Re: [CentOS-docs] MoinMoin TableOfContents
On Fri, 30 Nov 2007, Ralph Angenendt wrote: Tim Verhoeven wrote: The start the TOC on a lower level add this to the page : #pragma section-numbers 2 Okay, so it was your fix :) Dag: Disregard what I tried above ... Thanks both :) I think the TableOfContents(x, y) is a newer patch than the MoinMoin we are using. Still, I think we are misusing the first level-1 title as some sort of page title ? Because it makes no sense that we can have more than one 1 page title, while you can have more than 1 level-1 title :-( There must be something I am overlooking, but being mostly wiki-ignorant I hope someone else can make me understand :) -- -- dag wieers, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://dag.wieers.com/ -- [Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors] ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Re: [CentOS-docs] MoinMoin TableOfContents
Dag Wieers wrote: I found with Google that there is a syntax like: [[TableOfContents(4,2)]] instead of [[TableOfContents(2)]] Try [[TableOfContents(2,3)]] (from depth to depth). But thanks for pointing that out. Probably I am using it wrong, can some one help me with: http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Laptops/IBM/Thinkpad-T43 Done :) Cheers, Ralph pgp8XYJNkipZl.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
Re: [CentOS-docs] MoinMoin TableOfContents
Tim Verhoeven wrote: The start the TOC on a lower level add this to the page : #pragma section-numbers 2 Okay, so it was your fix :) Dag: Disregard what I tried above ... Cheers, Ralph pgpCTttRMLlxm.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS-docs mailing list CentOS-docs@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
[CentOS-announce] CESA-2007:1084 Critical CentOS 4 ia64 seamonkey - security update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2007:1084 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2007-1084.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ia64: updates/ia64/RPMS/seamonkey-1.0.9-7.el4.centos.ia64.rpm updates/ia64/RPMS/seamonkey-chat-1.0.9-7.el4.centos.ia64.rpm updates/ia64/RPMS/seamonkey-devel-1.0.9-7.el4.centos.ia64.rpm updates/ia64/RPMS/seamonkey-dom-inspector-1.0.9-7.el4.centos.ia64.rpm updates/ia64/RPMS/seamonkey-js-debugger-1.0.9-7.el4.centos.ia64.rpm updates/ia64/RPMS/seamonkey-mail-1.0.9-7.el4.centos.ia64.rpm updates/ia64/RPMS/seamonkey-nspr-1.0.9-7.el4.centos.ia64.rpm updates/ia64/RPMS/seamonkey-nspr-devel-1.0.9-7.el4.centos.ia64.rpm updates/ia64/RPMS/seamonkey-nss-1.0.9-7.el4.centos.ia64.rpm updates/ia64/RPMS/seamonkey-nss-devel-1.0.9-7.el4.centos.ia64.rpm -- Pasi Pirhonen - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://pasi.pirhonen.eu/ Top-postings silently ignored signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ CentOS-announce mailing list CentOS-announce@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
Re: [CentOS-es] Montar server en CentOS 4.5
hpla te recomiendo que uses lvm Mensaje citado por Camilo Sperberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Nov 30, 2007 11:25 AM, Luis Alejandro Aguilera Pascual [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hola Tengo una maquina con placa Asuss P5LD2-VM/S, Micro P4 *Genuino* a 3.0Ghz, 512 de Ram y un SATA de 120 Gb. un poco difícil veo que se copie un procesador :P En ella quiero montar uno de los server de mi empresa, la cual solo cuenta con 2 server, uno bajo Linux y otro bajo Windows. Las politicas de la empresa me exigen que todos los servicios de red corran bajo Linux, el Windows solo se utiliza para realizar las salvas de las BD del software economico con que trabaja la empresa el cual esta sujeto a derechos de autor y es software propietario y exige salvar en servidores SQL de Microsoft. es una pena ... supieran lo poderoso que es PostGreSQL :D Les pido opiones del particionamiento del SATA en cuanto a los servicios que quiero brindar y a la vez escucho opiniones sobre que servicios de los que menciono abajo se me pudieran quedar dentro de los basicos, es que soy nuevo en el mundo de la administracion de sistemas. Personalmente, prefiero el esquema viejo: ese donde uno mismo se hacía las particiones :D En fin, te recomiendo (y en este orden) : 1GB swap (también puede ser 1.5GB si le vas a poner más ram después, aunque dudo que se ocupe mucho) 4GB / 12GB /var 12GB /usr 1GB /etc el-restoGB /home -- incluido /home/www que es donde irá toda la parte web Servicios Mensajeria(correo) Web(varios sitios) FTP(mas o menos cargado) PDC(alrededor de 100 usuariosy 50 estaciones de trabajo) LAMP(para los sites) Personalmente, creo que es muy poca máquina para el uso que se le va a dar... Yo dejaría repartida la carga entre los 2 pc's que ya tienes... lamentablemente no das las características del otro servidor, pero supongamos que se trata de un tarro similar: Mensajería, y PDC lo dejaría en un tarro LAMP y FTP lo dejaría en el otro ... (LAMP incluye web -- Linux Apache MySQL PHP/Perl) Si alguno de los datos necesite ser de dominio común ... pues monta el /home en el otro pc como unidad de red ;) Desde ya Gracias De nada, espero haber servido en algo ;) salu2 luisito ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es Saludos !! -- Mailed by: UnReAl4U - unreal4u ICQ #: 54472056 www: http://www.chilehardware.com/ This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. Este Correo ha sido revisado por servidor de antivirus de ZOFRI S.A. ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] Problema al instalar CentOS x86_64 No se inician las X, la pantalla se queda en negro!!!
Hola: Las novedades son las siguientes. Si arranco directamente desde grub en init 3, me aparece un kernel panic. Si arranco en modo single y después cambio a init 3, va perfecto. Y me deja arrancar las X estupendamente con todos los servicios arrancados. Pero al cerrar sesión, se sigue quedando la pantalla en negro y tengo que reiniciar a botón. Por otra parte, la tarjeta de red no me la detecta. ¿Alguien sabe qué puedo hacer? El 29/11/07, Jose Antonio kerjo [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió: Hola. --- Pedro Jose [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No puedos mostraros el modprobe.conf porque no sé cómo hacer para mostrarlo, puesto que mi windows no detecta las particiones linux, y cuando instalo el ext2fs, no las reconoce con formato e intenta formatearlas. Si usas LVM, ext2fs no trabaja adecuadamente. LVM se usa en la instalación por defecto de CentOS. No conozco ninguna opción para poder trabajar con LVM desde windows. La única solución que se me ocurre y no he usado, es utilizar virtualización. Con VMWARE server puedes hacer que una máquina virtual tenga una o varias particiones del disco duro asignadas. Es más, si tienes mucha prisa por usar CentOS, puedes usar VMWARE para instalarlo sin ningún problema de drivers etc... en tanto solucionas tu problema. Eso si, perderás un poco de rendimiento. Yo lo tengo así para ir probando configuraciones etc... Un saludo, y suerte. Jose Antonio Kerjo. __ ¿Chef por primera vez? Sé un mejor Cocinillas. http://es.answers.yahoo.com/info/welcome ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es -- Saludos, Pedro ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] Montar server en CentOS 4.5
El día 30/11/07, Camilo Sperberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió: On Nov 30, 2007 11:25 AM, Luis Alejandro Aguilera Pascual [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hola Tengo una maquina con placa Asuss P5LD2-VM/S, Micro P4 *Genuino* a 3.0Ghz, 512 de Ram y un SATA de 120 Gb. un poco difícil veo que se copie un procesador :P No entiendo lo que dices En ella quiero montar uno de los server de mi empresa, la cual solo cuenta con 2 server, uno bajo Linux y otro bajo Windows. Las politicas de la empresa me exigen que todos los servicios de red corran bajo Linux, el Windows solo se utiliza para realizar las salvas de las BD del software economico con que trabaja la empresa el cual esta sujeto a derechos de autor y es software propietario y exige salvar en servidores SQL de Microsoft. es una pena ... supieran lo poderoso que es PostGreSQL :D Les pido opiones del particionamiento del SATA en cuanto a los servicios que quiero brindar y a la vez escucho opiniones sobre que servicios de los que menciono abajo se me pudieran quedar dentro de los basicos, es que soy nuevo en el mundo de la administracion de sistemas. Personalmente, prefiero el esquema viejo: ese donde uno mismo se hacía las particiones :D En fin, te recomiendo (y en este orden) : 1GB swap (también puede ser 1.5GB si le vas a poner más ram después, aunque dudo que se ocupe mucho) 4GB / 12GB /var 12GB /usr 1GB /etc el-restoGB /home -- incluido /home/www que es donde irá toda la parte web hasta donde yo se en /home es donde estan los perfiles del sistema y en /var es donde esta el ftp y la web(/www) Servicios Mensajeria(correo) Web(varios sitios) FTP(mas o menos cargado) PDC(alrededor de 100 usuariosy 50 estaciones de trabajo) LAMP(para los sites) Personalmente, creo que es muy poca máquina para el uso que se le va a dar... Yo dejaría repartida la carga entre los 2 pc's que ya tienes... lamentablemente no das las características del otro servidor, pero supongamos que se trata de un tarro similar: Mensajería, y PDC lo dejaría en un tarro LAMP y FTP lo dejaría en el otro ... (LAMP incluye web -- Linux Apache MySQL PHP/Perl) El otro tarro es igual pero recuerda que tiene que estar sobre Windows por las salvas de la BD, tambien ten en cuenta que tengo solo 100 usuarios y 50 estaciones de trabajo y estamos hablando de una subred de la empresa, creo que esto no lo mencione antes, perdon. Si alguno de los datos necesite ser de dominio común ... pues monta el /home en el otro pc como unidad de red ;) Desde ya Gracias De nada, espero haber servido en algo ;) no tengo que montar otros servicios??? salu2 luisito ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es Saludos !! -- Mailed by: UnReAl4U - unreal4u ICQ #: 54472056 www: http://www.chilehardware.com/ ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
[CentOS-es] Re: Ayuda con VSFTPD
