subject:"\[beagleboard\] Running Qt gui application on BBB"

Re[2]: [beagleboard] Running Qt gui application on BBB

2016-01-25 Thread Marius

I am not sure about this but I think I read somewhere that QT 5.3.x does 
not support the "qws" anymore. I run QT 5.3.1 with -platform linuxfb 
only and it works. I did compile with eglfs but have not been able to 
get that to work either.

-- Original Message --
From: em.ce.kwad...@gmail.com
To: "BeagleBoard" 
Sent: 2016-01-24 23:21:11
Subject: Re: [beagleboard] Running Qt gui application on BBB

Have you finally solved this problem? If so, could you please give some 
advice how to fix this problem?
 I am stuck in the same place right now. Trying to run an example after 
cross compiling qt for BBB.

On Sunday, 20 December 2015 12:39:38 UTC+1, bremenpl wrote:

I tried the first hint:

root@beaglebone:/home/debian/ImpedanceManager-build# 
./ImpedanceManager -qws -platform eglfs

libEGL warning: DRI3: xcb_connect failed
libEGL warning: DRI2: xcb_connect failed
libEGL warning: DRI2: xcb_connect failed
Could not initialize egl display
Aborted

Theb second:

root@beaglebone:/home/debian/ImpedanceManager-build# DISPLAY=:0 
./ImpedanceManager -qws

No protocol specified
QXcbConnection: Could not connect to display :0
Aborted

Is there something more I should specify?

W dniu 2015-12-20 o 08:49, Maxim Podbereznyy pisze:

Try it this thus way:

DISPLAY=:0 myapp -qws

19 Дек 2015 г. 23:07 пользователь "Bremenpl"  
написал:
I am not sure, coz i wasnt building it- i fownloaded it from paxjage 
manager.

On December 19, 2015 7:51:18 PM John Syne  wrote:

i haven’t done this in ages, but try to run your QT app with the 
"-platform eglfs” option. I’m assuming you built QT with EGL.

Regards,
John

On Dec 19, 2015, at 3:46 AM, Bremenpl  wrote:

Hello there,
I managed to set up qt 5.3.2 on the beaglebone. I have build 
everything there and it took ages but it works .

Next step is that I need to check either it is possible to run qt 
app on bbb without gui with qws parameter. Because at the moment 
when i run it with qws i get QXcbconnection: Could not connect to 
display. I need to do it like this because thw gui is really 
really slow.

On December 15, 2015 6:10:13 AM John Syne  
wrote:

For purely building armhf code, Odroid XU4 might be a good 
choice:

http://www.hardkernel.com/main/main.php

This is an Octacore processor with 4 CortexA15 and 4 CortexA7 
processors. I don’t know how good their kernel/debian support is, 
but I know Robert had looked at this board or a predecessor in 
the past, so perhaps he can give his input here.

Clearly this board doesn’t have the flexibility of the 
BeagleBoard-x15 with it’s dual DSP, Dual CortexM4, Quad PRU, SATA 
interface, PCIe interface, etc.

Regards,
John

On Dec 14, 2015, at 4:29 PM, William Hermans  
wrote:

Anyway, the main problem with the rPI 2 is that it has no "fast" 
non destructive storage. But the Omilex . . let me look it up.

https://www.olimex.com/Products/OLinuXino/A20/A20-OLinuXIno-LIME2-4GB/open-source-hardware 
Has SATA and GbE both. Dual cores too I think. However, you'd 
have to ask someone who has one how well they think it would 
work as a build board. RObert might know, as his Debian build 
guide also includes this board too I believe.

On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 5:25 PM, William Hermans 
 wrote:

https://www.adafruit.com/product/2358

On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 5:23 PM, William Hermans 
 wrote:

The new board is armv7. Positively.

On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 5:24 PM, Bremenpl  
wrote:

Okay, thank . I am quite sure raspberry pi is not hard float.

W dniu 2015-12-15 o 01:21, William Hermans pisze:
So just thinking for a minute. A Raspberry PI 2, the new 
board with quad cores, and 1 GB ram would probably work 
fairly decent as a build system for the Beaglebones. 
Granted, something like the X15, of that new nVidia ARM 
board, or even the Omelex A20 board with SATA would probably 
be a much better choice if cost is not a problem.

By the way, I have no idea what Robert is talking about. You 
need to ask him.

On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 5:15 PM, Bremenpl 
 wrote:
I have just flashed my BeagleBone Black emmc  with lxqt 
image linked by Robert. I cant seem to find qmake anywhere. 
I thought there would be qt installed and all. Am I missing 
something again?

W dniu 2015-12-15 o 00:54, William Hermans pisze:
Not necessarily, but consider this. How much does an 
embedded systems specialist in your area get paid per hour 
? In my area, about 15-20 years ago. The cost of a board 
like the X15 would have been absorbed in roughly half a 
day. That is to say, an embedded systems specialist could 
buy a board for $239 after working roughly half a day.

Now take into account that figuring out how to cross 
compile something like this is a serious headache, and 
often takes days, if not weeks to get right . . .

