[asterisk-users] Uninstalling Asterisk? No make uninstall?

2006-07-08 Thread Carey O'Shea
There does not seem to be any make uninstall for Asterisk 1.2.9.1 and
Zaptel 1.2.6... 

I tried to apply an uninstall patch but got many Hunk errors from both
1.2.9.1 and latest SVN:
http://bugs.digium.com/file_download.php?file_id=8805type=bug

Is there a reason that there is no make uninstall? And what is the
easiest way to completely remove Asterisk and Zaptel from any given
system -- cleanly and properly?

Thanks in advance.


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Uninstalling Asterisk? No make uninstall?

2006-07-08 Thread Carey O'Shea
On Sat, 2006-07-08 at 10:22 +0300, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
 On Sat, Jul 08, 2006 at 04:46:00PM +1000, Carey O'Shea wrote:
  There does not seem to be any make uninstall for Asterisk 1.2.9.1 and
  Zaptel 1.2.6... 
  
  I tried to apply an uninstall patch but got many Hunk errors from both
  1.2.9.1 and latest SVN:
  http://bugs.digium.com/file_download.php?file_id=8805type=bug
 
 Next time, patch --dry-run # :-(

It's OK, I did the patch on copies of my built source on an isolated
server, so I still have my original untouched sources that I am
currently running.

  Is there a reason that there is no make uninstall? And what is the
  easiest way to completely remove Asterisk and Zaptel from any given
  system -- cleanly and properly?
 
 If you want to reinstall just reinstall on top of the old system.

I don't need to reinstall, I need to uninstall.

 
 You can't really be sure that the uninstall script you'll be running is
 using the same options as the one you build with.

I should be able to with a proper make uninstall.

 
 If you want to allow a clean uninstall, either use asterisk from a
 decent package or try something like checkinstall .
 

The Asterisk packages built for my systems are always far too out of
date. However you are right, since there seems to be no make
uninstall, then packages should have been built by hand at compile time
instead of make install. But it is too late for that now, make
install has already been run, hence my post. Is the only option to
manually remove everything?


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Uninstalling Asterisk? No make uninstall?

2006-07-08 Thread Carey O'Shea
On Sat, 2006-07-08 at 10:58 +0300, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
 On Sat, Jul 08, 2006 at 05:43:41PM +1000, Carey O'Shea wrote:
  On Sat, 2006-07-08 at 10:22 +0300, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
   On Sat, Jul 08, 2006 at 04:46:00PM +1000, Carey O'Shea wrote:
There does not seem to be any make uninstall for Asterisk 1.2.9.1 and
Zaptel 1.2.6... 

I tried to apply an uninstall patch but got many Hunk errors from both
1.2.9.1 and latest SVN:
http://bugs.digium.com/file_download.php?file_id=8805type=bug
   
   Next time, patch --dry-run # :-(
  
  It's OK, I did the patch on copies of my built source on an isolated
  server, so I still have my original untouched sources that I am
  currently running.
  
Is there a reason that there is no make uninstall? And what is the
easiest way to completely remove Asterisk and Zaptel from any given
system -- cleanly and properly?
   
   If you want to reinstall just reinstall on top of the old system.
  
  I don't need to reinstall, I need to uninstall.
  
   
   You can't really be sure that the uninstall script you'll be running is
   using the same options as the one you build with.
  
  I should be able to with a proper make uninstall.
  
   
   If you want to allow a clean uninstall, either use asterisk from a
   decent package or try something like checkinstall .
   
  
  The Asterisk packages built for my systems are always far too out of
  date. However you are right, since there seems to be no make
  uninstall, then packages should have been built by hand at compile time
  instead of make install. But it is too late for that now, make
  install has already been run, hence my post. Is the only option to
  manually remove everything?
 
 Everything is not much. Mostly /etc/asterisk , /var/lib/asterisk ,
 /var/spool/asterisk , /var/run/asterisk , /etc/asterisk ,
 /usr/lib/asterisk (/modules) and /usr/share/asterisk (at least in some
 cases).
 
 There are also a number of binaries in /usr/sbin (most notably asterisk)
 which may differ a bit, depending on yor installation method.
 

And the many manpages, and zaptel modules, and header include for
zaptel, and /dev/zap, and /usr/include/asterisk, and rasterisk, and
safe_asterisk, and /var/log/asterisk, and astkeygen, and astman, ztcfg,
zttool, and I'm sure there are more.

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [asterisk-users] Uninstalling Asterisk? No make uninstall?