Message: 3 Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 12:00:41 -0600 (CST) From: Freddy Angulo [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [CentOS-es] Ayuda con VSFTPD To: centos-es@centos.org Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 hola listeros: amigos necesito de su ayuda, tengo un server ftp en VSFTPD, el cual acepta conexiones pasivas y activas. Este servico esta funcionando sin inconveniente. El problema es q se hay un cliente q desea conectarse de manera pasiva al server desde aun aplicacion en Oracle. El problema es q cuando se conecta manualmente desde el oracle se establece la conexion y transfiere la data sin problemas, el problema es cuando se intenta conectar automaticamente desde la aplicacion ftp de oracle, la conexion no se establese a pesar de q esta de manera pasiva porq es la conexion que debe de aceptar el servere ftp, el log que se genera en el momento de la conexion es el siguiente: 23/11/2007 08:13:58.424667000 .Preparando para transferir el archivo ... 227 Entering Passive Mode (192,168,0,226,108,132) 23/11/2007 08:17:08.287021000 .Error: -29260 - ORA-29260: network error: TNS peration timed out 23/11/2007 08:17:08.889754000 .Se ha desconectado del FTP 23/11/2007 08:17:08.890566000 .Se han cerrado todas las conexiones TCP pense q era el firewall por lo q opte por bajar e servicio del firewall y el inconveniente aun continua. si alguna sabe si tenbgo q correr algun modulo o habilitar alguna linea q este comentada en el vsftpd para q se puedan conectar desde oracle se los agradecere mucho. Gracias por su ayuda. - Comparte video en la ventana de tus mensajes (y también tus fotos de Flickr). Usa el nuevo Yahoo! Messenger versión Beta. Visita http://e1.beta.messenger.yahoo.com/ próxima parte Se ha borrado un adjunto en formato HTML... URL: http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-es/attachments/20071127/9764ffab/attachment-0001.htm -- -- Hola, quizas te sirva de ayuda en algo, hace algún tiempo tuve un problema similar solo que era con powerbuilde y Sql Server 7.0. Si utilizaba un cliente de FTP o me conectaba desde la pc que deseaba hacer la transmisión vía FTP lo hacia sin problemas, pero cuando utilizaba el programa para transmitir la data me mostraba un mensaje similar al tuyo indicando que el tiempo de conexión había expirado. Después de mucho buscar encontre que esto sucedia cuando se intentaba hacer la transmisión desde un cliente el cual tenía que pasar por un proxy o firewall para poder salir a internet. La solución en mi caso fue argegar las lineas modprobe ip_nat_ftp y modprobe ip_conntrack_ftp. Agregue esas 2 lineas al firewall y ya no tengo problemas para transmitir o recibir data mediante FTP Saludos José A. Sabastizagal Orellana ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] Como migrar un pdc samba en centos 5 a otro centos 5
Hola Amigos de la lista. Bueno mi consulta es si puedo migrar un pdc samba en centos 5, a otro con centos 5 pero con distinto hardware bastara con solo copiar el los archivos de la carpeta /etc/samba, y el passwd, shadow y gshadow reemplazarlos, re-iniciar el servicio.? O hay que hacer algo mas he estado leyendo pero estoy algo confundido entre MACHINE.SID Y SECRETS.TDB... por favor si fueran tan amables de guiarme. Atte. Mario Ganga Castro. Hola, yo cuando mudo cualquier linux de una maquina a otra, copio el disco duro de un equipo a otro sin mayores problemas, no reinstalo y luego muevo archivos, solamente copio el disco completo. Si te encuentras con cualquier problema del tipo la tarjeta de red se muestra como eth2 o eth1 y no como eth0 o cosas de ese estilo, revisas los archivos de /etc/udev/rules.d y fin de los problemas, puedes borrar incluso lso archivos de esa carpeta, los cuales se crearan automaticamente al reiniciar la maquina. Saludos. César Sepúlveda B. ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
[CentOS-es] spamassassin con mysql
Hola buenos días, alguien tiene implementado spamassassin con Mysql?? http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/UsingSQL este es el error que me aparece cuando arranco spamassassin [EMAIL PROTECTED] src]# /etc/init.d/spamassassin start Iniciando spamd: [32459] info: config: failed to parse line, skipping, in /etc/mail/spamassassin/sql.cf: username = '$GLOBAL' OR username = CONCAT('%',_DOMAIN_) ORDER BY username ASC [ OK ] cat /etc/mail/spamassassin/sql.cf user_scores_dsn DBI:mysql:spamassassin:localhost user_scores_sql_usernamespam user_scores_sql_password** user_scores_sql_custom_query SELECT preference, value FROM _TABLE_ WHERE username = _USERNAME_ OR username = '$GLOBAL' OR username = CONCAT('%',_DOMAIN_) ORDER BY username ASC me imagino que tengo que cambiar la consulta SQL, ¿alguien tiene algún ejemplo?. lo estoy probando para activarlo, ya que squirrelmail tiene un pluggins para que cada usuario modifique su propiedades de filtrado spamassassin (sasql-3.2.0.tar.gz)parace interesante. Gracias por todo. Un saludo. ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS-es] Problema al instalar CentOS x86_64 No se inician las X, la pantalla se queda en negro!!!
--- Pedro Jose [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hola: Las novedades son las siguientes. Si arranco directamente desde grub en init 3, me aparece un kernel panic. Si arranco en puede ser porque no lo especificas bien, y el kernel cree que quieres ejecutar un comando init que se llama 3 la forma es diferente entre el centos4 y el centos5 en centos4 se arranca en un nivel en especifico agregando: init N siendo N el runlevel pero en centos5 solo tienes que agregar el runlevel, por ejemplo: 3 modo single y después cambio a init 3, va perfecto. Y me deja arrancar las X estupendamente con todos los servicios arrancados. como las arrancas? con startx ? Pero al cerrar sesión, se sigue quedando la pantalla en negro y tengo que reiniciar a botón. Por otra parte, la tarjeta de red no me la como terminas ? siguiendo el procedimiento start+terminar_sesion+logout ? o de otro modo? prueba pulsando las teclas crtl+shift+del , es el equivalente del crtl+alt+del pero solo para el XWindows cu roger PD: este es el ultimo mensaje que te respondo si insistes en hacer top-posting, lo siento. PD2: cada cual es libre de hacer los emails como quiera pero tambien cada cual es libre de leer y responder los mensajes que quiera ;-) ; solo que si yo quiero que alguien me lea un correo trataría de escribirlo como más le place, digo yo, es lo que me dicta el sentido comun :-) __ RedHat Certified ( RHCE ) Cisco Certified ( CCNA CCDA ) Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page. http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs ___ CentOS-es mailing list CentOS-es@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Re: [CentOS] Announcing the CentOS on Laptops initiative
On Wed, 28 Nov 2007, Shawn O'Shea wrote: I think it is cool to see this effort undertaken, thanks Dag! :) I may need to install C5 on my Fujitsu that currently has Ubuntu on it. Speaking of which, those guys have been maintaining both official and user submitted laptop reports for awhile so you might want to take a look over there and possibly borrow some cues or ideas for this project. https://wiki.ubuntu.com/LaptopTestingTeam https://wiki.ubuntu.com/LaptopTesting https://wiki.ubuntu.com/LaptopTestingTeamTemplate That's an interesting read. The aim however seems to be different. Although I am in favor of doing consistent Laptop tests as well, I prefer listing solutions for common problems (most problems are not model-specific) first and if this becomes a success, go one step further. We also cannot fix most problems that are in the Ubuntu Test template because we cannot change a lot of the packages from upstream. So we are by design limited to providing documentation and providing drivers/tools to make the user experience better. However if we do have a problem with upstream provided packages, we should definitely report them upstream. Now my initial goal is to have more information regarding CentOS on Laptops because that information is hard to find and because there is this misconception that Enterprise Linux belongs on servers (or are unfit for Laptops). -- -- dag wieers, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://dag.wieers.com/ -- [Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors] ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Sharing Partitions between Linux and Windows
On 30/11/2007, MHR [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Nov 29, 2007 9:39 AM, Akemi Yagi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You can access (read/write) NTFS partitions from Linux: http://wiki.centos.org/TipsAndTricks/NTFSPartitions You can also build the NTFS module that comes with the kernel and modprobe it, or you can rebuild the kernel with the configuration changed to allow write access to NTFS file systems and install that. The NTFS driver included in the kernel is considered unreliable in its support for NTFS writing. The de-facto standard is NTFS-3G, which is developed as a FUSE module (i.e. not a kernel module). I would advise against using the kernel module as it is recognized as not supporting NTFS writing reliably. --Amos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] what's the equivalent to sendmail's Timeout.queuewarn in POSTFIX
Hi, I am ruunig postfix and MailScanner as a Mailgw on Centos 4.5. I want to know what is default warntime in Postfix? I.e - *what's the equivalent to sendmail's Timeout.queuewarn in POSTFIX ? . ANY IDEAS? *** -- Thank you Indunil Jayasooriya ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Replacement for Linux-HA (heartbeat) - RedHat cluster?
Matt Shields wrote: With a GUI that actually makes it more difficult to manage. Learn to use the command line tools and config files, it's so much easier. then why in Gaea's name did they make the heartbeat config files XML ?? while XML -can- be human read, its a freekin' mess to read and edit and maintain sanity. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Replacement for Linux-HA (heartbeat) - RedHat cluster?
On 30/11/2007, Matt Shields [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Nov 30, 2007 3:57 PM, John R Pierce [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Matt Shields wrote: Dump the cluste suite and use the LinuxVirtualServer.org packages. isn't that heartbeat and stuff repackaged? With a GUI that actually makes it more difficult to manage. Learn to use the command line tools and config files, it's so much easier. So it uses the same heartbeat as the one which comes in the heartbeat CentOS 5 package? I was hoping they implement their own thing. The last thing I need now is glossy interface which hides the little details that might help me understand what's wrong. Unless that interface can magically configure heartbeat in a way that it'll actually start running without core-dump'ing some of the programs it comes with. Thanks, --Amos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Replacement for Linux-HA (heartbeat) - RedHat cluster?
On 30/11/2007, Matt Shields [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: LVS is a group of tools that do a lot of different things, the two that you are interested in are: - heartbeat - provides failover if you have two nodes (active/active or active/passive) - ipvsadm/ldirectord - provides load balancing (ie. http(s) load balancer in front of multiple web servers) As stated in a previous post we have a number of these setup in our network and we handle a lot of traffic. Some we're using for http(s) traffic, others smtp/pop/imap, others mysql (read only queries off replicas). There's no end to what what you could use heartbeat or ipvsadm/ldirectord or both for. Both packages can be installed from dag's repo. Thanks. What platform are you using? Mine is CentOS 5 on x86_64. It runs as a Xen DomU but from what I read on the linux-ha users mailing list this shouldn't be the issue. The production system will run on the bare metal (not under Xen). My experience with LVS at a previous workplace (a very large ISP) was also excellent - they had a couple of LVS servers in front of hundreds of mini-clusters (each such cluster service its own web or other network application, sometimes sharing disks using DRBD). The difference, I suspect, is that I'm trying this now with version 2.1.2 on CentOS 5 and x86_64, as opposed to possibly older version of everything (RedHat version, LVS, hardware (i386)). Thanks for your input, --Amos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Replacement for Linux-HA (heartbeat) - RedHat cluster?
