[OSL | CCIE_Voice] crs editor
hi, I tried to run reactive debug in IPCC , and made a test call, the call trigger icd.aef but when i press "Start" from debug menu , it stopped at "Accept " and said "Trigger is not Contact Application Trigger" Any idea ? Thsk lot
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] WB 1, task 10.2
hi, I did the IPCC script in WB 1 , IP expert , task 10.2 When run the Reactive debug , it stop at "Select Resource" , and error msg Contact is inactive when getting channel Thks
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Requested circuit/channel not available on PSTN GW ?
hi, I made the test call to 911, from HQ phone, but the call failed in PSTN GW here is the error message in PSTN GW , Cause i = 0x82AC18 - Requested circuit/channel not available --- 9 14:14:53.610: ISDN Se0/3/0:23 Q931: RX <- SETUP pd = 8 callref = 0x0006 Bearer Capability i = 0x8090A2 Standard = CCITT Transfer Capability = Speech Transfer Mode = Circuit Transfer Rate = 64 kbit/s Channel ID i = 0xA98397 Exclusive, Channel 23 Calling Party Number i = 0x0081, '1006' Plan:Unknown, Type:Unknown Called Party Number i = 0x80, '911' Plan:Unknown, Type:Unknown Jan 9 14:14:53.614: %ISDN-6-CHAN_UNAVAILABLE: Interface Se0/3/0:23 Requested Channel 23 is not available Jan 9 14:14:53.614: ISDN Se0/3/0:23 **ERROR**: CCPMSG_InCall: Channel_ID IE invalid 44 (0x2C) Jan 9 14:14:53.614: ISDN Se0/3/0:23 **ERROR**: CCPMSG_InCall: rejecting call Jan 9 14:14:53.614: ISDN Se0/3/0:23 Q931: TX -> RELEASE_COMP pd = 8 callref = 0x8006 Cause i = 0x82AC18 - Requested circuit/channel not available
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] H.323 GW not showing in RouteGrup
hi, I have config the H.323 Gateway, and register and can make a call, but it not showing in Route Group , any idea ? I have restart the GW and CallManager Thks
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Attendant Console (Call control failed)
hi, I set up the AC, the logon to AC application working fine , but call to AC have error : "Initialization Call Control failed" thks
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Attendant Console (Call control failed)
hi, I set up the AC, the logon to AC application working fine , but call to AC have error : "Initialization Call Control failed" thks
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Cisco IP Communicator
hi, anybody experience this, Cisco IP Communicator ver 2.1 seem like hung, when it register to CCM thru VPN, any trick to resolve this ? thks
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] 6608 issue , channel
hi, - i config the 6608 and it registered to Call manager - config "Service parameter to use 3 channel , - and I restart the Call manager Service but it still use the channel 23 any suggestion ?
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Ip blue SRST mode
hi, how to config IP Blue phone to support SRST ? Thks
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] SRST default destination
hi, anybody have idea why , the unknown call not hitting the 2003 ext ? (from outside and internal) call-manager-fallback max-conferences 8 gain -6 ip source-address 177.2.91.1 port 2000 max-ephones 5 max-dn 10 dialplan-pattern 1 3122092... extension-length 4 default-destination 2003 cor incoming css-911-loc 1 2002 cor incoming css-intnl 2 2001 cor incoming css-intnl 3 2003 ! tks
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] SRST , default-destination not working
hi, in SRST mode, everything works fine, unless the unknown inbound call not hit the 2003 config - call-manager-fallback default-destination 2003 - when I "show ephone registered" , showing 2003 is up and registered Thks
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Call from PSTN to BR-2 (H.323) failed
hi, anybody have idea, call from PSTN to Branch-2 (H.323) sometimes did not go thru and hv this error msg from PSTN GW Cause i = 0x809B - Destination out of order thks
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] SRST , default-destination not working
yes, i saw from cisco web, work for fxo
does anybody have idea , what it should be ?
Thks
--- On Tue, 3/17/09, Sergio Polizer wrote:
From: Sergio Polizer
Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] SRST , default-destination not working
To: e_er...@yahoo.com, ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Date: Tuesday, March 17, 2009, 6:45 AM
#yiv679049383 .hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;padding:0px;}
#yiv679049383 {
font-size:10pt;font-family:Verdana;}
I have tested and did not worked for me too. So I did some digits manipulations
with TP to get the same function.
I've seen some posts that are pointing for a feature that works with fxo only.
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 13:17:09 -0700
From: e_er...@yahoo.com
To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] SRST , default-destination not working
hi,
in SRST mode, everything works fine, unless the unknown inbound call not hit
the 2003
config
-
call-manager-fallback
default-destination 2003
-
when I "show ephone registered" , showing 2003 is up and registered
Thks
Receba GRÁTIS as mensagens do Messenger no seu celular quando você estiver
offline. Conheça o MSN Mobile! Crie já o seu!
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] caller-id for E1-R2
hi, anybody know what is the command/how to enable caller-id in E1-R2 ? thks
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] dspfarm profile conference ?
hi, I config the dspfarm for conference in 2811 -- voice-card 0 dsp service dspfarm dspfarm profile 1 conference codec g711ulaw codec g711alaw no codec g729abr8 no codec g729br8 no codec gsmfr max session 2 associate application SCCP no shut -- I have not config any transcoding yet but the " max session" only 0 , mean do not work any idea/workaround ?
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] dspfarm profile conference ?
hi Anil, they have 16 DSP , use for 3 channel T1 only ( I shut down the other T1) -- FLEX VOICE CARD 0 -- *DSP VOICE CHANNELS* DSP DSP DSPWARE CURR BOOT PAK TX/RX TYPE NUM CH CODEC VERSION STATE STATE RST AI VOICEPORT TS ABRT PACK COUNT = === == === = === === == = == C5510 001 01 None 4.4.15 idle idle 0 0 0 0/0 C5510 001 02 None 4.4.15 idle idle 0 0 0 0/0 C5510 001 03 None 4.4.15 idle idle 0 0 0 0/0 C5510 001 04 None 4.4.15 idle idle 0 0 0 0/0 C5510 001 05 None 4.4.15 idle idle 0 0 0 0/0 C5510 001 06 None 4.4.15 idle idle 0 0 0 0/0 C5510 001 07 None 4.4.15 idle idle 0 0 0 0/0 C5510 001 08 None 4.4.15 idle idle 0 0 0 0/0 C5510 001 09 None 4.4.15 idle idle 0 0 0 0/0 C5510 001 10 None 4.4.15 idle idle 0 0 0 0/0 C5510 001 11 None 4.4.15 idle idle 0 0 0 0/0 C5510 001 12 None 4.4.15 idle idle 0 0 0 0/0 C5510 001 13 None 4.4.15 idle idle 0 0 0 0/0 C5510 001 14 None 4.4.15 idle idle 0 0 0 0/0 C5510 001 15 None 4.4.15 idle idle 0 0 0 0/0 C5510 001 16 None 4.4.15 idle idle 0 0 0 0/0 END OF FLEX VOICE CARD 0 tks --- On Tue, 3/31/09, anil batra wrote: From: anil batra Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] dspfarm profile conference ? To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com, e_er...@yahoo.com Date: Tuesday, March 31, 2009, 5:51 AM How many DSP u hv , how many T1/E1 you are using .seems like you are running short of DSP's --- On Tue, 3/31/09, Erwan Erwan wrote: From: Erwan Erwan Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] dspfarm profile conference ? To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Date: Tuesday, March 31, 2009, 3:16 AM hi, I config the dspfarm for conference in 2811 -- voice-card 0 dsp service dspfarm dspfarm profile 1 conference codec g711ulaw codec g711alaw no codec g729abr8 no codec g729br8 no codec gsmfr max session 2 associate application SCCP no shut -- I have not config any transcoding yet but the " max session" only 0 , mean do not work any idea/workaround ?
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] CONF & MTP IOS not register to CCM
hi, i config like this to register CFB & MTP, but not able to register to CCM however the " sh sccp " and "sh dspfarm " look fine Here is the config -- voice-card 0 dspfarm ! ! dspfarm transcoder maximum session 2 dspfarm confbridge maximum session 2 dspfarm ! sccp sccp local f0/0.11 sccp ccm 177.1.10.10 priority 1 sccp ccm 177.1.10.20 priority 2 !
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] call from PSTN to Br-2
hi, calling from PSTN to BR-2 , can not go thru, and "debug isdn q931" saying "network-out of order" , dial-peer is correct anybody have idea, what happen ? Progress Ind i = 0x8183 - Origination address is non-ISDN Calling Party Number i = 0x0180, '911' Plan:ISDN, Type:Unknown Called Party Number i = 0x81, '21313001' Plan:ISDN, Type:Unknown *Apr 5 19:35:17.367: ISDN Se1/0:15 Q931: TX -> CALL_PROC pd = 8 callref = 0x8086 Channel ID i = 0xA98381 Exclusive, Channel 1 BR-2# *Apr 5 19:35:17.387: ISDN Se1/0:15 Q931: TX -> DISCONNECT pd = 8 callref = 0x8086 Cause i = 0x80A6 - Network out of order *Apr 5 19:35:17.399: ISDN Se1/0:15 Q931: RX <- RELEASE pd = 8 callref = 0x0086 *Apr 5 19:35:17.399: ISDN Se1/0:15 Q931: TX -> RELEASE_COMP pd = 8 callref = 0x8086
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] call from PSTN to Br-2
hi Cliff and Day, right, ext 3001 in CCM , the debug that I sent before, showing call hit the BR-2 and correct dial-peer in BR-2 (dial-peer 1 and 3000) here is my config BR-2 --- voice translation-rule 20 rule 1 /^3.../ /44232141\0/ ! ! voice translation-profile Outbound-ANI translate calling 20 ! ! controller E1 1/0 pri-group timeslots 1-3,16 ! dial-peer voice 1 pots incoming called-number . direct-inward-dial port 1/0:15 ! dial-peer voice 3000 voip destination-pattern 21313... voice-class codec 1 session target ipv4:177.1.10.10 --> CCm no vad ! tks --- On Mon, 4/6/09, Cliff McGlamry wrote: From: Cliff McGlamry Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] call from PSTN to Br-2 To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Date: Monday, April 6, 2009, 10:59 AM How about posting the dial-peer so we can see it (actually the full config would be better). But in looking at this, I can guess what the problem is. The number hitting the gateway is 21313001. I don't have your config, but the extension should be 3001. I personally always have a translation rule that converts the incoming DNIS to the proper length. In this case, I'd have a rule called 8to4 that would take that number and return 3001. I apply this translation to the called number and place it on the voice-port (not the dial-peer) in the incoming direction. My bet is that you forgot (1)to build this, (2) the translation rule is off (check the the test command), (3) apply it to the port correctly, or possibly some combination of the above. If you post your full config, we can likely tell you exactly where the problem is. - Original Message - From: Erwan Erwan To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Sent: Sunday, April 05, 2009 10:51 PM Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] call from PSTN to Br-2 hi, calling from PSTN to BR-2 , can not go thru, and "debug isdn q931" saying "network-out of order" , dial-peer is correct anybody have idea, what happen ? Progress Ind i = 0x8183 - Origination address is non-ISDN Calling Party Number i = 0x0180, '911' Plan:ISDN, Type:Unknown Called Party Number i = 0x81, '21313001' Plan:ISDN, Type:Unknown *Apr 5 19:35:17.367: ISDN Se1/0:15 Q931: TX -> CALL_PROC pd = 8 callref = 0x8086 Channel ID i = 0xA98381 Exclusive, Channel 1 BR-2# *Apr 5 19:35:17.387: ISDN Se1/0:15 Q931: TX -> DISCONNECT pd = 8 callref = 0x8086 Cause i = 0x80A6 - Network out of order *Apr 5 19:35:17.399: ISDN Se1/0:15 Q931: RX <- RELEASE pd = 8 callref = 0x0086 *Apr 5 19:35:17.399: ISDN Se1/0:15 Q931: TX -> RELEASE_COMP pd = 8 callref = 0x8086
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] call from PSTN to Br-2
hi, right, and CCM, significan is 4 digit tks --- On Mon, 4/6/09, Duy Nguyen wrote: From: Duy Nguyen Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] call from PSTN to Br-2 To: e_er...@yahoo.com Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com, "Cliff McGlamry" Date: Monday, April 6, 2009, 11:30 AM So 21313001 is sending to CCM, how is that trunk configured for significant digits? On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 10:10 PM, Erwan Erwan wrote: hi Cliff and Day, right, ext 3001 in CCM , the debug that I sent before, showing call hit the BR-2 and correct dial-peer in BR-2 (dial-peer 1 and 3000) here is my config BR-2 --- voice translation-rule 20 rule 1 /^3.../ /44232141\0/ ! ! voice translation-profile Outbound-ANI translate calling 20 ! ! controller E1 1/0 pri-group timeslots 1-3,16 ! dial-peer voice 1 pots incoming called-number . direct-inward-dial port 1/0:15 ! dial-peer voice 3000 voip destination-pattern 21313... voice-class codec 1 session target ipv4:177.1.10.10 --> CCm no vad ! tks --- On Mon, 4/6/09, Cliff McGlamry wrote: From: Cliff McGlamry Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] call from PSTN to Br-2 To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Date: Monday, April 6, 2009, 10:59 AM How about posting the dial-peer so we can see it (actually the full config would be better). But in looking at this, I can guess what the problem is. The number hitting the gateway is 21313001. I don't have your config, but the extension should be 3001. I personally always have a translation rule that converts the incoming DNIS to the proper length. In this case, I'd have a rule called 8to4 that would take that number and return 3001. I apply this translation to the called number and place it on the voice-port (not the dial-peer) in the incoming direction. My bet is that you forgot (1)to build this, (2) the translation rule is off (check the the test command), (3) apply it to the port correctly, or possibly some combination of the above. If you post your full config, we can likely tell you exactly where the problem is. - Original Message - From: Erwan Erwan To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Sent: Sunday, April 05, 2009 10:51 PM Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] call from PSTN to Br-2 hi, calling from PSTN to BR-2 , can not go thru, and "debug isdn q931" saying "network-out of order" , dial-peer is correct anybody have idea, what happen ? Progress Ind i = 0x8183 - Origination address is non-ISDN Calling Party Number i = 0x0180, '911' Plan:ISDN, Type:Unknown Called Party Number i = 0x81, '21313001' Plan:ISDN, Type:Unknown *Apr 5 19:35:17.367: ISDN Se1/0:15 Q931: TX -> CALL_PROC pd = 8 callref = 0x8086 Channel ID i = 0xA98381 Exclusive, Channel 1 BR-2# *Apr 5 19:35:17.387: ISDN Se1/0:15 Q931: TX -> DISCONNECT pd = 8 callref = 0x8086 Cause i = 0x80A6 - Network out of order *Apr 5 19:35:17.399: ISDN Se1/0:15 Q931: RX <- RELEASE pd = 8 callref = 0x0086 *Apr 5 19:35:17.399: ISDN Se1/0:15 Q931: TX -> RELEASE_COMP pd = 8 callref = 0x8086
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] call from PSTN to Br-2
hi cliff CCM is 4 digit, the debug dialpeer is showing correct , hit incoming and goint to dial-peer 3000, which go to CCM (and CCM will take 4 digit) ok i will using the incoming Transaltion pattern as u suggest in my next session, tks for help erwan --- On Mon, 4/6/09, Cliff McGlamry wrote: From: Cliff McGlamry Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] call from PSTN to Br-2 To: e_er...@yahoo.com, ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Date: Monday, April 6, 2009, 11:27 AM Actually, you're missing some stuff here. You're not showing the voice-port, but let me take a swing at this just on paper. I'm a bit puzzled by this setup as the international location is normally the CME in the stuff I've seen, but we'll go with it being part of HQ or BR1: int loopback 0 h323-gateway voip interface h323-gateway voip bind srcaddress 172.X.X.X <-- Bind this to whatever you define for H323 gateway...usually the loopback ! voice translation-rule 1 rule 1 /2131\(3...\)/ /\1/ ! voice translation-profile 8to4 transate called 1 ! voice-port 1/0:15 translation-profile incoming 8to4 ! dial-peer voice 1 pots incoming called-number . direct-inward-dial port 1/0:15 ! dial-peer voice 3000 voip destination-pattern 21313... voice-class codec 1 <--- Not sure what you have defined here, so I'm not sure if this is right session target ipv4:177.1.10.10 --> CCm no vad dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric <--You missed this one. Will cause problems if you forget ip qos dscp cs3 signal <-- for QOS Hope this helps. If all else fails, do a DEBUG VOICE DIALPEER ALL and see what's happening when it hits. It's failing on the dial peer, and in the case of what you had, it's likely because the extension is defined as 4 digits and not 8. You might have the gateway definition in CCM defined to send all digits instead of just 4 (in which case, you could just change it to 4 digits and fix the issue). If you have the wrong CSS over there, it will also blow up on you. Cliff - Original Message - From: Erwan Erwan To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com ; Cliff McGlamry Sent: Sunday, April 05, 2009 11:10 PM Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] call from PSTN to Br-2 hi Cliff and Day, right, ext 3001 in CCM , the debug that I sent before, showing call hit the BR-2 and correct dial-peer in BR-2 (dial-peer 1 and 3000) here is my config BR-2 --- voice translation-rule 20 rule 1 /^3.../ /44232141\0/ ! ! voice translation-profile Outbound-ANI translate calling 20 ! ! controller E1 1/0 pri-group timeslots 1-3,16 ! dial-peer voice 1 pots incoming called-number . direct-inward-dial port 1/0:15 ! dial-peer voice 3000 voip destination-pattern 21313... voice-class codec 1 session target ipv4:177.1.10.10 --> CCm no vad ! tks --- On Mon, 4/6/09, Cliff McGlamry wrote: From: Cliff McGlamry Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] call from PSTN to Br-2 To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Date: Monday, April 6, 2009, 10:59 AM How about posting the dial-peer so we can see it (actually the full config would be better). But in looking at this, I can guess what the problem is. The number hitting the gateway is 21313001. I don't have your config, but the extension should be 3001. I personally always have a translation rule that converts the incoming DNIS to the proper length. In this case, I'd have a rule called 8to4 that would take that number and return 3001. I apply this translation to the called number and place it on the voice-port (not the dial-peer) in the incoming direction. My bet is that you forgot (1)to build this, (2) the translation rule is off (check the the test command), (3) apply it to the port correctly, or possibly some combination of the above. If you post your full config, we can likely tell you exactly where the problem is. - Original Message - From: Erwan Erwan To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Sent: Sunday, April 05, 2009 10:51 PM Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] call from PSTN to Br-2 hi, calling from PSTN to BR-2 , can not go thru, and "debug isdn q931" saying "network-out of order" , dial-peer is correct anybody have idea, what happen ? Progress Ind i = 0x8183 - Origination address is non-ISDN Calling Party Number i = 0x0180, '911' Plan:ISDN, Type:Unknown Called Party Number i = 0x81, '21313001' Plan:ISDN, Type:Unknown *Apr 5 19:35:17.367: ISDN Se1/0:15 Q931: TX -> CALL_PROC pd = 8 callref = 0x8086 Channel ID i = 0xA98381 Exclusive, Channel 1 BR-2# *Apr 5 19:35:17.387: ISDN Se1/0:15 Q931: TX -> DISCONNECT pd = 8 callref = 0x8086 Cause i = 0x80A6 - Network out of order *Apr 5 19:35:17.399: ISDN Se1/0:15 Q9
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] SIP client X-Lite failed register
hi , need advice - where can I find XMLDefault7960 in CCME router ? is it part of CCME file ? - when i register X-Lite to CCME it failed , w error msg ' Registration erro 408, reg timoue' any idea why here is my config - voice register global mode cme source -address 192.168.2.1 port 5060 max-dn 2 max-pool 2 load 7960-7940 P0S-08-12-00 autheticate reg tftp-path flash: create profile - voice register dn 1 number 3005 - voice register pool 1 id mac 000d.299d.348c number 1 dn 1 username 3005 pass cisco type 7960 also tftp-server point to fie in flash tks
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Release of new workbook ?
hi Vik, When IPexpert team plan to release new 3.0 workbook ? tks,
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] failed auto-reg CIPC to CCM 7.0
hi, I have auto-reg IP Blue and real 7940 and they register fine, but failed for CIPC any idea why ? - DP and Phone template already hv CIPC too tks
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] failed auto-reg CIPC to CCM 7.0
yes , point to correct TFTP --- On Sat, 6/27/09, Cristobal Priego wrote: From: Cristobal Priego Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] failed auto-reg CIPC to CCM 7.0 To: "Erwan Erwan" Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Date: Saturday, June 27, 2009, 5:56 AM Is your CIPC pointing to the correct TFTP server ? Launch your CIPC and do a right click on it then go to preferences, click on the Network tab and make sure that the proper TFTP servers are configured there 2009/6/26 Erwan Erwan hi, I have auto-reg IP Blue and real 7940 and they register fine, but failed for CIPC any idea why ? - DP and Phone template already hv CIPC too tks
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] command "pattern "
hi, when i type command " voice register dialplan 1" there is no " pattern" command , do I have to enable some anything or my IOS version ? I use 12.4(22) T1 tks
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] failed register CIPC SIP
hi, i try to migrate CIPC phone from SCCP (register fine) to SIP but it failed , and said in the status phone :" Error updating Locale" any idea? tks
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] X-lite in CM 7.0
hi, can X-lite register to CCM 7.0 for SIP phone? if yes, where to config the "user name" and "password" ? tks
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] call from PSTN to CCM failed
hi, my test all from PSTN to IP phone register to CCM 7.0 failed , and here is the error msg "Cause i=0x80B1 - Quality of Service Not Available" any idea ? tks
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Lab 4A - SIP Gateway issue
hi, I follow the config in LAb 4, it seems that my SIP Gateway has registered to CCM 7 Does SIP gateway , have the command like "sh ccm-manager" to check if the GW has register to CCM ? Then I config Route-Pattern in CCM 999 point to SIP trunk (DNA is showing correct) also " show isdn stat " is fine and "dial-peer in GW " is up but it failed to make call , said "called failed : service unavailable" from the IP phone and " debug voip dialpeer " also "debug isdn q931 " also " debug ccsip " show nothing Any suggestion? tks ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] trace file in CCM 7
hi, I set the trace setting like in Lab 4B, then make a call, but I do not see it update the trace file (I do not find the trace for my call) any idea ? thks ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] SIP/2.0 405 Method Not Allowed , Lab 4A
hi, i am testing the Lab 4A, calling to 3...@ipxcme,.com , and called failed , find from debug "SIP/2.0 405 Method Not Allowed" any suggestion, what is wrong ? tks ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] X-Lite phone call
hi, anybody experience this ? I register x-lite SIP phone and phone register fine, but when I make call it said "service unavilable" , when I make sure using DNA it showing call should go out using MGCP gateway (register ok in CCM 7.) pls help tks ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeepeer issue ?
hi , have anyone experience this ? The show do not reflect what I hv configured 1. gk-trunk_9 , i configure to use gk-trunk_10 2. in prefix 3*, prefix 1... and 5... not showing gatekeeper zone local PL test.com 9.0.40.241 zone prefix PL 1... gw-priority 10 gk-trunk_2 zone prefix PL 1... gw-priority 9 gk-trunk_1 zone prefix PL 1... gw-priority 0 UCME zone prefix PL 5... gw-priority 10 gk-trunk_2 zone prefix PL 5... gw-priority 9 gk-trunk_1 zone prefix PL 5... gw-priority 0 UCME no shutdown --- GATEWAY TYPE PREFIX TABLE = Prefix: 1#* Zone PL master gateway list: 9.56.159.210:1720 gk-trunk_9 9.56.159.205:1720 gk-trunk_1 Zone PL prefix 5... priority gateway list(s): Priority 9: 9.56.159.205:1720 gk-trunk_1 Priority 5: 9.56.159.210:1720 gk-trunk_9 Zone PL prefix 1... priority gateway list(s): Priority 9: 9.56.159.205:1720 gk-trunk_1 Priority 5: 9.56.159.210:1720 gk-trunk_9 Prefix: 3* Zone PL master gateway list: 9.0.40.231:1820 UCME ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeepeer issue ?
hi kapil, 1. yes. retstart CCM and GK same things 2. in prefix 3*, prefix 1... and 5... not showing Can you explain this at it sounds little confusing? There is no prefix 3* configured as per the screen-shot you shared. if you look at running config below, gk-trunk_9 and gk-trunk_10 should be the backup , right ? but it only show:in GK Prefix: 3* Zone PL master gateway list: 9.0.40.231:1820 UCME should be Prefix: 3* Zone PL master gateway list: 9.0.40.231:1820 UCME Zone PL prefix 1... priority gw list Zone PL prefix 5 priority gw lost Runnng config -- HQ > gatekeeper zone local PL test.com 9.0.40.241 zone prefix PL 1... gw-priority 10 gk-trunk_2 zone prefix PL 1... gw-priority 9 gk-trunk_1 zone prefix PL 1... gw-priority 0 UCME zone prefix PL 5... gw-priority 10 gk-trunk_2 zone prefix PL 5... gw-priority 9 gk-trunk_1 zone prefix PL 5... gw-priority 0 UCME BR-2> interface FastEthernet0/1 ip address 9.0.40.231 255.255.252.0 h323-gateway voip interface h323-gateway voip id PL ipaddr 9.0.40.241 1719 h323-gateway voip h323-id UCME h323-gateway voip tech-prefix 3 h323-gateway voip bind srcaddr 9.0.40.231 From: kapil atrish Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeepeer issue ? To: "Erwan Erwan" Date: Tuesday, August 4, 2009, 1:54 AM Hi, Are you saying you've configured the trunk name inside UCM as: gk-trunk10 but GK shows it as gk-trunk9. If that's true, I would first reset the GK trunk, if that doesn't resolve the issue try bouncing the ccm service. 2. in prefix 3*, prefix 1... and 5... not showing Can you explain this at it sounds little confusing? There is no prefix 3* configured as per the screen-shot you shared. --- On Mon, 8/3/09, Erwan Erwan wrote: From: Erwan Erwan Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekeepeer issue ? To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Date: Monday, August 3, 2009, 11:02 PM hi , have anyone experience this ? The show do not reflect what I hv configured 1. gk-trunk_9 , i configure to use gk-trunk_10 2. in prefix 3*, prefix 1... and 5... not showing gatekeeper zone local PL test.com 9.0.40.241 zone prefix PL 1... gw-priority 10 gk-trunk_2 zone prefix PL 1... gw-priority 9 gk-trunk_1 zone prefix PL 1... gw-priority 0 UCME zone prefix PL 5... gw-priority 10 gk-trunk_2 zone prefix PL 5... gw-priority 9 gk-trunk_1 zone prefix PL 5... gw-priority 0 UCME no shutdown --- GATEWAY TYPE PREFIX TABLE = Prefix: 1#* Zone PL master gateway list: 9.56.159.210:1720 gk-trunk_9 9.56.159.205:1720 gk-trunk_1 Zone PL prefix 5... priority gateway list(s): Priority 9: 9.56.159.205:1720 gk-trunk_1 Priority 5: 9.56.159.210:1720 gk-trunk_9 Zone PL prefix 1... priority gateway list(s): Priority 9: 9.56.159.205:1720 gk-trunk_1 Priority 5: 9.56.159.210:1720 gk-trunk_9 Prefix: 3* Zone PL master gateway list: 9.0.40.231:1820 UCME -Inline Attachment Follows- ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCM 7 trace ?
hi, i tried to run GK trace in CCM 7 , the make test call, but could not find the debug. i run this CLI admin:file list activelog/cm/trace/ccm/sdi/ tks for help ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] IP Blue in PSTN router , called
hi, I register IP Blue as PSTN phone in PSTN router , then I make a test call (from PSTN phone to BR-1) when I run the debug : - debug isdn q931 (show nothing) - debug voice ccapi inout (not properly show the digit i dialled) when I dial 88, i just show 88 , also sometimes 911 when i dial 1312301, show nothing any input ? what is the right debug ? and why ? config in PSTN - interface Serial3/1:15 no ip address encapsulation hdlc isdn switch-type primary-net5 isdn protocol-emulate network isdn incoming-voice voice no cdp enable ! --- dial-peer voice 100 pots description == BR1 3123YY destination-pattern ^1312301 port 3/1:15 forward-digits 10 dial-peer voice 1 pots incoming called-number . direct-inward-dial --- sh ephone registered = sh ephone registered ephone-1 Mac:0002.55B4.6AAC TCP socket:[1] activeLine:0 REGISTERED in SCCP ver 4 and Server in ver 3 mediaActive:0 offhook:0 ringing:0 reset:0 reset_sent:0 paging 0 debug:0 caps:1 IP:9.17.112.254 3118 7961 keepalive 0 max_line 6 button 1: dn 1 number 911 CH1 IDLE button 2: dn 2 number 1775504 CH1 IDLE button 3: dn 3 number 1312204 CH1 IDLE tks ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] PSTN router error
hi, Try to config E1 and T1 in PSTN router, but did not succedd , here is the error msg: any idea ? tks Aug 15 14:29:58.451: ISDN Se0/1/0:15 Q931: Ux_DLRelInd: DL_REL_IND received from L2 Aug 15 14:29:58.647: ISDN Se0/0/0:23 Q931: Ux_DLRelInd: DL_REL_IND received from L2 VORack03PSTN# Aug 15 14:30:07.451: ISDN Se0/1/0:15 Q931: Ux_DLRelInd: DL_REL_IND received from L2 Aug 15 14:30:07.647: ISDN Se0/0/0:23 Q931: Ux_DLRelInd: DL_REL_IND received from L2 VORack03PSTN# - ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] advice on ipexpert voice mock lab
hi mark and all, I hv studied for a while and plan to take Mock Lab (1 week lab experience) w ipexepert. 1. Need your advice, what is the best time / make sense to sit for real lab after mock lab ? Note : based your your experince teaching or students who already take the mock lab 2. And how easy to retake the ipexpert voice mock lab in term of schedule and seat ? (as I see not so many schedule for mock lab compare to bootcamp class ) tks in advance erwan ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Passed, thanks!
