RE: ENOUGH was RE: LONG time CF Supporter)

2002-10-09 Thread Vernon Viehe

Hey CF-Talk'ers,

It seemed most appropriate post this as a reply to the message below from Michael 
regading this thread. I really appreciate Michael's efforts hosting this venue for 
CFers to share technical help, information, perspectives and concerns with each other, 
as well as Macromedia personnel like me. Hosting this list is a mostly thankless job, 
and Michael does an awesome job. Thanks Michael!

(This response may be a little longer than normal, you may want to grab a cup of 
coffee. =)

As my job is two-fold, I want to let you know what I've heard as the bigger issues for 
the CF community raised in these recent threads, and convey any info on those issues I 
have for you now:

1. Some developers are not happy that they are required to provide a credit card 
number when contacting support. Nothing to report to you all yet, as this will be the 
first time I've raised this issue internally.

2. Developers would like more insight into the bug submission and handling process, as 
well as a way to readily find info about known issues.

This has come up on several occasions before. We're very interested in addressing this 
need, and we're currently investigating what we might be able to provide, largely due 
to your feedback. If/when I have some firm info, I'll announce it here (if someone 
doesn't scoop me!)

3. There is a desire for more information on best practices documentation / input from 
Macromedia. 

This is already being investigated internally, again because of your feedback, but I 
don't yet have any ETA. It may be more challenging than it seems - I've personally 
seen it discussed on several CF lists, and the only thing that folks seem to agree 
upon is that they disagree about what best practices should be. But most agree each 
shop should establish standards that all in the shop should follow. Internally, we 
are working to narrow down how we can best address the CF community's request for 
officially sanctioned best practices, especially with any sorts of universally 
applicable best practices.

Meanwhile, we're all relying upon the books written by the CF gurus for guidance in 
this area, even many of us within Macromedia.

There are additional sentiments expressed by some that I'll relate internally, 
including (but not limited to): 

* Macromedia is bigger and seems more impersonal than Allaire was.
* Macromedia doesn't seem to be prioritizing ColdFusion as highly as expected.
* Macromedia is sometimes inconsistent in it's communications. 

But that's not all! I'll also communicate internally the various CFMX-specific issues 
expressed by Lee and others (actually, I've already begun doing that). But, I'll also 
urge anyone having critical CFMX issues to utilize our Technical Support, especially 
if you can't resolve your issue with the help of the lists and the Macromedia forums. 
Tech Support will either be able to help you, or let you know it's a known but 
not-publicly documented issue, or they will gather the specific info the engineers 
need regarding previously unknown/unconfirmed issues which prevent a resolution of 
your issue.

All reports I've received are that Tech Support has been very fair about whether to 
charge for an incident or not. BTW, I understand that the standard on this is whether 
the bug/issue is undocumented - not just if it's a bug, so read the docs thoroughly if 
you're concerned about this. And, I'll repeat my promise - contact me directly off 
list if you don't think support handled your incident fairly and professionally, and 
I'll investigate your incident. I've got the full backing of Macromedia management in 
that promise, but I've not yet had anyone take me up on it. 

As I wrap this up, I want to acknowledge that many issues have been raised, and there 
are many facets to each issue. If I didn't address a particular concern, let's 
continue to talk about it. We'll continue to discuss on this list (and other venues) 
those issues which are important to the CF community. If your concern or issue is 
regarding your individual situation, please feel free to contact me off list. 

Thanks,

Vernon Viehe
Servers Community Manager
Macromedia, Inc.

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(remove NO-SPAM)

P.S. If anyone feels the needs to flame me, can you wait till later in the day? I live 
on the west coast, and I miss out on the real-time action if everyone on the east 
coast goes at it first thing in the AM. Good Morning! =)



 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 2:48 PM
 To: CF-Talk
 Subject: Re: ENOUGH ALREADY PLEASE RE: LONG time CF Supporter - About
 read y to dump CF!
 
 
 I let the thread continue because I felt that it did much 
 more good than
 harm to the list.
 On one side we heard what the community thought of certain MM related
 issues. As MM is listening to this list (with a number of ears), the
 concerns are being heard. Because there were so many voices 
 speaking the
 concerns 

RE: LONG time CF Supporter - About ready to dump CF!

2002-10-09 Thread Thomas Chiverton

 Hitler 

:deletes rest of unread messages in thread :-)

Tom Chiverton
You don't have to be a mad scientist to believe in ColdFusion

 


~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=listsbody=lists/cf_talk
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more 
resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm



RE: ENOUGH was RE: LONG time CF Supporter)

2002-10-09 Thread Michael Kear

Vernon thanks for your report - it's encouraging to know that the issues
we've tossed about here are going to find their way onto the agenda at
project meetings at Macromedia.

I think it would be really good if there was a way for MM to tell us what
you're working on.  It's a lot easier to deal with ongoing issues if you
know there's a solution on the way.  Yes, Mr Client, that's a problem, but
Macromedia are working on it and there should be a fix for it soon.  In the
mean time lets see if we can work out a  way around it as a temporary
measure.

At least you know where you stand then.   Or if you know that MM haven't got
the problem on the list of issues being worked on, you also know that you
aren't going to get a fix any time soon, so you'd best either start working
on 'encouraging' MM or finding an alternative way to do what you want done.

I know that no company wants to offer it's competitors a convenient weapon
to use  (ColdFusion!  Man you should see the list of bugs they have!!  Use
this instead!)   so I realise you can't easily make a public list of issues
you're working on, but surely others have solved this same problem.


I know I can be FAR more patient when I know someone's working on the
problem.


Cheers,
Mike Kear
Windsor, NSW, Australia
AFP WebWorks


-Original Message-
From: Vernon Viehe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, 9 October 2002 6:12 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: ENOUGH was RE: LONG time CF Supporter)

Hey CF-Talk'ers,

It seemed most appropriate post this as a reply to the message below from
Michael regading this thread. I really appreciate Michael's efforts hosting
this venue for CFers to share technical help, information, perspectives and
concerns with each other, as well as Macromedia personnel like me. Hosting
this list is a mostly thankless job, and Michael does an awesome job. Thanks
Michael!

[snip]

~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=listsbody=lists/cf_talk
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at 
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm



Capturing IP Addresses

2002-10-09 Thread Russ

Maybe I'm searching incorrectly, but it seems to be that it should be
relatively easy to capture a user's IP address, for example, when they
are submitting a form.

Can anyone push me in the right direction?

Thanks,

Russ

~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=listsbody=lists/cf_talk
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in 
ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm



Re: Capturing IP Addresses

2002-10-09 Thread Bob Haroche

 relatively easy to capture a user's IP address


#cgi.remote_addr#


Regards,
Bob Haroche
O n P o i n t  S o l u t i o n s
www.OnPointSolutions.com

~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=listsbody=lists/cf_talk
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in 
ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm



Re: Capturing IP Addresses

2002-10-09 Thread cf-talk

The variable you're looking for is #CGI.REMOTE_ADDR#.  You can also see a
bunch of other useful variables (like browser type, etc) by doing a dump of
the CGI scope like this:

cfdump var=#CGI#

-Novak


- Original Message -
From: Russ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 2:08 AM
Subject: Capturing IP Addresses


 Maybe I'm searching incorrectly, but it seems to be that it should be
 relatively easy to capture a user's IP address, for example, when they
 are submitting a form.

 Can anyone push me in the right direction?

 Thanks,

 Russ

 
~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=listsbody=lists/cf_talk
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com



RE: LONG time CF Supporter - About ready to dump CF!

2002-10-09 Thread Dave Wilson

Dave Watts wrote:
However, I'd recommend that you avoid using trusted connections for
database
authentication against SQL Server anyway, for various reasons.

Just Catching up on the thread here. I was told by a somewhat accomplished
[1] CF developer a few years ago that it was better to use trusted
connections because SQL 7 stores it's SQL authentication account details in
an unencrypted form in the system registry, which makes it more vulnerable
to hacking.

Perhaps you could enlighten me with the true situation involving trusted
connections, SQL authentication and their pros and cons?

Thanks,
Dave

[1] A contributing author of the O'Reilly Coldfusion book.

~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=listsbody=lists/cf_talk
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more 
resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm



RE: Problems with CFMX?

2002-10-09 Thread Dave Wilson

Mark,

Not sure if anyone has responded to you yet as I'm just catching up on the
list at the moment. However, I would urge you to go ahead and download a
trial and run your own tests with CFMX. The problems mentioned in the CF
support and unstable threads are not being experienced by everyone, and I do
believe that once CFMX installs correctly and actually gets running, it is a
great product. I did manage to have my install running for a few days before
problems began and I was extremely pleased with it...marked increase in
perfomrance, plus all the new functionality available to me (I moved from
4.52 to cfmx).

HTH,
Dave

-Original Message-
From: Mark W. Breneman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 08 October 2002 17:32
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Problems with CFMX?


I have been watching threads like LONG time CF Supporter - About ready to
dump CF and CFMX - I've never seen anything so unstable in my life over
the past few weeks.  What has me concerned is this next few weeks I am going
to upgrade a fairly large site to CFMX.  The site currently runs CF 5 and MS
SQL 2000.  Are there a large number of problems with CFMX that I should know
about?  Luckily I have a few weeks to play with the new servers before they
go live.

Any ETA on a CFMX .1 update?  (is one needed)

Thanks

Mark W. Breneman
-Macromedia Certified ColdFusion Developer
-Network / Web Server Administrator
  Vivid Media
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  www.vividmedia.com
  608.270.9770


~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=listsbody=lists/cf_talk
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com



Re: LONG time CF Supporter - About ready to dump CF!

2002-10-09 Thread Jochem van Dieten

Dave Wilson wrote:
 
 Just Catching up on the thread here. I was told by a somewhat accomplished
 [1] CF developer a few years ago that it was better to use trusted
 connections because SQL 7 stores it's SQL authentication account details in
 an unencrypted form in the system registry, which makes it more vulnerable
 to hacking.

If somebody has unauthorized access to the registry your system is 
beyond salvage anyway.

BTW, are you sure it is not about CF storing the password in unencrypted 
form in the registry? Because that is what previous versions used to do.

Jochem

~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=listsbody=lists/cf_talk
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more 
resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm



RE: JDBC socket reset (was CF supporter something or other....)

2002-10-09 Thread Trusz, Andrew

Yes, we have a project running cfmx on Solaris with Oracle (on a separate
machine) which gets a JDBC connection pooling error on an intermittent
basis. Restarting cfmx clears it for a few days.

The error reads: SQLException occurred in JDBCPool while attempting to
connect, please check your username, password, URL, and other connectivity
info. The setup uses Oracle OCI8 jdbc drivers.

andy

-Original Message-
From: Jochem van Dieten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 6:23 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: JDBC socket reset (was CF supporter something or other)


Mark A. Kruger - CFG wrote:
 Dave,
 
 Yes - that's the fix we are using. But all the hype over Type 4 drivers
 makes us want to use them instead of JDBC.

Some people doing i18n will not call the MS SQL Server Type 4 JDBC 
drivers a hype.

BTW, is there *anyone* that has JDBC problems where it is not with MS 
SQL Server? I sure get the impression that the problems are created by 
MS instead of MM.

Jochem

-- 
Why blame somebody else when you can blame MS?


~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=listsbody=lists/cf_talk
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for 
dependable ColdFusion Hosting.



RE: LONG time CF Supporter - About ready to dump CF!

2002-10-09 Thread Dave Wilson

I'm only testing a CFMX trial to determine wheter or not to purchase CFMX.
It's a question of staying with 4.5 and purchasing popchart ($1500) or
upgrading to CFMX reducing the need for popchart licensing ($800). We'll end
up purchasing CFMX eventually anyway so I was kinda hoping now that CFMX has
been on the market a while and there's even a patch available for it, that
it might be ready for our company to use.

As for code compatibility - I had our trial running perfectly for the first
couple days and there were practically no code problems, except for a COM
issue, which I took the necessary (as reccommended by MM) measures in
correcting, which in turn appears to have caused my server to die.

Dave

-Original Message-
From: Neil H. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 08 October 2002 19:19
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: LONG time CF Supporter - About ready to dump CF!


I don't know how could anyone possible upgrade to CFMX from CF 5.  If you
ran one site and thoroughly tested it maybe, but in a larger environment its
pure suicide.  There are pages and pages of differences between CF 5 and
CFMX and things just aren't backwards compatible.

Neil

- Original Message -
From: Lee Fuller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 1:30 PM
Subject: RE: LONG time CF Supporter - About ready to dump CF!


 OH yeah.. I completely agree.

 And (using hind-sight, which of course is ALWAYS 20/20) it would have
 been better to keep CFMX on the newer boxes only, and not upgrade any
 others.  Moving customers who wish to use the new functionality (with
 full disclosure and disclaimers) as they will.

 Oh well.. sigh...


 | -Original Message-
 | From: Rob Rohan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 | Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 10:08 AM
 | To: CF-Talk
 | Subject: RE: LONG time CF Supporter - About ready to dump CF!
 |
 |
 | Hi Lee,
 | Your point is well taken, I was a bit bummed that some
 | of our existing code didn't work too. I have to differ with
 | you a bit though.
 |
 | Internet languages (html, javascript, etc) are awful
 | sloppy. It makes them hard to read/debug. Coming from a
 | C/Java stand point they are too forgiving. If you look at the
 | trend of the internet (xhtml, xml, etc), you'll notice that
 | code tightening is where we are going.
 |
 | Code often runs better when it is uniform, predictable,
 | and structured.
 |
 | It's a bit painful, but I think it will help cf run
 | faster, among other things.
 |
 |
 | -Original Message-
 | From: Lee Fuller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 | Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 9:54 AM
 | To: CF-Talk
 | Subject: RE: LONG time CF Supporter - About ready to dump CF!
 |
 |
 | Hey Stace!
 |
 | I understand.  And with this, it's most likely the same type of issue.
 |
 | One of the things, however, that sticks in my craw (as it
 | were) was that during the months leading up to CFMX's
 | release, we were told OVER and OVER again that existing code
 | would work well in CFMX, with little, if any, changes.  I
 | heard that bell ring in the tower more than 20 times, that I
 | can count on one hand. grin
 |
 | Yet here we are with locking causes this, change code to
 | do this or that, fix up the code.  Uhm... ?  So am I to
 | believe that the chant
 | was false?   Telling my clients to go back and fix their
 | code is like
 | saying..
 |
 | Uhm.. Sorry you can't park that car here, it's BLUE!
 | But you told me to paint it blue!?!?
 | I know, but now we're back to only RED cars.  Sorry..
 | Go paint it BLUE!
 |
 | It's more than just an inconvenience, to say the least.  If
 | I switch back to 5, all the touting I did about CFMX's
 | behavior and power was for naught.  And even worse, many of
 | the CF clients may just opt for ASP, PHP, etc., just cuz they
 | don't believe me telling them Well.. But don't worry, it'll
 | be fixed.  Really!
 |
 |
 | | -Original Message-
 | | From: Stacy Young [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 | | Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 9:33 AM
 | | To: CF-Talk
 | | Subject: RE: LONG time CF Supporter - About ready to dump CF!
 | |
 | |
 | | Hi Lee,
 | |
 | | Out of 3 incidents I've opened relating to CFMX..I only got
 | dinged for
 | | 1 of 'em...cause it was an environment issue on our end.
 | |
 | | Cheers,
 | |
 | | Stace
 | |
 | | -Original Message-
 | | From: Lee Fuller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 | | Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 12:10 PM
 | | To: CF-Talk
 | | Subject: RE: LONG time CF Supporter - About ready to dump CF!
 | |
 | | Jesse,
 | |
 | | Yeah.. We understand that.  We completely understand what you're
 | | saying. But you missed my last post (or maybe I just
 | haven't read your
 | | response yet grin) that YOU may not want us to pay.  But
 | there are
 | | others that WOULD.  And that's what keeps us from calling
 | up good-ol'
 | | MM.
 | |
 | |
 | | | -Original Message-
 | | | From: Jesse Noller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 | | | Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 

RE: Not Another MX boo boo?

2002-10-09 Thread Greg Luce

Sean,
You're not impressing me with your defensive attitude. Is all
this arguing really part of your job?

Greg Luce

-Original Message-
From: Sean A Corfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 8:03 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Not Another MX boo boo?

On Tuesday, Oct 8, 2002, at 14:07 US/Pacific, Rob Rohan wrote:
 dateFormat(now(), dd/mm/yy (ddd))

 No longer works in MX. looks like only certain characters work in date
 format.

I get:

date is 08/10/02 (Tue)

using this code:

cfoutput
cfset str = dateFormat(now(), dd/mm/yy (ddd))/
date is #str#
/cfoutput

Can you be a bit more precise about what No longer works about this 
please?

(And perhaps use a less confrontational subject line? :)


An Architect's View -- http://www.corfield.org/blog/

Macromedia DevCon 2002, October 27-30, Orlando, Florida
Architecting a New Internet Experience
Register today at http://www.macromedia.com/go/devcon2002


~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=listsbody=lists/cf_talk
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at 
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm



cfcookie and cfset SESSION.variable =

2002-10-09 Thread FlashGuy

HI,

I'm getting a little confused with cfcookies and cfset SESSION.varaible =. My 
application was using cfcookies and it seemed to work fine. I was reading in a field 
from my 
database which was a comma delimited field of directories on my hard drive. This was 
then put into a cookie. I have a template that allows the user to add or remove 
directories for viewing in their navigation window (tree list). Any changes made from 
the template would be saved to the database and the cookie would be updated. 

The problem I'm experiencing now is I changed all my cfcookie calls to use cfset 
SESSSION.variable =  and when I add/remove a directory and click my refresh button 
it 
won't update my navigation (tree list) frame until I actually close my IE and start it 
back up again. Then the appropriate directorie(s) don't appear which where 
added/remove 
from my template.

How can I make this update appear by refreshing? Do I *have* to use cookies in my 
case?


---
Colonel Nathan R. Jessop
Commanding Officer
Marine Ground Forces
Guatanamo Bay, Cuba
---



~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=listsbody=lists/cf_talk
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com



RE: Subject lines (Was: Not Another MX boo boo?)

2002-10-09 Thread Hugo Ahlenius

Greg,

Keep the flames away, and please (this is for everyone) use meaningful
subject-lines. I scan the subjects now and then, and I don't read all the
mailings to this list. It also serves a point for the archives and the
digests.





~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=listsbody=lists/cf_talk
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at 
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm



RE: convert first letter of words in a string to upper

2002-10-09 Thread Dave Wilson

Check the Tag gallery there's a tag called CF_Capitalize...works well...I
have a copy of it if you need it...mail me offlist, its freeware.

Dave

-Original Message-
From: Jared Clinton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 09 October 2002 00:33
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: convert first letter of words in a string to upper


Chris,

Have a look at www.cflib.org

It has heaps of cool things, and I'm quite sure also what you are looking
for.

Jared Clinton.
NEC Australia.

-Original Message-
From: Chris Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, 9 October 2002 7:32 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: convert first letter of words in a string to upper


I need a function to
convert first letter of words in a string to upper case.


--
Chris Edwards
Web Application Developer
Outer Banks Internet, Inc.
252-441-6698
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.OuterBanksInternet.com




~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=listsbody=lists/cf_talk
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at 
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm



CF vs ASP

2002-10-09 Thread Howell Craig H Civ WRALC/LEEA

OK...I know I'm going to get beat-up over this question, but...

Being new at this, I am trying to determine why I should learn CF over ASP
(or vice versa).

Any input would be appreciated.

Thanks.
Craig



Re: cfcookie and cfset SESSION.variable =

2002-10-09 Thread Jon Hall

Is your session variable getting updated? If not, there is your
problem, if so, then the problem lies in some part of the program that
is not using the session variables value, or not using it correctly.
If the app works using just cookies, then switching to session
variables shouldn't be a problem in and of itself.

I'm not sure how secure your app needs to be, but storing paths like
that on the client in a cookie sounds very insecure. If I altered the
cookie with the list of paths to include c:\, could I get a listing
of that directory? Sounds like to me this variable should definitely
be a session or client scoped variable.

-- 
jon
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Wednesday, October 9, 2002, 7:40:05 AM, you wrote:

F HI,

F I'm getting a little confused with cfcookies and cfset SESSION.varaible =. My 
application was using cfcookies and it seemed to work fine. I was reading in a field 
from my 
F database which was a comma delimited field of directories on my hard drive. This 
was then put into a cookie. I have a template that allows the user to add or remove 
F directories for viewing in their navigation window (tree list). Any changes made 
from the template would be saved to the database and the cookie would be updated. 

F The problem I'm experiencing now is I changed all my cfcookie calls to use cfset 
SESSSION.variable =  and when I add/remove a directory and click my refresh button 
it 
F won't update my navigation (tree list) frame until I actually close my IE and start 
it back up again. Then the appropriate directorie(s) don't appear which where 
added/remove 
F from my template.

F How can I make this update appear by refreshing? Do I *have* to use cookies in my 
case?

