Re: newbie syntax question for cake 1.2 RC1
thanks
what about Not Equals
I don't think works anymore. What is it replaced by?
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 2:57 AM, grigri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
$this-Category-find('all', array(
'conditions' = array(
'name LIKE' = '%'.$parent.'%',
'parent_id' = null
)
));
On Jun 6, 10:26 am, . [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
I just switched from cake 1.2.6311 to cake 1.2.7125 (RC1)
what is the new syntax for this command?
$this-Category-findByName(array('name' ='LIKE %'.$parent.'%',
'parent_id'=null));
I want to find all categories where the name is like %parent% and the
parent_id is null
Thanks
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
CakePHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Select or text field depending on another select
Hi, I am doing searchs in my cake application. I have a select with options and a text field. I want that if in this select is chosen option 1 or option 2, the text field is kept to introduce the text to search, but if the selected option is 3, I want that the text field is replaced by another new select with 2 options. Has anyone made something similar? How can I do that? Thanks and regards. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: UTF8 vs Dreamweaver
On 7 Jun 2008, at 18:25, burzum wrote: It describes 41 steps (!!!) to arrange a form in two columns. The use of this gui is imo not less harder to learn then to read an article about css and columns and you're faster writing the code then using this editor ;) Plus I will still want to comb through the generated HTML myself afterwards to weed out any superfluous tags or attributes these WYSIWYGs tend to insert. Sorry, couldn't resist. EditorFlameWar over? ;o) --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Update from 1.2 beta to rc leads to huge perfomance drop
I have noted the same thing of Hermann. I use Xdebug and Wincachegrind. And I have noted that the problem is exactly the presence of many linked models in the application. I'm a newbie in Cake but I think that a post about The Things to do to get the best permorfance in cake could be useful for the person like me. On 7 Giu, 05:26, Dr. Tarique Sani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 6:06 PM, Hermann Wacker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What are the steps that one has to do for getting some descent performance out of cakephp? Where are the bottlenecks? If you are creating a sizable project and suffering performance issues the first thing to do is stop speculating about the bottlenecks and find them! Use Xdebug and Cachegrind to profile your application - you will then be able to pin point stuff from there on HTH Tarique -- = Cheesecake-Photoblog:http://cheesecake-photoblog.org PHP for E-Biz:http://sanisoft.com = --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: ACL schema
For some reason, I thought the AuthComponent used the username in it's
call to check but I can now see that in it's first parameter it is
using the array representing data from the User model. For some
reason I thought that it used to use only the username alias?
On Jun 6, 12:30 pm, mbavio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Aran,
I agree with your opinion about crud being cleaner, but, why do you
say what only with:
check('username', 'CamelCaseController', 'crudmappedaction');
will work? You can use:
check(array('model' = 'Model', 'foreign_key' = 'anID'),
'CamelCaseController', 'crudmappedaction');
and complement it with Acl Behavior, that not set Alias by default.
Just my two cents.
Cheers,
mbavio
On May 27, 11:29 am, aranworld [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Auth component has very specific rules for how it checks access.
In 'actions' mode, it will do:
check( 'username', 'CamelCaseController/action', *);
In 'crud' mode it will do:
check('username', 'CamelCaseController', 'crudmappedaction');
In light of this, your schema looks like it is meant to go with
'actions' mode and you would have to have a controller X with actions
like approve_member, post_forum, remove_member, which sounds messy to
me, becuase the controllers are starting to just become catch-all
function repositories rather than Classes.
One thing you could do is have acos like this and use 'crud' mode:
ClubXForums
ClubXMembers
ClubYForums
ClubYMembers
ClubZForums
ClubZMembers
These would all map to controllers with the standard add, edit,
delete, view, index actions. However, they would actually all be
empty controllers and would merely extend a more generic Forums and
Members controller.
So you have Tristan, who is a member of ClubX, but participates in the
admin of ClubY:
Acl-grant('Tristan', 'ClubXForums', array('read', 'create');
Acl-grant('Tristan', 'ClubXMembers', array('read');
Acl-grant('Tristan', 'ClubYForums', *);
Acl-grant('Tristan', 'ClubYMembers', *);
I have tried both crud and actions mode, and found that in the long
run it is much easier to manage crud mode, due to the reduced number
of ACO nodes.
-Aran
On May 27, 3:04 am, dmadruga [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi folks!
I'm trying to come up with a descent schema for the ACL of a tennis
association website.
Basically there are several tennis clubs, each club has several
regular members and a committee of 3 to 5 members responsible for
managing the club and accepting/rejecting new members. One person may
be a member of several clubs, and may be in different positions in
each one (for ex: Tom's a member of the club's X committee and a
regular member of the club Y).
The web system will centralize the management of all the clubs related
to the association.
A Guest will be allowed to sign up to the association and become a
Member.
A Member will be allowed to join a club.
A Member of the committee will be allowed to edit information related
to his club, approve/reject new members requests, among other
operations.
As soon as a new member is accepted to a club he'll be able to view
information related to this club, post messages in the club's forum,
and so on...
The ACL schema that first came to my mind was something like this:
_AROs_
Admin (the group of site admins, those who will have full access to
everything)
Guests
Members
--- Bob
--- Tom
--- John
_ACOs_
create_account (maps to the create_account method in the users
controller)
join_club (maps to the join_club method in the clubs controller)
club
--- X
--- --- view
--- --- edit
--- --- delete
--- --- approve_member
--- --- post_forum
--- --- remove_member
--- Y
--- --- view
--- --- edit
...
--- --- remove_member
--- Z
...
(X, Y, and Z are the clubs).
As far as I understood I'll be able to allow an specific user (say
Bob) to perform an specific operation (say club/Y/approve_member).
Am I wrong?
Then, in the method that performs this operation I can check if Bob
(the logged user) is allowed to perform the operation for the current
club (say .../clubs/approve_member/club_id).
Right?
I also though about creating a different ARO group for each club, but
the problem I found is that I can't associate a Member to more than
one group. I could create a new ARO each time a member joins a club,
but it seems to me more complex than the previous solution. Am I
wrong?
The last thing... I'm using the Auth component and I realized that it
has a strong interaction with the ACL component. If I use this non-
standard approach to construct my ACL will I mess Auth's work?
Thanks a lot!!!
Daniel Madruga.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
CakePHP group.
To post to this group,
Re: Update from 1.2 beta to rc leads to huge perfomance drop
On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 5:36 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have noted the same thing of Hermann. I use Xdebug and Wincachegrind. And I have noted that the problem is exactly the presence of many linked models in the application. Great Start - What you really mean that your application is running too many un-needed queries and handling too much data. The solution to this is using the Containable behavior see http://cakebaker.42dh.com/2008/05/18/new-core-behavior-containable/ I'm a newbie in Cake but I think that a post about The Things to do to get the best permorfance in cake could be useful for the person like me. Not exactly in those words but there are posts about it out there and like any other programming there can't be any one true solution for best performance... you have to tailor your application accordingly Perhaps you can write a post on how you optimized your application. Cheers Tarique -- = Cheesecake-Photoblog: http://cheesecake-photoblog.org PHP for E-Biz: http://sanisoft.com = --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Dynamic Controller
I would like to be able to have a single controller that handles other controllers . Basically I want to be able to 'install' a controller without modifying any files, so the 'installed' controller and views would live as text in the database and be called on either via the handlercontroller/installedcontroller/function/values or directly. Anyone have any idea how I might go about doing this? Thank you in advance! ~stillboy --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Paginate with Containable
I'm having trouble figuring out how to pare down my queries with Containable behavior when using paginate. Basically, I am showing Post records, but I want the Topic name (parent of Post) and Topic Group name (parent of Topic). If I do recursive = 2, then I have 200 queries, so I would like something like this (but this don't work): $this-paginate = array( 'Post' = array( 'fields' = array( 'id', 'title', 'description', 'url', 'domain', 'recommendation_count', 'comment_count' ), 'contain' = array( 'Member' = array( 'fields' = array( 'id', 'username' ) ), 'Topic' = array( 'TopicGroup' ) ) ) ); $posts = $this-paginate(); --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Keep current password
I use a password_confirm, have setup the validations in the model to
check password == password_confirm and have this function in my user
model:
function beforeSave() {
if (!isset($this-data['User']['password_confirm']) ||
empty($this-data['User']['password_confirm'])) {
unset($this-data['User']['password']);
}
return true;
}
So, you don't save passwords if there isn't confirmation, and
confirmation == password is enforced at validation code.
Here is my complete user model: http://bin.cakephp.org/view/1208127933
Regards,
- Dardo Sordi.
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 9:13 PM, b logica [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why not just remove the password field from the form and create a
dedicated action/view for changing a password? Works for me.
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 5:15 PM, benjam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't think beforeSave would work, because it gets hashed even
before the method that calls Save( ).
I think I may have found a cheater (read: non-cake) way of doing it...
I run the following test:
if ($this-Auth-password('') == $this-data['User']['password']) {
unset($this-data['User']['password']);
}
Basically, if the hash matches the hash of an empty string, the
password was empty... clear it. done.
thanks for all the input though guys, I appreciate it.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
CakePHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: UTF8 vs Dreamweaver
Sorry, couldn't resist. EditorFlameWar over? ;o) It's never over! Vim FTW! -- Marcin Domanski http://kabturek.info --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Select or text field depending on another select
Has anyone made something similar? How can I do that? JQuery? Thanks and regards. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Update from 1.2 beta to rc leads to huge perfomance drop
On Jun 7, 2008, at 8:18 AM, Femi Taiwo wrote:
Hi,
Here a quick 4-step primer to get better performance in cake
1. Specify var $recursive = 0; in your app/app_model.php
This will cut off all automatic calls to hasMany haBtm
relationships by default. three-quarters of the time, I don't want
those results - I simply need the belongsTo bindings.
2. Use the Containable behavior
http://cakebaker.42dh.com/2008/05/18/new-core-behavior-containable/
With that you can easily set the models to pull, the level of
recursion..
3. Use Wincachegrind and Xdebug to test after.
4. Avoid using so many App::import('Model',$modelName) in your
components where possible.
I've also seen a jump when I put the rewrite instructions in my apache
config rather than the .htaccess file.
-- John
Dr. Tarique Sani wrote:
On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 5:36 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I have noted the same thing of Hermann.
I use Xdebug and Wincachegrind.
And I have noted that the problem is exactly the presence of many
linked models in the application.
Great Start - What you really mean that your application is
running too many un-needed queries and handling too much data.
The solution to this is using the Containable behavior see
http://cakebaker.42dh.com/2008/05/18/new-core-behavior-containable/
I'm a newbie in Cake but I think that a post about The Things to do
to get the best permorfance in cake could be useful for the person
like me.
Not exactly in those words but there are posts about it out there
and like any other programming there can't be any one true solution
for best performance... you have to tailor your application
accordingly
Perhaps you can write a post on how you optimized your application.
Cheers
Tarique
--
=
Cheesecake-Photoblog: http://cheesecake-photoblog.org
PHP for E-Biz: http://sanisoft.com
=
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
CakePHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Strict or Pretty? We're looking for a few good opinions
Hey would you consider it acceptable to break strict mode in a few key (forward-compatible) areas if it meant significantly simplifying code and/or eliminating extra work you would otherwise have to do? it's like with piggy banks - you know you'll find some reward in there but it's still breaking a nice piggy ;) As a feature, how important is absolute compliance with strict-mode standards? strict is about using the newest greatest code available - IMO its not necessary to write all code that is strict compliant (vendor libraries are a pain) but I would prefer to maintain code that is strict - that would show the maturity of both php and cakephp. greets, -- Marcin Domanski http://kabturek.info --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Update from 1.2 beta to rc leads to huge perfomance drop
hi,
could you post an example about it? i would like to try it, but
unfortunately i'm not an apache expert.
thanks,
gbk
On Jun 7, 4:29 pm, John David Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Jun 7, 2008, at 8:18 AM, Femi Taiwo wrote:
Hi,
Here a quick 4-step primer to get better performance in cake
1. Specify var $recursive = 0; in your app/app_model.php
This will cut off all automatic calls to hasMany haBtm
relationships by default. three-quarters of the time, I don't want
those results - I simply need the belongsTo bindings.
