Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] (no subject)

[Ryan Schwab]

Hi Jean,

Yes, the RTMT is definitely what you need.


-Original Message-
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Jean M.
Thewissen
Sent: March-18-10 10:07 PM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] (no subject)

Anyone can point me to the best way to monitor unity connection ports?  
I need to see info like dnis, rdnis and the like when a call comes in.
Is RTMT the right tool for this?

Thx!


___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
visit www.ipexpert.com

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] (no subject)

[Jean M. Thewissen]

Anyone can point me to the best way to monitor unity connection ports?  
I need to see info like dnis, rdnis and the like when a call comes in.
Is RTMT the right tool for this?

Thx!


___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Buy Your CCIE With 360 Program

[Jim Van Kirk]

Agreed!! Move along folks, nothing to see here. Moving on

Thanks,
Jim

On Mar 18, 2010, at 3:27 PM, James Key  wrote:

> Well said Tanner.
>
>
> James Key
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice- 
> boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Tanner Ezell
> Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 12:27 AM
> To: Kevin Damisch
> Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com; David Lee
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Buy Your CCIE With 360 Program
>
> I find it interesting people constantly bring up 'fair' or 'cheating'
> when referring to this change. Why? Do you not have the same
> opportunity to go take the 360 program and get this waiver, and
> possibly the "additional" 30 minutes?
>
> As the saying goes, All is fair in love and war. And this is war, for
> your business. Cisco has found and presented you with an advantage
> that was not possible before, whether you choose to take it is
> entirely up to you.
>
> You now have three choices when there previously was two:
>
> 1) Take the Cisco 360 Program, be acknowledged by the instructor that
> you fulfill core knowledge requirements (I find this part iffy
> personally), be waived from the OEQs and have that additional time.
> 2) Go with your preferred training partner (I kinda like IPX..) and do
> the OEQs as you had already committed to doing. [And for new BLS
> customers get lots of rack time.. (really, couldn't throw us loyal
> folks a bone?)]
> 3) Don't take the CCIE and move on with your life.
>
> As I see it, option 2 is still the best. Option 3 if you wish to
> maintain your drinking habit..
>
> Anywho, essentially this changes NOTHING to anyone who never had any
> intention of doing the 360 program. Will it bring more people to the
> program? Probably. But if your sole reason for doing 360 is to waive
> the OEQs then you have other issues to worry about (such as learning
> the technology).
>
> As I see it, if you are confident in your abilities and you properly
> prepare yourself, you will not fail and this entire argument will
> still be moot. But those who fail, and fail as a result of the OEQs
> will complain to no end. They [OEQs] serve their purpose, I am
> thankful they are in place, and I am not concerned about this waiver.
>
> As I said before, each coin has two sides. Your opinion of the other
> side is directly influenced by the side you presently observe.
>
> Cheers :)
>
> (Apologizes for any incoherentness as displayed, it's late and I am
> rather exhausted :)
>
> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 11:47 PM, Kevin Damisch
>  wrote:
>> I know that the OEQs should typically be done within 10 minutes or  
>> so (unless you get some weird obscure questions), but since we are  
>> technically allowed 30 minutes for the OEQs and the remaining 7.5  
>> hours for the lab itself, shouldn't the waived 360 students be  
>> given less time on the lab if they don't have to do that part?   
>> Time is a precious commodity when taking the lab and I don't think  
>> it is fair that they should have more time on the lab just because  
>> they took a certain course.  I will take every possible minute I  
>> can get.  Plus, if you know for sure or have a suspicion that you  
>> missed 2 OEQs, then the rest of the day has a dark cloud over it  
>> while you are taking the lab because you know that you cannot pass  
>> with 2 wrong OEQs.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Kevin
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice- 
>> boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of CCIETalk.com
>> Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2010 11:25 PM
>> To: Jeff Garvas; David Lee; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
>> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Buy Your CCIE With 360 Program
>>
>> Agreed! What a waste of email bw talking about this.
>>
>> On 3/16/10, Jeff Garvas  wrote:
>>> We commonly perceive the OEQs to be a "cheat" gate.  Cisco is  
>>> saying if
>>> you've taken their course you're obviously not "cheating" because  
>>> you took
>>> officially approved training.  Just look at the number of people  
>>> who have
>>> passed the CCIE as written using ipexpert materials -- its entirely
>>> possible.
>>>
>>> It rewards those businesses who bought into Cisco's 360 program  
>>> while other
>>> vendors refused.   I fully understand it and I have to agree with  
>>> Tanner,
>>> and yet I see no reason not to continue on the path of using IPX.
>>>
>>> When I got into this I accepted the OEQs as part of the  
>>> challenge.  Just
>>> because other vendors could get me out of that doesn't mean I'm  
>>> not going to
>>> consider continuing on my path.  Everyone here who has written a  
>>> post-test
>>> recap indicates that if you know your material the OEQs are not a  
>>> hurdle to
>>> success.
>>>
>>> It would be nice if ipexpert could negotiate waivers by proving  
>>> that their
>>> course material meets or exceeds Cisco's standards, but I believe  
>>> Cisco
>>> won't do that due to the unique relationship they crea

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab 7 Question 3- DISA Dialling

[Omotayo]

Hello,

Am sure the conference resource on the br2 router is reachable because i
tested the Join Across Line feature on Br2 phone and the conference resource
was invoked

I do not know why the Barge is not working

BR2-RTR#sh sccp connections
sess_idconn_idstype mode codec   ripaddr rport sport
33555434   33554486 conf  sendrecv g729192.168.3.1225860 18686
33555434   33554484 conf  sendrecv g729192.168.3.1420442 18788
33555434   33554482 conf  sendrecv g711u   192.168.3.1618172 17154

On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 12:34 AM, Omotayo  wrote:

> Hello,
>
> i set the in built bridge to On on the hq phone 2( phone that is barged
> into). i get the Entance party tone and a message "you are not a valid
> conference partipant"
>
> i tried again i got the entrance party tone and message No Conference
> bridge
>
>   On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 11:02 AM, Omotayo wrote:
>
>> No
>>
>> I only change the Single button barge to CBarge
>>
>>   On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 9:49 PM, Radhesh Naik wrote:
>>
>>>   Is you built in bridge in phone configuration set to on by any chance
>>> ? even if its set to default try changing it to off.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -Radhesh
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:
>>> ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] *On Behalf Of *Omotayo
>>>
>>> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 17, 2010 8:21 PM
>>> *To:* Peter Slow
>>> *Cc:* OSL Group
>>> *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab 7 Question 3- DISA Dialling
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> yes i applied the mgl to the br2 device pool
>>>
>>> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 9:20 PM, Peter Slow 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> do you mean device pool or MRGL? No CFB means CUCM couldnt select a
>>> CFB from the MRGL it was using for selection.
>>>
>>> -Peter
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 10:46 AM, Omotayo 
>>> wrote:
>>> > Hello,
>>> > i meant to say i put all the software conference brige in a device pool
>>> that
>>> > is not assigned to any user
>>> > thanks
>>> >
>>> > On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 9:09 AM, Omotayo 
>>> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> Hello All,
>>> >> Worked on Lab 7 question 3 - DISA daling. i had two issues with this
>>> >> section while working on it;
>>> >>
>>> >> Q3.3. i configured conference resources on the br2 gateway and applied
>>> to
>>> >> the BR2 Device pool. While the phone is "In Remote Use" . Also applied
>>> >> CBarge on the BR2 phones.
>>> >>
>>> >> On pressing the red button, i get a reorder tone on both Br2 phone and
>>> the
>>> >> Hq phone
>>> >>
>>> >> After this i put all the Hardware conference brige in a device pool
>>> that
>>> >> is not assigned to any user, this time, when i press the red button, i
>>> get
>>> >> "No Conference Bridge"
>>> >>
>>> >> Anyone with an idea what the issue is because i have the software
>>> >> conference bridge registered on the UCM
>>> >>
>>> >> Also i want to know why i can not apply 07976852817 as the remote
>>> >> destination profile with partial match set at the servie parameter. i
>>> did
>>> >> and the br2 phone did not blink when calling HQ or BR1 phone.
>>> >> it was when i added the +447976852817 that it worked
>>> >>
>>> >> Thanks for the anticipated response
>>> >>
>>> >
>>>
>>> > ___
>>> > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
>>> please
>>> > visit www.ipexpert.com
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab 7 Question 3- DISA Dialling

[Omotayo]

Hello,

i set the in built bridge to On on the hq phone 2( phone that is barged
into). i get the Entance party tone and a message "you are not a valid
conference partipant"

i tried again i got the entrance party tone and message No Conference bridge

On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 11:02 AM, Omotayo  wrote:

> No
>
> I only change the Single button barge to CBarge
>
>   On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 9:49 PM, Radhesh Naik wrote:
>
>>   Is you built in bridge in phone configuration set to on by any chance ?
>> even if its set to default try changing it to off.
>>
>>
>>
>> -Radhesh
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:
>> ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] *On Behalf Of *Omotayo
>>
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 17, 2010 8:21 PM
>> *To:* Peter Slow
>> *Cc:* OSL Group
>> *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab 7 Question 3- DISA Dialling
>>
>>
>>
>> yes i applied the mgl to the br2 device pool
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 9:20 PM, Peter Slow  wrote:
>>
>> do you mean device pool or MRGL? No CFB means CUCM couldnt select a
>> CFB from the MRGL it was using for selection.
>>
>> -Peter
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 10:46 AM, Omotayo  wrote:
>> > Hello,
>> > i meant to say i put all the software conference brige in a device pool
>> that
>> > is not assigned to any user
>> > thanks
>> >
>> > On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 9:09 AM, Omotayo 
>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hello All,
>> >> Worked on Lab 7 question 3 - DISA daling. i had two issues with this
>> >> section while working on it;
>> >>
>> >> Q3.3. i configured conference resources on the br2 gateway and applied
>> to
>> >> the BR2 Device pool. While the phone is "In Remote Use" . Also applied
>> >> CBarge on the BR2 phones.
>> >>
>> >> On pressing the red button, i get a reorder tone on both Br2 phone and
>> the
>> >> Hq phone
>> >>
>> >> After this i put all the Hardware conference brige in a device pool
>> that
>> >> is not assigned to any user, this time, when i press the red button, i
>> get
>> >> "No Conference Bridge"
>> >>
>> >> Anyone with an idea what the issue is because i have the software
>> >> conference bridge registered on the UCM
>> >>
>> >> Also i want to know why i can not apply 07976852817 as the remote
>> >> destination profile with partial match set at the servie parameter. i
>> did
>> >> and the br2 phone did not blink when calling HQ or BR1 phone.
>> >> it was when i added the +447976852817 that it worked
>> >>
>> >> Thanks for the anticipated response
>> >>
>> >
>>
>> > ___
>> > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
>> please
>> > visit www.ipexpert.com
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Buy Your CCIE With 360 Program

[James Key]

Well said Tanner.


James Key

-Original Message-
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Tanner Ezell
Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 12:27 AM
To: Kevin Damisch
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com; David Lee
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Buy Your CCIE With 360 Program

I find it interesting people constantly bring up 'fair' or 'cheating'
when referring to this change. Why? Do you not have the same
opportunity to go take the 360 program and get this waiver, and
possibly the "additional" 30 minutes?

As the saying goes, All is fair in love and war. And this is war, for
your business. Cisco has found and presented you with an advantage
that was not possible before, whether you choose to take it is
entirely up to you.

You now have three choices when there previously was two:

1) Take the Cisco 360 Program, be acknowledged by the instructor that
you fulfill core knowledge requirements (I find this part iffy
personally), be waived from the OEQs and have that additional time.
2) Go with your preferred training partner (I kinda like IPX..) and do
the OEQs as you had already committed to doing. [And for new BLS
customers get lots of rack time.. (really, couldn't throw us loyal
folks a bone?)]
3) Don't take the CCIE and move on with your life.

As I see it, option 2 is still the best. Option 3 if you wish to
maintain your drinking habit..