On 30/11/2007, John R Pierce [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Matt Shields wrote: With a GUI that actually makes it more difficult to manage. Learn to use the command line tools and config files, it's so much easier. then why in Gaea's name did they make the heartbeat config files XML ?? while XML -can- be human read, its a freekin' mess to read and edit and maintain sanity. I wish THAT was my problem :). While I'm not fond of manually manipulating XML (XML is usually meant to be touched by programs, not humans), I can cope with it if the f*** programs executed properly. As it is now, even the BasicSanityCheck fails. I'm trying to run the system-config-cluster thing and see what happens. Cheers, --Amos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Replacement for Linux-HA (heartbeat) - RedHat cluster?
On Nov 30, 2007 6:53 PM, Amos Shapira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 30/11/2007, Matt Shields [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Take Xen out of the picture until you learn how heartbeat and ipvsadm/ldirectord actually work. You could be having network issues because you are hosting it on a virtual server instead of on a real server. So it's kinda hard to troubleshoot if you don't even know if your configs are broken. Get two crappy boxes that you can load everything up on, configure them with heartbeat, get that working Thanks for your suggestion. The reason I use Xen (beyond the huge convenience) is that I don't have spare hardware to play with. where it will failover an IP. then add some other service like ipvsadm/ldirectord, and take things one step at a time. Don't try to setup everything all at once, it makes it harder to try to debug problems. That's exactly what (I think) I did - just stuck to instructions from someone who seems to have been in exactly the same position and got it working. As for network issues - I see the packets coming and going all right. But I also see programs just crash and burn - I've just executed BasicSanityCheck on the primary node which appeared to be working relatively fine a couple of minutes ago (at least it got more processes running after three minutes than the other node) and that failed too with core dumps. I'm using CentOS4 and RHEL4 using dag'd rpms on a few of the CentOS and RHEL boxes and built from source on some of the other ones. I haven't had a chance to try out a CentOS 5 system yet. But as to your stability questions, we've been using LVS for about 3 or 4 years now and never, ever had stability problems. So maybe I should try to get packages from dag, even though there are ones included in CentOS? Which exact version of hearbeat are you using right now? From reading the history of Linux-HA it appears there was a huge change between 1.x and 2.x 2.x -- -matt ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Conexant fax/modem not faxing with sendfax
+++ MHR [2007-11-30 01:25:09]: I finally picked up a real modem (not a winmodem) and put it in my machine. I pulled down the hsfmodem driver from the source, got a license and installed the driver at full power. What you have isn't a real modem .. it's just a winmodem that is usable under linux. real modems don't need drivers to work. 11/30 00:31:52 dem mdm_command: string 'AT+FCLASS=2.0' 11/30 00:31:52 dem mdm_command: string 'ERROR' - ERROR 11/30 00:31:52 dem mdm_command: string 'AT+FCLASS=2' 11/30 00:31:52 dem mdm_command: string 'ERROR' - ERROR Your modem (rather the driver) doesn't support Class2 or Class2.0 fax command sets. Kingsly -- --- Kingsly At Users Dot SourceForge Dot Net -- http://kingsly.org/ --- ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Replacement for Linux-HA (heartbeat) - RedHat cluster?
On 30/11/2007, Matt Shields [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Take Xen out of the picture until you learn how heartbeat and ipvsadm/ldirectord actually work. You could be having network issues because you are hosting it on a virtual server instead of on a real server. So it's kinda hard to troubleshoot if you don't even know if your configs are broken. Get two crappy boxes that you can load everything up on, configure them with heartbeat, get that working Thanks for your suggestion. The reason I use Xen (beyond the huge convenience) is that I don't have spare hardware to play with. where it will failover an IP. then add some other service like ipvsadm/ldirectord, and take things one step at a time. Don't try to setup everything all at once, it makes it harder to try to debug problems. That's exactly what (I think) I did - just stuck to instructions from someone who seems to have been in exactly the same position and got it working. As for network issues - I see the packets coming and going all right. But I also see programs just crash and burn - I've just executed BasicSanityCheck on the primary node which appeared to be working relatively fine a couple of minutes ago (at least it got more processes running after three minutes than the other node) and that failed too with core dumps. I'm using CentOS4 and RHEL4 using dag'd rpms on a few of the CentOS and RHEL boxes and built from source on some of the other ones. I haven't had a chance to try out a CentOS 5 system yet. But as to your stability questions, we've been using LVS for about 3 or 4 years now and never, ever had stability problems. So maybe I should try to get packages from dag, even though there are ones included in CentOS? Which exact version of hearbeat are you using right now? From reading the history of Linux-HA it appears there was a huge change between 1.x and 2.x Thanks, --Amos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Filesystem for Maildir
Hi, A draft with results of my benchmark based on fsbench is available in http://www.htiweb.inf.br/benchmark/fsbench.htm. The methodology and the conclusion i will publish later, however, it shows that the XFS obtained better performance and EXT3 had results that can now compete in this environment. Regards, Heitor A.M. Cardozo Christopher Chan wrote: What does fsbench say? It has the best writing performance too?!? No, according to the fsbench results, ReiserFS wins on Read Performance, but XFS is, approximately, four times more faster on write. I said that the ReiserFS have the best performance based on my read/write server statics, where read requests are 70% of total I/O requests. Ah. Too bad reiserfs is not stable enough for you. In production, with ReiserFS, the server load average was around 30% lower than XFS. I guess Hans got something right with his reiserfs. Please post your findings. :-) I'm doing new tests with ReiserFS, XFS, EXT3 and JFS in CentOS 5. I will post soon as possible. Thank you very much in advance. And sorry for my english... No need to be and it is not bad at all. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CleanLog.h
On 30/11/2007, Alfredo Perez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Furthermore, this question is for the list I have a Centos 5 server running sshd for me to signon and check my emails. I use denyhosts to protect port 22. Is there anyother software you people use to protect your servers. There are a few such programs floating around. Do you confine yourself to CentOS packages? denyhosts is apparently a good one. Personally, I don't use any - once I moved to a non-standard port I've never seen anyone knocking on my SSH server's door. --Amos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CleanLog.h
On 30/11/2007, Evans F. Mitchell KD4EFM / AFA2TH / WQFK-894 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: By any chances, have you ran 'ps ax' from root and looked to see what does not look like it should be there?? IF you are willing, paste your 'ps' output for us to help you find the program that is running and sending out the emails. also review your sendmail rule set. Next, to help lock down your server a little more make sure you have set a password on your VNC. Tunnel your VNC over SSH (or SSL?). See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virtual_Network_Computing#Security about how insecure is the VNC protocol. I had and Italian 17 year old poking around one of my Amateur Radio boxes via VNC, simply cause I forgot to set a vnc password, so it was wide open like a windoz server box without a login screen, you know, the good old I AM OPEN FOR YOUR PLEASURES... Also change your sshd, the port it is on, and do a rule set that only allows a specific ip to access it. That's a good advise. I have yet to see my non-standard sshd server scanned since I changed it over 3-4 years ago. Same with a private http server. I think I am correct saying you can do that as well with VNC. See above - the VNC protocol is not secure on its own, but you can tunnel it over secure protocols. The other option would be to stop the service all together IF your not needing it. Of course. That's up in the top ten commandments - stop any service (and remove any package, I would add) that you don't need on the server. --Amos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Replacement for Linux-HA (heartbeat) - RedHat cluster?
On Nov 30, 2007 6:28 PM, Amos Shapira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 30/11/2007, Matt Shields [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: LVS is a group of tools that do a lot of different things, the two that you are interested in are: - heartbeat - provides failover if you have two nodes (active/active or active/passive) - ipvsadm/ldirectord - provides load balancing (ie. http(s) load balancer in front of multiple web servers) As stated in a previous post we have a number of these setup in our network and we handle a lot of traffic. Some we're using for http(s) traffic, others smtp/pop/imap, others mysql (read only queries off replicas). There's no end to what what you could use heartbeat or ipvsadm/ldirectord or both for. Both packages can be installed from dag's repo. Thanks. What platform are you using? Mine is CentOS 5 on x86_64. It runs as a Xen DomU but from what I read on the linux-ha users mailing list this shouldn't be the issue. The production system will run on the bare metal (not under Xen). My experience with LVS at a previous workplace (a very large ISP) was also excellent - they had a couple of LVS servers in front of hundreds of mini-clusters (each such cluster service its own web or other network application, sometimes sharing disks using DRBD). The difference, I suspect, is that I'm trying this now with version 2.1.2 on CentOS 5 and x86_64, as opposed to possibly older version of everything (RedHat version, LVS, hardware (i386)). Thanks for your input, Take Xen out of the picture until you learn how heartbeat and ipvsadm/ldirectord actually work. You could be having network issues because you are hosting it on a virtual server instead of on a real server. So it's kinda hard to troubleshoot if you don't even know if your configs are broken. Get two crappy boxes that you can load everything up on, configure them with heartbeat, get that working where it will failover an IP. then add some other service like ipvsadm/ldirectord, and take things one step at a time. Don't try to setup everything all at once, it makes it harder to try to debug problems. I'm using CentOS4 and RHEL4 using dag'd rpms on a few of the CentOS and RHEL boxes and built from source on some of the other ones. I haven't had a chance to try out a CentOS 5 system yet. But as to your stability questions, we've been using LVS for about 3 or 4 years now and never, ever had stability problems. -- -matt ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Replacement for Linux-HA (heartbeat) - RedHat cluster?
On 30/11/2007, Matt Shields [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yup. We use LVS for all types of failover senarios. We use it for redundant firewall/vpn servers which use heartbeat for failing over So you are using the same heartbeat that doesn't work for me? Or are you refering to another package which provides a similar functionality? the virtual IPs and services. We also use LVS with ldirectord as redundant load balancers. Read the docs, they explain how to set up a service to be started/stopped on failover I've been digging the web for over a week now but it just doesn't work the way it's supposed to, whatever I try. Any other hints? Thanks, --Amos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] unstable libdg error when ./configure Perfparse on Nagios 2.x / CentOS 4.x
On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 12:45:47PM -0800, Rogelio alleged: I'm trying to ./compile Perfparse on my Nagios CentOS 4.x box, but am having this error. (And am hoping someone here might point me in the right direction) I just downloaded and tried it. Turns our you need the gd-progs package installed to get the gdlib-config script (necessary to satisfy perfparse's configure). After installing gd-progs, everything built fine. So verify the following on your machine (make sure they are genuine centos packages and not from a 3rd party repo): $ rpm -q --qf '%{NAME}-%{VERSION}.%{RELEASE}.%{ARCH}\n' gd gd-devel gd-progs glib glib-devel gd-2.0.28.5.4E.x86_64 gd-devel-2.0.28.5.4E.x86_64 gd-progs-2.0.28.5.4E.x86_64 glib-1.2.10.15.x86_64 glib-1.2.10.15.i386 glib-devel-1.2.10.15.x86_64 Then start over with a clean build and try configure and make again. pgp4tqh3tzR5b.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] How to delete mails in the mailq in ONE DAY -- POSTFIX
Indunil Jayasooriya wrote: I am runnig posfix on Centos 4.4 as a Mailgateway. It only accepts mails for domains and then forwards mails to Lotus domino Server. All clients sends outgoing mails to that Lotus domino Server. Then , That Lotus Domino Server sends mails to Postfix mailgateway. This postfix mailgateway sends mails to all the destinations. But, This Postfix mailgateway has about 150 messages in the mailq. Some are unwanted mails. I think they keep trying until 5 days old. I want decrease it to ONE DAY. do not accept mail to inexistent addresses. implement proper recipient validation. if you can't share the list of users with postfix, then use reject_unverified_recipient (only for recipients of your domains). accept then bounce (backscatter) is no more acceptable. In Sendmail, this can be done by editing sendmail.mc as below. (`confTO_QUEUERETURN', `5d')dnl changing above line to below line (`confTO_QUEUERETURN', `1d')dnl How Can I do it in Postfix? ANY IDEA? O Timeout.queuereturn=5d ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] centos remote installation
Centos wrote: Hello I am installing Centos from remote location and have no problem if I upgrade Centos, however if I will have problem if I go through fresh installation, because once the fresh installation finished,at next reboot Centos will ask to define another user name with its pasword and that will be the time I will not see the console messages, so I should automate that part. Is there any easy way to do this or I should go all the way through Kickstart procedures ? you can define the password in your kickstart config file. Make sure to protect it enough (and better yet, change it once you are connected). ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
RE: [CentOS] Replacement for Linux-HA (heartbeat) - RedHat cluster?
