Re: re Hydroponics, my 2 cents worth

2002-01-10 Thread Kermit Carter

Well this has been positively stupefying.  Hydroponics
and BD agriculture are as far apart as anything I can imagine.  Yes,
preps will help anything.  Yes, using clay, humates, BC, 501, etc.,
etc., etc. will no doubt assist the hydro-grower.  But bottom line
is , biodynamics is a SYSTEM to heal the earth (yes, and everything
living on, in and above it).  Can we just go on?

Kermit

PS - And Allan, add my name to the list of those praising you with great
praise for all your work on our behalf.



Kermit Carter, General
Manager
Flowers by the Sea LLC
A Demeter Certified Biodynamic Farm and Nursery
V 707 877-1722
F 707 877-1721
PO Box 89 Elk, California 95432 USA

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.fbts.com

Whatever you can do or dream you can, begin it.
Boldness has genius, power and magic in it. Begin it now. "
Johann Wolfgang Von Goethe






Re: Question for Elaine

2002-01-10 Thread Scott Bitzer



Can a link to OSU's research be provided. I have 
six acres I would like to try this on.
 
thanks
 
scott

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 11:49 
  AM
  Subject: Question for Elaine
  In an interview with an 
  Aussie here http://www.nutri-tech.com.au/Interviews/Interviews10.htm 
  Elaine is quoted below.  I would like for her to elaborate from her 
  experience and maybe provide more reference that could be researched. 
   Dan Elaine:  "The reason the pan is formed is because the 
  soil got compacted, then went anaerobic. It always is the micro-organisms 
  getting the life back into that hardpan that opens it up and prevents it 
  from reforming as a compacted hardpan zone. Soil-life is the key. It needn’t 
  take very long with biology. Work at Ohio State University shows that you can 
  break up a hardpan at four inches in six weeks by just getting the right kinds 
  of fungi into that soil. You can break up a hardpan at four feet in six 
  months." 


SFW: Flowforms for Brewing Compost Teas

2002-01-10 Thread Allan Balliett

>
>>   From Cheryl Kemp
>>
>>For Elaine, firstly thanks for the tremendous job you are doing -
>>  were are learning so much, and your work is really helping us to
>>  understand how Biodynamics works in the soil.
>
>>  My question is: Can a flowform be used instead of a brewer for
>>  compost tea, especially if we use warmed water?
>>  My thoughts are that the oxygenation and movement helps develop 
>>the organisms.
>>  Have you done any experiments with this?
>>
>>  PS. If you would like to do some experiments in Australia I could
>>  help organise it! We have a flowform maker just near your Lismore Lab.
>  > Cheryl Kemp
>
>Hi Cheryl -
>
>Thank you for the kind words.  I do very much appreciate them.
>
>I think a flow form can make tea of just as good microbial activity and total
>biomass as commercial tea makers.  Of course, I have more data on 
>the commercial
>tea makers.  Little differences in the design of tea machines can be extremely
>important, so I would think the same would be the case for flow 
>forms.  Movement
>and aeration are critical because you have to keep the organisms aerobic.
>Extraction through the compost is critical too, because you have to pull the
>organisms from the surface of the compost and into the water.  So, if the flow
>forms keep the liquid well aerated, and pull the organisms from the 
>compost, plus
>impose an energy pattern on the water, then maybe flow forms can 
>make great tea
>too.  We need to assess the organisms, and the impact on the plants, soil, and
>surfaces in order to document this.
>
>So, yes, I would like to do some experiments on this, but we'd need 
>to sit down
>and talk about the experimental design, and that most unfortunate of 
>topics, how
>is going to pay to run the experiments?  I wish we could do all this work for
>free, but the technical staff need to buy food and pay rent..
>
>So, let me know what you see for possible interactions!  I hope we 
>can find some
>funding someplace!
>
>Elaine Ingham




Re: Hydoponic BD 2

2002-01-10 Thread panamabob

So what are your plans for the future?


bob
SLF



Archipelago_Map.gif
Description: GIF image


Re: re Hydroponics (FWD from GREG WILLIS)

2002-01-10 Thread Chris Shade

Allan,

I do take offense to that condescending comment.  The
fact that you mention conveyors with nutrient
solutions in reference to my ideas means you do not
read them - you know.  Your instant lack of faith in
me is upsetting.  

I don't know what it is specifically about this that
makes you shut your eyes and keep seeing the same
thing despite people saying, "No, that vision is not
what we are talking about," but I don't want to ruffle
your feathers anymore with open talk. 

No Thanks,
Chris

--- Allan Balliett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Certainly true if only HID lights are used.
> >
> >I think we are raising too much dichotomy here.  We
> >will talk about it some time.  The things I have in
> >mind are hybrid systems that are good for
> greenhouse
> >work in areas with bad or polluted soils.  It is
> not
> >so reductionist as you may be thinking.
> >
> >Thanks,
> >Chris
> 
> I dunno Chris. All I can see is that foolish
> conveyer belt pulling 
> those horrific bare rooted kale plants through
> nutrient sprays and 
> wondering why we aren't happly working with what we
> were given. So 
> pardon me if I can't help but look at your post and
> think 'Well, you 
> can take the kid out of Epcot, but you can't take
> the Epcot out of 
> the kid,' you know?
> 
> Thanks
> 
> -Allan
> 


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Send FREE video emails in Yahoo! Mail!
http://promo.yahoo.com/videomail/




Re: Resend: Advertisements for BD Now!

2002-01-10 Thread Christiane . Jaeger



Sorry, Allan, I don't know.  I don't even know "Biodynamic Perspectives".
I live near Mildura, northwest corner of Victoria in Australia.
Being a German migrant ( now Australian citizen) I have rather more connections
to Germany than the closer NZ.
Christiane




[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 11/01/2002 09:19:59

Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:(bcc: Christiane Jaeger/NRE)

Subject:  Re: Resend: Advertisements for BD Now!



Thanks for the attaboy, Christiane! Now, is there any chance that you
know anyone in NZ who can comment on the authors in Biodynamic
Perspectives? thanks -Allan

>Hi Allan,
>
>Your own words in your email are fantastic.  There is nothing to add.  Just
>rehash them a bit.  Here is a start:
>
>Bio-dynamics Now! provides an easy opportunity for people all
>around the Earth to work together.
>On the BD-Now! discussion list bio-dynamic farmers and those interested in
>bio-dynamics share their ideas and experiences,  are stimulated,
>learn lots and
>participate in a dream of a better world,  where man is not apart.
>We value your inputs.  Join our virtual caring global community of
>Bio-dynamics
>Now! by sending an email to ..
>
>I hope that's of some help.
>I really do appreciate the work you put into this list by acting as moderator
>etc.
>
>Regards,
>Christiane Jaeger









Re: Resend: Advertisements for BD Now!

