RE: Tennessee Police

2003-01-14 Thread Rose Tierney
Hi Jennifer,

If this guy had any knowledge
of dogs at all, he would have known that the tail wagging was a sign of
non-aggression.  Looks like just shooting them is first in his mind.  If I
were an attorney I would take this case on with a vengeance.

Jennifer Burgess (Rex -BMD, Mabel - Lab) in Memphis, TN


A wagging tail is not a sign of non-aggression. One has to take into
account the expression on the face, the positioning of the head and the
tenseness of the body.

There are nuances in the movement of the tail and some dogs lie!! The dog
might wag his tail in anticipation not solicitation!

Rose T.



-Original Message-
From: Mary Shaver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, January 12, 2003 10:10 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Tennessee Police


It appears this whole situation was the culmination of a series of
misunderstandings that ended in tragedy.  I am not going to either
defend or accuse the officer, but let me just say, things are different
here in the south.  Many, many of our more rural counties have no
animal control agency  - their animal control is limited to calling
the sheriff out when there is an animal problem, like an unwanted stray
in the yard, and the normal response to such a complaint is for the
sheriff to shoot the offending animal.  If it turns out that the animal
was someone's pet, oh, well...

My point is, law enforcement officers here in the south have probably
all been involved in this type of thing, so this particular officer may
have not even given it a second thought.  Is it right? No.  Is it
progressive? No.  But given the mind-set here, I can certainly see how
easily it could have happened.

Mary and the girls, Laurel and Bailey
Fayetteville, GA




RE: Tennessee Police

2003-01-12 Thread Amy Hutson
I can comment on this story as I live in TN.  The details make it all the
more horrible. It was two carloads of family members. Parents and one
child(and dogs) in one car and grandparents and two other kids in the car
behind. It was not just one police car but THREE. Only the driver in the
first car was out being handcuffed so presumably (?) the other occupants
could have shut the door? Maybe they were intimidated by the whole
situation. The police officer who shot the dog had many other officers
around to help him if the dog had actually bit him (no need to shoot before
an actual attack).  It was also not just a shot. The officer shot the dog's
head off! In front of all the family members.
The whole community is shocked by this. It seems the family is suing. I also
wonder at the individual who called in the robbery.  They claimed there
was lots of money flying out the window and the car was going 110 mph. I
really don't think that was the case. Who would start this manhunt for a few
bills flying around on the freeway?! I certainly hope they are ashamed.
Unfortunately, I'm sure the officer will get off with a hand slap. What is
it they say? People who are cruel to animals are more likely to be
criminals?..

Amy Hutson
Knoxville,TN




RE: Tennessee police

2003-01-12 Thread Pat Long Paul Dangel
A dog that I loved very well that was owned by a nearby friend was shot
and killed by police in Philadelphia. It was another situation that any
dog owner would have been happy to accuse the policeman involved of
stupidity and unreasonable behavior. The dog had been attacked by
another dog a week before, and when he saw him this time, he went to
attack back. Perfectly reasonable canine behavior.

But. The dog I knew and loved had slipped his collar and was running
loose. He was big, a pit bull great dane mix. He was a sweet as could
be, and a big old lap dog. He was not attacking any person, but the
woman who owned the nasty Westie that he was going for was screaming for
him to be killed. (The Westie had attacked other dogs, and had bit one
person badly enough that they required 23 stitches.) Needless to say,
those of us who knew the situation thought the wrong dog was killed.

However - and I have thought long and hard about this many a time. The
policeman made a call with very little time to assess the situation.
People were screaming, one dog was loose and not under control, and he
looked very much like many of the fighting pit bulls in the
neighborhood. He probably thought he was saving a human life.

