration that it takes that ilbc codec to load. Upon closer inspection, it seems that every time a caller is hears MOH, a new mpg123 is spawned. Right now top is showing 8 mpg123's running, and between then and * CPU utilisation is maxed out. About 30% user and 65% system. Can anyone tell me if this would make sense from a faulty IDE controller card, or is it most likely something else? I won't have a chance to use the slower onboard channels until later tonight, but if anyone has suggestions before then I'd love to hear them. Thanks, Trevor ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] Hardware
I'll be running the Red Hat Enterprise. I thought I saw people posting certain motherboards had issues with sound, I know I saw where others said to stay away from the VIA chipset. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stan Brinkerhoff Sent: Saturday, October 23, 2004 6:56 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Hardware Look for support by whatever operating system you plan on running. Henry Devito wrote: > Hi guys I know this has been asked on the list before, but my hard > drive crashed and I lost all of the past posts, I need to know what > motherboard works ok for asterisk, I have no problems with the Dual > and Quad Xeon processor boards I have used. Now I plan on building a > Pentium 4 3.0 with hyper-threading. I looked through the wiki and > could not find the recommended P4 board. Does anyone have any > suggestions? Thanks. > > > >___ >Asterisk-Users mailing list >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users >To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] doublehash patch for 1.0.1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Just tried the patch you made with the latest CVS and it patches fine > although it does not work. Now when I hit # it does not send the DTMF > to the other side at all. Although hitting ## does get the transfer. > Now # doesn't do ANYTHING :) I'm not sure why that is, it works with all our phones (Grandstream BT101s and analog phones on Grandstream ATA286s). I just tested by calling my bank's IVR. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] Re: Apple YDL g729
Michael Loftis wrote: --On Saturday, October 23, 2004 19:39 -0500 Kristian Kielhofner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hey, This is probably a good time to ask if there is any planned support for a g729 binary for YDL and G3/G4, etc. I would love to start playing with apple hardware, YDL, and asterisk. But I need that binary! Hummm, can't compile your own? And anyway please don't coopt others threads. It's FAR better to start a totally new thread on your subject, this ensures it gets read by more people, and that you get a better response to your question(s). Sorry, I felt that it was relevant seeing as many people swear up and down that you don't get any funky motherboard - zaptel issues with apple hardware. I don't know if you have ever used Digium's g729, but there are processor specific binaries and registration programs that just will not work with power pc. Maybe some kind of emulation, but that probably outweighs using ppc hardware in the first place... -- Kristian Kielhofner ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] doublehash patch for 1.0.1
Just tried the patch you made with the latest CVS and it patches fine although it does not work. Now when I hit # it does not send the DTMF to the other side at all. Although hitting ## does get the transfer. Now # doesn't do ANYTHING :) On Sat, 23 Oct 2004 19:00:38 -0500, Barton Hodges <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > is there a doublehash patch for 1.0.1? > > o old one to res_parking.c does not apply as there is no longer > > > res_parking.c o wiki search is useless > > o google only finds the problems applying old patch to 0.7 > > I've attached an old-school, no frills, double-hash patch ported to > the latest "Stable with bug fixes" CVS. > > Barton > > > ___ > Asterisk-Users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > > > -- MBM ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Support for reception of "send url" in SIP clients needed
Hello, On Sat, 23 Oct 2004 08:54:27 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I would like to let asterisk send an URL to a PC based softphone or a PC based > message client. This would allow for many great applications such as automatic > client data lookup. Or for technical client support. It is a must for many > types of customer support centers. > > I understand that the "send url" application can do the job seen from the > asterisk side. > > But I have not been able to find a PC client which is able to handle reception > of the url and the subsequent opening of it in the specified browser. > > It looks as if Nortel has two products capable of this, but I have not tested > them yet. > > I would like to know if anybody has experience about available PC clients > supporting this feature. Not exactly what you are looking for (it is not a soft phone), but you might want to look at Flash Operator Panel. It can open a web page sending the callerid received in certain channel as a GET variable (you can do automatic data lookup based on callerid). It connects to asterisk using the manager interface. It can also be used to visualize a call center, the latest version can display logged in agents, and it shows some statistics on queues and individual agents also. http://www.asternic.org Best regards, -- Nicolás Gudiño Buenos Aires - Argentina ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Hardware (and apple YDL G.729)
--On Saturday, October 23, 2004 19:39 -0500 Kristian Kielhofner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hey, This is probably a good time to ask if there is any planned support for a g729 binary for YDL and G3/G4, etc. I would love to start playing with apple hardware, YDL, and asterisk. But I need that binary! Hummm, can't compile your own? And anyway please don't coopt others threads. It's FAR better to start a totally new thread on your subject, this ensures it gets read by more people, and that you get a better response to your question(s). ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Uniden UIP 200 Phone and NAT?
Any chance you can pass me the Beta Version or let me know how to get it myself? I love this phone except for this problem, either way I guess I will keep it and wait for the new firmware since it's a nice phone overall. Thanks, Todd -- Start Your Own ISP! http://www.YourOwnISP.com - Original Message - From: "Ryan Courtnage" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, October 23, 2004 1:52 PM Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Uniden UIP 200 Phone and NAT? On Sat, 2004-23-10 at 08:14 -0500, Lyle Giese wrote: As of version 4.59a, no, it does not support NAT. Rumor had it that Uniden was going to release new firmware for the phone in October, but it's not there as of right now, it has not been posted on their web site. Yes - the new firmware is coming. I've tested a beta version, and it does fix the rport mess (which required nat=never or route). It also adds support for STUN. Last i heard, the release is supposed to be the end of Oct. Ryan ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Hardware (and apple YDL G.729)
Stan Brinkerhoff wrote: Look for support by whatever operating system you plan on running. Henry Devito wrote: Hi guys I know this has been asked on the list before, but my hard drive crashed and I lost all of the past posts, I need to know what motherboard works ok for asterisk, I have no problems with the Dual and Quad Xeon processor boards I have used. Now I plan on building a Pentium 4 3.0 with hyper-threading. I looked through the wiki and could not find the recommended P4 board. Does anyone have any suggestions? Thanks. Hey, This is probably a good time to ask if there is any planned support for a g729 binary for YDL and G3/G4, etc. I would love to start playing with apple hardware, YDL, and asterisk. But I need that binary! -- Kristian Kielhofner ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Hardware
--On Saturday, October 23, 2004 19:56 -0400 Stan Brinkerhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Look for support by whatever operating system you plan on running. I second thatpretty much any P4 based hardware should be perfectly fine for asterisk. I'd tend to lean towards SCSI drives though, but other than that go to town! ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] doublehash patch for 1.0.1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > is there a doublehash patch for 1.0.1? > o old one to res_parking.c does not apply as there is no longer > res_parking.c o wiki search is useless > o google only finds the problems applying old patch to 0.7 I've attached an old-school, no frills, double-hash patch ported to the latest "Stable with bug fixes" CVS. Barton res_features.diff Description: Binary data ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Hardware
Look for support by whatever operating system you plan on running. Henry Devito wrote: Hi guys I know this has been asked on the list before, but my hard drive crashed and I lost all of the past posts, I need to know what motherboard works ok for asterisk, I have no problems with the Dual and Quad Xeon processor boards I have used. Now I plan on building a Pentium 4 3.0 with hyper-threading. I looked through the wiki and could not find the recommended P4 board. Does anyone have any suggestions? Thanks. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] Re: Webmin for ASTERISK and QOS and call quality
Because I don't want to clog the list with more never-ending > discussions that seem to be so popular lately, I probably won't reply > to this thread any longer. I feel that I have gotten my point across. Yes... You have... And good points you made... There are people on this list who just love to criticize instead of trying to help with their knowledge/experience... Good luck in becoming asteriskian... and if you need help I will be glad to help if I can! Senad Jordanovic Bicom Systems - Complete Systems Provider www.bicomsystems.com ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Broadvoice
On Sat, 23 Oct 2004, Tim Jackson wrote: > We just got setup with Broadvoice yesterday for LD. This isn't something > I REALLY need (No local numbers avail so we just got a Houston number), > but I'm just curious. I can make outbound calls to Broadvoice and they > work great, but I can't do inbound. I have bv's voicemail turned off so > all I get is a busy signal when I call our bv number. I've tried this > with both type=peer and type=friend and I get the same results, any > ideas? in the * CLI, use 'sip show registry' to find out whether you're really registered with the BV servers. Also use 'sip debug' and then place a call. See whether your screen gets filled with a transcript of the conversation between your * and BV. If it does, then read through every line to decide whether what it says seems reasonable (or not). You should at least see attempts by your * to register with BV. If these don't get any reply, then you're probably fighting NAT or some other network issue. Once the registration is successful, then BV should know where to find you so that they can route your inbound calls. These may also be getting dumped by a router/nat somewhere along the network. Hopefully these tips will aid you in diagnosing the problem! Greg ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] Hardware
Hi guys I know this has been asked on the list before, but my hard drive crashed and I lost all of the past posts, I need to know what motherboard works ok for asterisk, I have no problems with the Dual and Quad Xeon processor boards I have used. Now I plan on building a Pentium 4 3.0 with hyper-threading. I looked through the wiki and could not find the recommended P4 board. Does anyone have any suggestions? Thanks. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] Re: Direct SIP connection to Vonage service
Hi, Thanks for the replies. Brian wrote: FYI these so called "unlimited" monthly plans are RARELY, if _EVER_ truly unlimited. They CAN (read the TOS), and WILL terminate you if you use too many minutes more then whatever average they calculated for when pricing the plan. I personally know several people who were using the Vonage "unlimited" calling plan and were terminated for _"EXCESSIVE USAGE"_ Ouch. I am aware that service is not really unlimited. My present POTS service has "unlimited" long distance; the TOS makes it clear that you are billed four cents per minute for usage beyond 5000 min. per month. That's pretty steep, but going a little over won't break you, and it sure beats having your service disconnected. I usually run 2000-3000 min., and have never gone over 3500, so I'm not in any danger. Vonage, OTOH, is quite vague; their TOS speaks of "inconsistent with normal residential usage patterns". Do you know what they consider "excessive", or if my usage would be acceptable? Benjk wrote: I personally wouldn't bother and I wouldn't want to take my money to a company that uses a business model that I despise. So, vote with your wallet. Don't use Vonage. Use a true VoIP service. And while we are at it, support IAX: Use a provider that offers IAX. I looked at NuFone.net and some others, but it appears that IAX is not right for my system. I live near Reno, NV, and have a second home in Paris. Most of my calling is to the US, via an H.323 gateway to the Reno POTS line; overflow traffic is sent to an H.323 ITSP. I run GnuGk on a shared server at a hosting provider in New York. Paris has a Cisco 827-4V (ADSL modem / NAT / 4 FXS) that speaks H.323 and SIP. There are also some associates on the system using ATA-186. When calling from an H.323 or SIP client to an IAX service (or vice-versa), I believe that Asterisk must proxy the media stream. If * is run at the hosting service, I'm worried that delays caused by other users will result in choppy voice. I'd rather run * in Reno, where it could also replace an ancient DOS-based voice mail, and possibly my Partner key system. However, that configuration would have lots of extra delay. For example, if the IAX provider is in Michigan, a call from Paris to San Francisco would go Paris->Reno->Michigan->California. With SIP, a REINVITE would cause it to go Paris->Michigan->California, saving two trips across the country. Have I missed something? Or did you mean that I should use a provider that *offers* IAX, but connect via SIP :) Thanks, Stewart ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Asterisk and Broadvoice, no incoming voice
On Sat, 23 Oct 2004, Terry Evans wrote: > I just signed up for the BroadVoice service a few hours ago, but for > the life of me I can't get any incoming voice. The incoming > connection is fine as it rings my extension from outside, but I can't > hear anyone talking. Outgoing voice is working fine though. (snip) > I have the following ports forwarded to my linux server (it's behind a > NAT router): > > 5060, 2-21000 (from my rdp.conf file), 4445, and 4569. All of > those have both TCP and UDP forwarded for now. It really sounds like a NAT problem to me.. If your NAT supports the notion of a "DMZ host" then give that a try. Or if the NAT has some sort of logging feature to let you know when the nat receives unexpected packets and discards them, then look through the log. It may be that BV isn't sending RTP in the 2-21000 port range, and that these packets are being dropped by the NAT. Outgoing RTP (voice) would work fine, of course, because the NAT is designed to work that direction. FYI, I just placed a call to my BV number and ran 'netstat -nupa'. UDP connections showed up on ports 14704, 14705, 19838, 19839. These disappeared when I hung up the call. While it might be a config issue, I'm inclined to believe that NAT is making life unpleasant for you. Greg ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Re: Webmin for ASTERISK and QOS and call quality
Thomas Hutton wrote: Mr Kielhofner, you answer nothing, while adding to the noise you complain about. Googling for information on the webmin module leads to nothing. The webmin module on the digium FTP site is worthless. Can somebody talk Jamie Cameron into writing one? Most people will tell you that gsm or ILBC is acceptable quality. If you want to run 20 simultaneous conversations, reserving 1 Megabit is more than sufficient. As for LDAP, search for that on the Wiki. http://voip-info.org/tiki-searchresults.php?words=LDAP&where=pages&search=go Thomas Hutton Mr. Hutton, I was simply trying to illustrate the point that if every single person that downloaded * and installed it went straight to the list with every BASIC question we ALL would be very overwhelmed. If the list were the sole source of information on asterisk, the people working on the docs project, the wiki etc. could all stop wasting their time. The docs project and the wiki are SUPERB sources of information for everything that the OP was asking about (and much, much more). I was telling him that if he were to type any of those queries into google, read what was returned to him (most likely from the wiki), he would have his answer right then and there, instead of waiting for someone on the list to answer or go look it up for him. There is an old saying about catching fish vs. teaching how to fish that applies here. I am sure that google knows about that one as well. I don't in any way want to sound like an elitist, but I had about 200 hours in working with * (and reading) before I ever made my first post to the list. I recognized that the people on the list take their spare time to help me (and others) when I (they) need it. I learned all that I could on my own out of respect for them and their time. In addition, I now know where to look should I have more questions, or am answering someone else's (like on the list). Someone once said that they couldn't figure out how people could find the list and not stumble across this kind of basic info in the process. I totally agree. This would be a good time for me to thank everyone on the list, the wiki, and all the developers. Really, thanks a lot. Asterisk is the most exciting thing since I found Linux! Back to the original thread. I understand that English is probably not the OP's first language. This is fine. I answered every question that I could reasonably understand, and I didn't want to confuse him more by throwing acronyms, etc. at him. I merely wanted him to go back and think about what he really meant, and hopefully in doing so realize that everything that he wanted to know is already out there for the asking (via google, etc.). Furthermore, I think that Asterisk is more deserving of it's own complete web environment, fulling integrating voice mail, user access, and admin access. Webmin probably isn't suitable for that. As for bandwidth: http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=Asterisk+bandwidth+usage&btnG=Google+Search Because I don't want to clog the list with more never-ending discussions that seem to be so popular lately, I probably won't reply to this thread any longer. I feel that I have gotten my point across. -- Kristian Kielhofner ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] Re: cannot call Grandstream
GS is fine for that -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Ishmael Sent: Saturday, October 23, 2004 5:49 PM To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion' Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] Re: cannot call Grandstream So in keeping with the topic, the GS phones work well with the Asterisk system? Should I get a GS phone or is there another phone that I should consider? Since this is for my home rather than a company, I just want something that will work with little fuss. ;) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of steve szmidt Sent: Saturday, October 23, 2004 4:37 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Re: cannot call Grandstream On Friday 22 October 2004 02:05 pm, Neil Cherry wrote: > David Ishmael wrote: > > I think my Netgear router will try to lease the same DHCP address to a > > device based on MAC automatically each time the device queries for an > > address (but I'm not 100% sure about that, never really watched it). So > > the problem is with the address changing? > > I can't infer that from the 2 examples as it may be some other > problem with the DHCP implementation on the DHCP server. Though > it may be a possibility. > > I like to have the stationary IP devices to have a permanent IP > address. It just makes it easier to admin my local DNS (I have > too many devices to remember all the IP addresses). Hmmm. In my opinion DHCP is mostly a false time saver anyway. It's true you can just plug in a host and have it get an ip nice and easily. But I prefer to know who's IP is on the wire with a minimum of fuss. I like to be able to notice that nnn is being involved far too often in that XYZ problem, or whatever. Plus it's one less service to maintain. Whenever I add a host I spend a little more time with configuring it but that's better than chasing leases as far as I'm concerned. Eases LAN maintenance a lot. True, as an ISP I would use DHCP. It's quite suitable there as I would have more limited resources. But on a LAN it's hard to run out of IP's. It's kind of how windows got popular, thanks to the apparent easier way of doing things, and how lazy we all seem to be. Anyway, this is on th edge of the topic so I'll stop here. -- Steve Szmidt "They that would give up essential liberty for temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." Benjamin Franklin ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] Re: cannot call Grandstream
So in keeping with the topic, the GS phones work well with the Asterisk system? Should I get a GS phone or is there another phone that I should consider? Since this is for my home rather than a company, I just want something that will work with little fuss. ;) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of steve szmidt Sent: Saturday, October 23, 2004 4:37 PM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Re: cannot call Grandstream On Friday 22 October 2004 02:05 pm, Neil Cherry wrote: > David Ishmael wrote: > > I think my Netgear router will try to lease the same DHCP address to a > > device based on MAC automatically each time the device queries for an > > address (but I'm not 100% sure about that, never really watched it). So > > the problem is with the address changing? > > I can't infer that from the 2 examples as it may be some other > problem with the DHCP implementation on the DHCP server. Though > it may be a possibility. > > I like to have the stationary IP devices to have a permanent IP > address. It just makes it easier to admin my local DNS (I have > too many devices to remember all the IP addresses). Hmmm. In my opinion DHCP is mostly a false time saver anyway. It's true you can just plug in a host and have it get an ip nice and easily. But I prefer to know who's IP is on the wire with a minimum of fuss. I like to be able to notice that nnn is being involved far too often in that XYZ problem, or whatever. Plus it's one less service to maintain. Whenever I add a host I spend a little more time with configuring it but that's better than chasing leases as far as I'm concerned. Eases LAN maintenance a lot. True, as an ISP I would use DHCP. It's quite suitable there as I would have more limited resources. But on a LAN it's hard to run out of IP's. It's kind of how windows got popular, thanks to the apparent easier way of doing things, and how lazy we all seem to be. Anyway, this is on th edge of the topic so I'll stop here. -- Steve Szmidt "They that would give up essential liberty for temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." Benjamin Franklin ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] Asterisk and Broadvoice, no incoming voice
I just signed up for the BroadVoice service a few hours ago, but for the life of me I can't get any incoming voice. The incoming connection is fine as it rings my extension from outside, but I can't hear anyone talking. Outgoing voice is working fine though. I've been looking through the archives, but I haven't found a solution to the problem yet. I even tried another router since someone had a problem with that, but still no dice. I've had my Asterisk server running fine for a few months, but this is the first time I've tried a VOIP service with it. I just downloaded and installed the lastest CVS and the problem is still there also. Here's some of my configuration information: sip.conf (I've tried with nat=no and it didn't help) [general] context=from-sip ; Default context for incoming calls port=5060 ; UDP Port to bind to (SIP standard port is 5060) bindaddr=0.0.0.0; IP address to bind to (0.0.0.0 binds to all) maxexpirey=3600 defaultexpirey=120 callerid=No CallID tos=lowdelay; 0x18 ; reliabile before dtmfmode=inband srvlookup=yes ;progressinband=no nat=yes notifymimetype=text/plain [broadvoice] type=friend username=801527 (hid real number) fromuser=801527 (hid real number) secret= (hid real password) fromdomain=sip.broadvoice.com host=sip.broadvoice.com canreinvite=no dtmfmode=inband context=broadvoice-inbound nat=yes (tried nat=never also) disallow=all allow=ulaw insecure=very I have the following ports forwarded to my linux server (it's behind a NAT router): 5060, 2-21000 (from my rdp.conf file), 4445, and 4569. All of those have both TCP and UDP forwarded for now. I've tried several different combinations from different posts, including splitting the broadvoice section up into parts for incoming and outgoing, but it still didn't work. Anyone have any ideas? Let me know if traces, etc. will help and I'll capture and post some. Thanks, Terry ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] Re: Webmin for ASTERISK and QOS and call quality
> Hitete wrote: > > Is there a FREE third party module for webmin ?. > > > > How much bandwidth do I have to reserver in order to get a good call quality > > ?. > > Let's say I have 20 people calling each other. > > > > Is 1MB of bindwidth Ok or can I reserve even less ?. > > > > To your experience what is the minimum "compression" to get good call > > quality ?. > > > > Has anybody tried putting all the callers info in a LDAP database yet ?. > > > > /Alexandre > > > > Please, please, please do some research before posting to the list. > > There is a webmin module on digium's ftp site. Last I heard it wasn't > being maintainted. > > What protocol? What codec? > > Compression? Do you mean codec? > > What caller info? CDR records, contact info, or user configuration. > You can use ODBC for most of that. > > I don't mean to sound rude but ALL of your questions here could be > answered by google. It cuts down on list traffic, and you don't have to > wait for someone on asterisk-users to read your message and post back. > You get your answers right away! > > Just an FYI. > > -- > Kristian Kielhofner Mr Kielhofner, you answer nothing, while adding to the noise you complain about. Googling for information on the webmin module leads to nothing. The webmin module on the digium FTP site is worthless. Can somebody talk Jamie Cameron into writing one? Most people will tell you that gsm or ILBC is acceptable quality. If you want to run 20 simultaneous conversations, reserving 1 Megabit is more than sufficient. As for LDAP, search for that on the Wiki. http://voip-info.org/tiki-searchresults.php?words=LDAP&where=pages&search=go Thomas Hutton ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] Geotel integration with Asterisk
Ok lets get this out of the way... WTF is Geotel? bkw > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greg Smith > Sent: Saturday, October 23, 2004 4:19 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Geotel integration with Asterisk > > > Has any one integrated to a Geotel with Asterisk? > > Thanks. > > Greg > Advanta ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] Geotel integration with Asterisk
Has any one integrated to a Geotel with Asterisk? Thanks. Greg Advanta ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] cheap gig switch? smc, netgear, or 3com?
On Thursday 21 October 2004 09:16 am, Matt Hess wrote: > There was a thread on NANOG a while back about dell switches and the > opinion at the time seemed almost in complete agreement - dell switches > stink for everything but pure ipv4 shuffle packets.. unmanaged without > any features. > They are not ciscos at all.. they have a cisco like interface but then > again so does zebra.. but that doesn't make it a cisco either. > And imho, being the 'wal-mart' of something isn't necessarily a good > thing.. even wal-mart sells some total junk (to put it lightly). And except for only the largest routers, Cisco is overpriced and under powered. Great support but poor value. -- Steve Szmidt "They that would give up essential liberty for temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." Benjamin Franklin ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] cheap gig switch? smc, netgear, or 3com?
On Wednesday 20 October 2004 04:08 am, Jay Wilton wrote: > Hello, > > The Smc 8508T goes for about $95, jumbo frame support, > lifetime warranty but no QOS. The Netgear GS608 is $ 100, > no jumbo frames, 1 year warranty, QOS, gig latency 10U max. > The 3com switch reviews that I read were not happy. Does > anyone hate or love their home switch? > > I doubt the jumbo frame support would help voip traffic, > but it seems like it wouldn't hurt. I was planning on > doing the QOS on linux. Gig support is wanted for file > transfers and the future. Thanks to all you nice asterisk > people and a few of the mean ones. > > Jay Haha, "a few of the mean ones"! I love it! : ) I prefer managed switches but they are all so pricey. The thing to go for with any switch for VoIP use is the ability to deal with QoS. Most of the routers are configured to support it and it does work. -- Steve Szmidt "They that would give up essential liberty for temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." Benjamin Franklin ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] cheap gig switch? smc, netgear, or 3com?
On Wednesday 20 October 2004 04:47 pm, Matt Hess wrote: > Remember, you pay for what you get.. especially with Dell networking > equipment. I have heard about several groups who tried the dell switches > only to give up on them because the dell switches just didn't perform. > Yes, price-wise they look good.. but as far as performance goes.. (that > is assuming you want high/solid performance) I'd look elsewhere. > Jup, I've read the same. -- Steve Szmidt "They that would give up essential liberty for temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." Benjamin Franklin ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Re: cannot call Grandstream
On Friday 22 October 2004 02:05 pm, Neil Cherry wrote: > David Ishmael wrote: > > I think my Netgear router will try to lease the same DHCP address to a > > device based on MAC automatically each time the device queries for an > > address (but I'm not 100% sure about that, never really watched it). So > > the problem is with the address changing? > > I can't infer that from the 2 examples as it may be some other > problem with the DHCP implementation on the DHCP server. Though > it may be a possibility. > > I like to have the stationary IP devices to have a permanent IP > address. It just makes it easier to admin my local DNS (I have > too many devices to remember all the IP addresses). Hmmm. In my opinion DHCP is mostly a false time saver anyway. It's true you can just plug in a host and have it get an ip nice and easily. But I prefer to know who's IP is on the wire with a minimum of fuss. I like to be able to notice that nnn is being involved far too often in that XYZ problem, or whatever. Plus it's one less service to maintain. Whenever I add a host I spend a little more time with configuring it but that's better than chasing leases as far as I'm concerned. Eases LAN maintenance a lot. True, as an ISP I would use DHCP. It's quite suitable there as I would have more limited resources. But on a LAN it's hard to run out of IP's. It's kind of how windows got popular, thanks to the apparent easier way of doing things, and how lazy we all seem to be. Anyway, this is on th edge of the topic so I'll stop here. -- Steve Szmidt "They that would give up essential liberty for temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." Benjamin Franklin ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] doublehash patch for 1.0.1
http://bugs.digium.com/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0002460 This patch includes the double key hangup patch too which lets you define what you want. bkw > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Randy Bush > Sent: Saturday, October 23, 2004 1:39 PM > To: splatters > Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] doublehash patch for 1.0.1 > > and the patch take19.txt in bug 0002010 does not apply cleanly > to the freebsd port of 1.0.1 > > randy > > ___ > Asterisk-Users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: >http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Uniden UIP 200 Phone and NAT?