2002-01-10 Thread Allan Balliett

Thanks for the attaboy, Christiane! Now, is there any chance that you 
know anyone in NZ who can comment on the authors in Biodynamic 
Perspectives? thanks -Allan

>Hi Allan,
>
>Your own words in your email are fantastic.  There is nothing to add.  Just
>rehash them a bit.  Here is a start:
>
>Bio-dynamics Now! provides an easy opportunity for people all
>around the Earth to work together.
>On the BD-Now! discussion list bio-dynamic farmers and those interested in
>bio-dynamics share their ideas and experiences,  are stimulated, 
>learn lots and
>participate in a dream of a better world,  where man is not apart.
>We value your inputs.  Join our virtual caring global community of 
>Bio-dynamics
>Now! by sending an email to ..
>
>I hope that's of some help.
>I really do appreciate the work you put into this list by acting as moderator
>etc.
>
>Regards,
>Christiane Jaeger




New thread: evaporation vis rainfall

2002-01-10 Thread Gil Robertson

Hi! All,
I live in the driest state on the driest continent and have to do battle
with water, or the lack of it for much of the year. (Port Lincoln, South
Australia)

In Australia, there has been a lot of work done to allow local food
production in areas where there is little available water, such as remote
communities and ABoriginal settlements. This has been on ways of water
harvesting and mulching etc.

Through Phil Callahan's work, we know that soil with a high Paramagnetic
value tends to resist evaporation and is conducive to precipitation,
including high dew fall. Put simply, if one can up the Paramagnetic
value, you will get more effective water harvesting from the atmosphere
and less given up to the atmosphere. It would also seem that the right
conditions will help hold the water in the soil layer, rather than allow
migration to the sub-soil and beyond. Effective dew fall can add up to
many inches of rain equivalent in a fall year. Reducing evaporation can
be significant. In my area, right on the coast, we get about nineteen
inches of rain and have a six or seven foot evaporation rate. A hundred
miles away, it is ten inches and fourteen to sixteen feet. Much of the
inland is less than five inches and tens of feet.

When flying to England, we went over many of the "Gulf States" and the
"Biblical Lands". In times past, these were forested and productive,
where I saw only deserts. I think the key factor has been the destruction
of the Paramagnetic force in the soil. This allows more evaporation and
does not attract dew fall.

Those who have read Callahan and that of those who hang from his Lab Coat
tails, will know that a Diamagnetic soil can change toward Paramagnetic
with the inclusion of oxygen, humates and a vital soil biota, in other
words, if one establishes a well functioning BD environment, we start to
get some of the advantages of a Paramagnetic condition. More effective
water harvesting and less loss though evaporation.

When In England I was mainly in areas that have rainfall not unlike the
parts of Australia, that are nearly desert, like my own area. I think the
key difference is the much lower evaporation.

On my own land, where we have really built the soil up and got it firing,
we use much less water than in the areas we are still working on.

If one is looking for an a lead in to promote the wide spread use of BD,
consider the water retention/ harvest aspect. On highly Diamagnetic
soils, I would also consider adding Paramagnetic rock dust.

Gil




SFW: Anaerobic Bacteria Remdiates PCBs

2002-01-10 Thread Allan Balliett

I never thought of this that seriously until Elaine mentioned it on 
the list yesterday, today, my co-worker Tim was breaking this story 
in the Baltimore press -AB

Welcome Progress on PCB Decontamination
By Tim Zink
Distributed 1/10/02 by Blue Ridge Press
Words: 838

There may be reason for hope in the effort to contain and minimize the
damage to the public health and natural environment inflicted by
polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). After seven years of experiments on
PCB-laden sediments taken from the Inner Harbor in Baltimore, Md., a team of
researchers reportedly has identified the first strain of anaerobic
bacterium known to break down the strong chlorine bonds within these
chemical compounds.

According to the Environmental Protection Agency, over 1.5 billion pounds of
PCBs were manufactured and sold in the U.S. before the 1976 Toxic Substances
Control Act banned domestic production and trade of the compounds. Long
prized because of their chemical stability, flame resistance and performance
as an insulator, PCBs were used in products ranging from electrical
equipment to insecticides. But they are now known to carry significant
risks.

Limited research into a direct causal link between PCB exposure and cancer
in humans has come close to finding a smoking gun, but inconsistencies among
studies have made clear proof elusive. Still, the Agency for Toxic
Substances and Disease Registry has concluded that, "Based on the evidence
of cancer in animals, the Department of Health and Human Services has stated
that PCBs may reasonably be anticipated to be carcinogens."

Further, a 1996 EPA study found that " Š PCBs also have significant
ecological and human health effects other than cancer, including
neurotoxicity, reproductive and developmental toxicity, immune system
suppression, liver damage, skin irritation, and endocrine disruption."

Which makes the discovery of a PCB-dechlorinating bacterium a major
development, especially since communities nationwide are struggling to
assess and reduce the levels of PCB contamination which have befallen them.
January 2002 saw the start of the second lawsuit brought by citizens of
Anniston, Ala., where a Monsanto Co. factory released immense amounts of
PCBs into the air, soil and water over several decades. Recent inquiries
allegedly have found that high-ranking officials from Monsanto, the largest
U.S. PCB manufacturer, knew PCBs posed serious threats to human health long
before production was halted. If proven in court - and if effective cleanup
technologies can be developed - the company's chemical division spinoff,
Solutia Inc., may be held responsible for shouldering broad cleanup measures
and public health studies.

Similar stakes may come into play in New York, where federal regulators
recently mandated that the General Electric Co. remove PCB-contaminated
sediments from stretches of the Hudson River. Debate has continued to flare,
however, because in some places the sediments on the river bottom appeared
to be naturally lessening the levels of PCB contamination. At other sites in
the Hudson, PCB levels in sediments remained constant. Ultimately, a lack of
scientific certainty over the best course of cleanup has delayed remediation
efforts.

For several reasons, the collaborative sediment analysis performed by
researchers from the University of Maryland's Biotechnology Institute and
the Medical University of South Carolina, funded by the U.S. Office of Naval
Research, could mark the beginning of real progress on these fronts.

First, while scientists have known that certain aerobic microbes were able
to dechlorinate lesser-concentrated PCBs, many within the scientific
community were skeptical of ever finding a microbe capable of breaking down
the compounds with greater chlorine concentration. Most PCBs commercially
produced in the U.S. fall in the latter category.

Second, by identifying one of the bacterium necessary for dechlorination of
PCBs to occur, the researchers have sped the emergence of practical
microbial probes that can guide cleanup activities. Such probes could be
used to test sediments on site for the presence of the bacterium necessary
to break down PCBs, allowing relatively quick and accurate decision making
on cleanup options. In the Hudson River cleanup, for example, microbial
probes might allow for on-the-spot testing on whether sediments would break
down naturally or require dredging, eliminating complex lab sampling that
can consume many months and dollars.

