Re: [blink-dev] Re: [discuss-webrtc] Deprecated "track" and "stream" stats are unshipped in M109.

2023-01-30 Thread Sudheer Boynapally
Hi Henrik,

Just want to confirm if this is rolled-back today at 9am PST ?


On Sat, Jan 28, 2023 at 1:59 AM Henrik Boström  wrote:

> Hi Anna, yes the experiment is being rolled back to 0% Stable (it's still
> 50% on Canary/Beta though).
> The rollback has already been submitted, but unfortunately we must wait
> for the next config push. I'm told this happens on *Monday, 9AM Pacific
> Time*. Users will need to restart their browser to get the config.
>
> In preparation for the next rollout, I've filed the much needed intent to
> deprecate here:
> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/NZVXsJQ7tV8.
> Please provide input on the proposed plans.
> On Saturday, January 28, 2023 at 12:45:00 AM UTC+1 Anna Vasilko wrote:
>
>> Hi Henrik,
>> Just wanted to double check that the latest plan is to revert the
>> experiment, correct? Asking because there was somewhat different comment on
>> the PR here
>> <https://github.com/twilio/twilio-video.js/pull/1970#issuecomment-1404596109>
>> .
>> At Twilio we really hope the experiment can be reverted asap given that
>> it is breaking for our customers and their end users in the wild. The
>> adoption of our new sdk release (with the above PR change) will take long
>> time for most of the customers as they need to 1) learn about the issue 2)
>> pick-up the new sdk version 3) roll out their applications with the new sdk
>> version. For some customers it takes months.
>> Basically the only way to really stop the breaking impact is to stop the
>> experiment and give some notice and time to adopt the changes.
>>
>> I have to acknowledge it took surprisingly long time for us to discover
>> this breaking change and act on it. Holidays probably played a role here.
>> But we will do a retrospective internally to understand the reasons better
>> and to catch such issues sooner in the future.
>>
>> On Friday, January 27, 2023 at 12:57:38 AM UTC-8 Henrik Boström wrote:
>>
>>> I'll roll it back and file an intent to deprecate thread. It was a big
>>> mistake that I forgot to do that in the first place, and it's unfortunate
>>> that we have to roll this back. But I take having reached 50% Stable and
>>> only knowing for sure about Twilio as a positive sign (if this was very
>>> widespread we would have heard about it earlier than we did). Still it
>>> seems like Finch is a problem for Selenium test environments in that it's
>>> possible to run test code for several months without noticing a feature is
>>> on. That's a bit sad.
>>>
>>> On Thursday, January 26, 2023 at 8:46:19 PM UTC+1 Sudheer Boynapally
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Is the experiment rolled back on January 25th ? or it is still at 50%
>>>> stable for M 109?
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 10:47 AM Alex Russell 
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> It appears this change is causing breakage at scale, including for our
>>>>> partners.
>>>>>
>>>>> Given how this is going, I'd like to suggest the following course of
>>>>> action:
>>>>>
>>>>>- Turn down the Finch rollout to 0% immediately
>>>>>- Revert the change in 111
>>>>>- File an intent-to-deprecate here ASAP w/ whatever data on compat
>>>>>we can gather (as it looks like usecounters won't work) so we can 
>>>>> discuss a
>>>>>new plan to land this
>>>>>
>>>>> We have options that might be more suitable (e.g., reverse OT), or
>>>>> maybe the change just needs devrel in wider channels + time to breathe.
>>>>> Either way, backing off of this rollout seems like the right thing to do.
>>>>> In future, web-visible WebRTC changes also need to come through the main
>>>>> Blink intents process. Let's start down that path now.
>>>>>
>>>>> Curious for other API OWNERs feedback, so cc-ing
>>>>> blink-api-owners-discuss@.
>>>>>
>>>>> Best,
>>>>>
>>>>> Alex
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 10:04 PM Henrik Boström 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> The track and stream removal experiment is at 50% Stable for M109. On
>>>>>> January 23rd it went from 10% to 50%. The intent is to ramp up to 100%.
>>>>>> Which experiment group you end up with (have or not have the
>>>>>> deprecated stats) are chosen with a dice roll every time the us

Re: [blink-dev] Re: [discuss-webrtc] Deprecated "track" and "stream" stats are unshipped in M109.