then why in Gaea's name . snip gaea? whoa nellie, I got first dibs on preaching Jesus here ;- Get in line. :-) - rh ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
RE: [CentOS] Replacement for Linux-HA (heartbeat) - RedHat cluster?
John R Pierce wrote: Matt Shields wrote: Dump the cluste suite and use the LinuxVirtualServer.org packages. isn't that heartbeat and stuff repackaged? Visiting the web site it appears to be a load-balancer, not that that wouldn't be useful in some scenarios, but it isn't really clustering software that is to have an application run in active/passive or active/active between multiple nodes cooperatively, with fencing and shared storage, locking and all that goes with that. -Ross __ This e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sender and permanently delete the original and any copy or printout thereof. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Dell Wireless WLAN Card Utility - mini-pci wireless card 1390
I've now upgraded the kernel to CentOS 2.6.18-8.1.15.e15, so assume my OS is now effectively CentOS 5.1. However, I'm afraid I'm still at a bit of a loss as to how it supports my Dell laptop wireless card (bcm43xx card?), as it's still not listed in the list of supported adapters in Network Config. Can anybody please suggest where I go from here? That kernel is still 5.0. 5.1 is not out yet. Akemi ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Replacement for Linux-HA (heartbeat) - RedHat cluster?
Matt Shields wrote: Dump the cluste suite and use the LinuxVirtualServer.org packages. isn't that heartbeat and stuff repackaged? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
RE: [CentOS] Replacement for Linux-HA (heartbeat) - RedHat cluster?
Amos Shapira wrote: Hello, I'm beginning to give up on making Linux-HA's heartbeat work for my environment (CentOS x86_64) and am wondering what other option have I got to help me: 1. Use IPVS to maintain a cluster of virtual servers, either master/slave or load-balanced. 2. Use DRBD in master/slave fashion to keep a home-grown application highly-available. The first thing I stumbled upon is RedHat Cluster Suite ( http://www.linuxtopia.org/online_books/centos_linux_guides/cen tos_cluster_configuration_and_management/ http://www.linuxtopia.org/online_books/centos_linux_guides/ce ntos_cluster_configuration_and_management/ ), from which I also saw some packages on my CentOS servers. I've never heard of it before and am just starting to dig its docs, but if someone here can confirm/deny that this is a possible route to take it might save me some time or doubts. What isn't working with heartbeat? It may be just that some help getting heartbeat working properly is all you need? If after working with it fully configured properly it still doesn't work the way you need it then I'd look at another clustering solution. -Ross __ This e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sender and permanently delete the original and any copy or printout thereof. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Replacement for Linux-HA (heartbeat) - RedHat cluster?
On 30/11/2007, Matt Shields [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dump the cluste suite and use the LinuxVirtualServer.org packages. You won't have a gui, but it will be better in the long run. We're using that for quite a few clusters and handling about 30MBit/s on each of the clusters, I think it's around 10k concurrent connections. I also need to fail-over DRBD (i.e. so if the primary goes down the secondary will notice this, mount that DRBD partition and start the server which uses the files on it) - will LVS give me that by itself or will I need something else on top of it to do that? I got the impression that this what Linux-HA's heartbeat adds to the plain LVS but it doesn't work for me. I'm really not concerned about GUI's - I'd rather edit config files manually if they are documented well enough. --Amos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: Release Cycles [was RE: [CentOS] special tricks for developersboxon centos 5]
On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 11:58:51AM -0800, Robert - elists alleged: Garrick moaned: Please keep the preaching out of a secular maillist. Thanks. Oh sorry Garrick my bad... Apology accepted! Did they ban Jesus or His Name at USC or other supposed institutions higher education and learning? Not that I'm aware of. There is a church on the USC campus. But I don't speak for USC and nor does USC speak for me, so I don't know why this would be important. Should I put it in a .signature instead? Is that protocol? How about we just stay on-topic? CentOS and Linux stuff, ok? pgphmpdW9AW4u.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: Release Cycles [was RE: [CentOS] special tricks for developersboxon centos 5]
On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 02:51:45PM -0500, Ross S. W. Walker alleged: Did you mean non-secular? Otherwise what sect is it? No, I mean secular. Secular refers to worldly, reality, fact-based things. Non-secular would refer to religion and the supernatural. http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=secular -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org Sent: Fri Nov 30 14:22:04 2007 Subject: Re: Release Cycles [was RE: [CentOS] special tricks for developersboxon centos 5] On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 09:39:01AM -0800, Robert - elists alleged: Cheers everyone, and remember, Jesus is the reason for everything. Huh? Please keep the preaching out of a secular maillist. Thanks. __ This e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sender and permanently delete the original and any copy or printout thereof. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos pgppr8vluLfW6.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
RE: Release Cycles [was RE: [CentOS] special tricks for developersboxon centos 5]
Garrick moaned: Please keep the preaching out of a secular maillist. Thanks. Oh sorry Garrick my bad... Did they ban Jesus or His Name at USC or other supposed institutions higher education and learning? Should I put it in a .signature instead? Is that protocol? - rh ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: Release Cycles [was RE: [CentOS] special tricks for developersbox on centos 5]
On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 09:39:01AM -0800, Robert - elists alleged: Cheers everyone, and remember, Jesus is the reason for everything. Huh? Please keep the preaching out of a secular maillist. Thanks. pgppFwwOhzUcN.pgp Description: PGP signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Kernel panic - where to go from here?
On Nov 30, 2007 10:07 AM, Mike [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 28 Nov 2007, Bart Schaefer wrote: Reboot with memtest86 (should be on the centos install media) and look for test failures. That was it! Replaced the failing memory, now OpenVPN has been up for ~16 hours. Glad to hear it. I sometimes wonder, given how often I've seen memory failures occur only under load, whether unused RAM is more likely to go bad than RAM that's kept busy all the time. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Kernel panic - where to go from here?
On Wed, 28 Nov 2007, Bart Schaefer wrote: On Nov 28, 2007 11:27 AM, Mike [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I googled unable to handle kernel paging request and didn't really find anything useful (to me). In my experience this probably means that you have some RAM going bad and you only manage to tickle the problem when the machine becomes loaded enough to need that part of the address space. Reboot with memtest86 (should be on the centos install media) and look for test failures. That was it! Replaced the failing memory, now OpenVPN has been up for ~16 hours. -- Thanks, Mike ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] centos remote installation
Hello I am installing Centos from remote location and have no problem if I upgrade Centos, however if I will have problem if I go through fresh installation, because once the fresh installation finished,at next reboot Centos will ask to define another user name with its pasword and that will be the time I will not see the console messages, so I should automate that part. Is there any easy way to do this or I should go all the way through Kickstart procedures ? Thanks ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
RE: Release Cycles [was RE: [CentOS] special tricks for developersbox on centos 5]
RH has shared already. Fedora is released on an ~6 month cycle [1]. RHEL is released on an 18/24 month cycle [2]. 18/6=3 and 24/6=4 EL5 branched off from FC6 during the testing stage, so EL6 should presumably be derived from Fedora 9 or 10. For more info google: fedora enterprise site:redhat.com Phil [1] http://www.redhat.com/magazine/019may06/features/fedora_rhel_1/ [2] http://www.redhat.com/magazine/022aug06/features/fedora_rhel_4/ Phil I guess some of us people in the trenches need to get out a bit more into the bleeding edge documentations eh? Of course I knew the fuzzy general basics of all this yet I suppose I needed a solid reminder... And I thank you for that. Good lookin' out. CentOS is so rock solid that our installs have been running since CentOS first came on the scene, was tested, and immediately provisioned and implemented. Good thing we are essentially done scrambling (read working like intelligent chicken with head cut off) for the 2007 year and now it is just time for cleanup getting organized to bed this year and birth a new one. Cheers everyone, and remember, Jesus is the reason for everything. - rh ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CleanLog.h
On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 10:04:19AM -0600, B.J. McClure wrote: On Fri, 2007-11-30 at 09:36 -0500, Evans F. Mitchell KD4EFM / AFA2TH / WQFK-894 wrote: By any chances, have you ran 'ps ax' from root and looked to see what does not look like it should be there?? The box is already down and replaced by a backup. Implemented some of your suggestions on it. Issue was unauthorized web site.I have bash_history logs for all the users created by hacker so I know commands run including starting httpd. When I get back from an 11 day business trip I will set those drives on a slow as molasses test machine and see what I can figure out...for educational purposes. B.J. IF you are willing, paste your 'ps' output for us to help you find the program that is running and sending out the emails. also review your sendmail rule set. Next, to help lock down your server a little more make sure you have set a password on your VNC. I had and Italian 17 year old poking around one of my Amateur Radio boxes via VNC, simply cause I forgot to set a vnc password, so it was wide open like a windoz server box without a login screen, you know, the good old I AM OPEN FOR YOUR PLEASURES... Also change your sshd, the port it is on, and do a rule set that only allows a specific ip to access it. I think I am correct saying you can do that as well with VNC. The other option would be to stop the service all together IF your not needing it. Good Luck. Evans F. Mitchell KD4EFM/AFA2TH/WQFK-894 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alfredo Perez Sent: Friday, November 30, 2007 7:40 AM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] CleanLog.h On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 04:43:44PM -0600, B.J. McClure wrote: Sad to say one of my file servers was exploited and used to run a Phishing scam. Have identified subject virus amongst other things. It appears twice in a virus scan; /sbin/z (which I assume can just be deleted) and /sys/bus/serio/drivers/atkbd/description. The latter file is also present in identical uninfected machines. I have been unable to open the file, even with root privileges, although it appears to be a text file. Any suggestions on how to proceed appreciated. Guess I could delete it and copy over the file from an identical machine. Thanks in advance, B.J. CentOS 5.0, Linux 2.6.18-8.1.15.el5 x86_64 16:26:48 up 10:46, 1 user, load average: 0.07, 0.08, 0.04 Hi Can you tell me which virus scan you are using? Thanks Can you share your findings with us? Furthermore, this question is for the list I have a Centos 5 server running sshd for me to signon and check my emails. I use denyhosts to protect port 22. Is there anyother software you people use to protect your servers. Thanks in advance Alfredo - The sauce ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CleanLog.h
On Fri, 2007-11-30 at 12:22 -0500, Alfredo Perez wrote: Hi Can you tell me which virus scan you are using? Thanks Can you share your findings with us? Yes, however this thread will be dead from my end for the next 2 weeks due to travel. I am taking some files from the compromised machine and hope to be able to spend a little time with them. B.J. Furthermore, this question is for the list I have a Centos 5 server running sshd for me to signon and check my emails. I use denyhosts to protect port 22. Is there anyother software you people use to protect your servers. Thanks in advance Alfredo - The sauce ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos CentOS 5.0, Linux 2.6.18-8.1.15.el5 x86_64 11:33:51 up 1 day, 5:53, 1 user, load average: 0.03, 0.02, 0.00 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] network interface activation order