On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 4:32 PM, Bremenpl 
 wrote:
So if I understand correctly, I should have a second 
board that is more powerfull than beagle just to compile 
the code for beagle?

Re[2]: [beagleboard] Running Qt gui application on BBB

2016-01-24 Thread Marius

I am not sure about this but I think I read somewhere that QT 5.3.x does
not support the "qws" anymore. I run QT 5.3.1 with -platform linuxfb
only and it works. I did compile with eglfs but have not been able to
get that to work either.

Have you finally solved this problem? If so, could you please give some
advice how to fix this problem?
I am stuck in the same place right now. Trying to run an example after
cross compiling qt for BBB.

On Sunday, 20 December 2015 12:39:38 UTC+1, bremenpl wrote:

I tried the first hint:

root@beaglebone:/home/debian/ImpedanceManager-build#
./ImpedanceManager -qws -platform eglfs

libEGL warning: DRI3: xcb_connect failed
libEGL warning: DRI2: xcb_connect failed
libEGL warning: DRI2: xcb_connect failed
Could not initialize egl display
Aborted

Theb second:

root@beaglebone:/home/debian/ImpedanceManager-build# DISPLAY=:0
./ImpedanceManager -qws

No protocol specified
QXcbConnection: Could not connect to display :0
Aborted

Is there something more I should specify?

W dniu 2015-12-20 o 08:49, Maxim Podbereznyy pisze:

Try it this thus way:

DISPLAY=:0 myapp -qws

19 Дек 2015 г. 23:07 пользователь "Bremenpl"
написал:
I am not sure, coz i wasnt building it- i fownloaded it from paxjage
manager.

On December 19, 2015 7:51:18 PM John Syne wrote:

i haven’t done this in ages, but try to run your QT app with the
"-platform eglfs” option. I’m assuming you built QT with EGL.

Regards,
John

On Dec 19, 2015, at 3:46 AM, Bremenpl wrote:

Hello there,
I managed to set up qt 5.3.2 on the beaglebone. I have build
everything there and it took ages but it works .

Next step is that I need to check either it is possible to run qt
app on bbb without gui with qws parameter. Because at the moment
when i run it with qws i get QXcbconnection: Could not connect to
display. I need to do it like this because thw gui is really
really slow.

On December 15, 2015 6:10:13 AM John Syne
wrote:

For purely building armhf code, Odroid XU4 might be a good
choice:

http://www.hardkernel.com/main/main.php

This is an Octacore processor with 4 CortexA15 and 4 CortexA7
processors. I don’t know how good their kernel/debian support is,
but I know Robert had looked at this board or a predecessor in
the past, so perhaps he can give his input here.

Clearly this board doesn’t have the flexibility of the
BeagleBoard-x15 with it’s dual DSP, Dual CortexM4, Quad PRU, SATA
interface, PCIe interface, etc.

Regards,
John

On Dec 14, 2015, at 4:29 PM, William Hermans
wrote:

Anyway, the main problem with the rPI 2 is that it has no "fast"
non destructive storage. But the Omilex . . let me look it up.

https://www.olimex.com/Products/OLinuXino/A20/A20-OLinuXIno-LIME2-4GB/open-source-hardware
Has SATA and GbE both. Dual cores too I think. However, you'd
have to ask someone who has one how well they think it would
work as a build board. RObert might know, as his Debian build
guide also includes this board too I believe.

On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 5:25 PM, William Hermans
wrote:

https://www.adafruit.com/product/2358

On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 5:23 PM, William Hermans
wrote:

The new board is armv7. Positively.

On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 5:24 PM, Bremenpl
wrote:

Okay, thank . I am quite sure raspberry pi is not hard float.

W dniu 2015-12-15 o 01:21, William Hermans pisze:
So just thinking for a minute. A Raspberry PI 2, the new
board with quad cores, and 1 GB ram would probably work
fairly decent as a build system for the Beaglebones.
Granted, something like the X15, of that new nVidia ARM
board, or even the Omelex A20 board with SATA would probably
be a much better choice if cost is not a problem.

By the way, I have no idea what Robert is talking about. You
need to ask him.

On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 5:15 PM, Bremenpl
wrote:
I have just flashed my BeagleBone Black emmc with lxqt
image linked by Robert. I cant seem to find qmake anywhere.
I thought there would be qt installed and all. Am I missing
something again?

W dniu 2015-12-15 o 00:54, William Hermans pisze:
Not necessarily, but consider this. How much does an
embedded systems specialist in your area get paid per hour
? In my area, about 15-20 years ago. The cost of a board
like the X15 would have been absorbed in roughly half a
day. That is to say, an embedded systems specialist could
buy a board for $239 after working roughly half a day.

Now take into account that figuring out how to cross
compile something like this is a serious headache, and
often takes days, if not weeks to get right . . .

On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 4:32 PM, Bremenpl
wrote:
So if I understand correctly, I should have a second
board that is more powerfull than beagle just to compile
the code for beagle?

