Re: [ccp4bb] RMSD calculation for large assemblies

2017-12-02 Thread Smith Liu
how about mean square deviation of the rmsd of each c alpha?





| |
Smith Liu
|
|
邮箱:smith_liu...@163.com
|

签名由 网易邮箱大师 定制




在2017年12月02日 22:48,Reza Khayat 写道:

Hi,





I'm analyzing the RMSD between 60 subunits of a virus. Can someone identify a 
program that can generate a spread for the RMSD between equivalent C-alpha 
atoms? For example, the C-alpha atom for amino acid 39 may have RMSD values 
from 0.1 to 1.5. Coot does a nice job of automatically detecting and 
calculating RMSD, but I'd like to have the spread for each atom in the final 
graph that Coot generates. Thank you.




Best wishes,
Reza 





Reza Khayat, PhD
Assistant Professor 
City College of New York
Department of Chemistry
New York, NY 10031


[ccp4bb] RMSD calculation for large assemblies

2017-12-02 Thread Reza Khayat
Hi,


I'm analyzing the RMSD between 60 subunits of a virus. Can someone identify a 
program that can generate a spread for the RMSD between equivalent C-alpha 
atoms? For example, the C-alpha atom for amino acid 39 may have RMSD values 
from 0.1 to 1.5. Coot does a nice job of automatically detecting and 
calculating RMSD, but I'd like to have the spread for each atom in the final 
graph that Coot generates. Thank you.


Best wishes,
Reza


Reza Khayat, PhD
Assistant Professor
City College of New York
Department of Chemistry
New York, NY 10031


Re: [ccp4bb] rmsd calculation for all atoms.

2011-01-01 Thread Eleanor Dodson

compar does this providing the sequence is the same.
amd you can get lsqkab to give you the full list but only i think for 
those atoms you overlap..

eleanor

On 12/29/2010 01:52 PM, Michael Swan wrote:

Dear all,
I am having a bit of trouble finding a program to do an rmsd calculation and
give me the differences between all the atoms in the structures.
I have two structures which are identical in the sense that one is the apo
protein and one is the bound structure. I would like to superimpose them
using only one domain then output the rmsd values for all the atoms or at
least individual residues. The structures are not completely identical as
some extra residues were visible in the bound structure so I hope there is a
program that can ignore those differences.
If anyone knows of a program that will do this calculation I would much
appreciate hearing about it. There seem to be many programs that will give
an average rmsd over the whole structure or just the region used for
alignment but I haven't found anything that will give me distances between
atoms or residues that were not used in the alignment.
Thanks,
Mike.



Re: [ccp4bb] rmsd calculation for all atoms.

2010-12-31 Thread Stephen Weeks
Michael,
I think something crudely resembling what you are asking can be done
with Chimera.

 Load your two PDBs and run matchmaker

Tools > Structure Comparison > MatchMaker

In the dialog box that appears, under matching, there is a box that is
ticked by default "iterate by pruning long atom pairs until no pair exceeds:
"

You can play with the value and see when the residues you are interested in
 are no longer involved in the superposition.

To see the RMSD between the atoms pairs used you need to look in the reply
log  (Favorites > Reply log)

Stephen


On 29 December 2010 14:52, Michael Swan  wrote:

> Dear all,
> I am having a bit of trouble finding a program to do an rmsd calculation
> and give me the differences between all the atoms in the structures.
> I have two structures which are identical in the sense that one is the apo
> protein and one is the bound structure. I would like to superimpose them
> using only one domain then output the rmsd values for all the atoms or at
> least individual residues. The structures are not completely identical as
> some extra residues were visible in the bound structure so I hope there is a
> program that can ignore those differences.
> If anyone knows of a program that will do this calculation I would much
> appreciate hearing about it. There seem to be many programs that will give
> an average rmsd over the whole structure or just the region used for
> alignment but I haven't found anything that will give me distances between
> atoms or residues that were not used in the alignment.
> Thanks,
> Mike.
>


Re: [ccp4bb] rmsd calculation for all atoms.