2006-07-08 Thread Carey O'Shea
On Sat, 2006-07-08 at 13:00 +0300, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
 On Sat, Jul 08, 2006 at 07:27:37PM +1000, Carey O'Shea wrote:
  On Sat, 2006-07-08 at 10:58 +0300, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
   On Sat, Jul 08, 2006 at 05:43:41PM +1000, Carey O'Shea wrote:
On Sat, 2006-07-08 at 10:22 +0300, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
 On Sat, Jul 08, 2006 at 04:46:00PM +1000, Carey O'Shea wrote:
  There does not seem to be any make uninstall for Asterisk 1.2.9.1 
  and
  Zaptel 1.2.6... 
  
  I tried to apply an uninstall patch but got many Hunk errors from 
  both
  1.2.9.1 and latest SVN:
  http://bugs.digium.com/file_download.php?file_id=8805type=bug
 
 Next time, patch --dry-run # :-(

It's OK, I did the patch on copies of my built source on an isolated
server, so I still have my original untouched sources that I am
currently running.

  Is there a reason that there is no make uninstall? And what is the
  easiest way to completely remove Asterisk and Zaptel from any given
  system -- cleanly and properly?
 
 If you want to reinstall just reinstall on top of the old system.

I don't need to reinstall, I need to uninstall.

 
 You can't really be sure that the uninstall script you'll be running 
 is
 using the same options as the one you build with.

I should be able to with a proper make uninstall.

 
 If you want to allow a clean uninstall, either use asterisk from a
 decent package or try something like checkinstall .
 

The Asterisk packages built for my systems are always far too out of
date. However you are right, since there seems to be no make
uninstall, then packages should have been built by hand at compile time
instead of make install. But it is too late for that now, make
install has already been run, hence my post. Is the only option to
manually remove everything?
   
   Everything is not much. Mostly /etc/asterisk , /var/lib/asterisk ,
   /var/spool/asterisk , /var/run/asterisk , /etc/asterisk ,
   /usr/lib/asterisk (/modules) and /usr/share/asterisk (at least in some
   cases).
   
   There are also a number of binaries in /usr/sbin (most notably asterisk)
   which may differ a bit, depending on yor installation method.
   
  
  And the many manpages, 
 
 Right
 
  and zaptel modules, 
 
 This is not asteris. It's zaptel.
 
 Take a look at the guessswork done in the install target of zaptel. 
 Do you really want such guesswork be done automatically? Hint: even
 getting the kernel version may notbe trivial. imply deleting everything
 under misc/ might deete something else you installed.
 
  and header include for
  zaptel, 
 
 zaptel.h and libtonezone are part of zaptel, again. 
 
  and /dev/zap, and /usr/include/asterisk, and rasterisk, and
  safe_asterisk, and /var/log/asterisk, and astkeygen, and astman, 
 
 Right
 
  ztcfg,
  zttool, and I'm sure there are more.
 
 Zaptel, again.
 

I realise which things I mentioned originated from Zaptel, as my
original post asked about removing both Asterisk and Zaptel. I'm not
complaining, I'm just saying that removing things manually means that
you are likely to miss things.


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] hangup lag causing the answering of already answered calls

2006-06-20 Thread Carey O'Shea
Well I've found out what was causing my duplicate logging: it was
entirely a NAT issue. Found out it was only happening on some remote
endpoints (and not all of them), and that different routers proved to
not have duplicate logging.

What part of NAT could cause this? Was it really sending all packets
twice, or something like that? Just seems kinda strange. Anyway, it's no
longer a problem.

My original problem, however, remains. Phone doesn't stop ringing when
it's meant to. Only happens when call is via my ZapATA.

Any ideas/help/input is appreciated!

Regards,
Carey.

On Sun, 2006-06-11 at 15:18 +1000, Carey O'Shea wrote:
 Does anyone have any ideas as to what can cause this large delay to stop
 ringing?
 
 It's quite a show stopper... imagine ringing a business and being
 answered by 3 different people, one after the other, all talking over
 the top of each other.
 
 On Fri, 2006-06-09 at 15:12 +1000, Carey O'Shea wrote:
  Hi Undrhil,
  
  A logical idea, but unfortunately adding it didn't change anything.
  
  Two important points:
  (1) When I test this with just IAX endpoints, no Zap, the call is hungup
  immediately, (2) but the console still shows the user being called
  twice.
  
  So as a wild guess, maybe the console logging twice is OK, and it's my
  Zap configuration?
  
