Re: Microsoft's Surface Book VS. Apple's MacBook Pro 2016
Re: Microsoft's Surface Book VS. Apple's MacBook Pro 2016 I think surface book wins in my opinion, so I will purchase it, with Surface studio as my Intel I7's computer replacement. URL: http://forum.audiogames.net/viewtopic.php?pid=286597#p286597 ___ Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/audiogames-reflector
Re: Microsoft's Surface Book VS. Apple's MacBook Pro 2016
Re: Microsoft's Surface Book VS. Apple's MacBook Pro 2016 Well, I guess one reason for not providing a touchscreen is because of the already existent multitouch, now force-touch, trackpad. But I agree, a bigger dedicated screen would've been nice. As for the touchbar, well, that's an innovation, but Apple's going too far into the future and leaving the present behind. That's always a trend. Usbc was a bad move, due to how quickly they moved to it as if usb was nothing. And with magsafe gone, gone are the days where you can freely trip on a powercord without bringing the mac to the ground. I actually would've taken a mac with no headphone jack over a mac without the magnet cord, as there are 0-latency usb soundcards for headphones. URL: http://forum.audiogames.net/viewtopic.php?pid=286601#p286601 ___ Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/audiogames-reflector
Re: Microsoft's Surface Book VS. Apple's MacBook Pro 2016
Re: Microsoft's Surface Book VS. Apple's MacBook Pro 2016 Hi,Surface all the way for me.I got to play with a 2014 air running windows. Right next to that was a surface 3 pro (not the 4).The air ran hotter (and I mean, when the processor was maxed out you could hardly touch the computer). Installing max fan control helped a bit, but I shouldn't have to do that on a $1800 computer.The surface pro 3, on the other hand, ran cool, silent and was a joy to use. The pain of installing windows on mac now is yet one more reason to go surface, especially if you bootcamp a lot. Older macs have it easy - newer not so much.With the new macs out now, the touch bar may be usable under mac but windows will be a lot more difficult. Gone are the days where you can find f3 with a finger. You're only point of reference will be the number keys and moving your finger up from there, which is just all kinds of horrible at best, especially for alt f4. Productivity will go down by 75% unless we somehow figure a method out.Don't factor out the surface pro 4. Though it doesn't have a dedicated dock, the cover is super nice to type on and it still gets decent batterylife. Of course if you're wanting the power of discrete graphics, go with the surface book but for what 99% of people do, the pro will do you just fine and price wise it's the way to go.After all that, I own a dell inspiron 13. Absolutely love it. i7, 12 gb ram, and512 gb ssd. With accident protection and warranty for 4 years, 13% tax here in Canada I still managed to get it for $1800. The surface pro, let alone the surface book, was $400 more than this dell and that didn't include warranty of any kind for the same specs - or at least, close enough to the same.Don't get me started on apples need of USB c now, too. On a computer starting at $1000 and coming with no adapters for anything is just ridiculous. Plus it just looks stupid - having to use a dongle to plug a simple USB cable into your comp uter is laughable, but that's just me.And there you go. My observations. URL: http://forum.audiogames.net/viewtopic.php?pid=286640#p286640 ___ Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/audiogames-reflector
Re: Microsoft's Surface Book VS. Apple's MacBook Pro 2016
Re: Microsoft's Surface Book VS. Apple's MacBook Pro 2016 I grabbed a 2015 macbook air, so i'm good in the mac department. I still would like a better windows machine, because the laptop i have is pushing 6 years old now. The surface book would probably be a good option, have to check one out. Also the surface pro 4 with type cover would work for me as well. URL: http://forum.audiogames.net/viewtopic.php?pid=286660#p286660 ___ Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/audiogames-reflector
Re: Microsoft's Surface Book VS. Apple's MacBook Pro 2016
Re: Microsoft's Surface Book VS. Apple's MacBook Pro 2016 Jack, you brought up another good point I neglected to include -- the introduction of the USB-C ports and the removal of MagSafe power adapters. Two more reasons to add to the list why I'm thankful for getting my MBP when I did.What I like about the Surface Book is that it models after the MBP, where you can configure the machine to your needs. Correct me if I'm wrong, but the previous Surface Pro series didn't offer as many customizable specs like RAM and CPU power.Is it me, or is the fact that it's made specifically by MS assuring? If a company can produce the hardware and OS for a product they sell, I would almost expect it to live up to the awesome claims MS makes about it.16 hours seems generous, but as always battery life varries depending on what activities you are performing.Best,Luke URL: http://forum.audiogames.net/viewtopic.php?pid=286667#p286667 ___ Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/audiogames-reflector
Re: Microsoft's Surface Book VS. Apple's MacBook Pro 2016
Re: Microsoft's Surface Book VS. Apple's MacBook Pro 2016 All valid points on the ports. Alright, 2 usb ports on the mbp2015's a nuisance, but getting a usb hub solves that problem as long as it's high-powered. But Apple should not have gone usbc without providing hardware manufacturers plenty of warning, and by plenty I mean a few solid years, to transfer. What Apple is doing with Usb is what Microsoft did with Vista. Taking hardware manufacturers by surprise. Manufacturers are as ill prepared for the usbc embrace as they were with Vista's demands. And like I said, I'd be more than happy to take a mac without an audio port, since you can get a basic usb soundcard with input and output ports for next to nothing. But magsafe is one of the things that Apple would dis pc manufacturers about, so now they're turning away from that? Apple's starting to go downhill. I'm holdin on to my mbp2015. It should still get a few solid years of updating. As for touch id, I could probably get a biometric device to do the same thing. URL: http://forum.audiogames.net/viewtopic.php?pid=286707#p286707 ___ Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/audiogames-reflector
Re: Microsoft's Surface Book VS. Apple's MacBook Pro 2016
Re: Microsoft's Surface Book VS. Apple's MacBook Pro 2016 I fully agree. I personally don't use any more than two USB-powered devices at once, but I can understand the inconvenience of being confined to just two ports. I'm not too impressed with the touch ID capability, but it's a nice added feature. I definitely will consider upgrading a Mac when 1. I need to, and 2. the MBP is actually worth investing money into.Best,Luke URL: http://forum.audiogames.net/viewtopic.php?pid=286920#p286920 ___ Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/audiogames-reflector
Re: Microsoft's Surface Book VS. Apple's MacBook Pro 2016
Re: Microsoft's Surface Book VS. Apple's MacBook Pro 2016 Apple's and oranges, pun absolutely intended. This is as good a comparison as any. For horsepower you need a 15-inch MacBook Pro, but on the other hand, it's not really clear to me why you'd buy surface when the market has so many other competitors at lower prices unless you really want the tripped-out Microsoft experience (TM). One only hopes that they do a better job with this than with the last Surface Book which had horrible power-management issues. And, of course, there's the small matter of Windows 10 ...I too am very, very happy I have the latest 15-inch 2015 MacBook Pro. I would not be interested in the Surface Pro original because it is dead-weight and very hard to lap. URL: http://forum.audiogames.net/viewtopic.php?pid=287584#p287584 ___ Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/audiogames-reflector
Re: Microsoft's Surface Book VS. Apple's MacBook Pro 2016
Re: Microsoft's Surface Book VS. Apple's MacBook Pro 2016 Slow OS X performance generally means it's time for a clean install. At the very least try an NVRAM reset (Command-Option-P-R at boot until it chimes thrice). My Mac Mini 2010 with HD and 8 GB RAM is doing fine under Sierra although I use it for running Windows XP nowadays.My beef with Win10 is less about the OS (I use 8.1) but privacy. I don't like the direction MS are going in at all. I'll take another look at Win10 when M$ aren't snooping and I have complete control over what gets sent and when. Yeah, even with the bugs in macOS creeping up to insane levels, I'd still rather be two releases behind than on Win10. Maybe one day I will surrender, but not yet ... URL: http://forum.audiogames.net/viewtopic.php?pid=287596#p287596 ___ Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/audiogames-reflector
Re: Microsoft's Surface Book VS. Apple's MacBook Pro 2016
Re: Microsoft's Surface Book VS. Apple's MacBook Pro 2016 Slow OS X performance generally means it's time for a clean install. At the very least try an NVRAM reset (Command-Option-P-R at boot until it chimes thrice). My Mac Mini 2010 with HD and 8 GB RAM is doing fine under Sierra although I use it for running Windows XP nowadays.My beef with Win10 is less about the OS (I use 8.1) but privacy. I don't like the direction MS are going in at all. I'll take another look at Win10 when M$ aren't snooping and I have complete control over what gets sent and when. Yeah, even with the bugs in macOS creeping up to insane levels, I'd still rather be two releases behind than on Win10. Maybe one day I will surrender, but not yet ...Doh: missed the bit there about a "fresh" install. But at least try the NVRAM reset. Sierra bumped up the requirements a lot but it still shouldn't take minutes to open Finder or whatever. But yes I agree, Windows is a great way to use a Mac once Apple give up on it. URL: http://forum.audiogames.net/viewtopic.php?pid=287596#p287596 ___ Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/audiogames-reflector
Re: Microsoft's Surface Book VS. Apple's MacBook Pro 2016
Re: Microsoft's Surface Book VS. Apple's MacBook Pro 2016 Slow OS X performance generally means it's time for a clean install. At the very least try an NVRAM reset (Command-Option-P-R at boot until it chimes thrice). My Mac Mini 2010 with HD and 8 GB RAM is doing fine under Sierra although I use it for running Windows XP nowadays.My beef with Win10 is less about the OS (I use 8.1) but privacy. I don't like the direction MS are going in at all. I'll take another look at Win10 when M$ aren't snooping and I have complete control over what gets sent and when. Yeah, even with the bugs in macOS creeping up to insane levels, I'd still rather be two releases behind than on Win10. Maybe one day I will surrender, but not yet ...Edit: Doh, missed the bit there about a "fresh" install. But at least try the NVRAM reset. Sierra bumped up the requirements a lot but it still shouldn't take minutes to open Finder or whatever. But yes I agree, Windows is a great way to use a Mac once Apple give up on i t. URL: http://forum.audiogames.net/viewtopic.php?pid=287596#p287596 ___ Audiogames-reflector mailing list Audiogames-reflector@sabahattin-gucukoglu.com https://sabahattin-gucukoglu.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/audiogames-reflector