Hi Jon, Congrats, definitely I understand your feeling , when u have to passed with hard work compare to those that cheat the lab. Just my opinion looking at the situation in my company on what we see about CCIE I do not really agree if CCIE cert is the expert/doctorate in networking, cause it more to config and troubleshoot for the cisco equipments. And i think that is the reason Cisco create it beside the marketing behind it :) And I meet lots out there with 20 years exp , even without CCNA , got the skills and knowledge beyond CCIEs, like understanding the protocol and work on multiplaform for voice. Sometimes those guy can solve the issue better than TAC cause they hv more comprehensive knowledge. Just opinion :) Thks, --- On Thu, 9/3/09, Jonathan Charles wrote: From: Jonathan Charles Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Passed, thanks! To: "jeremy co" Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Date: Thursday, September 3, 2009, 2:29 PM The problem is that there are some integrators that actually do a technical interview... Some companies understand the CCIE is meaningless and ignore the certification. I do not. If you have a CCIE, then I need to CCIE levels of skill. Jonathan On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 12:44 AM, jeremy co wrote: > No offence, > But IMO you don't need 5 years or whatever years of experience to get CCIE. > for being comfortable with lots of issues in the field I agree with you > though. CCIE is just an exam, neither proving you have field experience nor > knowledge of networking needed for real world project it proves that you > understand certain aspect of technology front and back that falls within > CCIE exam blueprint.yet acknowledge your troubleshooting skills on those > areas. > if sb ever went through AAR setup and troubleshooting could answer your > question, However cheater's would't be able to answer that. > Anyway , I encourage people to start their CCIE journey even if you have > zero experience, buy equipment, get hands on , read Docs and I call it > experience. you don't have to be in the field to know in and out of working > with cisco equipments you already have in your home lab. > > my 2 cents. > > Jeremy > On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 3:10 PM, Jonathan Charles wrote: >> >> Just some quick things I wanted to add >> >> >> First, take this lab as soon as you can... DO NOT WAIT. >> >> When Cisco adds DNS, AD, OCS, SIP Providers, T.38 faxing to CUC, VPIM >> and a crap load of techs they can't test for yet (missing underlying >> infrastructure right now...), this test will become nearly impossible >> >> >> >> Second, I have been doing Cisco VoIP for 5 years now. I started doing >> day 2 support for SBC back in 2004. >> >> I have the CCNP, CCDP, CCSP and I was one of the first few dozen >> people to get the CCVP in May of 2005. >> >> I have been working on CCM since it was called CCM... I consider >> myself an expert at dial peers, telco issues, Unity, CallManager (and >> CUCM) IPCC, Routing and Switching. >> >> I took the R&S Lab back in 2003 (failed it and gave up and went to do >> voip...)... >> >> All of that being said, I want everyone to realize that the CCIE is >> NOT a beginner's certification. >> >> I mean to say, that if you have less than 5 years of experience in >> voice, you should expect 5 years of pain and suffering before passing. >> >> The people out there braindumping the exam and passing it with no >> skills will never get through a tech interview worth a damn. And they >> certainly won't be worth a crap on a customer site. >> >> I have a tech interview that will annihilate any posers... I do not >> ask factoid questions, "What plugs into an FXS?" for example, all of >> my questions end with the line, 'walk me through your troubleshooting >> procedure...' >> >> And yes, I have had CCIE R&S's try to get past me who didn't know why >> OSPF wouldn't come up when a DS3 was terminating a bunch of DS1s. And >> I have had CCIE Voice's try to get past me who couldn't answer this >> question...: >> >> "You have a remote office, Automatic Alternate Routing is implemented >> correctly. During a WAN outage, calls are not rerouting to the PSTN, >> walk me through your troubleshooting procedure." >> >> Yes, the question is mean, yes, the question is unfair and YES, a >> customer once asked me why calls didn't reroute during a WAN outage. >> >> >> The next time someone tells you that you should cheat on the exam, ask >> them the above question, see if they can answer it, see if they could >> handle the normal onslaught of customer questions when you have to >> explain the limitations and features of Cisco products. >> >> >> >> Party on. >> >> >> Jonathan >> >> On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 11:46 PM, Jonathan Charles >> wrote: >> > OK, took it on Tuesday and passed version 3.0 in RTP... my number is >> > 25309 >> > >> > So, that is done, one less thing. >> > >> > Here is how I did it >> > >> > A lot of people post things about how they studied and stud
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Passed, thanks!
Hi Wayne, That is what I understand before :) , but seeing the reality working with those guys, which has much more exp and better. I would be more careful calling myself "expert" in front of them, if I happen to be ccie Sorry no offence, just opinion based on exp at work rgds, --- On Fri, 9/4/09, Wayne Lawson wrote: From: Wayne Lawson Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Passed, thanks! To: "Erwan Erwan" Cc: "jeremy co" , "Jonathan Charles" , "ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com" Date: Friday, September 4, 2009, 11:03 AM Erwan - you don't think the CCIE is the "expert" of networking.are you nuts?Do you not understand the IT industry? Regards, Wayne A. Lawson II - CCIE #5244 Founder & President - IPexpert, Inc. Mailto: wlaw...@ipexpert.com Mobile: +1.810.334.1564 :: Message sent from iPhone. On Sep 3, 2009, at 10:45 PM, Erwan Erwan wrote: Hi Jon, Congrats, definitely I understand your feeling , when u have to passed with hard work compare to those that cheat the lab. Just my opinion looking at the situation in my company on what we see about CCIE I do not really agree if CCIE cert is the expert/doctorate in networking, cause it more to config and troubleshoot for the cisco equipments. And i think that is the reason Cisco create it beside the marketing behind it :) And I meet lots out there with 20 years exp , even without CCNA , got the skills and knowledge beyond CCIEs, like understanding the protocol and work on multiplaform for voice. Sometimes those guy can solve the issue better than TAC cause they hv more comprehensive knowledge. Just opinion :) Thks, --- On Thu, 9/3/09, Jonathan Charles wrote: From: Jonathan Charles Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Passed, thanks! To: "jeremy co" Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Date: Thursday, September 3, 2009, 2:29 PM The problem is that there are some integrators that actually do a technical interview... Some companies understand the CCIE is meaningless and ignore the certification. I do not. If you have a CCIE, then I need to CCIE levels of skill. Jonathan On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 12:44 AM, jeremy co wrote: > No offence, > But IMO you don't need 5 years or whatever years of experience to get CCIE. > for being comfortable with lots of issues in the field I agree with you > though. CCIE is just an exam, neither proving you have field experience nor > knowledge of networking needed for real world project it proves that you > understand certain aspect of technology front and back that falls within > CCIE exam blueprint.yet acknowledge your troubleshooting skills on those > areas. > if sb ever went through AAR setup and troubleshooting could answer your > question, However cheater's would't be able to answer that. > Anyway , I encourage people to start their CCIE journey even if you have > zero experience, buy equipment, get hands on , read Docs and I call it > experience. you don't have to be in the field to know in and out of working > with cisco equipments you already have in your home lab. > > my 2 cents. > > Jeremy > On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 3:10 PM, Jonathan Charles wrote: >> >> Just some quick things I wanted to add >> >> >> First, take this lab as soon as you can... DO NOT WAIT. >> >> When Cisco adds DNS, AD, OCS, SIP Providers, T.38 faxing to CUC, VPIM >> and a crap load of techs they can't test for yet (missing underlying >> infrastructure right now...), this test will become nearly impossible >> >> >> >> Second, I have been doing Cisco VoIP for 5 years now. I started doing >> day 2 support for SBC back in 2004. >> >> I have the CCNP, CCDP, CCSP and I was one of the first few dozen >> people to get the CCVP in May of 2005. >> >> I have been working on CCM since it was called CCM... I consider >> myself an expert at dial peers, telco issues, Unity, CallManager (and >> CUCM) IPCC, Routing and Switching. >> >> I took the R&S Lab back in 2003 (failed it and gave up and went to do >> voip...)... >> >> All of that being said, I want everyone to realize that the CCIE is >> NOT a beginner's certification. >> >> I mean to say, that if you have less than 5 years of experience in >> voice, you should expect 5 years of pain and suffering before passing. >> >> The people out there braindumping the exam and passing it with no >> skills will never get through a tech interview worth a damn. And they >> certainly won't be worth a crap on a customer site. >> >> I have a tech interview that will annihilate any posers... I do not >> ask factoid questions, "What plugs into an FXS?" fo
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Passed, thanks!
Yes, that is right ! --- On Fri, 9/4/09, Jonathan Charles wrote: From: Jonathan Charles Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Passed, thanks! To: "Erwan Erwan" Cc: "jeremy co" , ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Date: Friday, September 4, 2009, 12:36 PM Well, to be honest, I agree, but only to the extent that the v2 lab was known by everyone... if you were at all pegged into the system, you knew exactly what was on the lab... What this really meant was that a lot of people go tthe v2 CCIE Voice who suck. And when I say 'suck', I mean they blow, they are inept, incompetent and useless. The CCIE was getting watered down to be meaningless. In some companies in Chicagoland they have so many CCIE Voice's that they don't even give out a raise for the cert anymore (not even cost of living, I think they are more impressed by people who pass the CCNA) So, yes, the CCIE is getting a little beaten down. Not anymore. The test I took on Tuesday was not a test of worst practices, it was not a test of bizarreness... it was a complex configuration that, if done correctly proved your understanding... The four questions were not very hard, but one was tricky... I am still not sure of the answer... but I passed, and I might have missed that one... So, in the final analysis, employers should be asking what version of CCIE you have... and if you got your CCIE on Version 1 of the test, you would really need to sit me down and explain to me how that skillset is current. Also, just because you have a CCIE doesn't mean I waive the tech interview... we pay our engineers a lot... and we expect them to be able to do stuff... Jonathan On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 9:45 PM, Erwan Erwan wrote: > Hi Jon, > > Congrats, definitely I understand your feeling , when u have to passed with > hard work compare to those that cheat the lab. > > Just my opinion looking at the situation in my company on what we see about > CCIE > > I do not really agree if CCIE cert is the expert/doctorate in networking, > cause it more to config and troubleshoot for the cisco equipments. And i > think that is the reason Cisco create it beside the marketing behind it :) > > And I meet lots out there with 20 years exp , even without CCNA , got the > skills and knowledge beyond CCIEs, like understanding the protocol and work > on multiplaform for voice. Sometimes those guy can solve the issue better > than TAC cause they hv more comprehensive knowledge. > > Just opinion :) > > Thks, > > > --- On Thu, 9/3/09, Jonathan Charles wrote: > > From: Jonathan Charles > Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Passed, thanks! > To: "jeremy co" > Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com > Date: Thursday, September 3, 2009, 2:29 PM > > The problem is that there are some integrators that actually do a > technical interview... Some companies understand the CCIE is > meaningless and ignore the certification. > > I do not. > > If you have a CCIE, then I need to CCIE levels of skill. > > > > Jonathan > > On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 12:44 AM, jeremy co wrote: >> No offence, >> But IMO you don't need 5 years or whatever years of experience to get >> CCIE. >> for being comfortable with lots of issues in the field I agree with you >> though. CCIE is just an exam, neither proving you have field experience >> nor >> knowledge of networking needed for real world project it proves that you >> understand certain aspect of technology front and back that falls within >> CCIE exam blueprint.yet acknowledge your troubleshooting skills on those >> areas. >> if sb ever went through AAR setup and troubleshooting could answer your >> question, However cheater's would't be able to answer that. >> Anyway , I encourage people to start their CCIE journey even if you have >> zero experience, buy equipment, get hands on , read Docs and I call it >> experience. you don't have to be in the field to know in and out of >> working >> with cisco equipments you already have in your home lab. >> >> my 2 cents. >> >> Jeremy >> On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 3:10 PM, Jonathan Charles >> wrote: >>> >>> Just some quick things I wanted to add >>> >>> >>> First, take this lab as soon as you can... DO NOT WAIT. >>> >>> When Cisco adds DNS, AD, OCS, SIP Providers, T.38 faxing to CUC, VPIM >>> and a crap load of techs they can't test for yet (missing underlying >>> infrastructure right now...), this test will become nearly impossible >>> >>> >>> >>> Second, I have been doing Cisco VoIP for 5 years now. I started doing >>> day 2 support for SBC back in 2004
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Service in IP Blue, error ?
hi, last time I saw posting about the Service error in IP Blue, does anyone got the workaround yet ? When tried to register with EM i got error msg : Permission Denied file://C:\Documents and Settings\root\Application Data\IP blue\VTGO\Services\bin\services.html But it work fine with IP Communicator tks in advance erwan ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] ip communicator
hi, I register IP comm to BR2 router, then move back to CCM , it said "DB error" even thought I had delete config in CCM and CCm is auto-reg. Also I hv reset /erase the config in IP Comm by , **# in Setting button any suggestion ? tks ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol 2 Mod 1 Q 4.2 - CUBE and Gatekeepers
hi all, What I understand is like demarc/firewall to provider also billing purpose. Cisco hv presentation about SBC concept in Networker website While you guys are discussing the CUBE. I have question: - I heard Acme Packet is leading for SBC, anybody in this forum hv experience with that in real, maybe can share why ? Because our team just new to this tech, and need to review whether Cisco or Acme. Thks in advance --- On Wed, 9/16/09, Michael Ciarfello wrote: From: Michael Ciarfello Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol 2 Mod 1 Q 4.2 - CUBE and Gatekeepers To: "Nara Shikamaru" Cc: "OSL Group" Date: Wednesday, September 16, 2009, 11:57 PM Yes. Except the last statement. CUBE is doing…….. Codec conversion. The GK has nothing to do with codec negotiation. And there is only one GK. From: Nara Shikamaru [mailto:shikam...@kagadis.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2009 11:20 AM To: Michael Ciarfello Cc: OSL Group Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol 2 Mod 1 Q 4.2 - CUBE and Gatekeepers Okay, I think understand the logic better now. The gatekeepers are used to centralize the dial plans and the SBC is used to demarc sites (summarizing). In the context of the V2 L1 question, each site is using gatekeepers to keep the dial plans between HQ and BR2 centralized, then CUBE is used to manage the traffic between the gatekeepers (right?) On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 12:11 AM, Michael Ciarfello wrote: Well, simply put to just mess with you. Make it difficult. Why in real life? If you are running an H323 network to multiple clusters, you want the GK to manage CAC and centralized dial-plan management. Or even smaller scale, how about a bunch of CCME routers. Instead of MANY dial-peers and trying to manage them when new sites are added or changed, etc. One dial-peer to the GK. Then maybe you are doing SIP trunk out that same router. (SIP in the cloud). Easier than managing a SIP connection at each remote site. If you have a need to use a SIP trunk to a SIP provider that's on another cluster, then we need CUBE. Protocol conversion and use of different codecs. Maybe some CCME sites didn't purchase a bunch of DSPs for transcoding so just send G711 over the WAN. Maybe some sites did and want to conserve BW over the WAN. So there's the need for codec and transcoding. I've never used CUBE/GK combo it in real life. So the above are just my understanding of how it could be used. Maybe someone has used it in real life and can share their design and reasons for using it. From: Nara Shikamaru [shikam...@kagadis.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2009 1:55 AM To: Michael Ciarfello Cc: OSL Group Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol 2 Mod 1 Q 4.2 - CUBE and Gatekeepers Volume 2 Lab 1 uses CUBE in conjunction with Gatekeepers, which is confusing. Okay, I kind understand that mechanically CUBE works the same way as an H323 gateway in that you send the traffic and if everything is set up correctly it works. Why are gatekeepers and gatekeeper-controlled trunks used as well? I don't understand why they would do it. On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 6:20 PM, Michael Ciarfello wrote: Answers in-line. Hopefully you can see the color. From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Nara Shikamaru [shikam...@kagadis.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2009 4:40 PM To: OSL Group Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Vol 2 Mod 1 Q 4.2 - CUBE and Gatekeepers My question is not so much about specifics as it is clarity, would like to know your opinion. I'm working through implementing CUBE/SBC in this question (which I'm new to.) As a Session Border Controller, the SBC allows the implementation of security and conversion of voip traffic between codecs. Correct. Mostly used to connect, say to a SIP provider (which connects to a public IP address most of the time) and translates it to your private addressing. You can also have a direct tunk from CCM to the SIP provider. You would want to make sure the SIP provider is properly VLANed or firewalled to do this. Besides the security concerns, you also lose the ability to look at debugs of calls on the router, forcing you to go through many MBs of CCM trace files. The router can filter a debug based on a number of parameters which makes it much easier to see what's going on. So you do CCM to a CUBE at your site and point a dial-peer to their CUBE (or SBC more generically if they are not using Cisco, but most SIP providers I've seen are using Cisco equipment.) This question also requires gatekeeper registration. My impression is that gatekeepers are needed to register to CUBE. The other way around for this question. The CUBE registers as an h323 gateway to the gatekeeper so you can do your protocol conversion. In a CCIE v2 workbook, they used GK/CUBE to translate to a SIP trunk to the BR2 site. And they were messing with codecs
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] VM port wizard not synch
hi, when I run the wizard, after done, it said " VM Port Wizard operation was out of synch, please start over" I start still same thing any suggestion, what wrong and should i do ? tks ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Ip Phone service ?
when I want to subscriber Phone to IPMA service, I only find "Intercom Call" in drop down I have restart all service in CCM also IPMA. also Tomcat , also enable the service is this related to SQL service in CCM 7 or do i miss something ? tks ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Unity rejected after SRST mode
hi, I try to test SRST , by disable CCM service , when i rerun CCM service. Voice mail port is rejected. Have tried to restart all Unity service , reset port from CCM and Unity , still not help Any suggestion, what is wrong ? tks ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] can't see the debug voice dialpeer & translation
hi, I make call from PSTN to BR-1 , call go thru fine. But i am just wondering, why I can not see the "debug voice translation" and "debug voice dialpeer" when I activate those debug , see nothing. I can only see the "debug isdn q931" = here is my config -- voice translation-rule 10 rule 1 /^1.../ /312301\0/ ! voice translation-rule 11 rule 1 // /\0/ type any unknown plan any unknown ! voice translation-rule 20 rule 1 /^312...\(1...\)/ /\1/ ! voice translation-profile In translate called 20 ! voice translation-profile Out-Strip translate calling 10 translate called 11 ! voice-port 0/0/0:23 translation-profile incoming In translation-profile outgoing Out-Strip ! ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] BR-2 E1 as MGCP gateway
hi, I tried to run BR-2 E1 as MGCP gateway, but can't bring the isdn up , any advice appreciated. tks Here is config - BR-2 controller E1 1/0/0 pri-group timeslots 1-3,16 service mgcp ! interface Serial1/0/0:15 no ip address encapsulation hdlc isdn switch-type primary-net5 isdn incoming-voice voice isdn bind-l3 ccm-manager no cdp enable !voice-port 1/0/0:15 ! ccm-manager fallback-mgcp ccm-manager redundant-host 177.1.10.20 ccm-manager mgcp ccm-manager fax protocol cisco ccm-manager music-on-hold ! mgcp mgcp call-agent 177.1.10.10 service-type mgcp version 0.1 mgcp fax t38 ecm mgcp bind control source-interface FastEthernet0/0.11 mgcp bind media source-interface FastEthernet0/0.11 ! mgcp profile default ! dial-peer voice 2 pots incoming called-number . direct-inward-dial ! dial-peer voice 1 pots service mgcp port 1/0/0:15 ! PSTN interface Serial0/2:15 no ip address encapsulation hdlc isdn switch-type primary-net5 isdn incoming-voice voice isdn bchan-number-order ascending no cdp enable ! dial-peer voice 200 pots description == BR2 232Y3Y destination-pattern ^44232131 port 0/2:15 forward-digits 8 ! controller E1 0/2 clock source internal pri-group timeslots 1-3,16 service mgcp ! ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] debug voice translation,
hi, call from PSTN to Br1 success, and it supposed to trigger the "Translation Rule" in Br1, however can't see it. BR1 config voice translation-rule 60 rule 1 /^312301\(1...\)/ /\1/ ! ! voice translation-profile In-DNIS translate called 60 ! voice-port 0/0/0:23 translation-profile incoming In-DNIS ! instead see this , below wondering , what is wrong ? tks == BR-1#debug voice translation VoIP Translation Rule debugging is enabled BR-1# *Oct 3 23:39:00.987: //-1/BCA5EB788003/RXRULE/regxrule_stack_pop_callinfo_internal: numinfo=0x0 *Oct 3 23:39:01.015: //-1/BCA5EB788003/RXRULE/regxrule_stack_pop_callinfo_internal: numinfo=0x0 BR-1# *Oct 3 23:39:21.991: //-1/CB4AB18E8004/RXRULE/regxrule_stack_pop_callinfo_internal: numinfo=0x0 *Oct 3 23:39:21.991: //-1/CB4AB18E8004/RXRULE/regxrule_stack_pop_callinfo_internal: numinfo=0x0 ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] BR-2 E1 as MGCP gateway
tks Andrew and Anil for help, still failed. In CCM I choose VWIC-2MFT-E1 as shown in sh inv in BR-2 here , I attached my config and debug 1. show run 2. show version 3. show controllers 4. show isdn status 5. debug isdn q921 tks --- On Sun, 10/4/09, Andrew Lythgoe wrote: From: Andrew Lythgoe Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] BR-2 E1 as MGCP gateway To: "anil batra" Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com, "Erwan Erwan" Date: Sunday, October 4, 2009, 3:13 PM Hi Erwan, In your config for BR2 I see you have: controller E1 0/2 clock source internal pri-group timeslots 1-3,16 service mgcp Howevever I don't see you binding this to CCM which is required for MGCP, for example: interface Serial0/2:15 isdn bind-l3 ccm-manager If this is a back-to-back E1 connection then you will need to specify the network side (only configure this on one side of the E1, not both): example: interface Serial2/0/1:15 isdn protocol-emulate network Once completed the above and if problem is still experienced, please send the following from both routers: 1. show run 2. show version 3. show controllers 4. show isdn status 5. debug isdn q921 Regards, Andrew anil batra wrote: > Can you let us know your outputs for .. > 1. debug isdn q921 > 2. sh isdn status > > --- On *Sun, 10/4/09, Erwan Erwan //* wrote: > > > From: Erwan Erwan > Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] BR-2 E1 as MGCP gateway > To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com > Date: Sunday, October 4, 2009, 4:32 AM > > hi, > I tried to run BR-2 E1 as MGCP gateway, but can't bring the* > isdn up , *any advice appreciated. tks > Here is config > - > *BR-2* > controller E1 1/0/0 > pri-group timeslots 1-3,16 service mgcp > ! > interface Serial1/0/0:15 > no ip address > encapsulation hdlc > isdn switch-type primary-net5 > isdn incoming-voice voice > isdn bind-l3 ccm-manager > no cdp enable > !voice-port 1/0/0:15 > ! > ccm-manager fallback-mgcp > ccm-manager redundant-host 177.1.10.20 > ccm-manager mgcp > ccm-manager fax protocol cisco > ccm-manager music-on-hold > ! > mgcp > mgcp call-agent 177.1.10.10 service-type mgcp version 0.1 > mgcp fax t38 ecm > mgcp bind control source-interface FastEthernet0/0.11 > mgcp bind media source-interface FastEthernet0/0.11 > ! > mgcp profile default > ! > dial-peer voice 2 pots > incoming called-number . > direct-inward-dial > ! > dial-peer voice 1 pots > service mgcp > port 1/0/0:15 > ! > ** *PSTN* > > interface Serial0/2:15 > no ip address > encapsulation hdlc > isdn switch-type primary-net5 > isdn incoming-voice voice > isdn bchan-number-order ascending > no cdp enable > ! > dial-peer voice 200 pots > description == BR2 232Y3Y > destination-pattern ^44232131 > port 0/2:15 > forward-digits 8 > ! > controller E1 0/2 > clock source internal > pri-group timeslots 1-3,16 service mgcp > ! > > > > -Inline Attachment Follows- > > ___ > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, > please visit www.ipexpert.com > > > > > ___ > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > visit www.ipexpert.com > sh run Building configuration... Current configuration : 2949 bytes ! version 12.4 service timestamps debug datetime msec service timestamps log datetime msec no service password-encryption ! hostname BR-2 ! boot-start-marker boot-end-marker ! logging message-counter syslog enable secret 5 $1$KItM$Oih6efbILe7TjcNC0D7Z.0 ! no aaa new-model no network-clock-participate slot 1 ! voice-card 0 ! voice-card 1 dspfarm --More-- ! dot11 syslog ip source-route ! ! ip cef ! ! no ip domain lookup no ipv6 cef ! multilink bundle-name authenticated ! ! ! ! isdn switch-type primary-ni ! ! ! ! ! ! --More-- ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! archive log config hidekeys ! ! --More-- ! ! ! controller E1 1/0/0 pri-group timeslots 1-3,16 service mgcp ! controller E1 1/0/1 channel-group 0 timeslots 1-31 ! ip tcp synwait-time 5 ! ! ! ! interface Loopback0 ip address 177.1.254.3 255.255.255.255 ! interface FastEthernet0/0 description == To SW2 no ip address duplex auto s
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] DP Calling Party Trans CSS
hi, in the CCM Gateway configuration page, under "Call Routing Information-Outbound Calls" Use Device Pool Calling Party Transformation CSS Is that mean "Calling Party Ext Mask" from Phone ? or really from DP ? cause in DP , there is only "Calling Party Transformation CSS" but for DEvice mobility related setting, ? tks ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Volume 2 Lab 4 Question 1.2 - CUPS integration
Nara, I got same thing like u following the PG steps. erwan --- On Sat, 10/10/09, Nara Shikamaru wrote: From: Nara Shikamaru Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Volume 2 Lab 4 Question 1.2 - CUPS integration To: "OSL Group" Date: Saturday, October 10, 2009, 1:51 PM In working though this section and doublechecking my work in the Proctor Guide, there seem to be a few steps missing in the solution (like associating the line 5002 to the end user gwashington, not just the device.) So, I'm wondering if my problem is related to anything else not mentioned in the PG. The CUPS client works fine and the question doesn't ask for Desk Phone Mode to be working, but the screenshot in the PG shows that it should be working. My client only shows Softphone, not Desk Phone. Has anyone else run into this issue? I can't seem to find the source of the problem. -- -Shikamaru -Inline Attachment Follows- ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] BR-2 E1 as MGCP gateway
yes, it work. Seen from "debug mgcp packet' , endpoint unknown, so i move to slot in CCM setting and fine now --- On Sun, 10/4/09, Nara Shikamaru wrote: From: Nara Shikamaru Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] BR-2 E1 as MGCP gateway To: "Andrew Lythgoe" Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com, "anil batra" Date: Sunday, October 4, 2009, 3:47 PM This is an interesting scenario. Is this realistic - back-hauling a CME PRI to CUCM? On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 12:13 AM, Andrew Lythgoe wrote: Hi Erwan, In your config for BR2 I see you have: controller E1 0/2 clock source internal pri-group timeslots 1-3,16 service mgcp Howevever I don't see you binding this to CCM which is required for MGCP, for example: interface Serial0/2:15 isdn bind-l3 ccm-manager If this is a back-to-back E1 connection then you will need to specify the network side (only configure this on one side of the E1, not both): example: interface Serial2/0/1:15 isdn protocol-emulate network Once completed the above and if problem is still experienced, please send the following from both routers: 1. show run 2. show version 3. show controllers 4. show isdn status 5. debug isdn q921 Regards, Andrew anil batra wrote: > Can you let us know your outputs for .. > > 1. debug isdn q921 > > 2. sh isdn status > > --- On *Sun, 10/4/09, Erwan Erwan //* wrote: > > > From: Erwan Erwan > Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] BR-2 E1 as MGCP gateway > To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com > Date: Sunday, October 4, 2009, 4:32 AM > > hi, > > I tried to run BR-2 E1 as MGCP gateway, but can't bring the* > isdn up , *any advice appreciated. tks > > Here is config > - > *BR-2* > controller E1 1/0/0 > pri-group timeslots 1-3,16 service mgcp > ! > interface Serial1/0/0:15 > no ip address > encapsulation hdlc > isdn switch-type primary-net5 > isdn incoming-voice voice > isdn bind-l3 ccm-manager > no cdp enable > !voice-port 1/0/0:15 > ! > ccm-manager fallback-mgcp > ccm-manager redundant-host 177.1.10.20 > ccm-manager mgcp > ccm-manager fax protocol cisco > ccm-manager music-on-hold > ! > mgcp > mgcp call-agent 177.1.10.10 service-type mgcp version 0.1 > mgcp fax t38 ecm > mgcp bind control source-interface FastEthernet0/0.11 > mgcp bind media source-interface FastEthernet0/0.11 > ! > mgcp profile default > ! > dial-peer voice 2 pots > incoming called-number . > direct-inward-dial > ! > dial-peer voice 1 pots > service mgcp > port 1/0/0:15 > ! > > ** > *PSTN* > > interface Serial0/2:15 > no ip address > encapsulation hdlc > isdn switch-type primary-net5 > isdn incoming-voice voice > isdn bchan-number-order ascending > no cdp enable > ! > dial-peer voice 200 pots > description == BR2 232Y3Y > destination-pattern ^44232131 > port 0/2:15 > forward-digits 8 > ! > controller E1 0/2 > clock source internal > pri-group timeslots 1-3,16 service mgcp > ! > > > > -Inline Attachment Follows- > > ___ > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, > please visit www.ipexpert.com > > > > > ___ > For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please > visit www.ipexpert.com > ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com -- -Shikamaru -Inline Attachment Follows- ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] BLF 7962
hello, is it to use CIPPM , we hv to use 7962 ? as I config phone template with - Speed dia BLF - Autpork BLF, and when i config , it did not take it and not the icon not showing like Lab 13 Book 1 tks ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Backup config CCM 7
hi all, I am trying to back up CCM 7 config , so that I can reload in my next session. >From "Disaster Recovery Backup" was very slow, cause they back up lots stuff. Does anybody know how to backup config in CCM only ? thks ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Backup config CCM 7
hi Peter, wondering if there is a way to just enable several things to back up by CLI ? what is the title in the archive ? tks --- On Sun, 10/18/09, Peter Slow wrote: From: Peter Slow Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Backup config CCM 7 To: "Erwan Erwan" Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Date: Sunday, October 18, 2009, 8:21 AM no... you need to use DRS to be able to back stuff up and import it back into CUCM. If you jsut want to print out your dialplan, you can use the SQL scrit that i wrote. It shoudl be in the archives if you search for it. -Peter On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 8:17 PM, Erwan Erwan wrote: hi all, I am trying to back up CCM 7 config , so that I can reload in my next session. >From "Disaster Recovery Backup" was very slow, cause they back up lots stuff. Does anybody know how to backup config in CCM only ? thks ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Thank you everyone
Congrats Mike ,
Agree, very good point , by helping others we also learn.
Looking at how detailed you explained for most issue we hv in this milis, you
really deserve for the number :)
Erwan
--- On Thu, 11/5/09, Michael Ciarfello wrote:
From: Michael Ciarfello
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Thank you everyone
To: "Jeff Garvas"
Cc: "ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com"
Date: Thursday, November 5, 2009, 11:41 PM
#yiv1155123887 P {
MARGIN-TOP:0px;MARGIN-BOTTOM:0px;}
There's really not much to say that already hasn't been shared from everyone
else. I will add or stress the following:
1. Practice, practice and practice some more.
You have to be able to finish the IPexpert labs on-time and without running
into any troubles. Make note of questions that give you trouble. GO back to
it 1 day, 2 days, 1 week, etc later and repeat it. One of the tough things is
to not fool yourself. If you find yourself saying "ahh, I don' t need to
practice that again, I know it." You need to decide if that is REALLY true or
not.
2. More labs.
After finishing the IPexpert labs, twist them around and create your own
scenarios. I and a couple others have some threads with some examples of what
we twisted. And configure them without running into any troubles.
3. Time
You REALLY need that 2 hours at the end of the exam for testing and more
testing and carefully reading the questions. You can only get that free time
if you follow the other numbers.
4. Participate
By participating in the OSL (and other groups if you are on any), you test your
knowledge and prepardness. If you can help others, you are helping yourself.
If you can explain it to someone else, you are better prepared. There's a
difference in sitting in front of the customer's equipment and getting it to
work vs telling them how it works or how to configure something (hey it's their
equipment.)
You should monitor participation and keep track of how you are more easily
helping others solove their questions. You may not get every question correct
or offer correct advice, but keep track of that. It;s part of the game. Even
those that are just starting their quest can still participate. Ask the
original poster for an output that you would think offer insight into solving
their question.
Try their questions in your lab or on PL. Ipexpert has stated they are working
towards 4 hours lab rental times. These will help to try out a couple
questions or scenarios or re-practice things that have been bugging you or
giving you trouble.
5. Read
Read the SRND cover to cover MANY times. TRY everything they mention in there
in the lab. The SRND is also very detailed and leave a lot to be desired.
Figure out what they are getting at and fill in those blanks.
Read the CCM and CCME admin guides. The Feature and Services guide, the
system guide, the CCME SRND, CUP Integration guide. Well, just about every
document you can FIND. And find time searching for and downloading any
supporting Cisco documentation that IPX has as it's content. Then find some
more. I had a huge folder on my laptop with Cisco documentation. Oh, read
releae notes also.
P.S. Time for the hardline.
I will not say anything about the test content, either detailed, implied or
generally. Follow the above, keep working at it and take then exam when you
feel you are ready. Inside information, details or insight won't matter if you
follow the above.
ANYONE asking me for information that *I* feel breaks NDA will have that e-mail
forwarded to tipline for Cisco to decide on the intrepretation. They may not
be able to do anything, but it gives them more information on what's going on
out there. They are WELL aware of what used to happen and are continuing to
take steps to correct that to get the exam back to the level and value it used
to be.
Keep up the good work. Thanks everyone.
From: jgar...@gmail.com [jgar...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Jeff Garvas
[j...@cia.net]
Sent: Thursday, November 05, 2009 10:07 AM
To: Michael Ciarfello
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Thank you everyone
Congrats. When you're ready, give us the after action report :)
On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 9:51 AM, Michael Ciarfello
wrote:
I took my lab attempt in San Jose on Tuesday. I am proud to say I met Cisco's
requirements to validate my expertise.
Thanks to IPExpert for providing a great baseline of practice material and very
inventive and thoughtful questions. Thanks for everyone on this list for
answering my questions and also ASKING great questions. Keep up the good work
on a great forum and tool for pursuing this certification.
Thanks again everyone.
Michael Ciarfello (CCIE Voice 25698)
Unified Communications
Subject Matter Expert
IPLogic, Inc.
www.iplogic.com
Connect . Communicate . Compete . BetterTM
___
For more information regarding industry leading
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] First lab attempt
hi all, Does anyone know if we have to sit for first lab within 18 months exactly ? or can be bit flexible , mean 1 or 2 weeks more than 18 months As I tried to schedule for lab , and the system take it , even after 18 months period Thks for answer.. Rgs ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Boot Camp March 15 - 26
hi all, i plan to attend on 25 Jan , San Jose. if anyone attend same schedule and want to share hotel, pls ping me tks --- On Thu, 1/7/10, Roger Källberg wrote: From: Roger Källberg Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Boot Camp March 15 - 26 To: "Amp" , "ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com" Date: Thursday, January 7, 2010, 9:41 PM Hi Amp, I plan to go to the second week, 22-26 of March, of this boot camp in San Jose and before that I will attend the first week in Columbus on the 8-12 of March. I haven't booked it yet, but according to Mike Down there are still available seats. Plan to make up my mind within the next couple of days and book it :-) Brgds, Roger Källberg -Original Message- From: Amp [mailto:amccar...@cciequest.com] Sent: den 4 januari 2010 18:18 To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Boot Camp March 15 - 26 Hey gang, I was wondering has registered for or is planning to register for the boot camp in San Jose from March 15 - 26? Amp ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Clients experiencing EZVPN Problems with Proctorlabs
Hi Tyson, Will the 806 or 815 work fine for these ? (I am planning to connect 3 7961 phone without switch) Can you suggest me, what is minimum Router and IOS for EZVPN to your rack? tks --- On Wed, 2/10/10, Tyson Scott wrote: From: Tyson Scott Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Clients experiencing EZVPN Problems with Proctorlabs To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Cc: supp...@proctorlabs.com Date: Wednesday, February 10, 2010, 11:13 AM Voice Candidates, After working with a few customers I have verified that using Virtual-Template interfaces seem to solve all problems that have been discussed lately on the forum with new phone types lack of audio, etc. Please make sure you are using the latest configuration templates when connecting to proctorlabs. I have given the templates to support and hopefully it will be uploaded to Proctorlabs sometime tomorrow. The following is required to use the latest configuration files A router that will support Cisco IOS 12.4T. A lot of earlier codes have bugs so it would be best if you have the latest versions available off of Cisco.com. Currently the ASA is not supported The Cisco VPN client is still compatible if you will just be using soft phones. Using the VPN client with Network sharing is no longer supported. I will update the list if in the future the ASA is fixed by Cisco and supports our implementation If anyone has problems with features not functioning and you believe it to be related to the VPN while connected please direct them my way. I would like to make sure you guys are having a good experience and there should be no reason not to if you are using the newest configurations with the IOS required. Good Luck in your studies. Regards, Tyson Scott - CCIE #13513 R&S, Security, and SP Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc. Mailto: tsc...@ipexpert.com Telephone: +1.810.326.1444, ext. 208 Live Assistance, Please visit: www.ipexpert.com/chat eFax: +1.810.454.0130 IPexpert is a premier provider of Classroom and Self-Study Cisco CCNA (R&S, Voice & Security), CCNP, CCVP, CCSP and CCIE (R&S, Voice, Security & Service Provider) Certification Training with locations throughout the United States, Europe and Australia. Be sure to check out our online communities at www.ipexpert.com/communities and our public website at www.ipexpert.com -Inline Attachment Follows- ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] EzVPn connectivity D-Link Switch
hi folks, I use 2611XM to connect to ipexpert remote lab. Is the D-Link Switch will work fine? Cable modem ---> Linksys wireless router > 2611XM Fa0/0 (VPN outside) 2611XM Fa 0/1 (VPN inside) > D-Link switch > Configuration laptop/desktop D-Link switch ---> 7961G (power cube) tks, ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] DHCP in CCM on Proctor lab
hi, Is anybody know how to activate DHCP in proctolab CCM for our home IP phones ? What need to condig in VPN router and Switches ? tks ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] verify QoS on 3750
hi, any body know what command to see if QOS configure in 3750 is actually working, when we place call. ie: we cofigure "auto qos voip trust" in switch port As I did not see in "sh mls qos interface" . Maybe there is other command or tool ? tks ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] IP Blue
are the IP Blue work in Windows 7 ? tks --- On Sat, 5/22/10, Wael Agina wrote: From: Wael Agina Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] IP Blue To: "KatGuru" Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Date: Saturday, May 22, 2010, 1:05 PM Hi Kat, I dont think it is free at all. However i am using thier multilab version which allowing you easly to run up to 5 instances with whatever MAC addresses without creating any loopbacks. It is running good with me. Try to negotiate with them and they might give you good discount as you running it for study purposes. Regards, Wael Agina On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 3:22 AM, KatGuru wrote: Guys, Can anyone please advise where to download free IP Blue client with multiple instances. Thank you for your help. ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com -- Thanks and Best Regards, Wael Agina -Inline Attachment Follows- ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] verify QoS on 3750
tks i saw the traffic --- On Tue, 5/25/10, Tapan Gautam (tgautam) wrote: From: Tapan Gautam (tgautam) Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] verify QoS on 3750 To: "Erwan Erwan" , ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Date: Tuesday, May 25, 2010, 3:02 AM Clear counters. Place a call and check interface stats using ‘show mls qos interface statistics’. Could not locate any other command. Tapan From: ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com [mailto:ccie_voice-boun...@onlinestudylist.com] On Behalf Of Erwan Erwan Sent: Monday, May 24, 2010 1:45 PM To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] verify QoS on 3750 hi, any body know what command to see if QOS configure in 3750 is actually working, when we place call. ie: we cofigure "auto qos voip trust" in switch port As I did not see in "sh mls qos interface" . Maybe there is other command or tool ? tks ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] ICD device not register to Call Manager ??
hi all, I tried to config IPCC express 4.0 and CCM 4.1 , however my ICD device (ICD_1701 and ICD_1702) status still said "Not Found " and I can not call ext 1700, which is my RP but the RP_1700 is registered, anybody can help me please ?? Thks
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ICD device not register to Call Manager ??
hi Mark, When you say your ICD Device - are you speaking of two CTI Ports that do not show as registered - but your CTI Route Point does show as registered? Yes, right I would go over and check things on the UCCX box. Check the JTAPI Subsystem - do a "check sync status" (not in front of me so forgive the slight mis-wording :)) and if not in sync (which it sounds like it isn't), then re-sync things up. Create, correct JTAPI providers, user/pass, and CTI Call Control Groups (CTI Ports in UCM) as necessary. I did, still the same Do you have any other suggestion, what should I do ? Thks in advance Rgds, --- On Fri, 10/31/08, Mark Snow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: From: Mark Snow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] ICD device not register to Call Manager ?? To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Date: Friday, October 31, 2008, 10:45 PM When you say your ICD Device - are you speaking of two CTI Ports that do not show as registered - but your CTI Route Point does show as registered? I would go over and check things on the UCCX box. Check the JTAPI Subsystem - do a "check sync status" (not in front of me so forgive the slight mis-wording :)) and if not in sync (which it sounds like it isn't), then re-sync things up. Create, correct JTAPI providers, user/pass, and CTI Call Control Groups (CTI Ports in UCM) as necessary. Cheers, -- Mark Snow CCIE #14073 (Voice, Security) Senior Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc. Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 Fax: +1.309.413.4097 Mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Join our free online support and peer group communities: http://www.IPexpert.com/communities -- IPexpert - The Global Leader in Self-Study, Classroom-Based, Video-On-Demand and Audio Certification Training Tools for the Cisco CCIE R&S Lab, CCIE Security Lab, CCIE Service Provider Lab , CCIE Voice Lab and CCIE Storage Lab Certifications. -- On Oct 30, 2008, at 7:45 PM, Erwan Erwan wrote: hi all, I tried to config IPCC express 4.0 and CCM 4.1 , however my ICD device (ICD_1701 and ICD_1702) status still said "Not Found " and I can not call ext 1700, which is my RP but the RP_1700 is registered, anybody can help me please ?? Thks
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Berbee remote ph control
hi, does anybody how to use Berbee without license key installed for lab practice? Thks
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] MGCP gateway not registered ?
hi, I am using Grade Lab voice lab, any body ever experienced this issue before and know the workaround ? - 2811 MGCP gateway is registered in Call Manager (dial-peer , mgcp config is in place) - however the "sh ccm-manager" is showwing "down" I have : 1. restart CCM service and reboot CCM 2. bunce MGCP by no mgcp and mgcp any idea , how to resolve it ? Thks,
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] max session 0 - IOS Conf Bridge (failed)
hi, I try to config IOS Conf Bridge and Transcode in 2811 , DSP type C5110 - Config for Transcode succeed - But config for Conference failed, it said max session 0, i think I still hv enough DSP - voice-card 0 dspfarm dsp services dspfarm sccp ccm group 1 associate ccm 2 priority 2 associate ccm 1 priority 1 associate profile 1 register cfb001e7a5f9530 associate profile 2 register mtp001e7a5f9530 ! dspfarm profile 2 transcode codec g711ulaw codec g729r8 maximum sessions 2 associate application SCCP ! dspfarm profile 1 conference codec g711ulaw codec g729r8 associate application SCCP shutdown --- NAME: "PVDMII DSP SIMM with one DSP", DESCR: "PVDMII DSP SIMM with one DSP" PID: PVDM2-16 , VID: V01 , SN: FOC0D7C NAME: "High Density Voice", DESCR: "High Density Voice" PID: NM-HDV= , VID: 1.1, SN: JAB05400BRG NAME: "PVDM 3-C549 Simm", DESCR: "PVDM 3-C549 Simm" PID: PVDM-12= , VID: 1.1, SN: NAME: "PVDM 3-C549 Simm", DESCR: "PVDM 3-C549 Simm" PID: PVDM-12= , VID: 1.1, SN: Thks
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] max session 0 - IOS Conf Bridge (failed)
Thks Kevin and Jacobs, I have not tried it yet, but I believe must work w/ your workaround,cause I remember it worked before w/ the same amount of DSP, and Kevin's explanation really make sense why it failed --- On Sun, 11/16/08, Kevin Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: From: Kevin Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] max session 0 - IOS Conf Bridge (failed) To: "Jacob Owen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Date: Sunday, November 16, 2008, 3:17 AM You must have a “free” DSP to configure any sessions for conferencing. With a PVDM2-16 you will be able to configure 2 conferencing sessions as long as nothing else has grabbed any of the channels. Transcoding will “share” DSP’s with Voice Port terminations, so I agree that it is best to configure the conferencing first, which will reserve the DSP channels first, then go to transcoding… Just for info, conferencing profiles grab 8 channels of a PVDM2 per session, so a PVDM2-8 will give you a 1 for “Max sessions”, a PVDM2-16 will give you a 2, PVDM2-32 gives you 4, so on and so forth, but the DSP must be “free” of any other channels being allocated… Kevin Kevin Porter Systems Engineer L4 Netelligent Corporation 400 South Woods Mill Drive, Suite 105 St. Louis , MO 63017 Office: (314) 392-6921 Cell: (314) 852-1252 Fax: (314) 392-9760 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.netelligent.com Bridging The Gap Between Good and GREAT IP Communications! From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jacob Owen Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2008 11:25 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] max session 0 - IOS Conf Bridge (failed) You can also try to turn up your conference dspfarm profile first, and then the transcoder. I have run into the same issue when trying to do the transcoder first, so just "shut" on dspfarm profile 2, then "no shut" on dspfarm profile 1, and finally "no shut" on dspfarm profile 2. Let me know if that helps. On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 10:42 AM, Erwan Erwan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: hi, I try to config IOS Conf Bridge and Transcode in 2811 , DSP type C5110 - Config for Transcode succeed - But config for Conference failed, it said max session 0, i think I still hv enough DSP - voice-card 0 dspfarm dsp services dspfarm sccp ccm group 1 associate ccm 2 priority 2 associate ccm 1 priority 1 associate profile 1 register cfb001e7a5f9530 associate profile 2 register mtp001e7a5f9530 ! dspfarm profile 2 transcode codec g711ulaw codec g729r8 maximum sessions 2 associate application SCCP ! dspfarm profile 1 conference codec g711ulaw codec g729r8 associate application SCCP shutdown --- NAME: "PVDMII DSP SIMM with one DSP", DESCR: "PVDMII DSP SIMM with one DSP" PID: PVDM2-16 , VID: V01 , SN: FOC0D7C NAME: "High Density Voice", DESCR: "High Density Voice" PID: NM-HDV= , VID: 1.1, SN: JAB05400BRG NAME: "PVDM 3-C549 Simm", DESCR: "PVDM 3-C549 Simm" PID: PVDM-12= , VID: 1.1, SN: NAME: "PVDM 3-C549 Simm", DESCR: "PVDM 3-C549 Simm" PID: PVDM-12= , VID: 1.1, SN: Thks -- Jacob Owen CCIE #14063 (R&S, Voice, Service Provider), CCDP
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MGCP gateway not registered ?
hi tks James , yes it work, just remove and re-add bind command --- On Mon, 11/17/08, Ryan Trauernicht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: From: Ryan Trauernicht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MGCP gateway not registered ? To: "James Key" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Date: Monday, November 17, 2008, 12:13 PM Do you have the config? On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 4:45 PM, James Key <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Are you using the MGCP bind commands? If so, try removing these and re-add. James From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Erwan Erwan Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2008 2:57 PM To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] MGCP gateway not registered ? hi, I am using Grade Lab voice lab, any body ever experienced this issue before and know the workaround ? - 2811 MGCP gateway is registered in Call Manager (dial-peer , mgcp config is in place) - however the "sh ccm-manager" is showwing "down" I have : 1. restart CCM service and reboot CCM 2. bunce MGCP by no mgcp and mgcp any idea , how to resolve it ? Thks, NOTICE: This electronic mail message and any files transmitted with it are intended exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed. The message, together with any attachment, may contain confidential and/or privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, printing, saving, copying, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please immediately advise the sender by reply email and delete all copies.
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] 6608 failed call
hi, I config the 6608 PRI , and it registered in CCM , however I can't make outgoing call. 7 digit and 10 digit I capture debug from Tracy Tool. Can anybody help me understand what is wrong from my debug ? Thks Live trace on 177.1.71.20 Log File Opened 10/15/08 07:19:15 07:19:01.900 (GMSG) Statusing TCP Socket for CP#0 07:19:01.950 (MGCP) Outgoing CMD: Adding transID<50> CMD to outgoing list 07:19:01.950 (MGCP) Outgoing CMD: Re-starting list timer 07:19:01.950 (MGCP)Outgoing Msg: NTFY 50 [EMAIL PROTECTED] MGCP 0.1 X: 0 O: 07:19:02.000 (MGCP) Incoming RSP: Matching transID<50> found on outgoing list, removing CMD 07:19:02.000 (MGCP)Incoming Msg: 200 50 (NMP) Set Mask -> Mask<0x0> (DSP) Set Mask -> Mask<0x0> 07:19:14.770 (LINE) TraceMask value = Where Bit0 = Call Control Statess Bit1 = Q931 Bit2 = Q931 Msg's Bit3 = Line Restarts Bit4 = E&M Trunk States/Events Bit5 = Ground Start Trunk States/Events Bit6 = Loop Start Trunk States/Events Bit7 = Robbed Bit Signalling Changes (GMSG) Set Mask -> Mask<0xFF> (CFG) Set Mask -> Mask<0x0> (XA) Set Mask -> Mask<0x0> 07:19:14.770 SPAN: --> TraceMask value = TraceMask bit 0x01 --> Show Frameslips TraceMask bit 0x02 --> Show Alarm Changes TraceMask bit 0x04 --> Show HDLC Rx Errors TraceMask bit 0x08 --> Show HDLC Tx/Rx Msgs TraceMask bit 0x10 --> Show FDL Errors TraceMask bit 0x20 --> Show ANSI PRM Tx/Rx TraceMask bit 0x40 --> Show FDL BOCs TraceMask bit 0x80 --> Show FDL TABS Req/Resp TraceMask bit 0x100 --> Show Raw 1-sec Stats TraceMask bit 0x200 --> Show Rcv Signalling Changes 07:19:14.770 (Q921) --> TraceMask value = 00ff Where Bit0 = BackHaul Status Messages -- DL-Est Req/Cfm, DL-Rel Req/Cfm, ... Bit1 = BackHaul Operational Messages -- Data Ind/Req Bit2 = D-Channel Messages -- SABME, UA, DISC, RR, ... Bit3 = Timer Events Bit4 = Error Events Bit5 = State Machine Events Bit6 = Show Variables in I-Frame Received Bit7 = Decoded PRI Q.931 Messages 07:19:16.950 (MGCP) Outgoing CMD: Adding transID<51> CMD to outgoing list 07:19:16.950 (MGCP) Outgoing CMD: Re-starting list timer 07:19:16.950 (MGCP)Outgoing Msg: NTFY 51 [EMAIL PROTECTED] MGCP 0.1 X: 0 O: 07:19:16.950 (MGCP) Incoming RSP: Matching transID<51> found on outgoing list, removing CMD 07:19:16.950 (MGCP)Incoming Msg: 200 51 07:19:23.800 Q921: T203 Timeout 07:19:23.800 Q921: T203 Expired 07:19:23.800 Q921sm: From ST_MultipleFrameEstablished, To ST_TimerRecover, Event EV_T203Expire 07:19:23.800 Q921: Send RR 07:19:23.800 Q921: Start T200 07:19:23.800 Q921: ProcDChan - SAPI = 0x0, TEI = 0x1,RxSeq = 0x19, TxSeq = 0x0, Event = RR, Length=4 07:19:23.800 Q921: Variables - Vr = 018, Vs = 012, Va = 012, Nr = 012, Ns = 017 07:19:23.800 Q921 -- RCV RR 07:19:23.800 Q921sm: From ST_TimerRecover, To ST_TmrRcovrRRnREJ, Event EV_RR 07:19:23.800 Q921sm: From ST_TmrRcovrRRnREJ, To ST_MultipleFrameEstablished, Event EV_TmrRcovrRRnREJ_C 07:19:23.800 Q921: Stop T200 07:19:23.800 Q921: Start T203 (NMP) Set Mask -> Mask<0x0> (DSP) Set Mask -> Mask<0x0> 07:19:26.010 (LINE) TraceMask value = Where Bit0 = Call Control Statess Bit1 = Q931 Bit2 = Q931 Msg's Bit3 = Line Restarts Bit4 = E&M Trunk States/Events Bit5 = Ground Start Trunk States/Events Bit6 = Loop Start Trunk States/Events Bit7 = Robbed Bit Signalling Changes (GMSG) Set Mask -> Mask<0xFF> (CFG) Set Mask -> Mask<0x0> (XA) Set Mask -> Mask<0x0> 07:19:26.010 SPAN: --> TraceMask value = TraceMask bit 0x01 --> Show Frameslips TraceMask bit 0x02 --> Show Alarm Changes TraceMask bit 0x04 --> Show HDLC Rx Errors TraceMask bit 0x08 --> Show HDLC Tx/Rx Msgs TraceMask bit 0x10 --> Show FDL Errors TraceMask bit 0x20 --> Show ANSI PRM Tx/Rx TraceMask bit 0x40 --> Show FDL BOCs TraceMask bit 0x80 --> Show FDL TABS Req/Resp TraceMask bit 0x100 --> Show Raw 1-sec Stats TraceMask bit 0x200 --> Show Rcv Signalling Changes 07:19:26.020 (Q921) --> TraceMask value = 00ff Where Bit0 = BackHaul Status Messages -- DL-Est Req/Cfm, DL-Rel Req/Cfm, ... Bit1 = BackHaul Operational Messages -- Data Ind/Req Bit2 = D-Channel Messages -- SABME, UA, DISC, RR, ... Bit3 = Timer Events Bit4 = Error Events Bit5 = State Machine Events
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] IPCC script ??
hi, I edit the IPCC express for ICD , but I can't find "agent1" user id in Resource IPCC Express,when I have to put in variable for State Does it actually a new variable that I have to create or user id :agent1 from CCM / IPCC? And if that is the user id, how to enable it? so It will show in script tks
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] IPCC script ??
hi marwa, yes it associate to phone and ICD config in CCM tks --- On Wed, 11/19/08, marwa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: From: marwa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] IPCC script ?? To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wednesday, November 19, 2008, 3:06 PM hi, u need to associate the agent1 to the phone and choose ICD in the callmanger - Original Message - From: Erwan Erwan To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2008 7:41 AM Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] IPCC script ?? hi, I edit the IPCC express for ICD , but I can't find "agent1" user id in Resource IPCC Express,when I have to put in variable for State Does it actually a new variable that I have to create or user id :agent1 from CCM / IPCC? And if that is the user id, how to enable it? so It will show in script tks
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 6608 failed call
hi Greg, I can't find this command in 6608 module interface S1/0:23 isdn T203 15000 (or other msec value greater than the default 1) I have tried , Top-Down & Bottom-Up, still not working -- and here is my Trace Analysis when I place call , when I go to Q931 Tranmslator, they said not ISDN debug - Cisco CallManagercarryOnResList table has 0 entries Cisco CallManagernotifiedSsManagerList table has 0 entries Cisco CallManagerremoteJoinSecondaryResList table has 0 entries Cisco CallManagerMGCPBhHandler - Receiving BhHdr: 0004 0011 0001 * Cisco CallManagerMGCPBhHandler - PktCapService::out(Protocol_Backhaul,src=177.1.101.102,port=2428,desc=177.1.100.10,port=2428,0,0,msg,len=12,gateway=177.1.101.102) Cisco CallManagerMGCPBhHandler::wait_SdlDataInd - backhaul message length error uiBufLen=12, message ignored from ipAddr 177.1.101.102 --- On Tue, 11/18/08, Pulos, Greg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: From: Pulos, Greg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 6608 failed call To: "Erwan Erwan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com" Date: Tuesday, November 18, 2008, 7:21 PM Hi Erwan, This dick tracy seems to show your T203 timer is reaching it's 'maximum time in seconds allowed without frames being exchanged between the endpoints of the link'. This is causing MGCP to delete the connection it had just created 10 seconds before when attempting to setup the call. By default, the T203 timer is 10 seconds. A couple of things to note: 1) you may have more help determining the problem if by collecting CCM traces on the call. 2) you may want to verify your config of the PRI. Ie: framing, line encoding, speed of channels, channels to be used, top-down or bottom-up channel selection, etc. 3) if all config is 100% correct, perhaps there is some sort of delay on the D-channel causing the exchange of frames to take longer than 10 seconds. (the T203 timer value that is set) perhaps increasing this just a few seconds will allow more time to get the initial frames exchanged for the connection to succeed. (a physical problem will likely not allow any increase in T203 to help) To increase the T203 timer, use the following command on your D-channel interface of the PRI. Ie: interface S1/0:23 isdn T203 15000 (or other msec value greater than the default 1) greg -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Erwan Erwan Sent: Monday, November 17, 2008 4:03 PM To: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] 6608 failed call hi, I config the 6608 PRI , and it registered in CCM , however I can't make outgoing call. 7 digit and 10 digit I capture debug from Tracy Tool. Can anybody help me understand what is wrong from my debug ? Thks
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] PSTN router ??
hi, what happen if we config the PSTN router config correctlt, but no phone registered ? Let say , we have translation rule, translation profile, e-phone, but the Phone is unregistered. Are we going to get unallocated/unassigned in isdn q931 debug ? (when we place a call to that number ) Thks,
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Workbook, Vol1 , Section 4 no.7 (SIP table)
hi, anybody know which table 22 that they refer in Section 4 , no. 7 . they mention SIP Register, but i do not see in my table Thks
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Workbook, Vol1 , Section 4 no.7 (SIP table)
i bought on June 2008, do u hv link where i can download ? thks --- On Tue, 11/25/08, down loader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: From: down loader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Workbook, Vol1 , Section 4 no.7 (SIP table) To: "Erwan Erwan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Date: Tuesday, November 25, 2008, 1:23 AM I've got that table on mine. Is your material up to date? On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 6:59 PM, Erwan Erwan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: hi, anybody know which table 22 that they refer in Section 4 , no. 7 . they mention SIP Register, but i do not see in my table Thks
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCE failed to connect to UNITY cluster
hi , I try to connect UCE to Cisco Unity cluster , but when I verify server , it failed here is the log it is ping able from Unity and UCE, any idea ? - interface Service-Engine0/0 ip unnumbered FastEthernet0/0.51 service-module ip address 177.3.51.2 255.255.255.0 service-module ip default-gateway 177.3.51.1 !--- Testing Device 1 - CiscoUM2-VI1 Device SecurityMode is Non-Secure. *** Device Test Failed. *** CCM Server 1 [177.3.51.1, TCP Port 2000] - Register Test Failed. Resolved IP Address as 177.3.51.1. Failure Reason: ErrorCannotEstablishWinsockConnection Troubleshooting Tip: Make sure that the CCM Server is accessible via the network and is otherwise operating correctly.
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Unity Express w/ IP blue ?
hi, does anybody ever experience this ? I hv config this and others also setup fine. telephony-service voicemail 3600 --- however when I press "Message" button, it just ring busy, any idea what is wrong ? Rgds,
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] debug IPCC, error
hi, I edit & debug script using script editor to display ANI for 617 in workbook Vol 1 (IPCC) and it show error msg when the pointer hit the script ANI=Get Call Contact Info (--Triggering Contact --, Calling Number ) Error msg : Task 325 GetCallContactInfoStep (HandledSessionStep) Wrong trigger typecom.cisco.app.remote.RemoteApplicationTrigger any suggestion ? thks
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] crs editor ?
hi, anybody experience this ? I tried to debug CRS script using CRS Editor and it show error msg, like this Wrong trigger type: com.cisco.app.remote.RemoteApplicationTrigger thks
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Gatekepeer interzone fail ?
hi, I am configuring interzone GK like this IP Phone UCM --- GK 1 -- UCME (also act as GK-2 ) --- IP Phone Endpoint and zone prefix registered fine, but The call failed after try to ringing several times & here is the debug (seem stop after sending the LRQ from GK-1) here is the config == GK-1 gatekeeper zone local HQ-RTR ipexpert.com 177.7.254.1 zone remote PSTN-WAN ipexpert.com 177.253.7.1 1719 zone prefix PSTN-WAN 011* gw-type-prefix 1#* default-technology no shutdown ! and UCM -- Gatekeeper section, config as H.225 Trunk (Gakekeer Controlled) point to GK-1 UCME -- interface Loopback0 ip address 177.7.254.254 255.255.255.255 h323-gateway voip interface h323-gateway voip id PSTN-WAN ipaddr 177.253.7.1 1719 h323-gateway voip h323-id PSTN-GW h323-gateway voip tech-prefix 2# h323-gateway voip bind srcaddr 177.7.254.254 ! gatekeeper zone local PSTN-WAN ipexpert.com 177.253.7.1 zone remote HQ-RTR ipexpert.com 177.7.254.1 1719 no zone subnet PSTN-WAN default enable zone subnet PSTN-WAN 177.7.254.254/32 enable gw-type-prefix 011* gw ipaddr 177.7.254.254 1720 no shutdown ! The call failed after try to ringing several times & here is the debug (seem stop after sending the LRQ from GK-1) debug gatekeeper main 10 -- *Dec 14 14:28:35.427: gk_process: QUEUE_EVENT (minor 0) wakeup *Dec 14 14:28:35.427: gk_rassrv_arq: arqp=0x479A21B0, crv=0x10, answerCall=0 *Dec 14 14:28:35.427: gk_rassrv_sep_arq: ARQ Didn't use GK_AAA_PROC *Dec 14 14:28:35.427: gk_dns_query: No Name servers *Dec 14 14:28:35.427: rassrv_get_addrinfo: (01144232737) Tech-prefix match failed. *Dec 14 14:28:35.427: rassrv_get_addrinfo: (01144232737) Matched zone prefix 011 and remainder 44232737 *Dec 14 14:28:35.427: gk_rassrv_get_ingress_network: returning default ingress network = 1 *Dec 14 14:28:35.427: rassrv_arq_select_viazone: about to check the source side, src_zonep=0x478A4BDC *Dec 14 14:28:35.427: rassrv_arq_select_viazone: matched zone is HQ-RTR, and z_invianamelen=0 *Dec 14 14:28:35.427: rassrv_arq_select_viazone: about to check the destination side, dst_zonep=0x478A4E3C *Dec 14 14:28:35.427: rassrv_arq_select_viazone: matched zone is PSTN-WAN, and z_outvianamelen=0 *Dec 14 14:28:35.427: rassrv_get_addrinfo: No tech prefix *Dec 14 14:28:35.427: rassrv_get_addrinfo: Alias not found *Dec 14 14:28:35.427: rassrv_put_remote_zones_from_zone_list: zone PSTN-WAN *Dec 14 14:28:35.427: send_lrq: seq_lrq 1, use_be 0, rzone_cnt 1 *Dec 14 14:28:35.427: send_lrq: lrq array index 2, lap 479F0C34 *Dec 14 14:28:35.431: send_lrq: sent lrq - zonecount 1 *Dec 14 14:28:35.431: gk_process: QUEUE_EVENT (minor 0) wakeup *Dec 14 14:28:35.431: gk_rassrv_sep_arq: LRQ suspension point failed (return code = 0x4009)
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Proctor is DOWN
does anyone exp proctorlab , very slow now? can't do lab properly --- On Thu, 4/28/11, Naoufal Kerboute wrote: From: Naoufal Kerboute Subject: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Proctor is DOWN To: "ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com" Received: Thursday, April 28, 2011, 6:59 PM Guys, Proctor is DOWN? Naoufal. * * This Communication is Private & Confidential. This message and any attachments may contain information that is privileged and / or confidential and is the property of MHD InfoTech LLC. * * It is intended solely for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you are not authorized to read, print, retain copy, disseminate, distribute, or * * use this message & any attachments or any part thereof. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the message and any attachments from your system. * * -Inline Attachment Follows- ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] cme- transfer go to MOH
hi there, I use "transfer full consult" in CME. When call from Phone A 3001 hit 4000(repcetion) , and reception transfer to 5000, it can't speak to 5000 before tranfer. Soon when 5000 pick up from 4000, it always hear MOH. 4000 should be able to announce the 5000 on who is calling before transfre to him. Whta I miss ? tks___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] sip phone register
hi , I have sip phone 7965 register to CME , and i like to change to sccp. however , I have factory reset, still it pick up the SIP loads (not sure where it from, I have delete from router config ) anyone know why ? and how to move to SCCP easily in this case? tks___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] sip phone register
ic, however in my case, i do not have UCM --- On Sat, 6/18/11, Bill Lake wrote: From: Bill Lake Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] sip phone register To: "Erwan Erwan" Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Received: Saturday, June 18, 2011, 7:45 PM Enable auto registration on your CUCM as SCCP, point your DHCP for your CME option 150 to your CUCM and reboot that phone. It will download the firmware from CUCM to SCCP and then you will be ready to go. You should be able to watch the phone load and show it its progress as it updates. On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 10:23 PM, Erwan Erwan wrote: hi , I have sip phone 7965 register to CME , and i like to change to sccp. however , I have factory reset, still it pick up the SIP loads (not sure where it from, I have delete from router config ) anyone know why ? and how to move to SCCP easily in this case? tks ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] Fw: MVA load issue in proctor rack
hi Vik and others, Have you ever encounter this on proctor rack. Router will not load the MVA application. ( i have reset PUB and router ,still same) Wondering if this is VM bug or proctor ruouter error and what is the workaround ? Jul 21 10:52:15.755: //-1//HIFS:/hifs_http_cb: hifs http callback: load of http://10.10.210.10:8080/ccmivr/pages/IVRMainpage.vxml failed. Status=httpc error -5=internal client transmit error *Jul 21 10:52:15.755: //-1//HIFS:/hifs_free_idata: hifs_free_idata: 0x4A3668DC *Jul 21 10:52:15.755: //-1//HIFS:/hifs_hold_idata: hifs_hold_idata: 0x4A3668DC *Jul 21 10:52:15.755: Could not load IVR script http://10.10.210.10:8080/ccmivr/pages/IVRMainpage.vxml --- On Thu, 7/21/11, Erwan Erwan wrote: From: Erwan Erwan Subject: MVA load issue in proctor rack To: vma...@ipexpert.com Cc: supp...@ipexpert.com Received: Thursday, July 21, 2011, 1:09 AM hi Vik, I have encountered sevreral times, running MVA application (this always work most time in rack). In rack 11, I have this issue and other rack not remember. - I have reset and restart UCM PUB , reload router, check connectivity from router to PUB but still give me failed on load MVA here is my error == l 20 03:31:45.271: //-1//HIFS:/hifs_http_cb: hifs http callback: load of http://10.10.210.10:8080/ccmivr/pages/IVRMainpage.vxml failed. Status=httpc error -2=internal client timeout error *Jul 20 03:31:45.271: //-1//HIFS:/hifs_free_idata: hifs_free_idata: 0x4A829DAC *Jul 20 03:31:45.271: //-1//HIFS:/hifs_hold_idata: hifs_hold_idata: 0x4A829DAC *Jul 20 03:31:45.271: Could not load IVR script http://10.10.210.10:8080/ccmivr/pages/IVRMainpage.vxml version of pod 11 ystem returned to ROM by reload at 21:52:33 UTC Tue Jul 19 2011 System restarted at 19:07:10 CDT Tue Jul 19 2011 System image file is "flash:c2800nm-adventerprisek9_ivs-mz.124-20.T1.bin" config --- application service mwa http://10.10.210.10:8080/ccmivr/pages/IVRMainpage.vxml dial-peer voice 410 voip service mwa destination-pattern 3000 voice-class codec 1 session target ipv4:10.10.210.10 dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric no vad dial-peer voice 4101 pots service mwa incoming called-number 3000 voice service voip allow-connections h323 to h323 allow-connections h323 to sip allow-connections sip to h323 allow-connections sip to sip ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Fw: MVA load issue in proctor rack
Adil, tks for help, so u mean i do not need this command for h323? "application" service mwa http://x.x.x.x - this is nothing to do until dialpeer level, this issue come up when load the applicatio service . --- On Thu, 7/21/11, Adil Shaikh wrote: From: Adil Shaikh Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Fw: MVA load issue in proctor rack To: "Erwan Erwan" Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Received: Thursday, July 21, 2011, 3:00 PM hi Erwan, is this H323 gateway or MGCP gatway? if this is H323 gateway you do not need to do hairpinning, if mgcp then you need to do hairpinning, most likely, you are getting error message due to 'server mwa' command in voip and pots dialpeer. could you please post your full config of this router. thanks -adil On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 4:07 PM, Erwan Erwan wrote: hi Vik and others, Have you ever encounter this on proctor rack. Router will not load the MVA application. ( i have reset PUB and router ,still same) Wondering if this is VM bug or proctor ruouter error and what is the workaround ? Jul 21 10:52:15.755: //-1//HIFS:/hifs_http_cb: hifs http callback: load of http://10.10.210.10:8080/ccmivr/pages/IVRMainpage.vxml failed. Status=httpc error -5=internal client transmit error *Jul 21 10:52:15.755: //-1//HIFS:/hifs_free_idata: hifs_free_idata: 0x4A3668DC *Jul 21 10:52:15.755: //-1//HIFS:/hifs_hold_idata: hifs_hold_idata: 0x4A3668DC *Jul 21 10:52:15.755: Could not load IVR script http://10.10.210.10:8080/ccmivr/pages/IVRMainpage.vxml --- On Thu, 7/21/11, Erwan Erwan wrote: From: Erwan Erwan Subject: MVA load issue in proctor rack To: vma...@ipexpert.com Cc: supp...@ipexpert.com Received: Thursday, July 21, 2011, 1:09 AM hi Vik, I have encountered sevreral times, running MVA application (this always work most time in rack). In rack 11, I have this issue and other rack not remember. - I have reset and restart UCM PUB , reload router, check connectivity from router to PUB but still give me failed on load MVA here is my error == l 20 03:31:45.271: //-1//HIFS:/hifs_http_cb: hifs http callback: load of http://10.10.210.10:8080/ccmivr/pages/IVRMainpage.vxml failed. Status=httpc error -2=internal client timeout error *Jul 20 03:31:45.271: //-1//HIFS:/hifs_free_idata: hifs_free_idata: 0x4A829DAC *Jul 20 03:31:45.271: //-1//HIFS:/hifs_hold_idata: hifs_hold_idata: 0x4A829DAC *Jul 20 03:31:45.271: Could not load IVR script http://10.10.210.10:8080/ccmivr/pages/IVRMainpage.vxml version of pod 11 ystem returned to ROM by reload at 21:52:33 UTC Tue Jul 19 2011 System restarted at 19:07:10 CDT Tue Jul 19 2011 System image file is "flash:c2800nm-adventerprisek9_ivs-mz.124-20.T1.bin" config --- application service mwa http://10.10.210.10:8080/ccmivr/pages/IVRMainpage.vxml dial-peer voice 410 voip service mwa destination-pattern 3000 voice-class codec 1 session target ipv4:10.10.210.10 dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric no vad dial-peer voice 4101 pots service mwa incoming called-number 3000 voice service voip allow-connections h323 to h323 allow-connections h323 to sip allow-connections sip to h323 allow-connections sip to sip ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com -- . . . . _7___|___|_|_|adil.sha...@gmail.com . . ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Fw: MVA load issue in proctor rack
hi Adil, My issue is not able to load Application service mva. I load this application service mwa http://10.10.210.10:8080/ccmivr/pages/IVRMainpage.vxml and gave me the error: *Jul 21 10:52:15.755: //-1//HIFS:/hifs_http_cb: hifs http callback: load of http://10.10.210.10:8080/ccmivr/pages/IVRMainpage.vxml failed. Status=httpc error -5=internal client transmit error *Jul 21 10:52:15.755: //-1//HIFS:/hifs_free_idata: hifs_free_idata: 0x4A3668DC *Jul 21 10:52:15.755: //-1//HIFS:/hifs_hold_idata: hifs_hold_idata: 0x4A3668DC *Jul 21 10:52:15.755: Could not load IVR script http://10.10.210.10:8080/ccmivr/pages/IVRMainpage.vxml It has nothing to do with dial-peer for for this to be able to download. --- On Fri, 7/22/11, Adil Shaikh wrote: From: Adil Shaikh Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Fw: MVA load issue in proctor rack To: "Erwan Erwan" Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Received: Friday, July 22, 2011, 8:09 AM hi erwan, if your router is an H323 and you are getting inbound for Mobile Voice Access, you need 'service mwa' command on POTS dial-peer which has incoming-called number 3000. you do not need the same command on voip dial-peer. You will always need 'application' 'service mwa http://..' Please post full config of router and let us know what have you configured on Call Manager (including service parameters) for MVA. -adil On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 5:48 AM, Erwan Erwan wrote: Adil, tks for help, so u mean i do not need this command for h323? "application" service mwa http://x.x.x.x - this is nothing to do until dialpeer level, this issue come up when load the applicatio service . --- On Thu, 7/21/11, Adil Shaikh wrote: From: Adil Shaikh Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Fw: MVA load issue in proctor rack To: "Erwan Erwan" Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Received: Thursday, July 21, 2011, 3:00 PM hi Erwan, is this H323 gateway or MGCP gatway? if this is H323 gateway you do not need to do hairpinning, if mgcp then you need to do hairpinning, most likely, you are getting error message due to 'server mwa' command in voip and pots dialpeer. could you please post your full config of this router. thanks -adil On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 4:07 PM, Erwan Erwan wrote: hi Vik and others, Have you ever encounter this on proctor rack. Router will not load the MVA application. ( i have reset PUB and router ,still same) Wondering if this is VM bug or proctor ruouter error and what is the workaround ? Jul 21 10:52:15.755: //-1//HIFS:/hifs_http_cb: hifs http callback: load of http://10.10.210.10:8080/ccmivr/pages/IVRMainpage.vxml failed. Status=httpc error -5=internal client transmit error *Jul 21 10:52:15.755: //-1//HIFS:/hifs_free_idata: hifs_free_idata: 0x4A3668DC *Jul 21 10:52:15.755: //-1//HIFS:/hifs_hold_idata: hifs_hold_idata: 0x4A3668DC *Jul 21 10:52:15.755: Could not load IVR script http://10.10.210.10:8080/ccmivr/pages/IVRMainpage.vxml --- On Thu, 7/21/11, Erwan Erwan wrote: From: Erwan Erwan Subject: MVA load issue in proctor rack To: vma...@ipexpert.com Cc: supp...@ipexpert.com Received: Thursday, July 21, 2011, 1:09 AM hi Vik, I have encountered sevreral times, running MVA application (this always work most time in rack). In rack 11, I have this issue and other rack not remember. - I have reset and restart UCM PUB , reload router, check connectivity from router to PUB but still give me failed on load MVA here is my error == l 20 03:31:45.271: //-1//HIFS:/hifs_http_cb: hifs http callback: load of http://10.10.210.10:8080/ccmivr/pages/IVRMainpage.vxml failed. Status=httpc error -2=internal client timeout error *Jul 20 03:31:45.271: //-1//HIFS:/hifs_free_idata: hifs_free_idata: 0x4A829DAC *Jul 20 03:31:45.271: //-1//HIFS:/hifs_hold_idata: hifs_hold_idata: 0x4A829DAC *Jul 20 03:31:45.271: Could not load IVR script http://10.10.210.10:8080/ccmivr/pages/IVRMainpage.vxml version of pod 11 ystem returned to ROM by reload at 21:52:33 UTC Tue Jul 19 2011 System restarted at 19:07:10 CDT Tue Jul 19 2011 System image file is "flash:c2800nm-adventerprisek9_ivs-mz.124-20.T1.bin" config --- application service mwa http://10.10.210.10:8080/ccmivr/pages/IVRMainpage.vxml dial-peer voice 410 voip service mwa destination-pattern 3000 voice-class codec 1 session target ipv4:10.10.210.10 dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric no vad dial-peer voice 4101 pots service mwa incoming called-number 3000 voice service voip allow-connections h323 to h323 allow-connections h323 to sip allow-connections sip to h323 allow-connections sip to sip ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab tr
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Fw: MVA load issue in proctor rack -config
and here is my config (when I able to load mva , i have no issue for receive and outgoing call in MVA) This is work all the time, if I able to load the MVA application service mwa http://10.10.210.10:8080/ccmivr/pages/IVRMainpage.vxml ! voice service voip allow-connections h323 to h323 allow-connections h323 to sip allow-connections sip to h323 allow-connections sip to sip ! dial-peer voice 410 voip service mwa destination-pattern 2999 session target ipv4:10.10.210.10 dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric no vad ! dial-peer voice 4101 pots service mwa incoming called-number 2999 ! UCM serv paramter : 2999, also MVA in UCM 2999 This is H323 MVA. --- On Fri, 7/22/11, Adil Shaikh wrote: From: Adil Shaikh Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Fw: MVA load issue in proctor rack To: "Erwan Erwan" Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Received: Friday, July 22, 2011, 8:09 AM hi erwan, if your router is an H323 and you are getting inbound for Mobile Voice Access, you need 'service mwa' command on POTS dial-peer which has incoming-called number 3000. you do not need the same command on voip dial-peer. You will always need 'application' 'service mwa http://..' Please post full config of router and let us know what have you configured on Call Manager (including service parameters) for MVA. -adil On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 5:48 AM, Erwan Erwan wrote: Adil, tks for help, so u mean i do not need this command for h323? "application" service mwa http://x.x.x.x - this is nothing to do until dialpeer level, this issue come up when load the applicatio service . --- On Thu, 7/21/11, Adil Shaikh wrote: From: Adil Shaikh Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Fw: MVA load issue in proctor rack To: "Erwan Erwan" Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Received: Thursday, July 21, 2011, 3:00 PM hi Erwan, is this H323 gateway or MGCP gatway? if this is H323 gateway you do not need to do hairpinning, if mgcp then you need to do hairpinning, most likely, you are getting error message due to 'server mwa' command in voip and pots dialpeer. could you please post your full config of this router. thanks -adil On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 4:07 PM, Erwan Erwan wrote: hi Vik and others, Have you ever encounter this on proctor rack. Router will not load the MVA application. ( i have reset PUB and router ,still same) Wondering if this is VM bug or proctor ruouter error and what is the workaround ? Jul 21 10:52:15.755: //-1//HIFS:/hifs_http_cb: hifs http callback: load of http://10.10.210.10:8080/ccmivr/pages/IVRMainpage.vxml failed. Status=httpc error -5=internal client transmit error *Jul 21 10:52:15.755: //-1//HIFS:/hifs_free_idata: hifs_free_idata: 0x4A3668DC *Jul 21 10:52:15.755: //-1//HIFS:/hifs_hold_idata: hifs_hold_idata: 0x4A3668DC *Jul 21 10:52:15.755: Could not load IVR script http://10.10.210.10:8080/ccmivr/pages/IVRMainpage.vxml --- On Thu, 7/21/11, Erwan Erwan wrote: From: Erwan Erwan Subject: MVA load issue in proctor rack To: vma...@ipexpert.com Cc: supp...@ipexpert.com Received: Thursday, July 21, 2011, 1:09 AM hi Vik, I have encountered sevreral times, running MVA application (this always work most time in rack). In rack 11, I have this issue and other rack not remember. - I have reset and restart UCM PUB , reload router, check connectivity from router to PUB but still give me failed on load MVA here is my error == l 20 03:31:45.271: //-1//HIFS:/hifs_http_cb: hifs http callback: load of http://10.10.210.10:8080/ccmivr/pages/IVRMainpage.vxml failed. Status=httpc error -2=internal client timeout error *Jul 20 03:31:45.271: //-1//HIFS:/hifs_free_idata: hifs_free_idata: 0x4A829DAC *Jul 20 03:31:45.271: //-1//HIFS:/hifs_hold_idata: hifs_hold_idata: 0x4A829DAC *Jul 20 03:31:45.271: Could not load IVR script http://10.10.210.10:8080/ccmivr/pages/IVRMainpage.vxml version of pod 11 ystem returned to ROM by reload at 21:52:33 UTC Tue Jul 19 2011 System restarted at 19:07:10 CDT Tue Jul 19 2011 System image file is "flash:c2800nm-adventerprisek9_ivs-mz.124-20.T1.bin" config --- application service mwa http://10.10.210.10:8080/ccmivr/pages/IVRMainpage.vxml dial-peer voice 410 voip service mwa destination-pattern 3000 voice-class codec 1 session target ipv4:10.10.210.10 dtmf-relay h245-alphanumeric no vad dial-peer voice 4101 pots service mwa incoming called-number 3000 voice service voip allow-connections h323 to h323 allow-connections h323 to sip allow-connections sip to h323 allow-connections sip to sip ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Ar
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Fw: MVA load issue in proctor rack
hi Ash, Thanks, this is very make sense. I will test in my next session. I was able to ping from router to PUB 10.10.210.10. I have loaded with basic image in proctor rack,should not be any ACL blocking it, And from their diagram it only show BR router connect thru FR to PUB. tks --- On Thu, 7/21/11, Ashraf Ayyash wrote: From: Ashraf Ayyash Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Fw: MVA load issue in proctor rack To: "Adil Shaikh" Cc: "Erwan Erwan" , ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Received: Thursday, July 21, 2011, 4:09 PM Hello All , This error indicates that while loading the script, the VXML file IVRMainpage.vxml failed to be downloaded from 10.10.210.10:8080 (HTTP GET). maybe a firewall in the network is blocking the request from your GW interface to 10.10.210.10:8080 or the GET HTTP souce ip is the reason of this problem but finally this is a connectivity issue , i have seen some other post here for people who have MVA VXML loaded but they have another issue , not sure how proctor lab is working internal but this is the reason of the fail of loading the VMXL script , you can Telnet/ping/traces route using specific interface sources etc.. if you found that there router to 10.10.210.10 is routable from specific source you can add static route for 10.10.210.10 via the routable interface . #The reason for the static route is because of the fact that the router will always use the interface closest to the destination, there is no command to bind the http to an specific interface so static route can be a solution for such situations Best regards Ash On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 10:00 AM, Adil Shaikh wrote: > > hi Erwan, > > is this H323 gateway or MGCP gatway? > > if this is H323 gateway you do not need to do hairpinning, > > if mgcp then you need to do hairpinning, > > > most likely, you are getting error message due to 'server mwa' command in > voip and pots dialpeer. > > could you please post your full config of this router. > > thanks > -adil > > > > On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 4:07 PM, Erwan Erwan wrote: >> >> hi Vik and others, >> >> Have you ever encounter this on proctor rack. Router will not load the MVA >> application. >> >> ( i have reset PUB and router ,still same) >> >> Wondering if this is VM bug or proctor ruouter error and what is the >> workaround ? >> >> >> Jul 21 10:52:15.755: //-1//HIFS:/hifs_http_cb: hifs http callback: load of >> http://10.10.210.10:8080/ccmivr/pages/IVRMainpage.vxml failed. Status=httpc >> error -5=internal client transmit error >> *Jul 21 10:52:15.755: //-1//HIFS:/hifs_free_idata: hifs_free_idata: >> 0x4A3668DC >> *Jul 21 10:52:15.755: //-1//HIFS:/hifs_hold_idata: hifs_hold_idata: >> 0x4A3668DC >> *Jul 21 10:52:15.755: Could not load IVR script >> http://10.10.210.10:8080/ccmivr/pages/IVRMainpage.vxml >> >> >> --- On Thu, 7/21/11, Erwan Erwan wrote: >> >> From: Erwan Erwan >> Subject: MVA load issue in proctor rack >> To: vma...@ipexpert.com >> Cc: supp...@ipexpert.com >> Received: Thursday, July 21, 2011, 1:09 AM >> >> hi Vik, >> >> I have encountered sevreral times, running MVA application (this always work >> most time in rack). In rack 11, I have this issue and other rack not >> remember. >> >> - I have reset and restart UCM PUB , reload router, check connectivity from >> router to PUB >> >> but still give me failed on load MVA >> >> here is my error >> == >> l 20 03:31:45.271: //-1//HIFS:/hifs_http_cb: hifs http callback: load of >> http://10.10.210.10:8080/ccmivr/pages/IVRMainpage.vxml failed. Status=httpc >> error -2=internal client timeout error >> *Jul 20 03:31:45.271: //-1//HIFS:/hifs_free_idata: hifs_free_idata: >> 0x4A829DAC >> *Jul 20 03:31:45.271: //-1//HIFS:/hifs_hold_idata: hifs_hold_idata: >> 0x4A829DAC >> *Jul 20 03:31:45.271: Could not load IVR script >> http://10.10.210.10:8080/ccmivr/pages/IVRMainpage.vxml >> >> >> version of pod 11 >> >> ystem returned to ROM by reload at 21:52:33 UTC Tue Jul 19 2011 >> System restarted at 19:07:10 CDT Tue Jul 19 2011 >> System image file is "flash:c2800nm-adventerprisek9_ivs-mz.124-20.T1.bin" >> >> >> config >> --- >> >> application >> >> service mwa http://10.10.210.10:8080/ccmivr/pages/IVRMainpage.vxml >> >> >> >> dial-peer voice 410 voip >> >> service mwa >> >> destination-pattern 3000 >> >> voice-class codec 1 >> >> session
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] paging with CallManager 7
hi all, does call manager 7 have paging feature we can use ? for basic paging tks___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] paging with CallManager 7
tks Ash and all for answer --- On Mon, 8/29/11, Ashraf Ayyash wrote: From: Ashraf Ayyash Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] paging with CallManager 7 To: "Erwan Erwan" Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Received: Monday, August 29, 2011, 3:20 PM Hello Erwan , Paging Feature will be available on the latest 8.6 CCM Version , Ash On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 8:38 AM, Erwan Erwan wrote: hi all, does call manager 7 have paging feature we can use ? for basic paging tks ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] CCIE San Jose Exam Lab Equipment Problems
hi all, Does anyone had experienced Voice Lab equipment issue/problems in San Jose testing center? Could share the experience here ? I see the old posting saying someone experienced the HW issue during the lab exam (below) Norm Hinman Wed, 07 Jan 2009 16:53:46 -0800 Next time, if this happens and they won't swap the PC, I am demanding to speak to a manager. The more I think about it, the angrier I get. that was MY $1,400! What ever happened to the concept of taking care of the customer? - Original Message - From: Jimmy Lister To: Norm Hinman ; ccie_secur...@onlinestudylist.com Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2009 9:26 PM Subject: RE: [OSL | CCIE_Security] CCIE San Jose Exam Lab Equipment Problems Norm, Thanks for the heads up. I am scheduled for San Jose next Friday; hope I don't get that workstation! I just checked and there are a lot of dates open in Feb at San Jose but RTP is full until April. There must be limited seats for security at RTP or people just prefer RTP. Thanks___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Mobile Labs Voice
hi Emanuel, I agree with you, if the phone like the Cisco 360 testing. It is really hard to test feature and hard to predict the behaviour,it can suddely disconnect without any cause. Tks erwan --- On Thu, 10/13/11, Vik Malhi wrote: From: Vik Malhi Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] Mobile Labs Voice To: "Emanuel Damasceno" , "Marko Milivojevic" Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com Received: Thursday, October 13, 2011, 2:16 AM Whether phones are virtualized or not should not in theory make a difference to the candidate. I would expect them to announce this officially so my guess is that physical phones will be present in the mobile testing centers. The other question is will they switch to electronic copies of labs from hardcopies? We have these two questions out to a few people who should be able to confirm either way (either on here or on Learning @ Cisco's site) shortly. Either way - it's no reason to panic and I would see no reason to doubt that Cisco have not thought about the issues that come with mobile testing centers. Vik Malhi – CCIE #13890 Managing Partner - IPexpert, Inc. Telephone: +1.810.326.1444 ext 420 Fax: +1.810.454.0130 Mailto: vma...@ipexpert.com On Oct 12, 2011, at 4:45 PM, Emanuel Damasceno wrote: Hey guys, I saw the post of one of our brothers here about the Mobile Labs. I checked out that information and I saw that Mobile Labs will be in Buenos Aires in March of 2012. This will be a lot cheaper for me, since I am departing from Brazil. However, something bothers me. I saw Vik's post about the phones not being at the lab (physically present). At least it was what I understood. I looked everywhere to see if I could find that information, but I couldn't find it. Did I understand Vik correctly? I am thinking here that if that's true, I'd rather pay a little more and take the exam with "the devil we already know". If the phones are not physically present, we are susceptible for more problems. Can anybody confirm? Thanks :) Antonio Emanuel Damasceno CCNA, CCNA Voice, CCNP Voice, CCIE Voice (written) CompTIA Network+ ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com -Inline Attachment Follows- ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out www.PlatinumPlacement.com
[OSL | CCIE_Voice] High Traffic ?
hi, Does anyone experience this - Call from HQ 5001 to 5600 (VM) said " High Traffic Try Again Later" I checked in cisco web, this can cause by lots of hunt group and loop in Hunt group How to disable the loop and make sure if no loop in Hunt Grup and VM ? (As I only config VM thru wizard) tks ___ For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit www.ipexpert.com
