Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Dumb question about Agent Single Sign Button Sign-on

[David Lee]

Crap.  I know my mistake now.  Reading the technotes more closely, I've been
using the default URL with "IPAgentInitial.jsp".  Suppose to use the one
after with "IPAgentLogin.jsp."



On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 11:37 PM, David Lee  wrote:

> Hi Alex,
>
> Thanks for replying.  I think there is a misunderstanding.
>
> The Single Button Sign-on I was talking about is IP Phone Agent.  After I
> configure it, and press the services button, I still have to sign the agent
> on.  The credentials I enter on the  phone are the ones I put under the
> service subscription.
>
> Anyways, it does not seem to work.  (It worked before cuz I never logged
> the agent out. :) )  I gotta do some troubleshooting...
>
> -Dave
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 11:20 PM, Alex Golovin wrote:
>
>>  Dave,
>>
>> Users must configure their credentials on the ccmuser page under the phone
>> services. So pressing the single sign button would authenticate and log them
>> in.
>>
>> Hope it helped.
>>
>> Alex
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:
>> ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] *On Behalf Of *David Lee
>> *Sent:* Thursday, September 30, 2010 10:56 PM
>> *To:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
>> *Subject:* [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Dumb question about Agent Single Sign
>> Button Sign-on
>>
>>
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>>
>>
>> I can't remember the proper behavior, so if would be great if someone can
>> confirm for me.  I've configured Agent Single Sign Button Sign-on, but I
>> still need to log the agent in with credentials/extension the FIRST TIME.
>>  Afterwards, the agent can login without entering the credential again.  Is
>> that the right behavior, or should agent single button sign-on work from the
>> first time?
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>>
>>
>> -Dave
>>
>>
>>
>
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Dumb question about Agent Single Sign Button Sign-on

[David Lee]

Hi Alex,

Thanks for replying.  I think there is a misunderstanding.

The Single Button Sign-on I was talking about is IP Phone Agent.  After I
configure it, and press the services button, I still have to sign the agent
on.  The credentials I enter on the  phone are the ones I put under the
service subscription.

Anyways, it does not seem to work.  (It worked before cuz I never logged the
agent out. :) )  I gotta do some troubleshooting...

-Dave


On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 11:20 PM, Alex Golovin  wrote:

>  Dave,
>
> Users must configure their credentials on the ccmuser page under the phone
> services. So pressing the single sign button would authenticate and log them
> in.
>
> Hope it helped.
>
> Alex
>
>
>
> *From:* ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:
> ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] *On Behalf Of *David Lee
> *Sent:* Thursday, September 30, 2010 10:56 PM
> *To:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
> *Subject:* [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Dumb question about Agent Single Sign Button
> Sign-on
>
>
>
> Hello,
>
>
>
> I can't remember the proper behavior, so if would be great if someone can
> confirm for me.  I've configured Agent Single Sign Button Sign-on, but I
> still need to log the agent in with credentials/extension the FIRST TIME.
>  Afterwards, the agent can login without entering the credential again.  Is
> that the right behavior, or should agent single button sign-on work from the
> first time?
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> -Dave
>
>
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Dumb question about Agent Single Sign Button Sign-on

[David Lee]

Hello,

I can't remember the proper behavior, so if would be great if someone can
confirm for me.  I've configured Agent Single Sign Button Sign-on, but I
still need to log the agent in with credentials/extension the FIRST TIME.
 Afterwards, the agent can login without entering the credential again.  Is
that the right behavior, or should agent single button sign-on work from the
first time?

Thanks,

-Dave
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Adding Subscriber on VMware

[xmunish]

Follow these steps on adding Sub so that you don't get DB Sync problems
later.

1) On Pub add the NTP via OS administration (could be the loop back of HQ
RTR as NTP source) 
2) Add Subscriber in the Publisher Server. Also if you're using ESX, add PUB
and SUB MAC addresses along with IPs.
3) SSH to PUB - run utils ntp status to make sure it's synced to NTP source
4) Start installing the SUB - during the installation make sure it finds the
PUB (if not do it again)
5) Once SUB is installed OK - Start all services in SUB
6) RTMT to PUB after 10 mins. And make sure the status of DB replication is
OK
7) Take the snapshot of PUB as Base Config

I hope this helps.
Munish

-Original Message-
From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of
ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com
Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2010 7:11 PM
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: CCIE_Voice Digest, Vol 55, Issue 110

Send CCIE_Voice mailing list submissions to
ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://onlinestudylist.com/mailman/listinfo/ccie_voice
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
ccie_voice-requ...@onlinestudylist.com

You can reach the person managing the list at
ccie_voice-ow...@onlinestudylist.com

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of CCIE_Voice digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1.  Adding Subscriber on VMware (Tamer Ismail)
   2. Re: UCX preventing from answering calls that it   originated
  (Miron Kobelski)
   3. RES:   Adding Subscriber on VMware (Marcelo Alexandria)
   4. Re: Adding Subscriber on VMware (Tamer Ismail)


--

Message: 1
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 23:28:11 +0200
From: "Tamer Ismail" 
To: 
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice]  Adding Subscriber on VMware
Message-ID: <00b501cb60e6$6415dc90$2c4195...@com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

Hello,

I just begin my first day in preparing CCIE Voice lab.

I can't install CUCM subscriber server installing on VMware machine.

Can someone help.

 

Tamer,

Thanks

-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:


--

Message: 2
Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2010 00:12:34 +0200
From: Miron Kobelski 
To: "Stutz, Bernhard" 
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCX preventing from answering calls
that it originated
Message-ID:

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

Hi Bernhard,

My understanding is that CUC can sometimes originate calls, which could be
routed back to it.
E.g. voicemail notification for a DN with cfwdall back to CUC would end up
as an endless loop of CUC speaking with itself.

Have a look at options at:
CUC Administration > Telephony Integration > Phone System > Call Loop
Detection by Using DTMF

regards
kobel


On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 18:42, Stutz, Bernhard  wrote:

>  Hi,
>
> I came across a question that is always within a Unity Connection
> integration:
>
> "The UC server should be prevented from answering calls that it
> originated."
>
> I am not sure what this means. Could someone please shed some light on it?
> Is there a checkbox somewhere that needs to be checked in order to achieve
> this?
> I can't find a explanation for this at the solutions so far, so i was
> guessing that this is given anyway.
>
> thanks in advance,
> Bernhard
>
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
>
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:


--

Message: 3
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 19:41:48 -0300
From: "Marcelo Alexandria" 
To: "'Tamer Ismail'" ,

Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] RES:   Adding Subscriber on VMware
Message-ID: <000f01cb60f0$ae003da0$0a00b8...@com.br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

Put your problem...what error you got?

 

De: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] Em nome de Tamer Ismail
Enviada em: quinta-feira, 30 de setembro de 2010 18:28
Para: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Assunto: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Adding Subscriber on VMware

 

Hello,

I just begin my first day in preparing CCIE Voice lab.

I can?t install CUCM subscriber server installing on VMware machine.

Can someone help?

 

Tamer,

Thanks

Nenhum v?rus encontrado nessa mensagem recebida.
Verificado por AVG - www.avgbrasil.com.br
Vers?o: 9.0.856 / Banco de dados de v?rus: 271.1.1/3168 - Data de
Lan?amento: 09/30/10 03:34:00

-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:


--

Message: 4
Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2010 01:09:48 +0200
From: "Tamer Ismail" 
To: "'Marcelo Alexandria'" 
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudy

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Adding Subscriber on VMware

[Bill Lake]

Hello Tammer,

I am using ESXi to run my lab. You install the Pub first, then you add the
Sub to the pub under servers.  Then you install the sub on VMWare and point
to the Pub.  If for some reason this fails it is most likely your networking
of the VM's. I have found it best to give them actual IP's on the network
and not do nat or local networking to the VM environment.  Hope this helps.

Bill
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Adding Subscriber on VMware

[Tamer Ismail]

Subscriber couldn’t sync with publisher NTP server (something like that)
actually I couldn’t remember the error syntax.

 

From: Marcelo Alexandria [mailto:malexand...@uol.com.br] 
Sent: Friday, October 01, 2010 12:42 AM
To: 'Tamer Ismail'; ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: RES: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Adding Subscriber on VMware

 

Put your problem...what error you got?

 

De: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] Em nome de Tamer Ismail
Enviada em: quinta-feira, 30 de setembro de 2010 18:28
Para: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Assunto: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Adding Subscriber on VMware

 

Hello,

I just begin my first day in preparing CCIE Voice lab.

I can’t install CUCM subscriber server installing on VMware machine.

Can someone help…

 

Tamer,

Thanks

Nenhum vírus encontrado nessa mensagem recebida.
Verificado por AVG - www.avgbrasil.com.br
Versão: 9.0.856 / Banco de dados de vírus: 271.1.1/3168 - Data de
Lançamento: 09/30/10 03:34:00

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] RES: Adding Subscriber on VMware

[Marcelo Alexandria]

Put your problem...what error you got?

 

De: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com
[mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] Em nome de Tamer Ismail
Enviada em: quinta-feira, 30 de setembro de 2010 18:28
Para: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Assunto: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Adding Subscriber on VMware

 

Hello,

I just begin my first day in preparing CCIE Voice lab.

I can’t install CUCM subscriber server installing on VMware machine.

Can someone help…

 

Tamer,

Thanks

Nenhum vírus encontrado nessa mensagem recebida.
Verificado por AVG - www.avgbrasil.com.br
Versão: 9.0.856 / Banco de dados de vírus: 271.1.1/3168 - Data de
Lançamento: 09/30/10 03:34:00

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCX preventing from answering calls that it originated

[Miron Kobelski]

Hi Bernhard,

My understanding is that CUC can sometimes originate calls, which could be
routed back to it.
E.g. voicemail notification for a DN with cfwdall back to CUC would end up
as an endless loop of CUC speaking with itself.

Have a look at options at:
CUC Administration > Telephony Integration > Phone System > Call Loop
Detection by Using DTMF

regards
kobel


On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 18:42, Stutz, Bernhard  wrote:

>  Hi,
>
> I came across a question that is always within a Unity Connection
> integration:
>
> "The UC server should be prevented from answering calls that it
> originated."
>
> I am not sure what this means. Could someone please shed some light on it?
> Is there a checkbox somewhere that needs to be checked in order to achieve
> this?
> I can't find a explanation for this at the solutions so far, so i was
> guessing that this is given anyway.
>
> thanks in advance,
> Bernhard
>
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Adding Subscriber on VMware

[Tamer Ismail]

Hello,

I just begin my first day in preparing CCIE Voice lab.

I can't install CUCM subscriber server installing on VMware machine.

Can someone help.

 

Tamer,

Thanks

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Speed for taking the Lab

[Daniel Berlinski]

HI Pithog

Here comes my suggestion:
Choose one lab and change the IP addresses in your environment, the number
plan, and the physical position of the phones you work with on your desk,
introduce infrastructure probs, make sure you make it very hard for your
phones to register.

Review the troubleshooting IP Tel book on chapter  3 I think speaks about
phone registration and there is a white paper on cisco.com that talks about
common phone registration probs, make sure you are familiar with those and
practice those scenarios so you can see the symptoms happening before you in
the stress room chamber

On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 9:38 AM, Amp  wrote:

> Hey Pithog,
> You ask a tough question my friend. I think some of the things that you
> need to consider are how well do you know the core technologies and how fast
> can you correctly configure them? Based upon the forums and the practice
> labs there are going to be some things that you will need to know how to
> configure rather swiftly. Will you have CME with SCCP and SIP phones to
> configure on your lab? Who knows but it would be a good idea to know how to
> configure CME in a matter of minutes. Can you configure IOS media resources
> as fast as you can type your name? If not then ask yourself why not. Start
> configuring H323, MGCP, and Gatekeepers in notepad. If you can do it in
> notepad with little to no screw-ups then you can do it in the router
> lightning fast. Are you able to read the question and not over-complicate
> what's being asked? How fast can you configure COR? Furthermore what's your
> strategy? Do you plan on configuring once and copying, modifying, and
> pasting? What do you know really well and what do you need help in? Spend as
> much time trying to master the areas that you are weak in. Also remember, it
> is very possible that the IPX labs are more difficult than the actual lab so
> if you can't get through the IPX labs in less than 8 hours, can you do the
> core of what's being asked in a timely manner? So in my opinion, configure
> as much as you can in notepad to ensure you know the configuration steps
> inside and out. During your steps write out the steps to configure what's
> being asked. Do this without looking it up and see where you are coming up
> short. I know I didn't directly answer your question but I hope that helps.
>
> Amp
>
>
> Quoting Pithog Oil :
>
>  Please i will like to know if my speed is okay and good enough for the
>> exam,
>> it takes me 8 hours at the moment to finish the ipexpert, Labs,
>>  suggestions are welcome on how i can shorthen the time to 4 hours, i
>>  really hope its possible, please i need assistance on this.
>> Ultimately i want to know how to manage my time better.
>> Thanks
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Speed for taking the Lab

[Amp]

Hey Pithog,
You ask a tough question my friend. I think some of the things that  
you need to consider are how well do you know the core technologies  
and how fast can you correctly configure them? Based upon the forums  
and the practice labs there are going to be some things that you will  
need to know how to configure rather swiftly. Will you have CME with  
SCCP and SIP phones to configure on your lab? Who knows but it would  
be a good idea to know how to configure CME in a matter of minutes.  
Can you configure IOS media resources as fast as you can type your  
name? If not then ask yourself why not. Start configuring H323, MGCP,  
and Gatekeepers in notepad. If you can do it in notepad with little to  
no screw-ups then you can do it in the router lightning fast. Are you  
able to read the question and not over-complicate what's being asked?  
How fast can you configure COR? Furthermore what's your strategy? Do  
you plan on configuring once and copying, modifying, and pasting? What  
do you know really well and what do you need help in? Spend as much  
time trying to master the areas that you are weak in. Also remember,  
it is very possible that the IPX labs are more difficult than the  
actual lab so if you can't get through the IPX labs in less than 8  
hours, can you do the core of what's being asked in a timely manner?  
So in my opinion, configure as much as you can in notepad to ensure  
you know the configuration steps inside and out. During your steps  
write out the steps to configure what's being asked. Do this without  
looking it up and see where you are coming up short. I know I didn't  
directly answer your question but I hope that helps.


Amp

Quoting Pithog Oil :


Please i will like to know if my speed is okay and good enough for the exam, 
it takes me 8 hours at the moment to finish the ipexpert, Labs,   
suggestions are welcome on how i can shorthen the time to 4 hours, i  
 really hope its possible, please i need assistance on this.

Ultimately i want to know how to manage my time better.
Thanks






___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Speed for taking the Lab

[Pithog Oil]

Please i will like to know if my speed is okay and good enough for the exam, 
it takes me 8 hours at the moment to finish the ipexpert, Labs, suggestions are 
welcome on how i can shorthen the time to 4 hours, i really hope its possible, 
please i need assistance on this.
Ultimately i want to know how to manage my time better.
Thanks

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Does anyone know what Microsoft BPOS is?

[Brian Mulgrew]

Hi - its effectively MS OCS 2K7 and E2K7 in the cloud. Can be used
with CUCIMOC and CUCM  for Presence and IM, with E2K7 being used for
UM.

Cheers
b

On 30/09/2010, gwen...@gmail.com  wrote:
>
>
> Sent from my HTC on the Now Network from Sprint!
>
> - Reply message -
> From: "CCIE Voice GMAIL" 
> Date: Thu, Sep 30, 2010 11:05 am
> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] FW:  CME and SIP Phone Presence
> To: "'osl osl'" 
>
>

-- 
Sent from my mobile device
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QOS solution required.

[Ashar Siddiqui]

Help yourself .. it would then be worth being CCIE..

Ash>

voice-gang voice-gang wrote:

Lab in 5 days if anyone can help that would be appreciated

On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 4:12 PM, voice-gang voice-gang 
mailto:mgcptroubleshoot...@gmail.com>> 
wrote:


8.1 Switch QoS

2) On port fa 1/0/13 which is connected to HQ Phone 1, guarantee
32k for

incoming SCCP signaling traffic. Excess traffic should be marked
to DSCP 8 and

then transmitted. By default, IP Phones mark SCCP signaling
traffic to CS3.

(3 points)

8.2 Link fragmentation and Interleaving

There is 384k frame-relay PVC between HQ and SiteB. Configure R1
and R2 to
enable MLP, link fragmentation and interleaving on this circuit.
(2 points)
 
Regarding the WAN qos if i will configure the HQ to SB my SC link

become 56 K
So i can achieve this task by adding the class map of T1 link to
SC but do we have to do this or not.
 
Regards

MGCP




___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com
  

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCX preventing from answering calls that it originated

[Stutz, Bernhard]

Hi,
 
I came across a question that is always within a Unity Connection integration:
 
"The UC server should be prevented from answering calls that it originated."
 
I am not sure what this means. Could someone please shed some light on it?
Is there a checkbox somewhere that needs to be checked in order to achieve 
this? 
I can't find a explanation for this at the solutions so far, so i was guessing 
that this is given anyway.
 
thanks in advance,
Bernhard
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Does anyone know what Microsoft BPOS is?

[Brian Valentine]

http://lmgtfy.com/?q=Microsoft+BPOS&l=1


On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 11:56 AM, gwen...@gmail.com  wrote:
>
>
> Sent from my HTC on the Now Network from Sprint!
>
> - Reply message -
> From: "CCIE Voice GMAIL" 
> Date: Thu, Sep 30, 2010 11:05 am
> Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] FW: CME and SIP Phone Presence
> To: "'osl osl'" 
>
> I wouldn’t be so obvious if it was a real lab question, simply something I’m
> building on my own.
>
>
>
> Just a note, I am using entirely SIP, so SCCP wouldn’t matter and to assume
> that SCCP and SIP will behave the same way would seem troublesome to me.  If
> someone has done CME presence with SIP Phones and comment on this I would
> appreciate it, otherwise I will assume that this is how SIP Phones will
> function with presence in CME.
>
>
>
> Jeff
>
>
>
> From: voice-gang voice-gang [mailto:mgcptroubleshoot...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2010 3:35 AM
> To: CCIE Voice GMAIL
> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CME and SIP Phone Presence
>
>
>
> Hi Jeff,
>
>
>
> No it should not work like that, Bec in SCCP phone when u pickup the
> heandset then the red light should glow of SCPH2
>
>
>
> I just have one concern is this real lab question i am sure this is not ..!!
> :)
>
>
>
> Bec i have all the labs let me know if you want to be a study partner.
>
>
>
> Thks
>
> On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 4:12 AM, CCIE Voice GMAIL
>  wrote:
>
> Hey everyone,
>
>
>
> I am looking for some help on CME presence.  I have configured presence and
> its working with my SIP Phones, but it only works when there is an active
> call.
>
>
>
> There is SCPH1 with extension 4001 and SCPH2 with extension 4002.  Both are
> configured with BLFs to point to the other phone.  When I pick up SCPH1, the
> BLF on SCHPH2 does nothing.  However, if I make a call with SCHPH1, the BLF
> on SCHPH2 will turn red.
>
>
>
> Has anyone experienced this before?  Is this the accurate way to function
> with SIP Phones?
>
>
>
> Here is the relevant configurations:
>
>
>
> voice register global
>
>  mode cme
>
>  source-address 10.5.202.1 port 5060
>
>  max-dn 10
>
>  max-pool 2
>
>  load 7945 SIP45.9-0-3S
>
>  load 7942 SIP42.9-0-3S
>
>  authenticate register
>
>  authenticate realm cisco.com
>
>  url directory http://10.5.202.1/localdirectory/
>
>  tftp-path flash:
>
>  create profile sync 0063161211015195
>
>
>
> voice register dn  1
>
>  number 4001
>
>  allow watch
>
>  name Site C Phone 1
>
>  label 4001
>
> !
>
> voice register dn  2
>
>  number 4002
>
>  allow watch
>
>  name Site C Phone 2
>
>  label 4002
>
> !
>
> voice register pool  1
>
>  id mac 0024.9733.6C28
>
>  type 7942
>
>  number 1 dn 1
>
>  presence call-list
>
>  dtmf-relay rtp-nte sip-notify
>
>  voice-class codec 1
>
>  username scuser1 password cisco
>
>  blf-speed-dial 1 4002 label "SCPh2 4002" device
>
> !
>
> voice register pool  2
>
>  id mac 0024.14B2.F542
>
>  type 7945
>
>  number 1 dn 2
>
>  presence call-list
>
>  voice-class codec 1
>
>  username scuser2 password cisco
>
>  blf-speed-dial 1 4001 label "SCPh1 4001" device
>
>
>
> presence
>
>  presence call-list
>
>
>
> sip-ua
>
>  sip-server ipv4:10.5.202.1
>
>  presence enable
>
>
>
>
>
> Any help is appreciated!
>
>
>
> Jeff
>
>
>
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
>
>
> ___
> For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
> visit www.ipexpert.com
>
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Does anyone know what Microsoft BPOS is?

[gwen...@gmail.com]

Sent from my HTC on the Now Network from Sprint!

- Reply message -
From: "CCIE Voice GMAIL" 
Date: Thu, Sep 30, 2010 11:05 am
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] FW:  CME and SIP Phone Presence
To: "'osl osl'" 

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] FW: CME and SIP Phone Presence

[CCIE Voice GMAIL]

I wouldn't be so obvious if it was a real lab question, simply something I'm
building on my own.  

 

Just a note, I am using entirely SIP, so SCCP wouldn't matter and to assume
that SCCP and SIP will behave the same way would seem troublesome to me.  If
someone has done CME presence with SIP Phones and comment on this I would
appreciate it, otherwise I will assume that this is how SIP Phones will
function with presence in CME.

 

Jeff

 

From: voice-gang voice-gang [mailto:mgcptroubleshoot...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2010 3:35 AM
To: CCIE Voice GMAIL
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CME and SIP Phone Presence

 

Hi Jeff,

 

No it should not work like that, Bec in SCCP phone when u pickup the
heandset then the red light should glow of SCPH2

 

I just have one concern is this real lab question i am sure this is not ..!!
:)

 

Bec i have all the labs let me know if you want to be a study partner.

 

Thks

On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 4:12 AM, CCIE Voice GMAIL
 wrote:

Hey everyone,

 

I am looking for some help on CME presence.  I have configured presence and
its working with my SIP Phones, but it only works when there is an active
call.

 

There is SCPH1 with extension 4001 and SCPH2 with extension 4002.  Both are
configured with BLFs to point to the other phone.  When I pick up SCPH1, the
BLF on SCHPH2 does nothing.  However, if I make a call with SCHPH1, the BLF
on SCHPH2 will turn red.  

 

Has anyone experienced this before?  Is this the accurate way to function
with SIP Phones?

 

Here is the relevant configurations:

 

voice register global

 mode cme

 source-address 10.5.202.1 port 5060

 max-dn 10

 max-pool 2

 load 7945 SIP45.9-0-3S

 load 7942 SIP42.9-0-3S

 authenticate register

 authenticate realm cisco.com  

 url directory http://10.5.202.1/localdirectory/

 tftp-path flash:

 create profile sync 0063161211015195

 

voice register dn  1

 number 4001

 allow watch

 name Site C Phone 1

 label 4001 

!

voice register dn  2

 number 4002

 allow watch

 name Site C Phone 2

 label 4002

!

voice register pool  1

 id mac 0024.9733.6C28

 type 7942

 number 1 dn 1

 presence call-list

 dtmf-relay rtp-nte sip-notify

 voice-class codec 1

 username scuser1 password cisco

 blf-speed-dial 1 4002 label "SCPh2 4002" device

!

voice register pool  2

 id mac 0024.14B2.F542

 type 7945

 number 1 dn 2

 presence call-list

 voice-class codec 1

 username scuser2 password cisco

 blf-speed-dial 1 4001 label "SCPh1 4001" device

 

presence

 presence call-list

 

sip-ua

 sip-server ipv4:10.5.202.1

 presence enable

 

 

Any help is appreciated!

 

Jeff

 


___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
visit www.ipexpert.com  

 

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CME and SIP Phone Presence

[CCIE Voice GMAIL]

Hi Fab,

 

This is just a scenario I'm configuring on my own, no labs.  I am just
attempting to build an entire lab with only SIP just to better understand
how this all works.  I read that Ben stated at Cisco Live that there was an
intention to involve SIP now in the exam.  I want to make sure that I can
handle SIP and eventually the internetworking of SIP and H323.

 

Jeff

 

From: Fabien Habbouche [mailto:oilb...@hotmail.com] 
Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2010 12:43 AM
To: givemeccievoice2...@gmail.com
Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CME and SIP Phone Presence

 

Hey Jeff,
 
Hope this email finds you well. Which Lab are you working on? And would it
be possible to share the questions with me? Maybe we can work on it together
as I will be sitting for my lab in less than 30 days. Hope to hear from you
soon.
 
Fab
 

  _  

From: givemeccievoice2...@gmail.com
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 17:01:01 -0700
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] CME and SIP Phone Presence

Nevermind.  I didn't realize you have to start dialing before the BLF will
register.  

 

Thanks anyways,

 

Jeff

 

From: CCIE Voice GMAIL [mailto:givemeccievoice2...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2010 3:43 PM
To: 'osl osl'
Subject: CME and SIP Phone Presence

 

Hey everyone,

 

I am looking for some help on CME presence.  I have configured presence and
its working with my SIP Phones, but it only works when there is an active
call.

 

There is SCPH1 with extension 4001 and SCPH2 with extension 4002.  Both are
configured with BLFs to point to the other phone.  When I pick up SCPH1, the
BLF on SCHPH2 does nothing.  However, if I make a call with SCHPH1, the BLF
on SCHPH2 will turn red.  

 

Has anyone experienced this before?  Is this the accurate way to function
with SIP Phones?

 

Here is the relevant configurations:

 

voice register global

 mode cme

 source-address 10.5.202.1 port 5060

 max-dn 10

 max-pool 2

 load 7945 SIP45.9-0-3S

 load 7942 SIP42.9-0-3S

 authenticate register

 authenticate realm cisco.com

 url directory http://10.5.202.1/localdirectory/

 tftp-path flash:

 create profile sync 0063161211015195

 

voice register dn  1

 number 4001

 allow watch

 name Site C Phone 1

 label 4001 

!

voice register dn  2

 number 4002

 allow watch

 name Site C Phone 2

 label 4002

!

voice register pool  1

 id mac 0024.9733.6C28

 type 7942

 number 1 dn 1

 presence call-list

 dtmf-relay rtp-nte sip-notify

 voice-class codec 1

 username scuser1 password cisco

 blf-speed-dial 1 4002 label "SCPh2 4002" device

!

voice register pool  2

 id mac 0024.14B2.F542

 type 7945

 number 1 dn 2

 presence call-list

 voice-class codec 1

 username scuser2 password cisco

 blf-speed-dial 1 4001 label "SCPh1 4001" device

 

presence

 presence call-list

 

sip-ua

 sip-server ipv4:10.5.202.1

 presence enable

 

 

Any help is appreciated!

 

Jeff

 


___ For more information
regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com 

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] QOS solution required.

[voice-gang voice-gang]

Lab in 5 days if anyone can help that would be appreciated

On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 4:12 PM, voice-gang voice-gang <
mgcptroubleshoot...@gmail.com> wrote:

> 8.1 Switch QoS
>
> 2) On port fa 1/0/13 which is connected to HQ Phone 1, guarantee 32k for
>
> incoming SCCP signaling traffic. Excess traffic should be marked to DSCP 8
> and
>
> then transmitted. By default, IP Phones mark SCCP signaling traffic to CS3.
>
> (3 points)
> 8.2 Link fragmentation and Interleaving
>
> There is 384k frame-relay PVC between HQ and SiteB. Configure R1 and R2 to
> enable MLP, link fragmentation and interleaving on this circuit.
> (2 points)
>
> Regarding the WAN qos if i will configure the HQ to SB my SC link become 56
> K
> So i can achieve this task by adding the class map of T1 link to SC but do
> we have to do this or not.
>
> Regards
> MGCP
>
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

[OSL | CCIE_Voice] QOS solution required.

[voice-gang voice-gang]

8.1 Switch QoS

2) On port fa 1/0/13 which is connected to HQ Phone 1, guarantee 32k for

incoming SCCP signaling traffic. Excess traffic should be marked to DSCP 8
and

then transmitted. By default, IP Phones mark SCCP signaling traffic to CS3.

(3 points)
8.2 Link fragmentation and Interleaving

There is 384k frame-relay PVC between HQ and SiteB. Configure R1 and R2 to
enable MLP, link fragmentation and interleaving on this circuit.
(2 points)

Regarding the WAN qos if i will configure the HQ to SB my SC link become 56
K
So i can achieve this task by adding the class map of T1 link to SC but do
we have to do this or not.

Regards
MGCP
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com