RE: multiple configurations (multiple axis2.xml with different names)?
Hi, I am using axis2c_1.5.0 release. When I specify libDir and moduleDir in axis2.xml, axis2c client on Linux still, axis2c client run time still does not use paths specified in axis2.xml file and exits with an error. I am attaching my axis2.xml file. I am specifying parameter name=libDir/usr/local/axis2c/lib/parameter parameter name=moduleDir/usr/local/axis2c/modules/parameter as children of axisconfig root element. Here is the axis2client log [Wed Apr 15 10:49:36 2009] [error] class_loader.c(162) Loading shared library /usr/ops/5.0/config/wsclient/http/lib/libaxis2_http_sender.so Failed. DLERROR IS /usr/ops/5.0/config/wsclient/http/lib/libaxis2_http_sender.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory [Wed Apr 15 10:49:36 2009] [error] conf_builder.c(898) Transport sender is NULL for transport http, unable to continue [Wed Apr 15 10:49:36 2009] [error] conf_builder.c(261) Processing transport senders failed, unable to continue [Wed Apr 15 10:49:36 2009] [error] dep_engine.c(939) Populating Axis2 Configuration failed [Wed Apr 15 10:49:36 2009] [error] conf_init.c(195) Loading deployment engine failed for client repository /usr/ops/5.0/config/wsclient/http [Wed Apr 15 10:49:36 2009] [error] class_loader.c(162) Loading shared library /usr/ops/5.0/config/wsclient/http/lib/libaxis2_http_sender.so Failed. DLERROR IS /usr/ops/5.0/config/wsclient/http/lib/libaxis2_http_sender.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory [Wed Apr 15 10:49:36 2009] [error] conf_builder.c(898) Transport sender is NULL for transport http, unable to continue [Wed Apr 15 10:49:36 2009] [error] conf_builder.c(261) Processing transport senders failed, unable to continue [Wed Apr 15 10:49:36 2009] [error] dep_engine.c(939) Populating Axis2 Configuration failed [Wed Apr 15 10:49:36 2009] [error] conf_init.c(195) Loading deployment engine failed for client repository /usr/ops/5.0/config/wsclient/http [Wed Apr 15 10:49:42 2009] [error] class_loader.c(162) Loading shared library /usr/ops/5.0/config/wsclient/http/lib/libaxis2_http_sender.so Failed. DLERROR IS /usr/ops/5.0/config/wsclient/http/lib/libaxis2_http_sender.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory [Wed Apr 15 10:49:42 2009] [error] conf_builder.c(898) Transport sender is NULL for transport http, unable to continue [Wed Apr 15 10:49:42 2009] [error] conf_builder.c(261) Processing transport senders failed, unable to continue I need to have lib and modules located in AXIS2C_HOME directory. I am setting up soft links to actual lib and module dir. Once lib and modules links are set up in axis2c_home dir every thing works fine. Thanks, Raghu From: Raymond Zhou [mailto:raywang...@yahoo.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2009 1:11 PM To: Apache AXIS C User List Subject: Re: multiple configurations (multiple axis2.xml with different names)? OK, I just tried, it seems that I can only use the name axis2.xml. I can specify different folds and axis2/c will look for axis2.xml in that fold. I can also specify a file path ended with axis2.xml. All works fine. But axis2/c will fail to create a wb service client if I specify a full file path with a name different from axis2.xml. I think this needs to be fixed. In my environment, my web service client needs to connect to several web service providers with different configurations, it would be convenient if I can create several config files with different names. Thanks! Frank --- On Mon, 3/2/09, Samisa Abeysinghe sam...@wso2.com wrote: From: Samisa Abeysinghe sam...@wso2.com Subject: Re: multiple configurations (multiple axis2.xml with different names)? To: Apache AXIS C User List axis-c-user@ws.apache.org Date: Monday, March 2, 2009, 1:35 AM Raymond Zhou wrote: OK, Thanks Dinesh. So it seems that I can create multiple configuration files all named axis2.xml but put in different folds, and in each axis2.xml, specify the library and module locations pointing to the single axis2/c installation. It would be nice if I can create multiple configuration files with different names, so I can put them in a same fold, and then set the axis2_home programmatically. That should be possible, but we might have to pach the current implementation of config builder. Thanks, Samisa... Thanks! Frank --- On *Fri, 2/27/09, Dinesh Premalal /xydin...@gmail.com http://us.mc464.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=xydin...@gmail.com /* wrote: From: Dinesh Premalal xydin...@gmail.com http://us.mc464.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=xydin...@gmail.com Subject: Re: multiple configurations (multiple axis2..xml with different names)? To: axis-c-user@ws.apache.org
Spurious client time out errors -- duplicate transmission