  * extensions.conf:
  [incoming]
  exten = s,1,Dial(IAX2/carey)
  exten = s,2,Hangup(IAX2/carey)
  
  * zapata.conf:
  [channels]
  usecallerid=no
  signalling=fxs_ks
  context=incoming
  channel = 4 
  
  * zaptel.conf
  loadzone=au
  defaultzone=au
  fxsks=4
  
  * ztcfg -vv
  Channel 04: FXS Kewlstart (Default) (Slaves: 04)
  1 channels configured.
  
  I'm from Australia so I assume the loadzone and defaultzone is OK as per
  zaptel.c. Did not post iax.conf due to my SIP phones having the same
  behaviour, and IAX-to-IAX not exhibiting the problem.
  
  
  On Fri, 2006-06-09 at 04:54 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   So, your dialplan for that incoming call is just the one line?
   
   exten =
   s,1,Dial(IAX2/carey)
   
   Nothing else?  Try adding a Hangup command on the
   next priority and see if that helps any.
   
   exten = s,2,Hangup
   
   If you
   already have a Hangup command in there, then I apologize for wasting your
   time.  :)
   
   Undrhil
   
   --- Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
   asterisk-users@lists.digium.com wrote:
   I have a TDM-400P with one FXO module.
   On an incoming call, I have set
Asterisk to dial my phone (exten = s,1,Dial(IAX2/carey)),
   which is
basically the only thing in my dialplan.

When the call
   is answered by the PSTN phone first, or when the ringing
call is hung up,
   Asterisk keeps ringing for 5+ seconds, which causes
trouble (the answering
   of already answered calls).

I noticed in the Asterisk console that
   my phone is called twice every
time there is an incoming call. Is this
   normal, and could it be causing
this behaviour?

If not, any ideas
   as to what could be causing this? I can provide full
debug logs and my
   relevant configuration if needed.

Console log:

-- Starting
   simple switch on 'Zap/4-1'
-- Executing Dial(Zap/4-1, IAX2/carey)
   in new stack
-- Called carey
-- Starting simple switch on 'Zap/4-1'
   
-- Executing Dial(Zap/4-1, IAX2/carey) in new stack
-- Called
   carey
-- Call accepted by 10.0.12.102 (format ulaw)
-- Format
   for call is ulaw
-- Call accepted by 10.0.12.102 (format ulaw)

  -- Format for call is ulaw
-- IAX2/carey-1 is ringing
--
   IAX2/carey-1 is ringing
-- Hungup 'IAX2/carey-1'
  == Spawn extension
   (incoming, s, 1) exited non-zero on 'Zap/4-1'
-- Hungup 'Zap/4-1'
-- Hungup 'IAX2/carey-1'
  == Spawn extension (incoming, s, 1) exited
   non-zero on 'Zap/4-1'
-- Hungup 'Zap/4-1'


___
   
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users
   mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
   

   ___
   --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
   
   Asterisk-Users mailing list
   To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
  
  ___
  --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
  
  Asterisk-Users mailing list
  To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 
 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
 
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [Asterisk-Users] hangup lag causing the answering of already answered calls

2006-06-20 Thread Carey O'Shea
http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/index.php?page=Australia%20Asterisk%
20Details

Stumbled across this Reverse On Idle Condition (ROIC) 'feature' that
sounds very promising. Will get it enabled later today and give it a go.


On Tue, 2006-06-20 at 23:35 +1000, Carey O'Shea wrote:
 Well I've found out what was causing my duplicate logging: it was
 entirely a NAT issue. Found out it was only happening on some remote
 endpoints (and not all of them), and that different routers proved to
 not have duplicate logging.
 
 What part of NAT could cause this? Was it really sending all packets
 twice, or something like that? Just seems kinda strange. Anyway, it's no
 longer a problem.
 
 My original problem, however, remains. Phone doesn't stop ringing when
 it's meant to. Only happens when call is via my ZapATA.
 
 Any ideas/help/input is appreciated!
 
 Regards,
 Carey.
 
 On Sun, 2006-06-11 at 15:18 +1000, Carey O'Shea wrote:
  Does anyone have any ideas as to what can cause this large delay to stop
  ringing?
  
  It's quite a show stopper... imagine ringing a business and being
  answered by 3 different people, one after the other, all talking over
  the top of each other.
  
  On Fri, 2006-06-09 at 15:12 +1000, Carey O'Shea wrote:
   Hi Undrhil,
   
   A logical idea, but unfortunately adding it didn't change anything.
   
   Two important points:
   (1) When I test this with just IAX endpoints, no Zap, the call is hungup
   immediately, (2) but the console still shows the user being called
   twice.
   
   So as a wild guess, maybe the console logging twice is OK, and it's my
   Zap configuration?
   
