Re: [ccp4bb] Using chaperones to boost expression in E. coli

2011-04-29 Thread Kothe, Michael
Hi,

 

I wanted to thank everyone for their responses to my inquiry. It's good
to see that there have been positive examples, and also that one should
not be discouraged from trying by initial negative results. 

 

Thanks again, and have a nice weekend,

Michael

 



From: Olga Kolaj [mailto:olga.ko...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2011 5:17 AM
To: Kothe, Michael
Cc: CCP4BB@jiscmail.ac.uk
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] Using chaperones to boost expression in E. coli

 

Michael,

We have put together a review about use of folding modulators to improve
expression in E. coli some time ago which might be useful to you (Kolaj
et al Microb Cell Fact. 2009 Jan 27;8:9). Here is the link:

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19173718

 

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19173718 Regards

On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 4:28 PM, Kothe, Michael
michael.ko...@genzyme.com wrote:

Dear ccp4bb,

 

I am curious to hear of examples where the expression of well-behaved
protein was achieved by the coexpression of chaperones in E. coli. I
know the appropriate strains and vectors exist, but I can't remember
hearing of a successful case. I have heard anecdotally of several cases
where it was tried without success (including one attempt I made
myself). I also heard of concerns that the chaperones might copurify
with the (now soluble) protein of interest and are difficult to remove.

 

Thanks,

Michael

 



Re: [ccp4bb] Using chaperones to boost expression in E. coli

2011-04-26 Thread Olga Kolaj
Michael,

We have put together a review about use of folding modulators to improve
expression in E. coli some time ago which might be useful to you (Kolaj et
al Microb Cell Fact. 2009 Jan 27;8:9). Here is the link:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19173718

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19173718Regards

On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 4:28 PM, Kothe, Michael
michael.ko...@genzyme.comwrote:

  Dear ccp4bb,



 I am curious to hear of examples where the expression of well-behaved
 protein was achieved by the coexpression of chaperones in E. coli. I know
 the appropriate strains and vectors exist, but I can’t remember hearing of a
 successful case. I have heard anecdotally of several cases where it was
 tried without success (including one attempt I made myself). I also heard of
 concerns that the chaperones might copurify with the (now soluble) protein
 of interest and are difficult to remove.



 Thanks,

 Michael





Re: [ccp4bb] Using chaperones to boost expression in E. coli

2011-04-22 Thread aaleshin
Hi Michael,
It worked for me with one viral enzyme but did not work with 2 others. In the 
successful case, I used Takara's chaperone plasmids to screen for the best 
composition of chaperones. The GroEL-GroES improved the yield of the soluble 
enzyme, but I got same activity (per 1L of media) as  before. The plasmid with  
chaperone tig gave the biggest increase in activity (~4-8 fold). Still, the 
yield was rather low, in a range of 1 mg of purified protein per 1L of media. I 
also had to optimize the expression time and temperature  to get best results. 
They were ~14 h at 17-20C. Interestingly, the protein failed to express in 
insect cells (was too poisonous for them), so the combination of a solubilizing 
domain, chaperones and Ecoli expression were the only available option for me.

Regards
Alex

On Apr 22, 2011, at 8:28 AM, Kothe, Michael wrote:

 Dear ccp4bb,
  
 I am curious to hear of examples where the expression of well-behaved protein 
 was achieved by the coexpression of chaperones in E. coli. I know the 
 appropriate strains and vectors exist, but I can’t remember hearing of a 
 successful case. I have heard anecdotally of several cases where it was tried 
 without success (including one attempt I made myself). I also heard of 
 concerns that the chaperones might copurify with the (now soluble) protein of 
 interest and are difficult to remove.
  
 Thanks,
 Michael
  



Re: [ccp4bb] Using chaperones to boost expression in E. coli

2011-04-22 Thread Shaun Lott
As with all these things, YMMV.

In our experience, chaperone co-expression can help not at all, can produce 
more folded protein or can produce more soluble protein, with co-purifying 
chaperone. With GroEL/S at least, chaperone release is easy (add ATP) and 
sometimes results in the liberation of folded protein, sometimes not.

One case where for us chaperones made an enabling difference: Acta Cryst. 
(2005). F61, 403–406 

Like most things, worth trying!

cheers

Shaun