RE: [Axapta-Knowledge-Village] Re: updating problem at production
Check the inventory transactions for the production order, what do you see? What is the quantity of the production order vs inventory transaction quantity Regards harry From: Axapta-Knowledge-Village@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of IRWAN Sent: 15 January 2007 05:41 To: Axapta-Knowledge-Village@yahoogroups.com Subject: [Axapta-Knowledge-Village] Re: updating problem at production We also have the similar problem as that. We received message Quantity ordered cannot be reduced, as there are not enough inventory transaction with the 'on order' status. can anyone help me ? --- In Axapta-Knowledge-Village@yahoogroups.commailto:Axapta-Knowledge-Village%40yahoogroups.com, fvatne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi The problem is that there is not a match between the different dimensions E.g. Batch number at the one and not at the other one. --- In Axapta-Knowledge-Village@yahoogroups.commailto:Axapta-Knowledge-Village%40yahoogroups.com, Hulya Erginler hulyaerginler@ wrote: Hi, we update our production orders as end . at some production orders, we having an error message. Quantity ordered cannot be reduced, as there are not enough open inventory transactions with the Ordered status. and we can not finish update. Orders have picking list journals, job cards, reported as finished journals and they are posted. what must we do to finish update? many thanks for your answer. Hulya Erginler - Need a quick answer? Get one in minutes from people who know. Ask your question on Yahoo! Answers. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Axapta-Knowledge-Village] Bank Payment Reversal Voucher Series
Hi All One of the customer has reversed a Vendor Payment, after generating a cheque for the same. A voucher number is attached to this reversed transaction. Can any one point me out, where this particular voucher number is to be attached or where can it be changed from? Regards Nihar
[Axapta-Knowledge-Village] Cost Accounting 4.0
Can anyone give me adresses of contact info for training on Dynamics AX 4.0 Cost accounting modules Kind regards
Re: [Axapta-Knowledge-Village] Bank Payment Reversal Voucher Series
Number sequence defined for Closing voucher is used for these reversals both in AR and AP. Regards Dishant - Original Message From: Nihar Saraiya MS CISA Certified [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Axapta-Knowledge-Village@yahoogroups.com Sent: Monday, January 15, 2007 3:42:00 PM Subject: [Axapta-Knowledge-Village] Bank Payment Reversal Voucher Series Hi All One of the customer has reversed a Vendor Payment, after generating a cheque for the same. A voucher number is attached to this reversed transaction. Can any one point me out, where this particular voucher number is to be attached or where can it be changed from? Regards Nihar Do you Yahoo!? Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta. http://new.mail.yahoo.com [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Axapta-Knowledge-Village] Problem_Account Reference
Dear all, I have a query, In COA InquiryReferences we can see the list of Account references, Then go to GL Setupposting account reference Here some conectivity is there I do not know whats the concept behind that Pls help me to clear that, Thanks in Anticipation Regards kumkum __ Yahoo! India Answers: Share what you know. Learn something new http://in.answers.yahoo.com/ [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Axapta-Knowledge-Village] Virtual Company
How do we setup Virtual Company in Axapta? Please write the exact steps . I read somewhere, it helps us to share data between different companies . Can anyone please explain it with some example? Regards [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Re: [Axapta-Knowledge-Village] Re: Master Planning Query
Hi Pragashnee, Thank you so much for your explaination. This will help me alot. Regards, Anisha - Original Message From: varsityblews [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Axapta-Knowledge-Village@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, January 12, 2007 2:26:37 PM Subject: [Axapta-Knowledge-Village] Re: Master Planning Query Hi Anisha Yes Master Planning is date dependent. You have loaded a Sales order for 12/12/2006 which means you have to have the stock available for sale by that date. Your Purchase order however is for 20/02/2007 (after the sale) meaning you will still have to purchase stock for the original sales order since this purchase order obviously wouldnt be available in time for the original sale. If however you load a purchase order with a delivery date before the 12/12/2006 the planned purchase order will fall away. Hope this helps Regards Pragashnee --- In Axapta-Knowledge- [EMAIL PROTECTED] ups.com, anishafakir1 anishafakir1@ ... wrote: Hi, I need help in understanding why the following appears in Master planning. The scenario is as follows, A sales order with a delivery date of 12/12/2006 for a quantity of 73 is captured. When running the Master Scheduling job, we make use of a 2 plan scheduling (Master plan static and Master plan dynamic) it creates a requirement of a planned order of 73 which is correct. We then go create a Purchase order with a delivery date of 20/02/2007 for the demand (quantity of 73). We thereafter run the two plans again MRS and then MRD and the requirement (planned PO) does not fall away even though a PO has been created for the demand. What is the cause of this? How can we fix it? Is master planning dependent on dates and not on what is provided? Thanking you in advance. Regards, Anisha The fish are biting. Get more visitors on your site using Yahoo! Search Marketing. http://searchmarketing.yahoo.com/arp/sponsoredsearch_v2.php [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Axapta-Knowledge-Village] Wildcard characters in primary key
