Re: [Asterisk-Users] enum problem with latest cvs
Any suggestions on how to resolve this problem? :) Thanks, Wojtek - Original Message - From: "Aaron J. Angel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, June 21, 2004 12:01 AM Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] enum problem with latest cvs > Try RFC3761. It specifies E2U+ under section 2.4.2. It obsoletes > RFC2916, and nothing has superseded it yet. > > Brian K. West [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > 3762 is for h323 only: > > > > RFC 3762 - Telephone Number Mapping (ENUM) Service > > Registration for H.323 > > > > 2916 is a bit more general: > > > > RFC 2916 - E.164 number and DNS > > > > Then we have: > > > > RFC 2915 - The Naming Authority Pointer (NAPTR) DNS Resource Record > > > > I was pointing out that E2U+IAX2 was backwards.. but then > > again asterisk > > doesn't really care about that... at this point. > > > > bkw > > > > > > ----- Original Message - > > From: "Duane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Sunday, June 20, 2004 9:48 PM > > Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] enum problem with latest cvs > > > > > >> Brian K. West wrote: > >> > >>> but then again what do I know.. I have only been using > > enum for about a > > year > >>> now. > >> > >> RFC's change, if you want to stick to the standards you have to keep > >> up with them... > >> > >> 3762 > 2916 > > ___ > Asterisk-Users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: >http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] enum problem with latest cvs
Aaron J. Angel wrote: Try RFC3761. It specifies E2U+ under section 2.4.2. It obsoletes RFC2916, and nothing has superseded it yet. Damn always seem to get these out by 1 errors ;) -- Best regards, Duane http://www.cacert.org - Free Security Certificates http://www.nodedb.com - Think globally, network locally http://www.sydneywireless.com - Telecommunications Freedom http://happysnapper.com.au - Sell your photos over the net! http://e164.org - Using Enum.164 to interconnect asterisk servers "In the confrontation between the stream and the rock, the stream always wins; not through strength, but through persistence." ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] enum problem with latest cvs
Brian K. West wrote: I was pointing out that E2U+IAX2 was backwards.. but then again asterisk doesn't really care about that... at this point. Considering the voip-info.org site has it as that, and that's before we go on to mention the fact IAX2 isn't in any rfc, and that it's ENUM implementation still leaves a few things out that I'm trying to get fixed, but person/professional and other things have taken priority of late... -- Best regards, Duane http://www.cacert.org - Free Security Certificates http://www.nodedb.com - Think globally, network locally http://www.sydneywireless.com - Telecommunications Freedom http://happysnapper.com.au - Sell your photos over the net! http://e164.org - Using Enum.164 to interconnect asterisk servers "In the confrontation between the stream and the rock, the stream always wins; not through strength, but through persistence." ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] enum problem with latest cvs
Try RFC3761. It specifies E2U+ under section 2.4.2. It obsoletes RFC2916, and nothing has superseded it yet. Brian K. West [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > 3762 is for h323 only: > > RFC 3762 - Telephone Number Mapping (ENUM) Service > Registration for H.323 > > 2916 is a bit more general: > > RFC 2916 - E.164 number and DNS > > Then we have: > > RFC 2915 - The Naming Authority Pointer (NAPTR) DNS Resource Record > > I was pointing out that E2U+IAX2 was backwards.. but then > again asterisk > doesn't really care about that... at this point. > > bkw > > > - Original Message - > From: "Duane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Sunday, June 20, 2004 9:48 PM > Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] enum problem with latest cvs > > >> Brian K. West wrote: >> >>> but then again what do I know.. I have only been using > enum for about a > year >>> now. >> >> RFC's change, if you want to stick to the standards you have to keep >> up with them... >> >> 3762 > 2916 ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] enum problem with latest cvs