Is it the responsibility of police to understand all the nuances of
canine behavior? No. Would we like them to? Certainly. The Tennessee
policemen were begged by the family to close the car door.  The
policeman's story apparently was that they still thought a crime had
been committed and needed a clear line of sight into the car. Many
things went wrong in that whole incident. I hope that a full
investigation and some changes in how situations are handled would be
initiated because of this. If I did something stupid like leaving my
wallet on the roof of the car at a gas station, I would be very upset to
be hauled out of my car and handcuffed without being given an
explanation or chance to explain. If my dog were also killed during the
process, I personally would be glad that I was handcuffed at the time.
I'd be very afraid of what I might do next.

We pay police a very unreasonable amount and expect a great deal of
them. They are often outmanned and outgunned. They regularly walk
willingly into situations that I would not ever want to be in. They will
make mistakes. As will doctors and lawyers and judges and computer
programmers. We all do.

I feel sick about what happened, but I can't condemn the officer out of
hand. If he is unsuitable for the job, I hope his department will make
that determination. If his actions were based on department policy, then
I hope they will make changes.

Pat Long ( Luther)
Berwyn PA




RE: Tennessee Police

2003-01-12 Thread Mary Shaver
It appears this whole situation was the culmination of a series of
misunderstandings that ended in tragedy.  I am not going to either
defend or accuse the officer, but let me just say, things are different
here in the south.  Many, many of our more rural counties have no
animal control agency  - their animal control is limited to calling
the sheriff out when there is an animal problem, like an unwanted stray
in the yard, and the normal response to such a complaint is for the
sheriff to shoot the offending animal.  If it turns out that the animal
was someone's pet, oh, well...

My point is, law enforcement officers here in the south have probably
all been involved in this type of thing, so this particular officer may
have not even given it a second thought.  Is it right? No.  Is it
progressive? No.  But given the mind-set here, I can certainly see how
easily it could have happened.

Mary and the girls, Laurel and Bailey
Fayetteville, GA




RE: Tennessee police

2003-01-12 Thread Matt Julia Richert
It is easy to condemn this police officer, but before we rush to
judgment, we perhaps should attempt to put ourselves in the shoes of the
officer.

Police officers must react with amazing rapidity to all kinds of things
that most of us could never even dream up. They must make split-second
decisions in assessing a potentially dangerous situation. Sadly, it is
not uncommon in the slightest for criminals to train dogs to be,
essentially, weapons. So it is not at all unreasonable for an officer
who believes that a serious crime has been committed to believe that a
dog traveling with the suspects could be dangerous.  

It is easy to look at that footage, while we are sitting relaxed and
comfortable at our computers, and see what that dog's real intentions
were. But in the heat of an arrest and a situation perceived to be
dangerous, a police officer simply can't see all the nuances that we
can. There just isn't time.

I'm not condoning the officer's actions -- I don't think any of us know
enough yet to really say if he was right or not. My heart goes out to
the family for the loss of their beloved pet and for the trauma of
witnessing it. But I strongly believe that it is wrong to be accusing
that officer of malicious and stupid action until the facts are more
clearly known. Police officers risk their lives for all of us on a daily
basis. They at least deserve the benefit of the doubt. 

And, lest we forget, don't you imagine the officer feels terribly guilty
for what happened? He may also feel justified, but I would bet that he
feels just terrible for killing the dog, especially in front of the
family. 

Just my two cents,
Julia
Lily  Max
Astoria, OR




RE: Tennessee Police

2003-01-11 Thread Pat Long Paul Dangel
Diana,

I saw a writeup of this story. The man had filled his gas tank and left
his wallet on the top of his car by accident. Someone found it and
thought a robbery had occurred, an APB went out as a possible robbery,
the family was pulled over, the people were pulled out of the car and
handcuffed. They begged the officers to close the car door so the dogs
wouldn't escape, the one dog jumped out and trotted around to the
officer - who shot the Bulldog as it viciously attacked him. The video
from the police car supports the fact that the police were asked to
close the door, and shows the friendly family dog trotting over to the
police officer. It's all under investigation, but it sounds like the
police wretchedly mishandled the whole incident. The family of four -
husband and wife and two kids - are understandably distraught.

Makes me want to avoid Tennessee, which is a real shame!

Pat Long ( Luther)
Berwyn PA