Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAB 7 question 3.2 (DISA)
In system parameters, if you select partial match, MVA will always ask your number and then PIN. Change it to exact match and if you have correct caller ID coming in and it matches then you get only asked for PIN. I've tested it with both h323 and mgcp gateways. -- Mustafa sean hurricane wrote: I am able to call MVA directory number but instead of being asked to enter PIN...the system is prompting me to enter my remote destination number which means my remote destination number is not been recognized, see config below application service MVA http://10.10.210.10:8080/ccmivr/pages/IVRMainpage.vxml voice translation-rule 9 rule 1 /^0/ /+44/ dial-peer voice 9 pots translation-profile incoming MVA service mva incoming called-number 3777 no digit-strip All the necessary parameters were turned enabled in CCM remote destination # is line 6 of pstn phone: +447976852817 any thoughts? ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Calls from h323 gateway rejected by call manager
I have an h323 gateway provisioned in call manageri can successfully make outbound calls but inbound PSTN calls are not ringing the phone (translation pattern is configured to strip inbound calls from 10 to 4) i am getting the following error in the trace file 04/06/2010 23:57:43.327 CCM|H225Handler::SdlConnectionInd, rejecting the TCP connection from IP=10.10.201.1. Incoming H225 call on Port=1720, can't find this port in the registered H323 endpoints port list. |CLID::StandAloneClusterNID::10.10.210.11CT::0,0,0,0.0IP::DEV::LVL::ErrorMASK::0100 04/06/2010 23:57:59.551 CCM|H225Handler::SdlConnectionInd, rejecting the TCP connection from IP=10.10.201.1. Incoming H225 call on Port=1720, can't find this port in the registered H323 endpoints port list. |CLID::StandAloneClusterNID::10.10.210.11CT::0,0,0,0.0IP::DEV::LVL::ErrorMASK::0100 04/06/2010 23:58:51.835 CCM|H225Handler::SdlConnectionInd, rejecting the TCP connection from IP=10.10.201.1. Incoming H225 call on Port=1720, can't find this port in the registered H323 endpoints port list. |CLID::StandAloneClusterNID::10.10.210.11CT::0,0,0,0.0IP::DEV::LVL::ErrorMASK::0100 *Router Config * voice translation-rule 1 rule 1 /415888\(1...\)/ /\1/ voice translation-profile INBOUND translate called 1* *voice-port 0/2/1:23 translation-profile incoming INBOUND* *dial-peer voice 3000 voip destination-pattern 1...$ voice-class codec 1 voice-class h323 1 session target ipv4:10.10.210.11 dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric no vad dial-peer voice 3005 voip preference 1 destination-pattern 1...$ voice-class codec 1 voice-class h323 1 session target ipv4:10.10.210.10 dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric no vad BR1#sh run int fa0/0.240 Building configuration... Current configuration : 204 bytes ! interface FastEthernet0/0.240 encapsulation dot1Q 240 ip address 10.10.201.1 255.255.255.0 ip helper-address 10.10.200.3 h323-gateway voip interface h323-gateway voip bind srcaddr 10.10.201.1 Weird thing is i can use csim start to call phones and they ring but inbound PSTN calls gets the error msg above any thots? ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Supplementary CUCME Services
When I went through the CUCME admin guide, I looked for features that were supported on the version that is being tested. Since the version tested in LAB is 7.0, then it would be just extra work to practice features that are only enabled with 7.1. For example, when you look at SNR in Express, it only becomes available in 7.1. Most of the SIP features require 7.1 version. Second, use your own judgment, whether a feature is lab testable or not. Some features are simply not lab testable. And yes, you have to be very familiar with the documentation. Sometimes, your brain locks up under pressure and if you know where to look in documentation, it can make a difference when you try to recall. You don't have to remember it all, just be able to reference to it when needed. hth -- Mustafa Matthew Berry wrote: All - I've been going through the System Admin guide for CUCME and feel overwhelmed by the amount of information contained in the document. I'm wondering how necessary it is to be able to configure MLPP or SNR off the top of my head. I'm wondering if a better approach would be to be familiar with the document and be able to quickly refer to it during the lab. Thoughts? -- Matthew Berry /A+, CCENT, CCNA, CCNA Voice, CCVP, CCIE Written/ *Gmail:* ciscovoiceguru *Skype:* ciscovoiceguru *Twitter:* ciscovoiceguru *1st Lab Attempt: *Aug 16, 2010 ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Calls from h323 gateway rejected by call manager
You need to add dial-peer voice 100 pots incoming called-number . direct-inward-dial On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 7:12 AM, sean hurricane shurric...@gmail.com wrote: I have an h323 gateway provisioned in call manageri can successfully make outbound calls but inbound PSTN calls are not ringing the phone (translation pattern is configured to strip inbound calls from 10 to 4) i am getting the following error in the trace file 04/06/2010 23:57:43.327 CCM|H225Handler::SdlConnectionInd, rejecting the TCP connection from IP=10.10.201.1. Incoming H225 call on Port=1720, can't find this port in the registered H323 endpoints port list. |CLID::StandAloneClusterNID::10.10.210.11CT::0,0,0,0.0IP::DEV::LVL::ErrorMASK::0100 04/06/2010 23:57:59.551 CCM|H225Handler::SdlConnectionInd, rejecting the TCP connection from IP=10.10.201.1. Incoming H225 call on Port=1720, can't find this port in the registered H323 endpoints port list. |CLID::StandAloneClusterNID::10.10.210.11CT::0,0,0,0.0IP::DEV::LVL::ErrorMASK::0100 04/06/2010 23:58:51.835 CCM|H225Handler::SdlConnectionInd, rejecting the TCP connection from IP=10.10.201.1. Incoming H225 call on Port=1720, can't find this port in the registered H323 endpoints port list. |CLID::StandAloneClusterNID::10.10.210.11CT::0,0,0,0.0IP::DEV::LVL::ErrorMASK::0100 *Router Config * voice translation-rule 1 rule 1 /415888\(1...\)/ /\1/ voice translation-profile INBOUND translate called 1* *voice-port 0/2/1:23 translation-profile incoming INBOUND* *dial-peer voice 3000 voip destination-pattern 1...$ voice-class codec 1 voice-class h323 1 session target ipv4:10.10.210.11 dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric no vad dial-peer voice 3005 voip preference 1 destination-pattern 1...$ voice-class codec 1 voice-class h323 1 session target ipv4:10.10.210.10 dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric no vad BR1#sh run int fa0/0.240 Building configuration... Current configuration : 204 bytes ! interface FastEthernet0/0.240 encapsulation dot1Q 240 ip address 10.10.201.1 255.255.255.0 ip helper-address 10.10.200.3 h323-gateway voip interface h323-gateway voip bind srcaddr 10.10.201.1 Weird thing is i can use csim start to call phones and they ring but inbound PSTN calls gets the error msg above any thots? ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAB 7 question 3.2 (DISA)
if you change it to complete match it breaks requirement for question 3.1 and if i am correct you will need application dial rules... anyways i changed it to complete match,restarted ccm and cti service and it didn't help. thanks. On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 2:04 AM, Mustafa afat...@verizon.net wrote: In system parameters, if you select partial match, MVA will always ask your number and then PIN. Change it to exact match and if you have correct caller ID coming in and it matches then you get only asked for PIN. I've tested it with both h323 and mgcp gateways. -- Mustafa sean hurricane wrote: I am able to call MVA directory number but instead of being asked to enter PIN...the system is prompting me to enter my remote destination number which means my remote destination number is not been recognized, see config below application service MVA http://10.10.210.10:8080/ccmivr/pages/IVRMainpage.vxml voice translation-rule 9 rule 1 /^0/ /+44/ dial-peer voice 9 pots translation-profile incoming MVA service mva incoming called-number 3777 no digit-strip All the necessary parameters were turned enabled in CCM remote destination # is line 6 of pstn phone: +447976852817 any thoughts? ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Calls from h323 gateway rejected by call manager
i had that in another dial-peer, see below: dial-peer voice 1 pots incoming called-number . direct-inward-dial dial-peer voice 1000 voip destination-pattern 3...$ voice-class codec 1 voice-class h323 1 session target ipv4:10.10.210.11 dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric no vad dial-peer voice 1005 voip preference 1 destination-pattern 3...$ voice-class codec 1 voice-class h323 1 session target ipv4:10.10.210.10 dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric no vad dial-peer voice 3600 voip destination-pattern 3600$ session protocol sipv2 session target ipv4:10.10.202.2 dtmf-relay sip-notify codec g711ulaw no vad dial-peer voice 3 pots translation-profile outgoing OUTBOUND destination-pattern 999 port 0/2/0:15 forward-digits 3 dial-peer voice 5 pots translation-profile outgoing OUTBOUND destination-pattern 9%112 port 0/2/0:15 forward-digits 3 dial-peer voice 7 pots translation-profile outgoing LOCAL destination-pattern 97... port 0/2/0:15 forward-digits 8 dial-peer voice 11 pots translation-profile outgoing +DIAL destination-pattern 90T port 0/2/0:15 forward-digits 12 dial-peer voice 666 voip service clid_authen_collect destination-pattern 907976852817 session target ipv4:10.10.110.3 incoming called-number 907976852817 dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric codec g711ulaw no vad dial-peer voice 9 pots translation-profile incoming MVA service mva incoming called-number 3777 no digit-strip direct-inward-dial On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 2:23 AM, Omotayo adefilabi...@gmail.com wrote: You need to add dial-peer voice 100 pots incoming called-number . direct-inward-dial On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 7:12 AM, sean hurricane shurric...@gmail.comwrote: I have an h323 gateway provisioned in call manageri can successfully make outbound calls but inbound PSTN calls are not ringing the phone (translation pattern is configured to strip inbound calls from 10 to 4) i am getting the following error in the trace file 04/06/2010 23:57:43.327 CCM|H225Handler::SdlConnectionInd, rejecting the TCP connection from IP=10.10.201.1. Incoming H225 call on Port=1720, can't find this port in the registered H323 endpoints port list. |CLID::StandAloneClusterNID::10.10.210.11CT::0,0,0,0.0IP::DEV::LVL::ErrorMASK::0100 04/06/2010 23:57:59.551 CCM|H225Handler::SdlConnectionInd, rejecting the TCP connection from IP=10.10.201.1. Incoming H225 call on Port=1720, can't find this port in the registered H323 endpoints port list. |CLID::StandAloneClusterNID::10.10.210.11CT::0,0,0,0.0IP::DEV::LVL::ErrorMASK::0100 04/06/2010 23:58:51.835 CCM|H225Handler::SdlConnectionInd, rejecting the TCP connection from IP=10.10.201.1. Incoming H225 call on Port=1720, can't find this port in the registered H323 endpoints port list. |CLID::StandAloneClusterNID::10.10.210.11CT::0,0,0,0.0IP::DEV::LVL::ErrorMASK::0100 *Router Config * voice translation-rule 1 rule 1 /415888\(1...\)/ /\1/ voice translation-profile INBOUND translate called 1* *voice-port 0/2/1:23 translation-profile incoming INBOUND* *dial-peer voice 3000 voip destination-pattern 1...$ voice-class codec 1 voice-class h323 1 session target ipv4:10.10.210.11 dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric no vad dial-peer voice 3005 voip preference 1 destination-pattern 1...$ voice-class codec 1 voice-class h323 1 session target ipv4:10.10.210.10 dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric no vad BR1#sh run int fa0/0.240 Building configuration... Current configuration : 204 bytes ! interface FastEthernet0/0.240 encapsulation dot1Q 240 ip address 10.10.201.1 255.255.255.0 ip helper-address 10.10.200.3 h323-gateway voip interface h323-gateway voip bind srcaddr 10.10.201.1 Weird thing is i can use csim start to call phones and they ring but inbound PSTN calls gets the error msg above any thots? ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Calls from h323 gateway rejected by call manager
Sean, That's a POTS dial-peer. Add it to a VOIP one too. :) Roger On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 5:29 PM, sean hurricane shurric...@gmail.com wrote: i had that in another dial-peer, see below: dial-peer voice 1 pots incoming called-number . direct-inward-dial dial-peer voice 1000 voip destination-pattern 3...$ voice-class codec 1 voice-class h323 1 session target ipv4:10.10.210.11 dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric no vad dial-peer voice 1005 voip preference 1 destination-pattern 3...$ voice-class codec 1 voice-class h323 1 session target ipv4:10.10.210.10 dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric no vad dial-peer voice 3600 voip destination-pattern 3600$ session protocol sipv2 session target ipv4:10.10.202.2 dtmf-relay sip-notify codec g711ulaw no vad dial-peer voice 3 pots translation-profile outgoing OUTBOUND destination-pattern 999 port 0/2/0:15 forward-digits 3 dial-peer voice 5 pots translation-profile outgoing OUTBOUND destination-pattern 9%112 port 0/2/0:15 forward-digits 3 dial-peer voice 7 pots translation-profile outgoing LOCAL destination-pattern 97... port 0/2/0:15 forward-digits 8 dial-peer voice 11 pots translation-profile outgoing +DIAL destination-pattern 90T port 0/2/0:15 forward-digits 12 dial-peer voice 666 voip service clid_authen_collect destination-pattern 907976852817 session target ipv4:10.10.110.3 incoming called-number 907976852817 dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric codec g711ulaw no vad dial-peer voice 9 pots translation-profile incoming MVA service mva incoming called-number 3777 no digit-strip direct-inward-dial On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 2:23 AM, Omotayo adefilabi...@gmail.com wrote: You need to add dial-peer voice 100 pots incoming called-number . direct-inward-dial On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 7:12 AM, sean hurricane shurric...@gmail.comwrote: I have an h323 gateway provisioned in call manageri can successfully make outbound calls but inbound PSTN calls are not ringing the phone (translation pattern is configured to strip inbound calls from 10 to 4) i am getting the following error in the trace file 04/06/2010 23:57:43.327 CCM|H225Handler::SdlConnectionInd, rejecting the TCP connection from IP=10.10.201.1. Incoming H225 call on Port=1720, can't find this port in the registered H323 endpoints port list. |CLID::StandAloneClusterNID::10.10.210.11CT::0,0,0,0.0IP::DEV::LVL::ErrorMASK::0100 04/06/2010 23:57:59.551 CCM|H225Handler::SdlConnectionInd, rejecting the TCP connection from IP=10.10.201.1. Incoming H225 call on Port=1720, can't find this port in the registered H323 endpoints port list. |CLID::StandAloneClusterNID::10.10.210.11CT::0,0,0,0.0IP::DEV::LVL::ErrorMASK::0100 04/06/2010 23:58:51.835 CCM|H225Handler::SdlConnectionInd, rejecting the TCP connection from IP=10.10.201.1. Incoming H225 call on Port=1720, can't find this port in the registered H323 endpoints port list. |CLID::StandAloneClusterNID::10.10.210.11CT::0,0,0,0.0IP::DEV::LVL::ErrorMASK::0100 *Router Config * voice translation-rule 1 rule 1 /415888\(1...\)/ /\1/ voice translation-profile INBOUND translate called 1* *voice-port 0/2/1:23 translation-profile incoming INBOUND* *dial-peer voice 3000 voip destination-pattern 1...$ voice-class codec 1 voice-class h323 1 session target ipv4:10.10.210.11 dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric no vad dial-peer voice 3005 voip preference 1 destination-pattern 1...$ voice-class codec 1 voice-class h323 1 session target ipv4:10.10.210.10 dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric no vad BR1#sh run int fa0/0.240 Building configuration... Current configuration : 204 bytes ! interface FastEthernet0/0.240 encapsulation dot1Q 240 ip address 10.10.201.1 255.255.255.0 ip helper-address 10.10.200.3 h323-gateway voip interface h323-gateway voip bind srcaddr 10.10.201.1 Weird thing is i can use csim start to call phones and they ring but inbound PSTN calls gets the error msg above any thots? ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Calls from h323 gateway rejected by call manager
Sean, the last config you posted lloks like its on the br2 router. you should have the dial-peer voice 1 pots incoming called-number . direct-inward-dial on the br1 router On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 7:29 AM, sean hurricane shurric...@gmail.com wrote: i had that in another dial-peer, see below: dial-peer voice 1 pots incoming called-number . direct-inward-dial dial-peer voice 1000 voip destination-pattern 3...$ voice-class codec 1 voice-class h323 1 session target ipv4:10.10.210.11 dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric no vad dial-peer voice 1005 voip preference 1 destination-pattern 3...$ voice-class codec 1 voice-class h323 1 session target ipv4:10.10.210.10 dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric no vad dial-peer voice 3600 voip destination-pattern 3600$ session protocol sipv2 session target ipv4:10.10.202.2 dtmf-relay sip-notify codec g711ulaw no vad dial-peer voice 3 pots translation-profile outgoing OUTBOUND destination-pattern 999 port 0/2/0:15 forward-digits 3 dial-peer voice 5 pots translation-profile outgoing OUTBOUND destination-pattern 9%112 port 0/2/0:15 forward-digits 3 dial-peer voice 7 pots translation-profile outgoing LOCAL destination-pattern 97... port 0/2/0:15 forward-digits 8 dial-peer voice 11 pots translation-profile outgoing +DIAL destination-pattern 90T port 0/2/0:15 forward-digits 12 dial-peer voice 666 voip service clid_authen_collect destination-pattern 907976852817 session target ipv4:10.10.110.3 incoming called-number 907976852817 dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric codec g711ulaw no vad dial-peer voice 9 pots translation-profile incoming MVA service mva incoming called-number 3777 no digit-strip direct-inward-dial On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 2:23 AM, Omotayo adefilabi...@gmail.com wrote: You need to add dial-peer voice 100 pots incoming called-number . direct-inward-dial On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 7:12 AM, sean hurricane shurric...@gmail.comwrote: I have an h323 gateway provisioned in call manageri can successfully make outbound calls but inbound PSTN calls are not ringing the phone (translation pattern is configured to strip inbound calls from 10 to 4) i am getting the following error in the trace file 04/06/2010 23:57:43.327 CCM|H225Handler::SdlConnectionInd, rejecting the TCP connection from IP=10.10.201.1. Incoming H225 call on Port=1720, can't find this port in the registered H323 endpoints port list. |CLID::StandAloneClusterNID::10.10.210.11CT::0,0,0,0.0IP::DEV::LVL::ErrorMASK::0100 04/06/2010 23:57:59.551 CCM|H225Handler::SdlConnectionInd, rejecting the TCP connection from IP=10.10.201.1. Incoming H225 call on Port=1720, can't find this port in the registered H323 endpoints port list. |CLID::StandAloneClusterNID::10.10.210.11CT::0,0,0,0.0IP::DEV::LVL::ErrorMASK::0100 04/06/2010 23:58:51.835 CCM|H225Handler::SdlConnectionInd, rejecting the TCP connection from IP=10.10.201.1. Incoming H225 call on Port=1720, can't find this port in the registered H323 endpoints port list. |CLID::StandAloneClusterNID::10.10.210.11CT::0,0,0,0.0IP::DEV::LVL::ErrorMASK::0100 *Router Config * voice translation-rule 1 rule 1 /415888\(1...\)/ /\1/ voice translation-profile INBOUND translate called 1* *voice-port 0/2/1:23 translation-profile incoming INBOUND* *dial-peer voice 3000 voip destination-pattern 1...$ voice-class codec 1 voice-class h323 1 session target ipv4:10.10.210.11 dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric no vad dial-peer voice 3005 voip preference 1 destination-pattern 1...$ voice-class codec 1 voice-class h323 1 session target ipv4:10.10.210.10 dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric no vad BR1#sh run int fa0/0.240 Building configuration... Current configuration : 204 bytes ! interface FastEthernet0/0.240 encapsulation dot1Q 240 ip address 10.10.201.1 255.255.255.0 ip helper-address 10.10.200.3 h323-gateway voip interface h323-gateway voip bind srcaddr 10.10.201.1 Weird thing is i can use csim start to call phones and they ring but inbound PSTN calls gets the error msg above any thots? ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAB 7 question 3.2 (DISA)
Hello: Modify voice translation-rule 9 in order to match the calling number with your RD number hth Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2010 02:25:53 -0400 From: shurric...@gmail.com To: afat...@verizon.net CC: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAB 7 question 3.2 (DISA) if you change it to complete match it breaks requirement for question 3.1 and if i am correct you will need application dial rules... anyways i changed it to complete match,restarted ccm and cti service and it didn't help. thanks. On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 2:04 AM, Mustafa afat...@verizon.net wrote: In system parameters, if you select partial match, MVA will always ask your number and then PIN. Change it to exact match and if you have correct caller ID coming in and it matches then you get only asked for PIN. I've tested it with both h323 and mgcp gateways. -- Mustafa sean hurricane wrote: I am able to call MVA directory number but instead of being asked to enter PIN...the system is prompting me to enter my remote destination number which means my remote destination number is not been recognized, see config below application service MVA http://10.10.210.10:8080/ccmivr/pages/IVRMainpage.vxml voice translation-rule 9 rule 1 /^0/ /+44/ dial-peer voice 9 pots translation-profile incoming MVA service mva incoming called-number 3777 no digit-strip All the necessary parameters were turned enabled in CCM remote destination # is line 6 of pstn phone: +447976852817 any thoughts? ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com _ Hotmail: Trusted email with Microsoft’s powerful SPAM protection. https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=60969___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAB 7 question 3.2 (DISA)
Hi, You don't need to have complete match to only get asked about PIN when you dial in to MVA. But there are some well known strange behaviors that can be seen in the version of UCM we use in the lab. When you change the setting for partial/complete match and the number of digits needed, you may need to change the setting for needed numbers to for example first 7, then back to 10 (default), then back to 7 again. Don’t ask why, but this has fixed the match for me and also for some other that attended the ILT boot camp in SJ in March. Brgds, Roger Källberg Consultant Cygate AB Eric Perssons väg 21, SE-217 62 MALMÖ Från: Mustafa [afat...@verizon.net] Skickat: den 7 april 2010 08:04 Till: sean hurricane Kopia: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Ämne: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAB 7 question 3.2 (DISA) In system parameters, if you select partial match, MVA will always ask your number and then PIN. Change it to exact match and if you have correct caller ID coming in and it matches then you get only asked for PIN. I've tested it with both h323 and mgcp gateways. -- Mustafa sean hurricane wrote: I am able to call MVA directory number but instead of being asked to enter PIN...the system is prompting me to enter my remote destination number which means my remote destination number is not been recognized, see config below application service MVA http://10.10.210.10:8080/ccmivr/pages/IVRMainpage.vxml voice translation-rule 9 rule 1 /^0/ /+44/ dial-peer voice 9 pots translation-profile incoming MVA service mva incoming called-number 3777 no digit-strip All the necessary parameters were turned enabled in CCM remote destination # is line 6 of pstn phone: +447976852817 any thoughts? ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Time of Day Routing
What if you change this setup somewhat to be like this instead? Use a CTI RP in PT ToD_RollToVM_P with dn 6XXX, or whatever that matches your internal dn’s. Use a TP in AllHours_P with match 6XXX, send it to a CSS that can see the PT that the phone’s dn uses. That PT need to be different than AllHours_P and ToD_RollToVM_P, for example Internal_PT or whatever name you’re used to use. All in all you would have tree PT’s with the dn’s. I think that this would eliminate the need to have unique CTI ports for each dn, since you would get an equal match for the CTI RP and the TP. Roger Källberg Consultant Cygate AB Eric Perssons väg 21, SE-217 62 MALMÖ Från: mthompson...@gmail.com [mthompson...@gmail.com] Skickat: den 6 april 2010 19:13 Till: Sivakumar Mahalingam; Mike Thompson Kopia: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Ämne: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Time of Day Routing so if you have 2 partitions with the same DN: AllHours_P 6110 - this partition is where the phone DN sits, this is accessible by the internal phones (school front office, etc) and more specifically from CER ToD_RollToVM_P 6110 - this partition has a CTI port that has Cfwd All to VM checked. it's accessible only by gateways and calls forwarded from Unity (to prevent someone tyring to back door access from a call handler) the important part is the second is a Time of Day partition and is HIGHER in the CSS than the AllHours parition. that way, when a call comes in from the gateway, it will see that port first and then roll to voicemail. the major caveat is that you have to have a separate port for each DN since a 'masked' extension won't work. the CSS priority only deifferentiates when there's an EXACT match. so the incoming GW CSS has: P1 - other random partitions P2 P3 ToD_RollToVM_P AllHours_P The CSS applied to CER has only P1 P2 P3 AllHours_P Note the absense of the ToD_RollToVM_P, this way calls from CER and internal phones (if so desired) are never trapped by the CFwd to VM. MAKE SURE that the MWI CSS has access to only the AllHours_P, we ran into issues that the MWI wouldn't work during the day and it was because the CTI Port was getting the MWI on/off requests. does that make sense? On Apr 6, 2010 10:59am, Sivakumar Mahalingam sima...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Mike, Thanks for your quick response. We also have the CER integrated with the call manager and configured the onsite alert list(They dont have the internal security and the alerts(phone and e-mail) are sent to some main people of the school.)Below is the setup. 1.Single DID(ELIN)is attached to more than one phones by grouping it to ERL. 2.When a 911 call is made the PSAP will receive the DID number ,the location with color code and the Main number of the school as the alternative call back number. 3.The PSAP will call back the alternate call back number (Main number)while dispatching the help 4.The alternate call back number has been provided with the capability to reach the classroom phone at anytime of the day. Inspite of having these options,the client needs the classroom phone to ring the directly. Thanks, Simah. On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 10:33 AM, Mike Thompson mthompson...@gmail.com wrote: The way we addressed those in the past is to have any 911 calls coming from a class room ring a internal security group (hunt group) consisting of a dozen or so numbers of internal staff (phones that are always manned in some form or fashion during the day). Any calls that require actual emergency services are then dispatched / contacted by the office staff of the school. Another option is if they want to install CER to do e-911, then you can make the PSAP response callback number a viable endpoint for incoming calls. HTH From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Sivakumar Mahalingam Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2010 10:08 AM To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Time of Day Routing Hi All, I need some help in tweaking the TOD routing configuration on a real network. Scenario : It's a school environment where we have configured the TOD for the classroom phones to goto VM during instruction hours( 8-5) and ring the phone after hours.It's working and the problem we are facing is, when someone makes a 911 call during instructional hour from a classroom phone the call goes to the PSAP and if the PSAP calls back that number ,it directs the PSAP officer to the VM of that extension. So my question is, is there a way to overide the TOD routing for certain incoming numbers (say 10 numbers from PSAP) and allow those calls only to ring the phone directly during instructional hours. I appericiate all your ideas and help. Thanks in advance. Simah.
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCMCUPS service
Q: What service is used on the CCM to communicate with CUPS? I would say Cisco AXL web service as it is used to sync with sync Agent at CUPS but I can see CTI Manager could very well be that service which is needed for Desktop control... Thoughts? Ash ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAB 7 question 3.2 (DISA)
i will try later tonite and report back, thanks all 2010/4/7 Roger Källberg roger.kallb...@cygate.se Hi, You don't need to have complete match to only get asked about PIN when you dial in to MVA. But there are some well known strange behaviors that can be seen in the version of UCM we use in the lab. When you change the setting for partial/complete match and the number of digits needed, you may need to change the setting for needed numbers to for example first 7, then back to 10 (default), then back to 7 again. Don’t ask why, but this has fixed the match for me and also for some other that attended the ILT boot camp in SJ in March. Brgds, Roger Källberg Consultant Cygate AB Eric Perssons väg 21, SE-217 62 MALMÖ Från: Mustafa [afat...@verizon.net] Skickat: den 7 april 2010 08:04 Till: sean hurricane Kopia: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Ämne: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] LAB 7 question 3.2 (DISA) In system parameters, if you select partial match, MVA will always ask your number and then PIN. Change it to exact match and if you have correct caller ID coming in and it matches then you get only asked for PIN. I've tested it with both h323 and mgcp gateways. -- Mustafa sean hurricane wrote: I am able to call MVA directory number but instead of being asked to enter PIN...the system is prompting me to enter my remote destination number which means my remote destination number is not been recognized, see config below application service MVA http://10.10.210.10:8080/ccmivr/pages/IVRMainpage.vxml voice translation-rule 9 rule 1 /^0/ /+44/ dial-peer voice 9 pots translation-profile incoming MVA service mva incoming called-number 3777 no digit-strip All the necessary parameters were turned enabled in CCM remote destination # is line 6 of pstn phone: +447976852817 any thoughts? ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Calls from h323 gateway rejected by call manager
sorry about that, it was almost 4:00am and eyes were getting weary. I had the dial-peer just not in the config i posted. i seriously do not think it's a dial-peer issue, if it was that i should just get a secondary dial-tone, excuse my failed attempt at being clever by posting snipet of the config but I do not think a missing dial-peer would make UCCM reject connections from a gteway that is registered to it. I am at work now but i will post full config later tonight. thanks. On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 3:33 AM, Omotayo adefilabi...@gmail.com wrote: Sean, the last config you posted lloks like its on the br2 router. you should have the dial-peer voice 1 pots incoming called-number . direct-inward-dial on the br1 router On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 7:29 AM, sean hurricane shurric...@gmail.comwrote: i had that in another dial-peer, see below: dial-peer voice 1 pots incoming called-number . direct-inward-dial dial-peer voice 1000 voip destination-pattern 3...$ voice-class codec 1 voice-class h323 1 session target ipv4:10.10.210.11 dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric no vad dial-peer voice 1005 voip preference 1 destination-pattern 3...$ voice-class codec 1 voice-class h323 1 session target ipv4:10.10.210.10 dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric no vad dial-peer voice 3600 voip destination-pattern 3600$ session protocol sipv2 session target ipv4:10.10.202.2 dtmf-relay sip-notify codec g711ulaw no vad dial-peer voice 3 pots translation-profile outgoing OUTBOUND destination-pattern 999 port 0/2/0:15 forward-digits 3 dial-peer voice 5 pots translation-profile outgoing OUTBOUND destination-pattern 9%112 port 0/2/0:15 forward-digits 3 dial-peer voice 7 pots translation-profile outgoing LOCAL destination-pattern 97... port 0/2/0:15 forward-digits 8 dial-peer voice 11 pots translation-profile outgoing +DIAL destination-pattern 90T port 0/2/0:15 forward-digits 12 dial-peer voice 666 voip service clid_authen_collect destination-pattern 907976852817 session target ipv4:10.10.110.3 incoming called-number 907976852817 dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric codec g711ulaw no vad dial-peer voice 9 pots translation-profile incoming MVA service mva incoming called-number 3777 no digit-strip direct-inward-dial On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 2:23 AM, Omotayo adefilabi...@gmail.com wrote: You need to add dial-peer voice 100 pots incoming called-number . direct-inward-dial On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 7:12 AM, sean hurricane shurric...@gmail.comwrote: I have an h323 gateway provisioned in call manageri can successfully make outbound calls but inbound PSTN calls are not ringing the phone (translation pattern is configured to strip inbound calls from 10 to 4) i am getting the following error in the trace file 04/06/2010 23:57:43.327 CCM|H225Handler::SdlConnectionInd, rejecting the TCP connection from IP=10.10.201.1. Incoming H225 call on Port=1720, can't find this port in the registered H323 endpoints port list. |CLID::StandAloneClusterNID::10.10.210.11CT::0,0,0,0.0IP::DEV::LVL::ErrorMASK::0100 04/06/2010 23:57:59.551 CCM|H225Handler::SdlConnectionInd, rejecting the TCP connection from IP=10.10.201.1. Incoming H225 call on Port=1720, can't find this port in the registered H323 endpoints port list. |CLID::StandAloneClusterNID::10.10.210.11CT::0,0,0,0.0IP::DEV::LVL::ErrorMASK::0100 04/06/2010 23:58:51.835 CCM|H225Handler::SdlConnectionInd, rejecting the TCP connection from IP=10.10.201.1. Incoming H225 call on Port=1720, can't find this port in the registered H323 endpoints port list. |CLID::StandAloneClusterNID::10.10.210.11CT::0,0,0,0.0IP::DEV::LVL::ErrorMASK::0100 *Router Config * voice translation-rule 1 rule 1 /415888\(1...\)/ /\1/ voice translation-profile INBOUND translate called 1* *voice-port 0/2/1:23 translation-profile incoming INBOUND* *dial-peer voice 3000 voip destination-pattern 1...$ voice-class codec 1 voice-class h323 1 session target ipv4:10.10.210.11 dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric no vad dial-peer voice 3005 voip preference 1 destination-pattern 1...$ voice-class codec 1 voice-class h323 1 session target ipv4:10.10.210.10 dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric no vad BR1#sh run int fa0/0.240 Building configuration... Current configuration : 204 bytes ! interface FastEthernet0/0.240 encapsulation dot1Q 240 ip address 10.10.201.1 255.255.255.0 ip helper-address 10.10.200.3 h323-gateway voip interface h323-gateway voip bind srcaddr 10.10.201.1 Weird thing is i can use csim start to call phones and they ring but inbound PSTN calls gets the error msg above any thots? ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] MGCP gw not stripping to 4 digits?
I have two MGCP IOS gw set up (HQ/BR1), and they are registered and working OK. For some reason, they seem not to be stripping the significant digits to 4 as I have configured in CUCM. I have tired resetting the GW and no/mgcp, as well as rebuilding the GW in CUCM. The SIP phones can call each other in CUCM using 4-digits. I'm probably doing something stupid... The call reaches the CUCM with the full dialed digits and I get this on the GW; Apr 7 14:52:11.858: ISDN Se0/1/0:15 Q931: TX - RELEASE_COMP pd = 8 callref = 0x8094 Cause i = 0x8081 - Unallocated/unassigned number on the CUCM I see the full numbers coming in, and no match: 04/07/2010 16:04:29.889 CCM|Digit analysis: match(pi=2,fqcn=, cn=3942123, plv=5, pss=, TodFilteredPss=, dd=2123945002,dac=0)|CLID::StandAloneClusterNID::10.10.210.11CT::2,100,133,1.126IP::10.10.110.1DEV::LVL::DetailedMASK::0800 04/07/2010 16:04:29.889 CCM|Digit analysis: potentialMatches=NoPotentialMatchesExist|CLID::StandAloneClusterNID::10.10.210.11CT::2,100,133,1.126IP::10.10.110.1DEV::LVL::DetailedMASK::0800 04/07/2010 16:04:29.889 CCM| |CLID::StandAloneClusterNID::10.10.210.11LVL::State TransitionMASK::0040 04/07/2010 16:04:29.889 CCM|Out Message -- PriReleaseCompleteMsg -- Protocol= PriEuroProtocol|CLID::StandAloneClusterNID::10.10.210.11LVL::SignificantMASK::0040 04/07/2010 16:04:29.889 CCM|Ie - Q931CauseIe IEData= 08 02 80 81 |CLID::StandAloneClusterNID::10.10.210.11LVL::State TransitionMASK::0040 Thanks for any help... ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MGCP gw not stripping to 4 digits?
Can you make outbound calls through your gateways? Check your CSS/Partitions etc. On 07/04/2010 16:05, Stephen Greszczyszyn wrote: I have two MGCP IOS gw set up (HQ/BR1), and they are registered and working OK. For some reason, they seem not to be stripping the significant digits to 4 as I have configured in CUCM. I have tired resetting the GW and no/mgcp, as well as rebuilding the GW in CUCM. The SIP phones can call each other in CUCM using 4-digits. I'm probably doing something stupid... The call reaches the CUCM with the full dialed digits and I get this on the GW; Apr 7 14:52:11.858: ISDN Se0/1/0:15 Q931: TX - RELEASE_COMP pd = 8 callref = 0x8094 Cause i = 0x8081 - Unallocated/unassigned number on the CUCM I see the full numbers coming in, and no match: 04/07/2010 16:04:29.889 CCM|Digit analysis: match(pi=2,fqcn=, cn=3942123, plv=5, pss=, TodFilteredPss=, dd=2123945002,dac=0)|CLID::StandAloneClusterNID::10.10.210.11CT::2,100,133,1.126IP::10.10.110.1DEV::LVL::DetailedMASK::0800 04/07/2010 16:04:29.889 CCM|Digit analysis: potentialMatches=NoPotentialMatchesExist|CLID::StandAloneClusterNID::10.10.210.11CT::2,100,133,1.126IP::10.10.110.1DEV::LVL::DetailedMASK::0800 04/07/2010 16:04:29.889 CCM| |CLID::StandAloneClusterNID::10.10.210.11LVL::State TransitionMASK::0040 04/07/2010 16:04:29.889 CCM|Out Message -- PriReleaseCompleteMsg -- Protocol= PriEuroProtocol|CLID::StandAloneClusterNID::10.10.210.11LVL::SignificantMASK::0040 04/07/2010 16:04:29.889 CCM|Ie - Q931CauseIe IEData= 08 02 80 81 |CLID::StandAloneClusterNID::10.10.210.11LVL::State TransitionMASK::0040 Thanks for any help... ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com -- Thanks, Ashar Siddiqui ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Time of Day Routing
At present the system is configured with unique CTI ports for each dn's with ToDRollToVM_PT and i will try changing the CSS for the CER RoutePoint(which is now same as Gateway CSS) to something else and not have the e TODRollToVm _PT and let you know if it works. Again thanks for all your help. Simah. 2010/4/7 Roger Källberg roger.kallb...@cygate.se What if you change this setup somewhat to be like this instead? Use a CTI RP in PT ToD_RollToVM_P with dn 6XXX, or whatever that matches your internal dn’s. Use a TP in AllHours_P with match 6XXX, send it to a CSS that can see the PT that the phone’s dn uses. That PT need to be different than AllHours_P and ToD_RollToVM_P, for example Internal_PT or whatever name you’re used to use. All in all you would have tree PT’s with the dn’s. I think that this would eliminate the need to have unique CTI ports for each dn, since you would get an equal match for the CTI RP and the TP. *Roger Källberg* Consultant Cygate AB Eric Perssons väg 21, SE-217 62 MALMÖ -- *Från:* mthompson...@gmail.com [mthompson...@gmail.com] *Skickat:* den 6 april 2010 19:13 *Till:* Sivakumar Mahalingam; Mike Thompson *Kopia:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com *Ämne:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Time of Day Routing so if you have 2 partitions with the same DN: AllHours_P 6110 - this partition is where the phone DN sits, this is accessible by the internal phones (school front office, etc) and more specifically from CER ToD_RollToVM_P 6110 - this partition has a CTI port that has Cfwd All to VM checked. it's accessible only by gateways and calls forwarded from Unity (to prevent someone tyring to back door access from a call handler) the important part is the second is a Time of Day partition and is HIGHER in the CSS than the AllHours parition. that way, when a call comes in from the gateway, it will see that port first and then roll to voicemail. the major caveat is that you have to have a separate port for each DN since a 'masked' extension won't work. the CSS priority only deifferentiates when there's an EXACT match. so the incoming GW CSS has: P1 - other random partitions P2 P3 ToD_RollToVM_P AllHours_P The CSS applied to CER has only P1 P2 P3 AllHours_P Note the absense of the ToD_RollToVM_P, this way calls from CER and internal phones (if so desired) are never trapped by the CFwd to VM. MAKE SURE that the MWI CSS has access to only the AllHours_P, we ran into issues that the MWI wouldn't work during the day and it was because the CTI Port was getting the MWI on/off requests. does that make sense? On Apr 6, 2010 10:59am, Sivakumar Mahalingam sima...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Mike, Thanks for your quick response. We also have the CER integrated with the call manager and configured the onsite alert list(They dont have the internal security and the alerts(phone and e-mail) are sent to some main people of the school.)Below is the setup. 1.Single DID(ELIN)is attached to more than one phones by grouping it to ERL. 2.When a 911 call is made the PSAP will receive the DID number ,the location with color code and the Main number of the school as the alternative call back number. 3.The PSAP will call back the alternate call back number (Main number)while dispatching the help 4.The alternate call back number has been provided with the capability to reach the classroom phone at anytime of the day. Inspite of having these options,the client needs the classroom phone to ring the directly. Thanks, Simah. On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 10:33 AM, Mike Thompson mthompson...@gmail.com wrote: The way we addressed those in the past is to have any 911 calls coming from a class room ring a internal security group (hunt group) consisting of a dozen or so numbers of internal staff (phones that are always manned in some form or fashion during the day). Any calls that require actual emergency services are then dispatched / contacted by the office staff of the school. Another option is if they want to install CER to do e-911, then you can make the PSAP response callback number a viable endpoint for incoming calls. HTH From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Sivakumar Mahalingam Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2010 10:08 AM To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Time of Day Routing Hi All, I need some help in tweaking the TOD routing configuration on a real network. Scenario : It's a school environment where we have configured the TOD for the classroom phones to goto VM during instruction hours( 8-5) and ring the phone after hours.It's working and the problem we are facing is, when
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MGCP gw not stripping to 4 digits?
Ashar, After rebooting my Pub/Sub I got even stranger things happening with my SIP phones (constantly restarting). This usually signals to me that something is wrong with replication, although RTMT showed both servers at 2. I switched the CUCM group to just have the Pub in it and shut down the Sub and sure enough everything (including the MGCP GW incoming) works fine now. Something surely was messed up with replication, but RTMT was lying. I guess the lesson for me is to only practice labs with one server up, or to stop and reset dbReplication on the Pub/Sub each time I roll back to a VM snapshot. On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 4:16 PM, Ashar Siddiqui siddas...@gmail.com wrote: Can you make outbound calls through your gateways? Check your CSS/Partitions etc. ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MGCP gw not stripping to 4 digits?
I have had more strange issues then you are having due to this db_replication thing. I remember few weeks back when I was practicing at one of the IPexpert rack with Sub first and Pub second, none of my devices were showing registered at CUCM yet they all were working perfectly normal. All my phones, MOH, Transcoder, CTI ports, RP, VM were in UNKNOWN status but working as normal. When I reached to test the SRST part where I had to shut the services on SUB, they all got registered to PUB and started showing Registered at CUCM. I think few racks have db_replication issue. Ash On 07/04/2010 17:24, Stephen Greszczyszyn wrote: Ashar, After rebooting my Pub/Sub I got even stranger things happening with my SIP phones (constantly restarting). This usually signals to me that something is wrong with replication, although RTMT showed both servers at 2. I switched the CUCM group to just have the Pub in it and shut down the Sub and sure enough everything (including the MGCP GW incoming) works fine now. Something surely was messed up with replication, but RTMT was lying. I guess the lesson for me is to only practice labs with one server up, or to stop and reset dbReplication on the Pub/Sub each time I roll back to a VM snapshot. On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 4:16 PM, Ashar Siddiquisiddas...@gmail.com wrote: Can you make outbound calls through your gateways? Check your CSS/Partitions etc. -- Thanks, Ashar Siddiqui ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Calls from h323 gateway rejected by call manager
*10.10.201.1 is the configured ip address in UCCM*. On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 12:12 PM, James Rosenfelt jaros...@cisco.com wrote: 04/06/2010 23:57:43.327 CCM|H225Handler::SdlConnectionInd, rejecting the TCP connection from IP=*10.10.201.1*. Incoming H225 call on Port=1720, can't find this port in the registered H323 endpoints port list. |CLID::StandAloneClusterNID::10.10.210.11CT::0,0,0,0.0IP::DEV::LVL::ErrorMASK::0100 Is 10.10.201.1 the configured IP address in CUCM for the H323 GW? That’s why it’s failing. If CUCM doesn’t have the IP configured as a H323 gw that matches the source then it will reject the call. I’ve had a similar problem when I was sourcing H323 from the incorrect interface. James Rosenfelt Network Consulting Engineer Advanced Services jaros...@cisco.com http://jaros...@cisco.com/ Phone :425-468-0912 Mobile :425-241-0702 Epage :jaros...@epage.cisco.com This e-mail may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender by reply e-mail and delete all copies of this message. ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Calls from h323 gateway rejected by call manager
You could very well be another victim of db_replication. Take off your sub from the CCM group and make everything register with PUB. Give it a go and see if it works... Ash On 07/04/2010 17:50, sean hurricane wrote: *10.10.201.1 _is_ the configured ip address in UCCM*. On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 12:12 PM, James Rosenfelt jaros...@cisco.com mailto:jaros...@cisco.com wrote: 04/06/2010 23:57:43.327 CCM|H225Handler::SdlConnectionInd, rejecting the TCP connection from IP=*10.10.201.1*. Incoming H225 call on Port=1720, can't find this port in the registered H323 endpoints port list. |CLID::StandAloneClusterNID::10.10.210.11CT::0,0,0,0.0IP::DEV::LVL::ErrorMASK::0100 Is 10.10.201.1 the configured IP address in CUCM for the H323 GW? That’s why it’s failing. If CUCM doesn’t have the IP configured as a H323 gw that matches the source then it will reject the call. I’ve had a similar problem when I was sourcing H323 from the incorrect interface. James Rosenfelt Network Consulting Engineer Advanced Services jaros...@cisco.com http://jaros...@cisco.com/ Phone :425-468-0912 Mobile :425-241-0702 Epage :jaros...@epage.cisco.com http://jaros...@epage.cisco.com/ This e-mail may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender by reply e-mail and delete all copies of this message. ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com -- Thanks, Ashar Siddiqui ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MGCP gw not stripping to 4 digits?
This command use to fix db replication issues for example you reset the phone from GUI and the phone doesn't reset, etc (ESXi 4) utils dbreplication repair all It takes 2-3 min and use to work as expected, sometimes it's necessary to repeat the command a second time I have also seen RTMT showing 2 in replication status but replication was broken hth Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2010 17:32:12 +0100 From: siddas...@gmail.com To: sgres...@gmail.com CC: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MGCP gw not stripping to 4 digits? I have had more strange issues then you are having due to this db_replication thing. I remember few weeks back when I was practicing at one of the IPexpert rack with Sub first and Pub second, none of my devices were showing registered at CUCM yet they all were working perfectly normal. All my phones, MOH, Transcoder, CTI ports, RP, VM were in UNKNOWN status but working as normal. When I reached to test the SRST part where I had to shut the services on SUB, they all got registered to PUB and started showing Registered at CUCM. I think few racks have db_replication issue. Ash On 07/04/2010 17:24, Stephen Greszczyszyn wrote: Ashar, After rebooting my Pub/Sub I got even stranger things happening with my SIP phones (constantly restarting). This usually signals to me that something is wrong with replication, although RTMT showed both servers at 2. I switched the CUCM group to just have the Pub in it and shut down the Sub and sure enough everything (including the MGCP GW incoming) works fine now. Something surely was messed up with replication, but RTMT was lying. I guess the lesson for me is to only practice labs with one server up, or to stop and reset dbReplication on the Pub/Sub each time I roll back to a VM snapshot. On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 4:16 PM, Ashar Siddiqui siddas...@gmail.com wrote: Can you make outbound calls through your gateways? Check your CSS/Partitions etc. -- Thanks, Ashar Siddiqui _ Hotmail: Trusted email with powerful SPAM protection. https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=60969___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Calls from h323 gateway rejected by call manager
i will try that tonite. Thanks all On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 1:01 PM, Ashar Siddiqui siddas...@gmail.com wrote: You could very well be another victim of db_replication. Take off your sub from the CCM group and make everything register with PUB. Give it a go and see if it works... Ash On 07/04/2010 17:50, sean hurricane wrote: *10.10.201.1 is the configured ip address in UCCM*. On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 12:12 PM, James Rosenfelt jaros...@cisco.comwrote: 04/06/2010 23:57:43.327 CCM|H225Handler::SdlConnectionInd, rejecting the TCP connection from IP=*10.10.201.1*. Incoming H225 call on Port=1720, can't find this port in the registered H323 endpoints port list. |CLID::StandAloneClusterNID::10.10.210.11CT::0,0,0,0.0IP::DEV::LVL::ErrorMASK::0100 Is 10.10.201.1 the configured IP address in CUCM for the H323 GW? That’s why it’s failing. If CUCM doesn’t have the IP configured as a H323 gw that matches the source then it will reject the call. I’ve had a similar problem when I was sourcing H323 from the incorrect interface. James Rosenfelt Network Consulting Engineer Advanced Services jaros...@cisco.com http://jaros...@cisco.com/ Phone :425-468-0912 Mobile :425-241-0702 Epage :jaros...@epage.cisco.com This e-mail may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender by reply e-mail and delete all copies of this message. ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com -- Thanks, Ashar Siddiqui ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] V2 Lab 8 - problems with CUBE
I'm working through V2 Lab8 and I'm having problems with the CUBE part. Calls are passing from HQ to BR2 fine via the CUBE in HQ, but when they arrive in BR2, I'm getting some sort of 501 error. Calls are working ok from the BR2 SIP phones (all 7965) in/out PSTN. Apr 7 18:33:01.613: //-1//SIP/Msg/ccsipDisplayMsg: Received: INVITE sip:3...@10.10.202.1:5060 SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.10.110.1:5060;branch=z9hG4bK81840 Remote-Party-ID: hqph1 sip:5...@10.10.110.1;party=calling;screen=yes;privacy=off From: hqph1 sip:5...@10.10.110.1;tag=E67794-1928 To: sip:3...@10.10.202.1 Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2010 18:33:01 GMT Call-ID: d4dd9559-41aa11df-803bc738-41c42...@10.10.110.1 Supported: 100rel,timer,resource-priority,replaces,sdp-anat Min-SE: 1800 Cisco-Guid: 11711741-3721380283-100665601-168478822 User-Agent: Cisco-SIPGateway/IOS-12.x Allow: INVITE, OPTIONS, BYE, CANCEL, ACK, PRACK, UPDATE, REFER, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY, INFO, REGISTER CSeq: 101 INVITE Max-Forwards: 70 Timestamp: 1270665181 Contact: sip:5...@10.10.110.1:5060 Expires: 180 Allow-Events: telephone-event Content-Type: application/sdp Content-Disposition: session;handling=required Content-Length: 289 v=0 o=CiscoSystemsSIP-GW-UserAgent 92 2665 IN IP4 10.10.110.1 s=SIP Call c=IN IP4 10.10.110.1 t=0 0 m=audio 16528 RTP/AVP 18 101 19 c=IN IP4 10.10.110.1 a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000 a=fmtp:18 annexb=no a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 a=fmtp:101 0-15 a=rtpmap:19 CN/8000 a=ptime:20 Apr 7 18:33:01.633: //-1//SIP/Msg/ccsipDisplayMsg: Sent: SIP/2.0 100 Trying Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.10.110.1:5060;branch=z9hG4bK81840 From: hqph1 sip:5...@10.10.110.1;tag=E67794-1928 To: sip:3...@10.10.202.1 Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2010 18:33:01 GMT Call-ID: d4dd9559-41aa11df-803bc738-41c42...@10.10.110.1 Timestamp: 1270665181 CSeq: 101 INVITE Allow-Events: telephone-event Server: Cisco-SIPGateway/IOS-12.x Content-Length: 0 Apr 7 18:33:01.649: //-1//SIP/Msg/ccsipDisplayMsg: Sent: SIP/2.0 501 Not Implemented Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.10.110.1:5060;branch=z9hG4bK81840 From: hqph1 sip:5...@10.10.110.1;tag=E67794-1928 To: sip:3...@10.10.202.1;tag=141D4E0-701 Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2010 18:33:01 GMT Call-ID: d4dd9559-41aa11df-803bc738-41c42...@10.10.110.1 Timestamp: 1270665181 CSeq: 101 INVITE Allow-Events: telephone-event Server: Cisco-SIPGateway/IOS-12.x Reason: Q.850;cause=65 Content-Length: 0 Also, I'm having problems with the reverse path, where I'm not matching on the dial-peer since the SIP phone in BR2 seems to be sending only the first digit 5 instead of 5001. Apr 7 18:36:41.775: //-1//SIP/Msg/ccsipDisplayMsg: Received: INVITE sip:5...@10.10.202.1;user=phone SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.10.202.50:5060;branch=z9hG4bK8cd3e814 From: br2ph1 sip:3...@10.10.202.1;tag=002414b3848e001e33ed6b24-5959f9a0 To: sip:5...@10.10.202.1;user=phone Call-ID: 002414b3-848e0010-f54653b4-59c5d...@10.10.202.50 Max-Forwards: 70 Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2010 18:36:40 GMT CSeq: 101 INVITE User-Agent: Cisco-CP7965G/8.4.0 Contact: sip:3...@10.10.202.50:5060;transport=udp Expires: 180 Accept: application/sdp Allow: ACK,BYE,CANCEL,INVITE,NOTIFY,OPTIONS,REFER,REGISTER,UPDATE,SUBSCRIBE Remote-Party-ID: br2ph1 sip:3...@10.10.202.1;party=calling;id-type=subscriber;privacy=off;screen=yes Allow-Events: kpml,dialog Content-Length: 324 Content-Type: application/sdp Content-Disposition: session;handling=optional v=0 o=Cisco-SIPUA 15580 0 IN IP4 10.10.202.50 s=SIP Call t=0 0 m=audio 18680 RTP/AVP 0 8 18 116 101 c=IN IP4 10.10.202.50 a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000 a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000 a=fmtp:18 annexb=no a=rtpmap:116 iLBC/8000 a=fmtp:116 mode=20 a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 a=fmtp:101 0-15 a=sendrecv I've looked at the solutions, and it seems as though I have the same configuration. Any pointers would be appreciated. ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] V2 Lab 8 - problems with CUBE
Ensure you are allowing sip to sip connections and that you are matching an inbound voip dialpeer on the BR2 router (as opposed to using dial-peer 0). For calls from BR2HQ can you check the dialplan xml file (or even remove it altogether). Check which dial-peers you are using- it seems that you are somehow matching a VOIP dial-peer after dialing the first digit. Debug voip dialpeer will show you which dial-peers are being hit. --- Amy Ryan CCIE #24677 (Voice) Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc. Mailto: ar...@ipexpert.com Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 Live Assistance, Please visit: www.ipexpert.com/chat http://www.ipexpert.com/chat eFax: +1.810.454.0130 IPexpert is a premier provider of Classroom and Self-Study Cisco CCNA (RS, Voice Security), CCNP, CCVP, CCSP and CCIE (RS, Voice, Security Service Provider) Certification Training with locations throughout the United States, Europe and Australia. Be sure to check out our online communities at www.ipexpert.com/communities http://www.ipexpert.com/communities and our public website at www.ipexpert.com http://www.ipexpert.com . From: Stephen Greszczyszyn sgres...@gmail.com Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2010 19:32:28 +0100 To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] V2 Lab 8 - problems with CUBE I'm working through V2 Lab8 and I'm having problems with the CUBE part. Calls are passing from HQ to BR2 fine via the CUBE in HQ, but when they arrive in BR2, I'm getting some sort of 501 error. Calls are working ok from the BR2 SIP phones (all 7965) in/out PSTN. Apr 7 18:33:01.613: //-1//SIP/Msg/ccsipDisplayMsg: Received: INVITE sip:3...@10.10.202.1:5060 SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.10.110.1:5060;branch=z9hG4bK81840 Remote-Party-ID: hqph1 sip:5...@10.10.110.1;party=calling;screen=yes;privacy=off From: hqph1 sip:5...@10.10.110.1;tag=E67794-1928 To: sip:3...@10.10.202.1 Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2010 18:33:01 GMT Call-ID: d4dd9559-41aa11df-803bc738-41c42...@10.10.110.1 Supported: 100rel,timer,resource-priority,replaces,sdp-anat Min-SE: 1800 Cisco-Guid: 11711741-3721380283-100665601-168478822 User-Agent: Cisco-SIPGateway/IOS-12.x Allow: INVITE, OPTIONS, BYE, CANCEL, ACK, PRACK, UPDATE, REFER, SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY, INFO, REGISTER CSeq: 101 INVITE Max-Forwards: 70 Timestamp: 1270665181 Contact: sip:5...@10.10.110.1:5060 Expires: 180 Allow-Events: telephone-event Content-Type: application/sdp Content-Disposition: session;handling=required Content-Length: 289 v=0 o=CiscoSystemsSIP-GW-UserAgent 92 2665 IN IP4 10.10.110.1 s=SIP Call c=IN IP4 10.10.110.1 t=0 0 m=audio 16528 RTP/AVP 18 101 19 c=IN IP4 10.10.110.1 a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000 a=fmtp:18 annexb=no a=rtpmap:101 telephone-event/8000 a=fmtp:101 0-15 a=rtpmap:19 CN/8000 a=ptime:20 Apr 7 18:33:01.633: //-1//SIP/Msg/ccsipDisplayMsg: Sent: SIP/2.0 100 Trying Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.10.110.1:5060;branch=z9hG4bK81840 From: hqph1 sip:5...@10.10.110.1;tag=E67794-1928 To: sip:3...@10.10.202.1 Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2010 18:33:01 GMT Call-ID: d4dd9559-41aa11df-803bc738-41c42...@10.10.110.1 Timestamp: 1270665181 CSeq: 101 INVITE Allow-Events: telephone-event Server: Cisco-SIPGateway/IOS-12.x Content-Length: 0 Apr 7 18:33:01.649: //-1//SIP/Msg/ccsipDisplayMsg: Sent: SIP/2.0 501 Not Implemented Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.10.110.1:5060;branch=z9hG4bK81840 From: hqph1 sip:5...@10.10.110.1;tag=E67794-1928 To: sip:3...@10.10.202.1;tag=141D4E0-701 Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2010 18:33:01 GMT Call-ID: d4dd9559-41aa11df-803bc738-41c42...@10.10.110.1 Timestamp: 1270665181 CSeq: 101 INVITE Allow-Events: telephone-event Server: Cisco-SIPGateway/IOS-12.x Reason: Q.850;cause=65 Content-Length: 0 Also, I'm having problems with the reverse path, where I'm not matching on the dial-peer since the SIP phone in BR2 seems to be sending only the first digit 5 instead of 5001. Apr 7 18:36:41.775: //-1//SIP/Msg/ccsipDisplayMsg: Received: INVITE sip:5...@10.10.202.1;user=phone SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.10.202.50:5060;branch=z9hG4bK8cd3e814 From: br2ph1 sip:3...@10.10.202.1;tag=002414b3848e001e33ed6b24-5959f9a0 To: sip:5...@10.10.202.1;user=phone Call-ID: 002414b3-848e0010-f54653b4-59c5d...@10.10.202.50 Max-Forwards: 70 Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2010 18:36:40 GMT CSeq: 101 INVITE User-Agent: Cisco-CP7965G/8.4.0 Contact: sip:3...@10.10.202.50:5060;transport=udp Expires: 180 Accept: application/sdp Allow: ACK,BYE,CANCEL,INVITE,NOTIFY,OPTIONS,REFER,REGISTER,UPDATE,SUBSCRIBE Remote-Party-ID: br2ph1 sip:3...@10.10.202.1;party=calling;id-type=subscriber;privacy=off;screen=yes Allow-Events: kpml,dialog Content-Length: 324 Content-Type: application/sdp Content-Disposition: session;handling=optional v=0 o=Cisco-SIPUA 15580 0 IN IP4 10.10.202.50 s=SIP Call t=0 0 m=audio 18680 RTP/AVP 0 8 18 116 101 c=IN IP4 10.10.202.50 a=rtpmap:0 PCMU/8000 a=rtpmap:8 PCMA/8000 a=rtpmap:18 G729/8000 a=fmtp:18 annexb=no a=rtpmap:116
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol 2, Lab 8, Task 7.1
I'm working on Lab 8, Task 7.1 and was trying to figure out how to accomplish the SIP SRST as outlined in the task, honoring the requirement of You are not allowed to create a voice translation-rule (or translation-rule) to achieve this task. After trying various things which didn't work I looked at the Solution Guide, and the solution involves applying voice translation-rules to the gateway? Should there have been some other solution to this requirement which didn't make it into the printed version of the Solution Guide, or was the wording of the requirements in the workbook supposed to have been updated to remove that caveat? I was just really curious to see how the solution worked WITHOUT using voice translation-rules, but was disappointed to see that the solution guide used the very thing we weren't supposed to be ALLOWED to use. J Earl Hough CCIE #16508 (RS/Security) _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ The information contained in this transmission is confidential. It is intended solely for the use of the individual(s) or organization(s) to whom it is addressed. Any disclosure, copying or further distribution is not permitted unless such privilege is explicitly granted in writing by PC Mall, Inc. Furthermore, PC Mall, Inc. is not responsible for the proper and complete transmission of the substance of this communication, nor for any delay in its receipt. ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Calls from h323 gateway rejected by call manager
Still no luck, spent hours on this tonite On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 2:24 PM, sean hurricane shurric...@gmail.com wrote: i will try that tonite. Thanks all On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 1:01 PM, Ashar Siddiqui siddas...@gmail.comwrote: You could very well be another victim of db_replication. Take off your sub from the CCM group and make everything register with PUB. Give it a go and see if it works... Ash On 07/04/2010 17:50, sean hurricane wrote: *10.10.201.1 is the configured ip address in UCCM*. On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 12:12 PM, James Rosenfelt jaros...@cisco.comwrote: 04/06/2010 23:57:43.327 CCM|H225Handler::SdlConnectionInd, rejecting the TCP connection from IP=*10.10.201.1*. Incoming H225 call on Port=1720, can't find this port in the registered H323 endpoints port list. |CLID::StandAloneClusterNID::10.10.210.11CT::0,0,0,0.0IP::DEV::LVL::ErrorMASK::0100 Is 10.10.201.1 the configured IP address in CUCM for the H323 GW? That’s why it’s failing. If CUCM doesn’t have the IP configured as a H323 gw that matches the source then it will reject the call. I’ve had a similar problem when I was sourcing H323 from the incorrect interface. James Rosenfelt Network Consulting Engineer Advanced Services jaros...@cisco.com http://jaros...@cisco.com/ Phone :425-468-0912 Mobile :425-241-0702 Epage :jaros...@epage.cisco.com This e-mail may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender by reply e-mail and delete all copies of this message. ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com -- Thanks, Ashar Siddiqui ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Calls from h323 gateway rejected by call manager
why don't you enable the following debug on the router debug cch323 h225, to check the call setup and check how the gw attempts to contact the cucm. you can also enable debug cch323 h245 to check the logical channel negotiation 2010/4/7 sean hurricane shurric...@gmail.com Still no luck, spent hours on this tonite On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 2:24 PM, sean hurricane shurric...@gmail.comwrote: i will try that tonite. Thanks all On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 1:01 PM, Ashar Siddiqui siddas...@gmail.comwrote: You could very well be another victim of db_replication. Take off your sub from the CCM group and make everything register with PUB. Give it a go and see if it works... Ash On 07/04/2010 17:50, sean hurricane wrote: *10.10.201.1 is the configured ip address in UCCM*. On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 12:12 PM, James Rosenfelt jaros...@cisco.comwrote: 04/06/2010 23:57:43.327 CCM|H225Handler::SdlConnectionInd, rejecting the TCP connection from IP=*10.10.201.1*. Incoming H225 call on Port=1720, can't find this port in the registered H323 endpoints port list. |CLID::StandAloneClusterNID::10.10.210.11CT::0,0,0,0.0IP::DEV::LVL::ErrorMASK::0100 Is 10.10.201.1 the configured IP address in CUCM for the H323 GW? That’s why it’s failing. If CUCM doesn’t have the IP configured as a H323 gw that matches the source then it will reject the call. I’ve had a similar problem when I was sourcing H323 from the incorrect interface. James Rosenfelt Network Consulting Engineer Advanced Services jaros...@cisco.com http://jaros...@cisco.com/ Phone :425-468-0912 Mobile :425-241-0702 Epage :jaros...@epage.cisco.com This e-mail may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender by reply e-mail and delete all copies of this message. ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com -- Thanks, Ashar Siddiqui ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Calls from h323 gateway rejected by call manager
Sean, There are a couple of things you can try. First there is a CCM service param called accept tcp connections from unknown devices or something similar, set that to true and see if the call goes through. If the call goes through, then you know everythings fine on the GW side Now you can turn off the service param and delete the h323 gw from ccm. Reinsert the h323 gw and restart ccm service( if possible) Sent from my phone On Apr 7, 2010, at 10:46 PM, sean hurricane shurric...@gmail.com wrote: Still no luck, spent hours on this tonite On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 2:24 PM, sean hurricane shurric...@gmail.com wrote: i will try that tonite. Thanks all On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 1:01 PM, Ashar Siddiqui siddas...@gmail.com wrote: You could very well be another victim of db_replication. Take off your sub from the CCM group and make everything register with PUB. Give it a go and see if it works... Ash On 07/04/2010 17:50, sean hurricane wrote: 10.10.201.1 is the configured ip address in UCCM. On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 12:12 PM, James Rosenfelt jaros...@cisco.com wrote: 04/06/2010 23:57:43.327 CCM|H225Handler::SdlConnectionInd, rejecting the TCP connection from IP=10.10.201.1. Incoming H225 call on Port=1720, can't find this port in the registered H323 endpoints port list. |CLID::StandAloneClusterNID::10.10.210.11CT:: 0,0,0,0.0IP::DEV::LVL::ErrorMASK::0100 Is 10.10.201.1 the configured IP address in CUCM for the H323 GW? That’s why it’s failing. If CUCM doesn’t have the IP configured as a H323 gw that matches the source then it will rejec t the call. I’ve had a similar problem when I was sourcing H323 from the incor rect interface. James Rosenfelt Network Consulting Engineer Advanced Services jaros...@cisco.com Phone :425-468-0912 Mobile :425-241-0702 Epage :jaros...@epage.cisco.com This e-mail may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender by reply e-mail and delete all copies of this message. ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com -- Thanks, Ashar Siddiqui ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Calls from h323 gateway rejected by call manager
Are you using the Loopback 0 ip address as the Device Name for the H323 gateway in UCM? Do you have 'h323-gateway voip interface' and 'h323-gateway voip bind srcaddr x.x.x.x' on the router's Loopback 0 interface so packets are sources from Loopback 0? On Apr 7, 2010, at 8:46 PM, sean hurricane wrote: Still no luck, spent hours on this tonite On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 2:24 PM, sean hurricane shurric...@gmail.com wrote: i will try that tonite. Thanks all On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 1:01 PM, Ashar Siddiqui siddas...@gmail.com wrote: You could very well be another victim of db_replication. Take off your sub from the CCM group and make everything register with PUB. Give it a go and see if it works... Ash On 07/04/2010 17:50, sean hurricane wrote: 10.10.201.1 is the configured ip address in UCCM. On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 12:12 PM, James Rosenfelt jaros...@cisco.com wrote: 04/06/2010 23:57:43.327 CCM|H225Handler::SdlConnectionInd, rejecting the TCP connection from IP=10.10.201.1. Incoming H225 call on Port=1720, can't find this port in the registered H323 endpoints port list. |CLID::StandAloneClusterNID::10.10.210.11CT::0,0,0,0.0IP::DEV::LVL::ErrorMASK::0100 Is 10.10.201.1 the configured IP address in CUCM for the H323 GW? That’s why it’s failing. If CUCM doesn’t have the IP configured as a H323 gw that matches the source then it will reject the call. I’ve had a similar problem when I was sourcing H323 from the incorrect interface. James Rosenfelt Network Consulting Engineer Advanced Services jaros...@cisco.com Phone :425-468-0912 Mobile :425-241-0702 Epage :jaros...@epage.cisco.com This e-mail may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender by reply e-mail and delete all copies of this message. ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com -- Thanks, Ashar Siddiqui ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] %CDP-4-DUPLEX_MISMATCH: duplex mismatch discovered on HQ3750 SW...can not browse into CUCM
I am in middle of the session on Proctor labs... I am getting %CDP-4-DUPLEX_MISMATCH: duplex mismatch discovered on FastEthernet1/0/4 (not half duplex), with CUC7-Pub eth0 (half duplex). on HQ 3750 Switch. I can ping 10.10.210.10 CUCM but can't web browse into it. Any help will be highly appreciated. ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] %CDP-4-DUPLEX_MISMATCH: duplex mismatch discovered on HQ3750 SW...can not browse into CUCM
From what I understand, the Duplex message is an issue with the ESX setup, and nothing to be considered about. If it's a nuisance, disable CDP on Fa 1/0/4 with no cdp enable Can you SSH into the Pub? Perhaps the services have yet to fully load. From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of vccie2010 Sent: April-07-10 10:59 PM To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] %CDP-4-DUPLEX_MISMATCH: duplex mismatch discovered on HQ3750 SW...can not browse into CUCM I am in middle of the session on Proctor labs... I am getting %CDP-4-DUPLEX_MISMATCH: duplex mismatch discovered on FastEthernet1/0/4 (not half duplex), with CUC7-Pub eth0 (half duplex). on HQ 3750 Switch. I can ping 10.10.210.10 CUCM but can't web browse into it. Any help will be highly appreciated. ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] %CDP-4-DUPLEX_MISMATCH: duplex mismatch discovered on HQ3750 SW...can not browse into CUCM
I would agree, first things is to verify that Tomcat is happy. From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Ryan Schwab Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2010 1:11 AM To: 'vccie2010'; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] %CDP-4-DUPLEX_MISMATCH: duplex mismatch discovered on HQ3750 SW...can not browse into CUCM From what I understand, the Duplex message is an issue with the ESX setup, and nothing to be considered about. If it's a nuisance, disable CDP on Fa 1/0/4 with no cdp enable Can you SSH into the Pub? Perhaps the services have yet to fully load. From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of vccie2010 Sent: April-07-10 10:59 PM To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] %CDP-4-DUPLEX_MISMATCH: duplex mismatch discovered on HQ3750 SW...can not browse into CUCM I am in middle of the session on Proctor labs... I am getting %CDP-4-DUPLEX_MISMATCH: duplex mismatch discovered on FastEthernet1/0/4 (not half duplex), with CUC7-Pub eth0 (half duplex). on HQ 3750 Switch. I can ping 10.10.210.10 CUCM but can't web browse into it. Any help will be highly appreciated. ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] %CDP-4-DUPLEX_MISMATCH: duplex mismatch discovered on HQ3750 SW...can not browse into CUCM
Mike, on that note, are there any specific CLI commands you can think of to verify this? :) From: Mike Thompson [mailto:mthompson...@gmail.com] Sent: April-07-10 11:16 PM To: 'Ryan Schwab'; 'vccie2010'; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] %CDP-4-DUPLEX_MISMATCH: duplex mismatch discovered on HQ3750 SW...can not browse into CUCM I would agree, first things is to verify that Tomcat is happy. From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Ryan Schwab Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2010 1:11 AM To: 'vccie2010'; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] %CDP-4-DUPLEX_MISMATCH: duplex mismatch discovered on HQ3750 SW...can not browse into CUCM From what I understand, the Duplex message is an issue with the ESX setup, and nothing to be considered about. If it's a nuisance, disable CDP on Fa 1/0/4 with no cdp enable Can you SSH into the Pub? Perhaps the services have yet to fully load. From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of vccie2010 Sent: April-07-10 10:59 PM To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] %CDP-4-DUPLEX_MISMATCH: duplex mismatch discovered on HQ3750 SW...can not browse into CUCM I am in middle of the session on Proctor labs... I am getting %CDP-4-DUPLEX_MISMATCH: duplex mismatch discovered on FastEthernet1/0/4 (not half duplex), with CUC7-Pub eth0 (half duplex). on HQ 3750 Switch. I can ping 10.10.210.10 CUCM but can't web browse into it. Any help will be highly appreciated. ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] %CDP-4-DUPLEX_MISMATCH: duplex mismatch discovered on HQ3750 SW...can not browse into CUCM
Syntax escapes me right now, but there will be a show service or list service command that will show the status of all services on the server. It should show status as well From: Ryan Schwab [mailto:schwab...@shaw.ca] Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2010 1:15 AM To: 'Mike Thompson'; 'vccie2010'; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] %CDP-4-DUPLEX_MISMATCH: duplex mismatch discovered on HQ3750 SW...can not browse into CUCM Mike, on that note, are there any specific CLI commands you can think of to verify this? :) From: Mike Thompson [mailto:mthompson...@gmail.com] Sent: April-07-10 11:16 PM To: 'Ryan Schwab'; 'vccie2010'; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] %CDP-4-DUPLEX_MISMATCH: duplex mismatch discovered on HQ3750 SW...can not browse into CUCM I would agree, first things is to verify that Tomcat is happy. From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Ryan Schwab Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2010 1:11 AM To: 'vccie2010'; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] %CDP-4-DUPLEX_MISMATCH: duplex mismatch discovered on HQ3750 SW...can not browse into CUCM From what I understand, the Duplex message is an issue with the ESX setup, and nothing to be considered about. If it's a nuisance, disable CDP on Fa 1/0/4 with no cdp enable Can you SSH into the Pub? Perhaps the services have yet to fully load. From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of vccie2010 Sent: April-07-10 10:59 PM To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] %CDP-4-DUPLEX_MISMATCH: duplex mismatch discovered on HQ3750 SW...can not browse into CUCM I am in middle of the session on Proctor labs... I am getting %CDP-4-DUPLEX_MISMATCH: duplex mismatch discovered on FastEthernet1/0/4 (not half duplex), with CUC7-Pub eth0 (half duplex). on HQ 3750 Switch. I can ping 10.10.210.10 CUCM but can't web browse into it. Any help will be highly appreciated. ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] %CDP-4-DUPLEX_MISMATCH: duplex mismatch discovered on HQ3750 SW...can not browse into CUCM
Utils service list will show the list of services and their status From: Ryan Schwab [mailto:schwab...@shaw.ca] Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2010 1:15 AM To: 'Mike Thompson'; 'vccie2010'; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] %CDP-4-DUPLEX_MISMATCH: duplex mismatch discovered on HQ3750 SW...can not browse into CUCM Mike, on that note, are there any specific CLI commands you can think of to verify this? :) From: Mike Thompson [mailto:mthompson...@gmail.com] Sent: April-07-10 11:16 PM To: 'Ryan Schwab'; 'vccie2010'; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] %CDP-4-DUPLEX_MISMATCH: duplex mismatch discovered on HQ3750 SW...can not browse into CUCM I would agree, first things is to verify that Tomcat is happy. From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Ryan Schwab Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2010 1:11 AM To: 'vccie2010'; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] %CDP-4-DUPLEX_MISMATCH: duplex mismatch discovered on HQ3750 SW...can not browse into CUCM From what I understand, the Duplex message is an issue with the ESX setup, and nothing to be considered about. If it's a nuisance, disable CDP on Fa 1/0/4 with no cdp enable Can you SSH into the Pub? Perhaps the services have yet to fully load. From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of vccie2010 Sent: April-07-10 10:59 PM To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] %CDP-4-DUPLEX_MISMATCH: duplex mismatch discovered on HQ3750 SW...can not browse into CUCM I am in middle of the session on Proctor labs... I am getting %CDP-4-DUPLEX_MISMATCH: duplex mismatch discovered on FastEthernet1/0/4 (not half duplex), with CUC7-Pub eth0 (half duplex). on HQ 3750 Switch. I can ping 10.10.210.10 CUCM but can't web browse into it. Any help will be highly appreciated. ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
