[OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCM LOCATION QUESTION

2011-06-22 Thread Stephen Manuel
Experts, 

 

I have a somewhat basic question just clear up something that is lingering
in my mind. 

 

The example is this:

 

In a multiple remote location site company, with a Centralized UCM
architecture, each site has it's own device pool, region, and location
settings. 

 

All the DN's on the phones for all sites are in the same PT, meaning calls
between sites are on net via their existing WAN infrastructure and not the
SIP Trunk/PSTN. 

 

Remote site A is rather large 50-60 phones.

 

Remote site B is rather small 10-15 phones. 

 

Calls between regions use g729

Calls to the PSTN using a SIP Trunk use g711

 

The location setting for site A is unlimited.

The location setting for site B is 256

 

What I am wondering is this, Site B has 3 calls to the PSTN using the SIP
Trunk using g711 @ 80k per call which equals 240k. The SIP trunk is also in
it's own Device Pool, region, etc.

 

Now someone from Site A calls site B, the bandwidth at Site A is unlimited
so no issue there. 

According to the Cisco Research I've done, a call requires 2 streams. 

Since Site B is using 240 of 256k of bandwidth on the 3 PSTN/SIP Trunk
calls, when a g729 calls comes inbound  which requires 24k  which causes
Site B location setting to be exceeded, will the call fail or succeed ??

 

IMO, the call will fail.

 

Thanks, 

Stephen Manuel

 

 

 

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCM LOCATION QUESTION

2011-06-22 Thread Cristobal Priego
Stephen,

the call will fail
you're going to get a message on the phone saying not enough bandwidth and
the call will drop

2011/6/22 Stephen Manuel srman...@bellsouth.net

 Experts, 

 ** **

 I have a somewhat basic question just clear up something that is lingering
 in my mind. 

 ** **

 The example is this:

 ** **

 In a multiple remote location site company, with a Centralized UCM
 architecture, each site has it’s own device pool, region, and location
 settings. 

 ** **

 All the DN’s on the phones for all sites are in the same PT, meaning calls
 between sites are on net via their existing WAN infrastructure and not the
 SIP Trunk/PSTN. 

 ** **

 Remote site A is rather large 50-60 phones.

 ** **

 Remote site B is rather small 10-15 phones. 

 ** **

 Calls between regions use g729

 Calls to the PSTN using a SIP Trunk use g711

 ** **

 The location setting for site A is unlimited.

 The location setting for site B is 256

 ** **

 What I am wondering is this, Site B has 3 calls to the PSTN using the SIP
 Trunk using g711 @ 80k per call which equals 240k. The SIP trunk is also in
 it’s own Device Pool, region, etc…

 ** **

 Now someone from Site A calls site B, the bandwidth at Site A is unlimited
 so no issue there. 

 According to the Cisco Research I’ve done, a call requires 2 streams. 

 Since Site B is using 240 of 256k of bandwidth on the 3 PSTN/SIP Trunk
 calls, when a g729 calls comes inbound  which requires 24k  which causes
 Site B location setting to be exceeded, will the call fail or succeed ??**
 **

 ** **

 IMO, the call will fail.

 ** **

 Thanks, 

 Stephen Manuel

 ** **

 ** **

 ** **

 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
 visit www.ipexpert.com

 Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
 www.PlatinumPlacement.com

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCM LOCATION QUESTION

2011-06-22 Thread Stephen Manuel
That's what I thought, but have not tested it to know for sure. 

 

As a follow up, as a general design what would be better. 

 

Using the Location setting as a form of Call-Admission-Control, or use
various QOS and IOS mechanisms to implement CAC on the Gateway Routers. 

 

IMO, I would rather have CAC implemented on the Routers, leaving UCM to
process calls, which is why I have usually set the Audio Bandwidth setting
under Locations to Unlimited. 

 

Thanks, 

 

Stephen Manuel

 

From: Cristobal Priego [mailto:cristobalpri...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 2:37 PM
To: Stephen Manuel
Cc: ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
Subject: Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCM LOCATION QUESTION

 

Stephen,

the call will fail
you're going to get a message on the phone saying not enough bandwidth and
the call will drop

2011/6/22 Stephen Manuel srman...@bellsouth.net

Experts, 

 

I have a somewhat basic question just clear up something that is lingering
in my mind. 

 

The example is this:

 

In a multiple remote location site company, with a Centralized UCM
architecture, each site has it's own device pool, region, and location
settings. 

 

All the DN's on the phones for all sites are in the same PT, meaning calls
between sites are on net via their existing WAN infrastructure and not the
SIP Trunk/PSTN. 

 

Remote site A is rather large 50-60 phones.

 

Remote site B is rather small 10-15 phones. 

 

Calls between regions use g729

Calls to the PSTN using a SIP Trunk use g711

 

The location setting for site A is unlimited.

The location setting for site B is 256

 

What I am wondering is this, Site B has 3 calls to the PSTN using the SIP
Trunk using g711 @ 80k per call which equals 240k. The SIP trunk is also in
it's own Device Pool, region, etc.

 

Now someone from Site A calls site B, the bandwidth at Site A is unlimited
so no issue there. 

According to the Cisco Research I've done, a call requires 2 streams. 

Since Site B is using 240 of 256k of bandwidth on the 3 PSTN/SIP Trunk
calls, when a g729 calls comes inbound  which requires 24k  which causes
Site B location setting to be exceeded, will the call fail or succeed ??

 

IMO, the call will fail.

 

Thanks, 

Stephen Manuel

 

 

 


___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
visit www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

 

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCM LOCATION QUESTION

2011-06-22 Thread Randall Saborio
The call will fail.

On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 11:18 AM, Stephen Manuel srman...@bellsouth.netwrote:

 Experts, 

 ** **

 I have a somewhat basic question just clear up something that is lingering
 in my mind. 

 ** **

 The example is this:

 ** **

 In a multiple remote location site company, with a Centralized UCM
 architecture, each site has it’s own device pool, region, and location
 settings. 

 ** **

 All the DN’s on the phones for all sites are in the same PT, meaning calls
 between sites are on net via their existing WAN infrastructure and not the
 SIP Trunk/PSTN. 

 ** **

 Remote site A is rather large 50-60 phones.

 ** **

 Remote site B is rather small 10-15 phones. 

 ** **

 Calls between regions use g729

 Calls to the PSTN using a SIP Trunk use g711

 ** **

 The location setting for site A is unlimited.

 The location setting for site B is 256

 ** **

 What I am wondering is this, Site B has 3 calls to the PSTN using the SIP
 Trunk using g711 @ 80k per call which equals 240k. The SIP trunk is also in
 it’s own Device Pool, region, etc…

 ** **

 Now someone from Site A calls site B, the bandwidth at Site A is unlimited
 so no issue there. 

 According to the Cisco Research I’ve done, a call requires 2 streams. 

 Since Site B is using 240 of 256k of bandwidth on the 3 PSTN/SIP Trunk
 calls, when a g729 calls comes inbound  which requires 24k  which causes
 Site B location setting to be exceeded, will the call fail or succeed ??**
 **

 ** **

 IMO, the call will fail.

 ** **

 Thanks, 

 Stephen Manuel

 ** **

 ** **

 ** **

 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
 visit www.ipexpert.com

 Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
 www.PlatinumPlacement.com




-- 
Randall da ill Saborio
CCIE Voice Wannabe #10054675811
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCM LOCATION QUESTION

2011-06-22 Thread Cristobal Priego
my thoughts are if you want to use QoS you actually can't do a lot ob CAC
with QoS
you will degrade the quality of the call, but i don't think you can fully
implement CAC with QoS. this is just my thought though.
i've used only 2 types of CAC mechanisim. locations CAC or GK CAC
my 2 cents
hth

2011/6/22 Stephen Manuel srman...@bellsouth.net

 That’s what I thought, but have not tested it to know for sure. 

 ** **

 As a follow up, as a general design what would be better. 

 ** **

 Using the Location setting as a form of Call-Admission-Control, or use
 various QOS and IOS mechanisms to implement CAC on the Gateway Routers. **
 **

 ** **

 IMO, I would rather have CAC implemented on the Routers, leaving UCM to
 process calls, which is why I have usually set the Audio Bandwidth setting
 under Locations to Unlimited. 

 ** **

 Thanks, 

 ** **

 Stephen Manuel

 ** **

 *From:* Cristobal Priego [mailto:cristobalpri...@gmail.com]
 *Sent:* Wednesday, June 22, 2011 2:37 PM
 *To:* Stephen Manuel
 *Cc:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
 *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCM LOCATION QUESTION

 ** **

 Stephen,

 the call will fail
 you're going to get a message on the phone saying not enough bandwidth
 and the call will drop

 2011/6/22 Stephen Manuel srman...@bellsouth.net

 Experts, 

  

 I have a somewhat basic question just clear up something that is lingering
 in my mind. 

  

 The example is this:

  

 In a multiple remote location site company, with a Centralized UCM
 architecture, each site has it’s own device pool, region, and location
 settings. 