Anywho, essentially this changes NOTHING to anyone who never had any
intention of doing the 360 program. Will it bring more people to the
program? Probably. But if your sole reason for doing 360 is to waive
the OEQs then you have other issues to worry about (such as learning
the technology).

As I see it, if you are confident in your abilities and you properly
prepare yourself, you will not fail and this entire argument will
still be moot. But those who fail, and fail as a result of the OEQs
will complain to no end. They [OEQs] serve their purpose, I am
thankful they are in place, and I am not concerned about this waiver.

As I said before, each coin has two sides. Your opinion of the other
side is directly influenced by the side you presently observe.

Cheers :)

(Apologizes for any incoherentness as displayed, it's late and I am
rather exhausted :)

On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 11:47 PM, Kevin Damisch
 wrote:
> I know that the OEQs should typically be done within 10 minutes or so (unless 
> you get some weird obscure questions), but since we are technically allowed 
> 30 minutes for the OEQs and the remaining 7.5 hours for the lab itself, 
> shouldn't the waived 360 students be given less time on the lab if they don't 
> have to do that part?  Time is a precious commodity when taking the lab and I 
> don't think it is fair that they should have more time on the lab just 
> because they took a certain course.  I will take every possible minute I can 
> get.  Plus, if you know for sure or have a suspicion that you missed 2 OEQs, 
> then the rest of the day has a dark cloud over it while you are taking the 
> lab because you know that you cannot pass with 2 wrong OEQs.
>
> Thanks,
> Kevin
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
> [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of CCIETalk.com
> Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2010 11:25 PM
> To: Jeff Garvas; David Lee; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Buy Your CCIE With 360 Program
>
> Agreed! What a waste of email bw talking about this.
>
> On 3/16/10, Jeff Garvas  wrote:
>> We commonly perceive the OEQs to be a "cheat" gate.  Cisco is saying if
>> you've taken their course you're obviously not "cheating" because you took
>> officially approved training.  Just look at the number of people who have
>> passed the CCIE as written using ipexpert materials -- its entirely
>> possible.
>>
>> It rewards those businesses who bought into Cisco's 360 program while other
>> vendors refused.   I fully understand it and I have to agree with Tanner,
>> and yet I see no reason not to continue on the path of using IPX.
>>
>> When I got into this I accepted the OEQs as part of the challenge.  Just
>> because other vendors could get me out of that doesn't mean I'm not going to
>> consider continuing on my path.  Everyone here who has written a post-test
>> recap indicates that if you know your material the OEQs are not a hurdle to
>> success.
>>
>> It would be nice if ipexpert could negotiate waivers by proving that their
>> course material meets or exceeds Cisco's standards, but I believe Cisco
>> won't do that due to the unique relationship they created with those vendors
>> who accepted their mandated program.
>>
>> Whose to say there won't be a course the 360 providers can offer that gains
>> you that exemption and doesn't require you to fork out thousands of
>> dollars?What if they offered an eight hour techtorial at Cisco Live that
>> gave you the same exemption?
>>
>> -Jeff
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> 

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] mwi in srst

[Berry, Matthew J.]

Anupam,

Can you please provide more detail?  Take opportunities like this to thoroughly 
explain what you do know, including config examples and outputs from show 
statements.  Your issues could be caused by any number of nuances.

Approach these scenarios as if you were already a CCIE.  Provide detail.  No 
one can help you unless you do your due diligence in sending us usable 
information.

It's a lot like opening a case with Cisco TAC.  If you tell them, "My Cisco is 
broke," they're going to throw your question on the back burner and send you 
canned email responses.  If you give them usable information, they'll go the 
extra mile because you have already learned their respect as someone who knows 
what's going on.

Matthew Berry

From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of anupam TYAGI
Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 12:29 PM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com; ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] mwi in srst

Hi Guys,


My MWI is not working in SRST . what can be the probable reasons ..

Thanks
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] mwi in srst

[anupam TYAGI]

Hi Guys,


My MWI is not working in SRST . what can be the probable reasons ..

Thanks
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] [OSL | CCIE_RS] [OSL | CCIE_Security] Great New Offers from IPexpert

[Omotayo]

Hello,

Just think it wont hurt to have an idea of what is going on
Thanks for the info
Regards

On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 2:49 PM, Marko Milivojevic wrote:

> On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 13:25, Omotayo  wrote:
> > Hello,
> > is this information available online
>
> Not that I know of. Why does it matter, though? You still need to pass
> both sections, nothing changes, really.
>
> --
> Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427
> Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert
>
> YES! We include 400 hours of REAL rack
> time with our Blended Learning Solution!
>
> Mailto: mar...@ipexpert.com
> Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
> Fax: +1.810.454.0130
> Web: http://www.ipexpert.com/
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] unsubscribe

[Gotam Kumar (gokumar)]

unsubscribe

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] [OSL | CCIE_RS] [OSL | CCIE_Security] Great New Offers from IPexpert

[Marko Milivojevic]

On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 13:25, Omotayo  wrote:
> Hello,
> is this information available online

Not that I know of. Why does it matter, though? You still need to pass
both sections, nothing changes, really.

--
Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427
Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert

YES! We include 400 hours of REAL rack
time with our Blended Learning Solution!

Mailto: mar...@ipexpert.com
Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
Fax: +1.810.454.0130
Web: http://www.ipexpert.com/
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] [OSL | CCIE_RS] [OSL | CCIE_Security] Great New Offers from IPexpert

[Omotayo]

Hello,
is this information available online

On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 2:20 PM, Marko Milivojevic wrote:

> On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 11:23, Mike Thompson 
> wrote:
> > ??? When did that change take place?and why?
>
> It changed starting January 4th, if I recall. The way one of the
> proctors explained it to me, they thought the OEQs with 21 points
> carried way too many points, compared to the rest of the lab. They
> simply changed the rule to say "you need to pass both sections",
> instead of treating OEQs as the part of the overall score.
>
> It still doesn't matter - you need 80% of the points in all sections.
> Figuring out what makes 80% is a little bit more dfficult now that
> total score isn't 100.
>
> --
> Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427
> Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert
>
> YES! We include 400 hours of REAL rack
> time with our Blended Learning Solution!
>
> Mailto: mar...@ipexpert.com
> Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
> Fax: +1.810.454.0130
> Web: http://www.ipexpert.com/
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] [OSL | CCIE_RS] [OSL | CCIE_Security] Great New Offers from IPexpert

[Marko Milivojevic]

On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 11:23, Mike Thompson  wrote:
> ??? When did that change take place?and why?

It changed starting January 4th, if I recall. The way one of the
proctors explained it to me, they thought the OEQs with 21 points
carried way too many points, compared to the rest of the lab. They
simply changed the rule to say "you need to pass both sections",
instead of treating OEQs as the part of the overall score.

It still doesn't matter - you need 80% of the points in all sections.
Figuring out what makes 80% is a little bit more dfficult now that
total score isn't 100.

--
Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427
Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert

YES! We include 400 hours of REAL rack
time with our Blended Learning Solution!

Mailto: mar...@ipexpert.com
Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
Fax: +1.810.454.0130
Web: http://www.ipexpert.com/
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] GK"s lab released (3rd lab)

[Voicechamp Voice]

>
>
>  Hi,
>
> I have a question for all who has passed CCIE Voice lab.
>
> ** So here is the question Live recording should work once the external
> caller will call and once his call will get connected it should show
> 972123678 number. His calling number is 9721.*
>
> *Now to configure or find the solution it will take atleast min 2 hr for
> expert and 1 day for a normal guy, So if i will consider you as a an expert
> it will eat your 2 hr in the lab and you have to complete your lab in 6
> hrs max to pass the lab, and 2 hr test is required.*
>
> *Ah, There is nothing to hide everyone has the paper or they share it to
> pass the lab. The fact is fact, Cisco wants good money they why have started
> 360 programe in which if you attend for 4000$ you can skip your OEQ (If i am
> not wrong).*
>
> *By the way Gk lab is released i am happy i can practise now and clear in
> my next attempt. *
>
> *Soon i will provide you the more important, Interested parties and mail
> me and i will respond to them.*
> **
> *Best of luck, Now there will be some guys how never can pass come up and
> put some comments but i am ok for the same, CCIE knows the fact. *
> *I and everyone has a respect because you can update from all the
> technology but passing the lab required real questions and with right
> solutions.*
>
> *Best of luck guys.*
>
>
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] RDNIS ISSUE WITH LAB1 HA (10.2)

[Otto Sanchez]

Hi Sean,

Did you make sure the isdn outgoing ie redirecting-number command is present
in the voice serial interface?, how does the br1 debug isdn q931 look like?,
what is getting to the vm?, did you take a look at the rtmt for uc?

Thanks,

On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 9:07 AM, sean hurricane wrote:

>
>
>
>
>> Question: Ensure if nobody within huntgroup is available to answer call,
>> the caller  hears subscriber greeting for br1-phn2
>>
>> Config below:
>>
>> telephony-service
>>  srst mode auto-provision all
>>  srst dn line-mode dual
>>  em logout 0:0 0:0 0:0
>>  max-ephones 2
>>  max-dn 10 preference 8
>>  ip source-address 10.10.201.1 port 2000
>>  time-zone 12
>>  voicemail 5600
>>  max-conferences 8 gain -6
>>  moh music-on-hold.au
>>  multicast moh 239.1.1.1 port 16384 route 10.10.110.2 10.10.201.1
>>  transfer-system full-consult
>>  create cnf-files version-stamp 7960 Mar 14 2010 13:16:05
>>
>> voice hunt-group 1 peer
>>  final 5600
>>  list 1001,1002
>>  timeout 12
>>  pilot 1000
>>
>> dial-peer voice 30 pots
>>  destination-pattern 5600
>>  port 0/2/0:23
>>  forward-digits 11
>>  prefix 1212394
>>
>> RDNIS inbound is checked on HQ gw and RDNIS outbound checked on BR1 gw
>>
>> Alternate extension with dn 1000 is checked in UC for user mailbox 1002
>> and also 6178631000 just in case
>>
>> Caller hears UC opening greeting instead of mailbox 1000 greeting, it
>> works if i use call-manager fallback, but the requirement for hunt-group
>> with not be met if call-manager fallback is used.
>>
>> My question is does telephony-system send RDNIS when configured in srst
>> mode?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 4:41 PM, 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Send CCIE_Voice mailing list submissions to
>>>ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
>>>
>>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>>>http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice
>>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>>>ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com
>>>
>>> You can reach the person managing the list at
>>>ccie_voice-ow...@onlinestudylist.com
>>>
>>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>>> than "Re: Contents of CCIE_Voice digest..."
>>>
>>>
>>> Today's Topics:
>>>
>>>   1. QoS Calculation Value for L2 MLPoFR (Berry, Matthew J.)
>>>   2. Re: Proctorlabs PSTN Router As A GK (CCIETalk.com)
>>>   3. Re: Proctorlabs PSTN Router As A GK (scott carruthers)
>>>   4. Re: Proctorlabs PSTN Router As A GK (CCIETalk.com)
>>>   5. UCM with SIP account Configuration Implementation (Saeed IDris)
>>>   6. Re: SIP Hardware Transcoder (Otto Sanchez)
>>>   7. Re: MVA (Otto Sanchez)
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> Message: 1
>>> Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2010 11:13:49 -0500
>>> From: "Berry, Matthew J." 
>>> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QoS Calculation Value for L2 MLPoFR
>>> To: "CCIE Voice OSL (ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com)"
>>>, Vik Malhi 
>>> Message-ID:
>>><
>>> 0d69df41cdb9bf4bb30c481d414a8be70af63b0...@usepx2pmxmbx04.corp.kroll.com
>>> >
>>>
>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>>>
>>> Working on Vol 1 Lab 10A, Question 10.4
>>>
>>> The Proctor Guide calculates L2 MLPoFR as 9 bytes per packet.  However,
>>> the QoS SRND defines the following on page 1-15:
>>> - PPP = 12 bytes
>>> - MLP = 13 bytes
>>> - FR = 4 bytes
>>> - FR with FRF.12 = 8 bytes
>>>
>>> None of those match up.  Why did IPexpert chose 9 bytes per packet?
>>>
>>> Matthew Berry
>>>
>>> Digital Footprint:
>>> Twitter: ciscovoiceguru
>>> Skype: ciscovoiceguru
>>> 1st Lab Attempt: Aug 16th, 2010
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> Message: 2
>>> Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2010 11:17:56 -0500
>>> From: "CCIETalk.com" 
>>> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Proctorlabs PSTN Router As A GK
>>> To: scott carruthers ,
>>>ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
>>> Message-ID:
>>><1a6434191003140917k411cada1oe2cb1282db365...@mail.gmail.com>
>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>>>
>>> Yes it does esp lab 5c
>>>
>>> On 3/13/10, scott carruthers  wrote:
>>> >
>>> > In some CCIE V2 labs Proctorlabs PSTN router was configured as GK so
>>> that we
>>> > could practice remote zone scenarios.  I have not reviewed all of the
>>> new
>>> > lab IP Expert labs - do any call for sending calls thru our own HQ GK
>>> to a
>>> > remote zone outside of our direct control?  Do any of the Proctorlabs
>>> > pre-configs configure the PSTN router as a GK?
>>> >
>>> > Thanks
>>> > Scott
>>> >
>>> > _
>>> > Hotmail has tools for the New Busy. Search, chat and e-mail from your
>>> inbox.
>>> >
>>> http://www.windowslive.com/campaign/thenewbusy?ocid=PID27925::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:WM_HMP:032010_1
>>>
>>> --
>>> Sent from my mobile device
>>>
>>> www.ccietalk.com
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> Message: 3
>>> Date: Sun, 14 Mar