W dniu 2015-12-15 o 00:26, William Hermans pisze:
I cant change the board right now, it has to be
BeagleBone Black. Thats why I need to build on my host.
Did you succed on installing QT5.1 and deploying it to
Beagle

Re: [beagleboard] Running Qt gui application on BBB

2016-01-24 Thread Bremenpl

Hi there,
I was not able to solve this. Because of lack of time, I decided to install
qt 5+ on the bbb usong apt manager and build serialport (i needed ot and it
was not included) on the bbb itself. For now i am stuck with building on
bbb without crosscompiling as i wasnt able to set it for qt 5+ as well.

If you would find a solution to this i would be gratefull if you let me
know. I still need the qt on bbb in own frame buffer version.

On January 25, 2016 12:44:23 AM em.ce.kwad...@gmail.com wrote:

On Sunday, 20 December 2015 12:39:38 UTC+1, bremenpl wrote:

I tried the first hint:

root@beaglebone:/home/debian/ImpedanceManager-build# ./ImpedanceManager
-qws -platform eglfs
libEGL warning: DRI3: xcb_connect failed
libEGL warning: DRI2: xcb_connect failed
libEGL warning: DRI2: xcb_connect failed
Could not initialize egl display
Aborted

Theb second:

root@beaglebone:/home/debian/ImpedanceManager-build# DISPLAY=:0
./ImpedanceManager -qws
No protocol specified
QXcbConnection: Could not connect to display :0
Aborted

Is there something more I should specify?

W dniu 2015-12-20 o 08:49, Maxim Podbereznyy pisze:

Try it this thus way:

DISPLAY=:0 myapp -qws
19 Дек 2015 г. 23:07 пользователь "Bremenpl" > написал:

I am not sure, coz i wasnt building it- i fownloaded it from paxjage
manager.

On December 19, 2015 7:51:18 PM John Syne <
john...@gmail.com > wrote:

i haven’t done this in ages, but try to run your QT app with the "-platform
eglfs” option. I’m assuming you built QT with EGL.

Regards,
John

On Dec 19, 2015, at 3:46 AM, Bremenpl < brem...@gmail.com
> wrote:

Hello there,
I managed to set up qt 5.3.2 on the beaglebone. I have build everything
there and it took ages but it works :).

Next step is that I need to check either it is possible to run qt app on
bbb without gui with qws parameter. Because at the moment when i run it
with qws i get QXcbconnection: Could not connect to display. I need to do
it like this because thw gui is really really slow.

On December 15, 2015 6:10:13 AM John Syne > wrote:

For purely building armhf code, Odroid XU4 might be a good choice:

http://www.hardkernel.com/main/main.php

This is an Octacore processor with 4 CortexA15 and 4 CortexA7
processors. I don’t know how good their kernel/debian support is, but I
know Robert had looked at this board or a predecessor in the past, so
perhaps he can give his input here.

Clearly this board doesn’t have the flexibility of the BeagleBoard-x15
with it’s dual DSP, Dual CortexM4, Quad PRU, SATA interface, PCIe
interface, etc.

Regards,
John

On Dec 14, 2015, at 4:29 PM, William Hermans <
yyr...@gmail.com > wrote:

Anyway, the main problem with the rPI 2 is that it has no "fast" non
destructive storage. But the Omilex . . let me look it up.

https://www.olimex.com/Products/OLinuXino/A20/A20-OLinuXIno-LIME2-4GB/open-source-hardware
Has SATA and GbE both. Dual cores too I think. However, you'd have to ask
someone who has one how well they think it would work as a build board.
RObert might know, as his Debian build guide also includes this board too I
believe.

On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 5:25 PM, William Hermans <
yyr...@gmail.com > wrote:

https://www.adafruit.com/product/2358

On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 5:23 PM, William Hermans <
yyr...@gmail.com > wrote:

The new board is armv7. Positively.

On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 5:24 PM, Bremenpl <
brem...@gmail.com > wrote:

Okay, thank :P. I am quite sure raspberry pi is not hard float.

W dniu 2015-12-15 o 01:21, William Hermans pisze:

So just thinking for a minute. A Raspberry PI 2, the new board with
quad cores, and 1 GB ram would probably work fairly decent as a build
system for the Beaglebones. Granted, something like the X15, of that new
nVidia ARM board, or even the Omelex A20 board with SATA would probably be
a much better choice if cost is not a problem.

By the way, I have no idea what Robert is talking about. You need to
ask him.

On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 5:15 PM, Bremenpl <
brem...@gmail.com > wrote:

I have just flashed my BeagleBone Black emmc with lxqt image
linked by Robert. I cant seem to find qmake anywhere. I thought there would
be qt installed and all. Am I missing something again?

W dniu 2015-12-15 o 00:54, William Hermans pisze:

Not necessarily, but consider this. How much does an embedded
systems specialist in your area get paid per hour ? In my area, about 15-20
years ago. The cost of a board like the X15 would have been absorbed in
roughly half a day. That is to say, an embedded systems specialist could
buy a board for $239 after working roughly half a day.

