subject:"\[asterisk\-users\] Fax with asterisk\?"

[asterisk-users] Fax with Asterisk and T38Modem

2011-06-27 Thread Thorolf Godawa

Hi,

I'm fighting with HylaFAX, Asterisk and T38Modem since some time, to get
fax2mail and mail2fax working, my SIP-provider only supports T38 and
thus using G711 with IAXModem is not an option.


I have got running mail2fax with HylaFAX+ 5.5.0, Asterisk 1.4.20 and
T38Modem 2.0.0 successfull, but I'm not able to upgrade to anything
newer than Asterisk 1.4.24.

I was able to break down this problem to some changes in the chan_sip.c,
where a "improved support for T38 on initial INVITE" has been
implemented (see:
https://reviewboard.asterisk.org/r/208/diff/#index_header).

I'm not sure what the problem is, but it seems that the T38 handshake
does not work correct any more.

Goal is, to get running this with the latest Asterisk, right now 1.8.4.3,

Is there s.b. who can give me a hint how to solve the problem?


For fax2mail I use Asterisk 1.8.4.3, but it is not working too, after a
fax call, the connection with T38Modem is established, HylaFAX reports
"ANSWER: FAX CONNECTION DEVICE '/dev/ttyT380'", but a fax is never received.

In the tcpdump I see the correct handshaking between Asterisk and
T38Modem, but finaly T38Modem switches to "recvonly" and Asterisk
answers with "SIP/2.0 488 Not acceptable here" and the call ends shortly
after that.


Probably there is a problem in T38Modem, so I filed a bug at sourceforge
for that:

https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=3337581&group_id=152230&atid=783657

But may be, somebody has a solution for this too.


Thanks a lot,
-- 

Chau y hasta luego,

Thorolf

--
_
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
New to Asterisk? Join us for a live introductory webinar every Thurs:
   http://www.asterisk.org/hello

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Fax with asterisk

2008-09-26 Thread Andrew Joakimsen

On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 7:34 AM, Rizwan Hisham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The fax is originated from a fax machine connected to an ata which supports
> t38.
>

That would be great if Asterisk had true T.38 support. It can pass the
T.38 packets it receives to another SIP endpoint (it will do this even
if the other device doesn't suppor tT.38 -- which cause the call to
drop) but it cannot originate nor terminate T.38 traffic. If you have
a VoIP provider or Cisco gateway that support T.38 then that's all you
need but if you want to terminate the calls yourself on a T1/E1 T.38
does not help when using Asterisk.

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona
Register Now: http://www.astricon.net

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Fax with asterisk

2008-09-25 Thread Rizwan Hisham

The fax is originated from a fax machine connected to an ata which supports
t38.

On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 11:54 PM, C F <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 5:43 AM, Rizwan Hisham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > Sorry to interrupt. I need some help regarding fax passthru mode.
> >
> > We are trying to configure fax passthru mode in asterisk using sip. For
> out
> > of network calls/fax we use trunk configuration. i am using asterisk
> 1.4.2.
> > The user has to use fax machine connected to their ata and dial the
> callee
> > number, the call is originated just like a regular voice call. have not
> > defined any special context for sending faxes. Have enabled t38 and
> > canreinvite in peer/user and trunk configuration. But the fax is not
> going
> > thru. Our service provider does support fax passthru. Following is the
> trunk
> > and user/peer configuration:
>
> They support passthru, and the originating send fax is what? PSTN? or
> VoIP ATA with t38 support?
> There has to one that does the t38, if the point where it gets
> converted to VoIP does not support t38 then passthru will not help
> you.
>
> >
> > TRUNK CONF
> > [TRUNK-OUT]
> > type=peer
> > host=XXX
> > port=5060
> > context=default
> > country=us
> > dtmfmode=rfc2833
> > restrictcid=no
> > canreinvite=yes
> > insecure=no
> > disallow=all
> > allow=ulaw
> > allow=alaw
> > allow=g729
> > allow=gsm
> > promiscredir=yes
> > t38_udptl=yes
> >
> > USER/PEER
> >
> > [abc]
> > username=abc
> > type=friend
> > secret=123
> > qualify=25000
> > nat=yes
> > mailbox=12129339037
> > insecure=port,invite
> > incominglimit=2
> > outgoinglimit=2
> > intl_trunk=TRUNK-OUT
> > local_trunk=TRUNK-OUT
> > host=dynamic
> > dtmfmode=inband
> > context=uscan
> > canreinvite=yes
> > callerid="Rizwan Qureshi" <122>
> > accountcode=1:0:abc
> > amaflags=default
> > disallow=all
> > allow=ulaw
> > allow=alaw
> > allow=gsm
> > t38_udptl=yes
> >
> >
> > Any solutions?
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 10:21 PM, Andrew Joakimsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 10:02 AM, Steve Totaro
> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> > ATAs work OK I guess, just make sure to use a loss less codec such as
> >> > ULAW.
> >>
> >> Since the OP stated he is using E1 lines then he should probably be
> >> using alaw instead.
> >>
> >> ___
> >> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
> >>
> >> AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona
> >> Register Now: http://www.astricon.net
> >>
> >> asterisk-users mailing list
> >> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> >>   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Best Regards
> > Rizwan Hisham
> >
> >
> > ___
> > -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
> >
> > AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona
> > Register Now: http://www.astricon.net
> >
> > asterisk-users mailing list
> > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> >   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> >
>
> ___
> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
>
> AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona
> Register Now: http://www.astricon.net
>
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>



-- 
Best Regards
Rizwan Hisham
___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona
Register Now: http://www.astricon.net

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Fax with asterisk

2008-09-24 Thread C F

On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 5:43 AM, Rizwan Hisham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
> Sorry to interrupt. I need some help regarding fax passthru mode.
>
> We are trying to configure fax passthru mode in asterisk using sip. For out
> of network calls/fax we use trunk configuration. i am using asterisk 1.4.2.
> The user has to use fax machine connected to their ata and dial the callee
> number, the call is originated just like a regular voice call. have not
> defined any special context for sending faxes. Have enabled t38 and
> canreinvite in peer/user and trunk configuration. But the fax is not going
> thru. Our service provider does support fax passthru. Following is the trunk
> and user/peer configuration:

They support passthru, and the originating send fax is what? PSTN? or
VoIP ATA with t38 support?
There has to one that does the t38, if the point where it gets
converted to VoIP does not support t38 then passthru will not help
you.

>
> TRUNK CONF
> [TRUNK-OUT]
> type=peer
> host=XXX
> port=5060
> context=default
> country=us
> dtmfmode=rfc2833
> restrictcid=no
> canreinvite=yes
> insecure=no
> disallow=all
> allow=ulaw
> allow=alaw
> allow=g729
> allow=gsm
> promiscredir=yes
> t38_udptl=yes
>
> USER/PEER
>
> [abc]
> username=abc
> type=friend
> secret=123
> qualify=25000
> nat=yes
> mailbox=12129339037
> insecure=port,invite
> incominglimit=2
> outgoinglimit=2
> intl_trunk=TRUNK-OUT
> local_trunk=TRUNK-OUT
> host=dynamic
> dtmfmode=inband
> context=uscan
> canreinvite=yes
> callerid="Rizwan Qureshi" <122>
> accountcode=1:0:abc
> amaflags=default
> disallow=all
> allow=ulaw
> allow=alaw
> allow=gsm
> t38_udptl=yes
>
>
> Any solutions?
>
> On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 10:21 PM, Andrew Joakimsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 10:02 AM, Steve Totaro
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > ATAs work OK I guess, just make sure to use a loss less codec such as
>> > ULAW.
>>
>> Since the OP stated he is using E1 lines then he should probably be
>> using alaw instead.
>>
>> ___
>> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
>>
>> AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona
>> Register Now: http://www.astricon.net
>>
>> asterisk-users mailing list
>> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>>   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards
> Rizwan Hisham
>
>
> ___
> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
>
> AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona
> Register Now: http://www.astricon.net
>
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona
Register Now: http://www.astricon.net

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Fax with asterisk

2008-09-24 Thread Rizwan Hisham

Hi all,
Sorry to interrupt. I need some help regarding fax passthru mode.

We are trying to configure fax passthru mode in asterisk using sip. For out
of network calls/fax we use trunk configuration. i am using asterisk
1.4.2.The user has to use fax machine connected to their ata and dial
the callee
number, the call is originated just like a regular voice call. have not
defined any special context for sending faxes. Have enabled t38 and
canreinvite in peer/user and trunk configuration. But the fax is not going
thru. Our service provider does support fax passthru. Following is the trunk
and user/peer configuration:

TRUNK CONF
[TRUNK-OUT]
type=peer
host=XXX
port=5060
context=default
country=us
dtmfmode=rfc2833
restrictcid=no
canreinvite=yes
insecure=no
disallow=all
allow=ulaw
allow=alaw
allow=g729
allow=gsm
promiscredir=yes
t38_udptl=yes

USER/PEER

[abc]
username=abc
type=friend
secret=123
qualify=25000
nat=yes
mailbox=12129339037
insecure=port,invite
incominglimit=2
outgoinglimit=2
intl_trunk=TRUNK-OUT
local_trunk=TRUNK-OUT
host=dynamic
dtmfmode=inband
context=uscan
canreinvite=yes
callerid="Rizwan Qureshi" <122>
accountcode=1:0:abc
amaflags=default
disallow=all
allow=ulaw
allow=alaw
allow=gsm
t38_udptl=yes

Any solutions?

On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 10:21 PM, Andrew Joakimsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:

> On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 10:02 AM, Steve Totaro
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > ATAs work OK I guess, just make sure to use a loss less codec such as
> ULAW.
>
> Since the OP stated he is using E1 lines then he should probably be
> using alaw instead.
>
> ___
> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
>
> AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona
> Register Now: http://www.astricon.net
>
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>

-- 
Best Regards
Rizwan Hisham
___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona
Register Now: http://www.astricon.net

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Fax with asterisk

2008-09-23 Thread Andrew Joakimsen

On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 10:02 AM, Steve Totaro
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ATAs work OK I guess, just make sure to use a loss less codec such as ULAW.

Since the OP stated he is using E1 lines then he should probably be
using alaw instead.

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona
Register Now: http://www.astricon.net

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Fax with asterisk

2008-09-23 Thread Giorgio Incantalupo

Hi Erik,

once we used grandstream ATAs but now we are using linksys models: it 
has better design (look is important too for customers) and has 2 ports 
for two analog devices. We tested it with PRI and BRI lines and it seems 
working fine!

Giorgio Incantalupo

Erik Haider Forsen wrote:
> Hi Giorgio,
>
> Thanks for your answer.
>
> Your setup is exactly what we're thinking of. We have 1100 DID's, so  
> that shouldn't be a problem at all. Which ATA box are you using?
>
> Erik
>
>
> On Sep 23, 2008, at 2:06 PM, Giorgio Incantalupo wrote:
>
>   
>> Hi Olivier,
>>
>> We DO NOT use faxdetect because it does not work properly. That's  
>> why we
>> link a PRI DID to it, so when people call that DID the fax machine  
>> gets
>> direct fax data without passing thru faxdetection.
>>
>> Giorgio Incantalupo.
>>
>> Olivier wrote:
>> 
>>> 2008/9/23 Giorgio Incantalupo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> >
>>>
>>>Hi Erik,
>>>we use an ATA device connected to the fax machine. If you want to
>>>receive faxes, since Asterisk fax detection is not reliable
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Which fax detection did you used, then ?
>>>
>>>
>>>, use one DID
>>>to link it directly to the ATA: you lose a number but you gain a
>>>fully-working fax!
>>>
>>>Giorgio Incantalupo.
>>>
>>>Erik Haider Forsen wrote:
>>>   
 Hi!

 I'm new to this list. I tried to search the list archive for a
 solution on my current setup, but couldn't find any.

 We have an asterisk connected directly to the PSTN with 2 E1 lines
 through a Sangoma A102d interface. We also have a regular FAX
 
>>>machine.
>>>   
 My question is how to get the fax service handled by asterisk? I
 
>>>want
>>>   
 to cancel the analog line I have for the FAX machine today.

 What would be the best solution? Fax machine and asterisk is on the
 same LAN, not much load, with high end switches etc. Can I
 
>>>expect good
>>>   
 results with using our existing FAX machine, connected to asterisk
 through an ATA box?