Matt Hyclak wrote: On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 08:51:50AM -0800, John R Pierce enlightened us: Graham Johnston wrote: I am using CentOS as a firewall/router. I am using bonded interfaces, vlan interfaces, and bridge interfaces. My problem currently is that on boot the system is attempting to activate the bridge interface before it's bonded-vlan members have been created. What this means is that the bridge is created but not activated. Is there anyway for me to influence the activation order and have bridge interfaces dealt with last? there's probably a better way to do this, but what I've done in the past is to create special firewall related kinda stuff like your'e describing in my own script thats run quite late in the init sequence, usually from rc2.d/S99myfirewall or even from /etc/rc.d/rc.local Yes, there is probably a better way. My initial thought was to set ONBOOT=no for the bridge interfaces and then bring them up in an initscript or rc.local later. Looking at the network startup script (/etc/init.d/network), though, it looks like you can probably achieve the same effect simply by renaming the ifcfg-brX files to something like ifcfg-zbrX. There is a loop to bring up interfaces that looks like: # bring up all other interfaces configured to come up at boot time for i in $interfaces; do and $interfaces is set just above by listing all files starting with ifcfg and snagging the end part (e.g. eth0 or br0). The loop figures out what kind of configuration it needs by reading the file, so I don't think it cares what it is named, as long as it is ifcfg-something. By renaming bridges to ifcfg-zbrX, it will come after ifcfg-vlanX and I think solve your problem. That was work, time for lunch :-) Matt I don't think so the initial loop is not activating bridge and vlan: if [ $TYPE = Bridge ]; then bridgeinterfaces=$bridgeinterfaces $i continue fi if [ ${DEVICE%%.*} != $DEVICE ] ; then vlaninterfaces=$vlaninterfaces $i continue fi Then later: for i in $vlaninterfaces $bridgeinterfaces ... snip a few lines action $Bringing up interface $i: ./ifup $i boot So, it should be bringing up your vlan interfaces before the bridges do you have TYPE=Bridge in your bridge ifcfg file? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Re: CentOS /boot kernel files removed after rpm upgrades
Hi, Thanks for your reply. I believe your right, it's fine, detecting everything. But in the below i'm seeing hda1 has different uuid than the other raid elements. How do i correct this as this appears to be the heart of the trouble? Thanks. Dave. Loading raid1.ko module md: raid1 personality registered for level 1 md: Autodetecting RAID arrays. md: autorun ... md: considering hdb5 ... md: adding hdb5 ... md: hdb3 has different UUID to hdb5 md: hdb2 has different UUID to hdb5 md: hdb1 has different UUID to hdb5 md: adding hda5 ... md: hda3 has different UUID to hdb5 md: hda2 has different UUID to hdb5 md: hda1 has different UUID to hdb5 md: created md3 md: bindhda5 md: bindhdb5 md: running: hdb5hda5 raid1: raid set md3 active with 2 out of 2 mirrors md: considering hdb3 ... md: adding hdb3 ... md: hdb2 has different UUID to hdb3 md: hdb1 has different UUID to hdb3 md: adding hda3 ... md: hda2 has different UUID to hdb3 md: hda1 has different UUID to hdb3 md: created md0 md: bindhda3 md: bindhdb3 md: running: hdb3hda3 raid1: raid set md0 active with 2 out of 2 mirrors md: considering hdb2 ... md: adding hdb2 ... md: hdb1 has different UUID to hdb2 md: adding hda2 ... md: hda1 has different UUID to hdb2 md: created md2 md: bindhda2 md: bindhdb2 md: running: hdb2hda2 raid1: raid set md2 active with 2 out of 2 mirrors md: considering hdb1 ... md: adding hdb1 ... md: adding hda1 ... md: created md1 md: bindhda1 md: bindhdb1 md: running: hdb1hda1 raid1: raid set md1 active with 2 out of 2 mirrors md: ... autorun DONE. md: Autodetecting RAID arrays. md: autorun ... md: ... autorun DONE. Trying to resume from /dev/md0 No suspend signature on swap, not resuming. Creating root device. Mounting root filesystem. mount: could notKernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill init! find filesystem '/dev/root' Setting up other filesystems. Setting up new root fs setuproot: moving /dev failed: No such file or directory no fstab.sys, mounting internal defaults setuproot: error mounting /proc: No such file or directory setuproot: error mounting /sys: No such file or directory Switching to new root and running init. unmounting old /dev unmounting old /proc unmounting old /sys switchroot: mount failed: No such file or directory - Original Message - From: Scott Silva [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: centos@centos.org Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2007 5:52 PM Subject: [CentOS] Re: CentOS /boot kernel files removed after rpm upgrades on 11/28/2007 2:46 PM Dave spake the following: Hello, The error is in my original posting, md the raid arrays are not synchronized. Checking /proc/mdstat output is below, doesn't look to me like trouble. Thanks. Dave. Personalities : [raid0] [raid1] [raid6] [raid5] [raid4] md1 : active raid1 hdb1[1] hda1[0] 102208 blocks [2/2] [UU] md3 : active raid1 hdb5[1] hda5[0] 1036096 blocks [2/2] [UU] md0 : active raid1 hdb3[1] hda3[0] 522048 blocks [2/2] [UU] md2 : active raid1 hdb2[1] hda2[0] 8337664 blocks [2/2] [UU] unused devices: none That looks perfectly fine. Maybe on boot the arrays weren't sync'd, but have since caught up. -- MailScanner is like deodorant... You hope everybody uses it, and you notice quickly if they don't ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] network interface activation order
I am using CentOS as a firewall/router. I am using bonded interfaces, vlan interfaces, and bridge interfaces. My problem currently is that on boot the system is attempting to activate the bridge interface before it's bonded-vlan members have been created. What this means is that the bridge is created but not activated. Is there anyway for me to influence the activation order and have bridge interfaces dealt with last? Graham Johnston Manager, Network Services Westman Communications Group 204.571.7225 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Replacement for Linux-HA (heartbeat) - RedHat cluster?
On Nov 30, 2007 4:12 PM, Ross S. W. Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: John R Pierce wrote: Matt Shields wrote: Dump the cluste suite and use the LinuxVirtualServer.org packages. isn't that heartbeat and stuff repackaged? Visiting the web site it appears to be a load-balancer, not that that wouldn't be useful in some scenarios, but it isn't really clustering software that is to have an application run in active/passive or active/active between multiple nodes cooperatively, with fencing and shared storage, locking and all that goes with that. -Ross LVS is a group of tools that do a lot of different things, the two that you are interested in are: - heartbeat - provides failover if you have two nodes (active/active or active/passive) - ipvsadm/ldirectord - provides load balancing (ie. http(s) load balancer in front of multiple web servers) As stated in a previous post we have a number of these setup in our network and we handle a lot of traffic. Some we're using for http(s) traffic, others smtp/pop/imap, others mysql (read only queries off replicas). There's no end to what what you could use heartbeat or ipvsadm/ldirectord or both for. Both packages can be installed from dag's repo. -- -matt ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Re: Release Cycles [was RE: special tricks fordevelopersboxon centos 5]
When did Centos become a religious mailing list? Yes I did top post on purpose to show how upset I am about this thread turning into what it has. (because i know the ones that are promoting the direction of this portion of the thread do not like top posting) Regards Steven --- Scott Silva [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: on 11/30/2007 12:12 PM Ross S. W. Walker spake the following: Garrick Staples wrote: On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 02:51:45PM -0500, Ross S. W. Walker alleged: Did you mean non-secular? Otherwise what sect is it? No, I mean secular. Secular refers to worldly, reality, fact-based things. Non-secular would refer to religion and the supernatural. http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=secular My bad, I had the definition reversed in my mind. You learn more on this list then just CentOS! -Ross snip I lost my virginity on this list... or was it my veracity? 8-D -- MailScanner is like deodorant... You hope everybody uses it, and you notice quickly if they don't ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Re: Release Cycles [was RE: special tricks fordevelopersboxon centos 5]
on 11/30/2007 12:12 PM Ross S. W. Walker spake the following: Garrick Staples wrote: On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 02:51:45PM -0500, Ross S. W. Walker alleged: Did you mean non-secular? Otherwise what sect is it? No, I mean secular. Secular refers to worldly, reality, fact-based things. Non-secular would refer to religion and the supernatural. http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=secular My bad, I had the definition reversed in my mind. You learn more on this list then just CentOS! -Ross snip I lost my virginity on this list... or was it my veracity? 8-D -- MailScanner is like deodorant... You hope everybody uses it, and you notice quickly if they don't ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
RE: Release Cycles [was RE: [CentOS] special tricks fordevelopersboxon centos 5]
Garrick Staples wrote: On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 02:51:45PM -0500, Ross S. W. Walker alleged: Did you mean non-secular? Otherwise what sect is it? No, I mean secular. Secular refers to worldly, reality, fact-based things. Non-secular would refer to religion and the supernatural. http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=secular My bad, I had the definition reversed in my mind. You learn more on this list then just CentOS! -Ross snip __ This e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sender and permanently delete the original and any copy or printout thereof. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
RE: [CentOS] CleanLog.h
By any chances, have you ran 'ps ax' from root and looked to see what does not look like it should be there?? IF you are willing, paste your 'ps' output for us to help you find the program that is running and sending out the emails. also review your sendmail rule set. Next, to help lock down your server a little more make sure you have set a password on your VNC. I had and Italian 17 year old poking around one of my Amateur Radio boxes via VNC, simply cause I forgot to set a vnc password, so it was wide open like a windoz server box without a login screen, you know, the good old I AM OPEN FOR YOUR PLEASURES... Also change your sshd, the port it is on, and do a rule set that only allows a specific ip to access it. I think I am correct saying you can do that as well with VNC. The other option would be to stop the service all together IF your not needing it. Good Luck. Evans F. Mitchell KD4EFM/AFA2TH/WQFK-894 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alfredo Perez Sent: Friday, November 30, 2007 7:40 AM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] CleanLog.h On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 04:43:44PM -0600, B.J. McClure wrote: Sad to say one of my file servers was exploited and used to run a Phishing scam. Have identified subject virus amongst other things. It appears twice in a virus scan; /sbin/z (which I assume can just be deleted) and /sys/bus/serio/drivers/atkbd/description. The latter file is also present in identical uninfected machines. I have been unable to open the file, even with root privileges, although it appears to be a text file. Any suggestions on how to proceed appreciated. Guess I could delete it and copy over the file from an identical machine. Thanks in advance, B.J. CentOS 5.0, Linux 2.6.18-8.1.15.el5 x86_64 16:26:48 up 10:46, 1 user, load average: 0.07, 0.08, 0.04 Hi Can you tell me which virus scan you are using? Thanks ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Good evening to all
On Fri, 2007-11-30 at 18:21 +0530, Silambarasan.R wrote: Hi.. Could u help me to re-install the centos 4 without affecting existing data...? is it possible? if so pl let me know... http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html You did not give enough information to get good advice. Provide output of df -h and fdisk -l as a start. One could always use an additional disk, if that is an option. Phil ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] what's the equivalent to sendmail's Timeout.queuewarn in POSTFIX
I am ruunig postfix and MailScanner as a Mailgw on Centos 4.5. I want to know what is default warntime in Postfix? I.e - *what's the equivalent to sendmail's Timeout.queuewarn in POSTFIX ? . ANY IDEAS? *** I think it is delay_warning_time .. so to work like sendmail which sends a warning after 4 hours of failed delivery would be: delay_warning_time=4 Barry ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Good evening to all
Hi.. Could u help me to re-install the centos 4 without affecting existing data...? is it possible? if so pl let me know... Regards Silambu.R ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Replacement for Linux-HA (heartbeat) - RedHat cluster?
