Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Transporter Review in TAS

2009-05-18 Thread agentsmith

Anne;422791 Wrote: 
 http://stereophile.com/mediaservers/207slim/  this is over 2 years
 old...did it ever get a bad review?

Actually, yes.  There was an extremely biased and carelessly written
review from audioenz.com, highlighting only on how operating the
Transporter is as difficult as learning a new instrument, and that it
sounds good, but a Airport express+DAC is just as good for less money. 
Both highly untrue of course as I used an Airport Express with Lavry and
benchmark DAC before and none of them came close to the Transporter.


-- 
agentsmith

System 1: Transporter+Hi-Line RCA-DIN, Naim
202/200/Hicap+Powerline/NAPSC, Harbeth Monitor 30
System 2: SB2 or Airport Express connected via TOSLINK to a Meridian
F80
Headphone: Naim Headline+NAPSC and ancient Senn HD580

agentsmith's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=1838
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=63161

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Power supply DAC for my SB3 - recommendations?

2009-05-18 Thread Uluen

Another vote for the 'Beresford TC-7520 DAC'
(http://www.beresford.me/UK/Stereo_Audio_Digital_to_Analogue_Converter_USB2FCOAX2FTOSLINK.html)
. The headphone amp might even be better than the one you've got.

You'll get your money back if you're not satisfied IIRC.


-- 
Uluen

SYSTEM: MUSIC - EARS
http://www.last.fm/user/Uluen

Uluen's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=12166
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=63349

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Break-in period for Transporter?

2009-05-18 Thread darrenyeats

dekaliber;424233 Wrote: 
 Thanks for the replies, all.  After a weekend that involved a good bit
 of listening, I'm really not sure I can pick out a real difference in
 sound quality between the two players.
 
 A lot of my initial impressions before level matching them were
 extremely biased by loudness.  As it turns out, the Transporter is about
 1 dB louder that the SB3 at fixed output.  The CI DAC is 1.5 dB louder
 than the SB3.  Both of these units sounded pronouncedly better until I
 level matched them using pink noise and an SPL meter, after which they
 all pretty much sounded the same.  (There's a more noticeable difference
 between the CI unit and the two Slim Devices units, but it's still
 pretty subtle.) 
 
 Don't get me wrong, it sounds wonderful, and I almost wouldn't mind
 buying one just to know that I have pretty darn close to the best that
 money can buy (I expect there might be a few in here that will take
 issue with that claim, but I'm not about to drop 5 figures on any single
 piece of audio gear anytime soon).  Plus, I do enjoy its aesthetic
 qualities and feature set.  That said, the SB3 comes awfully close in
 terms of purely sonic performance, at least to a point where I'm pretty
 sure I can't tell the difference.
 
 I didn't get a chance to do a DBT this weekend so that is to follow
 this week.  I'm willing to believe that there might be something to the
 theory that audio quality past a certain point works on a pretty
 subconscious level.  If I can identify the Transporter in a blind A/B
 test as being better most of the time, I'm quite content to make it a
 fixture in my system.
 
 Regarding the noise that my tweeter emits from the SB3 vs the
 Transporter, I did end up trying them both on RCA outs.  No major
 difference between Transporter on XLR vs RCA.  Difference between the
 SB3 vs Transporter as mentioned before, is very audible with my ear
 against the tweeter, but as soon as I got a couple feet away, I couldn't
 hear it anymore.  Note that this is at a setting 30 dB above my usual
 listening volume.  So, yes, the noise floor is lower in the TP, but I'm
 not convinced that it actually matters when I'm sitting 8+ feet from
 each speaker.
 
 Anyway, I have to admit I was a bit disappointed.  I was hoping the TP
 would be a total knockout, but it's been a little underwhelming so far.
I agree that if your expectations are sky high you will be
disappointed. The audible SQ differences between decent (decent mind
you) digital sources are subtle IMO. Stack them against the differences
between most loudspeakers or recordings, for example, and they seem to
pale into insignificance.

Whether the differences are worth the money depend completely on the
rest of your system and your budget. However, IMO a new DAC or source
will often (not always) be the bit which will do the least to improve
SQ. There are other reasons to buy equipment too: knowing you have the
best as you mentioned, looks or style, minimalism, domestic
considerations, simplicity, features etc. All completely valid reasons
if you apply them consciously!
Darren


-- 
darrenyeats

http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/richpub/listmania/byauthor/A3H57URKQB8AQO/ref=cm_pdp_content_listmania/203-7606506-5721503.

(Inguz bass EQ'd) SB3 - (pre bypassed) Krell KAV-300i - PMC AB-1
(caps bass EQ'd) Laptop - Genius Slab SW-flat2.1 700
SB3 / Rio Karma / Laptop - JVC UX-C30 / Sennheiser PX-100

darrenyeats's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=10799
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=63394

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] New System, Transporter Final Piece?

2009-05-18 Thread Rodney_Gold

Digital output of both TP and SB3 equal. So your decision to buy a TP
has to be related to it's DAC and some other peripheral questions.
If you expect the TP to trounce the SB3 sonically , you will be
dissapointed. IMHO if sonics are the only question then an outboard
DACof your choice and flavour might be the better buy.
If you want looks , digital effects loop , balanced outputs , better
power supply , the ability to play hi rez music and the ability of the
TP to act as a stand alone DAC and digital pre all in one unit  - then
buy one.


-- 
Rodney_Gold

Sb3/Z-sys RDP1/meridian DSP5500's
TP/X-cans v3/Senns 650's
TP/TACT 2.0/SCM 50a's
TP/Meridian DSP5000's
The nicest thing about smacking your head against the wall is...the
feeling you get when you stop

Rodney_Gold's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=14618
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=63465

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] New System, Transporter Final Piece?

2009-05-18 Thread iPhone

Rodney_Gold;424327 Wrote: 
 Digital output of both TP and SB3 equal. So your decision to buy a TP
 has to be related to it's DAC and some other peripheral questions.
 If you expect the TP to trounce the SB3 sonically , you will be
 dissapointed. IMHO if sonics are the only question then an outboard
 DACof your choice and flavour might be the better buy.
 If you want looks , digital effects loop , balanced outputs , better
 power supply , the ability to play hi rez music and the ability of the
 TP to act as a stand alone DAC and digital pre all in one unit  - then
 buy one.

If you have the money for the Transporter, if it were me, I would put
that in your system in a heartbeat.

I have to disagree with Rodney on the TP and SB3 digital output being
equal. The TP has a much better power supply. And I believe the Jitter
is much lower on the TP then on the SB3.

I do tend to lean toward Rodney's way of thinking when only using the
digital output to a point. I am in the camp that the SB3 and a DAC like
the Bel Canto is hard to beat, but combined they cost more then a
Transporter. Again just my personal opinion, but my Dodson DA-217 MK2-D
Digital Processor sounds better and is more real and alive when being
feed from my Transporter then from my SBR or SB3.


-- 
iPhone

*iPhone*   
Media Room:
Transporter, VTL TL-6.5 Signature Pre-Amp, Ayre MX-R Mono's,
Vandersteen Quatro, VeraStarr 6.4SE 6-channel Amp, VCC-5 Reference
Center, four VSM-1 Signatures, Runco RS 900 CineWide AutoScope 2.35:1  


Living Room:
Duet, ADCOM GTP-870HD, Cinepro 3K6SE III Gold, Vandersteen Model 3A
Signature, Two 2Wq subs, VCC-2, Two VSM-1  

Kitchen: Squeezebox BOOM
Bedroom: SB3, GFR-700HD, Thiel 2.3, Second Boom
Home Office: SB3, NAD C370, two VSM-1
Home Gym: SB3, Parasound Vamp v.3, Thiel PowerPoint 1.2
House Portable: SB3, Audioengine A5
Thunderbird: Duet, Mac Mini
Expedition: SB3, ToughBook

iPhone's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=13622
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=63465

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Power supply DAC for my SB3 - recommendations?

2009-05-18 Thread iPhone

jezbo;423329 Wrote: 
 My current system is detailed below. What reasonable cost (sub-£200)
 enhancements would you recommend to get the best improvements for
 listening to lossless (and possibly lossy) files through the SB3? I
 think I need to improve the setup with a new power supply (the one I'm
 using is the one that came with the SB3) and external DAC.
 
 Are there any other weak links in my set-up?
 
 SB3 - (Marantz PM4001 amp) - Heed Canamp - Denon AH-D5000 headphones
 (for listening through cans)
 SB3 - Marantz PM4001 amp - Mordaunt-Short Avant 904i Speakers (for
 external speakers)

Save your money and buy a Transporter. There is no power supply or mod
available to improve the power section on an SB3. Phil and I have done a
bunch of testing on this, and there is no solution that plugs into the
current 5VDC factory PS input (which I feel is due to the fact that the
SB3 has internal switching supplies after the factory PS input). I even
went as far as to disabled the internal switchers and feed the inputs
with linear and then battery supplied power and the results are not
worth the cost and effort.

The DAC in the SB3 is actually very good for the price point of the
SB3. Again, I recommend saving up for a Transporter or a DAC in the over
$1000 range to see/hear improvements worth paying for.


-- 
iPhone

*iPhone*   
Media Room:
Transporter, VTL TL-6.5 Signature Pre-Amp, Ayre MX-R Mono's,
Vandersteen Quatro, VeraStarr 6.4SE 6-channel Amp, VCC-5 Reference
Center, four VSM-1 Signatures, Runco RS 900 CineWide AutoScope 2.35:1  


Living Room:
Duet, ADCOM GTP-870HD, Cinepro 3K6SE III Gold, Vandersteen Model 3A
Signature, Two 2Wq subs, VCC-2, Two VSM-1  

Kitchen: Squeezebox BOOM
Bedroom: SB3, GFR-700HD, Thiel 2.3, Second Boom
Home Office: SB3, NAD C370, two VSM-1
Home Gym: SB3, Parasound Vamp v.3, Thiel PowerPoint 1.2
House Portable: SB3, Audioengine A5
Thunderbird: Duet, Mac Mini
Expedition: SB3, ToughBook

iPhone's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=13622
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=63349

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Squeezebox A/B - digital out rca out same level?

2009-05-18 Thread BlueScreenJunky

peterw;422019 Wrote: 
 Not I'm the latest software verisons. Don't recall when that changed --
 sometime after 7.0. That capability was removed to make room for other
 stuff in the Squeezebox firmware.

Damn ! I was hoping i'd be able to do that in order to so the same kind
of testings (A friend of mine will bring his Zhaolu DAC to compare it
with SB3's DAC).
So, is there any other way to level the volumes ? (which does not
involve buying some expensive hardware)


-- 
BlueScreenJunky

BlueScreenJunky's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=22725
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=63198

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] New System, Transporter Final Piece?

2009-05-18 Thread schiegl

For myself i can clearly answer the question Transporter Final Piece?
with yes
It's the final piece of an audio network streaming device (for me
again :-)

kind regards,
Markus


-- 
schiegl

schiegl's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=6654
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=63465

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles


[SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Calculate Attenuation

2009-05-18 Thread S2K

Hi,

I want tot connect my Transporter directly to my Primare A33.2
poweramp.
It has the following inputs:   
XLR, 2V for 120W into 8 Ohm
RCA, 1V for 120W into 8 Ohm

The Transporter has the following outputs:
XLR, 3v
RCA, 2v

How do I calculate how much attenuation I need on both the RCA en XLR
outputs in order to match to poweramp inputs?


-- 
S2K

S2K's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=12675
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=63495

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Squeezebox A/B - digital out rca out same level?

2009-05-18 Thread dekaliber

If you have a preamp that can set different levels for different inputs,
you're good.  Otherwise, you might have to look into passive
attenuation.


-- 
dekaliber

dekaliber's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=9852
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=63198

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] New System, Transporter Final Piece?

2009-05-18 Thread Gazjam

another option to think about if your spending around 2000GBP...

http://www.audiovenue.co.uk/news_info.asp?id=230

http://www.whathifi.com/News/BRISTOL-SHOW-Naim-makes-a-plea-for-Uniti/

Does what the Transporter does...but has a Naim CD player and Amp built
in.


just a thought


-- 
Gazjam

Gazjam's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=18604
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=63465

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Squeezebox A/B - digital out rca out same level?

2009-05-18 Thread BlueScreenJunky

Nope, only an integrated amp. I'll see what I can do with squeezeslave
and the digital output of my PC :-/

I'll check passive attenuation too, thanx.


-- 
BlueScreenJunky

BlueScreenJunky's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=22725
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=63198

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Nu Force amp and pre amp on the way

2009-05-18 Thread Schindler

And... How are the Amps?

Christian


-- 
Schindler

Schindler's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=8461
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=62326

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Calculate Attenuation

2009-05-18 Thread seanadams

You don't use a calculator for this. Just start at -30dB and work your
way up until 100% on Transporter's volume control corresponds to your
maximum desired listening level.

Or another way to look at it: if you always have Transporter's volume
control set to, say, -20db or lower, then it means you should instead be
using -20dB analog attenuation.


-- 
seanadams

seanadams's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=63495

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] New System, Transporter Final Piece?

2009-05-18 Thread parkmad

Thank you for the quick responses, any thoughts on the DAC in the
Transporter versus the Rotel?


-- 
parkmad

parkmad's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=839
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=63465

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] New System, Transporter Final Piece?

2009-05-18 Thread GuyDebord

parkmad;424512 Wrote: 
 Thank you for the quick responses, any thoughts on the DAC in the
 Transporter versus the Rotel?

no contest! TP is superior to any midfi inegrated dac (nad, rotel,
arcam...)


-- 
GuyDebord

'*LAST.FM*' (http://www.last.fm/user/bloodyrosa)  
- SPEAKERS: Kharma CRM 3.2FE - v/d Hul Inspiration
- PRE: Lyngdorf DPA-1 - Kharma Grand Reference XLR's - AMP: Halcro
  MC20
- ANALOGUE: Clearaudio Ambient CMB, Satisfy Carbon  Lyra Helikon SL,
  ASR Basis Exclusive phono pre - Acoustic Zen Silver Reference II
  XLR’s
- DIGITAL: Slim Devices Transporter - Siltech Golden Ridge AES/EBU
- AC: PS Audio Power Plant Premier, PS Audio Statement(PPP), ASR
  Magic Cord(ASR), Siltech SPX30 MKII's for the Lyngdorf, Halcro 
  Transporter

GuyDebord's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=14587
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=63465

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Empirical Audio Pace Car Reclocker Observations

2009-05-18 Thread silverlight

Just thought I'd throw my 2 cents in.  I just received a Pace Car 2 and
Bitmeister SPDIF cable today from Steve @ Empirical.  For the skeptics
in this thread, I will say unequivocally, hands down, this device has
added tremendously to my system in very, very noticeable ways.  I'm
sitting here writing this while I listen to some music I know well
(i.e., Seal Best of Acoustic 24bit recording ripped from DVD-A, Rebecca
Pidgeon Retrospective 24/96, Blue Coast Records tracks in 24/96, Norah
Jones, Lauridsen's O Magnum Mysterium, even a popular CD like Taylor
Swift Fearless, etc.), and am finding myself reguarly having to lift my
falling jaw...  and this is in it's first hour or two of duty and so not
broken in yet.  
Music has more detail, meaningfully more extension in the highs and
lows, more musical and analog sounding (without any compromise in
detail), better separation between instruments / voices, bigger
soundstage (and far better imaging of the instruments within the
soundstage).
Setup for context is Transporter-PaceCar2-Meridian568.2-Krell amp.
(the PaceCar2 uses it's word clock output with the Transporter as slave)
Kudo's to Steve for such a great product.


-- 
silverlight

silverlight's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=29788
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=57107

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] Break-in period for Transporter?

2009-05-18 Thread mswlogo

Break in time == about the time it takes to boot :)


-- 
mswlogo

XP  Cat5  Transporter/DuetController  SPDIF  Meridian G68  DSP6000,
DSP5500HC, DSP5000
XP  Cat5  SB3  SPDIF  Meridian DSP5000
XP  Cat5  DuetReceiver  SPDIF  Meridian G91  DSP5000

'My Transporter Setup'
(http://forums.slimdevices.com/showpost.php?p=350741postcount=45)
'Hitch Hikers Guide to Meridian' (http://www.meridianunplugged.com)

mswlogo's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=9090
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=63394

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles