Re: [Bacula-users] Win2k Automated Upgrade from 1.3x to 2.0
I've been looking for a way to automate the setup on xp workstations as well. After some fifteen tries to install and uninstall bacula in various ways i've decided to go the with the merest: 1. stop the service 2. replace the binary files 3. start the service again. as far as i've tested this, it works completely fine, and you do not have to play with nullsoft installers. I would like however to add some comments on the installers. Installer (as well as uninstaller) shows way to much messages which do not require any reaction form the user. For instance, why do we need that service was successfully installed (removed) message? I believe there should only be one saying, that service install failed, in case that happens. If (un)installer wouldn't have this irritating feature, it'd be easy to push new versios using the original installers, since the /S switch takes care of pretty much all the rest. Regards, Mantas. Does anyone have any scripts to push updates to clients on Windows 2000 network? OR alternatively, does Bacula-2.0.1.exe has any command line switches to help to automate deployment? If, nothing exists, I will write batch or bash script to do it. BTW - I did see the script to update existing 1.3x installs, but since the 2.0 is quite different, it will not work. Thanks everyone - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] Win2k Automated Upgrade from 1.3x to 2.0
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Mantas M. wrote: I've been looking for a way to automate the setup on xp workstations as well. After some fifteen tries to install and uninstall bacula in various ways i've decided to go the with the merest: 1. stop the service 2. replace the binary files 3. start the service again. as far as i've tested this, it works completely fine, and you do not have to play with nullsoft installers. I would like however to add some comments on the installers. Installer (as well as uninstaller) shows way to much messages which do not require any reaction form the user. For instance, why do we need that service was successfully installed (removed) message? I believe there should only be one saying, that service install failed, in case that happens. If (un)installer wouldn't have this irritating feature, it'd be easy to push new versios using the original installers, since the /S switch takes care of pretty much all the rest. If I recall correctly, the Installer is not the one giving that message. At least when I wrote the first version, it was the FD itself giving the message when called with /install et al. (Hence I had no way of getting rid of it in the installer.) Unless somebody added these messages to the new installer (and forgot to make them silencable), the FD probably needs modifying. This subject already came up on the list if I recall correctly, unfortunately I have forgotten the outcome of that discussion. Greetings, Michel -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (MingW32) - GPGrelay v0.959 iD8DBQFFud762Vs+MkscAyURAoNkAJ4mxFfU9zJrNcCA9/S6QtMkynWmzwCfR5LN VLDT2KZBeEjIPzo//5wJQ34= =Qz9z -END PGP SIGNATURE- - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] Win2k Automated Upgrade from 1.3x to 2.0
Thanks, Michel that explains why the message is shown regardless of the /S switch. It's sad, though, that this issue was overlooked, as it is a real bug for those, who use bacula in large windows based environments. Mantas. Michel Meyers wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Mantas M. wrote: I've been looking for a way to automate the setup on xp workstations as well. After some fifteen tries to install and uninstall bacula in various ways i've decided to go the with the merest: 1. stop the service 2. replace the binary files 3. start the service again. as far as i've tested this, it works completely fine, and you do not have to play with nullsoft installers. I would like however to add some comments on the installers. Installer (as well as uninstaller) shows way to much messages which do not require any reaction form the user. For instance, why do we need that service was successfully installed (removed) message? I believe there should only be one saying, that service install failed, in case that happens. If (un)installer wouldn't have this irritating feature, it'd be easy to push new versios using the original installers, since the /S switch takes care of pretty much all the rest. If I recall correctly, the Installer is not the one giving that message. At least when I wrote the first version, it was the FD itself giving the message when called with /install et al. (Hence I had no way of getting rid of it in the installer.) Unless somebody added these messages to the new installer (and forgot to make them silencable), the FD probably needs modifying. This subject already came up on the list if I recall correctly, unfortunately I have forgotten the outcome of that discussion. Greetings, Michel -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (MingW32) - GPGrelay v0.959 iD8DBQFFud762Vs+MkscAyURAoNkAJ4mxFfU9zJrNcCA9/S6QtMkynWmzwCfR5LN VLDT2KZBeEjIPzo//5wJQ34= =Qz9z -END PGP SIGNATURE- - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] Magic don't descend into this directory-files