2010-12-30 Thread Thomas Holder
Hello Mike,

I would recommend PyMOL. Consider this example:

# get structures from PDB
fetch 2j0s, async=0
fetch 2j0u, async=0

# remove alternative configurations
remove not alt +A

# select conformers with c-alpha atoms
select conf1, 2j0s and chain A and name CA
select conf2, 2j0u and chain A and name CA

# select domains
select dom1, resi 69-239
select dom2, resi 250-411

# superimpose on dom1 and calculate RMSD for dom2
fit (conf1 like conf2) and dom1, (conf2 like conf1) and dom1
rms_cur (conf1 like conf2) and dom2, (conf2 like conf1) and dom2


Cheers,
  Thomas


On Wed, 2010-12-29 at 13:52 +, Michael Swan wrote:
> Dear all,
> I am having a bit of trouble finding a program to do an rmsd
> calculation and give me the differences between all the atoms in the
> structures.
> I have two structures which are identical in the sense that one is the
> apo protein and one is the bound structure. I would like to
> superimpose them using only one domain then output the rmsd values for
> all the atoms or at least individual residues. The structures are not
> completely identical as some extra residues were visible in the bound
> structure so I hope there is a program that can ignore those
> differences.
> If anyone knows of a program that will do this calculation I would
> much appreciate hearing about it. There seem to be many programs that
> will give an average rmsd over the whole structure or just the region
> used for alignment but I haven't found anything that will give me
> distances between atoms or residues that were not used in the
> alignment.
> Thanks,
> Mike.


-- 
Thomas Holder
AG Jekely
MPI for Developmental Biology
Spemannstr. 35
D-72076 Tuebingen


Re: [ccp4bb] rmsd calculation for all atoms

2010-12-29 Thread Eric Pettersen


From:Michael Swan
Subject: rmsd calculation for all atoms.

Dear all,
I am having a bit of trouble finding a program to do an rmsd  
calculation and

give me the differences between all the atoms in the structures.
I have two structures which are identical in the sense that one is  
the apo
protein and one is the bound structure. I would like to superimpose  
them
using only one domain then output the rmsd values for all the atoms  
or at
least individual residues. The structures are not completely  
identical as
some extra residues were visible in the bound structure so I hope  
there is a

program that can ignore those differences.
If anyone knows of a program that will do this calculation I would  
much
appreciate hearing about it. There seem to be many programs that  
will give

an average rmsd over the whole structure or just the region used for
alignment but I haven't found anything that will give me distances  
between

atoms or residues that were not used in the alignment.
Thanks,
Mike.


If the domain is an entire chain, you could use Chimera's MatchMaker  
tool to do the alignment:


http://www.cgl.ucsf.edu/chimera/current/docs/ContributedSoftware/matchmaker/matchmaker.html

It will report that RMSD for the atoms used for matching.  To get the  
RMSD for all atoms in common you would have to use the 'rmsd' command  
and specify the parts in common:


http://www.cgl.ucsf.edu/chimera/current/docs/UsersGuide/midas/rmsd.html

So if all of chain A and residues 12-20 of chain B were in common, then:

rmsd #0:.a:12-20.b #1:.a:12-20.b

If there were differences in the side chains (say some were  
incomplete) then you might have to restrict the RMSD measurement to  
the backbone (which you might want to do anyway):


rmsd #0:@c,ca,n:12-2...@c,ca,n #1:@c,ca,n:12-2...@c,ca,n

--Eric


Eric Pettersen
UCSF Computer Graphics Lab
http://www.cgl.ucsf.edu




[ccp4bb] rmsd calculation for all atoms.

2010-12-29 Thread Michael Swan
Dear all,
I am having a bit of trouble finding a program to do an rmsd calculation and
give me the differences between all the atoms in the structures.
I have two structures which are identical in the sense that one is the apo
protein and one is the bound structure. I would like to superimpose them
using only one domain then output the rmsd values for all the atoms or at
least individual residues. The structures are not completely identical as
some extra residues were visible in the bound structure so I hope there is a
program that can ignore those differences.
If anyone knows of a program that will do this calculation I would much
appreciate hearing about it. There seem to be many programs that will give
an average rmsd over the whole structure or just the region used for
alignment but I haven't found anything that will give me distances between
atoms or residues that were not used in the alignment.
Thanks,
Mike.


Re: [ccp4bb] rmsd calculation

2007-05-11 Thread Douglas L. Theobald

Jenny,

I of course would suggest that you follow Olve's advice, and use  
theseus to do a maximum likelihood, simultaneous superposition of all  
your structures ( http://www.theseus3d.org ).  The variable bits,  
like your loop, will be naturally down-weighted in a rigorous  
statistical manner.  Then you can look at the average structure file  
that is output (_ave.pdb at the end of the filename), and the B- 
factor column has the overall RMSD for each atom in there.  You can  
look at the full superposition (the _sup.pdb file) in rasmol or in  
pymol with the 'set all_states, on' command.


However, if you really need to do the very analysis that you asked  
about, the following bash script will do exactly that with theseus  
(you need both awk and theseus in your executable path).  It prints  
out the average RMSD for the atoms you specify in the loop, after  
pairwise least-squares superpositioning on all atoms other than the  
loop, for all possible pairwise combinations of your pdb files. (Note  
that in this script all backslashes '\' must have a carriage return  
immediately after them.)  You will need to change the lower and upper  
values at the top of the script (inclusive for the loop you want  
excluded).  You invoke the script something like "karen.sh pdb1.pdb  
pdb2.pdb pdb3.pdb" or "karen.sh *.pdb" to do all the .pdbs in one  
directory.  If you have any problems or have other specific  
superpositioning issues I'm glad to help out.


Cheers,

Douglas


karen.sh
#

#!/bin/bash

# everything including and between lower and upper
# is excluded from the superposition
lower=40;
upper=60;

pdbs=($*);

for (( i = 0; i < [EMAIL PROTECTED]; ++i ))
do
  for (( j = 0; j < i; ++j ))
  do
name="${pdbs[i]%.*}_${pdbs[j]%.*}";
theseus -l -r ${name} -S ${lower}-${upper} ${pdbs[i]} ${pdbs[j]}\
> ${name}.log;
rmsd=$(cut -c 7-11,61-67 ${name}_ave.pdb |\
awk '{if ($1 > lo && $1 < up) {sum += $2; n++}}; END {print sum/ 
n}'\

lo=${lower} up=${upper});
echo "${name} rmsd = ${rmsd}";
  done
done





^`^`^`^`^`^`^`^`^`^`^`^`^`^`^`^`^`^`^`^`
Douglas L. Theobald
Department of Biochemistry
Brandeis University
Waltham, MA  02454-9110

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 ^\
   /`  /^.  / /\
  / / /`/  / . /`
 / /  '   '
'


On May 11, 2007, at 1:58 PM, Olve Peersen wrote:

I would highly recommend Doug Theobald's program Theseus for this -  
the pictures at www.theseus3d.org say it all.  Theseus does maximum  
likely hood superimpositions of multiple structures (i.e. NOT  
pairwise against a "master" copy), and the real beauty of it is  
that you don't have to pick which residues you want to  
superimpose.  Places where the whole set of structures show  
divergence are effectively down-weighted and don't contribute much  
to the final solution vs. least squares where every atom position  
has equal weight and the "bad" parts screw up the alignment of the  
"good" parts.  For this, I would do a Theseus superposition of all  
the structures and then analyze the set of superimposed structures  
by whatever method you want (e.g. rmsd of variances in important  
sections of the structures).


- Olve

---
Olve Peersen
Associate Professor
Dept. of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology
1870 Campus Delivery
Colorado State University
Ft. Collins, CO  80523-1870
---
970.491-0433Office  (MRB 279)
970.491-0271Lab (MRB 149)
970.491-0494Fax
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---

On May 11, 2007, at 11:15 AM, Donnie Berkholz wrote:


Eleanor Dodson wrote:
It is a bit clunky - you can use siperpose molecules - fit  
residues to
fit a selected range (1-40; 60-100 say) and write out a complete  
fitted

pdb file. Then you could use a VERY old program
compar  xyzin1 original.pdb xyzin2 fitted.pdb  (xyzin3 another.pdb)
and it will match all pairs with the same RESIDUE ID and give the  
RMSD

distance

There is documentation for it.


There's a nice (non-CCP4) program called ProFit that does a pretty  
nice

job of superimposing with a lot of flexibility.

Thanks,
Donnie



On May 10, 2007, at 6:45 PM, Jenny wrote:

Hi, All,

I have a question about rmsd calculation.

I have some pdbs (100 residues ) and these pdbs differ pretty  
much only the loop region 40-60. Is there any easy way that I can  
superimpose the fixed region ( 1-40,60-100) and then calculate  
the rmsd for the loop?I need to calculate for each pair, so if  
there is any script or program available to do this quickly, that  
would be great.


Thanks.

Jenny


Re: [ccp4bb] rmsd calculation

2007-05-11 Thread Olve Peersen
I would highly recommend Doug Theobald's program Theseus for this -  
the pictures at www.theseus3d.org say it all.  Theseus does maximum  
likely hood superimpositions of multiple structures (i.e. NOT  
pairwise against a "master" copy), and the real beauty of it is that  
you don't have to pick which residues you want to superimpose.   
Places where the whole set of structures show divergence are  
effectively down-weighted and don't contribute much to the final  
solution vs. least squares where every atom position has equal weight  
and the "bad" parts screw up the alignment of the "good" parts.  For  
this, I would do a Theseus superposition of all the structures and  
then analyze the set of superimposed structures by whatever method  
you want (e.g. rmsd of variances in important sections of the  
structures).


- Olve



---
Olve Peersen
Associate Professor
Dept. of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology
1870 Campus Delivery
Colorado State University
Ft. Collins, CO  80523-1870
---
970.491-0433Office  (MRB 279)
970.491-0271Lab (MRB 149)
970.491-0494Fax
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---



On May 11, 2007, at 11:15 AM, Donnie Berkholz wrote:


Eleanor Dodson wrote:
It is a bit clunky - you can use siperpose molecules - fit  
residues to
fit a selected range (1-40; 60-100 say) and write out a complete  
fitted

pdb file. Then you could use a VERY old program
compar  xyzin1 original.pdb xyzin2 fitted.pdb  (xyzin3 another.pdb)
and it will match all pairs with the same RESIDUE ID and give the  
RMSD

distance

There is documentation for it.


There's a nice (non-CCP4) program called ProFit that does a pretty  
nice

job of superimposing with a lot of flexibility.

Thanks,
Donnie



Re: [ccp4bb] rmsd calculation

2007-05-11 Thread Donnie Berkholz
Eleanor Dodson wrote:
> It is a bit clunky - you can use siperpose molecules - fit residues to
> fit a selected range (1-40; 60-100 say) and write out a complete fitted
> pdb file. Then you could use a VERY old program
> compar  xyzin1 original.pdb xyzin2 fitted.pdb  (xyzin3 another.pdb)
> and it will match all pairs with the same RESIDUE ID and give the RMSD
> distance
> 
> There is documentation for it.

There's a nice (non-CCP4) program called ProFit that does a pretty nice
job of superimposing with a lot of flexibility.

Thanks,
Donnie



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: [ccp4bb] rmsd calculation. .

2007-05-11 Thread Miguel Ortiz Lombardia
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Excellent!
Thank you Gerard,


Miguel

Gerard DVD Kleywegt escribió:
>> But my understanding is that Iain's procedure gives the rmsds of the
>> _aligned_ C-alphas, whereas Jenny actually seems to be more interested
>> in those that she excludes from the alignment. I may be wrong, but in
>> these cases, I use lsqman (from DVD) or lsqkab (from ccp4) to superpose
>> the proteins (using one as reference) according to a particular scheme
>> (Jenny's 1-40,60-100) and then write a script to calculate the rmsds for
>> the "interesting" 41-59 residues. There may be an easier way, which I'll
>> be interested to learn about.
> 
> hola miguel,
> 
> i would use the rmsd command in lsqman, like so:
> 
>   read m1 m1.pdb
>   read m2 m2.pdb
>   expl m1 "a1-40 a60-100" m2 "a1 a60"
>   rmsd m1 a41-59 m2 a41
> 
> --gerard
> 
> **
> Gerard J.  Kleywegt
> [Research Fellow of the Royal  Swedish Academy of Sciences]
> Dept. of Cell & Molecular Biology  University of Uppsala
> Biomedical Centre  Box 596
> SE-751 24 Uppsala  SWEDEN
> 
> http://xray.bmc.uu.se/gerard/  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> **
>The opinions in this message are fictional.  Any similarity
>to actual opinions, living or dead, is purely coincidental.
> **
> 
> 