On Fri, 2007-11-30 at 09:30 +, Amos Shapira wrote: Hello, I'm beginning to give up on making Linux-HA's heartbeat work for my environment (CentOS x86_64) and am wondering what other option have I got to help me: 1. Use IPVS to maintain a cluster of virtual servers, either master/slave or load-balanced. 2. Use DRBD in master/slave fashion to keep a home-grown application highly-available. The first thing I stumbled upon is RedHat Cluster Suite (http://www.linuxtopia.org/online_books/centos_linux_guides/centos_cluster_configuration_and_management/), from which I also saw some packages on my CentOS servers. I've never heard of it before and am just starting to dig its docs, but if someone here can confirm/deny that this is a possible route to take it might save me some time or doubts. Thanks, --Amos Perhaps you should read the CentOS docs - see http://www.centos.org/docs/5/ - cluster suite overview and admin Rob ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CleanLog.h
On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 04:43:44PM -0600, B.J. McClure wrote: Sad to say one of my file servers was exploited and used to run a Phishing scam. Have identified subject virus amongst other things. It appears twice in a virus scan; /sbin/z (which I assume can just be deleted) and /sys/bus/serio/drivers/atkbd/description. The latter file is also present in identical uninfected machines. I have been unable to open the file, even with root privileges, although it appears to be a text file. Any suggestions on how to proceed appreciated. Guess I could delete it and copy over the file from an identical machine. Thanks in advance, B.J. CentOS 5.0, Linux 2.6.18-8.1.15.el5 x86_64 16:26:48 up 10:46, 1 user, load average: 0.07, 0.08, 0.04 Hi Can you tell me which virus scan you are using? Thanks ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] what's the equivalent to sendmail's Timeout.queuewarn in POSTFIX
On Nov 30, 2007 11:04 AM, Indunil Jayasooriya [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I am ruunig postfix and MailScanner as a Mailgw on Centos 4.5. I want to know what is default warntime in Postfix? I.e - what's the equivalent to sendmail's Timeout.queuewarn in POSTFIX ? I dont know the sendmail nomenclature, but look for delay_warning_time and maybe you will be happy to know maximal_queue_lifetime Regards . ANY IDEAS? -- Thank you Indunil Jayasooriya ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos -- Alain Spineux aspineux gmail com May the sources be with you ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 33, Issue 15
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to [EMAIL PROTECTED] You can reach the person managing the list at [EMAIL PROTECTED] When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest... Today's Topics: 1. CESA-2007:1084 Critical CentOS 3 i386 seamonkey - security update (Tru Huynh) 2. CESA-2007:1084 Critical CentOS 3 x86_64 seamonkey - security update (Tru Huynh) 3. CESA-2007:1082 Critical CentOS 3 i386 firefox - security update (CENTOSPLUS only) (Tru Huynh) 4. CESA-2007:1082 Critical CentOS 3 x86_64 firefox - security update (CENTOSPLUS only) (Tru Huynh) 5. CESA-2007:1084 Critical CentOS 3 s390(x) seamonkey - security update (Pasi Pirhonen) 6. CESA-2007:1063 Important CentOS 3 ia64 pcre - security update (Pasi Pirhonen) 7. CESA-2007:1063 Important CentOS 3 s390(x) pcre - security update (Pasi Pirhonen) 8. CESA-2007:1068 Important CentOS 4 ia64 pcre - security update (Pasi Pirhonen) 9. CESA-2007:1063 Important CentOS 3 i386 pcre - security update (Tru Huynh) 10. CESA-2007:1063 Important CentOS 3 x86_64 pcre - security update (Tru Huynh) 11. CESA-2007:1068 Important CentOS 4 s390(x) pcre - security update (Pasi Pirhonen) 12. CESA-2007:1084-01: Critical CentOS 2 i386 seamonkey security update (John Newbigin) 13. CESA-2007:1065-01: Moderate CentOS 2 i386 pcresecurity update (John Newbigin) -- Message: 1 Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 14:04:23 +0100 From: Tru Huynh [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2007:1084 Critical CentOS 3 i386 seamonkey - security update To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2007:1084 seamonkey security update for CentOS 3 i386: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2007-1084.html The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to the mirrors: i386: updates/i386/RPMS/seamonkey-1.0.9-0.7.el3.centos3.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/seamonkey-chat-1.0.9-0.7.el3.centos3.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/seamonkey-devel-1.0.9-0.7.el3.centos3.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/seamonkey-dom-inspector-1.0.9-0.7.el3.centos3.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/seamonkey-js-debugger-1.0.9-0.7.el3.centos3.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/seamonkey-mail-1.0.9-0.7.el3.centos3.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/seamonkey-nspr-1.0.9-0.7.el3.centos3.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/seamonkey-nspr-devel-1.0.9-0.7.el3.centos3.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/seamonkey-nss-1.0.9-0.7.el3.centos3.i386.rpm updates/i386/RPMS/seamonkey-nss-devel-1.0.9-0.7.el3.centos3.i386.rpm source: updates/SRPMS/seamonkey-1.0.9-0.7.el3.centos3.src.rpm You may update your CentOS-3 i386 installations by running the command: yum update seamonkey Tru -- Tru Huynh (CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=getsearch=0xBEFA581B -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/attachments/20071129/d72d6ba8/attachment-0001.bin -- Message: 2 Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 14:05:28 +0100 From: Tru Huynh [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2007:1084 Critical CentOS 3 x86_64 seamonkey - security update To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii CentOS Errata and Security Advisory CESA-2007:1084 seamonkey security update for CentOS 3 x86_64: https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2007-1084.html The following updated file has been uploaded and is currently syncing to the mirrors: x86_64: updates/x86_64/RPMS/seamonkey-1.0.9-0.7.el3.centos3.i386.rpm updates/x86_64/RPMS/seamonkey-1.0.9-0.7.el3.centos3.x86_64.rpm updates/x86_64/RPMS/seamonkey-chat-1.0.9-0.7.el3.centos3.x86_64.rpm updates/x86_64/RPMS/seamonkey-devel-1.0.9-0.7.el3.centos3.x86_64.rpm updates/x86_64/RPMS/seamonkey-dom-inspector-1.0.9-0.7.el3.centos3.x86_64.rpm updates/x86_64/RPMS/seamonkey-js-debugger-1.0.9-0.7.el3.centos3.x86_64.rpm updates/x86_64/RPMS/seamonkey-mail-1.0.9-0.7.el3.centos3.x86_64.rpm updates/x86_64/RPMS/seamonkey-nspr-1.0.9-0.7.el3.centos3.i386.rpm updates/x86_64/RPMS/seamonkey-nspr-1.0.9-0.7.el3.centos3.x86_64.rpm updates/x86_64/RPMS/seamonkey-nspr-devel-1.0.9-0.7.el3.centos3.x86_64.rpm updates/x86_64/RPMS/seamonkey-nss-1.0.9-0.7.el3.centos3.i386.rpm updates/x86_64/RPMS/seamonkey-nss-1.0.9-0.7.el3.centos3.x86_64.rpm
[CentOS] Persist perms on devices after reboots
Hi Dumb question i think but how can i make devices permissions persist after a reboot. I dont think i have come across this issue before but i have some SAN disks that need to be oracle:dba as their perms but after a reboot they reset back to brw--- 1 root root 120, 49 Nov 30 10:40 /dev/emcpowerd1 any thoughts? thanks ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] kernel-2.6.9-55.0.12.EL not booting (lvm? 3ware?)
Ugo Bellavance wrote: Hi, Here's he setup. Original Kernel: kernel-smp-2.6.9-42.EL, booting fine. Error with kernel-2.6.9-55.0.12.EL (and kernel-2.6.9-55.0.12.ELsmp) No volume groups found Volume group VolGroup00 not found. ERROR: /bin/lvm exited abnormally! The system has a 3ware 9000 Storage Controller Model: 9500S-4LP Firmware FE9X 2.08.00.006, BIOS BE9X 2.03.01.052, Ports: 4. Anyone seen this? Does your 2.6.9-55.0.12 initrd image(s) contain the module for this controller? James Pearson ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Replacement for Linux-HA (heartbeat) - RedHat cluster?