Now take into account that figuring out how to cross compile
something like this is a serious headache, and often takes days, if not
weeks to get r

Re: [beagleboard] Running Qt gui application on BBB

2016-01-24 Thread em . ce . kwadrat

Have you finally solved this problem? If so, could you please give some 
advice how to fix this problem?
 I am stuck in the same place right now. Trying to run an example after 
cross compiling qt for BBB.

On Sunday, 20 December 2015 12:39:38 UTC+1, bremenpl wrote:
>
> I tried the first hint:
>
> root@beaglebone:/home/debian/ImpedanceManager-build# ./ImpedanceManager 
> -qws -platform eglfs
> libEGL warning: DRI3: xcb_connect failed
> libEGL warning: DRI2: xcb_connect failed
> libEGL warning: DRI2: xcb_connect failed
> Could not initialize egl display
> Aborted
>
> Theb second:
>
> root@beaglebone:/home/debian/ImpedanceManager-build# DISPLAY=:0 
> ./ImpedanceManager -qws
> No protocol specified
> QXcbConnection: Could not connect to display :0
> Aborted
>
>
> Is there something more I should specify?
>
> W dniu 2015-12-20 o 08:49, Maxim Podbereznyy pisze:
>
> Try it this thus way:
>
> DISPLAY=:0 myapp -qws
> 19 Дек 2015 г. 23:07 пользователь "Bremenpl"  > написал:
>
>> I am not sure, coz i wasnt building it- i fownloaded it from paxjage 
>> manager.
>>
>> On December 19, 2015 7:51:18 PM John Syne < 
>> john...@gmail.com > wrote:
>>
>>> i haven’t done this in ages, but try to run your QT app with the "-platform 
>>> eglfs” option. I’m assuming you built QT with EGL.  
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> John
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Dec 19, 2015, at 3:46 AM, Bremenpl < brem...@gmail.com 
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello there,
>>> I managed to set up qt 5.3.2 on the beaglebone. I have build everything 
>>> there and it took ages but it works :).
>>>
>>> Next step is that I need to check either it is possible to run qt app on 
>>> bbb without gui with qws parameter. Because at the moment when i run it 
>>> with qws i get QXcbconnection: Could not connect to display. I need to do 
>>> it like this because thw gui is really really slow.
>>>
>>> On December 15, 2015 6:10:13 AM John Syne >> > wrote:
>>>
 For purely building armhf code, Odroid XU4 might be a good choice: 

 http://www.hardkernel.com/main/main.php

 This is an Octacore processor with 4 CortexA15 and 4 CortexA7 
 processors. I don’t know how good their kernel/debian support is, but I 
 know Robert had looked at this board or a predecessor in the past, so 
 perhaps he can give his input here.

 Clearly this board doesn’t have the flexibility of the BeagleBoard-x15 
 with it’s dual DSP, Dual CortexM4, Quad PRU, SATA interface, PCIe 
 interface, etc. 

 Regards,
 John




 On Dec 14, 2015, at 4:29 PM, William Hermans < 
 yyr...@gmail.com > wrote:

 Anyway, the main problem with the rPI 2 is that it has no "fast" non 
 destructive storage. But the Omilex . . let me look it up.


 https://www.olimex.com/Products/OLinuXino/A20/A20-OLinuXIno-LIME2-4GB/open-source-hardware
  
 Has SATA and GbE both. Dual cores too I think. However, you'd have to ask 
 someone who has one how well they think it would work as a build board. 
 RObert might know, as his Debian build guide also includes this board too 
 I 
 believe.

 On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 5:25 PM, William Hermans < 
 yyr...@gmail.com > wrote:

> 
> https://www.adafruit.com/product/2358
>
> On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 5:23 PM, William Hermans < 
> yyr...@gmail.com > wrote:
>
>> The new board is armv7. Positively.
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 5:24 PM, Bremenpl < 
>> brem...@gmail.com > wrote:
>>
>>> Okay, thank :P. I am quite sure raspberry pi is not hard float.
>>>
>>> W dniu 2015-12-15 o 01:21, William Hermans pisze:
>>>
>>> So just thinking for a minute. A Raspberry PI 2, the new board with 
>>> quad cores, and 1 GB ram would probably work fairly decent as a build 
>>> system for the Beaglebones. Granted, something like the X15, of that 
>>> new 
>>> nVidia ARM board, or even the Omelex A20 board with SATA would probably 
>>> be 
>>> a much better choice if cost is not a problem.
>>>
>>> By the way, I have no idea what Robert is talking about. You need to 
>>> ask him.
>>>
>>> On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 5:15 PM, Bremenpl < 
>>> brem...@gmail.com > wrote:
>>>
 I have just flashed my BeagleBone Black emmc  with lxqt image 
 linked by Robert. I cant seem to find qmake anywhere. I thought there 
 would 
 be qt installed and all. Am I missing something again?