Kevin Sowers, the principal researcher from UMBI, considers his team's
research a big step toward greater understanding and treatment of PCB
contamination. "But a lot more steps need to be taken in the future," he
said. "We've found organisms (that cause PCBs to break down) and identified
them, next we need to study how exactly they work." There are over 200 known
chemical arrangements that PCBs may demonstrate. The recently identified
bacterium is especially promising, though, because 

Re: Resend: Advertisements for BD Now!

2002-01-10 Thread Christiane . Jaeger



Hi Allan,

Your own words in your email are fantastic.  There is nothing to add.  Just
rehash them a bit.  Here is a start:

Bio-dynamics Now! provides an easy opportunity for people all
around the Earth to work together.
On the BD-Now! discussion list bio-dynamic farmers and those interested in
bio-dynamics share their ideas and experiences,  are stimulated, learn lots and
participate in a dream of a better world,  where man is not apart.
We value your inputs.  Join our virtual caring global community of Bio-dynamics
Now! by sending an email to ..

I hope that's of some help.
I really do appreciate the work you put into this list by acting as moderator
etc.

Regards,
Christiane Jaeger




Re: REMINDER: Elaine is available through Friday

2002-01-10 Thread ron poitras

As I understand it, earthworm castings produce a reliable, well-balanced tea
and also facilitate homeopathic herbal and mineral additions. Isn't this
compost a good, somewhat easy to replicate material that would make it
easier to test out the  effectiveness of various additions to the mix?  Any
problems surfacing with using earthworm compost tea?

Another question: Maybe I'm missing the boat here but with reasonably good
soil crumb structure doesn't adding compost tea also improve fertility
provided the microbes have carboneous-type materials to chew on? Isn't this
part of the holy grail for growing healthy, nutritious crops where nutrients
become tied up by micro-organisms, and become insoluble but available, as
Hugh L. has so effectively instructed us? Haven't seen any discussion of the
fertility opportunities here yet,only disease prevention.

Thanks so much Allan for setting this opportunity up!

-Original Message-
From: Allan Balliett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thursday, January 10, 2002 11:23 AM
Subject: REMINDER: Elaine is available through Friday


>Elaine is going to be answering  questions for BD Now! through tomorrow.
>
>Now's the time: if any of the answers she has given have raised more
>questions about SFW or compost making or compost tea, be sure to ask
>for answers to those new questions!
>
>Thanks
>
>-Allan
>
>




Shopping tips

2002-01-10 Thread Allan Balliett

I just confirmed that Frontier herbs is disconinuing their superb 
line of capsuled herbs. They are remaining in bulk herbs (and empty 
caps...). They will continue the experimental garden and will 
continue the grower support that they are famous for. (I post this 
here for the information of you growers who either grow for Frontier 
or dream of growing for them.)

Central Tractor and those stores known as "CT Farmily or Farm or 
Fleet or whatever" are out of business. I don't know how it is in 
your town , but in our town most everything is 20% off and will be 
even cheaper week after week. even better, all the shit sold at 10 
percent off and they are now down to REAL GOODS, which seem to be 
holding, even at 20 percent. I bought a pile of tube gates yesterday 
and a long coveted t-post puller (the last one there, couldn't wait 
for 30 off) I don't think they can afford to advertise. If you need 
fencing, feed or implements, you might want to make a trip to town.

_Allan




OFF: factory farms

2002-01-10 Thread Deborah Byron

Please take a few minutes and make a call to help stop the very cruel
conditions that are part and parcel of industrial animal farming.
Warm regards,
Deborah Byron

HUMANElines
A project of The Humane Society of the United States
and The Fund for Animals(202)955-3666  
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

TELL YOUR SENATORS TO DITCH DORR:
Thomas Dorr, a staunch proponent of factory farms who once declared,
"factory farming is a model for the future," has been nominated to
become USDA's new undersecretary for rural development under the Bush
Administration.
 
Dorr's appointment would be disastrous for animals and
the environment, paving the way for factory farms to further dominate
the
agriculture scene.
 
Factory farms are notorious for both the animal
suffering they inflict (with horribly congested, filthy, stressful and
unhealthy conditions) and the tremendous amount of waste they dump
into the environment, fouling waterways and generating a stench that
carries for miles.

Despite this, Dorr's vision for the future, as outlined in
a 1998 interview with the New York Times, calls for county-sized
corporate farms, averaging 225,000 acres, to be operated as giant
agricultural

factories. 
He has denounced sustainable agriculture programs that
promote more humane alternatives.

WHAT YOU CAN DO:
Call your two U.S. Senators today (Congressional Switchboard:
202/224-3121) and urge them to "OPPOSE Thomas Dorr's nomination for
USDA undersecretary for rural development." Let them know that Dorr's
appointment to this key position would spell disaster for animals, the
environment, and rural communities nationwide. 

If you need to identify the names of your Senators, 
visit: www.senate.gov or call The HSUS at (202)955-3666.


_




Re: re Hydroponics (FWD from GREG WILLIS)

2002-01-10 Thread Allan Balliett

>Certainly true if only HID lights are used.
>
>I think we are raising too much dichotomy here.  We
>will talk about it some time.  The things I have in
>mind are hybrid systems that are good for greenhouse
>work in areas with bad or polluted soils.  It is not
>so reductionist as you may be thinking.
>
>Thanks,
>Chris

I dunno Chris. All I can see is that foolish conveyer belt pulling 
those horrific bare rooted kale plants through nutrient sprays and 
wondering why we aren't happly working with what we were given. So 
pardon me if I can't help but look at your post and think 'Well, you 
can take the kid out of Epcot, but you can't take the Epcot out of 
the kid,' you know?

Thanks

-Allan




Take heart, don't be discouraged

2002-01-10 Thread Bonnie York


Dear friends,

I am fairly new to this list and there is so much to learn. Knowing very 
little about biodynamics, I prefer to learn enough to actually have some 
questions before spouting off.  However, I do want to express my 
appreciation for this list and all who are here; making the world a 
better place one bit at a time.


Dearest Allan, do not be disheartened by so few that  participate by 
talking. Remember, the audience is just as important as the "players".  
We are all participants, just at our own pace and in our own way. There 
may also be those folk who don't put up a squeak here, but are talking 
about biodynamics to others in their own circles.

There are many brilliant and intuitive minds giving and receiving 
information, and not all of them human.  **Know that your efforts are 
not in vain. You do make a difference.  ** (Okay, that was a channeled 
bit from somewhere that I was to add.)