Hello, I'm beginning to give up on making Linux-HA's heartbeat work for my environment (CentOS x86_64) and am wondering what other option have I got to help me: 1. Use IPVS to maintain a cluster of virtual servers, either master/slave or load-balanced. 2. Use DRBD in master/slave fashion to keep a home-grown application highly-available. The first thing I stumbled upon is RedHat Cluster Suite ( http://www.linuxtopia.org/online_books/centos_linux_guides/centos_cluster_configuration_and_management/), from which I also saw some packages on my CentOS servers. I've never heard of it before and am just starting to dig its docs, but if someone here can confirm/deny that this is a possible route to take it might save me some time or doubts. Thanks, --Amos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Sharing Partitions between Linux and Windows
On Nov 29, 2007 9:39 AM, Akemi Yagi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You can access (read/write) NTFS partitions from Linux: http://wiki.centos.org/TipsAndTricks/NTFSPartitions You can also build the NTFS module that comes with the kernel and modprobe it, or you can rebuild the kernel with the configuration changed to allow write access to NTFS file systems and install that. To build the module, look here for guidance: http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/BuildingKernelModules To build the kernel, see here: http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Custom_Kernel mhr ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Replacement for Linux-HA (heartbeat) - RedHat cluster?
On Nov 30, 2007 6:40 PM, Matt Shields [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Nov 30, 2007 6:28 PM, Amos Shapira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 30/11/2007, Matt Shields [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: LVS is a group of tools that do a lot of different things, the two that you are interested in are: - heartbeat - provides failover if you have two nodes (active/active or active/passive) - ipvsadm/ldirectord - provides load balancing (ie. http(s) load balancer in front of multiple web servers) As stated in a previous post we have a number of these setup in our network and we handle a lot of traffic. Some we're using for http(s) traffic, others smtp/pop/imap, others mysql (read only queries off replicas). There's no end to what what you could use heartbeat or ipvsadm/ldirectord or both for. Both packages can be installed from dag's repo. Thanks. What platform are you using? Mine is CentOS 5 on x86_64. It runs as a Xen DomU but from what I read on the linux-ha users mailing list this shouldn't be the issue. The production system will run on the bare metal (not under Xen). My experience with LVS at a previous workplace (a very large ISP) was also excellent - they had a couple of LVS servers in front of hundreds of mini-clusters (each such cluster service its own web or other network application, sometimes sharing disks using DRBD). The difference, I suspect, is that I'm trying this now with version 2.1.2 on CentOS 5 and x86_64, as opposed to possibly older version of everything (RedHat version, LVS, hardware (i386)). Thanks for your input, Take Xen out of the picture until you learn how heartbeat and ipvsadm/ldirectord actually work. You could be having network issues because you are hosting it on a virtual server instead of on a real server. So it's kinda hard to troubleshoot if you don't even know if your configs are broken. Get two crappy boxes that you can load everything up on, configure them with heartbeat, get that working where it will failover an IP. then add some other service like ipvsadm/ldirectord, and take things one step at a time. Don't try to setup everything all at once, it makes it harder to try to debug problems. I'm using CentOS4 and RHEL4 using dag'd rpms on a few of the CentOS and RHEL boxes and built from source on some of the other ones. I haven't had a chance to try out a CentOS 5 system yet. But as to your stability questions, we've been using LVS for about 3 or 4 years now and never, ever had stability problems. Also, we're on a mix of i386 and x86_64 systems. But for each cluster the pair of nodes is identicle. -- -matt ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] network interface activation order
On Fri, 2007-11-30 at 18:20 +0100, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg wrote: Matt Hyclak wrote: On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 08:51:50AM -0800, John R Pierce enlightened us: Graham Johnston wrote: I am using CentOS as a firewall/router. I am using bonded interfaces, vlan interfaces, and bridge interfaces. My problem currently is that on boot the system is attempting to activate the bridge interface before it's bonded-vlan members have been created. What this means is that the bridge is created but not activated. Is there anyway for me to influence the activation order and have bridge interfaces dealt with last? there's probably a better way to do this, but what I've done in the past is to create special firewall related kinda stuff like your'e describing in my own script thats run quite late in the init sequence, usually from rc2.d/S99myfirewall or even from /etc/rc.d/rc.local Yes, there is probably a better way. My initial thought was to set ONBOOT=no for the bridge interfaces and then bring them up in an initscript or rc.local later. Looking at the network startup script (/etc/init.d/network), though, it looks like you can probably achieve the same effect simply by renaming the ifcfg-brX files to something like ifcfg-zbrX. There is a loop to bring up interfaces that looks like: # bring up all other interfaces configured to come up at boot time for i in $interfaces; do and $interfaces is set just above by listing all files starting with ifcfg and snagging the end part (e.g. eth0 or br0). The loop figures out what kind of configuration it needs by reading the file, so I don't think it cares what it is named, as long as it is ifcfg-something. By renaming bridges to ifcfg-zbrX, it will come after ifcfg-vlanX and I think solve your problem. That was work, time for lunch :-) Matt I don't think so the initial loop is not activating bridge and vlan: if [ $TYPE = Bridge ]; then bridgeinterfaces=$bridgeinterfaces $i continue fi if [ ${DEVICE%%.*} != $DEVICE ] ; then vlaninterfaces=$vlaninterfaces $i continue fi Then later: for i in $vlaninterfaces $bridgeinterfaces ... snip a few lines action $Bringing up interface $i: ./ifup $i boot So, it should be bringing up your vlan interfaces before the bridges do you have TYPE=Bridge in your bridge ifcfg file? I had TYPE=bridge, and it very much so wants TYPE=Bridge. thanks everyone for your help, it's working now. Graham Johnston Manager, Network Services Westman Communications Group 204.571.7225 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] network interface activation order
On Fri, 2007-11-30 at 12:03 -0500, Matt Hyclak wrote: On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 08:51:50AM -0800, John R Pierce enlightened us: Graham Johnston wrote: I am using CentOS as a firewall/router. I am using bonded interfaces, vlan interfaces, and bridge interfaces. My problem currently is that on boot the system is attempting to activate the bridge interface before it's bonded-vlan members have been created. What this means is that the bridge is created but not activated. Is there anyway for me to influence the activation order and have bridge interfaces dealt with last? there's probably a better way to do this, but what I've done in the past is to create special firewall related kinda stuff like your'e describing in my own script thats run quite late in the init sequence, usually from rc2.d/S99myfirewall or even from /etc/rc.d/rc.local Yes, there is probably a better way. My initial thought was to set ONBOOT=no for the bridge interfaces and then bring them up in an initscript or rc.local later. Looking at the network startup script (/etc/init.d/network), though, it looks like you can probably achieve the same effect simply by renaming the ifcfg-brX files to something like ifcfg-zbrX. There is a loop to bring up interfaces that looks like: # bring up all other interfaces configured to come up at boot time for i in $interfaces; do and $interfaces is set just above by listing all files starting with ifcfg and snagging the end part (e.g. eth0 or br0). The loop figures out what kind of configuration it needs by reading the file, so I don't think it cares what it is named, as long as it is ifcfg-something. By renaming bridges to ifcfg-zbrX, it will come after ifcfg-vlanX and I think solve your problem. That was work, time for lunch :-) Matt I have already attempted naming it ifcfg-xBrVoice with no success. For me the interfaces load in the following order, where the bridge members are bond0.198 and bond0.199. bond0 bond1 xBrVoice bond0.198 bond0.199 bond0.205 Graham Johnston Manager, Network Services Westman Communications Group 204.571.7225 [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] network interface activation order
Graham Johnston wrote: I am using CentOS as a firewall/router. I am using bonded interfaces, vlan interfaces, and bridge interfaces. My problem currently is that on boot the system is attempting to activate the bridge interface before it's bonded-vlan members have been created. What this means is that the bridge is created but not activated. Is there anyway for me to influence the activation order and have bridge interfaces dealt with last? there's probably a better way to do this, but what I've done in the past is to create special firewall related kinda stuff like your'e describing in my own script thats run quite late in the init sequence, usually from rc2.d/S99myfirewall or even from /etc/rc.d/rc.local ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Persist perms on devices after reboots
Tom Brown wrote: Hi Dumb question i think but how can i make devices permissions persist after a reboot. I dont think i have come across this issue before but i have some SAN disks that need to be oracle:dba as their perms but after a reboot they reset back to brw--- 1 root root 120, 49 Nov 30 10:40 /dev/emcpowerd1 any thoughts? man udev You probably need to create a suitable config file in /etc/udev/permissions.d James Pearson ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Re: How to delete mails in the mailq in ONE DAY -- POSTFIX
Indunil Jayasooriya wrote: I am runnig posfix on Centos 4.4 as a Mailgateway. It only accepts mails for domains and then forwards mails to Lotus domino Server. Ok All clients sends outgoing mails to that Lotus domino Server. Then , That Lotus Domino Server sends mails to Postfix mailgateway. This postfix mailgateway sends mails to all the destinations. But, This Postfix mailgateway has about 150 messages in the mailq. Some are unwanted mails. I think they keep trying until 5 days old. I want decrease it to ONE DAY. These messages are not harmfull, and you should keep your setting to 5 days. You'll thank you when your domino server stops accepting messages for some reasons for 25 hours or more... it can happen... Ugo ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Re: Good evening to all
Silambarasan.R wrote: Hi.. Could u help me to re-install the centos 4 without affecting existing data...? is it possible? if so pl let me know... Regards Silambu.R Depends on your partition scheme. If you used only one big / partition, probably not, but if you used a separate /home partition, you could save this one. Why do you need to re-install? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Replacement for Linux-HA (heartbeat) - RedHat cluster?
On Nov 30, 2007 4:30 AM, Amos Shapira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, I'm beginning to give up on making Linux-HA's heartbeat work for my environment (CentOS x86_64) and am wondering what other option have I got to help me: 1. Use IPVS to maintain a cluster of virtual servers, either master/slave or load-balanced. 2. Use DRBD in master/slave fashion to keep a home-grown application highly-available. The first thing I stumbled upon is RedHat Cluster Suite ( http://www.linuxtopia.org/online_books/centos_linux_guides/centos_cluster_configuration_and_management/), from which I also saw some packages on my CentOS servers. I've never heard of it before and am just starting to dig its docs, but if someone here can confirm/deny that this is a possible route to take it might save me some time or doubts. Dump the cluste suite and use the LinuxVirtualServer.org packages. You won't have a gui, but it will be better in the long run. We're using that for quite a few clusters and handling about 30MBit/s on each of the clusters, I think it's around 10k concurrent connections. -- -matt ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] CleanLog.h
On Fri, 2007-11-30 at 07:40 -0500, Alfredo Perez wrote: On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 04:43:44PM -0600, B.J. McClure wrote: Sad to say one of my file servers was exploited and used to run a Phishing scam. Have identified subject virus amongst other things. It appears twice in a virus scan; /sbin/z (which I assume can just be deleted) and /sys/bus/serio/drivers/atkbd/description. The latter file is also present in identical uninfected machines. I have been unable to open the file, even with root privileges, although it appears to be a text file. Any suggestions on how to proceed appreciated. Guess I could delete it and copy over the file from an identical machine. Thanks in advance, B.J. CentOS 5.0, Linux 2.6.18-8.1.15.el5 x86_64 16:26:48 up 10:46, 1 user, load average: 0.07, 0.08, 0.04 Hi Can you tell me which virus scan you are using? Thanks avg75flr-r49-a1130.i386.rpm B.J. CentOS 5.0, Linux 2.6.18-8.1.15.el5 x86_64 07:26:34 up 1 day, 1:45, 1 user, load average: 0.30, 0.13, 0.09 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Replacement for Linux-HA (heartbeat) - RedHat cluster?