 W dniu 2015-12-15 o 00:54, William Hermans pisze:

 Not necessarily, but consider this. How much does an embedded 
 systems specialist in your area get paid per hour ? In my area, about 
 15-20 
 years ago. The cost of a board like the X15 would have been absorbed 
 in 
 roughly half a day. That is to say, an embedded systems specialist 
 could 
 buy a board for $239

Re: [beagleboard] Running Qt gui application on BBB

2015-12-20 Thread Bremenpl


  
  
I tried the first hint:

root@beaglebone:/home/debian/ImpedanceManager-build#
  ./ImpedanceManager -qws -platform eglfs
libEGL warning: DRI3: xcb_connect failed
libEGL warning: DRI2: xcb_connect failed
libEGL warning: DRI2: xcb_connect failed
Could not initialize egl display
Aborted

Theb second:

root@beaglebone:/home/debian/ImpedanceManager-build# DISPLAY=:0
  ./ImpedanceManager -qws
No protocol specified
QXcbConnection: Could not connect to display :0
Aborted


Is there something more I should specify?

W dniu 2015-12-20 o 08:49, Maxim
  Podbereznyy pisze:


  Try it this thus way:
  DISPLAY=:0 myapp -qws
  19 Дек 2015 г. 23:07 пользователь
"Bremenpl" 
написал:

  

  
I am not sure,
  coz i wasnt
  building it- i fownloaded it from paxjage manager.
  
  
On
  December 19, 2015 7:51:18 PM John Syne 
  wrote:

  i haven’t done this in ages, but try to run your QT
  app with the
  "-platform eglfs” option. I’m
assuming you built QT with EGL. 
  
  
  
Regards,
John





  
  
  

  On Dec 19,
2015, at 3:46 AM, Bremenpl 
wrote:
  
  

  

  Hello
there,
I managed to set up qt 5.3.2 on the
beaglebone. I have build everything
there and it took ages but it works :).
  Next step is
that I need to
check either it is possible to run qt
app on bbb without gui with qws
parameter. Because at the moment when i
run it with qws i get
QXcbconnection: Could not connect to
display. I need to do it like this
because thw gui is really really slow.


  On
December 15, 2015 6:10:13 AM John Syne

wrote:
  
For purely building armhf code, Odroid
XU4 might be a good choice:


http://www.hardkernel.com/main/main.php


This is an Octacore processor with
  4 CortexA15
  and 4 CortexA7 processors. I don’t
  know how good their kernel/debian
  support is, but I know Robert had
  looked at this board or a predecessor
  in
  the past, so perhaps he can give his
  input here.


Clearly this board doesn’t have the
  flexibility of the BeagleBoard-x15
  with it’s dual DSP, Dual CortexM4,
  Quad
  PRU, SATA interface, PCIe interface,
  etc. 

  
Regards,
John





  
  
  

  On Dec 14,
2015, at 4:29 PM, William
Her

Re: [beagleboard] Running Qt gui application on BBB

2015-12-19 Thread Maxim Podbereznyy

Try it this thus way:

DISPLAY=:0 myapp -qws
19 Дек 2015 г. 23:07 пользователь "Bremenpl"  написал:

> I am not sure, coz i wasnt building it- i fownloaded it from paxjage
> manager.
>
> On December 19, 2015 7:51:18 PM John Syne  wrote:
>
>> i haven’t done this in ages, but try to run your QT app with the "-platform
>> eglfs” option. I’m assuming you built QT with EGL.
>>
>> Regards,
>> John
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Dec 19, 2015, at 3:46 AM, Bremenpl  wrote:
>>
>> Hello there,
>> I managed to set up qt 5.3.2 on the beaglebone. I have build everything
>> there and it took ages but it works :).
>>
>> Next step is that I need to check either it is possible to run qt app on
>> bbb without gui with qws parameter. Because at the moment when i run it
>> with qws i get QXcbconnection: Could not connect to display. I need to do
>> it like this because thw gui is really really slow.
>>
>> On December 15, 2015 6:10:13 AM John Syne  wrote:
>>
>>> For purely building armhf code, Odroid XU4 might be a good choice:
>>>
>>> http://www.hardkernel.com/main/main.php
>>>
>>> This is an Octacore processor with 4 CortexA15 and 4 CortexA7
>>> processors. I don’t know how good their kernel/debian support is, but I
>>> know Robert had looked at this board or a predecessor in the past, so
>>> perhaps he can give his input here.
>>>
>>> Clearly this board doesn’t have the flexibility of the BeagleBoard-x15
>>> with it’s dual DSP, Dual CortexM4, Quad PRU, SATA interface, PCIe
>>> interface, etc.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> John
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Dec 14, 2015, at 4:29 PM, William Hermans  wrote:
>>>
>>> Anyway, the main problem with the rPI 2 is that it has no "fast" non
>>> destructive storage. But the Omilex . . let me look it up.
>>>
>>>
>>> https://www.olimex.com/Products/OLinuXino/A20/A20-OLinuXIno-LIME2-4GB/open-source-hardware
>>> Has SATA and GbE both. Dual cores too I think. However, you'd have to ask
>>> someone who has one how well they think it would work as a build board.
>>> RObert might know, as his Debian build guide also includes this board too I
>>> believe.
>>>
>>> On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 5:25 PM, William Hermans 
>>> wrote:
>>>
 https://www.adafruit.com/product/2358