Hi, I am using Axis2C/1.5.0 on a Linux server as a client communicating to a Web service. Each message is delivered to a possibly different web service through a separate process. The process communicates either via http or https depending on remote web service configuration On couple of occasions, I got time out error at the client, while message was successfully received at the host. I have set the session time out to 3 minutes. When I enable the trace log, this problem does not happen. Here is a snapshot of axis2c log. 1) [Thu Feb 5 17:05:03 2009] [error] http_client.c(460) Response timed out [Thu Feb 5 17:05:03 2009] [error] http_sender.c(1342) status_code 0 [Thu Feb 5 17:05:03 2009] [error] engine.c(179) Transport sender invoke failed 2) [Thu Feb 5 17:05:03 2009] [error] http_client.c(460) Response timed out [Thu Feb 5 17:05:03 2009] [error] http_sender.c(1342) status_code 0 [Thu Feb 5 17:05:03 2009] [error] engine.c(179) Transport sender invoke failed 3) [Thu Feb 5 17:15:41 2009] [error] http_client.c(460) Response timed out [Thu Feb 5 17:15:41 2009] [error] http_sender.c(1342) status_code 0 [Thu Feb 5 17:15:41 2009] [error] engine.c(179) Transport sender invoke failed 4) [Thu Feb 5 17:19:47 2009] [error] http_client.c(460) Response timed out [Thu Feb 5 17:19:47 2009] [error] http_sender.c(1342) status_code 0 [Thu Feb 5 17:19:47 2009] [error] engine.c(179) Transport sender invoke failed For each of the above 4 attempts, message was delivered at the web service. In addition, the client received time-out as soon as the request was sent even though session timeout is set to 180 seconds. Here is the time when message was sent. 1) 17:05:02 16 [9406] SendMessage: Call web service. Signature reqd 0 17:05:03 16 [9406] axis2_stub_op_ReceiveEasyLinkFaxService_ReceiveFax: return code is null 2) 17:05:03 16 [9407] SendMessage: Call web service. Signature reqd 0 17:05:03 16 [9407] axis2_stub_op_ReceiveEasyLinkFaxService_ReceiveFax: return code is null 3) 17:15:41 16 [9672] SendMessage: Call web service. Signature reqd 0 17:15:41 16 [9672] axis2_stub_op_ReceiveEasyLinkFaxService_ReceiveFax: return code is null 4) 17:19:47 16 [9726] SendMessage: Call web service. Signature reqd 0 17:19:47 16 [9726] axis2_stub_op_ReceiveEasyLinkFaxService_ReceiveFax: return code is null Thanks, Raghu
RE: Spurious client time out errors -- duplicate transmission
Hi, This problem happens only when I use HTTP protocol. With HTTPS every thing works fine. One message is sent and one is received. I am using Axis2C/1.5.0 on a Linux server as a client communicating to a Web service. Each message is delivered to a possibly different web service through a separate process. The process communicates either via http or https depending on remote web service configuration On couple of occasions, I got time out error at the client, while message was successfully received at the host. I have set the session time out to 3 minutes. When I enable the trace log, this problem does not happen. Here is a snapshot of axis2c log. 1) [Thu Feb 5 17:05:03 2009] [error] http_client.c(460) Response timed out [Thu Feb 5 17:05:03 2009] [error] http_sender.c(1342) status_code 0 [Thu Feb 5 17:05:03 2009] [error] engine.c(179) Transport sender invoke failed 2) [Thu Feb 5 17:05:03 2009] [error] http_client.c(460) Response timed out [Thu Feb 5 17:05:03 2009] [error] http_sender.c(1342) status_code 0 [Thu Feb 5 17:05:03 2009] [error] engine.c(179) Transport sender invoke failed 3) [Thu Feb 5 17:15:41 2009] [error] http_client.c(460) Response timed out [Thu Feb 5 17:15:41 2009] [error] http_sender.c(1342) status_code 0 [Thu Feb 5 17:15:41 2009] [error] engine.c(179) Transport sender invoke failed 4) [Thu Feb 5 17:19:47 2009] [error] http_client.c(460) Response timed out [Thu Feb 5 17:19:47 2009] [error] http_sender.c(1342) status_code 0 [Thu Feb 5 17:19:47 2009] [error] engine.c(179) Transport sender invoke failed For each of the above 4 attempts, message was delivered at the web service. In addition, the client received time-out as soon as the request was sent even though session timeout is set to 180 seconds. Here is the time when message was sent. 1) 17:05:02 16 [9406] SendMessage: Call web service. Signature reqd 0 17:05:03 16 [9406] axis2_stub_op_ReceiveEasyLinkFaxService_ReceiveFax: return code is null 2) 17:05:03 16 [9407] SendMessage: Call web service. Signature reqd 0 17:05:03 16 [9407] axis2_stub_op_ReceiveEasyLinkFaxService_ReceiveFax: return code is null 3) 17:15:41 16 [9672] SendMessage: Call web service. Signature reqd 0 17:15:41 16 [9672] axis2_stub_op_ReceiveEasyLinkFaxService_ReceiveFax: return code is null 4) 17:19:47 16 [9726] SendMessage: Call web service. Signature reqd 0 17:19:47 16 [9726] axis2_stub_op_ReceiveEasyLinkFaxService_ReceiveFax: return code is null Thanks, Raghu
Using tcpmon with axis2_http_server
Hi, I am using axis2_http_server provided with axis2c 1.5.0 release for unit testing. The client and service applications are running properly. But, I can not see the messages in tcpmon. Is there any thing specific I need to specify in axis2.xml to get tcpmon to capture the messages. Client and the server applications run on Linux server. Thanks, Raghu
RE: rampart_handler_util.c -- parameter not set
Thanks Manjula. Does the policy.xml has to reside in AXIS2_HOME? Can I specify full pathname (to point to the policy file located in some other directory) through neeti APIs? Regards, Raghu From: Manjula Peiris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Fri 10/3/2008 11:11 PM To: Apache AXIS C User List Subject: RE: rampart_handler_util.c -- parameter not set On Fri, 2008-10-03 at 22:43 -0400, Raghu Udupa wrote: Thanks, Shankar, for the explanation. I was trying to send a signed request and receive a clear (un-signed) response. Our web services client need to connect to different web services some of which may require signed messages. So, can we do either of the following: 1. Does the policy.xml has to be named as policy.xml on the client side? If I can specify policy_cust1.xml for customer 1 and policy_cust2.xml for customer 2, then, same client will be able to handle multiple customers. Basically, my question is there a restriction like axis2c config file name being axis2.xml No it does not need to be policy.xml. If you carefully look at the rampart sample client you will understand. What you need to do is calling the neethi_util_create_policy_from_file() function with the policy file name. 2. Can we specify receiver certificate, for each customer programmatically through an API Current API does not allow this. Even though there are some properties like username can be passed through programmatically. Regards, Raghu From: Uthaiyashankar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Fri 10/3/2008 10:07 PM To: Apache AXIS C User List Subject: Re: rampart_handler_util.c -- parameter not set Hi Raghu, I think your configurations are wrong. First of all, I have to be clear that whether message sent from server to client is also signed? It has to be signed, otherwise rampart will not work. From client side, still we don't have support to have different security policy for outgoing message and incoming message. Hence my further explanations will assume even the message from server to client is signed. To sign from server to client, you have to give rampc:Certificate and rampc:PrivateKey in server side configuration. Also, you have to give rampc:ReceiverCertificate in client's configuration. Sample4 shipped with Rampart[1] is actually the usecase you are trying to achieve. You can have a look at that. Regards, Shankar [1] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/webservices/rampart/trunk/c/samples/secpolicy/scenario4 Raghu Udupa wrote: Thanks Shankar. I am a bit confused about specifying security phase in axis2.xml for client as well as for server. We need to sign the documents that are sent to the client which need to be verified at the server. Could you tell me whether my settings of axis2.xml and policy.xml on the client side and axis2.xml and service.xml on the server side are correct for a correct implementation of signature verification CLIENT SIDE axis2.xml = phaseOrder type=outflow !-- User defined phases could be added here -- !--phase name=userphase1/-- !--system predefined phase-- phase name=MessageOut/ phase name=Security/ !--phase name=Security/-- /phaseOrder policy.xml == rampc:RampartConfig xmlns:rampc=http://ws.apache.org/rampart/c/policy; rampc:Certificate/usr/certdir/openssl_crt.pem/rampc:Certificate rampc:PrivateKey/usr/certdir/sign.key/rampc:PrivateKey /rampc:RampartConfig SERVER SIDE axis2.xml = phaseOrder type=inflow !-- System pre defined phases -- phase name=Transport/ phase name=PreDispatch/ phase name=Dispatch/ phase name=PostDispatch/ phase name=Security/ /phaseOrder service.xml === service name=ReceiveEasyLinkFaxService parameter name=ServiceClassReceiveEasyLinkFaxService/parameter descriptionReceiveEasyLinkFaxService Service/description module ref=rampart/ operation name=ReceiveFax rampc:RampartConfig xmlns:rampc=http://ws.apache.org/rampart/c/policy; rampc:ReceiverCertificate/usr/certdir/openssl_crt.pem/rampc:ReceiverC ertificate /rampc:RampartConfig Thanks, Raghu -Original Message- From: Uthaiyashankar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2008 1:13 PM To: Apache AXIS C User List Subject: Re: rampart_handler_util.c -- parameter not set Raghu Udupa wrote: Thanks Samisa. The first reported error is parameter 0 not being set in rampart_handler_util.c. I wanted to know which configuration parameter method rampart_get_rampart_configuration in rampart_handler_util.c is looking for. That error message is misleading. It is actually not an error. :). We have to remove it. So, you can safely ignore it. Regards, Shankar. Regards
RE: rampart_handler_util.c -- parameter not set
Thanks Shankar. I am a bit confused about specifying security phase in axis2.xml for client as well as for server. We need to sign the documents that are sent to the client which need to be verified at the server. Could you tell me whether my settings of axis2.xml and policy.xml on the client side and axis2.xml and service.xml on the server side are correct for a correct implementation of signature verification CLIENT SIDE axis2.xml = phaseOrder type=outflow !-- User defined phases could be added here -- !--phase name=userphase1/-- !--system predefined phase-- phase name=MessageOut/ phase name=Security/ !--phase name=Security/-- /phaseOrder policy.xml == rampc:RampartConfig xmlns:rampc=http://ws.apache.org/rampart/c/policy; rampc:Certificate/usr/certdir/openssl_crt.pem/rampc:Certificate rampc:PrivateKey/usr/certdir/sign.key/rampc:PrivateKey /rampc:RampartConfig SERVER SIDE axis2.xml = phaseOrder type=inflow !-- System pre defined phases -- phase name=Transport/ phase name=PreDispatch/ phase name=Dispatch/ phase name=PostDispatch/ phase name=Security/ /phaseOrder service.xml === service name=ReceiveEasyLinkFaxService parameter name=ServiceClassReceiveEasyLinkFaxService/parameter descriptionReceiveEasyLinkFaxService Service/description module ref=rampart/ operation name=ReceiveFax rampc:RampartConfig xmlns:rampc=http://ws.apache.org/rampart/c/policy; rampc:ReceiverCertificate/usr/certdir/openssl_crt.pem/rampc:ReceiverC ertificate /rampc:RampartConfig Thanks, Raghu -Original Message- From: Uthaiyashankar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2008 1:13 PM To: Apache AXIS C User List Subject: Re: rampart_handler_util.c -- parameter not set Raghu Udupa wrote: Thanks Samisa. The first reported error is parameter 0 not being set in rampart_handler_util.c. I wanted to know which configuration parameter method rampart_get_rampart_configuration in rampart_handler_util.c is looking for. That error message is misleading. It is actually not an error. :). We have to remove it. So, you can safely ignore it. Regards, Shankar. Regards, Raghu -Original Message- From: Samisa Abeysinghe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2008 9:32 PM To: Apache AXIS C User List Subject: Re: rampart_handler_util.c -- parameter not set 2. Also, the webservices client is getting following error while attempting to engage rampart module. [Wed Oct 1 11:36:33 2008] [error] rampart_handler_util.c(241) [rampart][rampart_handler_utils] 0 parameter is not set. [Wed Oct 1 11:36:33 2008] [warning] msg_ctx.c(1381) RampartClientConfiguration not set in message context [Wed Oct 1 11:36:33 2008] [error] error.c(94) OXS ERROR [x509.c:284 in openssl_x509_get_subject_key_identifier] oxs defualt error , The extenension index of NID_subject_key_identifier is not valid [Wed Oct 1 11:36:33 2008] [error] http_sender.c(1374) Error occurred in transport [Wed Oct 1 11:36:33 2008] [error] rampart_engine.c(122) [rampart][rampart_engine] Cannot get saved rampart_context [Wed Oct 1 11:36:33 2008] [error] rampart_in_handler.c(114) [rampart][rampart_in_handler] rampart_context creation failed. [Wed Oct 1 11:36:33 2008] [error] phase.c(216) Handler RampartInHandler invoke failed within phase PreDispatch [Wed Oct 1 11:36:33 2008] [error] engine.c(696) Invoking phase PreDispatch failed [Wed Oct 1 11:36:33 2008] [error] soap11_builder_helper.c(368) Unidentified character in SOAP 1.1 builder helper processing As the error says, there is something wrong in your key. Samisa... 3. I am also including the server log. I am using a self signed certificate generated using openssl to sign the message. Digest verification is succeeding. But signature verification is failing. Thanks, Raghu To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: certificate file for communicating via https
Thanks Manjula. I need a couple more clarifications, 1) If I store multiple certificates in a PFX file, how would axis2c/rampart know which certificate to use? 1.1) Does it go by the domain name in the URI? If so, what is the criteria? That is, if URI is www.webservices.com/axis2/services/myservice, then, does it use the domain www.webservices.com for retrieving the certificate. 1.2) Do I need to specify a password for each certificate? 2) You mention providing .pfx file and password to Rampart/C. My thinking was to specify PFX file in axis2.xml under SERVER_CERT. There is no tag in axis2.xml for specifying password. Where do I specify the password? Can I do it programmatically or through module.xml? 3) This is just a reconfirmation. In the client guide, it is mentioned that I can specify a PEM file. As long as PEM file is one certificate per PEM file, can I still use a PEM file. Thanks, Raghu -Original Message- From: Manjula Peiris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 19, 2008 5:35 AM To: Apache AXIS C User List Subject: Re: certificate file for communicating via https On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 17:01 -0400, Raghu Udupa wrote: If a web services client wants to communicate with different servers, can certificates for different servers be specified in one PEM file. For curl, you can specify a single certificate file which can contain multiple certificates. I would like to know whether axis2c provides this feature. No you can't specify it in one PEM file. Rampart/C the Axis2/C security project does not support that. But you can store all the certificates in a pfx key store and provide Rampart/C with the .pfx file with the password to retrieve the certificate from the key store. Thanks, Raghu - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: rampart_handler_util.c -- parameter not set
Thanks, Shankar, for the explanation. I was trying to send a signed request and receive a clear (un-signed) response. Our web services client need to connect to different web services some of which may require signed messages. So, can we do either of the following: 1. Does the policy.xml has to be named as policy.xml on the client side? If I can specify policy_cust1.xml for customer 1 and policy_cust2.xml for customer 2, then, same client will be able to handle multiple customers. Basically, my question is there a restriction like axis2c config file name being axis2.xml 2. Can we specify receiver certificate, for each customer programmatically through an API Regards, Raghu From: Uthaiyashankar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Fri 10/3/2008 10:07 PM To: Apache AXIS C User List Subject: Re: rampart_handler_util.c -- parameter not set Hi Raghu, I think your configurations are wrong. First of all, I have to be clear that whether message sent from server to client is also signed? It has to be signed, otherwise rampart will not work. From client side, still we don't have support to have different security policy for outgoing message and incoming message. Hence my further explanations will assume even the message from server to client is signed. To sign from server to client, you have to give rampc:Certificate and rampc:PrivateKey in server side configuration. Also, you have to give rampc:ReceiverCertificate in client's configuration. Sample4 shipped with Rampart[1] is actually the usecase you are trying to achieve. You can have a look at that. Regards, Shankar [1] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/webservices/rampart/trunk/c/samples/secpolicy/scenario4 Raghu Udupa wrote: Thanks Shankar. I am a bit confused about specifying security phase in axis2.xml for client as well as for server. We need to sign the documents that are sent to the client which need to be verified at the server. Could you tell me whether my settings of axis2.xml and policy.xml on the client side and axis2.xml and service.xml on the server side are correct for a correct implementation of signature verification CLIENT SIDE axis2.xml = phaseOrder type=outflow !-- User defined phases could be added here -- !--phase name=userphase1/-- !--system predefined phase-- phase name=MessageOut/ phase name=Security/ !--phase name=Security/-- /phaseOrder policy.xml == rampc:RampartConfig xmlns:rampc=http://ws.apache.org/rampart/c/policy; rampc:Certificate/usr/certdir/openssl_crt.pem/rampc:Certificate rampc:PrivateKey/usr/certdir/sign.key/rampc:PrivateKey /rampc:RampartConfig SERVER SIDE axis2.xml = phaseOrder type=inflow !-- System pre defined phases -- phase name=Transport/ phase name=PreDispatch/ phase name=Dispatch/ phase name=PostDispatch/ phase name=Security/ /phaseOrder service.xml === service name=ReceiveEasyLinkFaxService parameter name=ServiceClassReceiveEasyLinkFaxService/parameter descriptionReceiveEasyLinkFaxService Service/description module ref=rampart/ operation name=ReceiveFax rampc:RampartConfig xmlns:rampc=http://ws.apache.org/rampart/c/policy; rampc:ReceiverCertificate/usr/certdir/openssl_crt.pem/rampc:ReceiverC ertificate /rampc:RampartConfig Thanks, Raghu -Original Message- From: Uthaiyashankar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2008 1:13 PM To: Apache AXIS C User List Subject: Re: rampart_handler_util.c -- parameter not set Raghu Udupa wrote: Thanks Samisa. The first reported error is parameter 0 not being set in rampart_handler_util.c. I wanted to know which configuration parameter method rampart_get_rampart_configuration in rampart_handler_util.c is looking for. That error message is misleading. It is actually not an error. :). We have to remove it. So, you can safely ignore it. Regards, Shankar. Regards, Raghu -Original Message- From: Samisa Abeysinghe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2008 9:32 PM To: Apache AXIS C User List Subject: Re: rampart_handler_util.c -- parameter not set 2. Also, the webservices client is getting following error while attempting to engage rampart module. [Wed Oct 1 11:36:33 2008] [error] rampart_handler_util.c(241) [rampart][rampart_handler_utils] 0 parameter is not set. [Wed Oct 1 11:36:33 2008] [warning] msg_ctx.c(1381) RampartClientConfiguration not set in message context [Wed Oct 1 11:36:33 2008] [error] error.c(94) OXS ERROR [x509.c:284 in openssl_x509_get_subject_key_identifier] oxs defualt error , The extenension index of NID_subject_key_identifier is not valid [Wed Oct 1 11:36:33 2008] [error] http_sender.c(1374) Error occurred in transport [Wed Oct 1 11:36:33 2008] [error
RE: rampart_handler_util.c -- parameter not set
Thanks Samisa. The first reported error is parameter 0 not being set in rampart_handler_util.c. I wanted to know which configuration parameter method rampart_get_rampart_configuration in rampart_handler_util.c is looking for. Regards, Raghu -Original Message- From: Samisa Abeysinghe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2008 9:32 PM To: Apache AXIS C User List Subject: Re: rampart_handler_util.c -- parameter not set 2. Also, the webservices client is getting following error while attempting to engage rampart module. [Wed Oct 1 11:36:33 2008] [error] rampart_handler_util.c(241) [rampart][rampart_handler_utils] 0 parameter is not set. [Wed Oct 1 11:36:33 2008] [warning] msg_ctx.c(1381) RampartClientConfiguration not set in message context [Wed Oct 1 11:36:33 2008] [error] error.c(94) OXS ERROR [x509.c:284 in openssl_x509_get_subject_key_identifier] oxs defualt error , The extenension index of NID_subject_key_identifier is not valid [Wed Oct 1 11:36:33 2008] [error] http_sender.c(1374) Error occurred in transport [Wed Oct 1 11:36:33 2008] [error] rampart_engine.c(122) [rampart][rampart_engine] Cannot get saved rampart_context [Wed Oct 1 11:36:33 2008] [error] rampart_in_handler.c(114) [rampart][rampart_in_handler] rampart_context creation failed. [Wed Oct 1 11:36:33 2008] [error] phase.c(216) Handler RampartInHandler invoke failed within phase PreDispatch [Wed Oct 1 11:36:33 2008] [error] engine.c(696) Invoking phase PreDispatch failed [Wed Oct 1 11:36:33 2008] [error] soap11_builder_helper.c(368) Unidentified character in SOAP 1.1 builder helper processing As the error says, there is something wrong in your key. Samisa... 3. I am also including the server log. I am using a self signed certificate generated using openssl to sign the message. Digest verification is succeeding. But signature verification is failing. Thanks, Raghu To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Testing http basic authentication using axis2c http server
Folks, I am trying to test http authentication in a web services client. Is it possible to test HTTP basic (or digest) authentication on axis2c http server that is part of axis2c package? Thanks, Raghu
axis2c installation with and without SSL
I am writing a web service client that could connect either to a HTTP or HTTPS client. I installed axis2c with and without SSL support. When I see the axis2c/lib directory for with and without SSL support, the shared object files have same names. I need to set the LD_LIBRARY_PATH to point to the correct library path before I run the client. If I set the LD_LIBRARY_PATH to include both SSL and non-SSL paths, at run time, the first path that has required shared object library file will be used. That is, if I specify library path that has SSL library files first, then these files will be used for a non-SSL client as well. Is there a simple way I can resolve this conflict? Or do I need 2 separate clients, one built with SSL axis2c library and the other with regular (non-SSL library)? Thanks, Raghu
RE: axis2c installation with and without SSL
Thanks Dumindu.
Initially I did a normal install using configure. Afterwards, I did an
install for SSL client using
%./configure --enable-openssl=yes --prefix=${AXIS2C_HOME}/deploy
The lib directory contained same number of library files, but their
sizes were different.
For example, the normal (without openssl), following .so files were
installed (/usr/local/axis2c/lib)
libaxutil.so.0.5.0412529
libguththila.so.0.5.0 338215
libaxis2_parser.so.0.5.081773
libaxis2_axiom.so.0.5.0496886
libneethi.so.0.5.0 504229
libaxis2_http_common.so.0.5.0 226953
libaxis2_engine.so.0.5.0 1175501
libaxis2_http_sender.so.0.5.0 205220
libaxis2_http_receiver.so.0.5.0 32794
When I specified SSL option (/usr/local/axis2c-ssl/deploy/lib)
libaxutil.so.0.5.0 412537
libguththila.so.0.5.0 338231
libaxis2_parser.so.0.5.0 81777
libaxis2_axiom.so.0.5.0 496902
libneethi.so.0.5.0 504241
libaxis2_http_common.so.0.5.0 226973
libaxis2_engine.so.0.5.0 1175549
libaxis2_http_sender.so.0.5.0 258473
libaxis2_http_receiver.so.0.5.0 32810
As you can see, there is slight difference in file sizes. These
differences may have to do with time stamping in the object header
files.
My question is does it matter which set of library files do I use? If
these differences do matter, can I use the .so library files generated
using SSL option for regular http server as well.
Regards,
Raghu
From: Dumindu Pallewela [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2008 3:33 PM
To: Apache AXIS C User List
Subject: Re: axis2c installation with and without SSL
You can use a single client for both http and https, if you provide the
ssl configuration in axis2.xml.
Regards,
Dumindu.
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 10:15 PM, Raghu Udupa [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I am writing a web service client that could connect either to a HTTP or
HTTPS client. I installed axis2c with and without SSL support.
When I see the axis2c/lib directory for with and without SSL support,
the shared object files have same names.
I need to set the LD_LIBRARY_PATH to point to the correct library path
before I run the client.
If I set the LD_LIBRARY_PATH to include both SSL and non-SSL paths, at
run time, the first path that has required shared object library file
will be used. That is, if I specify library path that has SSL library
files first, then these files will be used for a non-SSL client as well.
Is there a simple way I can resolve this conflict? Or do I need 2
separate clients, one built with SSL axis2c library and the other with
regular (non-SSL library)?
