[SlimDevices: Beta] Softsqueeze track progress problem
I was playing a track, which reported a track length of 05:05. The track played fine, but then started to play the next song without updating the display, which was still trying to report progress through the previous track. The progress bar was at 100%, and the time remaining reported negative negative minutes and seconds, eg: --1:-12. After that, as each track finished, the now-playing display was one track behind what was actually playing. I went back to the first track that cause the problem and played it again without any issues. I haven't been able to repeat the problem yet. I can't see any related bugs. Anyone seen a problem like this before? Phil ___ beta mailing list beta@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/beta
RE: [SlimDevices: Beta] Softsqueeze track progress problem
Yes, I have! Quite frequently as of a couple of weeks ago but it seemed to have gone last time I updated the version (about a week ago) and did a full rescan. It was quite unusual, even the web interface was one track behind, yet SS knew what track was playing because iTunesUpdate/SlimScrobbler were catching the correct track. Stopping and restarting the playlist was fixing the problem each time. James -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Philip Meyer Sent: 13 October 2005 11:16 To: beta@lists.slimdevices.com Subject: [SlimDevices: Beta] Softsqueeze track progress problem I was playing a track, which reported a track length of 05:05. The track played fine, but then started to play the next song without updating the display, which was still trying to report progress through the previous track. The progress bar was at 100%, and the time remaining reported negative negative minutes and seconds, eg: --1:-12. After that, as each track finished, the now-playing display was one track behind what was actually playing. I went back to the first track that cause the problem and played it again without any issues. I haven't been able to repeat the problem yet. I can't see any related bugs. Anyone seen a problem like this before? Phil ___ beta mailing list beta@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/beta NOTICE: If received in error, please destroy and notify sender. Sender does not waive confidentiality or privilege, and use is prohibited. ___ beta mailing list beta@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/beta
Re: [SlimDevices: Beta] Softsqueeze track progress problem
>Quite frequently as of a couple of weeks ago but it seemed to have gone >last time I updated the version (about a week ago) and did a full >rescan. > My problem happened with svn 4600. I don't frequently use SoftSqueeze, but I was suprised that it had only gone up a single beta release number since the last time I had used it. I can't remember seeing many posts from Richard - is SoftSqueeze still under active development? Phil ___ beta mailing list beta@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/beta
RE: [SlimDevices: Beta] Softsqueeze track progress problem
Ah sorry Philip didn't notice the title (doh), I've been seeing this on my SB2 so I don't think it's a softsqueeze issue rather a SlimServer one. James NOTICE: If received in error, please destroy and notify sender. Sender does not waive confidentiality or privilege, and use is prohibited. ___ beta mailing list beta@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/beta
Re: [SlimDevices: Beta] Softsqueeze track progress problem
>I've been seeing this on my SB2 so I don't think it's a softsqueeze >issue rather a SlimServer one. > I've never seen it go out of step on my SqueezeBox or SB2, but I've now changed the bug 2286 that I raised earlier to Player UI and added a note. Phil ___ beta mailing list beta@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo/beta