3762 is for h323 only: RFC 3762 - Telephone Number Mapping (ENUM) Service Registration for H.323 2916 is a bit more general: RFC 2916 - E.164 number and DNS Then we have: RFC 2915 - The Naming Authority Pointer (NAPTR) DNS Resource Record I was pointing out that E2U+IAX2 was backwards.. but then again asterisk doesn't really care about that... at this point. bkw - Original Message - From: "Duane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, June 20, 2004 9:48 PM Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] enum problem with latest cvs > Brian K. West wrote: > > > but then again what do I know.. I have only been using enum for about a year > > now. > > RFC's change, if you want to stick to the standards you have to keep up > with them... > > 3762 > 2916 > > -- > > Best regards, > Duane > > http://www.cacert.org - Free Security Certificates > http://www.nodedb.com - Think globally, network locally > http://www.sydneywireless.com - Telecommunications Freedom > http://happysnapper.com.au - Sell your photos over the net! > http://e164.org - Using Enum.164 to interconnect asterisk servers > > "In the confrontation between the stream and the rock, the > stream always wins; not through strength, but through persistence." > ___ > Asterisk-Users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: >http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] enum problem with latest cvs
Brian K. West wrote: but then again what do I know.. I have only been using enum for about a year now. RFC's change, if you want to stick to the standards you have to keep up with them... 3762 > 2916 -- Best regards, Duane http://www.cacert.org - Free Security Certificates http://www.nodedb.com - Think globally, network locally http://www.sydneywireless.com - Telecommunications Freedom http://happysnapper.com.au - Sell your photos over the net! http://e164.org - Using Enum.164 to interconnect asterisk servers "In the confrontation between the stream and the rock, the stream always wins; not through strength, but through persistence." ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] enum problem with latest cvs
The "sip+E2U" specifies a service to be contacted by SIP through the use of an E.164 to URI (E2U) translation. Thats in one of the documents that I have.. it depends on the direction of the translation. bkw - Original Message - From: "Brian K. West" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, June 20, 2004 9:33 PM Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] enum problem with latest cvs > No its backwards from what I have read... I got most of my info from many > sources and E2U+SIP vs SIP+E2U > > but then again what do I know.. I have only been using enum for about a year > now. > > bkw > > - Original Message - > From: "Duane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Sunday, June 20, 2004 8:32 PM > Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] enum problem with latest cvs > > > > Brian K. West wrote: > > > E2U+IAX2 <-- thats backwards also. > > > > actually later RFC's specify it in that format... > > > > http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc3762.html > > > > -- > > > > Best regards, > > Duane > > > > http://www.cacert.org - Free Security Certificates > > http://www.nodedb.com - Think globally, network locally > > http://www.sydneywireless.com - Telecommunications Freedom > > http://happysnapper.com.au - Sell your photos over the net! > > http://e164.org - Using Enum.164 to interconnect asterisk servers > > > > "In the confrontation between the stream and the rock, the > > stream always wins; not through strength, but through persistence." > > ___ > > Asterisk-Users mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > >http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > > > > ___ > Asterisk-Users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: >http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] enum problem with latest cvs
No its backwards from what I have read... I got most of my info from many sources and E2U+SIP vs SIP+E2U but then again what do I know.. I have only been using enum for about a year now. bkw - Original Message - From: "Duane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, June 20, 2004 8:32 PM Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] enum problem with latest cvs > Brian K. West wrote: > > E2U+IAX2 <-- thats backwards also. > > actually later RFC's specify it in that format... > > http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc3762.html > > -- > > Best regards, > Duane > > http://www.cacert.org - Free Security Certificates > http://www.nodedb.com - Think globally, network locally > http://www.sydneywireless.com - Telecommunications Freedom > http://happysnapper.com.au - Sell your photos over the net! > http://e164.org - Using Enum.164 to interconnect asterisk servers > > "In the confrontation between the stream and the rock, the > stream always wins; not through strength, but through persistence." > ___ > Asterisk-Users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: >http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] enum problem with latest cvs