 Best Regards,

 Erik

 ___
 -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by
 
>>>http://www.api-digital.com --
>>>   
 AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona
 Register Now: http://www.astricon.net

 asterisk-users mailing list
 To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


 
>>>___
>>>-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api- 
>>> digital.com --
>>>
>>>AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona
>>>Register Now: http://www.astricon.net
>>>
>>>asterisk-users mailing list
>>>To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>>>  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>>>
>>>
>>> 
>>>
>>> ___
>>> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
>>>
>>> AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona
>>> Register Now: http://www.astricon.net
>>>
>>> asterisk-users mailing list
>>> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>>>   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>>>   
>> ___
>> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
>>
>> AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona
>> Register Now: http://www.astricon.net
>>
>> asterisk-users mailing list
>> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>>   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>>
>> 
>
>
> ___
> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
>
> AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona
> Register Now: http://www.astricon.net
>
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>
>   


___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona
Register Now: http://www.astricon.net

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Fax with asterisk

2008-09-23 Thread Matthew Marion

Forgot to mention (I think) that though the chan_pika driver is for pika
hardware, the two fax apps for asterisk work with 3rd party hardware as
well, so you don't actually need the pika cards (that's why it's nice and
easy)

On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 10:23 AM, Matthew Marion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:

> Just to clarify, pika's chan_pika is their asterisk channel driver for
> their hardware.  The two fax applications, app_pikarxfax.so and
> app_pikatxfax.so are fax modules for asterisk to implement fax in your
> dialplan:
>
> exten => 5001,1,Answer(1000);
> exten => 5001,n,Set(LOCALSTATIONID=123456789)
> exten => 5001,n,Set(LOCALHEADERINFO="PIKARxFax Test Page %P Time: %H:%M To:
> %l From: %r")
> exten => 5001,n,Set(FAXFILE=/tmp/pikafax-${UNIQUEID}.tif)
> exten => 5001,n,PIKARxFax(${FAXFILE})
>
> you'd still need hardware to actually get the faxes to asterisk...
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 9:32 AM, Erik Haider Forsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
>> Hi Matthew,
>>
>> Thanks for your suggestion. The problem is that most of our users
>> would not feel comfortable with using software fax solutions. So we
>> will have to stick with the old fax machine.
>>
>> Our reception takes care of the fax machine, receiving and sending
>> faxes. This one fax is shared by ~ 600 employees.
>>
>> Erik
>>
>>
>> On Sep 23, 2008, at 3:25 PM, Matthew Marion wrote:
>>
>> > Hey Erik,
>> >
>> > You can also check out pika technologies which supply chan_pika.
>> > This comes with a fax application that will let you do your faxes in
>> > asterisk (even using non-pika boards).  Works pretty good...
>> >
>> > pikatechnologies.com
>> >
>> > mattm
>> >
>> > On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 4:51 AM, Erik Haider Forsen
>> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > Hi!
>> >
>> > I'm new to this list. I tried to search the list archive for a
>> > solution on my current setup, but couldn't find any.
>> >
>> > We have an asterisk connected directly to the PSTN with 2 E1 lines
>> > through a Sangoma A102d interface. We also have a regular FAX machine.
>> >
>> > My question is how to get the fax service handled by asterisk? I want
>> > to cancel the analog line I have for the FAX machine today.
>> >
>> > What would be the best solution? Fax machine and asterisk is on the
>> > same LAN, not much load, with high end switches etc. Can I expect good
>> > results with using our existing FAX machine, connected to asterisk
>> > through an ATA box?
>> >
>> > Best Regards,
>> >
>> > Erik
>> >
>> > ___
>> > -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
>> >
>> > AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona
>> > Register Now: http://www.astricon.net
>> >
>> > asterisk-users mailing list
>> > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>> >   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>> >
>> > ___
>> > -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
>> >
>> > AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona
>> > Register Now: http://www.astricon.net
>> >
>> > asterisk-users mailing list
>> > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>> >   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>>
>>
>> ___
>> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
>>
>> AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona
>> Register Now: http://www.astricon.net
>>
>> asterisk-users mailing list
>> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>>   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>>
>
>
___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona
Register Now: http://www.astricon.net

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Fax with asterisk

2008-09-23 Thread Matthew Marion

Just to clarify, pika's chan_pika is their asterisk channel driver for their
hardware.  The two fax applications, app_pikarxfax.so and app_pikatxfax.so
are fax modules for asterisk to implement fax in your dialplan:

exten => 5001,1,Answer(1000);
exten => 5001,n,Set(LOCALSTATIONID=123456789)
exten => 5001,n,Set(LOCALHEADERINFO="PIKARxFax Test Page %P Time: %H:%M To:
%l From: %r")
exten => 5001,n,Set(FAXFILE=/tmp/pikafax-${UNIQUEID}.tif)
exten => 5001,n,PIKARxFax(${FAXFILE})

you'd still need hardware to actually get the faxes to asterisk...

On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 9:32 AM, Erik Haider Forsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Hi Matthew,
>
> Thanks for your suggestion. The problem is that most of our users
> would not feel comfortable with using software fax solutions. So we
> will have to stick with the old fax machine.
>
> Our reception takes care of the fax machine, receiving and sending
> faxes. This one fax is shared by ~ 600 employees.
>
> Erik
>
>
> On Sep 23, 2008, at 3:25 PM, Matthew Marion wrote:
>
> > Hey Erik,
> >
> > You can also check out pika technologies which supply chan_pika.
> > This comes with a fax application that will let you do your faxes in
> > asterisk (even using non-pika boards).  Works pretty good...
> >
> > pikatechnologies.com
> >
> > mattm
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 4:51 AM, Erik Haider Forsen
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > I'm new to this list. I tried to search the list archive for a
> > solution on my current setup, but couldn't find any.
> >
> > We have an asterisk connected directly to the PSTN with 2 E1 lines
> > through a Sangoma A102d interface. We also have a regular FAX machine.
> >
> > My question is how to get the fax service handled by asterisk? I want
> > to cancel the analog line I have for the FAX machine today.
> >
> > What would be the best solution? Fax machine and asterisk is on the
> > same LAN, not much load, with high end switches etc. Can I expect good
> > results with using our existing FAX machine, connected to asterisk
> > through an ATA box?
> >
> > Best Regards,
> >
> > Erik
> >
> > ___
> > -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
> >
> > AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona
> > Register Now: http://www.astricon.net
> >
> > asterisk-users mailing list
> > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> >   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> >
> > ___
> > -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
> >
> > AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona
> > Register Now: http://www.astricon.net
> >
> > asterisk-users mailing list
> > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> >   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>
>
> ___
> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
>
> AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona
> Register Now: http://www.astricon.net
>
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>
___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona
Register Now: http://www.astricon.net

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Fax with asterisk

2008-09-23 Thread Steve Totaro

ATAs work OK I guess, just make sure to use a loss less codec such as ULAW.

Personally, I would install a single port FXS card in the Asterisk
server to avoid any IP transport.  You may have to mess with the gains
to get it working very well, but nothing beats your existing POTS
line.

If you had many physical fax machines and a spare T1 port, I would
suggest a channel bank, this has worked on par with a POTS line in my
experience, providing you are getting PSTN access through a T1/E1.

Thanks,
Steve Totaro

On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 9:32 AM, Erik Haider Forsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Matthew,
>
> Thanks for your suggestion. The problem is that most of our users
> would not feel comfortable with using software fax solutions. So we
> will have to stick with the old fax machine.
>
> Our reception takes care of the fax machine, receiving and sending
> faxes. This one fax is shared by ~ 600 employees.
>
> Erik
>
>
> On Sep 23, 2008, at 3:25 PM, Matthew Marion wrote:
>
>> Hey Erik,
>>
>> You can also check out pika technologies which supply chan_pika.
>> This comes with a fax application that will let you do your faxes in
>> asterisk (even using non-pika boards).  Works pretty good...
>>
>> pikatechnologies.com
>>
>> mattm
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 4:51 AM, Erik Haider Forsen
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> I'm new to this list. I tried to search the list archive for a
>> solution on my current setup, but couldn't find any.
>>
>> We have an asterisk connected directly to the PSTN with 2 E1 lines
>> through a Sangoma A102d interface. We also have a regular FAX machine.
>>
>> My question is how to get the fax service handled by asterisk? I want
>> to cancel the analog line I have for the FAX machine today.
>>
>> What would be the best solution? Fax machine and asterisk is on the
>> same LAN, not much load, with high end switches etc. Can I expect good
>> results with using our existing FAX machine, connected to asterisk
>> through an ATA box?
>>
>> Best Regards,
>>
>> Erik
>>
>> ___
>> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
>>
>> AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona
>> Register Now: http://www.astricon.net
>>
>> asterisk-users mailing list
>> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>>   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>>
>> ___
>> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
>>
>> AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona
>> Register Now: http://www.astricon.net
>>
>> asterisk-users mailing list
>> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>>   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>
>
> ___
> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
>
> AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona
> Register Now: http://www.astricon.net
>
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona
Register Now: http://www.astricon.net

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Fax with asterisk

2008-09-23 Thread Erik Haider Forsen

Hi Matthew,

Thanks for your suggestion. The problem is that most of our users  
would not feel comfortable with using software fax solutions. So we  
will have to stick with the old fax machine.

Our reception takes care of the fax machine, receiving and sending  
faxes. This one fax is shared by ~ 600 employees.

Erik


On Sep 23, 2008, at 3:25 PM, Matthew Marion wrote:

> Hey Erik,
>
> You can also check out pika technologies which supply chan_pika.   
> This comes with a fax application that will let you do your faxes in  
> asterisk (even using non-pika boards).  Works pretty good...
>
> pikatechnologies.com
>
> mattm
>
> On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 4:51 AM, Erik Haider Forsen  
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I'm new to this list. I tried to search the list archive for a
> solution on my current setup, but couldn't find any.
>
> We have an asterisk connected directly to the PSTN with 2 E1 lines
> through a Sangoma A102d interface. We also have a regular FAX machine.
>
> My question is how to get the fax service handled by asterisk? I want
> to cancel the analog line I have for the FAX machine today.
>
> What would be the best solution? Fax machine and asterisk is on the
> same LAN, not much load, with high end switches etc. Can I expect good
> results with using our existing FAX machine, connected to asterisk
> through an ATA box?
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Erik
>
> ___
> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
>
> AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona
> Register Now: http://www.astricon.net
>
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>
> ___
> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
>
> AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona
> Register Now: http://www.astricon.net
>
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users


___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona
Register Now: http://www.astricon.net

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Fax with asterisk

2008-09-23 Thread Erik Haider Forsen

Hi Giorgio,

Thanks for your answer.

Your setup is exactly what we're thinking of. We have 1100 DID's, so  
that shouldn't be a problem at all. Which ATA box are you using?