   * extensions.conf:
   [incoming]
   exten = s,1,Dial(IAX2/carey)
   exten = s,2,Hangup(IAX2/carey)
   
   * zapata.conf:
   [channels]
   usecallerid=no
   signalling=fxs_ks
   context=incoming
   channel = 4 
   
   * zaptel.conf
   loadzone=au
   defaultzone=au
   fxsks=4
   
   * ztcfg -vv
   Channel 04: FXS Kewlstart (Default) (Slaves: 04)
   1 channels configured.
   
   I'm from Australia so I assume the loadzone and defaultzone is OK as per
   zaptel.c. Did not post iax.conf due to my SIP phones having the same
   behaviour, and IAX-to-IAX not exhibiting the problem.
   
   
   On Fri, 2006-06-09 at 04:54 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, your dialplan for that incoming call is just the one line?

exten =
s,1,Dial(IAX2/carey)

Nothing else?  Try adding a Hangup command on the
next priority and see if that helps any.

exten = s,2,Hangup

If you
already have a Hangup command in there, then I apologize for wasting 
your
time.  :)

Undrhil

--- Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
asterisk-users@lists.digium.com wrote:
I have a TDM-400P with one FXO module.
On an incoming call, I have set
 Asterisk to dial my phone (exten = s,1,Dial(IAX2/carey)),
which is
 basically the only thing in my dialplan.
 
 When the call
is answered by the PSTN phone first, or when the ringing
 call is hung up,
Asterisk keeps ringing for 5+ seconds, which causes
 trouble (the answering
of already answered calls).
 
 I noticed in the Asterisk console that
my phone is called twice every
 time there is an incoming call. Is this
normal, and could it be causing
 this behaviour?
 
 If not, any ideas
as to what could be causing this? I can provide full
 debug logs and my
relevant configuration if needed.
 
 Console log:
 
 -- Starting
simple switch on 'Zap/4-1'
 -- Executing Dial(Zap/4-1, IAX2/carey)
in new stack
 -- Called carey
 -- Starting simple switch on 'Zap/4-1'

 -- Executing Dial(Zap/4-1, IAX2/carey) in new stack
 -- Called
carey
 -- Call accepted by 10.0.12.102 (format ulaw)
 -- Format
for call is ulaw
 -- Call accepted by 10.0.12.102 (format ulaw)
 
   -- Format for call is ulaw
 -- IAX2/carey-1 is ringing
 --
IAX2/carey-1 is ringing
 -- Hungup 'IAX2/carey-1'
   == Spawn extension
(incoming, s, 1) exited non-zero on 'Zap/4-1'
 -- Hungup 'Zap/4-1'
 -- Hungup 'IAX2/carey-1'
   == Spawn extension (incoming, s, 1) exited
non-zero on 'Zap/4-1'
 -- Hungup 'Zap/4-1'
 
 
 ___

 --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
 
 Asterisk-Users
mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

 
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
   
   ___
   --Bandwidth

[Asterisk-Users] TDM400P bad echo problem, tried lots of things

2006-06-20 Thread Carey O'Shea
I have a bad echo problem on my TDM400P with one FXO module installed.

I have tried a few things, such as:

* setting rxgain and txgain to 0
* setting echocancelwhenbridged to no / yes
* settting echocancel to 64 / no / yes
* setting echocanceltraining to 800 / no / yes
* MG2 echo cancellation
* MARK2 echo cancellation
* KB1 echo cancellation
* AGGRESSIVE_SUPPRESSOR option of MARK2

Each time restarting Asterisk, then opening the Zap channel, and then
speaking...only to hear my self played back almost instantly. 

None of these options changed the echo for me, it always sounded the
same -- except for the AGGRESSIVE_SUPPRESSOR option, in which every time
I spoke it made the other end a very low volume, so much that I couldn't
hear the other end (ie: not useful).

I don't have this problem with pure IP calls, it's only with my TDM400P
and FXO that I have this echo problem. This means my headset and IP
phones are fine (of course).

So, what else can I try? :-)

Any ideas why this is so consistent and persistent? Maybe it's something
to do with my phone cable or something of that nature (hmm?)?

Any input appreciated.

Thanks,
Carey O'Shea.


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Which application to open Zap channel?

2006-06-18 Thread Carey O'Shea
I'm using Dial(Zap/X/) as suggested. 

However, Dial(Zap/X) does indeed work for me. So I'm curious, what's the
difference between them, and when wouldn't just Zap/X work?