Aaron J. Angel wrote: 6.1.7.1.3.2.8.3.1.6.1.e164.org. 155 IN NAPTR 100 10 "u" "E2U+IAX2" "!^\\+16138231716$!iax2:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/16138231716!" . So why would asterisk log an error with just "!^+16138231716$"? I've probed all our name servers and they're all responding correctly, however someone else mentioned this the other day but we weren't able to track the problem then and assumed it was a bodgy resolver lib or something like that... -- Best regards, Duane http://www.cacert.org - Free Security Certificates http://www.nodedb.com - Think globally, network locally http://www.sydneywireless.com - Telecommunications Freedom http://happysnapper.com.au - Sell your photos over the net! http://e164.org - Using Enum.164 to interconnect asterisk servers "In the confrontation between the stream and the rock, the stream always wins; not through strength, but through persistence." ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] enum problem with latest cvs
Brian K. West wrote: E2U+IAX2 <-- thats backwards also. actually later RFC's specify it in that format... http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc3762.html -- Best regards, Duane http://www.cacert.org - Free Security Certificates http://www.nodedb.com - Think globally, network locally http://www.sydneywireless.com - Telecommunications Freedom http://happysnapper.com.au - Sell your photos over the net! http://e164.org - Using Enum.164 to interconnect asterisk servers "In the confrontation between the stream and the rock, the stream always wins; not through strength, but through persistence." ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] enum problem with latest cvs
E2U+IAX2 <-- thats backwards also. bkw - Original Message - From: "Aaron J. Angel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, June 20, 2004 6:13 PM Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] enum problem with latest cvs > Brian K. West [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Your regexp is WRONG > > The regexp isn't wrong. > > > 1.1.enum.blah.net naptr = 2 40 "u" "iax2+E2U" > > "!^\\+(.*)$!iax2:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/\\1!" . > > 6.1.7.1.3.2.8.3.1.6.1.e164.org. 155 IN NAPTR 100 10 "u" "E2U+IAX2" > "!^\\+16138231716$!iax2:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/16138231716!" . > > So why would asterisk log an error with just "!^+16138231716$"? > > ___ > Asterisk-Users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: >http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] enum problem with latest cvs
Brian K. West [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Your regexp is WRONG The regexp isn't wrong. > 1.1.enum.blah.net naptr = 2 40 "u" "iax2+E2U" > "!^\\+(.*)$!iax2:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/\\1!" . 6.1.7.1.3.2.8.3.1.6.1.e164.org. 155 IN NAPTR 100 10 "u" "E2U+IAX2" "!^\\+16138231716$!iax2:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/16138231716!" . So why would asterisk log an error with just "!^+16138231716$"? ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] enum problem with latest cvs
This is only intermittent problem!!?!? Wojtek - Original Message - From: "Brian K. West" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, June 20, 2004 3:50 PM Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] enum problem with latest cvs > Your regexp is WRONG > > 1.1.enum.blah.net naptr = 2 40 "u" "iax2+E2U" > "!^\\+(.*)$!iax2:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/\\1!" . > > Thats a valid enum naptr record. > > It would translate into iax2:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/11 > > bkw > > - Original Message - > From: "Wojciech Tryc" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Sunday, June 20, 2004 2:27 PM > Subject: [Asterisk-Users] enum problem with latest cvs > > > > Hi, > > I posted an error message I was getting while using enum with the latest > > CVS, but the problem disappered. > > Well, it seems to be intermitten. > > The messages below: > > > > Jun 20 15:23:30 WARNING[1218565440]: enum.c:186 parse_naptr: Regex > > compilation error (regex = "!^+16131234567$"). > > Jun 20 15:23:30 WARNING[1218565440]: enum.c:264 enum_callback: Failed to > > parse naptr :( > > Jun 20 15:23:30 WARNING[1218565440]: dns.c:141 dns_parse_answer: Failed to > > parse result > > Jun 20 15:23:30 WARNING[1218565440]: dns.c:183 ast_search_dns: Parse error > > > > What is internesting is that this is happening only with 1 number, I have > 2 > > other numbers registered and everything works fine with the other 2. > > > > Regards, > > Wojtek > > > > ___ > > Asterisk-Users mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > >http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > > > > ___ > Asterisk-Users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: >http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] enum problem with latest cvs
