Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] New Squeezebox Touch Mod

2011-08-06 Thread rgro

dynaudiorules;647463 Wrote: 
 Hi rgro,
 
 If you type ifconfig in a Console window you should only get etho and
 lo in the returning window.
 
 If wlan shows up then you need to put the # mark in front of the lines
 that I have shown on my site.  The # mark is called commenting out.
 This means that the software does not use the command on that line.
 
 Commenting out Samba is another one, it only further reduces the amount
 of processes running and makes the OS run more efficiently. 
 
 The root or purpose of all mods is to make the operating system and/or
 the music software run to maximum efficiency. 
 
 The lines of code are already installed no need to do them over again,
 in fact if you open the rcS file again you will see them at the bottom.
 Commenting out the other lines just insures that those processes are not
 running. Just be sure to type reboot in the console window afterwards.
 
 BTW, you are Welcome about the mod...this is all about good sound for
 everyone.

Thank youI will proceed per your instruction...much appreciated!


-- 
rgro

Rick

System information

Main: PS Audio Quintet  Vortexbox  Touch (wired) via spdif coax 
Rega DAC  LFD LE IV amp  VA Mozart Grands  REL Acoustics R305.  

Home Theatre:  SBR (Wired)  Pioneer VSX 919  Energy Take 5 Classic
5.1.

SBS 7.6.0 r32859 running on a Vortexbox Appliance, V 1.9.  Touch
w/Hardware V.5.  Touch: FW 7.6 r9458.  Duet: FW 77 r9458.

rgro's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=34348
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=89359

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] New Squeezebox Touch Mod

2011-08-06 Thread alec_cat

dynaudiorules;647456 Wrote: 
 Tip:
 If you feel the sound is a bit too clear for your system just back down
 on the SPDIF value a bit.  
 Enjoy!!

Sorry, dyn, can you clarify what you would tweak here? I understand how
you'd wish to separate IRQs but how does one determine which processes
should have more priority than others?


-- 
alec_cat

alec_cat's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=48527
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=89359

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] I need a little bit tone control . . .

2011-08-06 Thread Bert003

I walked through some manuals, it shouldn't be so difficult.

But it looks like Inguz tools are not developed anymore since a tweak
is necessary to get it to work under windows 7?

Anyway, if I have installed it and it, how do I create a filter curve
with +2dB at 150Hz? The measuring programs create a curve/wav, but how
do I do this manual?

I have to say after reading I got exited about room correction and it's
benefits so I would probably take the long route in time an buy a
microphone and do the whole setup.

But for now, how do I create a filter manually? Can one of the programs
do that?

I also looked at Sox, but I don't know if that is that simple I looked
at the file 'convert.conf' but it is quite a study to understand it.

But if i look at it it looks like if almost every filetype is converted
anyway in the Squeezebox Server?


-- 
Bert003

Bert003's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=31132
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=89355

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] I need a little bit tone control . . .

2011-08-06 Thread Daverz

Here's an example of a custom-convert.conf with a highpass filter
applied to flac playback:


Code:


  flc flc * *
[flac] -dcs $START$ $END$ -- $FILE$ | [sox] -q -t wav - -t flac -C 0 
$RESAMPLE$ - highpass -1 100
  



You'd probably want to use sox's equalizer effect.


-- 
Daverz

Daverz's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=32335
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=89355

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] New Squeezebox Touch Mod

2011-08-06 Thread RotelMan

dynaudiorules;647456 Wrote: 
 Tip:
 
 If you feel the sound is a bit too clear for your system just back down
 on the SPDIF value a bit.  
 
 
 Enjoy!!

Hi again... I have now also disabled Samba and WLAN and it gives me a
better sound balance... Big Thanks from Denmark :-)
I'm also running Soundcheck toolbox 2.0

If I want to back down the spdif value... do you then have f.ex. a IRQ
value I can try?


-- 
RotelMan

RotelMan's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=39498
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=89359

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] I need a little bit tone control . . .

