Re: Clinton not Bush

2002-02-09 Thread Frank Teuton

This is as unlikely a place for a discussion of the life and times of Frank
Zappa as I could imagine.

Imagine writing a paper entitled 'Rudolf Steiner and Frank Zappa: a BD take
on the crux of the biscuit'!

No, I don't think 'Dynamo Hum' or 'Cosmic Debris' qualify as new age hits,
python boots or no python boots.

On the other hand, naming your daughter 'Moon Unit' seems a touch more New
Agey somehow

One thing about Al Gore, he did write a preface to Our Stolen Future,
www.ourstolenfuture.org.

Frank Teuton---reminding everyone to not eat yellow snow..it is that
time of year, eh?


- Original Message -
From: "Lance Howard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, February 09, 2002 11:56 AM
Subject: Re: Clinton not Bush


> I believe Zappa was a Republican, although his politics seemed more
> libertarian.  He certainly didn't espouse any "new age" philosophies as
far
> as I know.  (Lance whose garage band played covers of Freak Out songs in
the
> 60s- which is not quite saying "I knew FZ and you're no FZ")
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Allan Balliett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Sunday, February 03, 2002 7:57 AM
> Subject: Re: Clinton not Bush
>
>
> > >I'm not certain change will come from politics and elected officials. I
> > >voted for Nadar too, really 'cause of his running mate, and I hated the
> > >thought of Gore in office...(being an old hippie (er' I mean a young
one)
> > >it's hard to forget Tipper's censorship of rock' n' roll.
> >
> > Hey, when chairman Senator Al Gore lost his composure like a child
> > while telling
> >
>
would-have-been-presidential-candidate-in-the-near-future-if-he-had-not-died
> -of-very-rapidly-growing-prostate-cancer
> > hearing witness Frank Zappa that he had been a 'fan of yours, Mr
> > Zappa, for my entire life,' I have to admit, I had more hope for ol'
> > Al than he ever deserved.
> >
> > I also heard him give a fine address on CSpan recently. In his
> > self-introduction he mentioned his life in politics with a line
> > something like this "You know, you either win or your lose and in
> > just a very few instances something other than that happens."
> >
> > Environmentalist he wasn't, but often there was a glimpse of a real
> > human being within the deepsea diving outfit he always seems to be
> > wearing under his suit. -Allan
> >
>




Re: Clinton not Bush

2002-02-09 Thread Lance Howard

I believe Zappa was a Republican, although his politics seemed more
libertarian.  He certainly didn't espouse any "new age" philosophies as far
as I know.  (Lance whose garage band played covers of Freak Out songs in the
60s- which is not quite saying "I knew FZ and you're no FZ")



- Original Message -
From: "Allan Balliett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, February 03, 2002 7:57 AM
Subject: Re: Clinton not Bush


> >I'm not certain change will come from politics and elected officials. I
> >voted for Nadar too, really 'cause of his running mate, and I hated the
> >thought of Gore in office...(being an old hippie (er' I mean a young one)
> >it's hard to forget Tipper's censorship of rock' n' roll.
>
> Hey, when chairman Senator Al Gore lost his composure like a child
> while telling
>
would-have-been-presidential-candidate-in-the-near-future-if-he-had-not-died
-of-very-rapidly-growing-prostate-cancer
> hearing witness Frank Zappa that he had been a 'fan of yours, Mr
> Zappa, for my entire life,' I have to admit, I had more hope for ol'
> Al than he ever deserved.
>
> I also heard him give a fine address on CSpan recently. In his
> self-introduction he mentioned his life in politics with a line
> something like this "You know, you either win or your lose and in
> just a very few instances something other than that happens."
>
> Environmentalist he wasn't, but often there was a glimpse of a real
> human being within the deepsea diving outfit he always seems to be
> wearing under his suit. -Allan
>




Re: Clinton not Bush

2002-02-03 Thread Barry Carter

Dear Friends,

Both Clinton and Bush have acted as hand puppets for corporate interests like
Enron. For a detailed description of this interaction see:

http://www.onlinejournal.com/Special_Reports/Chin020102/chin020102.html

--

With kindest regards,
 
Barry Carter 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
2319 Balm
Baker City, Oregon 97814
Phone: 541-523-3357
Web Pages: 
Forest - http://www.subtleenergies.com/ormus/bmnfa/index.htm
ORMUS - http://www.subtleenergies.com/ormus/whatisit.htm
 
In my first thirty years of life
I roamed hundreds and thousands of miles.
Walked by rivers through deep green grass
Entered cities of boiling red dust.
Tried drugs, but couldn't make Immortal;
Read books and wrote poems on history.
Today I'm back a Cold Mountain:
I'll sleep by the creek and purify my ears.
-Han-shan from Cold Mountain Poems by Gary Snyder




Re: Clinton not Bush

2002-02-03 Thread Allan Balliett

>I'm not certain change will come from politics and elected officials. I
>voted for Nadar too, really 'cause of his running mate, and I hated the
>thought of Gore in office...(being an old hippie (er' I mean a young one)
>it's hard to forget Tipper's censorship of rock' n' roll.

Hey, when chairman Senator Al Gore lost his composure like a child 
while telling 
would-have-been-presidential-candidate-in-the-near-future-if-he-had-not-died-of-very-rapidly-growing-prostate-cancer
 
hearing witness Frank Zappa that he had been a 'fan of yours, Mr 
Zappa, for my entire life,' I have to admit, I had more hope for ol' 
Al than he ever deserved.

I also heard him give a fine address on CSpan recently. In his 
self-introduction he mentioned his life in politics with a line 
something like this "You know, you either win or your lose and in 
just a very few instances something other than that happens."

Environmentalist he wasn't, but often there was a glimpse of a real 
human being within the deepsea diving outfit he always seems to be 
wearing under his suit. -Allan




Re: Clinton not Bush

2002-02-03 Thread jsherry

I'm not certain change will come from politics and elected officials. I
voted for Nadar too, really 'cause of his running mate, and I hated the
thought of Gore in office...(being an old hippie (er' I mean a young one)
it's hard to forget Tipper's censorship of rock' n' roll.

Real change must come from spirit first. If we can heal the hearts of men
and women, we can create political change. Just putting some other stooge in
office ain't gonna cut it.

JS

- Original Message -
From: "Robert Farr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, February 02, 2002 8:02 AM
Subject: Re: Clinton not Bush


Hey - not *my* president!  I voted for Ralph Nader.

And Bush should not have been elected.  He used the power of the white
male elite, as embodied by the Supreme Court, to steal the election.

Any action he takes here is colored by that theft.

I thought the UPI article reflected Bush's criminality quite accurately!

--
Robert Farr
(540) 668-7160
Check out http://www.thechileman.com
for Hot Sauces, Salsas, Mustards & More!






Re: Clinton not Bush

2002-02-03 Thread jsherry

Michael said, (snip)"Please note that Bush's daughters have gotten in
trouble with the law and now his neice.  Hardly made the news, but, if
Clinton's daughter...".

Actually Michael, her drunken f'ed up photo has been appearing on the news
aplenty. I certainly wouldn't bother to defend any of those children.
Sympathy perhaps...

As Allan said, there is no choice in this country. Too many amnesiacs
walking around.

Hope you all had an inspirational quickening yesterday. Here the light was
splendid, we finally had some cold weather (short supply this winter) here
outside of NYC. However we are in a severe drought, having received little
rain all year and last, and no snow basically. My plants are so confused in
the yard: irises popping up, rose leaf buds, golden willow branch tips. All
way ahead of schedule.

The earth needs our prayers, as for the children of these politicians, well,
we all have our karma to deal with.

