Re: [aur-general] Removal request for romextract
On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 05:20:29AM +, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > When deletion requests were sent to this mailing list, it was expected > to add the link, however, IIRC it changed 2 or more years ago. > > "[snip] requests can be created by clicking on the "Submit Request" link > under "Package Actions" on the right hand side. This automatically > sends a notification email to the current package maintainer and to the > aur-requests mailing list for discussion. [snip]" - > https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Arch_User_Repository#Other_requests Sorry, that was pretty boneheaded; I do remember this becoming a thing and haven't dealt with any AUR requests since AUR4.
Re: [aur-general] Removal request for romextract
On Wed, 20 Sep 2017 22:35:57 -0400, beest wrote: >I'd like to request removal for romextract. When deletion requests were sent to this mailing list, it was expected to add the link, however, IIRC it changed 2 or more years ago. "[snip] requests can be created by clicking on the "Submit Request" link under "Package Actions" on the right hand side. This automatically sends a notification email to the current package maintainer and to the aur-requests mailing list for discussion. [snip]" - https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Arch_User_Repository#Other_requests
Re: [aur-general] Removal request
Stefan, The preferred method of submitting removal requests is now through the AUR web interface. Search for the File Request link. — Jeremy 'Ichimonji10' Audet
Re: [aur-general] [Removal request] vim-lettuce
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 4:41 PM, Andy Weidenbaum archb...@gmail.com wrote: I added vim-colors-lettuce to replace vim-lettuce. The original vim-lettuce package is now obsolete. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/vim-lettuce/ Andy, Please use the web interface to file a deletion request (on the package's page). Very Respectfully, Taylor Lookabaugh
Re: [aur-general] Removal request -- osc-build-archlinux
On Tuesday 17 June 2014 00:49:06 Thiago Barroso Perrotta wrote: osc-build-archlinux [1] should be deleted: it is outdated; more than that, it is not needed anymore, since support for this feature is included upstream now (see comments in the package). Anyway, obs-build-git [2] is an up-to-date version of it. Done, thank you. -- С уважением, Е.Алексеев. Sincerely yours, E.Alekseev. e-mail: darkarca...@mail.ru ICQ: 407-398-235 Jabber: arca...@jabber.ru signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [aur-general] removal request: eos-git
On Sunday, June 15, 2014 19:40:58 wrote: Please delete the unmaintained eos-git package. The source github page is down. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/eos-git/ Removed, thanks. Regards, Felix Yan signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [aur-general] Removal request spyder2-hg
On Monday 09 June 2014 09:29:28 Willem wrote: Please remove spyder2-hg https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/spyder2-hg/. It will become part of split package spyder-hg https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/spyder-hg/. Done, thank you. -- С уважением, Е.Алексеев. Sincerely yours, E.Alekseev. e-mail: darkarca...@mail.ru ICQ: 407-398-235 Jabber: arca...@jabber.ru signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [aur-general] Removal Request: linux-xps13-docs
On Sunday, June 08, 2014 19:21:35 Ross Williams wrote: Hi, I would like to request the following package be removed: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/linux-xps13-docs/ It was a failed attempted a little while ago to upload my patched kernel to the AUR and I have since read up on the AUR and submitted the package using linux-ck as a guide. Removed, thanks. Regards, Felix Yan signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [aur-general] Removal request
On Wednesday, June 04, 2014 12:20:02 李胜明 wrote: Hi, Please remove the following pkgbuilds: - 115backup-gtk2 [1]; - 115backup-gtk3 [2]; - airweibo [3]; - weiboair [4]; - xbmc-addon-repo-hdpfans [5]; I am the submitter of the 5 packages. The upstream of [1] [2] has renamed them to 115wangpan. Package [3] and [4] are the same. Package [5] is contained by xbmc-addons-chinese-svn https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xbmc-addons-chinese-svn/. Also, It seems no one wants to maintain or use all of them. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/115backup-gtk2/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/115backup-gtk3/ [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/airweibo/ [4] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/weiboair/ [5] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xbmc-addon-repo-hdpfans/ All removed, thanks. Regards, Felix Yan signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [aur-general] Removal request
On Sunday, June 01, 2014 20:21:54 Charles Bos wrote: Hello, I think the following package ought to be removed: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/hackedbox/ The package is orphaned, hasn't been updated since 2008 and neither the upstream url nor the source link work. The following website lists 0.8.5 as the latest release: http://freecode.com/projects/hackedbox Version 0.8.5 is the same version that is in the AUR and that would indicate that upstream hasn't released a new version since January 2007 so the project would appear to be stone dead. Removed, thanks. Regards, Felix Yan signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [aur-general] Removal request