On Wed, 2006-06-14 at 11:14 -0500, Eric ManxPower Wieling wrote:
 Carey O'Shea wrote:
  I swear Dial(Zap/X) was the first thing I tried and it didn't work, but
  now it works fine... hmmm maybe I forgot to reload my extensions or
  something like that.
 
 Don't expect Dial(Zap/X) to work.  Expect Dial(Zap/X/) to work.
 

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Which application to open Zap channel?

2006-06-14 Thread Carey O'Shea
I'm sure this a very common and easy thing to do with Asterisk, but for
the life of me I can't find the application that will allow me to open a
Zap channel.

Real world example: To be able to connect to an open Zap channel, so it
would allow me to say, join in on a call that was originally answered by
a PSTN phone (ie. just like you would by simply picking up another PSTN
phone..!).

There is ZapBarge, but allows no speaking, which is useless for this
situation. Maybe I just have to use Dial in some way?

Thanks.


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Which application to open Zap channel?

2006-06-14 Thread Carey O'Shea
I swear Dial(Zap/X) was the first thing I tried and it didn't work, but
now it works fine... hmmm maybe I forgot to reload my extensions or
something like that.

Thanks though.


On Wed, 2006-06-14 at 10:03 -0400, Mailing List wrote:
 This will just pick up the line
 
 exten = *01,1,Dial(ZAP/1/)
 
 _
 Mobilcom
 http://www.mobilcom.net
 
 
 - Original Message - 
 From: Carey O'Shea [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com
 Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2006 9:48 AM
 Subject: [Asterisk-Users] Which application to open Zap channel?
 
 
  I'm sure this a very common and easy thing to do with Asterisk, but for
  the life of me I can't find the application that will allow me to open a
  Zap channel.
  
  Real world example: To be able to connect to an open Zap channel, so it
  would allow me to say, join in on a call that was originally answered by
  a PSTN phone (ie. just like you would by simply picking up another PSTN
  phone..!).
  
  There is ZapBarge, but allows no speaking, which is useless for this
  situation. Maybe I just have to use Dial in some way?
  
  Thanks.
  
  
  ___
  --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
  
  Asterisk-Users mailing list
  To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 
 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
 
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] hangup lag causing the answering of already answered calls

2006-06-10 Thread Carey O'Shea
Does anyone have any ideas as to what can cause this large delay to stop
ringing?

It's quite a show stopper... imagine ringing a business and being
answered by 3 different people, one after the other, all talking over
the top of each other.

On Fri, 2006-06-09 at 15:12 +1000, Carey O'Shea wrote:
 Hi Undrhil,
 
 A logical idea, but unfortunately adding it didn't change anything.
 
 Two important points:
 (1) When I test this with just IAX endpoints, no Zap, the call is hungup
 immediately, (2) but the console still shows the user being called
 twice.
 
 So as a wild guess, maybe the console logging twice is OK, and it's my
 Zap configuration?
 
 * extensions.conf:
 [incoming]
 exten = s,1,Dial(IAX2/carey)
 exten = s,2,Hangup(IAX2/carey)
 
 * zapata.conf:
 [channels]
 usecallerid=no
 signalling=fxs_ks
 context=incoming
 channel = 4 
 
 * zaptel.conf
 loadzone=au
 defaultzone=au
 fxsks=4
 
 * ztcfg -vv
 Channel 04: FXS Kewlstart (Default) (Slaves: 04)
 1 channels configured.
 
 I'm from Australia so I assume the loadzone and defaultzone is OK as per
 zaptel.c. Did not post iax.conf due to my SIP phones having the same
 behaviour, and IAX-to-IAX not exhibiting the problem.
 
 
 On Fri, 2006-06-09 at 04:54 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  So, your dialplan for that incoming call is just the one line?
  
  exten =
  s,1,Dial(IAX2/carey)
  
  Nothing else?  Try adding a Hangup command on the
  next priority and see if that helps any.
  
  exten = s,2,Hangup
  
  If you
  already have a Hangup command in there, then I apologize for wasting your
  time.  :)
  
  Undrhil
  
  --- Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
  asterisk-users@lists.digium.com wrote:
  I have a TDM-400P with one FXO module.
  On an incoming call, I have set
   Asterisk to dial my phone (exten = s,1,Dial(IAX2/carey)),
  which is
   basically the only thing in my dialplan.
   
   When the call
  is answered by the PSTN phone first, or when the ringing
   call is hung up,
  Asterisk keeps ringing for 5+ seconds, which causes
   trouble (the answering
  of already answered calls).
   
   I noticed in the Asterisk console that
  my phone is called twice every
   time there is an incoming call. Is this
  normal, and could it be causing
   this behaviour?
   