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] GlobalizationAndLocalization Issue

[Otto Sanchez]

Hi Naoufal,

Please stay away from cupc when testing globalization and localization, this
is not supported for this endpoint,

Thanks,

On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 9:37 PM, Kevin Damisch
wrote:

> What version of IP Blue are you using?  A couple of weeks ago, I downloaded
> the new version of IP Blue and was able to get + dialing to work just fine.
>  This was using GNS3 too.  I set the incoming calling party settings to
> prefix +1212 on subscriber calls (for example), and it showed +12123942123
> in the missed calls and was able to dial from there too.  Plus (pun
> intended), I could manually dial +12123942123 within IP Blue and it called
> the PSTN phone.
>
> Kevin
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:
> ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Cristobal Priego
> Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2010 8:53 PM
> To: kerboute kerboute
> Cc: CCIE Voice Maillist
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] GlobalizationAndLocalization Issue
>
> Correct me if im wrong but Those phones doesn't support + dialing. I
> had the same problem that you had and i replaced the ipc  with a 41
> and ot worked great. You need to try it on a 7941 and it will work.
> Did you add the translation pattern to call back?
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Mar 16, 2010, at 5:47 PM, kerboute kerboute
>  wrote:
>
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > Actually I'm working on LAB5A Vol1, and I have some problems related
> > to
> > globalization and localization.
> > Just for Information, my voice lab using GNS3 routers and vmware for
> > CUCM ..., Phones (IP Blue, xlite and CIPC 7)
> > My problem related to question 5.3, I setup everything for
> > globalization
> > and when i call from PSTN to HQ phone 2 i can see the calling number
> > as
> > +12123942123 type subscriber. After localization configuration i can
> > see
> > the calling number as a local call 3942123 but when i cheked the
> > history
> > (Missed calls) i cannot see the global number as +12123942123, what i
> > see is the local number 3942123.
> >
> > Any Ideas??
> >
> > I have another question; Is Cisco IP Communicator support + dialing?
> > (i
> > tested but not working I've got reorder)
> >
> >
> > Regards
> > Naoufal
> > ___
> > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,
> > please visit www.ipexpert.com
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
> This communication (including any attachments) is intended only for the use
> of the individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain
> information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure
> under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, any
> dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly
> prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify
> Vital Support Systems at 515 334 5700 and delete or destroy all copies and
> the original document.
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>



-- 
Regards,

Otto Sanchez
CCIE #25592 (Voice)
Support Engineer - IPexpert, Inc.
URL: http://www.IPexpert.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QoS SRND - Page 105

[Otto Sanchez]

Correct Mike,

The audio stream between phones is not maintained when the holder phone
press the hold softkey, in that moment an audio stream is sent from the
holdee moh server to the holdee itself, when the resume sofkey is pressed,
the audio stream is reestablished between the two original endpoints,

On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 6:51 AM, Mike Thompson wrote:

> Damn good question!!   My thought is that the call on hold will be
> 'termiated' at the call control and not to the phone.
>
> So while a call is on hold, the bandwidth will be near 0 to the phone.
>
>
>
> Sent from my phone, apologies for any typos.
>
> On Mar 18, 2010, at 6:17 AM, "Berry, Matthew J." 
> wrote:
>
> Pulling from the QoS SRND, the following configuration is only supposed to
> allow the bandwidth for one voice call per switchport VLAN.  Obviously,
> based on the 128k, we're focused on G.711 calls (so my next question will
> not apply to G.729).
>
> I want to know if the following command would disable the ability to have
> multiple calls (different lines) on the same phone.  For example: Phone A
> (with the policing command below) calls Phone B.  At this point, 128k of
> G.711 bandwidth is consumed.  If Phone A puts Phone B on hold and calls
> Phone C, would the call no go through due to policing?
>
>  CAT2970(config-cmap)#policy-map IPPHONE+PC-BASIC
> CAT2970(config-pmap)#class VVLAN-VOICE
> CAT2970(config-pmap-c)# set ip dscp 46 ! DSCP EF (Voice)
> CAT2970(config-pmap-c)# police 128000 8000 exceed-action drop
>
> I guess what I am asking is what happens to the initial call when it is
> placed on hold?  Is the audio stream maintained between phones (128k),
> thereby eliminating the ability to place another call?
>
> Matthew Berry
>
> Digital Footprint:
> Twitter: ciscovoiceguru
> Skype: ciscovoiceguru
> 1st Lab Attempt: Aug 16th, 2010
>
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
>
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
>


-- 
Regards,

Otto Sanchez
CCIE #25592 (Voice)
Support Engineer - IPexpert, Inc.
URL: http://www.IPexpert.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Need Clarification: mls qos map cos-dscp

[Otto Sanchez]

Hello Matthew, Mike,

The Cisco recommendation for marking signaling traffic has changed from dscp
26 to dscp 24 for call signalling in a production network, so I would do
that consistently over the network, however in the lab, you should do
exactly what they are asking you to, so should they ask you to apply best
marking recommendations from the access layer you know what to do, otherwise
just ask the proctor.

More information at:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/srnd/7x/netstruc.html#wp1044051

Please let me know if that answer your question,

Thanks,



On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 6:57 AM, Mike Thompson wrote:

> This has been a topic of conversation at work between a few of us, so I'm
> interested in the feedback.
>
>
> Sent from my phone, apologies for any typos.
>
> On Mar 18, 2010, at 5:55 AM, "Berry, Matthew J." 
> wrote:
>
> The QoS SRND states that the "auto qos voip" command adds the following
> config to the router:
>
> C2970(config)# mls qos
> C2970(config)# mls qos map cos-dscp 0 8 16 *26* 32 46 48 56
>
> Earlier in the SRND, around page 40, it says that the old marking for audio
> signaling was AF31 (26).  That is the same DSCP marking listed above.
>
> As part of our "best-practice" scenario, should we be changing the command
> to consider audio signaling as CS3 (24)?  The command would need to be
> modified:
>
> C2970(config)# mls qos map cos-dscp 0 8 16 *24 *32 46 48 56
>
> Is this true?  Otto, can you weigh in on this one?
>
> Thanks!
>
>  Matthew Berry
>
> Digital Footprint:
> Twitter: ciscovoiceguru
> Skype: ciscovoiceguru
> 1st Lab Attempt: Aug 16th, 2010
>
> ___
>
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
>
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
>


-- 
Regards,

Otto Sanchez
CCIE #25592 (Voice)
Support Engineer - IPexpert, Inc.
URL: http://www.IPexpert.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 49, Issue 128

[vijay kumar yadav]

gt; >>
> >> Just my 2 cents folks
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> *From:* 
> >> ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:<
> ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com>
> >> ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] *On Behalf Of *Tyson Scott
> >> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 17, 2010 1:46 AM
> >> *To:* 'Nadeem Rafi'; 'Brandon Carroll'
> >> *Cc:* 'CCIE_RS OnlineStudyList'; 'ccie OSL';
> >> ccie...@onlinestudylist.com;
> >> ccie_secur...@onlinestudylist.com
> >> *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] [OSL | CCIE_RS] [OSL | CCIE_Security]
> >> Great New Offers from IPexpert
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> But wait haha.  Thanks Marko.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Tyson Scott - CCIE #13513 R&S, Security, and SP
> >>
> >> Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.
> >>
> >> Mailto: tsc...@ipexpert.com
> >>
> >> Telephone: +1.810.326.1444, ext. 208
> >>
> >> Live Assistance, Please visit: <http://www.ipexpert.com/chat>
> >> www.ipexpert.com/chat
> >>
> >> eFax: +1.810.454.0130
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> IPexpert is a premier provider of Self-Study Workbooks, Video on Demand,
> >> Audio Tools, Online Hardware Rental and Classroom Training for the Cisco
> >> CCIE (R&S, Voice, Security & Service Provider) certification(s) with
> >> training locations throughout the United States, Europe, South Asia and
> >> Australia. Be sure to visit our online communities at
> >> <http://www.ipexpert.com/communities>www.ipexpert.com/communities and
> our
> >> public website at <http://www.ipexpert.com/>www.ipexpert.com
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> *From:* 
> >> ccie_rs-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:<
> ccie_rs-boun...@onlinestudylist.com>
> >> ccie_rs-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] *On Behalf Of *Nadeem Rafi
> >> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 17, 2010 12:53 AM
> >> *To:* Brandon Carroll
> >> *Cc:* CCIE_RS OnlineStudyList; ccie OSL;
> >> ccie_secur...@onlinestudylist.com;
> >> ccie...@onlinestudylist.com
> >> *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] [OSL | CCIE_Security] Great New Offers
> >> from IPexpert
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> a good answer to "purchase your ccie" kind stuff.
> >>
> >> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 7:47 AM, Brandon Carroll <<
> bcarr...@ipexpert.com>
> >> bcarr...@ipexpert.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Really Marko, when you step back and look at it this just reenforces
> >> what we all know: Time on the racks is more valuable than anything
> >> when you are preparing for the CCIE.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >>
> >> Brandon Carroll - CCIE #23837
> >> Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert
> >>
> >> Mailto: bcarr...@ipexpert.com
> >>
> >> Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
> >>
> >> Live Assistance, Please visit: <http://www.ipexpert.com/chat>
> >> www.ipexpert.com/chat
> >> eFax: +1.810.454.0130
> >>
> >> IPexpert is a premier provider of Self-Study Workbooks, Video on
> >> Demand, Audio Tools, Online Hardware Rental and Classroom Training for
> >> the Cisco CCIE (R&S, Voice, Security & Service Provider)
> >> certification(s) with training locations throughout the United States,
> >> Europe, South Asia and Australia. Be sure to visit our online
> >> communities at <http://www.ipexpert.com/communities>
> >> www.ipexpert.com/communities and our public website at
> >>  <http://www.ipexpert.com>www.ipexpert.com
> >>
> >>   On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 9:45 PM, Marko Milivojevic <<
> mar...@ipexpert.com>
> >> mar...@ipexpert.com> wrote:
> >> > On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 04:39, Brandon Carroll <<
> bcarr...@ipexpert.com>
> >> bcarr...@ipexpert.com> wrote:
> >> >> Do you know what 400 hours of rack time cost me when I was a student?
> >> >> Not only from an instructor point of view, but also from a former
> >> >> students point of viewWOW.  Unbelievable!
> >> >
> >> > Yeah. It's a $1400 right there, only in rack time. We're practically
> >> > giving away this deal.
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Marko Milivo

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] [OSL | CCIE_RS] [OSL | CCIE_Security] Great New Offers from IPexpert

[Omotayo]

Hello,

Has this 4 point OEQ been effected

On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 12:23 PM, Mike Thompson wrote:

>  ??? When did that change take place?and why?
>
>
> Sent from my phone, apologies for any typos.
>
> On Mar 18, 2010, at 4:11 AM, Paul Kruger  wrote:
>
>  Hi Mike,
>
> While your logic seems air-tight, I just want to let you guys know that you
> shouldn't count on the OEQ's giving you 21 points anymore. They've changed
> it to 4 points only. At least for the Voice Lab. I can't vouch for the other
> tracks. But! It is still mandatory pass this section to pass the lab. Even
> if it is only 4 points. If you fail this and get full 96 points from the
> lab, you still fail.
>
> Keep that in mind. It's an important bit to know, as it makes the test
> harder. I had my second attempt at the end of Jan, and this was implemented
> already. Third attempt: Aug/Sep.
>
> On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 2:14 AM, Mike Thompson wrote:
>
>>  Everyone keeps talking about the ‘free OEQ’, but they’re forgetting a
>> key thing.  The OEQ is 30 minutes.  There are 4 questions that are, if
>> you’re actually prepared for the exam, elementary questions.  Each of these
>> questions take a few minutes to answer on average.  I mean there isn’t much
>> calculation to ‘what is the TCP port used to control an IP Phone’ (not an
>> actual question I received).  It’s not like they want you to calculate the
>> airspeed of an unlaiden swallow.  In all reality, the 4 OEQ questions take
>> less than 15 minutes and give you a 21 point head start on your exam (and
>> yes, it’s not really a head start, but you get the gist).  More importantly,
>> you get an extra 15 minutes to get that critical 69 or more points to get
>> your number.
>>
>>
>>
>> Would you rather spend 480 minutes getting 100 points (.2083 points per
>> minute)
>>
>> Or
>>
>> 465 minutes getting 89 points (.1914 points per minute).
>>
>>
>>
>> Just my 2 cents folks
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:
>> ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] *On Behalf Of *Tyson Scott
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 17, 2010 1:46 AM
>> *To:* 'Nadeem Rafi'; 'Brandon Carroll'
>> *Cc:* 'CCIE_RS OnlineStudyList'; 'ccie OSL'; ccie...@onlinestudylist.com;
>> ccie_secur...@onlinestudylist.com
>> *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] [OSL | CCIE_RS] [OSL | CCIE_Security]
>> Great New Offers from IPexpert
>>
>>
>>
>> But wait haha.  Thanks Marko.
>>
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>>
>>
>> Tyson Scott - CCIE #13513 R&S, Security, and SP
>>
>> Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.
>>
>> Mailto: tsc...@ipexpert.com
>>
>> Telephone: +1.810.326.1444, ext. 208
>>
>> Live Assistance, Please visit: www.ipexpert.com/chat
>>
>> eFax: +1.810.454.0130
>>
>>
>>
>> IPexpert is a premier provider of Self-Study Workbooks, Video on Demand,
>> Audio Tools, Online Hardware Rental and Classroom Training for the Cisco
>> CCIE (R&S, Voice, Security & Service Provider) certification(s) with
>> training locations throughout the United States, Europe, South Asia and
>> Australia. Be sure to visit our online communities at
>> www.ipexpert.com/communities and our public website at www.ipexpert.com
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* ccie_rs-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:
>> ccie_rs-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] *On Behalf Of *Nadeem Rafi
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 17, 2010 12:53 AM
>> *To:* Brandon Carroll
>> *Cc:* CCIE_RS OnlineStudyList; ccie OSL;
>> ccie_secur...@onlinestudylist.com; ccie...@onlinestudylist.com
>> *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] [OSL | CCIE_Security] Great New Offers
>> from IPexpert
>>
>>
>>
>> a good answer to "purchase your ccie" kind stuff.
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 7:47 AM, Brandon Carroll 
>> wrote:
>>
>> Really Marko, when you step back and look at it this just reenforces
>> what we all know: Time on the racks is more valuable than anything
>> when you are preparing for the CCIE.
>>
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Brandon Carroll - CCIE #23837
>> Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert
>>
>> Mailto: bcarr...@ipexpert.com
>>
>> Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
>>
>> Live Assistance, Please visit: www.ipexpert.com/chat
>> eFax: +1.810.454.0130
>>
>> IPexpert is a premier provider of Self-Study Workbooks, Video on
>> Demand, Audio Tools, Online Hardware Rental and Classroom Training for
>> the Cisco CCIE (R&S, Voice, Security & Service Provider)
>> certification(s) with training locations throughout the United States,
>> Europe, South Asia and Australia. Be sure to visit our online
>> communities at www.ipexpert.com/communities and our public website at
>> www.ipexpert.com
>>
>>  On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 9:45 PM, Marko Milivojevic 
>> wrote:
>> > On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 04:39, Brandon Carroll 
>> wrote:
>> >> Do you know what 400 hours of rack time cost me when I was a student?
>> >> Not only from an instructor point of view, but also from a former
>> >> students point of viewWOW.  Unbelievable!
>> >
>> > Yeah. It's a $1400 right there, only in rack time. We're practically
>> > giving away this deal.
>> >
>> > --

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Great New Offers from IPexpert

[CCIETalk.com]

Everone knew you had to pass OEQs regardless of the points. Which
world are you living in?

On 3/18/10, Paul Kruger  wrote:
> I think about two months ago.
>
> I didn't see ANY announcements on it. I just saw it in my test. And thought
> - cool! Only 4 points. What a bonus - there goes some pressure.
>
> I stuffed up one of my four questions. And well... there was another one I
> which didn't have a clue. So stuffing up that question was a big mistake. It
> was an easy question, and one that I kinda brushed aside and figured - too
> easy.
>
> Only during lunch, I realized that I had answered it wrong! But thought, 4
> points wasted, not too bad. But then during lunch the proctor also told us
> that even though the Core Knowledge section is only worth 4 points, you
> still have to pass it to pass the exam.
>
> It sucked knowing for 5hours that no matter what I'm busy with now, it won't
> change my result. I pushed through just to "practice" speed, and see gotchas
> with the lab.
>
> And there were a couple...
>
> On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 1:23 PM, Mike Thompson
> wrote:
>
>> ??? When did that change take place?and why?
>>
>> Sent from my phone, apologies for any typos.
>>
>> On Mar 18, 2010, at 4:11 AM, Paul Kruger  wrote:
>>
>> Hi Mike,
>>
>> While your logic seems air-tight, I just want to let you guys know that
>> you
>> shouldn't count on the OEQ's giving you 21 points anymore. They've changed
>> it to 4 points only. At least for the Voice Lab. I can't vouch for the
>> other
>> tracks. But! It is still mandatory pass this section to pass the lab. Even
>> if it is only 4 points. If you fail this and get full 96 points from the
>> lab, you still fail.
>>
>> Keep that in mind. It's an important bit to know, as it makes the test
>> harder. I had my second attempt at the end of Jan, and this was
>> implemented
>> already. Third attempt: Aug/Sep.
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 2:14 AM, Mike Thompson < 
>> mthompson...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>  Everyone keeps talking about the ‘free OEQ’, but they’re forgetting a
>>> key thing.  The OEQ is 30 minutes.  There are 4 questions that are, if
>>> you’re actually prepared for the exam, elementary questions.  Each of
>>> these
>>> questions take a few minutes to answer on average.  I mean there isn’t
>>> much
>>> calculation to ‘what is the TCP port used to control an IP Phone’ (not an
>>> actual question I received).  It’s not like they want you to calculate
>>> the
>>> airspeed of an unlaiden swallow.  In all reality, the 4 OEQ questions
>>> take
>>> less than 15 minutes and give you a 21 point head start on your exam (and
>>> yes, it’s not really a head start, but you get the gist).  More
>>> importantly,
>>> you get an extra 15 minutes to get that critical 69 or more points to get
>>> your number.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Would you rather spend 480 minutes getting 100 points (.2083 points per
>>> minute)
>>>
>>> Or
>>>
>>> 465 minutes getting 89 points (.1914 points per minute).
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Just my 2 cents folks
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* 
>>> ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
>>> [mailto:
>>> ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] *On Behalf Of *Tyson Scott
>>> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 17, 2010 1:46 AM
>>> *To:* 'Nadeem Rafi'; 'Brandon Carroll'
>>> *Cc:* 'CCIE_RS OnlineStudyList'; 'ccie OSL';
>>> ccie...@onlinestudylist.com;
>>> ccie_secur...@onlinestudylist.com
>>> *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] [OSL | CCIE_RS] [OSL | CCIE_Security]
>>> Great New Offers from IPexpert
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> But wait haha.  Thanks Marko.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Tyson Scott - CCIE #13513 R&S, Security, and SP
>>>
>>> Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.
>>>
>>> Mailto: tsc...@ipexpert.com
>>>
>>> Telephone: +1.810.326.1444, ext. 208
>>>
>>> Live Assistance, Please visit: 
>>> www.ipexpert.com/chat
>>>
>>> eFax: +1.810.454.0130
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> IPexpert is a premier provider of Self-Study Workbooks, Video on Demand,
>>> Audio Tools, Online Hardware Rental and Classroom Training for the Cisco
>>> CCIE (R&S, Voice, Security & Service Provider) certification(s) with
>>> training locations throughout the United States, Europe, South Asia and
>>> Australia. Be sure to visit our online communities at
>>> www.ipexpert.com/communities and our
>>> public website at www.ipexpert.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* 
>>> ccie_rs-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
>>> [mailto:
>>> ccie_rs-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] *On Behalf Of *Nadeem Rafi
>>> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 17, 2010 12:53 AM
>>> *To:* Brandon Carroll
>>> *Cc:* CCIE_RS OnlineStudyList; ccie OSL;
>>> ccie_secur...@onlinestudylist.com;
>>> ccie...@onlinestudylist.com
>>> *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] [OSL | CCIE_Security] Great New Offers
>>> from IPexpert
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> a good answer to "purchase your ccie" kind stuff.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 7:47 AM, Brandon Carroll <
>>> bcarr...@ipexpert.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Really Marko, when y

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] [OSL | CCIE_RS] [OSL | CCIE_Security] Great New Offers from IPexpert

[Paul Kruger]

I think about two months ago.

I didn't see ANY announcements on it. I just saw it in my test. And thought
- cool! Only 4 points. What a bonus - there goes some pressure.

I stuffed up one of my four questions. And well... there was another one I
which didn't have a clue. So stuffing up that question was a big mistake. It
was an easy question, and one that I kinda brushed aside and figured - too
easy.

Only during lunch, I realized that I had answered it wrong! But thought, 4
points wasted, not too bad. But then during lunch the proctor also told us
that even though the Core Knowledge section is only worth 4 points, you
still have to pass it to pass the exam.

It sucked knowing for 5hours that no matter what I'm busy with now, it won't
change my result. I pushed through just to "practice" speed, and see gotchas
with the lab.

And there were a couple...

On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 1:23 PM, Mike Thompson wrote:

> ??? When did that change take place?and why?
>
> Sent from my phone, apologies for any typos.
>
> On Mar 18, 2010, at 4:11 AM, Paul Kruger  wrote:
>
> Hi Mike,
>
> While your logic seems air-tight, I just want to let you guys know that you
> shouldn't count on the OEQ's giving you 21 points anymore. They've changed
> it to 4 points only. At least for the Voice Lab. I can't vouch for the other
> tracks. But! It is still mandatory pass this section to pass the lab. Even
> if it is only 4 points. If you fail this and get full 96 points from the
> lab, you still fail.
>
> Keep that in mind. It's an important bit to know, as it makes the test
> harder. I had my second attempt at the end of Jan, and this was implemented
> already. Third attempt: Aug/Sep.
>
> On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 2:14 AM, Mike Thompson < 
> mthompson...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>  Everyone keeps talking about the ‘free OEQ’, but they’re forgetting a
>> key thing.  The OEQ is 30 minutes.  There are 4 questions that are, if
>> you’re actually prepared for the exam, elementary questions.  Each of these
>> questions take a few minutes to answer on average.  I mean there isn’t much
>> calculation to ‘what is the TCP port used to control an IP Phone’ (not an
>> actual question I received).  It’s not like they want you to calculate the
>> airspeed of an unlaiden swallow.  In all reality, the 4 OEQ questions take
>> less than 15 minutes and give you a 21 point head start on your exam (and
>> yes, it’s not really a head start, but you get the gist).  More importantly,
>> you get an extra 15 minutes to get that critical 69 or more points to get
>> your number.
>>
>>
>>
>> Would you rather spend 480 minutes getting 100 points (.2083 points per
>> minute)
>>
>> Or
>>
>> 465 minutes getting 89 points (.1914 points per minute).
>>
>>
>>
>> Just my 2 cents folks
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* 
>> ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
>> [mailto:
>> ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] *On Behalf Of *Tyson Scott
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 17, 2010 1:46 AM
>> *To:* 'Nadeem Rafi'; 'Brandon Carroll'
>> *Cc:* 'CCIE_RS OnlineStudyList'; 'ccie OSL';
>> ccie...@onlinestudylist.com;
>> ccie_secur...@onlinestudylist.com
>> *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] [OSL | CCIE_RS] [OSL | CCIE_Security]
>> Great New Offers from IPexpert
>>
>>
>>
>> But wait haha.  Thanks Marko.
>>
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>>
>>
>> Tyson Scott - CCIE #13513 R&S, Security, and SP
>>
>> Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.
>>
>> Mailto: tsc...@ipexpert.com
>>
>> Telephone: +1.810.326.1444, ext. 208
>>
>> Live Assistance, Please visit: 
>> www.ipexpert.com/chat
>>
>> eFax: +1.810.454.0130
>>
>>
>>
>> IPexpert is a premier provider of Self-Study Workbooks, Video on Demand,
>> Audio Tools, Online Hardware Rental and Classroom Training for the Cisco
>> CCIE (R&S, Voice, Security & Service Provider) certification(s) with
>> training locations throughout the United States, Europe, South Asia and
>> Australia. Be sure to visit our online communities at
>> www.ipexpert.com/communities and our
>> public website at www.ipexpert.com
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* 
>> ccie_rs-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
>> [mailto:
>> ccie_rs-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] *On Behalf Of *Nadeem Rafi
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 17, 2010 12:53 AM
>> *To:* Brandon Carroll
>> *Cc:* CCIE_RS OnlineStudyList; ccie OSL;
>> ccie_secur...@onlinestudylist.com;
>> ccie...@onlinestudylist.com
>> *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] [OSL | CCIE_Security] Great New Offers
>> from IPexpert
>>
>>
>>
>> a good answer to "purchase your ccie" kind stuff.
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 7:47 AM, Brandon Carroll <
>> bcarr...@ipexpert.com> wrote:
>>
>> Really Marko, when you step back and look at it this just reenforces
>> what we all know: Time on the racks is more valuable than anything
>> when you are preparing for the CCIE.
>>
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Brandon Carroll - CCIE #23837
>> Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert
>>
>> Mailto: bcarr...@ipexpert.com
>>
>> Telephon

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] (3rd lab)

[Voicechamp Voice]

 Hi,

I have a question for all who has passed CCIE Voice lab.

** So here is the question Live recording should work once the external
caller will call and once his call will get connected it should show
972123678 number. His calling number is 9721.*

*Now to configure or find the solution it will take atleast min 2 hr for
expert and 1 day for a normal guy, So if i will consider you as a an expert
it will eat your 2 hr in the lab and you have to complete your lab in 6
hrs max to pass the lab, and 2 hr test is required.*

*Ah, There is nothing to hide everyone has the paper or they share it to
pass the lab. The fact is fact, Cisco wants good money they why have started
360 programe in which if you attend for 4000$ you can skip your OEQ (If i am
not wrong).*

*By the way Gk lab is released i am happy i can practise now and clear in
my next attempt. *

*Soon i will provide you the more important, Interested parties and mail me
and i will respond to them.*
**
*Best of luck, Now there will be some guys how never can pass come up and
put some comments but i am ok for the same, CCIE knows the fact. *
*I and everyone has a respect because you can update from all the technology
but passing the lab required real questions and with right solutions.*

*Best of luck guys.*
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Fwd: GK"s lab released (3rd lab)

[Voicechamp Voice]

 Hi,

I have a question for all who has passed CCIE Voice lab.

** So here is the question Live recording should work once the external
caller will call and once his call will get connected it should show
972123678 number. His calling number is 9721.*

*Now to configure or find the solution it will take atleast min 2 hr for
expert and 1 day for a normal guy, So if i will consider you as a an expert
it will eat your 2 hr in the lab and you have to complete your lab in 6
hrs max to pass the lab, and 2 hr test is required.*

*Ah, There is nothing to hide everyone has the paper or they share it to
pass the lab. The fact is fact, Cisco wants good money they why have started
360 programe in which if you attend for 4000$ you can skip your OEQ (If i am
not wrong).*

*By the way Gk lab is released i am happy i can practise now and clear in
my next attempt. *

*Soon i will provide you the more important, Interested parties and mail me
and i will respond to them.*
**
*Best of luck, Now there will be some guys how never can pass come up and
put some comments but i am ok for the same, CCIE knows the fact. *
*I and everyone has a respect because you can update from all the technology
but passing the lab required real questions and with right solutions.*

*Best of luck guys.*
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] [OSL | CCIE_RS] [OSL | CCIE_Security] Great New Offers from IPexpert

[Arun Kumar]

yes they changed to 4 points friend of mine done 2 weeks back and had same
input.


On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 4:53 PM, Mike Thompson wrote:

> ??? When did that change take place?and why?
>
> Sent from my phone, apologies for any typos.
>
> On Mar 18, 2010, at 4:11 AM, Paul Kruger  wrote:
>
> Hi Mike,
>
> While your logic seems air-tight, I just want to let you guys know that you
> shouldn't count on the OEQ's giving you 21 points anymore. They've changed
> it to 4 points only. At least for the Voice Lab. I can't vouch for the other
> tracks. But! It is still mandatory pass this section to pass the lab. Even
> if it is only 4 points. If you fail this and get full 96 points from the
> lab, you still fail.
>
> Keep that in mind. It's an important bit to know, as it makes the test
> harder. I had my second attempt at the end of Jan, and this was implemented
> already. Third attempt: Aug/Sep.
>
> On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 2:14 AM, Mike Thompson < 
> mthompson...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>  Everyone keeps talking about the ‘free OEQ’, but they’re forgetting a
>> key thing.  The OEQ is 30 minutes.  There are 4 questions that are, if
>> you’re actually prepared for the exam, elementary questions.  Each of these
>> questions take a few minutes to answer on average.  I mean there isn’t much
>> calculation to ‘what is the TCP port used to control an IP Phone’ (not an
>> actual question I received).  It’s not like they want you to calculate the
>> airspeed of an unlaiden swallow.  In all reality, the 4 OEQ questions take
>> less than 15 minutes and give you a 21 point head start on your exam (and
>> yes, it’s not really a head start, but you get the gist).  More importantly,
>> you get an extra 15 minutes to get that critical 69 or more points to get
>> your number.
>>
>>
>>
>> Would you rather spend 480 minutes getting 100 points (.2083 points per
>> minute)
>>
>> Or
>>
>> 465 minutes getting 89 points (.1914 points per minute).
>>
>>
>>
>> Just my 2 cents folks
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* 
>> ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
>> [mailto:
>> ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] *On Behalf Of *Tyson Scott
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 17, 2010 1:46 AM
>> *To:* 'Nadeem Rafi'; 'Brandon Carroll'
>> *Cc:* 'CCIE_RS OnlineStudyList'; 'ccie OSL';
>> ccie...@onlinestudylist.com;
>> ccie_secur...@onlinestudylist.com
>> *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] [OSL | CCIE_RS] [OSL | CCIE_Security]
>> Great New Offers from IPexpert
>>
>>
>>
>> But wait haha.  Thanks Marko.
>>
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>>
>>
>> Tyson Scott - CCIE #13513 R&S, Security, and SP
>>
>> Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.
>>
>> Mailto: tsc...@ipexpert.com
>>
>> Telephone: +1.810.326.1444, ext. 208
>>
>> Live Assistance, Please visit: 
>> www.ipexpert.com/chat
>>
>> eFax: +1.810.454.0130
>>
>>
>>
>> IPexpert is a premier provider of Self-Study Workbooks, Video on Demand,
>> Audio Tools, Online Hardware Rental and Classroom Training for the Cisco
>> CCIE (R&S, Voice, Security & Service Provider) certification(s) with
>> training locations throughout the United States, Europe, South Asia and
>> Australia. Be sure to visit our online communities at
>> www.ipexpert.com/communities and our
>> public website at www.ipexpert.com
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* 
>> ccie_rs-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
>> [mailto:
>> ccie_rs-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] *On Behalf Of *Nadeem Rafi
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 17, 2010 12:53 AM
>> *To:* Brandon Carroll
>> *Cc:* CCIE_RS OnlineStudyList; ccie OSL;
>> ccie_secur...@onlinestudylist.com;
>> ccie...@onlinestudylist.com
>> *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] [OSL | CCIE_Security] Great New Offers
>> from IPexpert
>>
>>
>>
>> a good answer to "purchase your ccie" kind stuff.
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 7:47 AM, Brandon Carroll <
>> bcarr...@ipexpert.com> wrote:
>>
>> Really Marko, when you step back and look at it this just reenforces
>> what we all know: Time on the racks is more valuable than anything
>> when you are preparing for the CCIE.
>>
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Brandon Carroll - CCIE #23837
>> Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert
>>
>> Mailto: bcarr...@ipexpert.com
>>
>> Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
>>
>> Live Assistance, Please visit: 
>> www.ipexpert.com/chat
>> eFax: +1.810.454.0130
>>
>> IPexpert is a premier provider of Self-Study Workbooks, Video on
>> Demand, Audio Tools, Online Hardware Rental and Classroom Training for
>> the Cisco CCIE (R&S, Voice, Security & Service Provider)
>> certification(s) with training locations throughout the United States,
>> Europe, South Asia and Australia. Be sure to visit our online
>> communities at 
>> www.ipexpert.com/communities and our public website at
>>  www.ipexpert.com
>>
>>   On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 9:45 PM, Marko Milivojevic <
>> mar...@ipexpert.com> wrote:
>> > On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 04:39, Brandon Carroll <

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Need Clarification: mls qos map cos-dscp

[Mike Thompson]

This has been a topic of conversation at work between a few of us, so  
I'm interested in the feedback.


Sent from my phone, apologies for any typos.

On Mar 18, 2010, at 5:55 AM, "Berry, Matthew J." > wrote:


The QoS SRND states that the "auto qos voip" command adds the  
following config to the router:


C2970(config)# mls qos
C2970(config)# mls qos map cos-dscp 0 8 16 26 32 46 48 56

Earlier in the SRND, around page 40, it says that the old marking  
for audio signaling was AF31 (26).  That is the same DSCP marking  
listed above.


As part of our "best-practice" scenario, should we be changing the  
command to consider audio signaling as CS3 (24)?  The command would  
need to be modified:


C2970(config)# mls qos map cos-dscp 0 8 16 24 32 46 48 56

Is this true?  Otto, can you weigh in on this one?

Thanks!

Matthew Berry

Digital Footprint:
Twitter: ciscovoiceguru
Skype: ciscovoiceguru
1st Lab Attempt: Aug 16th, 2010
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,  
please visit www.ipexpert.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] [OSL | CCIE_RS] [OSL | CCIE_Security] Great New Offers from IPexpert

[Mike Thompson]

??? When did that change take place?and why?

Sent from my phone, apologies for any typos.

On Mar 18, 2010, at 4:11 AM, Paul Kruger  wrote:


Hi Mike,

While your logic seems air-tight, I just want to let you guys know  
that you shouldn't count on the OEQ's giving you 21 points anymore.  
They've changed it to 4 points only. At least for the Voice Lab. I  
can't vouch for the other tracks. But! It is still mandatory pass  
this section to pass the lab. Even if it is only 4 points. If you  
fail this and get full 96 points from the lab, you still fail.


Keep that in mind. It's an important bit to know, as it makes the  
test harder. I had my second attempt at the end of Jan, and this was  
implemented already. Third attempt: Aug/Sep.


On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 2:14 AM, Mike Thompson  
 wrote:
Everyone keeps talking about the ‘free OEQ’, but they’re  
forgetting a key thing.  The OEQ is 30 minutes.  There are 4 questio 
ns that are, if you’re actually prepared for the exam, elementary qu 
estions.  Each of these questions take a few minutes to answer on av 
erage.  I mean there isn’t much calculation to ‘what is the TCP  
port used to control an IP Phone’ (not an actual question I received 
).  It’s not like they want you to calculate the airspeed of an unla 
iden swallow.  In all reality, the 4 OEQ questions take less than 15 
 minutes and give you a 21 point head start on your exam (and yes, i 
t’s not really a head start, but you get the gist).  More importantl 
y, you get an extra 15 minutes to get that critical 69 or more point 
s to get your number.




Would you rather spend 480 minutes getting 100 points (.2083 points  
per minute)


Or

465 minutes getting 89 points (.1914 points per minute).



Just my 2 cents folks



From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice- 
boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Tyson Scott

Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2010 1:46 AM
To: 'Nadeem Rafi'; 'Brandon Carroll'
Cc: 'CCIE_RS OnlineStudyList'; 'ccie OSL';  
ccie...@onlinestudylist.com; ccie_secur...@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] [OSL | CCIE_RS] [OSL |  
CCIE_Security] Great New Offers from IPexpert




But wait haha.  Thanks Marko.



Regards,



Tyson Scott - CCIE #13513 R&S, Security, and SP

Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.

Mailto: tsc...@ipexpert.com

Telephone: +1.810.326.1444, ext. 208

Live Assistance, Please visit: www.ipexpert.com/chat

eFax: +1.810.454.0130



IPexpert is a premier provider of Self-Study Workbooks, Video on  
Demand, Audio Tools, Online Hardware Rental and Classroom Training  
for the Cisco CCIE (R&S, Voice, Security & Service Provider)  
certification(s) with training locations throughout the United  
States, Europe, South Asia and Australia. Be sure to visit our  
online communities at www.ipexpert.com/communities and our public  
website at www.ipexpert.com




From: ccie_rs-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_rs- 
boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Nadeem Rafi

Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2010 12:53 AM
To: Brandon Carroll
Cc: CCIE_RS OnlineStudyList; ccie OSL; ccie_secur...@onlinestudylist.com 
; ccie...@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] [OSL | CCIE_Security] Great New Offers  
from IPexpert




a good answer to "purchase your ccie" kind stuff.

On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 7:47 AM, Brandon Carroll > wrote:


Really Marko, when you step back and look at it this just reenforces
what we all know: Time on the racks is more valuable than anything
when you are preparing for the CCIE.



Regards,

Brandon Carroll - CCIE #23837
Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert

Mailto: bcarr...@ipexpert.com

Telephone: +1.810.326.1444

Live Assistance, Please visit: www.ipexpert.com/chat
eFax: +1.810.454.0130

IPexpert is a premier provider of Self-Study Workbooks, Video on
Demand, Audio Tools, Online Hardware Rental and Classroom Training for
the Cisco CCIE (R&S, Voice, Security & Service Provider)
certification(s) with training locations throughout the United States,
Europe, South Asia and Australia. Be sure to visit our online
communities at www.ipexpert.com/communities and our public website at
www.ipexpert.com

On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 9:45 PM, Marko Milivojevic > wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 04:39, Brandon Carroll > wrote:
>> Do you know what 400 hours of rack time cost me when I was a  
student?

>> Not only from an instructor point of view, but also from a former
>> students point of viewWOW.  Unbelievable!
>
> Yeah. It's a $1400 right there, only in rack time. We're practically
> giving away this deal.
>
> --
> Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427
> Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert
>
> YES! We include 400 hours of REAL rack
> time with our Blended Learning Solution!
>
> Mailto: mar...@ipexpert.com
> Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
> Fax: +1.810.454.0130
> Web: http://www.ipexpert.com/
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,  
please visit www.

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QoS SRND - Page 105

[Mike Thompson]

Damn good question!!   My thought is that the call on hold will be  
'termiated' at the call control and not to the phone.


So while a call is on hold, the bandwidth will be near 0 to the phone.



Sent from my phone, apologies for any typos.

On Mar 18, 2010, at 6:17 AM, "Berry, Matthew J." > wrote:


Pulling from the QoS SRND, the following configuration is only  
supposed to allow the bandwidth for one voice call per switchport  
VLAN.  Obviously, based on the 128k, we're focused on G.711 calls  
(so my next question will not apply to G.729).


I want to know if the following command would disable the ability to  
have multiple calls (different lines) on the same phone.  For  
example: Phone A (with the policing command below) calls Phone B.   
At this point, 128k of G.711 bandwidth is consumed.  If Phone A puts  
Phone B on hold and calls Phone C, would the call no go through due  
to policing?


CAT2970(config-cmap)#policy-map IPPHONE+PC-BASIC
CAT2970(config-pmap)#class VVLAN-VOICE
CAT2970(config-pmap-c)# set ip dscp 46 ! DSCP EF (Voice)
CAT2970(config-pmap-c)# police 128000 8000 exceed-action drop

I guess what I am asking is what happens to the initial call when it  
is placed on hold?  Is the audio stream maintained between phones  
(128k), thereby eliminating the ability to place another call?


Matthew Berry

Digital Footprint:
Twitter: ciscovoiceguru
Skype: ciscovoiceguru
1st Lab Attempt: Aug 16th, 2010
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,  
please visit www.ipexpert.com
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 49, Issue 123

[Mike Thompson]

 OSL; ccie_secur...@onlinestudylist.com 
; ccie...@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] [OSL | CCIE_Security] Great New Offers  
from IPexpert



a good answer to "purchase your ccie" kind stuff.

On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 7:47 AM, Brandon Carroll > wrote:

Really Marko, when you step back and look at it this just reenforces
what we all know: Time on the racks is more valuable than anything
when you are preparing for the CCIE.



Regards,

Brandon Carroll - CCIE #23837
Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert
Mailto: bcarr...@ipexpert.com

Telephone: +1.810.326.1444

Live Assistance, Please visit: www.ipexpert.com/chat
eFax: +1.810.454.0130

IPexpert is a premier provider of Self-Study Workbooks, Video on
Demand, Audio Tools, Online Hardware Rental and Classroom Training for
the Cisco CCIE (R&S, Voice, Security & Service Provider)
certification(s) with training locations throughout the United States,
Europe, South Asia and Australia. Be sure to visit our online
communities at www.ipexpert.com/communities and our public website at
www.ipexpert.com




On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 9:45 PM, Marko Milivojevic > wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 04:39, Brandon Carroll > wrote:
>> Do you know what 400 hours of rack time cost me when I was a  
student?

>> Not only from an instructor point of view, but also from a former
>> students point of viewWOW.  Unbelievable!
>
> Yeah. It's a $1400 right there, only in rack time. We're practically
> giving away this deal.
>
> --
> Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427
> Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert
>
> YES! We include 400 hours of REAL rack
> time with our Blended Learning Solution!
>
> Mailto: mar...@ipexpert.com
> Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
> Fax: +1.810.454.0130
> Web: http://www.ipexpert.com/
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,  
please visit www.ipexpert.com


___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training,  
please visit www.ipexpert.com




_
Hotmail: Trusted email with Microsoft?s powerful SPAM protection.
https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=60969
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
http://onlinestudylist.com/pipermail/ccie_voice/attachments/20100318/3b32d079/attachment-0001.htm

--

Message: 2
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 05:17:53 -0500
From: "Berry, Matthew J." 
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QoS SRND - Page 105
To: "CCIE Voice OSL (ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com)"
   
Message-ID:
   <3ccbc985abedc44db2053d59afb8122f05271...@usepx2pmxmbx04.corp.kroll.com 
>


Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

Pulling from the QoS SRND, the following configuration is only  
supposed to allow the bandwidth for one voice call per switchport  
VLAN.  Obviously, based on the 128k, we're focused on G.711 calls  
(so my next question will not apply to G.729).


I want to know if the following command would disable the ability to  
have multiple calls (different lines) on the same phone.  For  
example: Phone A (with the policing command below) calls Phone B.   
At this point, 128k of G.711 bandwidth is consumed.  If Phone A puts  
Phone B on hold and calls Phone C, would the call no go through due  
to policing?


CAT2970(config-cmap)#policy-map IPPHONE+PC-BASIC
CAT2970(config-pmap)#class VVLAN-VOICE
CAT2970(config-pmap-c)# set ip dscp 46 ! DSCP EF (Voice)
CAT2970(config-pmap-c)# police 128000 8000 exceed-action drop

I guess what I am asking is what happens to the initial call when it  
is placed on hold?  Is the audio stream maintained between phones  
(128k), thereby eliminating the ability to place another call?


Matthew Berry

Digital Footprint:
Twitter: ciscovoiceguru
Skype: ciscovoiceguru
1st Lab Attempt: Aug 16th, 2010
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
http://onlinestudylist.com/pipermail/ccie_voice/attachments/20100318/4b1c6d12/attachment-0001.htm

--

Message: 3
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 10:33:48 +
From: kerboute kerboute 
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAB 5A Vol1 question 5.3
To: CCIE Voice Maillist 
Message-ID: <4ba2018c.8040...@cbi.ma>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

Hi all,

Any one setup the question 5.3 of the lab 5A vol1 using IP comm 7.0.3
and IP blue 2.10 for globalization and localization.

Thank you


--

Message: 4
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 11:35:41 +0100
From: Omotayo 
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] about globalization and the lab's PSTN
To: "Berry, Matthew J." 
Cc: "ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com" ,
   "m...@mnet.com.mx" 
Message-ID:
   &

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 49, Issue 123

[vijay kumar yadav]

.ipexpert.com/communities and our public website at www.ipexpert.com
>
>
> From: ccie_rs-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:
> ccie_rs-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Nadeem Rafi
> Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2010 12:53 AM
> To: Brandon Carroll
> Cc: CCIE_RS OnlineStudyList; ccie OSL; ccie_secur...@onlinestudylist.com;
> ccie...@onlinestudylist.com
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] [OSL | CCIE_Security] Great New Offers from
> IPexpert
>
>
> a good answer to "purchase your ccie" kind stuff.
>
> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 7:47 AM, Brandon Carroll 
> wrote:
> Really Marko, when you step back and look at it this just reenforces
> what we all know: Time on the racks is more valuable than anything
> when you are preparing for the CCIE.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Brandon Carroll - CCIE #23837
> Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert
> Mailto: bcarr...@ipexpert.com
>
> Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
>
> Live Assistance, Please visit: www.ipexpert.com/chat
> eFax: +1.810.454.0130
>
> IPexpert is a premier provider of Self-Study Workbooks, Video on
> Demand, Audio Tools, Online Hardware Rental and Classroom Training for
> the Cisco CCIE (R&S, Voice, Security & Service Provider)
> certification(s) with training locations throughout the United States,
> Europe, South Asia and Australia. Be sure to visit our online
> communities at www.ipexpert.com/communities and our public website at
> www.ipexpert.com
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 9:45 PM, Marko Milivojevic 
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 04:39, Brandon Carroll 
> wrote:
> >> Do you know what 400 hours of rack time cost me when I was a student?
> >> Not only from an instructor point of view, but also from a former
> >> students point of viewWOW.  Unbelievable!
> >
> > Yeah. It's a $1400 right there, only in rack time. We're practically
> > giving away this deal.
> >
> > --
> > Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427
> > Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert
> >
> > YES! We include 400 hours of REAL rack
> > time with our Blended Learning Solution!
> >
> > Mailto: mar...@ipexpert.com
> > Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
> > Fax: +1.810.454.0130
> > Web: http://www.ipexpert.com/
> >
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
>
>
> _
> Hotmail: Trusted email with Microsoft?s powerful SPAM protection.
> https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=60969
> -- next part --
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
> http://onlinestudylist.com/pipermail/ccie_voice/attachments/20100318/3b32d079/attachment-0001.htm
>
> --
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 05:17:53 -0500
> From: "Berry, Matthew J." 
> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QoS SRND - Page 105
> To: "CCIE Voice OSL (ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com)"
>
> Message-ID:
><
> 3ccbc985abedc44db2053d59afb8122f05271...@usepx2pmxmbx04.corp.kroll.com>
>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Pulling from the QoS SRND, the following configuration is only supposed to
> allow the bandwidth for one voice call per switchport VLAN.  Obviously,
> based on the 128k, we're focused on G.711 calls (so my next question will
> not apply to G.729).
>
> I want to know if the following command would disable the ability to have
> multiple calls (different lines) on the same phone.  For example: Phone A
> (with the policing command below) calls Phone B.  At this point, 128k of
> G.711 bandwidth is consumed.  If Phone A puts Phone B on hold and calls
> Phone C, would the call no go through due to policing?
>
> CAT2970(config-cmap)#policy-map IPPHONE+PC-BASIC
> CAT2970(config-pmap)#class VVLAN-VOICE
> CAT2970(config-pmap-c)# set ip dscp 46 ! DSCP EF (Voice)
> CAT2970(config-pmap-c)# police 128000 8000 exceed-action drop
>
> I guess what I am asking is what happens to the initial call when it is
> placed on hold?  Is the audio stream maintained between phones (128k),
> thereby eliminating the ability to place another call?
>
> Matthew Berry
>
> Digital Footprint:
> Twitter: ciscovoiceguru
> Skype: ciscovoiceguru
> 1st Lab Attempt: Aug 16th, 2010
> -- next part --
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
> http

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] about globalization and the lab's PSTN

[Omotayo]

I always wonder if the guyz that wrote the PG looks through all this
concens. not just for this question but for all
They should help us with some of this issues as some of us trust that all
that is on the PG is what is needed, though i check config guides atimes

On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 3:17 AM, Berry, Matthew J.  wrote:

>  That's correct. When the call is delivered to the HQ gateway it is seen
> as national from the perspective of the terminating ISDN.
>
> From the standpoint of HQ, the 212 is national type. If it was a local PRI
> from a local LEC, I might expect a subscriber type, but itd be most common
> to receive a national type.
>
>
> - Sent from my Blackberry
>
>  --
> *From*: Jean M. Thewissen 
> *To*: Berry, Matthew J.; 'ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com' <
> ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com>
> *Sent*: Wed Mar 17 20:55:13 2010
> *Subject*: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] about globalization and the lab's PSTN
>
>   I am using proctorlabs…
>
>
>
> What really confuses me is that when the call leaves the B2 GW, it is
> correctly tagged as international.
>
>
>
> Bearer Capability i = 0x8090A3
>
> Standard = CCITT
>
> Transfer Capability = Speech
>
> Transfer Mode = Circuit
>
> Transfer Rate = 64 kbit/s
>
> Channel ID i = 0xA98383
>
> Exclusive, Channel 3
>
> Display i = 'b2 phone 3'
>
> Calling Party Number i = 0x0081, '+3432143003'
>
> Plan:Unknown, Type:Unknown
>
> *Called Party Number i = 0x91, '0012123945001'*
>
> *Plan:ISDN, Type:International*
>
>
>
>
>
> But when PSTN sends it to HQ GW, it is tagged as national:
>
>
>
> Bearer Capability i = 0x8090A2
>
> Standard = CCITT
>
> Transfer Capability = Speech
>
> Transfer Mode = Circuit
>
> Transfer Rate = 64 kbit/s
>
> Channel ID i = 0xA98381
>
> Exclusive, Channel 1
>
> Display i = 'b2 phone 3'
>
> Calling Party Number i = 0x0081, '+3432143003'
>
> Plan:Unknown, Type:Unknown
>
> *Called Party Number i = 0xA1, '2123945001'*
>
> *Plan:ISDN, Type:National*
>
>
>
> I really don’t see how I could alter how the PSTN tags the call… but maybe
> I am just not seeing the whole picture.
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Berry, Matthew J. [mailto:mjbe...@krollontrack.com]
> *Sent:* miércoles, 17 de marzo de 2010 07:50 p.m.
> *To:* Jean M. Thewissen; 'ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com'
> *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] about globalization and the lab's PSTN
>
>
>
> Jean,
>
> Are you using Proctor Labs or your own lab? The PSTN router should take
> care of the calling number type.
>
> You should also make sure you don't have any translation patterns on the
> BR2 gateway that would modify the type. Also check your H323 gateway to
> ensure the same thing.
> - Sent from my Blackberry
>
>
>  --
>
> *From*: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com <
> ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com>
> *To*: 'ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com' 
> *Sent*: Wed Mar 17 19:21:33 2010
> *Subject*: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] about globalization and the lab's PSTN
>
> Hello All.
>
>
>
> I am experiencing the following behavior:
>
>
>
> I place a call out of the Brach 2 site, internationally into the HQ site,
> the PSTN sends the call into HQ as “national”.
>
>
>
> If I place the call from the PSTN phone international line (India or Spain)
> into the HQ site, the call comes in correctly labeled as “international”.
>
>
>
> Is this the expected behavior due to the simulation of the PSTN in the lab?
> Or I am not setting something that I should when routing the calls out the
> Branch2 site?
>
>
>
> Any advice is greatly appreciated.
>
>
>
> Regards!
>
>
>
> MT
>
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAB 5A Vol1 question 5.3

[kerboute kerboute]

Hi all,

Any one setup the question 5.3 of the lab 5A vol1 using IP comm 7.0.3  
and IP blue 2.10 for globalization and localization.

Thank you
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] QoS SRND - Page 105

[Berry, Matthew J.]

Pulling from the QoS SRND, the following configuration is only supposed to 
allow the bandwidth for one voice call per switchport VLAN.  Obviously, based 
on the 128k, we're focused on G.711 calls (so my next question will not apply 
to G.729).

I want to know if the following command would disable the ability to have 
multiple calls (different lines) on the same phone.  For example: Phone A (with 
the policing command below) calls Phone B.  At this point, 128k of G.711 
bandwidth is consumed.  If Phone A puts Phone B on hold and calls Phone C, 
would the call no go through due to policing?

CAT2970(config-cmap)#policy-map IPPHONE+PC-BASIC
CAT2970(config-pmap)#class VVLAN-VOICE
CAT2970(config-pmap-c)# set ip dscp 46 ! DSCP EF (Voice)
CAT2970(config-pmap-c)# police 128000 8000 exceed-action drop

I guess what I am asking is what happens to the initial call when it is placed 
on hold?  Is the audio stream maintained between phones (128k), thereby 
eliminating the ability to place another call?

Matthew Berry

Digital Footprint:
Twitter: ciscovoiceguru
Skype: ciscovoiceguru
1st Lab Attempt: Aug 16th, 2010
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] [OSL | CCIE_RS] [OSL | CCIE_Security] Great New Offers from IPexpert

[Angel Perez]

Hi:

 

This is really a bad new... 
 


Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 10:11:02 +0200
From: pauld.kru...@gmail.com
To: mthompson...@gmail.com
CC: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com; bcarr...@ipexpert.com; nra...@gmail.com; 
tsc...@ipexpert.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] [OSL | CCIE_RS] [OSL | CCIE_Security] Great New 
Offers from IPexpert

Hi Mike,


While your logic seems air-tight, I just want to let you guys know that you 
shouldn't count on the OEQ's giving you 21 points anymore. They've changed it 
to 4 points only. At least for the Voice Lab. I can't vouch for the other 
tracks. But! It is still mandatory pass this section to pass the lab. Even if 
it is only 4 points. If you fail this and get full 96 points from the lab, you 
still fail.


Keep that in mind. It's an important bit to know, as it makes the test harder. 
I had my second attempt at the end of Jan, and this was implemented already. 
Third attempt: Aug/Sep.


On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 2:14 AM, Mike Thompson  wrote:




Everyone keeps talking about the ‘free OEQ’, but they’re forgetting a key 
thing.  The OEQ is 30 minutes.  There are 4 questions that are, if you’re 
actually prepared for the exam, elementary questions.  Each of these questions 
take a few minutes to answer on average.  I mean there isn’t much calculation 
to ‘what is the TCP port used to control an IP Phone’ (not an actual question I 
received).  It’s not like they want you to calculate the airspeed of an 
unlaiden swallow.  In all reality, the 4 OEQ questions take less than 15 
minutes and give you a 21 point head start on your exam (and yes, it’s not 
really a head start, but you get the gist).  More importantly, you get an extra 
15 minutes to get that critical 69 or more points to get your number.
 
Would you rather spend 480 minutes getting 100 points (.2083 points per minute)
Or
465 minutes getting 89 points (.1914 points per minute).
 
Just my 2 cents folks
 


From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Tyson Scott
Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2010 1:46 AM
To: 'Nadeem Rafi'; 'Brandon Carroll'
Cc: 'CCIE_RS OnlineStudyList'; 'ccie OSL'; ccie...@onlinestudylist.com; 
ccie_secur...@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] [OSL | CCIE_RS] [OSL | CCIE_Security] Great New 
Offers from IPexpert



 
But wait haha.  Thanks Marko.
 
Regards,
 
Tyson Scott - CCIE #13513 R&S, Security, and SP
Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.
Mailto: tsc...@ipexpert.com
Telephone: +1.810.326.1444, ext. 208
Live Assistance, Please visit: www.ipexpert.com/chat
eFax: +1.810.454.0130
 
IPexpert is a premier provider of Self-Study Workbooks, Video on Demand, Audio 
Tools, Online Hardware Rental and Classroom Training for the Cisco CCIE (R&S, 
Voice, Security & Service Provider) certification(s) with training locations 
throughout the United States, Europe, South Asia and Australia. Be sure to 
visit our online communities at www.ipexpert.com/communities and our public 
website at www.ipexpert.com
 

From: ccie_rs-boun...@onlinestudylist.com 
[mailto:ccie_rs-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Nadeem Rafi
Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2010 12:53 AM
To: Brandon Carroll
Cc: CCIE_RS OnlineStudyList; ccie OSL; ccie_secur...@onlinestudylist.com; 
ccie...@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] [OSL | CCIE_Security] Great New Offers from 
IPexpert
 

a good answer to "purchase your ccie" kind stuff.

On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 7:47 AM, Brandon Carroll  wrote:
Really Marko, when you step back and look at it this just reenforces
what we all know: Time on the racks is more valuable than anything
when you are preparing for the CCIE.



Regards,

Brandon Carroll - CCIE #23837
Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert
Mailto: bcarr...@ipexpert.com

Telephone: +1.810.326.1444

Live Assistance, Please visit: www.ipexpert.com/chat
eFax: +1.810.454.0130

IPexpert is a premier provider of Self-Study Workbooks, Video on
Demand, Audio Tools, Online Hardware Rental and Classroom Training for
the Cisco CCIE (R&S, Voice, Security & Service Provider)
certification(s) with training locations throughout the United States,
Europe, South Asia and Australia. Be sure to visit our online
communities at www.ipexpert.com/communities and our public website at
www.ipexpert.com




On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 9:45 PM, Marko Milivojevic  wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 04:39, Brandon Carroll  wrote:
>> Do you know what 400 hours of rack time cost me when I was a student?
>> Not only from an instructor point of view, but also from a former
>> students point of viewWOW.  Unbelievable!
>
> Yeah. It's a $1400 right there, only in rack time. We're practically
> giving away this deal.
>
> --
> Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427
> Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert
>
> YES! We include 400 hours of REAL rack
> time with our Blended Learning Solution!
>
> Mailto: mar...@ipexpert.com
> Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
> Fax: +1.810.454.0130
> Web: http://www.ipexpert.co

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab 7 Question 3- DISA Dialling

[Omotayo]

No

I only change the Single button barge to CBarge

On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 9:49 PM, Radhesh Naik  wrote:

>   Is you built in bridge in phone configuration set to on by any chance ?
> even if its set to default try changing it to off.
>
>
>
> -Radhesh
>
>
>
> *From:* ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:
> ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] *On Behalf Of *Omotayo
>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 17, 2010 8:21 PM
> *To:* Peter Slow
> *Cc:* OSL Group
> *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab 7 Question 3- DISA Dialling
>
>
>
> yes i applied the mgl to the br2 device pool
>
> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 9:20 PM, Peter Slow  wrote:
>
> do you mean device pool or MRGL? No CFB means CUCM couldnt select a
> CFB from the MRGL it was using for selection.
>
> -Peter
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 10:46 AM, Omotayo  wrote:
> > Hello,
> > i meant to say i put all the software conference brige in a device pool
> that
> > is not assigned to any user
> > thanks
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 9:09 AM, Omotayo  wrote:
> >>
> >> Hello All,
> >> Worked on Lab 7 question 3 - DISA daling. i had two issues with this
> >> section while working on it;
> >>
> >> Q3.3. i configured conference resources on the br2 gateway and applied
> to
> >> the BR2 Device pool. While the phone is "In Remote Use" . Also applied
> >> CBarge on the BR2 phones.
> >>
> >> On pressing the red button, i get a reorder tone on both Br2 phone and
> the
> >> Hq phone
> >>
> >> After this i put all the Hardware conference brige in a device pool that
> >> is not assigned to any user, this time, when i press the red button, i
> get
> >> "No Conference Bridge"
> >>
> >> Anyone with an idea what the issue is because i have the software
> >> conference bridge registered on the UCM
> >>
> >> Also i want to know why i can not apply 07976852817 as the remote
> >> destination profile with partial match set at the servie parameter. i
> did
> >> and the br2 phone did not blink when calling HQ or BR1 phone.
> >> it was when i added the +447976852817 that it worked
> >>
> >> Thanks for the anticipated response
> >>
> >
>
> > ___
> > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> > visit www.ipexpert.com
> >
> >
>
>
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Need Clarification: mls qos map cos-dscp

[Berry, Matthew J.]

The QoS SRND states that the "auto qos voip" command adds the following config 
to the router:

C2970(config)# mls qos
C2970(config)# mls qos map cos-dscp 0 8 16 26 32 46 48 56

Earlier in the SRND, around page 40, it says that the old marking for audio 
signaling was AF31 (26).  That is the same DSCP marking listed above.

As part of our "best-practice" scenario, should we be changing the command to 
consider audio signaling as CS3 (24)?  The command would need to be modified:

C2970(config)# mls qos map cos-dscp 0 8 16 24 32 46 48 56

Is this true?  Otto, can you weigh in on this one?

Thanks!

Matthew Berry

Digital Footprint:
Twitter: ciscovoiceguru
Skype: ciscovoiceguru
1st Lab Attempt: Aug 16th, 2010
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] [OSL | CCIE_RS] [OSL | CCIE_Security] Great New Offers from IPexpert

[Paul Kruger]

Hi Mike,

While your logic seems air-tight, I just want to let you guys know that you
shouldn't count on the OEQ's giving you 21 points anymore. They've changed
it to 4 points only. At least for the Voice Lab. I can't vouch for the other
tracks. But! It is still mandatory pass this section to pass the lab. Even
if it is only 4 points. If you fail this and get full 96 points from the
lab, you still fail.

Keep that in mind. It's an important bit to know, as it makes the test
harder. I had my second attempt at the end of Jan, and this was implemented
already. Third attempt: Aug/Sep.

On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 2:14 AM, Mike Thompson wrote:

>  Everyone keeps talking about the ‘free OEQ’, but they’re forgetting a key
> thing.  The OEQ is 30 minutes.  There are 4 questions that are, if you’re
> actually prepared for the exam, elementary questions.  Each of these
> questions take a few minutes to answer on average.  I mean there isn’t much
> calculation to ‘what is the TCP port used to control an IP Phone’ (not an
> actual question I received).  It’s not like they want you to calculate the
> airspeed of an unlaiden swallow.  In all reality, the 4 OEQ questions take
> less than 15 minutes and give you a 21 point head start on your exam (and
> yes, it’s not really a head start, but you get the gist).  More importantly,
> you get an extra 15 minutes to get that critical 69 or more points to get
> your number.
>
>
>
> Would you rather spend 480 minutes getting 100 points (.2083 points per
> minute)
>
> Or
>
> 465 minutes getting 89 points (.1914 points per minute).
>
>
>
> Just my 2 cents folks
>
>
>
> *From:* ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:
> ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] *On Behalf Of *Tyson Scott
> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 17, 2010 1:46 AM
> *To:* 'Nadeem Rafi'; 'Brandon Carroll'
> *Cc:* 'CCIE_RS OnlineStudyList'; 'ccie OSL'; ccie...@onlinestudylist.com;
> ccie_secur...@onlinestudylist.com
> *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] [OSL | CCIE_RS] [OSL | CCIE_Security]
> Great New Offers from IPexpert
>
>
>
> But wait haha.  Thanks Marko.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> Tyson Scott - CCIE #13513 R&S, Security, and SP
>
> Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.
>
> Mailto: tsc...@ipexpert.com
>
> Telephone: +1.810.326.1444, ext. 208
>
> Live Assistance, Please visit: www.ipexpert.com/chat
>
> eFax: +1.810.454.0130
>
>
>
> IPexpert is a premier provider of Self-Study Workbooks, Video on Demand,
> Audio Tools, Online Hardware Rental and Classroom Training for the Cisco
> CCIE (R&S, Voice, Security & Service Provider) certification(s) with
> training locations throughout the United States, Europe, South Asia and
> Australia. Be sure to visit our online communities at
> www.ipexpert.com/communities and our public website at www.ipexpert.com
>
>
>
> *From:* ccie_rs-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:
> ccie_rs-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] *On Behalf Of *Nadeem Rafi
> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 17, 2010 12:53 AM
> *To:* Brandon Carroll
> *Cc:* CCIE_RS OnlineStudyList; ccie OSL; ccie_secur...@onlinestudylist.com;
> ccie...@onlinestudylist.com
> *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_RS] [OSL | CCIE_Security] Great New Offers from
> IPexpert
>
>
>
> a good answer to "purchase your ccie" kind stuff.
>
> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 7:47 AM, Brandon Carroll 
> wrote:
>
> Really Marko, when you step back and look at it this just reenforces
> what we all know: Time on the racks is more valuable than anything
> when you are preparing for the CCIE.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Brandon Carroll - CCIE #23837
> Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert
>
> Mailto: bcarr...@ipexpert.com
>
> Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
>
> Live Assistance, Please visit: www.ipexpert.com/chat
> eFax: +1.810.454.0130
>
> IPexpert is a premier provider of Self-Study Workbooks, Video on
> Demand, Audio Tools, Online Hardware Rental and Classroom Training for
> the Cisco CCIE (R&S, Voice, Security & Service Provider)
> certification(s) with training locations throughout the United States,
> Europe, South Asia and Australia. Be sure to visit our online
> communities at www.ipexpert.com/communities and our public website at
> www.ipexpert.com
>
>   On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 9:45 PM, Marko Milivojevic 
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 04:39, Brandon Carroll 
> wrote:
> >> Do you know what 400 hours of rack time cost me when I was a student?
> >> Not only from an instructor point of view, but also from a former
> >> students point of viewWOW.  Unbelievable!
> >
> > Yeah. It's a $1400 right there, only in rack time. We're practically
> > giving away this deal.
> >
> > --
> > Marko Milivojevic - CCIE #18427
> > Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert
> >
> > YES! We include 400 hours of REAL rack
> > time with our Blended Learning Solution!
> >
> > Mailto: mar...@ipexpert.com
> > Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
> > Fax: +1.810.454.0130
> > Web: http://www.ipexpert.com/
> >
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE L

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MOH Multicast from Router flash

[Iwan Hoogendoorn]

Thanks for the suggestions!

Well after I did some intensive testing it is working as it should!

Met vriendelijke groet,
With kind regards,

ing. Iwan Hoogendoorn, CCIE3 #13084 (R&S, Sec, SP)
Homepage: http://www.i-1.nl
Blog: http://blog.i-1.nl
Twitter:  http://www.twitter.com/iwan_ccie
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/iwanhoogendoorn

From: Arun Kumar [mailto:arunv...@gmail.com]
Sent: donderdag 18 maart 2010 7:08
To: Iwan Hoogendoorn
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MOH Multicast from Router flash

show ccm-manager music-on-hold

and you will see packet in/out value increasing.

On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 1:35 AM, Iwan Hoogendoorn 
mailto:i...@i-1.nl>> wrote:
Hello,

I am trying to multicast MOH from router flash and was wondering if there is 
any way to verify live MOH feed when a call is placed on hold on the Proctorlab 
Racks.
According to Proctorlabs there is no way to hear MOH trough Multicast because 
of the the EzVPN (IPSec) connection...

So this is what I am doing now:

I have made a call from HQ to BR1 and at BR1 I have pressed Hold button. I can 
listen to the music but I am not sure if that is streaming from my router.
I have also done "debug ephone moh" and "sh ip mroute". The outouts of both 
commands are as follows:

Mar 17 19:57:45.587: MoH route If Loopback0 46 10.10.110.2 via 10.10.110.2
Mar 17 19:57:45.587: MoH route If Vlan240 ETHERNET 10.10.201.1 via ARP

Mar 17 19:57:47.983: ifs_read flash:music-on-hold.au end of file at 492841 read 
3680 = 496521
Mar 17 19:57:47.987: moh tail fill from 24 at 0x4A725AF8 length 4320



BR1-RTR-R#sh ip mroute
IP Multicast Routing Table
Flags: D - Dense, S - Sparse, B - Bidir Group, s - SSM Group, C - Connected,
   L - Local, P - Pruned, R - RP-bit set, F - Register flag,
   T - SPT-bit set, J - Join SPT, M - MSDP created entry,
   X - Proxy Join Timer Running, A - Candidate for MSDP Advertisement,
   U - URD, I - Received Source Specific Host Report,
   Z - Multicast Tunnel, z - MDT-data group sender,
   Y - Joined MDT-data group, y - Sending to MDT-data group,
   V - RD & Vector, v - Vector
Outgoing interface flags: H - Hardware switched, A - Assert winner
 Timers: Uptime/Expires
 Interface state: Interface, Next-Hop or VCD, State/Mode

(*, 224.0.1.40), 00:43:45/00:02:21, RP 0.0.0.0, flags: DCL
  Incoming interface: Null, RPF nbr 0.0.0.0
  Outgoing interface list:
Loopback0, Forward/Sparse-Dense, 00:43:45/00:00:00


Now the result of these commands remain same whether I am in a live call or no 
call.
Does this tell me that my MOH Multicasting from router flash is working fine?

Any help would be appreciated.


Met vriendelijke groet,
With kind regards,

ing. Iwan Hoogendoorn, CCIE3 #13084 (R&S, Sec, SP)
Homepage: http://www.i-1.nl
Blog: http://blog.i-1.nl
Twitter:  http://www.twitter.com/iwan_ccie
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/iwanhoogendoorn


___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com