[KCFusion] Version Control Evaluation
Has anybody out there ever done a formal evaluation of version control products for use with Coldfusion? If so would you care to share your results? Kory Bakken Nations Technical Services Prairie Village, KS [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ The KCFusion.org list and website is hosted by Humankind Systems, Inc. List Archives http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Questions, Comments or Glowing Praise.. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To Subscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [KCFusion] Version Control Evaluation
I use CVS and like it. Works well for distributed projects where team members aren't on a LAN. -glenn > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Behalf Of Kory Bakken > Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 9:57 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [KCFusion] Version Control Evaluation > > > Has anybody out there ever done a formal evaluation of version > control products for use with Coldfusion? If so would you care > to share your results? > > Kory Bakken > Nations Technical Services > Prairie Village, KS > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > __ > The KCFusion.org list and website is hosted by Humankind Systems, Inc. > List Archives http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Questions, Comments or Glowing Praise.. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > To Subscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > To Unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > __ The KCFusion.org list and website is hosted by Humankind Systems, Inc. List Archives http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Questions, Comments or Glowing Praise.. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To Subscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [KCFusion] Version Control Evaluation
Title: RE: [KCFusion] Version Control Evaluation I have also been very pleased with CVS. -Original Message- From: Glenn Crocker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 10:44 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [KCFusion] Version Control Evaluation I use CVS and like it. Works well for distributed projects where team members aren't on a LAN. -glenn > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On > Behalf Of Kory Bakken > Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 9:57 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [KCFusion] Version Control Evaluation > > > Has anybody out there ever done a formal evaluation of version > control products for use with Coldfusion? If so would you care > to share your results? > > Kory Bakken > Nations Technical Services > Prairie Village, KS > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > __ > The KCFusion.org list and website is hosted by Humankind Systems, Inc. > List Archives http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Questions, Comments or Glowing Praise.. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > To Subscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > To Unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > __ The KCFusion.org list and website is hosted by Humankind Systems, Inc. List Archives http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Questions, Comments or Glowing Praise.. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To Subscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [KCFusion] Version Control Evaluation
Title: RE: [KCFusion] Version Control Evaluation Does CVS integrate with CFStudio? Also CVS is version control but there does not seem to be the concept of check out where the file is locked by the current owner. - Original Message - From: Boles, Mark E To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 10:35 AM Subject: RE: [KCFusion] Version Control Evaluation I have also been very pleased with CVS. -Original Message- From: Glenn Crocker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 10:44 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [KCFusion] Version Control Evaluation I use CVS and like it. Works well for distributed projects where team members aren't on a LAN. -glenn > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On > Behalf Of Kory Bakken > Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 9:57 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [KCFusion] Version Control Evaluation > > > Has anybody out there ever done a formal evaluation of version > control products for use with Coldfusion? If so would you care > to share your results? > > Kory Bakken > Nations Technical Services > Prairie Village, KS > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > __ > The KCFusion.org list and website is hosted by Humankind Systems, Inc. > List Archives http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Questions, Comments or Glowing Praise.. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > To Subscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > To Unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > __ The KCFusion.org list and website is hosted by Humankind Systems, Inc. List Archives http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Questions, Comments or Glowing Praise.. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To Subscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [KCFusion] Version Control Evaluation
Title: RE: [KCFusion] Version Control Evaluation I am not sure what you mean by integrate with CFStudio. I am not sure if CFStudio has plugins to in effect have CSV a part of or extended feature for use in CFStudio. I do know there was such integration for other development tools. As for locked files... you could check out a file for read only when it was currently checked out. What I would typically do is check out for read only and then after the file was checked back in and I checked it out and lock it then I did a line comparison between the file I had checked out for read only and changed and the file I checked out for lock that had been checked back in. -MEB -Original Message-From: Bryan LaPlante [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 10:45 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [KCFusion] Version Control Evaluation Does CVS integrate with CFStudio? Also CVS is version control but there does not seem to be the concept of check out where the file is locked by the current owner. - Original Message - From: Boles, Mark E To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 10:35 AM Subject: RE: [KCFusion] Version Control Evaluation I have also been very pleased with CVS. -Original Message- From: Glenn Crocker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 10:44 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [KCFusion] Version Control Evaluation I use CVS and like it. Works well for distributed projects where team members aren't on a LAN. -glenn > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On > Behalf Of Kory Bakken > Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 9:57 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [KCFusion] Version Control Evaluation > > > Has anybody out there ever done a formal evaluation of version > control products for use with Coldfusion? If so would you care > to share your results? > > Kory Bakken > Nations Technical Services > Prairie Village, KS > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > __ > The KCFusion.org list and website is hosted by Humankind Systems, Inc. > List Archives http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Questions, Comments or Glowing Praise.. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > To Subscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > To Unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > __ The KCFusion.org list and website is hosted by Humankind Systems, Inc. List Archives http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Questions, Comments or Glowing Praise.. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To Subscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [KCFusion] Version Control Evaluation
Title: RE: [KCFusion] Version Control Evaluation It doesn't seamlessly integrate with CF Studio (or with DW MX, to my knowledge). It just manages the files externally using a separate check-in/check-out application. CVS doesn't use a file locking model. Instead, it does a very very good job of merging changes made in parallel. If folks check their changes in regularly, CVS does very well. (If people go for months without committing their changes, their checkin process will take a while and they may have to manually handle merge conflicts.) Visual SourceSafe may be a better option for what you want. -glenn -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Bryan LaPlanteSent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 10:45 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [KCFusion] Version Control Evaluation Does CVS integrate with CFStudio? Also CVS is version control but there does not seem to be the concept of check out where the file is locked by the current owner. - Original Message - From: Boles, Mark E To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 10:35 AM Subject: RE: [KCFusion] Version Control Evaluation I have also been very pleased with CVS. -Original Message- From: Glenn Crocker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 10:44 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [KCFusion] Version Control Evaluation I use CVS and like it. Works well for distributed projects where team members aren't on a LAN. -glenn > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On > Behalf Of Kory Bakken > Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 9:57 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [KCFusion] Version Control Evaluation > > > Has anybody out there ever done a formal evaluation of version > control products for use with Coldfusion? If so would you care > to share your results? > > Kory Bakken > Nations Technical Services > Prairie Village, KS > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > __ > The KCFusion.org list and website is hosted by Humankind Systems, Inc. > List Archives http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Questions, Comments or Glowing Praise.. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > To Subscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > To Unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > __ The KCFusion.org list and website is hosted by Humankind Systems, Inc. List Archives http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Questions, Comments or Glowing Praise.. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To Subscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [KCFusion] Version Control Evaluation
Title: RE: [KCFusion] Version Control Evaluation From what I understood from the CVS documentation, each developer would check out a version of their site before development began. I assume this would mean that each developer would have to have a web server, CF server, and access to each of his datasources on his client. Additionally, like Glenn stated, a developer could have a document checked out for long periods of time before checking it back in, causing problems with parallel development. I am correct in these assumptions? -Kory -Original Message-From: Glenn Crocker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 1:27 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [KCFusion] Version Control Evaluation It doesn't seamlessly integrate with CF Studio (or with DW MX, to my knowledge). It just manages the files externally using a separate check-in/check-out application. CVS doesn't use a file locking model. Instead, it does a very very good job of merging changes made in parallel. If folks check their changes in regularly, CVS does very well. (If people go for months without committing their changes, their checkin process will take a while and they may have to manually handle merge conflicts.) Visual SourceSafe may be a better option for what you want. -glenn -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Bryan LaPlanteSent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 10:45 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [KCFusion] Version Control Evaluation Does CVS integrate with CFStudio? Also CVS is version control but there does not seem to be the concept of check out where the file is locked by the current owner. - Original Message - From: Boles, Mark E To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 10:35 AM Subject: RE: [KCFusion] Version Control Evaluation I have also been very pleased with CVS. -Original Message- From: Glenn Crocker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 10:44 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [KCFusion] Version Control Evaluation I use CVS and like it. Works well for distributed projects where team members aren't on a LAN. -glenn > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On > Behalf Of Kory Bakken > Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 9:57 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [KCFusion] Version Control Evaluation > > > Has anybody out there ever done a formal evaluation of version > control products for use with Coldfusion? If so would you care > to share your results? > > Kory Bakken > Nations Technical Services > Prairie Village, KS > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > __ > The KCFusion.org list and website is hosted by Humankind Systems, Inc. > List Archives http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Questions, Comments or Glowing Praise.. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > To Subscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > To Unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > __ The KCFusion.org list and website is hosted by Humankind Systems, Inc. List Archives http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Questions, Comments or Glowing Praise.. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To Subscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [KCFusion] Version Control Evaluation
Title: RE: [KCFusion] Version Control Evaluation I always check in at least once a week, usually daily. For long-term development (like converting a site from access to sql server), CVS supports "branching" so I can check in without impacting the main trunk (until the "big merge" when the branch is ready to merge with the trunk). I usually have each developer set up with their own server and data instance, yeah. -glenn -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Kory BakkenSent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 1:30 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [KCFusion] Version Control Evaluation From what I understood from the CVS documentation, each developer would check out a version of their site before development began. I assume this would mean that each developer would have to have a web server, CF server, and access to each of his datasources on his client. Additionally, like Glenn stated, a developer could have a document checked out for long periods of time before checking it back in, causing problems with parallel development. I am correct in these assumptions? -Kory -Original Message-From: Glenn Crocker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 1:27 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [KCFusion] Version Control Evaluation It doesn't seamlessly integrate with CF Studio (or with DW MX, to my knowledge). It just manages the files externally using a separate check-in/check-out application. CVS doesn't use a file locking model. Instead, it does a very very good job of merging changes made in parallel. If folks check their changes in regularly, CVS does very well. (If people go for months without committing their changes, their checkin process will take a while and they may have to manually handle merge conflicts.) Visual SourceSafe may be a better option for what you want. -glenn -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Bryan LaPlanteSent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 10:45 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [KCFusion] Version Control Evaluation Does CVS integrate with CFStudio? Also CVS is version control but there does not seem to be the concept of check out where the file is locked by the current owner. - Original Message - From: Boles, Mark E To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 10:35 AM Subject: RE: [KCFusion] Version Control Evaluation I have also been very pleased with CVS. -Original Message- From: Glenn Crocker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 10:44 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [KCFusion] Version Control Evaluation I use CVS and like it. Works well for distributed projects where team members aren't on a LAN. -glenn > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On > Behalf Of Kory Bakken > Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 9:57 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [KCFusion] Version Control Evaluation > > > Has anybody out there ever done a formal evaluation of version > control products for use with Coldfusion? If so would you care > to share your results? > > Kory Bakken > Nations Technical Services > Prairie Village, KS > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > __ > The KCFusion.org list and website is hosted by Humankind Systems, Inc. > List Archives http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Questions, Comments or Glowing Praise.. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > To Subscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > To Unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > __ The KCFusion.org list and website is hosted by Humankind Systems, Inc. List Archives http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Questions, Comments or Glowing Praise.. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To Subscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [KCFusion] Version Control Evaluation
Title: RE: [KCFusion] Version Control Evaluation Dreamweaver MX has source control built in. Has anyone used that? Jason Nokes, Director of Internet DevelopmentDistributorCentral, LLCUPIC: DC888-516-7401http://www.distributorcentral.com[EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message-From: Glenn Crocker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 1:52 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [KCFusion] Version Control Evaluation I always check in at least once a week, usually daily. For long-term development (like converting a site from access to sql server), CVS supports "branching" so I can check in without impacting the main trunk (until the "big merge" when the branch is ready to merge with the trunk). I usually have each developer set up with their own server and data instance, yeah. -glenn -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Kory BakkenSent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 1:30 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [KCFusion] Version Control Evaluation From what I understood from the CVS documentation, each developer would check out a version of their site before development began. I assume this would mean that each developer would have to have a web server, CF server, and access to each of his datasources on his client. Additionally, like Glenn stated, a developer could have a document checked out for long periods of time before checking it back in, causing problems with parallel development. I am correct in these assumptions? -Kory -Original Message-From: Glenn Crocker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 1:27 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [KCFusion] Version Control Evaluation It doesn't seamlessly integrate with CF Studio (or with DW MX, to my knowledge). It just manages the files externally using a separate check-in/check-out application. CVS doesn't use a file locking model. Instead, it does a very very good job of merging changes made in parallel. If folks check their changes in regularly, CVS does very well. (If people go for months without committing their changes, their checkin process will take a while and they may have to manually handle merge conflicts.) Visual SourceSafe may be a better option for what you want. -glenn -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Bryan LaPlanteSent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 10:45 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [KCFusion] Version Control Evaluation Does CVS integrate with CFStudio? Also CVS is version control but there does not seem to be the concept of check out where the file is locked by the current owner. - Original Message - From: Boles, Mark E To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 10:35 AM Subject: RE: [KCFusion] Version Control Evaluation I have also been very pleased with CVS. -Original Message- From: Glenn Crocker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 10:44 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [KCFusion] Version Control Evaluation I use CVS and like it. Works well for distributed projects where team members aren't on a LAN. -glenn > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On > Behalf Of Kory Bakken > Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 9:57 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [KCFusion] Version Control Evaluation > > > Has anybody out there ever done a formal evaluation of version > control products for use with Coldfusion? If so would you care > to share your results? > > Kory Bakken > Nations Technical Services > Prairie Village, KS > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > __ > The KCFusion.org list and website is hosted by Humankind Systems, Inc. > List Archives http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Questions, Comments or Glowing Praise.. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > To Subscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > To Unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > __ The KCFusion.org list and website is hosted by Humankind Systems, Inc. List Archives http://www
[KCFusion] OT: CSS problem with A HREF
I've encountered an odd CSS bug that doesn't show up in online CSS bug references. In the attached file, when I view with IE6, the right hand link is fine. But the left hand link doesn't look normal (inside a colored box) until I mouse over. I can correct this if I change the value of HREF to be something other than a link to a Web site. Very strange. Any tips? Keith Purtell, Web/Network Administrator VantageMed Operations (Kansas City) Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message. Title: temp Public site Local file
RE: [KCFusion] OT: CSS problem with A HREF
I'd say that's an IE6 bug only, IE5.5 works fine as well as Opera 6 and 7. I also tested it on Navigator 6 and it worked great. My advise for everyone would be to stay away from IE6 as long as you can. Like Windows Media Player 9, you either can not back up, or its a pain in the ass to do so. IE6 is yet another example of Microsoft taking java and changing it into c# (sharp? who's in charge of naming this?). __ The KCFusion.org list and website is hosted by Humankind Systems, Inc. List Archives http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Questions, Comments or Glowing Praise.. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To Subscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [KCFusion] OT: CSS problem with A HREF
you did link and hover but you forgot visited A.row6:VISITED - Original Message - From: Keith Purtell To: KCFusion (E-mail) Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 4:23 PM Subject: [KCFusion] OT: CSS problem with A HREF I've encountered an odd CSS bug that doesn't show up in online CSS bug references. In the attachedfile, when I view with IE6, the right hand link is fine. But the left hand link doesn't look normal(inside a colored box) until I mouse over. I can correct this if I change the value of HREF to besomething other than a link to a Web site. Very strange. Any tips?Keith Purtell, Web/Network AdministratorVantageMed Operations (Kansas City)Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of theintended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorizedreview, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, pleasecontact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
RE: [KCFusion] OT: CSS problem with A HREF
In my "real" version it includes visited. I just wanted to trim the sample for your viewing. Chad, thanks for checking it in other browsers. I very much appreciate that. I will create a workaround, since I have many users on IE6. Possibly use JavaScript to redirect. Thanks again! Keith Purtell, Web/Network Administrator VantageMed Operations (Kansas City) Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Behalf Of Bryan LaPlante > Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 4:36 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [KCFusion] OT: CSS problem with A HREF > > > you did link and hover but you forgot visited > > A.row6:VISITED > - Original Message - > From: Keith Purtell > To: KCFusion (E-mail) > Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 4:23 PM > Subject: [KCFusion] OT: CSS problem with A HREF > > > I've encountered an odd CSS bug that doesn't show up in > online CSS bug references. In the attached > file, when I view with IE6, the right hand link is fine. > But the left hand link doesn't look normal > (inside a colored box) until I mouse over. I can correct > this if I change the value of HREF to be > something other than a link to a Web site. Very strange. Any tips? > > Keith Purtell, Web/Network Administrator > VantageMed Operations (Kansas City) > Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message, including any > attachments, is for the sole use of the > intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and > privileged information. Any unauthorized > review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If > you are not the intended recipient, please > contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of > the original message. > > --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] __ The KCFusion.org list and website is hosted by Humankind Systems, Inc. List Archives http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Questions, Comments or Glowing Praise.. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To Subscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [KCFusion] OT: CSS problem with A HREF
In my version of IE6 they look fine. Both are words on a gray background that turns to dark red when hovering. What should they be doing? Luke Templin Computer Access -Original Message- From: Keith Purtell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 4:44 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [KCFusion] OT: CSS problem with A HREF In my "real" version it includes visited. I just wanted to trim the sample for your viewing. Chad, thanks for checking it in other browsers. I very much appreciate that. I will create a workaround, since I have many users on IE6. Possibly use JavaScript to redirect. Thanks again! Keith Purtell, Web/Network Administrator VantageMed Operations (Kansas City) Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Behalf Of Bryan LaPlante > Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 4:36 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [KCFusion] OT: CSS problem with A HREF > > > you did link and hover but you forgot visited > > A.row6:VISITED > - Original Message - > From: Keith Purtell > To: KCFusion (E-mail) > Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 4:23 PM > Subject: [KCFusion] OT: CSS problem with A HREF > > > I've encountered an odd CSS bug that doesn't show up in > online CSS bug references. In the attached > file, when I view with IE6, the right hand link is fine. > But the left hand link doesn't look normal > (inside a colored box) until I mouse over. I can correct > this if I change the value of HREF to be > something other than a link to a Web site. Very strange. Any tips? > > Keith Purtell, Web/Network Administrator > VantageMed Operations (Kansas City) > Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message, including any > attachments, is for the sole use of the > intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and > privileged information. Any unauthorized > review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If > you are not the intended recipient, please > contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of > the original message. > > --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] __ The KCFusion.org list and website is hosted by Humankind Systems, Inc. List Archives http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Questions, Comments or Glowing Praise.. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To Subscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ The KCFusion.org list and website is hosted by Humankind Systems, Inc. List Archives http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Questions, Comments or Glowing Praise.. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To Subscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [KCFusion] OT: CSS problem with A HREF
In my version of IE6 (6.0.2800.1106), the one on the left starts out as a plain hyperlink (wrong) and only changes to white text inside a colored box during mouse over. Keith Purtell, Web/Network Administrator VantageMed Operations (Kansas City) Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Behalf Of Luke Templin > Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 4:52 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [KCFusion] OT: CSS problem with A HREF > > > In my version of IE6 they look fine. Both are words on a gray > background that turns to dark red when hovering. What should > they be doing? > > Luke Templin > Computer Access > > -Original Message- > From: Keith Purtell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 4:44 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [KCFusion] OT: CSS problem with A HREF > > > In my "real" version it includes visited. I just wanted to > trim the sample for your viewing. Chad, > thanks for checking it in other browsers. I very much > appreciate that. I will create a workaround, > since I have many users on IE6. Possibly use JavaScript to > redirect. Thanks again! > > Keith Purtell, Web/Network Administrator > VantageMed Operations (Kansas City) > Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message, including any > attachments, is for the sole use of the > intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and > privileged information. Any unauthorized > review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you > are not the intended recipient, please > contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of > the original message. > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Behalf Of Bryan LaPlante > > Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 4:36 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: [KCFusion] OT: CSS problem with A HREF > > > > > > you did link and hover but you forgot visited > > > > A.row6:VISITED > > - Original Message - > > From: Keith Purtell > > To: KCFusion (E-mail) > > Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 4:23 PM > > Subject: [KCFusion] OT: CSS problem with A HREF > > > > > > I've encountered an odd CSS bug that doesn't show up in > > online CSS bug references. In the attached > > file, when I view with IE6, the right hand link is fine. > > But the left hand link doesn't look normal > > (inside a colored box) until I mouse over. I can correct > > this if I change the value of HREF to be > > something other than a link to a Web site. Very strange. Any tips? > > > > Keith Purtell, Web/Network Administrator > > VantageMed Operations (Kansas City) > > Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message, including any > > attachments, is for the sole use of the > > intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and > > privileged information. Any unauthorized > > review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If > > you are not the intended recipient, please > > contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of > > the original message. > > <>
RE: [KCFusion] OT: CSS problem with A HREF
that is the same version I have, and they both looked and acted the same -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Keith Purtell Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 5:04 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [KCFusion] OT: CSS problem with A HREF In my version of IE6 (6.0.2800.1106), the one on the left starts out as a plain hyperlink (wrong) and only changes to white text inside a colored box during mouse over. Keith Purtell, Web/Network Administrator VantageMed Operations (Kansas City) Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Behalf Of Luke Templin > Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 4:52 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [KCFusion] OT: CSS problem with A HREF > > > In my version of IE6 they look fine. Both are words on a gray > background that turns to dark red when hovering. What should > they be doing? > > Luke Templin > Computer Access > > -Original Message- > From: Keith Purtell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 4:44 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [KCFusion] OT: CSS problem with A HREF > > > In my "real" version it includes visited. I just wanted to > trim the sample for your viewing. Chad, > thanks for checking it in other browsers. I very much > appreciate that. I will create a workaround, > since I have many users on IE6. Possibly use JavaScript to > redirect. Thanks again! > > Keith Purtell, Web/Network Administrator > VantageMed Operations (Kansas City) > Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message, including any > attachments, is for the sole use of the > intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and > privileged information. Any unauthorized > review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you > are not the intended recipient, please > contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of > the original message. > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Behalf Of Bryan LaPlante > > Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 4:36 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: [KCFusion] OT: CSS problem with A HREF > > > > > > you did link and hover but you forgot visited > > > > A.row6:VISITED > > - Original Message - > > From: Keith Purtell > > To: KCFusion (E-mail) > > Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 4:23 PM > > Subject: [KCFusion] OT: CSS problem with A HREF > > > > > > I've encountered an odd CSS bug that doesn't show up in > > online CSS bug references. In the attached > > file, when I view with IE6, the right hand link is fine. > > But the left hand link doesn't look normal > > (inside a colored box) until I mouse over. I can correct > > this if I change the value of HREF to be > > something other than a link to a Web site. Very strange. Any tips? > > > > Keith Purtell, Web/Network Administrator > > VantageMed Operations (Kansas City) > > Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message, including any > > attachments, is for the sole use of the > > intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and > > privileged information. Any unauthorized > > review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If > > you are not the intended recipient, please > > contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of > > the original message. > > __ The KCFusion.org list and website is hosted by Humankind Systems, Inc. List Archives http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Questions, Comments or Glowing Praise.. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To Subscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [KCFusion] OT: CSS problem with A HREF
What version of Windows are you on? I'm using W2000. Keith Purtell, Web/Network Administrator VantageMed Operations (Kansas City) Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Behalf Of Matt Jones > Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 5:07 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [KCFusion] OT: CSS problem with A HREF > > > that is the same version I have, and they both looked and > acted the same > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Behalf Of Keith Purtell > Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 5:04 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [KCFusion] OT: CSS problem with A HREF > > > In my version of IE6 (6.0.2800.1106), the one on the left > starts out as a plain hyperlink (wrong) and only changes to > white text inside a colored box during mouse over. > > Keith Purtell, Web/Network Administrator > VantageMed Operations (Kansas City) > Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message, including any > attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) > and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any > unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is > prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please > contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of > the original message. > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Behalf Of Luke Templin > > Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 4:52 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: RE: [KCFusion] OT: CSS problem with A HREF > > > > > > In my version of IE6 they look fine. Both are words on a gray > > background that turns to dark red when hovering. What should > > they be doing? > > > > Luke Templin > > Computer Access > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Keith Purtell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 4:44 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: RE: [KCFusion] OT: CSS problem with A HREF > > > > > > In my "real" version it includes visited. I just wanted to > > trim the sample for your viewing. Chad, > > thanks for checking it in other browsers. I very much > > appreciate that. I will create a workaround, > > since I have many users on IE6. Possibly use JavaScript to > > redirect. Thanks again! > > > > Keith Purtell, Web/Network Administrator > > VantageMed Operations (Kansas City) > > Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message, including any > > attachments, is for the sole use of the > > intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and > > privileged information. Any unauthorized > > review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you > > are not the intended recipient, please > > contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of > > the original message. > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Behalf Of Bryan LaPlante > > > Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 4:36 PM > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: Re: [KCFusion] OT: CSS problem with A HREF > > > > > > > > > you did link and hover but you forgot visited > > > > > > A.row6:VISITED > > > - Original Message - > > > From: Keith Purtell > > > To: KCFusion (E-mail) > > > Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 4:23 PM > > > Subject: [KCFusion] OT: CSS problem with A HREF > > > > > > > > > I've encountered an odd CSS bug that doesn't show up in > > > online CSS bug references. In the attached > > > file, when I view with IE6, the right hand link is fine. > > > But the left hand link doesn't look normal > > > (inside a colored box) until I mouse over. I can correct > > > this if I change the value of HREF to be > > > something other than a link to a Web site. Very > strange. Any tips? > > > > > > Keith Purtell, Web/Network Administrator > > > VantageMed Operations (Kansas City) > > > Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message, including any > > > attachments, is for the sole use of the > > > intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and > > > privileged information. Any unauthorized > > > review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If > > > you are not the intended recipient, please > > > contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of > > > the original message. > > > > <>
Re: [KCFusion] OT: CSS problem with A HREF
I have IE 6.0.26 and they both worked fine for me except for the visited thing which you mentioned you purposely left out of the example. Bryan - Original Message - From: "Matt Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 5:07 PM Subject: RE: [KCFusion] OT: CSS problem with A HREF that is the same version I have, and they both looked and acted the same -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Keith Purtell Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 5:04 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [KCFusion] OT: CSS problem with A HREF In my version of IE6 (6.0.2800.1106), the one on the left starts out as a plain hyperlink (wrong) and only changes to white text inside a colored box during mouse over. Keith Purtell, Web/Network Administrator VantageMed Operations (Kansas City) Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Behalf Of Luke Templin > Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 4:52 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [KCFusion] OT: CSS problem with A HREF > > > In my version of IE6 they look fine. Both are words on a gray > background that turns to dark red when hovering. What should > they be doing? > > Luke Templin > Computer Access > > -Original Message- > From: Keith Purtell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 4:44 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [KCFusion] OT: CSS problem with A HREF > > > In my "real" version it includes visited. I just wanted to > trim the sample for your viewing. Chad, > thanks for checking it in other browsers. I very much > appreciate that. I will create a workaround, > since I have many users on IE6. Possibly use JavaScript to > redirect. Thanks again! > > Keith Purtell, Web/Network Administrator > VantageMed Operations (Kansas City) > Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message, including any > attachments, is for the sole use of the > intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and > privileged information. Any unauthorized > review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you > are not the intended recipient, please > contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of > the original message. > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Behalf Of Bryan LaPlante > > Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 4:36 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: [KCFusion] OT: CSS problem with A HREF > > > > > > you did link and hover but you forgot visited > > > > A.row6:VISITED > > - Original Message - > > From: Keith Purtell > > To: KCFusion (E-mail) > > Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 4:23 PM > > Subject: [KCFusion] OT: CSS problem with A HREF > > > > > > I've encountered an odd CSS bug that doesn't show up in > > online CSS bug references. In the attached > > file, when I view with IE6, the right hand link is fine. > > But the left hand link doesn't look normal > > (inside a colored box) until I mouse over. I can correct > > this if I change the value of HREF to be > > something other than a link to a Web site. Very strange. Any tips? > > > > Keith Purtell, Web/Network Administrator > > VantageMed Operations (Kansas City) > > Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message, including any > > attachments, is for the sole use of the > > intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and > > privileged information. Any unauthorized > > review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If > > you are not the intended recipient, please > > contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of > > the original message. > > __ The KCFusion.org list and website is hosted by Humankind Systems, Inc. List Archives http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Questions, Comments or Glowing Praise.. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To Subscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] __ The KCFusion.org list and website is hosted by Humankind Systems, Inc. List Archives http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Questions, Comments or Glowing Praise.. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To Subscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: [KCFusion] OT: CSS problem with A HREF
2000 also -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Keith Purtell Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 5:15 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [KCFusion] OT: CSS problem with A HREF What version of Windows are you on? I'm using W2000. Keith Purtell, Web/Network Administrator VantageMed Operations (Kansas City) Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Behalf Of Matt Jones > Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 5:07 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [KCFusion] OT: CSS problem with A HREF > > > that is the same version I have, and they both looked and > acted the same > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Behalf Of Keith Purtell > Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 5:04 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [KCFusion] OT: CSS problem with A HREF > > > In my version of IE6 (6.0.2800.1106), the one on the left > starts out as a plain hyperlink (wrong) and only changes to > white text inside a colored box during mouse over. > > Keith Purtell, Web/Network Administrator > VantageMed Operations (Kansas City) > Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message, including any > attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) > and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any > unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is > prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please > contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of > the original message. > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Behalf Of Luke Templin > > Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 4:52 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: RE: [KCFusion] OT: CSS problem with A HREF > > > > > > In my version of IE6 they look fine. Both are words on a gray > > background that turns to dark red when hovering. What should > > they be doing? > > > > Luke Templin > > Computer Access > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Keith Purtell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 4:44 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: RE: [KCFusion] OT: CSS problem with A HREF > > > > > > In my "real" version it includes visited. I just wanted to > > trim the sample for your viewing. Chad, > > thanks for checking it in other browsers. I very much > > appreciate that. I will create a workaround, > > since I have many users on IE6. Possibly use JavaScript to > > redirect. Thanks again! > > > > Keith Purtell, Web/Network Administrator > > VantageMed Operations (Kansas City) > > Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message, including any > > attachments, is for the sole use of the > > intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and > > privileged information. Any unauthorized > > review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you > > are not the intended recipient, please > > contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of > > the original message. > > > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Behalf Of Bryan LaPlante > > > Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 4:36 PM > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: Re: [KCFusion] OT: CSS problem with A HREF > > > > > > > > > you did link and hover but you forgot visited > > > > > > A.row6:VISITED > > > - Original Message - > > > From: Keith Purtell > > > To: KCFusion (E-mail) > > > Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 4:23 PM > > > Subject: [KCFusion] OT: CSS problem with A HREF > > > > > > > > > I've encountered an odd CSS bug that doesn't show up in > > > online CSS bug references. In the attached > > > file, when I view with IE6, the right hand link is fine. > > > But the left hand link doesn't look normal > > > (inside a colored box) until I mouse over. I can correct > > > this if I change the value of HREF to be > > > something other than a link to a Web site. Very > strange. Any tips? > > > > > > Keith Purtell, Web/Network Administrator > > > VantageMed Operations (Kansas City) > > > Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message, including any > > > attachments, is for the sole use of the > > > intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and > > > privileged information. Any unauthorized > > > review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If > > > you are not the intended recipient, please > > > contact the sen
[KCFusion] OT: attention jim
Jim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you may have to remove KCFusion from you spam list, I don't want to have to register just to send email to you. Bryan LaPlante __ The KCFusion.org list and website is hosted by Humankind Systems, Inc. List Archives http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Questions, Comments or Glowing Praise.. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To Subscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