~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=listsbody=lists/cf_talk
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com



RE: CF vs ASP

2002-10-09 Thread Thomas Chiverton

 Being new at this, I am trying to determine why I should learn CF over ASP
 (or vice versa).

http://www.macromedia.com/software/coldfusion/productinfo/competitive/

Tom Chiverton
You don't have to be a mad scientist to believe in ColdFusion

 


~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=listsbody=lists/cf_talk
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more 
resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm



Re: cfcookie and cfset SESSION.variable =

2002-10-09 Thread FlashGuy

On Wed, 9 Oct 2002 08:02:24 -0400, Jon Hall wrote:

 Is your session variable getting updated? If not, there is your
 problem, if so, then the problem lies in some part of the program that
 is not using the session variables value, or not using it correctly.
 If the app works using just cookies, then switching to session
 variables shouldn't be a problem in and of itself.

Yes...I didn't change the line that was calling in the cookie. Now I get an error in 
my application saying that that it can't resolve the parameter SESSION.VariableName

Do I have to set it, maybe in my application.cfm to be Nil at first?

 I'm not sure how secure your app needs to be, but storing paths like
 that on the client in a cookie sounds very insecure. If I altered the
 cookie with the list of paths to include c:\, could I get a listing
 of that directory? Sounds like to me this variable should definitely
 be a session or client scoped variable.

This is strickly a intranet app.

 -- 
 jon
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Wednesday, October 9, 2002, 7:40:05 AM, you wrote:
 
 F HI,
 
 F I'm getting a little confused with cfcookies and cfset SESSION.varaible =. 
My application was using cfcookies and it seemed to work fine. I was reading in a 
field 
from my 
 F database which was a comma delimited field of directories on my hard drive. This 
was then put into a cookie. I have a template that allows the user to add or remove 
 F directories for viewing in their navigation window (tree list). Any changes made 
from the template would be saved to the database and the cookie would be updated. 
 
 F The problem I'm experiencing now is I changed all my cfcookie calls to use 
cfset SESSSION.variable =  and when I add/remove a directory and click my refresh 
button it 
 F won't update my navigation (tree list) frame until I actually close my IE and 
start it back up again. Then the appropriate directorie(s) don't appear which where 
added/remove 
 F from my template.
 
 F How can I make this update appear by refreshing? Do I *have* to use cookies in 
my case?
 
 
~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=listsbody=lists/cf_talk
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at 
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm



Re: cfcookie and cfset SESSION.variable =

2002-10-09 Thread FlashGuy

Nevermind...I got it to work.

Thanks

On Wed, 09 Oct 2002 08:22:42 -0400, FlashGuy wrote:

 On Wed, 9 Oct 2002 08:02:24 -0400, Jon Hall wrote:
 
  Is your session variable getting updated? If not, there is your
  problem, if so, then the problem lies in some part of the program that
  is not using the session variables value, or not using it correctly.
  If the app works using just cookies, then switching to session
  variables shouldn't be a problem in and of itself.
 
 Yes...I didn't change the line that was calling in the cookie. Now I get an error in 
my application saying that that it can't resolve the parameter SESSION.VariableName
 
 Do I have to set it, maybe in my application.cfm to be Nil at first?
 
  I'm not sure how secure your app needs to be, but storing paths like
  that on the client in a cookie sounds very insecure. If I altered the
  cookie with the list of paths to include c:\, could I get a listing
  of that directory? Sounds like to me this variable should definitely
  be a session or client scoped variable.
 
 This is strickly a intranet app.
 
  -- 
  jon
  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  Wednesday, October 9, 2002, 7:40:05 AM, you wrote:
  
  F HI,
  
  F I'm getting a little confused with cfcookies and cfset SESSION.varaible =. 
My application was using cfcookies and it seemed to work fine. I was reading in a 
field 
 from my 
  F database which was a comma delimited field of directories on my hard drive. 
This was then put into a cookie. I have a template that allows the user to add or 
remove 
  F directories for viewing in their navigation window (tree list). Any changes 
made from the template would be saved to the database and the cookie would be 
updated. 
  
  F The problem I'm experiencing now is I changed all my cfcookie calls to use 
cfset SESSSION.variable =  and when I add/remove a directory and click my refresh 
 button it 
  F won't update my navigation (tree list) frame until I actually close my IE and 
start it back up again. Then the appropriate directorie(s) don't appear which where 
 added/remove 
  F from my template.
  
  F How can I make this update appear by refreshing? Do I *have* to use cookies 
in my case?
  
  
 
~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=listsbody=lists/cf_talk
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com



Re: cfcookie and cfset SESSION.variable =

2002-10-09 Thread FlashGuy

Whats the best way to clear ALL session variables when a user logouts or closes IE?


On Wed, 09 Oct 2002 08:25:19 -0400, FlashGuy wrote:

 Nevermind...I got it to work.
 
 Thanks
 
 On Wed, 09 Oct 2002 08:22:42 -0400, FlashGuy wrote:
 
  On Wed, 9 Oct 2002 08:02:24 -0400, Jon Hall wrote:
  
   Is your session variable getting updated? If not, there is your
   problem, if so, then the problem lies in some part of the program that
   is not using the session variables value, or not using it correctly.
   If the app works using just cookies, then switching to session
   variables shouldn't be a problem in and of itself.
  
  Yes...I didn't change the line that was calling in the cookie. Now I get an error 
in my application saying that that it can't resolve the parameter SESSION.VariableName
  
  Do I have to set it, maybe in my application.cfm to be Nil at first?
  
   I'm not sure how secure your app needs to be, but storing paths like
   that on the client in a cookie sounds very insecure. If I altered the
   cookie with the list of paths to include c:\, could I get a listing
   of that directory? Sounds like to me this variable should definitely
   be a session or client scoped variable.
  
  This is strickly a intranet app.
  
   -- 
   jon
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   
   Wednesday, October 9, 2002, 7:40:05 AM, you wrote:
   
   F HI,
   
   F I'm getting a little confused with cfcookies and cfset SESSION.varaible 
=. My application was using cfcookies and it seemed to work fine. I was reading 
in a 
 field 
  from my 
   F database which was a comma delimited field of directories on my hard drive. 
This was then put into a cookie. I have a template that allows the user to add or 
remove 
   F directories for viewing in their navigation window (tree list). Any changes 
made from the template would be saved to the database and the cookie would be 
 updated. 
   
   F The problem I'm experiencing now is I changed all my cfcookie calls to use 
cfset SESSSION.variable =  and when I add/remove a directory and click my 
refresh 
  button it 
   F won't update my navigation (tree list) frame until I actually close my IE and 
start it back up again. Then the appropriate directorie(s) don't appear which where 
  added/remove 
   F from my template.
   
   F How can I make this update appear by refreshing? Do I *have* to use cookies 
in my case?
   
   
  
 
~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=listsbody=lists/cf_talk
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at 
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm



RE: QUestion about Input File and CFFILE

2002-10-09 Thread Yager, Brian T Contractor/Sverdrup

you can only use that AFTER you have used CFFILE.  I need the name of the file
BEFORE I use CFFILE so I can get the extension and change the file name.

Brian Yager
President - North AL Cold Fusion Users Group
http://www.nacfug.com
Sr. Systems Analyst
Sverdrup/CIC
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(256) 842-8342


-Original Message-
From: Jeff Garza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 4:56 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: QUestion about Input File and CFFILE


What does #CFFILE.ClientFile# return?

Jeff

- Original Message -
From: Yager, Brian T Contractor/Sverdrup [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 1:11 PM
Subject: QUestion about Input File and CFFILE


I am trying to upload a file using CFFILE.  I can get it to wrok just fine.
But
what I can't do is get the name of the file BEFORE I use CFFILE.  When I try
to
output the name of the file input box, I get some weird name with an
extension
of .tmp.  Can anyone help me with what I need please?

Thanks,

Brian Yager
President - North AL Cold Fusion Users Group
http://www.nacfug.com
Sr. Systems Analyst
Sverdrup/CIC
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(256) 842-8342



~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=listsbody=lists/cf_talk
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at 
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm



RE: Snippet Re: looping through a text string

2002-10-09 Thread Everett, Al

Huh?

 -Original Message-
 From: Brian Thornton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 7:51 PM
 To: CF-Talk
 Subject: Snippet Re: looping through a text string
 
 
 Broke out the RegEx manual.
 
 - Original Message -
 From: Everett, Al [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 2:51 PM
 Subject: RE: looping through a text string
 
 
  There wouldn't be one. You could do this, though:
 
  cfloop from=1 to=#Len(myString)# index=i
   cfset currentChar=Mid(myString,i,1)
   ...
  /cfloop
 
   -Original Message-
   From: Brian Thornton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
   Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 4:22 PM
   To: CF-Talk
   Subject: looping through a text string
  
  
   What would be the delimiter if you wanted to loop through a
   text string?
  
  
  
 
~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=listsbody=lists/cf_talk
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at 
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm



RE: CFMX wipes session vars after Verity update?

2002-10-09 Thread Raymond Camden

Gyrus, I couldn't reproduce this. I used a simpler test:


cfif not isDefined(session.verity)
setting session.veritybr
cfset session.verity = 1
/cfif

cfindex action=update
collection=6A89AE47-4D03-11D3-944600104BF23043_BODY
key=#ExpandPath('tags')# type=PATH
urlpath=http://localhost/downloads/; extensions=.cfm recurse=No

On first run, I see the setting... message, but I do not see it again.

===
Raymond Camden, ColdFusion Jedi Master for Hire

Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW  : www.camdenfamily.com/morpheus
Yahoo IM : morpheus

My ally is the Force, and a powerful ally it is. - Yoda 

 -Original Message-
 From: Gyrus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 9:35 PM
 To: CF-Talk
 Subject: CFMX wipes session vars after Verity update?
 
 
 Just had a curious glitch in an app (running CFMX with 
 updater on my local
 WinXP Pro desktop):
 
 Using the developer tools interface I've built into my app, I went and
 created the Verity collection for indexing a directory of 
 files. Fine. Then
 I selected the option to update (i.e. index) the collection. 
 There was the
 usual pause while it indexed, then I was promptly thrown back 
 to my login
 form. Apparently, my session vars no longer existed.
 
 The code I running was a plain CFINDEX:
 
   !--- Get paths to directory and file types ---
   cflock scope=APPLICATION type=READONLY timeout=10
cfset wwwroot = application.vars.front_wwwroot
cfset allowedFileTypes = 
 Duplicate(application.vars.allowedFileTypes)
   /cflock
   cfset allowedFileTypes = Replace(allowedFileTypes, ,, 
 ,., ALL)
   cfset allowedFileTypes = .#allowedFileTypes#
   !--- Do indexing ---
   cflock timeout=30 name=INDEXLOCK_downloads type=EXCLUSIVE
cfindex action=#attributes.action# collection=downloads
 key=#ExpandPath('..\downloads\')# type=PATH
 urlpath=#wwwroot#downloads/ extensions=#allowedFileTypes# 
 recurse=No
   /cflock
 
 I don't know *for sure* that the session variables had gone - 
 I've logged
 back in now and the indexing worked OK. But, to my eyes, it 
 seemed that my
 session had just been wiped.
 
 Anyone come across anything like this before?
 
 - Gyrus
 
 
 - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 work: http://www.tengai.co.uk
 play: http://www.norlonto.net
 - PGP key available
 
 
 
~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=listsbody=lists/cf_talk
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com



Re: 3rd Party JDBC Drivers was Re: LONG time CF Supporter - About ready to dump CF!

2002-10-09 Thread S . Isaac Dealey

 On Tuesday, Oct 8, 2002, at 18:05 US/Pacific, S. Isaac
 Dealey wrote:
 I thought all the db drivers were 3rd party ... Has
 Allaire / MM
 actually
 developed db drivers?

 Er, no, I just meant that the JDBC drivers about which
 people are
 complaining were not written by us... which means that we
 are reliant
 on 3rd party vendors fixing them or making other drivers
 available.

Ahh gotcha ... See, I'd been under the impression that was the case
all-along, which I guess explains why I never expected any potential
problems with db drivers to be quick fixes... because it requires MM tech
support getting enough data to give to the 3rd party and then either
producing a work-around or haggling with the driver vendors or both, which I
imagine could be a protracted sort of arrangement.

Isaac
Certified Advanced ColdFusion 5 Developer

www.turnkey.to
954-776-0046

~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=listsbody=lists/cf_talk
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com



RE: cfflush on mx small data pools

2002-10-09 Thread Raymond Camden

Internet Explorer has a 'feature' where even if you flush, it will not
display the text until it gets 'enough' text. What is enough text?
Around 250 chars I think. If I'm flushing and now I won't have more than
that, I add this BEFORE the flush:

#repeatString( ,x)#

where x is between 150 - 200 or so. This normally 'forces' IE to display
the text before the repeatString.

===
Raymond Camden, ColdFusion Jedi Master for Hire

Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW  : www.camdenfamily.com/morpheus
Yahoo IM : morpheus

My ally is the Force, and a powerful ally it is. - Yoda 

 -Original Message-
 From: Sam Farmer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 6:07 PM
 To: CF-Talk
 Subject: cfflush on mx small data pools
 
 
 I am trying to flush a very small amount of data on mx but 
 don't seem to be
 able to get the following to flush:
 
 cfoutput
  html
  head
   titleProcessing./title
  /head
  body
  processingbr
  /cfoutput
  cfflush interval=1
 
 I would like it to flush immeadiately--its a payment page and 
 I want to let
 users know something is happening.  The text does not appear 
 until the page
 loads (15-30 seconds later).
 
 Any ideas?
 
 Thanks,
 
 Sam
 
 
 
 
 
~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=listsbody=lists/cf_talk
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for 
dependable ColdFusion Hosting.



The Myth of Bugs (Was Huge Ungainly thread of Doom)

2002-10-09 Thread Jesse Noller

All-

Funny, I should stop sleeping. I wanted to take a moment to address something 
that is bothering me a great deal.

Out of the huge thread yesterday, there came a lot of realizations that 
Macromedia is currently examining internally, misconceptions if you will about the way 
MM communicates things.

Make no mistake, these issues are being discussed, as Sean and Vernon have 
both mentioned. However, one of the things that bothered me the most was the fact 
several people basically said:

OH NOES! CFMX is poop! I won't buy/run it until all of these horrible bugs are fixed.

This is what I refer too as the Myth of Bugs. I think something many people 
are forgetting is the scenario of a mailing list, or the forums. This is the scenario 
that discourses the fact that mainly the only people who will post to forums, and 
mailing lists in a typical day are those who have issues.

Now, if I read cf-talk on $RAND day, I could safely assume that CFMX was 
crippled, a lame-duck to the market. Does this assumption make it true?

No.

It bothers me to hear people say that they will not even try CFMX out because 
there are so many show stopping issues. I would beg the argument that this is far, 
very far, from the truth.

Those of you dropping CFMX or completely ignoring it because of the 
debates/issues raised on CF-Talk and the Forums would be better served if you actually 
downloaded and ran your application yourself, instead of taking the word of the 
mailing lists and forums.

CFMX, as has been stated before, was the *most* tested version of ColdFusion 
*ever* put on market, I can't make this clear enough.

I would imagine that some of the show stopper issues that are being raised 
have either been addresses, will be address, or are simply environmental. I would also 
state that the only people who raise the CFMX is Poop flag are those who have hit a 
bug, or other issue, which is show stopping to *them*. Remember, hundreds of people 
download CFMX daily (we have the numbers that show this) and run it without issue.

*of COURSE* those people who run into any type of problem are immediately 
going to identify that problem as a show stopper and post to the mailing lists and 
the forums screaming as loud as they can to hopefully either find a solution or get 
Macromedia to help them for free.

I can only stress that those of you reading these lists and the forums take 
everything you see with a grain of salt. Not everyone is running into these issues, 
everyone is not throwing CFMX out the window. We have *many* customers running CFMX 
in production, under load, daily, fine.

If you install CFMX, and you run it, and you find an issue, I cannot stress 
enough that you contact support *immediately* to get that issue addressed ASAP. 

I will not admit that the ColdFusion team (myself included) shipped Poop. I 
will not admit to having wasted nearly two years of my life, I know this is *not* the 
case. I personally believe that the firestorms shown on this list, and the forums, 
are not the rule, but rather the exception to the rule.

Please, try it out *for yourselves* before passing judgment.


Sorry for ranting, it bothers me. A lot.


Jesse Noller
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Macromedia Server Development

No concept man forms is valid unless he
integrates it without contradiction into the
sum of his knowledge. 
- Ayn Rand
~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=listsbody=lists/cf_talk
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com



RE: Capturing IP Addresses

2002-10-09 Thread Everett, Al

Did you try CGI.REMOTE_ADDR ?

 -Original Message-
 From: Russ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 5:09 AM
 To: CF-Talk
 Subject: Capturing IP Addresses
 
 
 Maybe I'm searching incorrectly, but it seems to be that it should be
 relatively easy to capture a user's IP address, for example, when they
 are submitting a form.
 
 Can anyone push me in the right direction?
 
 Thanks,
 
 Russ
 
 
~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=listsbody=lists/cf_talk
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at 
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm



RE: cfcookie and cfset SESSION.variable =

2002-10-09 Thread Everett, Al

 Yes...I didn't change the line that was calling in the 
 cookie. Now I get an error in my application saying that that 
 it can't resolve the parameter SESSION.VariableName
 
 Do I have to set it, maybe in my application.cfm to be Nil at first?

That, or wrap your check for it:

cfif IsDefined(Session.VariableName)
 cfset VariableName=Session.VariableName
cfelse
 cfset VariableName=
/cfif

Then use Variables.VariableName for the rest of your page.

(Don't forget your locks!)
~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=listsbody=lists/cf_talk
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at 
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm



RE: cfcookie and cfset SESSION.variable =

2002-10-09 Thread Everett, Al

cfset temp=StructClear(Session)

 -Original Message-
 From: FlashGuy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 8:29 AM
 To: CF-Talk
 Subject: Re: cfcookie and cfset SESSION.variable =
 
 
 Whats the best way to clear ALL session variables when a user 
 logouts or closes IE?
 
 
 On Wed, 09 Oct 2002 08:25:19 -0400, FlashGuy wrote:
 
  Nevermind...I got it to work.
  
  Thanks
  
  On Wed, 09 Oct 2002 08:22:42 -0400, FlashGuy wrote:
  
   On Wed, 9 Oct 2002 08:02:24 -0400, Jon Hall wrote:
   
Is your session variable getting updated? If not, there is your
problem, if so, then the problem lies in some part of 
 the program that
is not using the session variables value, or not using 
 it correctly.
If the app works using just cookies, then switching to session
variables shouldn't be a problem in and of itself.
   
   Yes...I didn't change the line that was calling in the 
 cookie. Now I get an error in my application saying that that 
 it can't resolve the parameter SESSION.VariableName
   
   Do I have to set it, maybe in my application.cfm to be 
 Nil at first?
   
I'm not sure how secure your app needs to be, but 
 storing paths like
that on the client in a cookie sounds very insecure. If 
 I altered the
cookie with the list of paths to include c:\, could I 
 get a listing
of that directory? Sounds like to me this variable 
 should definitely
be a session or client scoped variable.
   
   This is strickly a intranet app.
   
-- 
jon
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Wednesday, October 9, 2002, 7:40:05 AM, you wrote:

F HI,

F I'm getting a little confused with cfcookies and 
 cfset SESSION.varaible =. My application was using 
 cfcookies and it seemed to work fine. I was reading in a 
  field 
   from my 
F database which was a comma delimited field of 
 directories on my hard drive. This was then put into a 
 cookie. I have a template that allows the user to add or 
 remove 
F directories for viewing in their navigation window 
 (tree list). Any changes made from the template would be 
 saved to the database and the cookie would be 
  updated. 

F The problem I'm experiencing now is I changed all my 
 cfcookie calls to use cfset SESSSION.variable =  and 
 when I add/remove a directory and click my 
 refresh 
   button it 
F won't update my navigation (tree list) frame until I 
 actually close my IE and start it back up again. Then the 
 appropriate directorie(s) don't appear which where 
   added/remove 
F from my template.

F How can I make this update appear by refreshing? 
 Do I *have* to use cookies in my case?


   
  
 
~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=listsbody=lists/cf_talk
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at 
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm



RE: CF vs ASP

2002-10-09 Thread usr1

I think you would be better off learning JSP(java server pages) and some j2ee.
Why?
Because what CFMX does is translate CFML pages into some servlets
(correct me if I am wrong) so why learning CF(providing you don't
know it already) when you can learn Java(JSP and stuff).
As I see it CF is far from beating Java(that's why they choose to
use java in their very own CF)

Well, I have quite some experience with CF(more than 3 years) and I didn't
upgrade to CFMX and I will never do it.

Why not ASP?
Well because if you do that you are stuck with windows.
If that is not a problem go for it :)

Marius Burz

~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=listsbody=lists/cf_talk
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for 
dependable ColdFusion Hosting.