2. Use the Containable
behaviorhttp://cakebaker.42dh.com/2008/05/18/new-core-behavior-containable/
With that you can easily set the models to pull, the level of
recursion..
3. Use Wincachegrind and Xdebug to test after.
4. Avoid using so many App::import('Model',$modelName) in your
components where possible.
I've also seen a jump when I put the rewrite instructions in my apache
config rather than the .htaccess file.
-- John
Dr. Tarique Sani wrote:
On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 5:36 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I have noted the same thing of Hermann.
I use Xdebug and Wincachegrind.
And I have noted that the problem is exactly the presence of many
linked models in the application.
Great Start - What you really mean that your application is
running too many un-needed queries and handling too much data.
The solution to this is using the Containable behavior
seehttp://cakebaker.42dh.com/2008/05/18/new-core-behavior-containable/
I'm a newbie in Cake but I think that a post about The Things to do
to get the best permorfance in cake could be useful for the person
like me.
Not exactly in those words but there are posts about it out there
and like any other programming there can't be any one true solution
for best performance... you have to tailor your application
accordingly
Perhaps you can write a post on how you optimized your application.
Cheers
Tarique
--
=
Cheesecake-Photoblog:http://cheesecake-photoblog.org
PHP for E-Biz:http://sanisoft.com
=
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
CakePHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Strict or Pretty? We're looking for a few good opinions
Now, rather than give specifics and turn this into a discussion about semantics, I've decided to pose this as a general question, which we can use as a guideline moving forward: assuming we follow the spirit of the law in all other areas (i.e. using proper visibility modifiers in classes, cleaning up object handling to comply with PHP5, etc.), would you consider it acceptable to break strict mode in a few key (forward-compatible) areas if it meant significantly simplifying code and/or eliminating extra work you would otherwise have to do? As a feature, how important is absolute compliance with strict-mode standards? I don't see strict mode compliance as a matter of live or death, but as you are not giving details on were you are planing to break it is like signing a blank check... But I don't care, just continue building the greatest PHP framework ever! Cheers, - Dardo Sordi. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Paginate with Containable
Open cake/tests/cases/libs/model/behaviors/containable.test.php, and look for the testPaginate() function. On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 4:43 AM, NappyHeaded [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm having trouble figuring out how to pare down my queries with Containable behavior when using paginate. Basically, I am showing Post records, but I want the Topic name (parent of Post) and Topic Group name (parent of Topic). If I do recursive = 2, then I have 200 queries, so I would like something like this (but this don't work): $this-paginate = array( 'Post' = array( 'fields' = array( 'id', 'title', 'description', 'url', 'domain', 'recommendation_count', 'comment_count' ), 'contain' = array( 'Member' = array( 'fields' = array( 'id', 'username' ) ), 'Topic' = array( 'TopicGroup' ) ) ) ); $posts = $this-paginate(); --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Dynamic Controller
Ok, I think using routes I may be able to accomplish this. Can anyone
tell me what will happen with this route:
Router::connect('/*', array('controller' = 'plugins', 'action' =
'subdispatch'));
From what I understand, then everything will match to that - or should
that line -the /* definitely not happen?
~stillboy
On Jun 7, 7:43 am, stillboy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like to be able to have a single controller that handles other
controllers . Basically I want to be able to 'install' a controller
without modifying any files, so the 'installed' controller and views
would live as text in the database and be called on either via the
handlercontroller/installedcontroller/function/values or directly.
Anyone have any idea how I might go about doing this?
Thank you in advance!
~stillboy
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
CakePHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Router + form + edit
Hello,
I've found a little problem in cake and I don't know if it's me doing
something bad ?
I have a route like this :
Router::connect('/:project/:controller/:action/
*',array(),array('pass'=array('project')));
It's work just fine, when I do a link like this
$html-link('Edit Milestone', array('action'='edit', 'project' =
$projectId, $milestone['Milestone']['id'])); ?
I get a url like : /1/milestones/edit/5
For the form, i could get the right action by adding url param :
?php echo $form-create('Milestone', array('url' = array('project'
= $projectId)));?
I get a form tag like this : form id=MilestoneAddForm method=post
action=/~loic/trek/1/milestones/add
But, when I use the same thing for edit form, I get this :
form id=MilestoneEditForm method=post action=/~loic/trek/
milestones/edit/1/project:1
I have found one similar bug, but with admin url's. He is now
fixed : https://trac.cakephp.org/ticket/3108
If anyone knowwhat I did wrong, of if I should report this bug, please
let me know
Thanks
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
CakePHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Keep current password
To get around the same issue, I created a checkbox field on my user
form when $id 0. Name the field change_password or something like
that, and then you can roll your logic based off that field value
wether or not to change the password field.
On Jun 6, 1:33 pm, benjam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have an admin section to my site, which is protected by Auth and
using a Users table.
The trouble I'm having is, when I set up a user, everything works just
fine.
When I go in to edit that user, the password field gets corrupted
because instead of re-hashing the original password (which would be
impossible because it doesn't know it, unless it is specifically re-
entered in the password field), it hashes the hash that is output by
the form (the one stored in the database).
I was wondering if there was a way to prevent it from hashing the
password if there is no password entered?
