[ATrpms-devel] dovecot
Hi Axel, Here are a version bumped dovecot packages. I could not find SRPMS of your latest versions so perhaps you should just version bump your version instead :-( http://people.atrpms.net/~kbisgaar/dovecot-2.2.9-2_143.fc20.src.rpm http://people.atrpms.net/~kbisgaar/dovecot-pigeonhole-0.4.2-33.fc20.src.rpm Regards, Kim ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] package problems
And fedora have reached head i version numbers: # yum --showduplicates list dovecot Loaded plugins: auto-update-debuginfo, etckeeper, langpacks, refresh-packagekit Installed Packages dovecot.x86_64 1:2.2.6-2_141.fc19 @/dovecot-2.2.6-2_141.fc19.x86_64 Available Packages dovecot.x86_64 1:2.1.17-0_136.fc19 atrpms dovecot.i6861:2.2.2-2.fc19 fedora dovecot.x86_64 1:2.2.2-2.fc19 fedora dovecot.x86_64 1:2.2.7-0_142.fc19 atrpms dovecot.i6861:2.2.7-2.fc19 updates dovecot.x86_64 1:2.2.7-2.fc19 updates No problem for me as I just exclude dovecot from Fedora. Best regards, Kim On 14-11-2013 09:28, Kim Bisgaard wrote: Hi again, I was too fast on the dovecot packages :-( With these two: dovecot.x86_64 1:2.2.7-0_142.fc19atrpms dovecot-pigeonhole.x86_64 2:0.4.2-32.fc19 atrpms I get this in my log :-( Nov 14 09:13:57 dovecot: lda: Error: Module is for different ABI version 2.2.ABIv6(2.2.6) (we have 2.2.ABIv7(2.2.7)): /usr/lib64/dovecot/lib90_sieve_plugin.so Nov 14 09:13:57 dovecot: lda: Fatal: Couldn't load required plugins Regards, Kim Den 14-11-2013 09:02, Kim Bisgaard skrev: Hi Axel, Thanks for the new dovecot packages! Fedora-updates-testing have started on a libbluray-0.4.0 package which coannot be installed because of: file /usr/lib64/libbluray.so.1 from install of libbluray-0.4.0-1.fc19.x86_64 conflicts with file from package libbluray1-0.3.0-5.fc19.x86_64 I have a problem on F19 updating ffmpeg, because some packages are not available on the mirror: Some delta RPMs failed to download or rebuild. Retrying.. 100% [] 561 kB/s | 3.7 MB 00:00:00 ETA libavcodec52-0.7.16-33.fc19.x8 FAILED http://dl.atrpms.net/f19-x86_64/atrpms/stable/libavcodec52-0.7.16-33.fc19.x86_64.rpm: [Errno 14] HTTP Error 416 - Requested Range Not SatisfiableA Prøver et andet filspejl. libavformat52-0.7.16-33.fc19.x FAILED http://dl.atrpms.net/f19-x86_64/atrpms/stable/libavformat52-0.7.16-33.fc19.x86_64.rpm: [Errno 14] HTTP Error 416 - Requested Range Not Satisfiable Prøver et andet filspejl. libavutil50-0.7.16-33.fc19.x86 FAILED http://dl.atrpms.net/f19-x86_64/atrpms/stable/libavutil50-0.7.16-33.fc19.x86_64.rpm: [Errno 14] HTTP Error 416 - Requested Range Not SatisfiableTA Prøver et andet filspejl. libpostproc51-0.9.3-56.fc19.x8 FAILED http://dl.atrpms.net/f19-x86_64/atrpms/stable/libpostproc51-0.9.3-56.fc19.x86_64.rpm: [Errno 14] HTTP Error 416 - Requested Range Not SatisfiableA I cannot see that I am using a mirror so it must be at dl.atrpms they are missing :-/ [atrpms] name=Fedora $releasever - $basearch - ATrpms failovermethod=priority baseurl=http://dl.atrpms.net/f$releasever-$basearch/atrpms/stable but then again I can see them there: [ ]libpostproc51-0.7.16-33.fc19.i686.rpm11-Nov-2013 13:58 39K [ ]libpostproc51-0.7.16-33.fc19.x86_64.rpm11-Nov-2013 01:38 41K [ ]libpostproc51-0.8.15-55.fc19.i686.rpm11-Nov-2013 13:36 39K [ ]libpostproc51-0.8.15-55.fc19.x86_64.rpm11-Nov-2013 01:17 41K [ ]libpostproc51-0.9.3-56.fc19.i686.rpm11-Nov-2013 13:15 39K [ ]libpostproc51-0.9.3-56.fc19.x86_64.rpm11-Nov-2013 00:56 42K Hope you have better luck with figuring out what exactly is wrong. Best regards, Kim ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
[ATrpms-devel] Fedora 20
Hi Axel, Any packages not compiling on F20 that I can look at? Best regards, Kim ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] package problems
Hi again, I was too fast on the dovecot packages :-( With these two: dovecot.x86_64 1:2.2.7-0_142.fc19atrpms dovecot-pigeonhole.x86_64 2:0.4.2-32.fc19 atrpms I get this in my log :-( Nov 14 09:13:57 dovecot: lda: Error: Module is for different ABI version 2.2.ABIv6(2.2.6) (we have 2.2.ABIv7(2.2.7)): /usr/lib64/dovecot/lib90_sieve_plugin.so Nov 14 09:13:57 dovecot: lda: Fatal: Couldn't load required plugins Regards, Kim Den 14-11-2013 09:02, Kim Bisgaard skrev: Hi Axel, Thanks for the new dovecot packages! Fedora-updates-testing have started on a libbluray-0.4.0 package which coannot be installed because of: file /usr/lib64/libbluray.so.1 from install of libbluray-0.4.0-1.fc19.x86_64 conflicts with file from package libbluray1-0.3.0-5.fc19.x86_64 I have a problem on F19 updating ffmpeg, because some packages are not available on the mirror: Some delta RPMs failed to download or rebuild. Retrying.. 100% [] 561 kB/s | 3.7 MB 00:00:00 ETA libavcodec52-0.7.16-33.fc19.x8 FAILED http://dl.atrpms.net/f19-x86_64/atrpms/stable/libavcodec52-0.7.16-33.fc19.x86_64.rpm: [Errno 14] HTTP Error 416 - Requested Range Not SatisfiableA Prøver et andet filspejl. libavformat52-0.7.16-33.fc19.x FAILED http://dl.atrpms.net/f19-x86_64/atrpms/stable/libavformat52-0.7.16-33.fc19.x86_64.rpm: [Errno 14] HTTP Error 416 - Requested Range Not Satisfiable Prøver et andet filspejl. libavutil50-0.7.16-33.fc19.x86 FAILED http://dl.atrpms.net/f19-x86_64/atrpms/stable/libavutil50-0.7.16-33.fc19.x86_64.rpm: [Errno 14] HTTP Error 416 - Requested Range Not SatisfiableTA Prøver et andet filspejl. libpostproc51-0.9.3-56.fc19.x8 FAILED http://dl.atrpms.net/f19-x86_64/atrpms/stable/libpostproc51-0.9.3-56.fc19.x86_64.rpm: [Errno 14] HTTP Error 416 - Requested Range Not SatisfiableA I cannot see that I am using a mirror so it must be at dl.atrpms they are missing :-/ [atrpms] name=Fedora $releasever - $basearch - ATrpms failovermethod=priority baseurl=http://dl.atrpms.net/f$releasever-$basearch/atrpms/stable but then again I can see them there: [ ]libpostproc51-0.7.16-33.fc19.i686.rpm11-Nov-2013 13:58 39K [ ]libpostproc51-0.7.16-33.fc19.x86_64.rpm11-Nov-2013 01:38 41K [ ]libpostproc51-0.8.15-55.fc19.i686.rpm11-Nov-2013 13:36 39K [ ]libpostproc51-0.8.15-55.fc19.x86_64.rpm11-Nov-2013 01:17 41K [ ]libpostproc51-0.9.3-56.fc19.i686.rpm11-Nov-2013 13:15 39K [ ]libpostproc51-0.9.3-56.fc19.x86_64.rpm11-Nov-2013 00:56 42K Hope you have better luck with figuring out what exactly is wrong. Best regards, Kim ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
[ATrpms-devel] twolame and x264
Hi, I have uploaded updated packages: http://people.atrpms.net/~kbisgaar/x264-0.138-20_20131113.2245.fc20.src.rpm http://people.atrpms.net/~kbisgaard/twolame-0.3.13-3.fc20.src.rpm Regards, Kim ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
[ATrpms-devel] gstreamer ugly plugins for fc20
Hi, It seems that fc20 intends to build the 1.2 line of code as gstreamer1 ... http://people.atrpms.net/~kbisgaar/gstreamer1-plugins-ugly-1.2.1-19.fc20.src.rpm This implies that I have been able to build the latest fc19 version of the following packages for fc20 :-) a52dec lame libmad mpeg2dec opencore-amr x264 Best regards, Kim ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] mpd 0.18
On 08-11-2013 09:39, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 6:41 AM, Kim Bisgaard kim...@alleroedderne.adsl.dk mailto:kim...@alleroedderne.adsl.dk wrote: Thanks Paulo, Works fine on F19! There are some paths in the sample config file like pid-file and log-file which are not the commonly used paths on fedora - no problem, I just noticed in resolving with my prior config file. The example config file in the doc dir is just for reference. There should be a /etc/mpd.conf or /etc/mpd.conf.rpmnew (if you already had a file there) with the appropriate values for running mpd. You need just to uncomment the line bind_to_address /run/mpd/socket for putting the socket in the /run directory, and set the music directory in mpd.conf. Yes that was one of them - but a mistake on my part - I am used to /var/run but that is /run now so like i said - my mistake. The other is thid: /usr/lib/tmpfiles.d/mpd.conf Which would normally be '/var/log/...' Since the default is to log via syslog it does not matter much. The package does contain this, which would be unnecessary: # rpm -ql mpd /var/log/mpd /var/log/mpd/mpd.log Best regards, Kim Best regards, Kim PS Is Axel stil active here? I guess so... -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti LCG - UFRJ ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
[ATrpms-devel] Updated dovecot and pigeonhole packages
Hi Axel, Here are dovecot and pigeonhole packages for newly released versions: http://people.atrpms.net/~kbisgaard/dovecot-2.2.6-2_141.fc19.src.rpm http://people.atrpms.net/~kbisgaard/dovecot-pigeonhole-0.4.2-31.fc19.src.rpm Regards, Kim ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
[ATrpms-devel] mythbackend logrotate
Hi Axel,
Thanks for the newer Mythtv packages!
My Mythtv backend has logfiles of the format:
mythbackend.20131003170640.2039.log
If that is the intention, then the first line in the logrotate file
should look like this to get rotated:
/var/log/mythtv/mythbackend.*.log {
Regards,
Kim
___
atrpms-devel mailing list
atrpms-devel@atrpms.net
http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] updated dovecot and gstreamer-plugins-ugly
Hi Axel, Neither of these packages showed up - was there a problem building them? Meanwhile gstreamer got updated to 1.0.10: http://people.atrpms.net/~kbisgaard/gstreamer1-plugins-ugly-1.0.10-18.fc19.src.rpm Regards, Kim On 10-08-2013 12:24, Kim Bisgaard wrote: Hi Axel, Just normal version updates :-) http://people.atrpms.net/~kbisgaard/dovecot-2.2.5-2_140.fc19.src.rpm http://people.atrpms.net/~kbisgaard/gstreamer1-plugins-ugly-1.0.9-17.fc19.src.rpm PS: Did you run into problem rebuilding mythtv? Regards, Kim ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] updated dovecot and gstreamer-plugins-ugly
PS: Did you run into problem rebuilding mythtv? Thanks Axel! Works fine as far as I can see. I have a problem with !!!NoTrans!!! appearing all over in mythweb. To fix it use: https://github.com/MythTV/mythweb/commit/6e251346675db00a889fc922ab7f270c1d9b66c9 Do not know why it is not in 0.26-Fixes :-( Thanks again!! Regards, Kim ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
[ATrpms-devel] updated dovecot and gstreamer-plugins-ugly
Hi Axel, Just normal version updates :-) http://people.atrpms.net/~kbisgaard/dovecot-2.2.5-2_140.fc19.src.rpm http://people.atrpms.net/~kbisgaard/gstreamer1-plugins-ugly-1.0.9-17.fc19.src.rpm PS: Did you run into problem rebuilding mythtv? Regards, Kim ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] PyXML- was Re: gstreamer-plugins-ugly for f19
Hi Axel, On 02-07-2013 18:01, Axel Thimm wrote: I saw this: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/RemovePyXML Do you have an idea what to do? Remove where possible? put PyXML into Atrpms? or something third? I can see Mythtv also needs PyXML. I think we should put it into ATrpms. I'm on F19 with updates-testing enabled and are getting these: yum update Resolving Dependencies -- Running transaction check --- Package PyXML.x86_64 0:0.8.4-28.fc18 will be obsoleted -- Processing Dependency: PyXML for package: mythtv-frontend-0.26.0-294.fc19.x86_64 --- Package python.x86_64 0:2.7.5-1.fc19 will be updated --- Package python.x86_64 0:2.7.5-3.fc19 will be obsoleting --- Package python-devel.x86_64 0:2.7.5-1.fc19 will be updated --- Package python-devel.x86_64 0:2.7.5-3.fc19 will be an update --- Package python-libs.i686 0:2.7.5-1.fc19 will be updated --- Package python-libs.x86_64 0:2.7.5-1.fc19 will be updated --- Package python-libs.i686 0:2.7.5-3.fc19 will be an update --- Package python-libs.x86_64 0:2.7.5-3.fc19 will be an update --- Package tkinter.x86_64 0:2.7.5-1.fc19 will be updated --- Package tkinter.x86_64 0:2.7.5-3.fc19 will be an update -- Finished Dependency Resolution Error: Package: mythtv-frontend-0.26.0-294.fc19.x86_64 (@atrpms) Requires: PyXML Removing: PyXML-0.8.4-28.fc18.x86_64 (installed) PyXML = 0.8.4-28.fc18 Obsoleted By: python-2.7.5-3.fc19.x86_64 (updates) Not found Available: PyXML-0.8.4-27.99.fc19.x86_64 (atrpms) PyXML = 0.8.4-27.99.fc19 You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem ** Found 1 pre-existing rpmdb problem(s), 'yum check' output follows: kde-settings-kdm-19-23.1.fc19.noarch is a duplicate with kde-settings-kdm-19-23.fc19.noarch Are you sure about PyXML?? Regards, Kim ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] PyXML- was Re: gstreamer-plugins-ugly for f19
On 31-07-2013 10:33, Kim Bisgaard wrote:
On 31-07-2013 10:07, Axel Thimm wrote:
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 09:55:35AM +0200, Kim Bisgaard wrote:
I can see Mythtv also needs PyXML.
I think we should put it into ATrpms.
Removing: PyXML-0.8.4-28.fc18.x86_64 (installed)
PyXML = 0.8.4-28.fc18
Obsoleted By: python-2.7.5-3.fc19.x86_64 (updates)
Are you sure about PyXML??
That is definietely a drastic measure. This means we can only drop
anything that requires PyXML to run. e.g. ship mythtv w/ broken
unregistered depednencies. :/
Does mythtv really need PyXML?
I looked at mythtv's bugtracker for pyxml and only foud this closed bug:
http://code.mythtv.org/trac/ticket/6317
My limited understanding was that PyXML provided the same interface as
std. Python, but perhaps it does have extra methods :-/
Regards,
Kim
___
atrpms-devel mailing list
atrpms-devel@atrpms.net
http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
I just looked in the package from rpmfusion and they have no PyXML
package, nor a dependency to one. But they have a dependency on
python-lxml - perhaps that is useful??
Here are the python dependecies:
%if %{with_python}
BuildRequires: python-devel
BuildRequires: MySQL-python
BuildRequires: python-urlgrabber
%endif
%if %{with_mythnetvision}
BuildRequires: python-pycurl
BuildRequires: python-lxml
BuildRequires: python-oauth
%endif
%if %{with_python}
%package -n python-MythTV
Summary:Python bindings for MythTV
Group: Development/Languages
BuildArch: noarch
Requires: MySQL-python
Requires: python-lxml
%description -n python-MythTV
Provides a python-based interface to interacting with MythTV.
___
atrpms-devel mailing list
atrpms-devel@atrpms.net
http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] New mpd available - Part 1
Hi Paulo,
I need it running as a system daemon, so .. and it works i F19 except
for the creation of the /var/run/mpd dir and my smaller problems with
pulseaudio and alsa ...
Thanks!
Best regards,
Kim
On 26-07-2013 14:01, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote:
Hi, Kim
the only way I got mpd working system wide in F17, was recursively
labelling all my mp3 directory audio_home_t.
You can try mdp as a user, using something as:
music_directory /home/mp3
playlist_directory /home/kim/.mpd/playlists
db_file/home/kim/.mpd/database
log_file /home/kim/.mpd/log
pid_file /home/kim/.mpd/pid
state_file/home/kim/.mpd/state
.
bind_to_address 0.0.0.0 this may help
and just starting mpd (this is how it runs in Mac OS for me).
It should work in linux this way if the selinux labels are wrong.
But maybe F19 has something different.
Anyway, is it working in F19 using /var/run/mpd?
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 4:22 PM, Kim Bisgaard
kim...@alleroedderne.adsl.dk mailto:kim...@alleroedderne.adsl.dk wrote:
Hi Paulo,
If I look at selinux labeling in F19 it looks like the attached
picture. See Part 2
I can see that selinux expects the pid and socket file to be in
/var/run/mpd
I have no audio_home_t, but mpd_data_t
Here is my system wide config:
music_directory /var/lib/mpd/music
playlist_directory /var/lib/mpd/playlists
db_file /var/lib/mpd/database
pid_file/var/run/mpd/pid
usermpd
bind_to_address 192.168.0.5
bind_to_address /var/run/mpd/socket
port6600
log_level verbose
metadata_to_use
artist,album,title,track,__name,genre,date,composer,__performer,disc
follow_outside_symlinks yes
follow_inside_symlinks yes
zeroconf_enabledno
input {
plugin curl
}
audio_output {
typepulse
nameMy Pulse Output
sink
alsa_output.pci-_00_14.2.__analog-stereo
}
Which unfortunately does still not work. I can get alsa output to
work if I do not mind not beeing able to touch the volume. But
Pulseaudio just gives: {{mpd: output: Failed to open My Pulse
Output [pulse]: failed to connect: Connection terminated}}
I do NOT think that you can help or is responsible - I just think
that Mpd is somewhat difficult to configure correctly on Fedora (I
had similar problems in F17 :-( )
Best regards,
Kim
Den 25-07-2013 16 tel:25-07-2013%2016:01, Paulo Cavalcanti skrev:
mpd has a directory where, among other things, its database and
pid are
stored.
If mpd is run system wide as root, this is /var/lib/mpd, as you
should
set in
/etc/mpd.conf:
cascavel:~] ls -al /var/lib/mpd
total 12604
drwxr-xr-x. 5 mpd mpd4096 Jul 18 07:12 .
drwxrwxr-x. 78 root procgrafico4096 Jul 14 22:37 ..
-rw-r--r--. 1 mpd mpd 3350971 Jul 20 17:37 database
-rw---. 1 mpd mpd 16 Jul 5 2012 .esd_auth
-rw-r--r--. 1 root root9508991 Jul 24 18:20 log
drwxr-xr-x. 2 mpd mpd4096 Jul 10 09:08 music
-rw-r--r--. 1 mpd mpd 5 Jul 18 07:12 pid
drwxr-xr-x. 2 mpd mpd4096 Jul 10 09:08 playlists
drwx--. 2 mpd mpd4096 Feb 9 00:09 .pulse
-rw---. 1 mpd mpd 256 Jul 5 2012 .pulse-cookie
-rw-r--r--. 1 mpd mpd3258 Jul 20 17:42 state
If mpd is run for a single user this is generally ~/.mpd:
[cascavel:~] ls -al ~/.mpd
total 8260
drwxrwxr-x. 4 roma roma4096 Mar 11 08:45 .
drwxr-xr-x. 115 roma roma 12288 Jul 24 17:10 ..
drwxrwxr-x. 2 roma roma4096 Sep 2 2012 .AppleDouble
-rw-rw-r--. 1 roma roma 3313663 Mar 7 09:00 database
-rw-rw-r--. 1 roma roma 5093395 Mar 11 17:30 log
-rw-r--r--. 1 roma roma 13727 Jul 7 2012 mpd.conf
-rw-rw-r--. 1 roma roma 5 Mar 11 08:45 pid
drwxrwxr-x. 2 roma roma4096 Oct 14 2012 playlists
-rw-rw-r--. 1 roma roma3917 Mar 7 09:32 state
Therefore, there has never been a /var/run/mpd. To use the
system wide
approach with selinux active, the files must be labelled
audio_home_t.
Nonetheless, you have to edit /etc/mpd.conf and set your choices,
removing the pounds (#) at least until:
#state_file /var/lib/mpd/state
Otherwise, I doubt mpd will work...
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 8:14 AM, Kim Bisgaard
kim...@alleroedderne.adsl.dk
Re: [ATrpms-devel] New mpd available
Hi Paulo,
I have tried to use it on F19. THANKS!!
I could not get it to start. It threw a very misleading error - Failed to bind to 'localhost': No such file or directory, but the real
reason was that the directory /var/run/mpd was not created.
This in it self has nothing to do with systemd as such, just because Fedora
introduced the empty /var at the same time (tmpfs mounted /var) .
Hope this clears it up?
Regards,
Kim
On 2013-07-25 12:25, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote:
Hi,
the version for F17 uses systemd, ant the other for rhel6, does not.
What version do you mean?
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 8:51 AM, Kim Bisgaard kim...@alleroedderne.adsl.dk
mailto:kim...@alleroedderne.adsl.dk wrote:
Hi Paulo,
Could I persuade you to create the directory with the socket file in the
package? This prevents the package to work on distributions
with systemd.
The spec-file-fu is something like the following:
file mpd.tpmfilesd with this line:
d /var/run/mpd 0755 mpd audio -
Source10: mpd.tmpfilesd
%if %{with systemd}
#install -p -D -m 644 %{SOURCE10} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_tmpfilesdir}/mpd.conf
install -p -D -m 644 %{SOURCE10} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/etc/tmpfiles.d/mpd.conf
%endif
Regards,
Kim
On 2013-07-10 14:30, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote:
Hi, Axel
I have two versions. One for Fedora, which uses mpd.service,
and another for rhel6 with /etc/rc.d/init.d/mpd.
The fedora version is the same we had before, but the rhel6 will allow
an upgrade from the previous 0.16.7 we have at ATrpms.
Thanks.
http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/mpd-0.17.4-25.el6.src.rpm
http://people.atrpms.net/%7Epcavalcanti/srpms/mpd-0.17.4-25.el6.src.rpm
http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/mpd-0.17.4-27.fc17.src.rpm
http://people.atrpms.net/%7Epcavalcanti/srpms/mpd-0.17.4-27.fc17.src.rpm
--
Paulo Roma Cavalcanti
LCG - UFRJ
___
atrpms-devel mailing list
atrpms-devel@atrpms.net mailto:atrpms-devel@atrpms.net
http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
___
atrpms-devel mailing list
atrpms-devel@atrpms.net mailto:atrpms-devel@atrpms.net
http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
--
Paulo Roma Cavalcanti
DCC - UFRJ
___
atrpms-devel mailing list
atrpms-devel@atrpms.net
http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
___
atrpms-devel mailing list
atrpms-devel@atrpms.net
http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] New mpd available - Part 1
Hi Paulo,
If I look at selinux labeling in F19 it looks like the attached picture.
See Part 2
I can see that selinux expects the pid and socket file to be in
/var/run/mpd
I have no audio_home_t, but mpd_data_t
Here is my system wide config:
music_directory /var/lib/mpd/music
playlist_directory /var/lib/mpd/playlists
db_file /var/lib/mpd/database
pid_file/var/run/mpd/pid
usermpd
bind_to_address 192.168.0.5
bind_to_address /var/run/mpd/socket
port6600
log_level verbose
metadata_to_use
artist,album,title,track,name,genre,date,composer,performer,disc
follow_outside_symlinks yes
follow_inside_symlinks yes
zeroconf_enabledno
input {
plugin curl
}
audio_output {
typepulse
nameMy Pulse Output
sinkalsa_output.pci-_00_14.2.analog-stereo
}
Which unfortunately does still not work. I can get alsa output to work
if I do not mind not beeing able to touch the volume. But Pulseaudio
just gives: {{mpd: output: Failed to open My Pulse Output [pulse]:
failed to connect: Connection terminated}}
I do NOT think that you can help or is responsible - I just think that
Mpd is somewhat difficult to configure correctly on Fedora (I had
similar problems in F17 :-( )
Best regards,
Kim
Den 25-07-2013 16:01, Paulo Cavalcanti skrev:
mpd has a directory where, among other things, its database and pid are
stored.
If mpd is run system wide as root, this is /var/lib/mpd, as you should
set in
/etc/mpd.conf:
cascavel:~] ls -al /var/lib/mpd
total 12604
drwxr-xr-x. 5 mpd mpd4096 Jul 18 07:12 .
drwxrwxr-x. 78 root procgrafico4096 Jul 14 22:37 ..
-rw-r--r--. 1 mpd mpd 3350971 Jul 20 17:37 database
-rw---. 1 mpd mpd 16 Jul 5 2012 .esd_auth
-rw-r--r--. 1 root root9508991 Jul 24 18:20 log
drwxr-xr-x. 2 mpd mpd4096 Jul 10 09:08 music
-rw-r--r--. 1 mpd mpd 5 Jul 18 07:12 pid
drwxr-xr-x. 2 mpd mpd4096 Jul 10 09:08 playlists
drwx--. 2 mpd mpd4096 Feb 9 00:09 .pulse
-rw---. 1 mpd mpd 256 Jul 5 2012 .pulse-cookie
-rw-r--r--. 1 mpd mpd3258 Jul 20 17:42 state
If mpd is run for a single user this is generally ~/.mpd:
[cascavel:~] ls -al ~/.mpd
total 8260
drwxrwxr-x. 4 roma roma4096 Mar 11 08:45 .
drwxr-xr-x. 115 roma roma 12288 Jul 24 17:10 ..
drwxrwxr-x. 2 roma roma4096 Sep 2 2012 .AppleDouble
-rw-rw-r--. 1 roma roma 3313663 Mar 7 09:00 database
-rw-rw-r--. 1 roma roma 5093395 Mar 11 17:30 log
-rw-r--r--. 1 roma roma 13727 Jul 7 2012 mpd.conf
-rw-rw-r--. 1 roma roma 5 Mar 11 08:45 pid
drwxrwxr-x. 2 roma roma4096 Oct 14 2012 playlists
-rw-rw-r--. 1 roma roma3917 Mar 7 09:32 state
Therefore, there has never been a /var/run/mpd. To use the system wide
approach with selinux active, the files must be labelled audio_home_t.
Nonetheless, you have to edit /etc/mpd.conf and set your choices,
removing the pounds (#) at least until:
#state_file /var/lib/mpd/state
Otherwise, I doubt mpd will work...
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 8:14 AM, Kim Bisgaard
kim...@alleroedderne.adsl.dk mailto:kim...@alleroedderne.adsl.dk wrote:
Hi Paulo,
I have tried to use it on F19. THANKS!!
I could not get it to start. It threw a very misleading error -
Failed to bind to 'localhost': No such file or directory, but the
real reason was that the directory /var/run/mpd was not created.
This in it self has nothing to do with systemd as such, just because
Fedora introduced the empty /var at the same time (tmpfs mounted /var) .
Hope this clears it up?
Regards,
Kim
On 2013-07-25 12:25, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote:
Hi,
the version for F17 uses systemd, ant the other for rhel6, does not.
What version do you mean?
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 8:51 AM, Kim Bisgaard
kim...@alleroedderne.adsl.dk
mailto:kim...@alleroedderne.adsl.dk wrote:
Hi Paulo,
Could I persuade you to create the directory with the socket
file in the package? This prevents the package to work on
distributions with systemd.
The spec-file-fu is something like the following:
file mpd.tpmfilesd with this line:
d /var/run/mpd 0755 mpd audio -
Source10: mpd.tmpfilesd
%if %{with systemd}
#install -p -D -m 644 %{SOURCE10}
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_tmpfilesdir}/mpd.conf
install -p -D -m 644 %{SOURCE10}
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT/etc/tmpfiles.d/mpd.conf
%endif
Regards,
Kim
On 2013-07-10 14:30, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote:
Hi, Axel
I have two versions. One for Fedora, which uses mpd.service,
and another for rhel6 with /etc/rc.d/init.d/mpd.
The fedora version
Re: [ATrpms-devel] New mpd available
Hi Paulo,
Could I persuade you to create the directory with the socket file in the package? This prevents the package to work on distributions with
systemd.
The spec-file-fu is something like the following:
file mpd.tpmfilesd with this line:
d /var/run/mpd 0755 mpd audio -
Source10: mpd.tmpfilesd
%if %{with systemd}
#install -p -D -m 644 %{SOURCE10} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_tmpfilesdir}/mpd.conf
install -p -D -m 644 %{SOURCE10} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/etc/tmpfiles.d/mpd.conf
%endif
Regards,
Kim
On 2013-07-10 14:30, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote:
Hi, Axel
I have two versions. One for Fedora, which uses mpd.service,
and another for rhel6 with /etc/rc.d/init.d/mpd.
The fedora version is the same we had before, but the rhel6 will allow
an upgrade from the previous 0.16.7 we have at ATrpms.
Thanks.
http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/mpd-0.17.4-25.el6.src.rpm
http://people.atrpms.net/%7Epcavalcanti/srpms/mpd-0.17.4-25.el6.src.rpm
http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/srpms/mpd-0.17.4-27.fc17.src.rpm
http://people.atrpms.net/%7Epcavalcanti/srpms/mpd-0.17.4-27.fc17.src.rpm
--
Paulo Roma Cavalcanti
LCG - UFRJ
___
atrpms-devel mailing list
atrpms-devel@atrpms.net
http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
___
atrpms-devel mailing list
atrpms-devel@atrpms.net
http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
[ATrpms-devel] gstreamer 1.0 ugly
Hi, Just uploaded: http://people.atrpms.net/~kbisgaard/gstreamer1-plugins-ugly-1.0.8-16.fc19.x86_64.rpm Probably only a little useful for f19 - I do not know of players packaged using gstreamer 1.0 yet. Regards, Kim ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
[ATrpms-devel] pigeonhole
Hi Axel, Pigeonhole got released. I have uploaded an updated package - had to remove patch0 as it complained of not replying. I could not see in changelog when you applied it - so assuming it was to compile with dovecot-2.2.4? http://people.atrpms.net/~kbisgaard/dovecot-pigeonhole-0.4.1-28.fc19.src.rpm Regards, Kim ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
[ATrpms-devel] PyXML- was Re: gstreamer-plugins-ugly for f19
I Axel, On 15-06-2013 15:45, Kim Bisgaard wrote: on f18/f17 and with a missing PyXML on f19. (what happend to PyXML in f19???) If you do not know - neither do I. I removed the build-depend on PyXML - could not see it being used anywhere. I saw this: Do you have an idea what to do? Remove where possible? put PyXML into Atrpms? or something third? I can see Mythtv also needs PyXML. PS: It seems people.atrpms.net cannot see both Paolu and my uploads. I can understand that it cannot see mine, because I probable have the wrong ownership and/or permissions on the public_html dir. but Paulos? Regards, Kim ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] PyXML- was Re: gstreamer-plugins-ugly for f19
On 29-06-2013 09:54, Kim Bisgaard wrote: I saw this: Perhaps I should also include the link :-[ http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/RemovePyXML ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] avidemux
Hi Paulo! On 2013-06-27 12:03, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: The link is broken ... Also for me :-( but file name is ok and permissions are readable for all. Perhaps the files should belong to a specific group? I would also take a look at the package from Fusion: http://download1.rpmfusion.org/free/fedora/updates/18/SRPMS/avidemux-2.6.4-3.fc18.src.rpm Good idea - for a future package. Regards, Kim On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 8:39 AM, Kim Bisgaard kim...@alleroedderne.adsl.dk mailto:kim...@alleroedderne.adsl.dk wrote: Hi Axel and Paulo, I have after MANY attempts managed to get avidemux-2.6.4 to compile and build :-) at least on f18 and f19. I assumed all patches was upstreamed, so they are removed. I had to removed all that has to with languages (%find_lang) as it erred out. Many files and directories have changed names ... Paulo could you try to recompile the package, and possibly also test, to see if it is sensible what I have done? http://people.atrpms.net/~kbisgaard/avidemux-2.6.4-31.fc19.src.rpm http://people.atrpms.net/%7Ekbisgaard/avidemux-2.6.4-31.fc19.src.rpm Regards, Kim ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net mailto:atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti DCC - UFRJ ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
[ATrpms-devel] dovecot spec
Hi Axel,
I noticed that Dovecot had a 2.2.4 release, but with a warning (in 2.2.3) that it needed a new version of Pigeonhole. There is currently no
new release of Pigeonhole, so I wanted to see what would happen if I tried to recompile new Dovecot with old Pigeonhole.
I downloaded your src-rpm, updated the version, and tried to rebuild but ran
into this error:
Processing files: dovecot-2.2.4-2_138.fc17.i686
error: File must begin with /: %_tmpfilesdir/dovecot.conf
Executing(%doc): /bin/sh -e /home/kim/rpm/tmp/rpm-tmp.M1htXb
+ umask 022
+ cd /home/kim/rpm/BUILD
+ cd dovecot-2.2.4
+
DOCDIR=/home/kim/rpm/BUILDROOT/dovecot-2.2.4-2_138.fc17.i386/usr/share/doc/dovecot-2.2.4
+ export DOCDIR
+ /usr/bin/mkdir -p
/home/kim/rpm/BUILDROOT/dovecot-2.2.4-2_138.fc17.i386/usr/share/doc/dovecot-2.2.4
+ cp -pr docinstall/documentation.txt docinstall/dovecot-openssl.cnf docinstall/example-config docinstall/mkcert.sh
docinstall/solr-schema.xml docinstall/wiki AUTHORS ChangeLog COPYING COPYING.LGPL COPYING.MIT NEWS README
/home/kim/rpm/BUILDROOT/dovecot-2.2.4-2_138.fc17.i386/usr/share/doc/dovecot-2.2.4
+ exit 0
RPM build errors:
File must begin with /: %_tmpfilesdir/dovecot.conf
It seems to come from these lines:
%if %{with systemd}
%_tmpfilesdir/dovecot.conf
%{_unitdir}/dovecot.service
%{_unitdir}/dovecot.socket
%else
But I do not understand why dovecot.conf should go into some temp-dir? nor why I have a problem here, since I have the newest macros? I have
tried to surround it with {}, with no luck. This is on FC17.
Hope you can shed some light...
Regards,
Kim
___
atrpms-devel mailing list
atrpms-devel@atrpms.net
http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] dovecot spec
Looking in BUILDROOT:
ls -l BUILDROOT/
total 8
drwxr-xr-x. 5 kim users 4096 Jun 26 10:59 dovecot-2.2.4-2_138.fc17.i386
drwxr-xr-x. 2 kim users 4096 Jun 26 10:59
dovecot-2.2.4-2_138.fc17.i386%{_tmpfilesdir}
Does not look like _tmpfilesdir is set :-(
I have remembered that tmpfilesdir should be set to /etc/tmpfiles.d :-)
I have this installed:
atrpms-rpm-config-203-1.noarch
Regards,
Kim
On 2013-06-26 11:19, Kim Bisgaard wrote:
Hi Axel,
I noticed that Dovecot had a 2.2.4 release, but with a warning (in 2.2.3) that it needed a new version of Pigeonhole. There is currently
no new release of Pigeonhole, so I wanted to see what would happen if I tried to recompile new Dovecot with old Pigeonhole.
I downloaded your src-rpm, updated the version, and tried to rebuild but ran
into this error:
Processing files: dovecot-2.2.4-2_138.fc17.i686
error: File must begin with /: %_tmpfilesdir/dovecot.conf
Executing(%doc): /bin/sh -e /home/kim/rpm/tmp/rpm-tmp.M1htXb
+ umask 022
+ cd /home/kim/rpm/BUILD
+ cd dovecot-2.2.4
+
DOCDIR=/home/kim/rpm/BUILDROOT/dovecot-2.2.4-2_138.fc17.i386/usr/share/doc/dovecot-2.2.4
+ export DOCDIR
+ /usr/bin/mkdir -p
/home/kim/rpm/BUILDROOT/dovecot-2.2.4-2_138.fc17.i386/usr/share/doc/dovecot-2.2.4
+ cp -pr docinstall/documentation.txt docinstall/dovecot-openssl.cnf docinstall/example-config docinstall/mkcert.sh
docinstall/solr-schema.xml docinstall/wiki AUTHORS ChangeLog COPYING COPYING.LGPL COPYING.MIT NEWS README
/home/kim/rpm/BUILDROOT/dovecot-2.2.4-2_138.fc17.i386/usr/share/doc/dovecot-2.2.4
+ exit 0
RPM build errors:
File must begin with /: %_tmpfilesdir/dovecot.conf
It seems to come from these lines:
%if %{with systemd}
%_tmpfilesdir/dovecot.conf
%{_unitdir}/dovecot.service
%{_unitdir}/dovecot.socket
%else
But I do not understand why dovecot.conf should go into some temp-dir? nor why I have a problem here, since I have the newest macros? I
have tried to surround it with {}, with no luck. This is on FC17.
Hope you can shed some light...
Regards,
Kim
___
atrpms-devel mailing list
atrpms-devel@atrpms.net
http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
___
atrpms-devel mailing list
atrpms-devel@atrpms.net
http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] avidemux
Or alternative you can put it into the bleeding repo, and let somebody adventurous test it... Regards, Kim Den 22-06-2013 13:39, Kim Bisgaard skrev: Hi Axel and Paulo, I have after MANY attempts managed to get avidemux-2.6.4 to compile and build :-) at least on f18 and f19. I assumed all patches was upstreamed, so they are removed. I had to removed all that has to with languages (%find_lang) as it erred out. Many files and directories have changed names ... Paulo could you try to recompile the package, and possibly also test, to see if it is sensible what I have done? http://people.atrpms.net/~kbisgaard/avidemux-2.6.4-31.fc19.src.rpm Regards, Kim ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] Fedora is messing up f17
Hi Jim, Sorry for not replying to myself with the workaround :-/ as far as I can remember I did something like the following: yum --skip-broken update yumdownloader glibc.i686 glibc-common.i686 glibc-devel.i686 \ glibc-headers.i686 nscd.i686 rpm -Uvh glibc-* nscd-2.15-59.fc17.i686.rpm rm glibc-* nscd-2.15-59.fc17.i686.rpm It seems that rpm does not complain, where yum does ... go figure! Good luck! Regards, Kim Kim, I noticed a post you made in the ATrpms-devel June list: http://lists.atrpms.net/pipermail/atrpms-devel/2013-June/002979.html I am having the exact same problem… were you ever able to resolve it? Or do we need to waiting from an update to the ATrpms repository? Thanks in advance! Jim Cornacchia On 02-06-2013 11:02, Kim Bisgaard wrote: Hi Axel, I think that the file system unification (in part) is coming to f17: -- Package glibc.i686 0:2.15-58.fc17 will be updated --- Package glibc.i686 0:2.15-59.fc17 will be an update --- Package glibc-common.i686 0:2.15-58.fc17 will be updated --- Package glibc-common.i686 0:2.15-59.fc17 will be an update --- Package glibc-devel.i686 0:2.15-58.fc17 will be updated --- Package glibc-devel.i686 0:2.15-59.fc17 will be an update --- Package glibc-headers.i686 0:2.15-58.fc17 will be updated --- Package glibc-headers.i686 0:2.15-59.fc17 will be an update --- Package nscd.i686 0:2.15-58.fc17 will be updated --- Package nscd.i686 0:2.15-59.fc17 will be an update -- Processing Dependency: /usr/sbin/ldconfig for package: libmyth-0.26_0-0.26.0-292.1.fc17.i686 -- Processing Dependency: /usr/sbin/ldconfig for package: libmythui-0.26_0-0.26.0-292.1.fc17.i686 -- Processing Dependency: /usr/sbin/ldconfig for package: libmythnzmqt0-0.26.0-292.1.fc17.i686 -- Processing Dependency: /usr/sbin/ldconfig for package: libmythavformat54-0.26.0-292.1.fc17.i686 -- Processing Dependency: /usr/sbin/ldconfig for package: libmythpostproc52-0.26.0-292.1.fc17.i686 -- Processing Dependency: /usr/sbin/ldconfig for package: libmythservicecontracts-0.26_0-0.26.0-292.1.fc17.i686 -- Processing Dependency: /usr/sbin/ldconfig for package: libmythavdevice54-0.26.0-292.1.fc17.i686 -- Processing Dependency: /usr/sbin/ldconfig for package: libmythlivemedia-0.26_0-0.26.0-292.1.fc17.i686 -- Processing Dependency: /usr/sbin/ldconfig for package: libmythbase-0.26_0-0.26.0-292.1.fc17.i686 -- Processing Dependency: /usr/sbin/ldconfig for package: libmythzmq1-0.26.0-292.1.fc17.i686 -- Processing Dependency: /usr/sbin/ldconfig for package: libmythtv-0.26_0-0.26.0-292.1.fc17.i686 -- Processing Dependency: /usr/sbin/ldconfig for package: libmythmetadata-0.26_0-0.26.0-292.1.fc17.i686 -- Processing Dependency: /usr/sbin/ldconfig for package: libmythprotoserver-0.26_0-0.26.0-292.1.fc17.i686 -- Processing Dependency: /usr/sbin/ldconfig for package: libmythfreemheg-0.26_0-0.26.0-292.1.fc17.i686 -- Processing Dependency: /usr/sbin/ldconfig for package: libmythupnp-0.26_0-0.26.0-292.1.fc17.i686 -- Processing Dependency: /usr/sbin/ldconfig for package: libmythavfilter2-0.26.0-292.1.fc17.i686 -- Processing Dependency: /usr/sbin/ldconfig for package: libmythswscale2-0.26.0-292.1.fc17.i686 -- Processing Dependency: /usr/sbin/ldconfig for package: libmythswresample0-0.26.0-292.1.fc17.i686 -- Processing Dependency: /usr/sbin/ldconfig for package: libmythavutil51-0.26.0-292.1.fc17.i686 -- Processing Dependency: /usr/sbin/ldconfig for package: libmythhdhomerun-0.26_0-0.26.0-292.1.fc17.i686 -- Processing Dependency: /usr/sbin/ldconfig for package: libmythavcodec54-0.26.0-292.1.fc17.i686 -- Processing Dependency: /usr/sbin/ldconfig for package: libmythqjson0-0.26.0-292.1.fc17.i686 -- Finished Dependency Resolution Error: Package: libmythpostproc52-0.26.0-292.1.fc17.i686 (@atrpms) Requires: /usr/sbin/ldconfig Removing: glibc-2.15-58.fc17.i686 (@anaconda-0) Not found Updated By: glibc-2.15-59.fc17.i686 (updates) Not found Error: Package: libmythfreemheg-0.26_0-0.26.0-292.1.fc17.i686 (@atrpms) Requires: /usr/sbin/ldconfig Removing: glibc-2.15-58.fc17.i686 (@anaconda-0) Not found Updated By: glibc-2.15-59.fc17.i686 (updates) Not found . Thanks for getting mythtv forward to f19, so now I only really miss gstreamer-plugins-ugly - any idea what prerequisite package is the problem? I could look at that then? Best regards, Kim ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
[ATrpms-devel] avidemux
Hi Axel and Paulo, I have after MANY attempts managed to get avidemux-2.6.4 to compile and build :-) at least on f18 and f19. I assumed all patches was upstreamed, so they are removed. I had to removed all that has to with languages (%find_lang) as it erred out. Many files and directories have changed names ... Paulo could you try to recompile the package, and possibly also test, to see if it is sensible what I have done? http://people.atrpms.net/~kbisgaard/avidemux-2.6.4-31.fc19.src.rpm Regards, Kim ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
[ATrpms-devel] povray for f18 and f19
Hi Axel, I have updated povray to RC7 and it compiles at least for f18 and f19, but should compile all other places where the old package was successful. http://people.atrpms.net/~kbisgaard/povray-3.7.0.RC7-1.fc19.src.rpm Regards, Kim ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
[ATrpms-devel] YafaRay
Hi Axel, Do you want a package if it is already in Fedora? yum list YafaRay-blender.x86_64 blender.x86_64 Available Packages YafaRay-blender.x86_64 0.1.1-8.fc19 fedora blender.x86_64 1:2.67b-1.fc19 updates-testing # yum --showduplicates list YafaRay-blender.x86_64 blender.x86_64 YafaRay-blender.x86_640.1.1-6.fc18 fedora blender.x86_641:2.64a-3.fc18 fedora blender.x86_641:2.67a-2.fc18 updates blender.x86_641:2.67b-1.fc18 updates-testing Regards, Kim ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] gstreamer-plugins-ugly for f19
Hi Axel, On 15-06-2013 15:03, Axel Thimm wrote: Hi, this fails to build with CC libgstamrnb_la-amrnb.lo /bin/sh ../../libtool --silent --tag=CC --tag=disable-static --mode=compile gcc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../..-pthread -I/usr/include/gstreamer-0.10 -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib64/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/include/libxml2 -I../../gst-libs -I../../gst-libs -pthread -I/usr/include/gstreamer-0.10 -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib64/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/include/libxml2-DG_THREADS_MANDATORY -DG_DISABLE_CAST_CHECKS -DG_DISABLE_ASSERT -Wall -Wdeclaration-after-statement -Wvla -Wpointer-arith -Wmissing-declarations -Wmissing-prototypes -Wredundant-decls -Wwrite-strings -Wformat-nonliteral -Wformat-security -Wold-style-definition -Winit-self -Wmissing-include-dirs -Waddress -Waggregate-return -Wno-multichar -Wnested-externs -g -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -c -o libgstamrnb_la-amrnb.lo `test -f 'amrnb.c' || echo './'`amrnb.c In file included from amrnb.c:24:0: amrnbdec.h:25:24: fatal error: interf_dec.h: No such file or directory Yes as I wrote in a follow-up mail: I have looked at gstreamer-plugins-ugly for f19, and gotten it to compile by: * updating to 0.10.19 * adding upstream patch for cdio code changes * riped out sid Forgot to tell that I needed to symlink all opencore-amr include files to /usr/include I can remember having reverted to that before - are they installed in an unusual path on fedora? on f18/f17 and with a missing PyXML on f19. (what happend to PyXML in f19???) If you do not know - neither do I. I removed the build-depend on PyXML - could not see it being used anywhere. On Sun, Jun 02, 2013 at 03:46:15PM +0200, Kim Bisgaard wrote: Hi, I have looked at gstreamer-plugins-ugly for f19, and gotten it to compile by: * updating to 0.10.19 * adding upstream patch for cdio code changes * riped out sid Regards, Kim ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
[ATrpms-devel] avidemux
Hi Axel, Looked at avidemux (avidemux-2.5.6-30.src.rpm) and it compiled fine on both f18 and f19 :-) didn't do a thing. It is a bit old, so perhaps I will try to upgrade to version 2.6.4 later in the weekend. Regards, Kim ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
[ATrpms-devel] Fedora is messing up f17
Hi Axel, I think that the file system unification (in part) is coming to f17: -- Package glibc.i686 0:2.15-58.fc17 will be updated --- Package glibc.i686 0:2.15-59.fc17 will be an update --- Package glibc-common.i686 0:2.15-58.fc17 will be updated --- Package glibc-common.i686 0:2.15-59.fc17 will be an update --- Package glibc-devel.i686 0:2.15-58.fc17 will be updated --- Package glibc-devel.i686 0:2.15-59.fc17 will be an update --- Package glibc-headers.i686 0:2.15-58.fc17 will be updated --- Package glibc-headers.i686 0:2.15-59.fc17 will be an update --- Package nscd.i686 0:2.15-58.fc17 will be updated --- Package nscd.i686 0:2.15-59.fc17 will be an update -- Processing Dependency: /usr/sbin/ldconfig for package: libmyth-0.26_0-0.26.0-292.1.fc17.i686 -- Processing Dependency: /usr/sbin/ldconfig for package: libmythui-0.26_0-0.26.0-292.1.fc17.i686 -- Processing Dependency: /usr/sbin/ldconfig for package: libmythnzmqt0-0.26.0-292.1.fc17.i686 -- Processing Dependency: /usr/sbin/ldconfig for package: libmythavformat54-0.26.0-292.1.fc17.i686 -- Processing Dependency: /usr/sbin/ldconfig for package: libmythpostproc52-0.26.0-292.1.fc17.i686 -- Processing Dependency: /usr/sbin/ldconfig for package: libmythservicecontracts-0.26_0-0.26.0-292.1.fc17.i686 -- Processing Dependency: /usr/sbin/ldconfig for package: libmythavdevice54-0.26.0-292.1.fc17.i686 -- Processing Dependency: /usr/sbin/ldconfig for package: libmythlivemedia-0.26_0-0.26.0-292.1.fc17.i686 -- Processing Dependency: /usr/sbin/ldconfig for package: libmythbase-0.26_0-0.26.0-292.1.fc17.i686 -- Processing Dependency: /usr/sbin/ldconfig for package: libmythzmq1-0.26.0-292.1.fc17.i686 -- Processing Dependency: /usr/sbin/ldconfig for package: libmythtv-0.26_0-0.26.0-292.1.fc17.i686 -- Processing Dependency: /usr/sbin/ldconfig for package: libmythmetadata-0.26_0-0.26.0-292.1.fc17.i686 -- Processing Dependency: /usr/sbin/ldconfig for package: libmythprotoserver-0.26_0-0.26.0-292.1.fc17.i686 -- Processing Dependency: /usr/sbin/ldconfig for package: libmythfreemheg-0.26_0-0.26.0-292.1.fc17.i686 -- Processing Dependency: /usr/sbin/ldconfig for package: libmythupnp-0.26_0-0.26.0-292.1.fc17.i686 -- Processing Dependency: /usr/sbin/ldconfig for package: libmythavfilter2-0.26.0-292.1.fc17.i686 -- Processing Dependency: /usr/sbin/ldconfig for package: libmythswscale2-0.26.0-292.1.fc17.i686 -- Processing Dependency: /usr/sbin/ldconfig for package: libmythswresample0-0.26.0-292.1.fc17.i686 -- Processing Dependency: /usr/sbin/ldconfig for package: libmythavutil51-0.26.0-292.1.fc17.i686 -- Processing Dependency: /usr/sbin/ldconfig for package: libmythhdhomerun-0.26_0-0.26.0-292.1.fc17.i686 -- Processing Dependency: /usr/sbin/ldconfig for package: libmythavcodec54-0.26.0-292.1.fc17.i686 -- Processing Dependency: /usr/sbin/ldconfig for package: libmythqjson0-0.26.0-292.1.fc17.i686 -- Finished Dependency Resolution Error: Package: libmythpostproc52-0.26.0-292.1.fc17.i686 (@atrpms) Requires: /usr/sbin/ldconfig Removing: glibc-2.15-58.fc17.i686 (@anaconda-0) Not found Updated By: glibc-2.15-59.fc17.i686 (updates) Not found Error: Package: libmythfreemheg-0.26_0-0.26.0-292.1.fc17.i686 (@atrpms) Requires: /usr/sbin/ldconfig Removing: glibc-2.15-58.fc17.i686 (@anaconda-0) Not found Updated By: glibc-2.15-59.fc17.i686 (updates) Not found . Thanks for getting mythtv forward to f19, so now I only really miss gstreamer-plugins-ugly - any idea what prerequisite package is the problem? I could look at that then? Best regards, Kim ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
[ATrpms-devel] gstreamer-plugins-ugly for f19
Hi,
I have looked at gstreamer-plugins-ugly for f19, and gotten it to
compile by:
* updating to 0.10.19
* adding upstream patch for cdio code changes
* riped out sid
Axel: Perhaps I should get an account on your ftp-server to upload
src.rpm's?
Attached: patch and spec
Regards,
Kim
%define desktop_vendor ATrpms
%define majorminor 0.10
%define gstreamergstreamer
%define gst_minver 0.10.25
%define gstpb_minver 0.10.25
Summary: GStreamer streaming media framework ugly plug-ins
Name:gstreamer-plugins-ugly
Version: 0.10.19
Release: 15%{?dist}
License: LGPLv2
Group: Applications/Multimedia
URL: http://gstreamer.freedesktop.org/
Source0: http://gstreamer.freedesktop.org/src/gst-plugins-ugly/gst-plugins-ugly-%{version}.tar.bz2
Patch0: gst-plugins-ugly-%{version}.patch
BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root
BuildRequires: %{gstreamer}-devel = %{gst_minver}
BuildRequires: %{gstreamer}-plugins-base-devel = %{gstpb_minver}
BuildRequires: gettext-devel
#BuildRequires: libsidplay-devel = 1.36.0
BuildRequires: a52dec-devel = 0.7.3
BuildRequires: libdvdnav-devel = 0.1.3
BuildRequires: libdvdread-devel = 0.9.0
BuildRequires: lame-devel = 3.89
BuildRequires: libid3tag-devel = 0.15.0
BuildRequires: libmad-devel = 0.15.0
BuildRequires: twolame-devel
BuildRequires: mpeg2dec-devel = 0.4.0
BuildRequires: opencore-amr-devel
BuildRequires: liboil-devel
BuildRequires: libcdio-devel
BuildRequires: x264-devel
#BuildRequires: PyXML
Requires: %{gstreamer} = %{gst_minver}
#Provides: gstreamer-sid = %{version}-%{release}
Provides: gstreamer-lame = %{version}-%{release}
Provides: gstreamer-mad = %{version}-%{release}
Provides: gstreamer-a52dec = %{version}-%{release}
Provides: gstreamer-dvdnav = %{version}-%{release}
Provides: gstreamer-dvdread = %{version}-%{release}
Provides: gstreamer-mpeg2dec = %{version}-%{release}
%description
GStreamer is a streaming media framework, based on graphs of elements,
which operate on media data.
This package contains well-written plug-ins that can't be shipped in
gstreamer-plugins-good because:
- the license is not LGPL
- the license of the library is not LGPL
- there are possible licensing issues with the code.
%prep
%setup -q -n gst-plugins-ugly-%{version}
# Avoid standard rpaths on lib64 archs
sed -i -e 's|/lib /usr/lib\b|/%{_lib} %{_libdir}|' configure
%patch -P 0 -p 1
%build
%configure \
--with-package-name='gst-plugins-ugly %{desktop_vendor} rpm' \
--with-package-origin='http://atrpms.net/' \
--enable-debug \
--disable-static
%{__make} %{?_smp_mflags}
%install
%{__rm} -rf %{buildroot}
%makeinstall
%find_lang gst-plugins-ugly-%{majorminor}
# Clean out files that should not be part of the rpm.
%{__rm} -f %{buildroot}%{_libdir}/gstreamer-%{majorminor}/*.la
%{__rm} -f %{buildroot}%{_libdir}/*.la
%clean
%{__rm} -rf %{buildroot}
%files -f gst-plugins-ugly-%{majorminor}.lang
%defattr(-,root,root,-)
%doc AUTHORS COPYING README REQUIREMENTS
%{_datadir}/gstreamer-%{majorminor}/presets/GstX264Enc.prs
%{_datadir}/gstreamer-%{majorminor}/presets/GstAmrnbEnc.prs
%{_libdir}/gstreamer-%{majorminor}/libgstasf.so
%{_libdir}/gstreamer-%{majorminor}/libgstdvdlpcmdec.so
%{_libdir}/gstreamer-%{majorminor}/libgstdvdsub.so
%{_libdir}/gstreamer-%{majorminor}/libgstiec958.so
%{_libdir}/gstreamer-%{majorminor}/libgstmpegaudioparse.so
%{_libdir}/gstreamer-%{majorminor}/libgstmpegstream.so
%{_libdir}/gstreamer-%{majorminor}/libgstrmdemux.so
%{_libdir}/gstreamer-%{majorminor}/libgsta52dec.so
%{_libdir}/gstreamer-%{majorminor}/libgstcdio.so
%{_libdir}/gstreamer-%{majorminor}/libgstdvdread.so
%{_libdir}/gstreamer-%{majorminor}/libgstlame.so
%{_libdir}/gstreamer-%{majorminor}/libgstmad.so
%{_libdir}/gstreamer-%{majorminor}/libgstmpeg2dec.so
#%{_libdir}/gstreamer-%{majorminor}/libgstsid.so
%{_libdir}/gstreamer-%{majorminor}/libgsttwolame.so
%{_libdir}/gstreamer-%{majorminor}/libgstx264.so
%{_libdir}/gstreamer-%{majorminor}/libgstamrnb.so
%{_libdir}/gstreamer-%{majorminor}/libgstamrwbdec.so
%changelog
* Sun Jun 2 2013 Kim Bisgaard kim...@alleroedderne.adsl.dk - 0.10.19-15
- Update to 0.10.19 + patches
- Remove sidplay - new sidplayfp is incompatible
* Mon Jul 04 2011 Paulo Roma r...@lcg.ufrj.br - 0.10.18-14
- Update to 0.10.18.
* Sun Jan 30 2011 Axel Thimm axel.th...@atrpms.net - 0.10.17-12
- Update to 0.10.17.
* Tue Nov 2 2010 Axel Thimm axel.th...@atrpms.net - 0.10.16-11
- Update to 0.10.16.
* Sat Jun 05 2010 Paulo Roma r...@lcg.ufrj.br 0.10.15-10
- Updated to 0.10.15
* Sat Apr 10 2010 Paulo Roma r...@lcg.ufrj.br 0.10.14-9
- Updated to 0.10.14
- Removed the x264 patch.
- Added BR amrwb-devel.
- Added BR opencore-amr-devel.
* Sat Nov 28 2009 Paulo Roma r...@lcg.ufrj.br 0.10.13-8
- Patched for Fedora 12 (x264).
* Sat Nov 21 2009 Paulo Roma r...@lcg.ufrj.br 0.10.13-7
- Updated to 0.10.13
- Removed libgstamrnb.so
* Thu Jun 18 2009 Paulo Roma r...@lcg.ufrj.br 0.10.12-6
- Updated to 0.10.12
- Added BR x264-devel.
- Added GstX264Enc.prs
* Fri Apr
Re: [ATrpms-devel] gstreamer-plugins-ugly for f19
On 02-06-2013 15:46, Kim Bisgaard wrote: Hi, I have looked at gstreamer-plugins-ugly for f19, and gotten it to compile by: * updating to 0.10.19 * adding upstream patch for cdio code changes * riped out sid Forgot to tell that I needed to symlink all opencore-amr include files to /usr/include :-( I can remember having reverted to that before - are they installed in an unusual path on fedora? Axel: Perhaps I should get an account on your ftp-server to upload src.rpm's? Attached: patch and spec Regards, Kim ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] dovecot
Hi again Axel, Dovecot just got a new version - I have attached new spec files - where I have removed configure flags that is not used anymore. I made sure to use the correct day of week in the changelog ;-) Regards, Kim On 19-05-2013 09:22, Axel Thimm wrote: Thanks Kim, I had already uploaded new packages. Can you check whether they already have your changes? BTW I just found out that for EL6/5 I forgot to place it in the testing repo, it's in the stable until the next update. dovecot.spec.gz Description: GNU Zip compressed data dovecot-pigeonhole.spec.gz Description: GNU Zip compressed data ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] dovecot
I have a machine following f19, are the spec-files for f18 in good shape? because if they are I can start to see if they will compile there... probably the reason people use ATrpms is for the good shape of packages, so yes, they are in quite good shape, and while I haven't looked into the major changes in f19, I'm quite confident that they will rebuilt quite fine against current development/19 repos. That is a fact that I can follow 100%, but there are a number of packages that has not been available (compiled) for f18. Among them is gstreamer-plugins-ugly, spamassassin and avidemux. Regards Kim ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] dovecot
Hi Axel, I'm sure that they do, as I only added what was needed to get it to compile and package all files. You just too fast - I wanted to send clamav too - but you had done i too before I got there! I have a machine following f19, are the spec-files for f18 in good shape? because if they are I can start to see if they will compile there... Thanks for the good repo!!! - I will go play with upgrading to mythtv-0.26 on my f17 machine :-) Regards, Kim On 19-05-2013 09:22, Axel Thimm wrote: Thanks Kim, I had already uploaded new packages. Can you check whether they already have your changes? ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] dovecot
Hi Axel,
On 29-09-2012 15:46, Kim Bisgaard wrote:
Hi,
A lot of versions have rushed under the bridge ... and dovecot is at
2.1.10 and pigeonhole is at 0.3.3.
Status now is 2.2.1 for dovecot and 0.4.0 for pigeonhole. I have
attached spec-files :-) I have been using them since 10/5-2013 on
f17-i686
Regards,
Kim
I build for myself updated packages for f16 based on these versions.
If others are interested in doing the same:
yum install atrpms-rpm-config
Getting the Atrpms src.rpm packages for your OS and install them (will
only install the source)
change the version number to fit in the spec-files
downloaded sources (look in the spec-files)
rpmbuild -bb rpm/SPEC/package.spec
yum localinstall package.rpm
For F16 and F17 i think you should add these args [[--with systemd 1]]
to the rpmbuild command, not convinced that atrpms-rpm-config knows what
to default for each OS :-(
Regards,
Kim
___
atrpms-devel mailing list
atrpms-devel@atrpms.net
http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
%bcond_without inotify
%bcond_with forcequota2
%bcond_without pidfile
%bcond_without solr
%bcond_without systemd
%bcond_without rquota
Summary: Dovecot Secure imap server
Name: dovecot
Epoch: 1
Version: 2.2.1
Release: 2_132%{?dist}
License: MIT
Group: System Environment/Daemons
URL: http://www.dovecot.org/
Source0: http://www.dovecot.org/releases/2.2/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz
Source1: dovecot.init
Source2: dovecot.pam
Source3: maildir-migration.txt
Source9: dovecot.sysconfig
Source10: dovecot.tmpfilesd
#our own
Source14: dovecot.conf.5
Source88: dovecot.logrotate
Patch1: dovecot-2.1-defaultconfig.patch
Patch2: dovecot-1.0.beta2-mkcert-permissions.patch
Patch3: dovecot-1.0.rc7-mkcert-paths.patch
Patch4: dovecot-2.1-privatetmp.patch
Patch102: dovecot-1.1.3-pam-setcred.patch
BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root
BuildRequires: autoconf, automake, libtool, gettext-devel
BuildRequires: gcc-c++
BuildRequires: krb5-devel
BuildRequires: openssl-devel
BuildRequires: openldap-devel, cyrus-sasl-devel
BuildRequires: pam-devel
BuildRequires: pkgconfig
BuildRequires: zlib-devel, bzip2-devel
BuildRequires: libcap-devel
%{?with_solr:BuildRequires: libcurl-devel expat-devel}
%{?with_lucene:BuildRequires: clucene-core-devel}
%{?with_rquota:BuildRequires: quota-devel}
# Explicit Runtime Requirements
#Requires: openssl = 0.9.7f-4
Requires: openssl
Requires: shadow-utils
%if %{with systemd}
Requires: systemd
%else
Requires: initscripts, chkconfig
%endif
Provides: %{name}-pgsql = %{evr}, %{name}-mysql = %{evr}
Obsoletes: %{name}-pgsql %{epoch}:%{version}-%{release}, %{name}-mysql %{epoch}:%{version}-%{release}, %{name}-sqlite %{epoch}:%{version}-%{release}, %{name}-ldap %{epoch}:%{version}-%{release}, %{name}-gssapi %{epoch}:%{version}-%{release}
Conflicts: %{name}-pgsql %{epoch}:%{version}-%{release}, %{name}-mysql %{epoch}:%{version}-%{release}, %{name}-sqlite %{epoch}:%{version}-%{release}, %{name}-ldap %{epoch}:%{version}-%{release}, %{name}-gssapi %{epoch}:%{version}-%{release}
BuildRequires: postgresql-devel
BuildRequires: mysql-devel
BuildRequires: sqlite-devel
BuildRequires: db4-devel
%define ssldir %{_sysconfdir}/pki/%{name}
%description
Dovecot is an IMAP server for Linux/UNIX-like systems, written with security
primarily in mind. It also contains a small POP3 server. It supports mail
in either of maildir or mbox formats.
%package devel
Summary: Libraries and headers for Dovecot
Group: Development/Libraries
Requires: %name = %{epoch}:%{version}-%{release}
Requires: openssl-devel
%description devel
This package contains development files for linking against %{name}.
%prep
%setup -q
%patch1 -p1 -b .default-settings
%patch2 -p1 -b .mkcert-permissions
%patch3 -p1 -b .mkcert-paths
%patch4 -p1 -b .privatetmp
sed -i '/DEFAULT_INCLUDES *=/s|$| '$(pkg-config --cflags libclucene-core)| src/plugins/fts-lucene/Makefile.in
%patch102 -p1 -b .pam-setcred
cat Makefile.am Makefile.am.bak
echo 'ACLOCAL_AMFLAGS=-I .' Makefile.am
cat Makefile.am.bak Makefile.am
%build
#autoreconf -ifv
#required for fdpass.c line 125,190: dereferencing type-punned pointer will break strict-aliasing rules
#export CFLAGS=$RPM_OPT_FLAGS -fno-strict-aliasing
%configure \
--disable-dependency-tracking \
INSTALL_DATA=install -c -p -m644 \
--docdir=%{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version} \
--enable-header-install \
--disable-static \
--with-nss \
--with-shadow\
--with-pam \
--with-gssapi=plugin \
--with-ldap=plugin \
--with-sql=plugin\
--with-pgsql \
--with-mysql \
--with-sqlite\
--with-zlib \
--with-sql-drivers \
--with-libcap\
--with-db\
--with-ssl=openssl
Re: [ATrpms-devel] mythtv 0.26 on f17
On 2013-05-17 07:06, Axel Thimm wrote: Hi, On Tue, Jan 01, 2013 at 05:57:08PM +0100, Kim Bisgaard wrote: I have been able to build mythtv version 0.26 on f17. I stated with this src.rpm: http://dl.atrpms.net/all/mythtv-0.26.0-291.src.rpm added a line to the spec-file with: BuildRequires: qtwebkit-devel and it compiled. Didn't you hit on the zeromq issue? Or did you just build for i386? Hi Axel - pleased to have you back!! No I only built on i368 I tried to build x86_64 on f18 - but too many of the other packages did not build there so I ended giving up. Regards, Kim ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
[ATrpms-devel] mythtv 0.26 on f17
Hi, I have been able to build mythtv version 0.26 on f17. I stated with this src.rpm: http://dl.atrpms.net/all/mythtv-0.26.0-291.src.rpm added a line to the spec-file with: BuildRequires: qtwebkit-devel and it compiled. Word of warning though I HAVE NOT INSTALLED the resulting packages yet. I will probably try at some point - but I have not yet. And I might want to upgrade to a newer set of upstream sources. I tried the same on a F18-beta box, but there at too many missing required packages :-( might find more time later. The recipe here just in case somebody needs it more that I do. Regards, Kim ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
[ATrpms-devel] new fedora-17 python packages
Hi, I have been having problems updating to the new python packages in f17, because PIL and python-MythTV requires /bin/python2.7 (I assume the new packages provides /usr/bin/python2.7). I got rid of this problem by just rebuilding PIL from src.rpm - no update to new version or anything. I have not tried the same with mythtv src.rpm (too may -devel packages), but assume it will be the same there. So please rebuild PIL and mythtv for f17. Regards, Kim -- Processing Dependency: /bin/python2.7 for package: python-MythTV-0.25.2-287.fc17.x86_64 -- Finished Dependency Resolution Error: Package: python-MythTV-0.25.2-287.fc17.x86_64 (@atrpms) Requires: /bin/python2.7 Removing: python-2.7.3-6.fc17.x86_64 (@updates-testing) Not found Updated By: python-2.7.3-7.2.fc17.x86_64 (updates) Not found You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem You could try running: rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
[ATrpms-devel] libva - heads up
Hi Axel, There is a new version of libva on its way out through updates-testing (F17). As usual it is conflicting with atrpms version: === Package Arch VersionRepositorySize === Updating: libvax86_64 1.0.16-1.fc17 updates-testing 53 k Skipped (dependency problems): python x86_64 2.7.3-7.2.fc17 updates 78 k python-devel x86_64 2.7.3-7.2.fc17 updates 381 k python-libs x86_64 2.7.3-7.2.fc17 updates 5.5 M tkinter x86_64 2.7.3-7.2.fc17 updates 307 k Transaction Summary === Upgrade1 Package Skipped (dependency problems) 4 Packages Total size: 53 k Is this ok [y/N]: y Downloading Packages: Running Transaction Check Running Transaction Test Transaction Check Error: file /usr/lib64/libva.so.1 from install of libva-1.0.16-1.fc17.x86_64 conflicts with file from package libva1-1.0.15-7.fc17.x86_64 file /usr/lib64/libva-x11.so.1 from install of libva-1.0.16-1.fc17.x86_64 conflicts with file from package libva-x11_1-1.0.15-7.fc17.x86_64 Error Summary - [root@kim ~]# yum list libva Loaded plugins: auto-update-debuginfo, presto, refresh-packagekit Installed Packages libva.x86_64 1.0.15-7.fc17@atrpms Available Packages libva.i686 1.0.16-1.fc17updates-testing libva.x86_64 1.0.16-1.fc17updates-testing [root@kim ~]# Regards, Kim ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
[ATrpms-devel] clamav has security update
Hi, Clamav has had a security update to 0.97.5 The reason for this versions tarball being smaller seems to be that the virus db files are not included any more which seems reasonable. I have thus updated the version in the spec and removed these 2 lines: #%attr(0644,clamav,clamav) %verify(not mtime size md5) /var/lib/clamav/main.cvd #%attr(0644,clamav,clamav) %verify(not mtime size md5) /var/lib/clamav/daily.cvd Hope you will find time for building soon. Regards, Kim ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] new clamav version with minor bug corrected
On 2012-03-21 09:03, Kim Bisgaard wrote: Hope you find the time to do the same :-) Thanks!! -- Kim ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
[ATrpms-devel] new clamav version with minor bug corrected
Hi Axel, I just build clamav-0.97.4 on fc16. I just corrected the version, and build. Hope you find the time to do the same :-) PS. I have setup a FC17-alpha system - anything you want help with there? Regards, Kim ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] clamav released in new version [0.97.3]
On 2011-10-24 05:11, Chris Schanzle wrote: Back to the subject at hand...ClamAV 0.97.3 was released about a week ago...with eight CVE's fixed per Gentoo's Linux Security Advisory GLSA 201110-20 [1] (can't be right...has ancient CVE's in there, but it was forwarded to me from another sysadmin). Regardless of Gentoo's advisory, as an EL5 user, would appreciate seeing a clamav 0.97.3 update soon...thanks! [1] http://www.gentoo.org/security/en/glsa/glsa-201110-20.xml Axel: I just build clamav 0.97.3 for fc15 from spec-file by updating the version number. Chris: I do not promise to keep Clamav updated, neither do I expect Axel to. I am normally alerted to a new version when Clamav alerts in the logfile - they have not done that this time :-( What I have done is to download and install the Clamav source-rpm, and atrpms-rpm-config. The I download the source and signature files from Clamav.net and put them in rpm/SOURCES. I then update the version number in rpm/SPECS/clamav.spec, and run rpmbuild -bb clamav.spec. If I am lucky I end up with a new rpm-file which I then install. All well I then alert Axel of my findings. At some time Axel then schedules a rebuild across all the OS/ARCH combinations, and you can update. Regards, Kim ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] clamav released in new version
Hi Axel, On 14-06-2011 10:09, Axel Thimm wrote: Hi, On Mon, 2011-06-13 at 10:42 +0200, Kim Bisgaard wrote: Thanks for getting F15 support up this fast! Next time Fedora updates please post on the blog what you plan to do in general to the packages (like adding systemd), then I will try to help out with recompiling f15 packages in the beta phase. Thanks! Actually many of the planned changes just popped up during package builds, e.g. there was no real planning, but we'll get there. :) The place to look for upcoming changes in Fedora is http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/16/FeatureList Not all features make it and not all make it as advertized (e.g. F15 was originally supposed to be systemd w/o any legacy initscripts, but the time constraints were to stringent). I have a machine with f16-beta now, and I have looked at the f16-src clamav. It looks like it is still using a normal sysv-init file. Is it still the plan not to have those in F16? I have these already: # ls -l /etc/init.d/ total 160 -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 3737 Jul 6 08:02 autofs -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 1479 Feb 8 2011 btseed -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 1651 Feb 8 2011 bttrack -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 19871 Oct 12 22:48 functions -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 1388 Sep 29 2010 haldaemon -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 5675 Oct 12 22:48 halt -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 17341 Feb 9 2011 hsqldb -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 3371 Sep 13 14:27 httpd -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 4273 Jun 28 23:10 jetty -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 9972 Sep 15 2010 jexec -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 659 Oct 12 22:48 killall -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 1387 Sep 3 03:37 mythbackend -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 2986 Oct 12 22:48 netconsole -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 5593 Oct 12 22:48 netfs -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 7364 Oct 12 22:48 network -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 3819 Sep 12 10:33 postfix -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 6203 Apr 18 2011 postgresql-9.0 -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 6053 Sep 23 12:40 postgresql-9.1 lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 4 Oct 15 14:50 reboot - halt -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 1346 Oct 4 15:04 sandbox -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 647 Oct 12 22:48 single -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 2243 Jul 21 18:33 svnserve -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 9040 Feb 9 2011 tomcat5 Any other things to look for, besides systemd? Regards, -- Kim ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
[ATrpms-devel] clamav released in new version
Hi Axel,
Thanks for getting F15 support up this fast! Next time Fedora updates
please post on the blog what you plan to do in general to the packages
(like adding systemd), then I will try to help out with recompiling f15
packages in the beta phase.
There is a new version of clamav - 0.97.1:
I have changed the version number and added this line to the files section:
%{_mandir}/man1/clambc.1*
Best regards,
Kim
___
atrpms-devel mailing list
atrpms-devel@atrpms.net
http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
[ATrpms-devel] new update of clamav
Hi Axel, I have just built the rpm for clamav-0.97 and it is a simple update - just updated the Version-tag. Regards, Kim ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
[ATrpms-devel] new update of clamav
Hi Axel, I have just built the rpm for clamav-0.96.4 and it is a simple update - just updated the Version-tag. Regards, Kim ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
[ATrpms-devel] new (security) update of clamav
Hi Axel, I have just build the rpm for clamav-0.96.3 and it is a simple update - the only thing besides version numbers, is to remove the 2 patch3 lines that was necessary in 0.96.2 Regards, Kim ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
[ATrpms-devel] dovecot 2.0.1
%config(noreplace) %{ssldir}/dovecot-openssl.cnf
%{_initddir}/dovecot
%dir %{ssldir}
%dir %{ssldir}/certs
%dir %{ssldir}/private
%attr(0600,root,root) %ghost %config(missingok,noreplace) %verify(not md5 size
mtime) %{ssldir}/certs/dovecot.pem
%attr(0600,root,root) %ghost %config(missingok,noreplace) %verify(not md5 size
mtime) %{ssldir}/private/dovecot.pem
%dir %{_libdir}/dovecot
%{_libdir}/dovecot/auth
%{_libdir}/dovecot/dict
%{_libdir}/dovecot/doveadm
%{_libdir}/dovecot/*_plugin.so
%{_libdir}/dovecot/*.so.*
%{_libdir}/dovecot/libdriver_*.so
%{_libexecdir}/dovecot
%attr(2755,root,mail) %{_libexecdir}/dovecot/deliver
%attr(0755,root,dovecot) %dir /var/run/dovecot
%dir /var/run/dovecot/empty
%attr(0750,root,dovenull) %dir /var/run/dovecot/login
%attr(0750,dovecot,dovecot) %dir /var/lib/dovecot
%{_mandir}/man1/deliver.1.gz
%{_mandir}/man1/doveadm*.1.gz
%{_mandir}/man1/doveconf.1.gz
%{_mandir}/man1/dovecot*.1.gz
%{_mandir}/man1/dsync.1.gz
%{_mandir}/man7/doveadm*.7.gz
%{_mandir}/man5/dovecot.conf.5.gz
%dir /var/cache/dovecot
%attr(1777,root,dovecot) %dir /var/cache/dovecot/indexes
%files devel
%defattr(-,root,root,-)
#%{_libdir}/dovecot/*/*.a
%{_includedir}/dovecot
%{_datadir}/aclocal/dovecot.m4
%{_libdir}/dovecot/libdovecot*.so
%{_libdir}/dovecot/dovecot-config
%changelog
* Sat Aug 28 2010 Kim Bisgaard kim...@alleroedderne.adsl.dk - 1:2.0.1-0.15_114
- Update to 2.0.1
* Sun Jul 4 2010 Axel Thimm axel.th...@atrpms.net - 1:2.0-0.15_113_rc1
- Update to 2.0.rc1.
* Fri Jun 18 2010 Axel Thimm axel.th...@atrpms.net - 1:2.0-0.12_111_beta6
- Update to 2.0.beta6.
* Tue May 25 2010 Axel Thimm axel.th...@atrpms.net - 1:2.0-0.12_109_beta5
- Update to 2.0.beta5.
* Sat Apr 3 2010 Axel Thimm axel.th...@atrpms.net - 1:1.2.11-3_108
- Update to 1.2.11.
- Disable bzlib/zlib, they are buggy in 1.x and will be fixed only in 2.x.
* Mon Jan 25 2010 Angel Marin an...@anmar.eu.org - 1:1.2.10-2_107
- Update to 1.2.10.
- Update managesieve patch to 0.11.11.
* Mon Dec 21 2009 Angel Marin an...@anmar.eu.org - 1:1.2.9-0_105
- No need for two copies of dovecot-config
- header files are now installed by dovecot, so we start with that
copy then figure out the rest out of the Makefile
- find all .a files and copy them (some are multiple levels depth
into the src dir)
- Update managesieve patch to 0.11.10
* Thu Dec 17 2009 Axel Thimm axel.th...@atrpms.net - 1:1.2.9-0_104
- Update to 1.2.9.
* Fri Nov 20 2009 Axel Thimm axel.th...@atrpms.net - 1:1.2.8-0_103
- Update to 1.2.8.
- sync with rawhide.
* Fri Nov 13 2009 Axel Thimm axel.th...@atrpms.net - 1:1.2.7-0_102
- Update to 1.2.7.
* Tue Oct 6 2009 Axel Thimm axel.th...@atrpms.net - 1:1.2.6-0_101
- Update to 1.2.6.
* Fri Sep 18 2009 Axel Thimm axel.th...@atrpms.net - 1:1.2.5-0_100
- Update to 1.2.5.
* Tue Aug 18 2009 Axel Thimm axel.th...@atrpms.net - 1:1.2.4-0_99
- Update to 1.2.4.
* Wed Aug 5 2009 Axel Thimm axel.th...@atrpms.net - 1:1.2.3-0_97
- Update to 1.2.3.
* Tue Jul 14 2009 Axel Thimm axel.th...@atrpms.net - 1:1.2.1-0_96
- Update to 1.2.1.
* Sun Jul 5 2009 Axel Thimm axel.th...@atrpms.net - 1:1.2.0-0_95
- Update to 1.2.0.
* Tue Jun 23 2009 Axel Thimm axel.th...@atrpms.net - 1:1.2-0_94_rc6
- Update to 1.2rc6.
* Sat Jun 13 2009 Axel Thimm axel.th...@atrpms.net - 1:1.2-0_93_rc5
- Update to 1.2rc5.
* Sat Apr 18 2009 Axel Thimm axel.th...@atrpms.net - 1:1.2-0_92_rc3
- Update to 1.2rc3.
- Add managesieve support.
* Wed Mar 25 2009 Axel Thimm axel.th...@atrpms.net - 1:1.1.13-0_91
- Update to 1.1.13.
* Wed Feb 4 2009 Axel Thimm axel.th...@atrpms.net - 1:1.1.11-0_90
- Update to 1.1.11.
* Sat Jan 31 2009 Axel Thimm axel.th...@atrpms.net - 1:1.1.10-0_89
- Update to 1.1.10.
* Sat Jan 24 2009 Axel Thimm axel.th...@atrpms.net - 1:1.1.9-0_86
- Update to 1.1.9.
* Sat Jan 10 2009 Axel Thimm axel.th...@atrpms.net - 1:1.1.8-0_85
- Update to 1.1.8.
* Sun Nov 30 2008 Axel Thimm axel.th...@atrpms.net - 1:1.1.7-0_84
- Update to 1.1.7.
* Thu Oct 30 2008 Axel Thimm axel.th...@atrpms.net - 1:1.1.6-0_83
- Update to 1.1.6.
* Mon Oct 27 2008 Axel Thimm axel.th...@atrpms.net - 1:1.1.5-0_82
- Update to 1.1.5.
* Wed Oct 8 2008 Axel Thimm axel.th...@atrpms.net - 1:1.1.4-0_81
- Update to 1.1.4.
* Wed Sep 3 2008 Axel Thimm axel.th...@atrpms.net - 1:1.1.3-0_78
- Update to 1.1.3.
* Thu Jul 24 2008 Axel Thimm axel.th...@atrpms.net - 1:1.1.2-2_77
- Update to 1.1.2.
* Thu Jun 26 2008 Axel Thimm axel.th...@atrpms.net - 1:1.1.1-0_75
- Update to 1.1.1.
* Sat Jun 21 2008 Axel Thimm axel.th...@atrpms.net - 1:1.1.0-0_74
- Update to 1.1.0.
* Sat Jun 14 2008 Axel Thimm axel.th...@atrpms.net - 1:1.1.rc10-0_73
- Update to 1.1rc10.
* Tue Jun 10 2008 Axel Thimm axel.th...@atrpms.net - 1:1.1.rc9-0_72
- Update to 1.1rc9.
* Tue Jun 3 2008 Axel Thimm axel.th...@atrpms.net - 1:1.1.rc8-0_71
- Update to 1.1.0rc8.
* Wed May 14 2008 Axel Thimm axel.th...@atrpms.net - 1:1.1.rc5-0_70
- Update to 1.1.rc5.
* Wed Apr 30 2008 Angel Marin an...@anmar.eu.org - 1:1.1.rc4-0_69
- Update to 1.1.rc4
[ATrpms-devel] clamav 0.96.2
Hi, I have tried to build (change the spec to above version) the newly released clamav-0.96.2. It builds ok once one adds 'BuildRequires: sendmail-milter', *BUT* here it core dumps once I try to run it. I have tried to get the debug-symbols, and starting clamd in gdb but when started in debugger it does not core dump :-( could be a selinux thing - but I have not found any AVC's that makes the core dump go away. This is f13 and i686. I advice to hold off the update until a patch shows up. Regards, Kim ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] clamav 0.95.2
Axel Thimm wrote: Hi, On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 08:01:58PM +0200, Kim Bisgaard wrote: Hi, Could we please have a version update clamav to version 0.95.2 - according to http://www.h-online.com/security/Clam-AV-update-fixes-archive-bug--/news/113556 there are security fixes in the upgrade. I do not send a spec file as the previous spec builds just fine by just updating the version number. Thanks for pinging, I had queued it into the build system some time ago after reading this mail, but I forgot to answer it. :/ Yes I saw the update - thanks for all the good work you do 8-) ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
Re: [ATrpms-devel] clamav 0.95.1
Axel Thimm wrote: Hi, On Thu, Apr 09, 2009 at 11:14:52AM +0200, Kim Bisgaard wrote: I have updated clamav to the newest version, and added the clamdtop executable to the spec file. Hope this is of interest for others. sorry for the late reply, No problemo! as you hopefully noticed I had submitted this shortly after your post, thanks! Thank YOU! Regards, Kim ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
[ATrpms-devel] new spec file for nvidia-grapthics180.18
This is the beta version with libvdpau in it - definitely bleeding.
I have removed a uninstall command and added include and libraries for
vdpau, otherwise it a 177.80 spec file.
There is also a 177.82 upgrade on nvidias site, but since its just to
update the spec's version I have not included it here.
Thanks,
Kim
%define NVversion 180.18
%define NVIDIArelease %(echo %{NVversion} | sed -e's,1.0-,,')
%define NVfolder nvidia-graphics-%{NVversion}
%define NVmodule nvidia-%(echo %{NVversion} | sed -e's,\\.,_,g')
%kmdl nvidia-graphics%{NVIDIArelease}
%define hastls %(test -e /%{_lib}/tls echo 1 || echo 0)
Summary: NVIDIA Linux Display Driver
Name: nvidia-graphics%{NVIDIArelease}
Version: %(echo %{NVversion} | sed -e's,-,_,')
Release: 103.1%{?dist}
Epoch: 1
License: NVIDIA, distributable
Group: User Interface/X Hardware Support
Source0:
ftp://download.nvidia.com/XFree86/Linux-x86/%{NVversion}/NVIDIA-Linux-x86-%{NVversion}-pkg0.run
Source1:
ftp://download.nvidia.com/XFree86/Linux-x86_64/%{NVversion}/NVIDIA-Linux-x86_64-%{NVversion}-pkg0.run
Patch0: NVIDIA_kernel-1.0-9625-NOSMBUS.diff.txt
#Patch1: patch-nv-1.0-9625-xenrt.txt
#Patch2: NVIDIA_kernel-169.12-2286310.diff.txt
URL: http://www.nvidia.com/object/linux_display_ia32_%{NVversion}
BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-buildroot
BuildRequires: fakeroot, /sbin/modprobe, nvidia-graphics-helpers = 0.0.18
BuildRequires: %{_x_module_path}
ExclusiveArch: %ix86 x86_64
Requires: %{name}-libs = %{evr}
%kmdl_parentdependencies
Requires: python2, pyxf86config = 0.3.5
Requires(post): nvidia-graphics-helpers
%description
The NVIDIA Accelerated Linux Driver Set brings both accelerated 2D
functionality and high performance OpenGL support to Linux x86 with
the use of NVIDIA graphics processing units (GPUs).
These drivers provide optimized hardware acceleration of OpenGL
applications via a direct-rendering X Server and support nearly all
NVIDIA graphics chips. TwinView, TV-Out and flat panel displays are
also supported.
This package includes NVIDIA module for X11 and OpenGL libraries.
Older RIVA 128 based video cards are supported by the server module
shipping with xorg/XFree86, nv_drv.o.
You must also install a matching %kmdl_namepure rpm, if you want to
utilize these drivers.
Add
ModulePath %{_x_module_path}/extensions/nvidia
ModulePath %{_x_module_path}/extensions
ModulePath %{_x_module_path}
to `Section Files' in the config file and remove/comment the dri module.
%package libs
Summary: Libraries for nvidia-graphics chips
Group: System Environment/Libraries
%description libs
The NVIDIA Accelerated Linux Driver Set brings both accelerated 2D
functionality and high performance OpenGL support to Linux x86 with
the use of NVIDIA graphics processing units (GPUs).
This package contains runtime libraries for NVIDIA GPUs.
%package devel
Summary: Development files for nvidia-graphics chips
Group: Development/Libraries
Requires: %{name}-libs = %{evr}
%description devel
The NVIDIA Accelerated Linux Driver Set brings both accelerated 2D
functionality and high performance OpenGL support to Linux x86 with
the use of NVIDIA graphics processing units (GPUs).
This package contains files necessary for developing for NVIDIA GPUs.
%package -n %kmdl_name
%kmdl_dependencies
Summary: Kernel module for NVIDIA graphics architecture support
Group: System Environment/Kernel
Requires: nvidia-graphics-devices
%description -n %kmdl_name
NVIDIA Architecture support for systems with updated or custom kernels.
%kmdl_desc
%prep
%setup -q -c -T
%ifarch %ix86
sh %{SOURCE0} --extract-only
%else
sh %{SOURCE1} --extract-only
%endif
mv NVIDIA-Linux-*-%{NVversion}*/{*,.??*} .
rmdir NVIDIA-Linux-*-%{NVversion}*
%patch0 -p0
#cd usr/src/nv
#patch1 -p1
#cd ../../../
#patch2 -p0
%define installpath %{kmdl_moduledir}/drivers/video/nvidia
%install
rm -rf %{buildroot}
mkdir -p %{buildroot}
fakebin=`pwd`/fakebin
mkdir $fakebin
PATH=%{_libexecdir}/nvidia-graphics-helpers:$PATH
export PATH
%if %{kmdl_userland}
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=%{buildroot}%{_libdir} fakeroot \
./nvidia-installer -s -N -e -b \
--no-runlevel-check \
--no-rpms \
--no-x-check \
--utility-prefix=%{buildroot}%{_prefix} \
--documentation-prefix=%{buildroot}%{_prefix} \
--x-prefix=%{buildroot}%{_x_prefix} \
--x-library-path=%{buildroot}%{_x_libraries} \
--x-module-path=%{buildroot}%{_x_module_path} \
--opengl-prefix=%{buildroot}%{_prefix} \
--log-file-name=user.log \
--no-kernel-module \
success=yes
cat user.log
cat /tmp/fakebin.log
test -z $success exit 1
# remove embedded destination dir
sed -i -es,%{buildroot},,g \
%{buildroot}%{_prefix}/share/applications/nvidia-settings.desktop \
%{buildroot}%{_libdir}/libGL.la
# copy png for desktop file
mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/pixmaps
cp -a %{buildroot}%{_prefix}/share/doc/NVIDIA_GLX-1.0/nvidia-settings.png \
%{buildroot}%{_datadir}/pixmaps
sed -i
Re: [ATrpms-devel] mythmusic 196 broke
Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: error: failed to stat /home/roma/lufs/atrpms: Permission denied Preparing... ### [100%] 1:mythmusic ### [100%] error: unpacking of archive failed on file /usr/lib64/mythtv/plugins/libmythmusic.so;49316ce1: cpio: MD5 sum mismatch I have downloaded it twice, with equal results ... Which distro? Worked fine for me on f8. regards, Kim ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
[ATrpms-devel] nvidia-graphics173.14.09
Hi, I am trying to change the 173.14.05 specfile into a 173.14.09, but I get: + fakebin=/home/kim/rpm/BUILD/nvidia-graphics173.14.09-173.14.09/fakebin + mkdir /home/kim/rpm/BUILD/nvidia-graphics173.14.09-173.14.09/fakebin + PATH=/usr/libexec/nvidia-graphics-helpers:/usr/kerberos/bin:/usr/local/bin:/bin:/usr/bin:/home/kim/bin + export PATH + LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/kim/rpm/tmp/nvidia-graphics173.14.09-173.14.09-98.1.fc8-buildroot/usr/lib + fakeroot ./nvidia-installer -s -N -e -b --no-runlevel-check --no-rpms --no-x-check --utility-prefix=/home/kim/rpm/tmp/nvidia-graphics173.14.09-173.14.09-98.1.fc8-buildroot/usr --documentation-prefix=/home/kim/rpm/tmp/nvidia-graphics173.14.09-173.14.09-98.1.fc8-buildroot/usr --x-prefix=/home/kim/rpm/tmp/nvidia-graphics173.14.09-173.14.09-98.1.fc8-buildroot/usr --x-library-path=/home/kim/rpm/tmp/nvidia-graphics173.14.09-173.14.09-98.1.fc8-buildroot/usr/lib --x-module-path=/home/kim/rpm/tmp/nvidia-graphics173.14.09-173.14.09-98.1.fc8-buildroot/usr/lib/xorg/modules --opengl-prefix=/home/kim/rpm/tmp/nvidia-graphics173.14.09-173.14.09-98.1.fc8-buildroot/usr --log-file-name=user.log --no-kernel-module WARNING: You specified the '--no-kernel-module' command line option, nvidia-installer will not install a kernel module as part of this driver installation, and it will not remove existing NVIDIA kernel modules not part of an earlier NVIDIA driver installation. Please ensure that an NVIDIA kernel module matching this driver version is installed seperately. ERROR: Failure creating directory '/var/lib/nvidia': (Permission denied) ERROR: Installation has failed. Please see the file 'user.log' for details. You may find suggestions on fixing installation problems in the README available on the Linux driver download page at www.nvidia.com. Do I really need to build the rpm as root, when it using fakeroot? TIA, Kim ___ atrpms-devel mailing list atrpms-devel@atrpms.net http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