Thanks,
Raghu
clarification on axis2_svc_client_send_receive_with_op_qname API call
If I use the synchronous call axis2_svc_client_send_receive_with_op_qname to send and receive a message, how do I track errors at server? It appears that I need to check the response received and verify locally whether the service execution is successful or not. My question, is can the error at service be tracked by checking the value returned by axis2_svc_client_send_receive_with_op_qname call? Or do I process the response and handle error based on what I receive in the response? Thanks, Raghu
RE: Simplifying code generated by adb
Thanks Dimuthu. At this point, I am proceeding with Samisa's suggestion to modify generated code by hand. I will take a look at the new wsdl2c at a later time. Regards, Raghu From: Dimuthu Gamage [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Mon 9/15/2008 11:26 AM To: Apache AXIS C User List Subject: Re: Simplifying code generated by adb Hi Raghu, The adb generated code will completely depends on the schema you have. If you really want to generate a similar set of adb structs you need to have a similar set of schemas in your WSDL. Or with the fix to the JIRA https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2C-1145 you are no longer need to write wrapper structs. And it will really minimize the code you have to write. (explained more on my blog, http://www.dimuthu.org/blog/2008/09/15/use-axis2c-wsdl2c-with-unwrapped-mode-for-simpler-code/ ) Thanks Dimuthu On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 11:24 PM, Raghu Udupa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am using codegen with adb option to generate code for client stub and service processing. I have many simple string types defined in the XML schema. There is a significant amount of repetitive code generated for various elements. Generated code works properly. Is there a way, I mean, suggested guidelines to simplify the code generated to make all similar elements to share same methods? Thanks, Raghu -- Thanks, Dimuthu Gamage http://www.dimuthu.org http://www.dimuthu.org/ http://www.wso2.org http://www.wso2.org/ winmail.dat- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
User-id/password authentication while using https
In axis2c user manual and API documentation, user-id and password authentication appears to be provided only for HTTP protocol as shown in the call below axis2_options_set_http_auth_info( axis2_options_t * options, const axutil_env_t * env, const axis2_char_t * username, const axis2_char_t * password, const axis2_char_t * auth_type); Could you let me know how to do similar validation on https transport? Thanks, Raghu
RE: User-id/password authentication while using https
Thanks Hatim. I am not using libcurl. I wanted to make sure I can use the same API call with https transport as well. Thanks, Raghu From: Hatim Daginawala [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2008 3:00 PM To: Apache AXIS C User List Subject: RE: User-id/password authentication while using https I think this same call also works for https if you are not using libcurl. If you are using libcurl, I have a patch to get this to work. I can give it to you. From: Raghu Udupa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2008 1:52 PM To: axis-c-user@ws.apache.org Subject: User-id/password authentication while using https In axis2c user manual and API documentation, user-id and password authentication appears to be provided only for HTTP protocol as shown in the call below axis2_options_set_http_auth_info( axis2_options_t * options, const axutil_env_t * env, const axis2_char_t * username, const axis2_char_t * password, const axis2_char_t * auth_type); Could you let me know how to do similar validation on https transport? Thanks, Raghu --- Confidentiality Notice: This electronic mail transmission is confidential, may be privileged and should be read or retained only by the intended recipient. If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately notify the sender and delete it from your system.
RE: User-id/password authentication while using https
Thanks for the clarification Dimindu, Regards, Raghu From: Dumindu Pallewela [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2008 3:18 PM To: Apache AXIS C User List Subject: Re: User-id/password authentication while using https Yes the same API can be used for either http or https transports, if you don't use libcurl. Regards, Dumindu. On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 12:35 AM, Raghu Udupa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks Hatim. I am not using libcurl. I wanted to make sure I can use the same API call with https transport as well. Thanks, Raghu From: Hatim Daginawala [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2008 3:00 PM To: Apache AXIS C User List Subject: RE: User-id/password authentication while using https I think this same call also works for https if you are not using libcurl. If you are using libcurl, I have a patch to get this to work. I can give it to you. From: Raghu Udupa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2008 1:52 PM To: axis-c-user@ws.apache.org Subject: User-id/password authentication while using https In axis2c user manual and API documentation, user-id and password authentication appears to be provided only for HTTP protocol as shown in the call below axis2_options_set_http_auth_info( axis2_options_t * options, const axutil_env_t * env, const axis2_char_t * username, const axis2_char_t * password, const axis2_char_t * auth_type); Could you let me know how to do similar validation on https transport? Thanks, Raghu --- Confidentiality Notice: This electronic mail transmission is confidential, may be privileged and should be read or retained only by the intended recipient. If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately notify the sender and delete it from your system. -- Dumindu Pallewela Creately.com
RE: Get error while parsing an XML message containing a complex type at axis2_http_server