I use a simple technique - my client configurations have an exclude statement for *.nobackup. If a user doesn't want to back up a directory, he can rename the directory with a .nobackup 'extension'. This is easier for a user to see and it's quite obvious later when he adds additional files to that directory. Cheers, Ian On Jan 24, 2007, at 1:08 PM, Per Andreas Buer wrote: Hello people. I've finally put my Bacula system into production and I am really happy about how things are going. There is one feature from Arkeia which I am missing; in Arkeia you could create a empty file in a folder and Arkeia would not descend into that structure. If there was such a feature it would make my configuration a lot simpler - because I would not need a custom FileSet for each server that has some directory shouldn't be backed up (like /var/lib/mysql). Am I missing something? Is this a desired feature? Per. -- --- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php? page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] Magic don't descend into this directory-files
On Wednesday 24 January 2007 7:08 pm, Per Andreas Buer wrote: I've finally put my Bacula system into production and I am really happy about how things are going. There is one feature from Arkeia which I am missing; in Arkeia you could create a empty file in a folder and Arkeia would not descend into that structure. If there was such a feature it would make my configuration a lot simpler - because I would not need a custom FileSet for each server that has some directory shouldn't be backed up (like /var/lib/mysql). There is a similar feature supported by GNU tar, see here http://www.brynosaurus.com/cachedir/spec.html which Bacula might also be interested in supporting. Davide Bolcioni -- Paranoia is an afterthought. - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] Magic don't descend into this directory-files
On Friday 26 January 2007 17:27, Ian Levesque wrote: I use a simple technique - my client configurations have an exclude statement for *.nobackup. If a user doesn't want to back up a directory, he can rename the directory with a .nobackup 'extension'. This is easier for a user to see and it's quite obvious later when he adds additional files to that directory. For the others who suggest Bacula becoming aware of special file names to stop recursion, the answer is no. Bacula administration is all maintained in the Director. However, for those who *really* want such features, the Bacula administrator can implement it as shown above, which is perfectly OK with me and also very visible for the user. Cheers, Ian On Jan 24, 2007, at 1:08 PM, Per Andreas Buer wrote: Hello people. I've finally put my Bacula system into production and I am really happy about how things are going. There is one feature from Arkeia which I am missing; in Arkeia you could create a empty file in a folder and Arkeia would not descend into that structure. If there was such a feature it would make my configuration a lot simpler - because I would not need a custom FileSet for each server that has some directory shouldn't be backed up (like /var/lib/mysql). Am I missing something? Is this a desired feature? Per. -- --- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php? page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
[Bacula-users] Possible missing SD Device resource configuration options
Hi all,
I just upgraded to 2.0 and have been going through my configuration
files (converting to per-client Devices). I noticed a couple definitions
in my old 1.38 Device {} sections that are not mentioned in the manual.
The first is Automatic Mount, is this still valid (was it ever? am I
crazy?)? The other is mentioned in Basic Volume Management but not in
the SD Device page: Label Media. Is this still valid? I get no errors
currently from including them, so I figure I'll copy them over just to
be safe, but maybe the manual needs to be updated.
Josh
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] Win2k Automated Upgrade from 1.3x to 2.0
Those messages come from the 1.3x Bacula-fd.exe. The new version doesn't display them. But during an upgrade the old one is used to uninstall the existing service. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mantas M. Sent: Friday, January 26, 2007 1:43 AM To: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Win2k Automated Upgrade from 1.3x to 2.0 I've been looking for a way to automate the setup on xp workstations as well. After some fifteen tries to install and uninstall bacula in various ways i've decided to go the with the merest: 1. stop the service 2. replace the binary files 3. start the service again. as far as i've tested this, it works completely fine, and you do not have to play with nullsoft installers. I would like however to add some comments on the installers. Installer (as well as uninstaller) shows way to much messages which do not require any reaction form the user. For instance, why do we need that service was successfully installed (removed) message? I believe there should only be one saying, that service install failed, in case that happens. If (un)installer wouldn't have this irritating feature, it'd be easy to push new versios using the original installers, since the /S switch takes care of pretty much all the rest. Regards, Mantas. Does anyone have any scripts to push updates to clients on Windows 2000 network? OR alternatively, does Bacula-2.0.1.exe has any command line switches to help to automate deployment? If, nothing exists, I will write batch or bash script to do it. BTW - I did see the script to update existing 1.3x installs, but since the 2.0 is quite different, it will not work. Thanks everyone - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
[Bacula-users] bacula 2.0 on Ubuntu
Hello, I am trying to install bacula 2.0 on Ubuntu Edty Eft machine. I read in the 2.0 announcement that Bacula 2.0 release is available for Ubuntu. I downloaded the latest release 2.0.1 .deb files from SourceForge, and tried installing. I get dependency errors when I try to install. Are the .deb files on sourceforge suitable for Ubuntu? Has anybody tried installing Bacula 2.0.1 on Ubuntu successfully? If yes, how did you get around the dependency problem? Thanks binB16F6lX9CU.bin Description: PGP Public Key - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] bacula 2.0 on Ubuntu
On 26 Jan 2007 at 11:44, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, I am trying to install bacula 2.0 on Ubuntu Edty Eft machine. I read in the 2.0 announcement that Bacula 2.0 release is available for Ubuntu. I downloaded the latest release 2.0.1 .deb files from SourceForge, and tried installing. I get dependency errors when I try to install. It might help to know the errors you are getting. -- Dan Langille : Software Developer looking for work my resume: http://www.freebsddiary.org/dan_langille.php PGCon - The PostgreSQL Conference - http://www.pgcon.org/ - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
[Bacula-users] no respose when spooling attributes
We're doing a large backup (1.5 million files). We have Spool Attributes = Yes. I suspect it is spooling the attributes now and has been doing so for a few hours. Is status client expected to work during the spooling of attributes? I ask because we wanted an hour or so for a reply. In fact, all the clients we tried are like that. We have no idea why. status storage and status director all work. Top shows postgres and bacula-sd to be busy. Status storage works just fine. and show attribute spooling is under way: Attr spooling: 1 active jobs, 2,397,406,830 bytes; 3 total jobs, 4,173,518,749 max bytes This is all Version: 2.0.1 (12 January 2007) on FreeBSD 6.2 with PostgresSQL 8.2.1 -- Dan Langille : Software Developer looking for work my resume: http://www.freebsddiary.org/dan_langille.php PGCon - The PostgreSQL Conference - http://www.pgcon.org/ - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] no respose when spooling attributes
On 26 Jan 2007 at 15:00, Dan Langille wrote: We're doing a large backup (1.5 million files). We have Spool Attributes = Yes. I suspect it is spooling the attributes now and has been doing so for a few hours. Is status client expected to work during the spooling of attributes? I ask because we wanted an hour or so for a reply. In fact, all the clients we tried are like that. We have no idea why. status storage and status director all work. Top shows postgres and bacula-sd to be busy. Status storage works just fine. and show attribute spooling is under way: Attr spooling: 1 active jobs, 2,397,406,830 bytes; 3 total jobs, 4,173,518,749 max bytes This is all Version: 2.0.1 (12 January 2007) on FreeBSD 6.2 with PostgresSQL 8.2.1 I guess that spooling value decreases, so we have another 2GB to put into the DB: Attr spooling: 1 active jobs, 2,384,918,334 bytes; 3 total jobs, 4,173,518,749 max bytes. -- Dan Langille : Software Developer looking for work my resume: http://www.freebsddiary.org/dan_langille.php PGCon - The PostgreSQL Conference - http://www.pgcon.org/ - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] bacula 2.0 on Ubuntu
It might help to know the errors you are getting. following are the files I downloaded: $ ls -1 bacula_2.0.0-1_all.deb bacula-client_2.0.0-1_all.deb bacula-common_2.0.0-1_all.deb bacula-console_2.0.0-1_i386.deb bacula-director-common_2.0.0-1_i386.deb bacula-director-mysql_2.0.0-1_i386.deb bacula-fd_2.0.0-1_i386.deb bacula-sd_2.0.0-1_i386.deb bacula-sd-mysql_2.0.0-1_i386.deb bacula-server_2.0.0-1_all.deb $ sudo dpkg -i *.deb Selecting previously deselected package bacula. (Reading database ... 45846 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking bacula (from bacula_2.0.0-1_all.deb) ... Selecting previously deselected package bacula-client. Unpacking bacula-client (from bacula-client_2.0.0-1_all.deb) ... Selecting previously deselected package bacula-common. Unpacking bacula-common (from bacula-common_2.0.0-1_all.deb) ... Adding user 'bacula'... Ok. Selecting previously deselected package bacula-console. Unpacking bacula-console (from bacula-console_2.0.0-1_i386.deb) ... Selecting previously deselected package bacula-director-common. dpkg: regarding bacula-director-common_2.0.0-1_i386.deb containing bacula-director-common, pre-dependency problem: bacula-director-common pre-depends on bacula-common (= 2.0.0-1) bacula-common is unpacked, but has never been configured. dpkg: error processing bacula-director-common_2.0.0-1_i386.deb (--install): pre-dependency problem - not installing bacula-director-common Selecting previously deselected package bacula-director-mysql. Unpacking bacula-director-mysql (from bacula-director-mysql_2.0.0-1_i386.deb) ... Selecting previously deselected package bacula-fd. Unpacking bacula-fd (from bacula-fd_2.0.0-1_i386.deb) ... Selecting previously deselected package bacula-sd. dpkg: regarding bacula-sd_2.0.0-1_i386.deb containing bacula-sd, pre-dependency problem: bacula-sd pre-depends on bacula-common (= 2.0.0-1) bacula-common is unpacked, but has never been configured. dpkg: error processing bacula-sd_2.0.0-1_i386.deb (--install): pre-dependency problem - not installing bacula-sd Selecting previously deselected package bacula-sd-mysql. Unpacking bacula-sd-mysql (from bacula-sd-mysql_2.0.0-1_i386.deb) ... Selecting previously deselected package bacula-server. Unpacking bacula-server (from bacula-server_2.0.0-1_all.deb) ... Setting up bacula-common (2.0.0-1) ... dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of bacula-console: bacula-console depends on libssl0.9.8 (= 0.9.8c-1); however: Version of libssl0.9.8 on system is 0.9.8b-2ubuntu2. dpkg: error processing bacula-console (--install): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of bacula-director-mysql: bacula-director-mysql depends on bacula-director-common (= 2.0.0-1); however: Package bacula-director-common is not installed. bacula-director-mysql depends on libssl0.9.8 (= 0.9.8c-1); however: Version of libssl0.9.8 on system is 0.9.8b-2ubuntu2. dpkg: error processing bacula-director-mysql (--install): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of bacula-fd: bacula-fd depends on libssl0.9.8 (= 0.9.8c-1); however: Version of libssl0.9.8 on system is 0.9.8b-2ubuntu2. dpkg: error processing bacula-fd (--install): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of bacula-sd-mysql: bacula-sd-mysql depends on bacula-sd (= 2.0.0-1); however: Package bacula-sd is not installed. bacula-sd-mysql depends on libssl0.9.8 (= 0.9.8c-1); however: Version of libssl0.9.8 on system is 0.9.8b-2ubuntu2. dpkg: error processing bacula-sd-mysql (--install): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of bacula-server: bacula-server depends on bacula-director-sqlite3 (= 2.0.0-1) | bacula-director; however: Package bacula-director-sqlite3 is not installed. Package bacula-director is not installed. Package bacula-director-mysql which provides bacula-director is not configured yet. bacula-server depends on bacula-sd (= 2.0.0-1); however: Package bacula-sd is not installed. bacula-server depends on bacula-sd-sqlite3 (= 2.0.0-1) | bacula-sd-tools; however: Package bacula-sd-sqlite3 is not installed. Package bacula-sd-tools is not installed. Package bacula-sd-mysql which provides bacula-sd-tools is not configured yet. dpkg: error processing bacula-server (--install): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of bacula: bacula depends on bacula-server; however: Package bacula-server is not configured yet. dpkg: error processing bacula (--install): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of bacula-client: bacula-client depends on bacula-console (= 2.0.0-1); however: Package bacula-console is not configured yet. bacula-client depends on bacula-fd (= 2.0.0-1); however: Package bacula-fd is
Re: [Bacula-users] fd failing on windows 2003
What Anti Virus package are you using?
E
On Jan 26, 2007, at 4:15 AM, Mantas M. wrote:
I had bacula running in trace mode with debug set to 200. For
brevity's sake i've stripped the
klf3-fd: ../../filed/backup.c:506 Send data to SD len=*
lines from the trace.
Please see attachment for the tail of the trace file. I couldn't
find anything suspicious at the end of the log, looks bacula just
completes the backup and there is no records at all that something
failed the next time.
while memtest might be a good idea just to make sure it's not RAM
that is causing this, it is a critical system and everything
besides bacula is working fine. At these circumstances I cannot
afford to put it offline even on the weekend.
Erich Prinz wrote:
Threads within a thread - sigh.
Good idea from Alan to run the memtest. I bacula is the leading
indicator something more is wrong on the machine, I'd be thankful
to know before a meltdown!
The other thing to do is run the FD in trace mode to see where it
exits. That alone should yield valuable info to permit corrective
action.
Erich
On Jan 17, 2007, at 3:22 AM, Mantas M. wrote:
...
klf3-fd: ../../findlib/find.c:180 F E:/db
klf3-fd: compat.cpp:697 opendir(E:/db)
spec=\\?\GLOBALROOT\Device\HarddiskVolumeShadowCopy39\db\*,
FindFirstFile returns 1847512
klf3-fd: compat.cpp:706 FirstFile=.
klf3-fd: compat.cpp:778 readdir_r(17d29d8, { d_name=.,
d_reclen=1, d_off=0
klf3-fd: compat.cpp:778 readdir_r(17d29d8, { d_name=..,
d_reclen=2, d_off=1
klf3-fd: compat.cpp:778 readdir_r(17d29d8, { d_name=obs,
d_reclen=29, d_off=3
klf3-fd: compat.cpp:697 opendir(E:/db/obs)
spec=\\?\GLOBALROOT\Device\HarddiskVolumeShadowCopy39\db\obs\*,
FindFirstFile returns 1718976
klf3-fd: compat.cpp:706 FirstFile=.
klf3-fd: compat.cpp:778 readdir_r(17d3fa8, { d_name=.,
d_reclen=1, d_off=0
klf3-fd: compat.cpp:778 readdir_r(17d3fa8, { d_name=..,
d_reclen=2, d_off=1
klf3-fd: compat.cpp:778 readdir_r(17d3fa8, { d_name=repl-rp.BAK,
d_reclen=12, d_off=3
klf3-fd: ../../filed/backup.c:147 FT_REG saving: E:/db/obs/repl-rp.BAK
klf3-fd: ../../filed/backup.c:225 bfiled: sending E:/db/obs/repl-
rp.BAK to stored
klf3-fd: ../../filed/heartbeat.c:82 wait_intr=0 stop=0
klf3-fd: compat.cpp:778 readdir_r(17d3fa8, { d_name=repl_db.BAK,
d_reclen=12, d_off=15
klf3-fd: ../../filed/backup.c:147 FT_REG saving: E:/db/obs/repl_db.BAK
klf3-fd: ../../filed/backup.c:225 bfiled: sending E:/db/obs/
repl_db.BAK to stored
klf3-fd: compat.cpp:778 readdir_r(17d3fa8,
{ d_name=NorthCS_db.BAK, d_reclen=18, d_off=27
klf3-fd: ../../filed/backup.c:147 FT_REG saving: E:/db/obs/
NorthCS_db.BAK
klf3-fd: ../../filed/backup.c:225 bfiled: sending E:/db/obs/
NorthCS_db.BAK to stored
klf3-fd: compat.cpp:778 readdir_r(17d3fa8, { d_name=list_db.BAK,
d_reclen=14, d_off=45
klf3-fd: ../../filed/backup.c:147 FT_REG saving: E:/db/obs/list_db.BAK
klf3-fd: ../../filed/backup.c:225 bfiled: sending E:/db/obs/
list_db.BAK to stored
klf3-fd: ../../filed/heartbeat.c:82 wait_intr=0 stop=0
klf3-fd: ../../filed/backup.c:173 FT_DIREND: E:/db/obs/
klf3-fd: ../../filed/backup.c:225 bfiled: sending E:/db/obs to stored
klf3-fd: compat.cpp:778 readdir_r(17d29d8,
{ d_name=tep_dev_db.bak.BAK, d_reclen=20, d_off=32
klf3-fd: ../../filed/backup.c:147 FT_REG saving: E:/db/
tep_dev_db.bak.BAK
klf3-fd: ../../filed/backup.c:225 bfiled: sending E:/db/
tep_dev_db.bak.BAK to stored
klf3-fd: ../../filed/heartbeat.c:82 wait_intr=0 stop=0
klf3-fd: compat.cpp:778 readdir_r(17d29d8,
{ d_name=repl_dev_dev1_db.BAK, d_reclen=22, d_off=52
klf3-fd: ../../filed/backup.c:147 FT_REG saving: E:/db/
repl_dev_dev1_db.BAK
klf3-fd: ../../filed/backup.c:225 bfiled: sending E:/db/
repl_dev_dev1_db.BAK to stored
klf3-fd: ../../filed/heartbeat.c:82 wait_intr=0 stop=0
klf3-fd: compat.cpp:778 readdir_r(17d29d8,
{ d_name=repl_dev_dev2_db.BAK, d_reclen=24, d_off=74
klf3-fd: ../../filed/backup.c:147 FT_REG saving: E:/db/
repl_dev_dev2_db.BAK
klf3-fd: ../../filed/backup.c:225 bfiled: sending E:/db/
repl_dev_dev2_db.BAK to stored
klf3-fd: ../../filed/heartbeat.c:82 wait_intr=0 stop=0
klf3-fd: compat.cpp:778 readdir_r(17d29d8,
{ d_name=repl_testing_db.BAK, d_reclen=20, d_off=98
klf3-fd: ../../filed/backup.c:147 FT_REG saving: E:/db/
repl_testing_db.BAK
klf3-fd: ../../filed/backup.c:225 bfiled: sending E:/db/
repl_testing_db.BAK to stored
klf3-fd: ../../filed/heartbeat.c:82 wait_intr=0 stop=0
klf3-fd: compat.cpp:778 readdir_r(17d29d8, { d_name=itrad_db.BAK,
d_reclen=21, d_off=118
klf3-fd: ../../filed/backup.c:147 FT_REG saving: E:/db/itrad_db.BAK
klf3-fd: ../../filed/backup.c:225 bfiled: sending E:/db/
itrad_db.BAK to stored
klf3-fd: compat.cpp:778 readdir_r(17d29d8,
{ d_name=Master_db.BAK, d_reclen=13, d_off=139
klf3-fd: ../../filed/backup.c:147 FT_REG saving: E:/db/Master_db.BAK
klf3-fd: ../../filed/backup.c:225
Re: [Bacula-users] fd failing on windows 2003
Nod32. Erich Prinz wrote: What Anti Virus package are you using? E - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
[Bacula-users] ? Device is BLOCKED waiting for mount of volume
This is a problem since I moved from 1.38.11 to 2.0.1 that I can't seem to get past. My changer script works from the command line. The btape 'test' and 'autochanger' work fine from the command line. If I try to run a job that uses the autochanger it will load the first media and then sit and wait for Godot. It seems to hate me. ... Device status: Autochanger DSI with devices: SDLT320 (/dev/nrst0) Device Repository (/u1/bacula/repository) is not open. Device FileStorage (/tmp) is not open. Device SDLT320 (/dev/nrst0) open but no Bacula volume is currently mounted. Device is BLOCKED waiting for mount of volume OS0001. Slot 1 is loaded in drive 0. Total Bytes Read=0 Blocks Read=0 Bytes/block=0 Positioned at File=0 Block=0 In Use Volume status: OS0001 on device SDLT320 (/dev/nrst0) * 26-Jan 15:16 sname-sd: Please mount Volume OS0001 on Storage Device SDLT320 (/dev/nrst0) for Job Tape.2007-01-26_15.12.38 * The components are: # ch0 at scsibus0 target 14 lun 0: BDT, ThinStor AutoLdr, T16r changer removable # ch0: 8 slots, 1 drive, 1 picker, 0 portals # ch0: async, 8-bit transfers # st0 at scsibus0 target 0 lun 0: QUANTUM, SDLT320, 5252 tape removable # st0: density code 73, variable blocks, write-enabled # st0: sync (25.00ns offset 62), 16-bit (80.000MB/s) transfers I guess I should note that with 1.38.11 it would at least write the first tape and then end up in this same state after mounting the second tape. I can't do an 'mt status' at this point because it seems to be doing something to the drive, but whatever that is isn't writing. Ideas? peter - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] ? Device is BLOCKED waiting for mount of volume
Hello, On 1/26/2007 10:24 PM, Peter Eisch wrote: This is a problem since I moved from 1.38.11 to 2.0.1 that I can't seem to get past. My changer script works from the command line. The btape 'test' and 'autochanger' work fine from the command line. If I try to run a job that uses the autochanger it will load the first media and then sit and wait for Godot. It seems to hate me. Have you done an 'update slots' command? ... Device status: Autochanger DSI with devices: SDLT320 (/dev/nrst0) Device Repository (/u1/bacula/repository) is not open. Device FileStorage (/tmp) is not open. Device SDLT320 (/dev/nrst0) open but no Bacula volume is currently mounted. Device is BLOCKED waiting for mount of volume OS0001. Slot 1 is loaded in drive 0. Total Bytes Read=0 Blocks Read=0 Bytes/block=0 Positioned at File=0 Block=0 In Use Volume status: OS0001 on device SDLT320 (/dev/nrst0) * 26-Jan 15:16 sname-sd: Please mount Volume OS0001 on Storage Device SDLT320 (/dev/nrst0) for Job Tape.2007-01-26_15.12.38 * The components are: # ch0 at scsibus0 target 14 lun 0: BDT, ThinStor AutoLdr, T16r changer removable # ch0: 8 slots, 1 drive, 1 picker, 0 portals # ch0: async, 8-bit transfers # st0 at scsibus0 target 0 lun 0: QUANTUM, SDLT320, 5252 tape removable # st0: density code 73, variable blocks, write-enabled # st0: sync (25.00ns offset 62), 16-bit (80.000MB/s) transfers I guess I should note that with 1.38.11 it would at least write the first tape and then end up in this same state after mounting the second tape. I can't do an 'mt status' at this point because it seems to be doing something to the drive, but whatever that is isn't writing. Try unmounting the device first. Ideas? Well, you should tell us which volumes are in the autoloader, show us (examples of) the volume metadata, and tell us what you do when you load or change tapes. What you describe looks like Bacula doesn't know about any volumes in the autochanger, or these are not labeled. Arno peter - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users -- IT-Service Lehmann[EMAIL PROTECTED] Arno Lehmann http://www.its-lehmann.de - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] ? Device is BLOCKED waiting for mount of volume
Hi Peter,
I could be wrong, but I *think* that is the same problem I experienced
when I updated to 2.0.1. Once a job began, my autochanger would not
load the tape it needed. My solution was to add three lines of code to
the /etc/bacula/mtx-changer file on lines 157-159. I added the
following.
if mt -f $device status | grep ONLINE /dev/null 21; then
mt -f $device offline
fi
So now it looks like this from line 153 to 170.
#
# enable the following line if you need to eject the cartridge
# mt -f $device offline
# sleep 10
if mt -f $device status | grep ONLINE /dev/null 21; then
mt -f $device offline
fi
${MTX} -f $ctl unload $slot $drive
;;
load)
debug Doing mtx -f $ctl load $slot $drive
${MTX} -f $ctl load $slot $drive
rtn=$?
#
# Increase the sleep time if you have a slow device
# or remove the sleep and add the following:
# wait_for_drive $device
Cheers,
Dave
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Peter
Eisch
Sent: Friday, January 26, 2007 1:24 PM
To: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Bacula-users] ? Device is BLOCKED waiting for mount of volume
This is a problem since I moved from 1.38.11 to 2.0.1 that I can't seem
to get past. My changer script works from the command line. The btape
'test'
and 'autochanger' work fine from the command line. If I try to run a
job that uses the autochanger it will load the first media and then sit
and wait for Godot. It seems to hate me.
...
Device status:
Autochanger DSI with devices:
SDLT320 (/dev/nrst0)
Device Repository (/u1/bacula/repository) is not open.
Device FileStorage (/tmp) is not open.
Device SDLT320 (/dev/nrst0) open but no Bacula volume is currently
mounted.
Device is BLOCKED waiting for mount of volume OS0001.
Slot 1 is loaded in drive 0.
Total Bytes Read=0 Blocks Read=0 Bytes/block=0
Positioned at File=0 Block=0
In Use Volume status:
OS0001 on device SDLT320 (/dev/nrst0)
*
26-Jan 15:16 sname-sd: Please mount Volume OS0001 on Storage Device
SDLT320 (/dev/nrst0) for Job Tape.2007-01-26_15.12.38
*
The components are:
# ch0 at scsibus0 target 14 lun 0: BDT, ThinStor AutoLdr, T16r changer
removable # ch0: 8 slots, 1 drive, 1 picker, 0 portals # ch0: async,
8-bit transfers
# st0 at scsibus0 target 0 lun 0: QUANTUM, SDLT320, 5252 tape
removable # st0: density code 73, variable blocks, write-enabled # st0:
sync (25.00ns offset 62), 16-bit (80.000MB/s) transfers
I guess I should note that with 1.38.11 it would at least write the
first tape and then end up in this same state after mounting the second
tape. I can't do an 'mt status' at this point because it seems to be
doing something to the drive, but whatever that is isn't writing.
Ideas?
peter
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join
SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDE
V
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
[Bacula-users] DVD+RW vs DVD-RAM for incremental daily backups
I have a question about DVD+RW vs. DVD-RAM. I read through the archives but I didn't see anything comparing DVD+RW vs DVD-RAM. Here's my plan: a) DVD+RW or DVD-RAM for incremental daily backups. I am planning on at least 7 disks so I can extend the lifetime of the media. DVD-RAM would last longer and I like the hardware verification. b) DVD+R for archiving weekly and full backups. Probably dual layer for full backups and single layer for weekly. I don't think I'll generate much more data than that. Will DVD+R, DVD+RW, and DVD-RAM all work fine when I need multiple disks for each task? If a weekly backup needs 3 disks, will that be okay? Similarly for the other tasks. Is there any different setup you would recommend? I looked into tape drives but they are so expensive for the tapes and drives. Right now I'm leaning towards DVD+RW and DVD+R because I know it's supported according to the bacula manual. Has anyone used DVD-RAM with the hardware verification? I'm not sure how to turn that on/off in Linux since it's just treated as a hard drive. According to the wikipedia entry, it will take about twice as long to write. I'm only concerned with backing up a single system (linux 2.6.18) but will soon be interested in at least 1 more. Thanks. - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] DVD+RW vs DVD-RAM for incremental daily backups
Hello. On 1/27/2007 12:23 AM, cy tune wrote: I have a question about DVD+RW vs. DVD-RAM. I read through the archives but I didn't see anything comparing DVD+RW vs DVD-RAM. Here's my plan: a) DVD+RW or DVD-RAM for incremental daily backups. I am planning on at least 7 disks so I can extend the lifetime of the media. DVD-RAM would last longer and I like the hardware verification. b) DVD+R for archiving weekly and full backups. Probably dual layer for full backups and single layer for weekly. I don't think I'll generate much more data than that. One byte more than what you can put onto a disk is enough :-) Will DVD+R, DVD+RW, and DVD-RAM all work fine when I need multiple disks for each task? If a weekly backup needs 3 disks, will that be okay? Similarly for the other tasks. You mean, if you can mix the three media types? No. You can mix DVD+R and +RW but DVD-RAM is treated differently. Is there any different setup you would recommend? I looked into tape drives but they are so expensive for the tapes and drives. The have much higher capacity, are more reliable, and more robust... I prefer tape or, if offsite storage and the ability to endlessly add storage count less than speed (and price) disk. Right now I'm leaning towards DVD+RW and DVD+R because I know it's supported according to the bacula manual. Yes, it should work, but I must admit I haven't tried it seriously since the first 1.39 versions. Has anyone used DVD-RAM DVD-RAM should usually be used just like a removable disk, i.e. insert disk, create filesystem, use, unmount. This is quite different to what Bacula does with DVDs. with the hardware verification? I'm not sure how to turn that on/off in Linux since it's just treated as a hard drive. According to the wikipedia entry, it will take about twice as long to write. Right, it takes longer and it's always on. This is not something you can turn on or off, AFAIK. I'm only concerned with backing up a single system (linux 2.6.18) but will soon be interested in at least 1 more. Thanks. - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users -- IT-Service Lehmann[EMAIL PROTECTED] Arno Lehmann http://www.its-lehmann.de - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] DVD+RW vs DVD-RAM for incremental daily backups
On 1/26/07, Arno Lehmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello. Hi On 1/27/2007 12:23 AM, cy tune wrote: Will DVD+R, DVD+RW, and DVD-RAM all work fine when I need multiple disks for each task? If a weekly backup needs 3 disks, will that be okay? Similarly for the other tasks. You mean, if you can mix the three media types? No. You can mix DVD+R and +RW but DVD-RAM is treated differently. I didn't phrase it properly. I meant can I backup to several disks of the same type for one task? If my daily backup takes 2 DVD+R disks, is that okay? Is there any different setup you would recommend? I looked into tape drives but they are so expensive for the tapes and drives. The have much higher capacity, are more reliable, and more robust... I I'm not sure I would use the capacity though. It's about $8 per disk for a Verbatim double sided DVD-RAM disk (9.4 GB) in a cartridge. Going the tape route would cost far, far more wouldn't it? prefer tape or, if offsite storage and the ability to endlessly add storage count less than speed (and price) disk. I'm not concerned about speed of a tape vs DVD. I am price conscious at this point though. My old (unfortunate) method was a full backup every 6 months with no incremental backups. I'm now looking at using bacula for daily backups and weekly/monthly full backups. I had a tape drive on an older computer and never used it. It's capacity is so small compared to today's hard drives. It seems to me that by the time I would want to replace DVD-RAM disks, I would be ready to upgrade my tape drive to support larger capacity tapes. By the time I'm ready to replace the DVD-RAM disks, I could be buying blu-ray or hd-dvd or whatever is sufficiently cheap at the time. Let me know if any of this is wrong. :) I like the bacula manual as far as setting everything up. It looks clear how all the parts integrated and how to write a config file for each part. What's not clear is what backup media to choose and what kind of backup strategies people use. with the hardware verification? I'm not sure how to turn that on/off in Linux since it's just treated as a hard drive. According to the wikipedia entry, it will take about twice as long to write. Right, it takes longer and it's always on. This is not something you can turn on or off, AFAIK. Oh okay thanks. - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
[Bacula-users] MaxWaitTime and MaxStartDelay
Since updating to 2.0.0, MaxWaitTime and MaxStartDelay aren't working
for me. The config is:
Job {
Name = Nightly
Type = Backup
Level = Full
Client = **
FileSet = FullBackup
Messages = Standard
Storage = ExternalDisk
Pool = Daily
Schedule = Nightly
Max Start Delay = 1800
Max Wait Time = 300
}
And should mean that it should wait up to 5 minutes to put the media in.
It starts out of hours, so if the media isn't in then, it won't be
inserted until morning.
It was Australia Day yesterday, so the USB disk didn't get attached. The
backup started at 22:00, and is still waiting for media... any
suggestions?
status dir:
Running Jobs:
Console connected at 27-Jan-07 13:16
JobId Level Name Status
==
22 FullNightly.2007-01-26_22.00.00 is waiting for a mount
request
It used to work fine in 1.38.
Thanks
James
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] ? Device is BLOCKED waiting for mount of volume
-Original Message- From: David Hatcher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, January 26, 2007 4:26 PM To: Peter Eisch; bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: RE: [Bacula-users] ? Device is BLOCKED waiting for mount of volume Hi Peter, I could be wrong, but I *think* that is the same problem I experienced when I updated to 2.0.1. Once a job began, my autochanger would not load the tape it needed. My solution was to add three lines of code to the /etc/bacula/mtx-changer file on lines 157-159. I added the following. if mt -f $device status | grep ONLINE /dev/null 21; then mt -f $device offline fi While the device is showing BLOCKED I can't do any 'mt' commands as it says that the device is busy. If I umount, er unmount, in bconsole it will move the media back to the slot properly even without an explicit unmounting or offline of the drive. Thanks for the idea, but this isn't quite my situation as I can tell. peter - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