Here is what I have so far...
in my model: (not complete)
var $validate = array(
'username' = array('alphaNumeric'),
'email' = array('email'),
'password' = VALID_NOT_EMPTY,
);
in my controller: (not complete)
function admin_edit($id = null) {
if (!$id empty($this-data)) {
$this-Session-setFlash(__('Invalid User', true));
$this-redirect(array('action'='index'));
}
if (!empty($this-data)) {
if (empty($this-data['User']['password'])) {
unset($this-data['User']['password']);
}
if ($this-User-save($this-data)) {
$this-Session-setFlash(__('The User has
been saved', true));
$this-redirect(array('action'='index'));
} else {
$this-Session-setFlash(__('The User could
not be saved. Please,
try again.', true));
}
}
if (empty($this-data)) {
$this-data = $this-User-read(null, $id);
}
}
in my view: (not complete)
?php
echo $form-input('username');
echo $form-input('email');
echo 'span class=infoLeave Password field blank to keep
current
password/span';
echo $form-input('password', array('value' = ''));
echo $form-input('contact');
echo $form-input('active');
?
When I debug output $this-data right after I clear out an empty
password field in the controller, it shows a hash in the password
field, which means the data gets hashed before it gets to the
controller admin_edit method.
Where should I put the condition to clear out the password field if
it's empty so that I can keep the current password if none is entered
in the edit form?
And how can I make sure that when adding a user, a password is
required, but when editing a user, it is not?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
CakePHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: TreeBehavior and callbacks
Hi grigri,
thanks for your feedback.
I get what you're saying, but is it just me or does it seem wrong to
corrupt the tree, even though we fix it again (re-sync it)?
On Jun 5, 5:09 pm, grigri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Then the children will not get deleted and I'll end up with orphans..
Really? I admit I don't use the TreeBehavior, but I am familiar with
MPTT hierarchies, and I've got the code in front of me.
I might well be wrong, but it seems like this:
With the above code:
1. You call Asset::del(id), maps to Model::del();
2. Upload::beforeDelete() is called, file is deleted (id)
3. Tree::beforeDelete() is called with id, Tree:deleteAll() is
called (once) for all descendants of id (not just direct children)
4. Tree::deleteAll() detaches Tree behavior
5. Tree::deleteAll() calls Model::deleteAll() with cascade and
callbacks
6. Model::deleteAll() performs a find('all') - retrieving the ids of
all the descendants, calls Asset::del() on each descendant (maps to
Model::del())
7. [each descendant] Model::del() calls Asset::beforeDelete, file is
deleted
(Tree::beforeDelete() is not called because it's still detached)
8. Tree::deleteAll() re-attaches Tree behavior and exits
9. Upload::beforeDelete re-syncs the tree
10. rest of Asset::del(id)
I could be completely wrong here, but looking at the code it seems to
me this is how it would play out.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
CakePHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Strict or Pretty? We're looking for a few good opinions
The blank check metaphor is excellent. It can be a very slippery slope when heading down the path of non-strict compliance. If we understand the hazards and take precautions hopefully we can prevent sliding down too far. As far as what Nate is getting at, I think I understand him correctly when I say that the need to move outside of strict mode comes with the Models. Basically, if we do not comply with strict mode, we can call models statically, with late bindings and without the need for a separate Record class for handling data results as objects. To put it in code, and based on some initial testing we should be able to do: $post = Post::create(); $post-title = This is cool; Post::save(); This violates strict mode because you are calling static methods on a non static class. Anyway, this is the best I can do to explain the scenario we have encountered so far. Bottom line is..we do want the best framework. To us, that means code that is cleaner and simpler. Sometimes the benefits of such ease outweigh the costs of being completely compliant. To be honest, I do not know 100% the inner workings of php. My fear is that php could change and we would end up with unexpected behavior. Also, while I do not support labels, being strict means being enterprise ready. For the average developer this is not a problem, but for larger companies looking to adopt Cake this is a valid concern for the same reasons as the slippery slope. There are more questions...How important is static access to models? Should we just create instances as we do now? Would you prefer the global access that a static class would provide? Hope this helps the discussion. I look forward to more opinions on how people see the use of CakePHP evolving. Bake on. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Strict or Pretty? We're looking for a few good opinions
Sometimes us programmers not on the CakePHP development team will think that we have an improvement to the core code, so we come up with our own solution (hack) to improve things. But then inevitably the core code gets changed, and we suddenly find out that our hack is broken, or just didn't make sense in the context of the future direction of the Cake core. This is why I think it might be hazardous to not use strict. Presumably certain rules are in place, because the people who live and breath the PHP core code have a good idea about where things are going and they are trying to signal to us how to do things properly so that they match where they are going and don't break with future versions. On Jun 7, 10:26 am, Gwoo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The blank check metaphor is excellent. It can be a very slippery slope when heading down the path of non-strict compliance. If we understand the hazards and take precautions hopefully we can prevent sliding down too far. As far as what Nate is getting at, I think I understand him correctly when I say that the need to move outside of strict mode comes with the Models. Basically, if we do not comply with strict mode, we can call models statically, with late bindings and without the need for a separate Record class for handling data results as objects. To put it in code, and based on some initial testing we should be able to do: $post = Post::create(); $post-title = This is cool; Post::save(); This violates strict mode because you are calling static methods on a non static class. Anyway, this is the best I can do to explain the scenario we have encountered so far. Bottom line is..we do want the best framework. To us, that means code that is cleaner and simpler. Sometimes the benefits of such ease outweigh the costs of being completely compliant. To be honest, I do not know 100% the inner workings of php. My fear is that php could change and we would end up with unexpected behavior. Also, while I do not support labels, being strict means being enterprise ready. For the average developer this is not a problem, but for larger companies looking to adopt Cake this is a valid concern for the same reasons as the slippery slope. There are more questions...How important is static access to models? Should we just create instances as we do now? Would you prefer the global access that a static class would provide? Hope this helps the discussion. I look forward to more opinions on how people see the use of CakePHP evolving. Bake on. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