Re: The Myth of Bugs (Was Huge Ungainly thread of Doom)

2002-10-09 Thread Simon Whittaker

Hi there,

Just wanted to add my 2c to this issue - We recently installed a version of
cfmx on a completely clean server - the server itself runs fine but the
amount of trouble we have had trying to get our previous applications to run
under CFMX is mind boggling. I am sure that CFMX is as good as you describe
it - of course there will be issues, there always are with new/updated
products BUT it is my belief that these  products should have backwards
compatability, ie sites that run under CF5 should also run under CFMX which
is just doesn't seem to be the case at present, I know that unfortunately
there will be a lot of redevelopment to make some of our more complex apps
run under CFMX.

Cheers

Simon


- Original Message -
From: Jesse Noller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 1:48 PM
Subject: The Myth of Bugs (Was Huge Ungainly thread of Doom)


 All-

 Funny, I should stop sleeping. I wanted to take a moment to address
something that is bothering me a great deal.

 Out of the huge thread yesterday, there came a lot of realizations that
Macromedia is currently examining internally, misconceptions if you will
about the way MM communicates things.

 Make no mistake, these issues are being discussed, as Sean and Vernon have
both mentioned. However, one of the things that bothered me the most was the
fact several people basically said:

 OH NOES! CFMX is poop! I won't buy/run it until all of these horrible
bugs are fixed.

 This is what I refer too as the Myth of Bugs. I think something many
people are forgetting is the scenario of a mailing list, or the forums. This
is the scenario that discourses the fact that mainly the only people who
will post to forums, and mailing lists in a typical day are those who have
issues.

 Now, if I read cf-talk on $RAND day, I could safely assume that CFMX was
crippled, a lame-duck to the market. Does this assumption make it true?

 No.

 It bothers me to hear people say that they will not even try CFMX out
because there are so many show stopping issues. I would beg the argument
that this is far, very far, from the truth.

 Those of you dropping CFMX or completely ignoring it because of the
debates/issues raised on CF-Talk and the Forums would be better served if
you actually downloaded and ran your application yourself, instead of taking
the word of the mailing lists and forums.

 CFMX, as has been stated before, was the *most* tested version of
ColdFusion *ever* put on market, I can't make this clear enough.

 I would imagine that some of the show stopper issues that are being
raised have either been addresses, will be address, or are simply
environmental. I would also state that the only people who raise the CFMX
is Poop flag are those who have hit a bug, or other issue, which is show
stopping to *them*. Remember, hundreds of people download CFMX daily (we
have the numbers that show this) and run it without issue.

 *of COURSE* those people who run into any type of problem are immediately
going to identify that problem as a show stopper and post to the mailing
lists and the forums screaming as loud as they can to hopefully either find
a solution or get Macromedia to help them for free.

 I can only stress that those of you reading these lists and the forums
take everything you see with a grain of salt. Not everyone is running into
these issues, everyone is not throwing CFMX out the window. We have *many*
customers running CFMX in production, under load, daily, fine.

 If you install CFMX, and you run it, and you find an issue, I cannot
stress enough that you contact support *immediately* to get that issue
addressed ASAP.

 I will not admit that the ColdFusion team (myself included) shipped
Poop. I will not admit to having wasted nearly two years of my life, I
know this is *not* the case. I personally believe that the firestorms
shown on this list, and the forums, are not the rule, but rather the
exception to the rule.

 Please, try it out *for yourselves* before passing judgment.


 Sorry for ranting, it bothers me. A lot.


 Jesse Noller
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Macromedia Server Development

 No concept man forms is valid unless he
 integrates it without contradiction into the
 sum of his knowledge.
 - Ayn Rand
 
~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=listsbody=lists/cf_talk
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more 
resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm



RE: Problems with CFMX?

2002-10-09 Thread Kola Oyedeji

Sorry Rob I meant 'if',From your first example I could understand why a
cfoutput in an if statement became 2 methods?

Are you saying every tag call is implemented as a method?

Thanks

Kola

-Original Message-
From: Rob Rohan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 08 October 2002 22:58
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Problems with CFMX?

 are you saying theres a java limit on the size of a method?
Yes.

 Also is a method generated for every case in a switch
 statement?

No.

That would be nice, but no.

cfswitch expression=#a#
cfcase value=1bla/cfcase
/cfswitch

equals

switch(a){
case 1: write.out(bla);
}



-Original Message-
From: Kola Oyedeji [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 12:52 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Problems with CFMX?


Rob

Can you confirm 2 things about your post are you saying theres a java
limit
on the
size of a method? Also is a method generated for every case in a switch
statement?

Thanks

 -Original Message-
 From: Rob Rohan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: 08 October 2002 18:13
 To: CF-Talk
 Subject: RE: Problems with CFMX?
 
 
 Yeah, I posted it a while back.
 
 Quick synapses:
 
  Coders write:
  cfif 1 eq 1
  cfoutputblarg/cfoutput
  /cfif
 
  That gets made into:
 
  public void whatever(){
 =   public void doSomething(){
  if(1=1){
  out.write(blarg);
  }
 =   }
  }
 
 
 the part between the = can be no greater than 64k. You have no way
to
 predetermine what that size will be when you write the page (it
 happens at
 about 850 though).  When a page is too big you get an error like
 
 Code of a method greater then 65535 bytes
 
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Mark W. Breneman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 10:02 AM
 To: CF-Talk
 Subject: RE: Problems with CFMX?
 
 
 Thanks,
 
 The only flag that goes up for me is the large file issue.  Can you
 elaborate a bit on that.
 Does CFMX hang or run the file slow?
 How are you defining ~850 lines?
 
 I guess I never considered 850 lines to be big.  Years ago I
 would get Mega
 HTML forms from the dream weaver guys that were about 1150
 before I started.
 (I do not miss those days) Most every thing today is 300 - 500 lines
 
 
 Thanks again
 
 Mark W. Breneman
 -Macromedia Certified ColdFusion Developer
 -Network / Web Server Administrator
   Vivid Media
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   www.vividmedia.com
   608.270.9770
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Rob Rohan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 11:46 AM
 To: CF-Talk
 Subject: RE: Problems with CFMX?
 
 
 Hi Mark,
  We have a very large site, and have had a few problems.
 
  Here are some other thing you need to watch for / problems
 we had/have:
 
  1. MX can not handle large .cfm files. By large I mean 
 ~850 lines of code
  2. You could have some issues if you use fusebox methodology.
  3. Jacked up database connections - I believe these are due
 to the fact
 that MS doesn't have a SQL *7* JDBC Driver. Since you are using
 SQL2000 they
 have native JDBC drivers so you *might* not have issues.
  4. Sloppy code
  5. XSL transformations can not have variables passed into them
 
 On the plus side:
  MX does XML building really, really cool and in a groovy way
  Once complied the feel of MX is quite snappy.
  Debugging is rad - especially if you know Java
  CFC are cool
  in cfscript you can use normal tags!
 
 Cheers,
 Rob
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Mark W. Breneman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 9:32 AM
 To: CF-Talk
 Subject: Problems with CFMX?
 
 
 I have been watching threads like LONG time CF Supporter -
 About ready to
 dump CF and CFMX - I've never seen anything so unstable in my
 life over
 the past few weeks.  What has me concerned is this next few
 weeks I am going
 to upgrade a fairly large site to CFMX.  The site currently runs
 CF 5 and MS
 SQL 2000.  Are there a large number of problems with CFMX that I
 should know
 about?  Luckily I have a few weeks to play with the new servers
 before they
 go live.
 
 Any ETA on a CFMX .1 update?  (is one needed)
 
 Thanks
 
 Mark W. Breneman
 -Macromedia Certified ColdFusion Developer
 -Network / Web Server Administrator
   Vivid Media
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   www.vividmedia.com
   608.270.9770
 
 
 
 
 


~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=listsbody=lists/cf_talk
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for 
dependable ColdFusion Hosting.



RE: CF vs ASP

2002-10-09 Thread Kris Pilles

I'm hard pressed not to move all of my future development to .Net.  AS
much as I love CF and how well I know it, Being a Windows application
developer, I can't not switch to .NET it will allow me to have all of
our programmers on 1 platforma dn deploy our applications in whatever
enviroment that we see fit  Hate to say it but my days on the list
are numbered...

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 9:03 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CF vs ASP


I think you would be better off learning JSP(java server pages) and some
j2ee. Why? Because what CFMX does is translate CFML pages into some
servlets (correct me if I am wrong) so why learning CF(providing you
don't know it already) when you can learn Java(JSP and stuff). As I see
it CF is far from beating Java(that's why they choose to use java in
their very own CF)

Well, I have quite some experience with CF(more than 3 years) and I
didn't upgrade to CFMX and I will never do it.

Why not ASP?
Well because if you do that you are stuck with windows.
If that is not a problem go for it :)

Marius Burz


~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=listsbody=lists/cf_talk
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in 
ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm



Re: The Myth of Bugs (Was Huge Ungainly thread of Doom)

2002-10-09 Thread Jeffry Houser

At 08:48 AM 10/9/2002 -0400, you wrote:
 CFMX, as has been stated before, was the *most* tested version of 
 ColdFusion *ever* put on market, I can't make this clear enough.

  I might argue this point.
  I believe I once heard Ben Forta say ( Or read an e-mail he typed ) that 
CF5 was built off of CF4.5 .

  That makes sense and is expected and is not a surprise.  But, that would 
leave me to believe all the beta testing and experimentation and real world 
use that went into cf4.5 carried over into CF5.  And everything in CF3 
rolled over into CF4, and CF2 rolled over into CF3, etc.. etc..
  Being a new code-base, CFMX has not had that benefit.


--
Jeffry Houser | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Need a Web Developer?  Contact me!
AIM: Reboog711  | Phone: 1-203-379-0773
--
My CFMX Book: 
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0072225564/instantcoldfu-20
My Books: http://www.instantcoldfusion.com
My Band: http://www.farcryfly.com 

~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=listsbody=lists/cf_talk
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for 
dependable ColdFusion Hosting.



RE: cfcookie and cfset SESSION.variable =

2002-10-09 Thread FlashGuy

On Wed, 9 Oct 2002 09:00:59 -0400, Everett, Al wrote:

  Yes...I didn't change the line that was calling in the 
  cookie. Now I get an error in my application saying that that 
  it can't resolve the parameter SESSION.VariableName
  
  Do I have to set it, maybe in my application.cfm to be Nil at first?
 
 That, or wrap your check for it:
 
 cfif IsDefined(Session.VariableName)
  cfset VariableName=Session.VariableName
 cfelse
  cfset VariableName=
 /cfif
 
 Then use Variables.VariableName for the rest of your page.
 
 (Don't forget your locks!)

I've heard about this but I've never done this before. What do you mean by locks?


 
~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=listsbody=lists/cf_talk
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at 
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm



RE: The Myth of Bugs (Was Huge Ungainly thread of Doom)

2002-10-09 Thread Jesse Noller

Simon-

This is another gripe of mine. The issue is that we tested backwards 
compatibility extensively, almost exhaustively. 

What *specific* issues did you run into? Were you running Fusebox? Was your 
application using improper coding methodologies, what were the *specific* problems?

Did you contact technical support? What was the resolution?

CFMX is as backwards compatible as we could make it in the time allocated. We 
took many customer applications in house and ran them with little or *no* 
modification. 

You are correct, a new version will never be 100% compatible, but once again, 
there are hundreds of people who upgraded without issue. You ran into a specific 
problem that was a show stopper to *you* while many people were unfettered by this.

CFMX is backwards compatible, as much as we could make it within reason. 
Will you need to massage things? Yes, much like upgrading *any other software package 
on any platform anywhere*.


Jesse Noller
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Macromedia Server Development

No concept man forms is valid unless he
integrates it without contradiction into the
sum of his knowledge. 
- Ayn Rand

 -Original Message-
 From: Simon Whittaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 8:58 AM
 To: CF-Talk
 Subject: Re: The Myth of Bugs (Was Huge Ungainly thread of Doom)
 
 Hi there,
 
 Just wanted to add my 2c to this issue - We recently installed a version
 of
 cfmx on a completely clean server - the server itself runs fine but the
 amount of trouble we have had trying to get our previous applications to
 run
 under CFMX is mind boggling. I am sure that CFMX is as good as you
 describe
 it - of course there will be issues, there always are with new/updated
 products BUT it is my belief that these  products should have backwards
 compatability, ie sites that run under CF5 should also run under CFMX
 which
 is just doesn't seem to be the case at present, I know that unfortunately
 there will be a lot of redevelopment to make some of our more complex apps
 run under CFMX.
 
 Cheers
 
 Simon
 
 
 - Original Message -
 From: Jesse Noller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 1:48 PM
 Subject: The Myth of Bugs (Was Huge Ungainly thread of Doom)
 
 
  All-
 
  Funny, I should stop sleeping. I wanted to take a moment to address
 something that is bothering me a great deal.
 
  Out of the huge thread yesterday, there came a lot of realizations that
 Macromedia is currently examining internally, misconceptions if you will
 about the way MM communicates things.
 
  Make no mistake, these issues are being discussed, as Sean and Vernon
 have
 both mentioned. However, one of the things that bothered me the most was
 the
 fact several people basically said:
 
  OH NOES! CFMX is poop! I won't buy/run it until all of these horrible
 bugs are fixed.
 
  This is what I refer too as the Myth of Bugs. I think something many
 people are forgetting is the scenario of a mailing list, or the forums.
 This
 is the scenario that discourses the fact that mainly the only people who
 will post to forums, and mailing lists in a typical day are those who have
 issues.
 
  Now, if I read cf-talk on $RAND day, I could safely assume that CFMX was
 crippled, a lame-duck to the market. Does this assumption make it true?
 
  No.
 
  It bothers me to hear people say that they will not even try CFMX out
 because there are so many show stopping issues. I would beg the argument
 that this is far, very far, from the truth.
 
  Those of you dropping CFMX or completely ignoring it because of the
 debates/issues raised on CF-Talk and the Forums would be better served if
 you actually downloaded and ran your application yourself, instead of
 taking
 the word of the mailing lists and forums.
 
  CFMX, as has been stated before, was the *most* tested version of
 ColdFusion *ever* put on market, I can't make this clear enough.
 
  I would imagine that some of the show stopper issues that are being
 raised have either been addresses, will be address, or are simply
 environmental. I would also state that the only people who raise the CFMX
 is Poop flag are those who have hit a bug, or other issue, which is show
 stopping to *them*. Remember, hundreds of people download CFMX daily (we
 have the numbers that show this) and run it without issue.
 
  *of COURSE* those people who run into any type of problem are
 immediately
 going to identify that problem as a show stopper and post to the mailing
 lists and the forums screaming as loud as they can to hopefully either
 find
 a solution or get Macromedia to help them for free.
 
  I can only stress that those of you reading these lists and the forums
 take everything you see with a grain of salt. Not everyone is running into
 these issues, everyone is not throwing CFMX out the window. We have
 *many*
 customers running CFMX in production, under load, daily, fine.

OT: Ways of Submission

2002-10-09 Thread Mark Stephenson - Evolution Internet

Sorry for the OT post but need a quick answer...

Does anyone know any javascript I can use for the onclick caller for a
rollover image that will submit a form?

I know you use image as a form type but that doesn't allow me to have a roll
over...

Kind Regards,



Mark Stephenson
New Media Director
Evolution Internet
T: 0870 757 1631
F: 0870 757 1632
W: www.evolutioninternet.co.uk
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


WARNING:
---
The information contained in this document and attachments is confidential
and intended only for the person(s) named above.  If you are not the
intended recipient you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying,
distribution, or any other use of the information is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this document by mistake, please notify the sender
immediately and destroy this document and attachments without making any
copy of any kind.

AVIS IMPORTANT:
---
Les informations contenues dans le present document et ses pieces jointes
sont strictement confidentielles et reservees a l'usage de la (des)
personne(s) a qui il est adresse. Si vous n'etes pas le destinataire, soyez
avise que toute divulgation, distribution, copie, ou autre utilisation de
ces informations est strictement prohibee.  Si vous avez recu ce document
par erreur, veuillez s'il vous plait communiquer immediatement avec
l'expediteur et detruire ce document sans en faire de copie sous quelque
forme.




-Original Message-
From: Thomas Chiverton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 09 October 2002 13:04
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CF vs ASP


 Being new at this, I am trying to determine why I should learn CF over ASP
 (or vice versa).

http://www.macromedia.com/software/coldfusion/productinfo/competitive/

Tom Chiverton
You don't have to be a mad scientist to believe in ColdFusion





~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=listsbody=lists/cf_talk
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more 
resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm



RE: cfcookie and cfset SESSION.variable =

2002-10-09 Thread FlashGuy

What if someone just closes IE?

On Wed, 9 Oct 2002 09:01:38 -0400, Everett, Al wrote:

 cfset temp=StructClear(Session)
 
  -Original Message-
  From: FlashGuy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 8:29 AM
  To: CF-Talk
  Subject: Re: cfcookie and cfset SESSION.variable =
  
  
  Whats the best way to clear ALL session variables when a user 
  logouts or closes IE?
  
  
  On Wed, 09 Oct 2002 08:25:19 -0400, FlashGuy wrote:
  
   Nevermind...I got it to work.
   
   Thanks
   
   On Wed, 09 Oct 2002 08:22:42 -0400, FlashGuy wrote:
   
On Wed, 9 Oct 2002 08:02:24 -0400, Jon Hall wrote:

 Is your session variable getting updated? If not, there is your
 problem, if so, then the problem lies in some part of 
  the program that
 is not using the session variables value, or not using 
  it correctly.
 If the app works using just cookies, then switching to session
 variables shouldn't be a problem in and of itself.

Yes...I didn't change the line that was calling in the 
  cookie. Now I get an error in my application saying that that 
  it can't resolve the parameter SESSION.VariableName

Do I have to set it, maybe in my application.cfm to be 
  Nil at first?

 I'm not sure how secure your app needs to be, but 
  storing paths like
 that on the client in a cookie sounds very insecure. If 
  I altered the
 cookie with the list of paths to include c:\, could I 
  get a listing
 of that directory? Sounds like to me this variable 
  should definitely
 be a session or client scoped variable.

This is strickly a intranet app.

 -- 
 jon
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Wednesday, October 9, 2002, 7:40:05 AM, you wrote:
 
 F HI,
 
 F I'm getting a little confused with cfcookies and 
  cfset SESSION.varaible =. My application was using 
  cfcookies and it seemed to work fine. I was reading in a 
   field 
from my 
 F database which was a comma delimited field of 
  directories on my hard drive. This was then put into a 
  cookie. I have a template that allows the user to add or 
  remove 
 F directories for viewing in their navigation window 
  (tree list). Any changes made from the template would be 
  saved to the database and the cookie would be 
   updated. 
 
 F The problem I'm experiencing now is I changed all my 
  cfcookie calls to use cfset SESSSION.variable =  and 
  when I add/remove a directory and click my 
  refresh 
button it 
 F won't update my navigation (tree list) frame until I 
  actually close my IE and start it back up again. Then the 
  appropriate directorie(s) don't appear which where 
added/remove 
 F from my template.
 
 F How can I make this update appear by refreshing? 
  Do I *have* to use cookies in my case?
 
 

   
  
 
~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=listsbody=lists/cf_talk
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com



RE: The Myth of Bugs (Was Huge Ungainly thread of Doom)

2002-10-09 Thread Jesse Noller

   I might argue this point.
   I believe I once heard Ben Forta say ( Or read an e-mail he typed ) that
 CF5 was built off of CF4.5 .
 
   That makes sense and is expected and is not a surprise.  But, that would
 leave me to believe all the beta testing and experimentation and real
 world
 use that went into cf4.5 carried over into CF5.  And everything in CF3
 rolled over into CF4, and CF2 rolled over into CF3, etc.. etc..
   Being a new code-base, CFMX has not had that benefit.
 

While it is true one can assume that the testing in CF 4.5 rolled into CF5, 
that is both true, and false to a degree.

While one can make assumptions about functionality when utilizing the same 
code base, when you rewrite the entire thing, you *do* loose previous testing, 
however...

We had a *huge* team working on CFMX, we ran hundreds of thousands of hours of 
regression. Thousands of regression tests, many customer application, we ran it under 
load for WEEKS.

This is what I mean when I say most tested. CFMX spent more time under the 
microscope than any other .rev of ColdFusion ever. 

-jesse
~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=listsbody=lists/cf_talk
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com



RE: The Myth of Bugs (Was Huge Ungainly thread of Doom)

2002-10-09 Thread Dave Wilson

Jesse,

Whilst I agree with your general point that there's possibly a
misintepretation of doom and gloom for CFMX within the recent threads, I'd
like to also point out that from what I can see, the developers highlighting
the problems are actually seeking help from Macromedia in order to
continue using CFMX - NOT in order to give up on it altogether.

I have in fact advised a few people either within the Long time CF
supporter thread and also outside of it during the last couple of days, to
go ahead and try CFMX for themselves, despite having some very obvious
problems myself - which, I am still working on solving at the moment after 3
days - I believe I'm starting to see where the major problems lie now.

Basically, there's a problem with the JDBC driver (thats pretty obvious).
Whilst there is also a problem with installing CFMX on a Server which had a
previous version of CF on it before, despite removing old registry keys and
directories.

I believe Vernon has already picked up on these issues and is going to try
and raise them internally with MM.

I don't have a problem with MM. They're doing grand as far as I can see,
considering their size. Maybe I'm just used to large corporate bureaucracy
at this stage, with much much larger and slower entities (oil and automotive
companies). Maybe too, I have come to take the cf-talk list for granted as
an effective channel for solving issues with CF - over the years. I've seen
issues raised on the list being actively tackled head on by both MM and
Allaire in the past. Yes developers are looking for what is effectively
free support - but it's support at a cost to the developer in terms of
time etc - e.g. I've lost almost 3 days in my current situation, but at
least I'm proactively ruling out things and feeding back my findings to the
people who may need that info i.e. MM or the CF Community.

Just my 2c.
Dave

-Original Message-
From: Jesse Noller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 09 October 2002 13:48
To: CF-Talk
Subject: The Myth of Bugs (Was Huge Ungainly thread of Doom)


All-

Funny, I should stop sleeping. I wanted to take a moment to address
something that is bothering me a great deal.

Out of the huge thread yesterday, there came a lot of realizations that
Macromedia is currently examining internally, misconceptions if you will
about the way MM communicates things.

Make no mistake, these issues are being discussed, as Sean and Vernon have
both mentioned. However, one of the things that bothered me the most was the
fact several people basically said:

OH NOES! CFMX is poop! I won't buy/run it until all of these horrible bugs
are fixed.

This is what I refer too as the Myth of Bugs. I think something many
people are forgetting is the scenario of a mailing list, or the forums. This
is the scenario that discourses the fact that mainly the only people who
will post to forums, and mailing lists in a typical day are those who have
issues.

Now, if I read cf-talk on $RAND day, I could safely assume that CFMX was
crippled, a lame-duck to the market. Does this assumption make it true?

No.

It bothers me to hear people say that they will not even try CFMX out
because there are so many show stopping issues. I would beg the argument
that this is far, very far, from the truth.

Those of you dropping CFMX or completely ignoring it because of the
debates/issues raised on CF-Talk and the Forums would be better served if
you actually downloaded and ran your application yourself, instead of taking
the word of the mailing lists and forums.

CFMX, as has been stated before, was the *most* tested version of
ColdFusion *ever* put on market, I can't make this clear enough.

I would imagine that some of the show stopper issues that are being
raised have either been addresses, will be address, or are simply
environmental. I would also state that the only people who raise the CFMX
is Poop flag are those who have hit a bug, or other issue, which is show
stopping to *them*. Remember, hundreds of people download CFMX daily (we
have the numbers that show this) and run it without issue.

*of COURSE* those people who run into any type of problem are immediately
going to identify that problem as a show stopper and post to the mailing
lists and the forums screaming as loud as they can to hopefully either find
a solution or get Macromedia to help them for free.

I can only stress that those of you reading these lists and the forums take
everything you see with a grain of salt. Not everyone is running into these
issues, everyone is not throwing CFMX out the window. We have *many*
customers running CFMX in production, under load, daily, fine.

If you install CFMX, and you run it, and you find an issue, I cannot stress
enough that you contact support *immediately* to get that issue addressed
ASAP.

I will not admit that the ColdFusion team (myself included) shipped Poop.
I will not 

Re: The Myth of Bugs (Was Huge Ungainly thread of Doom)

2002-10-09 Thread Jochem van Dieten

Quoting Simon Whittaker [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
 
 Just wanted to add my 2c to this issue - We recently installed a
 version of cfmx on a completely clean server - the server itself runs
 fine but the amount of trouble we have had trying to get our previous
 applications to run under CFMX is mind boggling.

What issues *exactly*?
Which of those were not documented?


 I am sure that CFMX
 is as good as you describe it - of course there will be issues, there
 always are with new/updated products BUT it is my belief that these 
 products should have backwards compatability, ie sites that run under
 CF5 should also run under CFMX which is just doesn't seem to be the
 case at present, I know that unfortunately there will be a lot of
 redevelopment to make some of our more complex apps run under CFMX.

I wouldn't necessarily agree with you here. Environment changes are 
something that might force changes in an application, to the extend 
that your only option is to either accept the changes or don't change 
the environment.
For instance, I think the ODBC spec lets you issue multiple prepared 
statements at once, which the JDBC spec appears to forbid. In that 
case, I vote for dropping this feature, which was never explicitly 
supported anyway, instead of not moving to a Java based architecture.

All changes have to be documented, but incomplete backward 
compatibility is not a reason to just keep everything the same.

Jochem
~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=listsbody=lists/cf_talk
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for 
dependable ColdFusion Hosting.



RE: cfcookie and cfset SESSION.variable =

2002-10-09 Thread Jillian Carroll

Courtesy of Hal Helms, put this in your Application.cfm:

CFIF IsDefined( Cookie.CFID ) AND IsDefined( Cookie.CFTOKEN )
   cfset localCFID = Cookie.CFID
   cfset localCFTOKEN = Cookie.CFTOKEN
   cfcookie name=CFID value=#localCFID#
   cfcookie name=CFTOKEN value=#localCFTOKEN#
/CFIF

--
Jillian

-Original Message-
From: FlashGuy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 7:14 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: cfcookie and cfset SESSION.variable =


What if someone just closes IE?

On Wed, 9 Oct 2002 09:01:38 -0400, Everett, Al wrote:

 cfset temp=StructClear(Session)

  -Original Message-
  From: FlashGuy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 8:29 AM
  To: CF-Talk
  Subject: Re: cfcookie and cfset SESSION.variable =
 
 
  Whats the best way to clear ALL session variables when a user
  logouts or closes IE?
 
 
  On Wed, 09 Oct 2002 08:25:19 -0400, FlashGuy wrote:
 
   Nevermind...I got it to work.
  
   Thanks
  
   On Wed, 09 Oct 2002 08:22:42 -0400, FlashGuy wrote:
  
On Wed, 9 Oct 2002 08:02:24 -0400, Jon Hall wrote:
   
 Is your session variable getting updated? If not, there is your
 problem, if so, then the problem lies in some part of
  the program that
 is not using the session variables value, or not using
  it correctly.
 If the app works using just cookies, then switching to session
 variables shouldn't be a problem in and of itself.
   
Yes...I didn't change the line that was calling in the
  cookie. Now I get an error in my application saying that that
  it can't resolve the parameter SESSION.VariableName
   
Do I have to set it, maybe in my application.cfm to be
  Nil at first?
   
 I'm not sure how secure your app needs to be, but
  storing paths like
 that on the client in a cookie sounds very insecure. If
  I altered the
 cookie with the list of paths to include c:\, could I
  get a listing
 of that directory? Sounds like to me this variable
  should definitely
 be a session or client scoped variable.
   
This is strickly a intranet app.
   
 --
 jon
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Wednesday, October 9, 2002, 7:40:05 AM, you wrote:

 F HI,

 F I'm getting a little confused with cfcookies and
  cfset SESSION.varaible =. My application was using
  cfcookies and it seemed to work fine. I was reading in a
   field
from my
 F database which was a comma delimited field of
  directories on my hard drive. This was then put into a
  cookie. I have a template that allows the user to add or
  remove
 F directories for viewing in their navigation window
  (tree list). Any changes made from the template would be
  saved to the database and the cookie would be
   updated.

 F The problem I'm experiencing now is I changed all my
  cfcookie calls to use cfset SESSSION.variable =  and
  when I add/remove a directory and click my
  refresh
button it
 F won't update my navigation (tree list) frame until I
  actually close my IE and start it back up again. Then the
  appropriate directorie(s) don't appear which where
added/remove
 F from my template.

 F How can I make this update appear by refreshing?
  Do I *have* to use cookies in my case?


   
  
 


~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=listsbody=lists/cf_talk
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for 
dependable ColdFusion Hosting.



RE: cfcookie and cfset SESSION.variable =

2002-10-09 Thread Everett, Al

 I've heard about this but I've never done this before. What 
 do you mean by locks?

In CF5 or lower, to prevent server instability, you need to lock all
shared-scope variables, i.e., SERVER, APPLICATION, and SESSION. In all
versions of CF, if there is a possible race condition, you need to lock
your shared-scope variables.

Some TechNotes you should read:

ColdFusion MX Best Practices for Locking Shared Scope Variables:
http://www.macromedia.com/v1/Handlers/index.cfm?ID=23021Method=Full

ColdFusion 5 Locking Best Practices:
http://www.macromedia.com/v1/Handlers/index.cfm?ID=20370Method=Full

ColdFusion TechTips:
http://www.macromedia.com/v1/Handlers/index.cfm?ID=13810Method=Full

~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=listsbody=lists/cf_talk
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com



RE: Ways of Submission

2002-10-09 Thread Dave Wilson

onclick=form.submit()

-Original Message-
From: Mark Stephenson - Evolution Internet
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 09 October 2002 13:40
To: CF-Talk
Subject: OT: Ways of Submission


Sorry for the OT post but need a quick answer...

Does anyone know any javascript I can use for the onclick caller for a
rollover image that will submit a form?

I know you use image as a form type but that doesn't allow me to have a roll
over...

Kind Regards,



Mark Stephenson
New Media Director
Evolution Internet
T: 0870 757 1631
F: 0870 757 1632
W: www.evolutioninternet.co.uk
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


WARNING:
---
The information contained in this document and attachments is confidential
and intended only for the person(s) named above.  If you are not the
intended recipient you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying,
distribution, or any other use of the information is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this document by mistake, please notify the sender
immediately and destroy this document and attachments without making any
copy of any kind.

AVIS IMPORTANT:
---
Les informations contenues dans le present document et ses pieces jointes
sont strictement confidentielles et reservees a l'usage de la (des)
personne(s) a qui il est adresse. Si vous n'etes pas le destinataire, soyez
avise que toute divulgation, distribution, copie, ou autre utilisation de
ces informations est strictement prohibee.  Si vous avez recu ce document
par erreur, veuillez s'il vous plait communiquer immediatement avec
l'expediteur et detruire ce document sans en faire de copie sous quelque
forme.




-Original Message-
From: Thomas Chiverton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 09 October 2002 13:04
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CF vs ASP


 Being new at this, I am trying to determine why I should learn CF over ASP
 (or vice versa).

http://www.macromedia.com/software/coldfusion/productinfo/competitive/

Tom Chiverton
You don't have to be a mad scientist to believe in ColdFusion






~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=listsbody=lists/cf_talk
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com



RE: cfcookie and cfset SESSION.variable =

2002-10-09 Thread Everett, Al

Not necessarily. The Session variables are tied to the CFID and CFTOKEN,
which are Cookies on the client's machine. If the user comes back to your
site before the Session variables expire they'll still exist.

There are ways to get the CFID and CFTOKEN cookies to be deleted when the
browser is closed. Check the archives.

 -Original Message-
 From: FlashGuy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 9:14 AM
 To: CF-Talk
 Subject: RE: cfcookie and cfset SESSION.variable =
 
 
 What if someone just closes IE?
 
 On Wed, 9 Oct 2002 09:01:38 -0400, Everett, Al wrote:
 
  cfset temp=StructClear(Session)
  
   -Original Message-
   From: FlashGuy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
   Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 8:29 AM
   To: CF-Talk
   Subject: Re: cfcookie and cfset SESSION.variable =
   
   
   Whats the best way to clear ALL session variables when a user 
   logouts or closes IE?
   
   
   On Wed, 09 Oct 2002 08:25:19 -0400, FlashGuy wrote:
   
Nevermind...I got it to work.

Thanks

On Wed, 09 Oct 2002 08:22:42 -0400, FlashGuy wrote:

 On Wed, 9 Oct 2002 08:02:24 -0400, Jon Hall wrote:
 
  Is your session variable getting updated? If not, 
 there is your
  problem, if so, then the problem lies in some part of 
   the program that
  is not using the session variables value, or not using 
   it correctly.
  If the app works using just cookies, then switching 
 to session
  variables shouldn't be a problem in and of itself.
 
 Yes...I didn't change the line that was calling in the 
   cookie. Now I get an error in my application saying that that 
   it can't resolve the parameter SESSION.VariableName
 
 Do I have to set it, maybe in my application.cfm to be 
   Nil at first?
 
  I'm not sure how secure your app needs to be, but 
   storing paths like
  that on the client in a cookie sounds very insecure. If 
   I altered the
  cookie with the list of paths to include c:\, could I 
   get a listing
  of that directory? Sounds like to me this variable 
   should definitely
  be a session or client scoped variable.
 
 This is strickly a intranet app.
 
  -- 
  jon
  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  Wednesday, October 9, 2002, 7:40:05 AM, you wrote:
  
  F HI,
  
  F I'm getting a little confused with cfcookies and 
   cfset SESSION.varaible =. My application was using 
   cfcookies and it seemed to work fine. I was reading in a 
field 
 from my 
  F database which was a comma delimited field of 
   directories on my hard drive. This was then put into a 
   cookie. I have a template that allows the user to add or 
   remove 
  F directories for viewing in their navigation window 
   (tree list). Any changes made from the template would be 
   saved to the database and the cookie would be 
updated. 
  
  F The problem I'm experiencing now is I changed all my 
   cfcookie calls to use cfset SESSSION.variable =  and 
   when I add/remove a directory and click my 
   refresh 
 button it 
  F won't update my navigation (tree list) frame until I 
   actually close my IE and start it back up again. Then the 
   appropriate directorie(s) don't appear which where 
 added/remove 
  F from my template.
  
  F How can I make this update appear by refreshing? 
   Do I *have* to use cookies in my case?
  
  
 

   
  
 
~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=listsbody=lists/cf_talk
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in 
ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm



RE: QUestion about Input File and CFFILE

2002-10-09 Thread Yager, Brian T Contractor/Sverdrup

this worked great!  Thanks a million!

Brian Yager
President - North AL Cold Fusion Users Group
http://www.nacfug.com
Sr. Systems Analyst
Sverdrup/CIC
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(256) 842-8342


-Original Message-
From: Robert Polickoski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 4:15 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: QUestion about Input File and CFFILE


Brian,

Here is the code I  am using:

 script language=JavaScript
function parseFileName(theFile)
{
   var start = -1;
   while (theFile.value.indexOf(\\, start + 1) != -1)
   {
  start = theFile.value.indexOf(\\, start + 1);
   }
   FileUpload.action = FileUpload.action +
theFile.value.substring(start+1, theFile.value.length);
}

 /script
/head

body
form id=FileUpload name=FileUpload title=Form to upload a file from the
user to the server action=FileUpload.cfm?FileName= method=post
enctype=multipart/form-data onsubmit=validateForm(this)
   label id=UploadFileLabel title=Lebel for UploadFile Input
for=UploadFile
  Select your file
   /label
   input id=UploadFile name=UploadFile title=File to be uploaded
type=file onchange=parseFileName(this)
   br
   button id=UploadButton name=UploadButton title=Button to start the
Upload type=submit
  Upload
   /button
/form


Then in fileupload.cfm I have:

 cfset uploadPath = Left(PATH_TRANSLATED, Find(FileUpload.cfm,
PATH_TRANSLATED)-1)  UploadFiles\
 cffile action=upload destination=#uploadPath# filefield=UploadFile
nameconflict=makeunique attributes=readonly

It is working for me.  I hope this helps.

Take care,
Robert

-- Original Message --
From: Yager, Brian T Contractor/Sverdrup [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date:  Tue, 8 Oct 2002 15:11:09 -0500 

I am trying to upload a file using CFFILE.  I can get it to wrok just fine.
But
what I can't do is get the name of the file BEFORE I use CFFILE.  When I try to
output the name of the file input box, I get some weird name with an extension
of .tmp.  Can anyone help me with what I need please?

Thanks,

Brian Yager
President - North AL Cold Fusion Users Group
http://www.nacfug.com
Sr. Systems Analyst
Sverdrup/CIC
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(256) 842-8342



~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=listsbody=lists/cf_talk
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for 
dependable ColdFusion Hosting.



RE: The Myth of Bugs (Was Huge Ungainly thread of Doom)

2002-10-09 Thread Jeffry Houser

At 09:10 AM 10/9/2002 -0400, you wrote:
Simon-

 This is another gripe of mine. The issue is that we tested 
 backwards compatibility extensively, almost exhaustively.

 What *specific* issues did you run into? Were you running Fusebox?

  : chuckle:  I found this funny.  Asking Simon if he uses Fusebox, is like 
asking Hal Helms if he uses cfobjects.

  Back to your regularly scheduled list posting now.


--
Jeffry Houser | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Need a Web Developer?  Contact me!
AIM: Reboog711  | Phone: 1-203-379-0773
--
My CFMX Book: 
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0072225564/instantcoldfu-20
My Books: http://www.instantcoldfusion.com
My Band: http://www.farcryfly.com 

~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=listsbody=lists/cf_talk
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com



RE: QUestion about Input File and CFFILE

2002-10-09 Thread Mosh Teitelbaum

Brian:

Is there a particular reason why you have to change the filename before you
use CFFILE for upload?  Because you can always follow your CFFILE
ACTION=Upload with a CFFILE ACTION=Rename if necessary.

--
Mosh Teitelbaum
evoch, LLC
Tel: (301) 625-9191
Fax: (301) 933-3651
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW: http://www.evoch.com/


 -Original Message-
 From: Yager, Brian T Contractor/Sverdrup
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 8:33 AM
 To: CF-Talk
 Subject: RE: QUestion about Input File and CFFILE


 you can only use that AFTER you have used CFFILE.  I need the
 name of the file
 BEFORE I use CFFILE so I can get the extension and change the file name.

 Brian Yager
 President - North AL Cold Fusion Users Group
 http://www.nacfug.com
 Sr. Systems Analyst
 Sverdrup/CIC
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (256) 842-8342


 -Original Message-
 From: Jeff Garza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 4:56 PM
 To: CF-Talk
 Subject: Re: QUestion about Input File and CFFILE


 What does #CFFILE.ClientFile# return?

 Jeff

 - Original Message -
 From: Yager, Brian T Contractor/Sverdrup [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 1:11 PM
 Subject: QUestion about Input File and CFFILE


 I am trying to upload a file using CFFILE.  I can get it to wrok
 just fine.
 But
 what I can't do is get the name of the file BEFORE I use CFFILE.
 When I try
 to
 output the name of the file input box, I get some weird name with an
 extension
 of .tmp.  Can anyone help me with what I need please?

 Thanks,

 Brian Yager
 President - North AL Cold Fusion Users Group
 http://www.nacfug.com
 Sr. Systems Analyst
 Sverdrup/CIC
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 (256) 842-8342



 
~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=listsbody=lists/cf_talk
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in 
ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm



RE: Ways of Submission

2002-10-09 Thread Mark Stephenson - Evolution Internet

Doh!

Thanks

Mark Stephenson
New Media Director
Evolution Internet
T: 0870 757 1631
F: 0870 757 1632
W: www.evolutioninternet.co.uk
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


WARNING:
---
The information contained in this document and attachments is confidential
and intended only for the person(s) named above.  If you are not the
intended recipient you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying,
distribution, or any other use of the information is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this document by mistake, please notify the sender
immediately and destroy this document and attachments without making any
copy of any kind.

AVIS IMPORTANT:
---
Les informations contenues dans le present document et ses pieces jointes
sont strictement confidentielles et reservees a l'usage de la (des)
personne(s) a qui il est adresse. Si vous n'etes pas le destinataire, soyez
avise que toute divulgation, distribution, copie, ou autre utilisation de
ces informations est strictement prohibee.  Si vous avez recu ce document
par erreur, veuillez s'il vous plait communiquer immediatement avec
l'expediteur et detruire ce document sans en faire de copie sous quelque
forme.




-Original Message-
From: Dave Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 09 October 2002 14:19
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Ways of Submission


onclick=form.submit()

-Original Message-
From: Mark Stephenson - Evolution Internet
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 09 October 2002 13:40
To: CF-Talk
Subject: OT: Ways of Submission


Sorry for the OT post but need a quick answer...

Does anyone know any javascript I can use for the onclick caller for a
rollover image that will submit a form?

I know you use image as a form type but that doesn't allow me to have a roll
over...

Kind Regards,



Mark Stephenson
New Media Director
Evolution Internet
T: 0870 757 1631
F: 0870 757 1632
W: www.evolutioninternet.co.uk
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


WARNING:
---
The information contained in this document and attachments is confidential
and intended only for the person(s) named above.  If you are not the
intended recipient you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying,
distribution, or any other use of the information is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this document by mistake, please notify the sender
immediately and destroy this document and attachments without making any
copy of any kind.

AVIS IMPORTANT:
---
Les informations contenues dans le present document et ses pieces jointes
sont strictement confidentielles et reservees a l'usage de la (des)
personne(s) a qui il est adresse. Si vous n'etes pas le destinataire, soyez
avise que toute divulgation, distribution, copie, ou autre utilisation de
ces informations est strictement prohibee.  Si vous avez recu ce document
par erreur, veuillez s'il vous plait communiquer immediatement avec
l'expediteur et detruire ce document sans en faire de copie sous quelque
forme.