Hello, One of our cutomers wants to use special characters in IItemId. For example exclamation mark, comma and so on..It is known that these characters are used in filter or permanent range and although Axapta save the ItemId without error , some problems can be arised during application work. I would like to know if you have the document or recommendation for your customers containig list of reserverd words/characters- that are disabled to use in primary key. Thank you and Best regards, Tomas [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
RE: [Axapta-Knowledge-Village] Wildcard characters in primary key
I recommend you don't use any of the wildcards...you can and I have one customer who went ahead with an asterix on the front of some item ids. Means when you do search you got to put a slash in front to tell that it should be read as character and not control character. E.g. \*itemid -Original Message- From: Axapta-Knowledge-Village@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of MBS Axapta Sent: 15 January 2007 23:21 To: Axapta-Knowledge-Village@yahoogroups.com Subject: [Axapta-Knowledge-Village] Wildcard characters in primary key Hello, One of our cutomers wants to use special characters in IItemId. For example exclamation mark, comma and so on..It is known that these characters are used in filter or permanent range and although Axapta save the ItemId without error , some problems can be arised during application work. I would like to know if you have the document or recommendation for your customers containig list of reserverd words/characters- that are disabled to use in primary key. Thank you and Best regards, Tomas [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] Sharing the knowledge on Axapta. Visit www.frappr.com/axapta for axapta friends. Visit www.axapta-knowledge-village.tk Yahoo! Groups Links
[Axapta-Knowledge-Village] Re: Production closing error: Quantity ordered may not be reduced, as there are
We have the similar problem as mikki. There are some inventory transactions with on order status for that production order. That inventory were meant to be a subtitute item and already been closed on the picking list journal. We tried to close the on order status by generating a new picking list journal for the same item without fill the consumption and thick the end field, but the error message appears again Quantity ordered may not be reduced, as there are not enough stock transactions with 'on order' status. The items are 'Sold', 'Deducted' or 'Picked' . --- In Axapta-Knowledge-Village@yahoogroups.com, Harry Deshpande [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hi Is there any inventory reference on the inventory transaction for the item? I dont have Ax in front of me right now, but this reference is I think on the second tab and the field is InventRefChildId or something similar regards harry From: Axapta-Knowledge-Village@yahoogroups.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of futzawm [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 15, 2007 9:23 PM To: Axapta-Knowledge-Village@yahoogroups.com Subject: [Axapta-Knowledge-Village] Production closing error: Quantity ordered may not be reduced, as there are.. Please help on the following problem (I have seen similar questions in the forum but none Were resolved): We are trying to close a production order and the following error is being generated: Calculating BOM Consumption Posting - Picking list journal Journal: PJ Voucher: PV Line No: 1 Item No: 00123 Quantity ordered may not be reduced, as there are not enough stock transactions with 'on order' status. The items are 'Sold', 'Deducted' or 'Picked'. The production was started with the item in question but another item was substituted during production. Registration of the picking list journal was thus done with the item consumption = 0. There are no transactions with 'Sold', 'Deducted' or 'Picked' status for the item as referring to that particular production. However, the item transactions show a quantity equal to the original started quantity with status 'On Order' for that particular production (therefore, no reason for the error not enough stock transactions with 'On Order' status). I saw one earlier response to this type of problem by fvatne where it was suggested that the problem can be a result of mismatch between different dimensions. This seemed a logical reason but the problem was not solved even after we removed all dimension restrictions on the particular item. How would we be able to resolve this problem? Would be very grateful for some pointers. Thanks. Mikki