Amos Shapira wrote: Hello, I'm beginning to give up on making Linux-HA's heartbeat work for my environment (CentOS x86_64) and am wondering what other option have I got to help me: 1. Use IPVS to maintain a cluster of virtual servers, either master/slave or load-balanced. 2. Use DRBD in master/slave fashion to keep a home-grown application highly-available. The first thing I stumbled upon is RedHat Cluster Suite ( http://www.linuxtopia.org/online_books/centos_linux_guides/centos_cluster_configuration_and_management/), from which I also saw some packages on my CentOS servers. I've never heard of it before and am just starting to dig its docs, but if someone here can confirm/deny that this is a possible route to take it might save me some time or doubts. AFAIK, RHCS has at its core a spin of heartbeat. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
[CentOS] Load-Balancing Virtualized Guests
Hi everyone: According to Automated failover and recovery of virtualized guests in Advanced Platform, one can easily migrate virtualized guests around different hosts. However, is it currently possible for CentOS 5 with VirtualizationClustering Suite to migrate guests dynamically according to loads on different hosts? Thanks, -- Alvin Chang Yu-Ming ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] network interface activation order
On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 08:51:50AM -0800, John R Pierce enlightened us: Graham Johnston wrote: I am using CentOS as a firewall/router. I am using bonded interfaces, vlan interfaces, and bridge interfaces. My problem currently is that on boot the system is attempting to activate the bridge interface before it's bonded-vlan members have been created. What this means is that the bridge is created but not activated. Is there anyway for me to influence the activation order and have bridge interfaces dealt with last? there's probably a better way to do this, but what I've done in the past is to create special firewall related kinda stuff like your'e describing in my own script thats run quite late in the init sequence, usually from rc2.d/S99myfirewall or even from /etc/rc.d/rc.local Yes, there is probably a better way. My initial thought was to set ONBOOT=no for the bridge interfaces and then bring them up in an initscript or rc.local later. Looking at the network startup script (/etc/init.d/network), though, it looks like you can probably achieve the same effect simply by renaming the ifcfg-brX files to something like ifcfg-zbrX. There is a loop to bring up interfaces that looks like: # bring up all other interfaces configured to come up at boot time for i in $interfaces; do and $interfaces is set just above by listing all files starting with ifcfg and snagging the end part (e.g. eth0 or br0). The loop figures out what kind of configuration it needs by reading the file, so I don't think it cares what it is named, as long as it is ifcfg-something. By renaming bridges to ifcfg-zbrX, it will come after ifcfg-vlanX and I think solve your problem. That was work, time for lunch :-) Matt -- Matt Hyclak Department of Mathematics Department of Social Work Ohio University (740) 593-1263 ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: Release Cycles [was RE: [CentOS] special tricks for developersboxon centos 5]
Did you mean non-secular? Otherwise what sect is it? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org Sent: Fri Nov 30 14:22:04 2007 Subject: Re: Release Cycles [was RE: [CentOS] special tricks for developersboxon centos 5] On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 09:39:01AM -0800, Robert - elists alleged: Cheers everyone, and remember, Jesus is the reason for everything. Huh? Please keep the preaching out of a secular maillist. Thanks. __ This e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sender and permanently delete the original and any copy or printout thereof. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: Release Cycles [was RE: [CentOS] special tricks for developersboxon centos 5]
On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 14:51:45 -0500 Ross S. W. Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Did you mean non-secular? Otherwise what sect is it? Miriam-Webster dictionary: Main Entry: sec·u·lar Function: adjective 1 a: of or relating to the worldly or temporal secular concerns 1 b: not overtly or specifically religious secular music 1 c: not ecclesiastical or clerical secular courts secular landowners 2: not bound by monastic vows or rules; specifically : of, relating to, or forming clergy not belonging to a religious order or congregation a secular priest 3 a: occurring once in an age or a century 3 b: existing or continuing through ages or centuries 3 c: of or relating to a long term of indefinite duration secular inflation -- Thanks http://www.911networks.com When the network has to work ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
RE: Release Cycles [was RE: [CentOS] special tricks fordevelopersboxon centos 5]
Can we change the subject line to Off Topic Rant if this is going to be drawn out? Just trying to keep the inbox sorted. Yeah, I know it's a top post. Have a great weekend! James N. Smith, MBA, MCSE Information Systems Manager / Network Engineer L.E. Schwartz Son, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, November 30, 2007 3:02 PM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: Release Cycles [was RE: [CentOS] special tricks fordevelopersboxon centos 5] On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 14:51:45 -0500 Ross S. W. Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Did you mean non-secular? Otherwise what sect is it? Miriam-Webster dictionary: Main Entry: sec.u.lar Function: adjective 1 a: of or relating to the worldly or temporal secular concerns 1 b: not overtly or specifically religious secular music 1 c: not ecclesiastical or clerical secular courts secular landowners 2: not bound by monastic vows or rules; specifically : of, relating to, or forming clergy not belonging to a religious order or congregation a secular priest 3 a: occurring once in an age or a century 3 b: existing or continuing through ages or centuries 3 c: of or relating to a long term of indefinite duration secular inflation -- Thanks http://www.911networks.com When the network has to work ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Replacement for Linux-HA (heartbeat) - RedHat cluster?
On Nov 30, 2007 3:21 PM, Amos Shapira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 30/11/2007, Matt Shields [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dump the cluste suite and use the LinuxVirtualServer.org packages. You won't have a gui, but it will be better in the long run. We're using that for quite a few clusters and handling about 30MBit/s on each of the clusters, I think it's around 10k concurrent connections. I also need to fail-over DRBD (i.e. so if the primary goes down the secondary will notice this, mount that DRBD partition and start the server which uses the files on it) - will LVS give me that by itself or will I need something else on top of it to do that? I got the impression that this what Linux-HA's heartbeat adds to the plain LVS but it doesn't work for me. I'm really not concerned about GUI's - I'd rather edit config files manually if they are documented well enough. --Amos Yup. We use LVS for all types of failover senarios. We use it for redundant firewall/vpn servers which use heartbeat for failing over the virtual IPs and services. We also use LVS with ldirectord as redundant load balancers. Read the docs, they explain how to set up a service to be started/stopped on failover -- -matt ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Dell Wireless WLAN Card Utility - mini-pci wireless card 1390
On Mon, 2007-11-19 at 15:52 -0600, Barry Brimer wrote: Quoting Andrew Allen [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Sun, 2007-11-18 at 19:41 -0600, Barry Brimer wrote: I have a Dell laptop that I believe has the same card. The CentOS 5 kernel did not appear to support it, but the RHEL 5.1 (and subsequently upon its release) the CentOS 5.1 kernel does support it. You will need to drop the firmware into /lib/firmware .. I believe this is a bcm43xx card. Barry Thanks Barry, In view of what you say about CentOS 5.1 supporting this card, I think I'm going to wait until it's released - hope that won't be too long. Any other possible solutions (eg like using ndiswrapper) look far too complicated for a linux newbie like me! I hope that I'll be able to update the kernel without having to do a complete re-install. In the meantime I'm just going to have to use MS Windows XP (I have dual-boot on this laptop) for any wireless networking. I was using ndiswrapper for this card until RHEL 5.1's kernel picked it up. I noticed that it now found an 'eth1' interface that didn't exist before. ndiswrapper does work, but has somewhat occasional crashes most likely due to RHEL's 4k stack size that is not really compatible with ndiswrapper. I agree, you should wait until the CentOS 5.1 kernel comes out because assuming you and I have the same card, all you need is the firmware .. and it will work without further issue. Barry I've now upgraded the kernel to CentOS 2.6.18-8.1.15.e15, so assume my OS is now effectively CentOS 5.1. However, I'm afraid I'm still at a bit of a loss as to how it supports my Dell laptop wireless card (bcm43xx card?), as it's still not listed in the list of supported adapters in Network Config. Can anybody please suggest where I go from here? Thanks, Andy ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Replacement for Linux-HA (heartbeat) - RedHat cluster?
On Nov 30, 2007 3:57 PM, John R Pierce [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Matt Shields wrote: Dump the cluste suite and use the LinuxVirtualServer.org packages. isn't that heartbeat and stuff repackaged? With a GUI that actually makes it more difficult to manage. Learn to use the command line tools and config files, it's so much easier. -- -matt ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Dell Wireless WLAN Card Utility - mini-pci wireless card 1390
Quoting Andrew Allen [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Mon, 2007-11-19 at 15:52 -0600, Barry Brimer wrote: Quoting Andrew Allen [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Sun, 2007-11-18 at 19:41 -0600, Barry Brimer wrote: I have a Dell laptop that I believe has the same card. The CentOS 5 kernel did not appear to support it, but the RHEL 5.1 (and subsequently upon its release) the CentOS 5.1 kernel does support it. You will need to drop the firmware into /lib/firmware .. I believe this is a bcm43xx card. Barry Thanks Barry, In view of what you say about CentOS 5.1 supporting this card, I think I'm going to wait until it's released - hope that won't be too long. Any other possible solutions (eg like using ndiswrapper) look far too complicated for a linux newbie like me! I hope that I'll be able to update the kernel without having to do a complete re-install. In the meantime I'm just going to have to use MS Windows XP (I have dual-boot on this laptop) for any wireless networking. I was using ndiswrapper for this card until RHEL 5.1's kernel picked it up. I noticed that it now found an 'eth1' interface that didn't exist before. ndiswrapper does work, but has somewhat occasional crashes most likely due to RHEL's 4k stack size that is not really compatible with ndiswrapper. I agree, you should wait until the CentOS 5.1 kernel comes out because assuming you and I have the same card, all you need is the firmware .. and it will work without further issue. Barry I've now upgraded the kernel to CentOS 2.6.18-8.1.15.e15, so assume my OS is now effectively CentOS 5.1. However, I'm afraid I'm still at a bit of a loss as to how it supports my Dell laptop wireless card (bcm43xx card?), as it's still not listed in the list of supported adapters in Network Config. Can anybody please suggest where I go from here? Thanks, Andy You are still on the CentOS 5 kernel, not the CentOS 5.1 kernel. The base RHEL 5 kernel is kernel-2.6.18-53.el5 and the most recent is kernel-2.6.18-53.1.4.el5. I don't believe CentOS 5.1 is out yet, but I've not checked today. Barry ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos