Re: [Asterisk-Users] Digium G.729 codec modules updated
On 10/08/05 13:32 Kevin P. Fleming said the following: Once I return from Astricon, we will use this new build system to produce FreeBSD modules for the same processor architectures, and also this is wonderful ! how long has it been since licensed g.729 codecs were available from digium for freebsd ? -- Regards, /\_/\ All dogs go to heaven. [EMAIL PROTECTED](0 0)http://www.alphaque.com/ +==oOO--(_)--OOo==+ | for a in past present future; do| | for b in clients employers associates relatives neighbours pets; do | | echo The opinions here in no way reflect the opinions of my $a $b. | | done; done | +=+ ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Digium G.729 codec modules updated
Dinesh Nair wrote: this is wonderful ! how long has it been since licensed g.729 codecs were available from digium for freebsd ? They have been on the web/FTP sites for some time, in the 'unsupported' directory. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Digium G.729 codec modules updated
On 10/09/05 03:58 Kevin P. Fleming said the following: Dinesh Nair wrote: this is wonderful ! how long has it been since licensed g.729 codecs were available from digium for freebsd ? They have been on the web/FTP sites for some time, in the 'unsupported' directory. and they still go for US$10 a pop ? -- Regards, /\_/\ All dogs go to heaven. [EMAIL PROTECTED](0 0)http://www.alphaque.com/ +==oOO--(_)--OOo==+ | for a in past present future; do| | for b in clients employers associates relatives neighbours pets; do | | echo The opinions here in no way reflect the opinions of my $a $b. | | done; done | +=+ ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Digium G.729 codec modules updated
Dinesh Nair wrote: and they still go for US$10 a pop ? Patent indemnification licenses are completely separate from the codec binary you choose to use. There is no price difference for CPU type, OS platform or anything else. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Digium G.729 codec modules updated
On 10/09/05 04:45 Kevin P. Fleming said the following: Dinesh Nair wrote: and they still go for US$10 a pop ? Patent indemnification licenses are completely separate from the codec binary you choose to use. There is no price difference for CPU type, OS platform or anything else. understood, thanx for the clarification, kevin. -- Regards, /\_/\ All dogs go to heaven. [EMAIL PROTECTED](0 0)http://www.alphaque.com/ +==oOO--(_)--OOo==+ | for a in past present future; do| | for b in clients employers associates relatives neighbours pets; do | | echo The opinions here in no way reflect the opinions of my $a $b. | | done; done | +=+ ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Digium G.729 codec modules updated
Have you founy any real life performance benefit of x86_64 (particularly EM64T on Xeon) as apposed to plan old x86? On 10/9/05, Kevin P. Fleming [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dinesh Nair wrote: and they still go for US$10 a pop ?Patent indemnification licenses are completely separate from the codecbinary you choose to use. There is no price difference for CPU type, OS platform or anything else.___--Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com --Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.comhttp://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-usersTo UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Digium G.729 codec modules updated
Eric Bishop wrote: Have you founy any real life performance benefit of x86_64 (particularly EM64T on Xeon) as apposed to plan old x86? Yes. On my Athlon-64 2200+ system on my desk, the 'opteron' version encodes a 6722 block sample file in 478ms; the 'i686' version does it in 514ms. The 'i386' version is somewhere near 600ms, since it has no fancy instruction scheduling. Interestingly, _all_ of the 32-bit x86 optimized versions run just fine on that machine, meaning that GCC did not opt to use any instructions that are specific to a processor model/family... the performance improvements come only from scheduling the instruction flow. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Digium G.729 codec modules updated
On a dual processor Xeon (EM64T) would you reccomend turning hypertreading on or off? I tend go for it off dual processor machines just in case 2 processes end up on the one physical processor rather than 2 processes on 2 different physical processors. What do you think?On 10/9/05, Kevin P. Fleming [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Eric Bishop wrote: Have you founy any real life performance benefit of x86_64 (particularly EM64T on Xeon) as apposed to plan old x86?Yes. On my Athlon-64 2200+ system on my desk, the 'opteron' versionencodes a 6722 block sample file in 478ms; the 'i686' version does it in514ms. The 'i386' version is somewhere near 600ms, since it has no fancy instruction scheduling.Interestingly, _all_ of the 32-bit x86 optimized versions run just fineon that machine, meaning that GCC did not opt to use any instructionsthat are specific to a processor model/family... the performance improvements come only from scheduling the instruction flow.___--Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com --Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.comhttp://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
Re: [Asterisk-Users] Digium G.729 codec modules updated
Eric Bishop wrote: On a dual processor Xeon (EM64T) would you reccomend turning hypertreading on or off? I tend go for it off dual processor machines just in case 2 processes end up on the one physical processor rather than 2 processes on 2 different physical processors. What do you think? I have no opinion; it would require real-world testing to know for sure. My instincts tell me that HT would be counter-productive when running lots of transcoding, though, since HT CPUs don't have two FPUs. Dual-core CPUs do, obviously, so that would be a different situation. ___ --Bandwidth and Colocation sponsored by Easynews.com -- Asterisk-Users mailing list Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