- --
Miguel Ortiz Lombardía
Centro de Investigaciones Oncológicas
C/ Melchor Fernández Almagro, 3
28029 Madrid, Spain
Tel. +34 912 246 900
Fax. +34 912 246 976
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.pangea.org/mol/spip.php?rubrique2
~~~
Le travail est ce que l'homme a trouvé de mieux
pour ne rien faire de sa vie.  (Raoul Vaneigem)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFGRDtWF6oOrDvhbQIRAiYIAJ9Zsh5KNyqzfWhz2WaaRYlRUfKXTwCeLQOK
YtSKkl+Q4N3TF8MganziUDs=
=TWIp
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


Re: [ccp4bb] rmsd calculation

2007-05-11 Thread Eleanor Dodson
It is a bit clunky - you can use siperpose molecules - fit residues to 
fit a selected range (1-40; 60-100 say) and write out a complete fitted 
pdb file. Then you could use a VERY old program

compar  xyzin1 original.pdb xyzin2 fitted.pdb  (xyzin3 another.pdb)
and it will match all pairs with the same RESIDUE ID and give the RMSD 
distance


There is documentation for it.
Eleanor


Jenny wrote:

Hi, All,

I have a question about rmsd calculation.

I have some pdbs (100 residues ) and these pdbs differ pretty much 
only the loop region 40-60. Is there any easy way that I can 
superimpose the fixed region ( 1-40,60-100) and then calculate the 
rmsd for the loop?I need to calculate for each pair, so if there is 
any script or program available to do this quickly, that would be great.


Thanks.

Jenny 


Re: [ccp4bb] rmsd calculation. .

2007-05-10 Thread Miguel Ortiz Lombardia
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Hi Jenny and Iain,

But my understanding is that Iain's procedure gives the rmsds of the
_aligned_ C-alphas, whereas Jenny actually seems to be more interested
in those that she excludes from the alignment. I may be wrong, but in
these cases, I use lsqman (from DVD) or lsqkab (from ccp4) to superpose
the proteins (using one as reference) according to a particular scheme
(Jenny's 1-40,60-100) and then write a script to calculate the rmsds for
the "interesting" 41-59 residues. There may be an easier way, which I'll
be interested to learn about.

Cheers,


M.

Kerr, Iain escribió:
> Hi Jenny,
> 
>  
> 
> You can do this in LSQMAN (if I’m understanding your question correctly…)
> 
>  
> 
> You’d first superimpose the residues in the “fixed region” to give a
> superimposed core using the ‘EXplicit’ command, eg:
> 
>  
> 
> *LSQMAN > ex m1*
> 
> * Range 1 ? (A1-10) "a4-10 a19-23 a28-36 a44-51 a53-66 a91-97 a106-111 
> a123:126"*
> 
> * Mol 2 ? (M1) m2*
> 
> * Range 2 ? (A1) "a4 a19 a28 a44 a53 a91 a106 a123"*
> 
> * Explicit fit of M1 "A4-10 A19-23 A28-36 A44-51 A53-66 A91-97 A106-111 
> A123:126"*
> 
> * And M2 "A4 A19 A28 A44 A53 A91 A106 A123"*
> 
> * Atom types | CA | N  | C  | O  | CB |*
> 
> * Nr of atoms to match : (295)*
> 
> * The295 atoms have an RMS distance of0.892 A*
> 
> * Rotation:  -0.956932  0.127723 -0.260706*
> 
> * 0.170532 -0.479456 -0.860837*
> 
> *-0.234946 -0.868222  0.437026*
> 
> * Translation : 13.78726.80038.541*
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> Then use the “IMProve” command to iteratively improve the fit over all
> CAs…this only works for two molecules at a time though…I guess choose a
> fixed standard to align all the others against. Remember to write out
> the coordinates for the rotated (ie. “m2”) molecules:
> 
>  
> 
> Ø   apply m1 m2
> 
> Ø   wr m2 blah_rotated.pdb
> 
>  
> 
> Then to calculate the RMSDs for just the loop regions compare the
> superimposed molecules to the fixed standard (ie. “m1” is the fixed
> standard, “m2” is your blah_rotated.pdb), explicitly using just the loop
> atoms this time in “m1” and “m2” ranges.
> 
>  
> 
> I’m sure there is an easier way to do this, but works for me.
> 
>  
> 
> HTH,
> 
> Iain
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
> *From:* CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of
> *Jenny
> *Sent:* Thursday, May 10, 2007 5:46 PM
> *To:* CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
> *Subject:* [ccp4bb] rmsd calculation. .
> 
>  
> 
> Hi, All,
> 
> I have a question about rmsd calculation.
> 
> I have some pdbs (100 residues ) and these pdbs differ pretty much only
> the loop region 40-60. Is there any easy way that I can superimpose the
> fixed region ( 1-40,60-100) and then calculate the rmsd for the loop?I
> need to calculate for each pair, so if there is any script or program
> available to do this quickly, that would be great.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> Jenny
> 

- --
Miguel Ortiz Lombardía
Centro de Investigaciones Oncológicas
C/ Melchor Fernández Almagro, 3
28029 Madrid, Spain
Tel. +34 912 246 900
Fax. +34 912 246 976
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www: http://www.pangea.org/mol/spip.php?rubrique2
~~~
Le travail est ce que l'homme a trouvé de mieux
pour ne rien faire de sa vie.  (Raoul Vaneigem)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFGRAwlF6oOrDvhbQIRAjmEAJ9UvAWXfIZU7bR1idcVqn8hE5zPwQCfc8Ko
JkvZQL9IHdB+ENi92nVVUmI=
=3HO2
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