2023-01-26 Thread Sudheer Boynapally
Is the experiment rolled back on January 25th ? or it is still at 50%
stable for M 109?

On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 10:47 AM Alex Russell 
wrote:

> It appears this change is causing breakage at scale, including for our
> partners.
>
> Given how this is going, I'd like to suggest the following course of
> action:
>
>- Turn down the Finch rollout to 0% immediately
>- Revert the change in 111
>- File an intent-to-deprecate here ASAP w/ whatever data on compat we
>can gather (as it looks like usecounters won't work) so we can discuss a
>new plan to land this
>
> We have options that might be more suitable (e.g., reverse OT), or maybe
> the change just needs devrel in wider channels + time to breathe. Either
> way, backing off of this rollout seems like the right thing to do. In
> future, web-visible WebRTC changes also need to come through the main Blink
> intents process. Let's start down that path now.
>
> Curious for other API OWNERs feedback, so cc-ing blink-api-owners-discuss@
> .
>
> Best,
>
> Alex
>
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 10:04 PM Henrik Boström  wrote:
>
>> The track and stream removal experiment is at 50% Stable for M109. On
>> January 23rd it went from 10% to 50%. The intent is to ramp up to 100%.
>> Which experiment group you end up with (have or not have the deprecated
>> stats) are chosen with a dice roll every time the user restarts their
>> browser.
>>
>> In M111 (which is currently Canary) the removal is enabled-by-default so
>> in that version there is no dependency on getting finch configs pushed
>> anymore.
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 12:52 AM Sudheer Boynapally <
>> sudheerr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Was there any change on January 23rd corresponding to this? like rolling
>>> out this deprecation?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 2:57:16 PM UTC-8 Sudheer Boynapally
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> Is the deprecation of 'track' and 'stream' objects completed 100% on
>>>> all the versions of chrome v109 or any specific sub version of 109?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tuesday, January 10, 2023 at 5:56:04 AM UTC-8 Henrik Boström wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 8:51 AM Yoav Weiss 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> +Henrik Boström - was there an intent sent for this removal? Any
>>>>>> form of developer communication?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> There was developer communication dating as far back as July but I
>>>>> admit I had forgotten to send out a formal blink-dev intent to deprecate!
>>>>>
>>>>> - I should have done that.
>>>>>
>>>>> The getStats() API in question is not being deprecated, but the
>>>>> RTCStatsReport (an id-to-stats-object map) report will stop containing the
>>>>> stats object which were made obsolete in the spec several years ago due to
>>>>> the contents of these stats objects having been moved to other stats
>>>>> objects that are still being returned. Same values, different location. In
>>>>> other words, the report is being trimmed down by removing duplicate
>>>>> information. Stats processing code in an application is gated on stats 
>>>>> type
>>>>> for knowing which metrics to look for on an individual stats object which
>>>>> should make this lower risk compared to other depracations. The motivation
>>>>> for this is performance optimizations (~40% report size reduction),
>>>>> technical debt reduction (-1400 LOC) and web compat ("track" does not
>>>>> exist in Firefox <https://webrtc-stats.callstats.io/verify/>).
>>>>>
>>>>> The communication channel used was WebRTC's official google group,
>>>>> discuss-webrtc <https://groups.google.com/g/discuss-webrtc>. History:
>>>>>
>>>>>- July 25, 2022 PSA
>>>>><https://groups.google.com/g/discuss-webrtc/c/lfkFCY2CFco> announced
>>>>>the plan to deprecate at a milestone TBD. This was also the time where 
>>>>> the
>>>>>"DEPRECATED_" prefix was added to the JavaScript-exposed stats object 
>>>>> IDs,
>>>>>which made it into M106. The deprecation prefix is also visible in the
>>>>>chrome://webrtc-intern

Re: [blink-dev] Re: [discuss-webrtc] Deprecated "track" and "stream" stats are unshipped in M109.

2023-01-25 Thread Sudheer Boynapally
Was there any change on January 23rd corresponding to this? like rolling 
out this deprecation?

Thanks,
On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 2:57:16 PM UTC-8 Sudheer Boynapally wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Is the deprecation of 'track' and 'stream' objects completed 100% on all 
> the versions of chrome v109 or any specific sub version of 109? 
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> On Tuesday, January 10, 2023 at 5:56:04 AM UTC-8 Henrik Boström wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 8:51 AM Yoav Weiss  wrote:
>>
>>> +Henrik Boström - was there an intent sent for this removal? Any form 
>>> of developer communication?
>>>
>>
>> There was developer communication dating as far back as July but I admit 
>> I had forgotten to send out a formal blink-dev intent to deprecate!
>>
>> - I should have done that.
>>
>> The getStats() API in question is not being deprecated, but the 
>> RTCStatsReport (an id-to-stats-object map) report will stop containing the 
>> stats object which were made obsolete in the spec several years ago due to 
>> the contents of these stats objects having been moved to other stats 
>> objects that are still being returned. Same values, different location. In 
>> other words, the report is being trimmed down by removing duplicate 
>> information. Stats processing code in an application is gated on stats type 
>> for knowing which metrics to look for on an individual stats object which 
>> should make this lower risk compared to other depracations. The motivation 
>> for this is performance optimizations (~40% report size reduction), 
>> technical debt reduction (-1400 LOC) and web compat ("track" does not 
>> exist in Firefox <https://webrtc-stats.callstats.io/verify/>).
>>
>> The communication channel used was WebRTC's official google group, 
>> discuss-webrtc <https://groups.google.com/g/discuss-webrtc>. History:
>>
>>- July 25, 2022 PSA 
>><https://groups.google.com/g/discuss-webrtc/c/lfkFCY2CFco> announced 
>>the plan to deprecate at a milestone TBD. This was also the time where 
>> the 
>>"DEPRECATED_" prefix was added to the JavaScript-exposed stats object 
>> IDs, 
>>which made it into M106. The deprecation prefix is also visible in the 
>>chrome://webrtc-internals/ developer page when a page uses WebRTC.
>>- There was another PSA on September 6, 2022 
>><https://groups.google.com/g/discuss-webrtc/c/mmudYReualE> about 
>>other stats news with a reminder of the imminent stats deprecation.
>>- The October 19, 2022 PSA 
>><https://groups.google.com/g/discuss-webrtc/c/R7Mcux9RK6g> announced 
>>"track" stats being removed at 50% Canary.
>>- The follow-up October 27, 2022 PSA 
>><https://groups.google.com/g/discuss-webrtc/c/9c8ZjberEcI> announced 
>>it would also be removed at 50% Beta (where M109 Beta was released on 
>>December 1st). This PSA also clarifies that "The goal is to continue 
>>ramping it up on Stable when M109 is released".
>>- Lastly we have yesterday's PSA 
>><https://groups.google.com/g/discuss-webrtc/c/Bxrxr8gw08Y> announcing 
>>that the removal was advanced to 1% Stable which this conversation is a 
>>response to.
>>
>>
>>> On Mon, Jan 9, 2023 at 9:42 PM Alex Russell  
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Thanks for adding blink-dev, Philipp. CC-ing the API OWNERs as this 
>>>> seems related to a pattern of breaking changes without Blink intents that 
>>>> we've been informed of by customers.
>>>>
>>>> Do I understand correctly that this deprecation is being managed via 
>>>> Finch for 109 Stable?
>>>>
>>>
>> Yes, as to minimize risk of breakage the deprecation is managed via a 
>> Finch flag, which is currently 1% Stable + 50% Canary/Beta.
>> To my knowledge, no issues have been reported since the rollout started 
>> in Canary in November, 2022 or "DEPRECATED_" prefix was added in July, 2022.
>> This, combined with the fact that apps usually gate on type, is why I 
>> thought it would be safe to gently roll out further to Stable.
>>  
>>
>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>>
>>>> Alex
>>>>
>>>>
>> On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 12:34 AM 'Aaron Boushley' via blink-dev <
>> blin...@chromium.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Can you help me understand exactly which objects are being removed here? 
>>> We rely on `RTCPeerConnection.getStats()` although we pass in a 

Re: [blink-dev] Re: [discuss-webrtc] Deprecated "track" and "stream" stats are unshipped in M109.