Blessings,
Jane




Re: Clinton not Bush

2002-02-02 Thread Michael Roboz

So-called "Democratic" process.  The primaries and the way the candidates
are set up for election is not the most democratic system in the world.  The
British Parliamentary system (which Canada uses for now) is a little more
democratic where anybody could run, even more than one candidate in the same
party, if they had enough backing.  That has not happened since the 1970's,
but, it is possible. With the American system, only one candidate is brought
forward from each party in the end, to be elected, by a small proportion of
the electorate historically.
   Please note that Bush's daughters have gotten in trouble with the law and
now his neice.  Hardly made the news, but, if Clinton's daughter would have
done the same thing, it would have been political fodder for a month.
M from C
- Original Message -
From: Allan Balliett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, February 02, 2002 9:34 AM
Subject: Re: Clinton not Bush


> >It is the selection process that sets up Americans to sometimes elect
the
> >"worst" rather than "better".  As Tony N-S said, not only do Americans
> >suffer for it, but, also the rest of the world. Michael
>
> What selection process, Michael?
>
> You mean like Gary Hart and his womanizing or John John Kennedy's
> plane going down days after he confided to friends that he was ready
> to enter politics?
>
> As with Hitler's rise, 30 years of assasination of the good and the
> bright will make most anyone look good to those who live the
> unreflected life
>
>




Re: Clinton not Bush

2002-02-02 Thread Anthony Nelson-Smith

Y'know, there are times when the rest of the world feels that US Americans
(present company excepted, natch) _deserve_ the bum Presidents which they
elect...  Pity that we have to suffer from their activities, too, though !
Tony N-S.




Re: Clinton not Bush (as reluctant bomber)

2002-02-02 Thread Anthony Nelson-Smith

Allan - I'm not entirely sure that bombing the Muslim world, by whatever
instigation, is necessarily the best indicator of a good President...
Tony N-S.




Re: Clinton not Bush

2002-02-02 Thread Michael Roboz

   It is the selection process that sets up Americans to sometimes elect the
"worst" rather than "better".  As Tony N-S said, not only do Americans
suffer for it, but, also the rest of the world. Michael


> Y'know, there are times when the rest of the world feels that US Americans
> (present company excepted, natch) _deserve_ the bum Presidents which they
> elect...  Pity that we have to suffer from their activities, too, though !
> Tony N-S.
>
>




Re: Clinton not Bush

2002-02-02 Thread Allan Balliett

>And Bush should not have been elected.  He used the power of the white
>male elite, as embodied by the Supreme Court, to steal the election.

Whenever we promote race as an issue we are playing right into the 
hands of the elite.  Race is used to divide us and to keep our eyes 
off from the real problems. Haven't you found your Commie and 
Socialist friends to be working for the welfare of all beings, not 
just their own race? Besides, there must be a better way to describe 
a body that includes that Coke-sucker Clarence Thomas and at least 
two women, I mean, there's something in all of this for them, too, 
isn't there? Equal opportunity exploitation, no?

It looks like this Poppa Bush sculpted crew may soon have a chance to 
shine again for Texas  if Cheney's refusal to cooperate with Congress 
falls into their lap.

-Allan




Re: Clinton not Bush

2002-02-02 Thread Robert Farr

Hey - not *my* president!  I voted for Ralph Nader.

And Bush should not have been elected.  He used the power of the white
male elite, as embodied by the Supreme Court, to steal the election.

Any action he takes here is colored by that theft.

I thought the UPI article reflected Bush's criminality quite accurately!

--
Robert Farr
(540) 668-7160
Check out http://www.thechileman.com
for Hot Sauces, Salsas, Mustards & More!




Re: Clinton not Bush

2002-02-01 Thread Allan Balliett

>Dear Robert,
>
>   Certain people were out to get Clinton any way they could.  This 
>does not seem to be the case with YOUR present President, who, 
>besides, should NOT have been the one that was elected to office in 
>the first place.
>Cheers, Michael from Canada.

Michael, I'm not really  certain what you are saying in the above 
paragraph, but, I think it is important to note that George Bush 
started bombing in the Moslem world on his own volition, but Bill 
Clinton waited to start his bombing of the Moslem world until his 
impeachment was all but certain. Once the bombs fell on Iraq in an 
operation that appeared simultaneously to be completely pointless and 
totally sadistic, the impeachment simply lifted from Bill Clinton's 
shoulders.  What bigger disbursement from the public coffers to the 
private sector that  calls the shots can occur than a few sessions of 
carpet bombing?

-Allan