Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] external DAC could someone suggest anything?

2007-06-30 Thread signor_rossi

Pat Farrell;211596 Wrote: 
 
 
 First, I'd listen to it for a month or two, and see if you really like
 it. If you are happy, you are done.
 

I second that. I somewhat prematurely (I am new to all this and had
some misconceptions and my amp-speaker combination is new too) bought
an external DAC myself, a Beresford, one of the cheapest DACs you can
get. ;)
To my ears the Beresford isn't better nor worse than the SB3 internal
DAC and so far I really have heard differences only in a few tracks. To
come to the point, my view now is that I wouldn't have needed the
Beresford for my needs, since the SB3 with it and the analog outs of
the SB3 alone sound both very similiar and very good IMO.
My amp is an Cambridge Audio 540Av2, speakers are Mordaunt Short 904i.

Bye, signor_rossi.


-- 
signor_rossi

signor_rossi's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=11941
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=36480

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] NAD 3020 variants

2007-06-30 Thread david68

swhite58;211519 Wrote: 
 I'm looking for a cheap used amp to replace my aging (and dying) Luxman
 L4.  I don't want to spend much money as I'm saving up to buy myself
 some more serious gear for my 50th birthday next year. I thought what
 about an old NAD?
 
 Currently, there are three different NAD 3020's for sale on eBay
 Australia: 
 3020e
 3020i
 3020 series 20
 
 They'll probably sell for a similar price.
 
 Doesd anyone know whether there are any significant differences between
 them?Why don't you look at the 3130's as well. Very similar presentation to
the 3020, but with a little more power. I believe they were very highly
thought of too.


-- 
david68

david68's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=12107
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=36468

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] external DAC could someone suggest anything?

2007-06-30 Thread bmclaurin

The Lavry DA10 I'm using is stunning and works great with the SB3. But
it's expensive at close to $1k US. The SB3 is a wonderful transport
device, but it isn't an audiophile grade source. I personally love the
flexibility that the combination of SB3 and external DAC gives me. And
the Lavry is world class if you can stomach the price of admission.


-- 
bmclaurin

bmclaurin's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=12183
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=36480

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Where to buy a Lavry Black

2007-06-30 Thread bmclaurin

ErikM;211195 Wrote: 
 Atlas Pro Audiohttp://www.atlasproaudio.com/  Just got mine $975.00
 free shipping and a free T-shirt :-)

x2

Atlas was great. Free, quick shipping, and yes, even a T-shirt.


-- 
bmclaurin

bmclaurin's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=12183
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=36369

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] external DAC could someone suggest anything?

2007-06-30 Thread zanash

Short tale 

I bought a behringer src 2496...as it was so cheap approx £90..with a
little effort I made a number of simple standard mods ..damped the case
fitted schottky diodes swapped the psu caps for panna fc's .

Anyway I took this over to a chap with a mk1 benchmark dac1..to cut the
story short he was gobsmacked at the src not only did thourghly spank
the benchmark it put it to bed with no supper. He sold the dac1 for
about £700 bought a src and I modded it total cost of about £250 tops
..then spent the rest on music ...


-- 
zanash

zanash's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=12157
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=36480

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] NAD 3020 variants

2007-06-30 Thread zanash

the sonic t is not up with the 3020b  in power terms but it has
imaging to die for ..if you have 100 db sensitiviety speakers you could
give it a go...if not the nads great ...I've got both


-- 
zanash

zanash's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=12157
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=36468

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Lite AH DAC (modded), SB3, dedicated 5v linear p/s

2007-06-30 Thread zanash

I agree there should be a classified .would stop people posting in
the wrong sections ?


-- 
zanash

zanash's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=12157
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=36454

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Nice feature on why modern music sounds bad

2007-06-30 Thread Mark Lanctot

Nostromo;211622 Wrote: 
 I see... But is there a master list of problem CD's?

More or less all of them released since 2000, and a significant
proportion of them since 1995 or so.


-- 
Mark Lanctot

'Sean Adams' Response-O-Matic checklist, patent pending!'
(http://forums.slimdevices.com/showpost.php?p=200910postcount=2)

Mark Lanctot's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2071
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=36476

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Here is why no FF/RW

2007-06-30 Thread lanierb

Thanks to Sean for the detailed explanation as to why ff/rw can't be
implemented as it is in a CD player.  However, add me to the list of
people that thinks ff/rw should be done differently than it is
currently.  The current implementation essentially doesn't work (at
least not for me -- I use mostly FLAC).  

I would much prefer a solution that does the following: ff: jump
forward about 30 seconds (it doesn't matter if it's not exactly 30
seconds), rwd: jump backward about 10 seconds.  This would be very
useful and I'm guessing it could be implemented easily.

Right now I use songscanner plugin and I'm reasonably happy with that.


-- 
lanierb

lanierb's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=5566
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=36446

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Here is why no FF/RW

2007-06-30 Thread peterw

flipflip;211357 Wrote: 
 the need for jumping forward and backward in a stream is critical to
 me. I listen to lots of podcasts (downloaded separately [1]) and audio
 books (e.g. language courses). And in this case I need to skip
 backwards a few seconds all the time to listen to a sentence I did not
 understand again. And here the FW/RW which is available is not
 suitable.
 
 So I wrote a small plugin that offers a function to skip forward or
 backward a certain amount of time [2] and mapped that function to
 buttons I don't need otherwise. This works great, apart from the
 playtime display which gets out of sync and the inaccuracy of the
 skipping, but that doesn't bother me.
 
 [2] http://oinkzwurgl.org/skipper

Have you looked at the Song Scanner plugin? Like lanierb, I've been
using Song Scanner to move through longer recordings like podcasts and
radio shows. One reason I mention this is that Song Scanner doesn't
seem to cause problems with the playtime display.

I think your skip forward/back sounds really good. That's something
I've become accustomed to having for video recordings with my MythTV
setup, and I think it'd be nice on the Squeezebox.

While I've said before that I think the overloaded/modal button
behavior is problematic, I wonder about an intelligent all-software (no
map file edit) solution like a plugin that would provide two modes for
Fwd/Rew: jumping seconds forward/back within a track; and skipping
to the beginning/end of tracks (current behavior). Default behavior
would be that jumping would require you to press some button on the
remote like Now Playing and then within a second or so, press Fwd or
Rew to jump. Subsequent Fwd/Rew presses (within the 1 second of the
last Fwd/Rew/Now Playing press) would be interpreted as jump. The
plugin should allow users 
1) the ability to reverse the behavior (i.e, treat plain Fwd/Rew as
Jump, and require a Now Playing button press to get the Skip behavior
that the buttons have out-of-the-box now)
2) the ability to have the plugin always treat Fwd/Rew as Jump if
there's only one item in the playlist, since Skip only makes sense with
multiple items in the playlist (my typical podcast usage; probably not
as helpful for language lessons where you probably queue up multiple
tracks)
3) the ability to specify how many seconds to jump, and allow
different Fwd and Rew timings (normally I'd expect Fwd to jump more
seconds than Rew)

-Peter

P.S. I don't use the built-in podcast support, either. I've been much
happier setting up a third-party app to download selected podcasts to
my Slimserver music directory.


-- 
peterw

http://www.tux.org/~peterw/
free plugins: http://www.tux.org/~peterw/#slim
BlankSaver BottleRocket FuzzyTime SaverSwitcher SleepFade StatusFirst
VolumeLock

peterw's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2107
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=36446

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] NAD 3020 variants

2007-06-30 Thread swhite58

david68;211678 Wrote: 
 Why don't you look at the 3130's as well. Very similar presentation to
 the 3020, but with a little more power. I believe they were very highly
 thought of too.

Funny you should say that - now I'm bidding for a 3140


-- 
swhite58

Clark Connect Linux file server-SB3-Luxman L4-Gale
speakers/Sennheiser headphones

swhite58's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=5038
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=36468

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Nice feature on why modern music sounds bad

2007-06-30 Thread Mark Lanctot

RG can't be used on a CD.

But yes, this is exactly what RG is meant to combat.

Unfortunately if the waveforms are clipped flat right on the CD,
there's nothing RG can do about that.  That data is gone forever.


-- 
Mark Lanctot

'Sean Adams' Response-O-Matic checklist, patent pending!'
(http://forums.slimdevices.com/showpost.php?p=200910postcount=2)

Mark Lanctot's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2071
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=36476

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Nice feature on why modern music sounds bad

2007-06-30 Thread Nostromo

Mark Lanctot;211712 Wrote: 
 RG can't be used on a CD.

Absolutely impossible or technically impossible right now?  

 But yes, this is exactly what RG is meant to combat.
 
 Unfortunately if the waveforms are clipped flat right on the CD,
 there's nothing RG can do about that.  That data is gone forever.

But if something like RG was made universal, it would put an end to the
loudness war era. Of course, the music made during the loudness war era
would still sound bad.


-- 
Nostromo

Nostromo's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=6322
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=36476

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Nice feature on why modern music sounds bad

2007-06-30 Thread Mark Lanctot

Nostromo;211716 Wrote: 
 Absolutely impossible or technically impossible right now?

It's not defined as a CD standard.  It's not impossible, look at all
the extra data they can fit on a CD.  But it's not part of the
standard.

Besides, it would be better to get them to stop doing this stupid stuff
in the first place.  If they won't stop that, why would they ever put RG
correction data on the CD?


-- 
Mark Lanctot

'Sean Adams' Response-O-Matic checklist, patent pending!'
(http://forums.slimdevices.com/showpost.php?p=200910postcount=2)

Mark Lanctot's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2071
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=36476

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Nice feature on why modern music sounds bad

2007-06-30 Thread Pat Farrell
Nostromo wrote:
 Mark Lanctot;211712 Wrote: 
 RG can't be used on a CD.
 
 Absolutely impossible or technically impossible right now?  

Nothing is absolutely impossible.
But, and its a big but, the CD is dead. The RedBook spec is 25 years old
and is not going to be changed. SACD and DVD-A were supposed to be the 
audiophile solution to CD's limitations, and they have failed.

 But if something like RG was made universal, it would put an end to the
 loudness war era. Of course, the music made during the loudness war era
 would still sound bad.

And this means all pop/rock/alt/emo/... music in the past decade or 
more. In theory, they could be remastered from the original tapes, but
there is no reason to expect that. Only a tiny number of CDs sell enough 
to get a second printing, let alone remastering.


-- 
Pat
http://www.pfarrell.com/music/slimserver/slimsoftware.html

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Nice feature on why modern music sounds bad

2007-06-30 Thread Toby Dickenson
Mark Lanctot wrote:

 Besides, it would be better to get them to stop doing this stupid stuff
 in the first place.  If they won't stop that, why would they ever put RG
 correction data on the CD?

And it is even less likely that they would put a *correct* RG value in
there. it would just be another opportunity to make the music EVEN
LOUDER.

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Nice feature on why modern music sounds bad

2007-06-30 Thread Nostromo

The CD player couldn't scan the tracks on the CD, give them a Replay
Gain value and then store it on the CD player itself?

Anyway, like pfarrell pointed out, the CD is dying.


-- 
Nostromo

Nostromo's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=6322
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=36476

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Nice feature on why modern music sounds bad

2007-06-30 Thread peterw

Mark Lanctot;211718 Wrote: 
 Besides, it would be better to get them to stop doing this stupid stuff
 in the first place.  If they won't stop that, why would they ever put
 RG correction data on the CD?

They would add RG values indicating that amplification was needed --
and still compress the dynamic range, because music with RG
amplification *and* compressed dynamics would sound louder (and, in
noisy environments, *better*) than music that only had RG
amplification. If CD players started reading  using RG data on audio
CDs, the problem would only get worse.

It would be much better for audio standards to include compression
recommendations. Record full-range tracks on the CD and use metadata to
indicate the recommended amount of dynamic range compression. And add
compression controls to music players that could be applied to music
that lacked compression metadata so they can make full-range music
sound better in worse listening environments. It's a shame that Sony 
Philips didn't build this into the audio CD standard from the get-go --
I don't know if they failed to foresee the problem, or if this seemed
unthinkably demanding on the 1980s era playback gear.

-Peter


-- 
peterw

http://www.tux.org/~peterw/
free plugins: http://www.tux.org/~peterw/#slim
BlankSaver BottleRocket FuzzyTime SaverSwitcher SleepFade StatusFirst
VolumeLock

peterw's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2107
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=36476

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Nice feature on why modern music sounds bad

2007-06-30 Thread Mark Lanctot

Nostromo;211727 Wrote: 
 The CD player couldn't scan the tracks on the CD, give them a Replay
 Gain value and then store it on the CD player itself?

That would need one helluva CD player.  And don't forget, aside from us
crazies, this isn't seen as a problem.  The labels are doing this quite
on purpose and think it's a good thing.


-- 
Mark Lanctot

'Sean Adams' Response-O-Matic checklist, patent pending!'
(http://forums.slimdevices.com/showpost.php?p=200910postcount=2)

Mark Lanctot's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2071
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=36476

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] First shot at using Inguz

2007-06-30 Thread tingtong5

After buying a decent sound card I get good measurements now and am
enjoying a proper working room correction now, which really is a huge
improvement over non-corrected sound :-

I am a happy guy :)


-- 
tingtong5

tingtong5's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=9671
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=35615

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] SB3 Internal Power Supply Circuit Questions

2007-06-30 Thread S-Man

I already have a 5V linear regulated supply in place of the walwart and
am pleased with the improvement to the sound. The next step would seem
to be to provide a well filtered 14VDC for the linear regs that supply
the analogue stages.

Question 1:
Does the switcher that normally supplies the 14VDC need a minimum load
to function properly? The analogue stage uses approx 20mA.

Question 2:
The digital side of the DAC runs off 3V3 supplied by a switching PSU.
Is there much/any benefit to be gained by using a linear PSU instead?
Sean Adams suggested the possibility of using the headphone amp's 3V3
supply in an old thread.


-- 
S-Man

S-Man's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=9593
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=36495

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] prefered listening position a or b ? - hope it make sence

2007-06-30 Thread fast eddie

What is the preferred listening position:

a:speakers either side but in front of me

spkr...spkr



me

b: speakers either side of me and in straight line

spkrme.spkr


-- 
fast eddie

fast eddie's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=7826
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=36496

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] prefered listening position a or b ? - hope it make sence

2007-06-30 Thread Phil Leigh

A.
That is what the engineer who mastered the CD did...


-- 
Phil Leigh

You want to see the signal path BEFORE it gets onto a CD/vinyl...it
ain't what you'd call minimal...

...SB3+TACT+Altmann+MF DACXV3/Linn tri-amped Aktiv 5.1 system and some
very expensive cables ;o)

Phil Leigh's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=85
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=36496

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Nice feature on why modern music sounds bad

2007-06-30 Thread mlsstl

Even if a RG standard were adopted that still doesn't fix all the badly
mastered CDs already there. 

Think of it as being served a scrambled egg and wishing you had poached
instead. Just as the egg can't be unscrambled, a distorted compressed CD
with clipped signals can't be restored.

A good example in the past would be the many LP records recorded in the
70's when one of the fads at that time on many rock records were poorly
recorded, muffled drums and bass. It certainly wasn't a technical issue
as there were recordings that got those right.

Then, like today, I suspect the producers are far more concerned how
their stuff sounds to the mass market listeners than whether they've
produced a quality audio product.


-- 
mlsstl

mlsstl's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=9598
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=36476

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] prefered listening position a or b ? - hope it make sence

2007-06-30 Thread adamslim

A is also what makes sense from a psychoacoustical perspective.  The
music should be 'over there' while I am 'over here'.  Having the centre
of the image away from the listener therefore makes sense.  Unless you
are listening to recordings of yourself, I guess, or are an
irrepressable egomaniac... :)


-- 
adamslim

Those are my principles, and if you don't like them... well, I have
others

http://www.last.fm/user/AdamSlim/
'Last.fm group: people who don't listen to any of last.fm's top
artists'
(http://www.last.fm/group/People+who+don%27t+listen+to+any+of+last.fm%27s+top+artists)

SB+, EAR 859, Living Voice Auditorium II plus some other stuff
SB3, Shek d2, Ming-Da MC84-C, Harbeth HL-P3ES

adamslim's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=7355
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=36496

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Nice feature on why modern music sounds bad

2007-06-30 Thread Timothy Stockman

Pat Farrell;211600 Wrote: 
 It is purely a myth that louder CDs get more airplay and thus more
 sales.
 
 What it does is suck all the life out of the music.
 
 And it destroys the hard work of the recording and mastering engineers.
 
 Why sweat to make it right to have some bozo crank up the compressor at
 
 the end? Its very disheartening.
 
 What is really sad is that *all* radio stations have their own 
 compressors to wack the music and suck the life out of it.
20 years or so ago, I was the engineer at one of those radio stations. 
For maybe a couple years, I did a pretty good job of staying clear of
the loudness war.  But, finally the management told me I must make our
station the loudest in town.  Talk about disheartening.  All the work
I'd put into tweaking on the equipment to get it to sound the best it
could was now wasted; the audio processing shredded it right before the
transmitter.  I resigned shortly after cranking up the processing.


-- 
Timothy Stockman

Timothy Stockman's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=8867
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=36476

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] *Cheap* 2-Channel Receiver for SB3

2007-06-30 Thread parfour7th

Hi,

I need to power two speakers on my deck.  Looking for an inexpensive
receiver to put between my SB3 and the two speakers.  Budget is $200 or
less.

Thanks,

Chris


-- 
parfour7th

parfour7th's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=11289
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=36501

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] *Cheap* 2-Channel Receiver for SB3

2007-06-30 Thread vdonovan

http://www.si5.com/products.php?pID=4004

Works best with high-efficiency speakers


-- 
vdonovan

vdonovan's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=11536
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=36501

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] *Cheap* 2-Channel Receiver for SB3

2007-06-30 Thread Pale Blue Ego

Yup.  The T-amp will sound a lot better than a cheapo 100-watt
receiver.


-- 
Pale Blue Ego

Pale Blue Ego's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=110
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=36501

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/audiophiles