On Sat, 2004-23-10 at 08:14 -0500, Lyle Giese wrote: > As of version 4.59a, no, it does not support NAT. Rumor had it that Uniden > was going to release new firmware for the phone in October, but it's not > there as of right now, it has not been posted on their web site. Yes - the new firmware is coming. I've tested a beta version, and it does fix the rport mess (which required nat=never or route). It also adds support for STUN. Last i heard, the release is supposed to be the end of Oct. Ryan ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] doublehash patch for 1.0.1
and the patch take19.txt in bug 0002010 does not apply cleanly to the freebsd port of 1.0.1 randy ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] iLBC/PCM16 Huge Cost
Eric Wieling wrote: Kevin Walsh wrote: Benjamin on Asterisk Mailing Lists [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can you set up a test call where Asterisk will transcode from ulaw to ILBC and see what it does to your CPU load? How should I go about creating such a test call? Also, try recalculating the translation matrix display values by typing "show translation recalc 5". Okay, that causes asterisk to crash... callcentre*CLI> show translation Translation times between formats (in milliseconds) Source Format (Rows) Destination Format(Columns) G723 GSM ULAW ALAW G726 ADPCM SLINR LPC10 G729A SPEEX ILBC G723 - - - - - - - - - - - GSM - - 2 2 4 2 1 237 - - 13561 ULAW - 5 - 1 4 2 1 237 - - 13561 ALAW - 5 1 - 4 2 1 237 - - 13561 G726 - 6 3 3 - 3 2 238 - - 13562 ADPCM - 5 2 2 4 - 1 237 - - 13561 SLINR - 4 1 1 3 1 - 236 - - 13560 LPC10 - 133 130 130 132 130 129 - - - 13689 G729A - - - - - - - - - - - SPEEX - - - - - - - - - - - ILBC - 200 197 197 199 197 196 432 - - - callcentre*CLI> show translation recalc 10 Recalculating Codec Translation (number of sample seconds: 10) callcentre*CLI> show translation callcentre*CLI> If that doesn't work disable the RAID card and try again. I can't do that right now for various reasons, but upon looking closer into our configuration, it seems we are just using an IDE Controller Card and software raid that's built in to linux. I have noticed that when * is first loading, CPU usage goes to 100% for exactly the same duration that it takes that ilbc codec to load. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] Broadvoice
We just got setup with Broadvoice yesterday for LD. This isn’t something I REALLY need (No local numbers avail so we just got a Houston number), but I’m just curious. I can make outbound calls to Broadvoice and they work great, but I can’t do inbound. I have bv’s voicemail turned off so all I get is a busy signal when I call our bv number. I’ve tried this with both type=peer and type=friend and I get the same results, any ideas? context=default recordhistory=yes realm=angelinacounty.net port=5060 bindaddr=0.0.0.0 srvlookup=yes disallow=all allow=ulaw dtmfmode=inband tos=reliability register => 7134810061:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [Broadvoice] type=friend username=7134810061 fromuser=7134810061 secret=[password] host=sip.broadvoice.com context=inbound-pots fromdomain=sip.broadvoice.com nat=yes canreinvite=no dtmfmode=inband ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] doublehash patch for 1.0.1
http://bugs.digium.com/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0002460 Give that a whirl Bkw > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Randy Bush > Sent: Saturday, October 23, 2004 11:46 AM > To: splatters > Subject: [Asterisk-Users] doublehash patch for 1.0.1 > > is there a doublehash patch for 1.0.1? > o old one to res_parking.c does not apply as there is no longer > res_parking.c > o wiki search is useless > o google only finds the problems applying old patch to 0.7 > > thanks > > randy > > ___ > Asterisk-Users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: >http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Webmin for ASTERISK and QOS and call quality .
Hitete wrote: Is there a FREE third party module for webmin ?. How much bandwidth do I have to reserver in order to get a good call quality ?. Let's say I have 20 people calling each other. Is 1MB of bindwidth Ok or can I reserve even less ?. To your experience what is the minimum "compression" to get good call quality ?. Has anybody tried putting all the callers info in a LDAP database yet ?. /Alexandre Please, please, please do some research before posting to the list. There is a webmin module on digium's ftp site. Last I heard it wasn't being maintainted. What protocol? What codec? Compression? Do you mean codec? What caller info? CDR records, contact info, or user configuration. You can use ODBC for most of that. I don't mean to sound rude but ALL of your questions here could be answered by google. It cuts down on list traffic, and you don't have to wait for someone on asterisk-users to read your message and post back. You get your answers right away! Just an FYI. -- Kristian Kielhofner ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] Zultys Zip 2 Setup
I bought one of these phones and I am trying to set it up. So far, I have figured out how to get to the web interface but I can't seem to figure out how to set some of the most important things like the Proxy address etc.. The manual is useless for things like this as well as their website. The only thing these folks seem to give instructions on is how to change the volume etc, but nothing related to actually setting up the phone for use with asterisk or anything else. The Uniden phone was pretty much the same thing, virtually zero docs on how to get started etc.. So far the cheapest phone (the GrandStream) has been the most straight forward to setup. I have already boxed up the Uniden which is ashame since it's a great phone. Thing is I can't use it behind a NAT so it has to go back :( I did email them though and ask them if they had the new firmware ready.. -- Start Your Own ISP! http://www.YourOwnISP.com ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Cheap hosted servers and Asterisk
Scott, I use an AMD 2400 hosted in The Planet (www.theplanet.com) to host my asterisk box currently. They don't directly offer AMDs but a provider that colocates there does. $60/mnth. SeverMatrix.com is the low end dedicated biz of The Planet directly. It is only 60ms from my home in NJ even in TX and I have all my voip routes into that. I use notransfer and G729 for most routes and been fine for the most part. Cisco 7960 here to TX via sip and in/out for origination/term by SIP or IAX2. It is a nice change since my system is reachable even when my cable decided to take a hiatus which is not unheard of with Comcast. I also configured it to forward calls to my cell phone if my VOIP extension isn't available which is nice when I'm out or Inet is down. Sure it costs me the mins addition for that leg but I preferred that over not getting the call at all. I would suggest looking around and finding one with good routing to your DSL But there isn't a shortage of providers that offer low end dedicated. Any specific questions feel free to contact me off list. -- William ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] Support for reception of "send url" in SIP clients needed
I would like to let asterisk send an URL to a PC based softphone or a PC based message client. This would allow for many great applications such as automatic client data lookup. Or for technical client support. It is a must for many types of customer support centers. I understand that the "send url" application can do the job seen from the asterisk side. But I have not been able to find a PC client which is able to handle reception of the url and the subsequent opening of it in the specified browser. It looks as if Nortel has two products capable of this, but I have not tested them yet. I would like to know if anybody has experience about available PC clients supporting this feature. Jon Bruel Denmark ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] doublehash patch for 1.0.1
is there a doublehash patch for 1.0.1? o old one to res_parking.c does not apply as there is no longer res_parking.c o wiki search is useless o google only finds the problems applying old patch to 0.7 thanks randy ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] Cheap hosted servers and Asterisk
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Laird > Sent: Saturday, October 23, 2004 12:37 PM > To: Asterisk Users Mailing List > Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Cheap hosted servers and Asterisk > > Does anyone have any experience with running Asterisk on dedicated > servers from any of the cheap hosting providers, like 1&1? > > I'd like to get my asterisk/mail/web server out of my house. There > isn't a whole lot of traffic involved, but I'd rather not end up with > someplace that *utterly* oversubscribes their bandwidth--it needs to > work with Asterisk, not just TCP-based services. I can find a number Haven't had any experience, however if your clients connecting to Asterisk are setup to properly reinvite (assume you are using sip) then you shouldn't have large overage charges. If your using Asterisk in the media path, the potential for overage charges then increases. - Brent ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] Cheap hosted servers and Asterisk
Does anyone have any experience with running Asterisk on dedicated servers from any of the cheap hosting providers, like 1&1? I'd like to get my asterisk/mail/web server out of my house. There isn't a whole lot of traffic involved, but I'd rather not end up with someplace that *utterly* oversubscribes their bandwidth--it needs to work with Asterisk, not just TCP-based services. I can find a number of providers that have listings for $50-$60/month (that's actually a net win over my current DSL bill), but I don't have experience with any of them. Does anyone have any suggestions? Scott ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] iLBC/PCM16 Huge Cost
Kevin Walsh wrote: Benjamin on Asterisk Mailing Lists [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, 23 Oct 2004 02:16:44 -0700, Trevor Peirce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: G723 GSM ULAW ALAW G726 ADPCM SLINR LPC10 G729A SPEEX ILBC G723 - - - - - - - - - - - GSM - - 2 2 4 2 1 1238 - - 529695 ULAW - 5 - 1 4 2 1 1238 - - 529695 ALAW - 5 1 - 4 2 1 1238 - - 529695 G726 - 7 4 4 - 4 3 1240 - - 529697 ADPCM - 5 2 2 4 - 1 1238 - - 529695 SLINR - 4 1 1 3 1 - 1237 - - 529694 LPC10 - 196 193 193 195 193 192 - - - 529886 G729A - - - - - - - - - - - SPEEX - - - - - - - - - - - ILBC - 219 216 216 218 216 215 1452 - - - Whoa. There must be something very wrong with your codec translation. I am getting the following on a PIII 533MHz IBM with Intel mobo, two Zaptel cards, no shared interrupts ... [snip: show translation results] Can you set up a test call where Asterisk will transcode from ulaw to ILBC and see what it does to your CPU load? Also, try recalculating the translation matrix display values by typing "show translation recalc 5". If that doesn't work disable the RAID card and try again. begin:vcard fn:Eric Wileing n:Wileing;Eric email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED] tel;work:504-899-1387 x2120 x-mozilla-html:FALSE version:2.1 end:vcard ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] Quintum ASM400, ASM200 and ASTERISK