  

 All the DN’s on the phones for all sites are in the same PT, meaning calls
 between sites are on net via their existing WAN infrastructure and not the
 SIP Trunk/PSTN. 

  

 Remote site A is rather large 50-60 phones.

  

 Remote site B is rather small 10-15 phones. 

  

 Calls between regions use g729

 Calls to the PSTN using a SIP Trunk use g711

  

 The location setting for site A is unlimited.

 The location setting for site B is 256

  

 What I am wondering is this, Site B has 3 calls to the PSTN using the SIP
 Trunk using g711 @ 80k per call which equals 240k. The SIP trunk is also in
 it’s own Device Pool, region, etc…

  

 Now someone from Site A calls site B, the bandwidth at Site A is unlimited
 so no issue there. 

 According to the Cisco Research I’ve done, a call requires 2 streams. 

 Since Site B is using 240 of 256k of bandwidth on the 3 PSTN/SIP Trunk
 calls, when a g729 calls comes inbound  which requires 24k  which causes
 Site B location setting to be exceeded, will the call fail or succeed ??**
 **

  

 IMO, the call will fail.

  

 Thanks, 

 Stephen Manuel

  

  

  


 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
 visit www.ipexpert.com

 Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
 www.PlatinumPlacement.com

 ** **

___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com

Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCM LOCATION QUESTION

2011-06-22 Thread Randall Saborio
If you want to be serious about doing an implementation, then you should get
your answers from reading the SRND. are you familiar with that document?

If you read the proper chapter, you would know the answer already and would
not need to read guess recommendations where we just don't know everything
about your deployment.

On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 1:03 PM, Stephen Manuel srman...@bellsouth.netwrote:

 That’s what I thought, but have not tested it to know for sure. 

 ** **

 As a follow up, as a general design what would be better. 

 ** **

 Using the Location setting as a form of Call-Admission-Control, or use
 various QOS and IOS mechanisms to implement CAC on the Gateway Routers. **
 **

 ** **

 IMO, I would rather have CAC implemented on the Routers, leaving UCM to
 process calls, which is why I have usually set the Audio Bandwidth setting
 under Locations to Unlimited. 

 ** **

 Thanks, 

 ** **

 Stephen Manuel

 ** **

 *From:* Cristobal Priego [mailto:cristobalpri...@gmail.com]
 *Sent:* Wednesday, June 22, 2011 2:37 PM
 *To:* Stephen Manuel
 *Cc:* ccie_voice@onlinestudylist.com
 *Subject:* Re: [OSL | CCIE_Voice] UCM LOCATION QUESTION

 ** **

 Stephen,

 the call will fail
 you're going to get a message on the phone saying not enough bandwidth
 and the call will drop

 2011/6/22 Stephen Manuel srman...@bellsouth.net

 Experts, 

  

 I have a somewhat basic question just clear up something that is lingering
 in my mind. 

  

 The example is this:

  

 In a multiple remote location site company, with a Centralized UCM
 architecture, each site has it’s own device pool, region, and location
 settings. 

  

 All the DN’s on the phones for all sites are in the same PT, meaning calls
 between sites are on net via their existing WAN infrastructure and not the
 SIP Trunk/PSTN. 

  

 Remote site A is rather large 50-60 phones.

  

 Remote site B is rather small 10-15 phones. 

  

 Calls between regions use g729

 Calls to the PSTN using a SIP Trunk use g711

  

 The location setting for site A is unlimited.

 The location setting for site B is 256

  

 What I am wondering is this, Site B has 3 calls to the PSTN using the SIP
 Trunk using g711 @ 80k per call which equals 240k. The SIP trunk is also in
 it’s own Device Pool, region, etc…

  

 Now someone from Site A calls site B, the bandwidth at Site A is unlimited
 so no issue there. 

 According to the Cisco Research I’ve done, a call requires 2 streams. 

 Since Site B is using 240 of 256k of bandwidth on the 3 PSTN/SIP Trunk
 calls, when a g729 calls comes inbound  which requires 24k  which causes
 Site B location setting to be exceeded, will the call fail or succeed ??**
 **

  

 IMO, the call will fail.

  

 Thanks, 

 Stephen Manuel

  

  

  


 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
 visit www.ipexpert.com

 Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
 www.PlatinumPlacement.com

 ** **

 ___
 For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please
 visit www.ipexpert.com

 Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out
 www.PlatinumPlacement.com




-- 
Randall da ill Saborio
CCIE Voice Wannabe #10054675811
___
For more information regarding industry leading CCIE Lab training, please visit 
www.ipexpert.com

Are you a CCNP or CCIE and looking for a job? Check out 
www.PlatinumPlacement.com