   If not, any ideas
  as to what could be causing this? I can provide full
   debug logs and my
  relevant configuration if needed.
   
   Console log:
   
   -- Starting
  simple switch on 'Zap/4-1'
   -- Executing Dial(Zap/4-1, IAX2/carey)
  in new stack
   -- Called carey
   -- Starting simple switch on 'Zap/4-1'
  
   -- Executing Dial(Zap/4-1, IAX2/carey) in new stack
   -- Called
  carey
   -- Call accepted by 10.0.12.102 (format ulaw)
   -- Format
  for call is ulaw
   -- Call accepted by 10.0.12.102 (format ulaw)
   
 -- Format for call is ulaw
   -- IAX2/carey-1 is ringing
   --
  IAX2/carey-1 is ringing
   -- Hungup 'IAX2/carey-1'
 == Spawn extension
  (incoming, s, 1) exited non-zero on 'Zap/4-1'
   -- Hungup 'Zap/4-1'
   -- Hungup 'IAX2/carey-1'
 == Spawn extension (incoming, s, 1) exited
  non-zero on 'Zap/4-1'
   -- Hungup 'Zap/4-1'
   
   
   ___
  
   --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
   
   Asterisk-Users
  mailing list
   To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
  
   
  ___
  --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
  
  Asterisk-Users mailing list
  To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 
 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
 
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] hangup lag causing the answering of already answered calls

2006-06-08 Thread Carey O'Shea
I have a TDM-400P with one FXO module. On an incoming call, I have set
Asterisk to dial my phone (exten = s,1,Dial(IAX2/carey)), which is
basically the only thing in my dialplan.

When the call is answered by the PSTN phone first, or when the ringing
call is hung up, Asterisk keeps ringing for 5+ seconds, which causes
trouble (the answering of already answered calls).

I noticed in the Asterisk console that my phone is called twice every
time there is an incoming call. Is this normal, and could it be causing
this behaviour?

If not, any ideas as to what could be causing this? I can provide full
debug logs and my relevant configuration if needed.

Console log:

-- Starting simple switch on 'Zap/4-1'
-- Executing Dial(Zap/4-1, IAX2/carey) in new stack
-- Called carey
-- Starting simple switch on 'Zap/4-1'
-- Executing Dial(Zap/4-1, IAX2/carey) in new stack
-- Called carey
-- Call accepted by 10.0.12.102 (format ulaw)
-- Format for call is ulaw
-- Call accepted by 10.0.12.102 (format ulaw)
-- Format for call is ulaw
-- IAX2/carey-1 is ringing
-- IAX2/carey-1 is ringing
-- Hungup 'IAX2/carey-1'
  == Spawn extension (incoming, s, 1) exited non-zero on 'Zap/4-1'
-- Hungup 'Zap/4-1'
-- Hungup 'IAX2/carey-1'
  == Spawn extension (incoming, s, 1) exited non-zero on 'Zap/4-1'
-- Hungup 'Zap/4-1'


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] hangup lag causing the answering of already answered calls

2006-06-08 Thread Carey O'Shea
Hi Undrhil,

A logical idea, but unfortunately adding it didn't change anything.

Two important points:
(1) When I test this with just IAX endpoints, no Zap, the call is hungup
immediately, (2) but the console still shows the user being called
twice.

So as a wild guess, maybe the console logging twice is OK, and it's my
Zap configuration?

* extensions.conf:
[incoming]
exten = s,1,Dial(IAX2/carey)
exten = s,2,Hangup(IAX2/carey)

* zapata.conf:
[channels]
usecallerid=no
signalling=fxs_ks
context=incoming
channel = 4 

* zaptel.conf
loadzone=au
defaultzone=au
fxsks=4

* ztcfg -vv
Channel 04: FXS Kewlstart (Default) (Slaves: 04)
1 channels configured.

I'm from Australia so I assume the loadzone and defaultzone is OK as per
zaptel.c. Did not post iax.conf due to my SIP phones having the same
behaviour, and IAX-to-IAX not exhibiting the problem.


On Fri, 2006-06-09 at 04:54 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 So, your dialplan for that incoming call is just the one line?
 
 exten =
 s,1,Dial(IAX2/carey)
 
 Nothing else?  Try adding a Hangup command on the
 next priority and see if that helps any.
 
 exten = s,2,Hangup
 
 If you
 already have a Hangup command in there, then I apologize for wasting your
 time.  :)
 
 Undrhil
 
 --- Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
 asterisk-users@lists.digium.com wrote:
 I have a TDM-400P with one FXO module.
 On an incoming call, I have set
  Asterisk to dial my phone (exten = s,1,Dial(IAX2/carey)),
 which is
  basically the only thing in my dialplan.
  
  When the call
 is answered by the PSTN phone first, or when the ringing
  call is hung up,
 Asterisk keeps ringing for 5+ seconds, which causes
  trouble (the answering
 of already answered calls).
  
  I noticed in the Asterisk console that
 my phone is called twice every
  time there is an incoming call. Is this
 normal, and could it be causing
  this behaviour?
  
  If not, any ideas
 as to what could be causing this? I can provide full
  debug logs and my
 relevant configuration if needed.
  
  Console log:
  
  -- Starting
 simple switch on 'Zap/4-1'
  -- Executing Dial(Zap/4-1, IAX2/carey)
 in new stack
  -- Called carey
  -- Starting simple switch on 'Zap/4-1'
 
  -- Executing Dial(Zap/4-1, IAX2/carey) in new stack
  -- Called
 carey
  -- Call accepted by 10.0.12.102 (format ulaw)
  -- Format
 for call is ulaw
  -- Call accepted by 10.0.12.102 (format ulaw)
  
-- Format for call is ulaw
  -- IAX2/carey-1 is ringing
  --
 IAX2/carey-1 is ringing
  -- Hungup 'IAX2/carey-1'
== Spawn extension
 (incoming, s, 1) exited non-zero on 'Zap/4-1'
  -- Hungup 'Zap/4-1'
  -- Hungup 'IAX2/carey-1'
== Spawn extension (incoming, s, 1) exited
 non-zero on 'Zap/4-1'
  -- Hungup 'Zap/4-1'
  
  
  ___
 
  --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
  
  Asterisk-Users
 mailing list
  To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
 http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
 
  
 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
 
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Re: Received VNAK: resending outstanding frames?

2006-04-15 Thread Carey O'Shea
I've recently swapped my router out for a slightly different router, and
now everything works fine. I guess my other router must not be very good
or have some issue with this protocol/setup/something.

Thanks for the help.

Regards,
Carey O'Shea.

On Wed, 2006-04-12 at 20:16 +1000, Carey O'Shea wrote:
 On Wed, 2006-04-12 at 07:58 +0100, Tim Panton wrote:
  There is a manual at:
  http://www.centralitycomm.com/solutions/Download/documents/product/ 
  PA168SUserguideEng.pdf
  
  Tim Panton
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 I'm now outside the network again and have run iax2 debug. Below are
 the results. Notice how after the Raw Hangup there is a 30 second
 pause, then it retries, and when it gets to the VNAK then it repeats
 the same message constantly for another 30 seconds (snipped the 5000+ lines of
 course), and then gets the Raw Hangup again. Ad infinitum.
 
 I have uploaded the log here:
 http://www.users.on.net/~lncoshea/carey/asterisk-log.txt
 
 Does the log help? Anyone have any ideas going from the log?
 
 Regards,
 Carey O'Shea.
 
 PS: Thanks Tim, I worked out how to reset the phone a few hours ago,
 the manual was wrong for my particular model, I had to press hash (#)
 _before_ power on, see here:
 http://forums.whirlpool.net.au/forum-replies.cfm?t=504889
 
 
 ___
 --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
 
 Asterisk-Users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Re: Received VNAK: resending outstanding frames?

2006-04-12 Thread Carey O'Shea
On Wed, 2006-04-12 at 07:58 +0100, Tim Panton wrote:
 There is a manual at:
 http://www.centralitycomm.com/solutions/Download/documents/product/ 
 PA168SUserguideEng.pdf
 
 Tim Panton
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

I'm now outside the network again and have run iax2 debug. Below are
the results. Notice how after the Raw Hangup there is a 30 second
pause, then it retries, and when it gets to the VNAK then it repeats
the same message constantly for another 30 seconds (snipped the 5000+ lines of
course), and then gets the Raw Hangup again. Ad infinitum.

I have uploaded the log here:
http://www.users.on.net/~lncoshea/carey/asterisk-log.txt

Does the log help? Anyone have any ideas going from the log?

Regards,
Carey O'Shea.

PS: Thanks Tim, I worked out how to reset the phone a few hours ago,
the manual was wrong for my particular model, I had to press hash (#)
_before_ power on, see here:
http://forums.whirlpool.net.au/forum-replies.cfm?t=504889


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


[Asterisk-Users] Re: Received VNAK: resending outstanding frames?

2006-04-11 Thread Carey O'Shea
Some more info:

Just tried this on a server without using any NAT and no port
forwarding, no masquerading, and I still have the same problem. So there
goes that idea. I do not know what this VNAK error means. 

By the way, I am using the latest version (1.2.6) of asterisk, have also
tried other versions with the same problem [1.0.9 (Ubuntu Breezy) and
1.0.7 (Debian Sarge) and 1.2.1 (Ubuntu Dapper)].

Wonder if this is something simple or not?

On Tue, 2006-04-11 at 23:00 +1000, Carey O'Shea wrote:
 I only receive 4 google results on my error. So some help would be
 appreciated. I could not even determine what VNAK was.
 
 Let me describe my problem. I have an IAX hardware phone here that
 connects and operates fine within my internal network. However, outside
 my internal network, the hardware phone fails to register. 
 
 The plot thickens: outside my internal network I've tested numerous IAX
 softphones and strangely enough they function fine, where the hardware
 phone does not. 
 
 Of course (seeing as how the softphones work externally) I have both TCP
 and UDP 4569 port forwarded to Asterisk server and there is no firewall
 on the Asterisk server.
 
 So I am guessing there is some NAT issue or some configuration issue
 with this hardware IAX phone I have.
 
 Below are the messages I receieve in my full log (about 20 or 30 of
 them each second for many seconds, then after the flood of messages it
 reports Raw Hangup, and then soon enough it starts again).
 
 I'm using a PA1686 IAX hardware phone.
 
 Any ideas please?
 
 snip
 ...
 Apr 11 22:49:52 DEBUG[16385] chan_iax2.c: Received VNAK: resending
 outstanding frames
 Apr 11 22:49:52 DEBUG[16385] chan_iax2.c: Received VNAK: resending
 outstanding frames
 Apr 11 22:49:52 DEBUG[16385] chan_iax2.c: Received VNAK: resending
 outstanding frames
 Apr 11 22:49:52 DEBUG[16385] chan_iax2.c: Received VNAK: resending
 outstanding frames
 Apr 11 22:49:52 DEBUG[16385] chan_iax2.c: Received VNAK: resending
 outstanding frames
 Apr 11 22:49:52 DEBUG[16385] chan_iax2.c: Received VNAK: resending
 outstanding frames
 Apr 11 22:49:52 DEBUG[16385] chan_iax2.c: Received VNAK: resending
 outstanding frames
 Apr 11 22:49:52 DEBUG[16385] chan_iax2.c: Received VNAK: resending
 outstanding frames
 Apr 11 22:49:52 DEBUG[16385] chan_iax2.c: Received VNAK: resending
 outstanding frames
 Apr 11 22:49:53 DEBUG[16385] chan_iax2.c: Raw Hangup
 59.167.XXX.XXX:8435, src=3, dst=9660
 

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


Re: [Asterisk-Users] Re: Received VNAK: resending outstanding frames?

2006-04-11 Thread Carey O'Shea
  On Tue, 2006-04-11 at 23:00 +1000, Carey O'Shea wrote:
  I only receive 4 google results on my error. So some help would be
  appreciated. I could not even determine what VNAK was.
 
  Let me describe my problem. I have an IAX hardware phone here that
  connects and operates fine within my internal network. However,  
  outside
  my internal network, the hardware phone fails to register.
 
  The plot thickens: outside my internal network I've tested  
  numerous IAX
  softphones and strangely enough they function fine, where the  
  hardware
  phone does not.
 
  Of course (seeing as how the softphones work externally) I have  
  both TCP
  and UDP 4569 port forwarded to Asterisk server and there is no  
  firewall
  on the Asterisk server.
 
  So I am guessing there is some NAT issue or some configuration issue
  with this hardware IAX phone I have.
 
  Below are the messages I receieve in my full log (about 20 or 30 of
  them each second for many seconds, then after the flood of  
  messages it
  reports Raw Hangup, and then soon enough it starts again).
 
  I'm using a PA1686 IAX hardware phone.
 
 
 I have a few PA1686 phones doing IAX through firewalls and NAT, so it  
 is possible :-)
 
 Try running :
 
 iax2 debug
 
 Can you send us the few lines in the log before the VNAK's start?
 
 Tim Panton
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

Thanks for the reply Tim.

I would love to send you those lines... but unfortunately I accidentally
put my PA168S phone into PPPoE mode and now it doesn't try to pick up
a local DHCP address, and just sits there endlessly trying to connect
to a bogus PPPoE account. 

I need to know how to reset this phone to defaults. Can't see any
pinhole or anything, so perhaps it needs to be opened up and there is a
way to do this inside of the phone?

Or any other ideas so that I can access it :-)

Carey O'Shea.


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users