2011-08-06 Thread frank_from_hh

Hi Bert003,
the entries in convert.conf do not mean that every thing is converted.
They are only rules which will be applied if you want conversion to be
applied. This is what you select in the Advanced/File Types menu. The
standard selections do not do any conversion if it is not necessary,
e.g. because your player does not understand a music format. Daverz
gave a nice line as a starting point. As long as you stay with simple
changes sox is easy to use. Doing a real room correction might also be
possible, but that might be more complicated than Inguz.


-- 
frank_from_hh

frank_from_hh's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=25866
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=89355

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] I need a little bit tone control . . .

2011-08-06 Thread Wirrunna

Bert003;647499 Wrote: 
 
 Anyway, if I have installed it and it, how do I create a filter curve
 with +2dB at 150Hz? The measuring programs create a curve/wav, but how
 do I do this manual?

Probably the easiest way in Inguz is to use a 15 band equalizer and
move the 160Hz band up 2db, or you could use a 31 band equalizer for an
even narrower band.


+---+
|Filename: inguz.JPG|
|Download: http://forums.slimdevices.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=12208|
+---+

-- 
Wirrunna

A camel is a racehorse designed by a committee.

Wirrunna's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3225
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=89355

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] New Squeezebox Touch Mod

2011-08-06 Thread tufty

Thanks for sharing this mod. I have already installed soundcheck's
toolbox 2 with impressive results. However, I am using WLAN... does
your mod work if I skip this step, or will wireless streaming be
compromised?


-- 
tufty

tufty's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=47700
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=89359

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] New Squeezebox Touch Mod

2011-08-06 Thread dynaudiorules

Hi Tuffy,

The mod works regardless if wlan is enabled or not. Wireless streaming
will not be compromised.


-- 
dynaudiorules

dynaudiorules's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=12568
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=89359

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] New Squeezebox Touch Mod

2011-08-06 Thread castalla

Reducing 'sharpness'  any suggested values?


-- 
castalla

castalla's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=15624
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=89359

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] New Squeezebox Touch Mod

2011-08-06 Thread dynaudiorules

Try 53 for spdif, you may also like to try other values for spdif to
suit your particular system and tastes...usually between 41-59.


-- 
dynaudiorules

dynaudiorules's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=12568
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=89359

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] New Teddy Pardo Touch PSU

2011-08-06 Thread Tom186

JezA;644315 Wrote: 
 I meant using the s/pdif output of the Sneaky into your M1.
 
 If the Touch has all these sensitivities to lines of code, brightness
 of displays, power supplies why throw good money at it trying to bodge
 a fix?

Hello,

so does anybody on here have a comparison between a nicely modded,
Teddy Pardo (or comparable) powered SBT - and the digital out of a Linn
player? Final SBT mod: put it on eBay? ;)

Thanks,

Thomas


-- 
Tom186

Tom186's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=43852
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=89017

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] New Teddy Pardo Touch PSU

2011-08-06 Thread JezA

The more interesting comparison would be a (modded or otherwise) Touch
into any DAC vs a Linn DS.


-- 
JezA

JezA's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=21219
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=89017

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] technical question about sample frequency and bit depth digital output

2011-08-06 Thread adamslim

Phil Leigh;646811 Wrote: 
 Leaving aside the weirdness of a 16/96 dac, dither would only be needed
 if you were using the volume control.

It was a bit weird, but pretty good.  IIRC I was using it with a dCS
upsampler, hence the need for dither.  All ancient history now, I have
a 32/384-capable DAC :)


-- 
adamslim

MPD on Linux PC, Young DAC, DIY Kondo M7 pre, 6B4G SET, Lowther
monsters
SB3, Charlize 2, DIY open baffle speakers
Boom x 2, Radio

adamslim's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=7355
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=89273

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] New Teddy Pardo Touch PSU

2011-08-06 Thread Tom186

JezA;647624 Wrote: 
 The more interesting comparison would be a (modded or otherwise) Touch
 into any DAC vs a Linn DS.