Erik


On Sep 23, 2008, at 2:06 PM, Giorgio Incantalupo wrote:

> Hi Olivier,
>
> We DO NOT use faxdetect because it does not work properly. That's  
> why we
> link a PRI DID to it, so when people call that DID the fax machine  
> gets
> direct fax data without passing thru faxdetection.
>
> Giorgio Incantalupo.
>
> Olivier wrote:
>>
>>
>> 2008/9/23 Giorgio Incantalupo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >
>>
>>Hi Erik,
>>we use an ATA device connected to the fax machine. If you want to
>>receive faxes, since Asterisk fax detection is not reliable
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Which fax detection did you used, then ?
>>
>>
>>, use one DID
>>to link it directly to the ATA: you lose a number but you gain a
>>fully-working fax!
>>
>>Giorgio Incantalupo.
>>
>>Erik Haider Forsen wrote:
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>> I'm new to this list. I tried to search the list archive for a
>>> solution on my current setup, but couldn't find any.
>>>
>>> We have an asterisk connected directly to the PSTN with 2 E1 lines
>>> through a Sangoma A102d interface. We also have a regular FAX
>>machine.
>>>
>>> My question is how to get the fax service handled by asterisk? I
>>want
>>> to cancel the analog line I have for the FAX machine today.
>>>
>>> What would be the best solution? Fax machine and asterisk is on the
>>> same LAN, not much load, with high end switches etc. Can I
>>expect good
>>> results with using our existing FAX machine, connected to asterisk
>>> through an ATA box?
>>>
>>> Best Regards,
>>>
>>> Erik
>>>
>>> ___
>>> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by
>>http://www.api-digital.com --
>>>
>>> AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona
>>> Register Now: http://www.astricon.net
>>>
>>> asterisk-users mailing list
>>> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>>>   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>>>
>>>
>>
>>___
>>-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api- 
>> digital.com --
>>
>>AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona
>>Register Now: http://www.astricon.net
>>
>>asterisk-users mailing list
>>To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>>  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>>
>>
>> 
>>
>> ___
>> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
>>
>> AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona
>> Register Now: http://www.astricon.net
>>
>> asterisk-users mailing list
>> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>>   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>
> ___
> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
>
> AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona
> Register Now: http://www.astricon.net
>
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>


___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona
Register Now: http://www.astricon.net

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Fax with asterisk

2008-09-23 Thread Matthew Marion

Hey Erik,

You can also check out pika technologies which supply chan_pika.  This comes
with a fax application that will let you do your faxes in asterisk (even
using non-pika boards).  Works pretty good...

pikatechnologies.com

mattm

On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 4:51 AM, Erik Haider Forsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Hi!
>
> I'm new to this list. I tried to search the list archive for a
> solution on my current setup, but couldn't find any.
>
> We have an asterisk connected directly to the PSTN with 2 E1 lines
> through a Sangoma A102d interface. We also have a regular FAX machine.
>
> My question is how to get the fax service handled by asterisk? I want
> to cancel the analog line I have for the FAX machine today.
>
> What would be the best solution? Fax machine and asterisk is on the
> same LAN, not much load, with high end switches etc. Can I expect good
> results with using our existing FAX machine, connected to asterisk
> through an ATA box?
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Erik
>
> ___
> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
>
> AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona
> Register Now: http://www.astricon.net
>
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>
___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona
Register Now: http://www.astricon.net

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Fax with asterisk

2008-09-23 Thread Giorgio Incantalupo

Hi Olivier,

We DO NOT use faxdetect because it does not work properly. That's why we 
link a PRI DID to it, so when people call that DID the fax machine gets 
direct fax data without passing thru faxdetection.

Giorgio Incantalupo.

Olivier wrote:
>
>
> 2008/9/23 Giorgio Incantalupo <[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> >
>
> Hi Erik,
> we use an ATA device connected to the fax machine. If you want to
> receive faxes, since Asterisk fax detection is not reliable
>
> Hi,
>
> Which fax detection did you used, then ?
>  
>
> , use one DID
> to link it directly to the ATA: you lose a number but you gain a
> fully-working fax!
>
> Giorgio Incantalupo.
>
> Erik Haider Forsen wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > I'm new to this list. I tried to search the list archive for a
> > solution on my current setup, but couldn't find any.
> >
> > We have an asterisk connected directly to the PSTN with 2 E1 lines
> > through a Sangoma A102d interface. We also have a regular FAX
> machine.
> >
> > My question is how to get the fax service handled by asterisk? I
> want
> > to cancel the analog line I have for the FAX machine today.
> >
> > What would be the best solution? Fax machine and asterisk is on the
> > same LAN, not much load, with high end switches etc. Can I
> expect good
> > results with using our existing FAX machine, connected to asterisk
> > through an ATA box?
> >
> > Best Regards,
> >
> > Erik
> >
> > ___
> > -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by
> http://www.api-digital.com --
> >
> > AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona
> > Register Now: http://www.astricon.net
> >
> > asterisk-users mailing list
> > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> >http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> >
> >
>
> ___
> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
>
> AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona
> Register Now: http://www.astricon.net
>
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>
>
> 
>
> ___
> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
>
> AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona
> Register Now: http://www.astricon.net
>
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona
Register Now: http://www.astricon.net

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Fax with asterisk

2008-09-23 Thread Luis Morales

I have an TDM800P+ata+fax and work fine. This setup take 5 min.

The best solution must be hylax fax + asterisk. But you need an
asterisk specialist to make the setup and take more time. With this
solution you can send fax and receive fax in your inbox and reduce
toner/papper costs.

Regards,

Luis Morales


On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 4:21 AM, Erik Haider Forsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I'm new to this list. I tried to search the list archive for a
> solution on my current setup, but couldn't find any.
>
> We have an asterisk connected directly to the PSTN with 2 E1 lines
> through a Sangoma A102d interface. We also have a regular FAX machine.
>
> My question is how to get the fax service handled by asterisk? I want
> to cancel the analog line I have for the FAX machine today.
>
> What would be the best solution? Fax machine and asterisk is on the
> same LAN, not much load, with high end switches etc. Can I expect good
> results with using our existing FAX machine, connected to asterisk
> through an ATA box?
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Erik
>
> ___
> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
>
> AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona
> Register Now: http://www.astricon.net
>
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>



-- 
-
Luis Morales
Consultor de Tecnologia
Cel: +(58)416-4242091
-
"Empieza por hacer lo necesario, luego lo que es posible... y de
pronto estarás haciendo lo imposible"

Leonardo Da'Vinci
-

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona
Register Now: http://www.astricon.net

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Fax with asterisk

2008-09-23 Thread Olivier

2008/9/23 Giorgio Incantalupo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

> Hi Erik,
> we use an ATA device connected to the fax machine. If you want to
> receive faxes, since Asterisk fax detection is not reliable

Hi,

Which fax detection did you used, then ?


> , use one DID
> to link it directly to the ATA: you lose a number but you gain a
> fully-working fax!
>
> Giorgio Incantalupo.
>
> Erik Haider Forsen wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > I'm new to this list. I tried to search the list archive for a
> > solution on my current setup, but couldn't find any.
> >
> > We have an asterisk connected directly to the PSTN with 2 E1 lines
> > through a Sangoma A102d interface. We also have a regular FAX machine.
> >
> > My question is how to get the fax service handled by asterisk? I want
> > to cancel the analog line I have for the FAX machine today.
> >
> > What would be the best solution? Fax machine and asterisk is on the
> > same LAN, not much load, with high end switches etc. Can I expect good
> > results with using our existing FAX machine, connected to asterisk
> > through an ATA box?
> >
> > Best Regards,
> >
> > Erik
> >
> > ___
> > -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
> >
> > AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona
> > Register Now: http://www.astricon.net
> >
> > asterisk-users mailing list
> > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
> >http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> >
> >
>
> ___
> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
>
> AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona
> Register Now: http://www.astricon.net
>
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>
___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona
Register Now: http://www.astricon.net

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Fax with asterisk

2008-09-23 Thread Giorgio Incantalupo

Hi Erik,
we use an ATA device connected to the fax machine. If you want to 
receive faxes, since Asterisk fax detection is not reliable, use one DID 
to link it directly to the ATA: you lose a number but you gain a 
fully-working fax!

Giorgio Incantalupo.

Erik Haider Forsen wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I'm new to this list. I tried to search the list archive for a  
> solution on my current setup, but couldn't find any.
>
> We have an asterisk connected directly to the PSTN with 2 E1 lines  
> through a Sangoma A102d interface. We also have a regular FAX machine.
>
> My question is how to get the fax service handled by asterisk? I want  
> to cancel the analog line I have for the FAX machine today.
>
> What would be the best solution? Fax machine and asterisk is on the  
> same LAN, not much load, with high end switches etc. Can I expect good  
> results with using our existing FAX machine, connected to asterisk  
> through an ATA box?
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Erik
>
> ___
> -- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --
>
> AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona
> Register Now: http://www.astricon.net
>
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>
>   

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona
Register Now: http://www.astricon.net

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[asterisk-users] Fax with asterisk

2008-09-23 Thread Erik Haider Forsen

Hi!

I'm new to this list. I tried to search the list archive for a  
solution on my current setup, but couldn't find any.

We have an asterisk connected directly to the PSTN with 2 E1 lines  
through a Sangoma A102d interface. We also have a regular FAX machine.

My question is how to get the fax service handled by asterisk? I want  
to cancel the analog line I have for the FAX machine today.

What would be the best solution? Fax machine and asterisk is on the  
same LAN, not much load, with high end switches etc. Can I expect good  
results with using our existing FAX machine, connected to asterisk  
through an ATA box?

Best Regards,

Erik

___
-- Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com --

AstriCon 2008 - September 22 - 25 Phoenix, Arizona
Register Now: http://www.astricon.net

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[asterisk-users] FAX with asterisk

2007-09-04 Thread satish patel

Dear all

I have fax machine which is connected with audiocode FXS port 
and audiocode connected with my asterisk server now what configuration i have 
to configured on asterisk ?? can any one suggest me what would be best for this 
kind of setup ??


[FAX]--[Audiocode][asterisk]--[PRI]





   
-
Got a little couch potato? 
Check out fun summer activities for kids.___
--Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com--

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Fax with Asterisk + Hylafax

2007-04-17 Thread Jon Pounder


> 2007/4/16, Stephen Bosch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>
>>
>> It's not entirely clear to me why people continue to cling to the idea
>> that Asterisk should handle faxing also. What's the benefit? Hylafax is
>> great, and you can even use it on the same machine.
>
>
> The benefit, I guess, is to save a dedicated line and not changing
> incoming
> fax numbers, as you cannot port them individually.
> But you're right to point it also has drawbacks ...

saving the dedicated line is the biggest one, the next notch is what about
when you have busy periods of 5min a month, do you get a second dedicated
fax machine, fax line, hunt group etc ?


we just give out line 2 in our hunt group as the fax number, have
autodetect on the lines in asterisk and switch to the fax extension
(channel bank with faxmodem and hylafax) when a fax comes in. this gives
us an incoming fax pool as well with no extra line cost. This actually
works fairly well through a channel bank even with all the extra d/a a/d
conversion going on. We plan to try the soft fax channels as well but have
not tried that yet.

if someone has problems (pretty rarely), then we tell them the extension
of the faxmodem to dial, we also have a real fax machine on another
extension we have them try calling. That always works and the extra
switching does not impact the faxes themselves. The biggest issue is
remote does not talk to usr faxmodem, but will talk to a real fax machine,
nothing about the asterisk detection and switching usually matters.

we have never done it yet but the faxes could use all the lines at night
for mass faxouts or certain lines or whatever since its all connected that
way already anyway.

lots of the benifits are not possible with a dedicated fax line. as for
the drawbacks you could make a lot of the same arguments about voip in
general but people still use it anyway.

forgetting about voip and virtual channels and asterisk for a minute, why
is it so hard to find a faxmodem that actually works as reliably as a
physical fax machine ? Should be simple, but I guess it will eventually
lead to it just becoming software only when the hardware manufacturers
can't get it right.




> ___
> --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
>
> asterisk-users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>


Jon Pounder

   _/_/_/  _/_/  _/   _/_/_/  _/_/  _/_/_/_/
_/_/_/  _/  _/ _/_/_/  _/  _/_/
   _/_/  _/_/  _/ _/_/  _/_/  _/
_/_/_/  _/_/  _/_/_/_/ _/_/_/  _/_/  _/_/_/_/


Inline Internet Systems Inc.
Thorold, Ontario, Canada

Tools to Power Your e-Business Solutions
www.inline.net
www.ihtml.com
www.ihtmlmerchant.com
www.opayc.com
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Fax with Asterisk + Hylafax

2007-04-17 Thread Travis Schafer

In my case, I have a single PRI coming into a single port PRI card on my 
Asterisk box. My "old" fax numbers (prior to our switch to PRI) are DIDs on 
that PRI.

Using IAXModem+HylaFAX, I can recieve faxes without having seperate POTS lines 
for faxes, or an external fax board, or a multiport T1 card.

Adding new fax numbers involves assigning a new DID...so adding additional fax 
"lines" doesn't cost anything (again, IAXModem is free...)

--TS

>>> Olivier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 04/17/07 2:19 PM >>>
2007/4/16, Stephen Bosch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
> It's not entirely clear to me why people continue to cling to the idea
> that Asterisk should handle faxing also. What's the benefit? Hylafax is
> great, and you can even use it on the same machine.