Folks, I replaced axutil_array_list_set with axutil_array_list_add and every thing seem to work fine. Thanks, Raghu From: Raghu Udupa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2008 10:34 PM To: axis-c-user@ws.apache.org Subject: Get error while parsing an XML message containing a complex type at axis2_http_server I am using wsdl2c to generate code with data binding. I have been able to send and receive messages when XML message contains simple types. But, I have one unbounded array element FaxDataFiles defined as xsd:element name=FaxDataFiles xsd:annotation xsd:documentationThe list of files to be faxed/xsd:documentation /xsd:annotation xsd:complexType xsd:sequence xsd:element ref=ft:Data maxOccurs=unbounded/ /xsd:sequence /xsd:complexType /xsd:element xsd:element name=Data xsd:annotation xsd:documentationThe file to be faxed/xsd:documentation /xsd:annotation xsd:complexType xsd:sequence xsd:element name=FileContent type=xsd:string xsd:annotation xsd:documentationThe content of the file to be faxed (MIME encoded)/xsd:documentation /xsd:annotation /xsd:element xsd:element name=FileType type=xsd:string maxLength=100 xsd:annotation xsd:documentationThe type of the file to be faxed/xsd:documentation /xsd:annotation /xsd:element /xsd:sequence /xsd:complexType /xsd:element Further, message request is defined as xsd:element name=ProcRequest xsd:complexType xsd:sequence xsd:element ref=ft:BASETID/ xsd:element ref=ft:CONTROLTID/ xsd:element ref=ft:DELIVERYTID/ xsd:element ref=ft:PHONE/ xsd:element ref=ft:StartTime/ xsd:element ref=ft:StopTime/ I get the following error at axis2_http_server [Tue Sep 9 22:25:59 2008] [debug] phase.c(210) Invoke the handler context_handler within the phase PostDispatch [Tue Sep 9 22:25:59 2008] [debug] class_loader.c(140) ..//services/ReceiveFaxManagerService/libReceiveFaxManagerService.so shared lib loaded successfully [Tue Sep 9 22:25:59 2008] [error] src/adb_FaxDataFiles_type0.c(233) Data (@minOccurs = '1') only have 0 elements [Tue Sep 9 22:25:59 2008] [error] src/adb_ReceiveFaxRequest.c(1498) failed in building adb object for element FaxDataFiles [Tue Sep 9 22:25:59 2008] [error] src/adb_ReceiveFaxRequest.c(1508) failed in setting the value for FaxDataFiles [Tue Sep 9 22:25:59 2008] [error] axis2_svc_skel_ReceiveFaxManagerService.c(166) NULL returnted from the ReceiveFaxRequest_deserialize: This should be due to an invalid XML [Tue Sep 9 22:25:59 2008] [debug] raw_xml_in_out_msg_recv.c(382) fault_detail:Detail/Detail [Tue Sep 9 22:25:59 2008] [debug] phase.c(210) Invoke the handler AddressingOutHandler within the phase MessageOut [Tue Sep 9 22:25:59 2008] [info] Starting addressing out handler [Tue Sep 9 22:25:59 2008] [info] Request served in 0.006 seconds [Tue Sep 9 22:27:15 2008] [info] Received signal SIGINT. Server shutting down [Tue Sep 9 22:27:15 2008] [info] Terminating HTTP server thread I am populating all parts (parameters) properly as defined in xsd schema file. In addition, FaxDataFiles structure contains one entry (That is, one Data element). I appreciate any advice as to how to resolve this issue. Thanks, Raghu Udupa
RE: axis2 client with HTTP as well as HTTPS connectivity
Thanks Manjula. I was going through the section on Using SSL client in axis2c manual. My question is, can I use an axis2 client built with SSL library to communicate with a client using plain http protocol? Or do I need 2 separate axis2c clients, one for using http protocol and the other for https protocol. Thanks, Raghu -Original Message- From: Manjula Peiris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2008 1:57 AM To: Apache AXIS C User List Subject: Re: axis2 client with HTTP as well as HTTPS connectivity On Mon, 2008-09-08 at 15:09 -0400, Raghu Udupa wrote: I need connectivity to customers who would like to communicate either using HTTP or HTTPS protocol. Basically, I need to distribute documents, addressed to a particular customer, to that customer using the protocol (http/https) supported by their web service. I need to write a generic web-services generic client application that will support both. Could you let me know how I can do that programmatically? Follow [1] and go through the samples which comes with the distribution. [1] http://ws.apache.org/axis2/c/docs/axis2c_manual.html -Manjula Thanks, Raghu - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Clarification on axis2.xml
When I set the axis2.xml home, do I need to keep the name of the file as axis2.xml? What I mean is, can I name the file as say, cust1_axis2.xml as shown below? client_home = /home/cust1/axis2c/deploy/ cust1_axis2.xml /* Create service client */ svc_client = axis2_svc_client_create(env, client_home); Thanks, Raghu
axis2 client with HTTP as well as HTTPS connectivity
I need connectivity to customers who would like to communicate either using HTTP or HTTPS protocol. Basically, I need to distribute documents, addressed to a particular customer, to that customer using the protocol (http/https) supported by their web service. I need to write a generic web-services generic client application that will support both. Could you let me know how I can do that programmatically? Thanks, Raghu
wsdl2c question
Hi, I am using wsdl2c tool to generate C code for model object with ADB bindings. For each XML element, I see 3 sets of files like adb_UserCode.c adb_UserCode.h adb_UserCode_type0.c adb_UserCode_type0.h adb_UserCode_type1.c adb_UserCode_type1.h I would like to know how what each combination of files, adb_UserCode, adb_UserCode_type0 and adb_UserCode_type 1 is used for? Thanks, Raghu
Need to write a web services client with optional digital signature on Linux EV4 servers
I am writing a web services client to send messages to a customer's web service. This client will be running on an Intel x86 based RedHat Enterprise version 4.0 Linux server. Can I just install the Linux Binary distribution package? Or do I need to download the source package and make a new set of binaries for Redhat EV4 server? Thanks, Raghu