-Original Message-
From: Thomas Chiverton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 09 October 2002 13:04
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CF vs ASP


 Being new at this, I am trying to determine why I should learn CF over ASP
 (or vice versa).

http://www.macromedia.com/software/coldfusion/productinfo/competitive/

Tom Chiverton
You don't have to be a mad scientist to believe in ColdFusion







~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=listsbody=lists/cf_talk
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com



RE: Ways of Submission

2002-10-09 Thread Mosh Teitelbaum

Mark:

The code would look something like:

onClick=document.FormName.submit();

Just change FormName to whatever you've named your form.

--
Mosh Teitelbaum
evoch, LLC
Tel: (301) 625-9191
Fax: (301) 933-3651
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW: http://www.evoch.com/


 -Original Message-
 From: Mark Stephenson - Evolution Internet
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 8:40 AM
 To: CF-Talk
 Subject: OT: Ways of Submission


 Sorry for the OT post but need a quick answer...

 Does anyone know any javascript I can use for the onclick caller for a
 rollover image that will submit a form?

 I know you use image as a form type but that doesn't allow me to
 have a roll
 over...

 Kind Regards,



 Mark Stephenson
 New Media Director
 Evolution Internet
 T: 0870 757 1631
 F: 0870 757 1632
 W: www.evolutioninternet.co.uk
 E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


 WARNING:
 ---
 The information contained in this document and attachments is confidential
 and intended only for the person(s) named above.  If you are not the
 intended recipient you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying,
 distribution, or any other use of the information is strictly prohibited.
 If you have received this document by mistake, please notify the sender
 immediately and destroy this document and attachments without making any
 copy of any kind.

 AVIS IMPORTANT:
 ---
 Les informations contenues dans le present document et ses pieces jointes
 sont strictement confidentielles et reservees a l'usage de la (des)
 personne(s) a qui il est adresse. Si vous n'etes pas le
 destinataire, soyez
 avise que toute divulgation, distribution, copie, ou autre utilisation de
 ces informations est strictement prohibee.  Si vous avez recu ce document
 par erreur, veuillez s'il vous plait communiquer immediatement avec
 l'expediteur et detruire ce document sans en faire de copie sous quelque
 forme.




 -Original Message-
 From: Thomas Chiverton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: 09 October 2002 13:04
 To: CF-Talk
 Subject: RE: CF vs ASP


  Being new at this, I am trying to determine why I should learn
 CF over ASP
  (or vice versa).

 http://www.macromedia.com/software/coldfusion/productinfo/competitive/

 Tom Chiverton
 You don't have to be a mad scientist to believe in ColdFusion





 
~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=listsbody=lists/cf_talk
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at 
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm



RE: cfcookie and cfset SESSION.variable =

2002-10-09 Thread FlashGuy

On Wed, 9 Oct 2002 09:23:17 -0400, Everett, Al wrote:

 Not necessarily. The Session variables are tied to the CFID and CFTOKEN,
 which are Cookies on the client's machine. If the user comes back to your
 site before the Session variables expire they'll still exist.

So the only way to have these cleared (at logout or when IE is closed) would be to use 
cookies rather than session variables?

 There are ways to get the CFID and CFTOKEN cookies to be deleted when the
 browser is closed. Check the archives.
 
  -Original Message-
  From: FlashGuy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 9:14 AM
  To: CF-Talk
  Subject: RE: cfcookie and cfset SESSION.variable =
  
  
  What if someone just closes IE?
  
  On Wed, 9 Oct 2002 09:01:38 -0400, Everett, Al wrote:
  
   cfset temp=StructClear(Session)
   
-Original Message-
From: FlashGuy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 8:29 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: cfcookie and cfset SESSION.variable =


Whats the best way to clear ALL session variables when a user 
logouts or closes IE?


On Wed, 09 Oct 2002 08:25:19 -0400, FlashGuy wrote:

 Nevermind...I got it to work.
 
 Thanks
 
 On Wed, 09 Oct 2002 08:22:42 -0400, FlashGuy wrote:
 
  On Wed, 9 Oct 2002 08:02:24 -0400, Jon Hall wrote:
  
   Is your session variable getting updated? If not, 
  there is your
   problem, if so, then the problem lies in some part of 
the program that
   is not using the session variables value, or not using 
it correctly.
   If the app works using just cookies, then switching 
  to session
   variables shouldn't be a problem in and of itself.
  
  Yes...I didn't change the line that was calling in the 
cookie. Now I get an error in my application saying that that 
it can't resolve the parameter SESSION.VariableName
  
  Do I have to set it, maybe in my application.cfm to be 
Nil at first?
  
   I'm not sure how secure your app needs to be, but 
storing paths like
   that on the client in a cookie sounds very insecure. If 
I altered the
   cookie with the list of paths to include c:\, could I 
get a listing
   of that directory? Sounds like to me this variable 
should definitely
   be a session or client scoped variable.
  
  This is strickly a intranet app.
  
   -- 
   jon
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   
   Wednesday, October 9, 2002, 7:40:05 AM, you wrote:
   
   F HI,
   
   F I'm getting a little confused with cfcookies and 
cfset SESSION.varaible =. My application was using 
cfcookies and it seemed to work fine. I was reading in a 
 field 
  from my 
   F database which was a comma delimited field of 
directories on my hard drive. This was then put into a 
cookie. I have a template that allows the user to add or 
remove 
   F directories for viewing in their navigation window 
(tree list). Any changes made from the template would be 
saved to the database and the cookie would be 
 updated. 
   
   F The problem I'm experiencing now is I changed all my 
cfcookie calls to use cfset SESSSION.variable =  and 
when I add/remove a directory and click my 
refresh 
  button it 
   F won't update my navigation (tree list) frame until I 
actually close my IE and start it back up again. Then the 
appropriate directorie(s) don't appear which where 
  added/remove 
   F from my template.
   
   F How can I make this update appear by refreshing? 
Do I *have* to use cookies in my case?
   
   
  
 

   
  
 
~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=listsbody=lists/cf_talk
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at 
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm



RE: The Myth of Bugs (Was Huge Ungainly thread of Doom)

2002-10-09 Thread Benoit Hediard

Well said Jesse.
The funny thing is that most of the people complaining during those threads
have problems with JDBC, which is not directly related to MM/CFMX (but more
to third party JDBC drivers or M$ implementation)...
SQL Server 7 is getting very old right now (and it's a M$ product), so I
would not be surprised if it has some problems with JDBC.

CFMX is a GREAT product and works extremely well (for a V1.0!).
Of course, there is some minor pure CF issues but all of them have easy
workarounds.

I will NEVER go back to CF5.
CFCs and Flash Remoting have an incredible potential and offer so many great
new possibilities.
People also have to think about what they can do now... (which was
impossible with CF5-)

Benoit Hediard
www.benorama.com


-Message d'origine-
De : Jesse Noller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Envoyé : mercredi 9 octobre 2002 14:48
À : CF-Talk
Objet : The Myth of Bugs (Was Huge Ungainly thread of Doom)


All-

Funny, I should stop sleeping. I wanted to take a moment to address
something that is bothering me a great deal.

Out of the huge thread yesterday, there came a lot of realizations that
Macromedia is currently examining internally, misconceptions if you will
about the way MM communicates things.

Make no mistake, these issues are being discussed, as Sean and Vernon have
both mentioned. However, one of the things that bothered me the most was the
fact several people basically said:

OH NOES! CFMX is poop! I won't buy/run it until all of these horrible bugs
are fixed.

This is what I refer too as the Myth of Bugs. I think something many
people are forgetting is the scenario of a mailing list, or the forums. This
is the scenario that discourses the fact that mainly the only people who
will post to forums, and mailing lists in a typical day are those who have
issues.

Now, if I read cf-talk on $RAND day, I could safely assume that CFMX was
crippled, a lame-duck to the market. Does this assumption make it true?

No.

It bothers me to hear people say that they will not even try CFMX out
because there are so many show stopping issues. I would beg the argument
that this is far, very far, from the truth.

Those of you dropping CFMX or completely ignoring it because of the
debates/issues raised on CF-Talk and the Forums would be better served if
you actually downloaded and ran your application yourself, instead of taking
the word of the mailing lists and forums.

CFMX, as has been stated before, was the *most* tested version of
ColdFusion *ever* put on market, I can't make this clear enough.

I would imagine that some of the show stopper issues that are being
raised have either been addresses, will be address, or are simply
environmental. I would also state that the only people who raise the CFMX
is Poop flag are those who have hit a bug, or other issue, which is show
stopping to *them*. Remember, hundreds of people download CFMX daily (we
have the numbers that show this) and run it without issue.

*of COURSE* those people who run into any type of problem are immediately
going to identify that problem as a show stopper and post to the mailing
lists and the forums screaming as loud as they can to hopefully either find
a solution or get Macromedia to help them for free.

I can only stress that those of you reading these lists and the forums take
everything you see with a grain of salt. Not everyone is running into these
issues, everyone is not throwing CFMX out the window. We have *many*
customers running CFMX in production, under load, daily, fine.

If you install CFMX, and you run it, and you find an issue, I cannot stress
enough that you contact support *immediately* to get that issue addressed
ASAP.

I will not admit that the ColdFusion team (myself included) shipped Poop.
I will not admit to having wasted nearly two years of my life, I know this
is *not* the case. I personally believe that the firestorms shown on this
list, and the forums, are not the rule, but rather the exception to the
rule.

Please, try it out *for yourselves* before passing judgment.


Sorry for ranting, it bothers me. A lot.


Jesse Noller
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Macromedia Server Development

No concept man forms is valid unless he
integrates it without contradiction into the
sum of his knowledge.
- Ayn Rand

~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=listsbody=lists/cf_talk
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at 
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm



RE: cfcookie and cfset SESSION.variable =

2002-10-09 Thread FlashGuy

OK...thanks.  I noticed from the examples that they use cflock around only one 
cfset. Can you group cfset's?

cflock...
cfset SESSION.var1 = something1
cfset SESSION.var2 = something2
cfset SESSION.var3 = something3
/cflock

On Wed, 9 Oct 2002 09:19:59 -0400, Everett, Al wrote:

  I've heard about this but I've never done this before. What 
  do you mean by locks?
 
 In CF5 or lower, to prevent server instability, you need to lock all
 shared-scope variables, i.e., SERVER, APPLICATION, and SESSION. In all
 versions of CF, if there is a possible race condition, you need to lock
 your shared-scope variables.
 
 Some TechNotes you should read:
 
 ColdFusion MX Best Practices for Locking Shared Scope Variables:
 http://www.macromedia.com/v1/Handlers/index.cfm?ID=23021Method=Full
 
 ColdFusion 5 Locking Best Practices:
 http://www.macromedia.com/v1/Handlers/index.cfm?ID=20370Method=Full
 
 ColdFusion TechTips:
 http://www.macromedia.com/v1/Handlers/index.cfm?ID=13810Method=Full
 
 
~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=listsbody=lists/cf_talk
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at 
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm



RE: cfcookie and cfset SESSION.variable =

2002-10-09 Thread FlashGuy

I have multiple application.cfm's Would this code go in all or just the logout.cfm 
template?


On Wed, 9 Oct 2002 07:17:45 -0600, Jillian Carroll wrote:

 Courtesy of Hal Helms, put this in your Application.cfm:
 
 CFIF IsDefined( Cookie.CFID ) AND IsDefined( Cookie.CFTOKEN )
cfset localCFID = Cookie.CFID
cfset localCFTOKEN = Cookie.CFTOKEN
cfcookie name=CFID value=#localCFID#
cfcookie name=CFTOKEN value=#localCFTOKEN#
 /CFIF
 
 --
 Jillian
 
 -Original Message-
 From: FlashGuy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 7:14 AM
 To: CF-Talk
 Subject: RE: cfcookie and cfset SESSION.variable =
 
 
 What if someone just closes IE?
 
 On Wed, 9 Oct 2002 09:01:38 -0400, Everett, Al wrote:
 
  cfset temp=StructClear(Session)
 
   -Original Message-
   From: FlashGuy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
   Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 8:29 AM
   To: CF-Talk
   Subject: Re: cfcookie and cfset SESSION.variable =
  
  
   Whats the best way to clear ALL session variables when a user
   logouts or closes IE?
  
  
   On Wed, 09 Oct 2002 08:25:19 -0400, FlashGuy wrote:
  
Nevermind...I got it to work.
   
Thanks
   
On Wed, 09 Oct 2002 08:22:42 -0400, FlashGuy wrote:
   
 On Wed, 9 Oct 2002 08:02:24 -0400, Jon Hall wrote:

  Is your session variable getting updated? If not, there is your
  problem, if so, then the problem lies in some part of
   the program that
  is not using the session variables value, or not using
   it correctly.
  If the app works using just cookies, then switching to session
  variables shouldn't be a problem in and of itself.

 Yes...I didn't change the line that was calling in the
   cookie. Now I get an error in my application saying that that
   it can't resolve the parameter SESSION.VariableName

 Do I have to set it, maybe in my application.cfm to be
   Nil at first?

  I'm not sure how secure your app needs to be, but
   storing paths like
  that on the client in a cookie sounds very insecure. If
   I altered the
  cookie with the list of paths to include c:\, could I
   get a listing
  of that directory? Sounds like to me this variable
   should definitely
  be a session or client scoped variable.

 This is strickly a intranet app.

  --
  jon
  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  Wednesday, October 9, 2002, 7:40:05 AM, you wrote:
 
  F HI,
 
  F I'm getting a little confused with cfcookies and
   cfset SESSION.varaible =. My application was using
   cfcookies and it seemed to work fine. I was reading in a
field
 from my
  F database which was a comma delimited field of
   directories on my hard drive. This was then put into a
   cookie. I have a template that allows the user to add or
   remove
  F directories for viewing in their navigation window
   (tree list). Any changes made from the template would be
   saved to the database and the cookie would be
updated.
 
  F The problem I'm experiencing now is I changed all my
   cfcookie calls to use cfset SESSSION.variable =  and
   when I add/remove a directory and click my
   refresh
 button it
  F won't update my navigation (tree list) frame until I
   actually close my IE and start it back up again. Then the
   appropriate directorie(s) don't appear which where
 added/remove
  F from my template.
 
  F How can I make this update appear by refreshing?
   Do I *have* to use cookies in my case?
 
 

   
  
 
 
 
~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=listsbody=lists/cf_talk
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for 
dependable ColdFusion Hosting.



RE: CF vs ASP

2002-10-09 Thread Gary W. Sullivan II

Well, Kim... Keep in mind that you can still be a .NET guru and live in
harmony with CF!!!

I, too, am a Windows App Developer, and have been using .NET for about 2
years now (only 5 months in a production environment). I use CFMX in
conjunction with .NET with great success. I still use CF for
internet/intranet development (because of it's ease of use and
development), Asp.NET for heavy heavy intranet apps, and C# for custom
ASP.NET controls and for regular application development. I also make
use of .NET Remoting and some COM wrapping (with C#) as well, and am
looking in Windows CE.NET development as well. 

With the 2 together (plus Flash for some PocketPC development), I
couldn't be happier (or more productive) than I am right now :-)


 - Gary Sullivan

-Original Message-
From: Kris Pilles [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 9:07 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CF vs ASP


I'm hard pressed not to move all of my future development to .Net.  AS
much as I love CF and how well I know it, Being a Windows application
developer, I can't not switch to .NET it will allow me to have all of
our programmers on 1 platforma dn deploy our applications in whatever
enviroment that we see fit  Hate to say it but my days on the list
are numbered...

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 9:03 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CF vs ASP


I think you would be better off learning JSP(java server pages) and some
j2ee. Why? Because what CFMX does is translate CFML pages into some
servlets (correct me if I am wrong) so why learning CF(providing you
don't know it already) when you can learn Java(JSP and stuff). As I see
it CF is far from beating Java(that's why they choose to use java in
their very own CF)

Well, I have quite some experience with CF(more than 3 years) and I
didn't upgrade to CFMX and I will never do it.

Why not ASP?
Well because if you do that you are stuck with windows.
If that is not a problem go for it :)

Marius Burz



~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=listsbody=lists/cf_talk
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at 
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm



Re: The Myth of Bugs (Was Huge Ungainly thread of Doom)

2002-10-09 Thread Jon Hall

Wednesday, October 9, 2002, 8:48:24 AM, you wrote:
JN All-
JN Funny, I should stop sleeping. I wanted to take a moment to address something that 
is bothering me a great deal.

Hey, don't forget, people are passionate about CF, and that's a good
thing.

Every CF developer has had to basically start from scratch...way back
in the pre-MX era we could all count on a dozen people knowing the
answer to an odd CF problem. Now, no one really knows all the answers
yet, and there is naturally going to be a lot more unresolved quesions
than their used to be until we all figure out the answers to the new
questions. We will get there.

-- 
jon
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=listsbody=lists/cf_talk
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more 
resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm



RE: Can we help? (was RE: LONG time CF Supporter - About ready to dump CF!)

2002-10-09 Thread Cameron Childress

 Well MM should have already done this... and documented rules of
 new coding in RED rather than have developers waste time fighting issues.
 Hopefully we will see some better standards from MM.

Joe,

They did.  There's an entire book in the CFMX documentation set devoted to
upgrading, and pointing out the differences between CF5 and CFMX functions,
tags, and syntax.  Granted, it might not include things that came up after
release, but I'm not sure we can fault them for not being able to see into
the future.

They also included a code compatibility analyzer with CFMX so that you can
pre-run your code to see if there are any huge red flags.  Again, it may not
catch 100% of issues because some have come out since launch, but I do think
they tried hard to give us the tools, they are just misunderstood or not
used at all.

I can't help but point out that this is more evidence of a communication
problem at MM.  While it's not the job of MM to slap a big RTFM on the front
of every install, but it would be nice to see a PR campaign launched showing
how easy it is to upgrade and how stable the platform is.  An upgrade
center at MM.com wouldn't be totally uncalled for either.  Grouping KB
articles, the upgrade guide, etc all in one place for people to refer to
when they are upgrading.  Maybe this exists and I haven't been thorough in
my search, but all I came up with at MM.com was marketing drivel (required
to sell product, but not helpful to the audience on this list).

What if everyone on this list suggested a *constructive* solution with every
complaint in this thread?  Think that could happen?

-Cameron

-
Cameron Childress
Sumo Consulting Inc.
---
cell:  678-637-5072
aim:   cameroncf
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


 -Original Message-
 From: Joe Eugene [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 10:47 PM
 To: CF-Talk
 Subject: RE: Can we help? (was RE: LONG time CF Supporter - About ready
 to dump CF!)


 I personally think.. alot of the problems are due to making CFMX
 very backward compatible with older versions of CF.
 Why did MM claim CFMX backward compatible? Why not .NET Strategy?

 Again i think its the responsibility of developers to test their code
 on a totally different product(CFMX)..Load Test..etc. before going into
 production.

 Well MM should have already done this... and documented rules of
 new coding in RED rather than have developers waste time fighting issues.
 Hopefully we will see some better standards from MM.

 Joe


~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=listsbody=lists/cf_talk
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in 
ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm



TagCFMail::sendMessage

2002-10-09 Thread Larry Lyons

Hi,

We have several apps that use CFMail, normally without any problems. Now
suddenly we're getting the following error messages:

unknown exception condition

TagCFMail::sendMessage

The error occurred while processing an element with a general identifier of
(CFMAIL)


When I look in the mail spool folders I find several 0 length files. I have
not seen this before, any suggestions would help.

thanks,

larry

--
Larry C. Lyons
ColdFusion/Web Developer
Certified Advanced ColdFusion 5 Developer
EBStor.com
8870 Rixlew Lane, Suite 204
Manassas, Virginia 20109-3795
tel:   (703) 393-7930
fax:   (703) 393-2659
Web:   http://www.ebstor.com
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Chaos, panic, and disorder - my work here is done.
--
~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=listsbody=lists/cf_talk
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more 
resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm



RE: Can we help? (was RE: LONG time CF Supporter - About ready t o dump CF!)

2002-10-09 Thread Vernon Viehe

Cameron suggested:

 An upgrade
 center at MM.com wouldn't be totally uncalled for either.  
 Grouping KB
 articles, the upgrade guide, etc all in one place for people 
 to refer to
 when they are upgrading.  

I can't promise anything but to put the idea forward (which I just did before writing 
this reply), but I like the idea alot. Thanks Cameron!

-Vern

Vernon Viehe
ColdFusion Community Manager
Developer Relations
Macromedia, Inc.
Online diary: http://vvmx.blogspot.com/ 

Macromedia DevCon 2002, October 27-30, Orlando, Florida
Architecting a New Internet Experience
Register today at www.macromedia.com/go/devcon2002
~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=listsbody=lists/cf_talk
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more 
resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm



Push and CFFILE Question

2002-10-09 Thread Les Mizzell

Haven't done this before, looking for some pointers...

A. Page has a button on it to Create File from a database query
   (got no problem with this part)

B. When pressed, the file is created and pushed at the user, whom would
immediately get a prompt to Save or Open the file.

Possible? The client wants one simple step to do this and would prefer to
*not* have to browse/select the file after creation or click anything to
download. (Lazy, I know.)

