Re: [blfs-dev] seamonkey-2.10 (Was: r10285 - in trunk/BOOK: . introduction/welcome xsoft/graphweb xsoft/other)
--- Em sáb, 9/6/12, Andrew Benton escreveu: De: Andrew Benton a...@benton.eu.com Assunto: Re: [blfs-dev] seamonkey-2.10 (Was: r10285 - in trunk/BOOK: . introduction/welcome xsoft/graphweb xsoft/other) Para: blfs-dev@linuxfromscratch.org Data: Sábado, 9 de Junho de 2012, 19:30 On Sat, 09 Jun 2012 22:42:23 +0100 Fernando de Oliveira wrote: Andy, make installer succeeded with this: sed '/^MOZ_PKG_FATAL_WARNINGS/s@= 1@= 0@' \ -i suite/installer/Makefile.in Thanks for that. The installer works with the patch so I don't feel motivated to change it. I may use the sed in future though as patches can be a nuisance to update. Andy I only sent it because many people sent patchs and you and others transformed them into sed and it has been said that it is book's preference not to use patch if possible to use sed. I was not going to write the paragraph above, but was waiting for the patch to be uploaded, after the link failed again this morning, It is really broken: Broken link: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/patches/blfs/svn/seamonkey-2.10-package-manifest-1.diff Good link: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/patches/downloads/seamonkey/seamonkey-2.10-package-manifest-1.patch []s, Fernando -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-dev] seamonkey-2.10 (Was: r10285 - in trunk/BOOK: . introduction/welcome xsoft/graphweb xsoft/other)
On Mon, 11 Jun 2012 10:46:44 +0100 Fernando de Oliveira fam...@yahoo.com.br wrote: after the link failed again this morning, It is really broken: Broken link: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/patches/blfs/svn/seamonkey-2.10-package-manifest-1.diff Good link: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/patches/downloads/seamonkey/seamonkey-2.10-package-manifest-1.patch Yes, you're right, the patch isn't being copied across into http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/patches/blfs/svn I'm not seeing any error emails about missing patches on the BLFS Book list. I don't know why the script is failing. Andy -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-dev] seamonkey-2.10 (Was: r10285 - in trunk/BOOK: .introduction/welcome xsoft/graphweb xsoft/other)
On Mon, 11 Jun 2012 12:11:12 +0100, Andrew Benton a...@benton.eu.com wrote: Yes, you're right, the patch isn't being copied across into http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/patches/blfs/svn I'm not seeing any error emails about missing patches on the BLFS Book list. I don't know why the script is failing. I can't get on the LFS server from work to check, but my immediate thought on this is that patch is incorrectly named. package-manifest should be package_manifest in its name. Regards, Matt -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-dev] seamonkey-2.10 (Was: r10285 - in trunk/BOOK: .introduction/welcome xsoft/graphweb xsoft/other)
On Mon, 11 Jun 2012 12:15:34 +0100 Matthew Burgess matt...@linuxfromscratch.org wrote: I can't get on the LFS server from work to check, but my immediate thought on this is that patch is incorrectly named. package-manifest should be package_manifest in its name. I think it was the extension. When I originally created it I called it .diff (a bad habit?) but I see in the patches repo it's been renamed .patch Andy -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-dev] seamonkey-2.10 (Was: r10285 - in trunk/BOOK: .introduction/welcome xsoft/graphweb xsoft/other)
On 11-06-2012 08:13, Matthew Burgess wrote: On Mon, 11 Jun 2012 12:11:12 +0100, Andrew Benton wrote: Yes, you're right, the patch isn't being copied across into http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/patches/blfs/svn I'm not seeing any error emails about missing patches on the BLFS Book list. I don't know why the script is failing. I can't get on the LFS server from work to check, but my immediate thought on this is that patch is incorrectly named. package-manifest should be package_manifest in its name. Regards, Matt As I wrote before: Broken link: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/patches/blfs/svn/seamonkey-2.10-package-manifest-1.diff Good link: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/patches/downloads/seamonkey/seamonkey-2.10-package-manifest-1.patch In the book, the instruction is: patch -Np1 -i ../seamonkey-2.10-package-manifest-1.patch From these, the link, even after the corrections, seems to direct to a .diff file, whereas the correct one has a .patch extension. -- []s, Fernando -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-dev] seamonkey-2.10 (Was: r10285 - in trunk/BOOK: .introduction/welcome xsoft/graphweb xsoft/other)
On 11-06-2012 08:28, Andrew Benton wrote: On Mon, 11 Jun 2012 12:15:34 +0100 Matthew Burgess matt...@linuxfromscratch.org wrote: I can't get on the LFS server from work to check, but my immediate thought on this is that patch is incorrectly named. package-manifest should be package_manifest in its name. I think it was the extension. When I originally created it I called it .diff (a bad habit?) but I see in the patches repo it's been renamed .patch Andy Remember that in the installation instruction, it is .patch. -- []s, Fernando -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-dev] seamonkey-2.10 (Was: r10285 - in trunk/BOOK: .introduction/welcome xsoft/graphweb xsoft/other)