Sure, both interesting, yours will depend a lot on the DAC though. What
I am after is info on whether the Linn DS SPDIF output is that much
better (or at all better) than that of a modded SBT ...

Anyone?


-- 
Tom186

Tom186's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=43852
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=89017

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] New Teddy Pardo Touch PSU

2011-08-06 Thread JohnSwenson

Tom186;647636 Wrote: 
 Sure, both interesting, yours will depend a lot on the DAC though. What
 I am after is info on whether the Linn DS SPDIF output is that much
 better (or at all better) than that of a modded SBT ...
 
 Anyone?

The problem here is that such a test is only valid for one particular
DAC. There is such large variability in S/PDIF input circuits that if
you determine which sounds better with one DAC, there is guaranteed to
be other DACs where the reverse is true. 

The input impedance of receiver circuits varies all over the place (not
very many are even close to the official 75 ohm spec). The impedance
match between the source and receiver is one of the important aspects
of sound quality. 

A particular source does have a particular jitter and noise signature
on its output, AND a particular output impedance. Both the jitter/noise
AND the impedance match are important contributors to sound quality for
many DACS. The jitter/noise are going to be constant with different
DACs, but the impedance match is going to be a crapshoot.


The result of this is that say you have a DAC with a 90ohm input
impedance and you fed it from a source which has close to 90ohms output
impedance, its going to sound better than another source which has lower
jitter but has 75ohms output impedance.

This makes the whole concept of determining the absolute quality of a
source to be almost ludicrous. If you take several sources and rank them
with different DACs from different manufacturers the ranking order is
going to be different, guaranteed.

An interesting aspect of this is that because the final result is
primarily a combination of the two factors, if you take some sources
and significantly improve jitter/noise performance on all of them, the
impedance matching is now going to be the predominant factor, so the
variability in ranking between them is only going to get worse. So as
engineers and tweakers figure out how to improve the jitter/noise
performance of the sources, figuring out which one to choose for your
system is going to be even more of a crapshoot. 

That does not mean that things like TT2.0 are worthless, far from it.
For a given DAC (say the one YOU have) making these tweaks can improve
the final results, because they are improving one of the two main
components. If your particular situation has a good impedance match
between the source and receiver then such tweaks may make a big
improvement. If your situation has a lousy impedance match then the
tweaks my be less effective. Again its hard to tell in advance. 

So I guess what I'm trying to say is that trying to make a
determination as to which source is better only makes sense if you
specify a particular DAC. 

John S.


-- 
JohnSwenson

JohnSwenson's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=5974
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=89017

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] New Squeezebox Touch Mod

2011-08-06 Thread JohnSwenson

Just a caution, the process numbers are not carved in stone, as you
comment or uncomment things in rcS or change hardware configuration
(such as running off a USB disk), some of those process numbers can
change. 

So I highly recommend running the command

ps -eLo pid,cls,rtprio,pri,nice,cmd | grep -i irq

as listed in the instructions to find out what process numbers are used
for a particular interrupt on YOUR system. Use those process numbers in
your modified rcS file.

The IRQ numbers for a particular device seem to stay constant no matter
what, but the process numbers do change if you change the system. From
one boot to the next with a particular system configuration the the
process numbers DO stay the same. 

Just remember that if you change your hardware configuration there is a
very good chance some of those process numbers will have to change in
the rcS file.

John S.


-- 
JohnSwenson

JohnSwenson's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=5974
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=89359

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] New Squeezebox Touch Mod

2011-08-06 Thread dynaudiorules

Thanks John,

I am think I posted that on my site, but I will stress the need to make
sure the process ID is the same.