On Sunday, June 01, 2014 15:22:56 Ivaylo Kuzev wrote: Hi, The package [1] is out-of-date. Please remove [1]. [1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/nikola-zsh-completion/[1][1] Removed, thanks. Regards, Felix Yan signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [aur-general] removal request
On Mon, 26 May 2014 13:29:32 -0600 Alexej Magura sickhadas@gmail.com wrote: This is more of should this be removed; if so, please remove it-request. package-name: epsxe-bios-scph1001 package-url: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/epsxe-bios-scph1001/ I know that the package *even* states that it is illegal to use said package without owning an actual playstation console, but still... isn't this kinda like telling people that it's illegal to steal your car, but then leaving the keys on the hood and going about your business? Peeps are gonna steal! Not sure if this is issue/concern is actually meaningful in the sense that the package *is very* useful, but... yeah. Deleted, thanks. -- Bartłomiej Piotrowski http://bpiotrowski.pl/ signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [aur-general] removal request
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 26.5.2014 21:29, Alexej Magura wrote: This is more of should this be removed; if so, please remove it-request. package-name: epsxe-bios-scph1001 package-url: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/epsxe-bios-scph1001/ I know that the package *even* states that it is illegal to use said package without owning an actual playstation console, but still... isn't this kinda like telling people that it's illegal to steal your car, but then leaving the keys on the hood and going about your business? Peeps are gonna steal! Not sure if this is issue/concern is actually meaningful in the sense that the package *is very* useful, but... yeah. The maintainer here. If Arch Linux even so as *might* suffer from legal consequences because of it, by all means remove it immediately. If not, I don't see the harm in it being there. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJThDwRAAoJEB1x37R9kdwnlWsP/2SRx4HGTyenbUy4q4sbfzfT Z6YPXiH9kESjB30SkfxCzVzd3q3tGKlL4ipWsHLpVfyhl5oLmd9d2Os9ejKm7eHK UoPGkWs4rRzJrmPyeE2D1BW4Ge1EK5f7uqE/qPVtkygKLtHbolIZFLQ6FANhLuC1 WF1VCmHzcM9uAMq080/eQ20JAKnSXgpMKhZk/4topjlMvzr+iPoeKYijLZvUt0uD Ynff6sLdQRa/eMjbLFk7pU2+xPeIO+iHA694i7XB8E1xGpR6YeK61YmdHyXVlnkV ukfpL32MSt8X8kD5iru67nRNCxPxHrwj+l3N5IFgr2tpTSL8B1WAHwzpupD4yuxq YMSsjeq5KRBoMRfXO5FDJTqoxa0i5aT9sI2KLSQDPI4v7bFNoU9qMsZQ7eW2tRJ/ OaizfCdSvoYUkIpjE6YyixqeK/mIbZomSDF2v0o07WcQdSTTPTAAv4UyO0gw2OGG 1iVR3lFLnIZrQ7jZp90AMFL4picpO6GyAbJXBootCjlc/EcQ5jyhymb3y8LPYvtV U7/0R9iKCQBXGjblJdI/3xCaprIW1IQtfCwbddfk9U0m4dmDQOaXoPebnzUcn3Sh UvddldUqJf6lvuvebHVY4g82WHAGx8uK6AvL2N6fjWsSBwX69z04uRImdwUaKmUz qSZLjztTS8fBQRZJvOOS =33qa -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: [aur-general] removal request
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 26.5.2014 21:47, Steven Honeyman wrote: Not only that - it's yet another pointless package! All it does is unzip 1 file... How does the number of files in a package relate to its usefulness? It's there for convenience, as are many other packages. Take for example packages that change only one compile flag. Guess we should remove those. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJThDwVAAoJEB1x37R9kdwnCiIP/1T3M/68ucqgwpA9EVpKGxB2 kkqHwR4iYB2Vxp7Lm9ImGeJryMePK+mp3Ad1RhuoqJ/l/WpJUnMMANIze6I2q89A +vIDNYDOvgm2axQgjZi8Hnq8XJTjAFP0VQx/+b0x2LMD1kLqi7IDiq389LDaI+4A xQpCYsoqLOc1lYVkGlXjYTJ9Z8k0EIjYzlqwpsP3Qa2uGzi7AFVGC8+dfMcqHhf9 c9CUD7Vs4KLD6D3hzcJb8F9IEwFBkFM0/dEjhE1MTrxnfjaNCYxxw8L2aZ/UfRSC 60ZQRTn0+mnh9DGfXilR3vsl3SWQdH+mGFKPvOF0pCyunfTnyciRdQiN7KijWlLh ZVfDn3flDLxMVw2JU7NrAStz3Fyiitrov5wik1U0GkLrPwxs4qGtWEOaG6tlujza z6Bx9ZsgEb1ga5vWcqo6PujXyYURzb1t3UIm909nklZfEW/+ACPaiir64pgblgaO BEPc437a20xoCG4EMiYda1/lYNS8JddfwmnP07TLbCA/qUu0Bsmy+GpixiFu8QWF /wZEoY9Cm0PYAue8O8YAz/bQLHUYZn+/2r/dU+h55f9paMMZynH5ln1KTR1m69od IY1sVeTDioPsVlj5n+GJjPU4r0TY/zTQ1Htwh49T79BMsS5WuWASL9SycE9lqCvH o6kqQdWPOJ+UP/QHzzsz =fbt0 -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: [aur-general] removal request
Not only that - it's yet another pointless package! All it does is unzip 1 file... That's worse than firefox addon packages or desktop wallpapers. On 26 May 2014 20:29, Alexej Magura sickhadas@gmail.com wrote: This is more of should this be removed; if so, please remove it-request. package-name: epsxe-bios-scph1001 package-url: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/epsxe-bios-scph1001/ I know that the package *even* states that it is illegal to use said package without owning an actual playstation console, but still... isn't this kinda like telling people that it's illegal to steal your car, but then leaving the keys on the hood and going about your business? Peeps are gonna steal! Not sure if this is issue/concern is actually meaningful in the sense that the package *is very* useful, but... yeah.
Re: [aur-general] [removal request] mybb-polish
On Saturday, May 24, 2014 15:31:04 Stefan Tatschner wrote:
Please remove the outdated mybb-polish [1] package. I have adopted and
updated the mybb AUR package. Language packs can be easily added like I
did here [2]. If somebody likes I can create a polish language pack
('mybb-lang-pl') as well.
Stefan
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mybb-polish/
[2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mybb-lang-ger/
Removed [1], thanks.