2023-01-25 Thread Sudheer Boynapally
Hi,

Is the deprecation of 'track' and 'stream' objects completed 100% on all 
the versions of chrome v109 or any specific sub version of 109? 

Thanks,


On Tuesday, January 10, 2023 at 5:56:04 AM UTC-8 Henrik Boström wrote:

> On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 8:51 AM Yoav Weiss  wrote:
>
>> +Henrik Boström - was there an intent sent for this removal? Any form of 
>> developer communication?
>>
>
> There was developer communication dating as far back as July but I admit I 
> had forgotten to send out a formal blink-dev intent to deprecate!
>
> - I should have done that.
>
> The getStats() API in question is not being deprecated, but the 
> RTCStatsReport (an id-to-stats-object map) report will stop containing the 
> stats object which were made obsolete in the spec several years ago due to 
> the contents of these stats objects having been moved to other stats 
> objects that are still being returned. Same values, different location. In 
> other words, the report is being trimmed down by removing duplicate 
> information. Stats processing code in an application is gated on stats type 
> for knowing which metrics to look for on an individual stats object which 
> should make this lower risk compared to other depracations. The motivation 
> for this is performance optimizations (~40% report size reduction), 
> technical debt reduction (-1400 LOC) and web compat ("track" does not 
> exist in Firefox ).
>
> The communication channel used was WebRTC's official google group, 
> discuss-webrtc . History:
>
>- July 25, 2022 PSA 
> announced 
>the plan to deprecate at a milestone TBD. This was also the time where the 
>"DEPRECATED_" prefix was added to the JavaScript-exposed stats object IDs, 
>which made it into M106. The deprecation prefix is also visible in the 
>chrome://webrtc-internals/ developer page when a page uses WebRTC.
>- There was another PSA on September 6, 2022 
> about other 
>stats news with a reminder of the imminent stats deprecation.
>- The October 19, 2022 PSA 
> announced 
>"track" stats being removed at 50% Canary.
>- The follow-up October 27, 2022 PSA 
> announced 
>it would also be removed at 50% Beta (where M109 Beta was released on 
>December 1st). This PSA also clarifies that "The goal is to continue 
>ramping it up on Stable when M109 is released".
>- Lastly we have yesterday's PSA 
> announcing 
>that the removal was advanced to 1% Stable which this conversation is a 
>response to.
>
>
>> On Mon, Jan 9, 2023 at 9:42 PM Alex Russell  
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks for adding blink-dev, Philipp. CC-ing the API OWNERs as this 
>>> seems related to a pattern of breaking changes without Blink intents that 
>>> we've been informed of by customers.
>>>
>>> Do I understand correctly that this deprecation is being managed via 
>>> Finch for 109 Stable?
>>>
>>
> Yes, as to minimize risk of breakage the deprecation is managed via a 
> Finch flag, which is currently 1% Stable + 50% Canary/Beta.
> To my knowledge, no issues have been reported since the rollout started in 
> Canary in November, 2022 or "DEPRECATED_" prefix was added in July, 2022.
> This, combined with the fact that apps usually gate on type, is why I 
> thought it would be safe to gently roll out further to Stable.
>  
>
>>
>>> Best,
>>>
>>> Alex
>>>
>>>
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 12:34 AM 'Aaron Boushley' via blink-dev <
> blin...@chromium.org> wrote:
>
>> Can you help me understand exactly which objects are being removed here? 
>> We rely on `RTCPeerConnection.getStats()` although we pass in a stream 
>> selector. We then iterate over the returned stats reports looking for ones 
>> containing the values we need.
>>
>
> The selector (be it an RTCRtpSender, RTCRtpReceiver or MediaStreamTrack) 
> continues to work, it's just that the report no longer contains the removed 
> stats objects.
>  
>
>>
>> Is this a removal of the stats objects that have the fixed ID of "track" 
>> and "stream"?
>>
>
> It is the removal of the stats objects where .type == "track" or .type == 
> "stream".
> In the spec this refers to dictionaries RTCMediaStreamTrackStats 
>  and 
> RTCMediaStreamStats 
>  which are 
> part of the "Obsolete" section of the spec. See RTCStatsType 
>  for complete list 
> of stats object types.
>
> Regarding the track stats dictionary, the same metrics are still 
> available, but you have to look at the