Thanks,

Les
*
Happily using CFMX with
little or no problems...
*

~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=listsbody=lists/cf_talk
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more 
resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm



RE: Push and CFFILE Question

2002-10-09 Thread Alistair Davidson

Les

Write the file and then deliver it using CFCONTENT

HTH

Alistair

-Original Message-
From: Les Mizzell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 09 October 2002 16:01
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Push and CFFILE Question

Haven't done this before, looking for some pointers...

A. Page has a button on it to Create File from a database query
   (got no problem with this part)

B. When pressed, the file is created and pushed at the user, whom
would
immediately get a prompt to Save or Open the file.

Possible? The client wants one simple step to do this and would prefer
to
*not* have to browse/select the file after creation or click anything to
download. (Lazy, I know.)

Thanks,

Les
*
Happily using CFMX with
little or no problems...
*


~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=listsbody=lists/cf_talk
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for 
dependable ColdFusion Hosting.



RE: CF vs ASP

2002-10-09 Thread Kris Pilles

Good point.

-Original Message-
From: Gary W. Sullivan II [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 9:18 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CF vs ASP


Well, Kim... Keep in mind that you can still be a .NET guru and live in
harmony with CF!!!

I, too, am a Windows App Developer, and have been using .NET for about 2
years now (only 5 months in a production environment). I use CFMX in
conjunction with .NET with great success. I still use CF for
internet/intranet development (because of it's ease of use and
development), Asp.NET for heavy heavy intranet apps, and C# for custom
ASP.NET controls and for regular application development. I also make
use of .NET Remoting and some COM wrapping (with C#) as well, and am
looking in Windows CE.NET development as well. 

With the 2 together (plus Flash for some PocketPC development), I
couldn't be happier (or more productive) than I am right now :-)


 - Gary Sullivan

-Original Message-
From: Kris Pilles [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 9:07 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CF vs ASP


I'm hard pressed not to move all of my future development to .Net.  AS
much as I love CF and how well I know it, Being a Windows application
developer, I can't not switch to .NET it will allow me to have all of
our programmers on 1 platforma dn deploy our applications in whatever
enviroment that we see fit  Hate to say it but my days on the list
are numbered...

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 9:03 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CF vs ASP


I think you would be better off learning JSP(java server pages) and some
j2ee. Why? Because what CFMX does is translate CFML pages into some
servlets (correct me if I am wrong) so why learning CF(providing you
don't know it already) when you can learn Java(JSP and stuff). As I see
it CF is far from beating Java(that's why they choose to use java in
their very own CF)

Well, I have quite some experience with CF(more than 3 years) and I
didn't upgrade to CFMX and I will never do it.

Why not ASP?
Well because if you do that you are stuck with windows.
If that is not a problem go for it :)

Marius Burz




~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=listsbody=lists/cf_talk
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com



RE: LONG time CF Supporter - About ready to dump CF!

2002-10-09 Thread Tony Carcieri

Vernon,

You're one hell of a class act! Someone who cares enough to actually speak
to someone and not go to automated phone support. I applaud you! It's nice
to see that some people care about us lil guys!

Thanks,
T

-Original Message-
From: Vernon Viehe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 5:46 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: LONG time CF Supporter - About ready to dump CF!


Lee,

I appreciate your need TODAY, and I sympathize with your plight. However,
there are a couple of things to keep in mind...This problem didn't just crop
up today, and from the sound of it, it doesn't sound like it can be solved
today.

I strongly urge you to contact support, possibly become a Gold Support
customer. That program was designed for this kind of urgent service.

If I've read this thread correctly, you've said you don't want to call
support because you're afraid you'll be charged unfairly for something that
is a CFMX bug, yet I've not seen anyone on this list say that they have been
charged in such a situation, but they have reiterated just the opposite.

I'll repeat my earlier reassurance, if anyone, including you, are charged
for a support incident, and you don't think the charge is fair, I will
thoroughly look into it.

Trust me, I'm not unsympathetic, but unfortunately, this list is not an
official, one-to-one support venue. It's not where one turns for direct,
urgent one-to-one contact. I strongly urge you to work with our support
department instead of relying upon community lists/forums for urgent
situations where you need direct assistance from Macromedia.

The kind of simple information you seek simply isn't simple - but we are
always in an ongoing effort to get this information to our customers, and
will continue to do so.

If you'd like to speak with me personally, e-mail me your contact info
off-list, and I'll give you a call.

Vernon Viehe
ColdFusion Community Manager
Developer Relations
Macromedia, Inc.
Online diary: http://vvmx.blogspot.com/

Macromedia DevCon 2002, October 27-30, Orlando, Florida
Architecting a New Internet Experience
Register today at www.macromedia.com/go/devcon2002

 -Original Message-
 From: Lee Fuller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 1:01 PM
 To: CF-Talk
 Subject: RE: LONG time CF Supporter - About ready to dump CF!


 Vernon,

 I completely understand.  However, looking at it from my vantage point
 (and I'm pretty sure I'm not alone here on this mountain top
 - or at the
 bottom of this pit.. depending upon your viewpoint), I have a problem
 TODAY.  One that is causing me serious trouble TODAY.  I know that
 things like this take time, and I truly believe that this is not an MM
 thing.  That's not my view of it at all.  My view is simple
 (and I won't
 repeat it and bore everyone to death).

 Reality is that I need a solution TODAY.  Sometime to keep my people
 from throwing the baby out with the bath water.

 Maybe it would help for MM to post a simple, clean and concise,
 page-by-page setting list of how you (MM) suggest we setup our servers
 (using gulp IIS5, of course) to make sure that CFMX works properly.

 Specifically --

   - Page-by-page settings with the Administrator
   - Specific IIS changes/additions/amendments
   - Specific changes to CFMX setup files (similar to the XML file
 changes for multi-homing)
   - Some traps and tricks (simply put)

 I know that you have the best practices and performance
 tuning white
 papers.  However, a checklist would be far more helpful -- so that
 people like me that are experiencing a problem can turn to this
 checklist (knowing that it's not a cure-all) to make certain we have
 things set to MM's recommendations.

 Thoughts?

 | -Original Message-
 | From: Vernon Viehe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 | Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 11:44 AM
 | To: CF-Talk
 | Subject: RE: LONG time CF Supporter - About ready to dump CF!
 |
 |
 | Lee, Cameron, I'm mulling over thoughtful responses to your
 | thoughtful posts...
 |
 | But I couldn't resist a quick reply here:
 |
 | Macromedia's merger with Allaire was very expensive, and as
 | is the case with any merger, it's not been totally without
 | merger pains, which has been felt internally by most every employee.
 |
 | Please don't mistake the challenges presented from a merger
 | and also the challenges of a ground-up rewrite as lack of
 | full backing from Macromedia. I can assure you, we didn't go
 | through the expense and pains of such a challenging merger,
 | just to back-burner CF. CF is an extremely important part of
 | Macromedia's product line.
 |
 | There are folks running CFMX quite successfully - that's not
 | to say that there's no work to be done, but it's not all
 | blood  gore. We've made it through other rough spots, and
 | we'll make it through this one as well. It's as important to
 | our livelihood as it is to your livelihoods.
 |
 | Vernon Viehe
 | ColdFusion 

re: not another mx boo boo

2002-10-09 Thread Aaron Rouse

From best I can tell it is in fact part of his job.  It is good to see that MM has 
employees out in these circles to best represent company with such attitudes and at 
times insulting behavior.  Anyone know who we could contact at MM via smail to 
compliment such things?

Oh, wait, nevermind I am just part of that childish group(Sean The MM hat wearer 
words).

 Sean, You're not impressing me with your defensive
 attitude. Is all this arguing really part of your  job?

--
Snipe - CF_BotMaster Network=EFNet Channel=ColdFusion
--
~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=listsbody=lists/cf_talk
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more 
resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm



JDBC implementation (was RE: 3rd Party JDBC Drivers was Re: LONG time CF Supporter - About ready to dump CF!)

2002-10-09 Thread Matt Liotta

It would seem to me that the underlying J2EE application server
implements everything that goes along with JDBC drivers like connection
pooling, etc. Possibly, the people who are having JDBC problems with
CFMX should try CFMX J2EE on top of IBM WebSphere and see if the
problems go away.

Matt Liotta
President  CEO
Montara Software, Inc.
http://www.montarasoftware.com/
888-408-0900 x901

 -Original Message-
 From: S. Isaac Dealey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 8:47 AM
 To: CF-Talk
 Subject: Re: 3rd Party JDBC Drivers was Re: LONG time CF Supporter -
About
 ready to dump CF!
 
  On Tuesday, Oct 8, 2002, at 18:05 US/Pacific, S. Isaac
  Dealey wrote:
  I thought all the db drivers were 3rd party ... Has
  Allaire / MM
  actually
  developed db drivers?
 
  Er, no, I just meant that the JDBC drivers about which
  people are
  complaining were not written by us... which means that we
  are reliant
  on 3rd party vendors fixing them or making other drivers
  available.
 
 Ahh gotcha ... See, I'd been under the impression that was the case
 all-along, which I guess explains why I never expected any potential
 problems with db drivers to be quick fixes... because it requires MM
tech
 support getting enough data to give to the 3rd party and then either
 producing a work-around or haggling with the driver vendors or both,
which
 I
 imagine could be a protracted sort of arrangement.
 
 Isaac
 Certified Advanced ColdFusion 5 Developer
 
 www.turnkey.to
 954-776-0046
 
 
~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=listsbody=lists/cf_talk
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in 
ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm



RE: The Myth of Bugs (Was Huge Ungainly thread of Doom)

2002-10-09 Thread Mark A. Kruger - CFG

Jesse,

ok - now you got my dander up a little ;)



This is another gripe of mine. The issue is that we tested backwards
compatibility extensively, almost exhaustively.
   What *specific* issues did you run into? Were you running Fusebox? Was
your application using improper coding methodologies, what were the
*specific* problems?

What improper coding methodologies?  Are you saying there's a secret
standards book out there that MM has written and that everyone must follow
to be sure that things are backward compatible? Did no one check to see if
Fusebox would work on CFMX?  CF supports a variety of coding methodologies
from very good to very bad - and to argue that CFMX was only designed for
the proper coding methodologies implies that someone, somewhere has
codified what that means. Some might argue that's one of the big issues with
CFML.  I've been involved in the community for years and I'd have to say
that there is no agreed upon standards.  There are some generally accepted
best practices - but that is not the same thing.

Let me add that I'm a CFMX believer.  All the CF projects we are doing
going forward are on CFMX. We are also excited about and actively using
flash remoting with cfmx.  So I'm not down on cfmx - nor do I think that
true backward-compatibility could be acheived for more than about 80% of
applications out there.  My point is, CF 5 aps that ran perfectly well may
not run so well on CFMX - and the fault is with the technology path (moving
to a Java based platform).  It's unfair to say ...well, they weren't
written correctly to begin with.

Again - I mean to be friendly here, not snipish - hence the smily face :)

-mk


~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=listsbody=lists/cf_talk
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in 
ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm



test

2002-10-09 Thread Mark A. Kruger - CFG

Mark A. Kruger, MCSE, CFG
www.cfwebtools.com
www.necfug.com
..no more brochures!




~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=listsbody=lists/cf_talk
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com



CFX problem on Solaris

2002-10-09 Thread Steini Jonsson

Hi,

Straight to the problem.
I'm developing in CF and we have a C++ developer here who is writing the CFX's for me.
We are successfully using some CFX's on windows and Linux.  (CFMX)

Our production machine will be with Solaris.
So on the Solaris box we are always getting the unable to load library.

Now I know that the cfx is calling other libraries.

The C++ guy is blaming CFMX for it...  But I can't believe that. (of course)

Is there a way to track where the cfx hangs?

Cheers

Steini


~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=listsbody=lists/cf_talk
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com



RE: LONG time CF Supporter - About ready to dump CF!

2002-10-09 Thread Lee Fuller

I'd have to second that, Vernon.  I would have first'd it, but he beat
me to it!  grin



| -Original Message-
| From: Tony Carcieri [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
| Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 7:22 AM
| To: CF-Talk
| Subject: RE: LONG time CF Supporter - About ready to dump CF!
| 
| 
| Vernon,
| 
| You're one hell of a class act! Someone who cares enough to 
| actually speak to someone and not go to automated phone 
| support. I applaud you! It's nice to see that some people 
| care about us lil guys!
| 
| Thanks,
| T
| 
| -Original Message-
| From: Vernon Viehe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
| Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 5:46 PM
| To: CF-Talk
| Subject: RE: LONG time CF Supporter - About ready to dump CF!
| 
| 
| Lee,
| 
| I appreciate your need TODAY, and I sympathize with your 
| plight. However, there are a couple of things to keep in 
| mind...This problem didn't just crop up today, and from the 
| sound of it, it doesn't sound like it can be solved today.
| 
| I strongly urge you to contact support, possibly become a 
| Gold Support customer. That program was designed for this 
| kind of urgent service.
| 
| If I've read this thread correctly, you've said you don't 
| want to call support because you're afraid you'll be charged 
| unfairly for something that is a CFMX bug, yet I've not seen 
| anyone on this list say that they have been charged in such a 
| situation, but they have reiterated just the opposite.
| 
| I'll repeat my earlier reassurance, if anyone, including you, 
| are charged for a support incident, and you don't think the 
| charge is fair, I will thoroughly look into it.
| 
| Trust me, I'm not unsympathetic, but unfortunately, this list 
| is not an official, one-to-one support venue. It's not where 
| one turns for direct, urgent one-to-one contact. I strongly 
| urge you to work with our support department instead of 
| relying upon community lists/forums for urgent situations 
| where you need direct assistance from Macromedia.
| 
| The kind of simple information you seek simply isn't simple 
| - but we are always in an ongoing effort to get this 
| information to our customers, and will continue to do so.
| 
| If you'd like to speak with me personally, e-mail me your 
| contact info off-list, and I'll give you a call.
| 
| Vernon Viehe
| ColdFusion Community Manager
| Developer Relations
| Macromedia, Inc.
| Online diary: http://vvmx.blogspot.com/
| 
| Macromedia DevCon 2002, October 27-30, Orlando, Florida 
| Architecting a New Internet Experience Register today at 
| www.macromedia.com/go/devcon2002
| 
|  -Original Message-
|  From: Lee Fuller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
|  Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 1:01 PM
|  To: CF-Talk
|  Subject: RE: LONG time CF Supporter - About ready to dump CF!
| 
| 
|  Vernon,
| 
|  I completely understand.  However, looking at it from my 
| vantage point 
|  (and I'm pretty sure I'm not alone here on this mountain top
|  - or at the
|  bottom of this pit.. depending upon your viewpoint), I have 
| a problem 
|  TODAY.  One that is causing me serious trouble TODAY.  I know that 
|  things like this take time, and I truly believe that this 
| is not an MM 
|  thing.  That's not my view of it at all.  My view is simple (and I 
|  won't repeat it and bore everyone to death).
| 
|  Reality is that I need a solution TODAY.  Sometime to keep 
| my people 
|  from throwing the baby out with the bath water.
| 
|  Maybe it would help for MM to post a simple, clean and concise, 
|  page-by-page setting list of how you (MM) suggest we setup 
| our servers 
|  (using gulp IIS5, of course) to make sure that CFMX works 
| properly.
| 
|  Specifically --
| 
|  - Page-by-page settings with the Administrator
|  - Specific IIS changes/additions/amendments
|  - Specific changes to CFMX setup files (similar to the XML file 
|  changes for multi-homing)
|  - Some traps and tricks (simply put)
| 
|  I know that you have the best practices and performance tuning 
|  white papers.  However, a checklist would be far more 
| helpful -- so 
|  that people like me that are experiencing a problem can turn to this
|  checklist (knowing that it's not a cure-all) to make 
| certain we have
|  things set to MM's recommendations.
| 
|  Thoughts?
| 
|  | -Original Message-
|  | From: Vernon Viehe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
|  | Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 11:44 AM
|  | To: CF-Talk
|  | Subject: RE: LONG time CF Supporter - About ready to dump CF!
|  |
|  |
|  | Lee, Cameron, I'm mulling over thoughtful responses to your 
|  | thoughtful posts...
|  |
|  | But I couldn't resist a quick reply here:
|  |
|  | Macromedia's merger with Allaire was very expensive, and 
| as is the 
|  | case with any merger, it's not been totally without merger pains, 
|  | which has been felt internally by most every employee.
|  |
|  | Please don't mistake the challenges presented from a 
| merger and also 
|  | the 

RE: Flash Remoting (was: LONG time CF Supporter - About ready to dump CF!

2002-10-09 Thread Mike Chambers

Joe,

as Vern pointing out, the CF and Flash Remoting team are two separate
teams. So resources to Flash Remoting do not necessarily mean less
resources for CFMX.

However, I completely understand where you are coming from. You want to
ensure that CFMX is the best product available (as do we). That is why
vern suggested the wish list, as it helps us prioritize issues. As you
have probably noticed, we are also very engaged in the forum, and vern
will be consolidating all of this input and present it to the
appropriate people and teams.

hope that helps...

mike chambers

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 -Original Message-
 From: Joe Eugene [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 1:45 AM
 To: CF-Talk
 Subject: RE: Flash Remoting (was: LONG time CF Supporter - 
 About ready to dump CF!
 Importance: High
 
 
 Sorry Stacy I am least bothered with Flash and whatever gimmicks
 it has to offer.. we all know by now.. alot of the community 
 has problems
 with running CFMX in production...This is a very critical 
 problem and has
 to be resolved ASAP... Dont you think so...?
 
 We were close to going to CFMX.. with all these different 
 issues.. i dont
 think that will happen till next year...
 and u guys asking MM to do new Stuff?
 
 Joe
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Stacy Young [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 1:25 AM
  To: CF-Talk
  Subject: RE: Flash Remoting (was: LONG time CF Supporter - 
 About ready
  to dump CF!
 
 
  OK Joe please let's not start another one of these 
 threads...and I think
  you'd find many CF'ers interested in CFMX/Flash development.
 
  Nite
 
  Stace
 
  -Original Message-
  From: Joe Eugene [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 1:24 AM
  To: CF-Talk
  Subject: RE: Flash Remoting (was: LONG time CF Supporter - 
 About ready to
  dump CF!
 
  Vernon,
  Doesnt it sound logical to clean up bugs in CFMX before
  thinking of new
  features?
  Priorities...? CFMX Or Flash... dont think many ppl here are
  interested
  in Flash...
 
  Joe
 
   -Original Message-
   From: Vernon Viehe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
   Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 12:42 AM
   To: CF-Talk
   Subject: RE: Flash Remoting (was: LONG time CF Supporter 
 - About ready
   to dump CF!
  
  
   Matt,
  
it is
impossible for one to build an application that using 
 Flash Remoting
with both CF and Java.
  
   This sounds like a great feature request, have you sent it to our
   development team yet?
  
   http://www.macromedia.com/support/email/wishform?6213=23
  
   Vernon Viehe
   ColdFusion Community Manager
   Developer Relations
   Macromedia, Inc.
   Online diary: http://vvmx.blogspot.com/
   
   Macromedia DevCon 2002, October 27-30, Orlando, Florida
   Architecting a New Internet Experience
   Register today at www.macromedia.com/go/devcon2002
  
 
  
 
~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=listsbody=lists/cf_talk
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in 
ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm



SQL Insertion attacks

2002-10-09 Thread Casey C Cook

I remember a couple threads about this topic, however, I never have any
luck with the archives.  What approaches have you taken to stop SQL
insertion attacks.  Our current thinking is to check for a set of certain
characters (*,',, etc) and make the user removes those characters before
submitting a template.  One of my questions regarding this approach is: Can
you loop through each input form field (in javascript? in coldfusion?) in
some sort of array that contains form variables and ensure all potentially
malicious characters are removed before form submission? What I am trying
to avoid is checking each form field separately and I would like the code
to be portable to many applications, hopefully in a cfinclude on each page
that contains input fields. Your input/help is greatly appreciated.

Thanks!
Casey Cook

~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=listsbody=lists/cf_talk
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for 
dependable ColdFusion Hosting.



RE: The Myth of Bugs (Was Huge Ungainly thread of Doom)

2002-10-09 Thread Jesse Noller

 Whilst I agree with your general point that there's possibly a
 misintepretation of doom and gloom for CFMX within the recent threads,
 I'd
 like to also point out that from what I can see, the developers
 highlighting
 the problems are actually seeking help from Macromedia in order to
 continue using CFMX - NOT in order to give up on it altogether.

Threads like the one yesterday, if you go back and read them, degenerated into a 
series of throw it out the door and I won't be buying it etc, etc, etc.

People need to realize that yes while software might have issues, and they do want 
help publicly, there are other people who are reading these mediums who are directly 
making decisions based off of the words of the people within this community.

If I was a new CFMX customer, and I read the threads from the past few days(weeks) I 
would send my boxed copy back to macromedia saying that was fun, no? 

New users, and on the fence users are strongly influenced by the posts here and on 
the forums by you, the cf luminaries. 

 I have in fact advised a few people either within the Long time CF
 supporter thread and also outside of it during the last couple of days,
 to
 go ahead and try CFMX for themselves, despite having some very obvious
 problems myself - which, I am still working on solving at the moment after
 3
 days - I believe I'm starting to see where the major problems lie now.