On Mon, 11 Jun 2012 12:44:39 +0100 Fernando de Oliveira fam...@yahoo.com.br wrote: Remember that in the installation instruction, it is .patch. Indeed, though when I added it to the page it was .diff (my mistake). Good news everyone, it seems that the patch has been accepted upstream and will be committed tomorrow so we'll only need to carry the patch until that change filters out into the releases. https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=752895 Andy -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-dev] seamonkey-2.10 (Was: r10285 - in trunk/BOOK: .introduction/welcome xsoft/graphweb xsoft/other)
On 06/11/2012 06:09 PM, Andrew Benton wrote: On Mon, 11 Jun 2012 12:44:39 +0100 Fernando de Oliveirafam...@yahoo.com.br wrote: Remember that in the installation instruction, it is .patch. Indeed, though when I added it to the page it was .diff (my mistake). Good news everyone, it seems that the patch has been accepted upstream and will be committed tomorrow so we'll only need to carry the patch until that change filters out into the releases. https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=752895 Andy Hm, maybe this was already mentioned somewhere, but I am curious. Is there any good reason why BLFS instructions use installer method for Mozilla products? What was wrong with make install? IIRC, that was used for quite long time, wasn't it. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-dev] seamonkey-2.10 (Was: r10285 - in trunk/BOOK: .introduction/welcome xsoft/graphweb xsoft/other)
On Mon, 11 Jun 2012 17:24:56 +0100 Armin K. kre...@email.com wrote: Hm, maybe this was already mentioned somewhere, but I am curious. Is there any good reason why BLFS instructions use installer method for Mozilla products? What was wrong with make install? IIRC, that was used for quite long time, wasn't it. The current instructions explain that you can make install if you want all the development libraries and headers. The reason that isn't the default is that it installs an extra 30 MB or so of files that most people don't need. I also like to show people how to use the installer to make a tarball like the ones you can download from Mozilla. Andy -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-dev] seamonkey-2.10 (Was: r10285 - in trunk/BOOK: . introduction/welcome xsoft/graphweb xsoft/other)
Andrew Benton wrote: On Mon, 11 Jun 2012 10:46:44 +0100 Fernando de Oliveira fam...@yahoo.com.br wrote: after the link failed again this morning, It is really broken: Broken link: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/patches/blfs/svn/seamonkey-2.10-package-manifest-1.diff Good link: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/patches/downloads/seamonkey/seamonkey-2.10-package-manifest-1.patch Yes, you're right, the patch isn't being copied across into http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/patches/blfs/svn I'm not seeing any error emails about missing patches on the BLFS Book list. I don't know why the script is failing. I changed from a .diff to a patch yesterday in patches svn. The script that updates the patches is explicitly looking for a 'patch'. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-dev] seamonkey-2.10 (Was: r10285 - in trunk/BOOK: .introduction/welcome xsoft/graphweb xsoft/other)
On 11-06-2012 13:09, Andrew Benton wrote: On Mon, 11 Jun 2012 12:44:39 +0100 Fernando de Oliveira fam...@yahoo.com.br wrote: Remember that in the installation instruction, it is .patch. Indeed, though when I added it to the page it was .diff (my mistake). Good news everyone, it seems that the patch has been accepted upstream and will be committed tomorrow so we'll only need to carry the patch until that change filters out into the releases. https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=752895 Good news indeed! I have read the bug report. Now, I understand your preference for *the* patch. Thanks for that. -- []s, Fernando -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
[blfs-dev] seamonkey-2.10 (Was: r10285 - in trunk/BOOK: . introduction/welcome xsoft/graphweb xsoft/other)
--- Em sáb, 9/6/12, a...@linuxfromscratch.org escreveu: De: a...@linuxfromscratch.org Assunto: [blfs-book] r10285 - in trunk/BOOK: . introduction/welcome xsoft/graphweb xsoft/other [...] Log: seamonkey-2.10 [...] ../seamonkey-seamonkey-version;-package-manifest-1.diff/command: This + patch fixes the installer so it can cope with the situation where + Seamonkey was configured with --enable-system-sqlite, --with-system-nspr, + --with-system-nss and --disable-updater. Andy, make installer succeeded with this: sed '/^MOZ_PKG_FATAL_WARNINGS/s@= 1@= 0@' \ -i suite/installer/Makefile.in []s, Fernando -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-dev] seamonkey-2.10 (Was: r10285 - in trunk/BOOK: . introduction/welcome xsoft/graphweb xsoft/other)
On Sat, 09 Jun 2012 22:42:23 +0100 Fernando de Oliveira fam...@yahoo.com.br wrote: Andy, make installer succeeded with this: sed '/^MOZ_PKG_FATAL_WARNINGS/s@= 1@= 0@' \ -i suite/installer/Makefile.in Thanks for that. The installer works with the patch so I don't feel motivated to change it. I may use the sed in future though as patches can be a nuisance to update. Andy -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