I have some ASM200 and ASM400, these are analog gatewyas, The ASM 200 - 2 fxs 2 fxo ports (only two simulatenous calls) The ASM 400 - 4 fxs 4 fxo Ports ( only 4 simulatenous calls ) My intention is to integrate them with Asterisk, so that I can use their FXS channels as internal extensions in conjunctions with my ZAP boards and their fxo ports as outgoing to the pstn line. The only issue is I'm not use how to integrate or use the (ports) in the quintum box to asterisk, so asterisk can see them as extensions. ?? Any clues on this. Currently, there is a firmware that supports SIP and H323.. Hope to get some help from u guys !!! Cheers I am sure this will be helpful for some people out there... Thanks, Francisco ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] iLBC/PCM16 Huge Cost
Just an FYI show translation recalc 10 Give that a go. bkw > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Benjamin on Asterisk Mailing Lists > Sent: Saturday, October 23, 2004 4:56 AM > To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion > Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] iLBC/PCM16 Huge Cost > > On Sat, 23 Oct 2004 02:16:44 -0700, Trevor Peirce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > G723 GSM ULAW ALAW G726 ADPCM SLINR LPC10 G729A SPEEX ILBC > > G723 - - - - - - - - - - - > >GSM - - 2 2 4 2 1 1238 - - > 529695 > > ULAW - 5 - 1 4 2 1 1238 - - > 529695 > > ALAW - 5 1 - 4 2 1 1238 - - > 529695 > > G726 - 7 4 4 - 4 3 1240 - - > 529697 > > ADPCM - 5 2 2 4 - 1 1238 - - > 529695 > > SLINR - 4 1 1 3 1 - 1237 - - > 529694 > > LPC10 - 196 193 193 195 193 192 - - - > 529886 > > G729A - - - - - - - - - - - > > SPEEX - - - - - - - - - - - > > ILBC - 219 216 216 218 216 215 1452 - - - > > > > Whoa. There must be something very wrong with your codec translation. > I am getting the following on a PIII 533MHz IBM with Intel mobo, two > Zaptel cards, no shared interrupts ... > > tyo-switch*CLI> show translation > Translation times between formats (in milliseconds) > Source Format (Rows) Destination Format(Columns) > > G723 GSM ULAW ALAW G726 ADPCM SLINR LPC10 G729A SPEEX ILBC >G723 - - - - - - - - - - - > GSM - - 4 410 4 3 - - -66 >ULAW - 9 - 1 8 2 1 - - -64 >ALAW - 9 1 - 8 2 1 - - -64 >G726 -15 8 8 - 8 7 - - -70 > ADPCM - 9 2 2 8 - 1 - - -64 > SLINR - 8 1 1 7 1 - - - -63 > LPC10 - - - - - - - - - - - > G729A - - - - - - - - - - - > SPEEX - - - - - - - - - - - >ILBC -181111171110 - - - - > > Can you set up a test call where Asterisk will transcode from ulaw to > ILBC and see what it does to your CPU load? > > rgds > benjk > > -- > Sunrise Telephone Systems, 9F Shibuya Daikyo Bldg., 1-13-5 Shibuya, > Tokyo, Japan. > > NB: Spam filters in place. Messages unrelated to the * mailing lists > may get trashed. > ___ > Asterisk-Users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: >http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] Digum board TDM to Phonejack --Quicknet --Trandsfering calls.
I have succesfully integrated some phonejacks with Zaptels. I am able to transfer calls from my tdm board to my phonejack (from quicknet) using the hangup button (pressing it once). But I am unable to do this the other way around with the quicknet board. This works : Phonejack --Digium TDM -Phonejack But, THIS DOES NOT WORK Digium TDM to ---Phonejack -- X ( does not work ) --another extensions with a phonejack ANY HELP IS APPRECIATED. Thanks Francisco ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] IAX wireless problem
On Sat, 23 Oct 2004 17:10:40 +0200, Neal Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm using IAXComm on the Mac to connect to my Asterisk system and it > all seems to work well when I'm connected to my wired network. When I > use wireless instead, IAXComm never registers with Asterisk and when I > call, ASterisk seems to think it's connected but no sound comes back. did you define your client as host=dynamic in iax.conf? use "iax2 debug" on the asterisk console to get a session transcript when you try to register and make test calls. if there are no Rx-Frame messages coming in from the client, then you have some sort of connectivity problem with your wireless setup. Use tcpdump or ethereal to see if any traffic is coming in on port 4569. rgds benjk -- Sunrise Telephone Systems, 9F Shibuya Daikyo Bldg., 1-13-5 Shibuya, Tokyo, Japan. NB: Spam filters in place. Messages unrelated to the * mailing lists may get trashed. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] Need help with RDNIS on ISDN PRI
Still looking for some feedback... We are trying to configure our * box to receive RDNIS using ISDN PRI circuits from a Lucent 5ESS so that when a call gets forwarded to the vmail system (using call forward no answer) we get the original dialed digits to identify the mailbox owner. The local telco is now saying that Lucent is telling them that this feature is not available on the 5ESS switch but he is not sure if Lucent is giving them the "brush off or not". Is anyone getting RDNIS on a Lucent 5ESS over ISDN PRI? If so could you provide me the telco contact so that I can have my telco guy call them to see how they set it up? Alternatively, is anyone using ISDN PRI and RDNIS to identify the mailbox owner? If so, what is the upstream switch and was there a special feature you needed to have provisioned on the PRI to get the RDNIS? Thanks, Mike ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] chan_sip changes affecting ACK? - Bug?
Olle, No...Thank you! You are the perfect guy to look at this problem as well since ultimately I need to switch to chan_sip2 given the outboundproxy functionality. My testing shows that not only stable has this issue but so does head. That said, the problem could carry over to chan_sip2. Anyway... I originally sent several log files from both the Siparator and Asterisk but the message was refused from the list because of size. Attached are 2 asterisk sip debug files. I fear that some of the information scrolled off the screen during debug. If these don't have enough information please let me know. When I get back to the office I will log sip debug to a file rather than console as I was so I don't loose anything. If you would like to see the separator logs I will need to send them to you directly because they are 300K a piece and go over the limit for this list. Thanks, Chad -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Olle E. Johansson Sent: Saturday, October 23, 2004 2:29 AM To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] chan_sip changes affecting ACK? - Bug? Chad, I need a more complete SIP debug than just one packet to try to look into this issue. If the device registers, both a REGISTER transaction and a subsequent call with the ACK - THank you! /O ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users to 10.10.0.110:5060 -- Executing Dial("SIP/101-eac7", "SIP/[EMAIL PROTECTED]") in new stack We're at 10.10.0.6 port 17666 Answering/Requesting with root capability 4 Answering with capability 0x2(GSM) Answering with capability 0x8(ALAW) Answering with non-codec capability 0x1(G723) 12 headers, 12 lines Reliably Transmitting: INVITE sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.10.0.6:5060;branch=z9hG4bK6016290f From: "Chad Brown" ;tag=as2041d236 To: Contact: Call-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CSeq: 102 INVITE User-Agent: Asterisk PBX Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 17:14:13 GMT Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER Content-Type: application/sdp Content-Length: 255 v=0 o=root 8649 8649 IN IP4 10.10.0.6 s=session c=IN IP4 10.10.0.6 t=0 0 m=audio 17666 RTP/AVP 0 3 8 101 a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 a=rtpmap:3 GSM/8000 a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000 a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 a=fmtp:101 0-16 a=silenceSupp:off - - - - (no NAT) to 10.10.0.5:5060 -- Called [EMAIL PROTECTED] impbx01*CLI> Sip read: SIP/2.0 100 Trying Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.10.0.6:5060;branch=z9hG4bK6016290f From: "Chad Brown" ;tag=as2041d236 Call-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CSeq: 102 INVITE Server: SIParator/4.1.3 To: Content-Length: 0 8 headers, 0 lines impbx01*CLI> Sip read: SIP/2.0 180 Ringing To: ;tag=3307367608-554546 From: "Chad Brown" ;tag=as2041d236 Call-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CSeq: 102 INVITE Contact: Content-Type: application/sdp Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.10.0.6:5060;branch=z9hG4bK6016290f Content-Length: 187 v=0 o=NexTone-MSW 1234 467212419 IN IP4 10.10.0.5 s=sip call c=IN IP4 10.10.0.5 t=0 0 m=audio 58030 RTP/AVP 0 a=silenceSupp:off a=ecan:b on g168 a=ptime:20 a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 9 headers, 10 lines -- SIP/10.10.0.5-13c2 is ringing Transmitting (no NAT): SIP/2.0 180 Ringing Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.10.0.110:5060;branch=z9hG4bK1ed3fe76 From: "Chad Brown - ext 101" ;tag=001193d886a3010e3ae0c0a4-4f179b0e To: ;tag=as33b30738 Call-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CSeq: 101 INVITE User-Agent: Asterisk PBX Allow: INVITE, ACK, CANCEL, OPTIONS, BYE, REFER Contact: Content-Length: 0 to 10.10.0.110:5060 impbx01*CLI> Sip read: SIP/2.0 200 OK To: ;tag=3307367608-554546 From: "Chad Brown" ;tag=as2041d236 Call-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CSeq: 102 INVITE Contact: Content-Type: application/sdp Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.10.0.6:5060;branch=z9hG4bK6016290f Record-Route: Content-Length: 187 v=0 o=NexTone-MSW 1234 467212419 IN IP4 10.10.0.5 s=sip call c=IN IP4 10.10.0.5 t=0 0 m=audio 58030 RTP/AVP 0 a=silenceSupp:off a=ecan:b on g168 a=ptime:20 a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 10 headers, 10 lines Found RTP audio format 0 Peer audio RTP is at port 10.10.0.5:58030 Found description format PCMU Capabilities: us - 0x8000e(GSM|ULAW|ALAW|H263), peer - audio=0x4(ULAW)/video=0x0(EMPTY), combined - 0x4(ULAW) Non-codec capabilities: us - 0x1(G723), peer - 0x0(EMPTY), combined - 0x0(EMPTY) list_route: hop: list_route: hop: set_destination: Parsing for address/port to send to set_destination: set destination to 10.10.0.5, port 5060 Transmitting: ACK sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.10.0.6:5060;branch=z9hG4bK08fa5d64 Route: From: "Chad Brown" ;tag=as2041d236 To: ;tag=3307367608-554546 Contact: Call-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CSeq: 102 ACK User-Agent: Asterisk PBX Content-Length: 0 (no NAT) to 10.10.0.5:5060 -- SIP/10.10.0.5-13c2 answered SIP/101-eac7 We're at 10.10.0.6 port 17116 Answerin
[Asterisk-Users] IAX wireless problem
I'm using IAXComm on the Mac to connect to my Asterisk system and it all seems to work well when I'm connected to my wired network. When I use wireless instead, IAXComm never registers with Asterisk and when I call, ASterisk seems to think it's connected but no sound comes back. My Asterisk server contains a wireless card and all my wireless connections use a different subnet to my wired network. Wireless networking seem to work fine and in fact I've been using it for years, so I have no idea why Asterisk is having problems. Does anyone have any ideas why it doesn't work? ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Fw: SPA-3000 Disconnect tone detection in France?
On Sat, 23 Oct 2004 15:06:15 +0200, Yves-Marie CRABBE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks a lot, I tried, the string for the busy tone (from Voxzilla) is : > [EMAIL PROTECTED];10(.5/.5/1) > I also tried with [EMAIL PROTECTED];4(.5/.5/1) for a shorter detection delay (my pstn > provider > doesn't play the tone for 10 seconds). It still doesn't work. > > The sipura support told me before that the frequency must be in 2 parts and > suggested a > detection string like this : [EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED];2(.5/.5/1+2) > I tried many combinations, never worked :( Sorry to hear that. Is this on a France Telecom line? I too have a problem with the SPA-3000 here in Japan on an NTT line as it is unable to recognise incoming calls, outgoing works just fine, though, including disconnect supervision. So, if it turns out that the SPA-3000 cannot detect a buzy tone in France, that makes two major G7 countries where the device cannot really be used. I don't think Sipura have yet discovered that there is life outside the US. To be fair, the SPA-3000 is a very recent addition to their product portfolio, so the situation will probably improve over the next six months or so, > I'm also still waiting for an answer from the Sipura support. In my experience, they do eventually get back, but it can take quite a while, you have to be patient. Looks like they are very very busy. rgds benjk -- Sunrise Telephone Systems, 9F Shibuya Daikyo Bldg., 1-13-5 Shibuya, Tokyo, Japan. NB: Spam filters in place. Messages unrelated to the * mailing lists may get trashed. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] iLBC/PCM16 Huge Cost
Benjamin on Asterisk Mailing Lists [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Sat, 23 Oct 2004 02:16:44 -0700, Trevor Peirce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > G723 GSM ULAW ALAW G726 ADPCM SLINR LPC10 G729A SPEEX ILBC > > G723 - - - - - - - - - - - > >GSM - - 2 2 4 2 1 1238 - - 529695 > > ULAW - 5 - 1 4 2 1 1238 - - 529695 > > ALAW - 5 1 - 4 2 1 1238 - - 529695 > > G726 - 7 4 4 - 4 3 1240 - - 529697 > > ADPCM - 5 2 2 4 - 1 1238 - - 529695 > > SLINR - 4 1 1 3 1 - 1237 - - 529694 > > LPC10 - 196 193 193 195 193 192 - - - 529886 > > G729A - - - - - - - - - - - > > SPEEX - - - - - - - - - - - > > ILBC - 219 216 216 218 216 215 1452 - - - > > > Whoa. There must be something very wrong with your codec translation. > I am getting the following on a PIII 533MHz IBM with Intel mobo, two > Zaptel cards, no shared interrupts ... > > [snip: show translation results] > > Can you set up a test call where Asterisk will transcode from ulaw to > ILBC and see what it does to your CPU load? > Also, try recalculating the translation matrix display values by typing "show translation recalc 5". -- _/ _/ _/_/_/_/ _/_/ _/_/_/ _/_/ _/_/_/ _/_/ _/_/_/_/_/ _/ K e v i n W a l s h _/ _/_/ _/ _/ _/_/ _/_/[EMAIL PROTECTED] _/ _/ _/_/_/_/ _/_/_/_/ _/_/ ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] Getting started
Hi all Problem with gnophone: I can not make a call. (just hangs) Im am a novice to Asterisk but quite experienced Linux user. I am having some problems with the gnophone. I have tried to isert my user/password but nothing have changed. I have tested the michrophone and it is working. The sound also works. This is my configuration from preference->telephone Use Asterics. Server: iaxtel.com port 10004 (it is a NAT assigned tcp port on the router directed to my PC) Context: iaxtel prefix : username : my username provided by mail. password : my password peer(optional): my username provided by mail. secret : my password The user/pass-word is the same used to enter this mailing list. What I would like to know is how to fix my problems. Second I would like to know where there is some info for setting up a system. (I have tried to get these but only been able to find "buy a book". Before buying a book I would like to get it work first.) With regards Anders Gnistrup ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Uniden UIP 200 Phone and NAT?
As of version 4.59a, no, it does not support NAT. Rumor had it that Uniden was going to release new firmware for the phone in October, but it's not there as of right now, it has not been posted on their web site. Lyle - Original Message - From: "Me" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, October 23, 2004 12:03 AM Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Uniden UIP 200 Phone and NAT? > Hello, been digging through the archive and the Wiki and it looks like this > phone I bought just can't be configured to work behind a NAT. > > Just wanted to check one last time before sending it back if anyone has had > any luck with this. > > It's pretty useless to me if it can't work behind a NAT. > > Thanks! > > ___ > Asterisk-Users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: >http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Fw: SPA-3000 Disconnect tone detection in France?
Thanks a lot, I tried, the string for the busy tone (from Voxzilla) is : [EMAIL PROTECTED];10(.5/.5/1) I also tried with [EMAIL PROTECTED];4(.5/.5/1) for a shorter detection delay (my pstn provider doesn't play the tone for 10 seconds). It still doesn't work. The sipura support told me before that the frequency must be in 2 parts and suggested a detection string like this : [EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED];2(.5/.5/1+2) I tried many combinations, never worked :( I'm also still waiting for an answer from the Sipura support. Anyway, thanks again for your help, le localization wizard is very useful. Yves-Marie - Original Message - From: "Benjamin on Asterisk Mailing Lists" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, October 22, 2004 8:44 PM Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Fw: SPA-3000 Disconnect tone detection in France? On Fri, 22 Oct 2004 18:06:27 +0200, Yves-Marie CRABBE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I tried to define a disconnect tone description this way : [EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED];2(.5/.5/1+2) I'm located in France. Try the localisation wizard on Voxilla.com. France should be on the list. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] Webmin for ASTERISK and QOS and call quality .
Is there a FREE third party module for webmin ?. How much bandwidth do I have to reserver in order to get a good call quality ?. Let's say I have 20 people calling each other. Is 1MB of bindwidth Ok or can I reserve even less ?. To your experience what is the minimum "compression" to get good call quality ?. Has anybody tried putting all the callers info in a LDAP database yet ?. /Alexandre ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] iLBC/PCM16 Huge Cost
On Sat, 23 Oct 2004 02:16:44 -0700, Trevor Peirce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > G723 GSM ULAW ALAW G726 ADPCM SLINR LPC10 G729A SPEEX ILBC > G723 - - - - - - - - - - - >GSM - - 2 2 4 2 1 1238 - - 529695 > ULAW - 5 - 1 4 2 1 1238 - - 529695 > ALAW - 5 1 - 4 2 1 1238 - - 529695 > G726 - 7 4 4 - 4 3 1240 - - 529697 > ADPCM - 5 2 2 4 - 1 1238 - - 529695 > SLINR - 4 1 1 3 1 - 1237 - - 529694 > LPC10 - 196 193 193 195 193 192 - - - 529886 > G729A - - - - - - - - - - - > SPEEX - - - - - - - - - - - > ILBC - 219 216 216 218 216 215 1452 - - - > Whoa. There must be something very wrong with your codec translation. I am getting the following on a PIII 533MHz IBM with Intel mobo, two Zaptel cards, no shared interrupts ... tyo-switch*CLI> show translation Translation times between formats (in milliseconds) Source Format (Rows) Destination Format(Columns) G723 GSM ULAW ALAW G726 ADPCM SLINR LPC10 G729A SPEEX ILBC G723 - - - - - - - - - - - GSM - - 4 410 4 3 - - -66 ULAW - 9 - 1 8 2 1 - - -64 ALAW - 9 1 - 8 2 1 - - -64 G726 -15 8 8 - 8 7 - - -70 ADPCM - 9 2 2 8 - 1 - - -64 SLINR - 8 1 1 7 1 - - - -63 LPC10 - - - - - - - - - - - G729A - - - - - - - - - - - SPEEX - - - - - - - - - - - ILBC -181111171110 - - - - Can you set up a test call where Asterisk will transcode from ulaw to ILBC and see what it does to your CPU load? rgds benjk -- Sunrise Telephone Systems, 9F Shibuya Daikyo Bldg., 1-13-5 Shibuya, Tokyo, Japan. NB: Spam filters in place. Messages unrelated to the * mailing lists may get trashed. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] * dies with QuadBRI
Hi list, I have the following setup : a first asterisk is connected to the legacy Alcatel PaBX to connect to a remote site with a second asterisk server. PSTN | Legacy phones == Alcatel Omnipcx == Asterisk1 | | IAX | Asterisk2 == 25 Bugetone 101 Servers is a dell 400sc (Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz, 2 IDE disks in software RAID1) and the system has been used in production with a tdm04b connected to Omnipcx for a week wihtout troubles. System has been working flawlessly for a week with a 4 analog lines between the omnipcx and asterisk1 (using TDM04B). Today I've moved to a 4 BRI link between omnipcx and asterisk1 (using kpj's QuadBRI). It does work fine... for about 3 minutes, and then asterisk dies after hanging up a successful call to the omnipcx. Asterisk / Zaptel / Libpri / Qozap on first server have been built with the scripts from bri-stuff-0.1.0-RC4a.tar.gz. Asterisk1 logs shows warnings on all hangups, eg. Oct 22 16:39:47 WARNING[1101196208]: PRI: Can't destroy call 133! Oct 22 16:39:47 WARNING[1101196208]: Hangup on bad channel 0/1 on span 1 Oct 22 16:39:54 WARNING[1101196208]: Hangup on bad channel 0/1 on span 1 Oct 22 16:39:58 WARNING[1101196208]: Hangup on bad channel 0/1 on span 1 Oct 22 16:40:04 WARNING[1101196208]: PRI: Can't destroy call 135! Oct 22 16:40:04 WARNING[1101196208]: Hangup on bad channel 0/1 on span 1 Oct 22 16:40:41 WARNING[1101196208]: PRI: Can't destroy call 137! Oct 22 16:40:41 WARNING[1101196208]: Hangup on bad channel 0/2 on span 1 Oct 22 16:41:09 WARNING[1101196208]: Hangup on bad channel 0/1 on span 1 Oct 22 16:41:13 WARNING[1101196208]: Hangup on bad channel 0/1 on span 1 Oct 22 16:41:19 NOTICE[1121725360]: I should never be called! Oct 22 16:41:53 WARNING[1101196208]: PRI: Can't destroy call 140! Oct 22 16:41:53 WARNING[1101196208]: Hangup on bad channel 0/2 on span 1 Loading qozap shows no error except for devfs, but I doubt this is the source of the problem: Oct 22 16:29:43 asterisk1 kernel: Zapata Telephony Interface Registered on major 196 Oct 22 16:29:56 asterisk1 kernel: PCI: Enabling device 02:02.0 ( -> 0003) Oct 22 16:29:56 asterisk1 kernel: PCI: Found IRQ 10 for device 02:02.0 Oct 22 16:29:56 asterisk1 kernel: PCI: Sharing IRQ 10 with 00:1f.3 Oct 22 16:29:56 asterisk1 kernel: PCI: Sharing IRQ 10 with 00:1f.5 Oct 22 16:29:56 asterisk1 kernel: qozap: Junghanns.NET quadBRI card configured at mem 0xe08e IRQ 10 HZ 100 CardID 0 Oct 22 16:29:56 asterisk1 kernel: qozap: S/T ports: 4 [ NT NT NT NT ] Oct 22 16:29:56 asterisk1 kernel: card 1 span 1 state G0 (A_ST_RD_STA = 0x0) Oct 22 16:29:56 asterisk1 kernel: card 1 span 2 state G0 (A_ST_RD_STA = 0x0) Oct 22 16:29:56 asterisk1 kernel: card 1 span 3 state G0 (A_ST_RD_STA = 0x0) Oct 22 16:29:56 asterisk1 kernel: card 1 span 4 state G0 (A_ST_RD_STA = 0x0) Oct 22 16:29:56 asterisk1 kernel: qozap: 1 multiBRI card(s) in this box, 4 BRI ports total. Oct 22 16:29:56 asterisk1 devfsd[168]: error copying: "/lib/dev-state/zap/1" to "/dev/zap/1" Oct 22 16:29:56 asterisk1 devfsd[168]: error copying: "/lib/dev-state/zap/2" to "/dev/zap/2" Oct 22 16:29:56 asterisk1 devfsd[168]: error copying: "/lib/dev-state/zap/3" to "/dev/zap/3" Oct 22 16:29:56 asterisk1 devfsd[168]: error copying: "/lib/dev-state/zap/4" to "/dev/zap/4" Oct 22 16:29:56 asterisk1 devfsd[168]: error copying: "/lib/dev-state/zap/5" to "/dev/zap/5" Oct 22 16:29:56 asterisk1 devfsd[168]: error copying: "/lib/dev-state/zap/6" to "/dev/zap/6" Oct 22 16:29:56 asterisk1 devfsd[168]: error copying: "/lib/dev-state/zap/7" to "/dev/zap/7" Oct 22 16:29:56 asterisk1 devfsd[168]: error copying: "/lib/dev-state/zap/8" to "/dev/zap/8" Oct 22 16:29:56 asterisk1 devfsd[168]: error copying: "/lib/dev-state/zap/9" to "/dev/zap/9" Oct 22 16:29:56 asterisk1 devfsd[168]: error copying: "/lib/dev-state/zap/10" to "/dev/zap/10" Oct 22 16:29:56 asterisk1 devfsd[168]: error copying: "/lib/dev-state/zap/11" to "/dev/zap/11" Oct 22 16:29:56 asterisk1 devfsd[168]: error copying: "/lib/dev-state/zap/12" to "/dev/zap/12" Oct 22 16:30:36 asterisk1 kernel: Registered tone zone 2 (France) Oct 22 16:30:36 asterisk1 kernel: card 1 span 1 state G2 (A_ST_RD_STA = 0x82) Oct 22 16:30:36 asterisk1 kernel: card 1 span 2 state G2 (A_ST_RD_STA = 0xc2) Oct 22 16:30:36 asterisk1 kernel: card 1 span 3 state G2 (A_ST_RD_STA = 0x82) Oct 22 16:30:36 asterisk1 kernel: card 1 span 4 state G2 (A_ST_RD_STA = 0xc2) Oct 22 16:30:36 asterisk1 kernel: card 1 span 1 state G3 (A_ST_RD_STA = 0x13) Oct 22 16:30:36 asterisk1 kernel: card 1 span 2 state G3 (A_ST_RD_STA = 0x13) Oct 22 16:30:36 asterisk1 kernel: card 1 span 3 state G3 (A_ST_RD_STA = 0x13) Oct 22 16:30:36 asterisk1 kernel: card 1 span 4 state G3 (A_ST_RD_STA = 0x13) Oct 22 16:30:36 asterisk1 kernel: qozap: card 1 span 1 RX [ 0x0 0x1 0x7f 0x64 0x54 ] Oct 22 16:30:36
RE: [Asterisk-Users] Direct SIP connection to Vonage service
On Friday, October 22, 2004 2:40 PM Stewart Nelson wrote: > I presently have a small VoIP network using H.323 and gnugk, > and would like to upgrade it to an Asterisk-based system, > > primarily to take advantage of low cost unlimited calling > plans offered by SIP providers such as Vonage. FYI these so called "unlimited" monthly plans are RARELY, if _EVER_ truly unlimited. They CAN (read the TOS), and WILL terminate you if you use too many minutes more then whatever average they calculated for when pricing the plan. I personally know several people who were using the Vonage "unlimited" calling plan and were terminated for _"EXCESSIVE USAGE"_ >However, the carriers with good reputations for reliability and quality > seem to require that you connect via a "locked" ATA device. As some other people have suggested, your best bet is to just use a VoIP provider who natively supports the InterAsteriskExchange protocol. Two that I know of are NuFone.net and tollfreeexpress.com . Try Google and the voip-info.org wiki for others. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] iLBC/PCM16 Huge Cost
Could you tell us what RAID card you are using + what drivers you are using for it. Could you try to run it without the raid card ? Zoa. At 12:35 23/10/2004, you wrote: Trevor Peirce wrote: Sure. Running Fedora Core 2 with latest updates (kernel 2.6.8-1.521) on a Celeron 1.70 GHz chip. Half a gig DDR ram, one generic X100P card with it's very own IRQ. Asterisk is the latest CVS. It's about time for bed.. spent too many hours trying to figure out other things that I'm starting to lose it! I'll be back in a few hours to fill in any other details that might help to diagnose this problem. Thanks, Trevor Peirce ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] iLBC/PCM16 Huge Cost
Trevor Peirce wrote: Sure. Running Fedora Core 2 with latest updates (kernel 2.6.8-1.521) on a Celeron 1.70 GHz chip. Half a gig DDR ram, one generic X100P card with it's very own IRQ. Asterisk is the latest CVS. It's about time for bed.. spent too many hours trying to figure out other things that I'm starting to lose it! I'll be back in a few hours to fill in any other details that might help to diagnose this problem. Thanks, Trevor Peirce ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] iLBC/PCM16 Huge Cost
joachim wrote: Could you give us more information on: Distro, kernel version, compiler, makefile flags, version of asterisk, and hardware on your machine, + loaded modules ? GSM to LPC10 is also way tooo slow. Sure. Running Fedora Core 2 with latest updates (kernel 2.6.8-1.521) on a Celeron 1.70 GHz chip. Half a gig DDR ram, one generic X100P card with it's very own IRQ. I've got zaptel, wcfxs and wcfxo loaded, other those the only other modules are what Fedora put there during installation. Not sure what other specifics would be handy. Everything is pretty much vanilla except asterisk's sip.conf, zaptel.conf, and extensions.conf. Regards, Trevor ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] chan_sip changes affecting ACK? - Bug?
Chad, I need a more complete SIP debug than just one packet to try to look into this issue. If the device registers, both a REGISTER transaction and a subsequent call with the ACK - THank you! /O ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] asterisk & ipv6
Miroslav Nachev wrote: Dear Olle, I can say that Emil Ivov has very good knowledge on IPv6 too. You can use it. Great - the more IPv6 experts that can help us with coding advice, code review and patches - the better! /O ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] iLBC/PCM16 Huge Cost
Could you give us more information on: Distro, kernel version, compiler, makefile flags, version of asterisk, and hardware on your machine, + loaded modules ? GSM to LPC10 is also way tooo slow. - *CLI> show uptime System uptime: 27 minutes, 2 seconds *CLI> show translation Translation times between formats (in milliseconds) Source Format (Rows) Destination Format(Columns) G723 GSM ULAW ALAW G726 ADPCM SLINR LPC10 G729A SPEEX ILBC G723 - - - - - - - - - - - GSM - - 2 2 4 2 1 1238 - - 529695 ULAW - 5 - 1 4 2 1 1238 - - 529695 ALAW - 5 1 - 4 2 1 1238 - - 529695 G726 - 7 4 4 - 4 3 1240 - - 529697 ADPCM - 5 2 2 4 - 1 1238 - - 529695 SLINR - 4 1 1 3 1 - 1237 - - 529694 LPC10 - 196 193 193 195 193 192 - - - 529886 G729A - - - - - - - - - - - SPEEX - - - - - - - - - - - ILBC - 219 216 216 218 216 215 1452 - - - ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Trabas & Radius
If you look very hard, you can find two versions on trabas on the web, an old one, not working and a new one not complete and not installing. (the SQL files are incomplete for example) If you combine both, and you are extremely patient you might be able to get it to actually display something in your browser, by the time you get there, you might understand that its maybe not a very good idea to even want to try to use it. Many people tried, none survived. Joachim. I just saved you a week of complete misery, send me some beer on [EMAIL PROTECTED] :p At 02:04 23/10/2004, you wrote: Any tips, tricks or treats out there? I'm building a new system and would like to move away from my SQL based call rating solution... ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] iLBC/PCM16 Huge Cost
joachim wrote: I have seen similar things in the past, but only during startup. When started, do a show translation and look again, if that value is ok, you can ignore the one on startup. *CLI> show uptime System uptime: 27 minutes, 2 seconds *CLI> show translation Translation times between formats (in milliseconds) Source Format (Rows) Destination Format(Columns) G723 GSM ULAW ALAW G726 ADPCM SLINR LPC10 G729A SPEEX ILBC G723 - - - - - - - - - - - GSM - - 2 2 4 2 1 1238 - - 529695 ULAW - 5 - 1 4 2 1 1238 - - 529695 ALAW - 5 1 - 4 2 1 1238 - - 529695 G726 - 7 4 4 - 4 3 1240 - - 529697 ADPCM - 5 2 2 4 - 1 1238 - - 529695 SLINR - 4 1 1 3 1 - 1237 - - 529694 LPC10 - 196 193 193 195 193 192 - - - 529886 G729A - - - - - - - - - - - SPEEX - - - - - - - - - - - ILBC - 219 216 216 218 216 215 1452 - - - ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] iLBC/PCM16 Huge Cost
I have seen similar things in the past, but only during startup. When started, do a show translation and look again, if that value is ok, you can ignore the one on startup. Zoa. At 12:06 23/10/2004, you wrote: Hello, During asterisk bootup, I've been having a fun time with a random delay which can be quite long, from what seems to be the codec_ilbc.so file. I notice in verbose mode the cost is rather high, and was hoping someone will have some insight on what's going on here. Prior to a harddrive dying, I was running * on this same hardware flawlessly. The only difference now is a new RAID card (no IRQ conflicts), and a pair of harddrives instead of jsut one. This seems to happen on both CVS and stable 1.0.1. [codec_ilbc.so] => (iLBC/PCM16 (signed linear) Codec Translator) == Registered translator 'ilbctolin' from format ILBC to SLINR, cost 215 == Registered translator 'lintoilbc' from format SLINR to ILBC, cost 629693 TIA, Trevor Peirce ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] iLBC/PCM16 Huge Cost
Hello, During asterisk bootup, I've been having a fun time with a random delay which can be quite long, from what seems to be the codec_ilbc.so file. I notice in verbose mode the cost is rather high, and was hoping someone will have some insight on what's going on here. Prior to a harddrive dying, I was running * on this same hardware flawlessly. The only difference now is a new RAID card (no IRQ conflicts), and a pair of harddrives instead of jsut one. This seems to happen on both CVS and stable 1.0.1. [codec_ilbc.so] => (iLBC/PCM16 (signed linear) Codec Translator) == Registered translator 'ilbctolin' from format ILBC to SLINR, cost 215 == Registered translator 'lintoilbc' from format SLINR to ILBC, cost 629693 TIA, Trevor Peirce ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Re: Sipura 3000 FXO
Randy Bush wrote: i come from an automated ip backbone world where we generated configs automatically from sql data tied to the back office and sales systems. i want to have a shipping person take a new spa3k out of the box, plug it into an ether, hit the 'Confirm' button on the customer order fulfillment screen, wait 30 seconds, and then stick the puppy in the outbound shipping box. There's no reason a SPA configuration couldn't be auto-generated from a SQL database. There's the issue of interfacing that with the SPA Compiler to compile a configuration file and put it somewhere (e.g. a web server), but that should be easy to do. It's fairly trivial to set up a box as a DHCP server and tftp server with a spa.cfg (where is 2000, 3000, etc). The DHCP server sets the tftp-server option. This config simply sets a provisioning rule that says "go get your next config from https://some/website/$MA.cfg"; (where the device substitutes $MA for its MAC address). This URL would be the location where your auto-generated device configuration would reside. Optionally, you can also have it load new firmware. The spa.cfg file sits in the root of the tftp server. Basically, all you have to do is unbox a new SPA, plug the box in, wait several seconds, wait for the status lights to stop blinking, and the box is ready to ship. I did something similar with about 40 SPA-2000s and the entire process was painless and quick. It doesn't even need to have the "real" configuration from the SQL database yet, it can pick that up when it gets plugged in next time. -- PhoneBoy ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Load test IAX
.call files are through the manager. An simple app exists, and should make it online very soon on www.astertest.com (just cleaning up the code to make it a bit more user friendly atm). At 20:26 21/10/2004, you wrote: Is there a way to load test IAX? I know I can setup long duration calls via manager. Just wondering if there is an app that will spawn sessions easily. Thanks! ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users