The benefit, I guess, is to save a dedicated line and not changing incoming
fax numbers, as you cannot port them individually.
But you're right to point it also has drawbacks ...

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Fax with Asterisk + Hylafax

2007-04-17 Thread Olivier


2007/4/16, Stephen Bosch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:



It's not entirely clear to me why people continue to cling to the idea
that Asterisk should handle faxing also. What's the benefit? Hylafax is
great, and you can even use it on the same machine.



The benefit, I guess, is to save a dedicated line and not changing incoming
fax numbers, as you cannot port them individually.
But you're right to point it also has drawbacks ...
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Fax with Asterisk + Hylafax

2007-04-16 Thread Doug Lytle


Carlos Chavez wrote:


 You can have Asterisk and Hylafax on the same machine when you use
IAXmodem.  This is the way I fax in my office with 99% success rate.  I am
  
I've just compiled stats for the last 30 days on our system for 
management, info below:



Failure Rate
(0.26%)
  
   CallsCalls   CallsTotalPercentage

   Successful   Dropped Failed   CallsCalls Dropped
-
Total1944  311  5  2260   16.00%
  




NOTE:

Calls Successful do not reflect the actual number of pages received
Calls Failed that were successful on a second or third attempt are not 
listed
Calls Dropped(Spammers) may be of the same source trying to make 
multiple attempts of sending



Doug

--

Ben Franklin quote:

"Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, 
deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Fax with Asterisk + Hylafax

2007-04-16 Thread Carlos Chavez

On Sun, 15 Apr 2007 22:10:34 -0700, Yuan LIU wrote
> >From: Steve Totaro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2007 22:36:15 -0400
> >
> >Stephen Bosch wrote:
> >>Steve Totaro wrote:
> >>
> >>>You could try to get it working but it may never be 100%.  If your needs
> >>>are 100% then I suggest using a standard fax and get an analog line and
> >>>do it the old fashioned way.  If you need Hylafax type features then buy
> >>>a modem that is compatible with Hylafax and run it on a different box.
> >>
> >>It's not entirely clear to me why people continue to cling to the idea
> >>that Asterisk should handle faxing also. What's the benefit? Hylafax is
> >>great, and you can even use it on the same machine.
> 
> On same machine is a bit exaggerated, considering there is a Zaptel 
> card on it. (But if Zaptel and Hylafax can share an X100P driver ...)
> 
 You can have Asterisk and Hylafax on the same machine when you use
IAXmodem.  This is the way I fax in my office with 99% success rate.  I am
using a TDM04B card for my lines.  I use a software called Avantfax that gives
me an interface to send and receive faxes through a web page.  

 I have implemented this solution with several clients and have up to 15
virtual IAXmodem + Hylafax sessions running.

--
Carlos Chavez
Director de Tecnología
Telecomunicaciones Abiertas de México S.A. de C.V.
Tel: +52-55-91169161 Ext 2001

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Fax with Asterisk + Hylafax

2007-04-15 Thread Jose Limeres


My problem is that I already did what you proposed and I did not have much
sucess.
An Hylafax server with an external/internal modem using a driver from
linmodems worked in around 80% of the cases. To improve this rate you need a
modem like the ones offered by Mainpine which were way out of my budget.

Regards,
Jose L.
On 16/04/07, Tzafrir Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


On Sun, Apr 15, 2007 at 10:10:34PM -0700, Yuan LIU wrote:

> (But if Zaptel and Hylafax can share an X100P driver ...)

Where can you find a modem driver for a X100P?

I recently asked about it in the linmodemds.org mailing list, and
aparantly none is available.

--
   Tzafrir Cohen
icq#16849755jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+972-50-7952406   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.xorcom.com  iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/tzafrir
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Fax with Asterisk + Hylafax

2007-04-15 Thread Stephen Bosch

Steve Totaro wrote:
> Stephen Bosch wrote:
>> Steve Totaro wrote:
>>  
>>> You could try to get it working but it may never be 100%.  If your needs
>>> are 100% then I suggest using a standard fax and get an analog line and
>>> do it the old fashioned way.  If you need Hylafax type features then buy
>>> a modem that is compatible with Hylafax and run it on a different box.
>>> 
>>
>> It's not entirely clear to me why people continue to cling to the idea
>> that Asterisk should handle faxing also. What's the benefit? Hylafax is
>> great, and you can even use it on the same machine.
>>
>> -Stephen-
>>   
> 
> I could have sworn that is what I just said.

Yes, and I was commenting :)

-Stephen-
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Fax with Asterisk + Hylafax

2007-04-15 Thread Yuan LIU

From: Tzafrir Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2007 08:45:38 +0300

On Sun, Apr 15, 2007 at 10:10:34PM -0700, Yuan LIU wrote:

> (But if Zaptel and Hylafax can share an X100P driver ...)

Where can you find a modem driver for a X100P?

Kinda my question, too.  Motorola used to have an SM56 Linux driver, but 
removed from their site.  Now, there are some references to this, such as 
http://www.motorola.com/softmodem/public_download/Linux/ReadMe_Legacy_SM56.txt 
and http://www.angelfire.com/linux/sm56/, but if the original driver is 
nowhere to be downloaded, there might be a chance you can hack the URL based 
on the Motorola document.

No knowledge about X100P/Intel and other.

Yuan Liu

I recently asked about it in the linmodemds.org mailing list, and
aparantly none is available.

--
   Tzafrir Cohen
icq#16849755jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+972-50-7952406   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.xorcom.com  iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/tzafrir

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Fax with Asterisk + Hylafax

2007-04-15 Thread Tzafrir Cohen

On Sun, Apr 15, 2007 at 10:10:34PM -0700, Yuan LIU wrote:

> (But if Zaptel and Hylafax can share an X100P driver ...)

Where can you find a modem driver for a X100P? 

I recently asked about it in the linmodemds.org mailing list, and
aparantly none is available. 

-- 
   Tzafrir Cohen   
icq#16849755jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+972-50-7952406   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]   
http://www.xorcom.com  iax:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/tzafrir
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Fax with Asterisk + Hylafax

2007-04-15 Thread Yuan LIU

From: Steve Totaro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2007 22:36:15 -0400

Stephen Bosch wrote:

Steve Totaro wrote:

You could try to get it working but it may never be 100%.  If your needs
are 100% then I suggest using a standard fax and get an analog line and
do it the old fashioned way.  If you need Hylafax type features then buy
a modem that is compatible with Hylafax and run it on a different box.

It's not entirely clear to me why people continue to cling to the idea
that Asterisk should handle faxing also. What's the benefit? Hylafax is
great, and you can even use it on the same machine.

On same machine is a bit exaggerated, considering there is a Zaptel card on 
it. (But if Zaptel and Hylafax can share an X100P driver ...)

Yuan Liu

-Stephen-

I could have sworn that is what I just said.

Thanks,
Steve

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Fax with Asterisk + Hylafax

2007-04-15 Thread Steve Totaro


Stephen Bosch wrote:

Steve Totaro wrote:
  

You could try to get it working but it may never be 100%.  If your needs
are 100% then I suggest using a standard fax and get an analog line and
do it the old fashioned way.  If you need Hylafax type features then buy
a modem that is compatible with Hylafax and run it on a different box.



It's not entirely clear to me why people continue to cling to the idea
that Asterisk should handle faxing also. What's the benefit? Hylafax is
great, and you can even use it on the same machine.

-Stephen-
  


I could have sworn that is what I just said.

Thanks,
Steve
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Fax with Asterisk + Hylafax

2007-04-15 Thread Stephen Bosch

Steve Totaro wrote:
> You could try to get it working but it may never be 100%.  If your needs
> are 100% then I suggest using a standard fax and get an analog line and
> do it the old fashioned way.  If you need Hylafax type features then buy
> a modem that is compatible with Hylafax and run it on a different box.

It's not entirely clear to me why people continue to cling to the idea
that Asterisk should handle faxing also. What's the benefit? Hylafax is
great, and you can even use it on the same machine.

-Stephen-
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Fax with Asterisk + Hylafax

2007-04-15 Thread Steve Totaro

You could try to get it working but it may never be 100%.  If your needs 
are 100% then I suggest using a standard fax and get an analog line and 
do it the old fashioned way.  If you need Hylafax type features then buy 
a modem that is compatible with Hylafax and run it on a different box.

Just suggestions. 

Thanks,
Steve

Jose Limeres wrote:
I searched extensively on this and did not find anything conclusive 
except the general understanding that on TDM cards every instalation 
is different whereas for BRI /PRI it should work.

As for the config, Asterisk just works perfectly well with voice 
conversations over the FXO line. I add one IAX extension in * for the 
IAXModem and then in the IAXmodem configure the default modem as the 
one that is registered in *. If I make a Fax call to my mobile, it 
rings and I can hear the Fax on the other side. So, the problem I 
believe is in the negotiation/sinchronization where something is 
broken at some point.

I would like to know wether it is possible to solve this adjusting 
some parameter in some config file or I should just forget it and use 
a digital line instead.

Thanks,
Jose L.

CLI>
-- Accepting AUTHENTICATED call from 127.0.0.1 :
> requested format = slin,
> requested prefs = (),
> actual format = alaw,
> host prefs = (alaw),
> priority = mine
-- Executing [EMAIL PROTECTED]:1] Dial("IAX2/200-1", 
"Zap/g1/956855858") in new stack

-- Called g1/956855858
-- Zap/4-1 answered IAX2/200-1
-- Hungup 'Zap/4-1'
== Spawn extension (default, 956855858, 1) exited non-zero on 'IAX2/200-1'
-- Hungup 'IAX2/200-1'
CLI>

> faxstat -s
JID Pri S Owner Number Pages Dials TTS Status
35 126 S root 956855858 0:1 1:12 11.19 No carrier detected

On 15/04/07, *Steve Totaro* < [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> wrote:

Yuan LIU wrote:
>> From: "Jose Limeres" < [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>> Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2007 19:10:58 +0100
>>
>> Hi,
>> Anybody lucky with this config inside an Asterisk server for
dealing
>> with
>> FAX ?
>>
>> FXO_LINE > ASTERISK 1.4.2 ---> IAXMODEM --> HYLAFAX
>> TDM400P ZAPTEL
>> 4.3.1
>> 1 FXO port 1.41
>
> Search Asterisk forum. Yes, somebody posted positive results.
>
> Yuan Liu
I have had great results via PRI -> Asterisk -> IAXModem -> Hylafax

Post your log results and configs.

Thanks,
Steve

>
>>

>> I know Fax is not officially supported on TDM400P cards but I
did not
>> expect
>> not being able of sending one single Fax.
>> Actually when I try to send a Fax, the call is established
between my *
>> server and the remote Fax but after 30 secs Asterisk
disconnects the
>> call
>> and Hylafax reports NO CARRIER DETECTED.
>>
>> Tried playing around with a few parameters such as no
>> echocancellation, alaw
>> (also slinear) codec, faxdetection =incoming in zaptel but with
no luck.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Jose Limeres
>
>

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com
 --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Fax with Asterisk + Hylafax

2007-04-15 Thread Jose Limeres

I searched extensively on this and did not find anything conclusive except
the general understanding that on TDM cards every instalation is different
whereas for BRI /PRI it should work.

As for the config, Asterisk just works perfectly well with voice
conversations over the FXO line. I add one IAX extension in * for the
IAXModem and then in the IAXmodem configure the default modem as the one
that is registered in *. If I make a Fax call to my mobile, it rings and I
can hear the Fax on the other side. So, the problem I believe is in the
negotiation/sinchronization where something is broken at some point.

I would like to know wether it is possible to solve this adjusting some
parameter in some config file or I should just forget it and use a digital
line instead.

Thanks,
Jose L.