 On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 5:23 PM, William Hermans 
 wrote:

> The new board is armv7. Positively.
>
> On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 5:24 PM, Bremenpl  wrote:
>
>> Okay, thank :P. I am quite sure raspberry pi is not hard float.
>>
>> W dniu 2015-12-15 o 01:21, William Hermans pisze:
>>
>> So just thinking for a minute. A Raspberry PI 2, the new board with
>> quad cores, and 1 GB ram would probably work fairly decent as a build
>> system for the Beaglebones. Granted, something like the X15, of that new
>> nVidia ARM board, or even the Omelex A20 board with SATA would probably 
>> be
>> a much better choice if cost is not a problem.
>>
>> By the way, I have no idea what Robert is talking about. You need to
>> ask him.
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 5:15 PM, Bremenpl  wrote:
>>
>>> I have just flashed my BeagleBone Black emmc  with lxqt image linked
>>> by Robert. I cant seem to find qmake anywhere. I thought there would be 
>>> qt
>>> installed and all. Am I missing something again?
>>>
>>> W dniu 2015-12-15 o 00:54, William Hermans pisze:
>>>
>>> Not necessarily, but consider this. How much does an embedded
>>> systems specialist in your area get paid per hour ? In my area, about 
>>> 15-20
>>> years ago. The cost of a board like the X15 would have been absorbed in
>>> roughly half a day. That is to say, an embedded systems specialist could
>>> buy a board for $239 after working roughly half a day.
>>>
>>> Now take into account that figuring out how to cross compile
>>> something like this is a serious headache, and often takes days, if not
>>> weeks to get right . . .
>>>
>>> On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 4:32 PM, Bremenpl < 
>>> breme...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
 So if I understand correctly, I should have a second board that is
 more powerfull than beagle just to compile the code for beagle?

 W dniu 2015-12-15 o 00:26, William Hermans pisze:

 *I cant change the board right now, it has to be BeagleBone Black.
> Thats why I need to build on my host. Did you succed on installing 
> QT5.1
> and deploying it to BeagleBone Black? Maybe I should use it instead of
> 4.8.6 if its easier?*
>

 No one was saying change boards. Use the same board, but use a
 faster, more powerful ARM board to compile native ARM executable. The
 reasons are simple. No need to mess with cross compiling, which in many
 cases is messy, and sometimes near impossible.

 You don't think Robert spends days, or weeks compiling packages do
 you ? But why don't we ask Robert. Robert,

Re: [beagleboard] Running Qt gui application on BBB

2015-12-19 Thread Bremenpl

I am not sure, coz i wasnt building it- i fownloaded it from paxjage manager.

On December 19, 2015 7:51:18 PM John Syne wrote:

i haven’t done this in ages, but try to run your QT app with the "-platform
eglfs” option. I’m assuming you built QT with EGL.

Regards,
John

On Dec 19, 2015, at 3:46 AM, Bremenpl wrote:

Hello there,
I managed to set up qt 5.3.2 on the beaglebone. I have build everything
there and it took ages but it works :).

Next step is that I need to check either it is possible to run qt app on
bbb without gui with qws parameter. Because at the moment when i run it
with qws i get QXcbconnection: Could not connect to display. I need to do
it like this because thw gui is really really slow.

On December 15, 2015 6:10:13 AM John Syne wrote:

For purely building armhf code, Odroid XU4 might be a good choice:

http://www.hardkernel.com/main/main.php

This is an Octacore processor with 4 CortexA15 and 4 CortexA7 processors. I
don’t know how good their kernel/debian support is, but I know Robert had
looked at this board or a predecessor in the past, so perhaps he can give
his input here.

Clearly this board doesn’t have the flexibility of the BeagleBoard-x15 with
it’s dual DSP, Dual CortexM4, Quad PRU, SATA interface, PCIe interface, etc.

Regards,
John

On Dec 14, 2015, at 4:29 PM, William Hermans > wrote:

Anyway, the main problem with the rPI 2 is that it has no "fast" non
destructive storage. But the Omilex . . let me look it up.

https://www.olimex.com/Products/OLinuXino/A20/A20-OLinuXIno-LIME2-4GB/open-source-hardware

Has SATA and GbE both. Dual cores too I think. However, you'd have to ask
someone who has one how well they think it would work as a build board.
RObert might know, as his Debian build guide also includes this board too I
believe.

On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 5:25 PM, William Hermans > wrote:

https://www.adafruit.com/product/2358

On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 5:23 PM, William Hermans > wrote:

The new board is armv7. Positively.

On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 5:24 PM, Bremenpl > wrote:

Okay, thank :P. I am quite sure raspberry pi is not hard float.

W dniu 2015-12-15 o 01:21, William Hermans pisze:
So just thinking for a minute. A Raspberry PI 2, the new board with quad
cores, and 1 GB ram would probably work fairly decent as a build system for
the Beaglebones. Granted, something like the X15, of that new nVidia ARM
board, or even the Omelex A20 board with SATA would probably be a much
better choice if cost is not a problem.

By the way, I have no idea what Robert is talking about. You need to ask him.

On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 5:15 PM, Bremenpl > wrote:
I have just flashed my BeagleBone Black emmc with lxqt image linked by
Robert. I cant seem to find qmake anywhere. I thought there would be qt
installed and all. Am I missing something again?

W dniu 2015-12-15 o 00:54, William Hermans pisze:
Not necessarily, but consider this. How much does an embedded systems
specialist in your area get paid per hour ? In my area, about 15-20 years
ago. The cost of a board like the X15 would have been absorbed in roughly
half a day. That is to say, an embedded systems specialist could buy a
board for $239 after working roughly half a day.

Now take into account that figuring out how to cross compile something like
this is a serious headache, and often takes days, if not weeks to get right
. . .

On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 4:32 PM, Bremenpl <
breme...@gmail.com >
wrote:
So if I understand correctly, I should have a second board that is more
powerfull than beagle just to compile the code for beagle?

W dniu 2015-12-15 o 00:26, William Hermans pisze:
I cant change the board right now, it has to be BeagleBone Black. Thats why
I need to build on my host. Did you succed on installing QT5.1 and
deploying it to BeagleBone Black? Maybe I should use it instead of 4.8.6 if
its easier?

No one was saying change boards. Use the same board, but use a faster, more
powerful ARM board to compile native ARM executable. The reasons are
simple. No need to mess with cross compiling, which in many cases is messy,
and sometimes near impossible.

You don't think Robert spends days, or weeks compiling packages do you ?
But why don't we ask Robert. Robert, hey what percentage of the packages
you build are compiled native to ARM, from some sort of beefy ARM board?
I'm guessing nearly 100% if not 100% but . . .

On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 4:00 PM, Bremenpl <
breme...@gmail.com >
wrote:

Ahh., thats the way, you are right...
Thank you for all the support guys,

Re: [beagleboard] Running Qt gui application on BBB

2015-12-19 Thread John Syne

i haven’t done this in ages, but try to run your QT app with the "-platform 
eglfs” option. I’m assuming you built QT with EGL. 

Regards,
John




> On Dec 19, 2015, at 3:46 AM, Bremenpl  wrote:
> 
> Hello there,
> I managed to set up qt 5.3.2 on the beaglebone. I have build everything there 
> and it took ages but it works :).
> 
> Next step is that I need to check either it is possible to run qt app on bbb 
> without gui with qws parameter. Because at the moment when i run it with qws 
> i get QXcbconnection: Could not connect to display. I need to do it like this 
> because thw gui is really really slow.
> 
> On December 15, 2015 6:10:13 AM John Syne  wrote:
> 
>> For purely building armhf code, Odroid XU4 might be a good choice:
>> 
>> http://www.hardkernel.com/main/main.php 
>> 
>> 
>> This is an Octacore processor with 4 CortexA15 and 4 CortexA7 processors. I 
>> don’t know how good their kernel/debian support is, but I know Robert had 
>> looked at this board or a predecessor in the past, so perhaps he can give 
>> his input here.
>> 
>> Clearly this board doesn’t have the flexibility of the BeagleBoard-x15 with 
>> it’s dual DSP, Dual CortexM4, Quad PRU, SATA interface, PCIe interface, etc. 
>> 
>> Regards,
>> John
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> On Dec 14, 2015, at 4:29 PM, William Hermans >> > wrote:
>>> 
>>> Anyway, the main problem with the rPI 2 is that it has no "fast" non 
>>> destructive storage. But the Omilex . . let me look it up.
>>> 
>>> https://www.olimex.com/Products/OLinuXino/A20/A20-OLinuXIno-LIME2-4GB/open-source-hardware
>>>  
>>> 
>>>  Has SATA and GbE both. Dual cores too I think. However, you'd have to ask 
>>> someone who has one how well they think it would work as a build board. 
>>> RObert might know, as his Debian build guide also includes this board too I 
>>> believe.
>>> 
>>> On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 5:25 PM, William Hermans >> > wrote:
>>> https://www.adafruit.com/product/2358 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 5:23 PM, William Hermans >> > wrote:
>>> The new board is armv7. Positively.
>>> 
>>> On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 5:24 PM, Bremenpl >> > wrote:
>>> Okay, thank :P. I am quite sure raspberry pi is not hard float.
>>> 
>>> W dniu 2015-12-15 o 01:21, William Hermans pisze:
 So just thinking for a minute. A Raspberry PI 2, the new board with quad 
 cores, and 1 GB ram would probably work fairly decent as a build system 
 for the Beaglebones. Granted, something like the X15, of that new nVidia 
 ARM board, or even the Omelex A20 board with SATA would probably be a much 
 better choice if cost is not a problem.
 
 By the way, I have no idea what Robert is talking about. You need to ask 
 him.
 