Always keep in mind and heart that the ripple effect of small drops of 
water DO affect the whole.


Namaste,
Bonnie York


PSAllan, is there anything specific that you need help, 
encouragement or support for/with?




Re: re Hydroponics (FWD from GREG WILLIS)

2002-01-10 Thread Chris Shade

Allan,

--- Allan Balliett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm not interested in working with growing
> systems in which 
> humans introduce the "parts" they think should be in
> such a system, 
> I'm interested in working with growing systems that 
> optimize the 
> natural system ("heal the Earth").

Albrecht, Steiner, Reams, Willis, Lovel,
Schaubeger(sp?), Reich...all are choosing "parts" they
think should go into the farm system (rock
dusts/mineral balancing; cosmic energies from pipes;
prep application), or be multiplied within the system
(on-farm prep making and composting).  If we can not
try to understand the systems and make decisions about
the "parts", even wrong decisions, we are not using
our human potential.  Just because extension/AgScience
are a bunch of fools doesn't mean you should throw
away your mind.

hydroponic systems commonly (but not necessarily)
> ignore the value of 
> natural light: not just sunlight, but moonlight,
> planetlight, and 
> starlight in producing food truly appropriate for
> humans.

Certainly true if only HID lights are used.

I think we are raising too much dichotomy here.  We
will talk about it some time.  The things I have in
mind are hybrid systems that are good for greenhouse
work in areas with bad or polluted soils.  It is not
so reductionist as you may be thinking.

Thanks,
Chris

 




__
Do You Yahoo!?
Send FREE video emails in Yahoo! Mail!
http://promo.yahoo.com/videomail/




Re: New Member Introduction

2002-01-10 Thread Steven Mcfadden

Hi Cheryl, welcome aboard BD Now from a neighbor just up the road in Santa
Fe.

Good luck with your wornderful project, Steven



Steven McFadden, Director
Chiron Communications
7 Avenida Vista Grande  #195
Santa Fe, NM 87508   USA
http://www.chiron-communications.com












Question for Elaine

2002-01-10 Thread Lmvine1
In an interview with an Aussie here 
http://www.nutri-tech.com.au/Interviews/Interviews10.htm
Elaine is quoted below.  I would like for her to elaborate from her experience and maybe provide more reference that could be researched.  Dan

Elaine:  "The reason the pan is formed is because the soil got compacted, then went anaerobic. It always is the micro-organisms getting the life back into that
hardpan that opens it up and prevents it from reforming as a compacted hardpan zone. Soil-life is the key. It needn’t take very long with biology. Work at Ohio State University shows that you can break up a hardpan at four inches in six weeks by just getting the right kinds of fungi into that soil. You can break up a hardpan at four feet in six months."


REMINDER: Elaine is available through Friday

2002-01-10 Thread Allan Balliett

Elaine is going to be answering  questions for BD Now! through tomorrow.

Now's the time: if any of the answers she has given have raised more 
questions about SFW or compost making or compost tea, be sure to ask 
for answers to those new questions!

Thanks

-Allan




New Member Introduction

2002-01-10 Thread bdnow

Greetings,
Our project is in the City of Albuquerque on Open Space Land. It has 
a very public face and is used by walkers, joggers, etc. We lease the 
land from the city to demonstrate agricultural projects including an 
annual 8 acre corn maze, 1 acre community garden, and 40 acres of 
veggies, hedgerows, and crops for wildlife demonstrating agroecology. 
ABQ is a migratory fly over zone for the beautiful cranes, so our 
wildlife crops serve as habitat and food for them in the winter. The 
entire property is 138 acres, but we sub-lease the remainder to a 
local dairy farmer who manages it for hayland. We don't have the 
equipment needed to manage the whole property. We utilize the 
traditional acequias or ditches as our irrigation system. We are 
certified organic in the fields we manage, but haven't bothered with 
Demeter, as it has little value for our audience. Although they 
always are interested to see us spraying etc, and ask questions.
New Mexico has a fascinating cross-cultural agricultural heritage, 
but is rated in the bottom 5 of the nation in poverty. One-third of 
NM's children are hungry. We have just received a USDA food security 
grant to incorporate growing fresh food for the food charities into 
the project. This is very challenging because of a lot of problems 
with disease and pests. We hope the BD will help to strengthen the 
life forces of the plants to be able to resist these problems.


We sprayed Hugo Erbe's recipe for Frankincense, Gold and Myrrh on 
Three King's Day. Have you ever worked with this?
Cheryl




Resend: Advertisements for BD Now!

2002-01-10 Thread Allan Balliett

Friends - It has always been my dream that people can and will work 
together to make the world a better place. I've always believed that 
if everyone contributes just a little, we can accomplish an awful lot.

Biodynamics Now! has provided an easy opportunity for people all 
around the Earth to work together. There are many indications that 
this discussion group has done much to literally make the world a 
better place.  I think it important that we work to make certain that 
everyone who is interested in the values and methods we support here 
has an opportunity to chose to participate in this virtual community.

I have to admit that I've personally become very disappointed in the 
last two years at the very small level of participation that actually 
occurs on this list. With the exception of a literal handful of 
people, participation on the list is pathetically self-centered.  I'm 
not criticizing egoism or salesmanship with this statement, which, of 
course, are the driving forces behind most of the best conversations. 
I'm criticizing the many who look for what they can TAKE from BD Now! 
without any consideration of what they can BRING.  There are so many 
opportunities to bring something to this communal pot, even if it is 
just your own observations (How does your garden grow?)

Which brings me to this case in point (see below): Am I REALLY the 
only one who is interested in outreach for BD Now!  While I think 
that more minds, hearts and voices will make the discussion more 
valueable, and while I think that reaching more farms, gardens, and 
flower pots with BD will make the world a better place for everyone, 
I have to ask myself if I'm alone in this.

Let me know  - on-line or at [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Thanks

-Allan Balliett
Who, if it were not for the Harpies, would feel mighty alone



>BIODYNAMICS Journal  has offered to run announcements for BD Now! in 
>their future issues. The 'ads' will be text-based and small, similar 
>to the 'ads' currently run for Caretaker Gazette. (The deadline is 
>also immediate. No later than tomorrow.)  Those of you who have been 
>reading BD Now! for a while know that this is a rather momentous 
>event and I want to give public thanks to everyone involved with the 
>Journal for making this possible.
>
>The question: what words would you chose to make people new to 
>biodynamics aware of what the discussion here can offer them?
>
>Other biodynamic publications will be running announcements for BD 
>Now! in the near future and I expect a regular ad in ACRES to become 
>possible later in the year.
>
>Viva diversity! No?
>
>Thanks
>
>-Allan Balliett




Re: re Hydroponics (FWD from GREG WILLIS)

2002-01-10 Thread Fernando Cabral

In perfect agreement with Allan in this particular, let me add
a few things more:

a) The plants should give back something to the soil. Its root
   exudate as a minimum;
b) Roots have a role to perform in the soil, like opening it up
   for air and water to drain in;
c) micro life has a dynamic relation with the plants under the
   soil;
d) We don't know what kind of energies go up and down the plants;
e) Some plants -- like certain well-known leguminosae -- have a
   very important role of extracting nitrogen from the air and
   bringing it into the soil (with the help of some bacteria)

This list could go on and on. When we do hydroponics we KNOW
we are impeding several things to take place. Probability is
that there are many other things we don't know...