CLI>
   -- Accepting AUTHENTICATED call from 127.0.0.1:
  > requested format = slin,
  > requested prefs = (),
  > actual format = alaw,
  > host prefs = (alaw),
  > priority = mine
   -- Executing [EMAIL PROTECTED]:1] Dial("IAX2/200-1",
"Zap/g1/956855858") in new stack
   -- Called g1/956855858
   -- Zap/4-1 answered IAX2/200-1
   -- Hungup 'Zap/4-1'
 == Spawn extension (default, 956855858, 1) exited non-zero on 'IAX2/200-1'
   -- Hungup 'IAX2/200-1'
CLI>

faxstat -s

JIDPriSOwnerNumber PagesDials TTS
Status
35 126  Sroot 9568558580:1  1:12   11.19
No carrier detected

On 15/04/07, Steve Totaro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Yuan LIU wrote:
>> From: "Jose Limeres" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2007 19:10:58 +0100
>>
>> Hi,
>> Anybody lucky with this config inside an Asterisk server for dealing
>> with
>> FAX ?
>>
>> FXO_LINE   > ASTERISK 1.4.2 ---> IAXMODEM -->  HYLAFAX
>> TDM400PZAPTEL
>> 4.3.1
>> 1 FXO port  1.41
>
> Search Asterisk forum.  Yes, somebody posted positive results.
>
> Yuan Liu
I have had great results via PRI -> Asterisk -> IAXModem -> Hylafax

Post your log results and configs.

Thanks,
Steve

>
>>

>> I know Fax is not officially supported on TDM400P cards but I did not
>> expect
>> not being able of sending one single Fax.
>> Actually when I try to send a Fax, the call is established between my *
>> server and the remote Fax but after 30 secs Asterisk disconnects the
>> call
>> and Hylafax reports NO CARRIER DETECTED.
>>
>> Tried playing around with a few parameters such as no
>> echocancellation, alaw
>> (also slinear) codec, faxdetection =incoming in zaptel but with no
luck.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Jose Limeres
>
>

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Fax with Asterisk + Hylafax

2007-04-15 Thread Steve Totaro

Yuan LIU wrote:

From: "Jose Limeres" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2007 19:10:58 +0100

Hi,
Anybody lucky with this config inside an Asterisk server for dealing 
with

FAX ?

FXO_LINE   > ASTERISK 1.4.2 ---> IAXMODEM -->  HYLAFAX
TDM400PZAPTEL
4.3.1
1 FXO port  1.41

Search Asterisk forum.  Yes, somebody posted positive results.

Yuan Liu

I have had great results via PRI -> Asterisk -> IAXModem -> Hylafax

Post your log results and configs.

Thanks,
Steve

I know Fax is not officially supported on TDM400P cards but I did not 
expect

not being able of sending one single Fax.
Actually when I try to send a Fax, the call is established between my *
server and the remote Fax but after 30 secs Asterisk disconnects the 
call

and Hylafax reports NO CARRIER DETECTED.

Tried playing around with a few parameters such as no 
echocancellation, alaw

(also slinear) codec, faxdetection =incoming in zaptel but with no luck.

Regards,
Jose Limeres

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

RE: [asterisk-users] Fax with Asterisk + Hylafax

2007-04-15 Thread Yuan LIU

From: "Jose Limeres" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2007 19:10:58 +0100

Hi,
Anybody lucky with this config inside an Asterisk server for dealing with
FAX ?

FXO_LINE   > ASTERISK 1.4.2 ---> IAXMODEM -->  HYLAFAX
TDM400PZAPTEL
4.3.1
1 FXO port  1.41

Search Asterisk forum.  Yes, somebody posted positive results.

Yuan Liu

I know Fax is not officially supported on TDM400P cards but I did not 
expect

not being able of sending one single Fax.
Actually when I try to send a Fax, the call is established between my *
server and the remote Fax but after 30 secs Asterisk disconnects the call
and Hylafax reports NO CARRIER DETECTED.

Tried playing around with a few parameters such as no echocancellation, 
alaw

(also slinear) codec, faxdetection =incoming in zaptel but with no luck.

Regards,
Jose Limeres

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[asterisk-users] Fax with Asterisk + Hylafax

2007-04-15 Thread Jose Limeres


Hi,
Anybody lucky with this config inside an Asterisk server for dealing with
FAX ?

FXO_LINE   > ASTERISK 1.4.2 ---> IAXMODEM -->  HYLAFAX
TDM400PZAPTEL
4.3.1
1 FXO port  1.41


I know Fax is not officially supported on TDM400P cards but I did not expect
not being able of sending one single Fax.
Actually when I try to send a Fax, the call is established between my *
server and the remote Fax but after 30 secs Asterisk disconnects the call
and Hylafax reports NO CARRIER DETECTED.

Tried playing around with a few parameters such as no echocancellation, alaw
(also slinear) codec, faxdetection =incoming in zaptel but with no luck.

Regards,
Jose Limeres
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Fax with asterisk?

2006-09-04 Thread DRi


[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 31.08.2006
05:41:52 PM:

> Matthias Fechner wrote:
> 
> >Hello Roger,
> >
> >* Roger Schreiter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [31-08-06 14:19]:
> >  
> >
> >>did google for asterisk and fax show no results?
> >>    
> >>
> >
> >yes I found spandsp but it will do everything in software.
> >Is it not a good idea to use my modem for the fax stuff?
> >  
> >
> Why would it not be a good idea to do things in software?
> 
Hi all,

software-solution would be a good idea... eg. spandsp/iaxmodem & hylafax
but is where a app_rxfax/app_txfax planned/available
for spandsp-0.0.3 ?
this would myke things much easier as handling with
hylafax, at least to receive fax.
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Fax with asterisk?

2006-09-01 Thread Matthias Fechner

Hello Steve,

* Steve Underwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [31-08-06 23:41]:
> Why would it not be a good idea to do things in software?

hm, I have no idea

Ok, I configured asterisk to receive the fax and wrote a
small script which sent me the fax as pdf via email.

Seems to work. Lets see how stable it is.
The next days I will try to send mails with the help of a mail2fax
gateway.

Thx for all the answers.

Best regards,
Matthias

-- 

"Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to
build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the universe trying to
produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the universe is winning." --
Rich Cook
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Fax with asterisk?

2006-08-31 Thread Steve Underwood


Matthias Fechner wrote:


Hello Roger,

* Roger Schreiter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [31-08-06 14:19]:
 


did google for asterisk and fax show no results?
   



yes I found spandsp but it will do everything in software.
Is it not a good idea to use my modem for the fax stuff?
 


Why would it not be a good idea to do things in software?

Steve

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Fax with asterisk?

2006-08-31 Thread Jon Pounder


Quoting Roger Schreiter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:


Matthias Fechner schrieb:

...
yes I found spandsp but it will do everything in software.
Is it not a good idea to use my modem for the fax stuff?





I have the configuration below and its fine (usr usb modem plugged back 
into the

asterisk machine with hylafax) but I intend to replace with a software only
config now that they are mature enough. didn't exist yet when this setup was
built. it eliminates a device, some cables, and frees up a channel bank port.


I have still found though the odd fax just won't go through, so I have a real
fax machine hooked up that is used for outbound anyway, and have people dial
that extension if the automatic setup just refuses to work with the fax on
their end.





Hi,

ok, you want to use an external faxmodem?

Something like that:


outside (PSTN or anythin else)
   |
   V
asterisk box
   |
   | (via analogue phone line)
   |
   V
external faxmodem
   |
   | RS232 cable or similar
   |
   V
PC with faxmodem support



Yes, that's possible. You will need an ATA or in your asterisk
box a card for the analogue phone line.


Ok, what is your question now? Please ask more precisely!
(Or is "Yes, that's possible" already the desired answer?)


Roger.


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users





Jon Pounder

  _/_/_/  _/_/  _/   _/_/_/  _/_/  _/_/_/_/
   _/_/_/  _/  _/ _/_/_/  _/  _/_/
  _/_/  _/_/  _/ _/_/  _/_/  _/
_/_/_/  _/_/  _/_/_/_/ _/_/_/  _/_/  _/_/_/_/


Inline Internet Systems Inc.
Thorold, Ontario, Canada

Tools to Power Your e-Business Solutions
www.inline.net
www.ihtml.com
www.ihtmlmerchant.com
www.opayc.com


This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Fax with asterisk?

2006-08-31 Thread Roger Schreiter


Matthias Fechner schrieb:

...
yes I found spandsp but it will do everything in software.
Is it not a good idea to use my modem for the fax stuff?



Hi,

ok, you want to use an external faxmodem?

Something like that:


outside (PSTN or anythin else)
   |
   V
asterisk box
   |
   | (via analogue phone line)
   |
   V
external faxmodem
   |
   | RS232 cable or similar
   |
   V
PC with faxmodem support



Yes, that's possible. You will need an ATA or in your asterisk
box a card for the analogue phone line.


Ok, what is your question now? Please ask more precisely!
(Or is "Yes, that's possible" already the desired answer?)


Roger.


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Fax with asterisk?

2006-08-31 Thread Matthias Fechner

Hello Roger,

* Roger Schreiter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [31-08-06 14:19]:
> did google for asterisk and fax show no results?

yes I found spandsp but it will do everything in software.
Is it not a good idea to use my modem for the fax stuff?


Best regards,
Matthias

-- 

"Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to
build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the universe trying to
produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the universe is winning." --
Rich Cook
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [asterisk-users] Fax with asterisk?

2006-08-31 Thread Roger Schreiter


Matthias Fechner schrieb:

...
I use here mgetty+sendfax with a modem to receive and send fax
messages. Is it possible to receive and send a fax with asterisk
directly?



Hi,

did google for asterisk and fax show no results?

Strange!
Ok, what you need is Steve Underwood's package
spandsp and the two asterisk applications app_rxfax
and app_txfax, which is not included in spandsp nor
in asterisk, but is generally to be downloaded near
to spandsp.


Regards,
Roger.


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[asterisk-users] Fax with asterisk?

2006-08-31 Thread Matthias Fechner

Hi,

I use here mgetty+sendfax with a modem to receive and send fax
messages. Is it possible to receive and send a fax with asterisk
directly?

I have two passive ISDN card (HFC-S chipset, one in NT mode the other
in TE-mode) and a old ELSA Microlink modem via serial on my computer.
The OS is FreeBSD.

Best regards,
Matthias

-- 

"Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to
build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the universe trying to
produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the universe is winning." --
Rich Cook
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Fax with Asterisk and Sipura 2100

2006-01-06 Thread Jorge Cisneros

Change the RTP Packet Size: 0.010
 
to 

RTP Packet Size: 0.020

Asterisk only work with 2 frames. 

I can't send any fax with other values.






On 1/5/06, Joash Herbrink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You could use a cisco ata 186.There aren't very cheap, but I have made them work on several of mycustomer sites with faxes.The ata just registers to the * server as a SIP endpoint.Also, echo cancelling and other "intelligent" things are bad when
dealing with faxes and modems.Just use the cisco ATA (or any simple vegastream ATA device) to send /receive faxes.Codec should always be G.711 and no CNG or VAD or echo canceling shouldbe used, fax machines take care of that themselves.
(Contact me of list if you any of the mentioned devices)Joash[EMAIL PROTECTED]-Original Message-From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED][mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of RemcoBarendeSent: Thursday, January 05, 2006 4:42 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial DiscussionSubject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Fax with Asterisk and Sipura 2100I tried to get it working for a very long time (over a year) with everypossible set of config parameters I could find both for * as well as for
the Sipura's. Echo cancelling etc. etc. all changed but still problems.I tried to get it working on an * box with a BRI line.Finally I have given up and attached a traditional ISDN -> Analog (A/B)
converter to the ISDN line for the faxing bit next to Asterisk.I have yet to find a similar solution for faxing with a PRI, I'm afraiditwill be impossible because as far as I know it's not possible to hook up
some sort of A/B adapter next to the * box on one pri line.I think it can work if your fax machines are capable of capping faxtx/rxspeeds to 9600 baud maximum without error correction. However it seems
that not a single producer of FAX equipment (be it modems, all-in-onedevices or even dedicated fax machines) offer such an option. HP doesn'tseem very interested in capping the fax speeds for their all-in-one
thingies.All fax products keep trying to transmit/receive at higher speedsafter which the fax will fail completely or after the second page.Maybe there is a solution coming for PRI faxing. Junghanns informed me
some time ago that they were working on a PRI card with a possibility tosync the clock to other cards.If this works in theory you could use a Junghanns PRI card and aJunghannsBRI card, sync the clocks and keep the path fully digital without lost
frames. On their website however they only mention the possibility tointerconnect the PRI cards, not (yet?) PRI <-> BRI.On Thu, 5 Jan 2006, Darrell Long wrote:> I know the subject of faxing has been covered in some detail, but I
was> wondering if anyone has a hardware configuration similar to ours thathas> faxes working successfully and would be willing to share any> settings/insight.>> We are unable to fax reliably with a Sipura 2100 connected to
Asterisk. We do> not route calls over the Internet and our network has very lowlatency. The> Asterisk servers connect to Cisco Routers that have PRIs from various> carriers. We have all the recommended settings in the Sipura ATA, with
Echo> Cancellation and Silence Suppression off, uLaw only for the codec,etc.>> While I realize that no faxes going through passthrough like this willwork> 100% of the time, we currently have a less than 40% success rate with
inbound> faxes being the worst.>> Any insight anyone has would be greatly appreciated!>> Best Regards,>>___--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by 
Easynews.com --Asterisk-Users mailing listTo UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
___--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --Asterisk-Users mailing listTo UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

RE: [Asterisk-Users] Fax with Asterisk and Sipura 2100

2006-01-05 Thread Joash Herbrink

You could use a cisco ata 186.
There aren't very cheap, but I have made them work on several of my
customer sites with faxes.

