Re: Request for Admin Action (Was: Re: Fascist Censorship spreadinglike Cancer)

2004-03-13 Thread Jon Gabriel
From: Erik Reuter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Request for Admin Action (Was: Re: Fascist Censorship 
spreadinglike Cancer)
Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2004 07:57:17 -0500

On Sat, Mar 13, 2004 at 02:18:34AM -0500, Jon Gabriel wrote:

 Nick and Juilia, I formally request that The Fool be given a warning
 or some sort of reprimand for this obscenity-laced post as well as
 his repeated attacks over the last 6 weeks or more against John
 D. Giorgis.  I would like to further request that the list be
 completely informed of what action you do or do not take regarding
 this.
Nick and Julia, I think you should ignore Jon. He seems to think he
has a right to control other people on this list, but you should not
help him to achieve such control.
I'm sorry, but I don't have your blase attitude when it comes to being 
abused by other people.  I do not feel that the almighty word and The Fool's 
right to spew venom are more valuable than opening my mailbox to his 
consistent, unwarranted attacks of listmembers and cursing.  I can't speak 
for the rest of the list, but I suspect I'm not the only one here who feels 
that way.  We should expect that other members of our community be treated 
with respect.  In my opinion, if we don't, this list won't ever grow and 
thrive and that would be a shame.

If you do as Jon directs you to,
then I formally request that Jon be given a warning for personally
attacking Fool and trying to censor people on the list,
Go for it.  I'm quite interested to see whether Nick and Julia believe that 
by trying to keep a certain standard of civility alive I am actually harming 
the list.

and if you
do that then I also formally request an investigation into whether
Jon Gabriel is his real name, and if we are going to start formally
enforcing guidelines as strict rules, isn't there a guideline about
not posting under aliases?
:-D  Oh, it's most definitely my name.  Many list members already know this: 
Gabriel is my middle and not my last name. I have used it both 
professionally and privately as an online presence for many years.  It's 
also now the name I'm using with my newly-minted S-Corp.  I both answer to 
Jon Gabriel and have it printed as an alternate name on my passport.  The 
exact phrase on the passport (I checked) is ALSO KNOWN AS: JON GABRIEL.

Sorry, if you're going to look for a violation of the guiidelines you'll 
have to dig a little deeper.  Both the US federal gov't and NY state gov't 
recognize this as a valid name for me. I don't use this name as a shield 
from which to launch attacks, either.

A determined person could definitely track me down if they wanted to.  I 
know exactly how they could, too.  But this is an extra, justified defense 
for my family's safety.  Last year an ex-brineller posted people's work and 
home addresses, phone numbers and email addresses on his site AND I recall 
that he threatened to do the same to me so that I could (among other 
things,) rot in hell and he could make my life a misery.  The only thing 
that prevented him from doing so was his lack of knowledge of my last name.  
I have absolutely NO regrets for trying to keep myself and my family free 
from the apparently quite valid threat of real life attacks.  By the way, 
that page was only taken down recently.  It remained online for months.

Anyway, feel free to dig for other guideline violations.  I'm quite sure 
I've made them over the years. If you or anyone else has a problem with 
something I've done, go right ahead and let Julia and Nick know.  I will 
face the consequences of my actions.  That's part of what 'iaamoac' means to 
me.

 For The Fool: Since you seem to have forgotten it, I'm reposting the
 relevant parts of the Etiquette Guideline you're violating below.
violating? One can violate a guideline?
I guess we'll have to see.

Jon

_
One-click access to Hotmail from any Web page – download MSN Toolbar now! 
http://clk.atdmt.com/AVE/go/onm00200413ave/direct/01/

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Request for Admin Action (Was: Re: Fascist Censorship spreadinglike Cancer)

2004-03-13 Thread Erik Reuter
On Sat, Mar 13, 2004 at 09:21:39AM -0500, Jon Gabriel wrote:

 I'm sorry, but I don't have your blase attitude when it comes to being
 abused by other people.

If you're sorry, then stop your attempts to force your opinions on
others.

If you're not sorry about your intolerant attempts to abuse someone,
then why write it?

 I do not feel that the almighty word and The Fool's right to spew
 venom are more valuable than opening my mailbox to his consistent,
 unwarranted attacks of listmembers and cursing.

Aww, pooor Jonn. Can't figure out how to use the delete key
and gets his itsy bitsy brainy-wainy all worked up about it. Aww.

 I can't speak for the rest of the list, but I suspect I'm not the 
 only one here who feels that way. 

I suspect I'm not the only one who feels you are being a self-righteous,
control-freak jerk. I also suspect there are people who think that all
___'s should be silenced, for hundreds of different _'s. So
what?

 I don't use this name as a shield from which to launch attacks,
 either.

Actually, that is exactly what you are doing. Attacking someone else and
trying to force your opinions on him. And if you aren't hiding behind an
alias (which you admit you use for defense), then why not launch your
attack and sign the last name that you were born with?



-- 
Erik Reuter   http://www.erikreuter.net/
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Request for Admin Action (Was: Re: Fascist Censorship spreadinglike Cancer)

2004-03-13 Thread Damon Agretto
 I do not Believe 'profanity' exists.  

And other people do. Why are your beliefs so much more
important than anyone elses?

What gives you the right to be discourteous and
offensive on the list?

Do you believe in the concept of IAAMOAC or are you
just parroting Brin's philosophical musings to fit
your own agenda?

You have repeatedly shown you are ONLY interested in
your OWN agenda, and have no real desire to
participate here. You only reinforced that with your
recent childishness. How old are you REALLY Fool?

I may not be the most intelligent or prolific poster
on this list; for that I bow to others. But at least I
keep an open mind and TRY to subsume my own bias in
the interest of considering all perspectives. And I
try to structure arguments. You, so far, have shown no
interest in this.

Damon.


=

Damon Agretto
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum.
http://www.geocities.com/garrand.geo/index.html
Now Building: 


__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - More reliable, more storage, less spam
http://mail.yahoo.com
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Request for Admin Action (Was: Re: Fascist Censorship spreadinglike Cancer)

2004-03-13 Thread Damon Agretto
 He should have the right. Whether I think he should
 exercise it as often
 as he does is another matter. But he should have the
 right.

Unfortunately, this is a PRIVATE list, and whether the
Fool has the right to do or not is entirely up to the
listowners. 

But two can play this game: We'll concede (for now,
for argument's sake) that the Fool has a right to be
onboxious, offensive, and flagrantly violate list
rules. What, then, gives him the right to be immune to
the consequences to his actions?
 
 A! I am so offended by that word. What
 gives you the right
 to use that word and get me all worked up? What is
 wrong with you? Why
 can't you show some respect?

Unfortunately respect has to be earned in many cases.

Damon.


=

Damon Agretto
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum.
http://www.geocities.com/garrand.geo/index.html
Now Building: 


__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - More reliable, more storage, less spam
http://mail.yahoo.com
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Request for Admin Action (Was: Re: Fascist Censorship spreadinglike Cancer)

2004-03-13 Thread Erik Reuter
On Sat, Mar 13, 2004 at 10:46:48AM -0800, Damon Agretto wrote:

 But two can play this game: We'll concede (for now, for argument's
 sake) that the Fool has a right to be onboxious, offensive, and
 flagrantly violate list rules.

I'm not aware of any list rules to be flagrantly violated.

 Unfortunately respect has to be earned in many cases.

I'm not sure about the unfortunately, but otherwise I agree, yes, it
does.


-- 
Erik Reuter   http://www.erikreuter.net/
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Request for Admin Action (Was: Re: Fascist Censorship spreadinglike Cancer)

2004-03-13 Thread Travis Edmunds

From: Erik Reuter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Request for Admin Action (Was: Re: Fascist Censorship 
spreadinglike Cancer)
Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2004 07:57:17 -0500

Nick and Julia, I think you should ignore Jon. He seems to think he
has a right to control other people on this list, but you should not
help him to achieve such control. If you do as Jon directs you to,
then I formally request that Jon be given a warning for personally
attacking Fool and trying to censor people on the list, and if you
do that then I also formally request an investigation into whether
Jon Gabriel is his real name, and if we are going to start formally
enforcing guidelines as strict rules, isn't there a guideline about
not posting under aliases?
He has a right to be offended by some words which he finds offensive, does 
he not? And it just so happens that certain words, deemed profanity, are 
frowned upon here. It doesn't matter that someone doesn't recognize the idea 
of profanity. That's simply a clever way to stymie people who do.

As for Jon calling on Nick and/or Julia to actually DO something, well it's 
to be applauded. Why? Not because I'm offended by the use of profanity. I'm 
not. But I do find it offensive that someone would hide behind some half-ass 
excuse to use profanity, when we collectively agree not to. Play by the 
rules eh? Either that or get outta my sandbox...I'm sure people understand 
the allusion.

One more thing Erik. How do you justify calling on Nick and Julia to ignore 
Jon? Being admins, aren't they the logical choice for him to make the 
request to? I don't think that Jon was going to ask my dog Rocky to do 
something about the current situation...

-Travis

_
MSN Premium helps eliminate e-mail viruses. Get 2 months FREE*  
http://join.msn.com/?pgmarket=en-capage=byoa/premxAPID=1994DI=1034SU=http://hotmail.com/encaHL=Market_MSNIS_Taglines

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Request for Admin Action (Was: Re: Fascist Censorship spreadinglike Cancer)

2004-03-13 Thread Erik Reuter
On Sat, Mar 13, 2004 at 03:38:29PM -0330, Travis Edmunds wrote:

 And it just so happens that certain words, deemed profanity, are  
 frowned upon here.

It just so happens that they are not frowned upon here, also. It just
so happens that they are strongly supported here, also.

 we collectively agree not to.

No, WE do not.

 One more thing Erik. How do you justify calling on Nick and Julia to
 ignore Jon? Being admins, aren't they the logical choice for him to
 make the request to?

Nope, they are not censors. They are ADMINISTRATORS. They keep the email
flowing. In Nick's case, he also owns some of the equipment. But that
doesn't obligate him to be a list censor.


-- 
Erik Reuter   http://www.erikreuter.net/
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Request for Admin Action (Was: Re: Fascist Censorship spreadinglike Cancer)

2004-03-13 Thread Damon Agretto
 I'm not aware of any list rules to be flagrantly
 violated.

Erik, go to the bottom of this message (and EVERY
Bin-L message). Click on that link. Look under About
Brin-L. Click on Ettiquete Guidelines. Go to the
bottom where it says We further agree that: 3rd
Clause. Also take not of the last clause. You too
Fool.

Damon.


=

Damon Agretto
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum.
http://www.geocities.com/garrand.geo/index.html
Now Building: 


__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - More reliable, more storage, less spam
http://mail.yahoo.com
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Request for Admin Action (Was: Re: Fascist Censorship spreadinglike Cancer)

2004-03-13 Thread Erik Reuter
On Sat, Mar 13, 2004 at 11:22:56AM -0800, Damon Agretto wrote:

 Erik wrote:

  I'm not aware of any list rules to be flagrantly violated.

 Erik, go to the bottom of this message (and EVERY Bin-L
 message). Click on that link. Look under About Brin-L. Click on
 Ettiquete Guidelines. Go to the bottom where it says We further agree
 that: 3rd Clause. Also take not of the last clause. You too Fool.

Damon, read what you wrote, they are guidelines, not rules.  One does
not flagrantly violate guidelines. I certainly never agreed to any
hard and fast rules, and I certainly do not agree to never do anything
that is mentioned in the guidelines. I only agree to something if it is
specifically written down as a contract that I sign or type my name to.
When I signed up for brin-l, I agreed to no such contract.



-- 
Erik Reuter   http://www.erikreuter.net/
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Request for Admin Action (Was: Re: Fascist Censorship spreadinglike Cancer)

2004-03-13 Thread Damon Agretto


 Damon, read what you wrote, they are guidelines,
 not rules.  One does
 not flagrantly violate guidelines. I certainly
 never agreed to any
 hard and fast rules, and I certainly do not agree to
 never do anything
 that is mentioned in the guidelines. I only agree to
 something if it is
 specifically written down as a contract that I sign
 or type my name to.
 When I signed up for brin-l, I agreed to no such
 contract.

Actually, you did. It clearly states that WE AGREE. 

Also reread the last clause. The listowners have the
right to enforce these guidelines.

Damon.


=

Damon Agretto
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum.
http://www.geocities.com/garrand.geo/index.html
Now Building: 


__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - More reliable, more storage, less spam
http://mail.yahoo.com
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Request for Admin Action (Was: Re: Fascist Censorship spreadinglike Cancer)

2004-03-13 Thread Erik Reuter
On Sat, Mar 13, 2004 at 11:36:29AM -0800, Damon Agretto wrote:

 Actually, you did. It clearly states that WE AGREE.

Actually, I did NOT.


-- 
Erik Reuter   http://www.erikreuter.net/
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Request for Admin Action (Was: Re: Fascist Censorship spreadinglike Cancer)

2004-03-13 Thread Damon Agretto
  Actually, you did. It clearly states that WE
 AGREE.
 
 Actually, I did NOT.

Actually you did, Erik. Are you not using the service
as of now? Have you in the past used the service? To
what extent have you used the service? 

By using the service, you implicitly agree to obey the
guidelines. If you have a cell phone, use it often,
but never signed a contract, does this make you not
liable for the bills or usage? Unfortunately the law
says otherwise. Why should this be different, and more
to the point, Why Erik do you feel special that you
should be immune to the guidelines everyone else is
held to?

Damon.

=

Damon Agretto
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum.
http://www.geocities.com/garrand.geo/index.html
Now Building: 


__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - More reliable, more storage, less spam
http://mail.yahoo.com
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Request for Admin Action (Was: Re: Fascist Censorship spreadinglike Cancer)

2004-03-13 Thread Erik Reuter
On Sat, Mar 13, 2004 at 11:51:42AM -0800, Damon Agretto wrote:

 Actually you did, Erik. Are you not using the service as of now? Have
 you in the past used the service? To what extent have you used the
 service?

Okay, then pay up, Damon.

http://erikreuter.net/damon.html


-- 
Erik Reuter   http://www.erikreuter.net/
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Request for Admin Action (Was: Re: Fascist Censorship spreadinglike Cancer)

2004-03-13 Thread Damon Agretto
 Okay, then pay up, Damon.
 
 http://erikreuter.net/damon.html

Erik you must have some issues. Such an agreement is
not valid as YOU do not own Brin-L. If you can provide
such ownership, make proof available to the list.

Damon.


=

Damon Agretto
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum.
http://www.geocities.com/garrand.geo/index.html
Now Building: 


__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - More reliable, more storage, less spam
http://mail.yahoo.com
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Request for Admin Action (Was: Re: Fascist Censorship spreadinglike Cancer)

2004-03-13 Thread Erik Reuter
On Sat, Mar 13, 2004, Damon Agretto wrote:

 Actually, you did. 

So now you want to control not only what I can write, but you also want
to decide what I agreed to? What's next, do you want to take over where
Saddam Hussein left off? Sheesh, and he says I have issues.

 Erik you must have some issues. Such an agreement is not valid

Well, duh!

 YOU do not own Brin-L. If you can provide such ownership, make proof
 available to the list.

That is irrelevant on whether or not you or I agreed to a contract. One
does not legally enter a contract by sending an email. One enters into
a contract by signing one's name to a contract that is clearly worded
as such. Which I did not do. In fact, when that list was first written,
I specifically objected to it. And I'm on record as doing so. Only
a doofus would claim that I agreed to it. And such a doofus would
certainly lose in court.


-- 
Erik Reuter   http://www.erikreuter.net/
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Request for Admin Action (Was: Re: Fascist Censorship spreadinglike Cancer)

2004-03-13 Thread Damon Agretto
 That is irrelevant on whether or not you or I agreed
 to a contract. One
 does not legally enter a contract by sending an
 email. One enters into
 a contract by signing one's name to a contract that
 is clearly worded
 as such. Which I did not do. In fact, when that list
 was first written,
 I specifically objected to it. And I'm on record as
 doing so. Only
 a doofus would claim that I agreed to it. And such a
 doofus would
 certainly lose in court.

Erik, it is NOT irrelevant. The contract is not agreed
to by sending e-mail; the contract is agreed to by
USAGE. You are using Brin-L resources, which have been
provided for free. 

You do not need to sign anything to agree to a
contract. Signing a document is only one form of
entering into a contract. There are many others. 

Damon.


=

Damon Agretto
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum.
http://www.geocities.com/garrand.geo/index.html
Now Building: 


__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - More reliable, more storage, less spam
http://mail.yahoo.com
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Request for Admin Action (Was: Re: Fascist Censorship spreadinglike Cancer)

2004-03-13 Thread Erik Reuter
On Sat, Mar 13, 2004 at 01:30:33PM -0800, Damon Agretto wrote:

 You do not need to sign anything to agree to a contract.

For something like this, I do. And I did not agree.


-- 
Erik Reuter   http://www.erikreuter.net/
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Request for Admin Action (Was: Re: Fascist Censorship spreadinglike Cancer)

2004-03-12 Thread The Fool
 From: Jon Gabriel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 From: The Fool [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
 * Profanity is not welcome.

I do not Believe 'profanity' exists.  
 
 Your anonymity does not give you the right to spam this list with 
 uncivilized behavior.

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l