CustomQuery with Pagination
Hello, I had been looking for a pagination solution that I could use when I needed to write a custom queries using CakePhp as the framework. I did a lot of google searching and looked at a number of examples. However, I couldn't find the solution I needed. Looking at the cakeapps in the wild page and noticed phtagr. Checked out the demo and noticed that it wasn't using the native cakephp pagination. I started reading and hacking and ended up with a solution based on that code and wanted to share. Download it from here: http://mashupkeyword.com/blog/?p=23 HTH Thanks P.S. if it helps you say Thanks to Sebastian Felis who developed phtagr. -- Chauncey Thorn PHP Developer/Systems Administrator email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] url: http://www.cthorn.com/ url: http://www.mashupkeyword.com/ --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Strict or Pretty? We're looking for a few good opinions
I read somewhere that from PHP6, E_STRICT will be merged in E_ALL If you drop PHP4 support, be ready for PHP6 support ;) Personally, I usually follow core dev rules for Cake, and it's the same thing for PHP. They have Strict mode, so I try to have strict compliant code. As Aranworld said, if each brick we use has hacks (not the real word, but close to my thought), the wall won't be strong. On 7 juin, 20:38, aranworld [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sometimes us programmers not on the CakePHP development team will think that we have an improvement to the core code, so we come up with our own solution (hack) to improve things. But then inevitably the core code gets changed, and we suddenly find out that our hack is broken, or just didn't make sense in the context of the future direction of the Cake core. This is why I think it might be hazardous to not use strict. Presumably certain rules are in place, because the people who live and breath the PHP core code have a good idea about where things are going and they are trying to signal to us how to do things properly so that they match where they are going and don't break with future versions. On Jun 7, 10:26 am, Gwoo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The blank check metaphor is excellent. It can be a very slippery slope when heading down the path of non-strict compliance. If we understand the hazards and take precautions hopefully we can prevent sliding down too far. As far as what Nate is getting at, I think I understand him correctly when I say that the need to move outside of strict mode comes with the Models. Basically, if we do not comply with strict mode, we can call models statically, with late bindings and without the need for a separate Record class for handling data results as objects. To put it in code, and based on some initial testing we should be able to do: $post = Post::create(); $post-title = This is cool; Post::save(); This violates strict mode because you are calling static methods on a non static class. Anyway, this is the best I can do to explain the scenario we have encountered so far. Bottom line is..we do want the best framework. To us, that means code that is cleaner and simpler. Sometimes the benefits of such ease outweigh the costs of being completely compliant. To be honest, I do not know 100% the inner workings of php. My fear is that php could change and we would end up with unexpected behavior. Also, while I do not support labels, being strict means being enterprise ready. For the average developer this is not a problem, but for larger companies looking to adopt Cake this is a valid concern for the same reasons as the slippery slope. There are more questions...How important is static access to models? Should we just create instances as we do now? Would you prefer the global access that a static class would provide? Hope this helps the discussion. I look forward to more opinions on how people see the use of CakePHP evolving. Bake on. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Deleting dependent models with conditions
Has anyone ever deleted from a Model that has dependent joins with
conditions, and realized that more rows got deleted than they
expected?
To give an example, let's declare 3 classes, Book Cd and
OverallFavorite. OverallFavorite stores your prioritized rank of all
of your favorite stuff ... favorite book, cd, bike, framework,
whatever. So, since we're joining many models to a single model, in
addition to a foreign key ID, the OverallFavorite model ALSO needs to
store which table that ID is references (classic compound key
situation).
The Book class would look like:
Book extends AppModel{
...
var $hasOne = array('OverallFavorite' = array('foreignKey' =
'model_id', 'dependent' = true, 'conditions' =
'OverallFavorite.model_type = Book' );
...
}
What happens is, if you delete a book entry, the conditions aren't
being used. EVERY row in OverallFavorite with the same foreignKey id
gets deleted. If you have Cd, Book, and Framework, all with id=1 in
their tables, all three of those entries are deleted.
I ran into this yesterday, almost wrote up a new ticket ticket, and
found a 4-month old bug that was closed (not solved) with the
identical description. I tacked on a test case to push that ticket
along, but I'm still curious about this bug. So, my questions are:
Has anyone else had this problem before? Is anyone EXPECTING this
delete-happy behavior to happen? Is there some other understood
workaround for this?
Thanks all,
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
CakePHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Deleting dependent models with conditions
Almost forgot ... here's the link to the ticket:
https://trac.cakephp.org/ticket/4202
On Jun 7, 1:42 pm, floob [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has anyone ever deleted from a Model that has dependent joins with
conditions, and realized that more rows got deleted than they
expected?
To give an example, let's declare 3 classes, Book Cd and
OverallFavorite. OverallFavorite stores your prioritized rank of all
of your favorite stuff ... favorite book, cd, bike, framework,
whatever. So, since we're joining many models to a single model, in
addition to a foreign key ID, the OverallFavorite model ALSO needs to
store which table that ID is references (classic compound key
situation).
The Book class would look like:
Book extends AppModel{
...
var $hasOne = array('OverallFavorite' = array('foreignKey' =
'model_id', 'dependent' = true, 'conditions' =
'OverallFavorite.model_type = Book' );
...
}
What happens is, if you delete a book entry, the conditions aren't
being used. EVERY row in OverallFavorite with the same foreignKey id
gets deleted. If you have Cd, Book, and Framework, all with id=1 in
their tables, all three of those entries are deleted.
I ran into this yesterday, almost wrote up a new ticket ticket, and
found a 4-month old bug that was closed (not solved) with the
identical description. I tacked on a test case to push that ticket
along, but I'm still curious about this bug. So, my questions are:
Has anyone else had this problem before? Is anyone EXPECTING this
delete-happy behavior to happen? Is there some other understood
workaround for this?
Thanks all,
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
CakePHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
dynamic variable names?
Hi guys,
first post :)
my question: is it possible to have dynamic variable names, I mean
something like this:
for($i=0;$ix;$i++){
$y_$i = blabla;
}
in other words I want the number of the loop to be displayer in the
name of the variable.
Thanks for help.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
CakePHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Proper debugging of CakePHP
I respectfully disagree. I also have XDebug working with eclipse and PDT. I also can set a breakpoint in index.php. I am unable to figure out how to get execution to break in a controller. I've come across other threads in this group where folks are describing the same problem, but no one has answered the question. Is anyone out there successfully single-stepping through controller code? thanks, --ed On Jun 6, 9:45 am, Chris Hartjes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 9:43 AM, Sake [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ok, so do I run the debugger on the index.php file? How does it work? You're going off-topic from Cake and into the Land of Debugging. Please use Google or your other favourite search engine to find info on how to useXDebugor any other debugging tools. -- Chris Hartjes Internet Loudmouth Motto for 2008: Moving from herding elephants to handling snakes... @TheKeyBoard:http://www.littlehart.net/atthekeyboard --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: dynamic variable names?
Dave wrote On 06/07/2008 09:54 PM:
Hi guys,
first post :)
my question: is it possible to have dynamic variable names, I mean
something like this:
for($i=0;$ix;$i++){
$y_$i = blabla;
}
in other words I want the number of the loop to be displayer in the
name of the variable.
Thanks for help
Hi,
You can test this syntax :
$y = 'test';
for($i=0; $i 3; $i++)
{
${$y.'_'.$i} = 'blabla';
}
echo $test_0;
it should echo : blabla
voila :)
--
Simon COURTOIS
{EPITECH.} tek4 | (LINAGORA) Developer | [ADITAM] Project Manager
10, rue Brillat-Savarin 75013 Paris | 01 45 42 72 30 - 06 72 44 67 81
http://www.happynoff.fr
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
CakePHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: dynamic variable names?
On Jun 7, 9:54 pm, Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi guys,
first post :)
my question: is it possible to have dynamic variable names, I mean
something like this:
for($i=0;$ix;$i++){
$y_$i = blabla;
}
in other words I want the number of the loop to be displayer in the
name of the variable.
Thanks for help.
Hi,
You can test this syntax :
$y = 'test';
for($i=0; $i 3; $i++)
{
${$y.'_'.$i} = 'blabla';
}
echo $test_0;
it should echo : blabla
voila :)
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
CakePHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
custom routes and pagination (how I did it)
cake_1.2.x.x_6590
I'd been writing this cry for help when I suddenly had one more idea
to try ... and it works! Rather than delete this I thought it might
come in useful to someone else. And, if anyone cares to point out
something I've missed, or simply a better way to handle this, please
do let me know.
I have a view with a list of links, a, b, c, ... that are used to
place a find condition on last name. The controller is Artists but all
of the access to it is through custom routes because it's a
multilingual site. Some of my routes actually use regexp lists of
several words to match for a single controller but, in this case, it's
just a single word, 'repertoire', that the client really wants. So,
here are the index() routes:
Router::connect('/repertoire', array('controller' = 'artists',
'action' = 'index'));
Router::connect('/repertoire/index/*', array('controller' =
'artists', 'action' = 'index'));
Router::connect('/repertoire/:letter/*',
array('controller' = 'artists', 'action' = 'index'),
array('letter' = '[a-z]{1}')
);
The 2nd route here was necessary to get pagination working with a
general find().
I'd originally had the 3rd route pointing to findByLetter() but
pagination wouldn't work with that and, as i'm just rendering the
index view anyway, i thought i'd try to send it to index() instead. If
'letter' is available in params that is used, otherwise, all artists
are fetched.
Unfortunately, the pagination links always look like, eg:
/repertoire/index/page:2
I wanted the helper to tell Router to write them like, eg:
/repertoire/b/page:2
I tried playing with $paginator-options['url'] but giving it a string
always result in that string being appended to '/repertoire/index'.
Passing an array with controller/action didn't make sense because I'm
using a custom route (and this is where the Aha! moment came).
What i did was place the following in my view:
if (isset($letter))
{
$paginator-options['url'] = array('controller' = 'repertoire',
'action' = $letter);
}
Gadzooks! It works!
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
CakePHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: CustomQuery with Pagination
hey, I had been looking for a pagination solution that I could use when I needed to write a custom queries using CakePhp as the framework. I did a lot of google searching and looked at a number of examples. However, I couldn't find the solution I needed. When you look at the controller source[1] - paginate method you will see on lines 991 and 1008 that it looks for functons paginate() and paginateCount() in the object(model) that you want to paginate. just create these functions in the model with your custom logic. [1] http://api.cakephp.org/1.2/libs_2controller_2controller_8php-source.html#l00887 -- Marcin Domanski http://kabturek.info --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: dynamic variable names?
You could add dynamic keys values to an array. Then just extract() the array:
$a_vars = array();
for ($i = 0; $i $x; $i++)
{
$a_vars[foo_${i}] = bar_${i};
}
extract($a_vars);
You now have variables $foo_0, $foo_1, .. $foo_[x-1] available.
On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 3:54 PM, Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi guys,
first post :)
my question: is it possible to have dynamic variable names, I mean
something like this:
for($i=0;$ix;$i++){
$y_$i = blabla;
}
in other words I want the number of the loop to be displayer in the
name of the variable.
Thanks for help.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
CakePHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Update from 1.2 beta to rc leads to huge perfomance drop
today I upgraded to 1.2 RC1 ... and now I have minimum 1 second runtime and even worse: this goes sometimes up to 2 seconds execution time Hermann, I don't understand what you are asking for. Are you claiming 1.2 RC has dropped in performance relative to 1.2 beta, for the same application ? Or, are you just asking for general cake performance tips ? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Proper debugging of CakePHP
To get the execution to break in a controller, you need to either: 1) set a break point in the particular controller action you're trying to debug, or 2) make sure to step into $Dispatcher-dispatch($url) (line 82 for my version of Cake), then into return $this-_invoke (my line 246 in dispatcher.php), then call_user_func_array (my line 264 in dispatcher.php) should take you into your code. Mind you, I'm using XDebug in vim to do this, but I would be shocked if Eclipse's version didn't support this. On Jun 7, 4:53 pm, littlewoodEd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I respectfully disagree. I also have XDebug working with eclipse and PDT. I also can set a breakpoint in index.php. I am unable to figure out how to get execution to break in a controller. I've come across other threads in this group where folks are describing the same problem, but no one has answered the question. Is anyone out there successfully single-stepping through controller code? thanks, --ed On Jun 6, 9:45 am, Chris Hartjes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 9:43 AM, Sake [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ok, so do I run the debugger on the index.php file? How does it work? You're going off-topic from Cake and into the Land of Debugging. Please use Google or your other favourite search engine to find info on how to useXDebugor any other debugging tools. -- Chris Hartjes Internet Loudmouth Motto for 2008: Moving from herding elephants to handling snakes... @TheKeyBoard:http://www.littlehart.net/atthekeyboard --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Strict or Pretty? We're looking for a few good opinions
I think the strategic benefit of remaining compliant outweighs a cheap high of looking pretty. the people who live and breath the PHP core code have a good idea about where things are going and they are trying to signal to us how to do things properly so that they match where they are going and don't break with future versions. Well said. Better to work with the system than try to be mavericks. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Strict or Pretty? We're looking for a few good opinions
I think the strategic benefit of remaining compliant outweighs the quick high of looking pretty. the people who live and breath the PHP core code have a good idea about where things are going and they are trying to signal to us how to do things properly. Well said. being strict means being enterprise ready. For the average developer this is not a problem, but for larger companies looking to adopt Cake this is a valid concern. Agreed. Better to work with the system. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Misconfigured CSS Directory
In the end it was the absence of .htaccess files. Those files don't even show up in UNIX when 'ls dir' is called, so I panicked a little. This blog post turned out to be my saviour, and I recommend it to all who have similar problems: http://www.ninjavspenguin.com/blog/2007/01/21/cakephp-install-multiple-subdirectories-500-error/ On Jun 5, 3:15 am, Grant Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: /css/cake.generic.css is correct - you should never see the webroot in the url If mod_rewrite is enabled, are you sure you haven't removed any .htaccessfiles? If mod rewrite is disabled, are you sure you haven't removed any index.php files? if you have /var/www/html/cake/app/webroot then there should also be /var/www/html/cake/.htaccess /var/www/html/cake/app/.htaccess /var/www/html/cake/app/webroot/.htaccess plus index.php files in each of those locations too. On Jun 5, 7:17 am, spamguy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am running Cake 1.2 and just got my first test app running. By 'test app,' I mean basically the factory web page with a line or two of PHP to make sure everything's wired. If I visithttp://localhost/appname, I get /webroot without CSS styling. Studying the source makes the reason obvious: CakePHP seems to be looking for CSS in the wrong place. It accesses appname/css/cake.generic.css (which doesn't exist) instead of appname/webroot/css/cake.generic.css. I've already seen the same topic athttp://groups.google.com/group/cake-php/browse_thread/thread/b80f8013... , but none of the advice seems to apply. mod_rewrite is turned on, httpd.conf should be configured properly. Any other thoughts? Thanks. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: dynamic variable names?
merci
but how do I declare these as global variables?
I tried:
global ${$y.'_'.$i};
but I got a Parse error: syntax error, unexpected ','
On 7 Jun., 23:09, HappyNoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 7, 9:54 pm, Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi guys,
first post :)
my question: is it possible to have dynamic variable names, I mean
something like this:
for($i=0;$ix;$i++){
$y_$i = blabla;
}
in other words I want the number of the loop to be displayer in the
name of the variable.
Thanks for help.
Hi,
You can test this syntax :
$y = 'test';
for($i=0; $i 3; $i++)
{
${$y.'_'.$i} = 'blabla';
}
echo $test_0;
it should echo : blabla
voila :)
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
CakePHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: dynamic variable names?
Dave wrote On 06/08/2008 01:47 AM:
On 7 Jun., 23:09, HappyNoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 7, 9:54 pm, Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi guys,
first post :)
my question: is it possible to have dynamic variable names, I mean
something like this:
for($i=0;$ix;$i++){
$y_$i = blabla;
}
in other words I want the number of the loop to be displayer in the
name of the variable.
Thanks for help.
Hi,
You can test this syntax :
$y = 'test';
for($i=0; $i 3; $i++)
{
${$y.'_'.$i} = 'blabla';
}
echo $test_0;
it should echo : blabla
voila :)
merci
but how do I declare these as global variables?
I tried:
global ${$y.'_'.$i};
but I got a Parse error: syntax error, unexpected ',
It depends on context... where do u want to declare this variables ? and
where do you want to use it ?
Understand that when you type : ${$y.'_'.$i}
It's just a replacement.
If $y = 'test' and $i = '0', it's exactly like if you had
${'test'.'_'.'0'}, or ${'test_0'} or $test_0...
Is your 'global' call in a function that needs previously declared
variables ?
To help you, I need to understand what you wanna do and what you need ;)
--
Simon COURTOIS
{EPITECH.} tek4 | (LINAGORA) Developer | [ADITAM] Project Manager
10, rue Brillat-Savarin 75013 Paris | 01 45 42 72 30 - 06 72 44 67 81
http://www.happynoff.fr
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
CakePHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
new not equals syntax
i moved from cake 1.2.6 beta to 1.2.7 rc1. I am trying to do a query Not Equals, but does not work anymore. What is it replaced by? --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: new not equals syntax
On Jun 7, 2008, at 6:22 PM, . wrote: i moved from cake 1.2.6 beta to 1.2.7 rc1. I am trying to do a query Not Equals, but does not work anymore. What is it replaced by? It was mentioned in the release announcment: rather than: 'field' = 'operator value' it is: 'field operator' = 'value' My guess is you're still trying the latter (count = 4) when you should use the new syntax (count = 4); -- John --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: new not equals syntax
Ok that's right. thanks On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 5:26 PM, John David Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Jun 7, 2008, at 6:22 PM, . wrote: i moved from cake 1.2.6 beta to 1.2.7 rc1. I am trying to do a query Not Equals, but does not work anymore. What is it replaced by? It was mentioned in the release announcment: rather than: 'field' = 'operator value' it is: 'field operator' = 'value' My guess is you're still trying the latter (count = 4) when you should use the new syntax (count = 4); -- John --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: dynamic variable names?
ok I got this array from the facebook API:
[affiliations]=
array(2) {
[0]=
array(5) {
[nid]=
string(8) 16779497
[name]=
string(11) RWTH Aachen
[type]=
string(7) college
[status]=
string(9) Undergrad
[year]=
string(1) 0
}
[1]=
array(5) {
[nid]=
string(8) 67109293
[name]=
string(10) Luxembourg
[type]=
string(6) region
[status]=
string(0)
[year]=
string(1) 0
}
}
now i wrote a function split_vars() that should write the value of
nid, name, type, status and year into one variable. since there are
more than one arrays (2 in this case) it would be good if i could have
the number of the array in the name of the variable so that
$affiliations_1_name should echo Luxembourg.
I wrote this:
function split_vars(){
//This is just a part of the function, $user_info is the big array
where all the user_info data is
global $user_info, $affiliations, ${'affiliations_'.$i.'_nid'}, $
{'affiliations_'.$i.'_name'}, ${'affiliations_'.$i.'_type'}, $
{'affiliations_'.$i.'_status'}, ${'affiliations_'.$i.'_year'};
for($i=0;$icount($user_info[0]['affiliations']);$i++){
$affiliations = $user_info[0]['affiliations'][$i];
${'affiliations_'.$i.'_nid'} = $affiliations['nid'];
${'affiliations_'.$i.'_name'} = $affiliations['name'];
${'affiliations_'.$i.'_type'} = $affiliations['type'];
${'affiliations_'.$i.'_status'} =
$affiliations['status'];
${'affiliations_'.$i.'_year'} = $affiliations['year'];
}
}
and outside of the variable I need to echo all these variable
variables.
But I get a Parse error: syntax error, unexpected ',' in line where
globals are declared.
On 8 Jun., 02:10, Simon COURTOIS [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dave wrote On 06/08/2008 01:47 AM:
On 7 Jun., 23:09, HappyNoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 7, 9:54 pm, Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi guys,
first post :)
my question: is it possible to have dynamic variable names, I mean
something like this:
for($i=0;$ix;$i++){
$y_$i = blabla;
}
in other words I want the number of the loop to be displayer in the
name of the variable.
Thanks for help.
Hi,
You can test this syntax :
$y = 'test';
for($i=0; $i 3; $i++)
{
${$y.'_'.$i} = 'blabla';
}
echo $test_0;
it should echo : blabla
voila :)
merci
but how do I declare these as global variables?
I tried:
global ${$y.'_'.$i};
but I got a Parse error: syntax error, unexpected ',
It depends on context... where do u want to declare this variables ? and
where do you want to use it ?
Understand that when you type : ${$y.'_'.$i}
It's just a replacement.
If $y = 'test' and $i = '0', it's exactly like if you had
${'test'.'_'.'0'}, or ${'test_0'} or $test_0...
Is your 'global' call in a function that needs previously declared
variables ?
To help you, I need to understand what you wanna do and what you need ;)
--
Simon COURTOIS
{EPITECH.} tek4 | (LINAGORA) Developer | [ADITAM] Project Manager
10, rue Brillat-Savarin 75013 Paris | 01 45 42 72 30 - 06 72 44 67
81http://www.happynoff.fr
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
CakePHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: dynamic variable names?
Maybe you should just stick with an array and dynamic keys.
On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 7:47 PM, Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
merci
but how do I declare these as global variables?
I tried:
global ${$y.'_'.$i};
but I got a Parse error: syntax error, unexpected ','
On 7 Jun., 23:09, HappyNoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 7, 9:54 pm, Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi guys,
first post :)
my question: is it possible to have dynamic variable names, I mean
something like this:
for($i=0;$ix;$i++){
$y_$i = blabla;
}
in other words I want the number of the loop to be displayer in the
name of the variable.
Thanks for help.
Hi,
You can test this syntax :
$y = 'test';
for($i=0; $i 3; $i++)
{
${$y.'_'.$i} = 'blabla';
}
echo $test_0;
it should echo : blabla
voila :)
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
CakePHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: Strict or Pretty? We're looking for a few good opinions
On Sat, Jun 7, 2008 at 6:26 PM, keymaster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Better to work with the system. convention over configuration --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
paginator options newbie question
I am using cake rc1
In the following link, i am trying to find the list of keys for the
'options' variable, but can't find it. does any one have the link to all of
the available keys?
http://api.cakephp.org/1.2/class_paginator_helper.html#9c836737a166d2cdb2c0f666add5d845
2) I am trying to set up the paginator so that when it reaches the last
page, the Next button will return to the first page.
Something like this:
echo $paginator-next('Next', array(), 'Next', array('page'=1));
Thanks
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
CakePHP group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
controller paginate method
in cake RC1 1.2, what are the options available for the controller method $this-paginate(model, options, ? ? ? ) thanks --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Re: What is the best Image Upload / Thumbnail package for CakePHP?
here is my file image upload behaviour based on the code of iamkoa labs: http://bin.cakephp.org/saved/33249 On 7 Jun., 04:04, Dardo Sordi Bogado [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: AD7six upload behavior is the best tool thast you will find for this. Totally agree with Martin! Thanks AD7six for sharing this gem. Regards, Dardo Sordi. --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups CakePHP group. To post to this group, send email to cake-php@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