The ata just registers to the * server as a SIP endpoint.

Also, echo cancelling and other "intelligent" things are bad when
dealing with faxes and modems.

Just use the cisco ATA (or any simple vegastream ATA device) to send /
receive faxes.

Codec should always be G.711 and no CNG or VAD or echo canceling should
be used, fax machines take care of that themselves.

(Contact me of list if you any of the mentioned devices)

Joash
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Remco
Barende
Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2006 4:42 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] Fax with Asterisk and Sipura 2100

I tried to get it working for a very long time (over a year) with every 
possible set of config parameters I could find both for * as well as for

the Sipura's. Echo cancelling etc. etc. all changed but still problems.

I tried to get it working on an * box with a BRI line.

Finally I have given up and attached a traditional ISDN -> Analog (A/B) 
converter to the ISDN line for the faxing bit next to Asterisk.

I have yet to find a similar solution for faxing with a PRI, I'm afraid
it 
will be impossible because as far as I know it's not possible to hook up

some sort of A/B adapter next to the * box on one pri line.

I think it can work if your fax machines are capable of capping fax
tx/rx 
speeds to 9600 baud maximum without error correction. However it seems 
that not a single producer of FAX equipment (be it modems, all-in-one 
devices or even dedicated fax machines) offer such an option. HP doesn't

seem very interested in capping the fax speeds for their all-in-one 
thingies.

All fax products keep trying to transmit/receive at higher speeds 
after which the fax will fail completely or after the second page.

Maybe there is a solution coming for PRI faxing. Junghanns informed me 
some time ago that they were working on a PRI card with a possibility to

sync the clock to other cards.

If this works in theory you could use a Junghanns PRI card and a
Junghanns 
BRI card, sync the clocks and keep the path fully digital without lost 
frames. On their website however they only mention the possibility to 
interconnect the PRI cards, not (yet?) PRI <-> BRI.

On Thu, 5 Jan 2006, Darrell Long wrote:

> I know the subject of faxing has been covered in some detail, but I
was 
> wondering if anyone has a hardware configuration similar to ours that
has 
> faxes working successfully and would be willing to share any 
> settings/insight.
>
> We are unable to fax reliably with a Sipura 2100 connected to
Asterisk. We do 
> not route calls over the Internet and our network has very low
latency. The 
> Asterisk servers connect to Cisco Routers that have PRIs from various 
> carriers. We have all the recommended settings in the Sipura ATA, with
Echo 
> Cancellation and Silence Suppression off, uLaw only for the codec,
etc.
>
> While I realize that no faxes going through passthrough like this will
work 
> 100% of the time, we currently have a less than 40% success rate with
inbound 
> faxes being the worst.
>
> Any insight anyone has would be greatly appreciated!
>
> Best Regards,
>
>
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Fax with Asterisk and Sipura 2100

2006-01-05 Thread Remco Barende

I tried to get it working for a very long time (over a year) with every 
possible set of config parameters I could find both for * as well as for 
the Sipura's. Echo cancelling etc. etc. all changed but still problems.


I tried to get it working on an * box with a BRI line.

Finally I have given up and attached a traditional ISDN -> Analog (A/B) 
converter to the ISDN line for the faxing bit next to Asterisk.


I have yet to find a similar solution for faxing with a PRI, I'm afraid it 
will be impossible because as far as I know it's not possible to hook up 
some sort of A/B adapter next to the * box on one pri line.


I think it can work if your fax machines are capable of capping fax tx/rx 
speeds to 9600 baud maximum without error correction. However it seems 
that not a single producer of FAX equipment (be it modems, all-in-one 
devices or even dedicated fax machines) offer such an option. HP doesn't 
seem very interested in capping the fax speeds for their all-in-one 
thingies.


All fax products keep trying to transmit/receive at higher speeds 
after which the fax will fail completely or after the second page.


Maybe there is a solution coming for PRI faxing. Junghanns informed me 
some time ago that they were working on a PRI card with a possibility to 
sync the clock to other cards.


If this works in theory you could use a Junghanns PRI card and a Junghanns 
BRI card, sync the clocks and keep the path fully digital without lost 
frames. On their website however they only mention the possibility to 
interconnect the PRI cards, not (yet?) PRI <-> BRI.




On Thu, 5 Jan 2006, Darrell Long wrote:

I know the subject of faxing has been covered in some detail, but I was 
wondering if anyone has a hardware configuration similar to ours that has 
faxes working successfully and would be willing to share any 
settings/insight.


We are unable to fax reliably with a Sipura 2100 connected to Asterisk. We do 
not route calls over the Internet and our network has very low latency. The 
Asterisk servers connect to Cisco Routers that have PRIs from various 
carriers. We have all the recommended settings in the Sipura ATA, with Echo 
Cancellation and Silence Suppression off, uLaw only for the codec, etc.


While I realize that no faxes going through passthrough like this will work 
100% of the time, we currently have a less than 40% success rate with inbound 
faxes being the worst.


Any insight anyone has would be greatly appreciated!

Best Regards,



___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [Asterisk-Users] Fax with Asterisk and Sipura 2100

2006-01-05 Thread Tom Vile

This is what I set on my Sipura:

You have to be in as admin and then advanced settings.

On the SIP page change:

RTP Packet Size: 0.010

On the Line Page:

FAX CED Detect Enable: Yes
FAX CNG Detect Enable: Yes
FAX Passthru Codec: G711u
FAX Codec Symmetric: No
FAX Passthru Method: NSE
FAX Process NSE: Yes
Release Unused Codec: Yes

Click Submit All Changes

Have not had 1 dropped fax.

On 1/5/06, Darrell Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I know the subject of faxing has been covered in some detail, but I was
> wondering if anyone has a hardware configuration similar to ours that
> has faxes working successfully and would be willing to share any
> settings/insight.
>
> We are unable to fax reliably with a Sipura 2100 connected to Asterisk.
> We do not route calls over the Internet and our network has very low
> latency. The Asterisk servers connect to Cisco Routers that have PRIs
> from various carriers. We have all the recommended settings in the
> Sipura ATA, with Echo Cancellation and Silence Suppression off, uLaw
> only for the codec, etc.
>
> While I realize that no faxes going through passthrough like this will
> work 100% of the time, we currently have a less than 40% success rate
> with inbound faxes being the worst.
>
> Any insight anyone has would be greatly appreciated!
>
> Best Regards,
>
> --
> Darrell S. Long
> BestWeb Corporation
>
>
> ___
> --Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
>
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
>


--
Tom Vile
Baldwin Technology Solutions, Inc
Consulting - Web Design - VoIP Telephony
www.baldwintechsolutions.com
Phone: 518-631-2855 x205
Fax: 518-631-2856
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[Asterisk-Users] Fax with Asterisk and Sipura 2100

2006-01-05 Thread Darrell Long

I know the subject of faxing has been covered in some detail, but I was 
wondering if anyone has a hardware configuration similar to ours that 
has faxes working successfully and would be willing to share any 
settings/insight.


We are unable to fax reliably with a Sipura 2100 connected to Asterisk. 
We do not route calls over the Internet and our network has very low 
latency. The Asterisk servers connect to Cisco Routers that have PRIs 
from various carriers. We have all the recommended settings in the 
Sipura ATA, with Echo Cancellation and Silence Suppression off, uLaw 
only for the codec, etc.


While I realize that no faxes going through passthrough like this will 
work 100% of the time, we currently have a less than 40% success rate 
with inbound faxes being the worst.


Any insight anyone has would be greatly appreciated!

Best Regards,

--
Darrell S. Long
BestWeb Corporation
 	  


___
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[Asterisk-Users] Fax with asterisk

2005-09-30 Thread Rajesh kumar

Hi

I did install-pdf to receive fax and configured AMP (Extension of fax
machine for receiving faxes = system) to send it as an email attachment.
However, when i try to send the fax, sending fax machine gets the * digital
receptionist and doesn't accept the fax. it keeps prompting with options
just as i get when dialed from a phone.

What additional configuration i need to do?

thanks,
rajesh
___
--Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[Asterisk-Users] FAX with Asterisk

2005-08-29 Thread Nahid Hossain









Hi,

I want to do FAX through Asterisk with the following
scenario:

 

Fax Machine --àNortel PBX ---à E1 (euro-isdn)
---à Asterisk -à SIP -àAsteriskà E1 (euro-isdn)-àNortel PBX--à Fax Machine

 

Is there anyone who can help me to configure the above
scenario without any extra application/software.

 

I would appreciate if anyone help me.

 

Regards

Nahid

 

 






___
--Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com --

Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [Asterisk-Users] fax with asterisk

2005-02-18 Thread Mark Eissler

On Feb 17, 2005, at 2:32 PM, Justin Richards wrote:
 I don't do a lot
of faxing, but I would like to know I'm going to receive them when I
do get one..
I think therein lies the key to your problem. If you're not doing a lot 
of faxing then its hard to know if the problem is at your end or if its 
somewhere else (like your ISP). Sending or receiving a fax every now 
and then means you can easily fall into this situation:

	1) after a successful fax or two during a given period of time you 
think AHA! this is working without a hitch.

	2) after an unsuccessful fax or two during a given period of time you 
think DANG! this is no longer workingwhat changed at *my* end?

At least that has been my experience using several VOIP providers but 
always the same ISP with no changes at my end.

It comes down to the fact that some people are lucky to have an ISP 
that maintains their network properly while others must suffer at the 
hands of an ISP that does a really crummy job.

-mark
--
Mark Eissler, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mixtur Interactive, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.mixtur.com
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [Asterisk-Users] fax with asterisk

2005-02-17 Thread Justin Richards

Hmm I don't know what to think now.  I just tested again, using a
Cannon Multi-function laser fax/printer (G3) I got very few fake imput
errors, and the fax went through almost perfect. (PSTN to *)

Using a Brother MFC 3820CN that is attached via IAXy on private LAN, I
get tons of fake imput's and a non-usable fax.

Keeping in mind that the Brother MFC / IAXy used to work fine before i
patched everything  Is there any known issues using an IAXy with
fax machines?

I ordered a Sipura 2000 yesterday just to try out some other hardware
so when that gets in I'll try it out dedicating a port to the fax
machine.  I might simply stop using * fax all together if I can make
the Brother work well receiving through the Sipura..  I don't do a lot
of faxing, but I would like to know I'm going to receive them when I
do get one..

On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 11:43:39 -0700, Keith Burns
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Some of the issues I have had with fax with IP Centrex (my team was
> responsible for an IP Centrex product at a CLEC) that sounds like you are
> having, had to do with a number of factors:
> 
> - Network: latency, jitter, packetloss... fax is intolerant
> - Gateways and IADs: echo cancellers incorrectly set and NSE incorrectly
> set, attenuation on the PSTN side incorrectly set
> - Fax type: G3 or superG3, the echo-can settings and NSE settings are
> different for each since they are completely different ;-)
> 
> Some of the symptoms were:
> - complete inability to send/receive faxes
> - partial faxes (x pages received/sent out of x+y total)
> 
> I have never heard of a noise component though... which would account for
> the scrambling you mentioned. The RTP wouldn't be modified in transit or the
> packets checksum would barf. Its sounds like it maybe getting scrambled by a
> terminal which in * case could be the transmit/receive fax machines or *
> itself.
> 
> I hate fax over VoIP. E-fax anyone? :-)
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

RE: [Asterisk-Users] fax with asterisk

2005-02-17 Thread Keith Burns

Some of the issues I have had with fax with IP Centrex (my team was
responsible for an IP Centrex product at a CLEC) that sounds like you are
having, had to do with a number of factors:

- Network: latency, jitter, packetloss... fax is intolerant
- Gateways and IADs: echo cancellers incorrectly set and NSE incorrectly
set, attenuation on the PSTN side incorrectly set
- Fax type: G3 or superG3, the echo-can settings and NSE settings are
different for each since they are completely different ;-)

Some of the symptoms were:
- complete inability to send/receive faxes
- partial faxes (x pages received/sent out of x+y total)

I have never heard of a noise component though... which would account for
the scrambling you mentioned. The RTP wouldn't be modified in transit or the
packets checksum would barf. Its sounds like it maybe getting scrambled by a
terminal which in * case could be the transmit/receive fax machines or *
itself.

I hate fax over VoIP. E-fax anyone? :-)




> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Justin Richards
> Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2005 9:08 AM
> To: Keith Burns
> Cc: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
> Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] fax with asterisk
> 
> I'm not using any Digium cards.  I'm actually using SpanDSP and
> app_rxfax to process incoming faxes.
> 
> After drilling into it for about 8 hours yesterday I come to realize
> that there is a lot more to it than the asterisk upgrade.
> 
> I patched my FC3 box, which means libtiff is now 3.6.1 which according
> to Steven (spandsp) is broken for this application.  First, i compiled
> the latest spandsp which didn't make a difference. I re-compiled the
> rxfax and txfax apps, got nowhere.  Finally started trying to revert
> to an older libtiff, but apparently went too far back (3.5.7) and
> ended up getting core dumps.  I am need to downgrade libtiff to 3.6.0,
> and everything dependant on libtiff to try again.  simply downgrading
> libtiff on its own doesn't work well.. :-(
> 
> Thats what I get for patching.. :-)  This setup worked nearly flawless
> until I upgraded, so I'm pretty sure I can get it back again after i
> downgrade the right stuff in the right order.  If anyone has that
> list, please share!!
> 
> 
> On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 19:45:51 -0700, Keith Burns
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Are you both using Digium cards?
> >
> > Do you know if you are using G3 (standard) or SuperG3 (like a modem) fax
> > machines?
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users-
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Justin Richards
> > > Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2005 4:25 PM
> > > To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
> > > Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] fax with asterisk
> > >
> > > I'm getting a lot of this too :-( my fax stuff worked great under 1.0
> > > but after upgrading to 1.0.5 i've been broken..
> > >
> > >
> > > Fax3Decode2D: Warning, (FakeInput): Premature EOL at scanline 496 (got
> > > 912, expected 1728).
> > > Fax3Decode2D: (FakeInput): Bad code word at scanline 497 (x 470).
> > > Fax3Decode2D: Warning, (FakeInput): Premature EOL at scanline 497 (got
> > > 470, expected 1728).
> > > Fax3Decode2D: Warning, (FakeInput): Line length mismatch at scanline
> > > 498 (got 3195, expected 1728).
> > > Fax3Decode2D: Warning, (FakeInput): Line length mismatch at scanline
> > > 500 (got 2471, expected 1728).
> > > Fax3Decode2D: (FakeInput): Bad code word at scanline 501 (x 1595).
> > > Fax3Decode2D: Warning, (FakeInput): Premature EOL at scanline 501 (got
> > > 1595, expected 1728).
> > > Fax3Decode2D: Warning, (FakeInput): Line length mismatch at scanline
> > > 503 (got 2583, expected 1728).
> > > Fax3Decode2D: Warning, (FakeInput): Line length mismatch at scanline
> > > 504 (got 1877, expected 1728).
> > > Fax3Decode2D: (FakeInput): Bad code word at scanline 506 (x 22).
> > > Fax3Decode2D: Warning, (FakeInput): Premature EOL at scanline 506 (got
> > > 22, expected 1728).
> > > Fax3Decode2D: Warning, (FakeInput): Line length mismatch at scanline
> > > 507 (got 1818, expected 1728).
> > > Fax3Decode2D: Warning, (FakeInput): Line length mismatch at scanline
> > > 509 (got 1729, expected 1728).
> > > Fax3Decode2D: Warning, (FakeInput): Line length mismatch at scanline
> > > 510 (got 1738, expected 1728).
> > > Fax3Decode2D: Warning, (FakeInput): Line length mismatch at scanline
> >

Re: [Asterisk-Users] fax with asterisk

2005-02-17 Thread Justin Richards

I'm not using any Digium cards.  I'm actually using SpanDSP and
app_rxfax to process incoming faxes.

After drilling into it for about 8 hours yesterday I come to realize
that there is a lot more to it than the asterisk upgrade.

I patched my FC3 box, which means libtiff is now 3.6.1 which according
to Steven (spandsp) is broken for this application.  First, i compiled
the latest spandsp which didn't make a difference. I re-compiled the
rxfax and txfax apps, got nowhere.  Finally started trying to revert
to an older libtiff, but apparently went too far back (3.5.7) and
ended up getting core dumps.  I am need to downgrade libtiff to 3.6.0,
and everything dependant on libtiff to try again.  simply downgrading
libtiff on its own doesn't work well.. :-(

Thats what I get for patching.. :-)  This setup worked nearly flawless
until I upgraded, so I'm pretty sure I can get it back again after i
downgrade the right stuff in the right order.  If anyone has that
list, please share!!


On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 19:45:51 -0700, Keith Burns
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Are you both using Digium cards?
> 
> Do you know if you are using G3 (standard) or SuperG3 (like a modem) fax
> machines?
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users-
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Justin Richards
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2005 4:25 PM
> > To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
> > Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] fax with asterisk
> >
> > I'm getting a lot of this too :-( my fax stuff worked great under 1.0
> > but after upgrading to 1.0.5 i've been broken..
> >
> >
> > Fax3Decode2D: Warning, (FakeInput): Premature EOL at scanline 496 (got
> > 912, expected 1728).
> > Fax3Decode2D: (FakeInput): Bad code word at scanline 497 (x 470).
> > Fax3Decode2D: Warning, (FakeInput): Premature EOL at scanline 497 (got
> > 470, expected 1728).
> > Fax3Decode2D: Warning, (FakeInput): Line length mismatch at scanline
> > 498 (got 3195, expected 1728).
> > Fax3Decode2D: Warning, (FakeInput): Line length mismatch at scanline
> > 500 (got 2471, expected 1728).
> > Fax3Decode2D: (FakeInput): Bad code word at scanline 501 (x 1595).
> > Fax3Decode2D: Warning, (FakeInput): Premature EOL at scanline 501 (got
> > 1595, expected 1728).
> > Fax3Decode2D: Warning, (FakeInput): Line length mismatch at scanline
> > 503 (got 2583, expected 1728).
> > Fax3Decode2D: Warning, (FakeInput): Line length mismatch at scanline
> > 504 (got 1877, expected 1728).
> > Fax3Decode2D: (FakeInput): Bad code word at scanline 506 (x 22).
> > Fax3Decode2D: Warning, (FakeInput): Premature EOL at scanline 506 (got
> > 22, expected 1728).
> > Fax3Decode2D: Warning, (FakeInput): Line length mismatch at scanline
> > 507 (got 1818, expected 1728).
> > Fax3Decode2D: Warning, (FakeInput): Line length mismatch at scanline
> > 509 (got 1729, expected 1728).
> > Fax3Decode2D: Warning, (FakeInput): Line length mismatch at scanline
> > 510 (got 1738, expected 1728).
> > Fax3Decode2D: Warning, (FakeInput): Line length mismatch at scanline
> > 511 (got 2228, expected 1728).
> > Fax3Decode2D: Warning, (FakeInput): Line length mismatch at scanline
> > 514 (got 1824, expected 1728).
> > Fax3Decode2D: Warning, (FakeInput): Line length mismatch at scanline
> > 515 (got 2466, expected 1728).
> > Fax3Decode2D: Warning, (FakeInput): Line length mismatch at scanline
> > 516 (got 1730, expected 1728).
> > Fax3Decode2D: Warning, (FakeInput): Line length mismatch at scanline
> > 517 (got 2534, expected 1728).
> > Fax3Decode2D: Warning, (FakeInput): Line length mismatch at scanline
> > 518 (got 1949, expected 1728).
> > Fax3Decode2D: Warning, (FakeInput): Line length mismatch at scanline
> > 519 (got 1830, expected 1728).
> > Fax3Decode2D: Warning, (FakeInput): Line length mismatch at scanline
> > 521 (got 3401, expected 1728).
> > Fax3Decode2D: (FakeInput): Bad code word at scanline 522 (x 775).
> > Fax3Decode2D: Warning, (FakeInput): Premature EOL at scanline 522 (got
> > 775, expected 1728).
> > Fax3Decode2D: Warning, (FakeInput): Line length mismatch at scanline
> > 523 (got 2413, expected 1728).
> > Fax3Decode2D: Warning, (FakeInput): Line length mismatch at scanline
> > 524 (got 2279, expected 1728).
> > Fax3Decode2D: Warning, (FakeInput): Line length mismatch at scanline
> > 526 (got 2015, expected 1728).
> > Fax3Decode2D: Warning, (FakeInput): Line length mismatch at scanline
> > 530 (got 2677, expected 1728).
> > Fax3Decode2D: (FakeInput): Bad code word at scanline 531 (x 1220).
> > Fax3Decode2D: W

RE: [Asterisk-Users] fax with asterisk

2005-02-16 Thread Keith Burns

Are you both using Digium cards?

Do you know if you are using G3 (standard) or SuperG3 (like a modem) fax
machines?



> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:asterisk-users-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Justin Richards
> Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2005 4:25 PM
> To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
> Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] fax with asterisk
> 
> I'm getting a lot of this too :-( my fax stuff worked great under 1.0
> but after upgrading to 1.0.5 i've been broken..
> 
> 
> Fax3Decode2D: Warning, (FakeInput): Premature EOL at scanline 496 (got
> 912, expected 1728).
> Fax3Decode2D: (FakeInput): Bad code word at scanline 497 (x 470).
> Fax3Decode2D: Warning, (FakeInput): Premature EOL at scanline 497 (got
> 470, expected 1728).
> Fax3Decode2D: Warning, (FakeInput): Line length mismatch at scanline
> 498 (got 3195, expected 1728).
> Fax3Decode2D: Warning, (FakeInput): Line length mismatch at scanline
> 500 (got 2471, expected 1728).
> Fax3Decode2D: (FakeInput): Bad code word at scanline 501 (x 1595).
> Fax3Decode2D: Warning, (FakeInput): Premature EOL at scanline 501 (got
> 1595, expected 1728).
> Fax3Decode2D: Warning, (FakeInput): Line length mismatch at scanline
> 503 (got 2583, expected 1728).
> Fax3Decode2D: Warning, (FakeInput): Line length mismatch at scanline
> 504 (got 1877, expected 1728).
> Fax3Decode2D: (FakeInput): Bad code word at scanline 506 (x 22).
> Fax3Decode2D: Warning, (FakeInput): Premature EOL at scanline 506 (got
> 22, expected 1728).
> Fax3Decode2D: Warning, (FakeInput): Line length mismatch at scanline
> 507 (got 1818, expected 1728).
> Fax3Decode2D: Warning, (FakeInput): Line length mismatch at scanline
> 509 (got 1729, expected 1728).
> Fax3Decode2D: Warning, (FakeInput): Line length mismatch at scanline
> 510 (got 1738, expected 1728).
> Fax3Decode2D: Warning, (FakeInput): Line length mismatch at scanline
> 511 (got 2228, expected 1728).
> Fax3Decode2D: Warning, (FakeInput): Line length mismatch at scanline
> 514 (got 1824, expected 1728).
> Fax3Decode2D: Warning, (FakeInput): Line length mismatch at scanline
> 515 (got 2466, expected 1728).
> Fax3Decode2D: Warning, (FakeInput): Line length mismatch at scanline
> 516 (got 1730, expected 1728).
> Fax3Decode2D: Warning, (FakeInput): Line length mismatch at scanline
> 517 (got 2534, expected 1728).
> Fax3Decode2D: Warning, (FakeInput): Line length mismatch at scanline
> 518 (got 1949, expected 1728).
> Fax3Decode2D: Warning, (FakeInput): Line length mismatch at scanline
> 519 (got 1830, expected 1728).
> Fax3Decode2D: Warning, (FakeInput): Line length mismatch at scanline
> 521 (got 3401, expected 1728).
> Fax3Decode2D: (FakeInput): Bad code word at scanline 522 (x 775).
> Fax3Decode2D: Warning, (FakeInput): Premature EOL at scanline 522 (got
> 775, expected 1728).
> Fax3Decode2D: Warning, (FakeInput): Line length mismatch at scanline
> 523 (got 2413, expected 1728).
> Fax3Decode2D: Warning, (FakeInput): Line length mismatch at scanline
> 524 (got 2279, expected 1728).
> Fax3Decode2D: Warning, (FakeInput): Line length mismatch at scanline
> 526 (got 2015, expected 1728).
> Fax3Decode2D: Warning, (FakeInput): Line length mismatch at scanline
> 530 (got 2677, expected 1728).
> Fax3Decode2D: (FakeInput): Bad code word at scanline 531 (x 1220).
> Fax3Decode2D: Warning, (FakeInput): Premature EOL at scanline 531 (got
> 1220, expected 1728).
> Fax3Decode2D: Warning, (FakeInput): Line length mismatch at scanline
> 532 (got 1729, expected 1728).
> Fax3Decode2D: (FakeInput): Bad code word at scanline 534 (x 0).
> Fax3Decode2D: Warning, (FakeInput): Premature EOL at scanline 534 (got
> 0, expected 1728).
> Fax3Decode2D: Warning, (FakeInput): Line length mismatch at scanline
> 536 (got 2454, expected 1728).
> Fax3Decode2D: Warning, (FakeInput): Premature EOL at scanline 537 (got
> 0, expected 1728).
> Page 4 of /var/spool/asterisk/fax//1108596104.3.tif:
> 538 rows received
> 0 total bad rows
> 0 max consecutive bad rows
> ___
> Asterisk-Users mailing list
> Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
> http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
> To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
>http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Re: [Asterisk-Users] fax with asterisk

2005-02-16 Thread Justin Richards

I'm getting a lot of this too :-( my fax stuff worked great under 1.0
but after upgrading to 1.0.5 i've been broken..


Fax3Decode2D: Warning, (FakeInput): Premature EOL at scanline 496 (got
912, expected 1728).
Fax3Decode2D: (FakeInput): Bad code word at scanline 497 (x 470).
Fax3Decode2D: Warning, (FakeInput): Premature EOL at scanline 497 (got
470, expected 1728).
Fax3Decode2D: Warning, (FakeInput): Line length mismatch at scanline
498 (got 3195, expected 1728).
Fax3Decode2D: Warning, (FakeInput): Line length mismatch at scanline
500 (got 2471, expected 1728).
Fax3Decode2D: (FakeInput): Bad code word at scanline 501 (x 1595).
Fax3Decode2D: Warning, (FakeInput): Premature EOL at scanline 501 (got
1595, expected 1728).
Fax3Decode2D: Warning, (FakeInput): Line length mismatch at scanline
503 (got 2583, expected 1728).
Fax3Decode2D: Warning, (FakeInput): Line length mismatch at scanline
504 (got 1877, expected 1728).
Fax3Decode2D: (FakeInput): Bad code word at scanline 506 (x 22).
Fax3Decode2D: Warning, (FakeInput): Premature EOL at scanline 506 (got
22, expected 1728).
Fax3Decode2D: Warning, (FakeInput): Line length mismatch at scanline
507 (got 1818, expected 1728).
Fax3Decode2D: Warning, (FakeInput): Line length mismatch at scanline
509 (got 1729, expected 1728).
Fax3Decode2D: Warning, (FakeInput): Line length mismatch at scanline
510 (got 1738, expected 1728).
Fax3Decode2D: Warning, (FakeInput): Line length mismatch at scanline
511 (got 2228, expected 1728).
Fax3Decode2D: Warning, (FakeInput): Line length mismatch at scanline
514 (got 1824, expected 1728).
Fax3Decode2D: Warning, (FakeInput): Line length mismatch at scanline
515 (got 2466, expected 1728).
Fax3Decode2D: Warning, (FakeInput): Line length mismatch at scanline
516 (got 1730, expected 1728).
Fax3Decode2D: Warning, (FakeInput): Line length mismatch at scanline
517 (got 2534, expected 1728).
Fax3Decode2D: Warning, (FakeInput): Line length mismatch at scanline
518 (got 1949, expected 1728).
Fax3Decode2D: Warning, (FakeInput): Line length mismatch at scanline
519 (got 1830, expected 1728).
Fax3Decode2D: Warning, (FakeInput): Line length mismatch at scanline
521 (got 3401, expected 1728).
Fax3Decode2D: (FakeInput): Bad code word at scanline 522 (x 775).
Fax3Decode2D: Warning, (FakeInput): Premature EOL at scanline 522 (got
775, expected 1728).
Fax3Decode2D: Warning, (FakeInput): Line length mismatch at scanline
523 (got 2413, expected 1728).
Fax3Decode2D: Warning, (FakeInput): Line length mismatch at scanline
524 (got 2279, expected 1728).
Fax3Decode2D: Warning, (FakeInput): Line length mismatch at scanline
526 (got 2015, expected 1728).
Fax3Decode2D: Warning, (FakeInput): Line length mismatch at scanline
530 (got 2677, expected 1728).
Fax3Decode2D: (FakeInput): Bad code word at scanline 531 (x 1220).
Fax3Decode2D: Warning, (FakeInput): Premature EOL at scanline 531 (got
1220, expected 1728).
Fax3Decode2D: Warning, (FakeInput): Line length mismatch at scanline
532 (got 1729, expected 1728).
Fax3Decode2D: (FakeInput): Bad code word at scanline 534 (x 0).
Fax3Decode2D: Warning, (FakeInput): Premature EOL at scanline 534 (got
0, expected 1728).
Fax3Decode2D: Warning, (FakeInput): Line length mismatch at scanline
536 (got 2454, expected 1728).
Fax3Decode2D: Warning, (FakeInput): Premature EOL at scanline 537 (got
0, expected 1728).
Page 4 of /var/spool/asterisk/fax//1108596104.3.tif:
538 rows received
0 total bad rows
0 max consecutive bad rows
___
Asterisk-Users mailing list
Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
   http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

[Asterisk-Users] fax with asterisk

2005-02-12 Thread Venu V

GFI MailSecurity's HTML threat engine found HTML scripts in this email and has disabled them.







From couple of weeks i am working on asterisk fax but was
not successful.
I am able to receive only half fax documents and its ending with blurred lines.
I have tried with almost all the versions of spandsp 0.0.2pre4,pre10
etc but of      no use.

I have digium card to which i have plugged in 2 pstn lines and i have
removed echocancellation too(zapata.conf) and also enabled g7111
alaw&Ulaw codecs. When ever i receive a fax it will come upto some
extension(half) and ends.I even checked the pstn lines but its working
fine.
Please look into it and help me to get rid off.

BELOW ARE THE LOGS I HAVE GOT :

= Spawn extension (zapincoming, fax, 0) exited non-zero on 'Zap/2-1'
Changed from phase 0 to 1
Slow carrier up
Slow carrier down
Slow carrier up
Slow carrier down
Slow carrier up
Slow carrier down
Slow carrier up
Slow carrier down
Slow carrier up
Slow carrier down
Start receiving document
Changed from phase 1 to 4
Sending ident
>>> CSI: 40 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20
20
DIS:
Preferred octets: 256
Can receive fax
Supported data signalling rates: V.27ter and V.29
R8x7.7lines/mm and/or 200x200pels/25.4mm OK
2D coding OK
Scan line length: 215mm
Recording length: A4 (297mm)
Receiver's minimum scan line time: 0ms at 3.85 l/mm: T7.7 = T3.85
R8x15.4lines/mm OK
Minimum scan line time for higher resolutions: T15.4 = T7.7
>>> DIS: 80 00 ce f0 80 80 01
HDLC underflow in state 9
Changed from phase 4 to 3
Slow carrier up
Slow carrier down
Slow carrier up
Slow carrier down
Slow carrier up
Slow carrier down
Slow carrier up
<<< TSI: 43 35 32 30 39 35 33 33 32 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20
20
TSI without final frame tag
Remote fax gave TSI as: XX

DCS: 83 00 c6 f0 80 80 00
DCS with final frame tag
In state 9
DCS:
Can receive fax
Selected data signalling rate: V.29, 9600bps
R8x7.7lines/mm and/or 200x200pels/25.4mm OK
2D coding OK
Scan line length: 215mm
Recording length: A4 (297mm)
Minimum scan line time: 0ms
Minimum scan line time for higher resolutions: T15.4 = T7.7
Get at 9600
Changed from phase 3 to 5
Fast carrier up
Training failed (sequence failed)
Fast carrier training failed
Fast carrier down
Fast carrier up
Coarse carrier frequency 1699.76 (66)
Training error 15.399144
Training succeeded (constellation mismatch 10.791423)
Fast carrier trained
Fast carrier down
Changed from phase 5 to 4
Start rx document - compression 2
Start rx page
>>> CFR: 84
HDLC underflow in state 5
Post trainability
Changed from phase 4 to 5
Fast carrier up
Fast carrier down
Fast carrier up
Coarse carrier frequency 1699.81 (66)
Training error 3.356434
Training succeeded (constellation mismatch 2.404210)
Fast carrier trained
Feb 11 19:27:21 NOTICE[20570]: chan_sip.c:7531 handle_request:
Fast carrier down
Fax3Decode2D: Warning, (FakeInput): Line length mismatch at scanline
955 (got 1906, expected 1728).
Fax3Decode2D: Warning, (FakeInput): Line length mismatch at scanline
962 (got 2596, expected 1728).
Fax3Decode2D: Warning, (FakeInput): Line length mismatch at scanline
963 (got 1731, expected 1728).
Fax3Decode2D: Warning, (FakeInput): Line length mismatch at scanline
965 (got 2176, expected 1728).
Fax3Decode2D: Warning, (FakeInput): Line length mismatch at scanline
967 (got 1730, expected 1728).
Fax3Decode2D: Warning, (FakeInput): Line length mismatch at scanline
969 (got 2657, expected 1728).
Fax3Decode2D: Warning, (FakeInput): Premature EOL at scanline 971 (got
1723, expected 1728).
Fax3Decode2D: Warning, (FakeInput): Premature EOL at scanline 972 (got
1723, expected 1728).
Fax3Decode2D: Warning, (FakeInput): Line length mismatch at scanline
973 (got 1729, expected 1728).
Fax3Decode2D: (FakeInput): Uncompressed data (not supported) at
scanline 974 (x 1340).
Fax3Decode2D: Warning, (FakeInput): Premature EOL at scanline 974 (got
1340, expected 1728).
Fax3Decode2D: Warning, (FakeInput): Line length mismatch at scanline
975 (got 1741, expected 1728).
Fax3Decode2D: Warning, (FakeInput): Line length mismatch at scanline
976 (got 1729, expected 1728).
Fax3Decode2D: Warning, (FakeInput): Line length mismatch at scanline
979 (got 1795, expected 1728).
Fax3Decode2D: Warning, (FakeInput): Line length mismatch at scanline
980 (got 1795, expected 1728).
Fax3Decode2D: Warning, (FakeInput): Line length mismatch at scanline
981 (got 2032, expected 1728).
Fax3Decode2D: Warning, (FakeInput): Line length mismatch at scanline
982 (got 2699, expected 1728).
Fax3Decode2D: (FakeInput): Uncompressed data (not supported) at
scanline 983 (x 262).
Fax3Decode2D: Warning, (FakeInput): Premature EOL at scanline 983 (got
262, expected 1728).
Fax3Decode2D: Warning, (FakeInput): Line length mismatch at scanline
984 (got 2026, expected 1728).
Fax3Decode2D: Warning, (FakeInput): Line length mismatch at scanline
986 (got 1731, expected 1728).
Fax3Decode2D: Warning, (FakeInput): Line length mismatch at scanline
987 (got 1730, expected 1728).
Fax3Dec

58 matches

Mail list logo