The number is 1-613-823-1716 and the enum service is e164.org. The most interesting part is that this is intermittent problem, sometimes it works sometimes it doesn't work. Again, any other lookups works just fine. Thanks, Wojtek - Original Message - From: "Aaron J. Angel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, June 20, 2004 3:52 PM Subject: RE: [Asterisk-Users] enum problem with latest cvs > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Hi, > > I posted an error message I was getting while using enum with > > the latest CVS, but the problem disappered. > > Well, it seems to be intermitten. > > The messages below: > > > > Jun 20 15:23:30 WARNING[1218565440]: enum.c:186 parse_naptr: > > Regex compilation error (regex = "!^+16131234567$"). > > Jun 20 15:23:30 WARNING[1218565440]: enum.c:264 > > enum_callback: Failed to parse naptr :( Jun 20 15:23:30 > > WARNING[1218565440]: dns.c:141 dns_parse_answer: Failed to > > parse result Jun 20 15:23:30 WARNING[1218565440]: dns.c:183 > > ast_search_dns: Parse error > > > > What is internesting is that this is happening only with 1 > > number, I have 2 other numbers registered and everything works fine > > with the other 2. > > If that's the case, it's likely not a problem with Asterisk. Did you check > the syntax of the regexp in the NAPTR record? Without knowing the number > being looked up and the ENUM service being used, not much can be done to > troubleshoot. > > ___ > Asterisk-Users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: >http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
RE: [Asterisk-Users] enum problem with latest cvs
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi, > I posted an error message I was getting while using enum with > the latest CVS, but the problem disappered. > Well, it seems to be intermitten. > The messages below: > > Jun 20 15:23:30 WARNING[1218565440]: enum.c:186 parse_naptr: > Regex compilation error (regex = "!^+16131234567$"). > Jun 20 15:23:30 WARNING[1218565440]: enum.c:264 > enum_callback: Failed to parse naptr :( Jun 20 15:23:30 > WARNING[1218565440]: dns.c:141 dns_parse_answer: Failed to > parse result Jun 20 15:23:30 WARNING[1218565440]: dns.c:183 > ast_search_dns: Parse error > > What is internesting is that this is happening only with 1 > number, I have 2 other numbers registered and everything works fine > with the other 2. If that's the case, it's likely not a problem with Asterisk. Did you check the syntax of the regexp in the NAPTR record? Without knowing the number being looked up and the ENUM service being used, not much can be done to troubleshoot. ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] enum problem with latest cvs
Your regexp is WRONG 1.1.enum.blah.net naptr = 2 40 "u" "iax2+E2U" "!^\\+(.*)$!iax2:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/\\1!" . Thats a valid enum naptr record. It would translate into iax2:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/11 bkw - Original Message - From: "Wojciech Tryc" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, June 20, 2004 2:27 PM Subject: [Asterisk-Users] enum problem with latest cvs > Hi, > I posted an error message I was getting while using enum with the latest > CVS, but the problem disappered. > Well, it seems to be intermitten. > The messages below: > > Jun 20 15:23:30 WARNING[1218565440]: enum.c:186 parse_naptr: Regex > compilation error (regex = "!^+16131234567$"). > Jun 20 15:23:30 WARNING[1218565440]: enum.c:264 enum_callback: Failed to > parse naptr :( > Jun 20 15:23:30 WARNING[1218565440]: dns.c:141 dns_parse_answer: Failed to > parse result > Jun 20 15:23:30 WARNING[1218565440]: dns.c:183 ast_search_dns: Parse error > > What is internesting is that this is happening only with 1 number, I have 2 > other numbers registered and everything works fine with the other 2. > > Regards, > Wojtek > > ___ > Asterisk-Users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: >http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
[Asterisk-Users] enum problem with latest cvs
Hi, I posted an error message I was getting while using enum with the latest CVS, but the problem disappered. Well, it seems to be intermitten. The messages below: Jun 20 15:23:30 WARNING[1218565440]: enum.c:186 parse_naptr: Regex compilation error (regex = "!^+16131234567$"). Jun 20 15:23:30 WARNING[1218565440]: enum.c:264 enum_callback: Failed to parse naptr :( Jun 20 15:23:30 WARNING[1218565440]: dns.c:141 dns_parse_answer: Failed to parse result Jun 20 15:23:30 WARNING[1218565440]: dns.c:183 ast_search_dns: Parse error What is internesting is that this is happening only with 1 number, I have 2 other numbers registered and everything works fine with the other 2. Regards, Wojtek ___ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