-- 
dynaudiorules

'Dynobot's Audio' (https://sites.google.com/site/computeraudioorg/)

dynaudiorules's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=12568
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=89359

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] New Squeezebox Touch Mod

2011-08-06 Thread alec_cat

Hi again, Dyn. I was wondering, are those 5 processes the only that may
have a bearing on performance? I tried looking some of them up on alsa
and linux websites but some of them are not terribly descriptive.

I would have supposed they're all significant to some degree - clocks,
ethernet, spdif, etc. Mind boggling!


-- 
alec_cat

alec_cat's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=48527
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=89359

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] New Squeezebox Touch Mod

2011-08-06 Thread dynaudiorules

Hi alec,

For the purpose of audio I was only interested in audio related
processes.  Again these are tweaks I previously used on my Linux
machines. They proved to make Music Player Daemon sound really well so
I just used them on the Touch. For the Touch it would appear that the
etho IRQ would be important however I was not able to isolate that
process.  Also because the server does some work with the audio 'bits'
I applied the same tweaks [and more] to the Linux server as well. 
However I have been building a cMP2 machine to use as the Squeezebox
server just to see if it makes a difference.

Cheers


-- 
dynaudiorules

'Dynobot's Audio' (https://sites.google.com/site/computeraudioorg/)

dynaudiorules's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=12568
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=89359

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] New Squeezebox Touch Mod

2011-08-06 Thread dynaudiorules

Would be nice if we had a 3rd party app that provided a few different
filter settings that toggled the spdif valuesay 44, 48, 53, 59 for
example.

I don't know about you but if I have music playing while I change the
value I can actually hear the difference fade in...


-- 
dynaudiorules

'Dynobot's Audio' (https://sites.google.com/site/computeraudioorg/)

dynaudiorules's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=12568
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=89359

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] New Squeezebox Touch Mod

2011-08-06 Thread JohnSwenson

This is something I have been working towards for a long time.
Unfortunately its not simple. The current ALSA interface is different
than it was when the Touch drivers were written. So in order to use the
latest ALSA system the Touch drivers would have to be modified and
Logitech is (understandably) very reluctant to do that. I don't see
this happening any time soon.

To actually answer the question, yes I have tried it, and you get
gazillions of errors with the drivers.

John S.


-- 
JohnSwenson

JohnSwenson's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=5974
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=89359

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] New Squeezebox Touch Mod

2011-08-06 Thread kiat

JohnSwenson;647694 Wrote: 
 This is something I have been working towards for a long time.
 Unfortunately its not simple. The current ALSA interface is different
 than it was when the Touch drivers were written. So in order to use the
 latest ALSA system the Touch drivers would have to be modified and
 Logitech is (understandably) very reluctant to do that. I don't see
 this happening any time soon.
 
 To actually answer the question, yes I have tried it, and you get
 gazillions of errors with the drivers.
 
 John S.

Thanks John.  That's sad, looking at the change log.  It would be nice
to use the latest version.  

Another question.  What if we don't use the latest version.  Is there
any later version of ALSA usable in Touch environment?


-- 
kiat

kiat's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=30044
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=89359

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles


Re: [SlimDevices: Audiophiles] New Squeezebox Touch Mod

2011-08-06 Thread rgro

dynaudiorules;647565 Wrote: 
 Try 53 for spdif, you may also like to try other values for spdif to
 suit your particular system and tastes...usually between 41-59.

Do you need to do a reboot each time you change this value?

Thanks!


-- 
rgro

Rick

System information

Main: PS Audio Quintet  Vortexbox  Touch (wired) via spdif coax 
Rega DAC  LFD LE IV amp  VA Mozart Grands  REL Acoustics R305.  

Home Theatre:  SBR (Wired)  Pioneer VSX 919  Energy Take 5 Classic
5.1.

SBS 7.6.0 r32859 running on a Vortexbox Appliance, V 1.9.  Touch
w/Hardware V.5.  Touch: FW 7.6 r9458.  Duet: FW 77 r9458.

rgro's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=34348
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=89359

___
audiophiles mailing list
audiophiles@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/audiophiles