Re: [ccp4bb] rmsd calculation. .

2007-05-10 Thread Kerr, Iain
Hi Jenny,

 

You can do this in LSQMAN (if I'm understanding your question
correctly...)

 

You'd first superimpose the residues in the "fixed region" to give a
superimposed core using the 'EXplicit' command, eg:

 

LSQMAN > ex m1
 Range 1 ? (A1-10) "a4-10 a19-23 a28-36 a44-51 a53-66 a91-97 a106-111
a123:126"
 Mol 2 ? (M1) m2
 Range 2 ? (A1) "a4 a19 a28 a44 a53 a91 a106 a123"
 Explicit fit of M1 "A4-10 A19-23 A28-36 A44-51 A53-66 A91-97 A106-111
A123:126"
 And M2 "A4 A19 A28 A44 A53 A91 A106 A123"
 Atom types | CA | N  | C  | O  | CB |
 Nr of atoms to match : (295)
 The295 atoms have an RMS distance of0.892 A
 Rotation:  -0.956932  0.127723 -0.260706
 0.170532 -0.479456 -0.860837
-0.234946 -0.868222  0.437026
 Translation : 13.78726.80038.541

 

 

Then use the "IMProve" command to iteratively improve the fit over all
CAs...this only works for two molecules at a time though...I guess
choose a fixed standard to align all the others against. Remember to
write out the coordinates for the rotated (ie. "m2") molecules:

 

*   apply m1 m2

*   wr m2 blah_rotated.pdb

 

Then to calculate the RMSDs for just the loop regions compare the
superimposed molecules to the fixed standard (ie. "m1" is the fixed
standard, "m2" is your blah_rotated.pdb), explicitly using just the loop
atoms this time in "m1" and "m2" ranges.

 

I'm sure there is an easier way to do this, but works for me.

 

HTH,

Iain

 

 



From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Jenny
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2007 5:46 PM
To: CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK
Subject: [ccp4bb] rmsd calculation. .

 

Hi, All,

I have a question about rmsd calculation.

I have some pdbs (100 residues ) and these pdbs differ pretty much only
the loop region 40-60. Is there any easy way that I can superimpose the
fixed region ( 1-40,60-100) and then calculate the rmsd for the loop?I
need to calculate for each pair, so if there is any script or program
available to do this quickly, that would be great.

Thanks.

Jenny 



[ccp4bb] rmsd calculation

2007-05-10 Thread Jenny

Hi, All,

I have a question about rmsd calculation.

I have some pdbs (100 residues ) and these pdbs differ pretty much only the
loop region 40-60. Is there any easy way that I can superimpose the fixed
region ( 1-40,60-100) and then calculate the rmsd for the loop?I need to
calculate for each pair, so if there is any script or program available to
do this quickly, that would be great.

Thanks.

Jenny