Except your post of try it for yourself was drowned out by plenty of other people 
chanting the MM sux and CFMX is poop line. The fact is that the posts made here and 
elsewhere directly effect those people wanting to jump into CF 

 Basically, there's a problem with the JDBC driver (thats pretty obvious).
 Whilst there is also a problem with installing CFMX on a Server which had
 a
 previous version of CF on it before, despite removing old registry keys
 and
 directories.
 
 I believe Vernon has already picked up on these issues and is going to try
 and raise them internally with MM.

Yes, however, do not assume this will happen 100% of the time, Vernon, Sean, Mike and 
I are doing what we can, when we have time, but this is not the best, or recommended 
way of getting things escalated!

 I don't have a problem with MM. They're doing grand as far as I can see,
 considering their size. Maybe I'm just used to large corporate bureaucracy
 at this stage, with much much larger and slower entities (oil and
 automotive
 companies). Maybe too, I have come to take the cf-talk list for granted as
 an effective channel for solving issues with CF - over the years. I've
 seen
 issues raised on the list being actively tackled head on by both MM and
 Allaire in the past. Yes developers are looking for what is effectively
 free support - but it's support at a cost to the developer in terms of
 time etc - e.g. I've lost almost 3 days in my current situation, but at
 least I'm proactively ruling out things and feeding back my findings to
 the
 people who may need that info i.e. MM or the CF Community.

However, there is a distinct difference between rational discourse, and a mob 
mentality when it comes to commenting on issues. 

My point is simple, take the posts here and elsewhere with a grain of salt, realize 
that many of these people are not the rule, rather the exception.

Most of all, watch what you post, you, as community members, effect the perception of 
CF as a *whole*.

The community runs under the mob system, while 25 people may run fine and say so, 
100 people are screaming about $RAND issues. The 25 are ignored, and the 100 are taken 
as gospel.

See what I mean?



Jesse Noller
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Macromedia Server Development

No concept man forms is valid unless he
integrates it without contradiction into the
sum of his knowledge. 
- Ayn Rand 

~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=listsbody=lists/cf_talk
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for 
dependable ColdFusion Hosting.



RE: SQL Insertion attacks

2002-10-09 Thread Everett, Al

cfqueryparam is the answer. I have seen the Light!

 -Original Message-
 From: Casey C Cook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 10:52 AM
 To: CF-Talk
 Subject: SQL Insertion attacks
 
 
 I remember a couple threads about this topic, however, I 
 never have any
 luck with the archives.  What approaches have you taken to stop SQL
 insertion attacks.  Our current thinking is to check for a 
 set of certain
 characters (*,',, etc) and make the user removes those 
 characters before
 submitting a template.  One of my questions regarding this 
 approach is: Can
 you loop through each input form field (in javascript? in 
 coldfusion?) in
 some sort of array that contains form variables and ensure 
 all potentially
 malicious characters are removed before form submission? What 
 I am trying
 to avoid is checking each form field separately and I would 
 like the code
 to be portable to many applications, hopefully in a cfinclude 
 on each page
 that contains input fields. Your input/help is greatly appreciated.
 
 Thanks!
 Casey Cook
 
 
~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=listsbody=lists/cf_talk
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more 
resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm



RE: cfcookie and cfset SESSION.variable =

2002-10-09 Thread Everett, Al

You need to execute this on every page load. If you're using cascading
Application.cfm files (i.e., /subdir/Application.cfm contains the code
cfinclude template=..\Application.cfm) you'll want to put it at the top
level. (If you're not doing this, why do you have so many Application.cfm
files?)

It's got nothing to do with logout. It changes the CFID and CFTOKEN cookies
from expiring way out in the future (2037, I think) to being a session
cookie that will go away when the browser is closed.

 -Original Message-
 From: FlashGuy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 9:33 AM
 To: CF-Talk
 Subject: RE: cfcookie and cfset SESSION.variable =
 
 
 I have multiple application.cfm's Would this code go in all 
 or just the logout.cfm template?
 
 
 On Wed, 9 Oct 2002 07:17:45 -0600, Jillian Carroll wrote:
 
  Courtesy of Hal Helms, put this in your Application.cfm:
  
  CFIF IsDefined( Cookie.CFID ) AND IsDefined( Cookie.CFTOKEN )
 cfset localCFID = Cookie.CFID
 cfset localCFTOKEN = Cookie.CFTOKEN
 cfcookie name=CFID value=#localCFID#
 cfcookie name=CFTOKEN value=#localCFTOKEN#
  /CFIF
  
  --
  Jillian
  
  -Original Message-
  From: FlashGuy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 7:14 AM
  To: CF-Talk
  Subject: RE: cfcookie and cfset SESSION.variable =
  
  
  What if someone just closes IE?
  
  On Wed, 9 Oct 2002 09:01:38 -0400, Everett, Al wrote:
  
   cfset temp=StructClear(Session)
  
-Original Message-
From: FlashGuy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 8:29 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: cfcookie and cfset SESSION.variable =
   
   
Whats the best way to clear ALL session variables when a user
logouts or closes IE?
   
   
On Wed, 09 Oct 2002 08:25:19 -0400, FlashGuy wrote:
   
 Nevermind...I got it to work.

 Thanks

 On Wed, 09 Oct 2002 08:22:42 -0400, FlashGuy wrote:

  On Wed, 9 Oct 2002 08:02:24 -0400, Jon Hall wrote:
 
   Is your session variable getting updated? If not, 
 there is your
   problem, if so, then the problem lies in some part of
the program that
   is not using the session variables value, or not using
it correctly.
   If the app works using just cookies, then 
 switching to session
   variables shouldn't be a problem in and of itself.
 
  Yes...I didn't change the line that was calling in the
cookie. Now I get an error in my application saying that that
it can't resolve the parameter SESSION.VariableName
 
  Do I have to set it, maybe in my application.cfm to be
Nil at first?
 
   I'm not sure how secure your app needs to be, but
storing paths like
   that on the client in a cookie sounds very insecure. If
I altered the
   cookie with the list of paths to include c:\, could I
get a listing
   of that directory? Sounds like to me this variable
should definitely
   be a session or client scoped variable.
 
  This is strickly a intranet app.
 
   --
   jon
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
   Wednesday, October 9, 2002, 7:40:05 AM, you wrote:
  
   F HI,
  
   F I'm getting a little confused with cfcookies and
cfset SESSION.varaible =. My application was using
cfcookies and it seemed to work fine. I was reading in a
 field
  from my
   F database which was a comma delimited field of
directories on my hard drive. This was then put into a
cookie. I have a template that allows the user to add or
remove
   F directories for viewing in their navigation window
(tree list). Any changes made from the template would be
saved to the database and the cookie would be
 updated.
  
   F The problem I'm experiencing now is I changed all my
cfcookie calls to use cfset SESSSION.variable =  and
when I add/remove a directory and click my
refresh
  button it
   F won't update my navigation (tree list) frame until I
actually close my IE and start it back up again. Then the
appropriate directorie(s) don't appear which where
  added/remove
   F from my template.
  
   F How can I make this update appear by refreshing?
Do I *have* to use cookies in my case?
  
  
 

   
  
  
  
 
~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=listsbody=lists/cf_talk
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com



RE: cfcookie and cfset SESSION.variable =

2002-10-09 Thread Everett, Al

Of course. You can put just about anything in a CFLOCK, but you're better
off limiting it to CFSETs. You also want to limit your locks rather than
peppering your code with them. If you're doing a lot of variable
manipulation, or even using the variables a lot, copy them to the local
scope first, then use the local variables for the remainder of your code.

 -Original Message-
 From: FlashGuy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 9:32 AM
 To: CF-Talk
 Subject: RE: cfcookie and cfset SESSION.variable =
 
 
 OK...thanks.  I noticed from the examples that they use 
 cflock around only one cfset. Can you group cfset's?
 
 cflock...
 cfset SESSION.var1 = something1
 cfset SESSION.var2 = something2
 cfset SESSION.var3 = something3
 /cflock
 
 On Wed, 9 Oct 2002 09:19:59 -0400, Everett, Al wrote:
 
   I've heard about this but I've never done this before. What 
   do you mean by locks?
  
  In CF5 or lower, to prevent server instability, you need to 
 lock all
  shared-scope variables, i.e., SERVER, APPLICATION, and 
 SESSION. In all
  versions of CF, if there is a possible race condition, 
 you need to lock
  your shared-scope variables.
  
  Some TechNotes you should read:
  
  ColdFusion MX Best Practices for Locking Shared Scope Variables:
  http://www.macromedia.com/v1/Handlers/index.cfm?ID=23021Method=Full
  
  ColdFusion 5 Locking Best Practices:
  http://www.macromedia.com/v1/Handlers/index.cfm?ID=20370Method=Full
  
  ColdFusion TechTips:
  http://www.macromedia.com/v1/Handlers/index.cfm?ID=13810Method=Full
  
  
 
~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=listsbody=lists/cf_talk
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for 
dependable ColdFusion Hosting.



RE: LONG time CF Supporter - About ready to dump CF!

2002-10-09 Thread Lee Fuller

In the hope of finding a portion of the problem here, we've been
monitoring the server via Perf Monitor, and I've just added a counter
for CFMX's Running Requests.  I've noticed that at this moment, it
shows a steady number of running requests, which seems quite odd.  I
would think they would die over time, and even if there were a
consistent number of continued requests for the processes, the number
would fluctuate -- at least a little.

Does anyone know of any way to see which requests these are, or what is
running and not dying?

~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=listsbody=lists/cf_talk
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in 
ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm



RE: CFX problem on Solaris

2002-10-09 Thread Jesse Noller

What's the actual error?

Jesse Noller
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Macromedia Server Development

No concept man forms is valid unless he
integrates it without contradiction into the
sum of his knowledge. 
- Ayn Rand

 -Original Message-
 From: Steini Jonsson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 10:53 AM
 To: CF-Talk
 Subject: CFX problem on Solaris
 
 Hi,
 
 Straight to the problem.
 I'm developing in CF and we have a C++ developer here who is writing the
 CFX's for me.
 We are successfully using some CFX's on windows and Linux.  (CFMX)
 
 Our production machine will be with Solaris.
 So on the Solaris box we are always getting the unable to load library.
 
 Now I know that the cfx is calling other libraries.
 
 The C++ guy is blaming CFMX for it...  But I can't believe that. (of
 course)
 
 Is there a way to track where the cfx hangs?
 
 Cheers
 
 Steini
 
 
 
~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=listsbody=lists/cf_talk
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in 
ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm



RE: Can we help? (was RE: LONG time CF Supporter - About ready to dump CF!)

2002-10-09 Thread Lee Fuller

Hey Cam...

You're right.  And I thought that I had begun to do that -- create a
constructive suggestion with each complaint.

My suggestion was simply that there be a suggested value setting for
each of the basic server settings pages, so that we would have some sort
of clue as to what the recommended mininum (or maximum) values would
be under typical circumstances... heavy load, medium load, light load,
etc... You get the point.

As it sits now, one has to guess as to what the settings may be.  And
I contest that this may be part of the problem(s) we are facing, since
the server is not properly configured.  Or, at the very least, this is
contributing to the problem(s).

I still would like to see some of you all post your server settings
pages here -- or send them to me off list.  Of course, stripping out
what you find unnecessary or a security risk.  Pretty easy to copy the
page as text, and paste it to an email.. deleting what you don't want
shared.



| -Original Message-
| From: Cameron Childress [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
| Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 6:34 AM
| To: CF-Talk
| Subject: RE: Can we help? (was RE: LONG time CF Supporter - 
| About ready to dump CF!)
| 
| 
|  Well MM should have already done this... and documented 
| rules of new 
|  coding in RED rather than have developers waste time 
| fighting issues. 
|  Hopefully we will see some better standards from MM.
| 
| Joe,
| 
| They did.  There's an entire book in the CFMX documentation 
| set devoted to upgrading, and pointing out the differences 
| between CF5 and CFMX functions, tags, and syntax.  Granted, 
| it might not include things that came up after release, but 
| I'm not sure we can fault them for not being able to see into 
| the future.
| 
| They also included a code compatibility analyzer with CFMX so 
| that you can pre-run your code to see if there are any huge 
| red flags.  Again, it may not catch 100% of issues because 
| some have come out since launch, but I do think they tried 
| hard to give us the tools, they are just misunderstood or not 
| used at all.
| 
| I can't help but point out that this is more evidence of a 
| communication problem at MM.  While it's not the job of MM to 
| slap a big RTFM on the front of every install, but it would 
| be nice to see a PR campaign launched showing how easy it 
| is to upgrade and how stable the platform is.  An upgrade 
| center at MM.com wouldn't be totally uncalled for either.  
| Grouping KB articles, the upgrade guide, etc all in one place 
| for people to refer to when they are upgrading.  Maybe this 
| exists and I haven't been thorough in my search, but all I 
| came up with at MM.com was marketing drivel (required to sell 
| product, but not helpful to the audience on this list).
| 
| What if everyone on this list suggested a *constructive* 
| solution with every complaint in this thread?  Think that 
| could happen?
| 
| -Cameron
| 
| -
| Cameron Childress
| Sumo Consulting Inc.
| ---
| cell:  678-637-5072
| aim:   cameroncf
| email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| 
| 
|  -Original Message-
|  From: Joe Eugene [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
|  Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 10:47 PM
|  To: CF-Talk
|  Subject: RE: Can we help? (was RE: LONG time CF Supporter - About 
|  ready to dump CF!)
| 
| 
|  I personally think.. alot of the problems are due to making 
| CFMX very 
|  backward compatible with older versions of CF. Why did MM 
| claim CFMX 
|  backward compatible? Why not .NET Strategy?
| 
|  Again i think its the responsibility of developers to test 
| their code 
|  on a totally different product(CFMX)..Load Test..etc. before going 
|  into production.
| 
|  Well MM should have already done this... and documented 
| rules of new 
|  coding in RED rather than have developers waste time 
| fighting issues. 
|  Hopefully we will see some better standards from MM.
| 
|  Joe
| 
| 
| 
~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=listsbody=lists/cf_talk
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com



RE: SQL Insertion attacks

2002-10-09 Thread Bryan F. Hogan

Casey, the best way to avoid this problem is to use cfqueryparam within your
SQL.

If you want to modify the form, url etc to make sure no mal code is
including you can loop throught the structure like so.

I use this to trim submissions but you can modify to remove specials
characters.

cfloop collection=#form# item=i
cfset form[i]=trim(form[i])
/cfloop


Bryan F. Hogan
Director of Internet Development
Macromedia Certified ColdFusion MX Developer
Digital Bay Media, Inc.
1-877-72DIGITAL


-Original Message-
From: Casey C Cook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 10:52 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: SQL Insertion attacks


I remember a couple threads about this topic, however, I never have any
luck with the archives.  What approaches have you taken to stop SQL
insertion attacks.  Our current thinking is to check for a set of certain
characters (*,',, etc) and make the user removes those characters before
submitting a template.  One of my questions regarding this approach is: Can
you loop through each input form field (in javascript? in coldfusion?) in
some sort of array that contains form variables and ensure all potentially
malicious characters are removed before form submission? What I am trying
to avoid is checking each form field separately and I would like the code
to be portable to many applications, hopefully in a cfinclude on each page
that contains input fields. Your input/help is greatly appreciated.

Thanks!
Casey Cook


~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=listsbody=lists/cf_talk
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at 
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm



.htm file running as cfm

2002-10-09 Thread Paul Wilson

Using IIS I thought it was possible to run .htm files as if they were .cfm files.

Has this changed in MX?

thanks
~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=listsbody=lists/cf_talk
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for 
dependable ColdFusion Hosting.



JDBC and installation issues - my findings

2002-10-09 Thread Dave Wilson

Thought I'd share the following items which have been submitted to MM via a
direct contact a few minutes ago.

I have tried several different scenarios with the following results:

JDBC driver
---

I've only managed to get this to work with MS SQL 7 when and ONLY when its a
fresh OS, CFMX, SQL install, all on the same machine. Not yet been tested
for stability.

I've even had problems with using the ODBC Socket at times - especially when
the db is on a remote machine.
I realise these are not under MM's direct control and are more likely than
not to be attributed to SQL 7.

Installation issues
---
I initially installed on our development machine which was previously
running cf4.5 ENT which I removed entirely, including registry and files, as
I'd experienced problems before with installing cf5 pro onto a similar cf4.5
ent machine. In fact there has always been a problem when installing a new
release pro version over a machine having had Enterprise installed - this
is understandable.

Although my initial installation of CFMX was fine after having to manually
configure CF to run on all IIS virtual hosts, I ran into a COM related
problem which led me to installing the updater, which in turn led my server
to spiral out of control (JDBC, 404's in the Administrator!!, 500's and
more). I believe the iis configuration was only necessary because of having
had cf4.5ent installed on the server.

I was able to dig up a spare machine on which I could do a complete fresh
install of OS, SQL 7 and CFMX, including the updater and things seem to be
looking up. Not had any problems whatsoever. There was no need for me to
configure IIS for virtual hosts in this situation. There was one major
problem which would disable our company to use CFMX in production. That is
the JDBC driver being unable to connect to SQL 7 on a remote machine (same
LAN).

We haven't yet gone into production, which leaves me in a slightly more
luxurious position than some of the others experiencing the same problems
and I doubt we'll be using SQL 7 in production anyway. More likely to be SQL
2000, which I'll begin tests on now to check if the JDBC situation is any
better.

Hope some of this info helps MM pinpoint the problem. In the meantime,
perhaps some mention of avoiding installing CFMX on machines with previous
versions may be a prudent move, or at least an indication that problems
*may* occur in this scenario, as each environment will be slightly different
and lots of people may get away without any problems in this very same
scenario.

Dave

~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=listsbody=lists/cf_talk
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com



Re: JDBC implementation (was RE: 3rd Party JDBC Drivers was Re: LONG time CF Supporter - About ready to dump CF!)

2002-10-09 Thread S . Isaac Dealey

I'd be really hesitant to assume that anyone who can afford to implement
CFMX can afford to implement WebSphere... I haven't looked at it recently,
but I remember someone mentioning a figure to me that was well over 10x the
cost of CFMX Enterprise. I may be confused and that may include the cost of
the hardware, et al, though I'd be surprised if the software alone were
terribly inexpensive even after stripping all the extra stuff...

S. Isaac Dealey
Certified Advanced ColdFusion 5 Developer

www.turnkey.to
954-776-0046

 It would seem to me that the underlying J2EE application server
 implements everything that goes along with JDBC drivers like connection
 pooling, etc. Possibly, the people who are having JDBC problems with
 CFMX should try CFMX J2EE on top of IBM WebSphere and see if the
 problems go away.

 Matt Liotta
 President  CEO
 Montara Software, Inc.
 http://www.montarasoftware.com/
 888-408-0900 x901

 -Original Message-
 From: S. Isaac Dealey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 8:47 AM
 To: CF-Talk
 Subject: Re: 3rd Party JDBC Drivers was Re: LONG time CF Supporter -
 About
 ready to dump CF!

  On Tuesday, Oct 8, 2002, at 18:05 US/Pacific, S. Isaac
  Dealey wrote:
  I thought all the db drivers were 3rd party ... Has
  Allaire / MM
  actually
  developed db drivers?

  Er, no, I just meant that the JDBC drivers about which
  people are
  complaining were not written by us... which means that we
  are reliant
  on 3rd party vendors fixing them or making other drivers
  available.

 Ahh gotcha ... See, I'd been under the impression that was the case
 all-along, which I guess explains why I never expected any potential
 problems with db drivers to be quick fixes... because it requires MM
 tech
 support getting enough data to give to the 3rd party and then either
 producing a work-around or haggling with the driver vendors or both,
 which
 I
 imagine could be a protracted sort of arrangement.

 Isaac
 Certified Advanced ColdFusion 5 Developer

 www.turnkey.to
 954-776-0046


 
~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=listsbody=lists/cf_talk
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in 
ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm



RE: The Myth of Bugs (Was Huge Ungainly thread of Doom)

2002-10-09 Thread Matt Liotta

 Threads like the one yesterday, if you go back and read them,
degenerated
 into a series of throw it out the door and I won't be buying it
etc,
 etc, etc.
 
It seems like most of the people participating in the thread had already
bought CFMX and were just having problems with it.

 People need to realize that yes while software might have issues, and
they
 do want help publicly, there are other people who are reading these
 mediums who are directly making decisions based off of the words of
the
 people within this community.
 
 If I was a new CFMX customer, and I read the threads from the past few
 days(weeks) I would send my boxed copy back to macromedia saying that
was
 fun, no?
 
 New users, and on the fence users are strongly influenced by the
posts
 here and on the forums by you, the cf luminaries.

I don't think it is really fair to put Macromedia's PR problems from
yesterday on the participants in the thread. It seems to me that many of
the people on the thread didn't just throw up their hands as soon as
they ran into problems. It seemed more like the people were giving up
after spending significant time on their problems with CFMX without
resolution. IMHO, Macromedia should have caught on earlier and maybe the
situation wouldn't have happened.