Regards,
Felix Yan
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [aur-general] Removal request
On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 1:14 AM, Nuno Araujo nuno.ara...@russo79.comwrote: Hi Could a TU please remove glade3-gtk2 [1]? It's a duplicate of glade-gtk2 [2]. Both packages were orphaned and I took ownership and updated the glade-gtk2 [2] to the latest release. Thank you [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/glade3-gtk2/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/glade-gtk2/ -- Nuno Araujo nuno.ara...@russo79.com http://www.russo79.com Merged, thx. -- Maxime
Re: [aur-general] Removal request - talesofmajeyal
On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 9:30 AM, WorMzy Tykashi wormzy.tyka...@gmail.comwrote: Hi TUs, Please remove my package talesofmajeyal [1]. It is a duplicate of tome4[2], a package that I didn't notice until just now. Thanks, WorMzy [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/talesofmajeyal/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/tome4/ Removed. Thx, -- Maxime
Re: [aur-general] [Removal request] kfileaudiopreview-git
On Wednesday, May 14, 2014 14:09:06 Antonio Rojas wrote: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/kfileaudiopreview-git/ Merged in kio-extras Removed, thanks. Regards, Felix Yan signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [aur-general] Removal request: arc-status
On Saturday, May 10, 2014 10:58:31 David Phillips wrote: On a related note, I'd just like to ask why initscripts AUR packages aren't accepted. I was under the impression that while initscripts are no longer the official/supported init method for Arch, some people are still using them instead of systemd? They're okay to me as long as they are maintained. The package in the original request (arc-status) was an orphan and didn't get an update for more than 4 years, and that's why I think its removal is a good idea. Regards, Felix Yan signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [aur-general] Removal request: arc-status
Ahh okay, thanks for clarifying that for me On 10/05/2014, Felix Yan felixonm...@gmail.com wrote: On Saturday, May 10, 2014 10:58:31 David Phillips wrote: On a related note, I'd just like to ask why initscripts AUR packages aren't accepted. I was under the impression that while initscripts are no longer the official/supported init method for Arch, some people are still using them instead of systemd? They're okay to me as long as they are maintained. The package in the original request (arc-status) was an orphan and didn't get an update for more than 4 years, and that's why I think its removal is a good idea. Regards, Felix Yan -- David Phillips GPG Key 0x7BF3D17D0884BF5B Fingerprint 2426 235A 7831 AA2F 56AF 4BC0 7BF3 D17D 0884 BF5B
Re: [aur-general] Removal request: firefox-stable
On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 1:36 AM, Doug Newgard scim...@archlinux.infowrote: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/firefox-stable/ This is simply a duplicate of firefox in [extra]. Done, thx -- Maxime
Re: [aur-general] Removal request for cantata-qt
On Sunday, May 11, 2014 02:48:48 Spyros Stathopoulos wrote: The cantata package in [community] is now build with no kde dependencies so the package I maintain is now superfluous. Please delete it from the AUR. Removed. Please include a link to package next time, thanks. Regards, Felix Yan signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [aur-general] Removal request: arc-status
On a related note, I'd just like to ask why initscripts AUR packages aren't accepted. I was under the impression that while initscripts are no longer the official/supported init method for Arch, some people are still using them instead of systemd? On 09/05/2014, Felix Yan felixonm...@gmail.com wrote: On Thursday, May 08, 2014 15:46:28 Thiago Barroso Perrotta wrote: Hi, Just stumbled upon this[1] package, it is very old (last updated in 2009) and useful only when Arch used to have RC init scripts. I'd suggest its removal. [1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/arc-status/ Removed. Also, I think there are still a number of packages related to old initscripts. Do you mind if every time we find one, we request its removal here, or would this be too cumbersome? It's fine, and thanks for helping us cleaning AUR :) Regards, Felix Yan -- David Phillips GPG Key 0x7BF3D17D0884BF5B Fingerprint 2426 235A 7831 AA2F 56AF 4BC0 7BF3 D17D 0884 BF5B
Re: [aur-general] Removal request: glm-0.9.4, glm094
On Wednesday, April 30, 2014 15:27:00 Levente Polyak wrote: Please remove glm-0.9.4 [1] and glm094 [2] as both are orphan and unneeded/obsolete. small explanation: vertoe (the submitter) meant to use it as a dependency for some other package he is working on. I contacted him and discussed the problems involved in having a static version of glm as dependency. After my recommendations he issued the problem upstream (where a patch is already available) which made the static glm versions obsolete (so he disowned both now). cheers Levente [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/glm-0.9.4/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/glm094/ Both removed, thanks. Regards, Felix Yan signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [aur-general] [Removal request] kde-runtime-git
On Saturday, April 26, 2014 14:47:48 A Rojas wrote: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/kde- runtime-git kde-runtime is dead, long live kde-runtime Removed, thanks. Regards, Felix Yan signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [aur-general] [Removal Request] netdiscover-patched
On Tuesday 22 April 2014 20:00:57 Roel Blaauwgeers wrote: Hello, The package https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/netdiscover-patched/ should be removed as it is a duplicate of 'netdiscover'. The package has been removed, thank you =) -- С уважением, Е.Алексеев. Sincerely yours, E.Alekseev. e-mail: darkarca...@mail.ru ICQ: 407-398-235 Jabber: arca...@jabber.ru signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [aur-general] Removal request
On Monday, April 21, 2014 14:49:17 Charles Bos wrote: Hi, Can the following package be deleted please: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libnautilus-extension-ubuntu/ I originally uploaded it because the AUR doesn't yet support split packages but it doesn't really make sense to compile the whole of nautilus twice and then throw most of it away so I've made sure that libnautilus-extension-ubuntu is provided in this package: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/nautilus-ubuntu/ Removed, thanks. Regards, Felix Yan signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [aur-general] Removal request of pywapi
On Sunday, April 13, 2014 16:17:18 willemw wrote: Please remove https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pywapi/ and please move the votes to the renamed package https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python-pywapi/. Merged, thanks. Regards, Felix Yan signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [aur-general] [Removal Request] python2-pybitcointools
On Thursday 10 April 2014 18:28:23 Andy Weidenbaum wrote: This package has been renamed upstream to python2-bitcoin. Done. Please provide links in the next time. -- С уважением, Е.Алексеев. Sincerely yours, E.Alekseev. e-mail: darkarca...@mail.ru ICQ: 407-398-235 Jabber: arca...@jabber.ru signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [aur-general] Removal request
On Monday, April 07, 2014 11:02:14 James Bulmer wrote: I propose that https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-pycadf-deb/ should be deleted as https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-pycadf/ replaces it and that https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-oslo-messaging-deb/ should be deleted as https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-oslo-messaging/ replaces it Thanks -- James Both removed, thanks. Regards, Felix Yan signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [aur-general] Removal request
On Monday, April 07, 2014 11:25:19 James Bulmer wrote: Could https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-ceilometerclient-deb/ be removed as I have moved all of the dependency's to https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-ceilometerclient/ Thanks Removed, thanks. Regards, Felix Yan signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [aur-general] [removal request] Please remove tntdb-svn from AUR
On 5 April 2014 15:22, Jonas Platte jonaspla...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, please remove tntdb-svn [1] from AUR as it's source has moved to GitHub (see [2]) Thanks, Jonas Platte [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/tntdb-svn/ [2] http://www.tntnet.org/development.html Removed, thanks.
Re: [aur-general] [removal request] - linux-sun7i and sunxi-tools
On Saturday 05 April 2014 18:10:02 sehraf wrote: please remove linux-sun7i [1] and sunxi-tools [2] because: - both are outdated and orphaned - linux-sun7i is provided by Arch Linux ARM [3] - sunxi-tools is a duplication of sunxi-tools-git [4] I've removed linux-sun7i and have merged sunxi-tools into *-git (because it had several votes). -- С уважением, Е.Алексеев. Sincerely yours, E.Alekseev. e-mail: darkarca...@mail.ru ICQ: 407-398-235 Jabber: arca...@jabber.ru signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [aur-general] Removal request - redirfs package cleanup
On Saturday, April 05, 2014 00:53:11 WorMzy Tykashi wrote: Hi TUs, Please could you remove the following packages: redirfs-bin [1] and redirfs-lib [2]. Neither have been updated since 2009, and both have no maintainer, any votes, and depend a non-existent redirfs-modules package. Cheers, WorMzy [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/redirfs-bin/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/redirfs-lib/ Both removed, thanks. Regards, Felix Yan signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [aur-general] Removal request
On 03/04/14 12:46 PM, Ivaylo Kuzev wrote: Hi, The package [1] is orphan and the features are provided by [2]. Please remove [1]. [1]: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ratpoison-xft/[1] [2]: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ratpoison-git/[2] -- Ivaylo Kuzev | @ivo Merged [1] into [2], thanks! signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [aur-general] [Removal Request] stm32flash-svn
On Tuesday, April 01, 2014 00:53:37 Stephen Zhang wrote: Hi, everyone. I hope the package stm32flash-svn in AUR can be removed. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/stm32flash-svn/ The package was orphan, and I adopted it. but now, I have made two new packages (stm32flash-git and stm32flash) to replace it. So, it's unnecessary to keep stm32flash-svn in AUR. Removed, thanks. Regards, Felix Yan signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [aur-general] Removal request of i3-py-git
On Sunday, March 30, 2014 10:18:19 willemw wrote: Please remove i3-py-git. It has been replaced by python-i3-git and python2-i3-git. Removed. Please include a link to package next time, thanks. Regards, Felix Yan signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [aur-general] [Removal request] sublime-text-3
On Thursday 27 March 2014 12:15:10 Janne Haapsaari wrote: The package sublime-text-3 [1] is a duplicate of sublime-text-dev [2] package. Please remove the former. The package has only one vote, so I've removed it. -- С уважением, Е.Алексеев. Sincerely yours, E.Alekseev. e-mail: darkarca...@mail.ru ICQ: 407-398-235 Jabber: arca...@jabber.ru signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [aur-general] [Removal Request] libebur128 related
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 4:35 PM, Robert Mackanics schnoo...@gmail.comwrote: The following Packages should be removed: 1: loudness-cli-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/loudness-cli-git/ 2: libebur128-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libebur128-git/ 3: libebur128-nu774-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libebur128-nu774-git/ 1 and 2 are orphaned, I am the maintainer of 3. None of these packages build due to git repo changes and the functionality has been replaced by: loudness-scanner-git https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/loudness-scanner-git/ All merged into loudness-scanner-git, thx. -- Maxime
Re: [aur-general] [Removal Request] hubicfuse
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 4:31 PM, Mitsu archli...@suumitsu.eu wrote: Hi, My bad, package hubicfuse has to be removed (correct package is hubicfuse-git). Feel free to test the package, but I think I added all deps Removed, please include a link to the package next time. -- Maxime
Re: [aur-general] Removal request
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 4:31 PM, Charles Bos charlesb...@gmail.com wrote: Can the following package be removed: https://aur.archlinux.org/ packages/compiz-pure/ It's supposed to provide Compiz 0.8 plus the gtk-window-decorator. The package is orphaned, hasn't been updated in nearly 4 years, is several versions out of date and doesn't build successfully. Nothing will be lost here because there is a new package which provides exactly the same things as this package: https://aur.archlinux.org/ packages/compiz-gtk-standalone/ Merged into the latter, thx. -- Maxime
Re: [aur-general] Removal request
On Friday, March 21, 2014 20:04:22 Ivaylo Kuzev wrote: Hi, The package [1] is orphan and the features are provided by [2]. Please remove [1]. [1]: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages/emacs-smex--git/ [2]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/emacs-smex-git/ Ivaylo Kuzev | @ivo Removed, thanks. Regards, Felix Yan signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [aur-general] [Removal Request] linux-selinux
On 19/03/2014 01:11, Timothée Ravier wrote: Please remove linux-selinux: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/linux-selinux/ Support for SELinux has been merged into the official Arch Linux kernel. Thanks Done. -- Sébastien Seblu Luttringer https://seblu.net | Twitter: @seblu42 GPG: 0x2072D77A signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [aur-general] [Removal Request] lightworks
On Fri 14 Mar 2014 at 17:36, Pyro Devil wrote: Hi again! I just wanted to remind you that my request for removal of my package still exists. ;) Deleted, thanks. Sorry for the delay; not sure why this was overlooked. Am Montag, den 03.02.2014, 14:19 +0100 schrieb Pyro Devil: Hi! I am the author of https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lightworks/ and request removal because of duplication. When I created the package I didn't see that: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lwks already exists. Thanks! Pyro Devil -- Jonathan Steel pgpwUmmdC_dBd.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [aur-general] [Removal Request] lightworks
I just wanted to remind you that my request for removal of my package still exists. ;) Deleted, thanks. Sorry for the delay; not sure why this was overlooked. There was a discussion about the package name; and the suggested move was to removing lightworks, and move existing lwks into lightworks. -- Kind regards, Damian Nowak StratusHost www.AtlasHost.eu
Re: [aur-general] [Removal Request] lightworks
On Mon 17 Mar 2014 at 18:37, Jonathan Steel wrote: On Mon 17 Mar 2014 at 19:24, Nowaker wrote: I just wanted to remind you that my request for removal of my package still exists. ;) Deleted, thanks. Sorry for the delay; not sure why this was overlooked. There was a discussion about the package name; and the suggested move was to removing lightworks, and move existing lwks into lightworks. The official package (deb) name is lwks, and lightworks is in the description. I see no reason to change it. On second thoughts, maybe it should be listed as lightworks, but the maintainer should upload it under the new name and then request a merge here. Now lightworks is gone, he is able to. -- Jonathan Steel pgpHKygqNLmQn.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [aur-general] [Removal Request]
On 2014-03-16 10:46 +0100 Berno Strik wrote: Please remove[1] This is replaced by https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/brother-dcpj715w-cups/ [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lib32-brother-dcpj715w-cups done, thanks
Re: [aur-general] [Removal Request]
Please ignore this one. I made a mistake On Sat, 15 Mar 2014 13:52:26 +0100 Berno Strik dutchma...@gmx.com wrote: Please remove[1] and [2]. They are replaced by https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/brother-hl3140cn/ [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/brother-hl3040cn-cupswrapper [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/brother-hl3040cn-lpr -- Berno Strik dutchma...@gmx.com
Re: [aur-general] [Removal Request] pencil-svn
On Saturday, March 15, 2014 21:56:25 N30N wrote: Request removal of: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pencil-svn/ This project is dead and development continues under the pencil2D fork (which is now also available in the AUR), making this package redundant. Thanks and best regards, N30N. Removed, thanks. Regards, Felix Yan signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [aur-general] [Removal Request] brother-hl3170cdw-{cupswrapper, lpr}
On Saturday, March 15, 2014 14:04:00 Berno Strik wrote: Please remove[1] and [2]. They are replaced by https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/brother-hl3170cdw/ [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/brother-hl3170cdw-cupswrapper [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/brother-hl3170cdw-lpr Both removed, thanks. Regards, Felix Yan signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [aur-general] [Removal Request] lightworks
Hi again! I just wanted to remind you that my request for removal of my package still exists. ;) Cheers, Pyro Devil Am Montag, den 03.02.2014, 14:19 +0100 schrieb Pyro Devil: Hi! I am the author of https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lightworks/ and request removal because of duplication. When I created the package I didn't see that: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lwks already exists. Thanks! Pyro Devil
Re: [aur-general] Removal request python2-pycrypto
On Sunday, March 09, 2014 12:56:55 Levente Polyak wrote: Hey, please remove python2-pycrypto [1] as it is an orphaned duplicate of python2-crypto [2]. Seems it was created by accident (as pointed out in the comments) [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/python2-pycrypto/ [2] https://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/python2-crypto/ cheers Levente Removed, thanks. Regards, Felix Yan signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [aur-general] Removal request: perl-webservice-mtgox
On Saturday, March 08, 2014 20:22:42 Anton Leontiev wrote: Hi, Please delete my package perl-webservice-mtgox [1]. It is no longer works and MtGox was closed. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/perl-webservice-mtgox/ With the best wishes, Removed, thanks. Regards, Felix Yan signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [aur-general] [Removal Request] weston-rbp
On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 10:32 AM, Srki srki...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, package https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/weston-rbp is now obsolete since Raspberry Pi patched version is already included in ArchLinuxARM repositories: http://archlinuxarm.org/packages?search=weston Deleted, thx. -- Maxime
Re: [aur-general] [Removal Request] bitcoin-daemon-electrum
On Friday 28 February 2014 21:12:57 Andy Weidenbaum wrote: This package https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/bitcoin-daemon-electrum/has been made obsolete by the new version of electrum-server-git. Removed, thank you. -- С уважением, Е.Алексеев. Sincerely yours, E.Alekseev. e-mail: darkarca...@mail.ru ICQ: 407-398-235 Jabber: arca...@jabber.ru signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [aur-general] [Removal Request] electrum-entropy
On Friday 28 February 2014 18:25:03 Andy Weidenbaum wrote: I no longer wish to maintain this packagehttps://aur.archlinux.org/packages/electrum-entropy The package has several votes and it isn't broken. So I don't think that removal of tha package is needed. And I hope someone will adopt it in the future. -- С уважением, Е.Алексеев. Sincerely yours, E.Alekseev. e-mail: darkarca...@mail.ru ICQ: 407-398-235 Jabber: arca...@jabber.ru signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [aur-general] removal request: girlfriend
Can I have it?
Re: [aur-general] [Removal Request] lightworks
On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 11:47 PM, Jeremy Audet ichimonj...@gmail.com wrote: Yeah, but Arch Linux TUs seem to prefer project name than package name proposed by the upstream. I have recently reported an issue stating that it's not possible to find PowerDNS with pacman -Ss powerdns. Excellent point. The principle of least surprise would dictate that packages have obvious names light lightworks or powerdns. Status? There still are two packages: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?K=lightworks
Re: [aur-general] Removal request: pcf-tewi
On Monday, February 24, 2014 18:01:53 Lucy hi wrote: pcf-tewi: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pcf-tewi/ I have decided not to release or maintain stable versions, so this package is no longer useful. Removed, thanks. Regards, Felix Yan signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [aur-general] [Removal Request] lightworks
Am 24.02.2014 17:54, schrieb Karol Blazewicz: Status? There still are two packages: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?K=lightworks lwks by stjhimy: + automatic download of source + older + votes - name - maintainers today is two weeks so far lightworks by PyroDevil: + name - needs manual download of source My suggestion is merging lwks - lightworks, add 'lwks' to description (so it can be found by that name) and add DLAGENTS overwrite to new package. best regards, carstene1ns signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [aur-general] Removal request: minetestpp
On Wednesday, February 19, 2014 15:01:41 Arch Norrepli wrote: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/minetestpp/ I created the minetestpp package, but orphaned it after development was given up. Most features of minetestpp have been merged into the current minetest or are availabe through mods. As the repository of minetestpp has been deleted, I request the removal of the package. Removed, thanks. Regards, Felix Yan signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [aur-general] Removal request for slic3r-xs-git
On Friday, February 14, 2014 22:40:36 Swift Geek wrote: Please remove slic3r-xs-git as it is not needed anymore. I have managed to successfully merge it with slic3r-git PKGBUILD. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/slic3r-xs-git Removed, thanks. Regards, Felix Yan signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [aur-general] Removal Request - splashtop
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 12:52 PM, Mark Weiman mark.wei...@markzz.comwrote: It seems that the package splashtop was replaced by the splashtop-client and splashtop-streamer packages. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/splashtop/ Mark Merged into splashtop-streamer. Thx. -- Maxime
Re: [aur-general] Removal request - hddb
On Tuesday, February 11, 2014 21:32:40 Louis-Guillaume Gagnon wrote: Greetings! Please delete AUR package 'hddb' - upstream is gone. glg Removed. Please include a link to package next time, thanks. Regards, Felix Yan signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [aur-general] Removal request mkzipbomb
On 09/02/2014 00:06, Rikard Falkeborn wrote: Please remove the package mkzipbomb [1]. The package is empty and the former maintainer has asked it to be removed in the comments of the package. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mkzipbomb/ Thanks Done. Thanks. -- Sébastien Seblu Luttringer https://seblu.net | Twitter: @seblu42 GPG: 0x2072D77A signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [aur-general] Removal request - bitcoind
On Wednesday 05 February 2014 23:40:14 WorMzy Tykashi wrote: Please remove bitcoind [1], it is provided by community/bitcoin-daemon. Done, thank you. -- С уважением, Е.Алексеев. Sincerely yours, E.Alekseev. e-mail: darkarca...@mail.ru ICQ: 407-398-235 Jabber: arca...@jabber.ru signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [aur-general] Removal request
Hi, On 04/02/14 16:22, Daniel Landau wrote: Hi, The package [1] is outdated, an orphan and the features are provided by [2]. Please remove [1]. Daniel Landau [1]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gimp-resynth-heal-selection [2]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gimp-resynth-git/ Removed as requested. -- Regards, Martin.
Re: [aur-general] [Removal Request] lightworks
I am the author of https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lightworks/ and request removal because of duplication. When I created the package I didn't see that: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lwks already exists. Actually, the project name is lightworks, not lwks, so I'd suggest to remove lightworks, and then rename lwks to lightworks. -- Kind regards, Damian Nowak StratusHost www.AtlasHost.eu
Re: [aur-general] [Removal Request] lightworks
On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 2:51 PM, Nowaker enwuk...@gmail.com wrote: I am the author of https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lightworks/ and request removal because of duplication. When I created the package I didn't see that: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lwks already exists. Actually, the project name is lightworks, not lwks, so I'd suggest to remove lightworks, and then rename lwks to lightworks. -- Kind regards, Damian Nowak StratusHost www.AtlasHost.eu Merge lwks into lightworks and transfer maintainership to stjhimy, the current lwks maintainer?
Re: [aur-general] [Removal Request] lightworks
On 2014-02-03 07:51, Nowaker wrote: I am the author of https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/lightworks/ and request removal because of duplication. Actually, the project name is lightworks, not lwks, so I'd suggest to remove lightworks, and then rename lwks to lightworks. Actually, though the project name is lightworks, the packages distributed upstream are all named lwks. I feel like, keeping in line with upstream's naming convention, it makes sense to keep the name lwks. -- All the best, Sam Stuewe (HalosGhost)
Re: [aur-general] [Removal Request] lightworks
The lwks package includes the word Lightworks in the description, which means it can be found easily. Also, the lwks package has 21 votes to lightworks 0. That said, I have no personal experience with lightworks or how other distributions treat the package, so I have no solid opinion on the matter. --Jeremy
Re: [aur-general] [Removal Request] lightworks
On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 10:25 PM, Jeremy Audet ichimonj...@gmail.com wrote: The lwks package includes the word Lightworks in the description, which means it can be found easily. You're right, even though I prefer 'lightworks' :-) Also, the lwks package has 21 votes to lightworks 0. 'lightworks' has been uploaded to AUR only about 12 hours ago. 'lwks' has been submitted a year ago. That said, I have no personal experience with lightworks or how other distributions treat the package, so I have no solid opinion on the matter. --Jeremy
Re: [aur-general] [Removal Request] lightworks
Actually, though the project name is lightworks, the packages distributed upstream are all named lwks. I feel like, keeping in line with upstream's naming convention, it makes sense to keep the name lwks. The lwks package includes the word Lightworks in the description, which means it can be found easily. Also, the lwks package has 21 votes to lightworks 0. Yeah, but Arch Linux TUs seem to prefer project name than package name proposed by the upstream. I have recently reported an issue stating that it's not possible to find PowerDNS with pacman -Ss powerdns. xyproto changed the package name from pdns (that's how the tarball is named upstream) to powerdns. https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/38231 -- Kind regards, Damian Nowak StratusHost www.AtlasHost.eu
Re: [aur-general] [Removal Request] lightworks
On 2014-02-03 16:11, Nowaker wrote: Yeah, but Arch Linux TUs seem to prefer project name than package name proposed by the upstream. I have recently reported an issue stating that it's not possible to find PowerDNS with pacman -Ss powerdns. xyproto changed the package name from pdns (that's how the tarball is named upstream) to powerdns. https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/38231 That's valid. I don't honestly mind. Though the lwks package in the ALUR really needs to be updated to fetch the source from upstream (which it currently doesn't do). -- All the best, Sam Stuewe (HalosGhost)
Re: [aur-general] Removal request: udis86-bin
On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 9:31 AM, 483...@gmail.com wrote: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/udis86-bin/ This orphan package is obsoleted by udis86 and udis86-git. It hasn't been updated since 2011. Please consider deleting it. Deleted, thx. -- Maxime
Re: [aur-general] Removal request: fail2ban-systemd-journal-git
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 5:46 AM, William J. Bowman bluephoeni...@gmail.comwrote: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/fail2ban-systemd-journal-git/ has been superseded by https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/fail2ban-0.9dev/ -- William J. Bowman Northeastern University College of Computer and Information Science Merged, thx. -- Maxime
Re: [aur-general] Removal request: octave-ident
On Thursday 30 January 2014 20:23:40 Clemens Buchacher wrote: I am not the maintainer of the octave-ident package [1]. But the maintainer notes in the comments that it has been removed and merged into the control package. I confirm that it has been removed upstream [2]. Please remove. Both packages had been removed, thank you. -- С уважением, Е.Алексеев. Sincerely yours, E.Alekseev. e-mail: darkarca...@mail.ru ICQ: 407-398-235 Jabber: arca...@jabber.ru signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [aur-general] Removal request: ds4drv-hidraw-git
On Wednesday 29 January 2014 16:24:57 Lauri Niskanen wrote: ds4drv-hidraw-git was a package for an experimental feature of ds4drv. That feature is now merged to the master branch and is available with ds4drv-git. ds4drv-hidraw-git should be removed from AUR. Ds4drv-hidraw-git had been removed. Please provide links in the next time. -- С уважением, Е.Алексеев. Sincerely yours, E.Alekseev. e-mail: darkarca...@mail.ru ICQ: 407-398-235 Jabber: arca...@jabber.ru signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [aur-general] removal request: exfat
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 8:34 PM, Aliaksandr Stelmachonak m...@ava1ar.info wrote: exfat package was a first package for exfat kernel module, based on opened by samsung code. Currently it is outdated and not compatible with latest kernels. exfat-git is a replacement package, which is being supported and updated. So can you please remove https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/exfat/ package? Thanks, Alex If it's not a dead project and they are not done making stable releases, the package might as well remain there. There's no point in erasing the comments and votes whenever a package is temporarily broken.
Re: [aur-general] Removal request: dktools-gui
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 5:36 PM, Ansgar Taflinski ataflin...@uni-koblenz.de wrote: Hallo, please remove the package dktools-gui. GUI components for dktools are included in the dktools package since version 3.0, so the old dktools-gui package is obsolete. I am the owner of the package. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/dktools-gui Thanks, Ansgar Deleted, thx. -- Maxime
Re: [aur-general] Removal request: mixcloud-dl
On Wednesday, January 22, 2014 11:01:52 Jordi De Groof wrote: Hi, Please remove mixcloud-dl [1], the program is no longer functioning. I'm the maintainer. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/mixcloud-dl/ Regards, Jordi De Groof Removed, thanks. Regards, Felix Yan signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [aur-general] Removal request of linux-elantech-trackpoint
On Saturday 11 January 2014 17:26:27 Faule Socke wrote: Reason: My other package elantech-tp-dkms does the same but using dkms instead of patching the kernel which should be much more useful. Url: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/linux-elantech-trackpoint/ Regards Removed, thank you. -- С уважением, Е.Алексеев. Sincerely yours, E.Alekseev. e-mail: darkarca...@mail.ru ICQ: 407-398-235 Jabber: arca...@jabber.ru signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [aur-general] Removal request of ttf-font-ionicons-space
On Friday, January 10, 2014 14:44:43 Carlos Pita wrote: Reason: my other package ttf-font-icons do the same and more. URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ttf-font-ionicons-space/ Regards -- Carlos Removed, thanks. Regards, Felix Yan signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [aur-general] Removal request: selinux packages
On 02/01/2014 22:42, Timothée Ravier wrote: Thus, could you please remove the following outdated packages: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/selinux-coreutils/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/selinux-cronie/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/selinux-findutils/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/selinux-openssh/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/selinux-pam/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/selinux-pambase/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/selinux-psmisc/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/selinux-setools/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/selinux-shadow/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/selinux-sudo/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/selinux-systemd/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/selinux-usr-checkpolicy/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/selinux-usr-libselinux/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/selinux-usr-libsemanage/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/selinux-usr-libsepol/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/selinux-usr-policycoreutils/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/selinux-usr-sepolgen/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/selinux-util-linux/ I merged them with the package you had indicated in the last comment. Happy new year. -- Sébastien Seblu Luttringer https://seblu.net GPG: 0x2072D77A signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [aur-general] Removal request: selinux packages
On 02/01/2014 22:54, Sébastien Luttringer wrote: On 02/01/2014 22:42, Timothée Ravier wrote: Thus, could you please remove the following outdated packages: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/selinux-coreutils/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/selinux-cronie/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/selinux-findutils/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/selinux-openssh/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/selinux-pam/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/selinux-pambase/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/selinux-psmisc/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/selinux-setools/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/selinux-shadow/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/selinux-sudo/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/selinux-systemd/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/selinux-usr-checkpolicy/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/selinux-usr-libselinux/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/selinux-usr-libsemanage/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/selinux-usr-libsepol/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/selinux-usr-policycoreutils/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/selinux-usr-sepolgen/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/selinux-util-linux/ I merged them with the package you had indicated in the last comment. Happy new year. Thanks! Merging is great! -- Timothée Ravier
Re: [aur-general] Removal request: hawaii-fluid-git and hawaii-greenisland-git
On Tuesday, December 31, 2013 12:58:40 Pier Luigi wrote: Hi, Could you please remove the following packages: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/hawaii-fluid-git/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/hawaii-greenisland-git/ They were respectively renamed to `fluid-git' and `greenisland-git'. Cheers. Both removed, thanks. Regards, Felix Yan signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [aur-general] Removal Request - h2status
On Wednesday, December 25, 2013 10:45:33 Carlos Pita wrote: Hi, could you remove the h2status package? It's a tiny development of mine that is better distributed under h2status-git. It was quietly announced yesterday and the expected user base is infinitesimal so probably there is no one but me using the package. Regards, Carlos. Removed. Please provide a link to package next time, thanks. Regards, Felix Yan signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [aur-general] Removal Request - h2status
Thank you and sorry, I'm a first-timer. Regards, Carlos. On Wed, Dec 25, 2013 at 11:15 AM, Felix Yan felixonm...@gmail.com wrote: On Wednesday, December 25, 2013 10:45:33 Carlos Pita wrote: Hi, could you remove the h2status package? It's a tiny development of mine that is better distributed under h2status-git. It was quietly announced yesterday and the expected user base is infinitesimal so probably there is no one but me using the package. Regards, Carlos. Removed. Please provide a link to package next time, thanks. Regards, Felix Yan
Re: [aur-general] Removal request
On Thursday, December 19, 2013 19:45:16 Slavi Pantaleev wrote: Hi. This is about my libcvp11 package: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/libcvp11/ The binary blob source files now 404 and are nowhere to be found online. I no longer have a use for this package, as opensc from [community] seems to provide a working free-software alternative. I still have a local copy of the zip file, but: - binaries in a source package are not encouraged - everything around this driver seems shady - the package has 0 votes, so likely no one else has/had a need for it - I'd rather not host such a blob on a server of mine for no good reason (the free-software driver works for me) Based on all that, I think this should be deleted. Regards Removed, thanks. Regards, Felix Yan signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [aur-general] Removal request
On Wednesday 18 December 2013 22:15:08 Daniel Murphy wrote: Greetings, I managed the package linux-xps15z several months back. This package added a trackpad driver needed for certain laptops. The driver was merged into the 3.9 series kernel and has been working fine since; therefore the AUR package will no longer be maintained and can be deleted if you want. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/linux-xps15z/ Removed, thank you. -- С уважением, Е.Алексеев. Sincerely yours, E.Alekseev. e-mail: darkarca...@mail.ru ICQ: 407-398-235 Jabber: arca...@jabber.ru signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [aur-general] Removal request: owl-git
On 2013-12-16 18:10 +0100 Bastien Dejean wrote: Please remove the following package: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/owl-git/ It was renamed to `owlman-git`. Greetings, -- b.d (| |) ^ ^ rotated for science (merged in layman's terms)
Re: [aur-general] Removal request for [linux-xen].
On Friday, December 13, 2013 11:42:28 Evan Teitelman wrote: Please remove linux-xen[1]. Xen support is enabled in core/x86_64/linux. Since Xen support is disabled in core/i686/linux due to its PAE dependency[2], Xen support was enabled in linux-pae[3]. The linux-xen packages is out-dated and no longer necessary. [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/linux-xen [2] https://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2009-October/014142 .html [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/linux-pae/ Removed, thanks. Regards, Felix Yan signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [aur-general] removal request for rt-tests-git
On 2 December 2013 00:31, Joakim Hernberg j...@alchemy.lu wrote: rt-tests-git is no longer needed as when there are changes a new tarball is published and covered by the rt-tests buildscript. It was only created when kernel.org had been hacked and there was a problem getting the tarballs. No need to merge into rt-tests. Thanks in advance, Gone :) -- GPG/PGP ID: C0711BF1
Re: [aur-general] Removal request for f2fs packages
On 30/11/2013 23:06, Curtis Shimamoto wrote: There are still a couple f2fs packages in the AUR. Since f2fs is now included in the mainline kernel, I don't think that these are necessary anymore. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/linux-f2fs/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/nvidia-f2fs/ Thanks! Done Thanks. -- Sébastien Seblu Luttringer https://www.seblu.net GPG: 0x2072D77A signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [aur-general] Removal Request
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 10:44 AM, Dustin Falgout dus...@falgout.us wrote: Hi, The packages kcm-grub2[1] and kcm-grub2-git[2] are both orphans and there doesn't look to be any active development on the program. The PKGBUILD's need updating to compile properly. There is an alternative available in the AUR that has active development. (grub2-editor[3]) For that reason, please remove [1} and [2]. THANKS! Regards, Dustin [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/kcm-grub2/ [2] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/kcm-grub2-git/ --- [3] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/grub2-editor/ Both are now gone, thx. -- Maxime
Re: [aur-general] Removal request: Consort Desktop packages
On Saturday, November 23, 2013 19:39:27 Marco Scarpetta wrote: I think the following packages should be removed: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/athena-git/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/consort-panel-git/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/consort-session-git/ https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/consortium-git/ The project is no more developed and it is not stable. All removed, thanks. Regards, Felix Yan signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [aur-general] Removal Request: dswitcher
On Monday, November 25, 2013 11:08:07 tuftedocelot wrote: Hi, Please remove dswitcher[1]. I realized it would be better served with a -git package and so I have created a new dswitcher-git package. dswitcher is no longer necessary. Thanks [1] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/dswitcher/ Removed, thanks. Regards, Felix Yan signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [aur-general] Removal request
On 16/11/2013 19:17, Karol Blazewicz wrote: * https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/io-git-simply/ There already is https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/io-git/ , as mentioned in io-git-simply's description. This package doesn't build because the PKGBUILD doesn't list dependencies and makedependencies. It's in 'emulators' category for some reason. Removed. -- Sébastien Seblu Luttringer https://www.seblu.net GPG: 0x2072D77A signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [aur-general] Removal Request: Texmaker-qt5 kbibtex-kde4-svn
Hi, Removed texmaker-qt5 and merged+removed kbibtex-kde4-svn with kbibtex-svn. Thanks. -- Sincerely, Alexander Rødseth xyproto / TU