Let commercial growers who want more and more money in 
less and less time use hydroponics. Those of us who see the
planet as Gaia should avoid it.

- fernando


Allan Balliett wrote:
> 
> Chris - I'm not interested in working with growing systems in which
> humans introduce the "parts" they think should be in such a system,
> I'm interested in working with growing systems that  optimize the
> natural system ("heal the Earth"). You know: the plant between the
> earth and sun, with the plants roots firmly in the soil.
> 
>   A basic contention of this 'piety' is that, as far as producing
> appropriate food for humans is concerned (the goal of any real
> growing system), we do not yet know of either all the 'elements'
> healthy living farm soil contains nor of what it receives from
> biological relationships or cosmological 'forces.' Furthermore, the
> hydroponic systems commonly (but not necessarily) ignore the value of
> natural light: not just sunlight, but moonlight, planetlight, and
> starlight in producing food truly appropriate for humans.
> 
> So, sure, work with hydroponics if you want to. Use the preps if you
> want to. God knows they can be used anywhere: I have friends who
> spray them regularly around public buildings in the hope of
> introducing real life there. I understand that hydroponics may have
> appropriate applications at certain times and certain places, but
> let's keep in mind that there are hundreds of people who've joined
> this list to learn about biodynamics, which is commonly seen as
> holistic, integrating and natural.
> 
> Thanks -Allan
> 
> >Yeah, Allan, that was basically my reaction to your
> >post, too, thought I didn't have much time to get into
> >it.  Watch out for the lure of BD piety.  Hydroponics
> >does not have to mean chemicals, it means you remove
> >the soil physics, which are often limiting to the
> >system, or contaminated.
> >
> >Here is one thing to chew on:
> >Any compost teas will be loaded with humic colloids,
> >basically timy pieces of soil humus.
> >
> >So how would there be no earth element, no life ether,
> >no soil?  All those arguments become bullshit quickly.
> >  Add some azomite or other clay and you have colloidal
> >mineral earth, which will associate with the humic
> >colloids and you have the basis of dispersed soil
> >solutions.  There will be oodles of microorganisms,
> >and there can be plenty of "forces", if you add them.
> >
> >I have many ideas on these lines and have been holding
> >them until I can work on them.
> >
> >I am sure Willis will come up with some good things.
> >The Storchman would, too, if he applied to it.
> >
> >Chris
> >
> >
> >--- Allan Balliett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>  Dear Allan,
> >>
> >>  You said:
> >>
> >>  >Bob - Biodynamics is a system. Unlike
> >>  factory-oriented approaches,
> >>  >biodynamics cannot be 'parted out,' so, if you want
> >>  to use a
> >>  >biodynamic element as a  "tool" in your hydroponics
> >>  operation, well,
> >>  >you still ain't doing biodynamics and there ain't
> >>  any real reason to
> >>  >discuss what it is that you are doing on this list.
> >>  >
> >>  >Further more, I should hasten to add, many people
> >>  would argue that
> >>  >biodynamics begins with the soil, so, you probably
> >>  aren't ever going
> >>  >to be doing biodynamics in your hydroponics
> >>  operation and there ain't
> >>  >a lot of reason to discuss what it is that you are
> >>  doing on this list.
> >>  >
> >>  >OK?
> >>  >
> >>  >Thanks
> >>
> >>  -Allan Balliett
> >>  moderator
> >>  BD Now!
> >>
> >>  Well, I couldn't disagree with you more and I would
> >>  very much
> >>  appreciate it if you would send Bob's email address
> >>  to me so we could
> >>  discuss this.
> >>
> >>  Fundamentally, what Steiner was teaching is in the
> >>  title for his
> >>  lectures, to wit: "Foundations for the Spiritual
> >>  Renewal of
> >>  Agriculture."  The "tools" as you describe them, are
> >>  essential for
> >>  the working of the approach but they are not the
> >>  "system".  I have
> >>  studied hydroponics extensively and I am convinced
> >>  that a Steiner
> >>  approach to it would not only bring more spiritual
> >>  energy to the
> >>  plants g

Re: Fwd: Re: ELAINE: BD NOW! What is the future of compost tea?

2002-01-10 Thread Allan Balliett

I've passed this question to Elaine, but let's keep in mind that 
Elaine is an expert in microbiology and not in biodynamics. She is 
very open to biodynamics, can perceive that it does 'work' and is 
interested in knowing more about it.

Please, everyone, do not take her statements about biodynamics to 
have real relevance to our biodynamic practice. I invited Elaine to 
talk on BD Now! because the insights she's gained on plant/soil 
dynamics can be tremendously useful for anyone growing plants in 
cooperation with nature.  I think we should use Elaine for what we 
know she is good for and not take offense at her misunderstandings 
in the area ofthe theories and practices of biodynamics.

-Allan


>
>Elaine
>How do you explain the success of potentised BD preps as fungal or pest
>protection when they are firstly in 12% alcohol and diluted to 10X 30???
>
>Whats doing it?




Re: Fwd: Re: ELAINE: BD NOW! What is the future of compost tea?

2002-01-10 Thread Allan Balliett

For the Akashic - Elaine Ingham wrote the paragraph below, not Allan Balliett.

>Allan Balliett wrote:
>>   BD preps work the same way, I think.  Why?  They have the
>>  >organisms in them that inhibit, compete with and consume the
>>  >disease-causing organisms.  I think we could do alot to making certain
>>  >that  the BD preps "work" every time if we understood the organisms in
>  > >the preps better.  Just as we have done for compost tea.
>  > >




Re: ashing

2002-01-10 Thread Fernando Cabral

Moen Creek wrote:
> 
> > Perhaps special instructions for the snakes (most of the ones
> I
> > have captured are 3 feet or more long.
> 
>  I will risk being improper and un-PC and suggest
>  Eating them & then urinating around your gardens.
>  This works well for deer abatement even my wife uses
>  a chamber pot in the spring to have enough to mark
>  the gardens & re-establish proper boundaries.