 Yes, however, do not assume this will happen 100% of the time, Vernon,
 Sean, Mike and I are doing what we can, when we have time, but this is
not
 the best, or recommended way of getting things escalated!
 
And the community has spoken time and time again that the recommended
way is no good. Who is really to blame here?

-Matt

~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=listsbody=lists/cf_talk
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more 
resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm



RE: LONG time CF Supporter - About ready to dump CF!

2002-10-09 Thread Mark A. Kruger - CFG

Lee - I'm seeing this too (oddly).  Any clues? On CF 5 server this number
bumps up and down - often at 0 - even on a busy server.

-Original Message-
From: Lee Fuller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 8:45 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: LONG time CF Supporter - About ready to dump CF!


In the hope of finding a portion of the problem here, we've been
monitoring the server via Perf Monitor, and I've just added a counter
for CFMX's Running Requests.  I've noticed that at this moment, it
shows a steady number of running requests, which seems quite odd.  I
would think they would die over time, and even if there were a
consistent number of continued requests for the processes, the number
would fluctuate -- at least a little.

Does anyone know of any way to see which requests these are, or what is
running and not dying?


~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=listsbody=lists/cf_talk
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in 
ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm



cfchart and stacked bars?

2002-10-09 Thread Reed Powell

Hi all - I was sure that I'd seen a demo (maybe at CFUN02 or one of the
traveling MM roadshows) of using CFCHART to do stacked bar graphs.  But
I've spent more time than I want to admit trying to make it happen in real
life.  Am I hallucinating about the demo, or am I dense and not doing it
right (what a choice)?

Thanks for the help
-reed





RE: SQL Insertion attacks

2002-10-09 Thread Everett, Al

If you don't want to take my word for it, though, here's an article by Uncle
Ben:

http://www.macromedia.com/desdev/articles/ben_forta_faster.html

 cfqueryparam is the answer. I have seen the Light!
~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=listsbody=lists/cf_talk
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in 
ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm



RE: cfcookie and cfset SESSION.variable =

2002-10-09 Thread FlashGuy

On Wed, 9 Oct 2002 09:46:15 -0400, Everett, Al wrote:

 You need to execute this on every page load. If you're using cascading
 Application.cfm files (i.e., /subdir/Application.cfm contains the code
 cfinclude template=..\Application.cfm) you'll want to put it at the top
 level. (If you're not doing this, why do you have so many Application.cfm
 files?)

I read somewhere that every directory should have its own application.cfm and 
onrequestedend.cfm files.

 It's got nothing to do with logout. It changes the CFID and CFTOKEN cookies
 from expiring way out in the future (2037, I think) to being a session
 cookie that will go away when the browser is closed.
 
  -Original Message-
  From: FlashGuy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 9:33 AM
  To: CF-Talk
  Subject: RE: cfcookie and cfset SESSION.variable =
  
  
  I have multiple application.cfm's Would this code go in all 
  or just the logout.cfm template?
  
  
  On Wed, 9 Oct 2002 07:17:45 -0600, Jillian Carroll wrote:
  
   Courtesy of Hal Helms, put this in your Application.cfm:
   
   CFIF IsDefined( Cookie.CFID ) AND IsDefined( Cookie.CFTOKEN )
  cfset localCFID = Cookie.CFID
  cfset localCFTOKEN = Cookie.CFTOKEN
  cfcookie name=CFID value=#localCFID#
  cfcookie name=CFTOKEN value=#localCFTOKEN#
   /CFIF
   
   --
   Jillian
   
   -Original Message-
   From: FlashGuy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
   Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 7:14 AM
   To: CF-Talk
   Subject: RE: cfcookie and cfset SESSION.variable =
   
   
   What if someone just closes IE?
   
   On Wed, 9 Oct 2002 09:01:38 -0400, Everett, Al wrote:
   
cfset temp=StructClear(Session)
   
 -Original Message-
 From: FlashGuy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 8:29 AM
 To: CF-Talk
 Subject: Re: cfcookie and cfset SESSION.variable =


 Whats the best way to clear ALL session variables when a user
 logouts or closes IE?


 On Wed, 09 Oct 2002 08:25:19 -0400, FlashGuy wrote:

  Nevermind...I got it to work.
 
  Thanks
 
  On Wed, 09 Oct 2002 08:22:42 -0400, FlashGuy wrote:
 
   On Wed, 9 Oct 2002 08:02:24 -0400, Jon Hall wrote:
  
Is your session variable getting updated? If not, 
  there is your
problem, if so, then the problem lies in some part of
 the program that
is not using the session variables value, or not using
 it correctly.
If the app works using just cookies, then 
  switching to session
variables shouldn't be a problem in and of itself.
  
   Yes...I didn't change the line that was calling in the
 cookie. Now I get an error in my application saying that that
 it can't resolve the parameter SESSION.VariableName
  
   Do I have to set it, maybe in my application.cfm to be
 Nil at first?
  
I'm not sure how secure your app needs to be, but
 storing paths like
that on the client in a cookie sounds very insecure. If
 I altered the
cookie with the list of paths to include c:\, could I
 get a listing
of that directory? Sounds like to me this variable
 should definitely
be a session or client scoped variable.
  
   This is strickly a intranet app.
  
--
jon
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
   
Wednesday, October 9, 2002, 7:40:05 AM, you wrote:
   
F HI,
   
F I'm getting a little confused with cfcookies and
 cfset SESSION.varaible =. My application was using
 cfcookies and it seemed to work fine. I was reading in a
  field
   from my
F database which was a comma delimited field of
 directories on my hard drive. This was then put into a
 cookie. I have a template that allows the user to add or
 remove
F directories for viewing in their navigation window
 (tree list). Any changes made from the template would be
 saved to the database and the cookie would be
  updated.
   
F The problem I'm experiencing now is I changed all my
 cfcookie calls to use cfset SESSSION.variable =  and
 when I add/remove a directory and click my
 refresh
   button it
F won't update my navigation (tree list) frame until I
 actually close my IE and start it back up again. Then the
 appropriate directorie(s) don't appear which where
   added/remove
F from my template.
   
F How can I make this update appear by refreshing?
 Do I *have* to use cookies in my case?
   
   
  
 

   
   
   
  
 
~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=listsbody=lists/cf_talk
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Signup for the Fusion Authority 

RE: The Myth of Bugs (Was Huge Ungainly thread of Doom)

2002-10-09 Thread Jesse Noller

 What improper coding methodologies?  Are you saying there's a secret
 standards book out there that MM has written and that everyone must
 follow
 to be sure that things are backward compatible? Did no one check to see if
 Fusebox would work on CFMX?  CF supports a variety of coding methodologies
 from very good to very bad - and to argue that CFMX was only designed for
 the proper coding methodologies implies that someone, somewhere has
 codified what that means. Some might argue that's one of the big issues
 with
 CFML.  I've been involved in the community for years and I'd have to say
 that there is no agreed upon standards.  There are some generally
 accepted
 best practices - but that is not the same thing.

I am not arguing that only proper coding methodologies are supported, I am saying 
the CFML caters to yes, a wide variety of coders, and methodologies, however, we 
cannot be expected to support applications that were coded loosely.

No, there are no agreed upon standards, however, you cannot simply code as you will, 
and then expect everything, no matter how badly/loosely coded to be supported all the 
time, out of the box.

Case in point, Spectra. Spectra was NOT coded badly, however, it has a lot of highly 
custom code within it, not all of the methods utilized in the application were 
supported moving forward. This is a fact of upgrading/migrating to a new revision of 
any coding language or software package.

So, say you use something like, (lets pick on something easy) fusebox. Fusebox is a 
methodology for programming your CF application. Now, say you have a huge 
application written in it, a lot of customization...

Is it reasonable to expect every single function, line of code, etc to be fully 
functional when an entire REWRITE of the language is done?

No. It's not. You will run into problems, this is part of the problem with allowing 
any type of coding to be utilized.

Look at Apache, and inside of that, Apache modules. When apache 2 came out, one could 
run old modules inside of the new system, however, they never made the claim of 100% 
backwards compatibility; they said it was compatible. The statements, while 
seemingly the same, are completely and totally different.

That being said, if you run into something that worked in CF5, and does NOT work in 
CFMX, and it's NOT documented, it's a *BUG* and Macromedia should be contacted 
directly about it.


 Let me add that I'm a CFMX believer.  All the CF projects we are doing
 going forward are on CFMX. We are also excited about and actively using
 flash remoting with cfmx.  So I'm not down on cfmx - nor do I think that
 true backward-compatibility could be acheived for more than about 80% of
 applications out there.  My point is, CF 5 aps that ran perfectly well
 may
 not run so well on CFMX - and the fault is with the technology path
 (moving
 to a Java based platform).  It's unfair to say ...well, they weren't
 written correctly to begin with.
 
 Again - I mean to be friendly here, not snipish - hence the smily face :)

So you're blaming the move to Java for your application(s) not working? What if he had 
simply rewritten the code base in C++? What would you blame then?

-jesse
~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=listsbody=lists/cf_talk
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more 
resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm



Upgraded to CFMX on linux, unable to delete DSN

2002-10-09 Thread Stephenie Hamilton

We upgraded a client to CFMX from CF5 (on Linux) and the upgrade asked
if we would like to migrate our settings, DSN's etc...so of course we
said yes..

Now we find that we cannot delete one dsn that is a mySql dsn

The error received is:
An exception occurred when invoking an external process.  
The cause of this exception was that: java.io.IOException:
\soft/coldfusionmx/db\slserver52\admin\swcla.exe: not found.  


Anybody have any ideas what the issue is? Do I need to stop mySQL or
something? 
If I try to verify the dsn it gives me this error:
Variable THISDATASOURCE is undefined

This is my first client on linux for cf and I have no idea where to go
in the server to delete any reference to this dsn

Any help appreciated.

~~
Stephenie Hamilton



---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.394 / Virus Database: 224 - Release Date: 10/3/2002
 

~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=listsbody=lists/cf_talk
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at 
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm



Re: CFX problem on Solaris

2002-10-09 Thread Steini Jonsson

Here is the error:

  Unable to load library
  /nca/lib/CFX_NCAquery.so



- Original Message -
From: Jesse Noller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 5:31 PM
Subject: RE: CFX problem on Solaris


 What's the actual error?

 Jesse Noller
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Macromedia Server Development

 No concept man forms is valid unless he
 integrates it without contradiction into the
 sum of his knowledge.
 - Ayn Rand

  -Original Message-
  From: Steini Jonsson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 10:53 AM
  To: CF-Talk
  Subject: CFX problem on Solaris
 
  Hi,
 
  Straight to the problem.
  I'm developing in CF and we have a C++ developer here who is writing the
  CFX's for me.
  We are successfully using some CFX's on windows and Linux.  (CFMX)
 
  Our production machine will be with Solaris.
  So on the Solaris box we are always getting the unable to load library.
 
  Now I know that the cfx is calling other libraries.
 
  The C++ guy is blaming CFMX for it...  But I can't believe that. (of
  course)
 
  Is there a way to track where the cfx hangs?
 
  Cheers
 
  Steini
 
 
 
 
~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=listsbody=lists/cf_talk
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at 
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm



cfencode utility for CFMX seems missing

2002-10-09 Thread CS

Hi,

I've a CFMX eval copy running, 
the cfencode utility, located in the {cf_root/bin
directory = CFMX installation directory} is nowhere to
be found.  I hesitate to use CF5.0's equivalent
utility.  What's up?  Thanks.

Don

__
Do you Yahoo!?
Faith Hill - Exclusive Performances, Videos  More
http://faith.yahoo.com
~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=listsbody=lists/cf_talk
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at 
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm



RE: CFX problem on Solaris

2002-10-09 Thread Steve Green

Well if your C++ guy is any good he should be able to put try/catch's round
his code to stop the CFX knacking the server and exit gracefully on error,
and also write out a trace file or something to debug.

This is the approach i've taken in the past when developing CFX tags in
Delphi (but not for Solaris i might add, I've never even seen Solaris). 

SteG. :)


-Original Message-
From: Steini Jonsson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 09 October 2002 15:53
To: CF-Talk
Subject: CFX problem on Solaris


Hi,

Straight to the problem.
I'm developing in CF and we have a C++ developer here who is writing the
CFX's for me.
We are successfully using some CFX's on windows and Linux.  (CFMX)

Our production machine will be with Solaris.
So on the Solaris box we are always getting the unable to load library.

Now I know that the cfx is calling other libraries.

The C++ guy is blaming CFMX for it...  But I can't believe that. (of course)

Is there a way to track where the cfx hangs?

Cheers

Steini



~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=listsbody=lists/cf_talk
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com



RE: The Myth of Bugs (Was Huge Ungainly thread of Doom)

2002-10-09 Thread Jesse Noller

 It seems like most of the people participating in the thread had already
 bought CFMX and were just having problems with it.

Re-read it, more people jumped in, and it's not just yesterday's thread.

 I don't think it is really fair to put Macromedia's PR problems from
 yesterday on the participants in the thread. It seems to me that many of
 the people on the thread didn't just throw up their hands as soon as
 they ran into problems. It seemed more like the people were giving up
 after spending significant time on their problems with CFMX without
 resolution. IMHO, Macromedia should have caught on earlier and maybe the
 situation wouldn't have happened.

How can we catch on when they do not contact us via the proper manner?

 And the community has spoken time and time again that the recommended
 way is no good. Who is really to blame here?

The way we have it now may not be the proper way in your eyes, but as that is the 
*currently supported method* it doesn't leave any room for argument, now does it?

Saying that x sucks is fine, but it does not change x.
~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=listsbody=lists/cf_talk
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in 
ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm



RE: cfchart and stacked bars?

2002-10-09 Thread Raymond Camden

Can you show your code?

===
Raymond Camden, ColdFusion Jedi Master for Hire

Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW  : www.camdenfamily.com/morpheus
Yahoo IM : morpheus

My ally is the Force, and a powerful ally it is. - Yoda 

 -Original Message-
 From: Reed Powell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
 Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 12:02 PM
 To: CF-Talk
 Subject: cfchart and stacked bars?
 
 
 Hi all - I was sure that I'd seen a demo (maybe at CFUN02 or 
 one of the
 traveling MM roadshows) of using CFCHART to do stacked bar 
 graphs.  But
 I've spent more time than I want to admit trying to make it 
 happen in real
 life.  Am I hallucinating about the demo, or am I dense and 
 not doing it
 right (what a choice)?
 
 Thanks for the help
 -reed
 


~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=listsbody=lists/cf_talk
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in 
ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm



SOT Converting MS-Access databases on non-windows machines

2002-10-09 Thread Dick Applebaum

There is a situation that I  encounter  I wonder how others handle it

It is fairly common (almost a given),  that a new client will have some 
or all of his data available in offline MS-Access databases.

It is usually necessary to manipulate this data (validate, normalize, 
etc) to convert it into a usable online database (storing it in a more 
robust RDBMS).

I have found that CF is an excellent tool for this.

I normally just upload the MS-Access mdb file to the hosting service.  
Then I write CF programs that convert the data from MS-Access to, say 
SQL-Server, or Oracle.

No problem, as long as the host service is running on a windows 
platform -- MS-Access is usually supported.

But what happens if the Host uses a non-windows platform?

How do you read a MS-Access database on, say a Linux Box.

I guess you could capture the  Access database into SQL-Server, 
offline, if you had:

1) a windows machine
2) MSDE or SQL-Server
3) MS-Office

This extra step gives you a mirror of the client's MS-Access db  on 
SQL-Server -- you still need to manipulate it for validation, 
normalization, conversion to online, etc.

What do you do if you need to go to  some other (not SQL-Server) RDBMS, 
that doesn't have the ability to capture Access databases?

The problem gets compounded if the client requests periodic creation of 
an offline copy of the online database
-- for offline analysis, etc.

Is this an issue that any of you run into with any frequency?

How do you handle it?

(Of course the easy out is just host on windows platforms that support 
Ms-Access -- but that is totall the wrong reason to make a hosting 
decision).

TIA

Dick





~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=listsbody=lists/cf_talk
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com



RE: cfchart and stacked bars?

2002-10-09 Thread Dave Wilson

Yes this is easily achieved. You simply specify stacked in the
seriesplacement attribute of cfchart

-Original Message-
From: Reed Powell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 09 October 2002 17:02
To: CF-Talk
Subject: cfchart and stacked bars?


Hi all - I was sure that I'd seen a demo (maybe at CFUN02 or one of the
traveling MM roadshows) of using CFCHART to do stacked bar graphs.  But
I've spent more time than I want to admit trying to make it happen in real
life.  Am I hallucinating about the demo, or am I dense and not doing it
right (what a choice)?

Thanks for the help
-reed



~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=listsbody=lists/cf_talk
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for 
dependable ColdFusion Hosting.



Re: cfflush on mx small data pools

2002-10-09 Thread Sam Farmer

Thanks Raymond.  Glad to know it wasn't CFMX's fault.  I think I will stop
supporting Microsoft now. :)

Sam


- Original Message -
From: Raymond Camden [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 8:46 AM
Subject: RE: cfflush on mx small data pools


 Internet Explorer has a 'feature' where even if you flush, it will not
 display the text until it gets 'enough' text. What is enough text?
 Around 250 chars I think. If I'm flushing and now I won't have more than
 that, I add this BEFORE the flush:

 #repeatString( ,x)#

 where x is between 150 - 200 or so. This normally 'forces' IE to display
 the text before the repeatString.

 ===
 Raymond Camden, ColdFusion Jedi Master for Hire

 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 WWW  : www.camdenfamily.com/morpheus
 Yahoo IM : morpheus

 My ally is the Force, and a powerful ally it is. - Yoda

  -Original Message-
  From: Sam Farmer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
  Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 6:07 PM
  To: CF-Talk
  Subject: cfflush on mx small data pools
 
 
  I am trying to flush a very small amount of data on mx but
  don't seem to be
  able to get the following to flush:
 
  cfoutput
   html
   head
titleProcessing./title
   /head
   body
   processingbr
   /cfoutput
   cfflush interval=1
 
  I would like it to flush immeadiately--its a payment page and
  I want to let
  users know something is happening.  The text does not appear
  until the page
  loads (15-30 seconds later).
 
  Any ideas?
 
  Thanks,
 
  Sam
 
 
 
 
 
 
~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=listsbody=lists/cf_talk
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for 
dependable ColdFusion Hosting.



OT: arguing (was: Not Another MX boo boo?

2002-10-09 Thread Sean A Corfield

On Wednesday, Oct 9, 2002, at 04:34 US/Pacific, Greg Luce wrote:
   You're not impressing me with your defensive attitude.

I spent about 12 hours responding to people who were screaming that MM 
sux - I don't think it's very surprising that by 8pm at night I'm just 
a little less politic than some people might like... And, hey, I *did* 
put a smiley on my comment!

 Is all this arguing really part of your job?

Actually, yes. I'm well known for it! As it says in the bio at the 
bottom of my DesDev articles: He relishes a technical challenge both 
inside and outside of work and healthy technical debates. :)

I came here for an argument.
No you didn't
Yes I did!
-- Monty Python

OK, now I'll respond more seriously (and I haven't even had a coffee 
yet!):

Rob posted a code fragment under the banner of Another MX boo boo. 
It's good that he posted the code but he didn't say what was wrong or 
what result he got. I tested the code fragment and posted the result - 
which seemed to be exactly what I would have expected the code to 
produce. I asked Rob for more details.

That seems pretty fair to me.

As for the comment about the Subject line - something like Possible 
dateFormat error in MX? would have been more descriptive (and more 
tactful).

 -Original Message-
 From: Sean A Corfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
 Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 8:03 PM
 To: CF-Talk
 Subject: Not Another MX boo boo?

 On Tuesday, Oct 8, 2002, at 14:07 US/Pacific, Rob Rohan wrote:
 dateFormat(now(), dd/mm/yy (ddd))

 No longer works in MX. looks like only certain characters work in date
 format.

 I get:

 date is 08/10/02 (Tue)

 using this code:

 cfoutput
 cfset str = dateFormat(now(), dd/mm/yy (ddd))/
 date is #str#
 /cfoutput

 Can you be a bit more precise about what No longer works about this
 please?

 (And perhaps use a less confrontational subject line? :)

An Architect's View -- http://www.corfield.org/blog/

Macromedia DevCon 2002, October 27-30, Orlando, Florida
Architecting a New Internet Experience
Register today at http://www.macromedia.com/go/devcon2002

~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=listsbody=lists/cf_talk
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in 
ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm



RE: Not Another MX boo boo?

2002-10-09 Thread Rob Rohan

Error Occurred While Processing Request
{ts '2002-10-09 09:12:48'} is an invalid date format.


The Error Occurred in D:\http\test\datetest.cfm: line 8

6 : /FORM ---
7 :
8 : CFSET str = dateformat(now(),mm/dd/yy (ddd))
9 : CFOUTPUT#str#/CFOUTPUTBR
10 : CFOUTPUT#dateformat(now(),mm/dd/yy (ddd))#/CFOUTPUT




~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=listsbody=lists/cf_talk
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at 
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm



  1   2   3   4   >