Re: r664 - in trunk/BOOK: . chapter01 chapter06
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote these words in the HLFS-Book mailing list on 07/02/06 14:18 CST: > Date: 2006-07-02 13:18:42 -0600 (Sun, 02 Jul 2006) > New Revision: 664 > Add sed command to coreutils chapter 6 to fix overflow in the 'who' command > (Redhat bug #158405). Would this be applicable to the other LFS branches as well? -- Randy rmlscsi: [bogomips 1003.27] [GNU ld version 2.16.1] [gcc (GCC) 4.0.3] [GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.6] [Linux 2.6.14.3 i686] 14:23:00 up 51 days, 6:23, 1 user, load average: 0.15, 0.38, 0.50 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Bluefish-1.0.5
Here is a patch for bluefish. The notebook tab style is not being
restored correctly.
This is really of interest only for a dark theme. If I could just
remember my passwords :(
Should it be added to the instructions?
---
David Jensen
Submitted By:David Jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date:2006-07-02
Initial Package Version: 1.0.5
Upstream Status: Not submitted.
Origin: Mine
Description: Correctly? restores the notebook tab style after override.
$LastChangedBy: $
$Date: $
--- bluefish-1.0.5.orig/src/document.c 2006-01-29 14:33:52.0 -0600
+++ bluefish-1.0.5/src/document.c 2006-07-01 06:19:18.0 -0500
@@ -791,11 +791,11 @@
gtk_widget_modify_fg(doc->tab_label, GTK_STATE_PRELIGHT, &colorred);
gtk_widget_modify_fg(doc->tab_label, GTK_STATE_ACTIVE, &colorred);
} else {
- gtk_widget_modify_fg(doc->tab_menu, GTK_STATE_NORMAL, &colorblack);
- gtk_widget_modify_fg(doc->tab_menu, GTK_STATE_PRELIGHT, &colorblack);
- gtk_widget_modify_fg(doc->tab_label, GTK_STATE_NORMAL, &colorblack);
- gtk_widget_modify_fg(doc->tab_label, GTK_STATE_PRELIGHT, &colorblack);
- gtk_widget_modify_fg(doc->tab_label, GTK_STATE_ACTIVE, &colorblack);
+ gtk_widget_modify_fg(doc->tab_menu, GTK_STATE_NORMAL, NULL);
+ gtk_widget_modify_fg(doc->tab_menu, GTK_STATE_PRELIGHT, NULL);
+ gtk_widget_modify_fg(doc->tab_label, GTK_STATE_NORMAL, NULL);
+ gtk_widget_modify_fg(doc->tab_label, GTK_STATE_PRELIGHT, NULL);
+ gtk_widget_modify_fg(doc->tab_label, GTK_STATE_ACTIVE, NULL);
}
}
#ifdef DEBUG
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: minor nits with current svn
David Jensen wrote these words on 07/02/06 10:20 CST: > Randy McMurchy wrote: >> This would need to be in the configuration section. Consider it done. >> > Thanks Randy! All 4 items you mentioned have been updated. Thanks again, David. -- Randy rmlscsi: [bogomips 1003.27] [GNU ld version 2.16.1] [gcc (GCC) 4.0.3] [GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.6] [Linux 2.6.14.3 i686] 10:51:01 up 51 days, 2:51, 1 user, load average: 0.01, 0.11, 0.07 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: minor nits with current svn
Randy McMurchy wrote: I'm going to have to disagree here. The search facility considers 'found' text to be 'highlighted' (gnome terminology). The default highlighting color in almost every application I've ever come across is yellow, as is gedit. After years of all day 'cad' work (black on white), I really prefer the old neon on black from dos-3.3 days. White on bright yellow is not visible with my theme. I wish they would theme gedit ala mc, there are a lot of colors to change for a lot of languages. This would need to be in the configuration section. Consider it done. Thanks Randy! OT. I like seamonkey-1.0.2 mail. It has the red squiggly line like Abiword. :) --- David Jensen -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: minor nits with current svn
David Jensen wrote these words on 07/02/06 09:30 CST: > I completed? a new LFS/BLFS svn. It was hard to find anything to mention. > > FLAC-1.1.2 > could use --enable-sse (see libFAME Command Explanations), > but then we are not really doing optimizations, are we? A mention of sse on the FLAC page similar (the same) as the one on the libfame page would be prudent. Good catch! > Vorbis Tools-1.1.1 > --enable-vcut should have a Command Explanation. I agree. > GNOME-Media-2.14.2 > a 'gst-register' command, now defunct, should be removed. Agreed. Good catch. Thanks! > gedit-2.14.3 > a new hard coded search highlight background color, > unusable for me. maybe a suggested sed: > sed -i 's:78::' \ > gedit/gedit-document.c I'm going to have to disagree here. The search facility considers 'found' text to be 'highlighted' (gnome terminology). The default highlighting color in almost every application I've ever come across is yellow, as is gedit. I suppose however, something like "There is no way in the preferences to change the color of highlighted (such as when you search for text and it is found) text. If you wish to change the color, use this sed: sed ... This would need to be in the configuration section. Consider it done. > I'll try to figure out Trac, I expect there are things to be done. As always. And welcome back David. -- Randy rmlscsi: [bogomips 1003.27] [GNU ld version 2.16.1] [gcc (GCC) 4.0.3] [GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.6] [Linux 2.6.14.3 i686] 09:37:00 up 51 days, 1:37, 1 user, load average: 0.47, 0.14, 0.23 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
minor nits with current svn
I completed? a new LFS/BLFS svn. It was hard to find anything to mention. FLAC-1.1.2 could use --enable-sse (see libFAME Command Explanations), but then we are not really doing optimizations, are we? Vorbis Tools-1.1.1 --enable-vcut should have a Command Explanation. GNOME-Media-2.14.2 a 'gst-register' command, now defunct, should be removed. gedit-2.14.3 a new hard coded search highlight background color, unusable for me. maybe a suggested sed: sed -i 's:78::' \ gedit/gedit-document.c I'll try to figure out Trac, I expect there are things to be done. --- David Jensen -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Package server mirror syncing
Hi all, Not sure who to ask about this, so I'll just put it here and see what is said. It appears that the package server mirror syncing on (at least Anduin) the mirrors has not worked since the 20th or so of last month. Could someone look into this? There have been many, many packages updated/added since then, and they don't show up in the Anduin repo. I remember we changed methods of updating Anduin some time back because the repo would get a couple of weeks behind, and this is where we are right now. Is there some way to verify/check/ensure that the sync process is doing what it is supposed to? -- Randy rmlscsi: [bogomips 1003.27] [GNU ld version 2.16.1] [gcc (GCC) 4.0.3] [GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.6] [Linux 2.6.14.3 i686] 08:31:00 up 51 days, 31 min, 1 user, load average: 0.02, 0.01, 0.00 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