Problem with eating them is that I am a vegetarian. Sometimes I
do
cook them for my brothers and friends. When I am in the wrong
mood (carnivorous mode -- which is very, very rare) I can even
break my usual diet and have a piece. But I don't think I'd like
to make a habit of it :-)

Now, the real problem is: I don't fear the snakes myself. But
since
my father was bitten (he is OK now) my relatives, friends and
workers are frightned. I have no way to convince them that 
the snakes should survive. If for no other reason because
they control the rats and mice. Once I turn my back they
kill'em.

I'd rather see them protected in a different perimeter than
killed in the garden or even in the house.

>  "Tango Ombrei Porforvor"  as this gringo is want to
>  say.

Here we have "Samba, homem, por favor".

Regards

- fernando

-- 
REDUZIR, REUSAR, RECICLAR -- Dever de todos, amor aos que virão
REDUCE, REUSE, RECYCLE -- Everybody's duty, love to those who are
to come
Fernando CabralPadrao iX Sistemas Abertos
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.pix.com.br
Fone Direto: +55 61 329-0206   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PABX: +55 61 329-0202  Fax: +55 61 326-3082
15º 45' 04.9" S (23 L 0196446/8256520) 47º 49' 58.6" W
19º 37' 57.0" S (23 K 0469898/7829161) 45º 17' 13.6" W




Experiences with Radionics and Biodynamics in OZ

2002-01-10 Thread Allan Balliett

Hi! Allan,
Thank you for subbing me right on.
If you feel this would be of interest, feel free to post it to the list.
Gil

My current interest in Radionics is a direct result of Hugh Lovel's work on
what I tend to think of as "Energetic Agriculture". About ten or twelve
years ago, I decided, that, in at least my case, much of my health problems
were related to food and environmental factors. I found by Radiesthesia and
later confirmed by reading, that nearly all food currently available, had
levels of chemical and other pollutants that made them unsuited for human
consumption. This set me off on a search, initially for my own interest and
protection, to find how I could produce clean, healthy food for my own use.
This grew into an aim to find and define a workable system that could be
promoted to commercial growers, so they could produce food that was more
suited for humans, while still making reasonable profits and that this food
should not cost the end user significantly more than chemically polluted
food.

This took my down the path to Organics, then BD. With Dean Gentlin leading
the way, we started with 500/ 501 twice a year and compost preps in all our
compost heaps. We soon found marked changes. Wild mushrooms came up in our
clay soil, clean, unlike those a few yards away. They were larger and
thicker. They were not worried by slugs, millipedes etc for several days and
tasted much better. We are sure we can taste the difference in our
vegetables. We started making peppers, with mixed success. Some times
spectacular and others doubtful. Occasionally the reverse of our intention.

In my case I could easily handle the two to four acres of garden and fruit
trees, but I also wanted to use BD Preps and peppers over the whole 200
acres.

Then Hugh's articles on "Cosmic Pipes", came out in Acres USA. Hugh has been
kind enough to answer my many questions and when he visited Australia, I was
able to spend time in his company, by courtesy of Barbara and James Hedley.

It was Hugh, who told me, if I was to use a device like his Field
Broadcaster, and wanted to make Preps for it to suit our Australian
conditions, I would need to learn the English Radionics system. I was
already working to this end. I have just spent five weeks of special one to
one training in the UK, to tidy up my training and equip me to teach others
in Australia. I will be doing this in the name of the Radionic Centre of
Australia and under the direction of the Keys College of Radionics, who will
handle the examinations for the students.

I think that Biodynamics, as currently used is great, but it is not the
whole story. In my area, we have to look at remineralising the soil, as ours
are very depleted. Paramagnetic rock dust of the right type is a start, but
in most cases will need some topping up. Our soils are very low in soil
carbon and most productive country has been abused with chemicals, thus
there is little, if any good soil biota. BD can help with this, but on badly
denigrated sites, there is not the food for a reasonable soil biota level,
so we have to look to providing this also.

Another issue here, is the need to recondition water. Our mains water is
largely from underground basins and quite energetically dead. Some water we
use is said to have been in the basins for hundreds of thousands of years!!
Even just a couple of very strong magnets, properly placed, will produce
measurable differences.

At the risk of offending much of the list. I think, in my situation,
Biodynamics has a central and major place in the scheme of things, but I
must also balance the minerals in the soils/ provide paramagnetic rock dust
to help the energy levels/ increase soil carbon/ provide food for soil biota
and recondition my water supply. In addition I have many feral pests to deal
with. Some such as weeds and some insects will go or be of little impact, as
the energy levels rise and system gets up to speed. But there is problems
like foxes, rabbits, mice and rats, which I doubt will move away without
encouragement. This is an area where I thing the devices such as Hugh's
Broadcaster, or the "kites" used in the UK and Australia will be of great
use. An example is Joan Saunder's property. She is a Radionic Practitioner
of many years standing. Twenty years or so ago, they planted a commercial
apple orchard. Rabbits came for miles and started to ring bark the young
trees. Shooting, trapping etc did not make an impact. Still they came. They
set up Kites and set them to keep the rabbits outside the fences of the
property. In days, the rabbits understood and would run along the out side
of the fence and no longer come into the property. In about 1984, there were
major wild fires and all the fences were burnt, along with the Kites. The
remains of the Kites went to the tip along with the fences and a number of
out building and contents. (Including a De La Warr Camera!!) Even to day,
the rabbits run along the fence lines, but do not come into the property!!

Re: re Hydroponics (FWD from GREG WILLIS)

2002-01-10 Thread Allan Balliett

Chris - I'm not interested in working with growing systems in which 
humans introduce the "parts" they think should be in such a system, 
I'm interested in working with growing systems that  optimize the 
natural system ("heal the Earth"). You know: the plant between the 
earth and sun, with the plants roots firmly in the soil.

  A basic contention of this 'piety' is that, as far as producing 
appropriate food for humans is concerned (the goal of any real 
growing system), we do not yet know of either all the 'elements' 
healthy living farm soil contains nor of what it receives from 
biological relationships or cosmological 'forces.' Furthermore, the 
hydroponic systems commonly (but not necessarily) ignore the value of 
natural light: not just sunlight, but moonlight, planetlight, and 
starlight in producing food truly appropriate for humans.

So, sure, work with hydroponics if you want to. Use the preps if you 
want to. God knows they can be used anywhere: I have friends who 
spray them regularly around public buildings in the hope of 
introducing real life there. I understand that hydroponics may have 
appropriate applications at certain times and certain places, but 
let's keep in mind that there are hundreds of people who've joined 
this list to learn about biodynamics, which is commonly seen as 
holistic, integrating and natural.

Thanks -Allan

>Yeah, Allan, that was basically my reaction to your
>post, too, thought I didn't have much time to get into
>it.  Watch out for the lure of BD piety.  Hydroponics
>does not have to mean chemicals, it means you remove
>the soil physics, which are often limiting to the
>system, or contaminated.
>
>Here is one thing to chew on:
>Any compost teas will be loaded with humic colloids,
>basically timy pieces of soil humus. 
>
>So how would there be no earth element, no life ether,
>no soil?  All those arguments become bullshit quickly.
>  Add some azomite or other clay and you have colloidal
>mineral earth, which will associate with the humic
>colloids and you have the basis of dispersed soil
>solutions.  There will be oodles of microorganisms,
>and there can be plenty of "forces", if you add them.
>
>I have many ideas on these lines and have been holding
>them until I can work on them.
>
>I am sure Willis will come up with some good things.
>The Storchman would, too, if he applied to it.
>
>Chris
>
>
>--- Allan Balliett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>  Dear Allan,
>>
>>  You said:
>>
>>  >Bob - Biodynamics is a system. Unlike
>>  factory-oriented approaches,
>>  >biodynamics cannot be 'parted out,' so, if you want
>>  to use a
>>  >biodynamic element as a  "tool" in your hydroponics
>>  operation, well,
>>  >you still ain't doing biodynamics and there ain't
>>  any real reason to
>>  >discuss what it is that you are doing on this list.
>>  >
>>  >Further more, I should hasten to add, many people
>>  would argue that
>>  >biodynamics begins with the soil, so, you probably
>>  aren't ever going
>>  >to be doing biodynamics in your hydroponics
>>  operation and there ain't
>>  >a lot of reason to discuss what it is that you are
>>  doing on this list.
>>  >
>>  >OK?
>>  >
>>  >Thanks
>>
>>  -Allan Balliett
>>  moderator
>>  BD Now!
>>
>>  Well, I couldn't disagree with you more and I would
>>  very much
>>  appreciate it if you would send Bob's email address
>>  to me so we could
>>  discuss this.
>>
>>  Fundamentally, what Steiner was teaching is in the
>>  title for his
>>  lectures, to wit: "Foundations for the Spiritual
>>  Renewal of
>>  Agriculture."  The "tools" as you describe them, are
>>  essential for
>>  the working of the approach but they are not the
>>  "system".  I have
>>  studied hydroponics extensively and I am convinced
>>  that a Steiner
>>  approach to it would not only bring more spiritual
>>  energy to the
>>  plants grown, but sweeter, tastier, longer lasting
>>  vegetables also
>>  that are highly nutritious both physically and
>>  metaphysically.
>>
>>  This spring, my company is going to start research
>>  on hydroponics
>>  using our field sprays and other Steiner derived
>  > techniques.  I will
>>  not consider, even for a millisecond, that this
>>  could be called
>>  "biodynamic".  And to this comment I must add,
>>  "biodynamics" today
>>  has little relationship to what Steiner taught
>>  anyway.  It is far too
>>  limiting and limited as it is practiced and
>>  promulgated by the
>>  self-appointed leaders and organizations.  So to
>>  shoehorn the limited
>>  concept of "biodynamics" into hydroponics is an act,
>>  I think, that is
>>  both foolhardy and self-limiting in and of itself.
>>
>>  Also, as practiced today, "biodynamics" is not a
>>  system.  It is a
>>  group of practices cobbled together by, in many
>>  cases, well meaning
>>  people who, for the most part, fail to grasp the
>>  most basic concepts
>>  of this approach to farming, which is, again, the
>>  reintroduction of
>>  SPIRITUAL ENERGY into our food which is lo

Re: ashing

2002-01-10 Thread Fernando Cabral

James and Barbara Hedley wrote:
> 
> The insects burn down to nothing so I would potentise to 8x and then dilute
> and either water or spray out. Make sure that you enclose the area that you
> are trying to protect with the spray / ash by going right around the
> perimeter.

About potentizing, should I do it diluting in water (say, 100
ml),
shaking and then diluting again in 1 l, shaking, from that, 100
ml
in 1 l again, for ten times? For how long should I shake it?

Any other hints appreciated.

> Good luck in your South American odyssey.

Thank you.

> James Hedley.
> 

-- 
REDUZIR, REUSAR, RECICLAR -- Dever de todos, amor aos que virão
REDUCE, REUSE, RECYCLE -- Everybody's duty, love to those who are
to come
Fernando CabralPadrao iX Sistemas Abertos
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.pix.com.br
Fone Direto: +55 61 329-0206   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PABX: +55 61 329-0202  Fax: +55 61 326-3082
15º 45' 04.9" S (23 L 0196446/8256520) 47º 49' 58.6" W
19º 37' 57.0" S (23 K 0469898/7829161) 45º 17' 13.6" W




Re: ashing

2002-01-10 Thread James and Barbara Hedley

Dear Sarah,
We have found that a fire sign moon is the most effective for burning of
insects. in order of preference Leo, Sagitarius, Aries. Carbonate the
insects in a cast iron frypand homoeopathically potentise them as per the
methods developed by Lili and Eugen Kolisko [see archives].
Trials over a considerable period of time have shown that it is the
potentising that makes the difference to the efficacy of BD peppers.
Regards
James Hedley.

- Original Message -
From: "Sarah Cherry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 9:38 PM
Subject: Re: ashing


> Maria Thun's 'picture book" entitled "Gardening for Life" has a fairly
> specific outline regarding insects. She only lists a few, but you might
> get a sense of the rhythms she is suggesting from reading that book.
> Hugh Courtney at JPI has detailed instructions on burning and making
> the deltution. Insects are the trickiest to ash for. Their form is so
> varied during metamorphosis, the sun time for ashing will move
> correspondingly. With some insects, Thun found, you even have to
> consider the moon.
>
> I'm interested to hear that Agnihotra is effective in this regard.
>
> The information from JPI was in the newsletter some time ago. If you
> can't find a copy, write back and I'll dig for mine.
>
> Sarah
> --- Aurora Farm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Greetings Fernando:
> > The ashing process works mainly with insects, rodents and plants and
> > the
> > basic info is in Steiner's Agriculture.
> > We have had success with Agnihotra ash for pests as well. Their
> > website is ,
> > I believe, www.copworks. com/Agnihotra. There is a newsletter they
> > put out
> > which has many articles on farms which have fewer pest problems once
> > they
> > begin to practice Agnihotra.
> > Blessings and Good Luck,
> > Barbara and Woody
> > P.S. If anyone knows of the German book which explains in detail the
> > ashing
> > process for certain plants we would sure appreciate knowing the
> > title.
> > Thanks
> >
> > http://www.kootenay.com/~aurora
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Fernando Cabral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: Monday, January 07, 2002 1:29 PM
> > Subject: Re: ashing
> >
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > >
> > > I think you better just relocate..sstorch
> >
> > Is this supposed to be a joke?
> >
> > - fernando
> >
> >
> > --
> > REDUZIR, REUSAR, RECICLAR -- Dever de todos, amor aos que virão
> > REDUCE, REUSE, RECYCLE -- Everybody's duty, love to those who are
> > to come
> > Fernando CabralPadrao iX Sistemas Abertos
> > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.pix.com.br
> > Fone Direto: +55 61 329-0206   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > PABX: +55 61 329-0202  Fax: +55 61 326-3082
> > 15º 45' 04.9" S (23 L 0196446/8256520) 47º 49' 58.6" W
> > 19º 37' 57.0" S (23 K 0469898/7829161) 45º 17' 13.6" W
> >
>
>
> __
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Send FREE video emails in Yahoo! Mail!
> http://promo.yahoo.com/videomail/
>
>




Re: ashing

2002-01-10 Thread James and Barbara Hedley

Dear Fernando,
It certainly sounds as if you are in some pretty wild country down there.
[1] Rattlesnakes.
Try burning some on a full moon and spreading the ash around. I have an
acqaintance in Broome (Aust) who tryed burning vertebrates in many piles
through her orchard and just leaving it there. try burning several
rattlenakes in different piles and just leave the ash where it is burnt.
[2] You ask about moon and time of day for collecting the material, burning
it
> and spreading it. We have found that to burn the insects on a 3rd quarter
of Leo moon [as per Llewellyn's moon Sign Book not the biodynamic calenders
which can differ by as much as 2 days from Llewellyns].  This years stock
has not arrived but as soon as they do I will post you dates and times for
the next few months. We have found that insects are easier to control than
vertebates.
[2]   How to burn the material.We have found that the best results are
obtained by carbonating the pests in a cast iron saucepan or frying pan with
a lid on it. Carbonating seems to work better than burning.
[3] Spreading.  Vertebrates as per rattlesnakes.
The insects burn down to nothing so I would potentise to 8x and then dilute
and either water or spray out. Make sure that you enclose the area that you
are trying to protect with the spray / ash by going right around the
perimeter.
Good luck in your South American odyssey.
James Hedley.

- Original Message -
From: "Fernando Cabral" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 10:57 PM
Subject: ashing


> I have had lots of problems with
>
> Snakes (great number of rattle snakes)
> crickets (they chew around the plant whose growing tip is cut off
> and
> drops to the ground).
> bees (arapuã, a Brazilian black bee that eats flowers, buds,
>  young fruits and any soft plant tissue)
> butterfly
>
> I'd like to test ashing to diminish their attacks. Since I have
> never
> seen full, clear explanation on how to prepare and use the ashes,
> I'd
> appreciate if someone out there could educate me on that.
>
> Things like:
>
> a) moon and time of day for collecting the material, burning it
> and spreading it
> b) How to burn the material
> c) How to spread the ashes
>
> Perhaps special instructions for the snakes (most of the ones I
> have captured are 3 feet or more long.
>
> Thank you
>
> - fernando
>
>
>
> --
> REDUZIR, REUSAR, RECICLAR -- Dever de todos, amor aos que virão
> REDUCE, REUSE, RECYCLE -- Everybody's duty, love to those who are
> to come
> Fernando CabralPadrao iX Sistemas Abertos
> mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.pix.com.br
> Fone Direto: +55 61 329-0206   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> PABX: +55 61 329-0202  Fax: +55 61 326-3082
> 15º 45' 04.9" S (23 L 0196446/8256520) 47º 49' 58.6" W
> 19º 37' 57.0" S (23 K 0469898/7829161) 45º 17' 13.6" W
>
>




Re: Growing fruit/berries biodynamically

2002-01-10 Thread James and Barbara Hedley

Dear Dave,
My apologies for the late reply to your request for more information on our
use of Lycopodium as a homoeopathic treatment to strengthen the archetypal
being of a plant.The berry picking and processing season is now finished,
consequently I will have more energy to devote to the love of my life
(biodynamics) and getting plants to grow how they shouldn't.
This idea is still in the early stages of observation of what happens. The
theory is that once plants evolved from the primitive algaes the first two
were Lycopodium and Equisetum.
Lycopopdium fits between the mosses and the ferns, both of which were able
to propagate in the sulphur rich environment at that time.an incredibly
tough pair of plants.
The story starts with my finding of a large number of dendrites in the
strata of sedimentary rocks  in an area near us. For those who have never
seen a dendrite, it is the exact image of one of the Lycopodium ferns,
however at that particular geological age there was not any above ground
plants (or so biology tells me). The patterns for the forthcoming plants
were already here before they came into physical manifestation. The strange
thing is that this pattern was caused by pressure well below the earths
surface acting upon iron and manganese rich fluid seeping between the strata
of the rocks.
 Lycopodium also has the common name of  vegetable sulphur, sulphur being
the organising element, the assumption is that Lycopodium sprayed on the
foliage and soil of plants that were doing poorly would give some type of
effect. My hypothesis if you could call it that, involved an assumption that
these two plants were necessary for the rest of the plant world to evolve.
I do not need to enunciate any further on the role of Equisetum. which has
such a favoured place in biodynamic theory and practice, however the fact
that the first two plants on earth have such a great impact in homoeopathic
practice indicated to me that it had an application in healing the
elementals involved in plant growth. Lycopodium is one of the great
polychrest remedies of the Materia Medica, renowned for it's impact on the
whole organism.
Initial tests have shown that Apricot trees which had not fruited for at
least 10 years, as long as I can remember were able to set a bumper crop of
fruit and the trees are as vigorous as can be.
raspberries grow into shrubs not just canes.
The use of radionically potentised homoeopathic doses of herbal remedies to
treat plants has a lot of potential in strengthening plants.
I intend to use mixtures of Calcarea, Lycopodium and Sulphur this yearon
strips in pasture just to see the effects.
By the way has anyone ever investigated or used that common old weed
Phytolacca in homoeopathic dilutions to set the patterns for regulation of
the potassium element. Phytolacca root can contain up to 45% caustic potash
and large amounts of malic acid.
If there is anyone who reads this who can help with the role of malic acid
in plant growth could they please help with information.i read about it once
and now I can't find the information.
Maybe Chris Shade can help with developing my ideas about Lycopodium in
relation to the dendritic patterns found in sedimentary rocks.

Love and Light,
James Hedley


- Original Message -
From: "Dave Robison" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 6:45 AM
Subject: Re: Growing fruit/berries biodynamically


> This is interesting
> "To achieve this we use homoeopathic remedies such as Lycopodium at
> high potency to bring the plants back to their archetypal patterns."
> James, can you tell us more?
>
>
> ==
> Dave Robison
>
>