 On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 5:15 PM, Bremenpl >>> > wrote:
 I have just flashed my BeagleBone Black emmc  with lxqt image linked by 
 Robert. I cant seem to find qmake anywhere. I thought there would be qt 
 installed and all. Am I missing something again?
 
 W dniu 2015-12-15 o 00:54, William Hermans pisze:
> Not necessarily, but consider this. How much does an embedded systems 
> specialist in your area get paid per hour ? In my area, about 15-20 years 
> ago. The cost of a board like the X15 would have been absorbed in roughly 
> half a day. That is to say, an embedded systems specialist could buy a 
> board for $239 after working roughly half a day. 
> 
> Now take into account that figuring out how to cross compile something 
> like this is a serious headache, and often takes days, if not weeks to 
> get right . . .
> 
> On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 4:32 PM, Bremenpl < 
> breme...@gmail.com 
> > wrote:
> So if I understand correctly, I should have a second board that is more 
> powerfull than beagle just to compile the code for beagle?
> 
> W dniu 2015-12-15 o 00:26, William Hermans pisze:
>> I cant change the board right now, it has to be BeagleBone Black. Thats 
>> why I need to build on my host. Did you succed on installing QT5.1 and 
>> deploying it to BeagleBone Black? Maybe I should use it instead of 4.8.6 
>> if its easier?
>> 
>> No one was saying change boards. Use the same board, but use a faster, 
>> more powerful ARM board to compile native ARM executable. The reasons 
>> are simple. No need to mess with cross compiling, which in many cases is 
>> messy, and sometimes near impossible.
>> 
>> You don't think Robert spends days, or weeks compiling packages do you ? 
>> But why don't we ask Robert. Robert, hey what percentage of the packages 
>> you build

Re: [beagleboard] Running Qt gui application on BBB

2015-12-19 Thread Bremenpl

Hello there,
I managed to set up qt 5.3.2 on the beaglebone. I have build everything
there and it took ages but it works :).

Next step is that I need to check either it is possible to run qt app on
bbb without gui with qws parameter. Because at the moment when i run it
with qws i get QXcbconnection: Could not connect to display. I need to do
it like this because thw gui is really really slow.

On December 15, 2015 6:10:13 AM John Syne wrote:

For purely building armhf code, Odroid XU4 might be a good choice:

http://www.hardkernel.com/main/main.php

This is an Octacore processor with 4 CortexA15 and 4 CortexA7 processors. I
don’t know how good their kernel/debian support is, but I know Robert had
looked at this board or a predecessor in the past, so perhaps he can give
his input here.

Clearly this board doesn’t have the flexibility of the BeagleBoard-x15 with
it’s dual DSP, Dual CortexM4, Quad PRU, SATA interface, PCIe interface, etc.

Regards,
John

On Dec 14, 2015, at 4:29 PM, William Hermans wrote:

Anyway, the main problem with the rPI 2 is that it has no "fast" non
destructive storage. But the Omilex . . let me look it up.

https://www.olimex.com/Products/OLinuXino/A20/A20-OLinuXIno-LIME2-4GB/open-source-hardware

On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 5:25 PM, William Hermans > wrote:

https://www.adafruit.com/product/2358

On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 5:23 PM, William Hermans > wrote:

The new board is armv7. Positively.

On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 5:24 PM, Bremenpl > wrote:

Okay, thank :P. I am quite sure raspberry pi is not hard float.

W dniu 2015-12-15 o 01:21, William Hermans pisze:
So just thinking for a minute. A Raspberry PI 2, the new board with quad
cores, and 1 GB ram would probably work fairly decent as a build system for
the Beaglebones. Granted, something like the X15, of that new nVidia ARM
board, or even the Omelex A20 board with SATA would probably be a much
better choice if cost is not a problem.

By the way, I have no idea what Robert is talking about. You need to ask him.

W dniu 2015-12-15 o 00:54, William Hermans pisze:
Not necessarily, but consider this. How much does an embedded systems
specialist in your area get paid per hour ? In my area, about 15-20 years
ago. The cost of a board like the X15 would have been absorbed in roughly
half a day. That is to say, an embedded systems specialist could buy a
board for $239 after working roughly half a day.

Now take into account that figuring out how to cross compile something like
this is a serious headache, and often takes days, if not weeks to get right
. . .

W dniu 2015-12-15 o 00:26, William Hermans pisze:
I cant change the board right now, it has to be BeagleBone Black. Thats why
I need to build on my host. Did you succed on installing QT5.1 and
deploying it to BeagleBone Black? Maybe I should use it instead of 4.8.6 if
its easier?

On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 4:00 PM, Bremenpl <
breme...@gmail.com >
wrote:

Ahh., thats the way, you are right...
Thank you for all the support guys, I really mean it! Hope to get it
working in a while if i wont fall asleep on my desk!

On December 14, 2015 11:55:59 PM John Syne <
john3...@gmail.com >
wrote:

On Dec 14, 2015, at 2:34 PM, Bremenpl <
breme...@gmail.com >
wrote:

Okay

55 matches

Mail list logo